UGREEN NASync Celebrates 2 Years – But Is UGREEN Ready for the Big Leagues?

Two years ago, the popular battery and PC accessory company UGREEN, launched their Kickstarter campaign for the NASync personal NAS series of devices. The brand already had a steadily growing foothold in China with their DX series of NAS devices, but were still a huge outsider in the world of NAS globally. Fast forward two years, a $6 Million crowdfunding campaign, 6 new NAS releases, a new NAS kickstarter in progress (the IDX6011 AI NAS) and generally undermining long-time players who have been in the NAS market for more than a decade – UGREEN is looking like quite a beast in the world of NAS! But two years, UGREEN now finds that along with an increased market position also comes increased demand, scrutiny and expectation. I went to Shenzhen, China, to speak directly with the teams who direct and create their NASync division to ask them them questions about the development of this series, lessons that were learnt, where they are going and what they still need to do to further establish their position in the turnkey NAS market.

Full Disclosure – this Q&A has NOT been sponsored, subsidised or creatively controlled by UGREEN. These questions are my own, submitted to UGREEN 48 hours prior to the interview, and the answers provided were directly from their team.

UGREEN was already a well-established company in its own right before it expanded into NAS systems. So, currently, what is the scale of the teams and resources that your company has allocated to this? R&D, Design, Development, Technical Support, etc?

UGREEN put together its NAS team back in 2018, released its first NAS product in China in 2021, and went global for the first time in 2024, bringing its NAS products to markets around the world. NAS is one of the company’s key strategic product lines, with a team of several hundred people working on it—including product, R&D, design, testing, security, and more. This doesn’t count shared support teams like industrial design, legal, or finance; we’re only talking about people directly focused on NAS. In this whole building, every floor is filled with NAS team members—except for the third floor, which is just the cafeteria.

What has been the biggest challenge in the continued development of your NASync/UGOS services in these last 2 years?

One challenge is resource allocation. We need to support international users at the same time, which means balancing different priorities and expectations. Another challenge is localization. It’s not just about language, but also understanding different user behaviors and usage scenarios. So we had to spend a lot more time to research and validate what users actually need in each region. Based on that, we’ve been continuously adjusting our product direction and improving UGOS to better fit a global audience. It’s definitely an ongoing process, but it’s helped us build a much clearer understanding of the market.

Two years on from your initial crowdfunding, your position in the ‘turnkey NAS market’ from comparative obscurity has catapulted to effectively being in the top 5 (if not top 3) – What do you think UGREEN have brought to the market (or change in the market as a whole) that caused this?

There are a few key things behind that.

Hardware DNA, Built for AI

UGREEN is a hardware company at heart. With our NAS products, we insist on solid hardware—high-performance CPUs, ample memory, high-performance CPUs and ample memory—not just for reliability, but for computing power. AI NAS demands serious performance. Without a strong hardware foundation, AI is nothing more than a concept. Our hardware is designed to make AI run stable and fast.

User-Centric, Not Just a Slogan

We’ve always put ourselves in our users’ shoes. We listen to every voice—on social media, in forums, through user interviews. Many of our features, like snapshots and SAN Manager, came directly from users telling us, “I need this.” Our products aren’t built in a vacuum; they’re shaped together with you.

R&D Investment, Bringing NAS to Everyone

We established our software R&D team, including an AI pre-research team, early on. User feedback has driven us to keep investing, with one goal in mind: to shorten the learning curve. NAS shouldn’t be just a toy for tech enthusiasts. We believe the future of NAS is for everyone—simple, smart, and accessible. This is the path we’re on, and it’s one we want to walk together with you.

The UGREEN IDX6011 AI NAS series has been in development for a long time, and will be headed to its own crowdfunding campaign shortly. What was the biggest challenge you faced in its development and/or lesson that you learned about this new profile of solution?

The biggest challenge was finding the right balance between AI capabilities and real user value. It’s relatively easy to add AI features from a technical perspective, but making them actually useful, stable, and well-integrated into everyday workflows is much harder. Especially on a NAS, NAS is essentially a local storage product, everything runs locally, so for us, it was important that AI features also run locally. But hardware resources and compute power are limited. So the question is, how do we build useful and stable AI features without affecting NAS core functionality like storage, backup and overall system performance? That’s very difficult.

And from product design perspective，it’s also challenging to define the right AI use cases. It’s not about adding more AI features, but making sure they are scenario-driven and actually solve real problems, like better file organization, smarter search, easier intraction… We need to keep the experience simple. Many users are still new to AI on a NAS, so we wanna make things natural and do not add extra complexity. So right now, we’re still in the process of refining and validating these ideas, and making sure we deliver something that’s both practical and reliable for users.

I think it would be fair to say that UGREEN has chiefly focused on Desktop NAS server ownership in their portfolio of solutions to date. But have you explored rackmount solutions, and/or is this something that could happen in the near future?

Actually we’ve done some internal research on rackmount solutions, it’s quite different from desktop NAS in terms of target audience, hardware, software and sales. So it’s not just an extension of what we’re doing now, it requires a different product strategy. For now, our focus is still on improving and expanding our desktop NAS lineup, in the short term, we don’t have a concrete plan for rackmount products, but it’s something we’ll continue to evaluate over time.

Now that UGREEN is a largely established player in the turnkey NAS market, there is a lot more scrutiny on the extent to which your brand preemptively prepares against cyber security threats. What is UGREEN doing to address (in terms of foundations on this platform and broader services) this to avoid a potential slow moving snowballing security incident?

Security is something we take very seriously. At the product level, we provide a range of built-in security features. For example, users can enable DoS protection to defend against network attacks, automatically block IP addresses after multiple failed login attempts, and set up firewall rules to control access from specific IP addresses and built-in Security app to scan for suspicious files We also have a dedicated internal security team and a well-established vulnerability handling process, so critical issues can be identified and resolved quickly. We also provide a vulnerability reporting channel on our official website. If users discover any potential security issues, they can report them to us, and we will assess and respond accordingly.

(Below is a snippet of the Security Disclosure page from UGREEN, available HERE)

At CES 2026, UGREEN unveiled its surveillance platform and edge AI cameras. At that time, your team was kind enough to allow me to see the early development of your NAS surveillance application that will allow full management, direct control and storage of these new Surveillance services. Is development still continuing on this and will this be a service that existing NASync owners will have access to in the future

Yes, development is still ongoing. The surveillance platform you saw at CES is actually a part we are exploring, and is still under active development. From what I understand, AIOT is a broad ecosystem that is going to feature ai NAS, ai-based home security cameras, and many more AI-empowered hardware devices for a smarter lifestyle. On the NAS side, we’re also building our own surveillance application for NASync. We plan to launch it within this year. In terms of compatibility, we aim to support both UGREEN cameras and third-party cameras, so users have more flexibility to build their setup. So overall, both sides are moving forward, but they are different products within the UGREEN ecosystem.

In the last year, UGREEN released two ARM RK chip-powered NAS solutions in the DH2300 and DH4300 – How easy/hard was scaling UGOS onto this more modest hardware base, and were there any useful lessons learned that have benefited your NAS development as a whole?

DH series is our entry-level lineup, designed mainly for NAS beginners and users with simpler needs. From a technical perspective, running UGOS on an ARM-based platform is definitely more constrained compared to x86, especially in terms of performance and resource availability. A lot of things can’t just be directly carried over, we need to re-adapt them for the ARM architecture, including the kernel, system services, and many core features. So we had to be more selective and thoughtful about which features to include and how to optimize them. And from a product perspective, it actually helped us become more focused. With the DXP series, we already emphasized user-friendliness, but with the DH series, we really wanted to take that further and make it as simple as possible, essentially positioning it as a user’s first NAS.

So in practice, we streamlined certain features based on the hardware and target users. For example, we simplified or did not include things like virtual machines and some AI capabilities, and instead focused on delivering a smooth and reliable core experience. One key lesson we learned is that not every product needs to do everything. It’s more important to match the right experience to the right user group. And that thinking has also helped us better define our overall NAS product lineup.

I canvased a large group of UGREEN NAS users (many of whom were part of your original Kickstarter campaign) who are still using their NASync systems to this day, and have followed you on your journey so far. I asked them which features or improvements they would like to see in future updates and revisions to UGOS. Are you able to share if these are features that are on the roadmap, or have been explored?

• Full Volume Encryption
• WORM support
• A mixed drive RAID storage system (comparable to Synology Hybrid RAID or Terramaster TRAID)
• A tiered storage system (unlike the copy system of ‘caching’, but a SSD+HDD composite pool that intelligently moves ‘hot’, ‘warm’ and ‘cold’ data to appropriate storage areas)
• ZFS as a file system choice
• A native Plex Media Server Application
• A local client application for Mac/Windows for file pinning, streaming, intelligent 30-day deletion (see Synology Drive, QNAP Qsync, etc)
• A more comprehensive security scanner (eg scanning for unsecure open ports, SSH being open, weak passwords, admin accounts, auto blocks disabled, etc)

We’ve actually seen many of these requests from our users as well, these are very valuable suggestions and we’ve already had internal discussions around most of them. But many of these features, like full volume encryption, hybrid RAID, or tiered storage are quite complex, they take time to design, develop and validate, especially we wanted to make them stable and reliable.

So at this stage, we don’t have a specific timeline we can share yet. But these are definitely things we take seriously, and we’ll plan them carefully based on user demand and overall product direction. If we see strong demand from users, we’ll absolutely prioritize them accordingly.

Thank you to the team at UGREEN for their time in this interview. As mentioned, the answers about were provided in their entirety and without prejudice. This will be a video soon that covers this, the tour of the facilities, as well as further discussion around the IDX6011 NAS Kickstarter and how this has been managed.

Want to Support the work me and Eddie do at NASCompares? If you found this article helpful and are going to buy a UGREEN NAS from the brand’s official site or from Amazon, use the links below. Using these links will result in a small commission coming to us (which costs you nothing extra) and it allows us to keep doing what we do! Thank you for keeping the internet a fair and sustainable place!

Buy the UGREEN NAS from your local Amazon Store	Buy the UGREEN NAS solutions Directly from UGREEN.COM

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UGREEN NAS - 2 Years Later - IUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UGREEN DXP4800 PRO NAS ReviewUGREEN DXP4800 PRO NAS ReviewUGREEN iDX6011 Pro AI NAS ReviUGREEN iDX6011 Pro AI NAS ReviUGREEN Reveal New SurveillanceUGREEN Reveal New Surveillance100 Reasons Why Users Choose S Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Je viens tout juste de rentrer de vacances. Nous sommes partis en Sicile avec des amis, en explorant principalement l’Est de l’île : Syracuse, Taormine, l’Etna, etc. Un décor idéal pour tester un nouvel équipement que j’avais emporté dans mes bagages : le drone DJI NEO 2. Et clairement, je ne regrette pas mon choix…

Prise en main Neo 2

Je ne vais pas vous inonder de photos ou de vidéos ici. L’objectif est plutôt de partager mon retour d’expérience.

Il y a quelques années, j’avais acheté un drone Parrot en 2013. Je l’utilisais peu et je l’ai finalement revendu après 2 ans. Depuis, le marché a bien évolué… Les drones sont devenus bien plus accessibles et simples à utiliser. J’ai toujours été attiré par les images impressionnantes (vues aériennes) qu’ils permettent de prendre… mais je n’avais pas envie de passer des heures en réglage pour prendre une photo ou une vidéo. Mon besoin était simple : obtenir quelques prises de vue en hauteur facilement.

J’ai profité d’une promotion pour acheter le DJI NEO 2 à environ 200 €. Ce qui m’a attiré, c’est sa promesse de fonctionner de manière quasi-autonome.

Plusieurs modes de pilotage

Le drone peut être utilisé de plusieurs façons : via les boutons intégrés sur le côté (voir photo), l’application mobile, des commandes vocales et même avec des gestes de la main. Il propose une douzaine de modes automatiques (cercle, boomerang, rocket, suivi…), qui permettent de capturer facilement des séquences propres et dynamiques. Grâce à son LIDAR embarqué, il peut détecter et éviter les obstacles. Aussi, il suffit de présenter sa main, paume ouverte vers le haut pour que le drone viennent se poser. Sa vitesse maximale peut atteindre 12m/s (43,2km/s) !

À noter : il est compatible avec plusieurs radiocommandes DJI et casques FPV, à condition d’ajouter un émetteur-récepteur à l’arrière du drone (environ 20 €).

Comme vous pouvez le constater, il s’agit d’un petit drone, qui ne rivalise pas avec un modèle à plus de 1 000 €. Ce n’est pas l’objectif. Je cherchais un appareil léger (151 g), compact (147 × 171 × 41 mm) et accessible à toute la famille. Il dispose d’une mémoire interne de 49 Go.

En moins de 5 minutes (et avec quelques explications), ma fille cadette était capable de l’utiliser seule.

Qualité des photos et vidéos

Je n’ai utilisé le drone qu’en plein jour (pas testé la nuit). Par défaut, il est paramétré pour capturer des photos de 12 Mpx (format JPEG) et des vidéos 4K en 60 images par seconde (il peut monter jusqu’à 100 IPS). La plage ISO s’étend de 100 à 12 800 selon le fabricant, ce qui laisse à penser qu’il peut être polyvalent avec peu de luminosité.

Pour un usage en plein jour, les résultats sont franchement très très bien.

Autonomie : le point faible

L’autonomie est probablement le principal point faible de l’appareil. Sur le papier, on pourrait souhaiter mieux. En pratique, cela ne m’a pas posé de problème. Mes séquences n’ont jamais dépassé trois à quatre minutes : j’activais un mode et lançais le drone… il revenait et je le rangeais. Comptez environ 15 minutes en vol en tout sur une charge.

Pour le voyage, j’avais prévu une seconde batterie et une boîte de rangement. L’ensemble tenait sans problème dans mon sac Eastpak, à côté d’autres affaires. J’avais également prévu une batterie externe pour recharger (au cas où), mais je n’en ai pas eu besoin.

Mes accessoires indispensables pour voyager léger (sac, batterie, chargeurs…)

Attention au vent

Sur le terrain (que ce soit sur l’Etna ou en bord de mer), je n’ai rencontré aucun souci lié au vent. Mais il a des limites ! Selon le fabricant, sa résistance maximale est de 10,7 m/s (force 5 sur l’échelle de Beaufort).

En synthèse

Non, je n’ai pas prévu de devenir influenceur spécialisé dans les drones. Cet achat répond à un usage simple et efficace. Oui, c’est un gadget. Non, ce n’est pas un outil professionnel. Et non, il ne remplacera jamais un drone haut de gamme. En revanche, il coche toutes les cases pour un usage grand public : léger, simple, rapide à prendre en main, avec une qualité photo et vidéo très satisfaisante pour ce segment de prix.

Depuis quelque temp, un mouvement de fond s’observe : un retour progressif vers les infrastructures locales. La raison ? Même s’il a de nombreux atouts, le Cloud ne coche plus toutes les cases dès que l’on parle de confidentialité des données, de latence ou simplement de coûts. C’est sur ce créneau que QNAP positionne son QAI-h1290FX. Un serveur de stockage pensé pour les charges de travail IA : LLM, architectures RAG, inférence en temps réel. Ici, il ne s’agit pas d’un simple NAS avec un logo IA collé dessus…

QNAP QAI-h1290FX

Le QAI-h1290FX est un boitier 12 baies SSD U.2 NVMe/SATA. Pas de disques rotatifs ici, on est clairement dans le registre des IOPS élevées, indispensables pour alimenter des pipelines de données intensifs ou soutenir l’inférence en temps réel sans créer de goulot d’étranglement côté stockage. Il est animé par un AMD EPYC 7302P (16 cœurs / 32 threads) pouvant atteindre 3,3 GHz. A noter que ce processeur a obtenu 32 114 points selon PassMark. Ce dernier est épaulé par 128 Go de RAM RDIMM DDR4 ECC extensible jusqu’à 1 To (8 × 128 Go)

Le QAI-h1290FX n’est pas un NAS comme les autres. Il est compatible avec les cartes NVIDIA RTX, notamment la RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q, embarquant jusqu’à 96 Go de VRAM. Une capacité mémoire GPU qui change la donne pour quiconque veut faire tourner des LLM de taille respectable en local. La prise en charge de CUDA, TensorRT et du Transformer Engine vient confirmer l’orientation IA-first de la machine. On n’est pas sur un gadget, mais un outil capable d’accélérer des modèles de deep learning, de génération d’images ou de traitement du langage naturel.

Connectique

La connectivité est à la hauteur des ambitions du boîtier :

• 3 ports USB 3.0
• 2 ports réseau 2,5 Gb/s
• 2 ports réseau 25 Gb/s en SFP28

A noter la présence de 4 emplacements PCIe (3* Gen 4 x16 et 1* Gen 4 x8)

QuTS hero et l’écosystème logiciel

Côté système, on est sur du QuTS hero, basé sur ZFS. On retrouve les fonctionnalités attendues pour un usage professionnel : déduplication, snapshots, intégrité des données. Rien de révolutionnaire pour les habitués de la gamme… Container Station et Virtualization Station permettent de gérer des environnements bénéficiant d’un accès direct au GPU, ce qui permet aux équipes de déployer des modèles sans friction et sans reconfiguration complexe.

Plusieurs outils populaires dans l’écosystème IA open source sont préinstallés :

• AnythingLLM, OpenWebUI, Ollama : pour monter rapidement un LLM privé ;
• vLLM* : moteur d’inférence LLM ;
• Stable Diffusion*, ComfyUI* : pour la génération d’images ;
• n8n* : pour l’automatisation et les workflows sans code.

C’est une approche « prêt à l’emploi » qui tranche avec les serveurs IA nus que l’on retrouve chez certains concurrents.

En synthèse

Le QNAP QAI-h1290FX est un serveur de stockage conçu de bout en bout pour répondre aux besoins d’IA on-premise. L’alliance d’un stockage full-flash NVMe, d’un processeur EPYC et d’une compatibilité GPU NVIDIA en fait une plateforme intéressante pour les entreprises qui souhaitent reprendre la main sur leur stratégie IA (sans dépendre du cloud ou exposer leurs données).

Les logiciels faciles à installer (Ollama, OpenWebUI, n8n…) abaissent la barrière à l’entrée, ce qui est un point fort pour les équipes IT non spécialisées. Reste à connaître son prix et la date de disponibilité…

* en cours d’intégration

Sharge Go Back to the Drawing Board, with the Disk Pro 2

The Sharge Disk Pro 2 is an upcoming portable storage and connectivity device that combines the functionality of a USB hub with external SSD support in a compact, credit card-sized form factor. Developed by Sharge, the device is designed to address the increasing demand for high-speed data access, external storage expansion, and multi-port connectivity across mobile and desktop platforms. Unlike conventional USB-C hubs or portable SSDs, the Disk Pro 2 merges both roles into a single unit, while also incorporating active cooling to maintain consistent performance under sustained workloads. At launch, it will be available in two variants, Lite and Ultra, which differ in display capability and power efficiency, introducing a tiered approach not seen in the previous model.

Positioned as a follow-up to the earlier Sharge Disk Pro, this new iteration shifts away from fixed internal storage and instead introduces support for user-installed SSDs in multiple M.2 form factors. Alongside this change, the device retains key characteristics such as 10Gbps data throughput, integrated power delivery, and video output capabilities, while adding refinements including magnetic attachment and a lanyard-style data cable. The Lite version features HDMI 2.0 and a higher power draw of around 4W, while the Ultra version includes HDMI 2.1 and operates at approximately 1W, providing a more efficient option with expanded display support. The Disk Pro 2 is scheduled to launch via Kickstarter, continuing the company’s established approach of introducing new hardware through crowdfunding platforms.

Sharge Disk Pro 2 – Design & Storage

The Sharge Disk Pro 2 maintains a compact footprint, measuring approximately 90 × 61 × 11 mm, aligning closely with the dimensions of a standard credit card. This size places it firmly in the category of ultra-portable accessories, designed to be carried alongside a smartphone or laptop without requiring additional space typically associated with external drives or docking stations. The chassis follows a flat, rectangular layout with integrated components distributed to maximize internal efficiency while preserving a slim profile. A defining aspect of the design is its transparent enclosure, which exposes internal components in a style often associated with “cyberpunk” aesthetics. This approach is not purely cosmetic, as it also highlights the inclusion of active cooling hardware within a device of this size. The visible fan and internal layout reinforce the product’s positioning as a performance-oriented device rather than a passive accessory, distinguishing it from more conventional sealed USB hubs. The external design remains consistent across both Lite and Ultra variants, with no physical differentiation beyond internal configuration.

The Disk Pro 2 introduces a magnetic mounting system intended for direct attachment to compatible devices. This includes native support for MagSafe-enabled smartphones, as well as the option to use included magnetic rings for broader compatibility with non-MagSafe hardware. The goal is to reduce cable strain and improve portability by allowing the hub and connected device to function as a single unit during use, particularly in mobile workflows such as handheld video capture or on-the-go file transfers. Another physical design element is the inclusion of a detachable lanyard-style cable that supports both data and power delivery. This integrated approach removes the need for users to carry separate cables for connectivity, while also doubling as a carrying mechanism. The included cable is specified as a 24-pin pure copper design, supporting up to 10Gbps data transfer, power delivery, and DisplayPort signal passthrough.

Sharge Disk Pro 2 – Internal Hardware

At the core of the Sharge Disk Pro 2 is a multi-controller architecture described as an independent 4-chip control system. Each major function, including storage access, USB expansion, video output, and power delivery, is handled by a dedicated controller. This separation is intended to improve stability and reduce bandwidth contention when multiple ports are in use simultaneously, particularly under sustained workloads such as file transfers while outputting video and supplying power. A central feature of the internal design is the active cooling system, referred to as the “Ice-storm” fan. Operating at speeds of up to 10,000 RPM, the fan is designed to maintain consistent thermal conditions during extended data transfers. The system includes three operational modes: OFF, Auto, and Turbo. In Auto mode, fan speed adjusts based on internal temperatures, while Turbo maintains maximum cooling performance. This approach addresses a common limitation in compact hubs and SSD enclosures, where passive cooling can lead to thermal throttling under load. The cooling system is consistent across both Lite and Ultra variants, with no differentiation in thermal hardware between the two models.

Sharge Disk Pro 2 – Ports & Connections

The Sharge Disk Pro 2 integrates a total of 6 ports, combining data transfer, display output, and power delivery within a single device. These include 2 USB-C ports, 1 USB-A port, 1 HDMI output, and dual card reader slots for SD and microSD media. This configuration positions the device as a compact alternative to larger desktop docking stations, while maintaining compatibility with a wide range of peripherals and storage formats. The primary USB-C interface (USB-C1) supports 10Gbps data transfer alongside up to 100W power input, allowing the connected host device to be charged while the hub is in use. A secondary USB-C port (USB-C2) provides up to 80W power output, enabling downstream charging for connected devices. The inclusion of both input and output power delivery allows the hub to function as an intermediary between a power source and multiple connected devices without interrupting data throughput. This overall port layout remains consistent across both Lite and Ultra variants.

Sharge Disk Pro vs Sharge Disk Pro 2

The transition from the original Sharge Disk Pro to the Sharge Disk Pro 2 represents a shift in both hardware architecture and product segmentation. The Disk Pro is fundamentally an all-in-one device, combining fixed internal NVMe storage with a compact multi-port hub and active cooling, positioned as a self-contained solution for users who want storage and connectivity without additional components. It integrates storage capacities up to 4TB and was originally sold in tiered pricing depending on capacity . In contrast, the Disk Pro 2 removes onboard storage entirely and instead supports user-installed M.2 SSDs up to 8TB, changing the device into a modular enclosure and hub hybrid rather than a pre-configured storage product. This also alters the pricing structure significantly, as the Disk Pro 2 is sold as a standalone unit starting at $49 for the Lite version and $69 for the Ultra version, separating the cost of storage from the hardware itself.

Beyond storage, the Disk Pro 2 introduces clearer product tiering with Lite and Ultra variants, something not present in the original model. The Lite version reduces cost by using HDMI 2.0 and operating at a higher power draw of around 4W, while the Ultra version includes HDMI 2.1 and lowers power consumption to approximately 1W. Both retain the same core concept of combining data transfer, display output, and power delivery into a compact device, but the newer model expands connectivity with additional ports, including SD and microSD slots. Both generations maintain active cooling as a central feature, designed to prevent thermal throttling during sustained transfers, a capability that has been demonstrated in testing of the original device where performance remained stable under load . Physically, both devices share a similar credit card-sized footprint and transparent design, but the Disk Pro 2 refines usability with a detachable lanyard cable and broader magnetic compatibility. Overall, the original model prioritizes simplicity and integration, while the newer version emphasizes flexibility, lower entry cost, and configurable storage.

Sharge Disk Pro 2 – Launch Date and Price?

The Sharge Disk Pro 2 is scheduled to launch via a crowdfunding campaign on Kickstarter, with the campaign planned to go live on June 9. As with previous releases from Sharge, this approach places the product in an early-access phase prior to wider retail availability, meaning final specifications and delivery timelines may still be subject to change. The device will be offered in two distinct variants, allowing users to choose between different feature sets and efficiency profiles at launch. The entry-level Lite version is priced at $49 and features HDMI 2.0 output with a higher reported power consumption of around 4W. The higher-tier Ultra version is priced at $69 and includes HDMI 2.1 support, alongside a lower power draw of approximately 1W. Both versions are expected to ship with a 24-pin pure copper lanyard-style cable that supports data transfer, charging, and DisplayPort signal transmission. This tiered pricing structure introduces a lower entry point compared to earlier expectations, while still separating features such as display capability and power efficiency between the two models.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Sharge Disk Pro 2 RevealedSharge Disk Pro ReviewSharge Disk Pro ReviewThe Sharge Loomos AI Glasses ?The Sharge Loomos AI Glasses -Sharge Disk Plus SSD EnclosureSharge Disk Plus SSD Enclosure Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Avec le ZimaCube 2, IceWhale ambitionne de bousculer le marché des NAS. Fini le simple boîtier que l’on installe dans un coin pour stocker ses données. Le fabricant veut transformer le NAS en un véritable serveur domestique polyvalent, capable de gérer le stockage, la domotique, mais aussi des usages plus avancés comme l’IA en local…

ZimaCube 2

Le ZimaCube 2 est un boîtier avec 6 baies pouvant recevoir des SSD et disques durs 3,5 pouces. À cela s’ajoutent 4 emplacements M.2 NVMe. Le système (voir ci-dessous) est préinstallé sur un SSD interne de 256 Go et sur un autre emplacement dédié. Ce nouveau NAS est construit autour d’un processeur Intel Core de 12e génération (Core i3 ou Core i5) épaulé par de la mémoire DDR5.

3 configurations = 3 usages

La gamme se décline en 3 modèles :

• ZimaCube 2 est un boitier gris avec un Core i3-1215U et 8 Go de DDR5
• ZimaCube 2 Pro est un boitier noir avec un Core i5-1235U et 16 Go DDR5
• Creator Pack identique au Pro avec 64 Go DDR5, 1 To de NVMe et une NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000

Pour rappel, l’Intel Core i3-1215U a obtenu un score Passmark de 10 196 points. De son côté, l’Intel Core i5-1235U a obtenu 12 595 points.

Connectique

Pour les interfaces de connexion, le ZimaCube 2 propose:

• À l’avant : 3 ports USB 3.0 (dont 1 Type-C), 1 sortie audio 3,5 mm ;
• À l’arrière : 2 ports USB 3.0, 2 ports Thunderbolt 4, 1 sortie HDMI 2.0, 1 sortie DP 1.4, 2 ports réseau 2,5 Gb/s.

Les modèles Pro et Creator Pack disposent également d’un port réseau 10 Gb/s.

Le NAS dispose également de 2 emplacements PCIe (PCIe 4.0 x16 et PCIe 3.0 x8), permettant d’installer une carte graphique, un accélérateur IA ou encore une carte réseau supplémentaire.

ZimaOS

Le système maison se nomme ZimaOS (intégration native de CasaOS). Il est basé sur un Linux Debian et Docker. Il propose une boutique d’applications (800 différentes) permettant de déployer en un clic Plex, Jellyfin, Immich, Nextcloud, Home Assistant… Le gestionnaire de fichiers regroupe NAS local, stockage cloud et périphériques USB dans une même interface.

Pour les utilisateurs qui le souhaitent, TrueNAS, Proxmox, ou Unraid sont compatibles sur ce matériel.

Prix et disponibilités

Les machines sont disponibles dès maintenant sur shop.zimaspace.com :

• ZimaCube 2 = 681,70€
• ZimaCube 2 Pro = 1 108,30€
• Creator Pack = 2 132,13€

Un positionnement tarifaire intéressant, au regard des solutions concurrentes… À voir si le public sera au rendez-vous !

source

Should You Upgrade to the UniFi Dream Machine Beast?

The UniFi Dream Machine Beast arrives as a more serious entry in the Dream Machine range, and that immediately raises the main question: who is it actually for? Existing UniFi users may look at it as a possible upgrade from a UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max, while new buyers may see it as a way to start with a more capable console from day 1. On paper, it is clearly built for larger and busier networks, but that does not automatically make it the right choice for every UniFi setup. Whether the Dream Machine Beast makes sense depends less on the headline specification and more on the network around it. For some users, it may offer useful headroom for faster internet, heavier security processing, larger Protect installations, or wider UniFi management. For others, it may be more hardware than the deployment can realistically use, especially once the cost of switches, cabling, cameras, access points, and redundancy are taken into account. This article looks at where the Beast is a practical upgrade, where it may be excessive, and what trade-offs should be considered before buying.

UniFi Dream Machine Beast – Should You Buy? (The tl;dr)

The UniFi Dream Machine Beast is best viewed as a higher-capacity UniFi OS console for larger UniFi networks, rather than a default upgrade for every Dream Machine user. Its main advantages are the 8-core Arm v9 processor, 16GB of memory, 10GbE RJ45 ports, 10G SFP+ connectivity, 25G SFP28 support, 25Gbps-class IDS/IPS throughput, support for 750+ managed UniFi devices, 7,500+ concurrent clients, and 2 3.5-inch NVR bays for larger UniFi Protect deployments. These upgrades make it a more suitable option for businesses, multi-site networks, heavier camera installations, faster WAN environments, and users who are starting to outgrow the UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max. It also makes sense where security inspection, VPN use, traffic analysis, and UniFi application hosting are all expected to run at a larger scale on the same appliance. However, the Beast is not a simple plug-in upgrade for every setup. The $1,499 price, lack of PoE, internal non-removable PSU, and dependency on wider 25GbE infrastructure all make the total cost higher than the unit alone suggests. Users with mostly 1GbE, 2.5GbE, or 10GbE networks may not see enough practical benefit to justify the move, especially if their existing Dream Machine is not close to its limits. In many smaller UniFi deployments, the better use of budget may be a UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max combined with stronger switches, more access points, improved camera coverage, larger storage, or backup power. The Dream Machine Beast is therefore a strong option for larger and more demanding UniFi environments, but it should be bought with a clear network plan rather than as an automatic upgrade.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 7/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.6

PROS

8-core Arm v9 processor: Gives the Beast more headroom for routing, firewall rules, VPNs, IDS/IPS, DPI, SD-WAN, and UniFi application hosting.
25Gbps-class IDS/IPS throughput: A major step up from earlier Dream Machine models, making it better suited to high-speed networks with security inspection enabled.
25G SFP28 connectivity: Provides a faster uplink path for aggregation switches, high-speed WAN, NAS systems, and larger network cores.
10GbE RJ45 ports as standard: Makes the device more practical for users with existing 10GBASE-T equipment, without relying entirely on SFP modules or adapters.
16GB of system memory: Helps the appliance manage heavier UniFi workloads when Network, Protect, VPNs, traffic analysis, and security services are active at the same time.
Higher UniFi device and client capacity: Supports 750+ managed UniFi devices and 7,500+ concurrent clients, making it more suitable for larger sites and busy business networks.
Larger UniFi Protect capability: Supports up to 100 HD cameras, 60 2K cameras, or 40 4K cameras.
Dual 3.5-inch NVR drive bays: Gives Protect users more flexibility for recording capacity or redundancy than a single-drive Dream Machine.

CONS

High price compared with other Dream Machines: At $1,499, it costs far more than the UDM Pro, UDM SE, and UDM Pro Max.
No built-in PoE: Cameras, access points, phones, and other powered UniFi devices require separate PoE switches or injectors.
25GbE can make the wider upgrade expensive: To properly benefit from the Beast’s 25GbE capability, users may also need 25GbE switches, SFP28 modules, DACs, faster servers, or upgraded aggregation links.

Infrastructure-Class CPU for Heavier Routing and Security Workloads

A key hardware change in the UniFi Dream Machine Beast is its move to an 8-core Arm v9 processor running at 2.1GHz. This is a notable step up from the older Dream Machine models, such as the UDM SE, which uses a quad-core Arm Cortex-A57 at 1.7GHz with 4GB of memory. The Beast is built around Arm Neoverse N2 architecture, which Arm describes as its 1st Arm v9 infrastructure CPU, designed for cloud-to-edge workloads with improved performance per watt and a claimed 40% scalar performance uplift over Neoverse N1.

In practical terms, the CPU matters because the gateway is not just passing traffic from 1 port to another. It may also be handling firewall rules, IDS/IPS inspection, VPN traffic, DPI, policy routing, SD-WAN, VLANs, and UniFi application management at the same time. The supplied specification lists IDS/IPS throughput at 24.9Gbps, which is far beyond the 3.5Gbps figure associated with the UDM Pro class. That does not mean every user will need this level of processing headroom, but for larger networks it reduces the chance that security features or encrypted traffic become the main limit before the ports themselves do.

25GbE Uplinks and 10GbE Copper as Standard

The Dream Machine Beast makes a clear jump in physical connectivity compared with the smaller Dream Machine models. Instead of treating 10GbE as the higher-end connection, it uses 10GbE RJ45 as the baseline for its main LAN ports, alongside 10G SFP+ and 25G SFP28 connectivity. This matters because it gives the unit enough port flexibility to sit between faster WAN services, high-speed switches, NAS systems, and larger UniFi deployments without immediately forcing everything through a single 10GbE bottleneck.

The 25G SFP28 port is the more significant part of the design, as it gives the Beast room to aggregate traffic from larger networks rather than simply serve a handful of local devices. For users with multi-gig internet, large camera deployments, heavy internal routing, or multiple downstream switches, this creates a more capable central gateway than the UDM Pro Max. However, the benefit depends heavily on the rest of the network. A 25GbE port only becomes useful when switches, cabling, transceivers, and connected systems can also take advantage of it.

16GB of Memory for Larger UniFi Workloads

The Dream Machine Beast also increases system memory to 16GB, which is a practical upgrade when compared with smaller Dream Machine models. RAM is not as visible as the ports on the front of the unit, but it matters when the console is managing routing, firewall rules, VPNs, IDS/IPS, traffic identification, UniFi Network, UniFi Protect, and other UniFi applications at the same time. More memory gives the system more room to handle these services without the same pressure on resources as deployments grow.

In real terms, this is reflected in the stated management limits. The Beast is rated for 750+ managed UniFi devices and 7,500+ simultaneous connected users, while also supporting larger Protect deployments of up to 100 HD cameras, 60 2K cameras, or 40 4K cameras. Those figures put it in a different class from a typical small office or prosumer Dream Machine setup. The benefit is not just that the Beast can run faster, but that it is better equipped to keep multiple UniFi workloads active at once without becoming constrained as quickly.

Dual Drive Bays Give Protect More Room to Scale

The Dream Machine Beast includes 2 3.5-inch NVR HDD bays, which makes storage a more serious part of the appliance rather than a minor add-on. This is most relevant for UniFi Protect users, because camera recording is where local storage capacity has the biggest day-to-day impact. With support for up to 100 HD cameras, 60 2K cameras, or 40 4K cameras, the Beast is clearly intended to handle larger surveillance deployments than a basic Dream Machine setup.

The 2-bay design also gives users more flexibility than a single-drive console. It allows for higher total recording capacity or a redundant storage configuration, depending on how the system is deployed. The built-in 128GB SSD is separate from this and is used to keep the UniFi OS experience responsive rather than acting as the main video archive. This does not turn the Beast into a dedicated high-bay NVR, but it does make it more practical for sites that want gateway, management, and Protect recording in 1 rackmount device.

The Price Gap Against Other Dream Machines

The main drawback with the Dream Machine Beast is the price. At the quoted $1,499 figure from the launch material, it sits well above the rest of the Dream Machine range. For comparison, the UDM Pro is listed by Ubiquiti’s UK store at £300 before VAT, while the UDM SE is listed at £395 before VAT and the UDM Pro Max at £475 before VAT. Those models are clearly lower in throughput and capacity, but the difference still matters because the Beast is not a small step up in cost.

That makes the buying decision less about whether the Beast is technically better, and more about whether the network will actually use what it offers. A UDM Pro Max already provides 5Gbps IPS routing, 2,000+ client support, 200+ UniFi device support, and 2 NVR drive bays, which is still enough for many UniFi deployments. The Beast makes more sense when the extra routing capacity, larger client count, 25GbE connectivity, and higher Protect ceiling are genuinely required. For smaller sites, the money saved by choosing a lower Dream Machine could be more useful if spent on switches, access points, cameras, or backup power instead.

No PoE Limits Its Use as a Self-Contained Console

The Dream Machine Beast does not include PoE ports, which is a noticeable omission for a device at this price and scale. This does not affect its role as a gateway, firewall, UniFi OS console, or NVR, but it does mean that access points, cameras, door access hardware, phones, and smaller UniFi devices will need power from a separate PoE switch, injector, or other power source. For larger deployments this may not be a major issue, because a dedicated PoE switch would usually be part of the design anyway.

The drawback is more obvious for users upgrading from a Dream Machine model that already includes PoE, such as the UDM SE. Even a small number of PoE ports can be useful for directly powering a nearby access point, test device, camera, or compact downstream switch. On the Beast, the lack of PoE reinforces the idea that it is not intended to be a self-contained all-in-one network box. It is better understood as the central gateway and controller for a wider UniFi installation, rather than a device that can power much of that installation on its own.

Internal Power Supply Makes Hardware Servicing Less Convenient

The Dream Machine Beast uses an internal AC/DC power supply rather than a removable PSU module. It does support DC power backup through UniFi’s RPS system, which gives it a path for power failover when used with the required external hardware. However, this is not the same as having a hot-swappable or easily replaceable PSU built into the unit itself. If the internal supply fails, servicing is likely to be less convenient than it would be on a rackmount device with a standard removable power module.

This matters more because the Beast is aimed at larger and more business-critical UniFi environments. At this level, some buyers may expect either dual onboard PSUs or at least a removable single PSU design for easier replacement and reduced maintenance time. The RPS option helps with continuity, but it also adds another device to the rack and another cost to the overall setup. For users planning around uptime, this is an area where the Beast is functional, but not as service-friendly as some enterprise-style rack hardware.

Be Aware – 25GbE Can Push the Rest of the Network Into a Costly Upgrade Path

The Dream Machine Beast’s 25GbE capability is useful, but it can also change the scale of the upgrade. To take proper advantage of a 25GbE gateway, the rest of the network needs to be able to feed it and receive traffic from it at similar speeds. That usually means 25GbE-capable switches, suitable SFP28 modules or DAC cables, and potentially faster links to servers, NAS systems, or aggregation switches. Without that supporting hardware, the 25GbE port may end up being useful mainly as future headroom rather than something the network benefits from immediately.

This is where the Beast can become more expensive than it first appears. A network built around 2.5GbE or 10GbE copper may not need to move to 25GbE yet, especially if most endpoints are access points, cameras, desktops, or smaller servers. In those cases, a lower-cost Dream Machine paired with better 2.5GbE or 10GbE switching may be the more balanced upgrade. The Beast makes more sense when the wider network is already moving toward 25GbE, or when there is a clear plan to scale into it, rather than when the 25GbE port is the only part of the setup ready for that speed.

Verdict: Highly Capable Hardware, High Scalability, But Not a Universal Upgrade for All

The UniFi Dream Machine Beast is a stronger fit for users who have already reached the limits of the existing Dream Machine models, or who can clearly see those limits approaching. Its faster processor, 16GB of memory, 25GbE connectivity, high IDS/IPS throughput, larger UniFi management capacity, and 2 NVR drive bays all point toward larger networks with heavier traffic, more cameras, more clients, or more demanding security features. In that context, it is not simply a faster UDM Pro Max. It is a more substantial gateway and UniFi OS console for deployments that need more headroom.

For everyone else, the value is less clear. The higher price, lack of PoE, internal non-removable PSU, and likely need for wider 25GbE infrastructure all make it a device that should be bought with a specific network plan in mind. Users running smaller UniFi systems, mostly 1GbE to 10GbE networks, or modest Protect installations may get better value from a UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max with money left for switches, access points, storage, or backup power. The Beast is best judged as a targeted upgrade for larger UniFi environments, not as the default Dream Machine for every buyer.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShNew UniFi Dream Machine BEAST,New UniFi UDM Beast, EnterprisUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MLUniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewIs the UniFi Dream Router Stil Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

QNAP annonce le lancement d’une nouvelle gamme de switches : QSW-L2110. Derrière ce nom se cachent des produits destinés aussi bien aux professionnels qu’aux particuliers exigeants. Les modèles QSW-L2110-2S8T et QSW-L2110-10T sont administrables et s’inscrivent dans une tendance de fond : démocratiser le Multi-Gig sans se ruiner. Les prix démarrent à partir de 139 €.

QSW-L2110-2S8T et QSW-L2110-10T : le Multi-Gig accessible

Le QSW-L2110-2S8T dispose 8 ports 2,5 Gb/s RJ45 et 2 ports 10 Gb/s SFP+, ce qui permet de structurer un réseau hybride performant. Cette configuration est plutôt pertinente pour raccorder des NAS, des switches cœur de réseau ou encore un routeur compatible.

De son côté, le QSW-L2110-10T mise sur une approche full RJ45 avec 8 ports 2,5 Gb/s et 2 ports 10 Gb/s. Une solution adaptée aux infrastructures existantes câblées en RJ45, qui simplifie les déploiements et limite les coûts d’installation.

Dans les 2 cas, le gain de performance par rapport au gigabit traditionnel est réel et immédiatement : transferts de fichiers volumineux, virtualisation, production vidéo, etc. Il est important de noter que ces nouveaux produits sont sans ventilateur. Ils pourront donc être installés facilement, y compris sur un bureau.

Gestion simplifiée, mais suffisante

Les 2 switches s’appuient sur le système QSS (QNAP Switch System), déjà bien connu sur d’autres équipements de la marque. Depuis l’interface Web, on retrouve les fonctions essentielles de niveau 2 : VLAN, QoS, agrégation de liens (LACP), etc.

On reste sur une gestion allégée par rapport aux modèles plus haut de gamme… mais cela reste largement suffisant pour la majorité des usages. C’est totalement assumé et cohérent au regard du positionnement tarifaire.

Monter en débit sans tout reconstruire

L’atout majeur de la gamme QSW-L2110, c’est sa capacité à moderniser son infrastructure existante sans repartir de zéro. Le support du 2,5 Gb/s est compatible avec du câblage Cat 5e, ce qui évite de refaire son installation… Les ports 10 Gb/s du modèle apportent une couche de scalabilité supplémentaire, idéale pour connecter un NAS performant, consolider un réseau…

En synthèse

QNAP propose une solution cohérente pour les petites structures et les particuliers exigeants. Ces nouveaux produits permettent de passer au Multi-Gig sans se heurter à une complexité inutile… et cerise sur le gâteau, ils sont administrable via QSS. C’est plutôt rare pour ce type de produits.

Ces nouveaux modèles devraient arriver d’ici quelques jours. Côté tarif, le fabricant annonce :

• QSW-L2110-2S8T : 139€ HT
• QSW-L2110-10T : 189€ HT

L’équilibre entre performances, simplicité de gestion et rapport qualité/prix est bien maîtrisé. Difficile de trouver à redire sur le positionnement.

Terramaster D1 SSD (IP67 Waterproof & 1.2-Ton Crush Resistance and Silent)

April 28, 2026 | The Professional storage brand TerraMaster today officially introduces the all-new rugged portable SSD enclosure — D1 SSD. Designed for users who demand both data security and high-speed performance, the D1 SSD features an aircraft-grade all-metal chassis, IP67 water and dust resistance, and 1.2-ton crush resistance. Combined with high-speed data transfer, silent cooling, and broad platform compatibility, it becomes an ideal storage companion for photographers, outdoor professionals, and mobile workers.

Buy from Terramaster Official Site:	Buy from Your Local Amazon:
Specification	TerraMaster D1 SSD
Drive Bays	1
Supported SSD Type	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD
Maximum Capacity	8TB
Interface	USB 10Gbps
Max Read Speed	1020MB/s
Max Write Speed	1010MB/s
File Systems	NTFS, APFS, Mac OS, FAT32, EXT4, exFAT
Supported OS	Windows, macOS, Linux
Ingress Protection	IP67
Cooling	Fanless passive cooling
Noise Level	Noiseless
Power Consumption	3.2W read/write, 0.2W hibernation
Dimensions	113.6 x 45.0 x 21.0mm
Net Weight	146g
Warranty	2 years

Three Layers of Protection Build an Unbreakable Data Shield：

1. Solid All-Metal Chassis for High-Intensity Work Environments

 The D1 SSD adopts a unibody aircraft-grade aluminum alloy construction. The full-metal enclosure offers excellent scratch resistance and corrosion protection, making it well-suited for long-term, heavy-duty usage. Whether facing extreme temperature differences outdoors or constant wear from mobile work, the enclosure ensures stable operation, extended lifespan, and reliable storage performance for professional users.

2. IP67 Water & Dust Resistance for Harsh Conditions

 Equipped with precision silicone sealing rings, the D1 SSD meets IP67 certification standards. It can withstand submersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes and is fully protected against dust and splashes. From rainy outdoor shoots and desert environments to construction sites, the enclosure safeguards both the SSD and your data. Protection performance is verified by internationally recognized testing organizations such as SGS.

3. 1.2-Ton Crush Resistance with Shock & Drop Protection

 The aircraft-grade aluminum unibody structure enables the enclosure to withstand up to 1.2 tons of vehicle-level pressure. Its dedicated shock-resistant internal design absorbs impacts from drops and collisions during daily use. Even under extreme external force, internal drives and data remain fully protected—eliminating the fragility issues of ordinary enclosures.

High-Speed Performance with Silent Operation and Broad Compatibility

 The D1 SSD features a USB 3.2 Gen2 interface, supports UASP protocol and TRIM optimization, and delivers real-world sequential read/write speeds of up to 1020 MB/s. Transferring a 1GB file takes just seconds, making it ideal for 4K video editing and large photo backups. The all-metal housing provides 2.5× larger heat dissipation area, while the fanless passive cooling design ensures completely silent operation.

 The enclosure supports up to 8TB single-drive capacity and is compatible with M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs based on PCIe 3.0 / 4.0 / 5.0 standards. It can store up to 2.79 million high-resolution photos or 5,400 HD movies. Compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux, it also connects to computers, TVs, and OTG-enabled smartphones for true plug-and-play use.

Additionally, the D1 SSD supports one-touch photo backup via the TerraMaster TDAS mobile app. Once connected, photos are automatically synchronized from your smartphone, with data stored locally to prevent privacy leakage and enable efficient cross-device file management.

 Designed for Multiple Usage Scenarios:

• Photographers & Outdoor Professionals

Rugged protection handles complex environments, enabling fast backups and eliminating data loss risks. Ideal for field exploration, construction sites, and harsh outdoor conditions.

• Mobile Professionals & Students

Ultra-lightweight at only 146g, pocket-sized design, and instant file transfer create a portable “light office” anywhere.

• General Users & Mac Professionals

Perfect as an external expansion drive or boot drive—quiet, stable, and plug-and-play.

Availability & Service

The TerraMaster D1 SSD is now officially available through the TerraMaster website (https://www.terra-master.com/) and authorized global channels. Customers who purchase within the first two weeks of launch can enjoy a 15% discount. The product is backed by a two-year global warranty and lifetime technical support for a worry-free user experience.

Interested in the D1 SSD, or want to know more about the rest of the D1 SSD Range, below are the specs and prices for the D1 SSD (10Gb/s), D1 SSD PLUS (40Gb/s) and D1 SSD Pro (80Gb/s):

Specification	TerraMaster D1 SSD	TerraMaster D1 SSD Plus	TerraMaster D1 SSD Pro
Interface	USB 10Gbps	USB4 40Gbps	USB 80Gbps / Thunderbolt 5 class
Claimed Max Read	1020MB/s	3641MB/s specification, 3853MB/s listed in testing	7061MB/s
Claimed Max Write	1010MB/s	3498MB/s specification, 3707MB/s listed in testing	6816MB/s
SSD Support	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe
Max Capacity	8TB	8TB	8TB
Cooling	Fanless aluminum passive cooling	Fanless aluminum passive cooling	Fanless aluminum body with finned passive cooling
Protection / Build	IP67, dustproof, waterproof, crush-resistant up to 1.2 tons	All-metal unibody chassis, short circuit, surge, and ESD protection	All-aluminum dual-fin design, smart status indicator, short circuit, surge, and ESD protection
Price Listed	$33.99 (15% OFF $39.99)	$76.99 (30% OFF $109.99)	$199.99 (20% OFF $199.99)

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Terramaster D1 SSD (IP67 WaterTerramaster D1 Buyers Guide - Terramaster F2-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F2-425 NAS - BeforTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster D1 SSD Pro ReleaseTerramaster TOS 7 Public Beta Terramaster Launch the TOS 7 P100 Reasons Why Users Choose T Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Aujourd’hui nous recevons sur Cachem, Chad CHIANG, Directeur Général de Synology France. Il a pris ses fonctions en janvier de cette année au siège de Paris La Défense et supervise la France, le Benelux, l’Europe du Sud et l’Afrique.

Cachem : Bonjour Chad, merci de prendre quelques minutes pour répondre à nos questions. Vous arrivez dans un contexte un peu particulier pour Synology. Comment abordez-vous cette prise de fonction ?

Chad : J’aborde cette mission avec la volonté de donner la priorité à l’écoute. Prendre mes fonctions de directeur général pour l’Europe implique de trouver un équilibre entre les attentes élevées d’une base d’utilisateurs très avertis en matière de technologie et notre expansion rapide dans le secteur B2B. Mon objectif est de veiller à ce que, malgré notre croissance, nous ne perdions pas « l’ADN de Synology », cette alliance parfaite entre un matériel abordable et des logiciels intuitifs.

Cachem : Les équipes en France continuent de grandir. Pouvez-vous nous en dire plus ?

Chad : La France est l’un de nos marchés les plus dynamiques. Nous renforçons significativement notre présence locale à Paris afin d’offrir un meilleur support technique et un accompagnement dédié à nos partenaires entreprises. La croissance ne se limite pas aux ventes : il s’agit aussi d’avoir des experts sur le terrain capables d’accompagner une PME française comme une grande institution dans la définition de leur stratégie de résilience des données.

Cachem : Synology reste un acteur majeur du NAS, mais certains utilisateurs évoquent une forme de stagnation ces dernières années, tant sur le matériel que sur DSM. Partagez-vous ce constat ?

Chad : Je comprends cette perception, mais je ne pense pas que nous soyons à l’arrêt. Notre priorité a évolué : nous sommes passés d’une logique de “spécifications pour le simple plaisir de spécifications” à un focus sur la stabilité et la fiabilité des systèmes. Dans l’univers des NAS, être “ennuyeux” est souvent une qualité : cela signifie que vos données sont en sécurité. Cela dit, nous continuons d’innover, notamment sur les volumes NVMe et les réseaux à haut débit sur une plus large gamme de produits.

Cachem : Justement, parlons d’un sujet qui a fait beaucoup réagir en 2025 : la politique autour des disques durs et SSD. Synology a d’abord imposé ses propres disques sur les modèles Plus, avant de faire partiellement machine arrière avec DSM 7.3. Beaucoup d’utilisateurs ont parlé d’un écosystème fermé, voire d’un “DRM matériel”. Que s’est-il passé ?

Chad : L’objectif était, et reste, de garantir un niveau maximal de disponibilité et de fiabilité en utilisant des disques dont le firmware est validé par nos équipes. Cela dit, nous avons bien entendu les retours de la communauté. Avec DSM 7.3 sorti en octobre dernier, nous avons réintroduit plus de flexibilité. Notre intention n’est pas d’enfermer les utilisateurs, mais de proposer une offre “sans compromis” pour ceux qui ont besoin d’une fiabilité 24/7. Pour les autres, l’écosystème reste ouvert. Nous apprécions les retours de la communauté, et c’est une bonne leçon pour nous.

Cachem : Plus globalement, ce changement de cap a pu fragiliser la confiance des utilisateurs historiques, qui appréciaient justement la flexibilité de Synology. Comment comptez-vous la regagner ?

Chad : La confiance se regagne par la transparence et la performance. Nous réaffirmons notre engagement envers le segment “prosumer”. Cela se traduira dans nos prochaines évolutions matérielles et logicielles, en prenant en compte les retours sur des éléments comme les ports 2.5GbE ou la mémoire extensible. Nous voulons démontrer qu’il n’est pas nécessaire de choisir entre un outil professionnel et un système flexible.

Cachem : Autre sujet : les routeurs. Synology avait suscité beaucoup d’intérêt avec sa gamme RT, mais depuis plusieurs années, les évolutions sont quasi inexistantes. Le segment est-il toujours stratégique ? Certains utilisateurs ont le sentiment d’un abandon progressif face à une concurrence très dynamique… Peut-on attendre du nouveau à court terme ?

Chad : La plateforme SRM (Synology Router Manager) n’est pas abandonnée. La concurrence est forte, mais notre force réside dans la sécurité et la gestion des VPN. Nous ne sortons pas cinq routeurs par an, car nous voulons que ceux que nous lançons restent pertinents pendant plusieurs années. Nous continuons également à publier des mises à jour régulières et la dernière date de février 2026. https://www.synology.com/fr-fr/releaseNote/SRM

Cachem : Parlons maintenant de DSM. La version 7.3 a apporté des ajustements, mais reste relativement modeste en termes de nouveautés. Où en est DSM 8 ? Peut-on s’attendre à une vraie rupture ou simplement à une continuité de DSM 7 ?

Chad : Si DSM 7.x était axé sur le perfectionnement et l’hybridation avec le cloud (C2), la prochaine version marquera une avancée majeure avec l’intégration de l’IA dans la gestion. Nous travaillons sur des systèmes capables de s’auto-optimiser et sur une déduplication des données plus intelligente. L’objectif est clair : rendre le NAS plus autonome et réduire les interventions manuelles.

Cachem : Synology s’est fortement orienté vers les entreprises. Quels sont vos avantages face à des acteurs comme Dell EMC ou NetApp ?

Chad : Notre principal avantage réside dans le coût total de possession (TCO) et la simplicité d’utilisation. Il n’est pas nécessaire de suivre une formation spécialisée pendant une semaine pour gérer un cluster Synology. Nous proposons des fonctionnalités de niveau entreprise (snapshots, réplication, sauvegarde, etc) sans les coûts de licences élevés souvent pratiqués par nos concurrents.

Cachem : Synology développe également ses activités dans la vidéosurveillance. Où en êtes-vous aujourd’hui ?

Chad : La vidéosurveillance est l’un de nos piliers de croissance les plus rapides. En intégrant nos propres caméras Synology à Surveillance Station, nous avons mis au point une solution d’analyse avec IA prête à l’emploi. Nous ne sommes plus seulement un espace de stockage de vidéos ; nous sommes désormais une plateforme qui les analyse en temps réel pour fournir des informations concrètes en matière de sécurité.

Cachem : Le BeeStation avait surpris lors de son lancement. La frontière entre le BeeStation (version Plus) et un NAS est assez étroite. Quelle est sa place aujourd’hui ?

Chad : BeeStation est une porte d’entrée vers l’écosystème Synology. Il s’adresse aux particuliers ou aux créatifs sans expertise IT, qui trouvent le NAS encore trop complexe mais qui ont dépassé les limites du stockage cloud classique. Il ne remplace pas le cloud, il le complète en apportant un stockage local, intelligent et rapide.

Exemple ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSRtD0KQWmE

Cachem : Cet interview touche à sa fin, souhaitez-vous adresser un dernier mot à nos lecteurs ?

Chad : Aux lecteurs de Cachem et à la communauté tech française : merci d’être nos critiques les plus exigeants. Vos retours nous empêchent de devenir un acteur figé. Nous entrons dans une ère où la souveraineté des données est plus importante que jamais, et Synology s’engage à vous redonner le contrôle, que vous soyez freelance ou une grande entreprise du CAC 40. Synology ne propose pas seulement des produits, mais une véritable alternative de confiance sur le marché.

New Thunderbolt 5 NVMe Storage Solution Revealed – The OWC 4M2 Ultra

OWC has introduced the Express 4M2 Ultra at NAB 2026 as a compact 4 bay NVMe enclosure built around Thunderbolt 5. It is designed as a DIY storage solution for users who want to install their own M.2 SSDs and configure the enclosure for different RAID modes, including RAID 0, 1, 4, 5, 10, and JBOD. OWC positions it as a high performance option for media production, post production, and other bandwidth intensive workloads that benefit from fast external solid state storage.

The enclosure supports up to 4 NVMe M.2 drives in 2280 or 2242 formats and is rated for up to 6622MB/s in RAID 0 when paired with PCIe 4.0 or newer SSDs on Thunderbolt 5 systems. It also retains backward compatibility with Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 3 on Mac, and USB4 hosts, though throughput is lower on 40Gb/s connections. Capacity starts with whatever drives the user installs, with support for up to 32TB in a single unit based on current 8TB SSD support, while additional units can be daisy chained for larger storage pools.

OWC Express 4M2 Ultra – Design & Storage

The Express 4M2 Ultra uses a compact aluminum enclosure with a vertical desktop form factor intended to keep its footprint relatively small. OWC states that the chassis is built from aircraft grade aluminum, which serves both as the structural housing and as part of the thermal design. The unit measures 12.3 cm tall, 11.7 cm long, and 6.0 cm wide, with a listed weight of 900 g.

Internally, the enclosure provides 4 drive bays for NVMe M.2 SSDs and supports both 2280 and 2242 form factors. It accepts single sided and double sided drives, though SSDs with integrated heatsinks are not supported. OWC specifies support for PCIe Gen 3 and later SSDs, with Gen 4 and newer drives recommended for higher performance. Each bay operates at PCIe 4.0 x1, and single drive performance is rated at up to 1600MB/s.

From a storage flexibility standpoint, the enclosure is aimed at users who prefer to source and install their own drives rather than buy a preconfigured array. That allows the capacity and performance profile to vary depending on the SSDs installed. With current 8TB drives, the maximum listed capacity is 32TB in a single enclosure, while future higher capacity drives could increase that figure without requiring a new chassis.

RAID support is handled in software rather than through a dedicated hardware RAID controller. The Express 4M2 Ultra supports RAID 0, 1, 4, 5, 10, and JBOD, with OWC highlighting SoftRAID as its main management option. This gives users a wider range of configuration choices depending on whether they prioritize throughput, redundancy, usable capacity, or a balance between those factors.

Thermal management is handled by a 40mm cooling fan with multiple speed thresholds tied to internal temperature. According to OWC’s listed profile, the fan remains off below 35°C, then ramps progressively from 40% to 100% as temperatures rise from 35°C to 55°C and above. The stated approach is to reduce unnecessary noise under lighter workloads while maintaining SSD performance during sustained transfers.

OWC Express 4M2 Ultra – Ports and Connections

The Express 4M2 Ultra uses Thunderbolt 5 as its primary host interface, with 1 USB C host port rated for up to 80Gb/s. OWC also lists support for USB Attached SCSI Protocol, and the enclosure is designed to work across Thunderbolt 5, Thunderbolt 4, USB4, and Thunderbolt 3 on supported Mac systems. In practice, that gives it a broader compatibility range than a Thunderbolt 5 only accessory, though maximum throughput depends on the bandwidth available from the connected system.

A second Thunderbolt 5 port is included for downstream connectivity. OWC states that this allows users to daisy chain up to 5 additional Thunderbolt devices, along with 1 USB peripheral, from the same connection path. The same port can also be used to connect additional Express 4M2 Ultra units, with OWC positioning that as a way to build larger storage volumes without treating each enclosure as an entirely separate destination.

Compatibility varies by platform and interface generation. On newer Thunderbolt 5 Macs and PCs, OWC rates the enclosure at up to 6622MB/s, while Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 systems are listed at up to 3200MB/s. Intel Macs with Thunderbolt 3 are rated up to 2800MB/s, and OWC notes that Thunderbolt 3 support is Mac only. No driver is required, and the enclosure is listed as compatible with macOS 14.x Sonoma, macOS 15.x Sequoia, macOS 26.x Tahoe, Windows 11, and Linux, with some features depending on OS version and connection type.

OWC Express 4M2 Ultra – Price and Release date

OWC has set the starting price of the Express 4M2 Ultra at $399.99 for the standard non SoftRAID version. A version bundled with SoftRAID is priced at $549.99. As a result, the enclosure enters the market as a premium DIY storage option rather than a low cost external SSD enclosure, with the final overall build cost depending heavily on the NVMe drives a buyer installs.

The company says the Express 4M2 Ultra is available for pre order now following its reveal at NAB 2026 in Las Vegas. OWC lists shipping for Q3 2026, so early buyers will still be waiting several months for general availability. That places the launch window firmly in the second half of the year, even though orders have already opened.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...New OWC 4M2 Ultra Revealed - GOWC Thunderbolt 5 Dock - Are WOWC Thunderbolt 5 Dock - Are WRealtek to Showcase Full RangeOWC Thunderbolt 3 ThunderBay 8 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Accéder à son NAS depuis l’extérieur n’a rien de compliqué… mais toutes les méthodes ne se valent pas. Certaines privilégient la simplicité, d’autres la sécurité ou les performances. Si vous possédez un NAS, vous vous êtes probablement déjà demandé quelles solutions existent et quelles sont leurs différences. Voici un rapide tour d’horizon, avec les bonnes pratiques à connaître

Accès à distance

Quand on possède un NAS, on devient vite exigeant en matière de sécurité. Pendant longtemps, il était strictement impossible d’accéder à mon NAS depuis l’extérieur. Et puis, les usages ont changé, les enfants ont grandi… nos besoins ne sont plus les mêmes.

La question n’est donc plus “faut-il y accéder ?” mais plutôt “comment le faire correctement ?”

Accès facile des constructeurs

Les fabricants de NAS proposent des solutions clés en main, très simples à configurer. Chacun propose son propre service de type Cloud Relay.

L’activation se fait généralement en un clic, sans configuration réseau ni redirection de port. Ces services fonctionnent via un serveur relais hébergé par le fabricant. Cela signifie que vos données transitent par une infrastructure tierce. Même si elles sont chiffrées, cela implique une dépendance à l’écosystème du fabricant… et des performances souvent en retrait.

Sa simplicité extrême pousse de nombreux utilisateurs à l’activer sans en mesurer les implications, d’autant que certains fabricants la proposent dès le premier démarrage. C’est tellement simple que personnellement, je trouve cela dangereux.

DDNS

Le DDNS (Dynamic DNS) permet d’associer une adresse IP publique (celle de votre Box qui change régulièrement) à un nom de domaine fixe.  Vous pouvez acheter un domaine (.fr, .com, .eu…) pour quelques euros par an chez un registrar comme OVH ou Cloudflare, ou opter pour un sous-domaine gratuit via des services tiers tels que ChangeIP, FreeDNS, ou ceux proposés directement par les fabricants de NAS. Dans ce dernier cas, vous n’aurez pas la maîtrise totale du nom de domaine.

Cette méthode nécessite une redirection de port sur votre routeur. Il est également possible d’intégrer un reverse proxy (directement sur le NAS ou sur un autre équipement) pour gérer proprement un domaine et ses sous-domaines avec HTTPS.

VPN auto-hébergé

Héberger son propre serveur VPN est la solution offrant le meilleur rapport sécurité/contrôle. Le VPN constitue une porte d’entrée chiffrée vers votre réseau domestique. Pour accéder au NAS, vous devez d’abord vous authentifier via ce tunnel sécurisé… vous êtes connectés ensuite comme si vous étiez en local.

Le serveur VPN peut être installé sur :

• Votre Box ou routeur ;
• Un appareil dédié comme un Raspberry Pi ;
• Le NAS lui-même.

Je recommande WireGuard, qui combine une sécurité élevée avec d’excellentes performances, notamment en mobilité. C’est la solution que je privilégie personnellement. La contrepartie, c’est que sa configuration est plus technique que les autres méthodes. Elle nécessite également une redirection d’un port sur votre Box.

VPN hybride (mesh VPN)

Des solutions comme Tailscale proposent une approche simplifiée du VPN. Il suffit d’installer l’application sur le NAS et sur vos appareils, puis de se connecter avec un compte. La mise en relation entre les appareils est gérée automatiquement, sans configuration réseau.

Ces outils sont bien sécurisés (chiffrement de bout en bout), mais les données transitent via les serveurs de l’éditeur pour l’établissement de la connexion. Les performances sont souvent inférieures à un VPN auto-hébergé. L’offre gratuite est souvent suffisante pour un usage personnel…

Cloudflare Tunnel

Cloudflare Tunnel permet d’exposer son NAS via un nom de domaine, sans ouvrir le moindre port sur votre box… et en bénéficiant de la protection applicative de Cloudflare (WAF, gestion des accès, authentification à deux facteurs…).

Le fonctionnement repose sur un agent installé sur le NAS (généralement via Docker), qui établit une connexion sortante vers les serveurs Cloudflare. C’est ce tunnel qui permet l’accès depuis l’extérieur, sans exposition directe de votre réseau. La limite principale reste la même que pour toute solution cloud : vous faites confiance à un tiers pour le transit de vos données.

Rappel de sécurité

Dès qu’un NAS est accessible depuis Internet, il devient une cible potentielle. Des robots scannent en permanence le Web à la recherche de services exposés et des failles exploitables.

Je vous recommande d’appliquer un minimum de règles de sécurité :

• Activez le blocage automatique après plusieurs tentatives de connexion infructueuses ;
• Désactivez les comptes par défaut (admin, guest) ;
• Activez le pare-feu du NAS ;
• Utilisez un mot de passe robuste (majuscules, minuscules, chiffres et caractères spéciaux) ;
• Changez les ports par défaut ;
• Forcez l’utilisation du HTTPS (redirection HTTP vers HTTPS) ;
• Maintenez votre NAS à jour (système et applications) ;
• Mettez en place des sauvegardes régulières…

Il faut respecter toutes ces règles, voire plus…

En synthèse

Accéder à son NAS à distance est aujourd’hui indispensable, mais cela ne doit pas se faire au détriment de la sécurité. Plus une solution est simple à activer, plus elle mérite d’être questionnée. Prenez le temps de comprendre vos besoins et privilégiez toujours une approche sécurisée, même si elle demande un peu plus d’effort à la mise en place.

	Facilité	Sécurité	Contrôle	Ouverture de port
Solution constructeur				Non
DDNS				Oui
VPN auto-hébergé				Oui
VPN hybride				Non
Cloudflare Tunnel				Non

Seagate Shows Off It’s 44TB Hard Drive at NAB 2026

At the 2026 NAB Show 2026, Seagate Technology formally introduced its latest generation of high-capacity enterprise hard drives built on the Mozaic 4+ platform. These drives, (model ID ST4400NM002M)  reaching up to 44TB, represent the current peak of commercially deployed hard disk capacity and are already being shipped to select hyperscale cloud providers. The announcement reflects ongoing demand for higher-density storage as data generation continues to accelerate, particularly in artificial intelligence and large-scale cloud environments.

Rather than targeting general consumers, these drives are designed specifically for hyperscale data centres where efficiency, density, and cost per terabyte are critical considerations. The Mozaic 4+ platform is also notable for its reliance on heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR), a technology that has moved from experimental development into production-scale deployment. With broader qualification underway, the 44TB model serves as both a milestone in current storage capabilities and a step toward projected capacities approaching 100TB in future generations.

Everything we know about the Seagate 44TB Hard Drives

The 44TB drives are built on Seagate’s Mozaic 4+ platform, which represents the company’s production-ready implementation of heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR). Unlike earlier perpendicular magnetic recording approaches, HAMR uses localized heating via a nanophotonic laser to temporarily reduce the coercivity of the disk surface, allowing data to be written at much higher densities. This enables significantly greater areal density without requiring a complete redesign of the underlying hard drive architecture, allowing Seagate to scale capacity incrementally across generations.

At a physical level, the drives use a multi-platter design, widely understood to consist of 10 platters, each delivering over 4TB of capacity. This results in the total 44TB figure within a standard 3.5-inch enterprise form factor. The spindle speed is expected to remain at 7200 RPM, consistent with other enterprise-capacity drives, balancing throughput, reliability, and power consumption. Early estimates suggest sustained transfer rates in the region of 300 MB/s, though final performance characteristics depend on deployment conditions and firmware tuning. I think we are likely much more liekly to hit 280MB/s or so, such as you find in the 30TBs.

A key aspect of the Mozaic 4+ design is its vertically integrated photonics system. Seagate has developed its own laser components in-house, embedding them directly into the recording head. This allows precise, nanosecond-scale heating during write operations, which is critical for maintaining data integrity at such high densities. Vertical integration also gives Seagate tighter control over manufacturing consistency, yield, and long-term reliability, all of which are essential when deploying drives at hyperscale volumes.

The recording stack itself incorporates several advanced components. These include a Gen 2 superlattice platinum-alloy media designed for improved magnetic stability, a Gen 2 plasmonic writer responsible for delivering the heat-assisted write process, and a Gen 8 spintronic reader that improves read accuracy from increasingly smaller data bits. Together, these components enable higher density while maintaining error rates and durability within enterprise requirements.

Supporting these physical advancements is a 7nm integrated controller, which manages drive operations with improved precision. This controller enhances servo control, allowing the read/write heads to maintain accurate positioning over narrower tracks. It also contributes to improved power efficiency, reducing watts per terabyte and helping data centres optimize energy usage at scale. These gains are particularly relevant in large deployments where power and cooling costs scale with capacity.

From a manufacturing perspective, the Mozaic platform is designed to scale without requiring disruptive architectural changes between generations. Each iteration builds on existing processes, allowing Seagate to increase per-platter capacity over time. The company has indicated a roadmap toward 10TB per platter, which would enable drives approaching 100TB within a similar physical footprint. This approach prioritizes continuity in deployment while steadily increasing storage density.

Seagate 44TB HDDs – SMR or CMR?

Despite the push toward higher capacities, the 44TB drives based on the Mozaic 4+ platform use conventional magnetic recording (CMR) rather than shingled magnetic recording (SMR). This distinction is relevant because SMR typically achieves higher capacities by overlapping data tracks, which can negatively impact rewrite performance and latency in certain workloads. By retaining CMR, Seagate is prioritising predictable performance characteristics, particularly for enterprise environments where consistent throughput and low latency are required.

This approach also differentiates Seagate’s offering from competing high-capacity drives, such as those being developed by Western Digital, which have explored SMR and related technologies like UltraSMR to reach similar capacity points. While SMR can be effective for archival or sequential workloads, CMR remains better suited to mixed or write-intensive applications commonly found in hyperscale deployments. In this context, the use of HAMR allows Seagate to increase density without relying on SMR trade-offs, maintaining compatibility with existing data centre workloads and software stacks.

The introduction of 44TB hard drives based on the Mozaic 4+ platform reflects a continued focus on increasing storage density within the constraints of existing data centre infrastructure. By combining HAMR with incremental architectural improvements, Seagate Technology has demonstrated that higher capacities can be achieved without fundamental changes to form factor or deployment models. The emphasis remains on scaling capacity per rack and per watt, which aligns with the operational priorities of hyperscale environments.

At the same time, these drives remain firmly positioned within enterprise and cloud use cases, with limited relevance to consumer or small-scale storage in the near term. Factors such as cost, workload requirements, and integration complexity restrict their adoption outside large data centres. However, as with previous generations, advancements at this level are likely to influence broader storage markets over time, particularly as manufacturing scales and newer technologies mature.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Seagate 44TB Hard Drives ReveaWeek 50 Tech Roundup – ReactChoosing Between WD Red and SeSeagate Ironwolf vs WD Red (WhBlack Friday NAS Hard Drive DeBlack Friday Hard Drive Deals Black Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataWeek 46 Tech Roundup – SeagaWeek 44 Tech Roundup – TOS 7 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Bonjour à tous,

J’espère que vous allez bien. Les beaux jours sont enfin de retour et certains d’entre vous sont peut-être déjà en vacances… je dois avouer que je vous envie un peu Mais pas d’inquiétude, mon tour arrive bientôt… J’ai aussi prévu de lever le pied quelques jours.

Du côté de Cachem, j’ai fait quelques petits ajustements récemment. Rien de révolutionnaire, mais des petites optimisations pour garder un site toujours aussi rapide et agréable à parcourir. Le thème que j’utilise continue d’évoluer régulièrement depuis 2019.

Suite à mon article sur mes doutes, plusieurs idées intéressantes ont émergé. Parmi elles : une newsletter. Je vous le dis franchement, je n’ai jamais été un grand adepte… même si j’en lis quelques-unes. Tout le monde ne passe pas sur Cachem tous les jours (ni même toutes les semaines). Cette newsletter mensuelle sera donc là comme un rappel simple et pratique : l’essentiel à ne pas manquer, sans spam ni blabla inutile. L’objectif ? Vous partager les nouveautés, quelques trouvailles, et remettre en avant certains contenus passés entre les mailles du filet ou plus ancien mais toujours d’actualité comme ce guide pour nettoyer votre NAS. En résumé : un concentré de Cachem (mais pas seulement), avec une petite touche de fun en plus.

Côté séries TV, j’ai enchaîné ces derniers temps : la dernière saison de Bad Sisters, toujours aussi réussie ; The Rookie, qui se laisse regarder tranquillement ; Shrinking, qui reste clairement l’une de mes favorites (bonne nouvelle : une saison 4 a déjà été commandée par Apple).

Je vous laisse en vous souhaitant une bonne semaine,
FX

New UniFi UDM Beast, Enterprise FG Core, Enterprise 100G and Enterprise S Revealed

At NAB 2026 in Las Vegas, Ubiquiti Inc. showcased a number of rackmount UniFi devices that have not yet been formally announced or released. These systems were presented alongside existing products, making it necessary to distinguish between current hardware and what appears to be forthcoming or experimental equipment. The devices observed represent a noticeable increase in port density, throughput capability, and overall positioning compared to the current UniFi lineup.

Four specific devices stand out from this showcase: the UniFi Dream Machine Beast, the Enterprise Fortress Gateway Core, the Enterprise 100G switch, and the Enterprise S PoE switch. Based on available observations and supporting information, these products appear to form a cohesive expansion of the UniFi ecosystem into higher-performance enterprise and datacenter environments. However, specifications remain unconfirmed and should be considered provisional until officially published.

UniFi Dream Machine BEAST – A 25GbE UDM!

The UniFi Dream Machine BEAST appears to be a significant evolution of the existing Dream Machine platform, extending beyond the capabilities of current models such as the UniFi Dream Machine Pro Max. Based on observed hardware, this device integrates substantially higher port density, particularly in 10G and 25G connectivity, while also introducing onboard storage via dual SATA bays. This suggests a continued emphasis on combining routing, switching, and application hosting within a single appliance, including UniFi OS services such as Protect and other controller-based functions.

Compared to previous Dream Machine models, the BEAST shifts closer toward an enterprise-focused deployment, particularly in environments requiring direct multi-gigabit connectivity without reliance on additional aggregation switches. However, key system details such as CPU architecture, memory capacity, and throughput performance remain unconfirmed. The absence of official documentation indicates that this device is still in a pre-release or prototype stage, and its final positioning within the UniFi portfolio is not yet defined.

UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway Core – Truly Enterprise

The UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway Core appears to extend the capabilities of the existing UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway into a significantly higher performance tier. While the current Enterprise Fortress Gateway is already positioned as a high-end UniFi routing platform, the Core variant introduces substantially greater port density and bandwidth, including support for 100G connectivity. This suggests a shift from traditional edge gateway roles toward deployment in core or aggregation layers within larger enterprise or datacenter environments.

The observed hardware indicates a design focused on high-throughput routing and multi-layer network integration, with a combination of 10G copper, 25G SFP28, and 100G QSFP28 interfaces. This represents a notable departure from existing UniFi gateway designs, which typically rely on lower port counts and external switching for aggregation. As with the Dream Machine BEAST, critical specifications such as processing architecture, memory configuration, and pricing remain undisclosed, reinforcing the likelihood that this device is still in a pre-release stage.

UniFi Enterprise 100G – Next-Level Connections

The UniFi Enterprise 100G appears to be a high-density aggregation or spine switch designed for environments requiring large-scale bandwidth distribution. Its configuration, centered around 25G access ports and 100G uplinks, aligns with common leaf-spine architectures used in enterprise and datacenter networks. Within the current UniFi portfolio, the closest comparison would be aggregation-focused switches such as the UniFi Switch Enterprise Aggregation, although the observed specifications of this device significantly exceed existing models in both port count and total throughput capacity.

This device is likely intended for deployment deeper within network infrastructure rather than at the edge, acting as a central switching layer connecting multiple high-speed access or distribution switches. The combination of 48 × 25G and 6 × 100G ports suggests a focus on scalability and backbone connectivity rather than end-device access. As with the other devices observed, no official documentation, pricing, or detailed hardware specifications have been released, and its final role within the UniFi ecosystem remains unconfirmed.

UniFi Enterprise S – PoE Powerhouse

The UniFi Enterprise S appears to be a high-density access switch focused on multi-gigabit connectivity and high-power PoE delivery. Its configuration combines a large number of 2.5G and 10G copper ports, all supporting PoE+++, alongside 25G uplinks for upstream connectivity. Within the current UniFi lineup, there is no direct equivalent, although products such as the UniFi Switch Pro XG 48 PoE operate in a similar space with lower overall port density and more limited PoE capability. The Enterprise S extends this concept by standardising high-power PoE across all access ports.

This design suggests deployment in environments with dense endpoint requirements, including wireless access points, cameras, and AV equipment, where both bandwidth and power delivery are critical. The combination of 2.5G and 10G ports allows for flexibility across different device classes, while the inclusion of 25G uplinks supports integration into higher-speed aggregation layers. As with the other devices observed, there is no confirmed information regarding total power budget, internal hardware, or release timeline, and the device should be considered pre-release.

The four devices observed at NAB 2026 indicate a broader shift in the UniFi portfolio toward higher-performance networking tiers. Collectively, they introduce increased port density, support for 25G and 100G connectivity, and in some cases, significantly expanded power delivery capabilities. Compared to currently available products such as the UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway and UniFi Dream Machine Pro Max, these systems represent a move beyond traditional edge and SMB-focused deployments into roles typically associated with enterprise core, aggregation, and high-density access layers.

However, all four devices remain unannounced and lack confirmed specifications, pricing, and release timelines. As a result, their final positioning and availability cannot be determined with certainty. While the observed hardware suggests a structured expansion into a more complete end-to-end networking stack, any conclusions remain provisional until formal details are released by Ubiquiti Inc..

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShUniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShNew UniFi UDM Beast, EnterprisUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MLUniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewIs the UniFi Dream Router Stil Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

New QNAP TS-xh66TX SERIES – Intel i3, USB4, 2x 10GbE, M.2/E1.S, SATA, U.2, PCIe and MORE

QNAP’s TS h666TX, TS h866TX and TS h966TX arrive at a point where the company’s tower portfolio has had a fairly visible split between mainstream QTS systems such as the TS 464 and TS 664, and higher tier QuTS hero models such as the TVS h674. The older TS x64 family remains relevant, but those systems are built around the Intel Celeron N5095 with DDR4 memory and a lower ceiling for memory expansion, while the TVS h674 moves into a more performance led and more expensive part of the range with desktop class Intel Core processors and QuTS hero support. Against that backdrop, a new ZFS focused series with Intel Core i3 1215U, DDR5 memory, integrated 10GbE and USB4 has a clear role in the lineup, at least on paper.

That is also why these systems are likely to attract attention from buyers who want more than the current TS 464 or TS 664 can offer, but who may not need, or want to pay for, a TVS h674 class solution. The i3 1215U itself is a 6 core, 8 thread mobile processor with 2 Performance cores, 4 Efficient cores and boost speeds up to 4.40 GHz, which places it well above the older Celeron class hardware used in the TS x64 generation. Combined with QuTS hero’s ZFS platform and the broader move toward hybrid HDD and SSD storage layouts, these new TS h66xTX models appear designed to address demand for a more modern mid range NAS that balances file services, high speed networking and SSD aware storage without immediately stepping into QNAP’s more workstation style hero systems.

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Design & Storage

The clearest design distinction in this series is that QNAP is not treating all 3 models as simple capacity variants of the same enclosure. The TS h666TX and TS h866TX appear to share the same newer tower styling, with the standard 3.5 inch bays on the front and a separate area for the solid state media, while the TS h966TX moves into the denser mixed media format that QNAP has used before on some of its hybrid hero systems. That already places the range closer to a purpose built QuTS hero family than a straightforward update of the older TS 464 and TS 664, which used a more conventional compact tower layout with 4 or 6 HDD bays and 2 internal M.2 slots rather than externally accessible SSD facing bays.

From a storage layout perspective, the TS h666TX and TS h866TX are the more direct and easier models to position. They combine either 4 or 6 SATA HDD bays with 2 additional E1.S or M.2 NVMe capable bays, effectively giving each system a built in hybrid structure for HDD capacity and SSD tiering or fast pool allocation. That is a notable step away from the TS 464 and TS 664 approach, where the SSD element is present but still secondary, with 2 x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3 x1 slots intended mainly for caching or separate SSD storage rather than being presented as a more central part of the overall bay count.

The TS h966TX is the more unusual model in the group because it uses a 5 plus 4 arrangement, with 5 SATA HDD bays and 4 U.2 or SATA 2.5 inch bays. In practical terms, that design is less about scaling raw HDD capacity and more about offering a denser mixed media platform for users who want heavier SSD integration without moving into a full flash chassis. That layout is more in line with some of QNAP’s existing hybrid hero systems, where ZFS storage is paired with a more deliberate split between bulk HDD storage and higher speed SSD media, rather than the simpler HDD plus cache model seen in entry and lower mid range systems.

This is also where the new series starts to sit in a more defined position between the TS x64 range and the TVS h674 class. The TS 464 and TS 664 are still marketed as compact and affordable towers with M.2 support, but their storage design remains closer to mainstream SMB and prosumer use. The TVS h674, by comparison, is a 6 bay QuTS hero platform with 2 x M.2 NVMe slots and a much more traditional premium desktop NAS structure, focused on higher end ZFS deployment and PCIe expansion. The TS h666TX and TS h866TX seem to introduce a middle route, where the chassis and bay layout are more SSD aware and more explicitly hybrid than the TS x64 generation, but without fully mirroring the larger TVS hero desktop approach.

Overall, the design language here suggests that QNAP is targeting users who want direct access to both hard drive and flash storage in a tower form factor without relying entirely on internal motherboard mounted SSD slots. For QuTS hero in particular, that matters because ZFS benefits from clearer separation of storage roles, whether for high speed pools, application storage, read intensive workloads or automated tiering as QNAP continues to develop Qtier support in its ZFS platform. As a result, the storage design of the TS h666TX, TS h866TX and TS h966TX is not just a matter of adding more bays, but of shifting the product family toward more structured hybrid storage deployment than the older TS 464 and TS 664 offered.

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Internal Hardware

Internally, the most important shift in this series is the move to Intel Core i3 1215U. This is a 6 core, 8 thread processor with a hybrid layout of 2 Performance cores and 4 Efficient cores, up to 4.40 GHz boost, and a 15 W base power profile. In broad terms, that puts it above the Intel Celeron N5095 used in the TS 464 and TS 664 generation, which is a 4 core, 4 thread chip with a lower performance ceiling and no hybrid core structure. For a QuTS hero platform, that matters because ZFS services, snapshots, background data operations, deduplication related overhead where applicable, and multi user file handling all benefit from having more CPU headroom than the older Celeron class systems can typically provide.

Memory is the other clear upgrade point. According to the revealed specification, all 3 systems arrive with 8GB DDR5 and support expansion up to 64GB. That is a substantial change in class compared with the TS 464, which uses DDR4 and officially tops out at 16GB, and it aligns more closely with the expectations of a ZFS based system where memory capacity can have a direct effect on caching behaviour, data services and overall responsiveness under heavier workloads. It does not place these models at the same level as QNAP’s higher end QuTS hero hardware with larger default memory pools or ECC focused enterprise positioning, but it does move them noticeably beyond the entry and lower mid range segment.

That leaves these systems in an interesting middle position when compared with the TVS h674. The TVS h674 is still the more powerful desktop hero system overall, with Intel Core desktop CPUs such as the Core i5 12400 or Core i3 12100 depending on configuration, higher default memory allocations, and a more overtly performance focused design. At the same time, the new TS h666TX, TS h866TX and TS h966TX seem to be aiming for a more efficient balance of modern CPU architecture, ZFS support and hybrid storage flexibility without moving fully into that higher cost workstation style category. In other words, the internal hardware does not suggest a direct replacement for the TVS h674, but it does suggest a clear move away from the older TS x64 class and toward a more serious mid tier hero platform.

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Ports and Connectivity

Connectivity is one of the areas where this series separates itself most clearly from the older TS x64 generation. The TS h666TX and TS h866TX both combine 2 x 10GbE with 2 x USB 10Gb/s and 2 x USB4, alongside a PCIe Gen 3 x4 expansion slot. That is a substantial step forward from systems such as the TS 464, which provides 2 x 2.5GbE as standard and relies on PCIe expansion if higher bandwidth networking is needed. In practical terms, that means the new h66xTX models are being positioned for multi user editing, faster backup windows and direct attached workflows in a way that the mainstream TS line was not originally built around.

The inclusion of USB4 is particularly relevant here because QNAP has already used this kind of connectivity in creator focused products such as the TVS h674T, where Thunderbolt 4 is presented as a direct host connection option for Mac and Windows systems. While QNAP will still need to confirm the exact implementation and host workflow support on these new NAB 2026 systems, the presence of 2 x USB4 on all 3 models suggests that direct high bandwidth connection is a deliberate part of their design, rather than a secondary feature. That places these units closer to QNAP’s media and production focused hardware than to the more general office and home NAS segment.

The TS h966TX is slightly different, and arguably less aggressive, in its network configuration. Instead of the dual 10GbE arrangement of the h666TX and h866TX, the h966TX is listed with 1 x 10GbE and 1 x 2.5GbE, while still retaining 2 x USB 10Gb/s and 2 x USB4. That means the 9 bay model has the most storage flexibility in the family, but not the strongest network specification on paper. If that specification is accurate at launch, it makes the h966TX a more storage led hybrid platform rather than the highest bandwidth model in the group, which is not the usual assumption buyers would make when looking at the largest chassis first.

Specification:
TS h666TX: 2 x 10GbE, 2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4, 1 x PCIe Gen 3 x4
TS h866TX: 2 x 10GbE, 2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4, 1 x PCIe Gen 3 x4
TS h966TX: 1 x 10GbE, 1 x 2.5GbE, 2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Price and Release Date

At the time of writing, QNAP does not appear to have published final retail pricing or a formal product page for the TS h666TX, TS h866TX or TS h966TX on its main product catalogue or 2026 newsroom pages, so both availability and price should still be treated as unconfirmed. Based on the information shared at NAB 2026, the current indication is a target launch window around Q2 to Q3 2026, but that remains provisional until QNAP publishes official listings, regional store pages or a formal press release. QNAP’s own 2026 newsroom and product comparison pages currently show no live retail entry for these 3 systems, which supports the view that the series is still in the pre release stage rather than being commercially available now. In pricing terms, the most reasonable expectation is that this range will sit above the TS x64 family and below the TVS h74 class, assuming QNAP keeps the rest of its tower lineup structured in the same way. The TS 464 is still positioned by QNAP as a mainstream high performance tower option in its 2026 buying guide, while the current TVS h674 remains a more premium QuTS hero desktop platform with stronger CPU options and a generally higher specification tier. Given that the new TS h666TX and TS h866TX introduce QuTS hero, DDR5, Intel Core i3 1215U, integrated 10GbE and USB4, they would logically land between those 2 product families rather than alongside either one directly.

That said, the TS h966TX may prove harder to price neatly because its storage configuration is more specialised than the other 2 models. Its 5 plus 4 hybrid layout, mixed 10GbE and 2.5GbE networking, and heavier SSD oriented design could place it closer to existing hybrid hero systems in value, even if its processor remains the same. Until QNAP confirms MSRPs, any exact figure would be speculative, but the broader market position appears to be that these are intended as a mid tier QuTS hero tower family, not a direct budget replacement for the TS 464 and TS 664, and not a full substitute for the TVS h674 or TVS h674T either.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...New QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX QNAP 2x 10GbE to USB4 Adapter 100 Reasons Why Users Choose T100 Reasons Why Users Choose S100 Reasons DIY NAS (TrueNAS, 100 Reasons Turnkey (Synology/Week 48 Tech Roundup – myQNAWeek 47 Tech Roundup – SynolBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - Data Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Discrètement, OVHcloud a modifié les règles autour de son extension maison. Lors de la recherche d’un nom de domaine en .ovh, un message apparaît désormais : « L’extension .ovh n’est temporairement plus disponible à l’enregistrement, mais le renouvellement reste possible. En attendant, nous vous invitons à essayer une autre extension (.com, .fr, .net…) ». Cela soulève plusieurs questions…

Extension .ovh, une option populaire

Lancée comme une alternative économique, l’extension .ovh s’était rapidement imposée : auto-hébergement, développeurs, possesseur de NAS… Son principal argument, un tarif ultra-agressif : 1,99 € HT par an. Dans un contexte où les extensions classiques voient leurs prix augmenter, le .ovh représentait une solution idéale pour multiplier les projets sans exploser son budget. Beaucoup d’entre vous l’utilisaient…

Pourquoi cette suspension ?

OVHcloud n’a pas communiqué officiellement sur les raisons. Plusieurs hypothèses circulent :

• Rentabilité insuffisante : à ce tarif, la marge est inexistante ;
• Abus et spam : les extensions peu chères attirent souvent des usages malveillants (phishing, détournement de domaine) ;
• Repositionnement stratégique : rationaliser l’offre et recentrer les activités.

Quelle que soit la raison, le caractère “temporaire” reste flou. Rien n’indique à ce jour un retour à court terme…

Quel impact pour les utilisateurs ?

Pour les détenteurs existants (ceux qui ont déjà un domaine .ovh), pas de panique : les domaines restent actifs et renouvelables. En revanche, il est désormais impossible d’enregistrer de nouveaux noms en .ovh. Pour tout nouveau projet, il faudra se tourner vers d’autres extensions.

Quelles alternatives ?

Les utilisateurs orientés homelab et auto-hébergement peuvent prendre :

• .fr / .be / .eu : fiable, avec un référencement local ;
• .com : universel mais plus onéreux…

Attention au prix d’appel : certaines extensions affichent des tarifs très attractifs la première année, mais le renouvellement peut réserver de mauvaises surprises. L’extension .site par exemple est proposée à 0,99€ la première année, puis passe à 32,99 € les années suivantes.

Un signal pour le marché

Malheureusement, cette décision met en lumière une tendance de fond : le modèle des domaines low-cost atteint ses limites. Entre hausse des coûts opérationnels, lutte contre les abus et exigences de qualité… les registrars ajustent leur stratégie.

Pour les utilisateurs, le message est clair : mieux vaut privilégier la stabilité et la pérennité d’une extension plutôt que de se fier au seul critère du prix.

UGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Which Should You Buy?

The UniFi UNAS 4 and the UGREEN DH4300 Plus are being compared because they currently occupy a very similar part of the 4-bay NAS market, with both systems targeting buyers who want a relatively affordable turnkey storage solution with 2.5GbE connectivity, modern desktop design, and a lower entry price than many traditional NAS brands. On paper, they are close enough in price to be direct alternatives, but in practice they approach NAS deployment very differently. The UniFi UNAS 4 is built around tight integration with the wider UniFi ecosystem and focuses primarily on straightforward storage, backup, and remote file access, whereas the UGREEN DH4300 Plus is designed as a broader standalone NAS platform with more memory, a more powerful ARM processor, HDMI output, and a wider range of applications and services. That makes this comparison relevant not just because of the hardware and price overlap, but because each system reflects a different idea of what an entry to mid-range 4-bay NAS should be in 2026.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Brand vs Brand

Before I dig into which of the DH4300 or UNAS 4 is best for you, it is worth highlighting again that these are two comparatively new players in the NAS scene (compared with long time multi-decade vetrans such as Synology, QNAP, Asustor and Terramaster), so let’s talk about their priorities and focus at a brand level. Both UGREEN and UniFi have entered the NAS sector from distinct starting points and continue to move in different directions, each targeting a particular type of user. UniFi’s UNAS series delivers consistency, predictable performance, and dependable integration with the broader UniFi ecosystem. Its software is stable, lightweight, and well-suited to users who prioritize straightforward storage management, reliable data handling, and unified control across routers, switches, and surveillance systems. While the hardware is limited to fixed ARM configurations and non-expandable memory, it is efficient, quiet, and designed for continuous operation with minimal maintenance. For organizations already invested in UniFi infrastructure, the UNAS systems provide a logical expansion that keeps management centralized and operational risk low. However, their value depends heavily on ecosystem synergy; outside of that environment, the systems remain competent but relatively inflexible standalone NAS options.

UGREEN’s NASync platform, on the other hand, appeals to users seeking broader performance capability and independence. Its x86-based models, upgradable memory, and open software environment allow it to serve as a hybrid between NAS and compact server, capable of running applications, containers, and virtual machines alongside storage tasks. The design language is more suited to individual or small business use than datacenter deployment, but the hardware range—from ARM to Core i5—covers a far wider performance spectrum than UniFi’s. Software maturity continues to evolve quickly, with new features added frequently, and the systems provide extensive compatibility with third-party clients and backup services. The trade-off is that long-term reliability and enterprise-level security validation are still developing.

Ultimately, UniFi NAS suits users who already rely on UniFi’s networking ecosystem and value simplicity, predictability, and centralized management, while UGREEN NAS caters to those prioritizing flexibility, compute power, and open software capability. Both brands have lowered the entry barrier into reliable NAS ownership, but they embody opposing philosophies: UniFi focuses on integration and control, whereas UGREEN emphasizes capability and independence.

Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!

UGREEN DH4300 vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Design and Storage

From a physical design perspective, these 2 NAS systems take very different approaches. The UniFi UNAS 4 has a taller, narrower chassis with a more vertical layout, while the UGREEN DH4300 Plus uses a more cubic desktop design that will look more familiar to buyers coming from Synology, QNAP, or Asustor hardware. The UniFi system is also available in black or white, which gives it a more deliberate visual identity within the wider UniFi product range, whereas the UGREEN keeps to a more conventional single-finish enclosure. In both cases, the chassis material is primarily plastic, so neither is especially premium in material terms, but each is clearly trying to prioritize compactness and low manufacturing cost rather than metal construction.

The drive arrangement is also notably different. The UniFi UNAS 4 places its 4 SATA bays in the base of the chassis, with the drives inserted from underneath, while the UGREEN DH4300 Plus uses a top-loaded vertical bay arrangement hidden under a removable outer shell. Neither system uses a particularly enterprise-focused tray design, and neither is really built around frequent hot-swap use in the same way as more expensive rackmount or prosumer NAS systems. That said, the UniFi trays are easier to describe as straightforward click-in drive carriers, while the UGREEN trays feel more budget-oriented in construction and do not leave the same impression of robustness as more established NAS brands.

In storage flexibility, the UniFi has the more ambitious configuration. Alongside its 4 SATA bays, it also includes 2 dedicated M.2 NVMe slots for SSD cache. That gives it an advantage in hybrid storage architecture, since the hard drives can be used for capacity while the NVMe media handles read and write cache duties. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus does not include M.2 storage slots, so any SSD deployment has to consume one or more of the main SATA bays, which reduces total storage capacity. At the same time, UniFi currently limits those NVMe bays to cache use rather than general storage pools, so the practical advantage is still narrower than the raw hardware layout suggests.

The 2 brands also differ in RAID and storage management philosophy. The UGREEN supports a broader list of RAID modes, including JBOD, Basic, RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, which gives it more deployment flexibility for different user priorities around performance, redundancy, or simple linear storage. The UniFi platform supports RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, but its overall storage structure is more controlled and less flexible, with a stronger focus on a simplified single storage pool approach. For buyers who want fewer decisions and a cleaner setup process, that may be acceptable, but for users who want more granular control over how storage is arranged, the UGREEN is less restrictive.

In pure storage potential, the UGREEN is also easier to quantify because it officially supports up to 128TB across 4 bays using 32TB drives, whereas UniFi focuses more on supported drive compatibility and cache pairing than on headline raw capacity figures. The UniFi does have the practical advantage of SSD caching built in, which can improve responsiveness in repeated access and write-heavy workloads, but the UGREEN has the simpler storage proposition overall and does not tie part of its internal design to optional accessories such as UniFi’s separate M.2 tray approach. As a result, the UniFi has the more distinctive and technically layered storage design, while the UGREEN has the more conventional and broadly flexible one.

UniFi UNAS4 vs UGREEN DH 4300 – Internal Hardware & Connections

Internally, the UGREEN DH4300 Plus has the stronger hardware specification. It uses an 8-core Rockchip ARM processor based on Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores running at up to 2.0GHz, alongside 8GB of LPDDR4X memory and 32GB of eMMC for the system. By comparison, the UniFi UNAS 4 uses a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 processor at 1.7GHz with 4GB of memory. Both systems are clearly built around low-power ARM architecture rather than x86 processing, but the UGREEN has the more capable platform on paper and offers more headroom for multitasking, background services, and broader software functionality.

The UniFi system does, however, counter with a more unusual internal layout. In addition to its 4 SATA bays, it includes 2 M.2 NVMe slots dedicated to SSD cache, which gives it a storage acceleration feature that the UGREEN does not match natively. For users dealing with repeated file access, background synchronization, or burst-heavy write activity, that cache support has practical value. The UGREEN relies entirely on its 4 SATA bays for storage media, so although its CPU and memory are stronger, its internal storage architecture is less advanced in terms of tiered storage.

External connectivity is broader on the UGREEN. It includes 1x 2.5GbE LAN port, HDMI output at up to 4K 60Hz, 1x front USB 3.2 Gen 1 port at 5Gb/s, and 2 additional USB-A 5Gb/s ports. The UniFi UNAS 4 is much more limited, offering 1x 2.5GbE RJ45 port and 1x 5Gb/s USB-C port. This narrower I/O profile reflects the fact that UniFi has positioned the UNAS 4 as a focused network storage appliance rather than a multi-role NAS for media output, peripheral attachment, or application expansion. In direct hardware terms, the UGREEN is better equipped for users who expect more than basic file serving.

Power and deployment also separate these 2 systems. The UniFi UNAS 4 supports PoE+++ and includes a 90W PoE adapter, which allows both power and network connectivity over a single cable in supported environments. That is unusual in this part of the NAS market and makes it particularly relevant for users already invested in UniFi switching infrastructure or those deploying hardware in locations where simplified cabling matters. The UGREEN uses a more conventional external power arrangement, which is less distinctive but also less dependent on network infrastructure choices. Therefore, the UGREEN has the stronger internal compute hardware and broader physical connectivity, while the UniFi has the more specialized deployment advantage.

UGREEN DH4300 vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Software & Services

The biggest difference between these 2 NAS systems is not the chassis or the processor, but the software scope. The UniFi UNAS 4 runs UniFi Drive and is clearly built around a narrower storage-first brief, with support for SMB, NFS, snapshots, file encryption, Time Machine, share links, user groups, remote backup, cloud backup targets, and client apps. It covers the main NAS fundamentals expected by home users and small offices, but it does so within a more controlled environment that places simplicity and consistency ahead of feature breadth. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus, running UGOS Pro, aims much wider and includes not only file serving and backup tools, but also multimedia applications, container support, HDMI-based media playback, AI-assisted photo features, and broader service depth overall.

For pure storage management, UniFi Drive is cleaner and more focused, particularly for users who want the NAS to act primarily as private cloud storage, backup target, and centralized file repository. Its interface is built to align with the broader UniFi platform, and that gives it an advantage for users already running UniFi networking equipment and remote management tools. However, that same focus also means the UNAS 4 is less flexible as a general-purpose NAS. The UGREEN platform does not have the same ecosystem tie-in, but it operates more independently and gives the user more scope to use the system for different workloads beyond file storage.

Application support is where the gap becomes more obvious. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus supports Docker and has a noticeably broader service layer for media, backup, and user applications. That creates options for running third-party software, home media tools, and more customized services that simply are not part of the UniFi approach. The UniFi UNAS 4 does not currently try to compete in that area and instead presents itself as a dedicated NAS platform rather than an application host. For some users that will be a limitation, while for others it will be a benefit, because it reduces complexity and keeps the system centered on storage tasks rather than mixed workload experimentation.

In practical terms, the software decision comes down to whether the buyer values depth or focus. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus offers the broader NAS software experience and is better suited to users who want more features, more applications, and more ways to extend the system over time. The UniFi UNAS 4 offers the more controlled and storage-specific platform, with the clearest advantage appearing when it is deployed inside an existing UniFi environment. As a result, the UGREEN software stack is more versatile, while the UniFi software stack is more specialized.

UniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 NAS – Conclusion & Verdict

Taken as a whole, these 2 systems are aimed at a similar buyer in price terms, but they are not trying to solve the same problem in the same way. The UniFi UNAS 4 is a more specialized NAS that focuses on storage, backup, remote access, and integration within the UniFi ecosystem. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is a broader standalone NAS that gives the user more hardware resources, more software flexibility, and a wider overall role in the network. That difference matters more than the relatively small gap in price, because in day to day use they will appeal to different priorities. The UniFi UNAS 4 makes more sense for buyers who already use UniFi switches, gateways, and management tools, or for those who specifically want a NAS that stays focused on file storage instead of trying to become a media server or container host. Its built in NVMe cache support and PoE+++ deployment give it some useful differentiators, and its simpler software scope will suit users who want a more controlled experience. However, outside of the UniFi ecosystem, some of its strengths become less important, while its limitations in application support, connectivity, and hardware power become harder to ignore.

The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is the better fit for users who want a more traditional all-round NAS. It has the stronger CPU, more memory, broader external connectivity, more RAID options, HDMI output, Docker support, and a software platform with more room to scale into multimedia, backup variety, and third party services. It is the more capable choice for mixed home and small business use, particularly for buyers who are not tied to any specific network brand and want their NAS to handle more than just centralized storage. It is also the easier system to recommend to users comparing it against other established 4-bay NAS platforms in the same price bracket. So, in direct usage terms, the UniFi UNAS 4 is better for UniFi-centric deployments, cleaner storage-first use, and buyers who value NVMe caching and PoE-based installation. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is better for users who want stronger hardware, more software features, better connectivity, and a wider long term usage profile. If the question is which is the better pure value NAS for the largest number of users, the UGREEN DH4300 Plus is the stronger overall option. If the question is which fits better into a UniFi-led network and a simpler storage-focused role, the UniFi UNAS 4 is the more appropriate choice.

Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on Amazon @399	Buy the UniFi UNAS 4 on The UniFi Store for $379

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUGREEN vs UniFi NAS - Which NeWeek 39 Tech Digest – Wi-Fi UGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewUGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewNEW UniFi NAS - What Comes NexNEW UniFi NAS - What Comes NexUnifi NAS on YouTube Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Choisir un NAS peut vite devenir un casse-tête. Entre les marques, les modèles, le nombre de baies, les performances, le RAID ou encore les usages possibles, il est facile de s’y perdre… et de faire un mauvais choix. Et pourtant, dans de nombreux cas, quelques critères suffisent pour trouver le modèle adapté à ses besoins.

Les erreurs les plus fréquentes

Avec le recul, on observe souvent les mêmes erreurs :

• Choisir un NAS trop puissant (et donc trop cher) par rapport à son usage ;
• Sous-estimer ses besoins en stockage ;
• Ne pas vérifier les fonctionnalités disponibles ;
• Négliger la sécurité ou la sauvegarde.

Résultat : un équipement mal exploité… ou qu’il faut remplacer plus tôt que prévu.

Les critères essentiels pour choisir un NAS

Plutôt que de se focaliser sur les fiches techniques, mieux vaut commencer par l’essentiel.

L’usage principal :

• Sauvegarde de fichiers
• Stockage de photos et vidéos
• Serveur multimédia (Plex, streaming)
• Usage avancé (Docker, virtualisation)

Pour moi, c’est LE critère le plus important.

Le nombre d’utilisateurs :

• 1 à 2 utilisateurs → NAS 2 baies
• Famille ou équipe → NAS 4 baies recommandé

Plus il y a d’utilisateurs, plus les besoins en performances et en stockage augmentent. Cela peut sembler évident, mais c’est souvent sous-estimé…

L’évolutivité

Un NAS est un investissement sur plusieurs années. Il est donc préférable de prévoir :

• un peu plus de capacité que nécessaire ;
• une solution évolutive (RAM, disques, extensions).

Anticiper permet d’éviter un remplacement prématuré !

En pratique

Dans la majorité des cas :

• Un NAS 2 baies suffit pour débuter ;
• Un NAS 4 baies apporte plus de confort et de sécurité ;
• Les fabricant comme Synology, QNAP, Asustor ou TerraMaster couvrent la plupart des besoins…

Il est inutile de viser trop haut dès le départ, mais de nombreux utilisateurs commencent avec un NAS 2 baies et un an après… passent sur le modèle 4 baies.

Vous cherchez un NAS ? Téléchargez le guide gratuit pour faire le bon choix en quelques minutes

Un guide pour aller plus loin

Pour vous aider à faire le bon choix rapidement, j’ai créé un guide complet complet : Choisir son NAS en 10 minutes. Ce guide reprend les bases, explique simplement les notions importantes et propose des recommandations concrètes selon votre profil.

Vous y trouverez notamment :

• Les points essentiels à vérifier ;
• Les erreurs à éviter ;
• Un tableau pour choisir rapidement ;
• Une checklist avant achat.

TÉLÉCHARGER LE GUIDE

Une newsletter (1 fois par mois)

J’en profite également pour lancer une newsletter Cachem. Une fois par mois, vous recevrez :

• Les actualités importantes autour des NAS ;
• Des conseils pratiques ;
• Du contenu exclusif réservé aux abonnés ;
• Une sélection de ressources utiles.

L’objectif reste le même : vous faire gagner du temps et éviter les erreurs.

Recevoir le guide gratuitement

Le guide est accessible gratuitement en vous inscrivant à la newsletter

Pour aller plus loin

Vous pouvez également consulter les guides déjà disponibles sur le site :

• Guide d’achat NAS
• Conseils pour bien choisir son NAS
• Comment choisir un NAS
• Meilleurs NAS : le comparatif complet

Comme toujours sur Cachem, l’objectif est de proposer des contenus simples, utiles et directement exploitables. Si ce guide peut vous éviter une erreur ou vous faire gagner du temps, alors il aura rempli son rôle.

What is the Synology BeeStation BST151-4T NAS?

The Synology BeeStation BST151-4T is a 4 TB single drive personal cloud device that sits somewhere between an external hard drive and a traditional NAS, targeting users who want centralized storage, photo backup, file syncing, and remote access without dealing with a conventional multi bay server setup. It follows the original BST150-4T BeeStation, first released in February 2024, and appears to be a light refresh of that earlier model rather than a full redesign. As with the first version, the focus is on quick deployment, simple management, and a more consumer friendly software experience, using Synology’s BeeStation platform instead of the broader and more configurable DSM system found on the company’s standard NAS lineup.

Synology BeeStation BST151-4T Hardware Specifications

At a hardware level, the BST151-4T remains a very compact single bay network storage appliance with a fixed 4 TB hard drive, built around the Realtek RTD1619B platform and a 1GbE network connection. Physical connectivity is unchanged from the earlier BeeStation, with 1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 port, 1 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 port, and 1 x RJ-45 LAN port, all housed in the same 148.0 x 62.6 x 196.3 mm enclosure weighing 820 g.

That hardware profile makes clear where the BeeStation sits in Synology’s lineup. This is not a flexible NAS chassis with room for drive upgrades, SSD cache, multi bay expansion, or faster networking. The internal disk is part of the appliance design, so there is no meaningful path to RAID redundancy, easier drive level recovery, or long term capacity scaling in the way there is on a conventional 2 bay or 4 bay NAS.

Power and thermals are also modest, which is consistent with a low power, always on personal cloud device. Synology lists power consumption at about 7.85 W during access and 1.65 W in HDD hibernation, with a 36 W external power adapter. The system continues to use a single HAT3300-4T drive, and Synology’s current 4 TB HAT3300 model is a 5400 RPM class disk rather than a faster 7200 RPM unit.

The one specification that requires care is memory. Synology’s March 30, 2026 product specification PDF and the current BeeStation comparison page both list the BST151-4T with 1 GB DDR4, but Synology’s newer BST151-4T datasheet, published later in March 2026 and mirrored across multiple regional versions, lists 2 GB DDR4 instead. On balance, the later datasheet appears to reflect the intended refresh specification, but Synology’s own published material is not yet fully consistent. (UPDATE – RAM on the BST151-4T is CONFIRMED as 2GB)

Assuming the 2 GB figure in the later datasheet is the correct final spec, the BST151-4T is best understood as a minimal revision of the BST150-4T rather than a new hardware generation. The enclosure, CPU, ports, networking, and drive class are effectively the same, while the main change is the move from the predecessor’s 1 GB memory configuration to 2 GB. That could simply reflect practical component economics as much as performance tuning, since lower density memory packages can become less cost effective over time as supply shifts. In either case, this still appears to be fixed onboard memory, not a user upgradeable SO-DIMM arrangement, so the platform remains closed in the same way as the original model.

Synology BeeStation in 2026 – What can it do?

In 2026, the BeeStation platform is no longer limited to basic remote file access. Synology positions it as a consumer focused private cloud for storing, syncing, and sharing files and photos, with web, desktop, and mobile access, support for sign in via Google Account, Apple ID, or Synology Account, and shared access for up to 8 users on a single device. It is designed to pull together data from phones, computers, external drives, and selected cloud services into one managed location rather than acting only as a simple networked hard drive.

Photo handling is one of the more developed parts of the platform. Synology states that BeeStation can back up mobile photos, import content from sources such as Google Photos and iCloud Photos, and organize images with local AI based recognition for people, subjects, and places. The software also supports timeline and map based browsing, album creation, and controlled photo sharing, which places the BST151-4T closer to a private cloud photo hub than to a basic USB backup box.

Its data protection features have also expanded since launch. BeeStation now supports internal restore points based on snapshots, backups to BeeProtect, Synology NAS, and external drives, plus a 3 year Acronis True Image Essentials license for 1 computer. BeeStation OS 1.5 also added BeeCamera support, but Synology limits that feature to BeeStation Plus models rather than the standard 4 TB unit, so the BST151-4T does not currently gain the surveillance role that the higher tier model has started to take on.

Where the BeeStation still differs from a DSM based NAS such as the DS124 or DS223 is in breadth and flexibility. Synology’s DS124 and DS223 product pages explicitly advertise broader DSM functions including Synology Drive based private cloud workflows, Btrfs snapshot features, ShareSync between Synology systems, full Surveillance Station support, and the wider DSM application platform. By contrast, BeeStation remains a curated appliance with a narrower software stack, no general DSM Package Center environment, no broad package driven expansion path, and on the standard 4 TB model no BeeCamera surveillance support either. In other words, it can cover the main personal cloud tasks, but it still does not replace the wider role of even Synology’s entry level DSM NAS systems.

The BST151-4T looks like a modest revision of the original BeeStation rather than a substantially new product. Its appeal remains the same: a preconfigured, low friction private cloud for users who want basic file storage, photo backup, syncing, sharing, and remote access without moving into a full DSM based NAS environment. The hardware envelope is still narrow, with a fixed internal 4 TB drive, 1GbE networking, and no real upgrade path for storage expansion or RAID style redundancy, but that is consistent with its role as an entry level turnkey appliance rather than a general purpose NAS. Synology’s own later datasheet points to 2 GB of RAM on the new model, which would make the BST151-4T a small but practical refresh of the BST150-4T rather than a platform shift. Pricing is the main unknown at the time of writing. Synology’s support status page already lists the BST151-4T as generally available, but public retail pricing is still not clearly established. On that basis, the safest expectation is that it will land close to the earlier 4 TB BeeStation, which launched around $199 in the US and about £209 in the UK, while more recent BST150-4T retail listings have also appeared higher depending on seller and region, sat around $309 without TAX. That likely places the BST151-4T will land in excess of $300 and maybe closer to $350 when factoring the RAM increase.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology Official Cameras Now Synology Beestation BST151-4T Synology RS1626xs+ NAS - WorthSynology RS1626xs+ NAS RevealeSynology FS200T NAS RevealedSynology FS200T NAS Revealed100 Reasons Why Users Choose T100 Reasons Why Users Choose S100 Reasons DIY NAS (TrueNAS, 100 Reasons Turnkey (Synology/ Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE