ChatGPT occupe une place notable. Le chatbot d'OpenAI excelle pour des tâches parfois chronophages et permet de gagner beaucoup de temps. Mais il n'est pas la seule IA générative performante — une bonne nouvelle, puisque ChatGPT n'est pas infaillible. En cas de panne, il existe des alternatives à ChatGPT à considérer. Voici les meilleures.
The Beelink ME Pro is a 2-bay NAS-style mini PC that aims to deliver a full home or small office storage setup in a much smaller chassis than most traditional 2-bay systems. It is sold in 2 main versions, based on the Intel N95 or Intel N150, and both ship with pre-attached LPDDR5 memory and a bundled NVMe SSD as the system drive. Storage expansion is a mix of 2 SATA bays for 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch drives, plus 3 internal M.2 NVMe slots (1 running at PCIe 3.0 x2 and 2 running at PCIe 3.0 x1), and networking includes 5GbE plus 2.5GbE alongside WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.4. This review is based on several weeks of use and a set of structured tests covering temperatures over extended uptime, noise in idle and active states, power draw across different drive and workload combinations, and storage and network performance over both HDD and NVMe, with additional notes on the system’s internal layout and the practical limitations that come from its compact design.
The Beelink ME Pro is a very compact 2-bay NAS-style mini PC that combines 2 SATA bays with 3 M.2 NVMe slots and multi-gig connectivity, aiming to deliver a small footprint system without dropping features that are often reserved for larger enclosures. It is sold in N95 and N150 versions, both with pre-attached LPDDR5 memory (12GB or 16GB) and a bundled system SSD, and its internal layout uses 1 PCIe 3.0 x2 NVMe slot plus 2 PCIe 3.0 x1 slots, with 5GbE plus 2.5GbE Ethernet, WiFi 6, USB-C 10Gbps (with video output), HDMI 4K60, and a barrel-powered 120W PSU. In testing over extended uptime, external chassis temperatures stayed broadly in the mid-30C range with the rear around 38C, HDDs sat around 34C to 36C with modest 4TB drives installed, and NVMe temperatures rose sharply if the base thermal panel was removed, indicating the thermal pads and chassis contact are part of the cooling design and leaving no practical clearance for NVMe heatsinks. Noise in the tested setup remained in the mid-30 dBA range both at idle and under mixed access, power draw ranged from around 15W to 16W with no drives installed, 18W to 19W with only NVMe, about 22W to 23W with HDDs and NVMe idle, and peaked around 41W to 42W under a combined heavy workload. Performance was consistent with the hardware layout: HDD RAID1 throughput landed around 250MB/s to 267MB/s and will not saturate 5GbE, while NVMe could saturate the 5GbE link and internal testing showed about 1.5GB/s to 1.6GB/s reads and 1.1GB/s to 1.2GB/s writes on the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot, with the PCIe 3.0 x1 slots closer to roughly 830MB/s reads and 640MB/s to 670MB/s writes; media server use handled 4 simultaneous high bitrate 4K playback streams with CPU usage in the teens using Jellyfin. The main drawbacks are tied to the compact design choices: the RAM is not upgradeable, the chassis and storage fitting are very tight during installation, fan control outside BIOS was not straightforward in early testing, the NVMe slots are mixed speed by design, and the CPU options are closely spaced, meaning the upgrade decision is often about the bundled memory and SSD tier as much as the processor. Official messaging also says hot swapping is not supported, yet it worked during testing in a RAID1 scenario, suggesting a support-position limitation rather than a strict hardware block.
DESIGN - 9/10
HARDWARE - 8/10PERFORMANCE - 8/10PRICE - 8/10VALUE - 8/10
8.2
PROS
Very compact footprint for a 2-bay NAS class system (166 x 121 x 112mm, metal chassis)2x SATA bays (2.5-inch or 3.5-inch) plus 3x M.2 NVMe slots in the same enclosureMulti-gig wired networking: 5GbE + 2.5GbE, plus WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.4Strong idle efficiency in testing with drives installed and idle (about 22W to 23W)Noise stayed in the mid-30 dBA range in the tested HDD and NVMe configurationNVMe performance is sufficient to saturate the 5GbE link, with the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot clearly faster than the x1 slotsChassis thermal design appears effective under typical always-on use, with external temps broadly in the mid-30C rangePractical service access features: magnetic rear cover, base access for M.2, stored tool in the base, reset and CLR CMOS available
CONS
RAM is fixed (no SO-DIMM), so memory cannot be upgraded after purchaseVery tight internal tolerances make drive and bracket insertion less forgiving during installation and changesMixed NVMe slot speeds (1x PCIe 3.0 x2 and 2x PCIe 3.0 x1) and no 10GbE option
| Where to Buy the Beelink ME Pro NAS: |
The ME Pro is built around an all-metal unibody chassis that prioritizes footprint over easy internal spacing. In physical terms it sits noticeably smaller than many mainstream 2-bay enclosures, and in my comparisons it looked roughly 20% to 25% smaller next to typical 2-bay units from brands like Synology and TerraMaster. The front panel styling leans into a speaker-like look, and it has been compared to a Marshall speaker design, which is likely intentional given the mesh and badge layout. Functionally, that front area is not a speaker, and the design choice is mostly about appearance and airflow rather than adding any front-facing audio hardware.
|
|
From a storage perspective, the ME Pro is a hybrid layout rather than a traditional “2-bay only” NAS. It supports 2 SATA bays for 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch drives, and Beelink positions it as supporting up to 30TB per SATA bay, giving a stated 60TB HDD ceiling. Alongside that, it has 3 internal M.2 NVMe slots with a stated 4TB per slot limit, which Beelink frames as up to 12TB of SSD capacity. Taken together, that is the basis for the commonly quoted 72TB maximum figure, although most buyers will treat that as an upper boundary rather than a typical real-world configuration due to drive cost and heat considerations.
|
|
The SATA bays are accessed from the rear by removing a magnetic cooling mesh cover, then sliding out the drive bracket assembly. The trays are screw-mounted rather than tool-less, and the manual specifies different screw types depending on whether you are installing 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch drives. In practice, it is possible to physically place a drive in a tray without fully fastening it, but the design clearly expects proper screw mounting for stability and vibration control. The device also includes silicone plugs intended to reduce vibration and protect the drives, and the overall bay system is designed to sit very flush once reassembled.
|
|
One unusual design detail is that each HDD tray includes a thermal pad intended to draw heat away from the drive’s underside. That is not common on many 2-bay systems, and it suggests Beelink is trying to compensate for the compact enclosure by using direct contact points for heat transfer. The tradeoff is that this design pushes the product toward precision fitting, and it aligns with the wider theme of the ME Pro being tightly engineered rather than roomy.
If you typically choose NAS hardware where drive swaps are quick and frequent, this approach will feel more like a compact appliance that expects occasional changes, not a platform designed around constant drive rotation.
|
|
The compact chassis also affects how storage installation feels in the hands. Because clearances are tight, inserting the drive bracket and getting everything seated can feel less smooth than on larger 2-bay boxes, even though it looks clean once it is in place. This tightness is likely part of how Beelink is managing airflow paths and vibration control in such a small enclosure, but it still means you have less margin for error during installation. Overall, the storage design is best described as space-efficient and deliberate, but it asks for patience during assembly and it rewards users who install drives once and leave the configuration largely unchanged.
|
|
The ME Pro is sold in 2 CPU variants, based on Intel’s N95 or N150, both 4-core and 4-thread chips with integrated graphics. In practical NAS terms, these CPUs sit in the low power mini PC category rather than the heavier desktop class, so the platform is designed around efficiency and compact integration rather than raw compute headroom. In your testing and general use, that design target showed up as stable day-to-day responsiveness for typical NAS tasks, plus enough iGPU capability for common media server workloads when paired with the right software stack.
|
|
Memory is integrated rather than socketed. The configurations pair the N95 with 12GB LPDDR5 4800MHz and the N150 with 16GB LPDDR5 4800MHz, and there is no user-accessible SO-DIMM slot to expand it later. In the context of a small NAS, this matters less for basic file serving and backups, but it becomes more relevant if the device is expected to run multiple containers, heavier indexing, or virtual machines. Because the memory is fixed at purchase, the CPU choice is also effectively tied to your long-term memory ceiling.
|
|
Internally, the platform is constrained by limited PCIe resources, which affects how the storage and networking are wired. In the review you noted the CPU platform has 9 lanes available, and the device uses a split approach across its internal components rather than giving every subsystem the same bandwidth. The NVMe area reflects this most clearly, with 1 slot operating at PCIe 3.0 x2 while the other slots operate at PCIe 3.0 x1, which makes slot choice part of performance planning for any workload that leans heavily on NVMe. This lane budgeting also helps explain why the system lands at 5GbE plus 2.5GbE rather than a single 10GbE port, since 10GbE would typically add pressure to an already tight allocation.
|
|
Controller choices are mixed rather than uniform, and you called that out as unusual. The 5GbE port uses a Realtek RTL8126 controller and the 2.5GbE port uses an Intel i226-V controller, which is not a common pairing in the same chassis. On the storage side, the SATA side is handled by an ASMedia ASM2116 controller, and in your notes you referenced it operating on a PCIe 3.0 x1 link, which is still sufficient for 2 SATA bays in most real-world use. These choices are relevant for OS compatibility and driver maturity, particularly if the unit is being used with NAS focused platforms rather than the included Windows 11 installation.
|
|
Cooling is one of the main internal design decisions that enables the smaller enclosure. Instead of a traditional rear fan placed at the drive backplane, the system uses a CPU fan working with a vapor chamber arrangement, and airflow is routed so that it also passes over other internal heat sources rather than treating the CPU as a separate cooling zone. In your thermal testing, you observed that the front panel area ran warmer than the rest of the chassis due to the WiFi hardware placement, and you also saw a noticeable rise in NVMe temperatures when the base thermal panel was removed, which supports the idea that the chassis panels and pads are intended to be part of the heat management system. Power is delivered via a barrel connector using a 120W external PSU, which provides headroom for spin-up and load, but it also means this is not a USB-C powered design.
|
|
Up front, the ME Pro keeps things simple: a power button and a single front-mounted USB port for quick access. This suits the NAS-first intent, where most interaction is remote, but it also sets expectations for local use. If you plan to attach multiple peripherals directly to the unit, you are quickly pushed toward using a hub or relying on network-based management rather than treating it like a conventional mini PC with generous front I/O.
|
|
Most connectivity is placed at the rear and along the base section of the chassis, which also helps keep cables routed in one direction when the unit is placed on a desk or shelf. Wired networking is split across 2 Ethernet ports, a 5GbE port and a 2.5GbE port, and the unit also includes WiFi 6 plus Bluetooth 5.4. That mix allows both a standard single-cable setup and more flexible layouts such as separating traffic across the 2 wired links, or keeping WiFi available for temporary placement, troubleshooting, or scenarios where pulling Ethernet is not straightforward.
|
|
For general external connectivity, the ME Pro includes a USB-C port rated at 10Gbps for data and it supports video output, but it is not used for power input. Power is delivered through a barrel connector and the unit ships with a 120W external PSU, which provides comfortable headroom and removes any questions around USB-C PD negotiation. Alongside USB-C, it includes 1 USB 3.2 port rated at 10Gbps and 2 USB 2.0 ports at 480Mbps, which covers basic keyboard, mouse, UPS signalling, or low bandwidth accessories, but it is still a small selection compared with many mini PCs.
|
|
For local display and basic audio, there is 1 HDMI output rated up to 4K 60Hz and a 3.5mm audio jack. The manual also calls out a reset hole and a CLR CMOS function, which is useful context for users who intend to experiment with different operating systems, boot media, or BIOS settings, since recovery options are clearly exposed rather than being hidden inside the chassis. Overall, the port selection feels intentionally weighted toward networking and core connectivity, with enough display and USB support for setup and troubleshooting, but not a layout aimed at heavy local peripheral use.
Testing was done over several weeks of general use and targeted measurements, with a focus on temperatures, noise, power draw, and storage and network throughput. The typical configuration used for the core measurements included 2 SATA HDDs and 3 installed NVMe drives, with the system left running for extended periods and accessed regularly throughout the day. In addition to network file transfers, I also checked internal storage performance directly over SSH to separate storage limits from network limits.
On thermals, external chassis temperatures after a 24-hour period of operation with regular hourly access sat around 34C to 35C across most sides. The base area was a little warmer at roughly 34C to 38C, and the rear section around the motherboard and vapor chamber area was around 38C. The installed HDDs sat around 34C to 36C in that same period, using 4TB IronWolf drives, so not high power enterprise class media. The front panel area peaked higher than the rest of the enclosure, which aligned with the internal placement of the WiFi hardware near the front of the chassis.
|
|
|
|
The NVMe area showed the clearest example of how much the chassis panels and pads matter. With the base thermal panel in place, the panel itself sat around 36C over the same extended uptime. When that panel was removed, temperatures on the NVMe drives rose noticeably, with the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot drive reaching around 45C to 46C and the PCIe 3.0 x1 slot drives sitting around 38C to 41C. The difference suggested that the base panel and thermal pad contact are doing meaningful work as part of the heat path, and it also reinforces that there is no practical clearance for NVMe heatsinks in this chassis.
|
|
Noise levels were measured in a modest drive configuration, and they stayed in the mid-30 dBA range in the test environment. With the HDDs idle and the system otherwise sitting in standby, noise came in around 36 dBA to 37 dBA. With both HDDs being accessed simultaneously and NVMe activity occurring, it sat around 35 dBA to 38 dBA. The system uses a compact fan approach tied to the CPU cooling path, and one limitation I ran into is that I did not find a straightforward way to control the fan outside the BIOS during early testing, including attempts via SSH, which reduces fine tuning options for users who want tighter acoustics control.
|
|
Power consumption was tested in several stages to isolate the impact of installed storage. With no HDDs or NVMe installed and the system powered on, it drew around 15W to 16W. With 3 NVMe installed and no HDDs, it rose to around 18W to 19W. With 2 HDDs and 3 NVMe installed but all media idle, it sat around 22W to 23W.
Under a heavy combined workload with HDD and NVMe activity plus the CPU at full utilization, power draw reached around 41W to 42W, which reflects a worst case state rather than typical idle or light service operation.
For throughput, 2 HDDs in a RAID1 style setup were able to deliver around 250 MB/s to 267 MB/s, which is consistent with what you would expect from 2-bay HDD performance and means the HDD side will not saturate a 5GbE link.
NVMe storage over the 5GbE connection was able to reach full saturation of the network link in testing, so the network became the limiting factor rather than the SSD. Internal NVMe testing over SSH showed the expected split between slots, with the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot delivering roughly 1.5 GB/s to 1.6 GB/s reads and 1.1 GB/s to 1.2 GB/s writes, while the PCIe 3.0 x1 slots delivered around 830 MB/s to 835 MB/s reads and roughly 640 MB/s to 670 MB/s writes with more variability.
On media server use, 4 simultaneous high bitrate 4K playback streams ran with CPU usage in the teens, using Jellyfin. One extra operational note from testing is that while official messaging indicates hot swapping is not supported, I was able to remove and replace a drive in a RAID1 environment without powering down and continue the rebuild process, which suggests the limitation may be a support stance rather than an absolute hardware block.
The ME Pro’s main practical strengths are the space-efficient chassis, the combination of 2 SATA bays with 3 internal NVMe slots, and a connectivity set that includes 5GbE plus 2.5GbE and WiFi 6. In measured testing it delivered controlled external temperatures under typical always-on use, mid-30 dBA noise levels in the tested configuration, and power draw that stayed in the low-20W range at idle with drives installed, rising into the low-40W range under a full combined workload. Storage performance matched the internal design limits: HDD throughput was solid but not enough to saturate 5GbE, while NVMe performance split clearly between the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot and the PCIe 3.0 x1 slots, with the faster NVMe slot capable of saturating the 5GbE link in network transfers.
The main limitations are tied to the same compact, integrated approach that makes it unusual. Memory is fixed at purchase with no SO-DIMM upgrade path, NVMe cooling relies on chassis contact and leaves no clearance for heatsinks, and the lane allocation results in mixed NVMe slot speeds rather than uniform bandwidth across all 3 slots. The launch CPU options also remain close enough that the decision is often as much about bundled memory and SSD tier as it is about a clear performance tier shift. For buyers who want a small, always-on NAS with mixed SATA and NVMe storage, multi-gig networking, and reasonable thermals, noise, and power characteristics, the ME Pro aligns with that goal, but it is less suitable for users who expect frequent hardware changes, want expandability in RAM, or prefer a more conventional 10GbE-first network design.
| PROs of the Beelink ME Pro NAS | CONs of the Beelink ME Pro NAS |
|
|
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
Bon, vous commencez à me connaître, j'ai une passion presque maladive pour les câbles, les batteries et tout ce qui permet de nourrir mes trucs de geek maladif. J’ai acheté il y a quelques semaines ce bloc chargeur de chez Anker équipé d’un grand écran, et franchement, je l’adore. Il trône sur mon bureau, sous mon écran, et je charge absolument tout avec lui. Il fournit 250W en GaN, et autant vous dire qu’avec ce truc, votre bureau ne sera plus jamais le même.
Au premier coup d'œil, la bête ressemble à un petit réveil futuriste, compact et plutôt mignon avec sa robe grise assez classique des produits Anker Prime sortis ces dernières semaines. Puis vous le branchez, et là on change un peu de dimension. On se retrouve face à un chouette écran LCD de 2,26 pouces qui affiche en temps réel ce qui se passe dans le ventre de la bête. C’est le genre de détail dont je ne pourrai plus jamais me passer : voir les watts défiler précisément port par port, c'est limite hypnotique et vraiment très satisfaisant.
La fiche technique est tout simplement monstrueuse avec quatre ports USB-C en façade et deux ports USB-A sur le côté. Le premier port USB-C est capable à lui tout seul de balancer 140W, ce qui vous permettra de redonner 50% de batterie à un MacBook Pro 16 pouces en quelque 25 minutes. Avec une puissance totale de 250W, vous pouvez même alimenter simultanément deux ordinateurs portables, une tablette et vos smartphones divers et variés sans faire chauffer le boîtier (merci la technologie GaN).
L’autre truc très marrant c’est la molette de contrôle située sur le côté de l'appareil. En tournant et en cliquant, on accède à une gestion plus fine de l'énergie délivrée. On peut par exemple activer le mode Dual-Laptop pour prioriser deux ordinateurs, ou passer en mode Low Current pour optimiser la charge des petites batteries de vos AirPods ou de votre Apple Watch durant la nuit. Tout est transparent, intuitif, et on peut même gérer l'ensemble depuis une application dédiée sur son smartphone si l'on a la flemme de tendre le bras. Pour être très honnête je n’utilise jamais la molette, je l’ai branché, et par défaut, c’est déjà parfait.
Pour ceux qui veulent vraiment un réveil sur leur bureau, en mode horloge, le chargeur affiche l'heure et la date proprement. C’est validé pour ça aussi.
Alors certes, c’est 160 euros, mais franchement c’est tellement puissant, pratique, design et satisfaisant, qu’à mon avis, ça vaut vraiment le coup, surtout si vous aussi, vous aimez voir les watts défiler en temps réel. Disponible par ici, sur Amazon !
Article invité publié par Vincent Lautier . Vous pouvez aussi faire un saut sur mon blog , ma page de recommandations Amazon , ou lire tous les tests que je publie dans la catégorie "Gadgets Tech" , comme cette liseuse Android de dingue ou ces AirTags pour Android !
Non mais attendez... y'a un mec qui vient de concevoir une carte mère 486 from scratch , en grand 2026 comme disent les jeunes ! Pas une repro. Pas un clone. Non non, une vraie carte mère complète avec son propre chipset custom qui fait tourner DOOM et Linux.
Un PCB 4 couches fait maison, rien que ça !!
Piotr Grzesik, alias maniek86, est un étudiant en électronique polonais qui s'est lancé dans un projet complètement dingue. Tout est parti d'une sombre arnaque sur une carte POST ISA chinoise... et suite à ça, il s'est dit "bon, je vais apprendre le VHDL et l'ISA bus moi-même". En fait, au début je pensais que c'était juste un projet de bricolage de plus, mais non. De fil en aiguille, il a fini par créer la M8SBC-486 , une carte mère qui accueille de vrais processeurs Intel 486 vintage.
La carte mère M8SBC-486 dans toute sa splendeur rétro
Et le bonhomme n'a pas juste fait un PCB, mais a carrément développé son propre chipset baptisé "Hamster" qui tourne sur un FPGA Xilinx Spartan II. Il aurait pu utiliser un FPGA récent mais il a préféré le Spartan II parce que les outils Xilinx modernes supportent plus ces vieilles puces. Donc il bosse avec des logiciels de 15 ans d'âge... logique.
Et dedans, y'a tout ce qu'il faut pour émuler un PC des années 90 : un timer 8254, un contrôleur d'interruptions 8259, un contrôleur clavier PS/2, et même une horloge temps réel.
Côté specs c'est du bon vieux socket PGA-168 compatible avec tous les processeurs 486 5V, que ce soit du Intel ou des compatibles. Le bus tourne à 24 MHz, ce qui donne du 48 MHz avec un DX2 (et théoriquement 72 MHz avec un DX4). Y'a 4 Mo de SRAM, 256 Ko de ROM pour le BIOS, et deux slots ISA 16 bits pour les nostalgiques des cartes d'extension. Attention par contre, si vous comptez utiliser un 486 3.3V genre les derniers AMD, ça passera pas... faut du 5V uniquement.
Perso, ce qui m'impressionne le plus c'est la liste des trucs qui tournent dessus. MS-DOS 6.22 évidemment, FreeDOS, mais aussi Linux 2.2.26 ! Sans oublier DOOM, Wolfenstein 3D, et la démo Second Reality qui en a fait baver plus d'un à l'époque. Même Windows 3.1 démarre. Bon, la souris fonctionne pas, mais quand même...
J'aurais bien voulu tester moi-même sur un vieux 486 DX2/66 qui traîne quelque part dans un carton au garage, mais retrouver ce truc c'est un projet en soi. Finalement, si vous êtes fan d' émulation rétro , c'est pil poil le genre de projet qui fait rêver les vieux grands enfants que nous sommes !
Le plus beau dans tout ça, c'est que Piotr a publié l'intégralité du projet en open source sur GitHub : les schémas, le PCB, le code VHDL du chipset, les sources du BIOS... Tout est dispo. Du coup si vous avez envie de vous lancer dans le rétrocomputing hardcore, vous savez où chercher.
Bon après, y'a quelques limitations. C'est là que ça peut coincer car y'a pas de DMA, donc oubliez les cartes son type Sound Blaster. Pas de second PIC non plus, et le Plug and Play ISA n'est pas encore implémenté dans le BIOS. Sauf si vous êtes prêt à contribuer au code, évidemment.
Mais franchement, pour un premier essai de cette envergure, c'est du très très solide.
Bref, si vous voulez voir la bête en action, la vidéo montre la démo Second Reality qui tourne avec quelques petits glitches visuels et pas de son, mais c'est normal vu les limitations.
Et si vous avez des vieux 486 qui traînent dans un carton, vous avez maintenant une raison de les ressortir !
Le partenaire de Duncan dans A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms ne se nomme pas vraiment l'Œuf. Il s'agit d'un surnom, qui contient un secret sur sa véritable identité. Et la V.O. donne une bonne piste.
Alors que la saison 2 de l'émission phare de Canal+ vient de se clôturer avec deux derniers épisodes, le 23 janvier 2026, l'immense succès de Loups Garous pourrait lui permettre d'obtenir une suite. Mais le casting de cette potentielle saison 3 pourrait-il être ouvert au grand public ? Panayotis Pascot et Fary répondent à cette question que vous vous posez peut-être.
Bungie a récemment lancé une vague de braderie sur tout le contenu de Destiny 2 sur Steam, Xbox et PS5. Mais derrière cette offre alléchante se cache une vraie crainte pour la communauté.
Self-hosted : ce tutoriel explique comment installer BentoPDF avec Docker, une boite à outils PDF "client-side" accessible depuis votre navigateur web.
Le post Installation de BentoPDF : une boite à outils dans votre navigateur pour éditer les PDF a été publié sur IT-Connect.
Connexion