1Password a annoncé le 12 novembre 2025 une amélioration majeure : le gestionnaire de mots de passe peut désormais s’ouvrir automatiquement dès que vous déverrouillez votre appareil, que ce soit via Face ID, Touch ID, un code PIN ou un mot de passe.
1Password a annoncé le 12 novembre 2025 une amélioration majeure : le gestionnaire de mots de passe peut désormais s’ouvrir automatiquement dès que vous déverrouillez votre appareil, que ce soit via Face ID, Touch ID, un code PIN ou un mot de passe.
Valve a dévoilé une salve de nouveaux produits physiques pour sa gamme Steam. L’annonce la plus alléchante est la Steam Machine, pensée pour faire rentrer l’écosystème Steam dans son salon. Une réponse aux consoles de salon, en somme.
C’est l’histoire d’un mec qui a compressé 60 jeux Steam pour économiser 380 GB, et ainsi faire en sorte qu’ils se lancent plus vite qu’avant.
Ce mec a compris que sur un disque dur classique, décompresser en temps réel avec un CPU moderne est parfois plus rapide que de lire des gigaoctets bruts de données à 7200 tours/min. Et pour cela, il a utilisé CompactGUI !
On pourrait se dire qu’un fichier compressé, c’est forcément plus lent à ouvrir mais en fait non, car un CPU récent peut décompresser en RAM plus vite qu’un disque dur ne peut lire.
C’est en partant de ce constant que
IridiumIO
a imaginé CompactGUI qui exploite cette anomalie physique. C’est une interface graphique pour compact.exe, une commande Windows que Microsoft a discrètement re-boostée en 2015 avec des algorithmes de compression modernes (XPRESS4K, XPRESS8K, XPRESS16K, LZX), puis totalement oubliée dans un coin de Windows…
En gros, vous faites pointer CompactGUI vers un dossier qui contient vox jeux, vous choisissez un algorithme de compression, vous appuyez sur un bouton, et Windows compresse tous les fichiers de façon transparente. Quand je dis transparente, je veux dire que le jeu continue de tourner normalement quand vous le lancez. Les fichiers restent accessibles comme avant, ils apparaissent dans l’Explorateur Windows sans différence visible, mais ils prennent tout simplement moins de place sur le disque.
Et quand vous lancez un jeu, Windows décompresse les fichiers en RAM à la volée, et vous jouez comme d’habitude. Cette sorcellerie, on la doit aux algorithmes de compression modernes de Windows 10+ et il y en a quatre :
Tenez par exemple, sur un fichier de test de 46.6 MB, LZX compresse à 15.7 MB, XPRESS16K à 20.1 MB, XPRESS8K à 21.1 MB, et XPRESS4K à 23.0 MB. En comparaison, la vieille compression NTFS classique (LZNT1) ne descend qu’à 26.2 MB. Les nouveaux algorithmes sont donc objectivement meilleurs, mais personne ne les utilise parce qu’il faut taper des commandes dans PowerShell.
Et c’est là que CompactGUI intervient puisqu’il transforme compact.exe en version compatible avec votre syndrome du clickopathe. C’est tout.
Voici quelques exemples réels de compression tels que remontés par la communauté CompactGUI :
Et ce qui est fou, c’est que dans la plupart des cas, l’impact sur les performances est dans la marge d’erreur des benchmarks. Les utilisateurs sur les forums racontent jouer tout à fait normalement, sans ralentissement perceptible. Certains équipés de disques durs plus anciens rapportent même des temps de chargement réduits.
Alors pourquoi ça marche aussi bien de compresser ?
Hé bien parce que les textures et les sons des jeux sont déjà compressés dans des formats spécialisés (DDS, OGG, MP3…etc), mais les assets bruts, eux, (scripts, configs, shaders, données de niveau…etc) sont souvent non compressés. XPRESS et LZX s’attaquent donc à ces fichiers non compressés et permettent ainsi de gagner beaucoup de place.
Et votre CPU dans tout ça ? Hé bien sur un processeur moderne dual ou quad-core, la décompression LZW (l’algo derrière LZX) est tellement légère qu’on ne la sent pas. XPRESS est encore plus rapide et le gain de temps sur la lecture disque compense largement le coût CPU de la décompression.
Mais attention, il y a un piège !!! Et ce piège c’est DirectStorage. Ce truc est une techno de Microsoft pour Windows 11 qui permet aux jeux de charger les assets directement du SSD vers la carte graphique, en contournant le CPU. C’est conçu pour les SSD ultra-rapides (NVMe) et ça réduit beaucoup les temps de chargement sur certains jeux.
Sauf que DirectStorage n’aime pas du tout la compression NTFS et les jeux qui l’utilisent peuvent planter ou avoir des performances dégradées si vous compressez leurs fichiers. Donc si vous êtes sur Windows 11 avec un NVMe récent et que vous jouez à des jeux AAA avec DirectStorage, n’utilisez pas CompactGUI. Mais si vous avez un bon vieux HDD, ou un SSD SATA classique, ou des jeux anciens qui n’utilisent pas la techno de DirectStorage, CompactGUI est une bénédiction.
Comme d’hab, ça dépend de vos jeux, de votre PC…etc. Donc y’a plus qu’à tester pour savoir si ça peut être bénéfique ou pas pour vous.
Pour l’installer, vous téléchargez CompactGUI depuis les releases GitHub , ou via Winget avec
winget install CompactGUI
Puis vous lancez l’app, vous sélectionnez un dossier de jeu (par exemple C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\Doom), vous choisissez un algorithme (XPRESS8K pour commencer), et vous cliquez sur Compress !
L’app vous affichera alors une barre de progression, le temps estimé, et le ratio de compression en temps réel. Et une fois terminé, votre jeu pèsera de 30 à 60% de moins, et vous pourrez le lancer normalement.
Et si jamais vous voulez décompresser, vous retournez dans CompactGUI et vous cliquez sur Uncompress. Ça restaurera tout à l’état d’origine !
CompactGUI intègre même une fonctionnalité de monitoring en arrière-plan. Vous configurez un dossier à surveiller (genre votre bibliothèque Steam), et CompactGUI compressera automatiquement les nouveaux jeux installés. Comme ça vous êtes tranquille !
Vous pouvez aussi ajouter CompactGUI au menu contextuel de l’Explorateur Windows ce qui vous permettra de faire un clic droit sur un dossier → Compress with CompactGUI.
Bref, un grand merci à Microsoft qui a développé des algos de compression dignes de WinRAR, les a intégrés nativement dans Windows 10, et les a laissé moisir dans un outil en ligne de commande que personne n’utilise.
Et merci à Lorenper pour le partage.
On a tous le même problème. Une manette pour la Switch, une autre pour le PC, et impossible de jouer sur son Mac ou son iPad sans devoir acheter encore un autre accessoire. On passe son temps à chercher quel câble va où, ou à se battre avec les menus “Bluetooth” pour “oublier cet appareil” et le reconnecter ailleurs. C’est pénible.
Et si je vous disais qu’il existe une seule manette pour les contrôler tous ? J’ai passé la semaine avec la 8BitDo Pro 2 (édition Hall Effect) , et laissez-moi vous dire que c’est peut-être bien la manette parfaite pour la maison.
Le timing était idéal. Je devais justement rendre mon verdict sur le service de Cloud Gaming GeForce Now Ultimate pour les amis de Mac4Ever, que vous pouvez lire en cliquant ici (oui, je mène une double vie de testeur). J’ai donc fait d’une pierre deux coups : j’ai passé des heures à streamer Forza 5 en qualité maximale sur un MacBook Air et un iPad, le tout piloté par cette 8BitDo Pro 2 . Un test croisé parfait.
Je vous parle du service de jeu là-bas, mais ici, on va se concentrer sur la manette, car elle le mérite vraiment.
Ce qui est fort avec cette 8BitDo, c’est la polyvalence. Au dos de la manette, il y a un petit interrupteur physique à 4 positions. C’est simple comme bonjour : “S” pour la Switch, “A” pour les appareils Apple (Mac, iPhone, iPad), “D” pour Android, et “X” pour le PC. Le truc brillant, c’est que la manette mémorise un appareil pour chaque mode. Je jouais sur mon Mac (mode A), et quand j’ai voulu passer sur la Switch (mode S), je n’ai eu qu’à basculer le bouton. Pas de menu, pas de galère d’appairage. Ça marche, tout simplement. C’est exactement ce qu’on demande à la technologie.
En main, c’est le confort immédiat. La forme rappelle un peu la manette classique de la PlayStation, et elle tombe parfaitement sous les doigts, même pendant de longues sessions. La croix directionnelle est un pur régal, surtout si vous aimez les jeux rétro : elle est précise et bien plus agréable que celle de la plupart des manettes modernes. Et pour ceux qui aiment bien personnaliser leur expérience, une application (sur PC ou smartphone) permet de tout régler, et même d’utiliser deux boutons supplémentaires cachés à l’arrière, super pratiques pour des raccourcis.
Cette nouvelle version apporte aussi une technologie appelée “Effet Hall” pour les joysticks. Sans rentrer dans des détails techniques ennuyeux, cela signifie simplement que les mécanismes utilisent des aimants. L’avantage ? C’est ultra précis, et surtout, c’est conçu pour ne pas s’user. Fini ce bug horrible que l’on voit parfois sur les vieilles manettes, où le personnage se met à bouger tout seul à l’écran (le fameux “stick drift”). Ici, les sticks sont faits pour durer, tout en offrant une fluidité incroyable.
Enfin, 8BitDo a pensé au truc qui fâche : la panne de batterie. La manette est livrée avec une batterie rechargeable qui tient vraiment longtemps. Mais si jamais vous tombez en rade en plein milieu d’une partie et que vous n’avez pas le temps de la brancher, il y a une solution géniale. Le compartiment est aussi conçu pour accepter… deux piles AA classiques ! Vous prenez celles de votre télécommande, et c’est reparti. C’est tout bête, mais c’est le genre de détail qui montre qu’une marque respecte ses utilisateurs (pour ceux qui ont une Xbox, bah c’est pareil que dans les manettes de Xbox, sauf que ça oblige pas à acheter la batterie en plus).
Bref, cette 8BitDo Pro 2 Hall Effect est une réussite totale. Elle est confortable, incroyablement facile à utiliser sur toutes les plateformes, précise, et faite pour durer. Si vous cherchez une manette à tout faire pour jouer sur votre PC, votre Mac, votre iPad, votre Switch ou votre téléphone Android ou iPhone, sans vous prendre la tête, c’est tout simplement le meilleur choix que vous puissiez faire aujourd’hui. Surtout à moins de 50 balles .
Vous pouvez l’acheter en cliquant ici , et lire mon test de GeForce Now Ultimate ici , et ça vaut vraiment le coup, croyez moi !
Article invité publié par Vincent Lautier . Vous pouvez aussi faire un saut sur mon blog , ma page de recommandations Amazon , ou lire tous les tests que je publie dans la catégorie “Gadgets Tech” , comme cette liseuse Android de dingue ou ces AirTags pour Android !
The compact and SSD-focused NAS landscape has grown increasingly competitive, with new models targeting users who require silent operation, efficient performance, and small-scale virtualization or media serving capabilities. Devices like the GMKTec G9, Beelink ME Mini, and CWWK P6 represent a distinct shift from traditional 3.5” HDD-based systems, instead favoring M.2 NVMe SSD storage in compact chassis designs. These systems are marketed toward home users, prosumers, and developers looking for a balance between cost, flexibility, and low-noise operation, often for roles such as Plex servers, UnRAID deployments, or containerized environments.
Each unit in this comparison leverages low-power Intel Twin Lake processors (notably the N150), offers at least dual 2.5GbE connectivity, and supports multiple M.2 drives, but their implementations vary widely in thermal handling, expandability, and internal architecture. As the line between DIY NAS builds and pre-built options continues to blur, the GMKTec G9, Beelink ME Mini, and CWWK P6 provide a snapshot of how different brands interpret the needs of modern users who prioritize energy efficiency, small footprints, and SSD-based storage workflows. This article evaluates these three devices across pricing, storage architecture, design, and real-world usability to provide a clear overview of their relative strengths and compromises.
| CWWK P6 SSD NAS | Beelink ME Mini SSD NAS – HERE | GMKTec G9 SSD NAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The GMKTec G9 enters the market at around $199 for its 12GB RAM base configuration, positioning it as one of the more accessible SSD-based NAS units available. It includes a Windows 11 Pro license and Ubuntu Linux pre-installed, which can be attractive to users interested in general computing as well as NAS tasks. However, these operating systems are not tailored for storage-focused functionality, and the burden falls on the user to install and configure something like TrueNAS or UnRAID for proper NAS use. Additionally, the system uses non-upgradable LPDDR5 memory and features a plastic chassis, suggesting a design focus on affordability over long-term flexibility. While value is present in terms of included software and passive SSD-ready operation, its entry-level design limits appeal to users planning to scale or repurpose the device beyond its initial setup.
The Beelink ME Mini NAS, typically available at $209 on Beelink’s own storefront, offers a slightly higher upfront cost but balances that with integrated features aimed at simplifying deployment. Unlike the GMKTec G9, the ME Mini comes with an internal power supply and Crucial-branded SSDs in pre-built configurations, offering a greater level of assurance for storage reliability and plug-and-play readiness. The system supports Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, and features a silent fan-assisted cooling design that makes it more suitable for living rooms or office environments. Though it also utilizes soldered 12GB LPDDR5 memory, its form factor, passive aesthetics, and better thermals make it more appealing to users who want a quiet and tidy NAS solution that requires minimal tinkering post-installation. When compared to generic prebuilds, the ME Mini offers greater refinement and turnkey usability in exchange for a modest premium.
The CWWK P6 NAS sets itself apart with a lower base price of $195 for the N150 version, but this does not include memory or storage. Instead, the system is designed for users who prefer sourcing their own SO-DIMM DDR5 RAM and M.2 SSDs, potentially reducing costs if spare components are available. Its use of a single SO-DIMM slot enables expansion up to 48GB, which is considerably more than either the GMKTec or Beelink models. However, this flexibility comes at the cost of initial convenience. Users will need to handle their own OS installation, BIOS configuration, and possibly even resolve SATA recognition issues via firmware tweaks. The CWWK P6 also lacks wireless connectivity by default, and its use of a barrel connector rather than USB-C for power delivery may feel dated. Still, for users with a higher comfort level in DIY environments, the P6 offers a customizable platform with greater headroom for VMs, Plex, and containers.
When considering long-term value, each NAS appeals to a different kind of buyer. The GMKTec G9 is best suited for users who want a simple, functional NAS with minimal setup, though they may run into its limits quickly if performance expectations rise. The Beelink ME Mini justifies its price by offering a more thought-out design, silent thermals, and premium SSD options out of the box—better suited to users who want a clean and quiet system that can be set up rapidly. Meanwhile, the CWWK P6 represents a builder’s NAS: inexpensive upfront, highly scalable, and intended for users who value control over convenience. Ultimately, while price differences between these units are small, the total value depends heavily on user intent and whether ease of deployment, expansion, or component choice takes priority.
All three NAS systems in this comparison rely exclusively on M.2 NVMe SSDs for internal storage, reflecting a growing emphasis on silent, high-speed flash-based configurations in compact enclosures. The GMKTec G9 features four M.2 NVMe slots, each limited to PCIe Gen 3 x2, offering a theoretical maximum of 2GB/s per drive. In contrast, the Beelink ME Mini supports six M.2 NVMe slots, with five operating at PCIe Gen 3 x1 and one—typically reserved for the OS—at Gen 3 x2. The CWWK P6 matches the G9 in having four slots, though each operates at PCIe Gen 3 x1 speeds, reducing peak bandwidth per drive. This difference in PCIe lane allocation directly impacts aggregate read/write performance, especially in RAID configurations or during high-traffic file operations.
|
|
|
|
The GMKTec G9’s storage slots are laid out beneath a plastic panel with no included heatsinks, a decision that raises concerns about sustained thermal performance. While it technically supports up to 32TB of total storage across its four bays, the lack of passive or active SSD cooling can lead to throttling unless third-party heatsinks are installed. The Beelink ME Mini, in contrast, integrates a large aluminum heatsink with pre-applied thermal pads on all six slots, ensuring consistent heat transfer and reduced risk of SSD overheating. Though five of its six slots are bandwidth-limited to Gen 3 x1, the thermal design makes it better suited for prolonged uptime and high-usage environments. The CWWK P6 also features a metal enclosure that acts as a passive heat sink, but ships with notably thin thermal pads and relies on an optional USB-powered fan for improved airflow.
|
|
|
|
Memory configuration is another key area of differentiation. The GMKTec G9 and Beelink ME Mini both ship with 12GB of soldered LPDDR5 memory running at 4800MHz. This fixed memory cannot be upgraded, limiting their long-term viability in RAM-intensive use cases such as virtualization or large-scale container deployment. The CWWK P6, by contrast, includes a single SO-DIMM slot that supports up to 32GB of DDR5 4800MHz memory, making it the most flexible of the three for VM hosting, ZFS-based NAS operating systems, or other memory-sensitive applications. The tradeoff is that buyers must provide their own RAM, adding to the setup cost but allowing for performance tuning based on workload.
|
|
|
|
Boot and operating system storage configurations differ subtly across the three units. The GMKTec G9 includes a 64GB eMMC drive with pre-installed Windows 11 Pro and Ubuntu, though the eMMC capacity is insufficient for most NAS deployments beyond initial setup. The Beelink ME Mini also offers a 64GB eMMC module but encourages users to install the OS on the Gen 3 x2 slot, especially in bundled configurations that include Crucial P3 SSDs. The CWWK P6 does not include any pre-installed OS or eMMC storage but does allow booting from any of its four NVMe slots, giving advanced users greater freedom to optimize OS installation, especially when using UnRAID or TrueNAS SCALE.
|
|
|
Ultimately, the memory and storage architecture of each system reflects different user priorities. The GMKTec G9 aims for simplicity but is hindered by non-upgradable memory and inadequate SSD cooling. The Beelink ME Mini offers better thermal management and storage capacity, albeit with limited PCIe bandwidth on most slots. The CWWK P6 provides the greatest upgrade potential with socketed RAM and M.2 flexibility, but demands user familiarity with thermal solutions, BIOS configuration, and peripheral sourcing.
| Feature | GMKTec G9 | Beelink ME Mini | CWWK P6 (N150) |
|---|---|---|---|
| M.2 Slots | 4 x NVMe (PCIe Gen 3 x2) | 6 x NVMe (1 x Gen 3 x2, 5 x Gen 3 x1) | 4 x NVMe (PCIe Gen 3 x1) |
| Max Storage Capacity | Up to 32TB | Up to 24TB | Up to 32TB |
| eMMC / OS Drive | 64GB eMMC | 64GB eMMC | None |
| SSD Cooling | No heatsinks, plastic panel | Internal heatsink, pre-applied pads | Metal body, thin pads, optional fan |
| RAM Type | 12GB LPDDR5 (soldered) | 12GB LPDDR5 (soldered) | SO-DIMM DDR5 (user-installed) |
| RAM Expandability | Not expandable | Not expandable | Up to 32GB |
The physical construction of these three NAS units reflects differing priorities in material choice, ventilation, and power integration. The GMKTec G9 uses a lightweight plastic chassis, which helps reduce cost but limits heat dissipation across its four M.2 SSDs. The unit relies on internal airflow generated by laptop-style fans, but its design lacks direct ventilation over the SSD bays, and the use of a plastic cover above the M.2 slots reduces thermal transfer. In contrast, the Beelink ME Mini is housed in a symmetrical 99mm³ cube with an internal aluminum heatsink and integrated fan. Its minimalist cube layout includes top and bottom ventilation for vertical airflow and maintains a more enclosed, consistent cooling environment that better suits SSD longevity in passive setups.
The CWWK P6 offers the most robust build quality of the three, using a solid aluminum alloy chassis that doubles as a passive heat sink. It includes a base-level fan mounted beneath the CPU and an optional USB-powered fan for SSD cooling. However, the included thermal pads are extremely thin, reducing their effectiveness under prolonged load unless replaced. Despite this, the chassis is designed to tolerate higher ambient temperatures and shows consistent performance in enclosed spaces. One drawback is the lack of airflow across the top panel unless the optional fan is mounted—without it, SSDs tend to accumulate heat more rapidly, especially during concurrent write operations or large file transfers.
Power delivery also differentiates these devices. The GMKTec G9 uses a USB-C power connector with an external 65W power brick, aligning with modern standards and reducing desktop clutter. The Beelink ME Mini further improves on this with a built-in PSU, removing the need for external adapters altogether and simplifying cable management in home setups. The CWWK P6 reverts to a more traditional 12V barrel connector, which, while functional, feels outdated compared to the USB-C or internal PSU solutions. This design choice may require users to carry a dedicated power supply, limiting flexibility in mobile deployments or environments with shared power infrastructure.
In testing, all three systems showed efficient power usage, though their idle and peak wattages differ slightly due to cooling, CPU behavior, and drive count. The GMKTec G9 drew 19–20W at idle and peaked at 28–30W under sustained load. The Beelink ME Mini demonstrated the lowest idle consumption at 6.9W with no drives, increasing to around 30W when fully populated with six SSDs under heavy activity. The CWWK P6 consumed approximately 18W at idle and peaked at 34–35W with three active VMs and four SSDs. These figures indicate that, despite modest differences in architecture, each system remains power-efficient and suitable for 24/7 use, especially in home environments with low thermal tolerance and energy cost sensitivity.
| Feature | GMKTec G9 | Beelink ME Mini | CWWK P6 (N150) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Material | Plastic | Aluminum with internal heatsink | Aluminum alloy (entire chassis) |
| Cooling | Internal fans, no SSD airflow | Silent top fan, central heatsink | Base fan + optional USB top fan |
| Power Connector | USB-C (external 65W PSU) | Integrated PSU (no brick) | 12V Barrel connector (60W PSU) |
| Idle Power Consumption | 19–20W | 6.9W (no drives), 16.9W (6 SSDs) | ~18W (no drives) |
| Peak Power Consumption | 28–30W | ~30–31W | 34–35W |
| Idle Noise Level | <40 dBA | 31–34 dBA | 35–36 dBA (with fan) |
| Load Noise Level | ~40 dBA | 37–40 dBA | 38 dBA (with optional fan) |
When assessed across all key metrics, the GMKTec G9, Beelink ME Mini, and CWWK P6 occupy distinct positions within the low-cost, all-flash NAS landscape, each catering to different user expectations and levels of technical comfort. The GMKTec G9 is the most turnkey in terms of initial usability, with pre-installed Windows and Ubuntu providing a base for users new to NAS setups or simply looking to use the device as a low-power desktop or file server. Its plastic chassis and lack of thermal optimization limit its suitability for intensive tasks, and the fixed 12GB LPDDR5 memory restricts performance scaling for containers or virtualization. That said, the G9 offers predictable behavior and basic capabilities that will satisfy those seeking an easy, entry-level NAS with minimal setup time, especially for local media streaming or light SMB file services. That said, the G9 is getting rather notorious for it’s poor cooling abilities – so much so that the brand has rolled out an improved cooling verion (see images below). There DO help, but the G9 is still the poorest of the three NAS in this comparison in terms of active cooling and long term temps!
|
|
|
|
The Beelink ME Mini, though only marginally more expensive, adopts a more premium approach to internal design and build quality. The integrated fan and large aluminum heatsink ensure more consistent SSD temperatures under sustained workloads, and the system is noticeably quieter at idle compared to the G9. Its six M.2 NVMe slots provide greater storage density potential, even though five are limited to PCIe Gen 3 x1 speeds. The soldered memory mirrors the G9’s limitations in upgradeability, but its inclusion of Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth, and an internal PSU adds notable convenience for deployment in mixed-use environments like offices, bedrooms, or AV cabinets. It will appeal to users who value quiet, thermally reliable operation in a system that arrives largely preconfigured and ready for use with minimal additional hardware.
In contrast, the CWWK P6 forgoes polish and plug-and-play readiness in favor of maximum flexibility and user control. It is the only device in this group to feature upgradable RAM, allowing users to install up to 48GB of DDR5 memory, which opens the door to heavier workloads like virtual machines, ZFS-based NAS operating systems, or multiple Docker containers. The lack of included wireless, OS storage, or bundled RAM/SSD keeps the entry cost low but shifts responsibility onto the buyer to source compatible components. This extends to thermal management—while the chassis is solid aluminum, effective SSD cooling often requires replacing the thin stock pads and adding the optional USB-powered fan. These additional steps will deter less technical users but make the P6 a strong contender for builders, hobbyists, or professionals seeking a flexible platform they can adapt over time.
Ultimately, choosing between these three NAS units comes down to balancing ease of setup, long-term scalability, and thermal reliability. The GMKTec G9 suits users who want to get started quickly with a general-purpose device and accept limitations in memory and thermal design. The Beelink ME Mini delivers a more refined package, ideal for those who prioritize noise, storage density, and out-of-box functionality. The CWWK P6, meanwhile, is the most modular and scalable option, but requires technical confidence and additional investment in compatible components. Each has clear strengths and trade-offs, and the best choice depends on whether the user prioritizes convenience, passive reliability, or long-term upgradability in their NAS setup.
| Device | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| GMKTec G9 | – Includes Windows 11 Pro and Ubuntu pre-installed | – Non-upgradable 12GB LPDDR5 RAM |
| – USB-C power input with compact external PSU | – Plastic chassis with VERY poor SSD thermal management | |
| – Supports 4 x M.2 NVMe (PCIe Gen 3 x2) | – No SSD heatsinks or airflow over storage | |
| – Quiet operation under light loads | ||
| – Lower entry price with minimal setup required | ||
| Beelink ME Mini | – Includes 6 x M.2 NVMe slots (1 x Gen 3 x2, 5 x Gen 3 x1) | – Soldered 12GB LPDDR5, no memory expansion |
| – Built-in PSU for cable-free deployment | – Most SSD slots limited to PCIe Gen 3 x1 | |
| – Silent fan and integrated heatsink for passive SSD cooling | – No RAM or storage customization | |
| – Bundled with Crucial SSDs in some configurations | ||
| – Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2 included | ||
| CWWK P6 (N150) | – Upgradable DDR5 RAM (up to 48GB via SO-DIMM) | – No bundled RAM or SSD; user must supply all components |
| – Solid aluminum chassis for passive thermal dissipation | – Thermal pads are thin and require replacement for effective SSD cooling | |
| – 4 x M.2 NVMe slots (PCIe Gen 3 x1) with flexible boot drive assignment | – Barrel power connector instead of USB-C or internal PSU | |
| – Best suited for VMs, ZFS, and UnRAID with advanced configuration options | ||
| – Lowest base cost and broadest expansion potential |
| CWWK P6 SSD NAS | Beelink ME Mini SSD NAS – HERE | GMKTec G9 SSD NAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
Note – Massive thanks to PCWatch for their coverage of the Japan IT Week 2025 Event. They made an excellent article on the Minisforum MS-02 HERE and was the source for today’s article. Check them out!
The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is a compact 4.8-liter workstation revealed at Japan IT Week Autumn 2025, marking a major upgrade over the earlier MS-01 model. Built around Intel’s 24-core Core Ultra 9 285HX processor, it merges high-end mobile CPU performance with features traditionally reserved for full-size desktops. The system includes support for up to 256 GB of ECC DDR5 memory, four PCIe 4.0 NVMe slots, and three PCIe expansion slots, one of which supports PCIe 5.0 ×16. Network connectivity options extend up to dual 25 GbE SFP28 ports, alongside 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE (vPro) Ethernet. Designed to serve as a workstation or mini-server, the MS-02 Ultra incorporates an internal 350 W Flex PSU, a slide-out chassis for maintenance, and advanced front-to-rear cooling architecture.
| Category | Brief Specification |
|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (24 cores 8P + 16E, 36 MB cache, up to 5.5 GHz) |
| Memory | 4 × DDR5 SO-DIMM slots (up to 256 GB 4800 MHz, ECC supported) |
| Storage | 4 × M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 ×4 slots (up to 16 TB total) |
| Expansion | 1 × PCIe 5.0 ×16, 1 × PCIe 4.0 ×16 (25 GbE NIC installed by default), 1 × PCIe 4.0 ×4 |
| Networking | 2 × 25 GbE SFP28, 1 × 10 GbE RJ-45 (Realtek RTL8127), 1 × 2.5 GbE (vPro Intel i226-LM) |
| USB Ports | 2 × USB4 v2 Type-C (80 Gbps), 1 × USB4 Type-C (40 Gbps), 3 × USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (10 Gbps) |
| Display Output | 1 × HDMI 2.1 (up to 8K 60 Hz / 4K 120 Hz support) |
| Audio | 1 × 3.5 mm combo jack (TRRS) |
| Wireless | M.2 2230 E-Key slot (Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 support) |
| Power Supply | 350 W internal Flex PSU (100–240 V AC input) |
| Dimensions | 221.5 × 225 × 97 mm (≈ 4.8 liters) |
The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is built around Intel’s Arrow Lake-HX platform, with the Core Ultra 9 285HX serving as its central processor. This 24-core CPU combines eight performance cores and sixteen efficiency cores, reaching up to 5.5 GHz while maintaining a 140 W thermal design power. It incorporates an integrated Intel Arc GPU with four Xe cores and an NPU capable of up to 13 TOPS for AI acceleration. The CPU provides 24 PCIe lanes in total, which are distributed among the system’s multiple expansion and storage options.
Memory capacity is one of the most notable upgrades over its predecessor. The MS-02 Ultra offers four DDR5 SO-DIMM slots, supporting up to 256 GB of 4800 MHz memory, with full ECC functionality for stability in continuous workloads. Two modules are located on the CPU side of the board, and two on the reverse, optimizing thermal spacing and service access. This capacity places it closer to entry-level server configurations than typical mini PCs, reinforcing its suitability for virtualization or compute-heavy tasks.
Storage expansion is handled through four M.2 2280 NVMe slots, each supporting PCIe 4.0 ×4 bandwidth. Combined, these slots can accommodate up to 16 TB of SSD storage. The system’s slide-out chassis design allows quick installation or replacement of drives, simplifying maintenance. Minisforum has also introduced a small debug LED and clear CMOS button on the board, indicating that the model is targeted toward users familiar with system-level configuration and troubleshooting.
Expansion flexibility extends far beyond most small form factor workstations. The system includes three PCIe slots: one PCIe 5.0 ×16, one PCIe 4.0 ×16 (often occupied by a 25 GbE NIC in standard configurations), and one PCIe 4.0 ×4. The top slot can host dual-slot desktop graphics cards, drawing up to 140 W through an included 8-pin auxiliary connector. This allows for the addition of mid-range GPUs such as the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada or workstation accelerators, while still retaining physical compactness.
Power delivery is managed through a built-in 350 W Flex PSU that eliminates the need for an external brick. This internal supply was a deliberate shift from the MS-01’s external adapter and helps sustain higher CPU and GPU draw without additional clutter. The unit supports 100–240 V AC input, giving it universal deployment flexibility for both workstation and light server scenarios.
The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra includes a broad range of connectivity options intended to support both workstation and server workloads. Front access is optimized for frequent use, featuring two USB4 Version 2.0 Type-C ports offering 80 Gbps bandwidth each, a 10 Gbps USB Type-A port, a 3.5 mm audio combo jack, and the system power button. These front USB4 v2 ports also support DisplayPort Alternate Mode and Power Delivery up to 15 W per port, making them suitable for high-speed data transfer or direct monitor output without additional adapters.
The rear I/O layout is designed for permanent peripheral and network connections. It includes a third USB4 Type-C port rated at 40 Gbps, three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports at 10 Gbps each, and a single HDMI 2.1 output supporting up to 8K at 60 Hz or 4K at 120 Hz. For network communication, the MS-02 Ultra integrates four ports in total: two 25 GbE SFP28, one 10 GbE RJ-45, and one 2.5 GbE RJ-45. The 2.5 GbE interface uses Intel’s i226-LM controller and supports vPro remote management for BIOS-level administration, which is beneficial for enterprise or headless operation.
Wireless connectivity is provided by an M.2 2230 E-Key slot supporting Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 modules, enabling flexible configuration for wireless networks or peripheral pairing. The combination of USB4 v2, multiple Ethernet options, and RDMA capability positions the MS-02 Ultra as a system ready for both high-performance workstation setups and compact server deployments. Its port layout, with both front and rear accessibility, ensures straightforward use in horizontal or vertical orientations.
The cooling system of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is designed to manage sustained high thermal loads while maintaining compact dimensions. The chassis follows a front-intake and rear-exhaust airflow pattern, similar to rackmount servers. A six-heatpipe radiator combined with phase-change material (PCM) ensures efficient heat dissipation from both the CPU and expansion slots. This design enables the system to maintain stable operation at a 140 W CPU TDP, even when fully populated with PCIe cards and NVMe storage. Airflow direction also varies depending on the unit’s orientation, with side-mounted intakes feeding the expansion slots and rear vents handling exhaust when the unit is placed horizontally or vertically.
The internal layout is structured to prevent thermal overlap between major components. The CPU and memory modules are cooled through a direct-contact heat spreader, while GPU and add-in cards draw intake air from the left side and expel it from the right or top, depending on placement. The inclusion of an internal 350 W Flex PSU was balanced with this design, ensuring sufficient clearance and airflow. This approach allows the MS-02 Ultra to sustain continuous high-load performance without external cooling solutions or the noise levels typical of larger tower workstations.
The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra represents a substantial progression from the original MS-01 workstation, addressing nearly every limitation of its predecessor. The earlier model, released in 2023, gained attention for integrating desktop-class performance into a small form factor but was constrained by its single-slot PCIe design, limited memory capacity, and reliance on an external power brick. The MS-02 Ultra resolves these issues with four DDR5 SO-DIMM slots supporting up to 256 GB ECC memory, a dual-slot PCIe 5.0 ×16 slot for graphics or accelerator cards, and a fully internal 350 W Flex PSU. These refinements, along with the addition of 25 GbE networking and USB4 v2 connectivity, elevate the system into a new category that bridges high-end workstation and compact enterprise server design.
Performance and versatility are at the center of this system’s concept. The inclusion of a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX CPU and up to four PCIe 4.0 NVMe drives positions it for continuous workloads such as virtualization, software development, or AI inference without the thermal or structural compromises typical of small PCs. Minisforum’s decision to adopt ECC memory and RDMA-capable networking also underlines a shift toward reliability and professional usage scenarios rather than enthusiast or gaming audiences.
In terms of market placement, pricing has yet to be confirmed, but early indications suggest the MS-02 Ultra will likely start around $1,500, with higher configurations approaching or exceeding $2,000 depending on memory, storage, and NIC options. This aligns it with compact workstations like the ASRock DeskMeet X600 and high-end mini servers from OEM integrators, though the Minisforum model’s density and component flexibility set it apart. Overall, the MS-02 Ultra shows how far the brand’s SFF engineering has advanced since the MS-01, turning a well-liked prototype concept into a fully realized professional-grade workstation built for sustained heavy use.
Note – Massive thanks to PCWatch for their coverage of the Japan IT Week 2025 Event. They made an excellent article on the Minisforum MS-02 HERE and was the source for today’s article. Check them out!
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
Duke Nukem a sauvé le Far West de 1848, le futur post-apocalyptique et le Londres victorien de 1888, mais pendant 26 ans, il est resté coincé dans la prison ultime : une cartouche Nintendo 64 dont personne n’avait le code source.
Vous connaissez très probablement Duke Nukem 3D, le FPS culte de 1996 avec ses répliques iconiques et son humour trash, mais vous avez peut-être oublié Duke Nukem: Zero Hour, sorti en 1999 sur N64. C’était un jeu assez différent puisqu’il s’agissait d’un TPS (third-person shooter) développé par Eurocom, où Duke devait voyager dans différentes époques pour sauver le monde. Le concept était sympa, la réalisation correcte, mais c’est un jeu qui a été complètement éclipsé par les Perfect Dark et autres Goldeneye de l’époque. Snif !
Il était donc temps de le faire revenir dans le présent ! Et c’est ce qu’a fait Gillou68310 qui vient après des années de travail, de terminer la décompilation complète de Duke Nukem: Zero Hour . 100% du code machine original a été reconverti en code source C lisible et modifiable.
Le projet est sur GitHub et on y retrouve à la fois la version US et la version française du jeu et grâce à cette décompilation complète, d’autres développeurs peuvent maintenant bosser sur un port PC natif du jeu. Soit avec une approche custom comme le Ship of Harkinian (le port PC de Zelda: Ocarina of Time), soit via N64 Recomp , un projet dont je vous ai déjà parlé plusieurs fois.
Cet outil développé par Wiseguy peut transformer du code N64 en code C natif en quelques secondes (contre des années pour une décompilation traditionnelle) et avec cette décompilation de Zero Hour terminée, la route est toute tracée pour un portage rapide avec support des mods, du ray tracing via RT64 et même de la 4K.
Alors oui, Zero Hour n’était pas le meilleur jeu N64 de l’histoire c’est sûr, mais c’était un Duke Nukem oublié, avec des mécaniques intéressantes et une direction artistique sympa pour l’époque. Et grâce au boulot de Gillou68310 et de la communauté, il va pouvoir s’échapper de sa cartouche et rejoindre notre époque dans les meilleures conditions !
Pour ceux que ça intéresse, le repo GitHub est disponible ici mais attention, vous aurez besoin de votre propre ROM du jeu pour extraire les assets et compiler (c’est légal uniquement si vous possédez le jeu original).
Le Minisforum M1 Pro est un mini PC polyvalent et performant, équipé d'un Intel Core Ultra 125H et de : USB4, OCulink (pour un eGPU), DDR5, Wi-Fi 7, etc...
The post Test Minisforum M1 Pro : un mini PC prêt à l’emploi ou en version barebone first appeared on IT-Connect.
Connexion