[Deal du jour] Le FineTrack Slim Smart Finder est une balise de Ugreen en forme de carte, qui se glisse partout. Il est moins cher actuellement et devient une bonne alternative au traceur Apple ou Samsung.
Actuellement, plusieurs modèles de NAS UGREEN bénéficient de promotions pouvant atteindre -20 %. Parmi eux, le UGREEN DXP2800 se distingue avec une belle remise qui le fait passer sous la barre des 280 €. Un tarif très attractif pour un NAS 2 baies aux caractéristiques solides…
Le NAS UGREEN DXP2800 est un boitier de 2 baies accessible en façade et 2 emplacements pour des SSD NVME à l’intérieur.
Il est animé par un processeur Quad Core Intel N100 cadencé à 2 GHz (mode Burst jusqu’à 3,4 GHz) et épaulé par 8 Go de RAM DDR5 (extensible jusqu’à 16 Go). Il s’agit d’une configuration relativement musclée, qu’on rêverait de voir chez d’autres fabricants…
Le DXP2800 propose une connectique variée et bien pensée :
En résumé : tout ce qu’on attend d’un NAS moderne, à ce niveau de tarif.
Au-delà du matériel, les NAS UGREEN tournent sous UGOS, le système développé par le fabricant. Ce dernier se révèle déjà très complet et bénéficie de mises à jour régulières. Cependant, il s’adresse davantage à un public averti : beaucoup de fonctionnalités sont basées sur Docker, ce qui peut nécessiter quelques connaissances techniques.
Bonne nouvelle néanmoins : UGREEN permet d’installer un système d’exploitation alternatif, comme Unraid, OpenMediaVault (OMV) ou TrueNAS.
Avis – UGREEN DXP4800 Plus : une alternative aux NAS classiques ?
Les retours utilisateurs sont unanimes : UGREEN offre un excellent rapport qualité/prix dans l’univers des NAS. Et avec la promotion actuelle, le DXP2800 s’impose comme une alternative sérieuse aux modèles plus chers.
Si vous souhaitez vous lancer dans l’univers des NAS sans exploser votre budget, ce modèle à 280 € est une excellente porte d’entrée.
Le modèle 4 baies, le DXP2800 avec 4 emplacements) DXP4800 est à 444,12€
Cet article contient des liens affiliés
Découvrez notre avis sur l'UGREEN NAS XP4800 Plus, un modèle avec deux ports Ethernet (2.5 GbE et 10 GbE), un CPU Intel Pentium et 8 Go de RAM DDR5.
The post Test UGREEN NAS DXP4800 Plus : 10 GbE, Intel Pentium, 8 Go RAM DDR5, etc… first appeared on IT-Connect.
When choosing a NAS solution in 2025, two brands dominate the conversation: Synology and QNAP. These Taiwan-based companies have evolved their offerings significantly over the years, adapting to changing user needs in backup, multimedia, virtualization, and enterprise storage. Synology, with a strong emphasis on software polish and ecosystem integration, continues to appeal to users who prioritize stability and consistency. QNAP, by contrast, leans into offering higher-spec hardware, customization, and flexibility, targeting tech-savvy users who want granular control over their system. This article explores how the two compare across hardware, storage capabilities, software platforms, security, pricing, and overall value. Both Synology and QNAP share a lot of baseline features: multi-platform support across Windows, Mac, and Linux; mobile apps for Android and iOS; web-based GUIs; encryption; multi-user access; and strong community ecosystems. Yet important distinctions emerge as you look deeper. These differences often boil down to Synology delivering a more consistent, “appliance-like” experience, while QNAP offers broader hardware choices and wider compatibility. Neither brand is universally better, but each fits different user priorities. Let’s break down how Synology and QNAP stack up in detail for 2025.
In terms of hardware variety and specification, QNAP clearly maintains an advantage in 2025. QNAP offers a wider range of NAS models across every price tier, providing more options for users looking for features like 2.5GbE or 10GbE ports, Thunderbolt connectivity, PCIe expandability, and support for AI or GPU cards. Many QNAP systems at even mid-tier levels offer multi-core CPUs, 2.5GbE as a minimum, and M.2 NVMe slots for caching or storage pools. Synology, while offering a hardware range from ARM-based entry units to Xeon-powered enterprise models, typically emphasizes efficiency and stability over raw horsepower, often shipping systems with lower-core-count processors and 1GbE networking by default.
| Hardware Feature | Synology | QNAP |
|---|---|---|
| M.2 NVMe SSD Slots | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated Flash/SSD NAS Systems | ✓ (Only in Rackmount) | ✓ |
| PCIe Expansion Slots | ✓ | ✓ |
| 10GbE / 25GbE Network Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Thunderbolt Connectivity | ✓ | |
| Dual-Controller NAS Models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Support for SAS Drives | ✓ | ✓ |
| ZFS File System Support | ✓ | |
| Btrfs File System Support | ✓ | |
| Flexible/Hybrid RAID | ✓ (SHR) | ✓ (QTier) |
| HDMI Output for Direct Media Playback | ✓ | |
| Tool-less Drive Installation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated GPU for Media Transcoding | ✓ (only on the low tier PLUS range) | ✓ |
| External GPU Support (PCIe GPU Expansion) | ✓ | |
| U.2 NVMe SSD Support | ✓ | |
| Redundant Power Supply Options | ✓ | ✓ |
| High-Capacity Scalability (Over 1PB) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated Out-of-Band Management (IPMI/iKVM) | ✓ | |
| USB 4.0 Ports | ✓ | |
| 2.5GbE | ✓ (But only on x25 Models) | ✓ |
| 5GbE LAN Support | ✓ | |
| Thunderbolt-to-Ethernet Bridging | ✓ | |
| M.2 NVMe Storage Pool Creation | (only on new models) ✓ | ✓ |
| Hot-Swappable Drives | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Accelerator Card Support (TPU/NPU cards) | ✓ | |
| Edge AI/Surveillance AI Built-in Modules | (only DVA series) ✓ | ✓ |
However, Synology’s hardware strategy is tightly coupled to its software-first philosophy. Devices are designed to maximize compatibility, power efficiency, and seamless operation with DSM. Some newer 2025 Synology models do offer improvements — such as M.2 NVMe storage pools and optional 10GbE upgrades — but their pace remains slower compared to QNAP’s frequent hardware refresh cycles. For users whose priority is high performance, customization, or bleeding-edge hardware, QNAP offers far more compelling options. For those seeking low-power, quiet, turnkey systems, Synology still provides highly reliable appliances.
Storage capabilities represent a growing area of divergence. Synology’s storage ecosystem emphasizes stability and data integrity through Btrfs file systems, SHR (Synology Hybrid RAID), fast RAID rebuilds, and snapshot technology. However, Synology has dramatically tightened its drive compatibility rules from 2025 onwards, particularly in the Plus series and higher, limiting users to certified Synology drives for initialization. This hardline approach restricts flexibility, as users cannot freely install third-party HDDs or SSDs. Meanwhile, users still benefit from technologies like SHR, making mixed-drive RAID arrays easier to manage, though concerns remain about SHR’s future viability under Synology’s evolving drive policies.
| SERVICE | SYNOLOGY | QNAP | Notes | |
| File Services | SMB, AFP, NFS | |
|
Cross-platform sharing |
| WebDAV | |
|
Remote access | |
| FTP/FTPS | |
|
Standard protocols | |
| Rsync/Remote Sync | |
|
Sync across systems | |
| RAID & Storage | Basic, JBOD, RAID 0/1/5/6/10 | |
|
Core RAID support |
| SHR (Hybrid RAID) | |
|
Synology-exclusive | |
| Qtier Auto-Tiering | |
|
QNAP-exclusive SSD/HDD tiering | |
| ZFS Support | (DSM 7.2+ select models) |
(QuTS hero) |
Synology uses Btrfs more widely | |
| Storage Pools | |
|
Pool-based management | |
| Thin Provisioning | |
|
On supported file systems | |
| Storage Snapshots | (Btrfs-based) |
(ZFS/ext4-based) |
Both support snapshot schedules | |
| Inline Deduplication | (Btrfs) |
(ZFS) |
Both support dedup, method differs | |
| SSD Cache (Read/Write) | |
|
Model-dependent | |
| Encryption (AES-256) | |
|
Volume/folder-level encryption | |
| Backup & Sync | Hyper Backup / HBS3 | (Hyper Backup) |
(Hybrid Backup Sync 3) |
Functionally equivalent |
| Active Backup for Business | |
|
Enterprise-grade backup (free) | |
| Snapshot Replication | |
|
Data versioning support | |
| Cloud Sync | |
|
Multi-cloud sync integration |
QNAP’s storage flexibility is far greater. Users can utilize almost any NAS-rated or server-class drive from vendors like Seagate, Toshiba, and WD, without vendor lock-in. Beyond standard RAID levels, QNAP offers Qtier for intelligent auto-tiering between SSDs and HDDs and supports ZFS through its QuTS hero operating system. ZFS integration introduces enterprise-grade features such as inline deduplication, compression, triple-parity RAID options, and even faster rebuilds. Expansion is another strong suit for QNAP, with broad support for external expansion enclosures over USB and PCIe, while Synology supports far fewer expansion units. In short, QNAP offers a more powerful, flexible storage environment but demands more technical knowledge to manage effectively.
Synology’s DSM (DiskStation Manager) remains the benchmark for NAS operating systems in terms of polish, consistency, and ease of use. Its streamlined UI, consistent app design, and stable system management tools make it highly user-friendly. DSM’s integration with Synology Drive, Hyper Backup, Active Backup for Business, and its Office suite provide turnkey productivity and backup solutions. However, Synology is moving increasingly toward a closed ecosystem, prioritizing first-party apps and services over broader third-party integration. Applications like Surveillance Station remain best-in-class, but recent trends — such as discontinuing Video Station — indicate Synology’s increasing control over its ecosystem.
| Category | Feature | Synology | QNAP | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core OS | OS | DSM (DiskStation Manager) | QTS / QuTS hero | QuTS hero is ZFS-based |
| Web GUI Dashboard | |
|
Both have polished interfaces | |
| Mobile Apps | |
|
DS apps (Synology), Qfile/Qmanager (QNAP) | |
| Virtualization & Containers | Docker Support | |
|
QNAP supports LXC too |
| Virtual Machines | (VMM) |
(Virtualization Station) |
QNAP offers GPU passthrough | |
| GPU Passthrough | (limited) |
|
QNAP supports more virtualization use cases | |
| AI / Surveillance | Surveillance Station | |
(QVR Pro/Elite) |
QNAP includes more free camera licenses |
| AI Facial Recognition | (DVA series) |
(QVR Face Tiger) |
Hardware-dependent | |
| Smart Object Detection | |
|
Both support this in premium models | |
| Media Services | Plex Media Server | |
|
Supported by both |
| DLNA/UPnP Streaming | |
|
Basic media server support | |
| Video Transcoding (HW Acceleration) | (some models) |
(broader support) |
QNAP supports external GPUs | |
| Audio Station / Music Station | |
|
Web/mobile access to music | |
| Cloud & Remote Access | QuickConnect / myQNAPcloud | (QuickConnect) |
(myQNAPcloud) |
Brand-specific DDNS/remote access services |
| HybridShare / HybridMount | (HybridShare) |
(HybridMount) |
Mount cloud storage as local; brand equivalent | |
| Productivity & Apps | Synology Office (Docs, Sheets, Slides) | |
|
Google Docs-like suite for Synology only |
| Notes / Tasks / Calendar | |
|
Productivity tools | |
| Mail Server & Chat | |
|
Business collaboration tools | |
| App Ecosystem | App Center | |
|
QNAP has a broader variety |
| Package Manager CLI | (synopkg) |
(qpkg) |
Command-line support for installs |
QNAP’s QTS and QuTS hero systems offer greater flexibility and third-party support at the cost of consistency. Users can deploy a much wider range of apps, including those for AI recognition, media streaming, and backup tasks, often with deeper customization options. QNAP’s app ecosystem embraces both QNAP-native and third-party applications, with tools like HybridMount and Hybrid Backup Sync offering robust cloud and backup integrations.
However, design inconsistencies and a more complex setup process make QNAP platforms better suited to technically proficient users. QNAP systems offer more functionality out of the box but can feel less cohesive than Synology’s more curated environment.
Synology continues to lead in NAS security in 2025. The company’s multi-layered approach — including an in-house Security Response Team, bug bounty programs, pen-testing partnerships, and rapid patching policies — maintains its reputation as one of the most secure NAS ecosystems. Security Advisor, SSL certificate management, encrypted folders, and proactive system audits are standard across DSM systems. Remote access via QuickConnect is tightly controlled to minimize exposure. This emphasis on hardening and responding quickly to vulnerabilities makes Synology a strong choice for users prioritizing security with minimal manual intervention.
| Service | Synology | QNAP | Notes | |
| Security & Access | 2FA (Two-Factor Authentication) | |
|
User-level protection |
| VPN Server (OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP) | |
|
Standard features | |
| Firewall + IP Blocking | |
|
Security policy management | |
| SSL Certificate Management | |
|
Let’s Encrypt, custom certs | |
| Security Advisor | |
|
Built-in vulnerability scanner |
QNAP has made substantial strides in recent years to bolster its security posture, responding to earlier criticisms following ransomware incidents. The introduction of its own PSIRT team, participation in Pwn2Own, and improvements to myQNAPcloud services represent real progress. However, QNAP’s security tools, like Security Counselor, often need to be manually installed and configured. While they now offer multi-factor authentication and SSL options, the user experience around setting up and maintaining a secure environment still lags slightly behind Synology. Power users comfortable with managing network-level protections can achieve strong security on QNAP, but casual users may find Synology’s default setup safer out of the box.
QNAP consistently offers better raw hardware value for the price across its product range. A mid-tier QNAP NAS typically features higher-core CPUs, 2.5GbE or 10GbE networking, and expandability features like PCIe slots and multiple M.2 NVMe slots — features that, with Synology, are only available at much higher price points.
Additionally, QNAP’s lack of strict HDD compatibility listing (as currently the case for the Synology 2025 series, at the time of writing) and broader compatibility with storage and memory components can significantly reduce the total cost of ownership for DIY-minded users. Synology’s pricing, while generally higher, reflects its software development investment and the overall polish of its systems.
Buyers are paying for a more turnkey experience, better documentation, and consistent performance across the board. Moreover, Synology’s inclusion of powerful free tools like Active Backup for Business and Synology Drive adds enterprise-grade features without additional licensing costs, which in some cases offsets the hardware premium. Nonetheless, for users whose priority is maximum hardware performance and component freedom, QNAP usually offers a stronger return on investment.
Choosing between Synology and QNAP in 2025 depends largely on user priorities. Synology remains the best choice for users seeking a polished, consistent, stable, and secure NAS experience. Its streamlined DSM platform, reliable first-party apps, and strong support infrastructure make it ideal for small businesses, prosumers, and general users who want a “set it and forget it” solution. However, Synology’s movement toward hardware and software lock-in may be off-putting to users who value flexibility or those unwilling to buy only Synology-branded components. QNAP, by contrast, excels in offering more powerful hardware, greater configuration freedom, and broader third-party app support. Users who want to customize, expand, virtualize, and maximize their system’s capabilities — and who are comfortable managing more complex setups — will find QNAP to be the more empowering platform. While its software consistency and security history lag slightly behind Synology, the gap has narrowed considerably. Ultimately, Synology is the stronger pick for users valuing simplicity and long-term stability, while QNAP offers more opportunities for those willing to trade simplicity for flexibility and raw performance.
|
NAS Solutions |
NAS Solutions |
| + Better Software (In almost every respect!)
+ Much Better Global Support Presence + More business desirable + Larger Range of solutions – Compatibility restrictions on HDD and Upgrades More and more – Underwhelming hardware (comparatively) |
+ Better Hardware for Price
+ Wider Variety of Solutions and Hardware Profiles + Supports ZFS and/or EXT4 (with ZFS platform now available on latest Intel Celeron Systems) + Wide accessory range and compatibility – Software can often feel inconsistent – Hit by Security Issues if the past |
|
Check Amazon By Clicking Below:
|
Check Amazon By Clicking Below:
|
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
Depuis plusieurs mois, le marché des NAS connaît un regain d’effervescence. Longtemps dominé par une poignée d’acteurs, ce segment attire désormais des entreprises issues de secteurs connexes, bien décidées à se faire une place. Qu’est-ce qui motive cet intérêt soudain ? Quels enjeux pour les acteurs établis comme Synology ou QNAP ? Décryptage…
Ce que l’on observe actuellement n’est pas l’émergence de start-up, mais plutôt l’arrivée de groupes déjà bien installés sur d’autres segments technologiques. Citons notamment UGREEN, réputé pour ses accessoires, ou encore des spécialistes du Mini-PC comme Minisforum, Beelink, ORICO ou Aoostar. Tous ont récemment investi le marché des NAS avec une stratégie affirmée : concurrencer les leaders traditionnels en s’appuyant sur leurs capacités industrielles existantes.
Le NAS reste un produit de niche, à destination d’un public averti, professionnel ou technophile. Toutefois, il continue d’afficher une croissance régulière (souvent à 2 chiffres). Dans un contexte de diversification nécessaire pour les industriels chinois, ce segment représente un relais de croissance crédible, d’autant plus attractif qu’il ne requiert pas de rupture technologique majeure.
Historiquement, la conception de NAS impliquait des investissements significatifs (matériel et logiciel). Aujourd’hui, la donne a changé. Des systèmes comme OpenMediaVault, TrueNAS, Unraid ou encore ZimaOS permettent aux utilisateurs de déployer eux-mêmes une infrastructure de stockage avancée, sans expertise pointue.
Par ailleurs, l’essor de Docker facilite la gestion et l’installation d’applications sur les NAS, réduisant encore la nécessité pour les fabricants de développer des interfaces logicielles propriétaires. Une économie de ressources considérable pour les nouveaux entrants.
Résultat : les barrières à l’entrée se sont considérablement abaissées, rendant ce marché bien plus accessible qu’il ne l’était il y a encore quelques années.
Les marques traditionnelles comme Synology, QNAP et Asustor ont longtemps prospéré grâce à la robustesse de leur matériel, à leur écosystème logiciel intégré et à un service après-vente éprouvé. Mais l’arrivée d’acteurs disposant de capacités industrielles comparables (voire supérieures) rebat les cartes.
L’écart de prix entre les 2 marques est notable : les NAS UGREEN sont proposés à des tarifs sensiblement inférieurs à ceux de Synology, pour un nombre de baies équivalent et des composants souvent plus récents. Un positionnement agressif qui n’implique pas nécessairement de compromis sur les performances, lesquelles se révèlent parfois supérieures.
Autre évolution majeure : les utilisateurs, qu’ils soient professionnels ou particuliers, sont aujourd’hui plus avertis. Ils scrutent les composants, exigent une évolutivité tangible et comparent systématiquement les rapports qualité/prix. Les nouveaux venus pourraient tirer parti de cette exigence accrue, à condition de répondre aux standards attendus.
Si le cycle de renouvellement des NAS reste relativement lent, les précédents ne manquent pas pour illustrer la rapidité avec laquelle un marché peut se transformer. L’exemple des robots aspirateurs est éclairant : iRobot (Roomba), autrefois leader incontesté, a été rapidement dépassé par des challengers asiatiques comme Roborock, Dreame ou Mova. Le NAS pourrait-il suivre une trajectoire similaire ?
La question reste ouverte. Mais elle mérite d’être posée, tant les conditions semblent réunies pour une recomposition accélérée du secteur.
Le marché du NAS est à l’aube d’une profonde recomposition. Sous l’effet combiné d’une pression concurrentielle accrue, de l’évolution des attentes utilisateurs et de la baisse des barrières technologiques, les lignes sont en train de bouger. Si les leaders historiques disposent encore de solides atouts, ils ne peuvent ignorer la montée en puissance de nouveaux acteurs agiles, bien décidés à redistribuer les cartes.
– Article invité, rédigé par Vincent Lautier, contient des liens affiliés Amazon –
Dans un monde où nos ordinateurs portables se font de plus en plus fins, les ports se font eux de plus en plus rares. Et pourtant, nos besoins en connectique, eux, explosent. C’est là qu’entre en scène l’UGREEN Revodok Max 213, une station d’accueil Thunderbolt 4 pensée pour les créatifs, les développeurs, les télétravailleurs, et pour tout le monde en vrai. Disons surtout pour tous ceux qui veulent que ça marche sans chipoter. Et autant le dire tout de suite : ce dock coche toutes les cases, et même un peu plus.
As part of a week-long visit to Shenzhen to better understand the operations behind some of the rising tech brands in China, I arranged a tour of UGREEN’s headquarters. The visit was not sponsored or paid for by UGREEN, nor was I invited by them directly. It was simply part of a wider initiative to learn more about the companies producing network storage hardware that is increasingly popular in Western markets. Although UGREEN previously sponsored a separate video about their NAS hardware, this trip was independently funded and organized. I spent roughly four to five hours across several buildings at their primary site in Longzhen Industrial Park, Guangdong Province, gaining insight into their development process, support infrastructure, and product plans.
So, what do we know about UGREEN Online already? Founded in 2012 by Zhang Qingsen in Shenzhen, China, UGREEN began as an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) producing data cables for international brands. Recognizing the potential for greater innovation and brand identity, Zhang transitioned the company from OEM services to establishing UGREEN as an independent brand. The company specializes in a wide range of consumer electronics, including USB hardware, charging devices, audio equipment, and mobile accessories. Over the years, UGREEN has expanded its presence to over 100 countries, earning a reputation for delivering high-quality, affordable products. The company’s commitment to research and development, design, manufacturing, and brand marketing has solidified its position as a global leader in the consumer electronics market
UGREEN’s operation is spread across four main buildings, each with a distinct purpose: international and domestic marketing, customer support, and research and development. Most of my time was spent in the R&D building and parts of the customer service center.
The first area I visited was their product showroom, a space clearly designed for internal partners and B2B visitors rather than public foot traffic. The showroom featured one of every UGREEN product, including several items not yet announced publicly, with placeholders on the shelves suggesting upcoming Thunderbolt 5 and new NAS models.
Staffing levels across the buildings seemed consistent with what you’d expect from a company scaling into premium storage solutions. I counted around 40 to 50 people in support and R&D departments alone, with visible crossover between teams. The support center operated in what appeared to be a traditional open-office structure, with teams seated in long desk arrays. While I couldn’t film this area due to consent concerns (and was provided with some official footage), the impression was of a well-staffed, professional operation. Observing lunch break foot traffic—easily 60 or 70 people exiting en masse—it became clear that UGREEN’s core NAS and support teams were substantial and not limited to a token few.
One of my central questions going into the visit was about UGREEN’s approach to support. Network-attached storage is a 24/7 solution for most users and competes with both premium and open-source platforms. I was particularly interested in how UGREEN intended to position themselves with regard to long-term reliability and assistance. Their answer was partly logistical—dedicated support staffing—and partly software-focused. In discussions with their development team, it was apparent that software enhancements are now a priority following their initial hardware deployment. One example discussed was the demand for iSCSI support, which has been slower to arrive due to regional differences in usage habits.
UGREEN’s proprietary NAS OS, UOS, is based on development efforts that began with Chinese-market NAS solutions around 2020. With the newer DXP series expanding into international markets, UOS has been undergoing rapid westernization. There was a candid discussion about cultural and user-base differences that caught the team off-guard—particularly in the importance of specific protocol support and integrations. While I signed an NDA preventing me from disclosing every part of the roadmap, the general message was that the next two years will focus primarily on maturing the UOS software stack, including AI-driven features, broader language support, and improved cross-platform expansion options.
A significant portion of the discussion centered around hardware expansion. UGREEN has developed a range of DAS (direct-attached storage) solutions, many of which are still only available in China, but which they intend to integrate more fully with their NAS lineup globally and serve as NAS expansion devices. USB4 and Thunderbolt connectivity is also in active development, with Windows support reportedly complete but ongoing issues with macOS integration delaying a broader release.
These updates were presented not as future aspirations but as active, iterative engineering challenges currently underway, which aligns with the company’s overall stated intention of refining rather than rushing.
Arguably the most distinctive part of the visit was the NAS Lab—a dedicated test space designed to simulate real-world deployment scenarios. Unlike many brands that showcase NAS capabilities in tightly controlled demo booths or static displays at trade shows, UGREEN has constructed multiple functioning environments: a home media suite, an office collaboration space, and a creative studio tailored to video editing.
These setups are used internally to identify pain points in both hardware and software by replicating user workflows in a live, interactive context. It was clear from the walkthrough that this lab is an active part of their development cycle and not just a showroom for visitors.
These test suites enabled the company to simulate multi-user environments, such as households streaming content while backups run in parallel or video editors accessing high-bitrate files remotely. The lab also helps visualize inefficiencies and inconsistencies in system deployment, such as UI design issues or performance bottlenecks in hybrid-use cases.
Such testing environments are more commonly found in laptop and mobile device labs but are rare in the NAS world, especially at this price tier. It added credibility to UGREEN’s claims of wanting to provide a more seamless and flexible user experience.
During the visit, I was repeatedly shown signs of a long-term strategy. While some early criticisms of UGREEN’s NAS rollout remain valid—particularly around the initial reliance on crowdfunding and uneven software features—the team seemed aware of these issues and determined to address them. There was no indication of a short product lifecycle.
In fact, staff emphasized that the current DXP models are not expected to receive a hardware refresh for at least two years. The focus in that window will be firmware updates, compatibility expansions, and building out features. The overarching message was clear: UGREEN wants to be seen as a top-tier NAS vendor within the next 3 to 5 years.
UGREEN is clearly taking its NAS division seriously. While this visit offered a curated look at their operations—something to be expected with any factory tour—the underlying infrastructure and approach felt well-considered. Unlike many brands that rely on OEM or white-label models, UGREEN appears to be building their NAS solutions from the ground up.
While the company didn’t confirm or deny third-party manufacturing partnerships, the focus on in-house software, R&D-heavy staffing, and direct integration of their own accessory ecosystem suggests a vertically integrated model. Based on what I observed, UGREEN isn’t simply experimenting with NAS—they’re actively investing in it as a long-term product category. Their roadmap may still be evolving, and the software isn’t yet on par with incumbents like Synology or QNAP, but their forward-looking approach and resource commitment imply they’re in it for the long haul.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
Il y a quelques mois, j’ai décidé de remplacer mon QNAP TS-464. Ce dernier ne m’avait jamais vraiment convaincu : impression d’un OS mal fichu, performances pas dingues… Bref, il était temps de passer à autre chose. En cherchant une alternative, je suis tombé sur le UGREEN DXP4800 Plus – un nouveau venu sur le marché du NAS, avec des promesses intéressantes : matériel récent, format compact, et un OS maison qui semblait tenir la route. Voici mon retour après plusieurs semaines d’usage intensif…
Aujourd’hui, c’est Flow (lecteur de Cachem) qui s’est proposé de prendre le clavier pour nous présenté son UGreen DXP4800 Plus et l’usage qu’il en fait.
Présentation & déballageÀ la réception, bonne surprise côté packaging : soigné, propre, rien à dire. Le NAS lui-même respire la qualité, à la hauteur de ce qu’on retrouve chez QNAP ou Synology. Le boîtier est sobre, bien fini, et se fait discret une fois installé. Côté bruit, rien à signaler, même en charge. On est clairement sur un produit sérieux.
Configuration matérielleJ’ai choisi la version standard du DXP4800 Plus, avec un petit upgrade de la RAM à 32 Go.
Stockage :
Le CPU embarqué est bien plus récent que ce qu’on trouve chez Synology sur des gammes équivalentes. C’est aussi une des raisons de mon choix.
Installation & OSJ’ai gardé l’OS fourni par UGreen. Franchement, aucun souci à l’installation, c’est du plug and play comme on en a l’habitude avec les NAS récents. Pas besoin de réglages complexes ou de tweaks bizarres : ça fonctionne dès le départ.
Et pour les curieux, oui, on peut y installer autre chose (TrueNAS, Unraid…), mais je ne suis pas allé jusque-là pour l’instant.
Utilisation au quotidien : 70 containers Docker Je suis un gros utilisateur de containers Docker, et le NAS les encaisse sans broncher. Voici une liste (non exhaustive) des services que je fais tourner dessus :
Domotique & maison connectée :
Multimédia :
Téléchargement & automation :
Sauvegardes & supervision :
Divers :
À noter : 4 utilisateurs Jellyfin peuvent streamer en simultané sans aucun lag. Clairement, la machine est stable et tient la charge.
PerformancesJe n’ai pas benché précisément les débits, mais aucun ralentissement à signaler, même avec 70 containers actifs.
Pas de bruit excessif, pas de surchauffe, et je ne monitore pas la consommation électrique — mais vu la charge, je suis impressionné par la stabilité.
Comparaison & raisons du choixJ’ai eu plusieurs NAS avant celui-ci : des Synology 2 baies, un QNAP TS-464… Pourquoi avoir choisi le DXP4800 Plus ?
In the evolving world of network-attached storage (NAS), users in 2025 are faced with a broader range of choices than ever before. Among the most discussed options in both professional and enthusiast communities are Synology and UGREEN. Synology has been a mainstay in the industry for over two decades, known for its reliable software, long-term support, and deeply integrated ecosystem. UGREEN, by contrast, is a relative newcomer to the NAS market in the West, but has quickly established itself as a serious contender by offering competitive hardware and pricing. Originally known for consumer tech peripherals, UGREEN has leveraged its manufacturing experience and market agility to carve out space in an area traditionally dominated by established NAS brands.
This comparison aims to provide a clear, unbiased overview of both brands, structured across several key categories: hardware capabilities, storage flexibility, software ecosystem, security infrastructure, pricing strategy, and overall value proposition. While some buyers may lean toward a brand due to legacy, others are driven by performance-per-dollar, or openness to customization. It’s important to understand that neither brand is objectively “better” in all respects. Instead, each appeals to different user priorities. What follows is a breakdown of how Synology and UGREEN compare across the board, giving potential buyers the tools they need to make a decision that aligns with their use case, technical comfort level, and long-term plans.
Synology’s hardware lineup spans everything from small 1-bay entry-level NAS units to rackmount enterprise-class systems with dual controllers. With approximately 15–25 models available at any given time, the variety on offer is extensive. This allows users to choose systems that align closely with their needs—whether that’s for simple backups, media streaming, virtualization, or business-critical data management. However, despite the breadth of its portfolio, Synology’s consumer and SMB offerings are frequently criticized for underpowered processors and limited upgrade paths. Many of their mid-tier models still rely on AMD Embedded or lower-end Intel chips, and memory configurations are often modest compared to similarly priced alternatives. PCIe expansion, 10GbE networking, and true Flash storage support are typically reserved for only the highest-tier devices.
UGREEN, on the other hand, has entered the NAS space with a clear emphasis on hardware strength. Their NASync series—although more limited in model variety—delivers high-performance components out of the box. Even in models priced around $1,100 to $1,200 USD, UGREEN includes features like Intel i5 processors, 16GB of DDR5 RAM, dual 10GbE ports, USB4, SD card slots, and Thunderbolt connectivity. Most of specifications are generally only found in Synology’s XS or SA series, which can cost double or triple the price. In terms of build quality, UGREEN’s enclosures also lean toward a more robust, enterprise-like design with better thermal management and port selection. While they may not yet offer the same portfolio depth or high-end rackmount solutions, the raw hardware value they deliver—especially for power users and media professionals—is difficult to overlook.
Storage features and flexibility represent one of the most contested areas between the two brands. Synology has developed a very feature-rich storage management system over the years, offering support for RAID configurations, Btrfs and EXT4 file systems, fast RAID rebuilds, advanced iSCSI LUN management, and deep integration with backup and synchronization tools.
| File Services | SMB/NFS/AFP/WebDAV | Supported |
Supported (AFP not confirmed) |
Core protocols available |
| iSCSI Support | Native iSCSI manager |
Not currently supported |
Important for VM/block-level storage | |
| RAID & Storage | RAID 0/1/5/6/10, SHR | SHR and traditional RAID |
Traditional RAID 0/1/5/6/10 |
No SHR support in UGREEN |
| Snapshots | Btrfs-based with GUI versioning |
Btrfs-based snapshots |
Comparable snapshot system | |
| Deduplication | Btrfs-based |
Planned, not available yet |
UGREEN roadmap feature | |
| Encryption | Volume/folder/drive-level + WORM |
No integrated encryption |
Major security difference | |
| SSD Caching | GUI-managed |
CLI-managed only (UI planned) |
Limited interface currently |
Their platform also supports drive pooling, storage tiering (in some models), and robust snapshot capabilities. Expansion options are a strong point too, with a range of proprietary expansion units that allow users to scale storage well beyond the original NAS chassis. These are bolstered by robust utilities in DSM that help manage redundancy, performance, and data recovery, all while maintaining consistency across the ecosystem.
However, Synology’s 2025 policy shift around hard drive compatibility introduces a significant caveat. Newer devices now strictly require Synology-branded drives for both HDD and SSD roles, including caching and storage pools. This effectively locks users into the Synology ecosystem and limits the ability to use commonly available alternatives from WD, Seagate, Samsung, and others. Availability issues in some regions further complicate this approach.
UGREEN, conversely, supports a far more open system—allowing users to populate their NAS devices with nearly any 2.5″, 3.5″, or NVMe drive on the market. With support for drives up to 24TB and Gen 4 NVMe speeds reaching 6,000–7,000 MB/s, UGREEN offers unmatched flexibility in storage media. However, their systems currently lack support for iSCSI and official expansion units, which could be a limitation for more advanced storage scenarios.
Software Comparison
Synology’s DiskStation Manager (DSM) is widely regarded as one of the most refined and mature NAS operating systems in the market. Backed by over two decades of development, DSM offers a wide range of first-party apps covering backup, multimedia, productivity, collaboration, and virtualization.
Tools like Synology Drive, Active Backup for Business, and Synology Photos provide enterprise-grade capabilities in a consumer-friendly package. The platform also integrates with cloud services like Office 365 and Google Workspace, and includes support for SANs, VMs, containers, and cloud sync. Importantly, most of these apps are license-free, representing significant value over time. The application center in DSM is extensive, and Synology’s desktop and mobile client tools are similarly well-developed.
| Category | Feature | Synology | UGREEN NASync (DXP Series) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core OS | OS | DSM (DiskStation Manager) | UGOS | Synology has a mature, polished UI |
| Mobile Apps | Multiple DS apps across iOS/Android |
One core management app + FireTV/Google Home apps |
Broader app suite on Synology | |
| Virtualization & Containers | Virtual Machines | Virtual Machine Manager |
Dedicated VM app |
Both platforms now offer VMs |
| Docker Support | GUI + Docker CLI |
Portainer + Docker CLI |
Equal container support | |
| GPU Passthrough | Not available |
Not supported |
Neither platform offers this | |
| AI & Surveillance | AI Services | Facial/people detection on DVA NAS |
Advanced AI model recognition (Photo AI) |
UGREEN offers more AI model types |
| Surveillance Suite | Surveillance Station (native) |
No native system (use Frigate, MotionEye via Docker) |
Docker-based alternative | |
| Media & Streaming | Plex Media Server | Native app support |
Docker-only installation |
Equal in function |
| Jellyfin | Docker/homebrew only |
Native app available |
More flexible on UGREEN | |
| Video App | Video Station is EOL |
Native video player app |
UGREEN actively supports this | |
| Backup & Sync | Backup Solutions | Hyper Backup, Active Backup Suite |
Rsync, SMB, Cloud Backup, USB |
GUI edge to Synology |
| Cloud Sync | Native Cloud Sync app |
Planned, rclone CLI workaround only |
Still in development | |
| Remote Access | DDNS + Tunnel | QuickConnect |
UGREEN-hosted tunnel system |
Functional equivalents |
| App Ecosystem | App Center | Extensive with many native packages |
Real app center, but much smaller |
Synology has a broader catalog |
| Package Manager | synopkg |
APT + Docker |
UGREEN’s UGOS, by contrast, is still in its early stages—at least in the Western market—but has made notable progress. Built on a Linux-based open-source foundation, UGOS offers a modern UI and essential features like RAID management, Docker support, virtualization, remote access, and media streaming. The system is responsive and user-friendly, with most core NAS functions well-covered.
UGREEN’s App Center is less populated but growing, and the brand has made particular strides in AI-driven features—particularly in its photo application, which allows customizable object and face recognition with trainable AI modules. While still lacking some advanced enterprise features like Synology’s iSCSI or SAN support, UGOS is impressive for a brand with only a few years of development. Notably, UGREEN also supports the installation of third-party operating systems like TrueNAS or OpenMediaVault, appealing to users who want full control over their NAS.
When it comes to security, Synology’s long-standing reputation and infrastructure give it a distinct advantage. Over the years, the company has invested heavily in platform hardening, threat detection, and vulnerability response. The built-in Security Advisor not only scans for malware and viruses but also detects weak passwords, outdated software, open ports, and potentially exploitable system configurations. Synology participates in vulnerability disclosure programs, works with penetration testers, and maintains a public-facing security advisory database. They’ve even implemented a bounty system to reward ethical hackers for reporting vulnerabilities. These layers of proactive defense have earned Synology its reputation as one of the most secure NAS platforms in the world.
UGREEN has not experienced any public security incidents as of 2025, but its shorter time in the market means less historical data on its resilience. Their systems now include two-factor authentication and basic malware scanning, but currently lack the more comprehensive vulnerability detection tools that Synology provides. The security advisor in UGOS focuses primarily on active threats like viruses rather than system-level hardening.
That said, UGREEN has been responsive to user feedback and appears committed to improving its security infrastructure. For experienced users who follow best practices and secure their networks effectively, this may not be a deal-breaker. However, for enterprise users or those deploying systems in high-risk environments, Synology’s mature security ecosystem provides more peace of mind.
| Remote Access | DDNS + Tunnel | QuickConnect |
UGREEN-hosted tunnel system |
Functional equivalents |
| Security & Access | Security Advisor | Ransomware, audit, malware, system hardening |
Basic malware scanning only |
Synology offers deeper protections |
| VPN Server | Native UI for OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP |
Docker-based VPNs (WireGuard, OpenVPN) |
Manual setup on UGREEN | |
| SSL Certificates | Let’s Encrypt + GUI |
Let’s Encrypt via Web UI |
Parity here | |
| 2FA Support | App-based 2FA |
TOTP/Web 2FA |
Both support 2FA login |
Pricing is one of the most decisive factors favoring UGREEN in 2025. The brand offers high-performance hardware at price points that undercut Synology by a substantial margin. An 8-bay UGREEN NAS with an Intel i5 CPU, 16GB DDR5 RAM, dual 10GbE, and Thunderbolt can be purchased for roughly $1,200-1300 (store depending). A Synology unit with similar specs would require jumping to the DS1823xs+ or even the SA series—devices that retail between $1,800 and $3,000 depending on configuration and region. This gap in price-performance makes UGREEN especially appealing to users who want modern hardware for tasks like 4K video editing, large-scale backups, or AI analytics but can’t justify enterprise-level spending.
Synology’s pricing strategy is rooted more in its software and long-term value. While the upfront cost may be higher, the investment is offset by an integrated ecosystem, professional-grade applications, and superior long-term support. For some buyers, particularly businesses and advanced home users who need software stability and vendor accountability, the price premium is justified. However, for price-sensitive consumers, hobbyists, or those comfortable managing their own systems, UGREEN’s value proposition is hard to beat. It’s also worth noting that UGREEN’s openness to third-party operating systems can further extend the device’s utility without adding cost, whereas Synology systems are heavily locked into their proprietary software environment. Here is a comparison of the Synology DS1823xs+ and the UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS. Around $449 difference, but also the general level of the hardware inside and externally is technically higher on the UGREEN system. That said, the Synology system software does a huge amount with it’s software, keeping things super efficient. So, now let’s discuss storage and the respective software that both of these platforms offer to house and protect your data.
Choosing between Synology and UGREEN in 2025 ultimately comes down to what matters most to the user. Synology is the more mature and refined platform, with a rock-solid software ecosystem, strong security credentials, and long-standing industry credibility. It is ideal for users who want a fully integrated solution with minimal tinkering, extensive app support, and professional-grade backup, synchronization, and collaboration tools. However, the brand’s increasing restrictions on drive compatibility, slower hardware updates, and higher prices may discourage users seeking flexibility or better raw performance.
UGREEN, while newer and still building out its software platform, delivers excellent hardware value and impressive flexibility for the price. It supports a wide range of third-party drives, offers strong virtualization and AI capabilities, and even allows OS replacement—making it highly appealing to power users and technologists. While it may not yet match Synology in software maturity or enterprise security, it is evolving rapidly and clearly resonates with a growing segment of the NAS market. For buyers focused on hardware, performance, and freedom of customization, UGREEN may be the better choice today. For those seeking long-term support, stable software, and enterprise-grade functionality, Synology still sets the benchmark across the rest of the NAS industry in terms of providing an all covering solution, though there is no denying that buyers are getting a little more cost aware. Synology clearly has it’s eyes on bigger prizes right now, and perhaps this is a growing gap in the market that UGREEN is eying up – knife and fork in hand!
|
NAS Solutions |
NAS Solutions |
| + Better Software (In almost every respect!)
+ Much Better Global Support Presence + More More business desirable + Larger Range of solutions – Compatibility restrictions on HDD and Upgrades More and more – Underwhelming hardware (comparatively) |
+ Better Hardware for Price
+ Flexibility to Install 3rd Party OS’ + Excellent Mobile Application + Wide accessory compatibility – Software still has beta elements – The company has a much shorter NAS Market Experience |
|
Check Amazon By Clicking Below:
|
Check Amazon By Clicking Below:
|
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
Connexion