Avec les modèles USB-C et Pro, les Apple Pencil de première et seconde génération restent toujours disponibles en ligne : il y a autant de stylets que de tablettes chez Apple. Pour s'y retrouver vos mieux avoir ce guide sous la main.

On a beau aimer iOS et son interface fluide, complète et terriblement intuitive… mais cela ressemble parfois à une prison dorée. En effet, choisir un iPhone reste un sport puisqu'Apple multiplie les modèles et conserve des générations plus anciennes.

[Deal du jour] Avec son design atypique, le Nothing Phone (3a) Pro est un smartphone qui se remarque et qui vaut également le coup en promotion.

The Slate 7 Pro (GL-BE10000) is the latest travel router from GL.iNet, and it exists largely because the original Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) did not go quite far enough. The earlier model carried Wi Fi 7 branding but lacked 6GHz support, which for many users felt like a limitation rather than a stepping stone. The Slate 7 Pro corrects that by moving to full tri band Wi Fi 7, adding a dedicated 6GHz radio, expanding wireless bandwidth, and upgrading the touchscreen. It keeps the dual 2.5GbE ports and USB C powered design, but pushes the hardware and feature set further into premium territory.

I have reviewed and evaluated ALOT of travel routers over the years, and today I want to focus specifically on the pros and cons of the Slate 7 Pro (full detailed review still in progress, but this article will serve as the main focus good and bad bits). Rather than listing specifications alone, it looks at what those changes actually mean day to day, especially for travelers, remote workers, and users who rely heavily on VPN, captive portal access, and flexible networking. Some areas are clear improvements over the previous model, while others remain imperfect or introduce new trade offs. The goal here is to outline both sides clearly, without overselling what the device does well or ignoring where it still falls short.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Review – Quick Conclusion

The Slate 7 Pro (GL-BE10000) is a full tri band Wi Fi 7 travel router from GL.iNet that corrects the biggest limitation of the earlier Slate 7 by adding dedicated 6GHz support and 320MHz channel capability, delivering combined theoretical wireless bandwidth of 688Mbps on 2.4GHz, 2882Mbps on 5GHz, and 5764Mbps on 6GHz. It pairs this with dual 2.5GbE ports, high speed VPN performance up to 1100Mbps via WireGuard, integrated Deep Packet Inspection, a larger 2.8 inch touchscreen for on device management, and an optional active cooling system that engages only when thermals demand it. The OpenWrt based firmware remains one of the most flexible in the travel router space, supporting multi WAN failover, advanced traffic rules, plugin expansion, and remote management. However, it draws more power than the previous model, retains only 1 USB C data port with unreliable hub expansion, cannot handle captive portal login pages directly on the touchscreen, and implements single radio MLO rather than full multi radio aggregation. For users who want full spectrum Wi Fi 7 in a portable form, stronger VPN throughput, and granular network control while traveling or working remotely, it is a technically stronger and more complete option than the non 6GHz Slate 7, but it comes with higher power demands and a price premium that may not suit those who only need basic travel connectivity.

SOFTWARE - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 7/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.6

PROS

Full tri band Wi Fi 7 with dedicated 6GHz support and 320MHz channel capability
Combined theoretical wireless bandwidth of 688Mbps (2.4GHz), 2882Mbps (5GHz), and 5764Mbps (6GHz)
Dual 2.5GbE ports with configurable WAN/LAN and multi WAN failover support
High speed VPN performance up to 1100Mbps via WireGuard and 1000Mbps via OpenVPN DCO
2.8 inch color touchscreen for direct device level control and monitoring
Integrated Deep Packet Inspection for advanced traffic visibility and filtering
Active cooling system that engages only when required
OpenWrt based firmware with full customization, plugin support, and remote management

CONS

Touchscreen cannot handle captive portal login pages directly
Higher baseline power consumption compared to the earlier Slate 7
Only 1 USB C data port for storage or tethering
USB hub expansion remains unreliable for multi device use
MLO implementation is single radio coordination rather than full multi radio aggregation

Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro from the Official Store Below:

6GHz Support Finally Brings Full Tri Band Wi Fi 7 to the Slate 7 Pro

One of the most significant changes in the Slate 7 Pro compared with the earlier Slate 7 is the addition of a dedicated 6GHz band. The previous model operated only on 2.4GHz and 5GHz, which meant it technically supported Wi Fi 7 features but did not deliver the full tri band experience many users associate with the standard. By adding 6GHz, the Slate 7 Pro increases total theoretical wireless throughput to 688Mbps on 2.4GHz, 2882Mbps on 5GHz, and 5764Mbps on 6GHz. More importantly, it allows access to wider 320MHz channels, which are not available on 5GHz in most regulatory regions.

In practical terms, 6GHz provides a cleaner spectrum with less congestion, particularly in dense environments such as hotels, conferences, or apartment buildings. When combined with Multi Link Operation, the router can distribute traffic more effectively across three bands rather than two. This does not automatically guarantee higher real world speeds for every client, but it does increase headroom and flexibility for multiple active devices. For users who dismissed the original Slate 7 due to its lack of 6GHz, this update addresses that limitation directly and aligns the Pro model more closely with what most would consider a complete Wi Fi 7 implementation.

Active Cooling in a Travel Router, but Only When It Is Needed

One of the more unusual additions in the Slate 7 Pro is the inclusion of an internal cooling fan. Most travel routers rely entirely on passive cooling due to their compact size and relatively low power processors. Under moderate use this is usually sufficient, but in warmer climates or during sustained high load activity such as heavy VPN use, multi device streaming, or extended 6GHz operation, temperatures can rise enough to cause throttling or instability. The Slate 7 Pro addresses this by integrating active cooling, which is not common in this category.

Importantly, the fan does not run continuously. It can be configured to activate only once the CPU reaches a defined temperature threshold. In standard operation, the device remains silent. The fan engages only when sustained workload or environmental conditions demand additional cooling. This approach attempts to balance reliability and acoustics, reducing the risk of heat related slowdowns without introducing constant background noise. For users who travel to high humidity or high temperature regions, this is a practical addition, though it also reflects the higher performance hardware and increased power demands of the Pro model.

Strong Wired and Physical Connectivity Without Additional Accessories

The Slate 7 Pro continues to offer dual 2.5GbE ports, with 1 configurable WAN and 1 LAN port, providing multi gig wired connectivity in a compact travel router form factor. This allows users to connect to high speed wired internet sources where available, while also supporting local high bandwidth transfers across a wired network. The ports can be reassigned depending on deployment needs, and multi WAN failover remains supported through combinations of wired, wireless repeater, and tethered connections. For users who frequently move between hotel networks, offices, or temporary workspaces, this flexibility remains one of the defining strengths of the device.

In addition to Ethernet, the Slate 7 Pro replaces the previous USB Type A data port with a USB C 3.0 data port, aligning it more closely with modern devices and accessories. This port supports storage devices and USB tethering, while power is delivered through a separate USB C PD input. The programmable hardware toggle button is retained for quick VPN or feature switching, and the reset button remains accessible. Overall, the physical connectivity is broad for a travel router, and the Pro model maintains compatibility with high speed wired networks while modernizing the data interface.

The Larger 2.8 Inch Touchscreen Adds Real Practical Control

The Slate 7 Pro includes a 2.8 inch color touchscreen on the front panel, replacing the smaller and more limited display found on the earlier Slate 7. While the previous model did introduce touchscreen control to the travel router category, the Pro version expands both the size and usability of the interface.

From the screen, users can view network status, generate QR codes for Wi Fi sharing, toggle VPN connections, monitor connection modes, and manage basic wireless settings without needing to open a browser or mobile app.

For short term or ad hoc setups, this makes a noticeable difference. When arriving at a new location, it is possible to power on the router, assign a Wi Fi password, enable or disable a VPN, and confirm connectivity directly from the device itself. It also provides real time visibility of WAN, repeater, tethering, and LAN states through clear indicators. The screen does not replace the full web interface for advanced configuration, but for quick adjustments and monitoring, it reduces reliance on a secondary device and simplifies routine tasks.

The OpenWrt Based Software Platform Remains One of the Strongest in This Category

The Slate 7 Pro continues to run the customized OpenWrt based firmware developed by GL.iNet, and this remains one of the defining advantages of the platform. The interface provides a structured and accessible front end for everyday tasks such as WAN configuration, repeater mode, VPN management, and client monitoring, while still allowing full access to the underlying OpenWrt environment for advanced users. This dual layer approach means the device can operate as a simple travel router for casual users, or as a highly configurable networking tool for those comfortable with deeper control.

Beyond standard routing functions, the firmware includes integrated VPN client and server options, multi WAN failover, traffic rules per SSID, and application support through an app center. The Pro model also introduces built in Deep Packet Inspection, adding another layer of visibility and filtering capability.

Users can assign the physical toggle button to trigger specific actions, switch to raw OpenWrt if desired, and manage the device remotely through GoodCloud. In terms of flexibility and feature depth within a travel form factor, the software stack remains one of the most complete available.

The Touchscreen Still Cannot Handle Captive Portal Logins

While the 2.8 inch touchscreen adds useful control and monitoring features, it does not eliminate the need for a secondary device when dealing with captive portals. In environments such as hotels, cafés, airports, or in flight Wi Fi systems, users often encounter web based login pages that must be completed before internet access is granted. The Slate 7 Pro cannot display or interact with these login portals directly on its screen. As a result, a phone, tablet, or laptop is still required to complete the authentication process.

This limitation reduces some of the independence that the touchscreen otherwise provides. In scenarios where the goal is to connect once and share access with multiple devices through the router, the expectation might be that everything could be handled directly on the unit itself. Instead, the workflow still requires connecting a client device to trigger and complete the portal login. Given that the hardware includes a capable display and processing power, the absence of even a basic embedded browser feels like a missed opportunity rather than a technical constraint.

Increased Power Consumption Compared to the Previous Model

The Slate 7 Pro draws more power than the earlier Slate 7, which is not unexpected given the addition of 6GHz, a larger LCD, integrated DPI processing, and an active cooling system. Even under light usage with a single wireless client connected and no wired WAN active, the Pro model typically operates above 5W. By comparison, the earlier Slate 7 generally sat between 3W and 4W under similar conditions. While these figures are not high in absolute terms, they are noticeably different when measured side by side.

For most users powering the router from a standard USB C PD adapter, this increase will not present an issue. However, in travel scenarios where power is sourced from lower output USB ports on buses, trains, aircraft seats, or compact power banks, the higher baseline draw could matter.

It also reflects the broader shift in the Pro model toward higher performance hardware. The device remains portable and reasonably efficient, but it is less power conservative than its predecessor.

Single USB Port Continues to Limit Expansion and Hub Compatibility

Despite moving to a USB C 3.0 data port, the Slate 7 Pro still provides only 1 USB data interface for peripherals. This means users must choose between connecting external storage, tethering a smartphone, or attaching another USB based device. In practical travel use, it is common to want both tethering and storage active at the same time, particularly when using the router as a small file sharing hub or media server. With only a single port, that flexibility remains constrained.

Attempts to expand the port using USB hubs continue to produce inconsistent results. While some powered hubs may partially function, stable multi device operation is not guaranteed. This mirrors behavior seen in earlier models and suggests that the limitation is architectural rather than cosmetic. For users who rely heavily on USB expansion, especially for simultaneous tethering and storage, this remains a practical restriction rather than a minor inconvenience.

MediaTek Platform Instead of Qualcomm Hardware

The Slate 7 Pro is powered by a MediaTek quad core processor running at 2.0GHz, rather than a Qualcomm chipset. In previous generations, Qualcomm based platforms were often associated with stronger power efficiency and broader upstream driver maturity within certain networking ecosystems. The move to MediaTek is not uncommon in this segment, but it does represent a shift in hardware positioning compared with devices that have relied on Qualcomm silicon.

From a performance perspective, the 2.0GHz MediaTek CPU provides the necessary headroom for tri band Wi Fi 7, high throughput VPN, and DPI processing. However, MediaTek platforms are generally viewed as slightly less power efficient than comparable Qualcomm solutions, which ties back to the higher baseline power draw observed in the Pro model. For most users, the practical difference will center on efficiency rather than raw capability, but it remains a consideration for those who closely follow chipset selection in networking hardware.

Multi Link Operation Is Present, but Not Full Multi Radio Aggregation

The Slate 7 Pro supports Wi Fi 7 Multi Link Operation across its 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz bands, allowing compatible clients to establish links over multiple frequencies. In practice, this improves connection stability and can help balance traffic dynamically between bands. However, it is important to clarify that this implementation follows the more common single radio MLO model, where traffic is coordinated across bands rather than fully aggregated simultaneously through independent radio chains.

This means the router does not deliver true parallel multi radio throughput in the way some marketing descriptions of Wi Fi 7 may imply. Instead, it prioritizes stability, latency reduction, and intelligent band switching. At present, very few consumer or travel routers implement full multi radio MLO aggregation, and the Slate 7 Pro is not an exception to that wider market reality. For most users, the benefit will be smoother performance under load rather than a simple multiplication of peak speeds.

Should You Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Travel Router? Conclusion and Verdict

The Slate 7 Pro builds directly on the foundation of the earlier Slate 7 by addressing its most discussed limitation, namely the absence of 6GHz. With full tri band Wi Fi 7 support, dual 2.5GbE ports, a larger 2.8 inch touchscreen, integrated DPI, high throughput VPN capabilities up to 1100Mbps via WireGuard, and optional active cooling, it positions itself as a more complete and performance oriented travel router. For users who were hesitant about the original model due to clipped wireless capability, the Pro version resolves that concern and expands overall functionality in a meaningful way.

That said, it is not without compromises. Power draw is higher than before, USB expansion remains limited to a single port with inconsistent hub support, the touchscreen cannot handle captive portal logins directly, and its MLO implementation reflects the broader limitations of current consumer Wi Fi 7 hardware rather than a fully parallel multi radio design. The MediaTek platform delivers the required performance, but it does not prioritize efficiency to the same degree as some Qualcomm based alternatives. For buyers deciding between the Slate 7 and the Slate 7 Pro, the Pro model is the technically stronger device, provided the increased price and power requirements align with their intended use case.

Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro from the Official Store Below:

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Should YouGl.iNet Comet Q USB-C KVM for TP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouTP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouGl.iNet Comet 5G Review - The Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 TraGl.iNet Slate 7 vs Beryl 7 TraGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX TrGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX TrGl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Faut-il nécessairement se ruiner pour s'offrir un smartphone récent qui tient la route ? La réponse est non. Que vous cherchiez le meilleur rapport qualité-prix, un photophone efficace ou un monstre d'autonomie, nous avons passé au crible les nouveautés pour vous. Voici les meilleurs smartphones récents à moins de 300 €.

Contre toute attente, CD Projekt Red a déployé une mise à jour pour libérer le potentiel visuel de Cyberpunk 2077 sur PS5 Pro, la plus puissante des consoles actuelles. Le rendu est bluffant pour un jeu paru en 2020.

Comme Claude, OpenAI sépare désormais son abonnement ChatGPT Pro en deux niveaux, à 103 euros par mois (5 fois moins de limites) ou 229 euros par mois (20 fois moins de limites). L'entreprise veut s'adresser aux utilisateurs les plus demandeurs, notamment pour son outil de développement Codex, mais qui n'ont pas besoin du ChatGPT Pro le plus cher.

Dans la jungle des smartphones, trouver le modèle qui remplit parfaitement sa fonction pour vos besoins quotidiens, et ce au juste prix, reste un défi. Ici, on a regroupé plusieurs des meilleurs modèles pour couvrir toutes les gammes possibles. Voici les meilleurs smartphones en 2026.

En 2026, il y a de quoi se faire plaisir gratuitement avec de nombreux Free-to-play. Nous avons réuni ici une sélection de jeux gratuits disponibles sur PS5, Xbox et PC. Entre FPS, RPG, MOBA, il y en a pour tous les goûts dans ce top des meilleurs jeux gratuits.

Minisforum N5 Max NAS UPDATE

The Minisforum N5 Max was originally shown in January 2026 during CES 2026 as the next step in the company’s 5 bay NAS series, following the N5 Pro that arrived in summer 2025 and later sitting above the N5 Air that was introduced in February 2026. At that stage, most of the information around the system came from early hands on coverage, reveal material, and first wave specification details, which meant some elements were still provisional or inconsistent depending on source. Now, in April 2026, the picture around the N5 Max is much clearer. Minisforum has provided a more defined specification set, a clearer description of the hardware layout, and a much stronger explanation of how the system is intended to be positioned, not just as another compact 5 bay NAS, but as a higher tier platform that combines local AI capability, multi tier storage, and more advanced infrastructure features. This update is therefore intended to bring the original January reveal into line with what is currently known, clarify where earlier CES details have since been refined, and set out the N5 Max as it stands now based on the latest available information.

Minisforum N5 Max NAS Design and Storage

The N5 Max keeps the same broad chassis direction first seen in the earlier N5 systems, using a compact 5 bay enclosure that supports both 3.5 inch and 2.5 inch SATA drives. Physically, it remains very close to the N5 Pro and N5 Air in footprint, with the April 2026 dimensions now listed at 199 × 202.4 × 252.3 mm and a base unit weight of 5 kg. That means Minisforum has not redesigned the platform into a larger desktop tower, but instead chosen to scale capability within the same general enclosure class that defined the rest of the series.

One of the more visible design changes carried over from the original January reveal is the inclusion of lockable drive trays. That may seem like a small revision, but it directly addresses one of the practical complaints raised around the earlier N5 generation. Minisforum is also still using the pull out internal layout, where the main board and flash storage area can be accessed through a more service friendly internal assembly rather than a completely fixed internal frame.

In structural terms, the N5 Max remains very much part of the same family, but it has been revised in several small ways that make it look more mature than the first N5 design.

On the hard drive side, the N5 Max is now specified with 5 SATA 3.0 bays supporting up to 30 TB per bay, giving the system a stated raw HDD ceiling of 150 TB before any NVMe storage is counted. Minisforum also lists the platform as supporting up to 190 TB total storage overall. Compared with the 22 TB per drive guidance attached to earlier N5 series documentation, this higher ceiling does not change the number of bays, but it does position the Max for a higher total capacity target within the same physical format. As with most NAS vendors, real world drive compatibility will still depend on validation over time, but the intent is clearly to place the N5 Max above the earlier models in maximum raw storage potential.

Flash storage is where the N5 Max diverges most clearly from the N5 Pro and N5 Air. Instead of the mixed M.2 and U.2 style arrangement used on those systems, the N5 Max is now described as having 5 M.2 NVMe positions in total. The current April 2026 specification lists 1 × M.2 2280 NVMe slot running at PCIe 4.0 x4 with support up to 8 TB, plus 4 × M.2 2280 NVMe slots running at PCIe 4.0 x1 with support up to 8 TB each. Minisforum also states that the system disk is a preinstalled 64 GB module occupying 1 of those SSD positions, which is relevant because it affects how many slots are immediately free to the user out of the box.

That layout gives the N5 Max a storage structure that is more layered than the earlier N5 models, with large capacity HDDs handling primary bulk storage while multiple NVMe slots can be used for cache, active project data, containers, VM storage, model files, or application workloads. It also fits the broader April 2026 positioning of the unit as a system meant to keep more data in an active state rather than simply acting as a passive archive box. The tradeoff is that the Max no longer appears to prioritize the same U.2 flexibility seen on the N5 Pro and N5 Air, instead leaning harder into a denser onboard M.2 arrangement within the same 5 bay chassis.

Minisforum N5 Max NAS Internal Hardware

The N5 Max is built around the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, a 16 core, 32 thread processor with a 3 GHz base frequency and boost up to 5.1 GHz. Minisforum lists the chip with Radeon 8060S integrated graphics featuring 40 graphics cores, alongside AMD Ryzen AI support rated at up to 126 TOPS overall and up to 50 TOPS on the NPU. In simple terms, this places the N5 Max in a very different compute class to the original N5 and above the N5 Pro as well, making it much closer to a compact workstation platform than a conventional 5 bay NAS in processor terms.

Memory is also handled very differently from the rest of the series. Rather than using upgradeable SO-DIMM slots, the N5 Max is listed with 128 GB of LPDDR5x memory on a 256 bit interface, with support references of 7500 to 8000 MT/s depending on source. That fixed memory design should provide substantially more bandwidth than the socketed DDR5 approach in the N5 Pro and N5 Air, which matters for integrated graphics and local AI workloads, but it also removes user upgrade flexibility. This is one of the clearest examples of Minisforum prioritizing performance density over long term modularity in the Max model.

Cooling and power delivery have also been scaled up to match that higher tier hardware. Minisforum lists a cooling system built around 5 heat pipes with PCM, dual 80 × 15 mm turbo fans for the CPU area, dual 92 × 25 mm axial fans for the HDD section, and a separate 60 × 12 mm turbo fan for the SSD and PSU area. Power is now handled by an internal 250 W supply with AC input built directly into the chassis, replacing the external brick used on the earlier N5 systems. Taken together, these changes suggest that the N5 Max is not simply using a faster CPU in the same shell, but has been reworked internally to support higher sustained load, denser flash storage, and a more integrated overall design.

Minisforum N5 Max NAS Connectivity

The N5 Max keeps the same broad I/O philosophy as the rest of the N5 family, but with a more aggressive top end specification. On the front, Minisforum lists 1 × USB4 port with DisplayPort Alt Mode 2.0 support and 1 × USB 3.2 Gen 2 port. On the rear, the system is listed with 2 × USB4 v2, 1 × USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1 × USB 2.0, 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL, and 1 × AC input. There is also still an internal PCIe x16 slot operating at PCIe 4.0 x4, which means the N5 Max continues to support internal expansion in the same general way as the earlier N5 systems.

Networking is one of the areas where the April 2026 information has become more specific, but it is also where earlier coverage created some confusion. The latest specification material lists 2 × 10GbE LAN ports using Realtek RTL8127 controllers. That differs from some earlier CES era references that described 1 × 10GbE plus 1 × 5GbE, and it also differs from the N5 Pro and N5 Air, which were generally presented as 10GbE plus 5GbE systems. Based on the most recent material now available, the safest reading is that the N5 Max is currently positioned as a dual 10GbE model, though that was not consistently communicated in the earliest reveal phase.

Display and high speed external bandwidth are also stronger on the N5 Max than on the other N5 variants. Minisforum lists video output support through HDMI and USB4, with the current specification stating up to 8K at 60 Hz or 4K at 144 Hz. More notably, the USB configuration now includes 2 × USB4 v2 connections, which is a substantial increase in external bandwidth compared with standard USB4 implementations. In practical terms, that gives the N5 Max a better fit for high speed external storage, direct attach workflows, fast ingest tasks, and display connectivity, while reinforcing that this system is being pitched as more than just a standard network storage appliance.

What Can You Do with the Minisforum N5 Max NAS

At the most basic level, the N5 Max can still be understood as a compact 5 bay NAS for centralised storage, backup, and multi user file access. With support for up to 150 TB of raw HDD capacity across its SATA bays, plus additional NVMe storage for faster tiers, it can be used for the same core roles as more traditional NAS systems, including shared folders, media libraries, workstation backups, and project archives. The difference is that Minisforum is not presenting it as a storage box first and everything else second. Instead, the current messaging places storage alongside compute and local services as equal parts of the platform.

The second role is as a higher performance working data system for users who need more than simple network storage. The combination of 5 HDD bays, multiple NVMe slots, dual 10GbE, PCIe expansion, and high speed USB4 v2 means the N5 Max is better suited to active workloads than a typical 5 bay desktop NAS. That can include media production, large photo libraries, virtual machine storage, container workloads, active project caching, and heavier multi user access. In that sense, the N5 Max sits closer to a compact storage server or workstation adjacent appliance than to an entry level NAS.

The third and most distinctive role is local AI processing. Minisforum’s March 2026 positioning pushes the N5 Max as a platform for private AI workloads running directly on the device rather than through cloud services. The company has specifically highlighted OpenClaw deployment on local LLMs, semantic photo search, voice to text, summarisation, smart organisation, and a more unified AI assistant style interface inside its software environment. Whether all of those functions arrive in the same form and at the same maturity level at launch remains something that still needs real world validation, but the intended direction is clearly toward keeping both data and AI interactions local.

For more advanced users, the N5 Max is also being framed as a private infrastructure platform rather than only an appliance. Minisforum has attached features such as ZFS, snapshots, virtualization, Docker, UPS support, and stronger permission control to the product direction, which broadens its appeal beyond simple home storage. That means the N5 Max could be used not just for storing files or running AI assisted search, but also for self hosting services, managing recoverable local data pools, running isolated applications, or building a more controlled homelab environment around the same hardware.

Minisforum N5 Max Price & Release Date

As of April 6, 2026, Minisforum still does not appear to have published an official retail price or a confirmed shipping date for the N5 Max. The company’s March 11 announcement described the system as “to-be-launched,” and contemporaneous reporting also noted that pricing and release timing had not yet been announced. That means the N5 Max remains in a pre-release stage from a commercial point of view, even though the hardware platform, software direction, and much of the specification set are now clearer than they were during the original January CES reveal.

What can be said with more confidence is where the N5 Max is likely to sit within the existing Minisforum NAS range. On Minisforum’s current store listings, the N5 Air is shown at $519 sale price on the official store home page, the base N5 is shown at $599, and the N5 Pro is shown at $959, while no live product listing or price is currently visible there for the N5 Max. Given the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 platform, fixed 128 GB LPDDR5x memory, internal 250 W PSU, and broader AI focused positioning, it is reasonable to expect the N5 Max to land above the N5 Pro rather than alongside it, but until Minisforum formally opens orders or publishes a listing, that remains an informed expectation rather than a confirmed launch price.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Minisforum N5 Max - UPDATEMinisforum N5 AIR NAS ReviewMinisforum N5 AIR NAS ReviewMinisforum Reveal the New MiniMinisforum N5 MAX NAS RevealedMinisforum MS-02 Ultra PC ReviMinisforum MS-02 Ultra ReviewMinisforum MS-02 Ultra - EarlyMinisforum MS-02 Ultra - EarlyAoostar WTR Max NAS vs Minisfo Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Apple n'est pas le seul heureux élu de la mission Artemis II autour de la Lune : les astronautes ont aussi emmené une GoPro HERO4 Black de 2014 dans l'espace. La Nasa a publié de premiers clichés pris avec l'action cam : l'entreprise s'en est félicitée.

Update on the ZimaCube 2 NAS + Your Questions Answered

Following the original ZimaCube and ZimaCube Pro, IceWhale is now preparing the ZimaCube 2 range as a more mature follow-up to its first desktop NAS platform, combining the same broad idea of a compact, open, software-defined personal cloud with clearer attention paid to refinement, validation, and retail readiness. Based on the specifications revealed so far, the standard $799 ZimaCube 2, the $1,299 ZimaCube 2 Pro, and the $2,499 Creator Pack continue to target users who want a turnkey system that still leaves room for alternative operating systems, PCIe expansion, direct Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 connectivity, and mixed storage workloads, but the second generation also arrives in the shadow of the first model’s early issues around cooling, power handling, and hardware compatibility, all of which IceWhale now says informed the redesign. Rather than presenting the ZimaCube 2 as a radically different product category, the company appears to be positioning it as a more stable and better validated version of the same formula, with a stronger base model, revised cooling, closer hardware and software integration, and a retail launch path instead of another crowdfunding campaign.

Remember to use the NASCompares Channel Discount Code: ‘NASCOMPARES50’

Zimacube 2 First Look at the Design

In physical terms, the ZimaCube 2 remains very close to the original system. The listed chassis dimensions are still 240 x 221 x 220 mm, and the overall layout continues to center on a compact desktop enclosure with 6 front-facing drive bays, a removable front panel, and a secondary internal sled for the 7th-bay M.2 storage section. That means this is not a major departure in footprint or format, but rather a continuation of the same small-tower NAS concept that IceWhale introduced with the first ZimaCube generation.

The external build also keeps the same broad industrial approach, with an all-metal enclosure and a design that is intended to be visible on a desk rather than hidden away. Based on the Shenzhen hands-on material, the finish has been revised to a silver tone rather than the darker look associated with earlier models, and there are still decorative touches such as copper-coloured screws and RGB lighting. The magnetic front cover also remains part of the design language, although the hands-on notes suggest that removability is still not especially refined, with no obvious front handle to make access easier.

Internally, the most significant design revision appears to be in thermals rather than structure. The original ZimaCube family drew recurring criticism over cooling behaviour and fan noise, and IceWhale itself later issued optimisation guidance and revised cooling components for early units. On the ZimaCube 2, the cooling assembly appears to have been reworked substantially, with a much larger vapor-chamber style module, extended heatpipe routing, and a direct airflow path toward a rear-mounted fan. In practical terms, this is one of the clearest visible signs that the company is treating thermal control as a first-order design issue rather than a secondary adjustment.

The storage layout remains one of the most recognisable elements of the platform. At the front are 6 SATA bays for 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch drives, while the separate 7th-bay board carries 4 M.2 slots. What has changed is the clarification around performance tiers. Following the post-video corrections, both the standard and Pro use PCIe Gen 4 for the 7th-bay architecture, but the actual throughput differs because of the ASMedia bridge hardware: the standard model is rated for 800MB/s R/W, while the Pro and Creator Pack are rated for 3200MB/s R/W. So although the physical design remains familiar, the storage subsystem is now segmented more clearly by model.

Taken together, the ZimaCube 2’s design changes are best understood as a revision rather than a clean-sheet rethink. The enclosure, bay structure, general scale, and visual concept are all recognisably derived from the earlier ZimaCube, but the thermal hardware, finish, and some of the internal implementation details suggest a product that has been adjusted in response to first-generation feedback. From a design perspective, the main story is not reinvention. It is that IceWhale appears to have revisited the same chassis idea with greater emphasis on cooling headroom, validation, and long-term use as a retail product rather than a first-wave crowdfunded device.

Zimacube 2 Internal Hardware Confirmation

The internal hardware changes are more substantial than the exterior suggests, particularly at the lower end of the range. The standard ZimaCube 2 now moves from the original ZimaCube’s Intel N100 to a 12th Gen Intel Core i3-1215U, giving the base model 6 cores, 8 threads, and a much stronger starting point for mixed storage and application workloads.

The ZimaCube 2 Pro and Creator Pack both use the 12th Gen Intel Core i5-1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads, which keeps the Pro class in the same broad processor tier as the earlier ZimaCube Pro, but still gives the second-generation lineup a more balanced split between entry and higher-tier models. Memory has also shifted upward in platform terms, with DDR5 SODIMM support and upgradeable slots rather than fixed memory, allowing the standard model to start at 8GB, the Pro at 16GB, and the Creator Pack at 64GB.

One of the more important details here is that IceWhale is not presenting the hardware purely as a NAS board with attached storage, but as a compact compute platform that also happens to handle large-scale local storage. The system still uses an internal NVMe SSD for the operating system, with 256GB on the standard and Pro and 1TB on the Creator Pack, while retaining dual PCIe slots on a Mini-ITX based custom board. That means the core platform is still built around expandability, and not just in a theoretical sense. IceWhale continues to point toward GPU cards, AI accelerators, network cards, and SSD-focused upgrades as intended use cases, which places the ZimaCube 2 somewhere between a traditional NAS, a compact home server, and a turnkey prosumer workstation-style storage appliance.

At the same time, the scale of the internal upgrade depends on which earlier model is being used as the reference point. Against the original non-Pro ZimaCube, the jump is obvious: newer CPU class, higher memory ceiling, improved internal segmentation, and a platform that appears better prepared for virtualization, media handling, and direct-attached workloads. Against the original ZimaCube Pro, however, the advance is more limited, because the Pro remains on the same Core i5-1235U family and much of the underlying capability was already present in some form. So while the internal hardware is clearly stronger overall, especially in the standard model, this still reads more as a focused revision of the existing architecture than a complete hardware reset.

Zimacube 2 Final Ports and Connectivity

Externally, the ZimaCube 2 continues to position itself as something broader than a conventional NAS, and the port layout reflects that. On the rear, the standard model includes 2 x 2.5GbE network ports alongside 2 x Thunderbolt 4 or USB4-capable USB-C connections, which gives it both networked and direct-attached workflow options. That matters because IceWhale is still treating direct host connection as one of the platform’s defining features, particularly for users who want local high-speed access without routing everything through standard Ethernet alone. It also keeps the ZimaCube 2 distinct from many turnkey NAS systems that rely almost entirely on network connectivity as the primary access path.

The separation between the standard and Pro models is more visible in networking than in external appearance. The standard ZimaCube 2 is limited to 2 x 2.5GbE, while the ZimaCube 2 Pro adds an additional 10GbE port. That makes the Pro the more complete option for users intending to deploy the system as shared high-speed network storage, while the standard model leans more heavily on its direct-connect Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 story to offset the absence of 10GbE. In practical terms, this is an important distinction, because although both systems look closely related on paper, the network capabilities create a clear difference in how they are likely to be used in creative or multi-user environments.

The rest of the I/O remains relatively conventional but still useful for a system of this class. IceWhale lists 4 x USB-A 3.0 ports, 1 x USB-C 3.0 port, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, and a 3.5mm audio jack, while the internal platform also keeps 2 PCIe expansion slots available for broader configuration. None of these ports alone are unusual, but taken together they reinforce the same point as the rest of the hardware: this is not being framed as a sealed appliance. It is being framed as a turnkey system with room for local expansion, direct attachment, and mixed workload deployment, even if the actual value of that depends on whether the buyer is choosing the standard model’s lower-cost balance or the Pro model’s more complete network specification.

Next, I spent some time with the founder of Icewhale (the company behind the Zimacube and ZimaOS, as well as the popular Zimaboard and Zimablade) and put forward a few questions about the current development of Zimacube 2 and their recent pricing changes to ZimaOS.

What is the ZimaCube 2 bringing to the market that your previous ZimaCube/ZimaCube Pro does not?

Based on the hands-on session and Lauren Pan’s comments, IceWhale is not presenting the ZimaCube 2 as a completely new product category, but rather as a more refined and better balanced version of the same idea. The biggest practical difference is that the standard model is no longer a clearly compromised entry point in the way the original N100-based ZimaCube often appeared next to the first Pro. The move to a Core i3-1215U, DDR5 memory, dual Thunderbolt 4 or USB4, 6 SATA bays, 4 M.2 slots, 2 PCIe slots, and upgradeable SODIMM memory means the base model now looks much closer to the wider prosumer NAS and compact server market, instead of acting mainly as the cheaper route into the ecosystem. That gives the range a stronger starting point and makes the standard unit a more serious option in its own right.

The second major difference is maturity rather than raw specification. IceWhale is tying the ZimaCube 2 more directly to the lessons learned from the first generation, especially around cooling, stability, hardware validation, and closer coordination between hardware and software development. The revised thermal module, the stronger emphasis on compatibility testing, the claim of more OS-level control over system parameters such as fans, and the move away from crowdfunding toward direct retail all suggest that the ZimaCube 2 is intended to arrive as a more settled product. So while the overall concept remains familiar, what IceWhale appears to be bringing to market this time is a more fully developed turnkey platform, not just in hardware terms, but in how the product is being prepared, sold, and supported.

What lessons were learnt in the development of the original ZimaCube that are going to be applied in the development of ZimaCube 2?

The clearest lesson appears to have been that the original ZimaCube needed tighter coordination between hardware and software from the outset. According to Lauren Pan, one of the main internal changes for the second generation is that both teams now work far more closely together, discussing hardware and software details in the same development cycle rather than treating them as separate tracks. In practical terms, that matters because the first-generation platform showed that a NAS or personal cloud product is not defined by hardware alone. It also depends heavily on how well thermals, fan control, storage behaviour, connectivity, and OS-level management are integrated into a single system.

A second lesson concerns validation and first-batch readiness. The original ZimaCube attracted feedback around cooling, fan behaviour, drive compatibility, and power-related issues, and IceWhale now appears to be treating those areas much more seriously in the ZimaCube 2. Pan specifically pointed to a redesigned thermal module, more extensive compatibility testing, and additional work with drive manufacturers such as Seagate and Western Digital after earlier issues emerged. The broader implication is that ZimaCube 2 is being developed less like an experimental first-generation product and more like a revision intended to reduce the kind of early hardware and integration problems that affected the first release.

What was the biggest challenge that you have faced in the development of ZimaCube 2?

According to Lauren Pan, the biggest challenge in developing the ZimaCube 2 was production cost. That answer fits the wider context of the current hardware market, where CPU, memory, SSD, and other component pricing has remained a significant pressure on system builders. In the case of the ZimaCube 2, IceWhale appears to have been trying to hold onto several features that are often reduced or removed in competing products at this price level, including upgradeable SODIMM memory, bundled system storage, dual Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 connectivity, PCIe expansion, and a more substantial cooling solution. So the challenge was not simply making a new box, but doing so while keeping the product within a price band that still looked competitive against other turnkey and semi-DIY NAS systems in 2026.

That issue appears especially relevant to the standard model. IceWhale is trying to position the $799 ZimaCube 2 as a stronger base platform than the original non-Pro unit, while still including a Core i3-1215U, 8GB of DDR5, 256GB of NVMe storage, 6 SATA bays, 4 M.2 slots, and full ZimaOS licensing as part of the package. In that respect, the development challenge seems to have been balancing specification, manufacturability, and margin without moving the product out of reach of the same buyers it is trying to attract. The result is that cost control appears to have shaped not just pricing, but also the way IceWhale talks about the ZimaCube 2 as a price versus performance compromise rather than an attempt to maximise specifications at any cost.

What has the user response been to your switch towards a free/paid $29 model of your ZimaOS software since the announcement?

According to Lauren Pan, the response to the move from a fully free model to the current free tier plus $29 lifetime ZimaOS+ model has been mixed, but not unexpected. Some community members were confused by the change or felt the software should have remained fully free, while others accepted that the platform needed a sustainable business model if development was going to continue over the long term.

That split is fairly typical for software that begins as a no-cost offering and later introduces paid licensing, particularly when it has built much of its reputation through community use, testing, and feedback. In IceWhale’s case, the company’s position is that the low-cost lifetime fee is intended to make the software commercially sustainable without undermining its accessibility.

IceWhale has also tried to frame the pricing change as part of a broader community model rather than just a revenue switch. Pan said the company had explained the reasoning publicly in late 2025 and described a plan under which 33% of license revenue would be directed back toward community contributors, including moderators, app maintainers, and users helping support the wider ZimaOS and CasaOS ecosystem.

Whether that model proves sustainable over time remains to be seen, but the immediate point is that IceWhale does not appear to be treating the $29 fee as a traditional software upsell. Instead, it is presenting it as a low-cost, lifetime contribution intended to keep development active while maintaining a relatively low barrier to entry compared with other paid NAS software platforms.

Will ZimaCube 2 be headed for crowdfunding, or direct to traditional retail?

IceWhale says the ZimaCube 2 is going direct to traditional retail rather than returning to crowdfunding. In Lauren Pan’s explanation, Kickstarter is something the company now sees as useful in 2 specific cases: either when a product concept still needs market validation, or when production costs are high enough that outside funding is needed to get the first batch built. IceWhale’s position is that the original ZimaCube fit that earlier stage of the company, when the product was more expensive to bring to market and the business itself was still proving demand for this kind of home server and personal cloud hardware. With the ZimaCube 2, the company appears to believe it no longer needs crowdfunding for either of those reasons.

That change is also part of the wider message around the second generation. Moving straight to store-based pre-orders gives the impression that IceWhale wants the ZimaCube 2 to be seen less as an experimental or community-funded device and more as a normal retail product. Pan also described the early response as active, with roughly 200 to 300 community applications tied to testing and usage scenarios, suggesting that demand discovery is now happening around a product that already exists, rather than one still needing crowdfunding to justify its creation. In practical terms, the retail-first approach supports IceWhale’s broader attempt to position the ZimaCube 2 as a more mature follow-up to the first generation.

The NASCompares Conclusion and Verdict so Far on ZimaCube 2

Taken as a whole, the ZimaCube 2 looks less like a dramatic reinvention of the original platform and more like a deliberate correction and refinement of it. The overall chassis concept, storage layout, and broader product identity remain familiar, but IceWhale appears to have focused this second generation on the areas that mattered most after the first release: a stronger base model, revised thermals, closer hardware and software coordination, more validation around compatibility, and a direct retail launch rather than another crowdfunding cycle. That means the scale of change is uneven depending on which earlier model it is compared against, but the direction is clear enough. The ZimaCube 2 does not appear to be trying to replace the original with a wholly different vision. Instead, it looks like IceWhale is trying to turn the ZimaCube formula into a more complete and commercially mature turnkey platform, with ZimaOS, direct Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 connectivity, PCIe expansion, and hybrid storage still forming the core of its appeal.

Remember to use the NASCompares Channel Discount Code: ‘NASCOMPARES50’

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...ZimaCube 2 First Look + Q&A wiZimacube 2 NAS Revealed – EvZimacube 2 NAS Revealed - EverZimaCube Pro NAS ReviewZimaCube Pro NAS ReviewThe Zimacube NAS Prototype EarThe Zimacube NAS Teardown (EarThe ZimaCube NAS Kickstarter -The ZimaCube 6-bay NAS RevealeThe ZimaCube NAS - New Kicksta Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Minisforum N5 AIR NAS Review – A Lighter Better Way?

Minisforum entered the NAS market in Summer 2025 with the N5 and N5 Pro, 2 closely related 5 bay systems that stood out for combining a compact desktop form factor with relatively high-end AMD hardware, 10GbE plus 5GbE networking, and less common expansion features such as OCuLink and a PCIe slot. Between the 2, the N5 Pro drew more attention for its Ryzen AI CPU and ECC memory support, while the standard N5 was generally the more accessible option because it retained most of the same chassis design and connectivity at a much lower entry price. That first generation also established the basic identity of the range, namely a compact 5 bay NAS platform aimed more at prosumer and homelab users than at the usual entry-level turnkey NAS audience (albeit, with some bumps along the road in the first wave of devices – more on that in a bit).

The N5 Air now appears to take over that lower tier position in the lineup, sitting beneath the N5 Pro and alongside the higher end N5 Max that Minisforum previewed more recently. In practical terms, the N5 Air does not radically change the formula of the original N5, because it keeps the same Ryzen 7 255 CPU class, the same broad 5 bay plus NVMe storage approach, and the same expansion-minded design philosophy. What it changes is the balance of cost, materials, and positioning. The result is a system that looks intended to preserve the strengths of the original N5 platform while making the entry point slightly lower and the product identity within the range a little clearer.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Quick Conclusion

The Minisforum N5 Air is best viewed as a lower-cost refinement of the original N5 rather than a major new generation. It keeps the same core strengths that made the 2025 N5 notable, including a compact 5 bay design, Ryzen 7 255 CPU, Radeon 780M graphics, 10GbE plus 5GbE networking, 3x internal NVMe slots, OCuLink, and a PCIe x16 physical slot running at PCIe 4.0 x4, which still gives it a broader hardware feature set than many similarly sized NAS systems. The main changes are in positioning and materials, with a lighter plastic-led chassis, a more practical matte finish, and a lower entry price, making it easier to see as the current entry point in the N5 family. Storage flexibility remains one of its strongest points, with 5 SATA bays for bulk capacity and 3 NVMe slots for cache, containers, VMs, or faster working storage, while the slide-out internal design and socketed DDR5 memory up to 96 GB help keep the platform user-serviceable and upgrade-friendly. Performance appears solid for the class, with enough CPU and storage headroom for multi-hundred MB/s file operations, easy saturation of 10GbE from NVMe storage, reasonable idle power draw for an AMD-based NAS, and enough media capability for direct playback and general multimedia duties, even if AMD still lacks the same simple transcoding appeal as Intel in some setups.

The weaker side remains MinisCloud OS, which is functional and includes ZFS snapshots, compression, Docker, remote access, media tools, and mobile apps, but still does not feel as polished or mature as the hardware deserves, making the N5 Air easier to justify as a hardware-first purchase than as a fully rounded turnkey NAS appliance. That distinction matters, because buyers planning to use TrueNAS, Unraid, or another third-party NAS OS will likely find the value proposition much stronger than buyers expecting a highly refined out-of-box software experience. There is also some broader platform context, as early N5 and N5 Pro units drew user discussion online around first-wave storage and controller-related issues on some systems, though later production appeared more stable and there is no basis to treat that as a confirmed N5 Air problem. Overall, the N5 Air is a practical and well-specified NAS platform that retains most of what made the original N5 relevant, and while it is not the most polished turnkey NAS in software terms, it remains a strong option for users who prioritise compact size, flexible storage, multi-gig networking, and expansion over software maturity alone.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 8/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 8/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.2

PROS

5 bay SATA design in a relatively compact desktop footprint, in a space you would normamlly find 4x SATA
3x internal NVMe slots for cache, apps, VMs, or faster storage tiers
10GbE + 5GbE networking included as standard
PCIe x16 physical expansion slot wired at PCIe 4.0 x4
OCuLink support for external PCIe or eGPU expansion
User-upgradeable DDR5 SO-DIMM memory up to 96 GB
Lower entry price than the earlier N5 while keeping most of the same core hardware
Slide-out internal design makes memory and SSD upgrades easier than on many compact NAS systems
 Change in design has resulted in a price drop vs the original N5 Model and noticably cheaper than N5 Pro (2025)

CONS

MinisCloud OS still feels unfinished compared with more established NAS software platforms
Plastic-led chassis may be seen as a downgrade in build feel versus the earlier metal-heavy N5 design
No ECC memory support, unlike the N5 Pro
Included 64 GB OS drive occupies part of the internal SSD footprint

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Design & Storage

At a glance, the N5 Air remains very close to the chassis concept established by the earlier N5 and N5 Pro. It uses the same compact 199 × 202 × 252 mm footprint, the same 5 bay desktop layout, and the same slide-out internal assembly that allows access to memory, NVMe storage, and internal expansion without dismantling the whole enclosure. That layout still makes the system easier to service than many compact NAS designs in this size class, particularly for users who expect to upgrade memory or flash storage after purchase. Minisforum has kept the internal structure largely unchanged, so the Air still feels more like a revision of an existing platform than a ground-up redesign.

The main physical change is in the external construction. Where the earlier N5 and N5 Pro leaned more heavily on a metal outer shell, the N5 Air shifts to a more plastic-heavy chassis and a revised front finish. That change reduces the quoted weight from 5 kg to 4 kg, which is significant in relative terms for a desktop NAS of this size, but it also changes the character of the system.

The original front panel treatment on the N5 generation was prone to showing fingerprints quite easily, so the move to a more matte presentation is arguably more practical. At the same time, the change away from a more metal-heavy enclosure may lead some buyers to question long-term thermals and overall build perception, even if the basic form factor remains the same.

In storage terms, the N5 Air continues to offer 5 SATA drive bays for 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch media, with Minisforum quoting support for up to 30 TB per bay and a total raw HDD capacity of up to 150 TB. Alongside that, it includes 3 internal M.2 NVMe slots, with a claimed ceiling of up to 8 TB per slot, taking total flash capacity to a further 24 TB. As with the earlier N5 platform, the design is clearly intended to separate bulk storage and faster flash tiers in a flexible way, whether that is for caching, containers, VMs, or all-flash working datasets alongside larger HDD pools. The preinstalled 64 GB OS storage also occupies 1 of those internal SSD positions, which remains a practical inclusion for a turnkey setup but does still consume part of the internal flash footprint.

Minisforum continues to position the N5 Air around mixed media deployment and ZFS-oriented storage management, with support listed for RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5 or RAIDZ1, RAID 6 or RAIDZ2, snapshots, and LZ4 compression within MinisCloud OS. The system is therefore being presented less as a fixed-purpose home NAS and more as a compact storage platform that can be adapted for archive storage, media serving, backup tasks, and lighter virtualization.

It is also worth noting, as platform context rather than as a direct criticism of this model, that some early N5 and N5 Pro units drew user complaints online around SATA-side stability and storage behavior under certain workloads, although those reports appeared inconsistent across users and later production units seemed to fare better. That background does not confirm any equivalent issue on the N5 Air, but it remains part of the lineage around this hardware family.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Internal Hardware

The N5 Air is built around the AMD Ryzen 7 255, an 8-core, 16-thread processor with boost up to 4.9 GHz and a stated 45 W to 55 W operating range. In practical terms, this places it in the same compute tier as the original N5 rather than the N5 Pro, which used the more capable Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. That distinction matters because the N5 Air is not trying to move upmarket on raw CPU throughput. Instead, it keeps the same general processing profile as the earlier standard model, which is still relatively strong for a 5 bay NAS in this size class and substantially above the level of entry ARM or Intel N100 based systems.

Graphics are handled by the integrated Radeon 780M, again matching the original N5 and sitting below the Radeon 890M found in the Pro model. For NAS duties, that matters less in terms of display output and more in relation to media handling, accelerated workloads, and light edge compute. Minisforum continues to market the platform around AI-adjacent use cases, Docker deployments, and media serving, but the Air is clearly the more modest version of that vision. It can still support eGPU expansion over OCuLink and accepts a PCIe add-in card internally, so the compute story here is less about the onboard silicon alone and more about the range of hardware paths the system leaves open.

Memory remains user-upgradeable through 2 DDR5 SO-DIMM slots with support for up to 96 GB at 5600 MT/s, but unlike the N5 Pro there is no ECC support listed. That keeps the Air aligned with the original N5 and preserves one of the more important practical differences between the standard and Pro classes. In a market where some newer compact NAS systems are moving toward soldered memory, Minisforum retaining socketed DDR5 remains relevant because it gives buyers flexibility over cost and capacity at the point of purchase and later on. That said, buyers specifically looking for ECC-backed storage integrity or heavier VM density will still view the N5 Pro as the more appropriate tier in the lineup.

From a platform perspective, the N5 Air also appears to keep the same broad internal topology as the earlier N5 generation, including the split NVMe lane arrangement and the dedicated SATA controller architecture behind the 5 drive bays. That continuity is useful for understanding where the Air sits, but it also means some of the discussion around the earlier units still forms part of the background. In particular, some first-wave N5 and N5 Pro users reported online issues around controller behavior, power management, and storage-side stability under certain operating conditions, although those reports did not appear universal and later units seemed to be less affected. For the N5 Air, the important point is not to assume the same fault is present, but to recognise that this is still an evolution of an existing hardware platform rather than a completely new internal design.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Ports and Connections

The N5 Air keeps the same broad external I/O philosophy as the earlier N5 and N5 Pro, which is to say it offers a level of connectivity that is notably more flexible than most compact 5 bay NAS systems in this price bracket. On the rear, it includes 1x 10GbE RJ45 port, 1x 5GbE RJ45 port, 1x OCuLink port, 1x HDMI 2.1 output, 1x USB4 port, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 port, and 1x USB 2.0 port. On the front, there is an additional USB4 port and a further USB 3.2 Gen 2 port. Taken together, that gives the Air a more workstation-like I/O profile than a conventional closed NAS appliance.

Networking remains one of the more important features of the system. The N5 Air uses a 10GbE port based on the Realtek RTL8127 and a 5GbE port based on the Realtek RTL8126. Compared with the earlier N5 and N5 Pro, which paired the 5GbE port with Realtek but often used an AQC113 controller for 10GbE, this means the Air moves to a more consistent dual-Realtek controller setup. Functionally, the headline remains the same, namely that the system can support multi-gig client access well beyond standard 2.5GbE NAS territory, whether for direct workstation links, faster switch uplinks, or more demanding shared file workloads.

The USB4 and OCuLink support continue to define the range more than any of the USB-A ports do. Minisforum still positions the USB4 implementation not just as a display or peripheral connection, but also as part of direct host connectivity and higher speed external workflows. Alongside that, OCuLink remains unusual in a NAS at this level and gives the system a route toward external PCIe-based expansion such as eGPU support or other bandwidth-sensitive devices. Internally, the machine also retains a PCIe x16 physical slot wired at PCIe 4.0 x4, which means the external I/O is only part of the expansion story, not the whole of it.

Video output support is also unchanged in broad terms, with HDMI and USB4 both listed for high resolution display output, including up to 8K at 60 Hz or 4K at 144 Hz. For most NAS buyers this will not be a deciding factor in itself, but it does align with Minisforum’s attempt to present the N5 family as more than simple storage boxes. The Air can be used as a direct-attached media endpoint, a light desktop-style appliance, or a hybrid storage and compute system in ways that many traditional NAS systems do not attempt. Whether that added flexibility is necessary will depend on the deployment, but in terms of raw connectivity the N5 Air remains unusually well equipped for its class.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Noise, Heat, Power Use and Speed Tests

In testing, the N5 Air broadly behaves as expected for a NAS built around the same Ryzen 7 255 platform as the earlier N5. In day to day storage tasks, its behaviour is less defined by the CPU alone and more by the mix of storage media and network configuration being used. With HDD storage in place, the system was able to deliver around 650 MB/s read and roughly 500 to 525 MB/s write in RAID-based testing with 4 Seagate 4 TB drives, which is consistent with a multi-bay SATA array operating below the ceiling of the available 10GbE connection. When the system was tested with SATA SSDs instead, throughput moved closer to 800 MB/s in both directions, showing that the platform itself is not especially constrained at the CPU level in routine NAS workloads.

The internal NVMe storage naturally sits above that level and has little difficulty saturating the 10GbE interface. That is not especially surprising given the lane arrangement already seen in the earlier N5 generation, but it does reinforce the intended role of the 3 M.2 slots inside the Air. Used as fast working storage, cache, or application space, those slots allow the system to do more than simply serve as a 5 bay archive NAS. At the same time, buyers should remain realistic about the PCIe layout, because while the presence of 3 NVMe slots is useful, the available bandwidth is still split across x1, x1, and x2 links rather than full x4 across all slots. For NAS tasks that is generally acceptable, but it remains a design tradeoff rather than a fully unrestricted flash platform.

On acoustics and thermals, the N5 Air appears reasonably controlled. With SATA SSDs used to remove the variable of mechanical drive noise, idle noise was reported at around 35 to 38 dBA, while under higher CPU load and more aggressive fan settings this rose to around 46 to 48 dBA. Those figures place it in a fairly typical range for a compact performance-oriented desktop NAS, though not a silent one. Thermal imaging during testing showed mostly moderate external surface temperatures, generally in the high 20s to high 30s Celsius depending on area, which suggests that the cooling design remains broadly competent despite the move from a more metal-heavy chassis to a lighter plastic-led enclosure. Even so, the long-term thermal behaviour of the plastic revision is something that only extended real-world use will fully answer.

Power draw is one of the more practical areas where the N5 Air remains competitive. With SATA SSDs installed and the system otherwise idle, power use was around 26 to 27 W, rising to around 81 to 83 W under full CPU load. As always, those figures need context because populated HDD bays will raise the baseline by several watts per drive, especially with larger enterprise-class disks. Still, the base system draw is reasonable for this class of AMD-based NAS. In performance terms, media playback also looked acceptable for direct play workloads, with an 8K 60 fps test file reportedly using only around 9 to 11 percent CPU in playback, though transcoding remains a less clear-cut strength on AMD than on current Intel NAS platforms. The practical reading is that the N5 Air has enough performance for file serving, containers, lighter VMs, and media duties, but it is the storage and expansion balance that defines it more than any single benchmark figure.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Miniscloud OS NAS Software

The N5 Air ships with MinisCloud OS preinstalled on the included 64 GB system SSD, continuing Minisforum’s approach of treating the software stack as part of the out-of-box experience rather than expecting every buyer to start immediately with a third-party NAS OS. In practical terms, the platform remains centred on a ZFS-based storage model with built-in snapshots, LZ4 compression, multi-user account separation, remote access features, and container deployment. The interface is available across desktop, mobile, and local system access, and it is clearly intended to present the N5 Air as a turnkey NAS rather than only as bare hardware for TrueNAS, Unraid, or OpenMediaVault users.

In general use, MinisCloud OS appears functional but still not especially mature. Core tasks such as pool creation, snapshot management, file access, user permissions, and backup jobs are present and reasonably straightforward to work through, but the overall design still lacks the consistency seen in more established NAS platforms. Different parts of the interface can feel as though they were developed with different design priorities, and the result is a system that works in broad terms without always feeling cohesive. That does not make it unusable, but it does make it harder to treat the software as a primary buying reason in the same way buyers might with Synology DSM or QNAP QTS.

The feature set itself is relatively broad on paper. MinisCloud OS includes Docker deployment, VM tools, AI-assisted photo indexing, media playback, Time Machine support, remote sharing, and mobile-led backup functions, along with HDMI output management for local media use. Some of these features are more convincing than others.

The mobile application appears more polished and coherent than the desktop client in several areas, and basic backup or file access tasks seem better aligned there. By contrast, some system-level controls still feel incomplete, with examples including missing fan control in software, uneven interface presentation, and gaps around security and broader service maturity that make the platform feel like an actively developing beta rather than a fully settled NAS OS.

That remains the main software conclusion for the N5 Air just as it was for the earlier N5 and N5 Pro. MinisCloud OS is useful as an included baseline and may be enough for buyers who want simple storage, remote access, and a handful of bundled services without much setup effort.

However, it still feels secondary to the hardware rather than central to the value of the product. Most buyers considering this system are likely to be doing so because of the chassis, networking, expansion, and CPU platform first, with the included OS treated as a starting point rather than the final destination.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The Minisforum N5 Air does not substantially reinvent the N5 formula, but that appears to be a deliberate choice rather than a limitation in itself. In hardware terms, it keeps most of what made the original N5 relevant, including the Ryzen 7 255 platform, 5 bay storage layout, 3 NVMe slots, 10GbE plus 5GbE networking, OCuLink support, and the internal PCIe expansion slot. What has changed is mostly around materials, controller choices, and pricing. The move to a lighter plastic-led chassis and a revised front finish helps separate it physically from the earlier model, while the controller revisions and lower asking price make it easier to position as the more accessible member of the current range. In that sense, the N5 Air is best understood as a practical rework of the standard N5 rather than a major new generation, and for many buyers that may be enough.

That said, the balance of this system depends heavily on what the buyer expects from it. The hardware remains the strongest part of the package, particularly for users who value expandability, multi-gig networking, and a compact chassis that does more than a conventional 5 bay NAS in the same price range. At the same time, the software side still feels less mature than the hardware deserves, and the shift away from the older metal-heavy chassis may not appeal to everyone. Buyers planning to install a third-party NAS OS will likely view the N5 Air as a strong value-oriented platform with relatively few direct alternatives at this size and price. Buyers looking for a polished turnkey NAS with refined software, longer platform maturity, and fewer open questions may take a more cautious view. Overall, the N5 Air is a capable and well-specified NAS platform with a clear use case, but it remains easier to recommend on hardware merits than as a fully rounded appliance.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Minisforum N5 Max - UPDATE & NMinisforum N5 Max - UPDATEMinisforum N5 AIR NAS ReviewMinisforum Reveal the New MiniMinisforum N5 MAX NAS RevealedAoostar WTR Max NAS vs MinisfoMinisforum N5 vs Aoostar WTR MMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewWeek 17 Tech Roundup – Lenov Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

ZimaCube 2 NAS Announced – Bigger? Better? The Same?

IceWhale’s original ZimaCube and ZimaCube Pro established the company’s move beyond compact single-board servers and into desktop NAS hardware aimed at prosumers, creators, and home lab users. The standard ZimaCube launched at $699 with an Intel N100, while the ZimaCube Pro raised the ceiling with an Intel Core i5-1235U, 10GbE, Thunderbolt 4, faster 7th-bay M.2 performance, and broader appeal for heavier workloads. Both systems were positioned less as closed NAS appliances and more as flexible personal cloud platforms, with ZimaOS pre-installed and support for alternative operating systems such as TrueNAS, Unraid, Proxmox, pfSense, and Linux distributions. As with many crowdfunded hardware products, the first generation also required some early post-launch refinement, particularly around areas such as fan behaviour, thermal tuning, and broader system optimisation, which was reflected in community support discussions and early optimisation guidance from IceWhale.

Remember to use the NASCompares Channel Discount Code: ‘NASCOMPARES50’

The newly revealed ZimaCube 2 family builds directly on that same idea, but with a clearer emphasis on higher-performance local storage, hybrid workloads, and hardware expansion. The new range starts with the $799 ZimaCube 2 Standard, moves to the $1,299 ZimaCube 2 Pro, and extends to a $2,499 Creator Pack that adds 64GB of memory, 1TB of SSD storage, and an NVIDIA RTX Pro 2000 GPU. Based on the specifications revealed so far, IceWhale is positioning this generation as a more capable platform for media serving, virtualization, containers, AI-assisted workloads, and direct-attached creative workflows, while continuing to stress open hardware, multi-OS support, and the absence of ecosystem lock-in. Unlike the first ZimaCube generation, which began as a Kickstarter-era product, the ZimaCube 2 line is already being presented through standard pre-order retail channels ahead of its expected March 30 shipment window.

ZimaCube 2 – Design & Storage

From a design standpoint, the ZimaCube 2 family appears to retain the same broad desktop form factor as the earlier models, with listed dimensions of 240 x 221 x 220 mm. IceWhale is continuing with the same general visual approach: a compact metal chassis, magnetic front panel, and a visible RGB lighting element rather than the more utilitarian styling used by many conventional NAS systems. The company is also still presenting the system as something intended to sit on a desk rather than be hidden away, which places equal weight on appearance, acoustics, and accessibility alongside storage capacity.

The storage layout remains one of the more distinctive parts of the design. As before, the system uses a 6-bay SATA arrangement for 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch drives, but it is paired with a separate 7th-bay expansion structure built around 4 M.2 slots.

IceWhale continues to frame this as a hybrid storage design, separating bulk-capacity HDD storage from faster solid-state tiers for cache, active project data, applications, or virtualised workloads. In practical terms, that gives the ZimaCube 2 a broader remit than a basic backup NAS, since it is being positioned to handle both long-term storage and higher-speed local workloads within the same enclosure.

What is different in this generation is less the physical layout itself and more the way IceWhale is defining its purpose. The company is now pushing the 6+4 architecture more explicitly as a tiered storage platform for creators, self-hosters, and home lab users, with references to 164TB+ capacity, active “hot zone” NVMe storage, and room for long-term archive duties. That said, the overall storage philosophy is still familiar rather than radically new: the ZimaCube 2 appears to refine and repackage an existing concept instead of introducing a fundamentally different chassis or bay arrangement. The main change is that IceWhale is placing greater emphasis on workflow separation, SSD acceleration, and long-term expandability than it did with the original launch material.

ZimaCube 2 – Internal Hardware

Internally, the ZimaCube 2 range is split more clearly than the first generation. The base ZimaCube 2 moves to an Intel Core i3-1215U with 8GB of DDR5 memory, while the ZimaCube 2 Pro uses an Intel Core i5-1235U with 16GB of DDR5. At the top end, the Creator Pack keeps the same Core i5 platform but adds 64GB of memory, 1TB of NVMe storage, and a discrete NVIDIA RTX Pro 2000. That gives IceWhale a broader spread than before, from an entry configuration that is still positioned above the original N100-based ZimaCube to a much more workstation-like variant aimed at GPU-assisted workloads.

The wider platform also reflects a shift in how IceWhale wants these systems to be used. The first ZimaCube family already supported alternative operating systems, containers, media serving, and some expansion, but the ZimaCube 2 line places far more emphasis on concurrent mixed workloads. IceWhale is explicitly framing the hardware around virtual machines, Docker containers, AI tools, real-time media handling, and direct high-speed project access, which explains the move to newer mobile Intel processors, DDR5 memory, and a more aggressive expansion story. In that sense, the second generation is less a conventional NAS refresh and more an attempt to position the product as a compact storage server with broader compute utility.

In practical terms, the main difference is not clock speed, since both chips top out at 4.40GHz, but core count and thread count. The i5-1235U adds 4 more Efficient cores, 4 more threads, and 2MB more cache, which should make it noticeably better suited to heavier multitasking, containers, background services, and mixed NAS plus VM workloads.

At the same time, the headline changes need to be read carefully. The ZimaCube 2 Pro remains on the same Core i5-1235U class processor as the previous ZimaCube Pro, so not every model represents a major CPU leap. The more meaningful changes are in how the range is tiered, the addition of a pre-configured GPU-equipped Creator Pack, and the clearer effort to make higher-end use cases part of the official positioning rather than secondary possibilities. For buyers comparing model to model, the internal hardware story is therefore partly about real platform flexibility and partly about IceWhale packaging familiar capabilities into more defined product tiers.

ZimaCube 2 – Ports & Connections

The connectivity story is one of the clearer areas where IceWhale is trying to separate the ZimaCube 2 family from entry-level NAS hardware. Across the new range, the headline feature is the inclusion of 2 rear Thunderbolt 4 or USB4-class USB-C connections rated at 40Gbps on both the standard and Pro tier, which IceWhale is positioning for direct Mac or PC attachment as well as high-speed external expansion. That is a notable distinction from many mainstream NAS products, which typically rely on Ethernet alone for primary high-speed access. Here, IceWhale is clearly trying to support both networked storage use and direct-attached workflow scenarios from the same box.

Networking is also relatively strong on paper. Based on the revealed specifications, the ZimaCube 2 family includes 2 x Intel i226 2.5GbE ports and 1 x Marvell AQC113 10GbE port exclusively on the Pro model. In practical terms, that allows for several deployment options, including direct multi-gig connections, use as a higher-speed shared storage node, or separation of management and data traffic. For users comparing it with the previous generation, the main point is that higher-end network capability now appears to be treated as a core part of the wider ZimaCube 2 platform rather than something reserved only for the Pro model.

The rest of the external I/O is fairly conventional but functional. IceWhale lists 4 x USB-A 3.0 ports, 1 x USB-C 3.0 port, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, and a 3.5mm audio jack. Combined with the PCIe expansion support inside the chassis, that gives the platform a broader connection profile than a typical sealed NAS appliance. Even so, the real significance here is not any single port in isolation, but the fact that IceWhale continues to present the ZimaCube 2 as a hybrid device that sits somewhere between a NAS, a small server, and a compact workstation-class storage platform.

ZimaCube 2 vs ZimaCube 1 – What Has Changed?

The biggest change is at the bottom of the range. The original ZimaCube was built around Intel’s N100, DDR4 memory, Gen 3 expansion, and 2 x 2.5GbE, which made it the more basic model in the lineup. By contrast, the new ZimaCube 2 raises the baseline to a Core i3-1215U with DDR5 memory, while keeping the same overall 6-bay chassis concept and hybrid storage approach. That is a meaningful improvement in entry-level compute capability, but it does not completely remove the gap between standard and Pro variants, since the non-Pro ZimaCube 2 still stops at 2 x 2.5GbE and does not gain the extra 10GbE port.

The Pro side is a more mixed story. The original ZimaCube Pro already offered a Core i5-1235U, DDR5, 10GbE, Thunderbolt 4, and faster M.2 performance in the 7th bay, so the ZimaCube 2 Pro does not represent the same kind of obvious jump seen on the standard model. In CPU terms, it appears to stay in essentially the same class, which makes this look more like a product refinement than a full hardware reset. IceWhale is clearly pushing the second generation more aggressively toward creator workflows, virtualization, AI-related use cases, and direct-attached high-speed storage, but that broader messaging should not be mistaken for a major leap in every core hardware area.

That leaves the ZimaCube 2 generation looking unevenly improved depending on which model is being compared. The standard ZimaCube 2 is substantially more capable than the first non-Pro system, while the ZimaCube 2 Pro looks more like a cleaner, more retail-ready continuation of what the first Pro already set out to do. The new Creator Pack is the main addition that materially changes the shape of the lineup, since it introduces a pre-configured GPU-equipped option rather than leaving that path entirely to user expansion. So while IceWhale is presenting the ZimaCube 2 family as a broader second-generation platform, the actual extent of change varies quite sharply between the base and Pro tiers.

ZimaOS – The Software that is included with the ZimaCube 2 (Is it actually any good?)

ZimaOS is IceWhale’s Linux-based NAS operating system, developed out of the earlier CasaOS foundation and originally tied closely to the ZimaCube hardware before becoming available more broadly as a standalone platform. In practical terms, its main appeal is that it tries to lower the barrier to entry for first-time NAS users without stripping away too much of the flexibility expected from a self-hosted system. Based on the information provided, the software combines a browser-based management interface with a dedicated Zima Client application for desktop and mobile, giving it a more guided and consumer-facing feel than many free NAS operating systems.

Installation appears relatively straightforward, using a standard image-writing process and USB boot method, and the platform is light enough to run on modest boot media rather than requiring a large dedicated SSD. The interface focuses heavily on accessibility: native file browsing, straightforward share creation, basic RAID setup, network management, cloud and LAN storage integration, drive mapping, local backup jobs, and remote access are all presented in a simplified GUI rather than being heavily dependent on command line work. That simplicity is one of its clearest points of distinction from platforms such as TrueNAS and OpenMediaVault, which can offer deeper storage control but are often more intimidating to less experienced users.

At the same time, ZimaOS is not being positioned as a stripped-down toy platform. IceWhale is clearly treating it as a full software layer for a turnkey NAS or personal cloud deployment, with support for app containers, developer mode, SSH access, SMB sharing, Time Machine compatibility, AI-assisted semantic search, and direct Thunderbolt connectivity on supported hardware. The client application is also an important part of the package, since it extends the platform beyond simple browser access by adding local discovery, mapped access, backup synchronisation, and peer-to-peer file transfer in a way that many free NAS platforms do not include by default.

However, the software still has some visible limits: configuration depth remains lighter than enterprise-oriented rivals, some features appear to be more polished than others, and direct Thunderbolt or USB4 support may still depend heavily on driver compatibility and the exact hardware being used. Its RAID tools are deliberately simple, but do not currently match the flexibility of more mature systems in areas such as mixed-drive storage schemes.

Pricing also shows how IceWhale is segmenting the platform in 2026: the base ZimaOS Free tier includes core features, the Zima Client for mobile and PC, Thunderbolt support, developer mode, support for up to 4 disks, and 3 members, while ZimaOS+ adds unlimited disks and unlimited users for a $29 lifetime license (to confirm, any ZimaCube, Zimaboard and ZimaBlade device includes the lifetime license). Taken together, ZimaOS appears to sit in a useful middle ground: more approachable than many traditional NAS operating systems, more complete than many lightweight hobbyist options, and increasingly viable both as bundled software for ZimaCube hardware and as a standalone OS for low-cost custom systems.

ZimaCube 2 – Worth it? Price and Release Date?

Taken at face value, the ZimaCube 2 family looks more like a measured revision of the original concept than a major generational leap. Compared with the first ZimaCube, there are clear upgrades in entry-level processor choice, memory platform, expansion framing, and product segmentation, but the broader structure remains very familiar. The unchanged chassis dimensions, continued 6-bay plus 7th-bay layout, and the fact that the Pro model remains in essentially the same CPU class as before all make this feel closer to the kind of 2 to 3 year refresh cycle often seen from established turnkey NAS vendors such as Synology and QNAP, rather than a wholly new platform that significantly expands the portfolio or redefines what the product is.

That said, this does not make the ZimaCube 2 underwhelming in absolute terms. Even if the scale of change appears evolutionary rather than transformative, it is still a notably well-equipped system on paper, with ZimaOS included, direct Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 connectivity, PCIe expansion, hybrid storage flexibility, and a full hardware and software turnkey approach that many DIY alternatives do not offer in one package. The result is a platform that may not radically depart from the first ZimaCube’s formula, but still presents a relatively complete and capable storage server solution for users who want open deployment options without having to assemble and integrate everything themselves.

In pricing terms, IceWhale is placing the ZimaCube 2 range above the original entry model but still within the upper end of the prosumer NAS and compact server market. The ZimaCube 2 starts at $799, the ZimaCube 2 Pro rises to $1,299, and the Creator Pack reaches $2,499 with its added GPU, memory, and larger SSD allocation. That means the new range is not being introduced as a low-cost disruption, but rather as a more fully specified turnkey platform aimed at users who want performance, flexibility, and direct connectivity in a single package. IceWhale is currently listing the systems as pre-orders, with shipping expected to begin from March 30, suggesting that the second generation is being brought to market through a more conventional retail path than the original crowdfunding-led launch.

Remember to use the NASCompares Channel Discount Code: ‘NASCOMPARES50’

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...ZimaCube 2 Design Update + Q&AZimaCube 2 First Look + Q&A wiZimacube 2 NAS Revealed - EverZimaCube Pro NAS ReviewZimaCube Pro NAS ReviewThe Zimacube NAS Prototype EarThe Zimacube NAS Teardown (EarThe ZimaCube NAS Kickstarter -The ZimaCube 6-bay NAS RevealeThe ZimaCube NAS - New Kicksta Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE    

WE LOVE COFFEE

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

     

Aoostar WTR Max… but with an Intel i5 Now

The Aoostar WTR Max Intel version is best understood, at least at this stage, as an early preview of a known NAS design rather than a finished retail product. The unit sent to me appears to retain the same general WTR Max concept as the earlier 2025 model, built around a compact 6-bay SATA layout plus 5 M.2 NVMe slots, while replacing the Ryzen 7 8845HS used in the current WTR Max 8845 with Intel’s Core i5-1235U. That CPU change is significant because these 2 processors target different kinds of systems: the Ryzen 7 8845HS is an 8-core, 16-thread chip with a 45W default TDP and boost speeds up to 5.1GHz, whereas the Core i5-1235U is a 10-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-U part with 2 performance cores, 8 efficiency cores, a 15W processor base power, and a launch date going back to Q1 2022. On paper, that makes the Intel version a potentially more efficiency-focused or cost-focused variation of the same platform, rather than a direct step up from the AMD model. That distinction matters, because this is not yet a product with confirmed pricing, confirmed availability, or a final release timetable, so the more useful question at this stage is not whether it definitively replaces the existing WTR Max 8845, but whether Aoostar is preparing to turn this chassis into a broader platform with multiple hardware tiers built around different CPUs and buyer priorities.

If this version works as intended, its appeal is fairly easy to understand even before full launch details are known. The original WTR Max formula already stands out because it combines high drive density, modern external connectivity, and small-footprint DIY NAS flexibility in a way that relatively few systems currently do, and an Intel alternative could broaden that appeal for buyers who prefer Intel media features, lower-power mobile silicon, or simply a lower entry point than the Ryzen-based model if Aoostar prices it accordingly. At the same time, this remains a first look at hardware provided by the brand, not a final buying recommendation. Until Aoostar confirms retail positioning, regional availability, and exact specifications for this Intel edition, it makes more sense to treat the device as an interesting platform variation with clear practical potential, rather than a confirmed replacement for the existing AMD version already listed by Aoostar at $669 in its current storefront

Aoostar WTR Max Intel Version – Storage

The storage layout appears to be unchanged from the earlier WTR Max 8845 design. Physically, this platform combines 6 SATA drive bays with 5 M.2 2280 NVMe slots, giving it a mixed storage approach that is more flexible than most compact DIY NAS systems in the same size class. Aoostar’s official specification for the current WTR Max 8845 lists support for up to 6 x 24TB SATA HDDs and 5 NVMe SSDs, with the M.2 allocation split across PCIe 4.0 x2 and PCIe 4.0 x1 links rather than giving every slot the same bandwidth. In practical terms, that matters less for bulk storage and more for how the system is likely to be used: large-capacity SATA bays can be assigned to primary data, backup, or archive duties, while the NVMe slots are better suited to cache, application storage, containers, VMs, or high-speed working data. For a NAS aimed at users choosing their own OS and storage strategy, that mixed topology is one of the main reasons the WTR Max platform is notable in the first place.

The Intel Core i5-1235U is also a sensible fit for this kind of storage-heavy design because, like the Ryzen 7 8845HS used in the existing AMD version, it supports up to 20 PCIe lanes and PCIe 4.0 connectivity. That does not automatically mean the Intel model will perform identically in every storage scenario, because lane routing, controller choice, and motherboard implementation still determine how those lanes are divided between SATA, NVMe, USB4, OCuLink, and networking. Even so, on an early preview basis, the key point is that Aoostar does not appear to have changed the overall storage proposition of the WTR Max by moving to Intel. The appeal here remains the same: this is a compact chassis that can hold a large amount of slower capacity storage alongside a meaningful amount of flash storage, which makes it suitable for users who want both traditional NAS volume space and a faster SSD tier in the same enclosure.

Aoostar WTR Max Intel Version – Ports and Connections

The Aoostar WTR Max platform is already unusually well equipped on connectivity, and the Intel preview unit appears to preserve that same approach. On the currently listed WTR Max 8845 model, Aoostar specifies 2 x 10GbE SFP+ ports based on the Intel X710 controller, alongside 2 x 2.5GbE LAN ports, 1 x USB4 port, 1 x OCuLink port, 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports, 1 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 port, 1 x Type C port, 1 x HDMI output, a 3.5mm audio jack, a microSD card slot, and DC input. In practical terms, that gives the system a broader mix of storage, networking, and external expansion connectivity than most compact DIY NAS solutions, especially once the dual 10GbE and OCuLink are factored in. For an early preview, that matters because the appeal of the Intel version is not just the CPU change itself, but the fact that Aoostar seems to be pairing that CPU with the same high-connectivity platform rather than trimming the I/O to create a lower-tier model.

From the CPU side, the Core i5-1235U also makes sense in a system that leans heavily on external I/O. Intel’s official specifications list support for Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 4.0, which aligns well with the inclusion of USB4 and helps explain why this processor can still fit into a NAS design with multiple high-bandwidth ports despite being a lower-power mobile chip. By comparison, the Ryzen 7 8845HS used in the current AMD version is the stronger processor in raw core configuration and sustained power class, but the Intel option may still hold practical appeal for buyers who place more value on Intel platform familiarity, media handling, or a potentially lower-cost entry point into the same chassis.

At this stage, though, the key observation is simply that Aoostar does not appear to have repositioned the WTR Max Intel model as a cut-down connectivity variant. Based on the preview hardware and the existing WTR Max specification, this still looks like a NAS platform built around unusually broad networking and expansion options first, with the CPU choice acting as the variable element.

Aoostar WTR Max Intel Version – Internal Hardware

Internally, the previewed WTR Max Intel unit appears to follow the same motherboard and chassis logic as the existing AMD-based design, with the main change being the move to Intel’s Core i5-1235U. That processor combines 10 cores and 12 threads in a hybrid layout made up of 2 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, supports PCIe 4.0, and provides up to 20 PCIe lanes to distribute across storage, networking, and external expansion.

*Thanks to TechnicalCity and Nanoreview for their comparisons of these two processors

It also supports up to 64GB of memory officially on Intel’s own specification pages, across 2 channels, and does not list ECC memory support. By comparison, the Ryzen 7 8845HS commonly associated with this class of WTR Max hardware is an 8-core, 16-thread processor with PCIe 4.0, 20 usable PCIe lanes, support for DDR5-5600, and a much higher maximum supported memory capacity on AMD’s specification sheet. In simple terms, the Intel version looks less like a redesign of the platform and more like a rebalancing of it, using a lower-power mobile CPU that still has enough I/O resources to support the dense hardware layout that defines the WTR Max.

That internal trade-off is likely where the Intel model will either make sense or not, depending on the intended workload. The Ryzen 7 8845HS remains the stronger chip on paper for sustained multi-threaded tasks, heavier virtualization, and broader memory headroom, while the Core i5-1235U shifts the system toward a more efficiency-oriented profile and brings Intel’s integrated graphics stack into the equation. For a NAS like this, that could matter for media-focused deployments, lighter VM use, or users who simply prefer Intel’s platform characteristics, but it also means the Intel version should not automatically be viewed as equivalent to the AMD model in raw processing terms.

It is also worth noting that Aoostar’s current public WTR Max 8845 materials refer to the retail model as using a Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rather than the standard Ryzen 7 8845HS, which suggests the final retail naming and CPU positioning around this series may still vary depending on region or configuration. As an early preview, the most accurate conclusion is that the internal hardware remains recognisably WTR Max in structure, but the CPU choice changes the expected character of the system more than the exterior suggests.

Aoostar WTR Max Intel Version – Price, Launch Date, More?

At the time of writing, Aoostar has not publicly listed this Intel Core i5-1235U version of the WTR Max on its storefront, so price, release date, and regional availability remain unconfirmed. By contrast, the currently listed WTR Max 8845 is shown on Aoostar’s site at $669, reduced from $699, and the product naming has shifted to specifically identify that model as the WTR Max 8845 rather than simply the WTR Max. That naming detail is relevant because it suggests Aoostar may be preparing the chassis for more than 1 CPU configuration, even if the Intel variant has not yet been formally announced. The Core i5-1235U itself is not a new processor, having launched in Q1 2022 with a 15W processor base power, while the Ryzen 7 8845HS used in the 2025 WTR Max model is a newer and higher-power chip with an 8-core, 16-thread design and a 45W default TDP. Taken together, that makes the Intel preview unit look less like a replacement for the existing AMD version and more like a possible alternative tier within the same product family.

The more important question is what Aoostar intends to do with this platform next. If the company keeps the same chassis, storage layout, and broad I/O design while offering multiple CPU variants, the WTR Max could become a more flexible series rather than a single fixed model. In that context, an Intel version would make sense as a lower-cost or differently positioned option for buyers who do not need the stronger processing profile of the Ryzen 7 8845HS, or who specifically want an Intel-based media and virtualization platform. At this stage, though, that remains an informed reading of the hardware direction rather than a confirmed launch plan. Since this unit was sent as an early preview sample and Aoostar has not yet published a retail page for the Intel edition, the most accurate conclusion is that the WTR Max Intel version is promising as a product idea, but still undefined in the areas that matter most for a final purchasing decision: official pricing, shipping regions, final specification sheet, and release timing.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Aoostar WTR Max INTEL VERSION AOOSTAR WTR MAX PRO PCIe Lane Aoostar WTR Max NAS vs MinisfoMinisforum N5 vs Aoostar WTR MAoostar WTR Max NAS ReviewAoostar WTR Max NAS Review - NAoostar WTR Max POWERHOUSE NASMinisForum N5 Pro vs AOOSTAR WWeek 10 Tech Roundup – AOOSTAoostar TB4S-OC Review - USB4 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Ugreen continue son offensive sur le marché des NAS avec un nouveau 4 baies ambitieux : UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Pro. Après le DXP4800 Plus de l’an dernier, nous avons pu passer plusieurs jours avec le modèle Pro, une version musclée pensée pour les usages avancés, le multitâches intensif et les environnements exigeants sans compromis sur la simplicité d’utilisation. Sur le papier, la promesse est solide. En pratique, tout n’est cependant pas parfait…

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Pro

Là où le DXP4800 Plus s’appuie sur un Intel Pentium Gold 8505, le DXP4800 Pro passe sur un processeur Intel Core i3-1315U, offrant plus de puissance brute et une meilleure capacité de traitement pour des charges lourdes : virtualisation, transcodage multimédia, IA, Docker…

Contenu de la boîte

À l’ouverture, on retrouve :

• Le DXP4800 Pro en lui-même ;
• 2 câble réseau RJ45 Cat. 7 ;
• L’alimentation externe et son câble ;
• Des vis pour les SSD avec un tournevis ;
• 2 blocs de pâte thermique pour les SSD NVMe ;
• Un guide de démarrage rapide en anglais, allemand et chinois ;
• Une feuille sur la garantie de 2 ans.

Comme pour son grand frère, l’emballage reste soigné, avec plusieurs niveaux de protection. On note les efforts du fabricant…

Design et connectivité

Extérieurement, il ressemble comme 2 gouttes d »eau aux DXP4800 Plus. Nous avons un NAS bien lourd avec un boîtier en aluminium bleu-gris. Son poids sur la balance affiche 4,1 kg. À l’arrière, nous avons toujours un ventilateur de 140 mm. Seul le nom en façade (en bas) diffère…

Du côté de la connectique, ce NAS dispose de :​

• 2 ports USB 3.2 Gen 2 (dont 1 Type-C) ;
• 1 port USB 3.0 Type-A ;
• 2 ports USB 2.0 Type-A ;
• 1 lecteur de carte SD ;
• 1 sortie HDMI 2.1 ;
• 1 port RJ45 2,5 Gb/s ;
• 1 port RJ45 10 Gb/s.

Une connectivité bien pensée et complète.

Intérieur du DXP4800 Pro

C’est là que les choses changent ! Le DXP4800 Pro est animé par un processeur Intel Core i3-1315U capable d’atteindre 4,50 GHz  (6 cœurs, 8 threads) avec iGPU intégré. Il est épaulé par 8 Go de RAM DDR5 (extensibles à 96 Go). On aurait préféré voir 16 Go pour ce modèle Pro. Le score PassMark est de 11 183 points ! Pour ce tarif, il largue tous les concurrents…

Installation des disques et SSD

Les disques durs 3,5 pouces s’installent assez facilement, sans outils. Les chariots sont différents de ceux de Synology ou QNAP, mais ils sont fonctionnels.

Pour installer un SSD SATA, il faut retirer une fixation en plastique (en bas à droite sur la photo ci-dessus) via un outil fourni. Attention à ne pas forcer trop fort au risque d’abimer la pièce. Le NAS dispose de 2 emplacements pour SSD NVMe, accessibles via une trappe sous l’appareil. C’est également ici que vous pourrez augmenter la RAM. L’ajout de pâte thermique (fournie) et le rôle de dissipateur thermique du capot en aluminium sont des points positifs.

De notre point de vue, le NAS n’est pas suffisamment surélevé. Les patins sous l’appareil ne sont peu assez haut, ce qui limite la circulation de l’air et favorise les vibrations. De nombreux utilisateurs recommandent l’ajout de petits amortisseurs en élastomère pour corriger ce léger défaut. Nous validons ce choix.

UGOS

Nous vous avons déjà présenté le système embarqué UGOS précédemment. Nous avons bien conscience que Ugreen est encore jeune sur le marché et il faut savoir être indulgent. Le système évolue régulièrement sans rivaliser pour le moment avec les ténors du marché. Cependant, il n’a pas à rougir, car il sait déjà répondre à de nombreux usages.

Installation d’UGOS

L’utilisateur doit taper dans son navigateur find.ugnas.com pour trouver son NAS sur le réseau. L’installation se fait en 4 étapes (voire ci-dessous) :

Par rapport à notre précédent test, l’interface est désormais bien en français.

Une fois l’installation terminée, le NAS redémarre… il ne reste plus qu’à se connecter avec l’identifiant et le mot de passe saisis précédemment. Un nouveau guide se lance pour accompagner l’utilisateur dans les premières étapes :

• Découverte de l’interface ;
• Création d’un volume de stockage ;
• Premier dossier partagé ;
• Découverte d’UGREENlink pour l’accès à distance.

Note importante : lors du test précédent, nous pensions avoir commis une erreur, mais non… le service SMB (partage réseau) est désactivé par défaut. Cela veut dire que si vous ne faites rien, le NAS n’est pas accessible par le réseau (Windows, macOS ou Linux).

Usage au quotidien

UGOS est un système Linux optimisé pour le stockage en réseau. Il propose un ensemble de paramètres, auquel on peut ajouter des fonctionnalités via le Centre d’applications : Antivirus, Download Center, Text Edit, etc. Ugreen a fait le choix de privilégier Docker pour compléter son environnement applicatif.

Le fabricant propose une application mobile tout-en-un qui permet de profiter de son NAS à distance ou sur son réseau local. Il faut avouer qu’elle est complète et bien pensée. Ugreen propose également une application de bureau (Windows et macOS), ainsi qu’une adapté à Apple TV et Android TV. Elles permettent d’accéder aux fichiers, au statut du NAS, aux notifications… mais aussi au visionnage de vidéo, etc. Tout y est, un véritable couteau suisse !

Ugreen déploie fréquemment des mises à jour pour corriger des bugs et soucis de traductions, mais aussi pour améliorer les performances et ajouter des fonctionnalités. Un NAS, c’est un investissement sur le long terme. Aujourd’hui, les NAS sont régulièrement mis à jour… et surtout pendant de nombreuses années.

Nouvel entrant et tolérance

Ugreen est nouveau sur le marché des NAS, mais ce n’est pas un novice. L’entreprise possède une solide expérience industrielle et maîtrise déjà la conception matérielle et logicielle. Le fabricant connait également très bien ce secteur exigeant, dominé par des acteurs comme Synology et QNAP. Côté matériel, le produit tient la route…

Sur la partie logicielle, UGOS reste limité pour un usage avancé. S’il répond à 90% des particuliers, certains pourraient être déçus. La majorité des utilisateurs parient sur des mises à jour futures pour corriger le tir dans les prochains mois. Ugreen en a bien conscience… À noter qu’il propose également la possibilité d’installer de systèmes alternatifs comme OMV, TrueNAS, Unraid, etc. Une approche ouverte, que beaucoup apprécient.

L’essentiel est là : une base matérielle fiable et une volonté claire d’évoluer.

Performances du DXP4800 Pro

Dans la première partie des tests, nous allons évaluer les performances des transferts à travers un réseau 10 Gb/s (entre le NAS et des ordinateurs). Ensuite, nous regarderons les capacités du processeur, en analysant ses performances globales…

Vitesses dans les transferts

Depuis plusieurs années, nous avons mis en place un protocole de tests rigoureux fournissant des données fiables et comparables avec les performances des autres NAS. Pour cela, nous utilisons 4 applications de mesure différentes (2 sous macOS et 2 sous Windows) et réalisons en plus des transferts de fichiers de tailles variées dans les deux sens (NAS -> Ordinateur puis Ordinateur -> NAS) :

• Petites tailles : 100 fichiers de 500 Ko à 12 Mo (MP3, photos, documents Office)
• Tailles moyennes : 30 fichiers de 12 à 350 Mo (DivX, images RAW, archives ZIP)
• Fichiers volumineux : 10 fichiers avec une taille comprise entre 4 et 10 Go (MKV, ISO)

À la suite des tests, une moyenne des transferts est calculée et nous la représentons sous forme de graphiques exprimée en mégaoctets par seconde (Mo/s). Plus le nombre est élevé, plus le NAS est rapide. Pour notre évaluation du DXP4800 Plus, nous avons configuré un premier volume avec 2 SSD NVMe en RAID 0, puis un second volume avec 3 SSD SATA en RAID 5.

RAID 0

Le NAS propose d’excellentes performances en lecture. Le système est réactif et les transferts solides. On voit tout de suite le gain offert par le nouveau processeur. Si les performances en écriture progressent (par rapport au DXP 4800 Plus), nous restons un peu sur notre faim.

RAID 5

Les débits vous surprennent… nous aussi. En lecture, le RAID 5 SATA assure et nous sommes sur des performances proches du RAID 0 NVMe. En écriture, les SSD SATA font même mieux sur les petits fichiers et ceux de taille moyenne. Par contre, sur les gros fichiers, les choses sont différentes.

Performances générales

Avec son nouveau processeur, Ugreen propose un NAS offrant des capacités bien plus étendues. Comparons rapidement celui-ci

	UGREEN DXP4800 Pro	UGREEN DXP4800 Plus	ASUSTOR FS6806X	Synology DS925+
Processeur	Intel Core i3-1315U	Intel Pentium Gold	AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C14	AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B
iGPU intégré	Intel UHD Graphics (13th Gen)	Intel UHD Graphics (12th Gen)	Aucun	Aucun
Score Passmark (CPU)	11 182	9 080	11 882	4 513
Score Single Thread	3 315	3 226	2 800	1 136
TDP	15 W (55 W burst)	15 W	15 W	16 W
RAM max supportée	96 Go DDR5	64 Go DDR5	64 Go DDR5	32 Go DDR4 ECC

Vous l’aurez compris, le changement opéré par Ugreen n’est pas anodin. On se retrouve avec un processeur taillé pour les tâches complexes ou il n’aura pas de difficulté : chiffrement des données, virtualisation, conteneurisation ou encore le transcodage vidéo. Il sera difficile de le mettre en difficulté. Seul regret, la présence de seulement 8 Go de RAM par défaut. On ne va pas se mentir, c’est un peu juste pour exploiter pleinement le potentiel de ce NAS : 16 Go auraient été préférables.

IA & DXP 4800 Pro

Ugreen a été intégré ici et là quelques touches d’IA dans ses applications maisons (notamment dans son application pour les photos). Mais nous avons voulu aller plus loin et tenté l’expérience des modèles Qwen2.5:3B et Gemma2:2B avec Ollama. Ils fonctionnent très bien avec ce NAS et répondent en quelques secondes. Attention, l’IA consomme beaucoup de ressources : processeur et RAM. Aussi, nous avons constaté une certaine limitation dans la gestion des ressources avec Docker, certainement pour protéger les fonctions de base du NAS.

Consommation électrique et nuisance sonore

Le ventilateur arrière est relativement discret. Côté consommation électrique, le NAS affiche environ 27 W en usage normal (avec 2 SSD NVMe et 3 SSD SATA) et jusqu’à 45 W en charge plus soutenue.

Gl.iNet Comet 5G Review – The ULTIMATE ALL-ACCESS KVM?

The GL.iNet Comet 5G is a remote KVM built to provide keyboard, video, and mouse control of a connected computer from power on through BIOS, rather than relying on a working operating system like traditional remote desktop tools. It accepts HDMI input from the host and offers HDMI passthrough so a local display can remain connected, with support up to 4K at 30 fps or 1080p at 60 fps, plus 2 way audio. Connectivity is where the Comet 5G differentiates itself most clearly in this product line: it can be managed over Gigabit Ethernet and Wi-Fi 6, but it also includes a nano SIM slot for 5G RedCap with 4G LTE fallback, intended for out of band access when the site network is down, segmented, or simply not trusted. It also supports a local AP mode that broadcasts its own wireless network for nearby management sessions without joining the surrounding LAN. In day to day use, the device is mainly aimed at remote maintenance tasks such as OS installs, recovery and imaging, BIOS changes, and support work on machines that lack built in management like iDRAC or iLO. Compared with the Comet Pro, it keeps the same general platform and interface approach, but adds the cellular path, the AP mode, a larger 3.69 in touchscreen, and 64 GB of eMMC storage for ISO and file staging. The key questions for a review are less about raw compute, since the core platform is similar to the Comet Pro, and more about whether the extra connectivity options, storage capacity, and on device usability justify its higher price for the way it will actually be deployed.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Quick Conclusion

The GL.iNet Comet 5G is essentially the Comet Pro style KVM experience with a stronger connectivity toolkit rather than a major jump in raw performance: you still get reliable BIOS level access, HDMI passthrough so a local screen can stay connected, and flexible access from a browser across different operating systems, but the main reason to choose it is the extra ways it can be reached when the local network is unavailable or not trusted. The nano SIM support (5G RedCap with 4G LTE fallback) gives an out of band route that can keep access available even when Ethernet or Wi-Fi are misconfigured, and the AP mode adds a direct nearby connection for quick point to point management without joining the site LAN, which can be genuinely useful in field work, segmented networks, or recovery situations. It also doubles the internal storage to 64 GB, which makes it easier to keep several ISO images and tools ready to mount remotely, and the larger 3.69 in touchscreen makes local setup and status checks less cramped. The trade offs are mostly about expectations: storage speeds remain modest, so uploading and copying large files is not fast; USB based storage expansion exists but is limited by USB 2.0, can require reboots, and drive compatibility is not always consistent; and while the device supports multiple paths and is marketed around failover, the current interface does not expose deep, router style controls for tuning how those paths behave. If you mostly run KVM over a stable wired or Wi-Fi network, the Comet Pro will usually cover the same core tasks for less money, but if you want a small KVM that gives you more options to regain access when networks are awkward or failing, the Comet 5G is the more complete tool as long as you accept the storage and configuration limitations.

SOFTWARE - 9/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 8/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.4

PROS

Cellular out of band access via nano SIM (5G RedCap with 4G LTE fallback) adds a separate path when the site LAN is down or misconfigured
Nearby Control via AP mode enables direct point to point access without joining the surrounding network, useful for local BIOS work and isolated environments
HDMI passthrough plus capture keeps a local monitor active while still providing remote KVM access (up to 4K 30 fps, 1080p 60 fps)
Browser based management and access works across Windows, macOS, and Linux without requiring a dedicated client
64 GB eMMC provides more room for ISO images and utility files than the 32 GB model, reducing how often media needs to be rotated
3.69 in touchscreen makes on device setup and status checks less cramped than smaller panel implementations
Multiple remote access approaches are available (LAN, relay, and VPN style options like Tailscale and ZeroTier), allowing different trust and routing models
Low complexity deployment with passive cooling and a small footprint makes it viable as a 24/7 appliance when powered independently

CONS

Storage performance is modest, and remains closer to mid range eMMC speeds than fast removable storage
External storage expansion has caveats, including USB 2.0 limits, possible reboots, and inconsistent compatibility depending on the USB drive and power draw
Failover and cellular controls are not deeply tunable in the current UI, so users expecting router grade policy controls may find configuration limited

Buy the Gl.iNet KVM 5G from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Comet KVM ($219) from the Official Store Below:

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Design & Storage

The Comet 5G follows the same general design language as the Comet Pro, but it is physically larger and more deployment focused. It measures 128 × 93 × 33 mm and weighs 285 g, which makes it more of a bag sized tool than something that disappears behind a monitor without planning. The casing relies on passive ventilation rather than active cooling, and in normal use it is intended to be left running continuously, provided it is powered independently rather than from the host machine.

A practical difference in the Comet 5G design is the addition of external antennas to support its wireless roles.

This includes cellular and Wi-Fi antennas, and the unit is clearly built around the expectation that it may be used away from a stable wired network, whether that is via the SIM slot or via a direct nearby wireless connection. In a fixed desk setup the antennas can feel like overkill, but for temporary installs and field support they suit the intended use case.

On the front, the Comet 5G uses a 3.69 in touchscreen, which is notably larger than the Comet Pro’s 2.22 in panel. In practice, that extra size does not materially change the experience of mirroring the host display on the device itself, since you remain limited by the source resolution and scaling.

Where it does help is in the local management interface, where menus and status screens have more room and are less cramped, particularly during setup or when checking network state and service toggles directly on the unit.

Storage is expanded to 64 GB eMMC, and the main advantage is capacity rather than speed. In use, the internal storage is primarily for keeping ISO images, recovery media, and utility files that can be mounted remotely as virtual media or exposed to the host as a remote drive.

File transfers to and from the internal storage typically sit in the same general performance range as the Comet Pro, which means it is functional for staging installers and smaller toolsets, but slow for moving large data sets.

A newer software feature available across the platform also allows external storage via a USB drive, but it comes with constraints that affect how usable it is in practice. Adding a drive can require a reboot, compatibility varies between drives, and the management interface tends to treat partitions individually rather than offering straightforward full disk handling.

Because the port involved is USB 2.0, external storage is more about adding space for additional ISOs than achieving a meaningful improvement in transfer speeds.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Connectivity

The Comet 5G keeps its I/O layout simple, with the core KVM connections built around full sized HDMI input and HDMI output for passthrough. This avoids adapter reliance and makes it easier to drop into existing setups where monitors and capture paths already use standard HDMI cabling. In a permanent install, passthrough is the more important part of that arrangement, since it allows a local user to keep working on the attached screen while remote access remains available in the background.

For host control, the unit presents USB based keyboard and mouse emulation over its USB-C connection, while power is also supplied via USB-C at 5V/3A with PD compatibility.

In practical terms, powering it from an independent adapter is the safer approach, because drawing power from the host machine can remove KVM access when the host is powered off, rebooting, or in a state where USB power is unstable.

Wired networking is provided by a 1 GbE RJ45 port, which is the most consistent option for image quality and responsiveness when the site network is stable. Alongside this, the Comet 5G supports Wi-Fi 6 on both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, and it also includes an AP mode that allows a direct nearby wireless connection without joining the surrounding LAN.

That AP mode is best understood as a local management path rather than a general purpose hotspot, and it is primarily useful when you want a quick point to point session for BIOS work or initial configuration.

The main connectivity addition over the Comet Pro is the nano SIM slot for cellular access, supporting 5G RedCap with 4G LTE fallback. This is positioned as an out of band route that can keep the management channel available when Ethernet and Wi-Fi are unavailable or misconfigured, and it also reduces dependence on VLAN routing rules and other site side constraints.

In the current software experience, the cellular side is exposed through its own configuration section, but it does not offer the same depth of policy and failover tuning found on GL.iNet’s router products.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Internal Hardware

Internally, the Comet 5G is built around a quad core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC paired with 1 GB of DDR3L memory, which is broadly the same class of platform used by the Comet Pro. In review terms, this means the Comet 5G is not trying to win on raw compute, but on connectivity and deployment options, because the core processing headroom is similar. The A53 class CPU is adequate for running the management services, handling multiple control sessions, and keeping the on device UI responsive, but it is not aimed at heavier workloads outside the core KVM functions. The OS is Linux 6.1, and the device behaves like a small embedded appliance rather than a general purpose system you would extend with additional packages and services.

The video path is designed around HDMI ingest and H.264 hardware encoding, with the remote stream adapting to available bandwidth and quality settings in the client interface. Support is listed up to 4K at 30 fps and 1080p at 60 fps, with HDMI passthrough keeping a local monitor active while the unit captures the same signal for remote viewing.

Audio is supported in 2 directions, but the device itself is not treated as a standalone audio endpoint, so the practical experience depends on how the host exposes audio over HDMI or USB and how the client session is configured. Input is handled via USB based HID emulation, which is why copy and paste and keystroke injection can sometimes behave differently between applications depending on how they interpret simulated typing versus clipboard shortcuts.

The storage subsystem uses 64 GB eMMC soldered to the board, and in practice it is tuned for predictable, mid range throughput rather than high performance. Real world transfer rates observed during ISO uploads and mounted storage tests typically sit around the mid 20s to mid 30s MB/s range, which aligns with the Comet Pro experience and reflects the limits of the flash and controller rather than a network bottleneck.

That makes it usable for staging installers, recovery media, and driver packs, but not ideal for repeated large image transfers or heavy file shuttling. Expansion is possible via a USB drive using the USB 2.0 Type-A port, but that is primarily a capacity extension, because USB 2.0 limits both bandwidth and available bus power, and drive compatibility can vary depending on the enclosure controller and power draw.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Software, Services & Performance

The Comet 5G uses the same GLKVM software family as the earlier Comet devices, with access provided through a browser interface, a desktop client, and a mobile app. In testing, the browser UI is the most straightforward for configuration and for working across different operating systems, and it also exposes most of the device settings without needing to install anything locally.

Firmware maturity differed slightly between units during side by side use, with the Comet Pro running a stable 1.8 release build while the Comet 5G was still presented as beta, though the overall layout and feature set were close enough that the differences felt tied to hardware options rather than a separate software branch.

#

Account and session security options are built into the platform, including 2 factor authentication and passkey support at the account level, plus the ability to apply an additional password gate per device before entering a remote session. Remote access can be handled locally over LAN, through GL.iNet’s relay service, or through peer to peer options. Tailscale support is part of the platform, and newer software revisions have also introduced ZeroTier support, which addresses earlier feedback around relying on a single remote access option.

For users who prefer not to use relay services, these VPN style paths can provide remote reachability without opening ports or depending on the vendor’s cloud beyond account management.

Where the Comet 5G differs in day to day software behavior is how cellular and nearby access are exposed. Cellular configuration appears as a dedicated section for SIM based connectivity, while the Wi-Fi settings include an AP mode that allows direct nearby connections without joining the site WLAN. In practice, these features improve the chances of reaching the device when the surrounding network is misconfigured or inaccessible, but the management interface does not currently provide the same depth of routing, policy control, or visible failover logic that GL.iNet includes in its router products. Multi path behavior is present at a feature level, but there is limited opportunity to tune it beyond selecting the available connection modes.

Performance during remote control sessions depends mainly on the network path and the host workload rather than differences between the Comet 5G and Comet Pro hardware. Video quality controls and stream settings allow the session to be made more stable on weaker links, and the general desktop experience remains usable for BIOS work, OS installs, and troubleshooting.

A copy and paste stress test with a large block of text showed both devices could transfer long input sequences, but the Comet 5G produced fewer odd spacing issues in the final pasted document during that run. On mobile, both devices provide touch mode and cursor mode plus access to a software keyboard, and external Bluetooth keyboards and mice can be used, but fluidity and compression artifacts were more noticeable when the phone was on cellular data compared with a local Wi-Fi or wired path.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Verdict & Conclusion

The Comet 5G works as a continuation of the Comet Pro platform rather than a clean break. The remote session experience, general interface layout, and core feature set remain familiar, because the underlying compute and encoding approach is broadly the same, and both devices are aimed at the same type of work: BIOS access, OS installs, recovery tasks, and remote troubleshooting where standard remote desktop tools are not enough. The areas that do change the day to day ownership experience are mostly around how you can reach the device when things go wrong. The SIM based 5G RedCap and 4G LTE fallback adds a separate management path, and the AP mode provides a direct nearby connection that avoids relying on the site LAN. The larger 3.69 in screen also makes the on device menus easier to use, even if it does not transform the usefulness of live video mirroring on the panel itself.

On the positive side, the Comet 5G is more adaptable in awkward environments, such as networks with strict VLAN boundaries, unreliable Wi-Fi, or unknown cabling, and it gives you more ways to regain access without a site visit. The 64 GB eMMC storage is also easier to live with if you keep multiple ISO images or toolkits available, although transfer speed remains limited and does not materially improve over the 32 GB model. On the less positive side, the cellular and multi path story is currently presented more as a capability than as a deeply configurable system, so users expecting router style failover policies and detailed controls may find the options relatively basic. The external storage expansion feature helps with capacity, but it is constrained by USB 2.0, requires reboots in some situations, and drive compatibility can be inconsistent, which limits how predictable it is as a long term workflow.

Overall, the Comet 5G is easier to justify when you expect to use the cellular connection or the nearby AP mode regularly, because those are the main reasons it exists and the main differences you will notice. If the device will live on a stable wired network most of the time and you only need a straightforward remote KVM for routine maintenance, the Comet Pro will usually cover the same core tasks for less money. If your priority is having multiple ways to reach the box when the local network is down or not trusted, the Comet 5G is the more complete tool, but its value depends on those deployment realities rather than any large jump in raw performance.

Buy the Gl.iNet KVM 5G from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Comet KVM ($219) from the Official Store Below:

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Comet Q USB-C KVM for Gl.iNet Comet 5G Review - The NanoKVM and it's 'Secret' MicrNanoKVM (Original) and it's 'SSipeed NanoKVM Pro KVM ReviewNanoKVM Pro KVM Review - A WHOGL.iNet Comet Pro Review - The Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro vs Pro 8 NAS – WHICH ONE SHOULD YOU BUY?

Within UniFi, the UNAS line is positioned as a straightforward, storage focused, turnkey NAS platform that fits into the same single pane management style as the rest of the ecosystem, prioritizing file storage, sharing, snapshots, and backup workflows over broader server style expandability. In this 3 way comparison, the UNAS Pro (7 bay, Nov 2024), UNAS Pro 8 (8 bay, Nov 2025), and UNAS Pro 4 (4 bay, Feb 2026) look similar on the surface, but they target different deployment constraints and ceiling limits in rack depth, storage scalability, cache options, memory headroom, network redundancy, and power design. Two of the units (Pro 4 and Pro 8) add M.2 NVMe cache support and higher availability 10GbE networking than the original Pro, while the Pro 8 also pushes furthest on RAM capacity and physical redundancy expectations for a rack install.

BUY
Pro	More 3.5 inch bays than UNAS Pro 4 at the same $499 price (7 vs 4)	1U chassis (smallest height)	Most total bays (8) plus 2x NVMe cache slots
	Shallower chassis depth than both (325 mm), easier fit in short depth racks	2x 10G SFP+ instead of 1x 10G SFP+ on UNAS Pro	16 GB memory (double UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4)
	Front 10G SFP+ and 1G RJ45 placement can suit front of rack cabling	NVMe cache support (absent on UNAS Pro)	3 total 10 GbE ports (2x 10G SFP+ plus 10 GbE RJ45), most flexible networking
	1.3 inch touchscreen (absent on UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8)	Longer CPU clock than UNAS Pro (2.0 GHz vs 1.7 GHz)	Hot swappable power modules (only model with this design)
Con	No NVMe cache support (both UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 have it)	Lowest bay ceiling and no official expansion path, so it fills up fastest	Highest price up front ($799)
	Only 1x 10G SFP+ (UNAS Pro 4 has 2x, UNAS Pro 8 has 2x plus 10 GbE RJ45)	Deeper chassis than UNAS Pro (400 mm vs 325 mm)	Deepest chassis (480 mm), most demanding fit in shallow racks
	Lower CPU clock than UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 (1.7 GHz vs 2.0 GHz)	No hot swap PSU design (UNAS Pro 8 is the only one with hot swappable power modules)	No touchscreen (UNAS Pro includes a front touchscreen)
	Same 8 GB memory as UNAS Pro 4 and less than UNAS Pro 8 (16 GB)	Same 8 GB memory as UNAS Pro and less than UNAS Pro 8 (16 GB)	Higher power ceiling and max power consumption than the other 2 (250 W max)

At the same time, the lineup is notable for pricing that stays lower than many established rackmount NAS competitors at comparable connectivity, with both the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4 landing at $499, and the UNAS Pro 8 stepping up to $799 for more bays, more memory, and more network paths. The practical decision usually comes down to whether the priority is maximum bays at the lowest buy in, a tighter 1U footprint with newer cache and dual 10GbE links, or a higher ceiling platform with the strongest long term headroom in bays, RAM, and connectivity for users who expect growth rather than a fixed storage target.

IMPORTANT – It is worth highlighting that all three UNAS solutions include the same software and updates in the UniFi Drive and NAS OS services. Alongside the client tools (eg Identity Endpoint and File/Folder services remotely) and can be easily integrated into an existing Ubiquiti/UniFi network landscape. HOWEVER crucially, it is not ‘mandotory’ – you can run any of the UNAS Pro systems completely ‘offline’ (i.e LAN only) and there is no need to already have an existing UniFi network (existing 3rd party network landscapes work perfectly fine) and you also do not need to use/register any kind of UI.com/Ubiquiti account to setup the device.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro vs Pro 8 NAS – Design

At a chassis level, the lineup splits into 2U and 1U designs, and that difference shapes how each unit fits into smaller racks and shallow cabinets.

The UNAS Pro is the shortest depth of the 3, while the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 extend further back, which matters once you account for cable bend radius and rear clearance.

For compact wall racks and shorter cabinets, the older UNAS Pro tends to be easier to accommodate purely on physical depth, even before you consider anything about performance or features.

The UNAS Pro also stands apart on the front panel experience, because it includes a 1.3″ touchscreen that can surface live status information without needing to log into the UI. That is not present on the UNAS Pro 4 or UNAS Pro 8, which lean into a more conventional rack appliance faceplate focused on bay access and basic indicators. In day to day use, the screen is mainly a convenience feature for quick checks and basic local interaction, rather than something that changes how the system is deployed.

Another practical design difference is port placement philosophy. The UNAS Pro places its primary network connectivity on the front, while the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 move connectivity to the rear, matching the typical layout most rackmount NAS systems follow. Front facing ports can reduce visible cabling in front of a rack and shorten patch runs in some UniFi heavy layouts, but rear mounted ports are generally easier to route cleanly in deeper cabinets with rear cable management.

Power implementation also affects the physical serviceability profile of each unit. The UNAS Pro 8 uses hot swappable power modules, which changes how you handle failure or planned maintenance compared with the fixed internal power approach used by the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4.

All 3 use a steel enclosure and ship as purpose built rack devices rather than desktop conversions, but the UNAS Pro 8 is the one that most closely matches what many buyers expect from a higher end rack appliance in terms of field replacement for key physical components.

UniFi UNAS Pro vs Pro 4 vs Pro 8 NAS – Storage

The most obvious storage difference is the bay count and what that does to capacity planning. The UNAS Pro provides 7 front accessible 2.5 inch or 3.5 inch bays in a 2U chassis, the UNAS Pro 4 offers 4 bays in a 1U chassis, and the UNAS Pro 8 increases that to 8 bays in 2U. If you expect to grow into larger pools over time, the 7 bay and 8 bay models give more headroom before you are forced into drive replacements, a second NAS, or a new storage tier. With no official expansion chassis support referenced here, the physical bay count is effectively the ceiling for each system.

The UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 add 2 M.2 NVMe slots intended for SSD caching, while the UNAS Pro does not include NVMe slots. This changes how you can approach mixed workloads, because cache can reduce latency for repeated small file access and help smooth bursts of writes, depending on how the platform applies caching. It does not change the underlying reality that the main capacity tier is still the SATA bay set, but it gives the Pro 4 and Pro 8 a path to improve responsiveness for specific access patterns without committing to full SSD storage across all bays.

RAID flexibility also varies, not in the list of RAID levels available, but in how storage can be organized. All 3 units support RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, but the UNAS Pro 4 is listed as supporting a single RAID group, while the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 8 are listed with multiple RAID groups. In practice, the single group limitation matters if you prefer separating workloads or isolating different retention policies into distinct pools, rather than placing everything into 1 volume. On the larger models, multiple groups give more options for structuring storage around different priorities, such as performance versus redundancy, or shared storage versus dedicated project space.

Operational features tied to storage protection are also not identical across the range. Hot spare support is listed on the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 8, but not on the UNAS Pro 4, which affects how you plan for unattended recovery after a drive failure. All 3 support snapshots, file encryption, share links, Time Machine backup, and cloud and network backup targets, which makes baseline data protection and recovery workflows broadly consistent regardless of bay count.

The larger differentiation is therefore less about whether core protection features exist and more about how much flexibility you have in pool layout and drive management within the limits of each chassis.

All 3 systems are built around a quad core ARM Cortex A57 platform, but they are not configured identically. The UNAS Pro runs the Cortex A57 at 1.7 GHz, while the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 are listed at 2.0 GHz. In day to day use, this tends to show up less as a dramatic jump in peak throughput and more as extra headroom when the system is handling several background jobs at once, such as indexing, snapshots, and multi user access, while still servicing file activity. The architecture choice is aligned with lower draw compared with typical x86 NAS hardware, but it also sets a ceiling on heavier compute workloads that some buyers associate with higher end NAS platforms.Memory is where the split is clearer. The UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4 ship with 8 GB, while the UNAS Pro 8 steps up to 16 GB. The practical impact is less about basic file sharing and more about how much concurrent activity the system can absorb before responsiveness drops, particularly when you add more users, larger file operations, more snapshot activity, and cache related behavior on models that support it. None of these systems are positioned as memory expandable platforms in the provided specifications, so the installed capacity is effectively the long term limit.

Power delivery and serviceability differ meaningfully between the range. The UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4 use internal AC to DC power supplies with an additional USP RPS DC input for redundancy, and their overall platform power limits are lower, matching their smaller scale.

The UNAS Pro 8 uses hot swappable power modules and is designed to support more demanding configurations, reflected in the higher maximum power consumption and the larger drive power budget. This does not automatically translate into higher idle power, but it does indicate how much overhead the chassis is designed to tolerate when fully populated and under sustained activity.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro vs Pro 8 NAS – Ports and Connections

Across the 3 systems, the shared theme is 10 GbE as the primary path for file access, but the implementation differs. The UNAS Pro provides a single 10G SFP+ port plus a 1 GbE RJ45 port, which typically ends up used either for management traffic or as a slower access fallback. The UNAS Pro 4 shifts to a dual 10G SFP+ layout, giving more flexibility for link aggregation or failover planning, even if the practical benefit depends on the storage configuration and client support. The UNAS Pro 8 goes further with 2x 10G SFP+ and adds a 10 GbE RJ45 port that supports multi speed negotiation, which makes it easier to drop into networks that are already built around copper 10 GbE.

Port placement is also part of the decision, because the UNAS Pro uses front mounted networking, while the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 keep network connections on the rear. Front mounted ports can simplify short patch runs in racks that are set up around front facing switching, while rear mounted ports follow the more common rack NAS convention and can be cleaner in racks that route cabling at the back. None of the 3 is positioned as a platform for network expansion cards, so what you buy is the long term connectivity ceiling.

In day to day operation, the multi port models are mainly about resiliency and network design options rather than guaranteeing linear scaling for a single user. You can plan for redundancy across switches, use bonding where your environment supports it, or segment traffic patterns in a more controlled way.

The UNAS Pro 8 is also the only model here with 10 GbE available on both SFP+ and RJ45 in the base hardware, which reduces the need for media converters or additional transceiver planning if your network is not SFP+ centric.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro 8 vs Pro NAS – Price and Value

At list pricing, the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4 sit at the same $499, but they are selling different priorities. The UNAS Pro concentrates its value in raw bay count and a shorter 2U chassis, trading away NVMe cache support and additional 10 GbE links to keep the platform simple. The UNAS Pro 4 is priced the same while reducing the HDD bay count and moving to a 1U chassis, but it adds 2x NVMe cache slots and a second 10G SFP+ port, positioning it more as a “small but fast access” rack NAS rather than a capacity first box.

The UNAS Pro 8 steps up to $799 and is priced like a higher tier option, but the spec sheet shows where that uplift is meant to land: more drive bays than either $499 model, NVMe cache capability like the Pro 4, more total 10 GbE ports, and a jump to 16 GB memory. It is also the only one of the 3 with a 10 GbE RJ45 port alongside SFP+, which can reduce friction in mixed copper and fiber environments. If the goal is to keep the same platform longer term, the Pro 8 is the only one here with both the capacity headroom and the memory ceiling to match it.

Using the simplified “price per bay” and “price per element” approach, the headline result is that the Pro 8 looks strongest once you count all the included hardware features rather than only the number of drive bays. The UNAS Pro has the lowest cost per bay because it is a 7 bay system at the same price as the 4 bay model, but the Pro 4 catches up when the NVMe slots and dual 10 GbE are treated as part of the value calculation. The Pro 8 is not the cheapest upfront, but it ends up close to the Pro 4 on cost per bay and is the lowest on cost per element because it stacks more of the “platform” features in one chassis.

UniFi UNAS Pro 8 vs Pro vs Pro 4 NAS – VERDICT

The UNAS Pro 4, UNAS Pro, and UNAS Pro 8 are close enough in naming to look like simple capacity steps, but they are positioned more like 3 different takes on the same UniFi Drive appliance idea. The UNAS Pro is the most capacity oriented at $499, giving 7 bays in a shorter depth 2U chassis with a built in 1.3 inch touchscreen and a straightforward port layout that suits some front of rack workflows. The UNAS Pro 4 shifts the emphasis away from bay count and toward “newer platform features” at the same $499 price, combining a 1U form factor with 2x 10G SFP+ and 2x NVMe cache slots, at the cost of a deeper chassis and fewer total drive bays. The UNAS Pro 8 is the most complete hardware package in the lineup, adding more bays, NVMe cache, more total 10 GbE connectivity including 10 GbE RJ45, and 16 GB memory, while also being the only one of the 3 to use hot swappable power modules. None of the 3 supports an official expansion shelf approach, so the bay count you buy on day 1 is effectively the long term ceiling unless you plan a separate NAS later.

Choosing between them mostly comes down to which ceiling matters first in your deployment: total bays, total network options, or overall platform headroom. If you want the most bays at $499 and the chassis depth is a priority, the UNAS Pro remains the obvious pick, with the tradeoffs being no NVMe cache path and a simpler network layout than the newer units. If you want the $499 option that aligns most with modern expectations for a small rack NAS, the UNAS Pro 4 has the cleanest argument, because dual 10G and NVMe cache can matter more than extra bays in smaller, faster working sets, even if those cache slots are not usable as standalone storage pools. If you are planning for longer retention cycles, heavier multi user access, or you simply want the most complete feature set in a single chassis, the UNAS Pro 8 is the one that most clearly justifies its higher price, particularly once memory, network flexibility, and the power module design are considered together. The main limitation across the lineup is that the ARM platform and fixed memory approach sets expectations about the long term performance ceiling, but within that constraint, the decision is primarily about how you want the hardware budget divided between capacity, connectivity, and overall platform resources.

	UNAS Pro (7 Bay, $499)	UNAS Pro 4 (4 Bay, $499)	UNAS Pro 8 (8 Bay, $799)
BUY
Pros	More 3.5 inch bays than UNAS Pro 4 at the same $499 price (7 vs 4)	1U chassis (smallest height)	Most total bays (8) plus 2x NVMe cache slots
	Shallower chassis depth than both (325 mm), easier fit in short depth racks	2x 10G SFP+ instead of 1x 10G SFP+ on UNAS Pro	16 GB memory (double UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4)
	Front 10G SFP+ and 1G RJ45 placement can suit front of rack cabling	NVMe cache support (absent on UNAS Pro)	3 total 10 GbE ports (2x 10G SFP+ plus 10 GbE RJ45), most flexible networking
	1.3 inch touchscreen (absent on UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8)	Longer CPU clock than UNAS Pro (2.0 GHz vs 1.7 GHz)	Hot swappable power modules (only model with this design)
Cons	No NVMe cache support (both UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 have it)	Lowest bay ceiling and no official expansion path, so it fills up fastest	Highest price up front ($799)
	Only 1x 10G SFP+ (UNAS Pro 4 has 2x, UNAS Pro 8 has 2x plus 10 GbE RJ45)	Deeper chassis than UNAS Pro (400 mm vs 325 mm)	Deepest chassis (480 mm), most demanding fit in shallow racks
	Lower CPU clock than UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 (1.7 GHz vs 2.0 GHz)	No hot swap PSU design (UNAS Pro 8 is the only one with hot swappable power modules)	No touchscreen (UNAS Pro includes a front touchscreen)
	Same 8 GB memory as UNAS Pro 4 and less than UNAS Pro 8 (16 GB)	Same 8 GB memory as UNAS Pro and less than UNAS Pro 8 (16 GB)	Higher power ceiling and max power consumption than the other 2 (250 W max)

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UGREEN NAS - 2 Years Later - IGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Should YouUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 Lockerstor Gen 2+ NAS Series -Synology RS1626xs+ NAS - WorthSynology RS1626xs+ NAS RevealeUniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MLUniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MMinisforum N5 AIR NAS ReviewSupporting NASCompares - Help Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Review of the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS – Possibly the Best Value 1U Rack Ever?

Over the last 18-24 months, Ubiquiti has shifted the ‘UniFi’ label from being a networking and bridging ecosystem into a wider storage hardware and software platform that now includes a steadily expanding NAS line under UniFi Drive. Early UniFi UNAS storage products leaned heavily on simple file sharing and basic backup, but the pace of updates and the broader product rollout in 2025/2026 pushed the range closer to what small business buyers expect from an entry level NAS platform: clearer storage management, stronger snapshot and backup tooling, and tighter integration with the UniFi account and identity layer for remote access and user control (with the recent Drive 4.0 Update really uping their game considerably). The UniFi UNAS Pro 4 sits within that context as a compact 1U, 4 bay rack mount system designed mainly for file storage and sharing over SMB and NFS, rather than running third party applications, containers, or virtual machines. At $499, it is priced noticeably lower than many competing 1U rack NAS products at broadly comparable “headline” hardware, particularly where dual 10Gb networking and NVMe caching are concerned, which makes it hard to ignore if the goal is simple, high bandwidth storage in a rack footprint without moving into significantly higher spend.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Quick Conclusion

The UniFi UNAS Pro 4 is a 1U, 4 bay rack mount NAS aimed at straightforward SMB and NFS file storage, and its main differentiator is value: at $499 it undercuts many comparable 1U rack units while still offering 2x 10Gb SFP+ plus a separate 1GbE management port, 4 hot swap bays for 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch drives, and 2 M.2 NVMe slots for read and write caching. In testing with 4 HDDs in RAID 5 over 10GbE, it delivered strong real-world file transfer results for a small SATA array, with synthetic benchmarks showing high peak throughput but some variability depending on the tool used, and the platform’s power draw and noise profile were heavily influenced by drive choice and fan mode, including very loud output if maximum cooling is forced. UniFi Drive covers the core fundamentals expected at this level, including snapshots, encrypted volumes, and a wide range of backup targets (NAS, SMB, and multiple cloud services, with Microsoft 365 direction evident in recent updates), but the interface still limits deeper tuning in places and the feature set remains focused on storage rather than apps. The main downsides are structural and easy to identify up front: NVMe can only be used for cache rather than storage pools, the NVMe carriers are an extra purchase, there are no USB ports for local copy tasks, the PSU is internal and not a hot swap module, and missing features like iSCSI, ECC, and RAM upgradability place a clear ceiling on more advanced workloads, though those trade-offs are broadly consistent with a $499 ‘turnkey’ NAS appliance in 2026 though and hard to criticise!

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 10/10

8.4

PROS

Dual 10Gb SFP+ networking is unusual in a 1U 4 bay NAS at this price point + failover will not result in bandwidth throttle
A separate 1GbE port is useful for management or fallback connectivity
1U chassis with relatively short depth is easier to fit in smaller racks and cabinets
Rails and rack hardware included, reducing extra setup cost and friction
Ubiquiti and UniFi online/brand services are optional (i.e pure offline/LAN is possible)+ no need for a Ubiquiti/UniFi network setup to use
NVMe read and write caching support can improve responsiveness in mixed workloads
UniFi Drive provides snapshots, encryption, and a broad set of backup targets (NAS, SMB, and multiple cloud providers)
Setup and management are streamlined, especially for users already running UniFi infrastructure
Drive 4.0 Update scales up the Business Utilities notably

CONS

NVMe is cache only, with no option to use M.2 drives as primary storage pools
NVMe trays or carriers are not included, adding extra cost and an extra purchase step
Single PSU (no redundency) and non-slide removable SFX/ATX PSU (relies on propriatary UniFi Battery Backup rack module or external UPS)
No NAS Expansion Support, so 4 HDDs are your limit

You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Design & Storage

The UNAS Pro 4 uses a conventional 1U rack mount layout, with a plain, functional front panel and an all metal enclosure intended for permanent installation rather than desktop use. It ships with rails and rack handles, which removes the usual extra step of sourcing mounting hardware separately. The chassis depth is about 400 mm, so it is not in the “full depth server” category, and that helps in smaller cabinets where rear clearance and cable management space can be limited.

Across the front are 4 hot swap bays supporting both 3.5 inch and 2.5 inch SATA drives. The trays are set up for tool-less 3.5 inch HDD installation with a click-in fit, while 2.5 inch SSDs still require screws to secure them properly. Each bay has status lighting, and the front panel also provides system level indicators so you can identify basic state and drive activity at a glance without logging into the interface. The trays feel rigid and spring-loaded, but they are not lockable, which is a practical consideration if the unit is placed in a shared rack or anywhere physical access is not strictly controlled.

From a capacity and planning perspective, this system is defined by its fixed 4 bay layout. You can configure a conventional RAID group within those bays, but there is no built-in path to scale beyond the internal slots, and there is no supported external expansion shelf option to push the same chassis further later on. That means the decision on drive sizes and redundancy level matters upfront, because the ceiling is reached quickly compared with higher bay count rack units. In a small rack deployment, it also means the unit is either a compact standalone store or part of a broader multi-NAS approach rather than a single box that grows over time.

In addition to the SATA bays, the chassis supports 2 M.2 NVMe slots intended specifically for SSD caching. The caching model is designed to accelerate HDD-based storage by using SSDs as a performance layer, rather than allowing NVMe drives to become their own primary pool for general file storage. Practically, that positions the NVMe feature as a supplement for mixed workloads, such as improving responsiveness for frequently accessed data and smoothing write behavior, rather than a route to running the system as a small all flash NAS.

A design detail that affects the storage experience is the physical NVMe mounting method. Instead of a simple screw-down slot on a board, the NVMe drives are installed via a tray or carrier mechanism, and that carrier is not included with the base unit. The carrier itself is neatly engineered with a clip-in style insertion and thermal padding, and it supports common M.2 lengths including 2280 and 22110, but requiring an additional part adds friction if caching is part of the plan from day 1. It is a small issue, but it is the kind of detail that can slow down an otherwise straightforward deployment.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Internal Hardware

The UNAS Pro 4 is built around a quad core ARM Cortex-A57 CPU clocked at 2.0 GHz and paired with 8 GB of memory, which sets expectations for the type of workloads it is designed to handle. This is not a platform aimed at heavyweight compute tasks, but for file services and scheduled backup activity it has enough headroom to keep the system responsive, particularly when multiple users are accessing shared folders and snapshots are being taken in the background.

The CPU choice also reflects a focus on predictable appliance behavior and lower overall platform complexity rather than maximum expandable performance.

Internally, the power system is a single 150 W unit mounted inside the chassis rather than a hot swap module, which influences servicing and downtime planning. If the PSU fails, replacement is more involved than swapping an external canister, and that is a meaningful difference compared with rack systems that use easily replaceable redundant modules.

The unit does, however, support UniFi’s USP-RPS DC input as an alternative redundancy method, which changes the redundancy approach from “dual PSU in the chassis” to “centralized redundant supply for multiple devices,” with different trade-offs in cost, cabling, and rack layout.

A further internal design choice is how the system treats its software environment as a dedicated appliance rather than an OS sharing space with user storage. The system software runs on its own internal storage rather than living on the same disks that hold your data. In practical terms, that reduces the chance of the OS being affected by changes to the main array, and it can make maintenance tasks like drive replacement or pool rebuilds feel more self-contained, because the unit remains manageable even while the primary storage is under stress.

ARM-based NAS platforms typically bring some efficiency advantages, and this model follows that general pattern. The CPU class and memory configuration are aligned with lower baseline overhead than many x86 NAS designs, which can help keep idle draw and sustained power use in check relative to equivalent rack hardware, though drive choice still dominates the total. The trade-off is a lower performance ceiling compared with modern x86 systems for certain workloads, plus the usual limitations seen in this category: no practical RAM upgrade path, no ECC support, and fewer options for buyers who want to push beyond file services into heavier compute. At $499, those omissions are consistent with the target price bracket in 2026 rather than being unexpected corner cutting.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Ports and Connections

The rear connectivity is centered on 2x 10Gb SFP+ ports, and that is the defining hardware choice for this NAS in a 1U, 4 bay format. It allows the unit to be placed into a 10Gb environment without adapters, and it also opens up practical options beyond raw throughput, such as separating traffic types, connecting into different switches, or keeping a second path available for failover. The choice of SFP+ over 10GBase-T will suit users already running fiber or DAC links in a rack, but it can be less convenient for small setups built around copper RJ45.

Alongside the 10Gb ports is a separate 1GbE RJ45 port that can be used for management or for general connectivity in networks where 10Gb is not available everywhere. In a mixed UniFi environment, this is useful because it avoids tying basic onboarding and administration to a 10Gb port that might be better reserved for file traffic. It also gives a simple fallback path for access and troubleshooting if the 10Gb side is being reconfigured, moved between switches, or temporarily taken offline.

What is missing is just as relevant as what is included. There are no USB ports for quick ingest, offline copy tasks, or attaching temporary media, which some rack NAS platforms still provide for convenience even in 1U designs. Wireless is not a focus here, though Bluetooth is present for initial setup workflows, which fits the product’s “appliance onboarding” approach more than it does ongoing connectivity. The result is a port layout that prioritizes network-first storage and rack integration, while leaving out local expansion and quick-access I/O features that some users expect on a NAS.

However, (and I am sounding like a broken record at this point) at $499, these ports and connections are a notable degree more than most other turn-key NAS solutions from Synology, QNAP and even Terramaster (the more budget end of the NAS market already) are offering at under 500! So, what is presented here is a great value Day 1 solution in terms of base connectivity, but there is no denying that it might well feel the pinch in 5 years down the road when your storage is filling and your storage speeds begin to bottleneck vs your other equipment bandwidth.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Testing Noise, Temps, Power Consumption & Speed

Performance here needs to be framed around the physical limits of 4 SATA bays and the role of SSD caching. Even with dual 10Gb networking available, a 4 drive HDD array has a throughput ceiling that will be reached long before the network becomes the bottleneck in most single-client scenarios. The value of 10Gb in this context is less about hitting theoretical maximums and more about maintaining higher transfer rates consistently, handling multiple simultaneous users, and keeping latency lower when lots of smaller operations are happening alongside big file moves.

In testing with 4 HDDs in a RAID 5 configuration over a 10Gb link to a Windows 11 client, measured throughput landed in the range expected of a well-tuned 4 disk array. Using AJA with a repeated 1 GB test file, results sat around 680 to 730 MB/s for download and 520 to 600 MB/s for upload. A real-world Windows file transfer of 101 GB made up of 1,231 mixed files completed in 3 minutes and 57 seconds, which works out at an average of about 426 MB/s across the transfer, reflecting the usual drop from synthetic peak results when file variety and filesystem overhead are introduced.

Synthetic benchmarking results varied depending on the tool used, which is not unusual when caching behavior and test patterns differ. CrystalDiskMark with a 1 GB test file reported 353 MB/s read and 429 MB/s write in this run, with write coming out higher than read, which is atypical enough to treat as an outlier pending further retesting. ATTO produced stronger peak figures of 860 MB/s read and 570 MB/s write at the top end, which aligns more closely with the best-case behavior seen in sequential-focused tests on multi-drive arrays.

Noise, power draw, and thermal behavior were also measured because they affect rack placement and operating cost. With the fan profile set to auto and drives idle, noise sat around 42 to 44 dBA, dropping to roughly 38 to 40 dBA in the lowest RPM mode. Manually forcing maximum cooling pushed noise to around 56 to 57 dBA, and that level remained dominant even when drive activity increased, suggesting the cooling system prioritizes aggressive airflow when pushed. Power consumption with 4 enterprise HDDs measured roughly 49 to 50 W at idle and 60 to 62 W under activity, while swapping to 4 SATA SSDs reduced that to around 32 W during synchronization, underlining how drive choice can change the overall profile as much as the base platform.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Software and Services

The UNAS Pro 4 runs UniFi Drive and is managed through the same style of web interface used across the broader UniFi portfolio, with system status, storage, backups, and user access presented in a single dashboard. For basic NAS use, the core functions are in place: creating storage pools, managing shares, enabling file services, and monitoring drive health. The interface is generally structured around doing common tasks quickly rather than exposing every possible tuning option, which keeps setup approachable but also limits deeper control in areas that some experienced NAS users look for.

File access is centered on SMB and NFS, with browser-based file management available for basic upload, download, and folder navigation. The browser file manager covers the essentials and includes sharing link creation, but it is not positioned as a full productivity layer with advanced file handling or rich collaboration features. Remote access and identity-based access tools are tied into UniFi’s account and identity layer, and while local-only deployment is possible, the most integrated remote workflow is clearly designed around UniFi’s own services rather than third party remote networking tools.

Storage protection features include snapshot support, encrypted volumes, and configurable retention policies, which addresses most common rollback and recovery needs for file storage. Backup tooling covers several targets, including backing up to another UniFi NAS, to SMB targets, and to cloud services such as Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, and Wasabi, with Microsoft 365 backup support also part of the broader UniFi Drive direction. These features reflect the brand’s recent focus on strengthening data protection rather than expanding into application hosting or media server style functionality.

The gaps are consistent with the product’s current scope. There is no iSCSI target support, which limits certain virtualization and block-storage workflows, and there is no container or VM layer for running third party services directly on the NAS. NVMe usage remains limited to caching rather than becoming its own storage pool, which narrows the performance paths available if the goal is to build a small all-flash volume.

Client-side tooling is also still limited compared with platforms that provide a dedicated sync-and-pin application, with access leaning on standard network shares and UniFi’s identity-driven access methods rather than a full drive-style client experience.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Conclusion & Verdict

The UNAS Pro 4 is a focused 1U, 4 bay NAS that prioritizes networked file storage and straightforward deployment over broader application support. The hardware choices align with that goal: dual 10Gb SFP+ connectivity, 4 hot swap bays, and optional NVMe caching provide a platform that can deliver strong file transfer rates for a small array, while the ARM-based design keeps the system positioned as an appliance rather than a general-purpose server. Its main compromises are largely structural rather than hidden: fixed bay count with no expansion path, NVMe limited to cache, no USB I/O for local tasks, and a single internal PSU rather than a hot swap redundant design.

At $499, the value case is driven by how much rack-oriented networking is included at a price that undercuts many comparable 1U NAS systems, especially those offering 10Gb as standard. The software is usable for core storage tasks and has clearly improved over the last year in areas like snapshots and backup targets, but it still leaves out features that matter to some buyers, including iSCSI and a fuller client sync experience. For users who want a compact rack NAS primarily for SMB or NFS file storage with modern backup and snapshot features, it fits its role well; for users expecting a broader NAS app ecosystem or more hardware serviceability, the limitations are likely to be decisive. But, as Delboy once said, at this price, “what do you want? Jam on it?”. This system is giving more at this price than anyone else right now and for its limitations, for many these will be paletable in the grand scheme of things. 1U 4Bay rackmounts has always been something that most turnkey NAS brands treat poorly, due to the low saturation point of four SATA drives and why waste more capable hardware on that? In that sense, Ubiquiti is really piling on the hardware here at this price – and I for one applaud this.

You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Should YouUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MLUniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewIs the UniFi Dream Router StilUniFi Dream Router 7 - ONE YEAUniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro vs ProUniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro vs Pro Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE