UGREEN AI NAS Review – Is the iDX6011 Pro NAS a Kind of Greatness or Gimmick?

UGREEN has moved from being a peripheral brand in storage accessories to a recognisable name in turnkey NAS hardware in a relatively short time, helped in part by the NASync range that arrived via crowdfunding in 2024 and then transitioned into regular retail availability. The NASync iDX6011 series is the company’s next step, and it is a bigger swing than the earlier systems because it is trying to appeal to 2 different audiences at once. On one side, it is a high spec 6 bay NAS with features typically aimed at heavier workloads, including dual 10GbE, dual Thunderbolt 4, PCIe Gen4 expansion, and NVMe slots for caching or SSD volumes. On the other side, it is being marketed as a “local AI NAS” built around an on device assistant and offline processing, intended for people who like the idea of using natural language to search, summarise, and organise large private libraries without sending data to a public cloud. The practical question is whether buyers actually need an AI layer on a NAS, since many users simply want reliable storage, backups, and fast access, and will judge it on fundamentals like performance, noise, power, and software stability first. Based on hands on testing of the iDX6011 Pro hardware and the early UGOS Pro plus AI implementation, the platform looks close to finished on the hardware side, while the AI layer feels more like a developing feature set that is not yet consistently polished, which raises the possibility that UGREEN is attempting to deliver a full “appliance plus assistant” experience before every part of that assistant workflow is fully mature.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER! This is KICKSTARTER…

This product is being sold through a crowdfunding campaign rather than as a conventional retail NAS, and that changes the risk profile regardless of brand size or prior success. Pricing is tied to a refundable reservation deposit system and early bird tiers, and delivery timing is based on stated production and dispatch windows rather than the predictable stock availability that comes with established retail channels. Even though UGREEN has previously completed a large NAS crowdfunding campaign and later moved those products into normal retail, that track record does not remove the usual Kickstarter variables, such as software features changing between prototype and shipping units, performance tuning continuing during the campaign window, and schedules shifting due to manufacturing or regional fulfilment constraints. In this case, the hardware shown appears close to final, but the software, particularly the AI layer, is explicitly described as still in active optimisation, so any evaluation should treat feature completeness as provisional until the campaign is live, the final software build is confirmed, and post launch updates show what is actually delivered at scale.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Quick Conclusion

The UGREEN NASync iDX6011 Pro is a high spec 6 bay NAS that, in hardware terms, behaves more like a compact workstation class storage appliance than a typical consumer NAS, with dual 10GbE, dual Thunderbolt 4, PCIe Gen4 x8 expansion, OCuLink, 8K HDMI, 2 x M.2 NVMe slots, and a dedicated 128GB system SSD, backed by an Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and 64GB fixed LPDDR5X memory. In testing, the fundamentals were generally strong, including RAID 5 throughput around 950 MB/s read and 670 MB/s write with SSD caching, internal NVMe performance around 5.5 to 6.0 GB/s, acceptable sustained thermals for a metal chassis under long access periods, and noise and power figures that tracked with a 6 drive high performance platform rather than a low power home NAS. The main performance concern was that SMB multichannel scaling was uneven, with reads around 2200 to 2300 MB/s but writes closer to 1300 to 1500 MB/s in a dual 10GbE client setup, suggesting software or tuning limits that may or may not improve by launch. UGOS Pro is broadly feature complete for mainstream NAS use, with Docker, VMs, snapshots, iSCSI, and comprehensive backup and sync options, but it still lacks some ecosystem level elements that established competitors deliver, including ZFS and a more comprehensive security posture scanner, and the app catalogue gap around Plex remains notable. The local AI layer, marketed as a key differentiator, is currently the least mature part of the product, with useful building blocks like document summarisation, audio transcription, and photo recognition, but inconsistent workflows that rely on manual uploads rather than directory level crawling, limited smart commands, and permission controls that can be too rigid for practical assistant use, while also not offering generative photo or video creation. Overall, the iDX6011 Pro looks close to finished on hardware and competitive on capability at its early campaign pricing, but the AI experience still feels in development, and the Kickstarter purchase route adds risk for buyers who expect fully polished features on day 1.

SOFTWARE - 7/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 8/10

VALUE - 9/10

8.2

PROS

High bandwidth connectivity as standard, including 10GbE x2 and Thunderbolt 4 x2
Strong expansion options for a turnkey NAS, with PCIe Gen4 x8 and OCuLink on the Pro model
6 bay capacity design with a quoted 196TB maximum raw storage ceiling
Dedicated 128GB system SSD keeps the OS separate from the main storage pool
NVMe support via 2 x M.2 Gen4 slots with tested performance around 5.5 to 6.0 GB/s
RAID support includes 0, 1, 5, 6, 10 plus JBOD and Basic for flexible storage layouts
Tested RAID 5 plus SSD cache throughput was close to the practical limits of 10GbE class networking in many scenarios
Cooling design and sustained thermal readings remained within normal bounds during extended access testing
UGOS Pro covers mainstream NAS needs, including Docker, VMs, snapshots, iSCSI, and broad backup and sync options

CONS

Crowdfunding purchase path adds delivery and feature risk compared with conventional retail availability
AI layer feels unfinished, with limited pre crawling, uneven knowledge base behaviour, and incomplete integration across file types
Fixed LPDDR5X memory limits future upgrade options, so configuration choice is permanent
UGOS ecosystem gaps remain, notably no ZFS support and no native Plex app at the time of testing

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Design and Storage

The iDX6011 Pro is physically a more industrial looking unit than UGREEN’s earlier NAS designs, with a full metal outer chassis that feels closer to workstation gear than living room appliance styling. It is not a sealed box either, as the side panels are removable and intended to give access to internal expansion areas, though the process uses a hex key rather than a simple tool free latch. That approach is functional and keeps the exterior clean, but it also makes routine access slightly slower if you expect to swap SSDs or a PCIe card regularly. Ventilation is distributed around the sides rather than concentrated in a single grille, and the chassis is raised off the surface to allow airflow beneath, which matters in a system designed to host 6 hard drives plus NVMe storage and a higher performance CPU class than entry NAS models.

Storage capacity is built around 6 front loading SATA bays, with UGREEN quoting 196TB maximum raw capacity for the platform. Drive insertion uses the same general tray approach seen on the company’s recent NAS units, including lockable bay fronts and a plastic click and load mechanism intended to speed up installation without tools. It is a conventional arrangement for a 6 bay desktop NAS, but the metal enclosure can make drive acoustics more noticeable depending on the HDD model and rotational behaviour, which becomes relevant when users populate the unit with larger capacity drives that often have more platters and more audible seek patterns. The front bay layout is straightforward, prioritising density and serviceability, with the expectation that this is a system meant to hold a large primary library rather than act as a small secondary backup target.

Alongside the 6 bays, UGREEN separates the operating system onto a dedicated 128GB internal SSD, which avoids consuming any of the user’s drive pool for the system partition and aligns with how most modern NAS vendors isolate OS storage. In practical terms, that makes initial setup cleaner and reduces the chance that a storage rebuild or volume reconfiguration impacts the boot environment, though it also means the overall platform depends on an internal system SSD that is not part of the RAID group. Two internal M.2 NVMe slots are available for SSD cache or SSD volumes, and in testing they behaved like high performance local storage rather than token add ons, which fits the broader design goal of making this NAS suitable for heavier workflows and not just cold storage. The storage story here is therefore split into 3 layers, hard drive bays for capacity, M.2 for performance acceleration, and a separate system SSD for OS stability.

The Pro model also adds a front mounted 3.71 inch LCD, which provides real time status visibility such as usage and system state at a glance. As implemented in early hardware, it appears more like a monitoring and basic control surface than a full management interface, and it is not treated as a secure console with authentication, so it is best understood as a convenience feature rather than an administrative tool. In a shared environment, that trade off matters because a display that is easy to use is also easy to interact with physically, so the value depends on where the unit is placed and who has access to it. For some users it will be useful simply to confirm system health without opening the web UI, but it does not replace normal management, and it is not aimed at the same kind of on device control that some touchscreen equipped NAS systems attempt.

Maintenance and long term usability are supported by design choices such as accessible cooling and a removable rear panel area, which makes it easier to clean and service the main fans compared with fully enclosed designs. The unit includes an internal power supply, reducing external power brick clutter, and cooling is built around a combination of rear system fans and a dedicated CPU cooling assembly using copper heat piping and a dual fan arrangement. User control in software focuses on the rear fans, while the CPU fan behaviour is not exposed in the same way, which is typical for compact systems where CPU thermals are managed automatically. Overall, the enclosure and storage layout suggest UGREEN is treating this as a high duty appliance expected to run continuously, host large volumes, and remain serviceable, even if some access choices like hex key panels are more conservative than tool free designs.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Internal Hardware

At the centre of the iDX6011 lineup is a split CPU strategy, with the Pro model using Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and the non Pro models using Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, both in a 28W class envelope but with different core layouts and advertised AI compute capability. In practical terms, the Pro is the higher headroom option for simultaneous workloads, including heavier multitasking, more concurrent services, and more demanding local indexing or analysis tasks, while the Ultra 5 models are positioned as a lower cost entry that still retains the broader platform features. The Core Ultra family also brings an integrated graphics and NPU component, which matters here because UGREEN’s “local AI” positioning depends more on on device acceleration and sustained compute than on a simple low power NAS CPU. The important point from testing is that the system behaves like a higher performance appliance than the entry level NAS class, with clear implications for throughput, thermals, and power draw once you start adding drive count, caching, and background services.

Memory is LPDDR5X across all configurations, offered at 64GB on the Pro and one of the Ultra 5 models, and 32GB on the lower tier Ultra 5 model. This memory is fixed rather than modular, so there is no user upgrade path later, and buyers need to decide upfront how much headroom they want for containers, virtual machines, caching, and AI services. Fixed memory can bring benefits in bandwidth and power efficiency, but it also removes one of the typical ways NAS owners extend lifespan as demands grow. In the context of UGOS Pro, 32GB is likely to be workable for mainstream file services and lighter container use, but 64GB is the safer fit if the system is intended to run multiple applications at once, keep more services resident, or handle heavier indexing tasks, particularly when the AI layer is enabled and models are loaded into memory during use.

Storage connectivity inside the chassis is arranged so that the M.2 NVMe slots operate as high speed local devices rather than secondary add ons, and the system’s design encourages using them for caching or fast volumes alongside the 6 drive array. Beyond storage, the platform includes a PCIe Gen4 x8 expansion slot, which gives the unit a more flexible upgrade path than many turnkey NAS systems that are limited to fixed networking and fixed I O. The Pro model also includes an OCuLink port, which in practical testing allowed attachment of external PCIe devices such as a GPU dock, and the system recognised the hardware when connected, even though this is not the typical way consumer NAS boxes expand capability. This internal and external PCIe story is one of the defining hardware traits of the Pro model, because it creates options for future add ons that extend beyond storage, even if most buyers will never use it.

From an internal power and cooling perspective, the unit uses an internal PSU and a cooling layout that separates general chassis airflow from CPU cooling, with software fan control focused on the rear fans rather than the CPU fan assembly. That matters because the system’s CPU class, NVMe support, and expansion options can create load scenarios that are closer to small server behaviour than basic home NAS idle patterns, particularly during sustained indexing, RAID rebuilds, or heavy file operations across fast links like 10GbE and Thunderbolt.

The hardware review unit is described as a pre release prototype, and while the physical build appears close to final, some behaviour, especially around performance tuning and software integration, should be treated as subject to change before shipping. The overall internal hardware direction is clear though: this is not designed around the low power NAS CPU segment, and the component choices indicate UGREEN is targeting users who want workstation class connectivity and compute inside a NAS form factorAM, rather than a minimal file server.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Ports and Connections

The iDX6011 Pro is configured around higher bandwidth connectivity than most mainstream 6 bay NAS units, and the port layout reflects an intention to sit closer to a workstation or small office backbone rather than being limited to standard home networking. Dual 10GbE is present across all configurations, providing both higher single link throughput and the option for link aggregation or segmented network roles depending on the user’s environment. In practice, dual 10GbE also opens the door to multichannel SMB performance in supported client setups, and the platform is clearly built with large file workflows in mind, where sequential transfer speed and low friction access matter as much as raw storage capacity. Unlike NAS designs that reserve high speed networking for optional add in cards, the iDX6011 platform treats 10GbE as baseline rather than upgrade.

Thunderbolt 4 appears as 2 ports, and in your testing this mattered because it enabled direct high speed attachment use cases and compatibility with external adapters and docks. The most obvious implication is fast ingest and offload for users working from laptops or mobile workstations where Thunderbolt is a primary high speed interface, but it also intersects with the Pro model’s expansion story because external PCIe style docks become viable. The unit also includes USB connectivity split between faster USB 3 class ports and USB 2 ports for lower bandwidth peripherals, plus an SD 4.0 card slot that is front placed for frequent media ingest. That placement is relevant because it avoids reaching behind the unit for daily tasks, which is more aligned with content creation workflows than with the typical NAS assumption of mostly remote file transfer.

Video output is handled through an 8K capable HDMI port, which supports the idea of using the NAS as a directly attached media endpoint as well as a server, though this is a secondary function compared with network access. The presence of HDMI also ties into the software layer you described, where the system can be used for local playback and controlled through the broader UGOS environment, but it is still a NAS first device rather than a dedicated media box. For users who want the NAS to sit near a display and act as a playback source, the port is present, but the value depends heavily on application availability and the user’s preferred media stack.

Expansion is where the Pro model separates itself, because it combines an internal PCIe Gen4 x8 slot with an external OCuLink port, while the non Pro models omit OCuLink. In testing, the OCuLink path successfully recognised an attached GPU dock, which indicates that UGREEN is not treating this as a purely decorative specification, even if most of the AI positioning is currently built around CPU and NPU resources rather than discrete GPU acceleration. The PCIe slot provides additional flexibility for add in networking or other cards within the physical constraints of the chassis, and together these interfaces make the iDX6011 Pro less locked to its factory I O than typical turnkey NAS appliances. That said, the practical value of these ports depends on driver support, how UGOS exposes attached hardware, and whether users plan to run third party operating systems where PCIe device support can be more familiar.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Speed, Temp, Noise and Power Tests

In file transfer testing, the iDX6011 Pro showed performance that aligns with its connectivity and internal storage design, but also revealed at least one area where optimisation may still be needed. With 6 HDDs configured in RAID 5 and SSD caching enabled for read and write, throughput reached roughly 950 MB/s read and 670 MB/s write, which is consistent with a well tuned array benefitting from cache acceleration and a fast network path. The larger point is that the platform can make practical use of 10GbE class throughput without feeling artificially capped by an entry level CPU, and the results suggest the system is capable of handling sustained large file movement without immediately falling behind. The caveat is that this was tested on a pre release unit, and the way UGOS configures caching and network services can materially affect the final numbers.

The internal NVMe performance was strong, and importantly it was consistent whether measured through the UGOS interface or via SSH testing. In the built in NVMe benchmark, both drives returned around 6 GB/s reads and writes after repeated testing, and additional 1GB SSH tests also clustered around 5.5 to 6.0 GB/s. Those figures suggest the M.2 implementation is not a token feature and can support either aggressive caching configurations or fast SSD volumes for workloads that benefit from low latency access. This matters in the context of the iDX6011 Pro’s target audience because the NVMe layer is a primary tool for keeping responsiveness high when multiple services are active, when many small files are being indexed, or when a user wants a high performance workspace alongside bulk HDD capacity.

Where results were less ideal was in a dual 10GbE client scenario using SMB multichannel, where reads scaled well but writes did not. Using a USB4 laptop connected through a dual 10GbE to USB4 adapter, 2x 10GbE connections were visible and green-for-go on both ends! So, the system SHOUD saturate more than a single 10GbE link and make real use of multichannel behaviour to use both (with the right  media!) – which is exactly what we saw in sequential Read speed tests. Writes, however, sat around 1300 to 1500 MB/s, often behaving closer to a single 10GbE stream, with occasional dips that suggested the second link was not being fully utilised for upstream traffic in that setup. Jumbo frames were enabled with MTU set to 9000, and alternative approaches were tested, so the remaining explanation could be software overhead, SMB tuning, client limitations, or an area of UGOS optimisation that is not yet final in the pre release software build.

Thermally, the unit behaved within expected bounds for a metal chassis hosting multiple high capacity HDDs and sustained access patterns. After roughly 36 hours of continuous activity, surface readings showed around 35C at the top, roughly 38C around the drive bay area and side ventilation panels, and around 41 to 44C in lower vent channel areas where airflow is concentrated. The rear fan region was around 44 to 45C, the PSU region hovered around 38C, and the LCD area reached around 45C, with most of the base sitting around 35 to 38C. Importantly, internal software did not raise thermal warnings in normal testing, and the only notable heat related stress occurred during repetitive synthetic SSD write loops that are not representative of typical mixed use.

Noise and power draw reflect the fact that this is a higher performance NAS platform with 6 drive density and a stronger CPU class than low power appliances. With fans set to the lowest mode and drives idling after RAID setup and synchronisation, noise landed around 39 to 40 dBA, rising to around 40 to 43 dBA on automatic fan mode. With fans set to maximum, idle noise increased to around 48 dBA, and with active drive access plus high fan mode, measurements were around 50 to 51 dBA using 64TB NAS class HDDs, with the reminder that a metal chassis can transmit drive vibration and seek noise more readily than plastic enclosures. Power draw in a heavily populated configuration with 6 x 64TB drives, 2 x 1TB NVMe, and both 10GbE links active was around 67 to 68W at idle, rising to around 93 to 100W plus under active access, with the expectation that sustained CPU intensive AI tasks and any external GPU usage could push consumption substantially higher than typical home NAS patterns.

Test specification summary

• RAID and cache test: 6 HDDs in RAID 5, SSD read/write cache enabled

• RAID 5 throughput: ~950 MB/s read, ~670 MB/s write

• NVMe internal performance: ~5.5 to 6.0 GB/s read and write (UGOS benchmark and SSH tests)

• Dual 10GbE SMB multichannel via USB4 adapter: ~2200 to 2300 MB/s read, ~1300 to 1500 MB/s write

• Noise: ~39 to 40 dBA (low, idle), ~40 to 43 dBA (auto, idle), ~48 dBA (max, idle), ~50 to 51 dBA (high, active)

• Power: ~67 to 68W (idle with populated drives), ~93 to 100W plus (active access)

• Thermals after ~36 hours sustained access: top ~35C, bays ~38C, vents ~38C, lower channels ~41 to 44C, rear ~44 to 45C, LCD ~45C

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – UGOS Software and Services

UGOS Pro on the iDX6011 Pro presents a broadly familiar turnkey NAS experience, with the same general design language and application structure used across UGREEN’s recent NAS products, and most of the mainstream services expected in a current platform. Initial setup and day to day navigation are oriented around a unified web interface and companion apps, with storage management, user permissions, and application deployment consolidated into a single environment rather than split across multiple tools. In practical use, this matters because the value of a higher end NAS is not just the hardware, but the ability to configure it quickly and maintain it without constant manual intervention, particularly once you start adding multiple shares, remote access rules, and background services that need to run reliably without ongoing tuning.

Core storage features cover the standard RAID modes offered by the platform, along with typical NAS file systems used here, and the ability to configure M.2 SSDs either as cache or as separate storage volumes depending on the desired balance between speed and simplicity. Snapshot support and file versioning are included, which is a baseline requirement for protecting against accidental deletion and some ransomware scenarios, and the system also provides a dedicated encrypted vault style storage area for data that needs an additional password protected layer beyond normal share permissions. For users building a general purpose private cloud, the platform includes the expected file sharing and access tools and supports the usual network protocols, reducing the need for third party add ons for basic file serving and multi device access.

On the services side, UGOS Pro supports Docker and virtual machine deployment, which expands the platform beyond file storage into general application hosting and light server roles. The presence of both container support and VM support is relevant in a system with fixed memory configurations, because it encourages buyers to evaluate the 32GB versus 64GB models based on their intent to run multiple services concurrently. In addition, iSCSI support is integrated and in testing could be set up in a straightforward manner, allowing the NAS to present block storage to client machines for workflows where mapped drives are not ideal. Backup and synchronisation features include multi target options, including NAS to NAS, NAS to cloud, and other scheduled operations with filtering and policy controls, which is the foundation most users will rely on rather than the newer AI layer.

Where UGOS Pro still shows gaps is less about missing basic NAS features and more about the absence of certain mature ecosystem level tools that established competitors provide. There is no ZFS option in the platform’s storage stack, which will matter to users who specifically want ZFS features and workflows, and the application ecosystem still lacks certain expected first party packages, with Plex media server being the most obvious omission in your evaluation despite alternatives like Jellyfin being possible. Security tooling is also mixed, with useful features such as 2FA, firewall controls, and automatic blocking, but without a comprehensive security posture scanner that audits weak passwords, exposed services, open ports, and other common misconfigurations in a way that guides less technical owners. The end result is a software platform that can cover the core NAS job for many users, but may still push power users toward third party operating systems or additional manual administration depending on priorities.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – What the AI Can and Cannot Do?

The AI layer on the iDX6011 Pro is built around Uliya, which functions as the interface for local model use and a set of assistant driven tools that sit alongside the normal UGOS experience. AI features are disabled by default on first use, and the local models are not pre installed, which means users must actively opt in and download what they want, rather than having the system continuously analyse data out of the box. Once enabled, the AI console exposes model choices and basic operational details such as estimated resource requirements, and it also includes permission style controls that determine which AI services are active, for example speech to text or large language model usage. There is also an option to connect cloud based AI providers via API key, and a separate option to allow online search as a supplement to responses, but the platform’s primary selling point is that most of its AI functions can run locally without transmitting content to a third party service.

What it can do in its current form is focused on analysis, summarisation, and retrieval rather than creation. Uliya supports conversational queries that can operate offline using local resources, with optional online search when enabled, and it can accept uploaded files for analysis, including images that it can describe at a basic content level. Document handling is one of the more practically useful parts, because the system can summarise documents and PDFs and then allow follow up questions based on that output, and this capability is integrated into the file manager via right click actions for supported file types. The voice memo tool extends this into audio, allowing recordings or imported audio files to be transcribed, summarised, and represented as a basic topic map, with export and translation options available using local processing for supported languages. Separately, UGREEN’s existing photo management features include recognition and categorisation that can identify people and other elements in photo libraries, and this part of the platform appears more mature than the newer assistant workflows.

What it cannot do is equally important, because some of the expected behaviours associated with “AI NAS” marketing are either absent or only partially implemented. There is no generative photo or video creation feature set, so the AI functionality is limited to text generation, transcription, and content analysis rather than producing new media. The system also does not currently provide broad pre scraping of user libraries in the way some users might expect, where a chosen directory is crawled in the background so that later conversational queries can pull from an already indexed knowledge store. Instead, several workflows rely on manual file uploads into a knowledge base, and the knowledge base itself feels under explained and inconsistent, sometimes returning incomplete or incorrect results when it cannot find enough relevant material within the data it is allowed to access. There is also limited visibility into how responses are formed, and no clear built in way to observe what portion of an answer is derived from local data versus general model knowledge when online search is disabled.

A recurring limitation in testing was the balance between privacy controls and usefulness. Permission settings exist, but they are comparatively rigid, and there is not yet the level of directory by directory or user by user access scoping that would allow an owner to confidently grant the assistant deeper access to some datasets while keeping other areas restricted. In practice, that can lead to cases where the assistant refuses or fails to answer a question because it lacks access, even when the user would prefer to grant broader permissions for a specific folder or project. Smart commands are present and can trigger a small set of device actions, but the command library is limited, and some attempts showed contextual confusion where a request was handled as a conversational prompt rather than an actionable instruction.

Across these areas, the underlying direction is clear, but the current implementation behaves more like an early stage feature set that needs expansion, better background indexing options, and broader integration across file types such as images, video, and spreadsheets before it matches the implied promise of a fully “assistant ready” NAS.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Review and Conclusion

As a hardware platform, the iDX6011 Pro presents a clear step up in UGREEN’s NAS range, with a configuration that prioritises high bandwidth I O, expansion options, and enough CPU class performance to avoid feeling constrained in common multi service scenarios. The combination of 6 bays, NVMe support, dual 10GbE, dual Thunderbolt 4, PCIe expansion, and OCuLink creates a NAS that can serve both as large capacity storage and as a faster workspace tier when configured with caching or SSD volumes, and measured results generally reflect that intent. Thermals and acoustics were within expected limits for a dense metal chassis populated with high capacity drives, and while power draw is higher than low power NAS designs, it tracks with the component class and connectivity. In short, the hardware side looks close to finished and competitive on specification and practical performance, with the main open question being how much final tuning will improve edge cases such as multichannel write behaviour.

The AI services are the less settled part of the product, not because the core idea is unclear, but because the current workflows still require too much manual direction and the assistant is not yet integrated deeply enough across data types and system control. The most useful elements today are transcription, document summarisation, and the existing photo recognition features, while the larger “AI NAS” promise is limited by the absence of directory level pre crawling, a knowledge base that can feel incomplete, smart commands that are not yet extensive, and permission controls that do not provide fine grained scoping. For buyers primarily interested in a high spec NAS at early campaign pricing, and who view AI as optional or developing, the platform may be straightforward to justify if crowdfunding risk is acceptable. For buyers whose purchase decision depends on a polished local assistant experience that is ready to analyse and retrieve information from large libraries with minimal setup, the current AI layer suggests waiting to see how the feature set and optimisation mature by the time the campaign software build is final.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UGREEN iDX6011 Pro AI NAS ReviUGREEN Reveal New SurveillanceUGREEN Reveal New SurveillanceUGREEN NAS Black Friday 2025 DUGREEN NAS Black Friday 2025 DBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataNEW UGREEN DXP4800 PRO and DXPUGREEN NASync vs UniFi UNAS - UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Source

How Good is the Terramaster TOS 6 NAS Software?

TerraMaster’s TOS 6 represents the company’s most comprehensive evolution of its NAS operating system, delivering an interface and architecture that is redesigned both visually and structurally. Replacing the earlier TOS 5, it builds on user feedback from the last three hardware generations and now arrives preinstalled on systems such as the F4-425 Plus, F2-425, and F6-424, as well as the all-flash F8 SSD Plus. The system adopts the Linux Kernel 6.1 LTS, which improves memory handling, file system performance, and hardware compatibility across newer Intel and AMD processors. With over forty new functions and more than three hundred individual refinements, TOS 6 is positioned as a more capable and robust platform for modern data storage and multi-user environments. TerraMaster’s objective with this version is to combine an accessible setup process with enterprise-style administration tools, allowing users to deploy features such as ACL permissions, SMB multichannel, Hyper-Lock WORM protection, and advanced RAID management within a simplified interface. Although still developing its ecosystem when compared with long-established NAS vendors, TOS 6 signals a step toward bridging the gap between budget and professional-grade systems.

Terramaster TOS 6 – Design, GUI and UX

TOS 6 introduces a significantly redesigned interface that emphasizes simplicity and consistency while retaining the technical depth expected from a NAS management platform. The desktop layout has been decluttered, removing excess icons in favor of a single navigation bar that centralizes access to applications, settings, and the new “Start” shortcut menu. This layout, combined with subtle animation effects and theme customization options such as Night Mode and accent color selection, is intended to make the environment less visually overwhelming than previous releases. While the interface feels smoother and more responsive, some users may still find it utilitarian compared to the polished design language of DSM or QTS. Nevertheless, the decision to reduce visual clutter and allow personalized dashboards marks a meaningful progression toward a more user-centric control experience.

The control panel, which is the backbone of the system’s configuration layer, has undergone extensive structural improvement. It now allows users to jump between related settings without closing the current menu, effectively halving the time required to perform complex administrative tasks. The inclusion of a keyword search bar further simplifies access to hundreds of configuration options ranging from network tuning to caching policies. Real-time monitoring panels, including the resource manager and storage manager, remain integrated into the main interface, but TOS 6 refines them with more accurate live updates and adjustable widgets.

This customization extends to the new system dashboard, where users can drag and rearrange data modules to match their monitoring preferences. Despite these improvements, the GUI still presents a text-heavy design, particularly in areas dealing with drive management, which could be challenging for newcomers.

The user experience, while substantially enhanced, continues to cater more toward technically proficient users than beginners. Nearly every system element is accessible from the web interface, with contextual right-click menus providing file and folder actions similar to desktop OS environments. This native browser-based functionality eliminates the need for third-party explorers for most operations and allows complete administrative control without client software. However, the interface’s dense arrangement of settings can still appear intimidating for users expecting guided wizards or visualized workflows.

TerraMaster’s focus on efficiency and configurability, rather than aesthetic guidance, reflects a deliberate design choice favoring control and transparency. For experienced users, this approach offers depth and predictability, but it remains less forgiving to casual or first-time NAS owners.

Terramaster TOS 6 – Storage Services and File Services

Storage management within TOS 6 has evolved into a far more granular and flexible system. The platform supports both traditional RAID configurations and TerraMaster’s adaptive TRAID and TRAID+ systems, which allow mixed-capacity drives to be combined while retaining redundancy across one or two disks. This feature makes expansion and migration easier, particularly for users gradually upgrading storage capacity. RAID rebuilding efficiency has also improved through “fast repair,” a mechanism that prioritizes only data-occupied sectors rather than empty disk space, substantially reducing recovery times after drive replacement. The system now separates the operating system from storage volumes entirely, allowing users to install the OS on one or two designated drives, typically SSDs, to improve response speed and cache access performance. This separation not only increases system responsiveness but also helps to protect data pools from corruption caused by OS-level failures.

The volume creation process is more flexible than in previous iterations, supporting both Btrfs and EXT4 file systems alongside iSCSI targets for raw block-level storage. Btrfs, in particular, benefits from the Linux 6.1 kernel’s improved memory handling and snapshot reliability. The inclusion of Hyper-Lock WORM (Write Once, Read Many) in both Compliance and Enterprise modes offers organizations the ability to lock data for specific periods or indefinitely, preventing modification or deletion to meet audit or regulatory requirements.

Volume-level encryption can be enabled during creation, giving administrators the option to protect sensitive data without affecting system-level performance. The management interface also displays real-time disk health data and S.M.A.R.T. metrics, alerting users to failing drives through the Message Center and email notifications, minimizing downtime and data loss risks.

TOS 6’s file service layer emphasizes both accessibility and speed. SMB multichannel support, combined with link aggregation, allows the operating system to utilize multiple Ethernet ports simultaneously to multiply throughput on supported models, improving large file transfer rates in multi-user environments. Shared folder management includes advanced ACL permissions, extending beyond traditional read/write rules to thirteen distinct access types, providing fine-grained control for business use.

Native support for protocols such as SMB, AFP, NFS, FTP, and WebDAV ensures compatibility with Windows, macOS, and Linux systems, while local mounting enables users to attach external drives or even cloud-mapped directories that synchronize automatically. File management within the web interface now features a tab-based navigation system, a first among NAS platforms, enabling quick copy and move operations without opening multiple windows, reinforcing TerraMaster’s focus on operational efficiency.

Terramaster TOS 6 – Backups and Synchronisation

Backup management in TOS 6 consolidates all related tools into a single unified interface accessible from the desktop or the control panel. This centralized hub simplifies navigation between local, remote, and cloud-based backup options while maintaining compatibility with third-party systems. The platform supports Rsync for cross-NAS synchronization, Time Machine for macOS clients, and TerraMaster’s own Centralized Backup utility for deploying and scheduling protection across multiple TNAS and remote servers. Administrators can configure recurring snapshot tasks on individual volumes or shared folders, define retention policies, and even lock snapshots to prevent deletion within a specified period. While these snapshots are not substitutes for full backups, they provide a lightweight recovery mechanism that minimizes data loss in cases of user error or ransomware infection.

Local backup utilities have been expanded to support directory-level duplication, USB external drives, and iSCSI targets. This enables administrators to replicate data within the same device, between drives, or toward another NAS through the internal network. Although backing up within a single system cannot substitute true redundancy, it offers additional flexibility for temporary mirroring or fast internal restores. For users operating hybrid environments, TOS 6 integrates with major cloud providers using its CloudSync feature, which allows continuous bidirectional synchronization between TNAS and services such as Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, and WebDAV storage. Mounted cloud directories appear as native local folders, simplifying file interaction and ensuring that any modifications are reflected remotely. The mounting mechanism also allows automatic synchronization of remote data without external applications, further streamlining multi-location workflows.

In terms of automation and security, backup tasks in TOS 6 can be scheduled to run incrementally or in real time, minimizing bandwidth usage and system load. Each task includes verification and logging, with the ability to send alerts on failure through the Message Center or by email. The inclusion of Hyper-Lock WORM at the backup level ensures archived backups cannot be altered for a defined compliance period, an important feature for business environments managing regulated data. Despite the lack of the same polish found in Synology’s Active Backup or QNAP’s Hybrid Backup Sync, TerraMaster’s solution achieves a comparable range of features for small-scale and mid-tier operations. The combination of flexible snapshot scheduling, cloud integration, and data-integrity verification makes TOS 6 a notable step forward from earlier releases and closes much of the functionality gap that existed between TerraMaster and its larger competitors.

Terramaster TOS 6 – Applications, Client Tools and Services

The application ecosystem in TOS 6 has expanded both in variety and integration depth, blending TerraMaster’s own utilities with third-party and open-source solutions. The App Center serves as the central hub for installing, updating, and managing applications, ranging from productivity tools and cloud clients to virtualization and multimedia services. Many of these applications are developed in-house, such as the Centralized Backup, File Manager, and Photo Gallery utilities, while others leverage established third-party frameworks like VirtualBox for virtualization and Portainer for container management. Users can deploy Docker containers directly from the interface or access the full registry for advanced workloads, making it possible to host additional media servers, AI indexing tools, or web applications. Although the ecosystem remains smaller than Synology’s Package Center or QNAP’s App Center, the available selection covers nearly all core NAS functions that general users and small business environments would require.

Client connectivity is also a strong component of the system’s service design. The TerraMaster desktop client for Windows and macOS allows users to discover NAS systems on the network, manage synchronized folders, and create automated transfer tasks. This complements the browser-based interface by offering a faster method for initiating replication jobs or file transfers between devices. Mobile applications are available for remote access, providing basic file management and media browsing functionality, though they remain limited compared to the desktop experience. One notable improvement in TOS 6 is the ability to download client tools directly from within the App Center rather than navigating to external links, streamlining deployment and maintaining version consistency across environments.#

In the area of multimedia and AI-driven services, TerraMaster has continued to refine its photo and video indexing utilities. The AI Photo Recognition tool, embedded within the Photo Gallery application, performs facial and object detection to organize content by identity or category. It uses metadata and machine learning libraries to recognize patterns across uploaded images, enabling faster search and auto-tagging capabilities. Video and photo thumbnails can be displayed directly within File Manager, which now supports large or small thumbnail scaling depending on user preference. For users requiring broader streaming capabilities, the system includes native support for Plex and Jellyfin through the App Center, allowing local or remote playback using widely adopted external platforms rather than proprietary ones. HDMI output remains inactive on TerraMaster NAS units, so these integrations rely solely on network streaming protocols.

System maintenance and troubleshooting services have also received attention in TOS 6. The platform’s security advisor can perform automated vulnerability checks, flagging weak passwords, exposed ports, or outdated configurations. Isolation Mode remains one of its more practical safety features, instantly disconnecting all non-administrative users and disabling PHP-based third-party apps to prevent intrusion. When users encounter system errors, they can utilize the integrated issue reporting tool, which generates diagnostic logs and can enable temporary remote support for TerraMaster engineers through an authentication key.

Although this feature should be used sparingly, it represents a more direct support pathway than previous versions. Taken together, these improvements show a gradual shift in TOS 6 toward professionalization, improving reliability and ease of management while still allowing extensive customization for experienced administrators.

Conclusion and Verdict

TOS 6 demonstrates that TerraMaster’s NAS platform has matured into a far more capable and structured ecosystem. The software now integrates a wide range of features that were once missing or underdeveloped, from advanced storage management and ACL permissions to cloud synchronization and AI-driven media tools. The interface redesign brings a measurable improvement in usability, and the decision to rebuild the system on the Linux Kernel 6.1 LTS ensures better hardware compatibility and long-term stability. However, it remains evident that the user experience still leans toward a more technical audience, with complex menus and limited guidance compared to the automated workflows found on Synology DSM or QNAP QTS. The system performs reliably, but its presentation and documentation could still benefit from refinement to fully appeal to non-specialist users.

Overall, TOS 6 is TerraMaster’s most complete and confident release to date, delivering a noticeable leap in speed, data protection, and operational consistency across the company’s NAS lineup. It now offers enough depth for small businesses, IT enthusiasts, and hybrid work setups while remaining open to third-party operating systems for those seeking additional flexibility. The platform still trails behind the larger ecosystems in app diversity and cloud integration polish, yet the progress made in this generation positions TerraMaster as one of the more serious alternatives in the mid-range NAS market. For users who value functionality and system control over visual refinement, TOS 6 provides a stable and expandable foundation that indicates TerraMaster is steadily closing the gap with its more established competitors.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Terramaster TOS 7 Public Beta Terramaster Launch the TOS 7 PTerramaster Black Friday 2025 Terramaster Black Friday 2025 Black Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataTerramaster Black Friday 2025 Terramaster TOS 6 Software RevTerramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS ReTerramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Re Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Le MP700 Pro XT incarne l’offre la plus performante du catalogue Corsair. Voici le test complète de la version 2 To promettant des débits dépassant les 14,5 Go/s !

Cet article Test MP700 Pro XT 2 To de Corsair a été publié en premier par GinjFo.

Le Tivique AX18 est un ordinateur portable avec un écran full HD de 18.5 pouces, une puce Intel N150 et 16 Go de RAM pour moins de 450 euros.

Le post Test Tivique AX18 : un ordinateur portable 18.5 pouces à moins de 450 euros a été publié sur IT-Connect.

Source

The Beelink ME Pro NAS – Should You Buy

After the surprising hit that was the Beelink ME Mini NAS in 2025, a lot of users were looking forward to seeing what the brand would do next in the NAS space. In January 2026, the brand responded with the launch of the Beelink ME Pro: an Intel N95/N150 powered system with DDR5 memory, 5GbE plus 2.5GbE connectivity, 2 SATA HDD bays, 3 M.2 NVMe bays, and one of the smallest physical footprints in this device class that I have seen. I have a full detailed review in progress on the ME Pro, but even after several days of use, several pros and cons have already emerged that may influence whether this is the right purchase for a homelab. While the review comes together, this article will outline the good, the bad, and the weird aspects of the Beelink ME Pro NAS.

Bonus Point: Really Nice Logistics Design

This is a minor point, but it is worth noting how the ME Pro arrives. The chassis box is unusually small for a 2-bay NAS, and at first glance it can look like the packaging contains little more than the unit itself. In practice, the accessory items are stored inside the drive bracket area in small internal boxes, which helps avoid loose parts moving around in transit and reduces wasted packaging volume.

The device also arrives with the M.2 thermal pads already positioned in place, so the initial storage installation process is more direct. It is not a major buying factor, but it is a practical packaging decision that avoids the excessive empty space and material waste that is common in this product category.

Reasons you Should Buy the Beelink ME Pro NAS

The ME Pro is positioned as a compact, high-connectivity 2-bay NAS that also provides NVMe expansion and local display capability, with hardware aimed at users who want more than basic file serving in a small footprint. It combines dual-port networking, integrated wireless connectivity, and multiple internal storage options in a chassis designed for straightforward access and cleaning, while also introducing a motherboard drawer concept that Beelink claims will support future platform upgrades. If those priorities match your setup goals, the ME Pro has several practical advantages that can justify its price and design choices.

#1 Man alive – this 2 Bay NAS is TINY!

The ME Pro’s most immediate differentiator is its physical footprint. The chassis measures 166 x 121 x 112mm and uses an all metal unibody design, which is notably smaller than most 2-bay NAS boxes that also include NVMe storage and dual network ports. In person it reads closer to a compact mini PC enclosure than a traditional NAS, and that difference matters if you are placing it on a crowded desk, a media shelf, or anywhere you are trying to keep cabling and hardware out of the way.

That compactness is not just cosmetic, it directly shapes how the hardware is arranged and how it feels to work with. Storage bays, the NVMe area, networking, and the cooling hardware are densely packed, so clearances are tight and the device is designed around precision fit rather than roomy access. The upside is that it is easy to place in small spaces without needing the usual NAS sized footprint. The tradeoff is that installations and maintenance are likely to feel more constrained than they would on a larger, more conventional 2-bay enclosure.

#2 Arrives with 5GbE and WiFi6, when everyone else is still on 2.5GbE

On networking, the ME Pro ships with 2 wired Ethernet ports and integrated wireless. The wired setup is a 5GbE Realtek RTL8126 port alongside a 2.5GbE Intel i226-V port, and the unit also includes WiFi 6 plus Bluetooth 5.4. For a compact 2-bay NAS, that is a broader mix of connectivity than the many systems that still top out at dual 2.5GbE, and it gives you more options for how the device fits into an existing home or small office network.

In practical terms, this provides flexibility rather than guaranteeing a specific performance outcome. A 5GbE port can be useful for faster transfers if you already have compatible switching or direct attach options, while the 2.5GbE port can serve as a secondary link for a different subnet, failover, or a separate device path depending on the OS and network configuration you choose. WiFi 6 is not a replacement for wired networking in a NAS role, but it can be relevant for temporary placement, initial setup, or use cases where running a cable is not straightforward, and the manual indicates the antenna is integrated into the front panel design rather than using an external antenna.

#3 Maintenance and Internal Access is a work of art!

The ME Pro is built around user access rather than treating the internals as a sealed appliance. The manual’s process is simple: remove the magnetic cooling mesh cover, unscrew and pull out the hard drive bracket, and use the bottom access panel to reach the M.2 slots. A screwdriver is stored in the base under a silicone pad, so the tool required for basic access is physically included with the device. The ports and recovery related features also acknowledge user servicing, with items like a reset hole and a CLR CMOS function shown in the manual.

In day to day handling, the layout is designed to slide out and reassemble in a specific order, and it generally supports the idea of quick cleaning and drive installation without full disassembly. At the same time, access relies on small screws and tight tolerances, so it is not a tool-less experience. In your first impressions, the mechanism for sliding the internal assembly out felt solid and precisely aligned, but you also noted that the included tool is very small and can be fiddly to use. The result is a design that prioritizes compact service access, but still expects careful handling during installation and maintenance.

#4 Great Base Memory Quantity at a time when RAM costs are BONKERS

From the start, the ME Pro is configured with either 12GB LPDDR5 4800MHz on the N95 models or 16GB LPDDR5 4800MHz on the N150 models, rather than shipping with a minimal memory pool that immediately pushes users toward an upgrade. In practical NAS use, that baseline capacity is relevant because it can influence how comfortably the system handles common add-ons such as containers, light virtualization, background indexing, and multiple concurrent services, depending on the operating system and workload. It also reduces the likelihood that memory becomes the first immediate bottleneck for typical home and small office setups.

The tradeoff is that this approach is linked to the way the memory is implemented. In your inspection of the unit, you noted there is no SO-DIMM slot and the RAM appears soldered to the board, which means users are effectively choosing their memory tier at purchase rather than treating it as a later upgrade (more on that in a bit). This makes the initial configuration choice more important, especially for buyers who already know they will run heavier applications or multiple VMs over time.

#5 Genuinely unique modularisation and upgradability in a pre-built solution, which I have ever seen

The ME Pro’s most unusual design claim is the swappable modular motherboard. Beelink markets the system as supporting interchangeable boards across Intel, AMD, and ARM options, using a drawer style layout intended to let the main compute board slide out rather than being permanently fixed inside the chassis. The product page frames this as a way to avoid replacing the entire enclosure when you want a different CPU platform, and instead treat the chassis, drive housing, and general structure as the long-term part of the purchase.

In practical terms, this concept will only matter if Beelink actually sells the alternative boards at sensible pricing and maintains availability over time, but the physical architecture appears to be built around the idea. Your first look showed a clear internal separation between the board assembly and the rest of the enclosure, and you also observed hints of planned scale-up hardware, such as layout markings that suggest different future storage or platform variants. For buyers who like the idea of extending a system’s usable life without a full rebuild, the ME Pro is one of the few pre-built NAS style devices currently trying to formalize that upgrade path rather than leaving it to a full case swap.

Reasons You Might Want to Skip the Beelink ME Pro NAS

The ME Pro’s compact design and connectivity focused feature set come with tradeoffs that will matter to some buyers more than others. Several of the core choices are linked together, meaning you get the small chassis, the storage density, and the modular drawer approach, but you also accept limits around upgrades, physical handling, and how the platform is configured from the factory. This is not a device where every part is meant to be user replaceable or easily swapped in the way a DIY small form factor build would be.

It is also worth treating the launch configuration and roadmap as part of the buying decision. The product is being introduced with very similar Intel CPU options and fixed memory tiers, while the company is already pointing toward future AMD and ARM variants and possible expanded layouts. For some buyers, that is a reason to wait until the wider range exists and the upgrade parts are actually available. For others, the current design constraints are enough to prefer a more conventional 2-bay NAS that is larger, simpler to work on, and has clearer long-term upgrade paths.

The RAM is FIXED (i.e cannot be upgraded or changed)!!!

The ME Pro uses LPDDR5 memory (12GB on the N95 models, 16GB on the N150 models), and based on the internal layout you inspected, there is no SO-DIMM slot for user upgrades. In other words, the memory appears to be soldered to the motherboard rather than installed as a replaceable module. That makes the initial purchase configuration more important than on many small NAS builds where memory can be upgraded later as needs change.

The practical impact shows up when your usage grows beyond basic file storage. If you plan to run multiple containers, heavier indexing tasks, or virtual machines, memory headroom can become a limiting factor long before CPU or network does, depending on the OS and services you deploy. With this platform, there is no simple path to increase RAM after purchase, so anyone unsure about future requirements may prefer a system with upgradeable memory, or may want to treat the 16GB model as the safer long-term option by default.

The design is so, so very tight!

The ME Pro’s small enclosure is achieved through very tight internal tolerances. That is visible in how the drive bracket, motherboard drawer area, and storage zones are packed together, and it influences the overall experience during installation and servicing. The system relies on screw mounting for drives rather than a click-in tray approach, and while the manual provides clear steps, the process assumes careful alignment rather than quick, tool-less handling. This level of precision fit is likely part of how Beelink is trying to control airflow and improve thermal transfer in a compact space, and it also aligns with their noise and vibration messaging around tightened mounting and silicone dampening.

In the first impressions, that tightness showed up most clearly when inserting and removing components. Slotting the hard drive bracket and drives could feel rough at times, with very little clearance to work with, and the internal assembly can require a firmer push to seat correctly. Even if the compact fit is helping with heat dissipation and vibration control, it remains a very tight build, and it is less forgiving if you are frequently swapping drives, testing different storage combinations, or repeatedly opening the chassis. The end result is a device that looks clean and flush when assembled, but can feel constrained during hands-on work compared with a larger enclosure with more physical margin.

Launching the N95 version and N150 version was an odd choice (i.e very similar processors)

At launch, the ME Pro is offered in N95 and N150 variants, and on paper these CPUs sit very close to each other. Both are 4-core, 4-thread Intel N-series parts with 6MB cache, and the headline frequency difference is modest: up to 3.4GHz on the N95 and up to 3.6GHz on the N150. For many NAS workloads that are constrained by storage or network throughput rather than CPU, this kind of gap may not translate into a clearly different experience, especially once real world thermal and power limits are applied.

This tight spacing makes the product stack less clear than it could be, because the pricing difference between the entry and higher tier configurations is not simply paying for a meaningfully different platform. In practice, buyers are also paying for the memory and SSD tier attached to each CPU option, and in your case the non-upgradeable memory makes that choice more permanent. If the goal is to segment the lineup, the N95 and N150 pairing may feel like a small step that leaves some users waiting for a more distinct higher performance option rather than choosing between two closely related CPUs. Given the noise that Beelink has made about this expanding range, that only further encourages some users who think these CPUs a little timid, to remain on the fence a bit longer….

There are other CPU/Architecture versions coming

As mentioned, Beelink is already signalling that the ME Pro chassis is intended to outlive the initial Intel configurations. The official product messaging highlights a swappable modular motherboard concept and explicitly references future boards beyond the current Intel N-series options, including AMD and ARM. In your first look, you also noted visible hints inside the unit that suggest the internal layout has been planned with other variants in mind, rather than being a one-off design limited to the launch hardware.

For buyers, this creates a timing question. If those alternative boards and models arrive soon, they may offer clearer performance separation, different feature priorities, or a better match for specific workloads. At the same time, the current purchase decision depends on what is available today, not what is promised, and the value of the modular approach only becomes real once the upgrade boards can actually be bought at reasonable pricing. Until the roadmap becomes a shipping product line, some users may prefer to wait, while others will simply evaluate the current N95 and N150 models on their own merits.

Mixed M.2 Speeds at PCIe 3.0 x2 and PCIe 3.0 x1? Was 10GbE and uniform lanes discussed instead?

The ME Pro’s 3 M.2 NVMe slots are not equal. Slot 1 is PCIe 3.0 x2, while slots 2 and 3 are PCIe 3.0 x1, and the manual specifically recommends using slot 1 for the system drive because it is the fastest slot. In practical terms, this creates a tiered NVMe layout where one drive has higher potential bandwidth than the other 2, which can influence how you plan cache, containers, VM storage, or scratch workloads. It also means peak NVMe performance depends heavily on which slot you choose, not just the SSD you buy.

That design choice raises an obvious tradeoff question: whether the platform would have been better served by a different allocation, such as keeping all 3 M.2 slots at PCIe 3.0 x1 in exchange for other connectivity, or prioritizing a different network tier such as 10GbE (though arguably, it might well have to sit at 3×1 and potentially be bottlenecked to 800-900MB/s, unless that lowered the m.2 to x2 bays). The ME Pro already includes 5GbE plus 2.5GbE, so the networking is not low end, but the mixed NVMe lane widths still make the storage side feel uneven by design. For a NAS focused build, the practical impact will depend on real testing: whether the internal topology causes contention under mixed loads, and whether the faster slot meaningfully benefits common tasks once network and SATA throughput are considered.

Conclusion & Verdict – Should You Buy the Beelink ME Pro NAS?

The Beelink ME Pro is a compact 2-bay NAS platform that combines SATA storage with 3 M.2 NVMe slots, dual wired networking, and integrated wireless in an enclosure that prioritizes density and internal access. It also introduces a modular motherboard drawer concept that, if supported with real upgrade boards over time, could change how long the chassis remains useful compared with typical pre-built NAS systems. As a hardware package, it is aimed at users who want high connectivity and mixed storage options without moving to a larger box.

At the same time, several of its main limitations are set at purchase and cannot be easily changed later. The memory appears fixed, the internal fit is very tight during drive and bracket handling, and the launch CPU options are closely spaced rather than clearly separated performance tiers. The NVMe layout is also mixed speed by design, which affects how you should plan drive placement and workloads. Whether these tradeoffs are acceptable depends largely on how much you value the enclosure size, the network ports, and the promised modular roadmap versus the more conventional upgrade flexibility of larger or more established NAS designs.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Beelink ME Pro NAS ReviewBeelink ME Pro NAS - Should YoBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink NAS - Describe Your PeBeelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME Beelink Me Pro, S, X and MAX, Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink ME Mini NAS Review - a Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Did Minisforum FINALLY Go Too Far with the MS-02 Ultra?

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is positioned as a compact workstation that deliberately blurs the line between a high-end mini PC and a small server platform. While its physical footprint remains relatively small at 4.8 L, the design choices made across CPU selection, PCIe expansion, storage layout, and networking place it well beyond the scope of conventional desktop minis. During extended hands-on testing, it becomes clear that this system is not designed around a single use case. Instead, it targets users who expect to adapt the hardware over time, whether for professional content creation, software development, virtualization, NAS deployment, or mixed workloads that benefit from high I/O density. This flexibility comes with complexity, and the MS-02 Ultra expects a certain level of user familiarity with BIOS tuning, PCIe lane allocation, and thermal tradeoffs that are rarely encountered in this form factor. A key point that emerged during testing is how sharply the experience changes depending on which CPU configuration is selected. The Ultra 9 285HX variant is not simply faster than the lower-tier models. It fundamentally alters what the system can do by unlocking ECC memory support, enabling dual 25GbE SFP+ networking, and adding a PCIe combo card that expands total M.2 capacity to 4 slots. The Ultra 9 275HX and Ultra 5 235HX versions retain the same chassis and core platform, but they operate closer to a traditional high-end mini PC, with fewer storage options and reduced network throughput. As a result, the MS-02 Ultra range should be viewed less as a single product and more as a tiered platform, where hardware capability and intended role scale directly with price.

From a value perspective, pricing spans a wide range and reflects both component availability and Minisforum’s attempt to offer barebones and fully populated options. The entry barebones Ultra 9 285HX configuration sits at $1,199, while fully populated ECC-based builds can reach $2,999. During testing, it became apparent that much of the system’s long-term value is tied to its scalability rather than its out-of-the-box configuration. Users who intend to keep the system static may find better value in smaller Minisforum models, while those planning to expand storage, networking, or PCIe devices over time are more likely to benefit from the MS-02 Ultra’s architecture. This distinction frames the rest of the review, which focuses less on raw specifications and more on how those design choices behave in real-world use.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Quick Conclusion

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is best understood as a compact but highly modular platform rather than a conventional mini PC, and its design clearly reflects that intent. It delivers strong CPU performance, extensive connectivity, and an uncommon level of internal expansion for a system of this size, but it also expects the user to engage actively with its configuration, cooling behavior, and upgrade planning. The system’s real strength lies in how well it can scale over time through additional storage, PCIe expansion, or higher-speed networking, rather than in any single out-of-the-box performance metric. Its pricing and hardware complexity place it firmly in enthusiast and professional territory, making it ill-suited for users who want a simple or inexpensive desktop replacement, but a compelling option for those seeking a compact system that can grow into demanding roles such as a workstation, NAS, or virtualization host as their needs evolve.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 6/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.4

PROS

Strong multi-core CPU performance that approaches compact desktop-class systems
Unusually high internal expandability for a 4.8 L chassis
PCIe 5.0 x16 slot available for future expansion
Dual 25GbE SFP+ networking on the 285HX model
Support for ECC DDR5 memory on the 285HX configuration
Four M.2 NVMe slots available on the top-tier model
Internal 350 W PSU with auxiliary power for PCIe devices
USB4 v2 ports capable of very high external storage and docking throughput
Suitable for multiple roles including workstation, NAS, and virtualization host

CONS

High pricing for a area of the market where buyers are getting used to low, low prices, even for ECC-equipped or fully populated configurations
Limited physical space restricts larger GPU and PCIe card choices
Fan control largely confined to BIOS with limited OS-level adjustment (TBC)
Complexity and tuning requirements may deter less experienced users who want to maximize their investment in this system

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Design & Storage

The MS-02 Ultra immediately distinguishes itself from earlier Minisforum workstation designs by abandoning the lighter, more modular internal layout used in systems like the MS-01 and MS-S1 Max. Instead, the chassis adopts a far denser internal structure that resembles a compressed micro-tower, with components stacked tightly around a central airflow channel. While the system still uses a slide-out internal frame, the motion is more deliberate and less fluid than previous designs due to the weight and density of the installed hardware. This approach prioritizes structural rigidity and thermal containment over ease of access, signaling that the MS-02 Ultra is designed to be configured carefully rather than frequently opened.

Storage implementation is one of the defining aspects of the MS-02 Ultra, particularly on the Ultra 9 285HX configuration. In this model, storage is split across the motherboard and a dedicated PCIe combo card. Two M.2 NVMe slots are mounted directly on the board and are positioned close to the CPU and memory area, which places them inside an active airflow path but also imposes strict height limitations. SSDs with tall, pre-attached heatsinks are not practical here, and Minisforum instead supplies low-profile heatsinks intended to work within the confined space. During testing, this design proved functional, though it requires more planning than a conventional desktop layout.

The additional two M.2 slots are integrated into the PCIe card that also houses the dual 25GbE controllers. This card is exclusive to the Ultra 9 285HX version and is responsible for expanding total NVMe capacity from 2 drives to 4. Unlike typical expansion cards, this unit combines networking and storage on a single PCB and includes its own active cooling solution. In use, the card introduces noticeable power draw even when the network interfaces are idle, but it also centralizes high-speed I/O in a way that simplifies cabling and internal layout. This design choice is unusual, but it aligns with the system’s goal of maximizing capability within a small enclosure.

There are also important performance considerations tied to how storage bandwidth is allocated. The motherboard-mounted M.2 slots are specified as PCIe 4.0 x4, but during testing, lane sharing and PCIe crossover behavior resulted in scenarios where one slot operated at PCIe 5.0 x4 while others were reduced to PCIe 3.0 x4. This was not immediately obvious from the documentation and required closer inspection of the PCIe lane map and BIOS configuration to fully understand. While overall throughput remained strong across all drives, the behavior highlights that the MS-02 Ultra expects users to pay attention to lane allocation if they intend to fully populate all storage bays.

From a practical standpoint, the storage design reflects the broader philosophy of the MS-02 Ultra. It offers unusually high capacity and flexibility for a system of this size, but it does so by imposing constraints related to drive selection, thermal clearance, and PCIe bandwidth sharing. For users planning a fixed configuration, these limitations are manageable once understood. For those intending to experiment with different storage combinations over time, the layout rewards careful planning rather than casual swapping. This reinforces the idea that the MS-02 Ultra is engineered for deliberate, long-term deployment rather than frequent hardware iteration.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Internal Hardware

At the core of the MS-02 Ultra is Intel’s Core Ultra HX platform, with the Ultra 9 285HX representing the most complete implementation of what this chassis can support. This processor combines 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores, allowing the system to scale from low-load background tasks to sustained multi-threaded workloads without the immediate thermal collapse often seen in compact systems. In practice, the CPU feels closer to a desktop-class part than a mobile processor, particularly when sustained power limits are raised in the BIOS. That capability comes with tradeoffs in power draw and cooling demand, but it also defines the MS-02 Ultra’s positioning as something far more ambitious than a conventional mini PC.

Memory support further reinforces that distinction. The system includes 4 DDR5 SODIMM slots, but only the Ultra 9 285HX variant enables ECC functionality. During testing, ECC was supported at 4800 MT/s, and while that frequency is lower than some non-ECC DDR5 kits, the stability benefits are clearly aligned with the system’s server-adjacent ambitions. The physical layout of the memory slots is unconventional, with 2 slots positioned close to the CPU cooling path and the remaining 2 mounted on the opposite side of the board.

Minisforum has added a custom heatsink over part of the memory and nearby controllers, suggesting thermal behaviour around the DIMMs was significant enough during development to warrant dedicated mitigation.

PCIe lane availability is one of the most critical aspects of the MS-02 Ultra’s internal design. The system exposes 3 PCIe slots: 1 PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, 1 PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, and 1 PCIe 4.0 x4 slot. Notably, the PCIe 5.0 x16 slot is not occupied by the bundled 25GbE combo card, leaving it available for future expansion. This is an unusual design choice in a system of this size and points to forward-looking intent rather than immediate necessity. However, physical space limits the practicality of using this slot to low-profile, short-length cards, which significantly narrows the pool of compatible GPUs and accelerators.

Power delivery inside the chassis is handled by an internal 350 W PSU, which is uncommon for systems in this size class. During teardown and testing, it became clear that Minisforum opted for an internal unit to support higher transient loads and to provide direct power connectors for PCIe devices. While an external PSU would have simplified thermals and internal space management, the internal design enables a cleaner external setup and removes a common bottleneck seen in expandable mini PCs. The tradeoff is increased internal heat density, which places more responsibility on the cooling system to manage both CPU and power delivery components simultaneously.

Overall, the internal hardware configuration of the MS-02 Ultra reflects a deliberate shift away from simplicity and toward flexibility and scalability. Each major subsystem, CPU, memory, PCIe, and power delivery, is implemented in a way that assumes the user will actively engage with BIOS settings, lane allocation, and hardware planning.

This makes the system less forgiving for casual users but far more capable for those who intend to push it beyond default configurations. Rather than hiding complexity, the MS-02 Ultra exposes it, which is both its defining strength and a potential barrier depending on the user’s expectations.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Ports and Connections

The MS-02 Ultra offers a port layout that reflects its hybrid workstation and infrastructure-focused design rather than a consumer desktop orientation. On the front panel, Minisforum has placed 2 USB4 v2 Type-C ports operating at up to 80 Gbps, alongside a single USB 10 Gbps Type-A port, a 3.5 mm audio jack, and the power button. In practical use, the front USB4 v2 ports proved capable of sustained high-throughput operation, including external NVMe enclosures where transfer speeds in the 6 to 7 GB/s range were observed. This makes the front panel suitable not just for peripherals, but for temporary high-speed storage, capture devices, or docking solutions without needing to access the rear of the system.

The rear I/O panel expands connectivity significantly and is where the system’s infrastructure focus becomes clearer. It includes 1 USB4 Type-C port at 40 Gbps, 3 USB-A ports at 10 Gbps, and a full-size HDMI 2.1 port supporting high-resolution and high-refresh output. The HDMI port provides a straightforward display option for setups that do not rely on DisplayPort over USB4, which is useful in environments where compatibility or cable length is a concern. Together, these ports support multi-display configurations without requiring a discrete GPU, though display bandwidth sharing across USB4 ports should still be considered when attaching multiple high-resolution monitors.

Networking is one of the defining characteristics of the MS-02 Ultra, particularly on the Ultra 9 285HX model. This version includes the previously mentioned 2 25GbE SFP+ ports delivered via the internal PCIe combo card, in addition to a 10GbE RJ45 port and a 2.5GbE RJ45 port. Each wired interface uses a separate controller, allowing simultaneous multi-tier networking without shared bandwidth bottlenecks.

In testing, the presence of multiple active network controllers contributed to higher idle power draw, but it also enables complex routing, storage, or virtualization scenarios that would normally require a much larger system. The 2.5GbE interface also supports Intel vPro, allowing remote management and BIOS-level access in supported environments.

Wireless connectivity is handled by an onboard WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 module, with external antenna connectors located at the rear. In close-range testing, WiFi 7 throughput exceeded 5 Gbps when paired with a compatible router, making it a viable option for high-speed wireless workflows when cabling is impractical.

While wireless connectivity is unlikely to replace the wired interfaces for sustained workloads, its inclusion rounds out the system’s connectivity and reinforces the idea that the MS-02 Ultra is designed to function in a wide range of deployment scenarios, from desk-based workstations to lab or rack-adjacent environments.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Speed, Noise, Heat and Power Tests

In day-to-day operation, the MS-02 Ultra behaves closer to a compact desktop workstation than a typical mini PC, particularly when configured with the Core Ultra 9 285HX. General responsiveness under Windows 11 Pro was consistently strong, even with multiple background tasks running, and the system showed no signs of instability during extended uptime.

Light workloads such as desktop productivity, media playback, and development tools rarely pushed power draw beyond moderate levels, although the presence of the 25GbE combo card does raise baseline consumption compared to smaller Minisforum systems.

CPU-focused testing highlighted the platform’s ability to sustain high loads, but also underscored how aggressively the system can scale power. In Cinebench, single-core workloads typically drew around 65 to 70 W, while full multi-core runs pushed total system power beyond 200 W at peak. These figures are unusually high for a system of this size, but they align with what would be expected from a high-core-count HX processor running with elevated power limits. Despite this, the cooling system maintained control, with external chassis temperatures remaining within reasonable limits even during prolonged stress periods.

Integrated graphics performance was evaluated using a mix of synthetic benchmarks and real-world gaming tests. Cinebench GPU and PCMark scores placed the system solidly ahead of most integrated-graphics mini PCs, but well below even mid-range discrete GPUs. In practice, games such as Sons of the Forest and Street Fighter 6 were playable at 60 FPS using medium settings, confirming that casual and light gaming is viable without additional hardware.

However, more demanding benchmarks like Steel Nomad and Solar Bay Extreme demonstrated clear limitations, reinforcing that users seeking higher graphical fidelity or advanced rendering will need a discrete GPU or external GPU solution.

Where the MS-02 Ultra differentiates itself is in scalability rather than raw out-of-the-box performance. USB4 ports supported external GPUs and high-speed storage without issue, and internal PCIe expansion allowed for measurable gains when discrete graphics were introduced. Storage benchmarks showed expected scaling across PCIe generations, with PCIe 5.0 NVMe drives exceeding 12 GB/s, PCIe 4.0 drives reaching around 6 GB/s, and PCIe 3.0 drives performing in line with their specifications. Overall, performance testing confirmed that the system’s architecture prioritizes flexibility and sustained throughput over specialization in any single workload.

Disclaimer on 25GbE and NAS Testing

This review does not include full performance validation of the dual 25GbE SFP+ interfaces or in-depth NAS and virtualization benchmarking. At the time of testing, a complete 25GbE network environment was not yet in place, which prevented meaningful throughput, latency, and sustained load testing of those ports. As a result, the networking discussion in this article is limited to hardware behavior, configuration, and early observations rather than verified performance metrics. A dedicated follow-up video and article are planned that will focus specifically on deploying the MS-02 Ultra as a NAS and Proxmox host, including detailed 25GbE testing, storage performance under RAID and VM workloads, and long-term stability analysis.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Review – Conclusion & Verdict

After extended testing, the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra stands out as one of the most ambitious small-form-factor systems Minisforum has produced to date. It is not designed to be a simple plug-and-play mini PC, and it does not try to hide that fact. Almost every aspect of the system, from PCIe lane allocation to storage layout and cooling behavior, assumes the user will be willing to spend time understanding how the hardware fits together. In return, it offers a level of flexibility that is uncommon at this size, combining workstation-class CPU performance with expansion options that normally require a much larger chassis. The result is a system that feels closer to a modular platform than a fixed appliance.

In practical use, the MS-02 Ultra proves capable across a wide range of workloads, but its real value lies in how well it scales beyond its default configuration. CPU performance is strong enough for sustained professional tasks, integrated graphics are sufficient for light gaming and creative work, and the internal and external expansion options open the door to far more demanding roles over time. At the same time, the pricing, particularly for ECC-equipped or fully populated configurations, places it firmly in enthusiast and professional territory. Users who want something quiet, simple, and inexpensive will likely be better served by smaller Minisforum systems. For those who are comfortable tinkering, planning future upgrades, and investing in a platform that can evolve alongside their needs, the MS-02 Ultra delivers a rare combination of compact size, connectivity, and long-term adaptability that few systems currently match.

PROs of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra	CONs of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra
Strong multi-core CPU performance that approaches compact desktop-class systems Unusually high internal expandability for a 4.8 L chassis PCIe 5.0 x16 slot available for future expansion Dual 25GbE SFP+ networking on the 285HX model Support for ECC DDR5 memory on the 285HX configuration Four M.2 NVMe slots available on the top-tier model Internal 350 W PSU with auxiliary power for PCIe devices USB4 v2 ports capable of very high external storage and docking throughput Suitable for multiple roles including workstation, NAS, and virtualization host	High pricing for a area of the market where buyers are getting used to low, low prices, even for ECC-equipped or fully populated configurations Limited physical space restricts larger GPU and PCIe card choices Fan control largely confined to BIOS with limited OS-level adjustment (TBC) Complexity and tuning requirements may deter less experienced users who want to maximize their investment in this system

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UnifyDrive UP6 NAS ReviewBeelink ME Pro NAS ReviewUGREEN iDX6011 Pro AI NAS ReviUGREEN iDX6011 Pro AI NAS ReviMinisforum Reveal the New MiniMinisforum N5 MAX NAS RevealedBeelink ME Pro NAS - Should YoUniFi Travel Router Early ReviUniFi Travel Router ReviewJonsbo N6 NAS Case Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UniFi’s New Travel Router – Pocket-Sized Perfection?

The UniFi Travel Router (UTR) is a compact router intended to extend an existing UniFi network to temporary locations such as hotels, offices, or public WiFi environments, with setup and changes handled through the UniFi Mobile App rather than on device controls. It is designed to bind to a UniFi site so that WiFi settings and Teleport can be applied automatically, allowing a familiar SSID and consistent LAN behavior to follow the user between locations without re adopting devices each time. In practical use, this positions it as a way to place multiple client devices behind a single controlled access point when working from shared networks, while still routing traffic through a VPN path back to a UniFi gateway if desired. The UTR also supports multiple uplink types, including Ethernet, WiFi, and USB tethering through a smartphone, with the ability to set uplink priority once an upstream connection has been established and any captive portal login has been completed via the phone.

Item	Detail
Product	UniFi Travel Router (UTR)
Price	$79.00
Dimensions	95.95 x 65 x 12.5 mm
Weight	89 g
WiFi standard	WiFi 5 (802.11ac)
Bands	2.4 GHz, 5 GHz
WiFi MIMO	2 x 2
Antennas	2 embedded WiFi antennas
Max TX power	2.4G: 13 dBm, 5G: 13 dBm
Ethernet ports	2 x GbE RJ45
VPN client support	OpenVPN, WireGuard
Power method	USB-C
Power input	5V / 2A (adapter not included)
Max power consumption	5W
Display	1.14″ status display
Button	Factory reset
Certifications	CE, FCC, IC
Compliance	NDAA compliant
Not supported (per docs)	WPA Enterprise, Passpoint

UniFi Travel Router Review – Quick Conclusion

The UniFi Travel Router looks like a genuinely handy tool for people already invested in UniFi: it gives you a small, light travel router with two gigabit ports (WAN and LAN), USB C power, separate USB tethering for using a phone as a 5G uplink, and a status screen that makes it easy to confirm what uplink you are using and whether Teleport is active, plus the big headline benefit that you can bind it to an existing UniFi setup and effectively carry your familiar SSID and behavior with you so your devices and even colleagues can connect without reconfiguring anything, while tunneling sensitive traffic back home through Teleport for safer use on hotel, office, or coffee shop networks and simplifying captive portal logins through the app. The tradeoffs are mostly about performance and features compared with newer rivals: it is WiFi 5 only with modest real world throughput expectations, the Ethernet ports are 1 GbE rather than 2.5 GbE, the screen is not touch so you still rely on the mobile app for changes, and there is no internal battery plus no built in SIM or eSIM option, which will disappoint anyone wanting an all in one, fully cellular travel router rather than a UniFi focused extender that leans on WiFi uplinks, wired WAN, or phone tethering.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 8/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 8/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.0

PROS

Deep UniFi ecosystem fit, can bind to an existing UniFi site for a familiar setup on the go
Teleport support enables secure remote access back to your UniFi network on public WiFi
Can clone an existing SSID so your devices connect without reconfiguring
Multi uplink flexibility: WiFi uplink, wired WAN via Ethernet, and USB tethering via smartphone
Captive portal logins are handled through the mobile app, simplifying hotel and guest WiFi access
Two gigabit ports (WAN and LAN) allow simple wired integration when available
Separate USB C power and separate USB tethering is practical for travel scenarios
Pocket sized, lightweight design with a helpful status display for quick connection checks

CONS

WiFi 5 only, so performance and feature set trail newer WiFi 6 or WiFi 7 travel routers
Ethernet is 1 GbE, not 2.5 GbE
No internal battery and no built in SIM or eSIM option for standalone cellular use

---

UniFi Travel Router – Design

The UTR uses a slim, pocket oriented chassis that matches its intended role as a portable router rather than a fixed installation device. At 95.95 x 65 x 12.5 mm and 89 g, it is sized to carry alongside a phone, power bank, or small toolkit, and the enclosure is polycarbonate rather than metal. The design is built around external power, with no internal battery listed, so it is meant to be powered from common USB sources such as a charger, a power bank, or an available USB port in transit environments. UniFi specifies a USB-C 5V 2A input and up to 5W consumption, which places it within the output range of typical phone chargers and many shared USB outlets, but also means functionality depends on having a reliable external power source.

Physical I O is minimal and focused on travel use, with emphasis on flexibility rather than high port count. The unit provides 2 x GbE RJ45 ports for wired connectivity, typically used as WAN and LAN in practice, enabling either a wired upstream connection or a direct wired link to a local device when needed. It also includes a factory reset button but no other on device controls for configuration changes. In your usage notes, you highlighted that power and USB tethering are separated, allowing the device to stay powered from one source while using a different connection for phone tethering, which avoids the single port limitation found on some compact travel routers. You also noted that this layout suits scenarios where the most convenient power source might be a multi port power bank or a vehicle and public USB outlet, while the tether source remains the phone.

Status feedback is provided through a 1.14 inch display, but it is not a touchscreen, and configuration changes are handled in the UniFi Mobile App. This means the display functions as a quick reference for connection state and operational mode, such as whether it is using a particular uplink or whether Teleport is active, rather than a control surface for changing settings. Internally, WiFi is delivered via 2 embedded antennas with 2 x 2 MIMO and listed maximum transmit power of 13 dBm on both 2.4G and 5G, reflecting a design focused on compactness rather than external antenna placement. Operating limits are specified at -10 to 40 C and 5 to 95% noncondensing humidity, and the unit is listed as NDAA compliant with CE, FCC, and IC certifications, which may matter for users deploying it in regulated or corporate environments.

UniFi Travel Router – Connectivity

The UTR is built around 3 uplink paths: wired Ethernet, wireless WAN, and USB tethering through a smartphone, with the router acting as the single aggregation point for connected client devices. On the wired side, it provides 2 x GbE RJ45 ports, typically used as 1 WAN and 1 LAN, which allows a direct connection to an upstream network where a desk port or wall jack is available, while still offering a wired LAN handoff to a laptop, switch, or other local device. In your review, you also noted the practical advantage of using a wired uplink in temporary deployments, since it avoids relying entirely on building WiFi when you are on site for multiple days and want more predictable upstream stability.

For wireless connectivity, the UTR uses WiFi 5 (802.11ac) across 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, with 2 x 2 MIMO and support for typical channel widths of 20, 40, and 80 MHz. UniFi lists a maximum 802.11ac data rate of up to 866.7 Mbps at VHT 80 and corresponding 802.11n rates up to 300 Mbps, with legacy 802.11a b g rates also supported for compatibility. In your video, you set expectations around real world throughput, noting that this class of WiFi 5 travel router can feel limited compared with newer WiFi 6 and WiFi 7 options, and you referenced typical observed uplink figures around 150 Mbps in the context of public WiFi and travel scenarios rather than sustained near gigabit speeds.

When connecting through hotel or venue WiFi, captive portal handling is part of the connectivity workflow rather than a separate feature layer. The documented process is to select the upstream network in the UniFi Mobile App, then complete any captive portal login on the phone when prompted, after which the router maintains that authenticated upstream session for the devices behind it. This approach can simplify group use, since multiple devices can share the same authenticated uplink without each device individually interacting with the portal. Connectivity limitations are also defined in the documentation, including lack of support for WPA Enterprise and Passpoint networks, which can affect compatibility in some corporate or managed public environments where those authentication methods are enforced.

UniFi Travel Router – Software & Services

The UTR is designed to integrate into an existing UniFi deployment rather than operate as a standalone router with its own separate management model. Once it is bound to a UniFi site, it can automatically apply WiFi configuration and bring up the same network identity used elsewhere, including expected SSIDs and routing behavior. UniFi positions this as a continuity feature, where location aware policies and routing rules can activate when the router connects at a new site, reducing the amount of manual setup typically needed when moving between venues.

Teleport is the primary UniFi service feature tied to remote access on the UTR. The documented workflow is to complete initial setup, open the UniFi Mobile App, select an available UniFi gateway or console, and then connect using Teleport, creating a private path back to the user’s UniFi network. Alongside Teleport, the UTR lists VPN client support for OpenVPN and WireGuard, allowing VPN enforcement at the router level so connected devices use the same tunnel without requiring separate VPN configuration per device. In your review use case, this was framed around keeping work traffic routed through a known UniFi environment while operating on public or untrusted networks during multi day on site work.

Beyond remote access, the feature set includes core router functions such as firewall and port forwarding, with UniFi management intended to keep LAN behavior consistent across locations. UniFi also describes plug and play pairing with existing UniFi devices, aiming to reduce friction when traveling with preconfigured hardware that is expected to reappear on a familiar network. The documentation also references Auto Link in the context of keeping wireless cameras and devices online automatically, positioning it as a continuity mechanism rather than a separate setup workflow. Operationally, configuration and connection selection are handled through the UniFi Mobile App, including joining upstream WiFi and completing captive portal authentication when present, while enterprise style WiFi authentication methods like WPA Enterprise and Passpoint are listed as unsupported.

UniFi Travel Router – Conclusion

The UniFi Travel Router makes the most sense as a “UniFi extender you can pocket” rather than a generic travel router trying to win on raw specs. The real value is how quickly it drops you back into a familiar environment: bind it to your UniFi setup, carry over the SSID you already use, and your devices can reconnect without you rebuilding a network from scratch each time you land somewhere new. For people who work on site, bounce between coffee shops, or travel with a small team, that convenience adds up fast: one upstream connection, one captive portal login handled through the app, and everything behind the UTR can ride through a secure Teleport tunnel back to your home or office UniFi gateway. Add the practical hardware touches, like two gigabit ports for wired WAN or LAN use, separate USB C power and USB tethering for pulling in a phone connection, and a status display that helps you confirm what is actually happening at a glance, and it is easy to see why this little box is appealing if you already live in the UniFi ecosystem.

The drawbacks are largely about what it is not trying to be. If you want a bleeding edge travel router, the UTR’s WiFi 5 radio and 1 GbE ports will feel conservative next to WiFi 6E or WiFi 7 options, and your top end wireless throughput is simply going to be capped by the platform. The screen is useful, but it is not touch, so you are still leaning on the mobile app for most changes, and there is no internal battery to make it a truly self contained travel companion. Just as importantly, there is no integrated SIM or eSIM, so anyone hoping for an all in one cellular travel router will be looking elsewhere or relying on phone tethering. Taken together, the UniFi Travel Router is a strong niche product: it is not the fastest, but for existing UniFi users who care most about consistency, security, and getting online quickly in messy real world networks, it is a smart and affordable addition to the kit bag.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro (GL-BE1000Gl.iNet Beryl 7 WiFi 7 Travel Gl.iNet Beryl 7 WiFi 7 Travel UniFi Travel Router ReviewUniFi Black Friday Deals - SwiUniFi Black Friday Deals - SwiBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataUniFi UNAS Series of NAS DevicUniFi UNAS - 1 Year Later. Sho Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Source

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red (Which is Best in 2025/2026)?

In late 2025, choosing between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red for a NAS is less about raw performance and more about secondary factors such as noise, power consumption, pricing, and ecosystem. Both brands now offer broadly similar SATA performance in their mainstream and Pro lines once you reach 7200 RPM, 256 MB cache, and CMR recording, and both quote comparable workload ratings and multi bay support for NAS use. Durability claims in MTBF, workload per year, and 24 by 7 operation are also effectively at parity on paper, and the underlying engineering around vibration control, error recovery, and NAS specific firmware has converged to a large extent. Where meaningful technical differences still exist is in the maximum capacities on offer and how they are positioned. Seagate currently leads on headline capacity in the NAS tier with IronWolf Pro drives up to 30 TB, while WD Red Pro tops out slightly lower but overlaps most of the mainstream size points that home and small business users are likely to deploy. As a result, the decision for many buyers is less about which brand is objectively better and more about how each behaves in real deployments in terms of acoustics, energy use, long term running costs, warranty extras such as bundled recovery services, and regional pricing patterns at specific capacities.

Seagate vs WD (and Toshiba!) Market Share in 2025/2026?

Across the HDD industry in 2024 and early 2025, Western Digital and Seagate remain closely matched, with Western Digital holding a slight lead by several common measures. Public breakdowns of exabytes shipped in 2024 put Western Digital at roughly 38.6 percent of HDD capacity shipped worldwide, Seagate at about 37 percent, and Toshiba at around 24.4 percent, confirming that the market is effectively a 2 vendor race with a smaller but still significant third player. Although the exact percentages vary depending on whether you look at units, capacity, or revenue, the pattern is consistent, with Western Digital marginally ahead and Seagate following closely behind.

Recent industry and financial reporting also shows Western Digital gaining momentum in high capacity nearline drives, particularly in data center and cloud deployments, with disk based revenue and shipped capacity outpacing Seagate in at least some recent quarters. At the same time, Seagate retains a leadership position in very large capacity models, including 30 TB HAMR based NAS and nearline drives that are already commercially available and aimed at the same high density markets.

Taken together, these data points indicate a tightly contested landscape where Western Digital currently leads in overall shipped capacity and revenue, while Seagate pushes the capacity envelope and remains highly competitive in large scale deployments.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red NAS Hard Drives – Price

In late 2025 there is a clear pattern in how Seagate and WD position their HDDs on price, even if individual deals move around constantly. In general Seagate tends to be slightly cheaper per terabyte across many mainstream retailers and regions, particularly for larger 16 TB to 24 TB IronWolf and Exos capacities. WD pricing is often a little higher at like for like capacity in third party channels, especially for newer Red Plus and Red Pro models, although temporary sales can narrow or reverse this gap. Both brands are heavily discounted during seasonal events, so headline price screenshots are only ever a snapshot rather than a permanent rule.

Where WD changes the picture is through its own direct store. WD sells Red, Red Plus and Red Pro drives through its retail site and often undercuts third party resellers by a noticeable margin, especially during promotions. That means in some regions the cheapest way to buy WD is directly from WD, while Seagate relies entirely on partner channels and keeps relatively steady discounting through Amazon and similar outlets. As a result it is common to see Seagate come out cheaper in most general marketplaces while WD can be the lowest price only on its own store, which is not available in every country.

Once you move up into Pro and nearline class drives, such as IronWolf Pro versus WD Red Pro or WD Gold, pricing becomes more fragmented. Seagate keeps a fairly consistent capacity step pricing model where higher capacities scale in a relatively predictable way. WD on the other hand often runs multiple Red Pro and enterprise SKUs at the same capacity with different cache sizes or internal designs, which leads to overlapping prices and large swings between models that appear similar on paper. In practice this means that at the Pro tier Seagate is usually easier to price compare, while WD may offer good value on specific model IDs or capacities but requires more careful checking of part numbers and current discounts before purchase.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red – Noise Level Comparison

Capacity	Idle Seagate Ironwolf	Idle WD Red Plus	Idle Winner	Seek Seagate Ironwolf Pro	Seek WD Red Pro	Seek Winner
30TB	28 dBA (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate	32 dBA (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate
28TB	28 dBA (ST28000NT000)	25 dBA (WD281KFGX)	WD	32 dBA (ST28000NT000)	32 dBA (WD281KFGX)	Tie
26TB	no Seagate model	25 dBA (WD260KFGX)	WD	no Seagate model	32 dBA (WD260KFGX)	WD
24TB	28 dBA (ST24000NT002)	25 dBA (WD241KFGX), 20 dBA (WD240KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST24000NT002)	32 dBA (WD241KFGX), 32 dBA (WD240KFGX)	Seagate
22TB	28 dBA (ST22000NT001)	32 dBA (WD221KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST22000NT001)	32 dBA (WD221KFGX)	Seagate
20TB	28 dBA (ST20000NT001)	20 dBA (WD202KFGX, WD201KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST20000NT001)	32 dBA (WD202KFGX, WD201KFGX)	Seagate
18TB	28 dBA (ST18000NT001)	20 dBA (WD181KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST18000NT001)	36 dBA (WD181KFGX)	Seagate
16TB	28 dBA (ST16000NT001)	20 dBA (WD161KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST16000NT001)	36 dBA (WD161KFGX)	Seagate
14TB	20 dBA (ST14000NT001)	20 dBA (WD142KFGX), 20 dBA (WD141KFGX)	Tie	26 dBA (ST14000NT001)	36 dBA (WD142KFGX), 36 dBA (WD141KFGX)	Seagate
12TB	28 dBA (ST12000NT001)	20 dBA (WD121KFBX), 34 dBA (WD122KFBX)	WD	26 dBA (ST12000NT001)	36 dBA (WD121KFBX), 39 dBA (WD122KFBX)	Seagate
10TB	28 dBA (ST10000NT001)	20 dBA (WD102KFBX), 34 dBA (WD103KFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST10000NT001)	36 dBA (WD102KFBX), 39 dBA (WD103KFBX)	Seagate
8TB	28 dBA (ST8000NT001)	20 dBA (WD8003FFBX, WD8005FFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST8000NT001)	36 dBA (WD8003FFBX, WD8005FFBX)	Seagate
6TB	28 dBA (ST6000NT001)	21 dBA (WD6003FFBX, WD6005FFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST6000NT001)	36 dBA (WD6003FFBX, WD6005FFBX)	Seagate
4TB	28 dBA (ST4000NT001)	20 dBA (WD4003FFBX), 29 dBA (WD4005FFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST4000NT001)	36 dBA (WD4003FFBX, WD4005FFBX)	Seagate
2TB	28 dBA (ST2000NT001)	21 dBA (WD2002FFSX)	WD	30 dBA (ST2000NT001)	31 dBA (WD2002FFSX)	Seagate

The difference becomes more apparent once you move beyond a simple 1 or 2 bay NAS and start populating 4, 6 or 8 bay chassis. Multiple Seagate drives running together produce a slightly harsher mechanical sound profile, with more pronounced click and clunk patterns during head movements, as well as higher cumulative vibration. WD drives, particularly Red Plus and most of the more recent Red Pro helium models, lean toward a smoother background hum with less sharp seek noise and lower ambient vibration. For users placing a NAS in a living room, bedroom or under a desk, this cumulative effect can be significant, even if each individual drive only differs by a couple of dBA on paper.

It is worth noting that not every capacity behaves identically. Lower capacities and some air filled WD Red Plus models idle very quietly and can be comparable with the quietest Seagate SKUs, while some high capacity Red Pro variants with 7200 RPM motors and larger caches approach IronWolf Pro levels of seek noise. However, when you average across the current CMR product stacks in late 2025, WD holds a small but consistent advantage in both idle and seek acoustics, especially in multi bay deployments where background noise and vibration build up over time.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red – Power Consumption (Idle / Active)

Looking purely at spec sheets, both Seagate and WD publish idle and seek values that cluster in similar bands, typically around the low 20 dBA range at idle and high 20 to mid 30 dBA under seek as capacities and spindle speeds rise. In practice though, the character of the noise differs between the brands. IronWolf and IronWolf Pro models tend to produce a sharper mechanical click pattern during head seeks and a more noticeable spin up profile, while WD Red Plus and Red Pro lines usually present as a smoother hum with less abrupt transitions between idle and active states. In a quiet room this difference in tone can matter as much as the numeric dBA rating itself.

Capacity	Idle Seagate Ironwolf	Idle WD Red Plus	Idle Winner	Active Seagate Ironwolf Pro	Active WD Red Pro	Active Winner
30TB	6.8W (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate	8.3W (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate
28TB	6.8W (ST28000NT000)	3.6W (WD281KFGX)	WD	8.3W (ST28000NT000)	6.0W (WD281KFGX)	WD
26TB	no Seagate model	3.6W (WD260KFGX)	WD	no Seagate model	6.0W (WD260KFGX)	WD
24TB	6.3W (ST24000NT002)	3.6W (WD241KFGX), 3.9W (WD240KFGX)	WD	7.8W (ST24000NT002)	6.0W (WD241KFGX), 6.4W (WD240KFGX)	WD
22TB	6.0W (ST22000NT001)	3.4W (WD221KFGX)	WD	7.9W (ST22000NT001)	6.8W (WD221KFGX)	WD
20TB	5.7W (ST20000NT001)	2.8W (WD202KFGX), 3.6W (WD201KFGX)	WD	7.7W (ST20000NT001)	6.1W (WD202KFGX), 6.9W (WD201KFGX)	WD
18TB	5.0W (ST18000NT001)	3.0W (WD181KFGX)	WD	7.5W (ST18000NT001)	3.6W (WD181KFGX)	WD
16TB	5.0W (ST16000NT001)	3.6W (WD161KFGX)	WD	7.6W (ST16000NT001)	6.1W (WD161KFGX)	WD
14TB	5.0W (ST14000NT001)	3.0W (WD141KFGX), 3.6W (WD142KFGX)	WD	7.6W (ST14000NT001)	3.0W (WD141KFGX), 6.4W (WD142KFGX)	WD
12TB	5.0W (ST12000NT001)	2.8W (WD121KFBX), 6.1W (WD122KFBX)	WD	7.6W (ST12000NT001)	2.8W (WD121KFBX), 8.8W (WD122KFBX)	WD
10TB	7.8W (ST10000NT001)	2.9W (WD102KFBX), 3.0W (WD103KFBX)	WD	10.1W (ST10000NT001)	4.6W (WD101KFBX), 6.1W (WD103KFBX)	WD
8TB	7.8W (ST8000NT001)	4.0W (WD8003FFBX), 4.9W (WD8005FFBX)	WD	10.1W (ST8000NT001)	4.6W (WD8003FFBX), 6.9W (WD8005FFBX)	WD
6TB	7.1W (ST6000NT001)	3.7W (WD6003FFBX), 4.0W (WD6005FFBX)	WD	9.3W (ST6000NT001)	3.7W (WD6003FFBX), 6.9W (WD6005FFBX)	WD
4TB	7.8W (ST4000NT001)	3.7W (WD4003FFBX), 4.0W (WD4005FFBX)	WD	8.7W (ST4000NT001)	3.7W (WD4003FFBX), 5.8W (WD4005FFBX)	WD
2TB	6.7W (ST2000NT001)	6.0W (WD2002FFSX)	WD	6.7W (ST2000NT001)	7.8W (WD2002FFSX)	Seagate

At lower capacities, especially in the 2 TB to 6 TB range where air filled designs and lower spindle speeds are common, WD Red Plus models are often among the quietest options, with idle noise figures that sit at the lower end of the published spectrum and relatively soft seek sounds. Seagate standard IronWolf drives in these capacities are not especially loud by absolute numbers, but they generally sit slightly higher at idle and under random activity. Once you move into high capacity Pro class drives, WD Red Pro and IronWolf Pro become more comparable, although WD still often maintains a small advantage in idle noise on the newest helium filled models, while seek noise can be quite close on some capacities.

Noise differences increase as you add more bays and drives. A 2 bay or 4 bay NAS with mixed workloads may only expose a modest gap in acoustic behaviour between the brands, but 8 bay and larger systems can amplify any small variations. Multiple Seagate drives seeking at once will create more noticeable cumulative chatter and vibration inside a metal chassis, which can transfer into desks or shelving if the NAS is not well isolated. WD units with otherwise similar specifications and workload ratings usually generate less overall vibration, so the aggregate sound from a populated chassis can be easier to live with in shared spaces.

For users planning deployments in noise sensitive environments, such as a living room media setup or a small office where the NAS will sit in the same room as desks, these differences can be a factor in the buying decision once capacity and performance requirements are defined. Seagate remains attractive where price per terabyte and maximum capacity are the main priorities, and users are able to position the NAS in a cupboard, loft or separate room. WD drives typically suit scenarios where the system will remain close to people for long periods, sacrificing a small amount of price advantage in favour of lower background noise and a slightly less intrusive acoustic profile at both idle and under sustained activity.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red – Verdict & Conclusion

From a technical perspective Seagate and WD now sit very close to one another in most core HDD metrics, particularly in the NAS focused IronWolf, IronWolf Pro, Red Plus and Red Pro ranges. Both brands use CMR recording on their NAS lines, have comparable workload ratings in each class, and converge around similar sustained transfer rates once you reach 7200 RPM and larger cache sizes. The main structural differences are that Seagate currently pushes higher maximum capacities into the consumer and prosumer space and includes bundled rescue data recovery on many NAS models, while WD tends to retain a small advantage in power consumption and acoustic behaviour at equivalent capacities, especially in multi bay systems. Historical issues such as WD Red SMR drives and Seagate high failure rate models at specific points in time are still relevant for older stock, but the current generation NAS ranges for both vendors are broadly aligned in specification and intended workload.

In practical terms the choice between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red often comes down to priority order rather than any single clear winner. Users aiming for the lowest cost per terabyte and the highest capacities available in the near term will usually find Seagate more attractive, particularly in larger IronWolf Pro and Exos class drives, accepting higher power draw and a more noticeable acoustic profile. Users who are sensitive to noise, want marginally lower long term energy usage or prefer WD’s clearer product segmentation may gravitate toward Red Plus or Red Pro, taking care to select the correct CMR models and capacities. In all cases the decision should be made at model level using current datasheets and pricing, not just brand reputation, and should be paired with a sensible RAID plan and an independent backup strategy, since neither vendor can remove the fundamental risk that any individual hard drive can fail.

Idle Seagate Ironwolf	Idle WD Red Plus	Active Seagate Ironwolf Pro	Active WD Red Pro

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Week 50 Tech Roundup – ReactSeagate Ironwolf vs WD Red (WhBlack Friday NAS Hard Drive DeBlack Friday Hard Drive Deals Black Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataWeek 46 Tech Roundup – SeagaWeek 44 Tech Roundup – TOS 7SYNOLOGY SUPPORT SEAGATE & WD Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro and Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

EcoFlow DELTA 3 Max Plus : voici un avis complet sur cette nouvelle station électrique portable lancée en octobre 2025, avec une capacité de 2 kWh.

Le post Test EcoFlow DELTA 3 Max Plus : une station électrique portable pour la maison et en dehors a été publié sur IT-Connect.

Is the Sipeed NanoKVM Safe? On-board Microphone Identified

The Sipeed NanoKVM Cube is a low cost, network connected KVM built around the LicheeRV Nano RISC-V module, and recent reporting has drawn attention to the fact that this first generation hardware quietly inherited an onboard analog microphone from that core board. While the LicheeRV Nano documentation clearly lists audio input and output capabilities, the NanoKVM product materials initially focused on its KVM role and did not prominently call out the presence of a microphone on the internal PCB. That gap in presentation, combined with the device’s origin in China and its role as an always-on, remotely accessible appliance, has led to questions about transparency and potential privacy impact. This article reviews what is actually on the hardware, how Sipeed has responded, which issues have been addressed in software, and what residual risk remains for users who already have the NanoKVM Cube deployed.

The NanoKVM Cube and That Microphone – What We Learned?

The initial detailed public discussion of the NanoKVM Cube microphone came from a Telefoncek.si research article, which documented security testing of early units and highlighted the presence of a small, operational microphone on the device’s PCB. The NanoKVM Cube is built on the LicheeRV Nano platform, and that design decision is the origin of the audio hardware. The LicheeRV Nano specification explicitly lists an onboard analog silicon microphone for audio input and a PA amplifier for driving a small speaker, because the module is intended as a general purpose SBC for a range of embedded applications. When Sipeed used this module as the core of a consumer facing KVM, the Cube inherited that audio circuitry intact, including the tiny surface mount MEMS microphone, even though typical KVM usage does not require audio capture capabilities.

What Telefoncek.si article from Feb ’25  drew attention to was the combination of this hardware and a software stack that already contained working audio tooling. Researchers who obtained early NanoKVM units found that, with SSH access, standard ALSA tools such as amixer and arecord could be used to adjust gain and record ambient sound through the built in microphone, and that the resulting audio files could be copied or potentially streamed off the device. At that time, the NanoKVM product page described its relationship to the LicheeRV Nano SDK and resources in general terms, but did not highlight that a functioning microphone remained present on the KVM board. For many users, that gap between what the SBC documentation said and what the KVM product page emphasized was perceived as a lack of clear disclosure rather than a predictable consequence of module reuse.

The NanoKVM Security Concern and Presentation Issues

The initial concern around NanoKVM security was not limited to the microphone. Early firmware builds shipped with default credentials, SSH enabled, weak web security controls, and hardcoded encryption keys that were identical across devices. Researchers also found diagnostic and security utilities present on the system image that were more appropriate for development or lab use than for a small appliance likely to be exposed on home or small business networks. These findings created a picture of a product that had been moved from prototype to retail relatively quickly, with baseline functionality in place but limited attention paid to hardening or least privilege.

Presentation played a significant role in how the microphone issue was perceived. For the LicheeRV Nano SBC, the presence of audio input and output is clearly listed as part of the hardware specification, and that makes sense for a general purpose module. For NanoKVM Cube, the public facing documentation initially focused on KVM features, HDMI input, and compatibility with the LicheeRV Nano SDK, while leaving the inherited audio hardware implicit. Only later did the NanoKVM wiki entry gain explicit wording that the Cube retains display, touch, microphone, and amplifier circuits from the base module, and that newer firmware versions would remove the relevant drivers and future production runs would omit these components entirely.

Sipeed’s public responses combine these two aspects. On the one hand they point to the LicheeRV Nano documentation and the updated NanoKVM wiki as evidence that the microphone is not intended to be secret. On the other hand they argue that, from a threat model perspective, the presence of a board level microphone does not materially change risk once an attacker has obtained full control of the device, since they could already perform sensitive actions through the host system. For critics, the issue is less about the technical possibility of audio capture in a fully compromised scenario and more about expectation and trust: a network attached KVM marketed primarily on its remote control capabilities but not clearly calling out built in audio capture hardware is likely to be treated with more suspicion, especially when it comes from a vendor that has already needed several rounds of security fixes.

Reality Check – How Much of a Concern is this?

From a strict security engineering viewpoint, the onboard microphone in the NanoKVM Cube does not create a new, independent way into the device. An attacker still needs a working exploit, exposed service, or misconfiguration to gain sufficient access before any audio capture is possible. In that sense, the primary risk is still the usual set of issues that apply to any IP KVM: exposed management interfaces, weak credentials, unpatched firmware, or poor network segmentation. If those fundamentals are handled correctly, the probability that a remote attacker can turn the Cube into a listening device is significantly reduced, and using alternative firmware or a locked down software stack can further narrow the options.

The impact side of the equation is different. Once a NanoKVM Cube is compromised at a system level, the presence of a functional microphone increases the potential harm compared with a KVM that only relays keyboard, video, and mouse. A device that sits in a home office, lab, or equipment room and can capture ambient sound can turn a general compromise into a privacy incident that extends beyond the connected host system. For some users that incremental risk will be acceptable if the device is strictly isolated, regularly updated, and treated as an untrusted appliance at the edge of the network. For others, the residual possibility of room audio capture from a small, unattended box may be enough to justify either physical removal of the mic, replacement with a later hardware revision, or avoiding this particular model altogether.

Note. Here is the board view of the NanoKVM USB and NanaKVM Pro PCIe, with no microphone visible:

Asking Sipeed Questions about the NanoKVM Microphone Issue – How and Why This Occurred?

To clarify how the microphone ended up in a shipping KVM product and what Sipeed intends to do about it, I put a series of written questions to the company. The goal was not to reassess the technical findings already covered by independent research, but to obtain clear statements from the vendor on 4 points: how they view the documentation and disclosure around the microphone, which specific NanoKVM variants and hardware revisions include it, what mitigations they believe limit its security and privacy impact for existing deployments, and what concrete changes they are planning for future production runs. The questions and Sipeed’s responses are reproduced in full below. Thanks again to Caesar Wu for his time in answering my questions.

Why was there a microphone on the device, and how/why it’s absent from the documentation?

This premise contains a serious factual error made by the original article. The presence and rationale for the microphone are not undocumented; they are explicitly mentioned on the product’s main Wiki page: https://wiki.sipeed.com/hardware/en/kvm/NanoKVM/introduction.html#NanoKVM

Which Version/Batch/Revisions of NanoKVM feature this Microphone?

The microphone is featured on the NanoKVM Lite and NanoKVM Cube versions. These are derivative products based on the LicheeRV-Nano (RISC-V SBC core module) and consequently inherited its Single Board Computer (SBC) peripherals, including the microphone, speaker, and MIPI touchscreen support.

Is this present on other versions of NanoKVM (i.e PCIe, Pro, USB, etc)?

No. Other products use custom-designed boards dedicated solely to the KVM scenario. They do not reuse the SBC module and therefore do not include non-KVM-essential components.

Why was this microphone not eliminated at the point of production?

The core part of NanoKVM-Cube/Lite is LicheeRV Nano. We reuse LicheeRV Nano as a standard “SOM” in many different products, like AI Camera MaixCAM:    https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006912917562.html . And our toB customer also use it as a standard linux core board(Just like RPi CM4, CM5), they are very satisfied with the onboard microphone, speaker, and touch screen.  As stated in my previous email, we maintain that logically, the retention of the microphone on the board does not introduce any negative impact on security. While the onboard components (microphone, speaker power amplifier (PA), and touchscreen connector) introduce a slight increase in Bill of Materials (BoM) cost, this decision significantly simplifies inventory management.

In fact, the base LicheeRV Nano product already comes in 4 configuration variants (Basic, Eth, WiFi, and Ethe+WiFi).  If we were to further segment the inventory by adding options for the presence or absence of the microphone and touchscreen connector, the total number of SKUs  would increase exponentially(the number of SKUs multiplies by two for every added configuration options). Therefore, based on a comprehensive consideration of security, cost efficiency, and inventory management complexity, we maintain the microphone, speaker PA, and touchscreen connector as the default base configuration.

What steps are being taken to ensure that this does not pose a Security/Privacy threat to user who have the nanoKVM in active deployment?

Users must understand the threat model: an attacker can only listen via the onboard mic if the NanoKVM itself has already been fully compromised. The paradox is that once compromised, the attacker already has sufficient privileges to perform high-level operations (include record audio via PC’s own mic). Therefore, the presence of the onboard mic does not increase the inherent security risk of the device. We emphasize that proper network risk awareness and isolation configuration by the user are essential, regardless of whether the device is a NanoKVM, JetKVM, GL.iNet KVM, or PiKVM.

What further steps have been made/planned at Production to avoid this occurring again in future hardware releases?

As stated in Question 4, we plan to remove the microphone in the next batch of the Lite/Cube models purely for psychological comfort and ease of mind for our users. We acknowledge this step will inevitably increase our inventory management complexity due to the need for separate SKUs and production processes. We are also implementing more rigorous hardware audits to ensure compliance with the Principle of Least Privilege in future designs.

Conclusion – Should NanoKVM Owners Be Worried?

For current NanoKVM Cube owners, the level of concern depends largely on how and where the device is deployed. In a well segmented environment where the KVM sits on an isolated management network, with updated firmware and strong access controls, the presence of a dormant microphone on the board is a secondary issue behind the more general risk of any remote management appliance. In small or less structured setups where the NanoKVM has direct exposure to the internet or shares a LAN with everyday client devices, both the historical software weaknesses and the possibility of audio capture in a successful compromise are more relevant factors in deciding whether to keep using the unit unchanged.

Looking ahead, Sipeed has stated that newer firmware removes the audio drivers and that future Lite and Cube batches will omit the microphone and related circuitry entirely, which addresses the concern for new buyers over time. For existing devices, users who are uncomfortable with any residual audio capability have practical options: physically removing or disabling the mic at board level, reflashing with a minimal or community maintained software stack, or replacing the hardware with a later revision or a different KVM platform. The key is to treat the NanoKVM Cube as a high impact management tool rather than a neutral accessory, and to decide whether its cost and feature set justify the additional precautions it requires in a given environment.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...NanoKVM and it's 'Secret' MicrSipeed NanoKVM Pro KVM ReviewNanoKVM Pro KVM Review - A WHOGL.iNet Comet Pro Review - The Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

New KVMs, Travel Routers and WiFi 7 Tech on the way from Gl.iNet Soon

Gl.iNet is preparing several new devices for late 2025 and early 2026 that expand its presence in mobile networking, remote access management, and high speed home routing. These include the Beryl 7 travel router, the Comet 5G RedCap KVM with an integrated WiFi access point, and the Flint 3e dual band WiFi 7 desktop router. Each system is positioned to address a specific operational requirement, ranging from portable VPN-enabled wireless access to remotely deployable KVM control and multi gigabit home connectivity. The updated lineup also includes the Brume 3 high speed VPN security gateway, which builds on the Brume 2 by adding faster encrypted throughput and broader support for open VPN standards such as AmneziaVPN. Collectively, these releases indicate that Gl.iNet is prioritising more capable processors, improved wireless performance, and tighter integration between VPN features and local network tools.

Beryl 7 Travel Router (GL-MT3600BE)

The Beryl 7 is positioned as an updated travel router that builds on the feature set of the original Beryl while shifting to a more capable Qualcomm quad core processor running at 1.1GHz and 256MB of DDR4 memory. It uses IEEE 802.11a, b, g, n, ac, ax and be wireless standards and supports dual band WiFi 7 operation on the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands. Although it does not include 6GHz support, it delivers higher throughput than its predecessor, reaching 688Mbps on 2.4GHz and 2882Mbps on 5GHz. The unit also integrates two foldable external antennas and two 2.5GbE ports that can be configured as WAN plus LAN or as dual LAN for specific on-the-go deployment requirements.

The system maintains the travel-focused design of the original model by keeping compact dimensions, low power requirements and USB-C power delivery suitable for laptops, power banks and small chargers. The physical toggle switch remains, allowing quick selection between standard routing and VPN operation without navigating menus. VPN capability is supported by OpenVPN DCO, WireGuard and AmneziaVPN, enabling users to run a VPN server at home and connect to it through the Beryl 7 when travelling. As noted during the demonstration, the WiFi 7 implementation prioritises improved packet handling and multi-link operation rather than wide-band 6GHz performance, which keeps the device compatible in regions where 6GHz availability is limited or restricted.

The Beryl 7 aims to retain pricing similar to the original Beryl while scaling both its internal hardware and wireless capabilities. It uses a gigabit-class Ethernet configuration, supports sub-18W peak power draw and retains a form factor suited for hotel WiFi, temporary offices and public hotspot environments. The inclusion of 2.5GbE, higher throughput on both bands and broader VPN support allows it to operate as a compact edge router for users needing reliable encrypted access across multiple devices. Despite carrying a WiFi 7 label, it does not support the 6GHz band, mirroring the Slate 7, and instead focuses on maximising performance within the 2.4GHz and 5GHz ranges. Nevertheless, this is going to be a disappointment to users who were hoping to see ‘full fat’ WiFi 7 with that 3rd frequency in play, and really maximize MLO use.

Comet 5G KVM with Redcap 5G SIM/LTE Support (GL-RM10RC)

The Comet 5G is a RedCap-based KVM device that integrates remote management, HDMI capture and mobile connectivity into a single compact unit. It uses a quad core ARM Cortex-A53 processor, 1GB of DDR3 memory and 64GB of eMMC storage, matching the hardware profile of the existing Comet Pro. The device includes both HDMI in and HDMI out, allowing it to be used for remote console access, system monitoring and basic pass-through scenarios. A 2.22-inch touchscreen provides local visual feedback including IP address, active WiFi status and connection indicators. Wireless capability is delivered through 802.11a/n/ac/ax at 150Mbps on 2.4GHz and 286Mbps on 5GHz, supported by an external dual band WiFi 6 antenna rather than a WiFi 7 module.

A key addition to this model is the integrated 5G RedCap SIM slot. This allows the device to operate independently of the local network when deployed on-site, which is relevant for administrators or engineers who need to access remote systems without relying on customer-provided WiFi or Ethernet. The mobile connection also supports failover for situations where the primary network becomes unavailable, ensuring that remote KVM access remains possible. During the demonstration, it was highlighted that this improves usability for workloads such as multi-day monitoring or configuration tasks performed in locations where network restrictions or firewall rules prevent direct access.

The Comet 5G retains a familiar selection of ports including USB-C for power, USB-A for peripherals, a gigabit Ethernet port for direct LAN connection and a SIM slot for mobile data. The device is not PoE-powered, although an injector or adapter is expected to be offered as an accessory. This approach keeps the unit closer in design to a travel-friendly tool rather than a fixed enterprise appliance. It remains suited to users who already deploy compact KVM units as part of their field equipment and who require a method of accessing remote devices through either wired, wireless or cellular links.

The combination of 5G failover and HDMI-based remote access positions it as a small-scale management device for distributed environments, temporary field sites or systems that require out-of-band connectivity. Many users will make comparisons between this and the recently crowdfunded ‘Comet Pro’ device (very similar, but alongside a few small changes internally and adjustable antennae, also does not support a 5G SIM CARD/LTE), as well as the Comet PoE device recently released. This is largely the same, but tailored towards a different, decidedly more mobile deployment.

Flint 3e Dual Band WiFi 7 Router (GL-BE5600)

The Flint 3e is a dual band WiFi 7 router aimed at users who want higher wireless throughput and multi gigabit Ethernet connectivity without moving to a full tri band system. It is built around a Qualcomm quad core processor running at 1.5GHz with 1GB of DDR4 memory and 512MB of NAND storage. Wireless support covers IEEE 802.11a, b, g, n, ac, ax and be, delivering 688Mbps on 2.4GHz and 5764Mbps on 5GHz. The unit includes four external foldable antennas, a dual colour LED indicator and a housing designed for stable operation in home or small office environments. Connectivity is centred around five 2.5GbE ports, with one operating as a dedicated WAN input and the remainder configurable as LAN. This gives the router a faster wired backbone than earlier consumer models from the brand.

The router maintains a focus on local performance and low latency operation rather than offering the widest possible spectrum support. It does not include 6GHz capability, placing it closer to the Beryl 7 and Slate 7 in terms of band allocation. However, the higher 5GHz ceiling and improved channel management provide an upgrade path for users moving from WiFi 6 or earlier models who still want to take advantage of WiFi 7 features such as improved modulation and multi link operation. USB 3.0 support is included for storage or tethering tasks, and the system integrates the company’s familiar software stack with options for AdGuard Home, parental controls and fast VPN throughput, including WireGuard and OpenVPN DCO at speeds up to 680Mbps.

The Flint 3e is presented as a more accessible alternative to the full tri band Flint 3, offering similar processing power and Ethernet flexibility while reducing overall wireless complexity. Its design suits users who require multi gigabit wired networking for NAS systems, workstations or mesh uplinks, while maintaining predictable WiFi coverage within standard two band environments. Power consumption remains below 25W without USB load and below 37.2W with active USB devices. This allows the router to operate efficiently in homes with multiple connected devices, including smart home hubs, streaming systems and personal storage servers.

When comparing the Flint 3e with the currently available Flint 3, the key distinction lies in wireless scope and deployment scale. The Flint 3 includes an additional 6GHz band with a 5765Mbps ceiling, a larger 8GB eMMC module and the same five port 2.5GbE layout. This gives the Flint 3 wider spectrum availability, higher aggregate throughput and more headroom for larger properties or higher density environments. The Flint 3e, by contrast, focuses on delivering similar processor performance and identical wired networking while intentionally omitting the 6GHz band to reduce cost and complexity. The result is a model suited for medium sized homes or users who rely primarily on 5GHz and wired backhaul, while the Flint 3 is positioned for broader coverage, multi floor layouts and deployments with more simultaneous wireless clients.

When will the Comet 5G, Beryl 7 and Flint 3e Be Released and What Price?

Gl.iNet’s forthcoming device trio is designed to cover distinct deployment needs across travel, remote management and wired-performance routing. The Beryl 7 travel router brings dual-band WiFi 7, USB-C power, 2.5GbE wired ports and VPN switch functionality; it is estimated to launch at a price similar to the original Beryl AX model. The Comet 5G KVM device increases flexibility by adding 5G RedCap connectivity, HDMI I/O, gigabit Ethernet and WiFi 6, positioning it in terms of design and feature set somewhere between the Comet Pro and the Slate 7; pricing is yet to be confirmed. The Flint 3e desktop router offers dual-band WiFi 7 and five 2.5GbE ports while foregoing the 6GHz band, making it more affordable than the tri-band Flint 3; this pricing strategy targets users seeking strong wired and wireless performance without full spectrum coverage. All models are expected to be formally announced at CES 2026 and become available in Q1 2026.

Gl.iNet Comet KVM Series on Amazon HERE	Gl.iNet Slate 7 Mobile Router on Amazon HERE

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Reveal the Flint 4 WiFGl.iNet Flint 4 WiFi7 Router RGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Revealed aGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro (GL-BE1000Gl.iNet Beryl 7 WiFi 7 Travel Gl.iNet Beryl 7 WiFi 7 Travel Gl.iNet Mudi 7 Revealed - DualGl.iNet Mudi 7 RevealedNew Gl.iNet Beryl 7, Comet 5G GL.iNet Comet Pro Review - The Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE    

WE LOVE COFFEE

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

     

Source

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra – The First 48 Hours

The MS-02 Ultra is the latest workstation from Minisforum, and is currently undergoing testing and review here at NASCompares. However, even after just 48 hours, a whole bunch of interesting design choices and unique qwerks to the arcitecture have emerged that I wanted to cover in the meantime before the full review is complete. The MS-02 Ultra essentially trying to recapture the magic and impact of the incredibly popular MS-01 – and it is attempting this by doubling, trippling and (in some cases) quadrupling the base specifications! The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra arrives as a compact workstation that incorporates a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX processor, up to 256 GB of ECC DDR5 memory, internal 350 W power delivery, multiple PCIe expansion options, and a network configuration that includes dual 25GbE, 10GbE, and 2.5GbE. After 48 hours of initial testing, several hardware behaviors have emerged regarding thermals, acoustics, lane distribution, storage configuration, and chassis layout. The following sections outline these early observations, supported by confirmed specifications and hands-on inspection. Stay tuned for the full review, but at least for now, let’s discuss the early highlights and low lights!

Design of the MS-02 Ultra

The internal design of the MS-02 Ultra differs considerably from earlier Minisforum workstation models and moves away from the layout used in the MS-S1 Max. Although the system retains a slide-out internal frame, the mechanism is less streamlined than the earlier S-series implementation because of how densely the components are arranged.

The interior resembles a compressed micro-tower layout, with the CPU cooling assembly, PSU, PCIe risers, and storage positions layered closely together. A dual-fan ventilation chamber spans the frontal section of the chassis, pulling air through a vented intake and directing it across the primary cooling hardware before forcing it out the rear. This arrangement appears to be a necessary response to the higher thermal output of the Ultra 9 285HX and the inclusion of multiple expansion slots, both of which require more directed airflow than Minisforum’s previous compact workstation designs.

The placement of internal components reflects the limited spatial tolerance of the 4.8-liter enclosure. The internal 350 W PSU occupies a significant section of the lower frame and includes additional power leads intended for low-profile GPU or accelerator cards, something rarely present in machines of this size. The motherboard runs across most of the horizontal section and positions the CPU vapor-chamber cooler toward the middle, while memory slots, NVMe connectors, and the PCIe riser for the combo NIC occupy the remaining pockets of available space.

Because cooling pipes and the ventilation housing sit directly above the CPU-side memory slots, Minisforum added a custom angled heatsink to ensure airflow reaches these modules. This results in a serviceable layout but one that requires more deliberate disassembly, as the compact structure prioritizes component density and thermal guidance over ease of access or open internal spacing.

Early Heat, Noise and Power Use of the MS-02 Ultra

Initial thermal behavior suggests the MS-02 Ultra is managing its compact layout with a cooling strategy built around a dual-fan chamber and a six-heatpipe radiator assisted by phase-change material. During the first setup period, surface temperatures around the chassis varied, with readings near the side ventilation panels and case edges settling around the low-to-mid 40s, while the front intake area measured lower due to the direct airflow path.

Early internal temperature checks, taken before any sustained workloads were applied, showed values consistent with a system that is heavily packed but actively cooled across multiple zones. These readings align with Minisforum’s stated 5000 RPM maximum fan speed and the intention to maintain a 100 W to 140 W CPU power envelope depending on configuration. However, because these measurements were taken during routine preparation rather than stress testing, they provide only a preliminary indication of how the system will manage long-duration loads.

Noise levels during this early period ranged from the low 30s dBA while performing software installations and background operations, with no significant fluctuations unless brief bursts of activity occurred. This behavior suggests fan control may be tied primarily to BIOS-level thermal triggers rather than granular OS-side control, something that will require further testing.

Power consumption during light activity remained in the 50 to 60 W range, which is consistent with a workstation-class system running the Ultra 9 285HX while idle or handling moderate foreground tasks. Removing the dual-25GbE combo card or disabling its slot reduced power draw by roughly 10 to 11 W, highlighting the overhead associated with multi-lane NICs and onboard controllers. These early figures provide a baseline for comparison against heavier benchmarks that will be performed in the full review.

The 25GbE, 10GbE and WiFi 7 Network Card in the MS-02 Ultra

The MS-02 Ultra’s networking implementation is centered around a PCIe-based combo card that integrates dual 25GbE SFP+ ports with two additional M.2 NVMe slots. This card is installed in the PCIe 4.0 x16 position rather than the PCIe 5.0 slot, and it includes a dedicated controller with active cooling and heatsinks that cover both the networking and storage components.

Early inspection shows the card draws a notable amount of power, which corresponds with the increased thermal and electrical requirements of Intel’s E810-class 25GbE controllers. Because of this, Minisforum’s inclusion of dedicated airflow and structural reinforcement around the card is necessary within the constrained 4.8-liter chassis. The presence of this dual-purpose add-in card also means the MS-02 Ultra’s total NVMe count depends on whether the system is configured with the 285HX version, as the lower-tier CPUs remove the combo module entirely.

Beyond the 25GbE configuration, the system includes onboard 10GbE and 2.5GbE RJ45 ports, the latter supported by Intel’s i226-LM with vPro capabilities, allowing BIOS-level remote management. The combination of high-speed SFP+, copper-based multi-gigabit ports, and embedded management options positions the system for lab, server, or virtualization roles rather than conventional desktop use.

Wireless capability is supplied via a WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 module connected through an M.2 E-Key slot, providing high-throughput wireless performance alongside its wired interfaces. Together, these connectivity features expand the system’s potential use cases, particularly for users planning to deploy virtualized environments or bandwidth-intensive tasks such as shared storage testing or multi-system clustering.

How m.2 Storage on the MS-02 Ultra is Done

The MS-02 Ultra distributes its four NVMe slots across two different locations, with two mounted on the mainboard and two integrated into the dual-25GbE combo card. The pair located on the system board are positioned on the underside, near the memory and CPU assembly, and both are listed as PCIe 4.0 x4 according to Minisforum’s documentation.

Early inspection suggests that one of these may have a PCIe 5.0 lane path available at the hardware level, though software restrictions or lane bifurcation rules may currently limit it to Gen 4 behavior. This is an area that requires further validation using a Gen 5 SSD, as the lane layout on the 285HX platform allows various allocation possibilities depending on how Minisforum assigned bandwidth between CPU, chipset, and expansion slots. These internal slots have modest vertical clearance, meaning SSDs with tall heatsinks cannot be used without removing or replacing the pre-fitted cooling structures.

The remaining two NVMe slots reside on the network combo card alongside the 25GbE controllers. These operate under different bandwidth rules depending on SSD capacity: drives up to 4 TB operate at PCIe 4.0 x4, while larger 8 TB models shift down to PCIe 3.0 x4. This behavior appears to be related to the card’s onboard controller and how its internal bifurcation splits resources between the NIC and storage lanes.

Physical space is also restricted on the card, requiring low-profile SSDs in certain positions to avoid obstruction of the cooling shroud and airflow channel. Minisforum includes an additional heatsink in the package for users installing their own drives, but using SSDs with taller factory heatsinks may be impractical. Altogether, storage layout on the MS-02 Ultra is functional and high-capacity, but with lane behaviors and physical constraints that require attention during configuration.

Memory on the MS-02 Ultra

The MS-02 Ultra provides four DDR5 SODIMM slots, but their distribution within the chassis is unconventional due to the system’s compact thermal layout. Two slots sit on the mainboard near the CPU-side M.2 positions, placed directly in the airflow path of the vapor-chamber cooler and its dual-fan assembly. Because of this, Minisforum has added a custom angled heatsink that draws air from the primary cooling channel across the modules and nearby components.

This arrangement is intended to compensate for the thermal density around the CPU area, where heat buildup would otherwise be more likely. These two slots support both ECC and non-ECC memory, though ECC functionality is active only on the 285HX model. Their placement suggests Minisforum prioritized consistent airflow over ease of access, making upgrades possible but less straightforward than on more open workstation layouts.

The remaining pair of SODIMM slots is located on the opposite side of the board, positioned away from the CPU cooling assembly and closer to the chassis frame. These modules have more breathing room but rely on passive airflow from the system’s general ventilation rather than a focused cooling path. All four slots support speeds up to 4800 MHz, with XMP profiles unavailable due to Minisforum’s implementation and Intel’s platform limitations.

During early testing, memory installation worked as expected, though the arrangement of these slots means users planning maximum 256 GB configurations will need to work within the physical constraints of the layout. Overall, the memory design reflects a tradeoff between supporting high-capacity ECC configurations and fitting the necessary cooling infrastructure into a small volume.

PCIe Card Support on the MS-02 Ultra

The MS-02 Ultra incorporates three PCIe slots arranged to maximize flexibility within its compact chassis: a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, and a PCIe 4.0 x4 slot. The PCIe 5.0 slot is left unoccupied by default, allowing users to install a low-profile GPU or accelerator card that fits within the airflow and power constraints of the 350 W internal PSU.

Minisforum includes auxiliary power cables within the system, which is uncommon for small-form-factor workstations and indicates that the chassis is intended to support cards that require supplemental power. Because of the chassis height and width, only dual-slot, low-profile cards with modest cooling requirements are viable, but this still introduces options for compute or media workloads that benefit from hardware acceleration.

The PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is occupied in the 285HX configuration by the dual-25GbE plus dual-M.2 combo card, which introduces additional thermal and power considerations. This leaves the PCIe 4.0 x4 slot available for further expansion, provided the card used meets the system’s spatial limitations. The layout demonstrates Minisforum’s approach to balancing lane allocation between CPU, storage, and networking, especially given the 24 available PCIe lanes on the Ultra 9 platform.

Although the physical presence of three slots in such a compact volume is unusual, the arrangement is functional, and power delivery from the internal PSU supports moderate add-in card configurations. Users will need to consider airflow direction, card length, and slot occupation carefully to avoid restricting internal ventilation.

Conclusion and Verdict on the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra (So Far…)

The MS-02 Ultra presents a compact workstation design that integrates a high-core-count CPU, multiple NVMe storage options, high-speed networking, and an internal PSU within a tightly arranged chassis. Early testing indicates that the system’s thermal behavior, noise profile, and power draw are consistent with its component density, though the long-term performance of its cooling strategy requires extended benchmarking before reaching definitive conclusions. The design choices, such as the split placement of memory slots, the use of a large dual-fan cooling chamber, and the reliance on a densely packed internal layout, all reflect Minisforum’s effort to fit workstation-grade hardware into a constrained volume.

In terms of features, the dual-25GbE plus dual-M.2 combo card remains the most distinctive element, expanding the system’s potential for virtualized environments, NAS roles, and bandwidth-heavy workflows. PCIe allocation, memory configuration, and storage behavior introduce several considerations for users planning upgrades or specialized deployments. While these early observations indicate a capable and flexible platform, further testing is necessary to determine sustained thermal performance, PCIe stability under load, and real-world throughput of the networking and storage subsystems. The forthcoming full review will provide those extended results, but for now, the system presents a feature-rich design with several areas that merit deeper evaluation.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Minisforum Reveal the New MiniMinisforum N5 MAX NAS RevealedMinisforum MS-02 Ultra PC ReviMinisforum MS-02 Ultra ReviewMinisforum MS-02 Ultra - EarlyAoostar WTR Max NAS vs MinisfoMinisforum N5 vs Aoostar WTR MMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewMinisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 - Wh Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Jonsbo N6 9-Bay NAS Case Coming Soon

The Jonsbo N6 is the latest entry in the company’s NAS oriented chassis range and introduces a more conventional tower layout while keeping the compact profile that has defined the N series. It offers space for nine drives, a choice of ITX or micro ATX motherboards, and support for both ATX and SFX power supplies. The design focuses on storage density, flexible component placement, and broad cooling support, while early user feedback highlights both the advantages of this layout and concerns around airflow across populated drive arrays.

Jonsbo N6 NAS Case Design and Storage

The N6 uses a steel construction with a compact tower profile that measures three hundred and five millimetres wide, three hundred and fifty three millimetres deep, and three hundred and eighteen millimetres tall including the base. The layout presents a straightforward front to back airflow path with vented panels on multiple sides. The exterior follows the same plain industrial style found across the N series and shows no decorative features beyond the functional ventilation cut outs.

Inside, the drive system is the primary focus. The chassis accommodates up to nine storage devices in either three point five inch or two point five inch formats. This is provided through a tray based system rather than the rubber strap mounts used in previous models. The move to trays is intended to improve ease of installation and reduce vibration transfer, while also enabling a more rigid structure for the drive cage.

The N6 keeps the drive stack in a vertical position with two pre installed one hundred and twenty millimetre fans located directly behind the drive bay. These fans draw air from the case interior across the disks and push it toward the rear.

This arrangement is simple to maintain and suits slow turning fans, although the distance between the intake vents and the drive surfaces remains a factor in how effectively the drives can shed heat under sustained load.

Clearance for cables and power distribution is arranged around the drive column. The chassis uses a backplane with multiple individual connectors rather than a consolidated high density solution. This maintains compatibility with standard cabling but does not improve the airflow restriction created by the backplane structure itself. User feedback suggests that this region may become the warmest part of the case when all drive positions are populated.

Jonsbo N6 NAS Case Motherboard, PSU and PCIe Support

The N6 supports both ITX and micro ATX motherboards, which places it between the smaller N3 and N2 and the larger N5 in terms of platform flexibility. The internal frame leaves enough room for boards with multiple PCIe slots, allowing storage builders to use additional controllers or network adapters without relying on ITX limitations. The orientation of the motherboard tray also keeps all major connectors accessible even when the drive cage is fully populated.

Power supply placement is more flexible than in previous Jonsbo NAS cases. The N6 accepts either a full sized ATX unit up to two hundred and twenty millimetres or an SFX unit up to one hundred millimetres. The PSU can be installed in the upper or lower region of the chassis depending on component choice. This arrangement gives builders more freedom to balance cable routing, airflow, and space for larger GPUs or add in cards.

The case includes four PCI expansion slots. This is sufficient for a graphics card plus one or two additional cards such as HBA or 10GbE. Support for GPUs up to two hundred and seventy five to three hundred and twenty millimetres means that mid range cards fit comfortably, although very large triple fan cards remain outside the intended scope. For systems without a GPU, the space is adequate for controllers with extended PCBs or rear facing connectors.

Clearances around the CPU area allow for cooler heights between sixty five and one hundred and sixty millimetres depending on the chosen PSU configuration. Larger tower coolers require the PSU to be placed in the alternate position to avoid interference. This creates a predictable trade off between cooling hardware and power supply size but provides enough flexibility for both air and AIO setups.

Jonsbo N6 NAS Case Cooling and Ventilation

The N6 provides a wide set of fan positions, with mounting support on the front, left side, right side, rear, and directly beside the drive cage. The layout allows two front fans at either one hundred and twenty millimetres or one hundred and forty millimetres, two fans on each side panel at one hundred and twenty millimetres, a single rear fan at one hundred and twenty millimetres, and two one hundred and twenty millimetre units that ship pre installed behind the drive stack. This creates a total potential of nine fans, although actual airflow efficiency depends on how the interior pathways are used.

The most significant airflow path concerns the disks. The pre installed fans draw air across the drive bay, but the distance between the intake vents and the drive faces, as well as the obstruction created by the backplane, can restrict flow.

Community feedback from earlier N series layouts indicates that this region can become the thermal bottleneck when all drive positions are filled. The presence of additional intake positions on the front and sides gives users options to supplement the drive cooling, but the design may still require tuning based on workload and ambient temperature.

The N6 includes an integrated three port manual fan controller with three speed levels. This provides basic control for builders who prefer not to rely on motherboard based curves or who are using several fans connected through splitters. While simple, the controller suits the straightforward airflow design of the chassis and offers a fallback option for users configuring large storage arrays or low noise systems.

Jonsbo N6 – Pros and Cons of the new NAS Case

The N6 introduces a denser storage layout and more flexible internal configuration than earlier compact models in the series. It supports mainstream power supplies, allows the use of longer GPUs and additional PCIe cards, and moves to a more practical tray based drive system. The expanded fan placement and the inclusion of a manual controller give users a wider set of ventilation options.

• Nine drive bays in a compact tower format
• Choice of ITX or micro ATX motherboards
• Support for ATX or SFX power supplies with two placement positions
• Four PCIe slots with room for mid length GPUs or HBAs
• Multiple fan locations including two pre installed units behind the drives
• Integrated three speed fan controller
• Straightforward internal layout with easier drive installation compared to older strap based designs

The main concerns raised by early users relate to airflow through the drive area and the continued reliance on a backplane that restricts ventilation. Although the case offers many fan positions, the cooling efficiency across a fully populated drive stack may still require user modifications. The use of Molex and individual SATA power connections and the absence of intake fans by default also limit thermal performance for high density configurations.

• Backplane design reduces airflow across the drive surfaces
• No dedicated front intake fans included
• Cooling performance for nine populated drives may require user adjustments
• Reliance on Molex and multiple SATA power connectors rather than consolidated cabling
• No indication of filtration on intake areas
• Limited information on pricing and regional availability

Jonsbo N6 vs N5 vs N4 vs N3 vs N2 NAS Case

The N6 positions itself between the high capacity N5 and the smaller N4 and N3 by offering nine bays in a mid sized tower footprint. It improves motherboard and PSU flexibility over the N3 and N2 while maintaining a smaller profile than the N5. The primary differentiators across the series are storage density, motherboard support, GPU clearance, and cooling layout.

The N6 adds a higher capacity option to Jonsbo’s compact NAS case range by pairing nine drive bays with support for micro ATX motherboards and full sized ATX power supplies. Its internal structure is straightforward and offers more flexibility than the company’s smaller models, although airflow across the drive area remains the defining limitation based on early observations. The design serves users who want a dense multi drive system without moving to a full tower enclosure, provided that attention is given to fan placement and thermal management.

When will the Jonsbo N6 Be Released, and where To Buy the N6 NAS Case?

The Jonsbo N6 has only just been announced by the brand and official availability is still TBC. Traditionally, these cases have been made available on eastern eTail outlets such as AliEpxress around 10 days after the official pages go live at Jonsbo, and around a month or so later on sites like Amazon globally (arguably at around 30-40% more expensive, as they factor in the international shipping – and the N6 will not be a small box! .You can find purchasing links for the Jonsbo N6 and the other cases in this series below. Availability varies by region, and some retailers list these models under different category headings, so check both local and international stores when comparing prices. AliExpress tend to appear first, but seriously always verify the model name and drive bay count before ordering, since several Jonsbo cases share similar exterior designs and the shopping UI of Aliexpress has a nasty habit of showing the wrong image for the product in question! Check them out below:

N2 Best for Low/Efficient NAS Deployment Lowest Price Point Quietest of the Range Smallest Physical Footprint Smallest Storage Capacity Only 1 PCIe Card Slot and Half Height	N3 Best for  a Power NAS Build + Bigger CPU Cooling Largest Storage Capacity + Full Size PCIe Cards Best Prosumer Deployment Best All Round for Storage vs Scale vs Price BIG Size and oddly tall TALL!	N4 Better MoBo Compatibility (MITX and MATX) Best Size vs Storage Option + 4x PCIe Slots Most Conventially Aesthetically Appealing Flexible Deployment Most Expensive PCIe Cards Must Be Half Height	N5 MATX and ITX SUPPORT Largest Storage Capacity @ 12 BAY UNPARALLELLED PCIE SUPPORT Tonnes of Cooling/airflow potential MASSIVE…JUST MASSIVE Most Expensive of the bunch	N6 Best for  a Power NAS Build + Bigger CPU Cooling Largest Storage Capacity + Full Size PCIe Cards Best Prosumer Deployment PROPER HDD TRAYS! BIG Size and oddly tall Noisiest System of the Three
======= Where To Buy? =======
$76 (Check Aliexpress HERE)	$99.42 (Check Aliexpress HERE)	$76.99 (Check Aliexpress HERE)	$148.99 (Check Aliexpress HERE)	(Check Aliexpress HERE)
$149 (Check Amazon HERE)	$170 (Check Amazon HERE)	$199* (Check Amazon HERE)	$249 (Check Amazon HERE)	(Check Amazon HERE)

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Jonsbo N6 NAS Case ReviewJonsbo N6 NAS Case ReleasedJonsbo N10 NAS Case ReviewJonsbo N10 NAS Case Review - AJonsbo N10 and NV10 ITX NAS CaJonsbo N10 and NV10 ITX NAS CaJonsbo N5 ReviewJonsbo N5 vs N4 vs N3 vs N2 NAJonsbo N5 vs N4 vs N3 vs N2 NAJonsbo N5 NAS Case Revealed Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Black Friday 2025 NAS Deals – UGREEN NAS

Black Friday has brought some of the strongest discounts yet on UGREEN NASync systems, making it an ideal time for new users and homelab builders to step into the NAS ecosystem or upgrade to a more powerful and future proof setup. This year’s lineup ranges from compact and affordable 2-bay models for simple backups and family cloud storage to high performance all-flash and 10GbE systems aimed at media creators, home labs, and virtualisation workloads. Whether you need a quiet personal cloud, a fast Plex server, an NVMe-accelerated photo workflow, or a full 8-bay system capable of running containers, VMs, TrueNAS, or UnRAID, UGREEN’s NASync range covers every tier with significant holiday savings. Below is a detailed breakdown of each model on offer, including their best use cases and current Black Friday pricing.

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus – $594.99 

The UGREEN DXP4800 Plus is a 4 bay NAS running UGOS Pro and built around an Intel Pentium Gold 8505 processor with 5 cores and 6 threads, paired with 8GB DDR5 memory that can be expanded to 64GB. It includes a 128GB system SSD, 4 SATA bays, and 2 M.2 slots, allowing a maximum combined capacity of 136TB for mixed HDD and SSD storage. RAID options include JBOD, Basic, 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10, giving users flexible data protection choices. Connectivity is a strong point, with both 2.5GbE and 10GbE network ports, front USB C and USB A ports at 10Gb per second, additional rear USB ports, an SD 3.0 card reader, and 4K HDMI output for direct console access. With a compact footprint of 10.1 inches by 7.0 inches by 7.0 inches and power usage of 42.36W during disk access, the DXP4800 Plus is a high performance prosumer NAS that fits well into creative, home lab, and small business environments.

UGREEN 120W NAS UPS – 15% OFF, NOW $84.99

UGREEN NASync DH4300 Plus – $364.99 

Regular price$429.99

The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is a simple and affordable 4 bay NAS designed as a reliable backup hub and a private cloud alternative for homes and small offices. It uses an 8 core Rockchip ARM processor with 8GB LPDDR4X memory and a 32GB eMMC system disk, providing enough performance for file sync, photo and video backup, family cloud storage, and basic media streaming through UGOS Pro. The 4 SATA bays support up to 120TB with RAID options including JBOD, Basic, 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10, making it easy to choose between capacity and data protection. A single 2.5GbE port offers fast network transfers, while front USB 3.2 ports and 4K HDMI allow quick file import and local access when needed. With compact dimensions of 155 by 155 by 215.7 mm and low power draw of 22.89W during drive access, the DH4300 Plus is a cost effective way to move away from subscription cloud services and take full control of your own backup and storage system.

UGREEN NASync DXP480T Plus – $849.99 

Regular price$999.99

The UGREEN DXP480T Plus is a high speed 4 slot NVMe NAS built around the Intel Core i5 1235U processor, designed for users who want the performance benefits of full flash storage rather than traditional SATA drives. With 4 M.2 NVMe slots supporting up to 32TB, the system delivers extremely fast read and write speeds that are ideal for photo and video editing, virtual machines, database work, AI workloads, and low latency cloud sync tasks. UGOS Pro supports RAID modes including JBOD, Basic, 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10, allowing both performance and data protection on NVMe media. Connectivity is equally strong with a 10GbE port for high bandwidth transfers and dual Thunderbolt 4 ports that operate at 40Gb per second for fast external storage or workstation integration. The system includes 8GB DDR5 memory, expandable to 64GB, along with built in WiFi and 8K HDMI output for direct console use. With compact dimensions of 7.05 by 5.59 by 2.05 inches and efficient power consumption, the DXP480T Plus is a compelling option for anyone who wants the speed and responsiveness of an all flash NAS.

UGREEN DXP6800 PRO – 20% OFF, Now £799

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 – $499.99 

Regular price$549.99

The UGREEN DXP4800 is a 4 bay SATA NAS designed for users who want an affordable and straightforward media server for Plex, Jellyfin, or Emby. It runs on an Intel N100 processor with 8GB DDR5 memory and includes 2 M.2 slots for SSD caching, which helps speed up library scanning and artwork retrieval across large media collections. With space for up to 136TB and RAID options covering JBOD, Basic, 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10, it offers plenty of room and flexibility for growing libraries of movies, TV shows, and music. Dual 2.5GbE ports provide more than enough throughput for multiple streams on the local network, and the HDMI 4K output allows direct playback or simple setup without a separate computer. Front and rear USB ports make it easy to import media from external drives, while UGOS Pro supports popular self hosted media applications through containers or native apps. Compact dimensions of 10.1 by 7.0 by 7.0 inches and low power use make the DXP4800 a practical, quiet, and efficient platform for home media streaming with Plex, Jellyfin, or Emby.

UGREEN NASync DH2300 – $188.99 

Regular price$209.99

The UGREEN DH2300 is one of the most affordable and compact NAS options in the lineup, making it an ideal entry point for anyone who wants simple personal backups or a small private cloud without a large upfront cost. It runs on an efficient 8 core Rockchip A72 plus A53 processor with 4GB LPDDR4X memory and includes 2 SATA bays that support up to 60TB with JBOD, Basic, 0, or 1 for easy data protection. Despite its budget friendly price, it offers useful connectivity including 1GbE networking, front USB C and USB A ports for quick file import, and a 4K 60Hz HDMI output for local setup or direct playback. With a very small footprint at 151 by 98 by 213.7 mm and power use of only 13.72W during drive access, the DH2300 fits comfortably on a shelf or desk and provides a quiet, low cost alternative to cloud subscriptions for photos, documents, and home backups.

UGREEN DXP4800 PLUS – 20% OFF, NOW $559.99

UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro – $1,019.99 

Regular price$1,199.99

The UGREEN DXP6800 Pro is a powerful 6 bay NAS designed for photographers and media professionals who need fast ingest, responsive editing, and reliable large scale storage. It uses an Intel Core i5 1235U processor with 10 cores and 12 threads and includes 8GB DDR5 memory, expandable to 64GB, giving it enough performance for handling RAW photo workflows, large Lightroom or Capture One catalogs, and multi-stream media projects. With 6 SATA bays and 2 M.2 slots, the system can reach up to 196TB of combined storage, allowing long term archives, active project folders, and SSD cache acceleration for quicker preview loading. Dual 10GbE ports provide the bandwidth needed for teams or for editing directly from the NAS over a fast network, while the dual Thunderbolt 4 ports at 40Gb per second allow very rapid transfers from workstations or external drives. A front SD 4.0 card reader simplifies importing photos and footage, and the 8K HDMI output allows direct console access for quick management. Compact at 11.54 by 10.16 by 7.87 inches, the DXP6800 Pro is a high performance, creator focused storage solution that comfortably supports demanding photo and video workflows.

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus + UPS Add On – $639.99 

Regular price$799.99

The UGREEN DXP4800 Plus is a powerful and flexible 4-bay NAS built on the Intel Pentium Gold 8505 with 5 cores and 6 threads, paired with 8GB DDR5 memory and support for up to 64GB. It includes a 128GB system SSD, 4 SATA bays, and 2 M.2 SSD slots, giving the system a maximum capacity of 136TB for mixed HDD and NVMe setups. Connectivity is strong with both 2.5GbE and 10GbE ports for high-speed file transfers, media streaming, and multi-user access on UGOS Pro. This Black Friday bundle also includes the UGREEN US3000 UPS, a compact 120W lithium-ion backup module with 0s transfer time, 43.2Wh rated energy, and 12,000mAh capacity. It protects the NAS from sudden power loss, prevents file system corruption, and enables safe shutdown during outages. With front 10Gbps USB-C and USB-A ports, an SD 3.0 card reader, 4K HDMI output, and a compact 10.1 × 7.0 × 7.0 inch chassis, the DXP4800 Plus and included UPS form a reliable, high-performance storage solution for home and professional users.

UGREEN NASync DXP2800 – $319.99 

Regular price$349.99

The UGREEN DXP2800 is one of the best value NAS options in the lineup, offering full access to all UGOS Pro software features while keeping hardware costs low. It runs on the Intel N100 processor with 4 cores and 4 threads, paired with 8GB DDR5 memory and support for up to 16GB, making it capable of running file sharing, photo backup, cloud sync, container apps, and media servers without difficulty. The system includes 2 SATA bays and 2 M.2 SSD slots, giving a maximum storage capacity of 76TB, which is more than enough for home backups or small office data. A 2.5GbE port provides fast transfers for laptops, desktops, and media players, while the front USB-C and USB-A ports at 10Gbps make external storage import easy. With 4K HDMI output for direct console access and a low power draw of only 16.38W during drive access, the DXP2800 delivers the full UGOS Pro experience, including AI photo sorting, mobile backup, cloud sync, and app store functionality, all within a compact 9.1 × 4.3 × 7.0 inch chassis. It is an affordable and highly capable entry point for anyone wanting full NAS functionality without the premium price.

UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus – $1,274.99 

Regular price$1,499.99

The UGREEN DXP8800 Plus is the ultimate UGREEN NAS server for users who want maximum power, flexibility, and room to grow. It runs on the Intel Core i5 1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads, paired with 8GB DDR5 memory and support for up to 64GB, making it ideal for large scale virtual machines, Docker workloads, and advanced homelab setups including TrueNAS or UnRAID installations. With 8 SATA bays and 2 M.2 SSD slots, the system supports up to 256TB of total storage, which is enough for professional video archives, multi user environments, and massive Plex libraries. Dual 10GbE ports provide extremely fast network throughput for direct editing from the NAS in applications like DaVinci Resolve or Adobe Premiere, while the 2 Thunderbolt 4 ports at 40Gb per second allow rapid offload and workstation integration. A front SD 4.0 reader simplifies media ingest for photographers and editors, and the 8K HDMI output allows direct console access when needed. With a compact 7.05 by 5.59 by 2.05 inch design and strong performance under UGOS Pro, the DXP8800 Plus is the most capable and full featured UGREEN NAS platform for creators, homelab users, virtualisation workloads, Plex servers, and demanding professional storage environments.

Amazon Deals

UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Plus 6-Bay NAS –  $899..99

The UGREEN DXP6800 Pro is a high performance 6 bay NAS aimed at creators and production teams who need fast ingest, smooth editing, and dependable storage for large projects. It runs on an Intel Core i5 1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads and includes 8GB DDR5 memory with support for up to 64GB, giving it the power required for RAW photo sets, large catalog libraries, and demanding video work. The 6 SATA bays and 2 M.2 SSD slots allow a total capacity of 196TB, making it suitable for long term archives, active project folders, and fast SSD caching to speed up preview generation and media scrubbing. Dual 10GbE ports enable direct editing over the network, while the 2 Thunderbolt 4 ports operating at 40Gb per second support extremely fast transfers from workstations or external storage. A front SD 4.0 card reader streamlines importing footage from cameras, and the 8K HDMI output provides simple local access for setup and management. With a compact footprint of 11.54 by 10.16 by 7.87 inches, the DXP6800 Pro delivers a powerful and efficient workflow platform for photographers, videographers, and studio environments.

UGREEN NASync DH4300 Plus Value Class NAS – $364.99

UGREEN NASync DXP2800 2-Bay NAS – $319.99

UGREEN NASync DH2300 2-Bay Tiny Impact NAS – $188..99

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Beelink ME Pro NAS - Should YoBeelink ME Pro NAS - Should YoJonsbo N6 NAS Case ReviewBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBest Low-Cost / Value NAS of tBest Cheap NAS of 2025Best 4/5/6 Bay NAS of 2025Best 4/5/6 Bay NAS of 2025Best PLEX, Jellyfin or Emby NA Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Source