Pendant des années, le NAS était un boitier discret rangé dans un placard pour de la sauvegarde et du partage de fichiers. En 2026, certains modèles embarquent des processeurs surpuissants, un emplacement PCIe pour GPU et peuvent faire tourner des LLM en local. Mais est-ce vraiment une bonne idée ?

Quand le NAS a arrêté d’être simplement du stockage

Il y a 10 ans, un NAS était un appareil relativement humble : quelques disques durs en RAID, une interface Web basique et la satisfaction de savoir que vos photos de famille ne disparaîtraient pas du jour au lendemain. C’était son rôle et il le tenait bien…

Bien sûr, il était possible de lui ajouter quelques fonctionnalités supplémentaires : antivirus, serveur d’impression, station de téléchargement, serveur Web, etc. Puis Docker est arrivé.

Synology, QNAP, Asustor, TerraMaster ont progressivement intégré la gestion de conteneurs dans leurs interfaces. Et là, tout a basculé… Les forums ont explosé en tutoriel pour faire tourner AdGuard Home (bloqueur de pub), Jellyfin (votre Netflix personnel), Immich (votre Google Photos à vous), Bitwarden (vos mots de passe en local) ou encore Home Assistant (votre domotique sous contrôle total). Soudain, le NAS n’était plus un périphérique de stockage, c’était un vrai serveur.

Docker sur NAS : la révolution applicative

Comprendre pourquoi Docker a tout changé, c’est comprendre ce qu’il apporte : l’isolation. Chaque application fonctionne dans son propre conteneur, avec ses dépendances, sans polluer le système hôte. Pour un NAS qui doit avant tout rester stable, c’est idéal… enfin, en théorie.

En pratique, chaque application consomme de la mémoire vive (RAM), du temps processeur (CPU) et de l’espace disque. Là où les NAS d’entrée de gamme (ou les plus anciens) embarquaient des processeurs ARM modestes avec 512 Mo de RAM, les usages actuels exigent bien davantage.

Le processeur du NAS : de parent pauvre à pièce maîtresse

Historiquement, le dimensionnement du CPU d’un NAS était une préoccupation secondaire à la conception… quelque chose d’assez puissant pour gérer les entrées/sorties disques et le chiffrement, mais pas davantage. Cette époque est révolue !

Intel N100 et ses cousins

La génération de NAS sortie entre 2023 et 2025 s’est largement standardisée autour de processeurs comme l’Intel Celeron J4125 et N95. Ces puces offrent un excellent équilibre : faible consommation, transcodage matériel et performances suffisantes pour faire tourner confortablement plusieurs applications simultanément.

Un NAS équipé d’un N305 avec 16 Go de RAM représente aujourd’hui la configuration idéale pour l’utilisateur qui souhaite un serveur applicatif polyvalent sans alourdir sa facture d’électricité. C’est d’ailleurs le consensus des communautés homelab : pour 80 % des usages domestiques, ce profil CPU est amplement suffisant.

2026 : la montée en puissance s’accélère

Les constructeurs, eux, ne semblent pas vouloir s’arrêter là. L’année 2026 marque un tournant sur le marché des NAS haut de gamme, avec des annonces qui auraient semblé absurdes il y a 3 ans.

Plusieurs modèles intègrent désormais des processeurs haute performance avec des NPU (Neural Processing Unit) intégrés. Plus fort encore, certains proposent d’un emplacement PCIe pour des cartes GPU Nvidia (RTX 4060 ou carte d’inférence A2).

Attention, ce type de configuration consomme entre 35 et 65W en charge (contre 8-15W pour un N100). Sur une année de fonctionnement continu, la différence représente plusieurs dizaines d’euros sur votre facture d’électricité. La montée en puissance doit donc se justifier par des besoins réels.

L’IA locale sur NAS : révolution ou effet d’annonce ?

L’intelligence artificielle locale (faire tourner des LLM comme Llama, Mistral ou Phi-4 sur son propre matériel) est devenue le nouveau Graal du homelab. Des outils comme Ollama ou LM Studio permettent désormais à n’importe qui d’héberger son propre assistant IA privé, sans envoyer la moindre donnée dans le Cloud.

Les NAS de 2026 mettent cet argument en avant comme un atout commercial majeur. Le Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370, avec ses 50 TOPS de puissance NPU, peut faire tourner des modèles 7B (7 milliards de paramètres) à une vitesse tout à fait acceptable. Avec une carte GPU Nvidia en PCIe, on passe à un niveau différent : des modèles 13B ou 30B deviennent envisageables.

Mais soyons honnête, un NAS est-il vraiment la bonne machine pour faire de l’IA ?

Arguments pour l’IA sur NAS :

• Machine déjà allumée 24h/24, pas besoin de PC supplémentaire ;
• Intégration directe avec les données stockées localement ;
• Un seul équipement à administrer ;
• Les nouveaux modèles compacts (Phi-4, Gemma 3) tournent efficacement sur CPU/NPU ;
• Aucun envoi de données vers le cloud, la confidentialité préservée

Limites à considérer :

• Un GPU dédié (même RTX 3060) reste 5-10× plus rapide pour l’inférence ;
• Coût important : NAS + GPU > PC dédié ;
• Thermique : un NAS est conçu pour les disques et SSD, pas pour un GPU chaud ;
• Risque de concurrence pour les ressources avec les conteneurs Docker ;
• Maintenance plus complexe en cas de panne du GPU.

L’IA locale sur un NAS est une option crédible pour des usages légers comme un chatbot personnel interrogeant vos documents, de la transcription audio locale ou de l’analyse d’images simples. Pour de l’inférence intensive ou de la génération d’images (Stable Diffusion), un PC dédié avec GPU reste de loin la solution la plus efficiente.

Faut-il tout mettre dans son NAS ?

Voilà la vraie question de fond, celle que tout passionné de homelab finit par se poser. Et honnêtement, il n’y a pas de réponse universelle… mais 2 logiques s’affrontent clairement.

NAS tout-en-un

Un seul appareil à gérer, une seule prise électrique, une seule interface d’administration. Pour l’utilisateur qui débute en homelab ou qui veut une solution simple et économique, un NAS bien dimensionné (N305/16Go + quelques disques) fait très bien le travail : stockage, partage, sauvegardes, Jellyfin, Immich, Bitwarden, Home Assistant… tout cela tourne parfaitement sur ce profil matériel, sans dépenser 500€ supplémentaires en serveur séparé.

Dissociation

À mesure que les besoins s’étoffent (plus d’applications, des machines virtuelles, de la virtualisation réseau, des charges IA…), la logique évolue. Un NAS reste fondamentalement un appareil de stockage : son système de refroidissement, sa durée de vie, sa conception sont optimisés pour des disques durs en fonctionnement permanent, pas pour un CPU sollicité à 95 % de charge pendant 8 heures.

La séparation entre stockage et applicatifs présente un avantage opérationnel réel : si votre serveur Docker tombe, vos données sur le NAS restent intactes et accessibles. Si votre NAS rencontre un problème de disque, vos services continuent de fonctionner. Cette résilience a de la valeur, surtout si vous hébergez des services critiques (ex. : Bitwarden).

Mon humble avis

Un NAS équipé d’un processeur de type N150/N305 gère parfaitement les applicatifs courants du homelab, sans sourciller. C’est un équilibre excellent. En revanche, l’IA locale intensive mérite une machine dédiée : un PC avec GPU sera toujours plus performant à budget et consommation comparables.

Les NAS ultra-puissants de 2026 sont impressionnants sur le papier, mais leur proposition de valeur doit se confronter à la réalité des usages réels (et à votre facture d’électricité).

L’IA sur un NAS peut avoir un intérêt, c’est un indéniable… mais pour des usages ciblés. Les processeurs continueront de progresser tout en maîtrisant leur consommation énergétique. Ce qui n’est pas encore possible aujourd’hui le sera certainement demain.

Et l’avenir ?

L’arrivée de l’IA dans les NAS grand public est réelle et irréversible. Les cas d’usage vont se multiplier : reconnaissance d’objets dans vos photos (Immich le fait déjà), transcription automatique de réunions, assistants contextuels connaissant vos fichiers… Ces fonctions légères, intégrées nativement par les éditeurs, s’accommoderont très bien d’un CPU / NPU, même modeste.

La question n’est donc pas de savoir si l’IA a sa place sur un NAS (elle y est déjà), mais à quelle profondeur vous voulez l’intégrer… et si le jeu en vaut financièrement la chandelle. La mode des NAS « IA » de 2026 ressemble un peu à celle des NAS « 4K transcoding » de 2018 : une vraie capacité, que 10 % des utilisateurs exploiteront réellement à plein régime.

En synthèse

Le NAS a profondément évolué. De simple disque réseau, il est devenu un vrai serveur domestique, capable de faire tourner une constellation d’applications via Docker. Un processeur Intel N305 avec 16 Go de RAM est aujourd’hui la configuration raisonnable pour un homelab polyvalent et économe en énergie.

Les NAS de 2026 avec leurs Ryzen AI, leurs processeurs mobiles Core i7 mobiles et GPU sont de vraies prouesses techniques. Ils ouvrent des possibilités inédites (IA locale, inférence LLM, transcodage massif…). Mais cette puissance a un coût : financier, énergétique et en complexité de maintenance.

Pour la majorité des utilisateurs, un NAS bien dimensionné couvre largement les besoins applicatifs courants. L’IA locale intensive mérite une machine dédiée. Et pour les besoins les plus exigeants, l’architecture dissociée NAS + serveur applicatif reste la solution la plus robuste et la plus évolutive.

L’avenir du NAS comme serveur domestique universel est probable. Mais en 2026, nous n’en sommes qu’aux premiers chapitres… et les usages réels restent encore loin des promesses marketing.

Minisforum Expand Their NAS Range with 2 New Flash NAS – The S5 and S7 SSD Systems

Minisforum has revealed 2 new all-flash NAS systems, the Minisforum S5 and Minisforum S7, as part of a joint event with Intel in Xiamen, China. The announcement, covered in the official Minisforum press release and by VideoCardz, places both devices under the company’s “Agent NAS” branding, with a focus on SSD-only storage, local AI services, and compact edge computing rather than conventional HDD-based NAS design. The S5 is presented as the smaller and quieter model for environments where noise output is a priority, while the S7 is positioned as a larger all-flash system derived from Minisforum’s workstation platform, intended for users with higher storage density and network connectivity requirements.

Minisforum S5 NAS Hardware

The Minisforum S5 is the smaller of the 2 new all-flash NAS systems and is built around a compact, fanless design. Its storage configuration is based on 5 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x1 SSD slots, with no support for conventional 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch hard drives. This places the S5 closer to a silent flash storage appliance than a traditional desktop NAS, with the design clearly prioritising low noise, reduced mechanical vibration, and a smaller physical footprint.

The system uses an Intel Core Series 3 platform, identified in wider reporting as Wildcat Lake, alongside up to 16GB of LPDDR5X-7200 memory. The RAM appears to be soldered rather than user-upgradeable, which fits with the compact and fanless design. Connectivity is stronger than many small NAS systems, with 10GbE, 2.5GbE, USB4, HDMI, USB-A, and Wi-Fi 7 all listed. The use of PCIe 4.0 x1 per SSD slot means the device is not designed to deliver full-speed PCIe 4.0 x4 performance from each individual NVMe drive, but instead uses multiple SSDs for an all-flash pool in a low-noise enclosure.

Minisforum S7 NAS Hardware

The Minisforum S7 is the larger of the 2 systems and is based on the Minisforum MS-03 workstation platform. Unlike the S5, which is focused on passive cooling and compact silent operation, the S7 is aimed at higher-capacity all-flash storage and more advanced networking. It supports up to 7 NVMe SSDs, making it the more suitable model for users who need a denser flash-based storage pool in a small workstation-style chassis.

The S7 also has a more network-heavy configuration than the S5, with dual 10G SFP+ ports, 10GbE RJ45, 2.5GbE RJ45, and 2x USB4 40Gbps ports. Minisforum has also listed an LED status display for checking system and storage activity directly from the device. Full details on PCIe lane allocation for the 7 SSD slots have not yet been confirmed, so it is not currently clear whether all slots operate at the same speed or whether any of them receive more bandwidth than others.

Minisforum S5 NAS Price and Release Date

Minisforum has not confirmed pricing or a release date for the S5 NAS at the time of the announcement. The official material presents the system as part of the company’s new Agent NAS lineup, but does not include retail availability, regional rollout details, or launch pricing. Given the use of 5x NVMe SSD slots, 10GbE, USB4, Wi-Fi 7, soldered LPDDR5X memory, and a fanless chassis, the final price will be important in determining how it compares with both conventional HDD-based NAS systems and other compact all-flash NAS devices.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

UGREEN NAS and OpenClaw – How to Install it, Setup Your AI and Understanding The Risks!

OpenClaw has now moved from a manual self-hosted setup into the UGREEN UGOS Pro App Center, making it possible to install the assistant gateway directly on supported UGREEN NASync systems rather than building it manually through a VM, terminal commands, or a separate always-on PC. In practical terms, OpenClaw is not the AI model itself. It is the local assistant layer that connects your NAS, files, tools, skills, and messaging channels to an LLM such as OpenAI, Gemini, DeepSeek, MiniMax, OpenRouter, or a local model where supported. This matters because a NAS is where many users already keep their long-term data, backups, media, documents, and project files, but it also means OpenClaw needs to be treated as a privileged automation tool rather than a simple chatbot. The App Center version lowers the installation barrier, but the real value and the real risk both come from what you allow it to access, what model you connect it to, and which skills or messaging channels you enable.

Security Considerations Before Giving OpenClaw NAS Access

OpenClaw should be approached as a privileged automation layer, not as a normal chat assistant. On UGREEN NAS, it runs through Docker and is designed to read, write, delete, move files, publish messages, and execute system-level operations depending on what folders, skills, and channels you enable. UGREEN’s own notes state that the application runs inside a Docker container with root privileges, which is necessary for broad automation but also increases the potential damage from incorrect commands, poor configuration, compromised plugins, or prompt-injection style attacks. The main rule before installation is therefore straightforward: do not give OpenClaw access to anything you are not prepared for it to modify, and make sure you have a working backup before testing it on real data.

The risks increase further if you connect OpenClaw to a remote LLM provider or public messaging platform. When using OpenAI, Gemini, MiniMax, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, or similar services, your prompts, file context, directory details, task instructions, logs, or extracted content may be sent outside the NAS depending on the action being performed. OpenClaw’s own GitHub description warns that real messaging surfaces should be treated as untrusted inputs, and recent reporting has also highlighted malicious third-party OpenClaw skills that attempted to steal credentials, wallet data, and browser information. For NAS use, the safest starting point is to use a test folder, avoid private or business-critical data, do not expose the service directly to the public internet, install only trusted skills, and treat WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord, Slack, or similar integrations as external access points into your NAS assistant.

Preparing Folders and Installing OpenClaw from UGOS Pro

Before installing OpenClaw, create the folders it will use and decide how much of the NAS it should be allowed to see. In Files, either create a dedicated shared folder or a personal folder for OpenClaw’s workspace, for example openclaw-data or openclaw-workspace. This should ideally be an empty folder, as it will be used for temporary files, generated content, working data, and task execution. Separately, create or identify the folder that OpenClaw will be allowed to access for real NAS file operations. For first-time testing, this should be a limited test directory rather than a folder containing live backups, sensitive documents, business files, or irreplaceable media. The workspace path and file access path should not overlap, and the access path should not sit inside the workspace folder. UGREEN also notes that Docker should be installed and updated first, as OpenClaw relies heavily on the Docker container environment.

Once the folders are ready, open App Center in UGOS Pro, find OpenClaw under the app list, and select Install. During the installation wizard, set the Workspace path to the empty folder created for OpenClaw’s internal working area, then set the File access path to the NAS folder or folders that the assistant is permitted to read or modify. Multiple access paths can be added, but this should be done deliberately, as these paths define the practical scope of what OpenClaw can act on. Next, create a Gateway token, which will be required when signing in to the OpenClaw web interface. After reviewing the risk notice, tick the confirmation box and start the installation. The package is installed through the App Center, but it still deploys and runs through Docker in the background, so installation time will depend on NAS performance, internet connection speed, and the state of the Docker environment. OpenClaw’s own Docker documentation also describes the gateway token and container-based control UI as central parts of the deployment model.

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open Files in UGOS Pro.
2. Create an empty folder for the OpenClaw workspace, such as openclaw-workspace.
3. Create a separate test folder for OpenClaw file access, such as openclaw-test-data.
4. Avoid selecting folders that contain private, business-critical, backup, password, financial, or personal archive data.
5. Open App Center.
6. Confirm Docker is installed and updated.
7. Search for OpenClaw under the app list.
8. Click Install.
9. Set the Workspace path to the empty OpenClaw working folder.
10. Set the File access path to the limited folder OpenClaw can manage.
11. Add additional access paths only if they are required.
12. Create and record a Gateway token.
13. Read the installation risk notice.
14. Tick the confirmation box.
15. Click Install and allow the deployment to complete.

Linking OpenClaw to an AI Model Provider

OpenClaw needs an AI model before it can act as an assistant. The UGREEN App Center installation can collect model details during setup, but these can also be managed later from the OpenClaw console under Model providers. The information required is usually the same across providers: a base URL or request endpoint, a model name, and an API key.

OpenAI’s current API reference lists https://api.openai.com/v1 as the standard API base, with chat completions available under /chat/completions, while Google documents Gemini’s OpenAI-compatible endpoint as https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/openai/. These details matter because a wrong endpoint, wrong model name, or invalid key will usually result in provider errors inside OpenClaw rather than a NAS-side installation problem.

For a UGREEN NAS setup, most users will start with a remote model provider such as OpenAI, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, MiniMax, Groq, OpenRouter, or another OpenAI-compatible API. iDX models with local AI model support may also allow local model use, but that depends on the local model service exposing a usable API endpoint and key.

A remote model is easier to configure, but it can send task instructions, file context, extracted text, and other prompts outside the NAS. A local model reduces this dependency, but it may require more RAM, more setup, and a compatible local inference service. OpenClaw supports model provider configuration and key rotation through its own provider system, so the NAS app should be treated as the deployment layer rather than the only place where model behaviour can be managed.

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open the OpenClaw shortcut from the UGREEN NAS desktop.
2. Sign in using the Gateway token created during installation.
3. Go to Model providers in the left-side menu.
4. Click Add provider.
5. Select the provider you want to use, such as OpenAI, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, MiniMax, or another supported provider.
6. Enter the provider’s Base URL or full API endpoint.
7. Enter the required API key from the provider’s developer console.
8. Enter or select the Model name that matches the provider’s supported model ID.
9. Save the provider configuration.
10. Go to the Default model area.
11. Select the model OpenClaw should use by default.
12. Click Save to apply the default model.
13. Open Chat and send a basic test prompt, such as What model are you running on?
14. If OpenClaw returns a provider error, check the API key, model name, endpoint format, account billing status, and provider rate limits.
15. If using a local model on an iDX system, use the local service IP address and port as the base URL rather than a public cloud endpoint.

Common examples:

Opening the OpenClaw Console and Testing the Assistant

Once installation and model configuration are complete, OpenClaw can be launched from the UGREEN NAS desktop. Clicking the OpenClaw shortcut opens the web console in a browser, where the first prompt will ask for the Gateway token created during installation. After signing in, the Overview page shows whether the gateway is active, along with container runtime details such as uptime, CPU usage, memory usage, gateway port, process information, and overall service status. If the service is running correctly, the status area should show an active or healthy state, and the Open OpenClaw button can be used to launch the native OpenClaw interface in a new browser tab.

The first test should be simple. Open the Chat page, send a basic message, and confirm that the configured model responds. After that, test only against the limited folder path selected during setup. For example, ask it to list files in the permitted test directory, create a new folder inside it, or summarize a non-sensitive test document. This confirms that OpenClaw, the model provider, and the NAS file permissions are all working together. If the model does not respond, check the model provider settings first. If file actions fail, check that the command references the correct mounted path shown in the OpenClaw app configuration rather than a folder name as displayed in the normal UGREEN Files interface.

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open the OpenClaw shortcut from the UGREEN NAS desktop.
2. Enter the Gateway token.
3. Click Sign in or Connect.
4. Open Overview.
5. Confirm the service status is active.
6. Check the runtime snapshot for CPU usage, memory usage, and uptime.
7. Click Open OpenClaw if you want to use the native OpenClaw interface.
8. Open Chat from the left-side menu.
9. Send a basic test message, such as Hello.
10. Ask which model is active, for example What model are you using?
11. Test file access only inside the approved test folder.
12. Use a low-risk command, such as Create a folder called OpenClaw Test in [your mounted test path].
13. Open Files in UGOS Pro and confirm the folder was created.
14. If the command fails, check the actual accessible path under Control Panel > About > Apps > OpenClaw.
15. Review Operation Logs if OpenClaw responds incorrectly, fails to access files, or reports a gateway or provider error.

Choosing Skills and Plug-ins for NAS-Based Use

OpenClaw skills and plug-ins extend what the assistant can do beyond basic chat. In a NAS environment, these additions should be chosen more cautiously than they might be on a laptop or test VM, because a skill may request access to files, shell commands, browser sessions, messaging platforms, or external services. OpenClaw’s public site describes it as an assistant that can act through channels such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and other chat apps, while community skill indexes now list thousands of available skills. That breadth is useful, but it also means the skill ecosystem should not be treated as automatically safe or suitable for storage systems. (openclaw.ai, clawskills.sh)

For a UGREEN NAS, the sensible starting point is to enable only the skills that match a specific NAS task. File management, system monitoring, web browsing, document parsing, OCR, and basic notification workflows are the most relevant categories. Avoid installing skills that request broad shell access, browser credential access, crypto wallet access, password manager access, or unclear third-party scripts unless they have been reviewed carefully. This is not theoretical. Reports in early 2026 documented malicious OpenClaw skills that attempted to steal browser data, SSH credentials, wallet information, and other sensitive data, which is particularly relevant when the assistant is being installed on a machine that stores personal or business files.

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open the OpenClaw console from the UGREEN NAS desktop.
2. Sign in with the Gateway token.
3. Open the native OpenClaw interface using Open OpenClaw, if required.
4. Go to the Skills, Plug-ins, or Skills Store area.
5. Search for skills by function rather than installing large bundles.
6. Start with NAS-relevant categories only.
7. Check the skill description, source, permissions, and install method.
8. Avoid any skill that asks you to run unclear terminal commands.
9. Install 1 skill at a time.
10. Test it only against the approved OpenClaw test folder.
11. Check Operation Logs after each test.
12. Remove any skill that behaves unexpectedly or asks for broader permissions than needed.
13. Avoid using “always allow” approvals until the workflow has been tested repeatedly.
14. Keep a note of which skills are installed and what each one can access.
15. Review installed skills periodically, especially after OpenClaw or UGOS Pro updates.

Recommended NAS-related starting points:

Connecting OpenClaw to WhatsApp, Discord, and Telegram

OpenClaw can be used through external messaging platforms so that commands can be sent to the NAS assistant without opening the UGREEN web interface each time. The supported channel list includes WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord, Slack, Google Chat, Signal, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, Feishu, LINE, Mattermost, Nextcloud Talk, and others, but WhatsApp, Telegram, and Discord are likely to be the most relevant for home and small-office users. OpenClaw’s own channel notes state that multiple channels can run at the same time, but they also warn that inbound messages should be treated as untrusted input and that DM pairing or allowlists are used for access control. (github.com, docs.openclaw.ai)

For NAS use, Telegram is usually the simplest starting point because it relies on a bot token from BotFather. WhatsApp normally uses QR pairing and stores more session state on disk, which means it may need more care during backups, container resets, or reinstallation. Discord is more useful when OpenClaw needs to operate inside a server, channel, or team context, but it should be restricted to private channels and trusted roles rather than broad server-wide access. The UGREEN console provides a channel management area where plugins can be enabled, configured, and monitored, but more advanced channel setup may still require working inside the OpenClaw interface or Docker container depending on the platform and plugin. (docs.openclaw.ai, openclaw-openclaw.mintlify.app)

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open the OpenClaw console from the UGREEN NAS desktop.
2. Sign in using the Gateway token.
3. Go to Channels.
4. Select the channel you want to enable, such as Telegram, WhatsApp, or Discord.
5. Click Enable for the required channel plugin.
6. Wait until the plugin status changes to Ready.
7. Click Add channel.
8. Enter the required account, bot, or pairing details.
9. Configure DM access rules, pairing mode, or allowlist behaviour where available.
10. Bind the channel to the correct OpenClaw agent or default assistant.
11. Send a low-risk test message from the external app.
12. Confirm that OpenClaw replies through the same channel.
13. Test with a harmless NAS action inside the approved test directory only.
14. Check Operation Logs if messages are received but not answered.
15. Disable the channel if unexpected users, groups, or servers can trigger the assistant.

Telegram setup:

1. Open Telegram.
2. Search for @BotFather.
3. Create a new bot using /newbot.
4. Copy the bot token provided by BotFather.
5. Return to OpenClaw > Channels.
6. Enable the Telegram plugin.
7. Add a Telegram channel.
8. Paste the bot token.
9. Configure whether the bot can respond in DMs, groups, or both.
10. Send a test message to the bot.

WhatsApp setup:

1. Open OpenClaw > Channels.
2. Enable the WhatsApp plugin.
3. Add a WhatsApp channel.
4. Enter the phone number or pairing account details requested by the setup window.
5. Generate the QR pairing code.
6. Open WhatsApp on your phone.
7. Go to linked devices.
8. Scan the QR code.
9. Wait for the WhatsApp channel status to become active.
10. Send a test message to confirm OpenClaw responds.

Discord setup:

1. Create or use a Discord server where you control permissions.
2. Create a dedicated private channel for OpenClaw commands.
3. Create a Discord bot in the Discord Developer Portal.
4. Copy the bot token.
5. Return to OpenClaw > Channels.
6. Enable the Discord plugin.
7. Add a Discord channel.
8. Paste the bot token.
9. Restrict the bot to trusted channels and roles.
10. Send a test command in the private OpenClaw channel.

UGREEN x OpenClaw: Useful, but Only with Controlled Access

OpenClaw on UGREEN NAS is a notable step towards making AI-assisted NAS management more accessible, mainly because the App Center version removes much of the older manual deployment work. Instead of installing Ubuntu in a VM, configuring Node.js, running installation scripts, and manually binding the gateway, supported UGREEN NASync users can now install OpenClaw through UGOS Pro and complete the main path, token, and model setup through a guided interface. That makes the initial process easier, but it does not make OpenClaw a basic consumer NAS feature. It is still an automation agent with access to files, tools, model providers, messaging channels, and potentially system commands.

The value depends on how tightly it is configured. Used against a limited folder, with a known model provider, a small number of trusted skills, and private messaging channels, OpenClaw can help with file organisation, document handling, system checks, reminders, and assistant-style NAS interaction. Given broad storage access, untested skills, exposed web access, or remote AI services without understanding the data flow, it becomes a much higher-risk deployment. For most users, the best approach is to begin with a test directory, avoid sensitive data, keep backups current, and expand access only after confirming exactly how OpenClaw behaves in day-to-day use.

Want to Support the work me and Eddie do at NASCompares? If you found this article helpful and are going to buy a UGREEN NAS from the brand’s official site or from Amazon, use the links below. Using these links will result in a small commission coming to us (which costs you nothing extra) and it allows us to keep doing what we do! Thank you for keeping the internet a fair and sustainable place!

Buy the UGREEN NAS from your local Amazon Store	Buy the UGREEN NAS solutions Directly from UGREEN.COM

 

---

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

UniFi UNVR Gen 2 and UNVR Gen 2 Pro: What Has Actually Changed?

UniFi’s UNVR range has always occupied a fairly clear role in the Protect ecosystem: a dedicated rackmount recorder for users who have outgrown smaller gateway-based recording, or who want their surveillance storage separated from the rest of their network hardware. With the new UNVR Gen 2 and UNVR Gen 2 Pro, Ubiquiti is shifting that role further. These are still network video recorders first, but the hardware and software changes point toward a more active surveillance appliance, with higher camera support, local AI processing, HDMI output for live viewing, and closer integration with the newer direction of UniFi Protect. The issue is that this also comes with a much higher price than the previous UNVR and UNVR Pro, so the question is not simply whether the Gen 2 models are better, but whether the added hardware and features are relevant enough to justify the increase for different types of deployments.

UNVR G.2 and UNVR G.2 Pro – Specifications

The UNVR Gen 2 is the 1U model in the new range and keeps the same general rackmount class as the original UNVR, with 4 2.5/3.5″ HDD or SSD bays. Its camera support is rated at up to 50 HD cameras, 35 2K cameras, or 25 4K cameras, with support for 150+ Access Hubs. Networking is handled by 1 10G SFP+ port and 1 2.5GbE RJ45 port, while the chassis measures 442.4 x 43.7 x 325 mm.

Internally, it moves to a Qualcomm Kryo CPU built on Arm Cortex technology using a 4 nm process, with 1 Prime core at 3.2 GHz, 4 Performance cores at 2.8 GHz, and 3 Efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz. Memory is increased to 8 GB, drive power budget remains 75W, and maximum system power consumption is listed at 100W.

The UNVR Gen 2 Pro is the larger 2U model and increases the drive count to 8 2.5/3.5″ HDD or SSD bays, compared with 7 bays on the previous UNVR Pro. Its camera support is rated at up to 100 HD cameras, 70 2K cameras, or 50 4K cameras, again with support for 150+ Access Hubs. The Pro model uses the same Qualcomm Kryo CPU arrangement as the smaller Gen 2 model, but increases memory to 16 GB. Networking consists of 1 10G SFP+ port and 1 2.5GbE RJ45 port, with a listed chassis size of 442.4 x 87.4 x 325 mm. The drive power budget rises to 155W, while maximum power consumption is listed at 200W.

Both Gen 2 models also include HDMI output for the built-in ViewPort function, which allows a Protect multi-view to be assigned directly to a connected display rather than requiring a separate ViewPort device.

Specification	UniFi UNVR Gen 2	UniFi UNVR Gen 2 Pro
Price	$699	$999
Form factor	Rackmount 1U	Rackmount 2U
Dimensions	442.4 x 43.7 x 325 mm	442.4 x 87.4 x 325 mm
Drive bays	4 x 2.5/3.5″ HDD/SSD	8 x 2.5/3.5″ HDD/SSD
Managed cameras	50 HD / 35 2K / 25 4K	100 HD / 70 2K / 50 4K
Managed Access Hubs	150+	150+
Networking	1 x 10G SFP+ / 1 x 2.5GbE RJ45	1 x 10G SFP+ / 1 x 2.5GbE RJ45
HDMI output	Yes, built-in ViewPort	Yes, built-in ViewPort
ViewPort stream limit	Up to 16 streams	Up to 16 streams
Processor	Qualcomm Kryo CPU built on Arm Cortex technology, 4 nm	Qualcomm Kryo CPU built on Arm Cortex technology, 4 nm
CPU configuration	1 Prime core at 3.2 GHz, 4 Performance cores at 2.8 GHz, 3 Efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz	1 Prime core at 3.2 GHz, 4 Performance cores at 2.8 GHz, 3 Efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz
Memory	8 GB	16 GB
Integrated Edge AI	Yes	Yes
AI detections	Up to 1,000 per hour	Up to 1,000 per hour
Edge AI features	Natural Language Search, Object Indexing in Find Anything, Person ReID, Search by Image	Natural Language Search, Object Indexing in Find Anything, Person ReID, Search by Image
Max. drive power budget	75W	155W
Max. power consumption	100W	200W
Power method	Universal AC input, 100 to 240V AC, 50/60 Hz	Universal AC input, 100 to 240V AC, 50/60 Hz
Power supply	Internal PSU, 100W	Internal PSU, 200W
Minimum NVR version	Not specified in supplied notes	5.1.10
Minimum Protect version	7.1.46	7.1.46

UNVR Gen 2 vs Original UNVR: Where the Price Increase Comes From

The clearest difference between the original UNVR and the UNVR Gen 2 is the change in hardware platform. The older UNVR uses a quad-core ARM Cortex-A57 processor at 1.7 GHz with 4 GB of memory, while the UNVR Gen 2 moves to the newer Qualcomm Kryo ARM-based CPU platform and 8 GB of memory. The network layout has also changed, with the older model using 1 GbE RJ45 alongside 10G SFP+, while the Gen 2 model upgrades the RJ45 connection to 2.5GbE. Storage bay count remains the same at 4 bays, but camera capacity changes from 60 HD, 30 2K, or 18 4K cameras on the original UNVR to 50 HD, 35 2K, or 25 4K cameras on the Gen 2 model. That means the newer system is not a straight increase across every camera category, but it does raise support for higher-resolution 2K and 4K deployments.

The pricing difference is more substantial than the specification changes would suggest if this were only a conventional recorder update. The original UNVR is positioned at $299, while the UNVR Gen 2 is positioned at $699. The explanation appears to be that UniFi is treating the Gen 2 model as a more complete Protect appliance rather than just a higher-performance version of the old 4-bay recorder.

The HDMI output effectively integrates ViewPort-style live display support, while the built-in Edge AI features shift part of the workload that would otherwise require additional hardware such as an AI Key. This does not make the older UNVR obsolete for simpler recording tasks, but it does change the buying decision. The Gen 2 model is aimed more clearly at deployments that need local AI search, image-based search, person re-identification, and direct live monitoring from the recorder itself.

Specification	Older UNVR / UNVR Pro	New UNVR Gen 2 / UNVR Gen 2 Pro
Models compared	UNVR / UNVR Pro	UNVR Gen 2 / UNVR Gen 2 Pro
Price	$299 / $499	$699 / $999
Form factor	1U / 2U	1U / 2U
Dimensions	442 x 325 x 44 mm / 442 x 325 x 87 mm	442.4 x 43.7 x 325 mm / 442.4 x 87.4 x 325 mm
Drive bays	4 x 2.5/3.5″ HDD/SSD / 7 x 2.5/3.5″ HDD/SSD	4 x 2.5/3.5″ HDD/SSD / 8 x 2.5/3.5″ HDD/SSD
Managed HD cameras	60 / 70	50 / 100
Managed 2K cameras	30 / 35	35 / 70
Managed 4K cameras	18 / 24	25 / 50
Managed Access Hubs	150 / 150	150+ / 150+
Networking	1 x 10G SFP+ and 1 x GbE RJ45	1 x 10G SFP+ and 1 x 2.5GbE RJ45
HDMI output	No integrated ViewPort	Yes, integrated ViewPort via HDMI
ViewPort stream limit	Requires separate ViewPort device	Up to 16 streams
Processor	Quad ARM Cortex-A57 cores at 1.7 GHz	Qualcomm Kryo CPU built on Arm Cortex technology, 4 nm
CPU configuration	4 cores	1 Prime core at 3.2 GHz, 4 Performance cores at 2.8 GHz, 3 Efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz
Memory	4 GB / 8 GB	8 GB / 16 GB
Integrated Edge AI	No	Yes
AI features	Requires additional UniFi AI hardware for expanded AI functionality	Natural Language Search, Object Indexing in Find Anything, Person ReID, Search by Image
AI detections	Not specified	Up to 1,000 per hour
Max. drive power budget	75W / 135W	75W / 155W
Max. power consumption	100W / 160W	100W / 200W
Power supply	Internal AC/DC, 120W / 200W	Internal PSU, 100W / 200W
Power redundancy	USP-RPS DC input supported	USP-RPS DC input supported
Main practical difference	Dedicated UniFi Protect recording and storage appliances	Higher-resolution camera scaling, integrated display output, and local AI search features

Protect 7.1 and the Shift Toward Local AI Surveillance

UniFi Protect 7.1 is an important part of the UNVR Gen 2 release, because several of the headline hardware features depend on the newer Protect software stack. The Gen 2 recorders include built-in Edge AI functionality, with support for Natural Language Search, Object Indexing in Find Anything, Person ReID, and Search by Image. In practical terms, this changes how recorded footage can be searched. Instead of relying only on a timeline, motion events, or predefined smart detections, the system is designed to help users locate more specific events across stored footage using more descriptive search methods. The built-in AI functionality is local and license-free, but for larger or busier deployments, UniFi still recommends adding 1 or more AI Keys to expand processing capacity, reduce Edge AI latency, and lower the chance of missed events.

Protect 7.1 also expands the broader surveillance feature set beyond the Gen 2 recorders themselves. Custom Video Walls are now available in Site Manager, dashboard widgets have deeper customization, and live camera views can be configured with webhook shortcuts for triggering automations from the camera interface. Smart detections have been retrained for improved accuracy across UniFi cameras, PTZ tracking has been expanded to include vehicles, and 360 cameras now support native immersive downloads. ONVIF support is also more developed, with audio and motion detection support for third-party cameras, which is significant for sites migrating gradually from existing surveillance hardware into UniFi Protect. The update also introduces U.S.-only Noonlight dispatch services for sensor and video monitoring at $199 per year, DC-09 support for third-party monitoring integrations, and SuperLink Remote Control support for customizable site control. Below is a full breakdown of the feaures of UniFi Protect, and which require AI assistance (either edge based on the camera/AI-port, or local using an AI assisted server or AI-Key):

Bottom Line: A More Capable NVR, but Not a Like-for-Like Replacement

The UNVR Gen 2 and UNVR Gen 2 Pro make more sense when viewed as expanded Protect appliances rather than direct replacements for the older UNVR and UNVR Pro. The new models add faster processing, more memory, 2.5GbE RJ45 networking, HDMI output for built-in ViewPort use, higher 2K and 4K camera ceilings, and local Edge AI features that change how recorded footage can be searched and reviewed. The Pro model also gains an 8th drive bay, which makes it a cleaner fit for larger retention requirements than the older 7-bay UNVR Pro. For sites already planning to use AI search, Person ReID, image-based search, or a direct HDMI monitoring display, the higher price is easier to explain because those functions would otherwise involve additional hardware or a less integrated setup.

That does not mean the price increase will make sense for every Protect installation. The original UNVR and UNVR Pro remain better aligned with users who mainly need reliable recording, centralized Protect storage, and conventional camera management without paying for a broader AI-enabled appliance. The Gen 2 models are therefore best judged by deployment requirements rather than by bay count alone. For new or expanding surveillance environments with higher-resolution cameras, active monitoring, ONVIF migration plans, and a need to search footage more intelligently, the UNVR Gen 2 range has a clearer role. For simpler sites where AI features and HDMI ViewPort output are not a priority, the older UNVR models still have a practical argument, provided UniFi continues to keep them available.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Lime Technology vient de publier Unraid 7.3.0, une mise à jour majeure de son système d’exploitation destiné aux NAS. Au programme : un nouveau processus d’installation, une refonte du mécanisme de licence, une mise à jour majeure de Docker et de nombreuses corrections importants (notamment Copy Fail et Dirty Frag). Voici ce qu’il faut réellement retenir de cette version…

Unraid 7.3.0

L’une des nouveautés les plus visibles de cette version concerne l’expérience d’accueil des nouveaux utilisateurs. Un assistant d’intégration (Onboarding Wizard) prend désormais en charge la configuration initiale : langue, fuseau horaire, thème visuel, paramètres de licence et choix de la méthode de démarrage . Accessible également depuis Outils → Assistant d’intégration, il permet aux utilisateurs existants de revoir leur configuration ou de migrer vers le démarrage interne.

Ce démarrage interne (internal boot) constitue d’ailleurs l’évolution structurelle majeure de cette version. Unraid peut désormais démarrer depuis un pool ZFS dédié, indépendamment de la traditionnelle clé USB. Cette approche réduit surtout la dépendance aux clés USB, jugées moins fiables à long terme. Un point important tout de même : le support de démarrage doit être accessible via des pilotes Linux natifs au moment du démarrage. Les appareils nécessitant des pilotes tiers ne sont pas compatibles.

La licence migre vers le TPM

Unraid introduit une nouvelle méthode de licence liée au TPM, appelée à coexister avec l’activation traditionnelle par clé USB. Toutes les nouvelles clés et les clés de remplacement utilisent désormais ce mécanisme par défaut, jugé plus robuste. Les utilisateurs existants peuvent effectuer cette migration manuellement à l’aide de la documentation officielle. C’est un changement discret, mais important pour la pérennité des installations : la perte ou le remplacement d’une clé USB ne devrait plus rimer avec perte de licence.

Docker 29 : attention aux adresses MAC

Docker passe de la branche 27 à la branche 29.4.3 et ce saut de version entraîne un changement de comportement : les adresses MAC des conteneurs sont désormais générées de façon aléatoire à chaque démarrage. Pour les déploiements reposant sur des réservations DHCP, des règles de pare-feu ou des ACL de switch, cela peut être problématique.

Unraid répond à ce besoin en introduisant un champ optionnel d’adresse MAC fixe directement dans les templates Docker. Les valeurs héritées présentes dans les paramètres supplémentaires (–mac-address=) sont migrées automatiquement lorsque c’est possible. Par ailleurs, des « conteneurs fantômes » (phantom containers) devenus visibles après la migration Docker 27→29 sont désormais filtrés de l’interface, sans altérer l’état interne de Docker.

Stockage : ZFS gagne en visibilité et en contrôle

Plusieurs améliorations touchent le stockage. Les fichiers corrompus dans un pool ZFS sont maintenant affichés dans l’interface, ce qui facilite le diagnostic. La taille maximale de l’ARC ZFS est désormais configurable directement depuis Réglages → Paramètres disque, sans avoir à passer par un paramètre de pilote personnalisé.

Des régressions importantes sont également corrigées : les disques 4Kn et certaines configurations LSI HBA rencontraient des problèmes de compatibilité de taille de secteur avec XFS, c’est résolu. Des correctifs concernent aussi le réveil intempestif des pools ZFS toutes les 24 heures, la détection de périphériques avec des noms longs (sdp, sdap…), etc.

Virtualisation, interface et réseau

QEMU monte en version 10.2.2, libvirt en 12.2.0, et le firmware OVMF est rafraîchi. Un bug de blocage avec virtiofs sur certains systèmes Linux invités est corrigé. Du côté réseau, Unraid enrichit son support matériel AMD avec les modules XDNA, ACP et NPU, ainsi que des firmwares Bluetooth et Wi-Fi Intel mis à jour. Une page dédiée à Tailscale fait son apparition dans les réglages, facilitant la découverte du plugin.

L’interface web bénéficie de nombreuses corrections : gestion des fins de ligne Windows dans les fichiers de configuration GRUB et Syslinux, affichage de la RAM, isolation des cœurs CPU, redémarrage automatique du daemon SSH après une reprise réseau, et formatage des notifications Discord.

En synthèse

Unraid 7.3 n’est pas une mise à jour cosmétique. Le démarrage interne, la migration TPM, la gestion des MAC Docker et les corrections ZFS constituent des changements structurels qui améliorent la fiabilité à long terme des installations. Le noyau Linux passe en version 6.18.23, et l’ensemble de la distribution de base est mis à jour avec des versions récentes de curl, OpenSSL, PHP 8.4, rclone, et bien d’autres composants. Une mise à jour à planifier sérieusement pour tout utilisateur soucieux de la stabilité de son infrastructure.

source

Copy Fail, Dirty Frag et Fragnesia sont 3 failles de sécurité différentes touchant quasiment toutes les distributions Linux. Elles permettent à un utilisateur malveillant d’obtenir un accès root (super-utilisateur) et par conséquent, disposer de tous les droits sur le système. La très grande majorité des NAS fonctionnant ave un noyau Linux, il y a de fortes chances que votre appareil soit concerné…

Synology

Commençons par le leader du secteur : Synology. Le fabricant a rapidement communiqué sur Copy Fail et Dirty Frag. Ses systèmes (DSM, SRM, BeeStation…) ne sont pas impactés par ces deux failles. Concernant Fragnesia (qui vient tout juste d’être divulguée), Synology n’a pas communiqué dessus. Cette faille exploite les mêmes modules du noyau Linux que Dirty Frag (esp4, esp6 et rxrpc), il serait donc possible que les NAS Synology soient immunisés.

Le fabricant est souvent pointé du doigt pour l’utilisation d’un noyau Linux ancien, certes robuste… mais dépourvu de certaines fonctionnalités récentes. Force est de constater que cela joue ici en sa faveur.

QNAP

QNAP publie régulièrement des mises à jour, y compris du noyau. Pour autant, aucun correctif n’est encore disponible. Il investigue toujours… le fabricant est toujours en cours d’analyse et ne propose pour l’heure qu’un ensemble de recommandations (ex. : ici et là)..

QNAP souligne que l’exploitation de ces failles nécessite un accès SSH ou Telnet, des fonctionnalités que QTS et QuTS hero réservent exclusivement au groupe Administrateur. Le risque demeure néanmoins réel.

Asustor

Asustor a réagi rapidement en publiant un premier correctif pour Copy Fail dès le 12/05 (voir l’annonce ici). Pour Dirty Frag, il faudra attendre encore quelques jours pour en savoir plus.

Pour ce qui est de Fragnesia, le fabricant n’a pas encore communiqué. La faille étant très récente, il faudra patienter encore quelques jours avant d’en savoir davantage.

TerraMaster

Terminons avec TerraMaster. Le fabricant chinois a indiqué que TOS 6 (et les versions précédentes) ne sont pas impactés par Copy Fail et Dirty Frag (comme Synology). En revanche, TOS 7, actuellement en version bêta, est bien concerné. Un correctif est déjà annoncé pour arriver très prochainement. Aucune information n’a été communiquée au sujet de Fragnesia.

En synthèse

Seuls les systèmes actuels de Synology et TerraMaster semblent épargnés par Copy Fail et Dirty Frag. Asustor a été le premier à publier un correctif (et le seul pour le moment), un autre ne devrait pas tarder. QNAP semble encore en phase d’analyse… Nous n’avons pas trouvé d’information concernant UGREEN.

Concernant Fragnesia, aucun fabricant n’a communiqué pour le moment.

Minisforum est en grande forme et annonce l’arrivée de 2 nouveaux NAS « All-Flash » : les S5 et S7. Ces machines reposent sur les processeurs Intel Core Ultra Série 3 et Intel Core Série 3. Elles illustrent surtout la volonté du constructeur de pousser l’IA générative directement dans les foyers et les petites entreprises… sans dépendre du cloud. Regardons de plus près ces nouveaux NAS.

 

S5 : le NAS qui veut se faire oublier

Le Minisforum S5 mise sur la discrétion et la performance. Ce NAS fonctionne exclusivement avec des SSD et n’a aucun ventilateur. Le boîtier dispose de 5 emplacements M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 destinés aux SSD NVMe. Comme le montrent les visuels, le design est plutôt compact, sobre et moderne.

Le S5 est animé par un processeur Intel Core Series 3, sans plus de précision supplémentaire pour le moment. Il pourrait s’agir d’un Intel Core 7 350. Ce que l’on sait en revanche, c’est qu’il appartient à la famille Wildcat Lake et qu’il intègre un NPU capable d’atteindre 17 TOPS. Le NAS serait livré avec 16 Go de mémoire vive.

Côté connectique, le Minisforum S5 propose une configuration complète pour un format réduit :

• 2 ports USB4 ;
• 2 ports USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 ;
• 1 port réseau RJ45 10 Gb/s ;
• 1 port réseau RJ45 2,5 Gb/s ;
• 1 sortie HDMI 2.1

Toutes les interfaces sont positionnées à l’arrière du boîtier. Pour une machine aussi compacte, c’est assez impressionnant. On a vu des NAS bien plus volumineux et bien moins équipées.

S7 : une machine pensée pour le homelab

Le Minisforum S7 vise un public différent. Ce modèle reprend la plateforme MS-03 du constructeur et l’adapte dans une configuration NAS full-flash équipée de 7 emplacements NVMe.

Ici, le design est plus imposant et un écran LED est présent façade pour afficher l’état du système, l’activité réseau ou encore certaines informations de monitoring.

Le S7 est construit autour d’un processeur Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (16 cœurs) capable d’atteindre 4,7 GHz, épaulé par un iGPU Intel Xe3. Ce dernier obtient un score de 34 066 points selon Passmark. L’architecture intègre également un NPU pouvant atteindre 50 TOPS.

La connectivité réseau confirme clairement les ambitions du produit :

• 2 ports 10 Gb/s SFP+ ;
• 1 port RJ45 10 Gb/s ;
• 1 port RJ45 2,5 Gb/s ;
• 2 ports USB4.

Sur le papier, le S7 coche pratiquement toutes les cases du NAS orienté virtualisation, IA locale et homelab haut de gamme.

MinisCloud OS et MinisOpenClaw : l’IA locale

Comme le modèle N5 Max, Minisforum met en avant son système MinisCloud OS et MinisOpenClaw (son agent IA maison dérivée d’OpenClaw). Reste toutefois une question essentielle : un agent IA ne sert à rien sans modèle derrière lui. Toute la problématique sera donc de savoir si ces NAS disposeront réellement de suffisamment de puissance pour faire tourner des modèles d’IA localement dans de bonnes conditions. A noter que le système MinisCloud OS serait installé sur une clé USB.

Si Minisforum parvient à proposer une expérience fluide et des cas d’usage pertinents, ces machines pourraient être intéressantes pour les utilisateurs souhaitant conserver leurs données en local tout en profitant des outils IA modernes. Sur le papier, la proposition est séduisante…. mais il faudra vérifier ce que cela donne en conditions réelles.

En synthèse

Minisforum poursuit son offensive sur le marché des NAS avec 2 modèles clairement orientés IA locale et hautes performances réseau. Les S5 et S7 misent sur des SSD NVMe, une connectivité 10 Gb/s et des processeurs Intel intégrant des NPU dédiés à l’accélération IA. Une approche cohérente avec l’évolution du marché vers des solutions capables d’exécuter des modèles localement, sans dépendance au Cloud.

Les prix et dates de disponibilité n’ont pas encore été dévoilés, mais ces NAS sont à surveiller…

source

Le Minisforum N5 Max avait été présenté lors du CES 2026, mais on en sait désormais davantage à son sujet. Le constructeur a officialisé son prix ainsi que sa date de lancement. Avec son processeur AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, ce NAS à 5 baies s’annonce comme l’un des modèles les plus puissants jamais commercialisés sur le marché du stockage réseau. Voici ce qu’il faut retenir…

Minisforum N5 Max

Minisforum s’est imposé depuis 2018 comme un spécialiste reconnu des Mini PC performants. En 2025, la marque avait déjà fait une première percée sur le marché des NAS avec le N5 Pro, un modèle aux caractéristiques particulièrement ambitieuses.

Avec le N5 Max, le constructeur conserve le même châssis compact que les autres modèles de la gamme N5. L’appareil mesure 199 × 202,4 × 252,3 mm pour un poids d’environ 5 kg.

Ce nouveau boîtier embarque 5 baies SATA et 5 emplacements M.2 NVMe  (1 slot PCIe 4.0 x4 et 4 slots PCIe 4.0 x1). Un SSD de 128 Go préinstallé accueille le système d’exploitation et occupe l’un des emplacements NVMe.

Le Minisforum N5 Max est construit autour d’un processeur AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (capable d’atteindre 5,1 GHz), épaulé par un iGPU Radeon 8060S, ainsi qu’un NPU affichant une puissance de 126 TOPS (tera-opérations par seconde). Le NAS serait livré avec 64 Go de mémoire LPDDR5x (non extensible).

Vous l’aurez compris, Minisforum positionne clairement ce modèle comme un véritable serveur local dédié à l’intelligence artificielle. L’objectif est de permettre l’exécution locale de modèles IA, sans dépendre d’infrastructures cloud externes. Selon le site PassMark, ce processeur obtient 55 141 points… un niveau de performances bien éloigné des configurations habituellement. À noter que le fabricant annonce un TDP de 55W.

Connectique

Le N5 Max ne fait aucun compromis côté connectivité. Le boîtier intègre notamment :

• 2 ports RJ45 10 Gb/s ;
• 2 ports USB4 à 80 Gb/s ;
• 1 port USB4 à 40 Gb/s ;
• 1 sortie audio-vidéo HDMI 2.1.

Une fiche technique qui vise clairement les usages professionnels avancés, le traitement de données massif ou encore les workflows vidéo lourds.

MinisCloud OS et MinisOpenClaw : l’IA locale au centre du projet

Le système maison MinisCloud OS intègre la plateforme MinisOpenClaw (OpenClaw préinstallé). Celle-ci propose un assistant IA local (images et vidéos déjà pris en charge, support de tous les fichiers prévu d’ici la fin du troisième trimestre 2026), une recherche sémantique, la gestion de snapshots ZFS, des machines virtuelles, l’isolation multicomptes et un contrôle de permissions en un clic (cette dernière devrait arriver un peu plus tard, d’ici fin 2026). L’objectif affiché est clair : offrir de l’IA générative et du traitement de données localement, sans dépendance au cloud.

Prix et disponibilité

Ce nouveau NAS vise les professionnels qui travaillent sur des fichiers lourds, les entreprises qui souhaitent exécuter des modèles d’IA locaux sans passer par un fournisseur cloud… ou encore les particuliers les plus exigeants.

Le N5 Max serait vendu 2 899 $ (prix en euro non dévoilé pour le moment) dans une configuration incluant 64 Go de RAM et le SSD système de 128 Go. Pour comparaison, le N5 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) démarre à 959€ et le N5 Air (Ryzen 7 255) débute à 559€.

Le N5 Max occupe donc clairement le sommet de la gamme, avec un écart tarifaire significatif justifié par une puissance de calcul sans équivalent dans ce segment.

Synology élargit son offre avec 2 nouvelles caméras IP : BC510 et TC510. Selon le fabricant, ces dernières sont conçues pour répondre aux besoins des entreprises et organisations à la recherche d’une solution flexible, intelligente et compatible avec différents environnements réseau. Mais une information, discrètement glissée dans leur fiche produit, mérite qu’on s’y arrête…

Synology BC510 & TC510

Ces nouvelles caméras viennent remplacer les BC500 et TC500 lancées en 2023. L’objectif ici est de proposer des produits combinant analyses IA, stockage et gestion dans le Cloud au sein d’une même architecture. Les BC510 et TC510 sont pensées pour fonctionner aussi bien avec l’environnement natif Synology qu’avec des systèmes tiers via le protocole standard ONVIF.

Sur le plan technique, les 2 modèles partagent les mêmes caractéristiques : capteur offrant une résolution de 2880 x 1620 px à 30 images par seconde, angle de vision horizontal de 110° et vision nocturne portant jusqu’à 30 mètres. Elles sont certifiées IP66 et IP67, garantissant une résistance élevée à la poussière, à la pluie et aux conditions extérieures difficiles. Des spécifications globalement similaires à celles des modèles précédents.

L’un des principaux arguments reste l’intégration de fonctions IA directement en périphérie, au niveau de la caméra elle-même. Cette approche permet de traiter les analyses localement plutôt que sur le serveur, avec pour objectif une meilleure réactivité et une réduction de la charge côté NAS.

Parmi les fonctionnalités annoncées : comptage de personnes et de véhicules, reconnaissance des plaques d’immatriculation, détection d’intrusion ainsi qu’Instant Search (système pour accélérer la recherche dans les archives vidéo). Ces outils s’adressent aux entreprises, commerces, sites industriels ou collectivités souhaitant automatiser une partie de leur surveillance sans multiplier les ressources matérielles.

Enfin, Synology anticipe déjà l’avenir en annonçant la compatibilité de ces modèles avec sa future plateforme de surveillance cloud VSaaS. Une façon de positionner les BC510 et TC510 comme des solutions évolutives, capables d’accompagner les besoins des organisations sur le long terme.

Le retour des licences

Contrairement aux précédentes générations de caméras du fabricant, les nouvelles Synology BC510 et TC510 nécessitent une licence Surveillance Station. Oui, vous avez bien lu… Jusqu’à présent, les caméras Synology intégraient directement leur licence, permettant une utilisation sans coût supplémentaire dans son écosystème de vidéosurveillance. C’était d’ailleurs un avantage concurrentiel clairement différenciateur.

Pour rappel, chaque NAS Synology inclut par défaut 2 licences caméra pour Surveillance Station. Au-delà, l’ajout de nouvelles caméras impose l’achat de licences supplémentaires. Concrètement, une installation comprenant 4 caméras nécessite l’achat de 2 licences additionnelles, les 2 premières étant fournies avec le NAS.

Jusqu’ici, les caméras Synology échappaient à cette règle grâce à une licence embarquée directement dans le matériel. Avec les BC510 et TC510 (et également la BC800Z), ce fonctionnement semble définitivement abandonné. Ces nouveaux modèles nécessitent désormais une licence dédiée pour être exploitée dans Surveillance Station, au même titre que des caméras tierces Axis, Reolink, Sony, Foscam, etc.

Pour l’heure, Synology n’a pas détaillé les raisons de ce changement. Difficile toutefois de ne pas y voir une évolution stratégique et commerciale autour de son activité de vidéosurveillance. Nous avons contacté le fabricant afin d’obtenir des éclaircissements. Cet article sera mis à jour dès que nous aurons de plus amples informations.

Prix et disponibilité

Les 2 caméras sont déjà disponibles à la commande. Il faudra débourser 299,95€ pour chacune des caméras (oui, elles sont au même prix). Un prix identique au lancement de la génération précédente.

Synology Cameras Now Need a License for Surveillance Station

Synology has changed the licensing position for selected cameras in its 2026 surveillance camera range, with the newly listed BC510, TC510, and BC800Z now requiring a Surveillance Device License when used with Synology Surveillance Station. This marks a notable shift from the previous value proposition of Synology-branded cameras, which had been positioned as tightly integrated first-party devices that did not require an additional camera license. The new BC510 and TC510 have been introduced as AI-enabled bullet and turret cameras with 5MP resolution, 30 FPS recording, 110° horizontal field of view, IP66/IP67 protection, 30 m night vision, edge AI analytics, ONVIF support, and compatibility with Synology’s wider surveillance ecosystem, including its upcoming cloud-based surveillance platform. But why has Synology changed it’s stance on camera license requirements with this new series?

What Changed in Synology Cameras and the License Requirements?

Synology’s camera licensing policy has changed for part of its 2026 camera generation. The BC510, TC510, and BC800Z are now listed by Synology as requiring a Surveillance Device License, with Synology’s license documentation stating that these models require 1 license per camera. This means these Synology-branded cameras are now treated in the same basic licensing structure as regular IP cameras, where each camera consumes 1 available Surveillance Station camera license.

This is a significant change because Synology’s own cameras previously had a clear licensing advantage inside Surveillance Station. Earlier Synology camera models were positioned as first-party devices that worked directly with the platform without the need to buy an additional camera license. For users building a Synology-based surveillance setup, that made the cameras easier to justify even when comparable third-party ONVIF cameras were available at lower prices. The camera, platform integration, AI features, and license position were effectively part of the same value proposition.

With the 2026 generation, that arrangement has changed for the BC510, TC510, and BC800Z. Users will now need to account for the cost of a Surveillance Device License when deploying these cameras beyond the default licenses included with their Synology NAS, NVR, or DVA system. Synology NAS systems generally include 2 default licenses, Network Video Recorder systems include 4, and Deep Learning NVR systems include 8. Any deployment that exceeds the available default license count will require additional license packs, just as it would when adding third-party IP cameras or other supported surveillance devices.

Device Type		License Units	Example	License required
Synology Cameras		Per camera	BC510, TC510, BC800Z	1
		Per camera	BC500, TC500	0
Synology LiveCam		Per device	Synology LiveCam app	1
Regular IP camera		Per camera	AXIS P1347	1
Panoramic (fisheye)		Per camera	AXIS M3007	1
Multi-lens	Fixed lens	Per camera	ArecontVision AV8185DN	1
	Fixed lenses with independent IP	Per channel	AXIS Q3709-PVE	3
	Removable lens	Per channel	AXIS F44	5
Video server		Per channel	Vivotek VS8801	8
I/O module		Per device	AXIS A9188	1
Intercom		Per device	AXIS A8105-E	1
IP speaker		Per device	AXIS C3003-E	1
Access controller (door)		Per device	AXIS A1001	1
Transaction device (POS)		Per device	–	2

According to Synology’s stated position around the new generation, the decision is connected to broader deployment flexibility. The BC510 and TC510 are being introduced not only as cameras for Surveillance Station, but also as devices designed to work across multiple surveillance environments. Synology states that these cameras support deployment within the native Synology ecosystem, third-party NVR and VMS infrastructures through ONVIF, and its upcoming cloud-based surveillance platform. In that context, Synology appears to be separating the camera hardware from the Surveillance Station license entitlement, rather than treating the license as implicitly bundled with the camera.

The advantage Synology presents is that this approach allows the cameras to be used more flexibly outside Synology-only deployments. In theory, a lower hardware price can reduce the entry cost for users who want to deploy the cameras in third-party systems, where a Synology Surveillance Station license would not be relevant. For mixed environments, installers, managed service providers, or businesses migrating between platforms, the cameras can be positioned as ONVIF-capable AI cameras rather than hardware tied primarily to a Synology NAS or NVR. Synology’s argument is therefore less about removing value from Surveillance Station users, and more about aligning the cameras with wider interoperability, third-party infrastructure support, and future cloud surveillance services.

Which Cameras are Affected, and What About Older Synology Cameras?

The affected 2026 Synology camera models listed as requiring a Surveillance Device License are the BC800Z, BC510, and TC510. The BC800Z is the higher-end 8MP model with PoE connectivity, optical zoom coverage, longer night vision range, IP66/IP67/IK10 protection, a 5-year warranty, and additional analytics such as License Plate Recognition and Smoke Detection. The BC510 and TC510 are 5MP PoE cameras, offered in bullet and turret designs respectively, with 2880×1620 resolution, 30 FPS video, a 110° horizontal field of view, 30 m night vision, people and vehicle detection, intrusion detection, audio detection, tampering detection, motion detection, people and vehicle counting, Instant Search, and people-based auto tracking. The CC400W is not listed as requiring a Surveillance Device License, and remains separate from the licensing change affecting the BC800Z, BC510, and TC510.

At this stage, the licensing change appears to apply to the newer 2026 generation models listed by Synology, rather than being presented as a wider retrospective change across all previous Synology cameras. Older Synology camera models are less prominent on Synology’s current product pages following the arrival of the refreshed range, so the long-term public positioning of those older models is less clear from the current camera comparison material. Based on the available details, there is no indication in the supplied information that previously released Synology cameras are being newly reclassified in the same way, but buyers and existing users should still check the official Synology Camera Support List and license documentation for their exact model before expanding or changing a deployment.

Why Has Synology Made This Decision?

Synology’s stated reasoning appears to centre on making its newer cameras more flexible across different deployment environments. The BC510 and TC510 are being positioned not only as Surveillance Station cameras, but also as cameras for third-party NVR and VMS systems through ONVIF, as well as Synology’s upcoming cloud-based surveillance platform. By separating the camera hardware from the Surveillance Station license entitlement, Synology can sell the cameras into environments where a bundled Surveillance Station license would not be useful, while also lowering the hardware entry price for users who are not deploying them directly with Synology’s own platform. There may also be a wider commercial consideration around Synology’s position as a Taiwanese camera manufacturer. In some government, education, public sector, and official institutional deployments, the country of origin of surveillance hardware can be a factor in procurement, security review, and long-term platform approval.

This may give Synology an advantage over some Chinese-made camera brands, particularly in environments where hardware from certain vendors is harder to approve or deploy. In that context, Synology may see an opportunity to position the BC510, TC510, and BC800Z as more broadly deployable surveillance cameras for institutions that want ONVIF-compatible hardware without relying on brands that may face additional scrutiny. For Synology-only users, however, the practical result is different: the license cost now needs to be considered separately when adding the BC510, TC510, or BC800Z to a deployment that has already used its default license allowance. This does not remove the cameras’ first-party integration benefits, edge AI features, or official support inside the Synology ecosystem, but it does change the overall value calculation compared with older Synology cameras that did not require a separate Surveillance Device License.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Ce tutoriel explique comment installer Sync-in sur un NAS Synology à l'aide de Docker, en effectuant le lien avec les données existantes sur le NAS.

Le post Comment installer Sync-in sur un NAS Synology ? a été publié sur IT-Connect.

UGREEN NASync Celebrates 2 Years – But Is UGREEN Ready for the Big Leagues?

Two years ago, the popular battery and PC accessory company UGREEN, launched their Kickstarter campaign for the NASync personal NAS series of devices. The brand already had a steadily growing foothold in China with their DX series of NAS devices, but were still a huge outsider in the world of NAS globally. Fast forward two years, a $6 Million crowdfunding campaign, 6 new NAS releases, a new NAS kickstarter in progress (the IDX6011 AI NAS) and generally undermining long-time players who have been in the NAS market for more than a decade – UGREEN is looking like quite a beast in the world of NAS! But two years, UGREEN now finds that along with an increased market position also comes increased demand, scrutiny and expectation. I went to Shenzhen, China, to speak directly with the teams who direct and create their NASync division to ask them them questions about the development of this series, lessons that were learnt, where they are going and what they still need to do to further establish their position in the turnkey NAS market.

Full Disclosure – this Q&A has NOT been sponsored, subsidised or creatively controlled by UGREEN. These questions are my own, submitted to UGREEN 48 hours prior to the interview, and the answers provided were directly from their team.

UGREEN was already a well-established company in its own right before it expanded into NAS systems. So, currently, what is the scale of the teams and resources that your company has allocated to this? R&D, Design, Development, Technical Support, etc?

UGREEN put together its NAS team back in 2018, released its first NAS product in China in 2021, and went global for the first time in 2024, bringing its NAS products to markets around the world. NAS is one of the company’s key strategic product lines, with a team of several hundred people working on it—including product, R&D, design, testing, security, and more. This doesn’t count shared support teams like industrial design, legal, or finance; we’re only talking about people directly focused on NAS. In this whole building, every floor is filled with NAS team members—except for the third floor, which is just the cafeteria.

What has been the biggest challenge in the continued development of your NASync/UGOS services in these last 2 years?

One challenge is resource allocation. We need to support international users at the same time, which means balancing different priorities and expectations. Another challenge is localization. It’s not just about language, but also understanding different user behaviors and usage scenarios. So we had to spend a lot more time to research and validate what users actually need in each region. Based on that, we’ve been continuously adjusting our product direction and improving UGOS to better fit a global audience. It’s definitely an ongoing process, but it’s helped us build a much clearer understanding of the market.

Two years on from your initial crowdfunding, your position in the ‘turnkey NAS market’ from comparative obscurity has catapulted to effectively being in the top 5 (if not top 3) – What do you think UGREEN have brought to the market (or change in the market as a whole) that caused this?

There are a few key things behind that.

Hardware DNA, Built for AI

UGREEN is a hardware company at heart. With our NAS products, we insist on solid hardware—high-performance CPUs, ample memory, high-performance CPUs and ample memory—not just for reliability, but for computing power. AI NAS demands serious performance. Without a strong hardware foundation, AI is nothing more than a concept. Our hardware is designed to make AI run stable and fast.

User-Centric, Not Just a Slogan

We’ve always put ourselves in our users’ shoes. We listen to every voice—on social media, in forums, through user interviews. Many of our features, like snapshots and SAN Manager, came directly from users telling us, “I need this.” Our products aren’t built in a vacuum; they’re shaped together with you.

R&D Investment, Bringing NAS to Everyone

We established our software R&D team, including an AI pre-research team, early on. User feedback has driven us to keep investing, with one goal in mind: to shorten the learning curve. NAS shouldn’t be just a toy for tech enthusiasts. We believe the future of NAS is for everyone—simple, smart, and accessible. This is the path we’re on, and it’s one we want to walk together with you.

The UGREEN IDX6011 AI NAS series has been in development for a long time, and will be headed to its own crowdfunding campaign shortly. What was the biggest challenge you faced in its development and/or lesson that you learned about this new profile of solution?

The biggest challenge was finding the right balance between AI capabilities and real user value. It’s relatively easy to add AI features from a technical perspective, but making them actually useful, stable, and well-integrated into everyday workflows is much harder. Especially on a NAS, NAS is essentially a local storage product, everything runs locally, so for us, it was important that AI features also run locally. But hardware resources and compute power are limited. So the question is, how do we build useful and stable AI features without affecting NAS core functionality like storage, backup and overall system performance? That’s very difficult.

And from product design perspective，it’s also challenging to define the right AI use cases. It’s not about adding more AI features, but making sure they are scenario-driven and actually solve real problems, like better file organization, smarter search, easier intraction… We need to keep the experience simple. Many users are still new to AI on a NAS, so we wanna make things natural and do not add extra complexity. So right now, we’re still in the process of refining and validating these ideas, and making sure we deliver something that’s both practical and reliable for users.

I think it would be fair to say that UGREEN has chiefly focused on Desktop NAS server ownership in their portfolio of solutions to date. But have you explored rackmount solutions, and/or is this something that could happen in the near future?

Actually we’ve done some internal research on rackmount solutions, it’s quite different from desktop NAS in terms of target audience, hardware, software and sales. So it’s not just an extension of what we’re doing now, it requires a different product strategy. For now, our focus is still on improving and expanding our desktop NAS lineup, in the short term, we don’t have a concrete plan for rackmount products, but it’s something we’ll continue to evaluate over time.

Now that UGREEN is a largely established player in the turnkey NAS market, there is a lot more scrutiny on the extent to which your brand preemptively prepares against cyber security threats. What is UGREEN doing to address (in terms of foundations on this platform and broader services) this to avoid a potential slow moving snowballing security incident?

Security is something we take very seriously. At the product level, we provide a range of built-in security features. For example, users can enable DoS protection to defend against network attacks, automatically block IP addresses after multiple failed login attempts, and set up firewall rules to control access from specific IP addresses and built-in Security app to scan for suspicious files We also have a dedicated internal security team and a well-established vulnerability handling process, so critical issues can be identified and resolved quickly. We also provide a vulnerability reporting channel on our official website. If users discover any potential security issues, they can report them to us, and we will assess and respond accordingly.

(Below is a snippet of the Security Disclosure page from UGREEN, available HERE)

At CES 2026, UGREEN unveiled its surveillance platform and edge AI cameras. At that time, your team was kind enough to allow me to see the early development of your NAS surveillance application that will allow full management, direct control and storage of these new Surveillance services. Is development still continuing on this and will this be a service that existing NASync owners will have access to in the future

Yes, development is still ongoing. The surveillance platform you saw at CES is actually a part we are exploring, and is still under active development. From what I understand, AIOT is a broad ecosystem that is going to feature ai NAS, ai-based home security cameras, and many more AI-empowered hardware devices for a smarter lifestyle. On the NAS side, we’re also building our own surveillance application for NASync. We plan to launch it within this year. In terms of compatibility, we aim to support both UGREEN cameras and third-party cameras, so users have more flexibility to build their setup. So overall, both sides are moving forward, but they are different products within the UGREEN ecosystem.

In the last year, UGREEN released two ARM RK chip-powered NAS solutions in the DH2300 and DH4300 – How easy/hard was scaling UGOS onto this more modest hardware base, and were there any useful lessons learned that have benefited your NAS development as a whole?

DH series is our entry-level lineup, designed mainly for NAS beginners and users with simpler needs. From a technical perspective, running UGOS on an ARM-based platform is definitely more constrained compared to x86, especially in terms of performance and resource availability. A lot of things can’t just be directly carried over, we need to re-adapt them for the ARM architecture, including the kernel, system services, and many core features. So we had to be more selective and thoughtful about which features to include and how to optimize them. And from a product perspective, it actually helped us become more focused. With the DXP series, we already emphasized user-friendliness, but with the DH series, we really wanted to take that further and make it as simple as possible, essentially positioning it as a user’s first NAS.

So in practice, we streamlined certain features based on the hardware and target users. For example, we simplified or did not include things like virtual machines and some AI capabilities, and instead focused on delivering a smooth and reliable core experience. One key lesson we learned is that not every product needs to do everything. It’s more important to match the right experience to the right user group. And that thinking has also helped us better define our overall NAS product lineup.

I canvased a large group of UGREEN NAS users (many of whom were part of your original Kickstarter campaign) who are still using their NASync systems to this day, and have followed you on your journey so far. I asked them which features or improvements they would like to see in future updates and revisions to UGOS. Are you able to share if these are features that are on the roadmap, or have been explored?

• Full Volume Encryption
• WORM support
• A mixed drive RAID storage system (comparable to Synology Hybrid RAID or Terramaster TRAID)
• A tiered storage system (unlike the copy system of ‘caching’, but a SSD+HDD composite pool that intelligently moves ‘hot’, ‘warm’ and ‘cold’ data to appropriate storage areas)
• ZFS as a file system choice
• A native Plex Media Server Application
• A local client application for Mac/Windows for file pinning, streaming, intelligent 30-day deletion (see Synology Drive, QNAP Qsync, etc)
• A more comprehensive security scanner (eg scanning for unsecure open ports, SSH being open, weak passwords, admin accounts, auto blocks disabled, etc)

 

We’ve actually seen many of these requests from our users as well, these are very valuable suggestions and we’ve already had internal discussions around most of them. But many of these features, like full volume encryption, hybrid RAID, or tiered storage are quite complex, they take time to design, develop and validate, especially we wanted to make them stable and reliable.

So at this stage, we don’t have a specific timeline we can share yet. But these are definitely things we take seriously, and we’ll plan them carefully based on user demand and overall product direction. If we see strong demand from users, we’ll absolutely prioritize them accordingly.

Thank you to the team at UGREEN for their time in this interview. As mentioned, the answers about were provided in their entirety and without prejudice. This will be a video soon that covers this, the tour of the facilities, as well as further discussion around the IDX6011 NAS Kickstarter and how this has been managed.

 

Want to Support the work me and Eddie do at NASCompares? If you found this article helpful and are going to buy a UGREEN NAS from the brand’s official site or from Amazon, use the links below. Using these links will result in a small commission coming to us (which costs you nothing extra) and it allows us to keep doing what we do! Thank you for keeping the internet a fair and sustainable place!

Buy the UGREEN NAS from your local Amazon Store	Buy the UGREEN NAS solutions Directly from UGREEN.COM

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Depuis quelque temps, un mouvement de fond s’observe : un retour progressif vers les infrastructures locales. La raison ? Même s’il a de nombreux atouts, le Cloud ne coche plus toutes les cases dès que l’on parle de confidentialité des données, de latence ou simplement de coûts. C’est sur ce créneau que QNAP positionne son QAI-h1290FX. Un serveur de stockage pensé pour les charges de travail IA : LLM, architectures RAG, inférence en temps réel. Ici, il ne s’agit pas d’un simple NAS avec un logo IA collé dessus…

QNAP QAI-h1290FX

Le QAI-h1290FX est un boitier 12 baies SSD U.2 NVMe/SATA. Pas de disques rotatifs ici, on est clairement dans le registre des IOPS élevées, indispensables pour alimenter des pipelines de données intensifs ou soutenir l’inférence en temps réel sans créer de goulot d’étranglement côté stockage. Il est animé par un AMD EPYC 7302P (16 cœurs / 32 threads) pouvant atteindre 3,3 GHz. A noter que ce processeur a obtenu 32 114 points selon PassMark. Ce dernier est épaulé par 128 Go de RAM RDIMM DDR4 ECC extensible jusqu’à 1 To (8 × 128 Go)

Le QAI-h1290FX n’est pas un NAS comme les autres. Il est compatible avec les cartes NVIDIA RTX, notamment la RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q, embarquant jusqu’à 96 Go de VRAM. Une capacité mémoire GPU qui change la donne pour quiconque veut faire tourner des LLM de taille respectable en local. La prise en charge de CUDA, TensorRT et du Transformer Engine vient confirmer l’orientation IA-first de la machine. On n’est pas sur un gadget, mais un outil capable d’accélérer des modèles de deep learning, de génération d’images ou de traitement du langage naturel.

Connectique

La connectivité est à la hauteur des ambitions du boîtier :

• 3 ports USB 3.0
• 2 ports réseau 2,5 Gb/s
• 2 ports réseau 25 Gb/s en SFP28

A noter la présence de 4 emplacements PCIe (3* Gen 4 x16 et 1* Gen 4 x8)

QuTS hero et l’écosystème logiciel

Côté système, on est sur du QuTS hero, basé sur ZFS. On retrouve les fonctionnalités attendues pour un usage professionnel : déduplication, snapshots, intégrité des données. Rien de révolutionnaire pour les habitués de la gamme… Container Station et Virtualization Station permettent de gérer des environnements bénéficiant d’un accès direct au GPU, ce qui permet aux équipes de déployer des modèles sans friction et sans reconfiguration complexe.

Plusieurs outils populaires dans l’écosystème IA open source sont préinstallés :

• AnythingLLM, OpenWebUI, Ollama : pour monter rapidement un LLM privé ;
• vLLM* : moteur d’inférence LLM ;
• Stable Diffusion*, ComfyUI* : pour la génération d’images ;
• n8n* : pour l’automatisation et les workflows sans code.

C’est une approche « prêt à l’emploi » qui tranche avec les serveurs IA nus que l’on retrouve chez certains concurrents.

En synthèse

Le QNAP QAI-h1290FX est un serveur de stockage conçu de bout en bout pour répondre aux besoins d’IA on-premise. L’alliance d’un stockage full-flash NVMe, d’un processeur EPYC et d’une compatibilité GPU NVIDIA en fait une plateforme intéressante pour les entreprises qui souhaitent reprendre la main sur leur stratégie IA (sans dépendre du cloud ou exposer leurs données).

Les logiciels faciles à installer (Ollama, OpenWebUI, n8n…) abaissent la barrière à l’entrée, ce qui est un point fort pour les équipes IT non spécialisées. Reste à connaître son prix et la date de disponibilité…

* en cours d’intégration

Avec le ZimaCube 2, IceWhale ambitionne de bousculer le marché des NAS. Fini le simple boîtier que l’on installe dans un coin pour stocker ses données. Le fabricant veut transformer le NAS en un véritable serveur domestique polyvalent, capable de gérer le stockage, la domotique, mais aussi des usages plus avancés comme l’IA en local…

ZimaCube 2

Le ZimaCube 2 est un boîtier avec 6 baies pouvant recevoir des SSD et disques durs 3,5 pouces. À cela s’ajoutent 4 emplacements M.2 NVMe. Le système (voir ci-dessous) est préinstallé sur un SSD interne de 256 Go et sur un autre emplacement dédié. Ce nouveau NAS est construit autour d’un processeur Intel Core de 12e génération (Core i3 ou Core i5) épaulé par de la mémoire DDR5.

3 configurations = 3 usages

La gamme se décline en 3 modèles :

• ZimaCube 2 est un boitier gris avec un Core i3-1215U et 8 Go de DDR5
• ZimaCube 2 Pro est un boitier noir avec un Core i5-1235U et 16 Go DDR5
• Creator Pack identique au Pro avec 64 Go DDR5, 1 To de NVMe et une NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000

Pour rappel, l’Intel Core i3-1215U a obtenu un score Passmark de 10 196 points. De son côté, l’Intel Core i5-1235U a obtenu 12 595 points.

Connectique

Pour les interfaces de connexion, le ZimaCube 2 propose:

• À l’avant : 3 ports USB 3.0 (dont 1 Type-C), 1 sortie audio 3,5 mm ;
• À l’arrière : 2 ports USB 3.0, 2 ports Thunderbolt 4, 1 sortie HDMI 2.0, 1 sortie DP 1.4, 2 ports réseau 2,5 Gb/s.

Les modèles Pro et Creator Pack disposent également d’un port réseau 10 Gb/s.

Le NAS dispose également de 2 emplacements PCIe (PCIe 4.0 x16 et PCIe 3.0 x8), permettant d’installer une carte graphique, un accélérateur IA ou encore une carte réseau supplémentaire.

ZimaOS

Le système maison se nomme ZimaOS (intégration native de CasaOS). Il est basé sur un Linux Debian et Docker. Il propose une boutique d’applications (800 différentes) permettant de déployer en un clic Plex, Jellyfin, Immich, Nextcloud, Home Assistant… Le gestionnaire de fichiers regroupe NAS local, stockage cloud et périphériques USB dans une même interface.

Pour les utilisateurs qui le souhaitent, TrueNAS, Proxmox, ou Unraid sont compatibles sur ce matériel.

Prix et disponibilités

Les machines sont disponibles dès maintenant sur shop.zimaspace.com :

• ZimaCube 2 = 681,70€
• ZimaCube 2 Pro = 1 108,30€
• Creator Pack = 2 132,13€

Un positionnement tarifaire intéressant, au regard des solutions concurrentes… À voir si le public sera au rendez-vous !

source

New UniFi UDM Beast, Enterprise FG Core, Enterprise 100G and Enterprise S Revealed

At NAB 2026 in Las Vegas, Ubiquiti Inc. showcased a number of rackmount UniFi devices that have not yet been formally announced or released. These systems were presented alongside existing products, making it necessary to distinguish between current hardware and what appears to be forthcoming or experimental equipment. The devices observed represent a noticeable increase in port density, throughput capability, and overall positioning compared to the current UniFi lineup.

Four specific devices stand out from this showcase: the UniFi Dream Machine Beast, the Enterprise Fortress Gateway Core, the Enterprise 100G switch, and the Enterprise S PoE switch. Based on available observations and supporting information, these products appear to form a cohesive expansion of the UniFi ecosystem into higher-performance enterprise and datacenter environments. However, specifications remain unconfirmed and should be considered provisional until officially published.

UniFi Dream Machine BEAST – A 25GbE UDM!

The UniFi Dream Machine BEAST appears to be a significant evolution of the existing Dream Machine platform, extending beyond the capabilities of current models such as the UniFi Dream Machine Pro Max. Based on observed hardware, this device integrates substantially higher port density, particularly in 10G and 25G connectivity, while also introducing onboard storage via dual SATA bays. This suggests a continued emphasis on combining routing, switching, and application hosting within a single appliance, including UniFi OS services such as Protect and other controller-based functions.

Compared to previous Dream Machine models, the BEAST shifts closer toward an enterprise-focused deployment, particularly in environments requiring direct multi-gigabit connectivity without reliance on additional aggregation switches. However, key system details such as CPU architecture, memory capacity, and throughput performance remain unconfirmed. The absence of official documentation indicates that this device is still in a pre-release or prototype stage, and its final positioning within the UniFi portfolio is not yet defined.

UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway Core – Truly Enterprise

The UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway Core appears to extend the capabilities of the existing UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway into a significantly higher performance tier. While the current Enterprise Fortress Gateway is already positioned as a high-end UniFi routing platform, the Core variant introduces substantially greater port density and bandwidth, including support for 100G connectivity. This suggests a shift from traditional edge gateway roles toward deployment in core or aggregation layers within larger enterprise or datacenter environments.

The observed hardware indicates a design focused on high-throughput routing and multi-layer network integration, with a combination of 10G copper, 25G SFP28, and 100G QSFP28 interfaces. This represents a notable departure from existing UniFi gateway designs, which typically rely on lower port counts and external switching for aggregation. As with the Dream Machine BEAST, critical specifications such as processing architecture, memory configuration, and pricing remain undisclosed, reinforcing the likelihood that this device is still in a pre-release stage.

UniFi Enterprise 100G – Next-Level Connections

The UniFi Enterprise 100G appears to be a high-density aggregation or spine switch designed for environments requiring large-scale bandwidth distribution. Its configuration, centered around 25G access ports and 100G uplinks, aligns with common leaf-spine architectures used in enterprise and datacenter networks. Within the current UniFi portfolio, the closest comparison would be aggregation-focused switches such as the UniFi Switch Enterprise Aggregation, although the observed specifications of this device significantly exceed existing models in both port count and total throughput capacity.

This device is likely intended for deployment deeper within network infrastructure rather than at the edge, acting as a central switching layer connecting multiple high-speed access or distribution switches. The combination of 48 × 25G and 6 × 100G ports suggests a focus on scalability and backbone connectivity rather than end-device access. As with the other devices observed, no official documentation, pricing, or detailed hardware specifications have been released, and its final role within the UniFi ecosystem remains unconfirmed.

UniFi Enterprise S – PoE Powerhouse

The UniFi Enterprise S appears to be a high-density access switch focused on multi-gigabit connectivity and high-power PoE delivery. Its configuration combines a large number of 2.5G and 10G copper ports, all supporting PoE+++, alongside 25G uplinks for upstream connectivity. Within the current UniFi lineup, there is no direct equivalent, although products such as the UniFi Switch Pro XG 48 PoE operate in a similar space with lower overall port density and more limited PoE capability. The Enterprise S extends this concept by standardising high-power PoE across all access ports.

This design suggests deployment in environments with dense endpoint requirements, including wireless access points, cameras, and AV equipment, where both bandwidth and power delivery are critical. The combination of 2.5G and 10G ports allows for flexibility across different device classes, while the inclusion of 25G uplinks supports integration into higher-speed aggregation layers. As with the other devices observed, there is no confirmed information regarding total power budget, internal hardware, or release timeline, and the device should be considered pre-release.

---

The four devices observed at NAB 2026 indicate a broader shift in the UniFi portfolio toward higher-performance networking tiers. Collectively, they introduce increased port density, support for 25G and 100G connectivity, and in some cases, significantly expanded power delivery capabilities. Compared to currently available products such as the UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway and UniFi Dream Machine Pro Max, these systems represent a move beyond traditional edge and SMB-focused deployments into roles typically associated with enterprise core, aggregation, and high-density access layers.

However, all four devices remain unannounced and lack confirmed specifications, pricing, and release timelines. As a result, their final positioning and availability cannot be determined with certainty. While the observed hardware suggests a structured expansion into a more complete end-to-end networking stack, any conclusions remain provisional until formal details are released by Ubiquiti Inc..

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

New QNAP TS-xh66TX SERIES – Intel i3, USB4, 2x 10GbE, M.2/E1.S, SATA, U.2, PCIe and MORE

QNAP’s TS h666TX, TS h866TX and TS h966TX arrive at a point where the company’s tower portfolio has had a fairly visible split between mainstream QTS systems such as the TS 464 and TS 664, and higher tier QuTS hero models such as the TVS h674. The older TS x64 family remains relevant, but those systems are built around the Intel Celeron N5095 with DDR4 memory and a lower ceiling for memory expansion, while the TVS h674 moves into a more performance led and more expensive part of the range with desktop class Intel Core processors and QuTS hero support. Against that backdrop, a new ZFS focused series with Intel Core i3 1215U, DDR5 memory, integrated 10GbE and USB4 has a clear role in the lineup, at least on paper.

That is also why these systems are likely to attract attention from buyers who want more than the current TS 464 or TS 664 can offer, but who may not need, or want to pay for, a TVS h674 class solution. The i3 1215U itself is a 6 core, 8 thread mobile processor with 2 Performance cores, 4 Efficient cores and boost speeds up to 4.40 GHz, which places it well above the older Celeron class hardware used in the TS x64 generation. Combined with QuTS hero’s ZFS platform and the broader move toward hybrid HDD and SSD storage layouts, these new TS h66xTX models appear designed to address demand for a more modern mid range NAS that balances file services, high speed networking and SSD aware storage without immediately stepping into QNAP’s more workstation style hero systems.

Specification	TS-h666TX	TS-h866TX	TS-h966TX
CPU	Intel Core i3-1215U	Intel Core i3-1215U	Intel Core i3-1215U
Memory	8GB DDR5, up to 64GB	8GB DDR5, up to 64GB	8GB DDR5, up to 64GB
SATA Bays	4 x 3.5-inch	6 x 3.5-inch	5 x 3.5-inch
SSD Bays	2 x E1.S / M.2 NVMe 2280	2 x E1.S / M.2 NVMe 2280	4 x U.2 / SATA 2.5-inch
Network	2 x 10GbE	2 x 10GbE	1 x 10GbE, 1 x 2.5GbE
USB	2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4	2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4	2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4
PCIe Expansion	1 x PCIe Gen 3 x4	1 x PCIe Gen 3 x4	None listed

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Design & Storage

The clearest design distinction in this series is that QNAP is not treating all 3 models as simple capacity variants of the same enclosure. The TS h666TX and TS h866TX appear to share the same newer tower styling, with the standard 3.5 inch bays on the front and a separate area for the solid state media, while the TS h966TX moves into the denser mixed media format that QNAP has used before on some of its hybrid hero systems. That already places the range closer to a purpose built QuTS hero family than a straightforward update of the older TS 464 and TS 664, which used a more conventional compact tower layout with 4 or 6 HDD bays and 2 internal M.2 slots rather than externally accessible SSD facing bays.

From a storage layout perspective, the TS h666TX and TS h866TX are the more direct and easier models to position. They combine either 4 or 6 SATA HDD bays with 2 additional E1.S or M.2 NVMe capable bays, effectively giving each system a built in hybrid structure for HDD capacity and SSD tiering or fast pool allocation. That is a notable step away from the TS 464 and TS 664 approach, where the SSD element is present but still secondary, with 2 x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3 x1 slots intended mainly for caching or separate SSD storage rather than being presented as a more central part of the overall bay count.

The TS h966TX is the more unusual model in the group because it uses a 5 plus 4 arrangement, with 5 SATA HDD bays and 4 U.2 or SATA 2.5 inch bays. In practical terms, that design is less about scaling raw HDD capacity and more about offering a denser mixed media platform for users who want heavier SSD integration without moving into a full flash chassis. That layout is more in line with some of QNAP’s existing hybrid hero systems, where ZFS storage is paired with a more deliberate split between bulk HDD storage and higher speed SSD media, rather than the simpler HDD plus cache model seen in entry and lower mid range systems.

This is also where the new series starts to sit in a more defined position between the TS x64 range and the TVS h674 class. The TS 464 and TS 664 are still marketed as compact and affordable towers with M.2 support, but their storage design remains closer to mainstream SMB and prosumer use. The TVS h674, by comparison, is a 6 bay QuTS hero platform with 2 x M.2 NVMe slots and a much more traditional premium desktop NAS structure, focused on higher end ZFS deployment and PCIe expansion. The TS h666TX and TS h866TX seem to introduce a middle route, where the chassis and bay layout are more SSD aware and more explicitly hybrid than the TS x64 generation, but without fully mirroring the larger TVS hero desktop approach.

Overall, the design language here suggests that QNAP is targeting users who want direct access to both hard drive and flash storage in a tower form factor without relying entirely on internal motherboard mounted SSD slots. For QuTS hero in particular, that matters because ZFS benefits from clearer separation of storage roles, whether for high speed pools, application storage, read intensive workloads or automated tiering as QNAP continues to develop Qtier support in its ZFS platform. As a result, the storage design of the TS h666TX, TS h866TX and TS h966TX is not just a matter of adding more bays, but of shifting the product family toward more structured hybrid storage deployment than the older TS 464 and TS 664 offered.

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Internal Hardware

Internally, the most important shift in this series is the move to Intel Core i3 1215U. This is a 6 core, 8 thread processor with a hybrid layout of 2 Performance cores and 4 Efficient cores, up to 4.40 GHz boost, and a 15 W base power profile. In broad terms, that puts it above the Intel Celeron N5095 used in the TS 464 and TS 664 generation, which is a 4 core, 4 thread chip with a lower performance ceiling and no hybrid core structure. For a QuTS hero platform, that matters because ZFS services, snapshots, background data operations, deduplication related overhead where applicable, and multi user file handling all benefit from having more CPU headroom than the older Celeron class systems can typically provide.

Memory is the other clear upgrade point. According to the revealed specification, all 3 systems arrive with 8GB DDR5 and support expansion up to 64GB. That is a substantial change in class compared with the TS 464, which uses DDR4 and officially tops out at 16GB, and it aligns more closely with the expectations of a ZFS based system where memory capacity can have a direct effect on caching behaviour, data services and overall responsiveness under heavier workloads. It does not place these models at the same level as QNAP’s higher end QuTS hero hardware with larger default memory pools or ECC focused enterprise positioning, but it does move them noticeably beyond the entry and lower mid range segment.

That leaves these systems in an interesting middle position when compared with the TVS h674. The TVS h674 is still the more powerful desktop hero system overall, with Intel Core desktop CPUs such as the Core i5 12400 or Core i3 12100 depending on configuration, higher default memory allocations, and a more overtly performance focused design. At the same time, the new TS h666TX, TS h866TX and TS h966TX seem to be aiming for a more efficient balance of modern CPU architecture, ZFS support and hybrid storage flexibility without moving fully into that higher cost workstation style category. In other words, the internal hardware does not suggest a direct replacement for the TVS h674, but it does suggest a clear move away from the older TS x64 class and toward a more serious mid tier hero platform.

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Ports and Connectivity

Connectivity is one of the areas where this series separates itself most clearly from the older TS x64 generation. The TS h666TX and TS h866TX both combine 2 x 10GbE with 2 x USB 10Gb/s and 2 x USB4, alongside a PCIe Gen 3 x4 expansion slot. That is a substantial step forward from systems such as the TS 464, which provides 2 x 2.5GbE as standard and relies on PCIe expansion if higher bandwidth networking is needed. In practical terms, that means the new h66xTX models are being positioned for multi user editing, faster backup windows and direct attached workflows in a way that the mainstream TS line was not originally built around.

The inclusion of USB4 is particularly relevant here because QNAP has already used this kind of connectivity in creator focused products such as the TVS h674T, where Thunderbolt 4 is presented as a direct host connection option for Mac and Windows systems. While QNAP will still need to confirm the exact implementation and host workflow support on these new NAB 2026 systems, the presence of 2 x USB4 on all 3 models suggests that direct high bandwidth connection is a deliberate part of their design, rather than a secondary feature. That places these units closer to QNAP’s media and production focused hardware than to the more general office and home NAS segment.

The TS h966TX is slightly different, and arguably less aggressive, in its network configuration. Instead of the dual 10GbE arrangement of the h666TX and h866TX, the h966TX is listed with 1 x 10GbE and 1 x 2.5GbE, while still retaining 2 x USB 10Gb/s and 2 x USB4. That means the 9 bay model has the most storage flexibility in the family, but not the strongest network specification on paper. If that specification is accurate at launch, it makes the h966TX a more storage led hybrid platform rather than the highest bandwidth model in the group, which is not the usual assumption buyers would make when looking at the largest chassis first.

Specification:
TS h666TX: 2 x 10GbE, 2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4, 1 x PCIe Gen 3 x4
TS h866TX: 2 x 10GbE, 2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4, 1 x PCIe Gen 3 x4
TS h966TX: 1 x 10GbE, 1 x 2.5GbE, 2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Price and Release Date

At the time of writing, QNAP does not appear to have published final retail pricing or a formal product page for the TS h666TX, TS h866TX or TS h966TX on its main product catalogue or 2026 newsroom pages, so both availability and price should still be treated as unconfirmed. Based on the information shared at NAB 2026, the current indication is a target launch window around Q2 to Q3 2026, but that remains provisional until QNAP publishes official listings, regional store pages or a formal press release. QNAP’s own 2026 newsroom and product comparison pages currently show no live retail entry for these 3 systems, which supports the view that the series is still in the pre release stage rather than being commercially available now. In pricing terms, the most reasonable expectation is that this range will sit above the TS x64 family and below the TVS h74 class, assuming QNAP keeps the rest of its tower lineup structured in the same way. The TS 464 is still positioned by QNAP as a mainstream high performance tower option in its 2026 buying guide, while the current TVS h674 remains a more premium QuTS hero desktop platform with stronger CPU options and a generally higher specification tier. Given that the new TS h666TX and TS h866TX introduce QuTS hero, DDR5, Intel Core i3 1215U, integrated 10GbE and USB4, they would logically land between those 2 product families rather than alongside either one directly.

That said, the TS h966TX may prove harder to price neatly because its storage configuration is more specialised than the other 2 models. Its 5 plus 4 hybrid layout, mixed 10GbE and 2.5GbE networking, and heavier SSD oriented design could place it closer to existing hybrid hero systems in value, even if its processor remains the same. Until QNAP confirms MSRPs, any exact figure would be speculative, but the broader market position appears to be that these are intended as a mid tier QuTS hero tower family, not a direct budget replacement for the TS 464 and TS 664, and not a full substitute for the TVS h674 or TVS h674T either.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

UGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Which Should You Buy?

The UniFi UNAS 4 and the UGREEN DH4300 Plus are being compared because they currently occupy a very similar part of the 4-bay NAS market, with both systems targeting buyers who want a relatively affordable turnkey storage solution with 2.5GbE connectivity, modern desktop design, and a lower entry price than many traditional NAS brands. On paper, they are close enough in price to be direct alternatives, but in practice they approach NAS deployment very differently. The UniFi UNAS 4 is built around tight integration with the wider UniFi ecosystem and focuses primarily on straightforward storage, backup, and remote file access, whereas the UGREEN DH4300 Plus is designed as a broader standalone NAS platform with more memory, a more powerful ARM processor, HDMI output, and a wider range of applications and services. That makes this comparison relevant not just because of the hardware and price overlap, but because each system reflects a different idea of what an entry to mid-range 4-bay NAS should be in 2026.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Brand vs Brand

Before I dig into which of the DH4300 or UNAS 4 is best for you, it is worth highlighting again that these are two comparatively new players in the NAS scene (compared with long time multi-decade vetrans such as Synology, QNAP, Asustor and Terramaster), so let’s talk about their priorities and focus at a brand level. Both UGREEN and UniFi have entered the NAS sector from distinct starting points and continue to move in different directions, each targeting a particular type of user. UniFi’s UNAS series delivers consistency, predictable performance, and dependable integration with the broader UniFi ecosystem. Its software is stable, lightweight, and well-suited to users who prioritize straightforward storage management, reliable data handling, and unified control across routers, switches, and surveillance systems. While the hardware is limited to fixed ARM configurations and non-expandable memory, it is efficient, quiet, and designed for continuous operation with minimal maintenance. For organizations already invested in UniFi infrastructure, the UNAS systems provide a logical expansion that keeps management centralized and operational risk low. However, their value depends heavily on ecosystem synergy; outside of that environment, the systems remain competent but relatively inflexible standalone NAS options.

UGREEN’s NASync platform, on the other hand, appeals to users seeking broader performance capability and independence. Its x86-based models, upgradable memory, and open software environment allow it to serve as a hybrid between NAS and compact server, capable of running applications, containers, and virtual machines alongside storage tasks. The design language is more suited to individual or small business use than datacenter deployment, but the hardware range—from ARM to Core i5—covers a far wider performance spectrum than UniFi’s. Software maturity continues to evolve quickly, with new features added frequently, and the systems provide extensive compatibility with third-party clients and backup services. The trade-off is that long-term reliability and enterprise-level security validation are still developing.

Ultimately, UniFi NAS suits users who already rely on UniFi’s networking ecosystem and value simplicity, predictability, and centralized management, while UGREEN NAS caters to those prioritizing flexibility, compute power, and open software capability. Both brands have lowered the entry barrier into reliable NAS ownership, but they embody opposing philosophies: UniFi focuses on integration and control, whereas UGREEN emphasizes capability and independence.

Why Buy UniFi NAS?

Why Buy UGREEN NAS?

Ecosystem Integration: Seamlessly integrates with UniFi Network, Protect, and Access systems, allowing unified management through a single controller interface. Centralized Management: Designed for administrators managing multiple UniFi sites or devices, providing consistent firmware, remote access, and monitoring from one dashboard. Reliable, Efficient Design: ARM-based architecture ensures low power draw, cool operation, and stable long-term performance with minimal maintenance. Enterprise-Grade Networking: Equipped with up to dual 10G SFP+ and 10GBase-T ports, plus USP-RPS redundancy for professional deployments. Proven Security Framework: Benefits from Ubiquiti’s mature network security infrastructure, signed firmware updates, and NDAA-compliant hardware.

Superior Hardware Performance: Offers a full range from ARM to Intel Core i5 CPUs, with upgradable RAM, NVMe storage pools, and optional PCIe expansion. Versatile Software (UGOS Pro): Supports Docker, virtual machines, AI photo indexing, and multi-platform backups out of the box. All-in-One Standalone System: Functions independently without relying on an external ecosystem, ideal for users wanting a complete server in one unit. Advanced Connectivity: Includes 2.5 GbE and 10 GbE networking, USB 4/Thunderbolt 4, and support for direct-attached workflows like video editing or large-file transfer. Rapid Development and Updates: Frequent firmware releases continually add new features, broader hardware support, and improved backup and security options.

Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!

 

UGREEN DH4300 vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Design and Storage

From a physical design perspective, these 2 NAS systems take very different approaches. The UniFi UNAS 4 has a taller, narrower chassis with a more vertical layout, while the UGREEN DH4300 Plus uses a more cubic desktop design that will look more familiar to buyers coming from Synology, QNAP, or Asustor hardware. The UniFi system is also available in black or white, which gives it a more deliberate visual identity within the wider UniFi product range, whereas the UGREEN keeps to a more conventional single-finish enclosure. In both cases, the chassis material is primarily plastic, so neither is especially premium in material terms, but each is clearly trying to prioritize compactness and low manufacturing cost rather than metal construction.

The drive arrangement is also notably different. The UniFi UNAS 4 places its 4 SATA bays in the base of the chassis, with the drives inserted from underneath, while the UGREEN DH4300 Plus uses a top-loaded vertical bay arrangement hidden under a removable outer shell. Neither system uses a particularly enterprise-focused tray design, and neither is really built around frequent hot-swap use in the same way as more expensive rackmount or prosumer NAS systems. That said, the UniFi trays are easier to describe as straightforward click-in drive carriers, while the UGREEN trays feel more budget-oriented in construction and do not leave the same impression of robustness as more established NAS brands.

In storage flexibility, the UniFi has the more ambitious configuration. Alongside its 4 SATA bays, it also includes 2 dedicated M.2 NVMe slots for SSD cache. That gives it an advantage in hybrid storage architecture, since the hard drives can be used for capacity while the NVMe media handles read and write cache duties. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus does not include M.2 storage slots, so any SSD deployment has to consume one or more of the main SATA bays, which reduces total storage capacity. At the same time, UniFi currently limits those NVMe bays to cache use rather than general storage pools, so the practical advantage is still narrower than the raw hardware layout suggests.

The 2 brands also differ in RAID and storage management philosophy. The UGREEN supports a broader list of RAID modes, including JBOD, Basic, RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, which gives it more deployment flexibility for different user priorities around performance, redundancy, or simple linear storage. The UniFi platform supports RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, but its overall storage structure is more controlled and less flexible, with a stronger focus on a simplified single storage pool approach. For buyers who want fewer decisions and a cleaner setup process, that may be acceptable, but for users who want more granular control over how storage is arranged, the UGREEN is less restrictive.

In pure storage potential, the UGREEN is also easier to quantify because it officially supports up to 128TB across 4 bays using 32TB drives, whereas UniFi focuses more on supported drive compatibility and cache pairing than on headline raw capacity figures. The UniFi does have the practical advantage of SSD caching built in, which can improve responsiveness in repeated access and write-heavy workloads, but the UGREEN has the simpler storage proposition overall and does not tie part of its internal design to optional accessories such as UniFi’s separate M.2 tray approach. As a result, the UniFi has the more distinctive and technically layered storage design, while the UGREEN has the more conventional and broadly flexible one.

UniFi UNAS4 vs UGREEN DH 4300 – Internal Hardware & Connections

Internally, the UGREEN DH4300 Plus has the stronger hardware specification. It uses an 8-core Rockchip ARM processor based on Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores running at up to 2.0GHz, alongside 8GB of LPDDR4X memory and 32GB of eMMC for the system. By comparison, the UniFi UNAS 4 uses a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 processor at 1.7GHz with 4GB of memory. Both systems are clearly built around low-power ARM architecture rather than x86 processing, but the UGREEN has the more capable platform on paper and offers more headroom for multitasking, background services, and broader software functionality.

The UniFi system does, however, counter with a more unusual internal layout. In addition to its 4 SATA bays, it includes 2 M.2 NVMe slots dedicated to SSD cache, which gives it a storage acceleration feature that the UGREEN does not match natively. For users dealing with repeated file access, background synchronization, or burst-heavy write activity, that cache support has practical value. The UGREEN relies entirely on its 4 SATA bays for storage media, so although its CPU and memory are stronger, its internal storage architecture is less advanced in terms of tiered storage.

External connectivity is broader on the UGREEN. It includes 1x 2.5GbE LAN port, HDMI output at up to 4K 60Hz, 1x front USB 3.2 Gen 1 port at 5Gb/s, and 2 additional USB-A 5Gb/s ports. The UniFi UNAS 4 is much more limited, offering 1x 2.5GbE RJ45 port and 1x 5Gb/s USB-C port. This narrower I/O profile reflects the fact that UniFi has positioned the UNAS 4 as a focused network storage appliance rather than a multi-role NAS for media output, peripheral attachment, or application expansion. In direct hardware terms, the UGREEN is better equipped for users who expect more than basic file serving.

Power and deployment also separate these 2 systems. The UniFi UNAS 4 supports PoE+++ and includes a 90W PoE adapter, which allows both power and network connectivity over a single cable in supported environments. That is unusual in this part of the NAS market and makes it particularly relevant for users already invested in UniFi switching infrastructure or those deploying hardware in locations where simplified cabling matters. The UGREEN uses a more conventional external power arrangement, which is less distinctive but also less dependent on network infrastructure choices. Therefore, the UGREEN has the stronger internal compute hardware and broader physical connectivity, while the UniFi has the more specialized deployment advantage.

UGREEN DH4300 vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Software & Services

The biggest difference between these 2 NAS systems is not the chassis or the processor, but the software scope. The UniFi UNAS 4 runs UniFi Drive and is clearly built around a narrower storage-first brief, with support for SMB, NFS, snapshots, file encryption, Time Machine, share links, user groups, remote backup, cloud backup targets, and client apps. It covers the main NAS fundamentals expected by home users and small offices, but it does so within a more controlled environment that places simplicity and consistency ahead of feature breadth. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus, running UGOS Pro, aims much wider and includes not only file serving and backup tools, but also multimedia applications, container support, HDMI-based media playback, AI-assisted photo features, and broader service depth overall.

For pure storage management, UniFi Drive is cleaner and more focused, particularly for users who want the NAS to act primarily as private cloud storage, backup target, and centralized file repository. Its interface is built to align with the broader UniFi platform, and that gives it an advantage for users already running UniFi networking equipment and remote management tools. However, that same focus also means the UNAS 4 is less flexible as a general-purpose NAS. The UGREEN platform does not have the same ecosystem tie-in, but it operates more independently and gives the user more scope to use the system for different workloads beyond file storage.

Application support is where the gap becomes more obvious. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus supports Docker and has a noticeably broader service layer for media, backup, and user applications. That creates options for running third-party software, home media tools, and more customized services that simply are not part of the UniFi approach. The UniFi UNAS 4 does not currently try to compete in that area and instead presents itself as a dedicated NAS platform rather than an application host. For some users that will be a limitation, while for others it will be a benefit, because it reduces complexity and keeps the system centered on storage tasks rather than mixed workload experimentation.

In practical terms, the software decision comes down to whether the buyer values depth or focus. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus offers the broader NAS software experience and is better suited to users who want more features, more applications, and more ways to extend the system over time. The UniFi UNAS 4 offers the more controlled and storage-specific platform, with the clearest advantage appearing when it is deployed inside an existing UniFi environment. As a result, the UGREEN software stack is more versatile, while the UniFi software stack is more specialized.

UniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 NAS – Conclusion & Verdict

Taken as a whole, these 2 systems are aimed at a similar buyer in price terms, but they are not trying to solve the same problem in the same way. The UniFi UNAS 4 is a more specialized NAS that focuses on storage, backup, remote access, and integration within the UniFi ecosystem. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is a broader standalone NAS that gives the user more hardware resources, more software flexibility, and a wider overall role in the network. That difference matters more than the relatively small gap in price, because in day to day use they will appeal to different priorities. The UniFi UNAS 4 makes more sense for buyers who already use UniFi switches, gateways, and management tools, or for those who specifically want a NAS that stays focused on file storage instead of trying to become a media server or container host. Its built in NVMe cache support and PoE+++ deployment give it some useful differentiators, and its simpler software scope will suit users who want a more controlled experience. However, outside of the UniFi ecosystem, some of its strengths become less important, while its limitations in application support, connectivity, and hardware power become harder to ignore.

The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is the better fit for users who want a more traditional all-round NAS. It has the stronger CPU, more memory, broader external connectivity, more RAID options, HDMI output, Docker support, and a software platform with more room to scale into multimedia, backup variety, and third party services. It is the more capable choice for mixed home and small business use, particularly for buyers who are not tied to any specific network brand and want their NAS to handle more than just centralized storage. It is also the easier system to recommend to users comparing it against other established 4-bay NAS platforms in the same price bracket. So, in direct usage terms, the UniFi UNAS 4 is better for UniFi-centric deployments, cleaner storage-first use, and buyers who value NVMe caching and PoE-based installation. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is better for users who want stronger hardware, more software features, better connectivity, and a wider long term usage profile. If the question is which is the better pure value NAS for the largest number of users, the UGREEN DH4300 Plus is the stronger overall option. If the question is which fits better into a UniFi-led network and a simpler storage-focused role, the UniFi UNAS 4 is the more appropriate choice.

Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on Amazon @399	Buy the UniFi UNAS 4 on The UniFi Store for $379

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Choisir un NAS peut vite devenir un casse-tête. Entre les marques, les modèles, le nombre de baies, les performances, le RAID ou encore les usages possibles, il est facile de s’y perdre… et de faire un mauvais choix. Et pourtant, dans de nombreux cas, quelques critères suffisent pour trouver le modèle adapté à ses besoins.

Les erreurs les plus fréquentes

Avec le recul, on observe souvent les mêmes erreurs :

• Choisir un NAS trop puissant (et donc trop cher) par rapport à son usage ;
• Sous-estimer ses besoins en stockage ;
• Ne pas vérifier les fonctionnalités disponibles ;
• Négliger la sécurité ou la sauvegarde.

Résultat : un équipement mal exploité… ou qu’il faut remplacer plus tôt que prévu.

Les critères essentiels pour choisir un NAS

Plutôt que de se focaliser sur les fiches techniques, mieux vaut commencer par l’essentiel.

L’usage principal :

• Sauvegarde de fichiers
• Stockage de photos et vidéos
• Serveur multimédia (Plex, streaming)
• Usage avancé (Docker, virtualisation)

Pour moi, c’est LE critère le plus important.

Le nombre d’utilisateurs :

• 1 à 2 utilisateurs → NAS 2 baies
• Famille ou équipe → NAS 4 baies recommandé

Plus il y a d’utilisateurs, plus les besoins en performances et en stockage augmentent. Cela peut sembler évident, mais c’est souvent sous-estimé…

L’évolutivité

Un NAS est un investissement sur plusieurs années. Il est donc préférable de prévoir :

• un peu plus de capacité que nécessaire ;
• une solution évolutive (RAM, disques, extensions).

Anticiper permet d’éviter un remplacement prématuré !

En pratique

Dans la majorité des cas :

• Un NAS 2 baies suffit pour débuter ;
• Un NAS 4 baies apporte plus de confort et de sécurité ;
• Les fabricant comme Synology, QNAP, Asustor ou TerraMaster couvrent la plupart des besoins…

Il est inutile de viser trop haut dès le départ, mais de nombreux utilisateurs commencent avec un NAS 2 baies et un an après… passent sur le modèle 4 baies.

Vous cherchez un NAS ? Téléchargez le guide gratuit pour faire le bon choix en quelques minutes

Un guide pour aller plus loin

Pour vous aider à faire le bon choix rapidement, j’ai créé un guide complet complet : Choisir son NAS en 10 minutes. Ce guide reprend les bases, explique simplement les notions importantes et propose des recommandations concrètes selon votre profil.

Vous y trouverez notamment :

• Les points essentiels à vérifier ;
• Les erreurs à éviter ;
• Un tableau pour choisir rapidement ;
• Une checklist avant achat.

TÉLÉCHARGER LE GUIDE

Une newsletter (1 fois par mois)

J’en profite également pour lancer une newsletter Cachem. Une fois par mois, vous recevrez :

• Les actualités importantes autour des NAS ;
• Des conseils pratiques ;
• Du contenu exclusif réservé aux abonnés ;
• Une sélection de ressources utiles.

L’objectif reste le même : vous faire gagner du temps et éviter les erreurs.

Recevoir le guide gratuitement

Le guide est accessible gratuitement en vous inscrivant à la newsletter

Pour aller plus loin

Vous pouvez également consulter les guides déjà disponibles sur le site :

• Guide d’achat NAS
• Conseils pour bien choisir son NAS
• Comment choisir un NAS
• Meilleurs NAS : le comparatif complet

Comme toujours sur Cachem, l’objectif est de proposer des contenus simples, utiles et directement exploitables. Si ce guide peut vous éviter une erreur ou vous faire gagner du temps, alors il aura rempli son rôle.

What is the Synology BeeStation BST151-4T NAS?

The Synology BeeStation BST151-4T is a 4 TB single drive personal cloud device that sits somewhere between an external hard drive and a traditional NAS, targeting users who want centralized storage, photo backup, file syncing, and remote access without dealing with a conventional multi bay server setup. It follows the original BST150-4T BeeStation, first released in February 2024, and appears to be a light refresh of that earlier model rather than a full redesign. As with the first version, the focus is on quick deployment, simple management, and a more consumer friendly software experience, using Synology’s BeeStation platform instead of the broader and more configurable DSM system found on the company’s standard NAS lineup.

Synology BeeStation BST151-4T Hardware Specifications

At a hardware level, the BST151-4T remains a very compact single bay network storage appliance with a fixed 4 TB hard drive, built around the Realtek RTD1619B platform and a 1GbE network connection. Physical connectivity is unchanged from the earlier BeeStation, with 1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 port, 1 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 port, and 1 x RJ-45 LAN port, all housed in the same 148.0 x 62.6 x 196.3 mm enclosure weighing 820 g.

That hardware profile makes clear where the BeeStation sits in Synology’s lineup. This is not a flexible NAS chassis with room for drive upgrades, SSD cache, multi bay expansion, or faster networking. The internal disk is part of the appliance design, so there is no meaningful path to RAID redundancy, easier drive level recovery, or long term capacity scaling in the way there is on a conventional 2 bay or 4 bay NAS.

Power and thermals are also modest, which is consistent with a low power, always on personal cloud device. Synology lists power consumption at about 7.85 W during access and 1.65 W in HDD hibernation, with a 36 W external power adapter. The system continues to use a single HAT3300-4T drive, and Synology’s current 4 TB HAT3300 model is a 5400 RPM class disk rather than a faster 7200 RPM unit.

The one specification that requires care is memory. Synology’s March 30, 2026 product specification PDF and the current BeeStation comparison page both list the BST151-4T with 1 GB DDR4, but Synology’s newer BST151-4T datasheet, published later in March 2026 and mirrored across multiple regional versions, lists 2 GB DDR4 instead. On balance, the later datasheet appears to reflect the intended refresh specification, but Synology’s own published material is not yet fully consistent. (UPDATE – RAM on the BST151-4T is CONFIRMED as 2GB)

Assuming the 2 GB figure in the later datasheet is the correct final spec, the BST151-4T is best understood as a minimal revision of the BST150-4T rather than a new hardware generation. The enclosure, CPU, ports, networking, and drive class are effectively the same, while the main change is the move from the predecessor’s 1 GB memory configuration to 2 GB. That could simply reflect practical component economics as much as performance tuning, since lower density memory packages can become less cost effective over time as supply shifts. In either case, this still appears to be fixed onboard memory, not a user upgradeable SO-DIMM arrangement, so the platform remains closed in the same way as the original model.

Synology BeeStation in 2026 – What can it do?

In 2026, the BeeStation platform is no longer limited to basic remote file access. Synology positions it as a consumer focused private cloud for storing, syncing, and sharing files and photos, with web, desktop, and mobile access, support for sign in via Google Account, Apple ID, or Synology Account, and shared access for up to 8 users on a single device. It is designed to pull together data from phones, computers, external drives, and selected cloud services into one managed location rather than acting only as a simple networked hard drive.

Photo handling is one of the more developed parts of the platform. Synology states that BeeStation can back up mobile photos, import content from sources such as Google Photos and iCloud Photos, and organize images with local AI based recognition for people, subjects, and places. The software also supports timeline and map based browsing, album creation, and controlled photo sharing, which places the BST151-4T closer to a private cloud photo hub than to a basic USB backup box.

Its data protection features have also expanded since launch. BeeStation now supports internal restore points based on snapshots, backups to BeeProtect, Synology NAS, and external drives, plus a 3 year Acronis True Image Essentials license for 1 computer. BeeStation OS 1.5 also added BeeCamera support, but Synology limits that feature to BeeStation Plus models rather than the standard 4 TB unit, so the BST151-4T does not currently gain the surveillance role that the higher tier model has started to take on.

Where the BeeStation still differs from a DSM based NAS such as the DS124 or DS223 is in breadth and flexibility. Synology’s DS124 and DS223 product pages explicitly advertise broader DSM functions including Synology Drive based private cloud workflows, Btrfs snapshot features, ShareSync between Synology systems, full Surveillance Station support, and the wider DSM application platform. By contrast, BeeStation remains a curated appliance with a narrower software stack, no general DSM Package Center environment, no broad package driven expansion path, and on the standard 4 TB model no BeeCamera surveillance support either. In other words, it can cover the main personal cloud tasks, but it still does not replace the wider role of even Synology’s entry level DSM NAS systems.

The BST151-4T looks like a modest revision of the original BeeStation rather than a substantially new product. Its appeal remains the same: a preconfigured, low friction private cloud for users who want basic file storage, photo backup, syncing, sharing, and remote access without moving into a full DSM based NAS environment. The hardware envelope is still narrow, with a fixed internal 4 TB drive, 1GbE networking, and no real upgrade path for storage expansion or RAID style redundancy, but that is consistent with its role as an entry level turnkey appliance rather than a general purpose NAS. Synology’s own later datasheet points to 2 GB of RAM on the new model, which would make the BST151-4T a small but practical refresh of the BST150-4T rather than a platform shift. Pricing is the main unknown at the time of writing. Synology’s support status page already lists the BST151-4T as generally available, but public retail pricing is still not clearly established. On that basis, the safest expectation is that it will land close to the earlier 4 TB BeeStation, which launched around $199 in the US and about £209 in the UK, while more recent BST150-4T retail listings have also appeared higher depending on seller and region, sat around $309 without TAX. That likely places the BST151-4T will land in excess of $300 and maybe closer to $350 when factoring the RAM increase.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology Beestation BST151-4T

Check B&H for the Synology 4TB BST151-4T

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE