Mars 2026 commence, avec un nouveau programme astronomique bien rempli. Le mois du printemps sera marqué par une éclipse lunaire et des planètes visibles à l'œil nu. Voici les dates à retenir.
[Précommande] Après avoir fait les beaux jours de la Switch avec sa vue 2D à l'ancienne et ses niveaux déjantés, Super Mario Bros. Wonder arrive sur Switch 2, et est déjà disponible en précommande.
Asustor has always sat slightly off to one side of the mainstream NAS conversation. It does not chase the same marketing angles as the bigger names, but it has consistently tried to combine features that other brands often keep separated by model tier. The Lockerstor series is a good example of that approach, mixing prosumer hardware touches such as a metal chassis, HDMI output and multiple SSD bays with a fairly traditional four bay NAS layout. The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is not a clean-slate redesign. Instead, it is a mid-range refresh of the existing Lockerstor 4 Gen2, built on the same underlying platform. The CPU remains the Intel Celeron N5095, memory starts at 4 GB of DDR4, the four internal M.2 NVMe slots are unchanged, and the chassis and physical layout are effectively identical. The meaningful update in this revision is networking, with the Gen2+ moving from dual 2.5GbE ports to dual 5GbE. That change is intended to raise the usable network headroom for single users and small teams, particularly where SSD caching or multiple clients are involved, without forcing buyers straight into 10GbE. At the same time, the broader market has moved on since the original Gen2 launched. 2.5GbE is now common at this price point, and the N5095, while still stable and capable, is no longer the standout CPU it was in 2022 and 2023, with newer low power Intel platforms offering better efficiency and raw performance. Taken as a whole, the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is best viewed as a targeted update designed to keep the existing Lockerstor platform relevant for longer. It does not attempt to redefine what a mid-range four bay NAS should be, but instead focuses on addressing network performance as storage media and workflows continue to push beyond the limits of 2.5GbE.
The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is a competent and largely familiar system. From a hardware perspective, it remains solid, well built and flexible, with few outright weaknesses in isolation. The metal chassis, internal expandability and feature set still compare well against many competing four bay NAS systems. However, this revision does not materially change the overall character or capability of the platform beyond networking. The move from dual 2.5GbE to dual 5GbE is the defining update. For users who already have compatible network infrastructure, or who are working close to the limits of 2.5GbE with multiple clients, SSD caching or larger hard drives, this upgrade does provide tangible benefits. For others, particularly those still on gigabit or mixed networks, the improvement may be largely theoretical in day to day use. At the same time, the unchanged use of the Intel Celeron N5095 is more noticeable now than it was at the original Gen2 launch. While it remains stable and well supported, it no longer stands out in a market where newer low power Intel CPUs offer better efficiency and performance at similar price points. Combined with pricing that now faces stronger competition, the Gen2+ feels more like a stopgap refresh than a forward looking update. Overall, the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is a capable NAS that makes sense primarily for users who value its physical design, internal expandability and Asustor’s flexible hardware policy, and who can take advantage of 5GbE networking today. It is less compelling as a general upgrade for existing Gen2 owners, or as a default recommendation in a crowded mid-range market.
Dual 5GbE networking provides higher aggregate and single client throughput than 2.5GbE when supported by the surrounding networkFour internal M.2 NVMe slots allow SSD caching, SSD storage pools, or mixed configurations without sacrificing SATA baysSolid metal chassis and metal drive trays provide durability and assist passive heat dissipationHDMI output with Asustor Portal enables direct media playback, VM interaction and local management without a client PCSupports both EXT4 and Btrfs, including snapshot functionality for basic data protection and recoveryPCIe expansion slot allows future upgrade to 10GbE, extending the usable lifespan of the systemFlexible storage configuration, including use of NVMe drives as independent storage pools rather than cache onlyHardware warranty remains valid when installing third party NAS operating systems, supporting advanced and DIY users
Intel Celeron N5095 is now dated relative to newer low power CPUs available at similar price points (eg N100, N150, N355, etc) right nowADM software is stable but lacks the depth, automation and flagship features found on some competing platformsPCIe slot is shared between NVMe carrier and expansion cards, forcing a choice without a compatible combo cardPricing faces stronger competition in 2026, reducing its appeal as a default mid range NAS option
| Where to Buy a Product | |||
|
|
|
|
VISIT RETAILER ➤ |
|
|
|
|
VISIT RETAILER ➤ |
| Amazon in Your Region | B&H NAS Shop |
|
|
The physical design of the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is effectively unchanged from the earlier Gen2 model. Asustor has retained the same chassis, dimensions and layout, making this revision visually indistinguishable from its predecessor. This is a deliberate choice rather than an oversight, and it reflects Asustor’s preference for continuity in this product line.
The enclosure is almost entirely metal, including the outer shell and the individual drive trays. This gives the unit a robust, industrial feel and contributes to passive heat dissipation. It also differentiates the Lockerstor from many competing four bay NAS systems that rely more heavily on plastic for cost and noise reduction. The trade-off remains increased vibration and audible resonance when using higher capacity, faster spinning hard drives.
On the front of the unit, the Lockerstor retains its LCD display, a feature that has largely disappeared from this segment. The display provides system status information such as IP addresses, temperature readings and alert notifications. Beyond basic monitoring, it can also be used for initial system setup, allowing the NAS to be configured without a connected computer. While this will not replace web based administration for ongoing management, it remains useful for rapid deployment and troubleshooting, particularly when network access is limited.
Status LEDs are present alongside the display and drive bays, offering basic activity indicators. These are functional but secondary to the information provided by the LCD panel. A front mounted USB port with a dedicated copy button is also retained. This supports both manual and automatic backup tasks and has been upgraded in earlier Gen2 models to USB 3.2 Gen 2, allowing higher speed transfers to and from external storage devices.
The drive trays themselves are metal, ventilated and feature a locking mechanism. They support both 3.5 inch and 2.5 inch SATA drives and allow hot swapping where the configuration permits. The tray design prioritizes rigidity and airflow over acoustic dampening, which again reinforces the Lockerstor’s server-like character rather than a living room friendly one.
Ventilation is handled through a combination of tray perforation, side vents and a large rear mounted cooling fan. There have been minor adjustments over successive revisions to improve airflow around the M.2 area, but the overall cooling approach remains conservative and tuned for reliability rather than silence.
In summary, the design of the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ will appeal to users who value durability, serviceability and physical controls. It does not attempt to modernize its appearance or reduce its footprint, and buyers sensitive to noise or aesthetics should be aware of the compromises that come with this design philosophy.
The rear connectivity of the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ closely resembles that of the earlier Gen2 model, with one important exception. The dual 2.5GbE ports have been replaced with dual 5GbE Ethernet, which represents the core purpose of this refresh. Everything else in the port layout remains largely the same, reinforcing that this is a targeted update rather than a rework of the platform.
The two 5GbE ports support standard Ethernet features including link aggregation and SMB Multichannel. In practical terms, this allows higher aggregate throughput when multiple clients are accessing the NAS simultaneously, or improved single client performance in supported environments. Asustor positions this as offering near 10GbE class performance without the cost or infrastructure demands of full 10GbE. In reality, the benefits depend heavily on the surrounding network hardware, client support and workload type. Users without compatible switches or clients will see little immediate advantage over 2.5GbE.
Alongside the Ethernet ports, the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ retains its HDMI output. This is used with Asustor Portal, a parallel interface that allows direct interaction with media playback, virtual machines and containerized applications when the NAS is connected to a display. Unlike some competing implementations, this HDMI output is actively supported, though it remains a secondary interface compared to the browser based ADM environment. Two rear USB ports provide USB 3.2 Gen 2 connectivity for high speed external storage, adapters and peripherals.
A PCIe expansion slot is also present and remains an important part of the Lockerstor design. In the Gen2+ series, this slot is described as no longer proprietary, allowing broader compatibility with third party 10GbE network cards. This adds flexibility for users who expect to outgrow 5GbE in the future, although it still requires choosing between PCIe expansion and the preinstalled M.2 carrier board.
The combination of four SATA bays, four internal NVMe slots and dual 5GbE networking provides sufficient internal and external bandwidth for many small office and creative workloads. However, it is worth noting that modern hard drives and NVMe SSDs can quickly approach or exceed the limits of a single 5GbE connection. In environments where sustained maximum throughput is a priority, the optional move to 10GbE may still be the more appropriate long term choice.
Overall, the port selection on the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is well rounded and flexible. The addition of dual 5GbE meaningfully updates the networking capability of the system, but it does not fundamentally change how the device integrates into a network compared to the earlier Gen2.
Internally, the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is almost identical to the earlier Gen2 model. Asustor has not revised the core platform, and the internal layout, controller architecture and expansion approach remain the same. This consistency simplifies evaluation, but it also makes the age of some components more apparent in the current market.
The system is powered by the Intel Celeron N5095, a quad core processor based on Intel’s Jasper Lake architecture. At launch, this CPU was widely adopted in mid range NAS systems due to its balance of power consumption, integrated graphics and general purpose performance. It operates at a 2.0 GHz base frequency with burst speeds up to 2.9 GHz. In 2026 terms, the N5095 is no longer a standout choice. Newer low power Intel CPUs offer improved efficiency and stronger CPU side performance at similar price points, particularly for non media workloads.
The presence of integrated graphics remains relevant for hardware assisted video transcoding and HDMI based output, and the N5095 continues to handle typical NAS tasks, light virtualization and container workloads without issue. However, users planning heavier multi VM deployments or CPU intensive services may find the platform limiting compared to more recent alternatives.
Memory configuration starts at 4 GB of DDR4 2933 MHz SODIMM memory and can be expanded up to 16 GB. This is sufficient for most file serving, backup and multimedia tasks, and provides some headroom for virtualization and containers. ECC memory is not supported, which is worth noting given the pricing and the comparison to some competing systems in this segment.
One of the defining features of the Lockerstor platform remains the inclusion of four M.2 NVMe SSD slots. These support 2280 form factor drives and operate over PCIe Gen3. The slots can be used for SSD caching, dedicated storage pools, or a mixture of both, offering flexibility that is not universally available in this class. The practical throughput per slot is lower than modern x4 NVMe drives can deliver, but still significantly higher than SATA SSDs and more than sufficient for caching and high IOPS workloads. The NVMe slots are mounted on a dedicated PCIe carrier board that occupies the system’s expansion slot. This design choice means users must choose between using the four M.2 slots and installing a PCIe network card, unless a compatible combination card is used. While workable, it remains a compromise that should be considered when planning long term upgrades.
Overall, the internal hardware of the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ remains capable and flexible, but it is clearly rooted in an earlier generation of mid range NAS design. The networking upgrade extends its usefulness, but it does not address the broader shifts in CPU and platform expectations that have emerged since the original Gen2 release.
|
|
The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ ships with the latest version of Asustor Data Master, commonly referred to as ADM. Functionally, the software experience is the same as on the earlier Gen2 models, with no Gen2+ specific changes or features introduced as part of this refresh. Any improvements are the result of ongoing platform updates rather than hardware driven differentiation.
|
|
ADM presents a desktop style interface accessed through a web browser, with windowed applications, user accounts and a traditional file manager. It is straightforward to navigate and generally stable in operation. Performance on the N5095 platform is consistent and predictable, with no major responsiveness issues during typical file serving, backup or media management tasks.
|
|
Asustor continues to support both EXT4 and Btrfs file systems. Btrfs brings snapshot support and data versioning for shared folders and iSCSI volumes, while EXT4 remains available for users who prefer a simpler, lower overhead file system. Snapshot Center integrates with Btrfs to provide scheduled and manual snapshots, offering basic protection against accidental deletion or ransomware scenarios.
|
|
The application ecosystem in ADM remains broad but uneven. Core first party applications for storage management, backups, media indexing and basic virtualization are present and generally reliable. However, a number of advanced functions rely heavily on third party software. Virtualization, for example, is still built around VirtualBox rather than a native hypervisor. Container support is provided through Docker and Portainer, which is flexible but assumes a degree of user familiarity.
|
|
Multimedia support is one of ADM’s stronger areas. Applications such as LooksGood, Photo Gallery and SoundsGood provide local media management and streaming, and hardware assisted video transcoding is available through the Intel integrated graphics. HDMI output via Asustor Portal runs in parallel to ADM and allows direct playback and interaction with selected applications. While this remains more fully featured than some competing HDMI implementations, it is clearly secondary to the browser based interface and receives fewer updates.
|
|
Backup and synchronization tools are comprehensive in scope. ADM supports local and remote backups via rsync, USB devices, NAS to NAS replication and a wide range of public cloud services. DataSync Center and Cloud Backup Center consolidate many of these functions into centralized tools, though configuration can feel fragmented compared to more tightly integrated platforms.
|
|
Security features have expanded steadily since earlier releases. ADM includes a firewall, automatic IP blocking, antivirus scanning through ClamAV, two step verification and encryption options for shared folders and MyArchive volumes. These features provide a reasonable baseline for small business and advanced home users, though they rely on manual configuration rather than automated policy driven protection.
|
|
Overall, the ADM software platform is stable, functional and capable of supporting a wide range of use cases. It does not stand out for innovation or advanced automation, and it lacks some of the higher level, tightly integrated services offered by competitors. For users seeking a dependable and flexible NAS operating system that prioritizes core functionality over novelty, ADM remains adequate. For those placing heavy emphasis on software features and ecosystem depth, it may feel comparatively restrained.
The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is best understood as a maintenance refresh rather than a new generation. Asustor has taken an existing and well established platform and updated it in one specific area, network connectivity, to better align with how storage performance and workloads have evolved since the original Gen2 launch. Outside of that change, the system remains fundamentally the same device. The move to dual 5GbE does meaningfully extend the usable lifespan of the Lockerstor 4 design for users who are already constrained by 2.5GbE, particularly in multi user environments or setups that make effective use of SSD caching and faster hard drives. For those users, the Gen2+ offers a tangible improvement without the immediate cost or complexity of moving to 10GbE. For others, especially those still on gigabit or mixed networks, the practical benefit may be limited.
At the same time, the unchanged internal platform is harder to ignore in 2026. The Intel Celeron N5095 remains stable and compatible with a wide range of workloads, but it no longer compares as favourably against newer low power CPUs now appearing in similarly priced systems. Combined with increased competition across this segment, the value proposition of the Gen2+ is narrower than it was when the original Gen2 launched. The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ will appeal most to buyers who value its physical build quality, internal expandability, flexible storage configuration and Asustor’s relatively open hardware stance, including third party OS support. It is less compelling as an upgrade for existing Gen2 owners, and it is not a clear default choice in the current mid range NAS market unless its specific strengths align with the intended use case. In short, the Gen2+ succeeds in keeping the Lockerstor platform relevant for longer, but it does not redefine it.
| PROs of the Lockerstor 4 Gen 2+ NAS | CONs of the Lockerstor 4 Gen 2+ NAS |
|
|
Choosing the right data storage solution for your needs can be very intimidating and it’s never too late to ask for help. With options ranging from NAS to DAS, Thunderbolt to SAS and connecting everything up so you can access all your lovely data at the touch of a button can be a lot simpler than you think. If you want some tips, guidance or help with everything from compatibility to suitability of a solution for you, why not drop me a message below and I will get back to you as soon as possible with what you should go for, its suitability and the best place to get it. This service is designed without profit in mind and in order to help you with your data storage needs, so I will try to answer your questions as soon as possible.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle
Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
Ce tutoriel explique comment installer et configurer Watchtower pour gérer de façon automatique les mises à jour de Docker sur un NAS Synology (ou sur Linux).
Le post Automatiser la mise à jour des conteneurs Docker avec Watchtower sur Synology a été publié sur IT-Connect.
Gaël Musquet, mon copain hacker, me parlait déjà de tracking TPMS en 2020. Du coup, quand je vois des chercheurs publier un document de recherche en 2026 pour "découvrir" qu'on peut pister une voiture via ses capteurs de pneus, bon, comment dire... je suis pas tombé de ma chaise.
Mais faut reconnaître que l'étude en question va quand même plus loin qu'une discussion entre 2 stands au FIC. En effet, une équipe d'IMDEA Networks et d'armasuisse (le labo de défense suisse, rien que ça) a posé 5 récepteurs SDR dans une ville pendant 10 semaines. Coût du matos, environ 100 dollars par capteur, qui est en gros un Raspberry Pi 4 avec un dongle RTL-SDR à 25 balles. Et grâce à cela, ils ont capté plus de 6 MILLIONS de messages, provenant de plus de 20 000 véhicules !
un Raspberry Pi 4 avec un dongle RTL-SDR - Source
Car oui, vous ne le savez peut-être pas, mais les capteurs de pression des pneus (TPMS pour les intimes) émettent régulièrement dès que le véhicule roule, sur 433 MHz en Europe. Et ces signaux contiennent un identifiant unique... qui bien sûr est en clair ^^. Pas de chiffrement, pas d'authentification, QUE DALLE. Donc avec un logiciel open source comme rtl_433 , ça devient vite facile de capter tout ça à plusieurs dizaines de mètres à la ronde.
En croisant les identifiants captés par plusieurs récepteurs, les chercheurs ont pu reconstituer les trajets des véhicules, identifier leurs horaires de travail, détecter les jours de télétravail et même estimer les variations de charge du véhicule (et potentiellement déduire la présence de passagers, même si c'est encore approximatif). Le tout sans caméra, sans GPS, et sans accès au réseau du véhicule !
Il suffirait de trouver l'identifiant d'une voiture précise pour déclencher par exemple automatiquement un lâcher de confettis en papier parfaitement inoffensifs à son passage, si vous voyez ce que je veux dire.
Alors attention, tous les véhicules ne sont pas logés à la même enseigne. Les TPMS dits "directs" (dTPMS), qu'on trouve souvent chez Toyota, Peugeot, Citroën, Hyundai ou Mercedes, émettent ces fameux signaux radio captables. Alors que les systèmes "indirects" (iTPMS), utilisés par la plupart des modèles Volkswagen, Audi ou Skoda, se basent sur les capteurs ABS et n'émettent rien par radio. Bref, si vous roulez en Golf de base, y'a de bonnes chances que vous soyez tranquilles sur ce coup-là même si certaines versions sportives ou haut de gamme (Golf R, GTI selon les marchés) peuvent embarquer du dTPMS.
Et le pire dans tout ça c'est que la réglementation UN R155 sur la cybersécurité automobile n'impose pas explicitement le chiffrement des TPMS. En gros, les constructeurs ne sont pas forcés de sécuriser ces transmissions. Pirelli et Bosch bossent bien sur un "Cyber Tyre" en Bluetooth Low Energy, mais c'est réservé au haut de gamme et c'est pas demain que ça arrivera sur votre Clio.
Donc côté protection, soyons honnêtes, y'a pas grand-chose à faire côté utilisateur. Vous ne pouvez pas désactiver vos TPMS (c'est obligatoire depuis 2014 pour les voitures neuves en Europe), et les capteurs ne proposent aucune option de chiffrement. Sauf si vous roulez en véhicule vintage d'avant 2014, c'est open bar. Une des parades serait que les constructeurs implémentent un système de rotation d'identifiants, un peu comme le fait déjà le Bluetooth avec les adresses MAC aléatoires, mais pour l'instant on en est loin.
Pour ceux qui veulent creuser le sujet, j'avais fait une rencontre avec Gaël Musquet il y a quelques années, où il expliquait déjà comment reprendre le contrôle de nos véhicules connectés. Et si vous voulez comprendre comment on hacke une voiture de manière plus générale, c'est un rabbit hole sans fond !
Bref, la prochaine fois que vous gonflez vos pneus... dites-leur bonjour de ma part.
Netflix continue de proposer des temps forts chaque mois, pour gonfler son catalogue. En mars 2026, c'est l'heure de profiter des nouveaux épisodes de l'adaptation One Piece et du film Peaky Blinders.
Vous pensiez qu'on avait commis le pire des forfaits en classant les 20 jeux Zelda de la licence principale pour les 40 ans de la série ? Sachez qu'on est capable de bien pire que ça. En ce vendredi 27 février 2026, Pokémon, la licence la plus lucrative de la pop culture mondiale, célèbre déjà son 30e anniversaire. En attendant une dixième génération que l'on espère à la hauteur d'un héritage de plus en plus riche, nous nous sommes donc permis un crime de lèse-Pikachu : on a classé les neuf générations, de la première parue il y a 30 ans à la toute dernière, et on n'a aucun doute sur le fait que ça ne vous plaira absolument pas. Mais Pokémon c'est une histoire de choix avant toute chose, et choisir c'est renoncer.
Ce changement avait avait fait dégoupiller une bonne partie de la communauté Firefox. La nouvelle mise à jour du navigateur web permet désormais de garder ou non les outils d'IA dans le logiciel.
MinIO, tout le monde ou presque connaît car c'est LE truc quand on veut du stockage objet S3-compatible auto-hébergé sous Linux. Sauf que voilà... la licence AGPL, ça pique pour pas mal de boîtes qui ne veulent pas se retrouver à devoir ouvrir leur code.
Du coup, y'a un nouveau projet qui débarque dans le tiek et qui devrait en intéresser plus d'un. C'est RustFS , codé en Rust (comme le nom le laisse deviner mes petits Sherlock) et 100% compatible S3. En gros, vous prenez votre stack MinIO existante, vous remplacez par ce truc, et en fait tout continue de fonctionner pareil... Vos buckets, vos applis, vos scripts Python, boto3... tout pareil !
La licence c'est de l'Apache 2.0 comme ça y'a pas de contrainte virale, vous faites ce que vous voulez avec. Et c'est d'ailleurs sûrement la raison numéro un pour laquelle le projet cartonne.
Côté perfs, les devs annoncent 2,3x plus rapide que MinIO sur des petits objets de 4 Ko (testé sur un modeste 2 coeurs Xeon avec 4 Go de RAM). Bon, c'est un benchmark maison, à prendre avec des pincettes hein... mais finalement Rust pour du I/O intensif, ça se tient comme argument, car y'a pas de garbage collector qui vient foutre le bazar.
Pour l'installer, Docker en une ligne :
Connexiondocker run -d -p 9000:9000 -p 9001:9001 -v $(pwd)/data:/data -v $(pwd)/logs:/logs rustfs/rustfs:latest
Et voilà, l'API tourne sur le port 9000 et la console web sur le 9001 (identifiants par défaut : rustfsadmin/rustfsadmin, changez-les vite fait hein). Y'a aussi du Kubernetes via Helm, un script d'install one-click, du Nix, ou un bon vieux git clone pour compiler vous-même (attention, sur macOS faut un ulimit à 4096 sinon ça ne marche pas).
Le conteneur Docker tourne en non-root (UID 10001), donc c'est plutôt propre niveau sécu. Pensez juste à faire un petit chown -R 10001:10001 data logs sur vos répertoires avant de lancer, sinon ça casse au démarrage.
Petit bonus appréciable, y'a aussi de la détection de corruption intégrée, et même du versioning de buckets pour les plus méfiants côté intégrité des données. D'ailleurs, côté monitoring, c'est déjà câblé pour envoyer vos métriques dans Grafana, vos traces dans Jaeger et le reste dans Prometheus. Un petit docker compose --profile observability up -d et c'est plié.
Par contre, on est encore en alpha et le mode distribué et le KMS sont en phase de test. Donc c'est PAS le genre de truc que vous mettrez en prod demain matin pour vos données critiques... mais pour du dev, du lab, ou des tâches pas trop sensibles... ça tourne impecc !
Bref, si l'AGPL de MinIO vous gave et que vous cherchez une alternative S3-compatible, en Rust, sous licence + permissive, allez jeter un œil à RustFS.
Merci à Lorenper pour le partage !
Stellantis serait prêt à passer à l’étape suivante dans son partenariat avec le constructeur chinois Leapmotor. Les voitures européennes du groupe pourraient intégrer des technologies chinoises.
[Deal du jour] Le MacBook Air 13 avec puce M4 profite d’une bonne baisse de prix, alors qu'un nouveau modèle pointe à l'horizon.
Un dungeon crawler dans l'explorateur de fichiers Windows c'est maintenant une réalité grâce à Directory Dungeon qui transforme votre arborescence de fichiers en donjon, avec monstres, du loot et des combats au tour par tour. Du coup forcément, ça m'a intrigué.
Dans ce jeu, vous ouvrez un dossier C:\DirectoryDungeon sur votre PC et dedans y'a des salles de donjon. Ensuite, pour vous déplacer, vous glissez-déposez votre dossier "Player" dans une nouvelle pièce. Oui du vrai drag-and-drop dans explorer.exe.
Et votre inventaire, c'est un sous-dossier. Vos armes et armures, vous les équipez en les déposant dans le répertoire "Equipment". Et quand vous tombez sur un monstre, le combat se résout automatiquement dans une fenêtre console cmd.exe à côté. Du texte, des chiffres, du tour par tour. C'est old school à mort.
Vous l'aurez compris, y'a pas de surcouche graphique. C'est très nerd comme truc... Vous jouez dans explorer.exe que vous utilisez tous les jours, sauf que là y'a des squelettes dedans. C'est assez absurde en fait et c'est pour ça que ça le fait plutôt bien !
Côté config requise, faut 64 Mo de RAM, 65 Mo de stockage, un processeur 1 GHz minimum et... "un moniteur" comme indiqué dans les prérequis. En fait, si votre PC fait tourner Windows 7, vous pouvez jouer et c'est compatible jusqu'à Windows 11, donc pas besoin d'une bête de course.
Le développeur JuhrJuhr a donc choisi de coller un vrai système RPG complet dans l'arborescence de votre disque dur plutôt que de faire un jeu classique et rassurez-vous, le jeu ne touche à aucun fichier en dehors de son propre répertoire, donc vos documents et autres nudes sont safe. Et comme le mentionne fièrement le dev, aucune IA générative n'a été utilisée pour le développement. On dirait bien que c'est devenu un argument de vente ! lol
Voilà, si vous aimez les dungeon crawlers rétro à l'ancienne ou les délires qui détournent votre OS (genre DOOM en screensaver Windows ), ce petit RPG est pile dans cette veine. Y'a les achievements Steam, le partage familial, et une démo v1.8 déjà dispo pour tester avant la sortie prévue en mars 2026. Seul bémol, c'est Windows uniquement pour le moment, sauf si un portage Linux finit par arriver... On ne sait jamais...
Hey mais on dirait bien que c'est Red Hat qui débarque sur le marché des apps desktop pour conteneurs... mais lol ! Car oui, pendant que Docker Desktop trône depuis des années et qu'OrbStack séduit de plus en plus d'utilisateurs macOS, Red Hat se réveille ENFIN avec sa propre version Enterprise de Podman Desktop .
Bah mieux vaut tard que jamais !
Pour ceux qui débarquent (bouuuuh) Podman Desktop, c'est un outil open source qui existe depuis des années pour gérer vos conteneurs, images et pods via une interface graphique. C'est dispo sous Linux, macOS, Windows et le projet a même rejoint la CNCF (rien à voir avec les trains... lool) en janvier 2025 en même temps que d'autres briques Red Hat (Buildah, Skopeo, bootc, Composefs... chacun en projet séparé).
Interface de Podman Desktop
Et donc Red Hat a décidé de lancer sa propre "build" enterprise de cette app de conteneurs. En gros, c'est la même base que Podman Desktop, mais avec une couche admin par-dessus. Les responsables IT peuvent donc verrouiller des paramètres au niveau de la flotte tels que les registry mirrors, proxies HTTP, certificats custom... On est dans une ambiance un peu plus corporate quoi.
Côté Kubernetes, c'est également plutôt bien pensé. Vous créez vos pods en local, l'outil génère le YAML correspondant, et hop, déploiement sur Kind, Minikube ou directement sur OpenShift, les doigts dans le nez.
Pour ceux qui se demandent si ça remplace Docker Desktop, bah, ça dépend en fait. Podman tourne sans daemon et en rootless, du coup c'est un vrai plus côté sécurité. Mais par contre, le support Docker Compose passe par un système d'aliasing... ça marche bien, sauf si vous avez des configs Docker très exotiques... là faudra tester avant de tout basculer comme le early adopter fifou que vous êtes.
D'ailleurs, si vous êtes sur RHEL, Podman est déjà inclus dans votre abonnement et Red Hat a aussi bossé sur des extensions pour les images bootable OCI et le mode image RHEL.
Le truc, c'est que Red Hat arrive tard. TRÈS tard. Docker Desktop, c'est le standard de facto depuis des lustres, OrbStack a conquis les devs macOS avec sa légèreté sans oublier que Rancher Desktop et Portainer Business Edition occupent aussi le terrain. Du coup, leur stratégie c'est de cibler les boîtes déjà full Red Hat plutôt que d'essayer de convertir les utilisateurs Docker. C'est une ambition plutôt réaliste, je trouve.
Ça vient donc de passer en disponibilité générale via les canaux développeurs Red Hat, c'est gratuit, open source, et plutôt bien fichu pour ceux qui bossent dans un environnement RHEL au quotidien. Après, c'est pas non plus la révolution car ça reste Podman Desktop avec un petit chapeau d'entreprise.
Je pense que pour un usage hors Red Hat, Docker Desktop ou OrbStack restent devant. Mais si vous avez l'abonnement RHEL, ça peut valoir le coup d'y jeter un oeil.
LG a officialisé la famille “UltraGear evo” avant le CES 2026 et c’est maintenant que le plus impressionnant débarque avec L’UltraGear evo 52G930B
Cet article UltraGear EVO 52G930B, LG propose du 52 pouces en 5K2K à 240 Hz a été publié en premier par GinjFo.
The UniFi Cloud Gateway Industrial and UniFi Cloud Gateway Fiber are positioned as high throughput UniFi gateways that also act as the controller for UniFi Network and other UniFi applications, so the buying decision is less about basic compatibility and more about which hardware package better fits the environment and the deployment style. The Fiber model is typically the lower cost entry point and focuses on compact desktop placement, multiple high speed WAN options, and optional local storage via an NVMe SSD for UniFi Protect. The Industrial model costs more and its appeal is tied to practical deployment factors rather than raw routing numbers: a heavier, ruggedized, fanless chassis intended to tolerate harsher placement, integrated WiFi 7 for situations where local wireless is useful at the gateway, built in microSD storage for NVR use out of the box, and a much higher PoE output budget that can power downstream devices directly. Both are rated for similar IDS/IPS throughput and similar scale on paper, so the price gap tends to come down to whether you actually need the Industrial model’s power delivery, integrated wireless, and physical design features, or whether you would get more value by choosing the Fiber model and putting the savings into switches, access points, cameras, storage, or redundancy elsewhere in the network.
The UniFi Cloud Gateway Industrial only makes sense at $579 if you will actually use what drives that price. That primarily means the 270W PoE budget with multiple PoE+++ 90W ports, the integrated WiFi 7 radio, the included 128 GB microSD for immediate Protect recording, and the tougher deployment profile. That deployment profile includes a fanless design, heavier build, higher operating temperature rating, and more mounting options. Those features can replace a separate PoE switch, a basic access point, and some setup time. They are most relevant in locations that are not ideal for a small desktop gateway. If your network already has a PoE switch and dedicated access points, the value shifts quickly. The same is true if you mainly want a fast UniFi controller and gateway with flexible uplinks, or if you would rather put $300 into more switching, an AP, cameras, or more storage capacity.
In that case, the UniFi Cloud Gateway Fiber is generally the more rational buy. Both units share the same core platform traits that matter for routing and security workloads, including the 5 Gbps IDS/IPS rating. The Fiber’s higher WAN port count and 2x 10G SFP+ layout also fits conventional designs where WiFi and PoE are handled elsewhere. Put simply, the Industrial is a justified premium when it simplifies the overall bill of materials or solves placement constraints. It is hard to justify as an upgrade on performance alone. For typical indoor deployments, it usually makes more sense to buy the Fiber and allocate the difference to parts that materially expand the network.
| Here are all the latest UniFi Gateway, Routing and PoE+++ Solutions & Prices: |
You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do!
Physically, the UniFi Cloud Gateway Industrial is built around a larger, heavier enclosure that is meant to stay in place rather than sit lightly on a shelf. In informal handling, it feels closer to a small piece of infrastructure gear than a typical compact gateway, which is consistent with its stated intent for rugged or semi permanent installs. By contrast, the Cloud Gateway Fiber is a low profile compact desktop unit, and its design reads more like a traditional small office gateway that can be placed near an ISP handoff or a small network stack.
|
|
The materials reflect that difference in intent. The Industrial uses a polycarbonate and aluminium alloy enclosure, while the Fiber uses polycarbonate. In practical terms, the Industrial’s metal content is more aligned with durability and heat management expectations in a fanless box that may be mounted in less forgiving places, whereas the Fiber’s lighter build aligns with a device expected to live in normal indoor environments.
Mounting flexibility is also not equal. The Industrial is listed as supporting wall mounting, compact desktop placement, and rack mounting via an accessory sold separately. The hardware design includes elements intended to support reconfiguration and installation style changes without changing the device itself.
The Fiber is primarily framed as a compact desktop form factor, which is typically fine for small racks or structured cabling areas only if you are comfortable improvising placement, rather than using a purpose built mounting approach.
|
|
Environmental tolerances are one of the clearest design separators. The Industrial is rated for an ambient operating range of -30 to 50 C, with 5 to 95 percent noncondensing humidity. The Fiber is rated for 0 to 40 C, also with 5 to 95 percent noncondensing humidity. If the gateway will be placed in a garage, loft, workshop, cabinet with poor airflow, or any space that regularly drifts outside typical indoor office temperatures, the Industrial’s ratings are the more relevant detail than most headline performance numbers.
|
|
|
|
Storage is where the devices take opposite approaches. The Industrial includes pre installed storage for NVR use, listed as a 128 GB microSD, and also supports microSD expansion. The Fiber does not ship with built in NVR storage, but supports selectable NVMe SSD storage up to 2 TB. In practice, the Industrial’s included microSD makes Protect usable immediately for light camera retention without additional parts, while the Fiber’s NVMe approach is better aligned with longer retention targets and scaling camera storage without relying on removable flash media
|
|
At the core, both gateways sit on a very similar compute platform: a quad core ARM Cortex A73 CPU clocked at 2.2 GHz with 3 GB of system memory. In practical terms, that means neither device has an inherent advantage in baseline controller duties like running UniFi Network alongside other UniFi applications, or handling typical gateway services such as stateful firewalling, VPN termination, and traffic analysis.
|
|
The key performance headline for security enabled routing is also aligned. The Cloud Gateway Fiber is rated at 5 Gbps IDS/IPS throughput, and the Industrial model is positioned at the same 5 Gbps figure in the specifications you provided. That sets a realistic expectation that the price difference is not being driven by faster IDS/IPS, and that either unit can be the bottleneck if the goal is to inspect traffic at speeds above that rating.
|
|
Where the internal design diverges is less about raw compute and more about what each device integrates around that shared platform. The Industrial model bundles additional subsystems into the chassis, including a built in WiFi 7 radio, PoE switching hardware with much higher total PoE delivery, and cellular related features such as SIM slots intended for use with UniFi cellular hardware. Those additions change the role of the device from a gateway plus controller into something closer to a gateway, small switch, and basic wireless node combined, which can simplify certain installations where power and connectivity need to be consolidated.
|
|
The Fiber model stays more focused on being a high speed gateway with multiple WAN options and scalable local storage via NVMe for Protect, rather than integrating WiFi and high power PoE into the same chassis. In a typical structured network design, that aligns with the approach of keeping wireless and switching as separate components. In a more compact or power constrained install, the Industrial’s integrated approach can reduce the number of separate devices, but it also means you are paying for features you might not use if you already have dedicated switches and access points.
|
|
Both gateways are built around multi WAN capability and a mix of 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE connectivity, but they prioritize different things. The Fiber model pushes WAN flexibility and high speed uplinks, listing a max WAN port count of 6. The Industrial model lists a max WAN port count of 5 and instead leans into powering downstream equipment directly through multiple high wattage PoE ports.
On the Cloud Gateway Fiber, the physical layout is centered on high speed copper and fiber. It includes (2) 10G SFP+ ports, (1) 10 GbE RJ45 port, and (4) 2.5 GbE RJ45 ports. Its default WAN configuration is shown as (1) 10G SFP+ and (1) 10 GbE RJ45, which makes it straightforward to mix fiber and copper upstream, or to reserve additional ports for LAN and internal switching depending on how you assign roles inside UniFi.
On the Cloud Gateway Industrial, the port layout is more explicit about power delivery. It has (4) 2.5 GbE RJ45 ports split as (2) PoE+++ and (2) PoE+, plus (1) 10 GbE RJ45 port that is PoE+++, and (1) 10G SFP+ port. The default WAN ports are listed as (1) 10 GbE RJ45 and (1) 2.5 GbE RJ45. In other words, it gives up some of the Fiber model’s extra high speed uplink optionality in exchange for multiple powered Ethernet outputs, including 90W class ports intended for higher draw devices.
Power input design also differs because it sets limits on what the PoE side can realistically do. The Industrial lists a PoE budget of up to 270W on DC input, with a 54V 350W adapter included, and it also supports an ATX power input (48V) with a lower PoE budget listed at 75W. The Fiber lists a much smaller PoE budget of 30W and is powered via a 54V DC jack with a 1.1A adapter. Excluding PoE output, both are in the same general range for the gateway itself, listed at 28W max for the Industrial and 29.4W max for the Fiber, but the Industrial’s power system is sized for PoE heavy deployments.
The Industrial also adds non Ethernet connectivity that the Fiber does not include. It has integrated WiFi 7 on 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz with external antenna support, and it includes 2 SIM slots intended for use with UniFi cellular hardware. The Fiber does not integrate WiFi or SIM slots, so wireless and cellular failover are typically handled by separate UniFi devices rather than being built into the gateway.
At $579 versus $279, the Industrial is asking you to pay about $300 extra for a different kind of gateway bundle rather than a higher routing ceiling. Both platforms align on the core controller and gateway capability, including the same general IDS/IPS rating, so the decision largely comes down to whether you will use the Industrial model’s integrated features and physical design enough to offset the price difference. The biggest measurable value add is PoE output. The Fiber’s PoE budget is 30W total, which covers a single low to moderate power device, but it does not change how you design a network. The Industrial can deliver up to 270W of PoE output on DC input, with multiple ports supporting PoE+++ up to 90W per port. If your plan includes powering higher draw devices directly from the gateway, or you want to avoid adding a separate PoE switch in a small installation, that difference can replace other hardware and simplify cabling.
The next set of value drivers are convenience and deployment constraints. The Industrial includes integrated WiFi 7 (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) with external antennas, plus dual SIM slots intended for cellular related UniFi use, and it is built for harsher placement with a higher listed operating temperature range. Those are specific benefits when the gateway needs to live in less controlled spaces, when a basic local wireless link at the gateway is useful, or when you want those functions inside a single enclosure. If you already plan to deploy dedicated access points, dedicated switching, and a separate failover device, these integrated features are less likely to change the design. Storage is a smaller part of the $300, but it affects out of box readiness. The Industrial includes 128 GB microSD intended for NVR use, so Protect storage exists immediately with no additional parts. The Fiber can scale higher with an NVMe SSD up to 2 TB, but that storage is optional and adds cost. If Protect is a core requirement and you want higher retention, the Fiber can still end up costing more once storage is added, while the Industrial starts with basic capacity included.
The UniFi Cloud Gateway Industrial is primarily justified by what it combines into a single chassis, and by where it is intended to live. The unit pairs a fanless, ruggedized enclosure and higher temperature tolerance with integrated WiFi 7 (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) using external antennas, multi port PoE output that includes PoE+++ at up to 90W per port, and a high total PoE budget when powered from its included 54V adapter. It also includes pre installed microSD storage aimed at NVR duties, plus SIM slots that are designed around supported UniFi cellular integrations. None of these features change the stated IDS/IPS ceiling compared with other similar gateways, but they do change what additional equipment is required in smaller or more constrained deployments.
The value case depends on whether those integrated functions replace other purchases. If you would otherwise buy a separate network gateway, a WiFi access point or router, and a PoE+++ capable switch to power downstream devices, the combined cost and installation complexity can narrow the apparent price gap and in some cases make the Industrial model the simpler, potentially cheaper route overall. If your design already assumes dedicated switching, dedicated wireless, and storage sized beyond what a microSD setup can reasonably provide, the Industrial model’s premium is more likely to be paying for capabilities you do not use. In that situation, the practical advantage of the Industrial is mainly its physical build and power delivery, not a different performance class for routing and security inspection.
| Here are all the latest UniFi Gateway Network PoE Solutions & Prices: |
You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do!
| PROs of the UniFi Cloud Gateway Industrial | PROs of the UniFi Cloud Gateway Industrial |
|
|
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
