100 Reasons Turnkey (Synology/QNAP/etc) are BETTER than DIY NAS (TrueNAS, UnRAID, Proxmox)

I think most users who use out-the-box NAS solutions (also known commonly as ‘turnkey‘) will admit that, although they hear alot of good things about TrueNAS and UnRAID (as well as Proxmox, OMV and ZimaOS) – there are plenty of reasons why they have not jumped ship from their Synology or QNAP yet. No one can argue that the low resource and flexibility of UnRAID, or the power and scalability of TrueNAS is not absolutely incredible – but all to often people can forget the convenience and ease of turnkey solutions – and why in 2025 that can be as appealing to us as it was back in the early 2000s, when solutions like these first appeared at retail! So, below are 100 reasons why users choose to pick and/or stay in the safe (if more expensive!) world of turnkey NAS! Some reasons are more business-focused, some more about ease of use, and others are actually more NAS brand specific (eg QNAP Qtier, Synology Active Backup, Terramaster TRAID, etc)

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER – Different tools suit different tasks! I use both DIY and Turnkey Solutions in my own personal/work data storage environments (as well as a little bit of DAS and even some off site cloud!),. This article is not designed to ‘attack’ or ‘slag off’ one side of the home server market over another! It is to help understand why users might choose one over the other. Not disimilar in some ways to how some people prefer PC gaming vs Console gaming (or even exclusively mobile, though even struggle to wrap my head around that one!).

1. Simplified setup and onboarding

Vendor NAS software is typically ready out of the box with first run wizards, auto detection of drives, RAID suggestions and basic services pre enabled. Many users can reach a working file server or backup target in minutes without learning storage concepts in depth.

2. Unified interface across features

DSM, QTS, ADM, TOS, UGOS and UniFi Drive present storage, users, apps, snapshots, virtualisation and monitoring through one consistent GUI. In DIY platforms you often jump between different web apps, plugins or containers that each have their own interface and logic.

3. Opinionated defaults that reduce mistakes

Turnkey systems are designed around the most common small business and home use cases. They pre select file systems, background scrubs, SMART checks, scheduled snapshots and appropriate permissions. This reduces the risk of badly configured ZFS or array settings that can happen in DIY setups.

4. Integrated backup and sync ecosystem

Vendor NAS platforms usually bundle full backup suites for PCs, Macs, mobile devices, cloud sync and cross NAS replication, all controlled from one place. With DIY stacks you often assemble this from several separate tools such as Rsync, Restic, Duplicati, Hyper Backup style containers or custom scripts.

5. Official mobile and desktop apps

Synology, QNAP, Asustor, TerraMaster, UGREEN and UniFi all ship their own photo, video, music, file sync and admin apps for iOS, Android and desktop. Non technical users often rely on these instead of SMB, NFS or web portals. DIY platforms usually depend more on generic clients or community apps.

6. Vendor support and warranty alignment

When hardware and software come from the same company there is a single point of contact for troubleshooting, RMA and firmware issues. With DIY builds the user is responsible for diagnosing whether a problem is with the OS, the controller, the drives or their chosen container stack.

7. App stores and curated packages

Turnkey NAS operating systems provide an integrated app center with prebuilt and tested packages for Plex, Docker, databases, surveillance, office suites and more. Users avoid manual container creation or plugin hunting, and updates are delivered through the same update mechanism as the core OS.

8. Lower ongoing maintenance burden

Automatic OS updates, package updates, smart notifications and storage health checks are designed for people who do not want to maintain a homelab. DIY deployments like TrueNAS and UnRAID can be very stable but usually expect the admin to read changelogs, test new releases and manage hardware firmware themselves.

9. Polished UX for non technical family or staff

Many people want something they can hand to family members or colleagues without explaining datasets, pools or parity models. Vendor systems focus on friendly media apps, easy sharing links, simple user management and straightforward access control, which is less intimidating than more technical dashboards.

10. Purpose built hardware integration

Turnkey NAS software is tuned for the vendor chassis, CPU choices, fan curves, drive bays, expansion units and sometimes their own drives or NICs. This allows better power management, quieter cooling profiles and predictable performance under typical loads, whereas DIY setups sometimes require manual tweaking or custom scripts to reach the same level of integration.

11. Built in remote access services

Synology QuickConnect, QNAP myQNAPcloud, UGREEN remote access and UniFi cloud portals give relatively easy ways to reach the NAS from outside the home, with wizards for SSL certificates and relay or reverse proxy configuration. DIY solutions usually need separate VPN, reverse proxy or dynamic DNS setup, which can be a hurdle for less technical users.

12. Integrated surveillance and NVR features

Most turnkey NAS platforms bundle full camera management suites with motion detection, licensing, event timelines and mobile notification support. With DIY systems this often means combining separate containers or services and manually wiring storage, permissions and recording schedules together.

13. Smooth firmware and OS integration

Drive sleep, fan curves, thermal limits, UPS signals, LCD panels and front panel buttons are all tuned and tested by the vendor. This reduces strange edge cases such as fans stuck at full speed or drives not sleeping, which are more common when an OS is deployed on random DIY hardware.

14. Better experience for small offices and non technical teams

Turnkey NAS software is designed so that a small office without an IT department can manage users, quotas, shared folders, cloud sync and snapshots through a predictable interface. DIY stacks often assume there is a homelab style admin who is comfortable with shell access and manual recovery steps.

15. Pre integrated ecosystem services

Vendors often provide their own office suite, chat server, calendar, mail, photo and video applications that are aware of each other permissions and storage locations. Doing the same on a DIY system usually involves picking and integrating separate open source projects, each with its own user database and update cycle.

16. Clearer disaster recovery workflows

Many turnkey systems have guided workflows for replacing failed disks, expanding RAID, restoring from snapshots and recovering from another NAS or a cloud backup. DIY platforms are powerful here but often present more technical terminology and expect the admin to understand pool state, resilvering and dataset recovery in more detail.

17. Certification and ecosystem support

Synology, QNAP, Asustor and others often have official compatibility lists, certifications with backup vendors, hypervisors and camera brands, plus documentation that assumes their OS. This helps businesses that need a supported environment, rather than a custom stack that vendors may refuse to certify.

18. Predictable update cadence

Appliance style NAS software usually follows a documented release track, with security updates and feature releases pushed through a single updater. DIY NAS users often juggle OS upgrades, plugin or container updates and sometimes driver or kernel updates, which increases the risk of something breaking.

19. Lower learning curve for occasional admins

Some people only touch their NAS settings a few times per year. Turnkey software favours obvious icons, wizards and consistent terminology that are easier to come back to after a long gap. DIY environments frequently reward continuous familiarity and can feel opaque if you only log in when something has gone wrong.

20. Perceived professionalism and vendor reputation

For small businesses or freelance professionals, buying a branded NAS with an integrated OS feels closer to buying a finished appliance such as a router or firewall. This can inspire more confidence than a home built box with a community OS, even if the DIY system is technically superior, which influences purchasing decisions in many cases.

21. Built in cloud service integration

Turnkey NAS systems tend to ship with first party or curated apps for major cloud platforms such as Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Dropbox and S3 compatible services. The wizards handle credentials, scheduling and throttling, so users do not need to wire up separate containers or command line tools for each provider.

22. Clear licensing and feature tiers

Commercial NAS platforms usually define which features are free, which require extra licenses such as camera channels or mail server and which are part of business tiers. DIY solutions often involve a mix of open source projects with different licenses plus optional paid plugins, which can be harder for a small business to audit.

23. Centralised security controls

Security options such as two factor authentication, account lockout rules, firewall profiles, certificate management and brute force protection are normally surfaced in one place in turnkey NAS software. On DIY stacks these controls may live separately in the operating system, reverse proxy, containers and hypervisor.

24. Extensive official documentation and training material

Vendors publish step by step guides, video tutorials and certification style training that assume their software stack. This makes it easier for junior staff or generalists to learn the system compared with assembling knowledge from multiple communities and wikis for a custom DIY setup.

25. Easier compliance reporting

For organisations that need to satisfy basic compliance such as audit trails, retention rules or off site backups, vendor NAS platforms often include reporting tools, logs and checklists that map to common requirements. With DIY environments the admin usually has to prove and document these controls manually.

26. More predictable multi site deployments

If several offices all use the same NAS brand, the admin can reuse the same playbook for remote management, replication, user templates and monitoring. DIY deployments may vary more in hardware and configuration between locations, which complicates support.

27. Lower barrier for third party support

External IT providers and managed service companies are more likely to have experience with popular turnkey NAS brands and their operating systems. That makes it easier to hand off support or get short term help, compared with a custom server running a niche or heavily customised DIY stack.

28. Consistent user experience during upgrades

When upgrading from an older appliance to a newer one from the same vendor, the interface, migration tools and storage layout are usually similar. This reduces retraining and migration complexity, while a move between different DIY platforms or versions can feel more like a full redesign.

29. Smaller risk of silent misconfiguration

Turnkey NAS software often validates settings and warns if you choose insecure or unsupported combinations, for example exposing services directly without encryption or mixing unusual RAID and cache arrangements. DIY tools frequently assume the admin knows the implications and allow more dangerous combinations without warning.

30. Better fit for plug and forget scenarios

Many users and small businesses want a storage appliance that they configure once, then largely ignore apart from occasional updates. Vendor NAS systems are aimed at this type of usage pattern, with notifications only when something important changes, whereas DIY environments typically reward regular attention and active administration.

31. Better out of the box media experience

Turnkey platforms usually have polished photo, video and music apps, automatic indexing and pleasant web players for family or staff. DIY systems can match this with containers such as Jellyfin, Photoprism and Immich, but the user has to assemble and maintain all of it.

32. Built in wizards for directory services

Joining Microsoft 365, Azure AD, local Active Directory or LDAP is usually handled with simple wizards and documented steps. On DIY platforms it often means more manual configuration and troubleshooting of Samba, Kerberos and certificates.

33. Language, localisation and accessibility

Commercial NAS software is usually translated into many languages and tested for right to left scripts, date formats and accessibility features such as high contrast and screen reader support. DIY tools may only be fully usable in English and have less focus on accessibility.

34. Simpler notifications and alerting

Turnkey systems offer point and click setup for email alerts, mobile push messages and sometimes vendor cloud notifications. They choose sensible defaults for what counts as an important alert. DIY environments often need separate configuration for mail relays, monitoring containers and alert policies.

35. Integration with vendor hardware ecosystem

Vendors such as Synology, QNAP and UniFi design switches, routers, cameras and sometimes drives to work together. Using their NAS software often unlocks extra features or easier management when everything is from the same ecosystem, which is harder to replicate with a mixed DIY stack.

36. Cleaner upgrade path for non technical owners

If the original tech person leaves, a small office can more easily hand a vendor NAS to a new admin or outside consultant. A heavily customised TrueNAS or Unraid box may be much harder for someone new to understand, especially if it has many manual tweaks.

37. Better power management and noise tuning

Because the operating system is written for known hardware, the vendor usually has sensible defaults for drive spindown, CPU power states and fan speed curves. DIY builds sometimes run noisier or less efficiently until the owner spends time tuning them.

38. Easier resale and re deployment

A branded appliance that can be factory reset and resold is often more attractive on the second hand market, and the buyer knows they will get a familiar interface. A DIY server with a complex configuration is harder to pass on or repurpose.

39. Simple route to official feature requests

Turnkey NAS vendors maintain public roadmaps, ticket systems and sometimes beta programs where users can request features and see progress. DIY stacks rely more on open source project maintainers and community volunteers, which can be less predictable from a non technical user point of view.

40. Clear boundary between appliance and experiments

With a vendor box, many users treat the NAS as a stable appliance and do their experimental homelab work on other hardware. With DIY NAS platforms it can be tempting to mix storage, containers, VMs and random experiments on the same system, which increases the chance of self inflicted problems.

41. Integrated health check tools

Many turnkey NAS platforms include scheduled health scans, built in diagnostics and simple one click reports that summarise disk health, file system status and security posture. This gives casual admins a clear picture of whether things are normal without reading system logs.

42. Safer default network exposure

Vendor systems usually ship with conservative defaults for open ports, remote access and admin interfaces. They often require explicit confirmation before exposing services to the internet, which lowers the chance that a newcomer accidentally leaves something critical wide open.

43. Easier mixed environment support

Turnkey NAS software is designed from the start to serve Windows, macOS and Linux clients, as well as mobile devices, with presets for each. The same applies to printer shares, Time Machine and simple guest access, so a mixed household or office can work with fewer manual tweaks.

44. Family friendly features

Photo sharing, simple link based file sharing, parental controls and easy user creation make appliance NAS platforms attractive in homes where not everyone is technically minded. It is simpler to give each family member a home folder and app than to explain datasets and user groups in a more technical system.

45. Built in small business templates

Many vendor platforms include wizards labelled for small business tasks, for example file server for a workgroup, simple off site backup or camera recording for a shop. This template approach is less intimidating than building every share, permission and schedule from scratch.

46. Integrated antivirus and security scanners

Turnkey NAS operating systems usually include built in antivirus, basic malware detection and sometimes ransomware behaviour alerts that tie directly into shares and user accounts. With DIY stacks you often need to choose and connect your own security tools, then maintain them separately.

47. Built in help and guided troubleshooting

DSM, QTS, ADM and similar platforms tend to include integrated help panels, inline tooltips and simple diagnostic wizards that walk you through common problems such as slow access or failed backups. DIY platforms rely more on forum posts and community guides, which is slower for less experienced admins.

48. Tested support for vendor expansion hardware

Vendor NAS software is checked against their own expansion cards, external drive shelves, Wi Fi or cellular dongles and specific UPS models. This removes guesswork around drivers and compatibility that is more common when you deploy a general purpose OS on random hardware.

49. Clean virtual machine and container integration

On many turnkey NAS systems the built in virtualisation and container managers are linked directly into storage, networking and permissions with a unified permission model. DIY users often combine a separate hypervisor with storage and multiple container engines, which is more flexible but also more complex.

50. Easier link aggregation and networking features

Interface bonding, vlan tagging and basic quality of service are usually exposed through simple screens that understand the appliance hardware. On DIY setups these features can require manual configuration of network stacks or external switches with less guidance.

51. Integrated energy saving and scheduling

Turnkey NAS platforms frequently offer scheduled power on and power off, automatic hibernation and coordinated UPS shutdown in one place. DIY systems can do the same, but usually through a mixture of firmware settings, operating system tools and UPS software that are not collected into a single panel.

52. Simple handling of mixed storage tiers

Many vendor operating systems make it straightforward to mix solid state cache, solid state volumes and hard drive volumes with clear labels and usage suggestions. Users who just want a fast area and a bulk area can configure this quickly, without learning detailed tiering concepts.

53. Vendor tuned media indexing and AI features

Newer turnkey NAS software often includes ready configured services for face recognition, object tagging and quick search across photos and documents. Achieving the same on DIY systems typically means deploying several separate projects and ensuring they all stay updated and indexed correctly.

54. Friendly drive swap and expansion workflows

Guided workflows for swapping drives, upgrading disk size or adding new volumes reduce anxiety for people who only perform these tasks occasionally. DIY stacks present these operations at a lower level and expect the admin to understand more storage theory before they proceed.

55. Clearer codec and patent licensing story

For video playback and some network protocols the vendor usually takes care of licensing and legal obligations in the firmware and media apps. DIY stacks often leave it to the user to add codec packs, accept legal risk or live with reduced playback support.

56. Built in tools for privacy and data requests

Some turnkey NAS platforms provide simple tools for finding and exporting user data, wiping specific accounts and managing retention rules in ways that map to common privacy regulations. With DIY systems you usually have to design and script these workflows yourself.

57. Strong vendor partner and reseller ecosystem

Many service providers build standard offerings around Synology, QNAP or other vendor platforms, including fixed price backup, monitoring and remote management bundles. A customer can buy into that ecosystem more easily than asking a provider to support a one off DIY stack.

58. Remote diagnostic bundles for support

Vendor NAS software often includes support bundles that capture logs, system state and configuration in one archive that can be sent securely to support. On a DIY NAS, collecting everything a third party needs for diagnosis often involves more manual work and explanation.

59. Formal training and certification paths

Larger NAS vendors run structured training courses and certification exams focused on their platforms. Organisations can build a team of admins with recognised skills instead of relying only on informal community learning.

60. One click configuration backup and restore

Turnkey NAS systems usually have simple configuration backup features that capture users, shares, permissions and services in a single file that can be restored to identical or successor hardware. DIY platforms often have more moving parts, so configuration is spread across several tools and locations.

61. Better integration with office printers and scanners

Appliance NAS platforms commonly provide straightforward file shares and mail relay options with clear documentation for popular multifunction printers and scanners. In many cases, scan to folder and scan to mail work with only minor setup, which is harder on some DIY stacks.

62. Hardware backed security features surfaced clearly

Where the appliance includes secure boot, dedicated security modules or signed firmware, the NAS operating system usually exposes these with clear status indicators. DIY builds can also use such features, but enabling and monitoring them often involves lower level tools and more specialist knowledge.

63. Cloud based fleet management for many devices

Several vendors now offer cloud consoles that let you see, update and sometimes configure multiple NAS units from one place. This is useful for managed service providers and larger organisations and is not commonly available for DIY installations.

64. Reduced risk of software dependency conflicts

Vendor NAS software controls the package set tightly and exposes apps through a curated store. This lowers the chance that installing one package will silently break another through shared libraries or operating system updates. DIY systems give more freedom at the cost of more potential conflicts.

65. Integrated download and ingestion tools

Turnkey NAS platforms often include a full featured download client for web, ftp, torrent and nzb sources, tied directly into shares and quota rules. Non technical users can automate downloads and have them land in the right places without learning separate tools.

66. Native calendar and contact sync services

Many appliance systems expose built in calendar and contact sync using industry standard protocols, with setup wizards for common phones and desktop mail clients. Small teams get a simple private address book and calendar without having to assemble separate groupware software.

67. Turnkey VPN server with guided client setup

Synology, QNAP and others commonly include their own VPN server packages with wizards and downloadable client profiles, so remote users can get secure access without the admin needing to deploy a separate dedicated VPN appliance.

68. Integrated reverse proxy and virtual host manager

Turnkey NAS software often lets you publish several internal apps behind a single public address using a graphical reverse proxy manager, with automatic certificate handling. On DIY systems this usually means manual web server configuration and ongoing maintenance.

69. Front panel copy and import workflows

Many branded NAS units wire the front usb port and copy button directly into the operating system, so pressing it can trigger predefined jobs such as importing photos or backing up a specific share. Replicating this behaviour on a DIY server normally needs custom scripting.

70. Effortless discovery by televisions and consoles

Vendor NAS operating systems usually ship with media servers that smart televisions and game consoles can see immediately, with almost no setup. For many households this simple living room playback is more important than advanced tuning.

71. Simple resource controls for apps and containers

Appliance platforms often expose per application limits for cpu, memory and sometimes network through sliders or basic fields in the app center. This reduces the chance that one heavy service will starve others without the admin needing to understand deeper container controls.

72. Structured beta and preview channels

Several commercial NAS ecosystems provide clearly labelled preview tracks for new features with documented rollback paths and support boundaries. Curious users can try new capabilities while still having a straightforward route back to a stable release.

73. Hardware aware media transcoding controls

Turnkey NAS software usually knows exactly which media acceleration features are present and exposes them through simple settings. Users can enable or disable hardware transcode and change quality limits without hand tuning media server parameters.

74. Native smart home and voice assistant integration

Many vendor platforms provide official skills or actions for major voice assistants and sometimes hooks for smart home platforms. This allows simple voice commands or automation rules for tasks such as checking storage status or pausing heavy jobs.

75. Unified performance monitoring and graphs

Turnkey NAS systems usually include dashboards that graph cpu, memory, network and disk activity over time. Admins get an at a glance view of behaviour without deploying a separate monitoring stack or learning specialised graphing tools.

76. Integrated snapshot browsing for end users

On many turnkey NAS platforms, users can see and restore earlier versions of files directly from the web file portal or desktop client, without needing admin access to the snapshot tools. DIY systems often expose snapshots mainly at the storage layer, which makes end user self service recovery more complicated to set up.

77. Pre defined permission and role templates

Vendor NAS software usually ships with ready made roles such as administrator, power user, standard user and guest that map to sensible permission sets. This reduces the chance of over privileged accounts and saves admins from building every permission scheme by hand, which is more common with DIY platforms.

78. Unified logging and audit views

Turnkey NAS systems tend to centralise system logs, access logs and app logs in one interface with filters and export options. Admins can quickly see who did what and when, instead of piecing together multiple log locations and formats as is typical on general purpose DIY servers.

79. Guided guest and project share creation

Appliance NAS platforms often include wizards specifically for temporary project folders or guest access, with options for automatic expiry and simple sharing links. DIY systems can do the same but usually require manual user creation, ACL tweaks and later cleanup that is easier to forget.

80. Consistent behaviour across the product range

Once someone has learned one model from a vendor, most of their knowledge applies across the whole family, even when hardware capabilities differ. Features behave in a consistent way, whereas DIY deployments can vary widely depending on how each server was built and configured.

81. Workload tuned defaults out of the box

Many vendor platforms come with presets for common workloads such as general file server, surveillance recording or virtualisation, each with tuned cache, connection and background task settings. DIY stacks often leave all the tuning to the admin and assume they understand how to optimise for each workload.

82. Multi administrator delegation with scoped access

Turnkey NAS software frequently supports multiple administrator level accounts with different scopes, for example a main system admin and a helpdesk admin who can reset passwords but not change storage. Implementing that kind of scoped admin access on a DIY stack usually demands deeper knowledge of underlying permission models.

83. Guided certificate and HTTPS management

Many appliance NAS platforms provide wizards that request, install and renew certificates from public authorities and apply them across web admin, file portals and apps. On DIY systems, certificate handling often requires manual web server configuration, file placement and periodic renewal scripts.

84. Vendor push notification channels

In addition to email alerts, turnkey NAS platforms often use vendor operated push services tied to their mobile apps and cloud accounts. This means important alerts such as disk failures or overheating can reach admins even when mail relays are misconfigured, something that is less common in DIY environments.

85. Clear support lifecycle and end of service timelines

Commercial NAS vendors publish how long each model and OS train will receive security and feature updates. That clarity makes it easier to plan hardware refreshes and budgets, whereas with DIY combinations of OS and plugins it can be harder to know which components will still be maintained in several years.

86. Offline update bundles for secure or air gapped sites

Turnkey NAS operating systems usually provide complete update files that can be downloaded once, checked and then applied to machines without direct internet access. Assembling equivalent offline update workflows for DIY stacks involves collecting OS updates, plugin updates and container images individually.

87. Dedicated tools to migrate from older or rival devices

Many vendor platforms include built in migration tools that pull data, permissions and sometimes application settings from older appliances or even competing NAS brands over the network. In DIY setups, migration is more often built around manual rsync, snapshots and recreation of users and shares.

88. Native S3 compatible object storage services

Some turnkey NAS systems include official S3 compatible endpoints that are tightly integrated with the built in user and permission model. This lets organisations expose object storage to applications without standing up and maintaining a separate object storage project on top of a DIY server.

89. Simple controls for scrubbing and integrity repair

Appliance NAS platforms typically expose data scrubbing and repair functions as a schedule choice rather than a low level command. Admins can enable regular scrubs to catch bit rot and silent corruption without needing to learn or script the underlying integrity tools.

90. Guided secure erase and decommission procedures

Many vendor NAS operating systems offer secure wipe options for entire volumes or selected shares, often including crypto erase where keys are destroyed. This makes it easier to safely dispose of or resell hardware, while DIY admins must design and verify their own data destruction workflows.

91. Predictable behaviour under partial hardware failures

Turnkey stacks are tested against common faults such as a dead fan, a missing expansion tray or a single failing drive, with clear warning messages in the GUI. DIY combinations of OS and hardware can behave less predictably when something fails, which increases pressure on the admin during incidents.

92. Wizards for expansion units and bay mapping

Where vendors sell expansion shelves, their NAS software usually provides screens that show which bay belongs to which chassis and guide the user through adding or replacing shelves. With DIY servers and generic JBODs, tracking physical bay mapping is often left to labelling and manual documentation.

93. Clean separation of admin and user facing portals

Appliance NAS platforms normally offer a clear split between the administrative interface and user portals for files, photos, mail or collaboration tools. End users rarely need to see the admin side, which reduces the risk of accidental changes compared with some DIY environments where everything is accessed in the same way.

94. Sector specific documentation and examples

Larger NAS vendors often produce guidance tailored to common sectors such as creative studios, surveillance deployments, education or small offices, including reference topologies and settings. DIY platforms rely more on generic documentation, leaving admins to translate that into sector specific designs themselves.

95. Reduced risk of command line mistakes

Because turnkey NAS systems guide most changes through the web interface and hide many low level options, there is less chance that an admin will break the system with a single incorrect shell command. DIY stacks encourage deeper shell access, which is powerful but also easier to misuse.

96. Factory reset and recovery options designed for non experts

Many vendor NAS devices include simple factory reset procedures and guided recovery wizards that bring the system back to a known state without needing installation media. On DIY servers, reinstalling or repairing the OS often involves bootable images, manual partitioning and reimporting storage.

97. Easier integration into vendor router and Wi Fi ecosystems

When a NAS, router and access points all come from the same brand, the software often includes shortcuts for service discovery, internal DNS and basic quality of service for media traffic. Recreating that level of smooth integration with a DIY NAS in a mixed vendor network typically takes more tuning.

98. Safer experimentation through vendor sandboxes or trial modes

Some turnkey NAS platforms offer limited scope trial zones or beta features that are clearly flagged and easy to disable, reducing the risk that experiments will affect core data. DIY environments can provide similar separation, but usually only if the admin designs careful virtualisation or lab setups.

99. Simple inclusion in vendor managed backup services

Vendors increasingly offer their own cloud backup platforms that recognise their NAS appliances automatically and apply sensible defaults for encryption, retention and throttling. DIY NAS users can pick any cloud they like, but must design the backup strategy, encryption and job tuning themselves.

100. Stronger non technical stakeholder confidence in the solution

Managers, clients or family members often feel more comfortable when critical data lives on a named appliance with an official operating system, public documentation and a support contract. That confidence in a recognisable product can be important even when a well built DIY alternative is technically very capable.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Nous sommes en 2026 et les choses ont pas mal évolué ces derniers mois. À une certaine époque, les systèmes DIY pour NAS se comptaient sur les doigts d’une main : ce n’est plus le cas. Aujourd’hui, on trouve des solutions très abouties, avec un niveau de qualité proche du monde professionnel, comme TrueNAS Scale ou Unraid, des options intermédiaires comme OpenMediaVault (OMV), et d’autres plus accessibles et plus souples, comme CasaOS, ZimaOS ou UmbrelOS. Nous aborderons également le cas de Proxmox…

Qu’est-ce que le DIY pour les NAS ?

Le concept de NAS DIY (Do It Yourself) repose sur une idée simple : s’affranchir du verrouillage matériel des constructeurs (Synology, QNAP, Asustor…). Au lieu d’acheter un boîtier propriétaire, vous sélectionnez vos propres composants (boîtier, processeur, RAM, contrôleurs…) ou vous recyclez un ancien PC.

Cette approche offre 2 avantages majeurs :

• Rapport performance/prix : pour le prix d’un NAS 4 baies du commerce équipé d’un processeur souvent limité, vous pouvez assembler une machine capable de gérer du transcodage 4K, des dizaines de conteneurs Docker, des machines virtuelles… 
• Évolutivité : vous n’êtes plus limité par le nombre de ports, la mémoire soudée ou les choix matériels du constructeur. Votre NAS évolue avec vos besoins.

À cela s’ajoute un point souvent sous-estimé : la possibilité de donner une seconde vie à un NAS qui ne reçoit plus de mises à jour…

Qu’est-ce qu’un système DIY pour les NAS ?

On me pose souvent la question : pourquoi parler de « système » et pas simplement de « système d’exploitation (OS) » pour NAS ?

Parce qu’en 2026, un NAS moderne n’est plus seulement un serveur de partage de fichiers (SMB/NFS). C’est une plateforme qui combine trois couches complémentaires :

• OS : généralement Linux, il gère le matériel et le système de fichiers (ZFS, Btrfs, XFS…) ;
• Interface web : outil d’administration au quotidien, qui permet de gérer stockage, utilisateurs, services, mises à jour et supervision (sans passer par des lignes de commande) ;
• Applications : écosystème de services que vous hébergez qui était la force des fabricants historiques… mais maintenant Docker est devenu central.

Les poids lourds : Performance et stockage massif

Ces solutions visent d’abord la fiabilité et une gestion sérieuse du stockage.

TrueNAS Scale : l’incontournable

Avec ses évolutions récentes, TrueNAS Scale s’est imposé comme une référence du NAS DIY. Son point fort, c’est la protection des données grâce à ZFS (snapshots, auto-réparation, intégrité), avec une approche très “pro”.

En contrepartie, ZFS reste relativement rigide : étendre un pool en ajoutant “juste un disque” n’est pas aussi souple que sur d’autres solutions. Pour exploiter ZFS dans de bonnes conditions, il est recommandé d’avoir beaucoup de mémoire vive/RAM (ECC de préférence).

Si votre priorité est la pérennité et la sécurité des données, TrueNAS Scale est un excellent choix.

Unraid : la flexibilité avant tout

Toujours très populaire chez les particuliers, Unraid brille par sa capacité à gérer des disques hétérogènes (marques et tailles différentes) avec une grande simplicité. Son système de parité permet d’ajouter un disque facilement, au fil de l’eau. Son interface est aussi l’une des plus accessibles et sa gestion de la virtualisation (VM avec passthrough GPU) est une référence pour les configurations hybrides.

Le point à intégrer dans l’équation : son modèle économique a évolué. Les mises à jour sont désormais liées à un abonnement, sauf licence à vie plus onéreuse. Cela le place face à une concurrence gratuite de plus en plus solide.

Unraid reste un excellent choix pour le multimédia, l’hébergement d’applications et le recyclage de disques, à condition d’accepter le coût de la licence.

L’intermédiaire

OpenMediaVault est construit autour d’une base Debian, avec une philosophie simple : rester léger, stable et relativement proche de Linux.

OMV tourne sur à peu près tout, y compris sur du matériel ancien. Il laisse plus de latitude pour personnaliser l’OS sous-jacent que certaines solutions plus “encadrées”. En revanche, l’interface est plus austère et demande souvent un peu plus de connaissances pour obtenir une configuration parfaitement propre (permissions, services, supervision, sauvegardes).

C’est une solution cohérente pour les utilisateurs à l’aise avec Linux qui veulent un NAS sans fioritures, sur du matériel modeste.

La nouvelle vague : simplicité et one-click

Ici, l’objectif est clair : privilégier l’accessibilité, l’expérience utilisateur et une installation rapide.

CasaOS, ZimaOS et UmbrelOS

Ces systèmes (ou surcouches, selon les cas) cherchent à transformer un serveur en « cloud personnel » facile à prendre en main. Les interfaces sont modernes, visuelles et l’installation d’applications ressemble à un App Store… On déploie des services en quelques clics, ce qui les rend attractifs pour démarrer vite.

La limite est structurelle : ce ne sont pas, à la base, des OS orientés « stockage avancé ». La gestion RAID, la stratégie de protection des données et les scénarios de migration/extension sont sommaires (rien à voir comparé à TrueNAS et Unraid).

Ils sont donc très adaptés à un premier serveur multimédia/domotique, mais moins pertinent si vous cherchez une plateforme de stockage « sérieuse » pour des données réellement critiques.

HexOS

HexOS est très attendu (toujours en Bêta), car l’ambition est séduisante : proposer la puissance d’une base type TrueNAS avec une interface beaucoup plus simple. C’est une piste intéressante pour ceux qui veulent une expérience plus « grand public » sans renoncer à une base technique solide.

Point important : c’est un produit payant. Son intérêt dépendra de son niveau de maturité et de la qualité de l’intégration au quotidien.

L’alternative : virtualisation avec Proxmox

Techniquement, Proxmox VE n’est pas un OS de NAS : c’est un hyperviseur. Mais en 2026, c’est la base de nombreuses installations homelab.

Le principe est simple : vous installez Proxmox sur le matériel (bare metal), puis vous déployez votre NAS (TrueNAS, OMV…) dans une machine virtuelle et vos autres services dans d’autres VM ou conteneurs.

L’intérêt ici, c’est que vous séparez les rôles. Vous facilitez les sauvegardes complètes (snapshots, export) et vous rendez l’infrastructure plus résiliente. Si un service tombe, le reste continue de tourner et vous pouvez restaurer proprement.

Cependant, c’est une approche plutôt réservée aux utilisateurs avancés. Elle demande une bonne maîtrise des notions de stockage (pass-through, contrôleurs, performances, sécurité des données).

Que choisir en 2026 ?

Le choix ne dépend plus uniquement des fonctionnalités (Docker est devenu un standard), mais de votre priorité? Vous voulez :

• Protéger vos données avant tout : TrueNAS Scale
• Recycler des disques variés et évoluer facilement : Unraid
• Une solution simple, légère, proche de Linux : OMV
• Une belle interface et démarrage rapide : CasaOS ou ZimaOS
• Un homelab complet et une infra modulaire : Proxmox

Certains diront que le NAS DIY est à son apogée. De mon côté, je le vois plutôt comme une étape : les outils se simplifient, les standards se consolident et le niveau de finition continue de monter. Reste à choisir l’approche qui correspond à vos contraintes… et à votre tolérance à la complexité.

Ever Wanted a Modern Mac Mini, but Windows? And for AI? The MS-S1 Max Review

The Minisforum MS-S1 Max is one of those mini workstations that looks straightforward on paper, but starts to feel unusual once you look at how it is put together and who it seems to be aimed at. It is built around AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395, pairing a 16C/32T CPU with Radeon 8060S integrated graphics and an NPU that contributes to a quoted platform total of up to 126 TOPS. The big differentiator is the memory design: 128GB of LPDDR5x-8000 UMA, shared between the CPU and GPU, which changes the usual limits you hit on iGPU systems where VRAM is the first bottleneck. Minisforum also leans into “serious deployment” features here, including dual 10GbE, WiFi 7, USB4 v2, a slide-out chassis for maintenance, and even references to clustering and 2U rack mounting. The result is a machine that can make sense for creators, power users, and AI-focused workloads, but it also comes with a price level that forces the obvious question: what are you actually getting for that money beyond raw specs.

---

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Quick Conclusion

The Minisforum MS-S1 Max is best understood as a compact Strix Halo workstation rather than a conventional mini PC, because its value is tied to the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 APU, the Radeon 8060S iGPU, and especially the 128GB LPDDR5x-8000 UMA memory pool that helps avoid the usual iGPU VRAM ceiling in creation, GPU-accelerated work, and local AI experimentation. It pairs that core platform with unusually strong external connectivity for its size, including dual 10GbE RJ45, WiFi 7, and a mix of USB4 and USB4 v2 ports that make high-bandwidth docks and storage setups practical, while the internal 320W PSU and heavy cooling stack are clearly built for sustained loads rather than short bursts. In testing, the system’s behavior has a few quirks that matter in daily use, particularly the way the chassis can feel hot to the touch in idle until the fan profile becomes more reactive under load, and the fact that noise ramps into the low 50 dBA range once the cooling really gets going, even if idle acoustics are more modest. Expandability is also a mixed bag: the slide-out design is convenient, but the storage layout includes a PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot alongside a second M.2 limited to PCIe 4.0 x1, and the PCIe x16 slot is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, so it rewards buyers who already know what they plan to add. The price is the real gatekeeper here, because it only makes sense if you will actually use the UMA memory capacity, the iGPU performance, and the high-speed networking and USB bandwidth, but for that narrower audience, it offers a rare combination of compact form factor, strong APU compute, and connectivity that is difficult to match without moving to a much larger desktop or adding a discrete GPU.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Check AliExpress or the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Design & Storage

The MS-S1 Max feels like Minisforum took the general “mini workstation” idea and then built a thicker, more industrial version of it to cope with the Strix Halo platform. The chassis is metal and noticeably more substantial than the smaller MS-series boxes, with ventilation cut across multiple sides rather than relying on a single intake and exhaust path. It can be used vertically or horizontally thanks to feet on more than one face, which makes sense given how much of the marketing leans toward desk use one day and rack or shelf use the next.

Minisforum also keeps the slide-out structure here, and it is clearly intended to make maintenance less annoying than a traditional small desktop. In practice, it is still a compact, dense build, but you are not dismantling the entire enclosure just to access the main service areas. The system also has a couple of physical touches that make it feel more “deployment aware” than most mini PCs, like the mounting points underneath and the general emphasis on stacking, shelving, or grouping more than 1 unit together.

Storage is one of the areas where the MS-S1 Max shows both its strengths and its compromises. You get 2 internal M.2 2280 slots, but they are not equal: 1 is PCIe 4.0 x4 and the other is PCIe 4.0 x1. That means you can have a fast primary NVMe for OS and active work, but the second slot is better treated as capacity storage, warm data, or a secondary pool where peak throughput matters less. Minisforum ships the reviewed configuration with a 2TB Gen 4 SSD, so you can start testing immediately, but once you begin planning expansion, that lane split becomes a real consideration.

Physically, the M.2 placement is functional but not especially convenient. The slots sit low in the chassis near the base and tucked behind a lot of the cooling hardware, which makes upgrades feel more fiddly than they need to be. There is airflow down there, but it is not the kind of open, easy-access layout you get in a larger desktop. It also does not really encourage tall, pre-fitted heatsinks on SSDs, since clearance is limited and the space around the cooling assembly is tight. If you plan to run heavy sustained writes, you will probably end up choosing low-profile drives or slim heatsinks simply because it is the easiest fit.

On the expansion side, the MS-S1 Max includes a full-length PCIe x16 physical slot, but it is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, and that matters if you are buying cards based on the x16 shape alone. The form factor also pushes you toward half-height, half-length cards in most practical installs, and even then it can get cramped depending on cabling and where the PSU wiring runs.

In other words, the slot is useful for NICs, storage adapters, capture cards, and some compact accelerators, but it is not a “drop in any x16 card” situation, and the system rewards planning ahead before you buy hardware for it.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Internal Hardware

At the heart of the MS-S1 Max is AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395, and the main thing to understand is that it is an APU platform built to behave more like a compact workstation than a typical integrated-graphics mini PC. You are getting a 16C/32T Zen 5 CPU with boost up to 5.1GHz, paired with an on-die Radeon 8060S GPU with 40 CUs and up to 2900MHz. In real use, that combination shifts the expectations around what “no discrete GPU” actually means, because the compute and graphics capability are designed to scale together rather than feeling like a strong CPU with an afterthought iGPU.

The most defining hardware choice is memory, because you do not get SODIMM slots here at all. The system uses up to 128GB LPDDR5x-8000 on a 256-bit bus, and it is shared between CPU and GPU via UMA. That has practical implications in workloads that normally hit VRAM limits first, like GPU-accelerated creative work or local AI inference, where the ability to allocate a much larger pool to the GPU can matter more than raw shader count. It also means your “upgrade path” is basically decided at purchase, so the value proposition depends heavily on whether 128GB UMA is something you will genuinely use, rather than just admire on a spec sheet.

On the AI side, the platform is marketed around a combined figure of up to 126 TOPS, with the NPU itself rated up to 50 TOPS. In day-to-day terms, that does not automatically translate into every app running faster, because it depends on whether your software actually targets the NPU, the GPU, or the CPU. What is clear from the positioning, and from how similar Strix Halo systems are being used, is that this design is meant to handle local model work without immediately forcing you into a discrete GPU purchase. That also explains why Minisforum leans into “run large models locally” messaging more than it usually does on its mainstream mini PCs.

Cooling and power delivery are tightly linked to the internal hardware decisions. Minisforum rates the system at 130W in Performance mode, 95W in Balanced, and 60W in Quiet, and the cooling stack is built around a copper base, 6 heat pipes, phase change material, and dual turbine fans, with a max fan speed of 3600 RPM. The PSU is internal and rated up to 320W, which helps explain why the chassis is thicker than many of Minisforum’s earlier workstations. In practice, that internal PSU choice also supports the idea that this box is expected to hold higher sustained loads than a typical mini PC without relying on a large external power brick.

There are also a few platform-level details that shape how “workstation-like” it feels. The system supports Windows 11 Pro and Windows 11 24H2 Pro/Home, and the BIOS is positioned as feature-rich, with fan monitoring and tuning options plus platform toggles that matter to power users. This is relevant because the MS-S1 Max is not just built for one narrow purpose, it is built for people who will switch between modes, tweak profiles, and repurpose it across different roles over time. If you treat it like a sealed appliance, you will still get high performance, but you are leaving a lot of what the platform is trying to offer on the table.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Ports & Connections

The MS-S1 Max is one of the more connectivity-heavy systems Minisforum has put out, and it is clearly designed around the assumption that it will sit in a workstation or lab environment rather than acting as a living-room mini PC. On the front, you get 2 USB4 ports at 40Gbps, a USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A at 10Gbps, and a 3.5mm TRRS combo jack, plus 2 built-in DMIC mics that are pitched for voice and AI-assisted capture use. In practice, that front layout feels aimed at day-to-day convenience: fast external storage, a dock or capture device, and simple headset or mic options without needing to reach around the back.

On the rear, Minisforum doubles down on bandwidth. There are 2 USB4 v2 ports at 80Gbps, which is the kind of future-proofing that only really makes sense if you plan to use high-speed docks, external storage, or potentially GPU enclosures over time. The review experience lines up with that idea: the ports work as normal USB4 for most peripherals, but the value is really in the headroom, because 80Gbps devices and adapters are still not common in most studios. Alongside those, you get 2 USB 3.2 Gen2 ports at 10Gbps and 2 USB 2.0 ports, which is a more practical mix than it sounds, because it means you are not “wasting” high-speed ports on low-speed peripherals like keyboards, UPS management cables, or dongles.

Networking is a major selling point here, but it is also a slightly divisive one depending on your setup. The MS-S1 Max provides 2 10GbE RJ45 ports, both using Realtek RTL8127 controllers, and it also includes WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4. In use, the wired ports are straightforward and do what you would expect in a compact workstation, including saturating 10GbE when paired with storage that can keep up.

WiFi 7 is also immediately usable, and the practical takeaway is that you can get multi-gig wireless performance without much effort if you already have a WiFi 7 router, but it is still not a replacement for wired 10GbE if you are treating this as part of a storage or production workflow.

Video output is handled through 1 HDMI 2.1 FRL port plus DisplayPort Alt Mode over USB4 and USB4 v2, which makes multi-display setups easy without any additional hardware. Minisforum rates these outputs up to 8K@60Hz and 4K@120Hz, and in the real world that means you can run high-refresh 4K displays or multiple monitors with less compromise than most iGPU-based mini PCs. The only real caveat is that the system leans heavily on USB4 for flexible display and peripheral expansion, so the people who get the most out of the port selection are the ones already planning to use docks, external storage, or high-bandwidth accessories, rather than just plugging in a keyboard and a single monitor.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Performance & Tests

In day-to-day use, the MS-S1 Max feels less like a typical mini PC and more like a compact workstation that happens to have an iGPU. General desktop operation is consistently responsive, and the platform’s bandwidth-heavy design shows up most clearly when you start stacking tasks that normally push integrated graphics systems into obvious slowdown. One thing that stood out early is how “hot to the touch” the exterior can feel when the system is sitting idle, with thermal imaging showing roughly 55 to 60°C around sections of the chassis and vents in that state. At the same time, internal sensor readings were not presenting anything alarming, which suggests the metal body is doing what it is meant to do as part of heat dissipation, but the idle fan curve behavior did not feel especially reactive until a workload actually kicked in.

Once the system is put under load, the cooling behavior becomes easier to understand and, in practice, more reassuring. During active workloads, the external readings dropped notably in many areas, with measurements around 31 to 34°C being observed on parts of the casing once sustained tasks were running, and internal hot spots that had looked extreme during idle did not remain in that range once the fan profile ramped. Noise levels followed the same pattern: at idle the system sat around 39 to 41 dBA, but under heavier load it ramped to roughly 51 to 53 dBA. It is not silent, but it is also not unexpectedly loud for a high-power APU system with multiple fans and a chassis that is clearly built to move air.

Power draw is one of the more interesting parts of the MS-S1 Max story because it is unusually low when the system is doing very little, then rises quickly once the GPU side is engaged. Idle consumption landed around 13 to 16 W, which is striking given the CPU, GPU, memory bandwidth, and overall positioning of the device. More moderate CPU-oriented workloads pushed consumption into roughly the 45 to 58 W range, with brief spikes into the 70 to 80 W area depending on thread behavior in the test. Once the Radeon 8060S was hit hard in GPU-heavy testing, total system power moved into triple digits, with figures around 141 to 158 W being recorded, which lines up with the idea that this chassis is designed to translate a lot of electrical budget into sustained APU performance rather than short bursts.

Benchmarking results were strong, but the platform’s newness made comparison data less useful than usual in several tools. PCMark produced a score of 8,353, and a run through 3DMark showed a wide spread depending on the test: Solar Bay scored 5,200, Speedway landed at 1,900 with frame rates around 18 to 19 FPS, and Steel Nomad Light cleared 11,000 with an average of 82.3 FPS. Night Raid, which is a better fit for integrated graphics platforms, came in at 70,000 overall, with a graphics score of 130,522 and a CPU score of 19,312. The practical takeaway from these results is that the MS-S1 Max can behave like a “real” gaming-capable APU system in the right workloads, but it also sits in a strange middle ground where some benchmark suites still struggle to place it cleanly against older mini PCs or discrete-GPU desktops.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Verdict & Conclusion

The MS-S1 Max is easier to understand once you stop thinking of it as a “mini PC with good specs” and instead treat it as a purpose-built Strix Halo workstation in a compact chassis. The big wins are the APU design and the 128GB UMA memory pool, because that combination changes what is practical on integrated graphics, especially for workloads that normally fall over due to VRAM limits. In use, it shows up as a system that can handle serious creative and compute tasks without immediately forcing you into a discrete GPU upgrade path, while still giving you enough connectivity to fit into faster workflows through dual 10GbE, WiFi 7, and USB4 v2. It is not flawless though: the system can feel surprisingly hot to the touch in idle despite internal sensors looking fine, and the fan behavior seems more tuned for “react under load” than “stay cool at rest,” which is a real-world usability detail you notice when it is sitting on a desk near you.

Where things get more complicated is the value discussion. At pricing around the mid/high $2,000 range depending on configuration, this is not competing with mainstream mini PCs at all, and it is not trying to. The audience is much narrower: people who want a high-bandwidth APU platform, who will actually use the memory capacity and fast external connectivity, and who are comfortable paying for that kind of compact engineering. If your workload is mostly general office, light creation, or basic homelab tasks, it is difficult to justify over more conventional systems, including Minisforum’s own smaller workstations. But if you are specifically chasing a compact workstation that can credibly do gaming, content work, and local AI experimentation without a discrete GPU, the MS-S1 Max is one of the few systems that makes that argument feel realistic, even if it comes with the usual early-platform quirks and a price tag that will still put off most buyers.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Check AliExpress or the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Minisforum MS-S1 Max PROs

Minisforum MS-S1 Max CONs

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16C/32T) delivers workstation-class CPU performance in a compact chassis Radeon 8060S (40 CUs) iGPU is capable enough for 1080p gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads without a dGPU 128GB LPDDR5x-8000 UMA reduces typical iGPU VRAM limitations for creation and local AI tasks Strong idle efficiency with power draw observed around 13 to 16W in light desktop use Dual 10GbE RJ45 enables high-throughput workflows without needing add-in NICs WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 provide fast wireless connectivity for setups where wired is not practical 4 total USB4-class ports (2x USB4 40Gbps + 2x USB4 v2 80Gbps) support high-speed docks and storage Slide-out chassis design improves serviceability compared with many compact desktops Multiple power and fan modes (Performance/Balanced/Quiet/Rack) allow tuning for noise vs sustained load

High price puts it outside typical mini PC value expectations Storage expansion is uneven (1x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x4 + 1x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x1), limiting the second slot for high-performance SSD use Exterior can feel very hot at idle, with fan response seeming less aggressive until load begins PCIe x16 slot is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, and physical space constraints limit card choices

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

5 Mistakes New NAS Buyers ALWAYS MAKE

If you are buying a NAS for the first time, it is very easy to focus on brand names, bay counts and discounts while overlooking practical issues that will shape your experience for the next 5 to 7 years. New buyers often underestimate noise in real rooms, forget to plan for future capacity growth, misjudge the usefulness of SSD cache, ignore long term power consumption, or assume that a couple of very large drives are always the best value. On top of that, many people treat a NAS like a simple external drive rather than a 24/7 network device that will sit near family members or co workers and quietly draw power every day. This article looks at 5 common mistakes that first time NAS owners make and explains how each one happens, what it looks like in normal home or small office use, and the straightforward checks you can perform before you spend any money so you do not end up with a noisy, inefficient or inflexible system.

Mistake #1: Underestimating NAS Noise in REAL-WORLD Use (IGNORE the official Specs Sheets)

A common mistake with a first NAS is to assume it will sound like a quiet router or a small external drive. In practice a NAS contains several moving parts that generate and transmit noise into the room, especially at night or in a small flat. Drive seek clicks, spindle hum, fan airflow and vibration passing into the furniture all add together. If the system ends up in a bedroom, living room or small home office, the constant whirr can lead to complaints from other people in the house and leave the owner wondering whether the device is faulty when it is simply behaving as designed. It is also easy to forget that scheduled tasks such as antivirus scans, backups and indexing will often push the CPU, fans and disks harder than normal file access, so a system that seems acceptable during light daytime use can become noticeably louder when these jobs run.

Noise levels are heavily influenced by physical design choices that new buyers rarely consider. Metal chassis units tend to amplify vibration compared with plastic enclosures, which means every drive click and fan change is more noticeable. Larger capacity HDDs, particularly above 8TB, usually contain more platters and a more active actuator assembly, which produces sharper clicks and a deeper background rumble than smaller disks. Fan design also matters. Rear mounted fans tend to push sound directly into the room, while models with downward facing or internal fans may spread the noise more evenly into the surface under the NAS. Even the desk or cabinet matters, since hard surfaces can resonate and make a quiet system sound louder. Simple changes such as placing the NAS on a foam pad, an anti vibration mat or thick rubber feet will reduce the amount of vibration transferred into the furniture and can make a noticeable difference to perceived noise without changing the hardware.

The practical way to avoid this problem is to plan acoustics at the same time as you choose capacity and CPU. If the NAS must live in an occupied room, it makes sense to look at lower noise HDD lines, to avoid the very largest capacities where possible, and to consider using SATA SSDs for the working volume if budget allows. Checking vendor spec sheets for noise ratings in dB is useful, but you should also think about where the NAS will physically sit and how air can flow around it, since putting a box in a sealed cupboard simply forces the fans to run harder. Most modern NAS systems allow fan speed profiles and drive hibernation, which can reduce noise during idle periods, and many also support power schedules so the unit can power down completely during hours when it is not needed. You can also move heavy jobs such as RAID scrubs, indexing and backup windows into predictable time slots, for example overnight if the NAS is in a separate room, so that short periods of higher noise are less disruptive while the system remains quiet for normal daytime access.

Mistake #2: Ignoring Future Capacity and Expansion (PLAN AHEAD!)

A second common mistake is to buy a NAS that only matches your current data footprint with no realistic allowance for growth. Many first time buyers look at their existing files, see that they use 2TB or 4TB, then choose a 2 bay unit and a pair of modest drives that cover today with a small buffer. Once the NAS is in use, however, new cameras, phones and laptops start backing up to it, family members begin storing photos and videos, and it often becomes the default place for downloads and shared work files. Within a year or 2, the system that once looked spacious can be near its usable limit, especially once you take RAID overhead and snapshots into account.

The physical bay count and the way you populate those bays on day 1 has a direct impact on how easy it will be to grow later. A 2 bay NAS that starts fully populated leaves you with only a couple of options when you run out of room. You either replace both drives with larger ones, which is expensive and involves a full rebuild, or you bolt on an external expansion chassis if the vendor offers one. A 4 bay unit that initially uses only 2 drives gives you a much smoother path. You can add extra disks one at a time, or take advantage of flexible RAID schemes from some brands that allow mixing different drive sizes over time, which is far more forgiving when budgets are tight or upgrade windows are short.

Avoiding this mistake means planning capacity as a multi year decision rather than a single purchase. It is usually better to buy a slightly larger chassis with more bays than you think you need, then start with a sensible number of mid sized drives that offer a good cost per TB. This gives you headroom to add disks later without reorganising everything and lets the array performance improve as you add more spindles. It also leaves space for other changes such as introducing SSD volumes or cache in the future without having to retire the entire unit. In short, it is safer to overspec the enclosure a little and understuff it at the start than to buy the smallest possible model and discover that you have run out of practical expansion options far sooner than expected.

Mistake #3: Assuming SSD Cache and RAM Upgrades are a Magic Performance Fix (SAVE YOUR MONEY!)

New NAS owners often treat SSD cache and RAM upgrades as a universal answer to “my NAS feels slow”, without checking whether the underlying workload or hardware actually benefits. It is common to see a 2 or 4 bay system with a modest CPU and a couple of M.2 slots promoted heavily as “cache ready”, which encourages buyers to add SSDs and memory on day 1. In reality, if the processor is already running close to 100 percent under load, extra RAM will mostly sit idle and cache will only accelerate specific types of access. For simple sequential workloads such as bulk media streaming or large backup jobs, disk performance and network limits usually matter more than having faster cache in front of the array, so the investment does not translate into a noticeable improvement.

SSD cache in particular is often misunderstood. Write cache temporarily lands incoming data on SSDs and then flushes it to HDDs later, which can smooth out bursty writes but does not change the final speed of the array. Read cache keeps copies of frequently accessed “hot” data on SSDs, but in most NAS use this tends to be small random IO, metadata and thumbnails rather than entire large media files. Some platforms allow you to tune cache block size and policy, which can help in database or VM heavy environments, but for simple file sharing the benefit is limited. If a NAS mainly serves big video files to a handful of clients, using SSD cache rarely justifies the cost. In many cases, placing the NAS operating system, app data and indexes on an SSD volume, or using SSDs as a small primary pool for truly performance sensitive shares, delivers more predictable advantages than a generic cache layer.

The same caution applies to memory upgrades. More RAM allows the NAS to keep more filesystem cache and run more services concurrently, but it does not compensate for an underpowered CPU or a saturated network link. A basic check of CPU and memory utilisation under your typical workload is essential before buying additional modules. If CPU usage is consistently low while memory is pegged, extra RAM may help. If the processor is the bottleneck, adding memory or cache will not change the response time of apps and shares. For most first time buyers, it is more sensible to size CPU, network and base storage correctly first, then consider SSD based OS volumes, manual or automated tiering, and targeted RAM upgrades later if monitoring shows clear evidence that these changes will address a real bottleneck rather than an assumed one.

Note – If you are a QNAP NAS owner, you CAN use an alternative to ‘SSD Cache’, but using QTier – this MOVES (not copy) to data from slower HDDs and onto faster SSDs, as data is frequently accessed.

Mistake #4: Treating Power Consumption as an Afterthought (You Have CONTROL)

Many new NAS buyers focus on purchase price and capacity, then only think about power consumption after the first full month of electricity bills. A NAS is designed to be available around the clock, which means that even modest differences in idle draw add up over a year. Larger HDDs with more platters, multiple bays running full time, and older or less efficient CPUs all contribute to a steady baseline load, even when no one is actively using the system. In small flats or home offices this continuous draw can be a surprise, particularly for users coming from purely cloud based workflows where the power cost is hidden in the subscription fee.

Hardware choices have a direct impact on how much power a NAS will use at idle and under load. High capacity HDDs tend to have higher idle consumption because the mechanics must be ready to spin and seek immediately. A system with fewer, larger disks may draw more power at rest than a similar capacity built from several smaller drives, although this is not a strict rule and depends on the specific models. CPU generation and class matter as well. Modern low power x86 chips such as Intel N series parts can idle in the single digit watt range but still turbo high enough for typical home workloads, while older desktop class processors often draw more even when idle. Buyers who only look at drive capacity and bay count without checking HDD datasheets and CPU TDP figures can easily end up with a system that runs hotter and more power hungry than necessary for basic file serving and backups.

Software features and configuration also play a major role, yet many first time owners never touch these options after initial setup. Enabling HDD hibernation for lightly used volumes can drop disk consumption from around 8 to 12 W per drive to well under 1 W when idle, multiplied across several bays. Most NAS platforms support scheduled power on and power off, which allows you to shut the system down completely during hours when it is not needed and wake it automatically for work periods or backup windows. Moving heavy jobs such as backups, RAID scrubs and indexing into specific time slots also helps, since the system can stay in a lower power state for more of the day. Simple measures like these, applied on top of sensible hardware selection, make the difference between a NAS that quietly adds a manageable cost to your electricity bill and one that runs at full power far more often than your usage requires.

Mistake #5: Assuming Fewer Large Drives are Better (Often the REVERSE is Better)

A frequent assumption among new NAS buyers is that the best approach is to purchase the largest individual HDDs they can afford, fit a pair into a small enclosure and rely on that pair for both capacity and protection. On paper this looks simple and neat. Two 30TB drives in a 2 bay unit appear to offer an easy route to 30TB of usable space with RAID protection. However, this approach often produces a poor price per TB compared with building the same or greater capacity from several mid sized disks, and it concentrates a lot of risk and cost into each individual drive. When one of these large disks fails or needs replacing, the financial hit is substantial and rebuilds can be lengthy.

Cost of NAS Hard Drives (Example)
Seagate Ironwolf HDDs (Regular)	WD Red Pro HDDs (Pro Series)
1TB – $35 2TB – $65 4TB – $105 6TB – $158 8TB – $177 10TB – $224 12TB – $258 14TB – $271 16TB – $309 18TB – $389	4TB – $140 6TB – $173 8TB – $215 10TB – $245 12TB – $253 14TB – $270 16TB – $298 18TB – $349 20TB – $419 22TB – $551

In most cases, the price per terabyte on both sides will remain largely consistent at each capacity. HOWEVER, when you start putting these drives into a NAS/DAS enclosure and acting in the RAID configuration, it soon becomes apparent that the ben efits in Drive #s in a RAID 1 vs a RAID 5 immediately show a saving in almost every single capacity the smaller you go! Below are two examples of achieving 12TB in a NAS enclosure using RAID 1 vs using RAID 5 (so, still maintaining 1 disk drive failure protection and having 12TB of storage to use):

12TB Storage in a RAID 1 MIRROR	12TB Storage in a RAID 5

Looking at retail pricing makes the problem clear. Large capacity HDDs carry a significant premium that is not always reflected in proportional capacity gains. At the same time that a 30TB drive might cost 500 to 600 in local currency, 10TB or 12TB drives can often be found for less than 200 each. Four 12TB drives in RAID 5 or similar single disk fault tolerant layouts can deliver 36TB of usable space for less money than a pair of 30TB disks that only provide 30TB usable, while also offering more spindles for better aggregate performance. The trade off is higher drive count, which brings extra power use, more noise and additional points of failure, but in purely cost per TB terms the multi-drive configuration is often more efficient.

The practical lesson is that drive selection for a first NAS should consider more than headline capacity. New buyers should compare price per TB across several HDD sizes, factor in the desired RAID level and protection scheme, and understand how many drives their chassis can support now and in future. In many cases it is more effective to choose a slightly larger enclosure and populate it with several mid sized disks that offer a good value point, rather than filling a small unit with the largest drives available. This gives better flexibility for future expansion, more options if a disk fails, and a storage layout that balances cost, capacity and performance instead of relying entirely on a small number of very large and expensive disks.

Larger NAS/DAS systems are always more expensive, as they need to have more physical space, resource use in production and power/PSU sizes to run the larger enclosure. Add to this, thanks to memory shortages right now, that smaller scale NAS systems are starting to arrive with more memory by default (as 2-4GB is becoming less cost-effective to produce with chip shortages) and often with little/no increase in the base price. For example, below is the TS-264 and TS-464 NAS. Same CPU, design and ports – however the 2-Bay system has 8GB memory by default AND IS STILL $134 cheaper! So, this can often mean that you can save money on smaller quantities of larger capacity HDDs becuase the enclosure they are going in is cheaper over all.

Conclusion – PLAN AHEAD!

New NAS buyers rarely set out to make poor choices. The problems described above usually arise because a NAS is treated like a simple storage box rather than a device that will run all day, sit in shared spaces and gradually absorb more roles over several years. Noise, expansion, SSD cache, power consumption and drive sizing are all easy to overlook when you are comparing spec sheets or promotional bundles, yet each one has a direct and practical impact on how comfortable and economical the system will be to live with. The safest approach is to treat the first NAS purchase as a medium term infrastructure decision rather than a one off gadget. That means thinking realistically about where the box will sit, how many people will rely on it, how much data is likely to arrive over time and how much power draw and running cost is acceptable. A slightly quieter chassis, a few more bays, a balanced drive choice and sensible use of features like hibernation and scheduling will matter more in day to day use than chasing the biggest individual drives or adding SSD cache on day 1. By addressing these 5 areas before you buy, you reduce the risk of needing early upgrades or workarounds and increase the chance that the NAS you choose will remain suitable for several years without constant attention.

5 affordable Turnkey 10GbE NAS Solutions (Between $499 and $699)

For years, 10GbE networking has been seen as a premium feature reserved for high-end or enterprise-grade NAS devices, often pushing total system costs well beyond the reach of home users and small businesses. However, as controller prices have dropped and demand for faster data transfers has grown, a new wave of affordable NAS solutions has started to appear with built-in 10GbE. These systems no longer require expensive proprietary upgrade cards or third-party NICs, and many sit comfortably below the $699 / £599 price point. They cover a range of use cases, from compact SSD-based NAS devices to rackmount storage appliances and versatile desktop units. Below is a selection of some of the most notable options currently available, each offering a balance of performance, connectivity, and affordability for users who want to move beyond 1GbE or 2.5GbE without breaking the bank.

UniFi UNAS Pro (7-Bay, Rackmount)

I keep coming back to two words for the UniFi UNAS Pro—fundamentals and consistency. UniFi has clearly focused on making this system a strong addition to their ecosystem, prioritizing the essential storage needs of a NAS. They’ve succeeded in this, but comparisons with long-established competitors are inevitable. While solid, reliable, and stable, the UniFi UNAS Pro will take time to be competitive on the software front. If you’re deeply invested in the UniFi ecosystem, you’ll appreciate its ease of use and integration. However, outside of a UniFi network, it may feel feature-light compared to alternatives. The pricing is competitive for a launch product at $499, and while it’s not the best NAS on the market, it’s the most user-friendly and UniFi-ready. It will likely satisfy many users’ needs. I can certainly see this being integrated into existing UniFi networks as a 2nd stage backup alongside their already existing 3rd party NAS solution, with the potential to graduating to their primary storage as Ubiquiti continue to evolve this platform above and beyond the fundamentals their have nailed down in the UNAS Pro system.

• Approx. Price: $499 / £400

• Specs: ARM Cortex-A57 quad-core CPU, 8 GB RAM, seven 2.5″/3.5″ SATA bays, 1×10GbE SFP+ and 1×1GbE.

• Why It Stands Out: Exceptional price-to-performance for pure storage needs. Lacks advanced multimedia or container apps but ideal for high-speed backups in a rackmount setup.

---

 

Asustor Flashstor 12 Gen 1 (Compact NVMe NAS)

The Asustor Flashstor Gen 2 12-Bay NAS is a robust and versatile solution for users with demanding storage needs. Its combination of high-performance hardware, extensive connectivity options, and compact design makes it a standout choice for content creators, small businesses, and enthusiasts. With dual 10GbE ports, USB 4.0 connectivity, and support for up to 12 M.2 NVMe drives, it offers exceptional speed and scalability. While the device has a few quirks, such as its mixed PCIe slot speeds and lack of M.2 heat sinks, these are manageable with proper planning and aftermarket solutions. The Flashstor Gen 2 excels in raw performance, handling intensive workflows with ease and maintaining low noise levels even under load. Its power efficiency and robust thermal management further enhance its appeal for 24/7 operation. For users prioritizing hardware capabilities and performance, the Flashstor Gen 2 delivers on its promises. While its complexity may deter less experienced users, those with the technical expertise to configure and optimize the system will find it a valuable addition to their workflow.

• Approx. Price: $750 / £600

• Specs: Intel Celeron N5105, 12×M.2 NVMe slots, single 10GbE port, compact form factor.

• Notable Traits: High-density SSD storage in a small desktop chassis. Excellent value for SSD-heavy builds.

---

 

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus

BOTTOM LINE – The UGREEN NASYnc DXP4800 Plus does not feel ‘finished’ yet and still needs more time in the over, but UGREEN have been very clear with me that this product is not intended for release and fulfilment till summer 2024 and improvements, optimization and product completion is still in progress. Judging the UGREEN NAS systems, when what we have is a pre-release and pre-crowdfunding sample, was always going to be tough. The DXP4800 PLUS is a very well put-together NAS solution, arriving with a fantastic launching price point (arguably even at its RRP for the hardware on offer). UGREEN has clearly made efforts here to carve out their own style, adding their own aesthetic to the traditional 4-bay server box design that plagues NAS boxes at this scale. Equally, although they are not the first brand to consider Kickstarter/Crowdfunding for launching a new product in the NAS/personal-cloud sector, this is easily one of the most confident entries I have seen yet. The fact that this system arrives on the market primarily as a crowdfunded solution (though almost certainly, if successful, will roll out at traditional retail) is definitely going to give users some pause for thought. Equally, the UGREEN NAS software, still in beta at the time of writing, although very responsive and nailing down the basics, still feels like it needs more work to compete with the bigger boys at Synology and QNAP. Hardware architecture, scalability, and performance are all pretty impressive, though the performance of the Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe slots didn’t seem to hit the numbers I was expecting. Perhaps a question of PCIe bottlenecking internally, or a need for further tweaking and optimization as the system continues development. Bottom line, with expected software updates to roll out closer to launch and fulfillment, such as an expanded App center and mobile client, the UGREEN DXP4800 Plus is definitely a device worth keeping an eye on in the growing Turnkey and semi-DIY NAS market. As an alternative to public cloud services, this is a no-brainer and worth the entry price point. As an alternative to established Turnkey NAS Solutions, we will hold off judgment till it is publicly released.

• Approx. Price: $595 / £475

• Specs: Intel Pentium Gold 8505 (6-thread), 8 GB DDR5, 4×SATA + 2×M.2 slots, 1×10GbE and 1×2.5GbE, plus HDMI, USB-C, USB-A, and SD reader.

• Why It’s Attractive: Well-rounded design with rich connectivity and media support, undercuts most rivals on price and features.

---

 

TerraMaster F4-424 Max / F6-424 Max

The TerraMaster F4-424 Max is a robust 4-bay NAS system that offers a powerful mix of features and flexibility for a wide range of tasks. Powered by the Intel i5-1235U CPU with 10 cores and 12 threads, the F4-424 Max excels at resource-intensive applications such as Plex media streaming, 4K hardware transcoding, and virtual machine hosting. Its dual M.2 NVMe slots running at PCIe Gen 4 speeds significantly improve storage performance, especially when used for caching, while the two 10GbE ports offer high-speed networking environments, allowing for 20Gbps throughput via link aggregation.

In terms of software, TOS 6 brings notable improvements, although it still lags behind the more polished ecosystems of Synology DSM and QNAP QTS. That said, TerraMaster’s continuous software evolution with each new version of TOS ensures that users have access to more robust tools and security features. For its price point of $899.99, the F4-424 Max is a compelling option for those seeking high-performance NAS solutions with scalability in mind. While the Pro model offers competitive performance, the Max takes it a step further with advanced networking, making it ideal for environments where speed is a priority.

• Approx. Price: $675 / £550 (F4-424 Max, during sale) – $899 / £700 (F6-424 Max, regular)

• Specs: Intel Core i5-1235U (10-core), 8 GB RAM, dual 10GbE ports, dual M.2, with 4 or 6 SATA bays depending on model.

• Why It Helps: The F4-424 Max frequently drops below the $800 mark in promotions, offering unusually strong CPU performance and dual 10GbE at a mid-range price point.

Where to Buy? Terramaster F4-424 Max ($899 Amazon) – HERETerramaster F4-424 Max ($799 Aliexpress) – HERE

---

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Did Minisforum FINALLY Go Too Far with the MS-02 Ultra?

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is positioned as a compact workstation that deliberately blurs the line between a high-end mini PC and a small server platform. While its physical footprint remains relatively small at 4.8 L, the design choices made across CPU selection, PCIe expansion, storage layout, and networking place it well beyond the scope of conventional desktop minis. During extended hands-on testing, it becomes clear that this system is not designed around a single use case. Instead, it targets users who expect to adapt the hardware over time, whether for professional content creation, software development, virtualization, NAS deployment, or mixed workloads that benefit from high I/O density. This flexibility comes with complexity, and the MS-02 Ultra expects a certain level of user familiarity with BIOS tuning, PCIe lane allocation, and thermal tradeoffs that are rarely encountered in this form factor. A key point that emerged during testing is how sharply the experience changes depending on which CPU configuration is selected. The Ultra 9 285HX variant is not simply faster than the lower-tier models. It fundamentally alters what the system can do by unlocking ECC memory support, enabling dual 25GbE SFP+ networking, and adding a PCIe combo card that expands total M.2 capacity to 4 slots. The Ultra 9 275HX and Ultra 5 235HX versions retain the same chassis and core platform, but they operate closer to a traditional high-end mini PC, with fewer storage options and reduced network throughput. As a result, the MS-02 Ultra range should be viewed less as a single product and more as a tiered platform, where hardware capability and intended role scale directly with price.

From a value perspective, pricing spans a wide range and reflects both component availability and Minisforum’s attempt to offer barebones and fully populated options. The entry barebones Ultra 9 285HX configuration sits at $1,199, while fully populated ECC-based builds can reach $2,999. During testing, it became apparent that much of the system’s long-term value is tied to its scalability rather than its out-of-the-box configuration. Users who intend to keep the system static may find better value in smaller Minisforum models, while those planning to expand storage, networking, or PCIe devices over time are more likely to benefit from the MS-02 Ultra’s architecture. This distinction frames the rest of the review, which focuses less on raw specifications and more on how those design choices behave in real-world use.

---

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Quick Conclusion

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is best understood as a compact but highly modular platform rather than a conventional mini PC, and its design clearly reflects that intent. It delivers strong CPU performance, extensive connectivity, and an uncommon level of internal expansion for a system of this size, but it also expects the user to engage actively with its configuration, cooling behavior, and upgrade planning. The system’s real strength lies in how well it can scale over time through additional storage, PCIe expansion, or higher-speed networking, rather than in any single out-of-the-box performance metric. Its pricing and hardware complexity place it firmly in enthusiast and professional territory, making it ill-suited for users who want a simple or inexpensive desktop replacement, but a compelling option for those seeking a compact system that can grow into demanding roles such as a workstation, NAS, or virtualization host as their needs evolve.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra ($999-1499)

Check AliExpress or the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra

Check the Official Site for the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Design & Storage

The MS-02 Ultra immediately distinguishes itself from earlier Minisforum workstation designs by abandoning the lighter, more modular internal layout used in systems like the MS-01 and MS-S1 Max. Instead, the chassis adopts a far denser internal structure that resembles a compressed micro-tower, with components stacked tightly around a central airflow channel. While the system still uses a slide-out internal frame, the motion is more deliberate and less fluid than previous designs due to the weight and density of the installed hardware. This approach prioritizes structural rigidity and thermal containment over ease of access, signaling that the MS-02 Ultra is designed to be configured carefully rather than frequently opened.

Storage implementation is one of the defining aspects of the MS-02 Ultra, particularly on the Ultra 9 285HX configuration. In this model, storage is split across the motherboard and a dedicated PCIe combo card. Two M.2 NVMe slots are mounted directly on the board and are positioned close to the CPU and memory area, which places them inside an active airflow path but also imposes strict height limitations. SSDs with tall, pre-attached heatsinks are not practical here, and Minisforum instead supplies low-profile heatsinks intended to work within the confined space. During testing, this design proved functional, though it requires more planning than a conventional desktop layout.

The additional two M.2 slots are integrated into the PCIe card that also houses the dual 25GbE controllers. This card is exclusive to the Ultra 9 285HX version and is responsible for expanding total NVMe capacity from 2 drives to 4. Unlike typical expansion cards, this unit combines networking and storage on a single PCB and includes its own active cooling solution. In use, the card introduces noticeable power draw even when the network interfaces are idle, but it also centralizes high-speed I/O in a way that simplifies cabling and internal layout. This design choice is unusual, but it aligns with the system’s goal of maximizing capability within a small enclosure.

There are also important performance considerations tied to how storage bandwidth is allocated. The motherboard-mounted M.2 slots are specified as PCIe 4.0 x4, but during testing, lane sharing and PCIe crossover behavior resulted in scenarios where one slot operated at PCIe 5.0 x4 while others were reduced to PCIe 3.0 x4. This was not immediately obvious from the documentation and required closer inspection of the PCIe lane map and BIOS configuration to fully understand. While overall throughput remained strong across all drives, the behavior highlights that the MS-02 Ultra expects users to pay attention to lane allocation if they intend to fully populate all storage bays.

From a practical standpoint, the storage design reflects the broader philosophy of the MS-02 Ultra. It offers unusually high capacity and flexibility for a system of this size, but it does so by imposing constraints related to drive selection, thermal clearance, and PCIe bandwidth sharing. For users planning a fixed configuration, these limitations are manageable once understood. For those intending to experiment with different storage combinations over time, the layout rewards careful planning rather than casual swapping. This reinforces the idea that the MS-02 Ultra is engineered for deliberate, long-term deployment rather than frequent hardware iteration.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Internal Hardware

At the core of the MS-02 Ultra is Intel’s Core Ultra HX platform, with the Ultra 9 285HX representing the most complete implementation of what this chassis can support. This processor combines 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores, allowing the system to scale from low-load background tasks to sustained multi-threaded workloads without the immediate thermal collapse often seen in compact systems. In practice, the CPU feels closer to a desktop-class part than a mobile processor, particularly when sustained power limits are raised in the BIOS. That capability comes with tradeoffs in power draw and cooling demand, but it also defines the MS-02 Ultra’s positioning as something far more ambitious than a conventional mini PC.

Memory support further reinforces that distinction. The system includes 4 DDR5 SODIMM slots, but only the Ultra 9 285HX variant enables ECC functionality. During testing, ECC was supported at 4800 MT/s, and while that frequency is lower than some non-ECC DDR5 kits, the stability benefits are clearly aligned with the system’s server-adjacent ambitions. The physical layout of the memory slots is unconventional, with 2 slots positioned close to the CPU cooling path and the remaining 2 mounted on the opposite side of the board.

Minisforum has added a custom heatsink over part of the memory and nearby controllers, suggesting thermal behaviour around the DIMMs was significant enough during development to warrant dedicated mitigation.

PCIe lane availability is one of the most critical aspects of the MS-02 Ultra’s internal design. The system exposes 3 PCIe slots: 1 PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, 1 PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, and 1 PCIe 4.0 x4 slot. Notably, the PCIe 5.0 x16 slot is not occupied by the bundled 25GbE combo card, leaving it available for future expansion. This is an unusual design choice in a system of this size and points to forward-looking intent rather than immediate necessity. However, physical space limits the practicality of using this slot to low-profile, short-length cards, which significantly narrows the pool of compatible GPUs and accelerators.

Power delivery inside the chassis is handled by an internal 350 W PSU, which is uncommon for systems in this size class. During teardown and testing, it became clear that Minisforum opted for an internal unit to support higher transient loads and to provide direct power connectors for PCIe devices. While an external PSU would have simplified thermals and internal space management, the internal design enables a cleaner external setup and removes a common bottleneck seen in expandable mini PCs. The tradeoff is increased internal heat density, which places more responsibility on the cooling system to manage both CPU and power delivery components simultaneously.

Overall, the internal hardware configuration of the MS-02 Ultra reflects a deliberate shift away from simplicity and toward flexibility and scalability. Each major subsystem, CPU, memory, PCIe, and power delivery, is implemented in a way that assumes the user will actively engage with BIOS settings, lane allocation, and hardware planning.

This makes the system less forgiving for casual users but far more capable for those who intend to push it beyond default configurations. Rather than hiding complexity, the MS-02 Ultra exposes it, which is both its defining strength and a potential barrier depending on the user’s expectations.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Ports and Connections

The MS-02 Ultra offers a port layout that reflects its hybrid workstation and infrastructure-focused design rather than a consumer desktop orientation. On the front panel, Minisforum has placed 2 USB4 v2 Type-C ports operating at up to 80 Gbps, alongside a single USB 10 Gbps Type-A port, a 3.5 mm audio jack, and the power button. In practical use, the front USB4 v2 ports proved capable of sustained high-throughput operation, including external NVMe enclosures where transfer speeds in the 6 to 7 GB/s range were observed. This makes the front panel suitable not just for peripherals, but for temporary high-speed storage, capture devices, or docking solutions without needing to access the rear of the system.

The rear I/O panel expands connectivity significantly and is where the system’s infrastructure focus becomes clearer. It includes 1 USB4 Type-C port at 40 Gbps, 3 USB-A ports at 10 Gbps, and a full-size HDMI 2.1 port supporting high-resolution and high-refresh output. The HDMI port provides a straightforward display option for setups that do not rely on DisplayPort over USB4, which is useful in environments where compatibility or cable length is a concern. Together, these ports support multi-display configurations without requiring a discrete GPU, though display bandwidth sharing across USB4 ports should still be considered when attaching multiple high-resolution monitors.

Networking is one of the defining characteristics of the MS-02 Ultra, particularly on the Ultra 9 285HX model. This version includes the previously mentioned 2 25GbE SFP+ ports delivered via the internal PCIe combo card, in addition to a 10GbE RJ45 port and a 2.5GbE RJ45 port. Each wired interface uses a separate controller, allowing simultaneous multi-tier networking without shared bandwidth bottlenecks.

In testing, the presence of multiple active network controllers contributed to higher idle power draw, but it also enables complex routing, storage, or virtualization scenarios that would normally require a much larger system. The 2.5GbE interface also supports Intel vPro, allowing remote management and BIOS-level access in supported environments.

Wireless connectivity is handled by an onboard WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 module, with external antenna connectors located at the rear. In close-range testing, WiFi 7 throughput exceeded 5 Gbps when paired with a compatible router, making it a viable option for high-speed wireless workflows when cabling is impractical.

While wireless connectivity is unlikely to replace the wired interfaces for sustained workloads, its inclusion rounds out the system’s connectivity and reinforces the idea that the MS-02 Ultra is designed to function in a wide range of deployment scenarios, from desk-based workstations to lab or rack-adjacent environments.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Speed, Noise, Heat and Power Tests

In day-to-day operation, the MS-02 Ultra behaves closer to a compact desktop workstation than a typical mini PC, particularly when configured with the Core Ultra 9 285HX. General responsiveness under Windows 11 Pro was consistently strong, even with multiple background tasks running, and the system showed no signs of instability during extended uptime.

Light workloads such as desktop productivity, media playback, and development tools rarely pushed power draw beyond moderate levels, although the presence of the 25GbE combo card does raise baseline consumption compared to smaller Minisforum systems.

CPU-focused testing highlighted the platform’s ability to sustain high loads, but also underscored how aggressively the system can scale power. In Cinebench, single-core workloads typically drew around 65 to 70 W, while full multi-core runs pushed total system power beyond 200 W at peak. These figures are unusually high for a system of this size, but they align with what would be expected from a high-core-count HX processor running with elevated power limits. Despite this, the cooling system maintained control, with external chassis temperatures remaining within reasonable limits even during prolonged stress periods.

Integrated graphics performance was evaluated using a mix of synthetic benchmarks and real-world gaming tests. Cinebench GPU and PCMark scores placed the system solidly ahead of most integrated-graphics mini PCs, but well below even mid-range discrete GPUs. In practice, games such as Sons of the Forest and Street Fighter 6 were playable at 60 FPS using medium settings, confirming that casual and light gaming is viable without additional hardware.

However, more demanding benchmarks like Steel Nomad and Solar Bay Extreme demonstrated clear limitations, reinforcing that users seeking higher graphical fidelity or advanced rendering will need a discrete GPU or external GPU solution.

Where the MS-02 Ultra differentiates itself is in scalability rather than raw out-of-the-box performance. USB4 ports supported external GPUs and high-speed storage without issue, and internal PCIe expansion allowed for measurable gains when discrete graphics were introduced. Storage benchmarks showed expected scaling across PCIe generations, with PCIe 5.0 NVMe drives exceeding 12 GB/s, PCIe 4.0 drives reaching around 6 GB/s, and PCIe 3.0 drives performing in line with their specifications. Overall, performance testing confirmed that the system’s architecture prioritizes flexibility and sustained throughput over specialization in any single workload.

Disclaimer on 25GbE and NAS Testing

This review does not include full performance validation of the dual 25GbE SFP+ interfaces or in-depth NAS and virtualization benchmarking. At the time of testing, a complete 25GbE network environment was not yet in place, which prevented meaningful throughput, latency, and sustained load testing of those ports. As a result, the networking discussion in this article is limited to hardware behavior, configuration, and early observations rather than verified performance metrics. A dedicated follow-up video and article are planned that will focus specifically on deploying the MS-02 Ultra as a NAS and Proxmox host, including detailed 25GbE testing, storage performance under RAID and VM workloads, and long-term stability analysis.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Conclusion & Verdict

After extended testing, the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra stands out as one of the most ambitious small-form-factor systems Minisforum has produced to date. It is not designed to be a simple plug-and-play mini PC, and it does not try to hide that fact. Almost every aspect of the system, from PCIe lane allocation to storage layout and cooling behavior, assumes the user will be willing to spend time understanding how the hardware fits together. In return, it offers a level of flexibility that is uncommon at this size, combining workstation-class CPU performance with expansion options that normally require a much larger chassis. The result is a system that feels closer to a modular platform than a fixed appliance.

In practical use, the MS-02 Ultra proves capable across a wide range of workloads, but its real value lies in how well it scales beyond its default configuration. CPU performance is strong enough for sustained professional tasks, integrated graphics are sufficient for light gaming and creative work, and the internal and external expansion options open the door to far more demanding roles over time. At the same time, the pricing, particularly for ECC-equipped or fully populated configurations, places it firmly in enthusiast and professional territory. Users who want something quiet, simple, and inexpensive will likely be better served by smaller Minisforum systems. For those who are comfortable tinkering, planning future upgrades, and investing in a platform that can evolve alongside their needs, the MS-02 Ultra delivers a rare combination of compact size, connectivity, and long-term adaptability that few systems currently match.

PROs of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra	CONs of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra
Strong multi-core CPU performance that approaches compact desktop-class systems Unusually high internal expandability for a 4.8 L chassis PCIe 5.0 x16 slot available for future expansion Dual 25GbE SFP+ networking on the 285HX model Support for ECC DDR5 memory on the 285HX configuration Four M.2 NVMe slots available on the top-tier model Internal 350 W PSU with auxiliary power for PCIe devices USB4 v2 ports capable of very high external storage and docking throughput Suitable for multiple roles including workstation, NAS, and virtualization host	High pricing for a area of the market where buyers are getting used to low, low prices, even for ECC-equipped or fully populated configurations Limited physical space restricts larger GPU and PCIe card choices Fan control largely confined to BIOS with limited OS-level adjustment (TBC) Complexity and tuning requirements may deter less experienced users who want to maximize their investment in this system

 

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra ($999-1499)

Check AliExpress or the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra

Check the Official Site for the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

iXsystems a mis en ligne la nouvelle version TrueNAS 25.10 (nom de code Goldeye). Cette dernière vient renforcer les performances, simplifie la gestion et ouvre la voie au stockage de très haut niveau. Goldeye est clairement conçu pour les environnements exigeants, tout en restant accessible.

TrueNAS 25.10

Après une phase Beta d’environ 40 jours, iXsystems annonce l’arrivée de la version finale de TrueNAS 25.10.

NVMe over Fabric : la vitesse mise à distance

L’un des points forts de Goldeye, c’est l’intégration de NVMe-oF (NVMe over Fabric), qui permet de traiter du stockage distant comme s’il était local. TrueNAS propose deux modes :

• NVMe/TCP (disponible dans la version Community) fonctionne sur des réseaux Ethernet classiques et offre des débits très élevés ;
• NVMe/RDMA (réservé aux éditions Enterprise) permet un transfert mémoire à mémoire (bypass CPU), pour une latence ultra-faible, idéal pour des workloads comme l’IA, la base de données ou la virtualisation critique.

OpenZFS 2.3.4 : efficacité et performances prévisibles

Goldeye embarque OpenZFS 2.3.4, avec des optimisations importantes :

• L’algorithme d’allocation des pools ZFS a été amélioré pour répartir les données plus efficacement, ce qui réduit la latence et rend les performances d’écriture plus constantes ;
• Le clonage de blocs est étendu à davantage de scénarios, ce qui améliore la réduction de données ;
• L’ARC (cache ZFS) prend désormais la taille non compressée des données en cache, pour mieux refléter les gains réels d’espace.

Capacité matérielle renforcée

TrueNAS Enterprise (les NAS maison d’iXsystems) gagne en puissance :

• La série F (flash hautes performances) peut désormais gérer jusqu’à 20 Po de NVMe ;
• La série M, dédiée à l’archivage, monte jusqu’à 40 Po pour les données froides ;
• Le support des cartes réseau 400 Gb/s (Terabit Ethernet) est intégré, ouvrant la voie à des réseaux ultra haut débit.

Une API modernisée et versionnée

Avec Goldeye, TrueNAS passe à une API JSON-RPC 2.0 sur WebSocket, beaucoup plus rapide que l’ancienne API REST. Cette API est versionnée, ce qui garantit des intégrations tierces plus stables au fil des mises à jour.

Des plugins sont déjà en cours de développement pour Kubernetes, VMware vSphere, Proxmox VE… La doc de l’API est disponible sur api.truenas.com.

Gestion plus simple des mises à jour

TrueNAS 25.10 introduit également un système de profils de mise à jour : Early Adopter, General, Mission Critical, Developer. Chaque profil correspond à un niveau de tolérance au risque.

Une interface Web plus fluide

L’interface utilisateur Web de TrueNAS gagne en ergonomie :

• Le guide iSCSI est repensé pour être plus simple et rapide ;
• L’éditeur YAML pour les Apps est amélioré (meilleure validation, syntaxe, confort d’édition) ;
• Les tableaux de bord de statistiques deviennent plus réactifs, les graphiques plus dynamiques ;
• La page “Utilisateurs” est repensée, avec des rôles prédéfinis pour simplifier la création et la gestion des comptes.

TrueNAS Connect : un centre de contrôle cloud

Goldeye active la plateforme TrueNAS Connect, un panneau de gestion Web :

• Monitorage en temps réel, alertes personnalisables et inventaire des systèmes ;
• Installer un TrueNAS depuis un navigateur devient possible, sans passer par un clavier physique : l’installation est guidée, sécurisée, et simplifiée ;
• Jusqu’au 1er décembre 2025, la version préliminaire de TrueNAS Connect est gratuite pour les utilisateurs Community.

Virtualisation : TrueNAS comme hyperviseur de données

Dans Goldeye, l’interface “Machines Virtuelles” est séparée de celle des “Conteneurs”, pour une meilleure clarté. On bascule sur le KVM (Hyperviseur Virtualisation), très robuste et déjà utilisé dans des environnements cloud majeurs. TrueNAS prend désormais en charge les machines virtuelles avec haute disponibilité (HA) sur les appliances Enterprise. Il est aussi possible d’importer/exporter de disques VM : formats VMDK (VMware), QCOW2, RAW, VDI…

Compatibilité GPU et matériel

TrueNAS 25.10 utilise des modules NVIDIA open source (driver 570.172.08), ce qui lui permet de supporter les cartes Blackwell (séries RTX 50 et PRO). Cette évolution signale l’abandon de certaines générations plus anciennes de GPU, notamment certaines GTX non compatibles.

En synthèse

Avec TrueNAS 25.10 “Goldeye”, iXsystems propose un savant mélange d’innovation technologique et de maturité logicielle. L’arrivée de NVMe-oF, la modernisation de l’API, l’interface web plus fluide et la gestion via TrueNAS Connect posent un jalon déterminant pour les infrastructures de stockage modernes. Que vous soyez en Community (version gratuite) ou Enterprise, Goldeye offre des outils puissants pour tirer pleinement parti de vos ressources, avec une ambition claire : faire de TrueNAS bien plus qu’un simple NAS, mais un véritable hyperviseur de données, centralisé, performant et évolutif. Vous pouvez télécharger gratuitement TrueNAS 25.10 sur la page officielle.

À noter que TrueNAS Goldeye ne séduit plus seulement les passionnés du DIY. Certains fabricants de NAS historique annoncent désormais explicitement la compatibilité de leurs boîtiers réseau avec cette version, ce qui montre à quel point 25.10 gagne en légitimité dans l’industrie.

Minisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 – Which Should You Buy?

Minisforum has steadily earned recognition in the compact workstation space, and the MS-01 stands as one of its most prominent entries. Released with a focus on balancing high-performance hardware in a small chassis, the MS-01 quickly found popularity among professionals needing powerful networking and scalable internals without the bulk of a full-sized desktop. It supports CPUs up to the Intel Core i9-13900H, includes dual 10GbE SFP+ ports, and provides expansion via a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot (operating at x8 speed), giving users access to discrete graphics or high-performance cards if needed. With three internal M.2 slots and support for up to 64GB of DDR5 memory, the MS-01 became a go-to mini workstation for users who value connectivity and component flexibility at a relatively modest price point.

In early 2025, Minisforum introduced the MS-A2 — a system clearly designed as a next-generation counterpart to the MS-01, but one that leans into AMD’s latest advancements. Featuring the Ryzen 9 9955HX processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, the MS-A2 offers more cores, more threads, faster base and boost clocks, and higher supported memory capacity, reaching up to 96GB DDR5 at 5600MHz. It also brings upgrades in memory bandwidth, M.2 storage speed (with all three slots supporting PCIe 4.0 x4), and internal thermal design. From a feature standpoint, the MS-A2 is positioned to meet or exceed the MS-01 in most categories — but it does so with a noticeable bump in price. Still, for users prioritizing top-end performance and storage throughput, the MS-A2 might justify the premium. The sections below break down how these systems stack up in real-world terms — not just on paper, but in actual deployment.

Minisforum MS-A2 vs MS-01 – Hardware Specifications Compared

At a glance, both the MS-01 and MS-A2 share a near-identical chassis, measuring 196×189×48mm and following Minisforum’s signature small form factor aesthetic. Internally, however, there are several notable differences that affect both systems’ expandability and long-term utility. Both devices feature three M.2 slots for high-speed NVMe SSDs, but only the MS-A2 supports full PCIe 4.0 x4 lanes on all three slots. By contrast, the MS-01 includes a single PCIe 4.0 x4 slot, one PCIe 3.0 x4 slot, and one limited PCIe 3.0 x2 slot. This directly impacts storage performance, especially for users aiming to run multiple high-throughput drives in parallel. In real terms, the MS-A2 allows up to three SSDs each capable of saturating 7,000MB/s read speeds, whereas the MS-01 will bottleneck in its second and third storage bays.

Both systems include a PCIe 4.0 expansion slot, which is a rare and welcome inclusion in mini PCs. On the MS-01, this slot is x16 physically but electrically operates at x8 speed and is suitable for half-height, single-slot PCIe cards. The MS-A2 retains this format but introduces PCIe bifurcation support, enabling more advanced setups with compatible cards — a notable advantage for developers or users building niche use cases like NVMe RAID or multi-GPU compute tasks in an edge environment. Additionally, memory support is slightly more capable on the AMD model, with the MS-A2 supporting up to 96GB of DDR5-5600 via two SO-DIMM slots, compared to the MS-01’s 64GB ceiling at DDR5-5200. This can make a tangible difference in virtualization or memory-intensive creative workflows.

In terms of connectivity, both units are very well equipped: dual 10GbE SFP+ ports, dual 2.5GbE RJ45, HDMI output, USB 3.2 Gen1/Gen2 Type-A ports, and USB4 (or USB-C with DisplayPort alt mode). The MS-A2 takes a slight lead in display output capabilities, supporting HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0 over USB-C, compared to HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4a on the MS-01. This means the AMD system supports 8K60 and 4K144 video streams natively. Wireless capability is also a step ahead on the MS-A2 with Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3, compared to the MS-01’s Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2. Altogether, while the MS-01 still holds up well a year after release, the MS-A2 offers clearly improved throughput, higher bandwidth components, and better display and wireless standards.

Minisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 – CPUs Compared

The defining difference between the Minisforum MS-01 and MS-A2 lies in their processor choices: the Intel Core i9-13900H and the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, respectively. While both CPUs are built for high-end mobile performance and boast identical peak boost clocks of up to 5.4GHz, the underlying architecture and core configurations are markedly different. The i9-13900H uses a hybrid architecture with 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, totaling 14 cores and 20 threads. In contrast, the Ryzen 9 9955HX employs 16 full-fledged performance cores and 32 threads based on AMD’s latest Zen 5 architecture. For users engaged in parallel processing tasks—such as 3D rendering, large-scale compilation, or virtualization—the extra cores and threads in the AMD chip deliver a tangible performance uplift.

Zen 5 is a notable advancement over its predecessors, built on TSMC’s 4nm process and optimized for both performance and power efficiency. This gives the Ryzen 9 9955HX a structural advantage in multithreaded scenarios, with improved instruction throughput, cache handling, and memory bandwidth. The Intel Core i9-13900H, based on Raptor Lake and fabricated using Intel’s “7” process (a refinement of their 10nm SuperFin node), holds its own with mature thread management and strong single-thread performance. Its support for Intel’s Thread Director technology ensures efficient scheduling across its mixed-core layout, which can be beneficial in workloads like content creation and lightly-threaded business apps. However, the Ryzen chip’s unified core design tends to yield more predictable and consistent scaling when all threads are pushed simultaneously, reducing thermal spikes and improving overall sustained performance.

Thermal and power characteristics further highlight the gap between the two systems. Intel’s i9-13900H has a base power of 45W but can boost up to 115W under load, while AMD’s Ryzen 9 9955HX has a configurable TDP ranging from 55W to 75W. Although the Intel chip has a higher upper limit, in practice it tends to spike power draw during short workloads and then throttle back. In comparison, the Ryzen CPU maintains a steadier thermal and power profile over longer tasks. This behavior was reflected in sustained tests over one-hour and 24-hour windows under mixed network and compute usage: the MS-A2’s CPU performed more consistently, with lower long-term thermal build-up, aided by its upgraded internal fan design. Combined with support for up to 96GB of DDR5 memory versus 64GB on the MS-01, the MS-A2’s CPU configuration offers better overall headroom for demanding, sustained workstation use.

Minisforum MS-A2 vs MS-01 – Graphics and Processing Power Compared

Although the Minisforum MS-01 and MS-A2 are positioned as compact workstations rather than gaming rigs, integrated graphics performance still plays a role in determining their suitability for visual workloads, media playback, and GPU-accelerated tasks. The MS-01 leverages Intel’s Iris Xe graphics, which includes 96 execution units running at up to 1.5GHz. The MS-A2, on the other hand, features AMD’s Radeon 610M — a lightweight RDNA2-based iGPU with 2 compute units operating at 2.2GHz. While the AMD GPU has a higher clock speed on paper, the significantly larger number of execution units in the Iris Xe gives the Intel system a considerable edge in real-world performance. In benchmarks such as the Steel Nomad Light test, the MS-01 consistently delivered higher frame rates and better render completion times, particularly during prolonged sequences that tax the GPU.

This performance advantage was also evident in media encoding and general GPU-accelerated workloads. Intel’s integrated graphics tend to benefit from better driver maturity, wider codec support (particularly for Quick Sync Video), and improved handling in professional apps with Intel-optimized pipelines. Users working in environments involving light 3D rendering, accelerated video encoding, or virtual display compositing are more likely to see stable and consistent results from the MS-01’s iGPU. However, it’s important to note that neither device is intended to replace a discrete GPU for high-end graphical workflows. Their iGPUs are best suited for media playback, multi-monitor output, light rendering tasks, and as fallback units for headless server use.

That said, the MS-A2 reclaims ground when it comes to video output capabilities. While the MS-01 supports HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4a via USB4, the MS-A2 steps forward with HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0 over Type-C. This enables support for up to 8K at 60Hz and 4K at 144Hz, offering tangible benefits for users who rely on ultra-high-resolution displays or high refresh rate monitors in productivity setups. Professionals in video editing, CAD work, or photography may find that this broader standard support gives the AMD model a longer shelf life as display technologies advance. In broader processing terms, the MS-A2’s superior CPU — the Ryzen 9 9955HX — delivers more overall compute performance, particularly in multi-threaded applications. But for users with GPU-reliant workloads or who value stability across legacy software environments, the MS-01’s Iris Xe graphics make a compelling case. Ultimately, choosing between the two comes down to workload distribution: CPU-heavy environments favor the MS-A2, while mixed or GPU-skewed tasks lean toward the MS-01.

Minisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 – Conclusion and Verdict

After evaluating both systems across CPU architecture, internal connectivity, storage bandwidth, and thermal performance, it becomes clear that the Minisforum MS-01 and MS-A2 cater to slightly different segments of the same professional user base. The MS-01, despite being over a year old, still offers a well-balanced configuration with mature Intel performance, reliable thermal behavior, and excellent compatibility with existing Intel-optimized software. Its Intel Core i9-13900H processor delivers solid single-core performance and responsive handling in mixed-load scenarios, particularly when combined with Iris Xe graphics that outperform AMD’s 610M in general GPU-accelerated tasks. When paired with dual 10GbE SFP+ ports, 2.5GbE RJ45, and PCIe expansion, the MS-01 provides considerable functionality in a highly compact chassis — all at a more affordable starting price than its AMD counterpart.

However, the MS-A2’s specification gains are more than just incremental. It introduces a newer CPU platform with significantly higher multi-threaded performance, better storage throughput via triple PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slots, and wider memory support scaling up to 96GB at 5600MHz. These improvements position the A2 as a clear upgrade in raw compute potential. Enhanced display output support, including HDMI 2.1 and DP 2.0 over USB-C, adds flexibility for users deploying ultra-high-resolution or high-refresh-rate monitors in content creation, design, or data visualization environments. Furthermore, the updated internal cooling system — subtle in layout but effective in long-term thermal consistency — ensures the AMD-based system maintains sustained performance under extended workloads. While the MS-A2 demands a higher upfront investment, it delivers longer-term value for users running multi-threaded software stacks, high-speed storage arrays, or heavy virtual machine workloads. In essence, the MS-01 is still a dependable and well-priced workstation that meets the needs of a wide user base. But the MS-A2 redefines Minisforum’s performance ceiling with broader bandwidth, more compute power, and enhanced scalability. For users focused on future-proofing, heavier workloads, or maximizing hardware capability within a small form factor, the MS-A2 is the more capable — if more expensive — option. Your choice ultimately comes down to whether cost or capability is the higher priority in your deployment.

Minisforum MS-01 Pros and Cons	Minisforum MS-A2 Pros and Cons
Lower Price Point The MS-01 is considerably more affordable than the MS-A2, making it a better value for users with lighter or mixed workloads. → The MS-A2 demands a premium due to its higher-end specs, which may not be fully utilized in typical home or office deployments. Superior Integrated Graphics (Intel Iris Xe) With 96 execution units, the Iris Xe GPU in the MS-01 outperforms the Radeon 610M in the MS-A2 for media encoding, driver stability, and general GPU-accelerated workloads. → The MS-A2’s Radeon 610M has only 2 compute units and is weaker in rendering, encoding, and professional visual tasks. Thunderbolt 4 and Mature USB4 Support The MS-01 offers USB4 with DisplayPort 1.4a and Thunderbolt compatibility, which ensures greater peripheral compatibility and broader bandwidth for external devices. → The MS-A2 lacks Thunderbolt and uses USB-C ports with DisplayPort 2.0, which are better for displays but more limited in external expansion options. More Established Intel Software Ecosystem Features like Intel vPro, Thread Director, and DL Boost make the MS-01 better suited to enterprise, AI inference, and compatibility with legacy Intel-tuned workloads. → The MS-A2 is newer but lacks mature support for certain enterprise features like vPro or AI-specific instructions. Limited Storage Bandwidth Only one of the three M.2 slots runs at PCIe 4.0 x4; the others run at PCIe 3.0 x4 and x2. This bottlenecks multi-drive setups or RAID configurations. → The MS-A2 supports PCIe 4.0 x4 on all three M.2 slots, enabling full-speed NVMe performance on every drive. Lower Memory Capacity and Speed Supports up to 64GB DDR5 at 5200MHz. This limits RAM-heavy workloads like virtualization or large dataset handling. → The MS-A2 supports up to 96GB DDR5 at 5600MHz, giving it better headroom for demanding memory scenarios. Solid GPU Performance Stability The MS-01 performs better under GPU-accelerated tasks due to more mature graphics drivers and better software integration (Quick Sync, Adobe, etc.). → MS-A2 may suffer compatibility or driver limitations in older applications or video pipelines.	Much Higher CPU Performance The Ryzen 9 9955HX delivers 16 cores and 32 threads, far exceeding the MS-01’s i9-13900H with 14 cores (6P+8E) and 20 threads. This gives the MS-A2 a major edge in rendering, VMs, and parallel workloads. → The MS-01 holds its own in lightly threaded or bursty workloads but falls behind in sustained multi-core tasks. Full-Speed NVMe Across All Storage Bays All three M.2 slots run at PCIe 4.0 x4 speeds, which is ideal for users building high-speed RAID arrays or multi-disk configurations. → The MS-01’s mixed PCIe generation slots limit throughput and performance scaling with multiple drives. Higher RAM Capacity and Bandwidth The MS-A2 supports up to 96GB DDR5-5600, making it more suitable for VM clusters, code compilation, or large creative project workflows. → The MS-01 tops out at 64GB DDR5-5200, which may become a limiting factor in future-proofing. Advanced Display Output Support The MS-A2 features HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0, allowing up to 8K60 or 4K144Hz. Ideal for users with high-res displays or multi-monitor setups. → The MS-01 is limited to HDMI 2.0 and DP 1.4a, which caps out at 4K60 in most scenarios. Weaker Integrated GPU (Radeon 610M) The 2CU RDNA2 iGPU in the MS-A2 underperforms compared to the Iris Xe in the MS-01 in encoding tasks, graphical acceleration, and some professional media pipelines. → The MS-01 offers better iGPU performance and is more compatible with widely used software stacks. Higher Price for the Same Chassis While offering better specs, the MS-A2 comes at a significantly higher price for a similar form factor and port layout, making it less cost-efficient for users not needing its full capabilities. → The MS-01 delivers solid value for money and remains a competitive mini workstation despite being a generation older. Improved Thermal Efficiency and Sustained Load Performance A redesigned internal cooling layout in the MS-A2 provides better performance consistency under long-term stress compared to the MS-01, which can throttle during extended workloads. → The MS-01’s cooling is competent but may experience more thermal spikes under 24/7 heavy use.

Check Amazon for the Minisforum MS-A2 ($639-899 ) or MS-01 ($599-879) Below:

Check AliExpress for the Minisforum MS-A2 ($799 ) or MS-01 ($599) Below:

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE