Best Cheap NAS of the Year

Cheap NAS hardware in 2025 sits in an awkward middle ground between full DIY servers and polished, premium turnkey appliances, but it is also where many first time buyers start when they want to get away from cloud storage and subscriptions without spending a large amount of money. This article focuses on systems that have been available for under $249, arrive pre built with CPU and memory, and come either with their own NAS style operating system or with enough onboard storage to install one easily. The aim is to show what you realistically get at this price in terms of bays, network speed, scale and software, and where each device draws the line on features, expansion and flexibility so you can decide whether a low cost 2 bay box, an all M.2 cube or a bare board server is the better fit for your first step into local storage.

#1 UGREEN NASync DH2300 – $178 to $209

SPECS: Rockchip RK3576 8 core ARM up to 2.2 GHz – 4 GB LPDDR4X – 2 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays (up to 60 TB total) – 1 x 1 GbE RJ45 – no internal M.2 SSD slots, 32 GB eMMC OS storage.

The UGREEN NASync DH2300 is aimed at users who want the cheapest possible entry to a proper NAS without losing basic RAID and a guided setup experience. Two SATA bays and support for up to 60 TB in RAID 0, RAID 1, JBOD or Basic give enough room for a modest media library, photo archive and PC backups, while UGOS Pro adds mobile apps, 4K HDMI playback, simple remote access and basic snapshot and multi user features in a consumer friendly interface. Power draw is low, thanks to the 8 core ARM SoC and 1 GbE networking, which also keeps noise and heat down compared with larger multi bay units. The key limitation at this price is that you are locked to 2 drive bays, a single 1 GbE port and no internal SSD caching or containers on this model, so long term scale and heavy app use are constrained. Overall it suits buyers who want a cheap, mostly turnkey alternative to cloud storage and USB drives, rather than a platform for heavier virtualization or high speed workloads.

What we said in our October 2025 Review HERE:

The UGREEN DH2300 represents a carefully positioned step in the company’s ongoing effort to make private storage approachable for non-technical users. Its hardware configuration, led by the Rockchip RK3576 processor and 4GB of fixed memory, provides solid baseline performance for a two-bay ARM-powered NAS at this price point. Although its single 1GbE network port may limit throughput for larger file transfers, the system compensates with a highly efficient power profile, quiet operation, and full support for common RAID configurations. The inclusion of a dedicated 32GB eMMC system drive, HDMI 4K60 output, and an NPU capable of AI-based photo indexing places it above most similarly priced entry-level alternatives from QNAP and Synology. However, certain aspects of UGREEN’s marketing—particularly the way the dual quad-core CPU clusters are presented as a single 8-core design—could be clearer. Likewise, the absence of upgradeable memory or faster networking options limits its long-term scalability for users seeking to expand their NAS environment beyond basic media and backup tasks.

From a broader standpoint, the DH2300’s strongest appeal lies in its simplicity and low operational overhead. UGOS Pro, though still developing in maturity, has evolved into a competent, user-friendly platform offering the key features needed for home data management, multimedia access, and scheduled backups. The OS’s stability, combined with efficient hardware and lightweight design, makes this NAS a practical alternative to annual cloud subscriptions for users who simply want local control over their data. It is not a system aimed at enthusiasts or professionals demanding virtual machines, multi-gig networking, or broad third-party OS support, but rather those seeking a self-contained, reliable, and low-maintenance device. Within that niche, the DH2300 delivers strong value and performs consistently well for the intended demographic—serving as an accessible first step into local storage ownership.

Buy the UGREEN DH300 on Amazon @209	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on B&H
	STORE

SOFTWARE - 7/10

HARDWARE - 8/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 10/10

VALUE - 9/10

8.2

PROS

Efficient Rockchip RK3576 processor (dual quad-core ARM design) provides strong performance for a low-power NAS.
Integrated 6 TOPS NPU enables local AI functions such as face, text, and object recognition without cloud reliance.
UGOS Pro offers an intuitive, user-friendly interface with features like RAID management, snapshots, Docker, and backups.
Low noise output (31–45 dBA) and excellent power efficiency (9–13W typical use) suit 24/7 home operation.
Dedicated 32GB eMMC system drive keeps the OS separate from data volumes for better reliability.
HDMI 2.0 4K60 output allows direct media playback and display management.
Competitive pricing around $200 makes it a strong entry-level NAS alternative to subscription cloud storage.

CONS

Single 1GbE LAN port limits transfer speeds and network scalability.
Fixed 4GB memory restricts heavy multitasking or Docker use.
Spending just $100-150 more gets you much, much more capable x86 powered systems

#2 UniFi UNAS 2 – $199

SPECS: Quad core ARM Cortex A55 1.7 GHz – 4 GB RAM – 2 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays – 1 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 with PoE++ – no internal M.2 SSD slots, 1 x USB C 5 Gb/s expansion.

UniFi UNAS 2 targets users already invested in the UniFi ecosystem who want basic network storage and UniFi Drive integration at a low buy in price. Two SATA bays are enough for a mirrored pair of HDDs or SSDs for small site backups, UniFi Protect recordings or general file storage, and the 2.5 GbE plus PoE++ design keeps cabling simple by combining power and data on a single link to an existing UniFi switch. UniFi OS and UniFi Drive provide a simplified management layer for object storage, simple file shares and cloud synced folders, with a small color LCM display giving at a glance system status without needing to log in. The main limitation at this price is that UniFi’s NAS software is still relatively immature, with no native support for third party media servers or advanced NAS apps and no SSD cache tier, so it is best treated as a small, integrated storage node rather than a full featured general purpose NAS. For users who want a cheap box that drops straight into a UniFi rack and handles basic storage quietly and efficiently, it fits that role.

What we said in our September 2025 Review HERE:

The UniFi UNAS 2 is presented as a compact and affordable two-bay NAS designed for straightforward storage and backup tasks, particularly within environments already using UniFi networking hardware. Its PoE++ design is distinctive, allowing both power and connectivity to be delivered over a single cable, simplifying installation where compatible PoE switches are available. This approach aligns with UniFi’s strategy of reducing external hardware requirements, though it also means that a failed port or damaged cable will disable both power and network access simultaneously. For non-UniFi users, the reliance on PoE++ creates an additional barrier, as adoption requires either compatible infrastructure or the included 60W injector. The shared dual-drive tray, lack of hot-swap support, and absence of expansion options further reinforce the system’s role as a fixed-capacity solution, best suited to smaller or secondary deployments. With a maximum drive budget of 52W and overall consumption limited to 60W, the device is power-efficient, but its architecture prioritises simplicity over flexibility.

On the software side, the UNAS 2 provides a user-friendly interface with access to snapshots, RAID configuration, system backups, and integration into the UniFi identity ecosystem. However, the limited hardware constrains the range of features available, and certain tools seen in UniFi’s larger NAS models are absent, such as encrypted volumes or extended network protocol support. Performance testing showed sequential read speeds up to 260 MB/s and write speeds around 160–180 MB/s, which make full use of the 2.5 GbE interface but leave little headroom for more demanding tasks. Thermals during extended use regularly pushed the CPU into the high 70s Celsius, and although fan management can be adjusted, sustained workloads highlight the limits of the system’s cooling design. The software’s omission of iSCSI and advanced backup filters also narrows its role, making it less competitive against established vendors in professional or virtualisation scenarios.

Ultimately, the UNAS 2 is most appropriately positioned as an edge or secondary NAS, providing basic networked storage for existing UniFi users who value plug-and-play deployment and ecosystem consistency, but it is not equipped to serve as a primary system in larger or more demanding environments (VMs, Containers, etc). A great and unique NAS that will nbe at it’s most appealing if you are already invested in the UniFi ecosystem, or have a NAS already that needs a network backup.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 10/10

VALUE - 9/10

8.4

PROS

Benefits from almost a year of development of the UNAS Pro by UniFi, resulting in a much more complete solution in both hardware and software
Exceptionally appealing price point
Extremely low impact (power use, noise level, physical scale all great)
Introduction of USB C 5Gb/s Connectivity is very welcome
Supports complete network/local access if preferred, as well as full remote connectivity with the UI.com account and site manager services
Wide Hard Drives and SATA SSD Support (UniFi branded drives and those from 3rd parties such as Seagate Ironwolf, WD Red and Toshiba N300)
Comprehensive network storage software in UniFi NAS OS and Drive.
Latest OS updates have included fan control, flexible RAID configurations, encrypted drive creation, customizable snapshots, more backup client choices/targets
\'Single Pane of Glass\' management and monitoring screen is very well presented!
One of the fastest to deploy turnkey NAS solutions I have ever personally used!

CONS

Single network port, though not a dealbreaker (as this is still just 2x SATA throughput), is not great in terms of a network failover or in deployment of SATA SSDs
Choice of PoE deployment unusual and limits some deployments
USB C connectivity does not support network adapters, NAS expansions or 3rd party UPS devices
Very modest base hardware, but understandable relative to the price
HDD injection is very unique, but it prevents hot swapping
Still a lack of client applications native to the NAS services for Windows, Mac, Android and Linux

#3 Beelink ME Mini – $209 to $279

SPECS: Intel Processor N150 quad core up to 3.6 GHz – 12 GB or 16 GB LPDDR5 – 0 x SATA bays / 6 x M.2 2280 NVMe slots (5 x PCIe 3.0 x1, 1 x PCIe 3.0 x2, up to 24 TB) – 2 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 – 64 GB eMMC plus up to 2 TB NVMe preinstalled.

The Beelink ME Mini trades spinning disks for six M.2 slots in a 99 mm cube, making it one of the most storage dense budget options for users who already have or plan to buy multiple NVMe SSDs. At this price bracket it offers far more raw flash capacity potential than traditional 2 bay HDD NAS units, and the dual 2.5 GbE ports allow the box to push enough throughput for small media servers, backup targets and home lab services once an appropriate OS such as TrueNAS, Proxmox, Linux or a lightweight NAS distribution is installed. The integrated PSU, WiFi 6 and compact chimney style cooling keep the physical footprint small while still supporting continuous operation as a low to moderate power SSD based server. The main limitation is that PCIe lane allocation and the N150 CPU cap per drive performance and the unit can run hot under sustained load, so you do not get high end NVMe speeds from each slot and there is no turnkey NAS OS included. It is therefore best suited to buyers who value maximum flash capacity per dollar in a very small chassis and are comfortable treating it as a DIY NAS platform rather than a plug-and-play appliance.

What we said in our June ’25 Review HERE:

The Beelink ME Mini NAS delivers an uncommon blend of size, functionality, and efficiency in a market segment often dominated by larger, louder, and less integrated alternatives. It is not designed to compete with traditional enterprise-grade NAS devices or modular, scalable solutions for prosumers. Instead, its strengths lie in targeting the needs of home users who want a quiet, energy-efficient storage solution that is easy to deploy, aesthetically unobtrusive, and capable of handling daily tasks such as media streaming, file backup, or soft routing. The inclusion of six M.2 NVMe SSD slots—paired with a Gen 3 x2 system slot—offers a rare level of expansion in such a small enclosure. The integration of an internal PSU, silent fan-assisted cooling, and a surprisingly effective thermal design are thoughtful touches that differentiate it from the majority of DIY NAS mini PCs.

That said, it is not without limitations. The memory is non-upgradable, thermal accumulation at the base suggests room for improvement, and bandwidth ceilings imposed by Gen 3 x1 lanes will constrain users who demand high parallel throughput. Still, for its price point—particularly when pre-order discounts are applied—the ME Mini offers significant value, especially when compared to ARM-based NAS solutions with similar or lower specifications. With bundled Crucial SSD options and support for a wide range of NAS operating systems, it positions itself as a ready-to-go platform for tech-savvy users wanting to avoid the assembly of a fully DIY system. Overall, while not a product for every use case, the Beelink ME Mini succeeds in its aim to be a compact, stylish, and capable home NAS.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 8/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 10/10

8.8

PROS

Compact cube design (99x99x99mm) ideal for discreet home deployment
Supports up to 6x M.2 NVMe SSDs with total capacity up to 24TB
Integrated PSU eliminates bulky external power adapters
Dual 2.5GbE LAN ports with link aggregation support
Wi-Fi 6 and UnRAID7 Support means not limited to 2x2.5G
Low power consumption (as low as 6.9W idle, ~30W peak with full load)
Silent fan and effective internal thermal management via large heatsink
Includes Crucial-branded SSDs in pre-configured options for reliability

CONS

Five of the six SSD slots are limited to PCIe Gen 3 x1 bandwidth
Memory is soldered and non-upgradable
Not 10GbE Upgradable (maybe m.2 adapter - messy)
Bottom panel retains heat due to lack of active ventilation

#4 Xyber Hydra N150 – around $208 to $249

SPECS: Intel Processor N150 quad core up to 3.6 GHz – 16 GB LPDDR5 – 0 x SATA bays / 4 x M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 3.0 x2 slots – 2 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 plus WiFi 6 – 64 GB eMMC with Ubuntu preinstalled and 512 GB NVMe SSD included on many models.

The Xyber Hydra N150 aims at budget buyers who want an NVMe based NAS that is closer to ready out of the box, combining 4 PCIe 3.0 x2 M.2 bays with 16 GB of memory, preloaded Ubuntu and often a preinstalled 512 GB NVMe system drive. That combination makes it straightforward to stand up containers, Docker stacks or lightweight NAS services immediately, then expand capacity by populating the remaining M.2 slots with SSDs as budget allows. Dual 2.5 GbE ports with link aggregation give enough network bandwidth to take advantage of parallel NVMe arrays for home lab or small office workloads, and the revised metal baseplate plus dual fan cooling run cooler than earlier G9 derived designs while still keeping power use modest. The main limitation at this price is that RAM is soldered and each M.2 slot is only x2, so neither memory capacity nor per drive bandwidth can be increased later, and some tuning of fan curves is needed to keep thermals in check under heavy use. For users who want an inexpensive, compact NVMe appliance with more polish than bare boards but are comfortable managing their own OS and RAID layout, it offers a pragmatic middle ground.

What we said in our July ’25 Review HERE:

The Xyber Hydra N150 NAS represents a deliberate and measured evolution of the budget-friendly compact NAS formula, clearly designed to resolve key weaknesses of similar products like the GMKTec G9 without altering the fundamental architecture. Its use of a thicker, thermally conductive metal base plate provides demonstrable improvement in heat dissipation compared to the plastic underside of the G9, a difference borne out in extended load testing where temperatures stabilized more quickly and stayed lower when fan profiles were adjusted. The pre-installed 64GB eMMC module running Ubuntu out of the box eliminates the initial configuration barrier often faced by novice users, while still allowing more experienced users to easily replace it with their OS of choice, such as ZimaOS or TrueNAS. The inclusion of a 512GB NVMe SSD in the primary M.2 bay adds immediate storage capacity without requiring an upfront investment in additional drives, an uncommon but practical feature at this price point.

Internally, the decision to provide 16GB of fixed LPDDR5 memory — 4GB more than its nearest comparable competitor — gives the Hydra slightly more headroom for memory-intensive tasks, such as running lightweight container workloads or maintaining a larger metadata cache for media streaming applications. While the memory remains non-upgradable, the choice of capacity is a reasonable compromise given the constraints of the Intel N150 platform and the system’s focus on cost efficiency. The integrated Wi-Fi 6 module, with dual antennas and full UnRAID compatibility, is another meaningful addition, enabling wireless deployments where cabling is impractical and expanding the deployment scenarios for home and small office users. These subtle but important upgrades make the Hydra feel more complete out of the box, catering to a broader range of use cases with fewer compromises.

That said, the Hydra still shares many of the inherent trade-offs of its class. The N150 processor is adequate for modest workloads, but becomes saturated under sustained high parallel usage, especially when all four M.2 slots are simultaneously active and the CPU nears 100% utilization. The PCIe lane limitations of the platform, with each M.2 slot limited to Gen3 x2 speeds, restrict the aggregate performance potential of RAID arrays or concurrent high-bandwidth operations. Similarly, the continued reliance on dual 2.5GbE ports limits maximum external throughput despite the internal SSD bandwidth being capable of more, and although M.2-to-10GbE adapters remain an option, they come at the cost of sacrificing one storage slot. BIOS-level adjustments are also required to extract the best thermal and fan performance under heavy use, something that more advanced users will appreciate but could frustrate beginners.

Overall, at its introductory price of $218.99, the Xyber Hydra N150 achieves a strong balance of value, practicality, and refinement in the entry-level NAS segment. The thoughtful inclusion of extras — the 64GB bootable eMMC, 512GB SSD, improved cooling, and additional memory — make it feel more turnkey than competing models, while still leaving room for advanced customization. It’s a sensible option for users seeking a compact and efficient NAS for personal cloud storage, light virtualization, or as a dedicated media server, provided expectations around CPU and networking throughput are kept realistic. For its target audience, the Hydra is a compelling and notably improved choice that addresses many of the criticisms of earlier designs without abandoning the affordability that defines this class of devices.

BUILD QUALITY - 7/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 9/10

8.0

PROS

Improved thermal design with a thicker metal base plate for better heat dissipation compared to similar models.
Includes 64GB eMMC storage preloaded with Ubuntu OS for out-of-the-box usability.
Ships with a 512GB M.2 NVMe SSD in Bay 1, providing immediate usable storage.
Fixed 16GB LPDDR5 memory — higher than comparable devices — supports more concurrent tasks.
Wi-Fi 6 module with dual antennas, compatible with UnRAID, enabling flexible wireless deployment.
Four M.2 NVMe bays, each supporting PCIe Gen3 x2, allowing up to 4 SSDs for flash storage arrays.
Dual 2.5GbE ports with link aggregation support for improved network throughput.
Compact, quiet, and energy-efficient form factor suitable for home and small office environments.

CONS

Memory is soldered and non-upgradable, limiting future scalability.
PCIe Gen3 x2 and CPU bandwidth constraints limit maximum aggregate performance under full load.
Fans require BIOS adjustments for optimal thermal control during heavy sustained workloads.

#5 ZimaBoard 2 1664 – $239 to $349

SPECS: Intel Processor N150 quad core up to 3.6 GHz – 16 GB LPDDR5X – 2 x SATA 3.0 ports (via cables to external drives) – 2 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 – 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 slot, 64 GB eMMC OS storage.

ZimaBoard 2 1664 is a single board x86 server positioned for budget home lab builders who want more flexibility than a fixed enclosure can offer while staying under typical entry level NAS pricing. The board exposes 2 SATA ports with power for attaching HDDs or SSDs in whatever chassis or external mounting the user prefers, alongside dual 2.5 GbE, USB 3, Mini DisplayPort and a full PCIe 3.0 x4 slot that can host extra NICs, HBAs or NVMe adaptors to scale storage and connectivity over time. ZimaOS comes preinstalled and supports alternative systems such as CasaOS, Linux and Windows, so it can act as a low cost base for self hosted services, small virtualisation labs or custom NAS builds using external drive cages or repurposed cases. The main limitation is that there is no built in drive bay system or enclosure, so buyers must factor in the cost and effort of adding their own storage chassis, cabling and cooling if they want something as neat as a traditional NAS. For those willing to do that, it offers one of the most flexible and expandable x86 platforms in the budget bracket, with enough CPU and RAM headroom to grow beyond simple file serving as needs evolve.

What we said in our April ’25 Review HERE:

The ZimaBoard 2 is a competent and thoughtfully assembled single-board server that builds meaningfully on IceWhale’s earlier efforts, especially the original ZimaBoard and the ZimaBlade. Its design clearly targets users who want more flexibility and performance than traditional ARM-based boards can offer, but who also value power efficiency, silence, and a small footprint. The use of an Intel N150 CPU, 8GB of LPDDR5x memory, dual 2.5GbE ports, and a PCIe 3.0 x4 slot makes it viable for a variety of home server roles—from basic NAS and smart home coordination to lightweight container hosting and local media streaming. Features like onboard SATA, USB 3.1, and a DisplayPort connection further add to its utility. However, there are hardware limitations that may affect long-term suitability for advanced deployments. The soldered RAM cannot be upgraded, and the internal eMMC storage, while useful for initial setup, is too slow for OS-level responsiveness in more demanding use cases. Passive cooling, while appreciated for silence, also imposes some thermal limitations depending on the deployment environment.

On the software side, ZimaOS offers a decent out-of-the-box experience that caters to users with minimal technical background. It handles core tasks like application deployment, file sharing, and system monitoring without requiring advanced configuration, and its Docker-based App Store simplifies access to popular tools. For more experienced users, the system supports third-party OS installation, which is likely how many will ultimately use the ZimaBoard 2. Still, as a bundled solution, ZimaOS has matured significantly and now presents itself as a lightweight, capable, and non-intrusive platform for those who prefer to get started immediately. In the broader context of DIY server hardware, ZimaBoard 2 occupies a middle ground: more powerful and modular than Raspberry Pi-class systems, yet more constrained than full x86 mini PCs or enthusiast-grade NAS hardware. For those who understand and accept these trade-offs, and are willing to plan around its limitations, the ZimaBoard 2 offers a reliable and flexible foundation for compact, energy-efficient computing at the edge.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 8/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 10/10

9.0

PROS

x86 Architecture – Compatible with a wide range of operating systems including ZimaOS, Unraid, TrueNAS SCALE, and Proxmox.
Dual 2.5GbE LAN Ports – Offers strong networking capabilities for multi-service workloads and gateway setups.
PCIe 3.0 x4 Slot – Enables high-speed expansion for 10GbE NICs, NVMe storage, or combo cards.
Fanless, Silent Operation – Completely passively cooled, ideal for home or quiet office environments.
Compact and Durable Build – Small footprint with an all-metal chassis that doubles as a heatsink.
ZimaOS Included – User-friendly OS with a Docker-based App Store and basic VM tools, ready out of the box.
Flexible Storage Options – Dual SATA ports plus USB 3.1 support for connecting SSDs, HDDs, or external drives.
Low Power Consumption – Efficient 6W CPU with ~10W idle and ~40W max under heavy load scenarios.

CONS

Non-Upgradable RAM – 8GB of soldered LPDDR5x limits long-term scalability for memory-intensive tasks.
Slow/Small Default Internal Storage – 32GB eMMC is convenient but underperforms for OS-level responsiveness or high I/O workloads.
Thermal Headroom is Limited – Passive cooling alone may not be sufficient in closed environments or under sustained load without added airflow.
Not Launching on Traditional Retail, but instead on Crowdfunding.

Taken together, the UGREEN DH2300, UniFi UNAS 2, Beelink ME Mini, Xyber Hydra N150 and ZimaBoard 2 show the different ways vendors are trying to hit the sub 250 dollar bracket without stripping out the core value of a NAS. Some focus on simplicity and bundled software with limited scale, others trade turnkey polish for dense NVMe storage or flexible bare board layouts that assume you are willing to do more of the setup yourself. None of these devices removes the usual compromises around bays, performance, noise or software maturity at this price level, but each offers a clear path away from pure cloud dependence and USB drives. The practical decision is less about which is objectively “best” and more about whether you want a small 2 bay appliance, a compact all flash cube or a configurable single board system that can grow with your skills and requirements over time.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read... Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red (Which is Best in 2025/2026)?

In late 2025, choosing between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red for a NAS is less about raw performance and more about secondary factors such as noise, power consumption, pricing, and ecosystem. Both brands now offer broadly similar SATA performance in their mainstream and Pro lines once you reach 7200 RPM, 256 MB cache, and CMR recording, and both quote comparable workload ratings and multi bay support for NAS use. Durability claims in MTBF, workload per year, and 24 by 7 operation are also effectively at parity on paper, and the underlying engineering around vibration control, error recovery, and NAS specific firmware has converged to a large extent. Where meaningful technical differences still exist is in the maximum capacities on offer and how they are positioned. Seagate currently leads on headline capacity in the NAS tier with IronWolf Pro drives up to 30 TB, while WD Red Pro tops out slightly lower but overlaps most of the mainstream size points that home and small business users are likely to deploy. As a result, the decision for many buyers is less about which brand is objectively better and more about how each behaves in real deployments in terms of acoustics, energy use, long term running costs, warranty extras such as bundled recovery services, and regional pricing patterns at specific capacities.

Seagate vs WD (and Toshiba!) Market Share in 2025/2026?

Across the HDD industry in 2024 and early 2025, Western Digital and Seagate remain closely matched, with Western Digital holding a slight lead by several common measures. Public breakdowns of exabytes shipped in 2024 put Western Digital at roughly 38.6 percent of HDD capacity shipped worldwide, Seagate at about 37 percent, and Toshiba at around 24.4 percent, confirming that the market is effectively a 2 vendor race with a smaller but still significant third player. Although the exact percentages vary depending on whether you look at units, capacity, or revenue, the pattern is consistent, with Western Digital marginally ahead and Seagate following closely behind.

Recent industry and financial reporting also shows Western Digital gaining momentum in high capacity nearline drives, particularly in data center and cloud deployments, with disk based revenue and shipped capacity outpacing Seagate in at least some recent quarters. At the same time, Seagate retains a leadership position in very large capacity models, including 30 TB HAMR based NAS and nearline drives that are already commercially available and aimed at the same high density markets.

Taken together, these data points indicate a tightly contested landscape where Western Digital currently leads in overall shipped capacity and revenue, while Seagate pushes the capacity envelope and remains highly competitive in large scale deployments.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red NAS Hard Drives – Price

In late 2025 there is a clear pattern in how Seagate and WD position their HDDs on price, even if individual deals move around constantly. In general Seagate tends to be slightly cheaper per terabyte across many mainstream retailers and regions, particularly for larger 16 TB to 24 TB IronWolf and Exos capacities. WD pricing is often a little higher at like for like capacity in third party channels, especially for newer Red Plus and Red Pro models, although temporary sales can narrow or reverse this gap. Both brands are heavily discounted during seasonal events, so headline price screenshots are only ever a snapshot rather than a permanent rule.

Where WD changes the picture is through its own direct store. WD sells Red, Red Plus and Red Pro drives through its retail site and often undercuts third party resellers by a noticeable margin, especially during promotions. That means in some regions the cheapest way to buy WD is directly from WD, while Seagate relies entirely on partner channels and keeps relatively steady discounting through Amazon and similar outlets. As a result it is common to see Seagate come out cheaper in most general marketplaces while WD can be the lowest price only on its own store, which is not available in every country.

Once you move up into Pro and nearline class drives, such as IronWolf Pro versus WD Red Pro or WD Gold, pricing becomes more fragmented. Seagate keeps a fairly consistent capacity step pricing model where higher capacities scale in a relatively predictable way. WD on the other hand often runs multiple Red Pro and enterprise SKUs at the same capacity with different cache sizes or internal designs, which leads to overlapping prices and large swings between models that appear similar on paper. In practice this means that at the Pro tier Seagate is usually easier to price compare, while WD may offer good value on specific model IDs or capacities but requires more careful checking of part numbers and current discounts before purchase.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red – Noise Level Comparison

Capacity	Idle Seagate Ironwolf	Idle WD Red Plus	Idle Winner	Seek Seagate Ironwolf Pro	Seek WD Red Pro	Seek Winner
30TB	28 dBA (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate	32 dBA (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate
28TB	28 dBA (ST28000NT000)	25 dBA (WD281KFGX)	WD	32 dBA (ST28000NT000)	32 dBA (WD281KFGX)	Tie
26TB	no Seagate model	25 dBA (WD260KFGX)	WD	no Seagate model	32 dBA (WD260KFGX)	WD
24TB	28 dBA (ST24000NT002)	25 dBA (WD241KFGX), 20 dBA (WD240KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST24000NT002)	32 dBA (WD241KFGX), 32 dBA (WD240KFGX)	Seagate
22TB	28 dBA (ST22000NT001)	32 dBA (WD221KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST22000NT001)	32 dBA (WD221KFGX)	Seagate
20TB	28 dBA (ST20000NT001)	20 dBA (WD202KFGX, WD201KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST20000NT001)	32 dBA (WD202KFGX, WD201KFGX)	Seagate
18TB	28 dBA (ST18000NT001)	20 dBA (WD181KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST18000NT001)	36 dBA (WD181KFGX)	Seagate
16TB	28 dBA (ST16000NT001)	20 dBA (WD161KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST16000NT001)	36 dBA (WD161KFGX)	Seagate
14TB	20 dBA (ST14000NT001)	20 dBA (WD142KFGX), 20 dBA (WD141KFGX)	Tie	26 dBA (ST14000NT001)	36 dBA (WD142KFGX), 36 dBA (WD141KFGX)	Seagate
12TB	28 dBA (ST12000NT001)	20 dBA (WD121KFBX), 34 dBA (WD122KFBX)	WD	26 dBA (ST12000NT001)	36 dBA (WD121KFBX), 39 dBA (WD122KFBX)	Seagate
10TB	28 dBA (ST10000NT001)	20 dBA (WD102KFBX), 34 dBA (WD103KFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST10000NT001)	36 dBA (WD102KFBX), 39 dBA (WD103KFBX)	Seagate
8TB	28 dBA (ST8000NT001)	20 dBA (WD8003FFBX, WD8005FFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST8000NT001)	36 dBA (WD8003FFBX, WD8005FFBX)	Seagate
6TB	28 dBA (ST6000NT001)	21 dBA (WD6003FFBX, WD6005FFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST6000NT001)	36 dBA (WD6003FFBX, WD6005FFBX)	Seagate
4TB	28 dBA (ST4000NT001)	20 dBA (WD4003FFBX), 29 dBA (WD4005FFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST4000NT001)	36 dBA (WD4003FFBX, WD4005FFBX)	Seagate
2TB	28 dBA (ST2000NT001)	21 dBA (WD2002FFSX)	WD	30 dBA (ST2000NT001)	31 dBA (WD2002FFSX)	Seagate

The difference becomes more apparent once you move beyond a simple 1 or 2 bay NAS and start populating 4, 6 or 8 bay chassis. Multiple Seagate drives running together produce a slightly harsher mechanical sound profile, with more pronounced click and clunk patterns during head movements, as well as higher cumulative vibration. WD drives, particularly Red Plus and most of the more recent Red Pro helium models, lean toward a smoother background hum with less sharp seek noise and lower ambient vibration. For users placing a NAS in a living room, bedroom or under a desk, this cumulative effect can be significant, even if each individual drive only differs by a couple of dBA on paper.

It is worth noting that not every capacity behaves identically. Lower capacities and some air filled WD Red Plus models idle very quietly and can be comparable with the quietest Seagate SKUs, while some high capacity Red Pro variants with 7200 RPM motors and larger caches approach IronWolf Pro levels of seek noise. However, when you average across the current CMR product stacks in late 2025, WD holds a small but consistent advantage in both idle and seek acoustics, especially in multi bay deployments where background noise and vibration build up over time.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red – Power Consumption (Idle / Active)

Looking purely at spec sheets, both Seagate and WD publish idle and seek values that cluster in similar bands, typically around the low 20 dBA range at idle and high 20 to mid 30 dBA under seek as capacities and spindle speeds rise. In practice though, the character of the noise differs between the brands. IronWolf and IronWolf Pro models tend to produce a sharper mechanical click pattern during head seeks and a more noticeable spin up profile, while WD Red Plus and Red Pro lines usually present as a smoother hum with less abrupt transitions between idle and active states. In a quiet room this difference in tone can matter as much as the numeric dBA rating itself.

Capacity	Idle Seagate Ironwolf	Idle WD Red Plus	Idle Winner	Active Seagate Ironwolf Pro	Active WD Red Pro	Active Winner
30TB	6.8W (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate	8.3W (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate
28TB	6.8W (ST28000NT000)	3.6W (WD281KFGX)	WD	8.3W (ST28000NT000)	6.0W (WD281KFGX)	WD
26TB	no Seagate model	3.6W (WD260KFGX)	WD	no Seagate model	6.0W (WD260KFGX)	WD
24TB	6.3W (ST24000NT002)	3.6W (WD241KFGX), 3.9W (WD240KFGX)	WD	7.8W (ST24000NT002)	6.0W (WD241KFGX), 6.4W (WD240KFGX)	WD
22TB	6.0W (ST22000NT001)	3.4W (WD221KFGX)	WD	7.9W (ST22000NT001)	6.8W (WD221KFGX)	WD
20TB	5.7W (ST20000NT001)	2.8W (WD202KFGX), 3.6W (WD201KFGX)	WD	7.7W (ST20000NT001)	6.1W (WD202KFGX), 6.9W (WD201KFGX)	WD
18TB	5.0W (ST18000NT001)	3.0W (WD181KFGX)	WD	7.5W (ST18000NT001)	3.6W (WD181KFGX)	WD
16TB	5.0W (ST16000NT001)	3.6W (WD161KFGX)	WD	7.6W (ST16000NT001)	6.1W (WD161KFGX)	WD
14TB	5.0W (ST14000NT001)	3.0W (WD141KFGX), 3.6W (WD142KFGX)	WD	7.6W (ST14000NT001)	3.0W (WD141KFGX), 6.4W (WD142KFGX)	WD
12TB	5.0W (ST12000NT001)	2.8W (WD121KFBX), 6.1W (WD122KFBX)	WD	7.6W (ST12000NT001)	2.8W (WD121KFBX), 8.8W (WD122KFBX)	WD
10TB	7.8W (ST10000NT001)	2.9W (WD102KFBX), 3.0W (WD103KFBX)	WD	10.1W (ST10000NT001)	4.6W (WD101KFBX), 6.1W (WD103KFBX)	WD
8TB	7.8W (ST8000NT001)	4.0W (WD8003FFBX), 4.9W (WD8005FFBX)	WD	10.1W (ST8000NT001)	4.6W (WD8003FFBX), 6.9W (WD8005FFBX)	WD
6TB	7.1W (ST6000NT001)	3.7W (WD6003FFBX), 4.0W (WD6005FFBX)	WD	9.3W (ST6000NT001)	3.7W (WD6003FFBX), 6.9W (WD6005FFBX)	WD
4TB	7.8W (ST4000NT001)	3.7W (WD4003FFBX), 4.0W (WD4005FFBX)	WD	8.7W (ST4000NT001)	3.7W (WD4003FFBX), 5.8W (WD4005FFBX)	WD
2TB	6.7W (ST2000NT001)	6.0W (WD2002FFSX)	WD	6.7W (ST2000NT001)	7.8W (WD2002FFSX)	Seagate

At lower capacities, especially in the 2 TB to 6 TB range where air filled designs and lower spindle speeds are common, WD Red Plus models are often among the quietest options, with idle noise figures that sit at the lower end of the published spectrum and relatively soft seek sounds. Seagate standard IronWolf drives in these capacities are not especially loud by absolute numbers, but they generally sit slightly higher at idle and under random activity. Once you move into high capacity Pro class drives, WD Red Pro and IronWolf Pro become more comparable, although WD still often maintains a small advantage in idle noise on the newest helium filled models, while seek noise can be quite close on some capacities.

Noise differences increase as you add more bays and drives. A 2 bay or 4 bay NAS with mixed workloads may only expose a modest gap in acoustic behaviour between the brands, but 8 bay and larger systems can amplify any small variations. Multiple Seagate drives seeking at once will create more noticeable cumulative chatter and vibration inside a metal chassis, which can transfer into desks or shelving if the NAS is not well isolated. WD units with otherwise similar specifications and workload ratings usually generate less overall vibration, so the aggregate sound from a populated chassis can be easier to live with in shared spaces.

For users planning deployments in noise sensitive environments, such as a living room media setup or a small office where the NAS will sit in the same room as desks, these differences can be a factor in the buying decision once capacity and performance requirements are defined. Seagate remains attractive where price per terabyte and maximum capacity are the main priorities, and users are able to position the NAS in a cupboard, loft or separate room. WD drives typically suit scenarios where the system will remain close to people for long periods, sacrificing a small amount of price advantage in favour of lower background noise and a slightly less intrusive acoustic profile at both idle and under sustained activity.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red – Verdict & Conclusion

From a technical perspective Seagate and WD now sit very close to one another in most core HDD metrics, particularly in the NAS focused IronWolf, IronWolf Pro, Red Plus and Red Pro ranges. Both brands use CMR recording on their NAS lines, have comparable workload ratings in each class, and converge around similar sustained transfer rates once you reach 7200 RPM and larger cache sizes. The main structural differences are that Seagate currently pushes higher maximum capacities into the consumer and prosumer space and includes bundled rescue data recovery on many NAS models, while WD tends to retain a small advantage in power consumption and acoustic behaviour at equivalent capacities, especially in multi bay systems. Historical issues such as WD Red SMR drives and Seagate high failure rate models at specific points in time are still relevant for older stock, but the current generation NAS ranges for both vendors are broadly aligned in specification and intended workload.

In practical terms the choice between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red often comes down to priority order rather than any single clear winner. Users aiming for the lowest cost per terabyte and the highest capacities available in the near term will usually find Seagate more attractive, particularly in larger IronWolf Pro and Exos class drives, accepting higher power draw and a more noticeable acoustic profile. Users who are sensitive to noise, want marginally lower long term energy usage or prefer WD’s clearer product segmentation may gravitate toward Red Plus or Red Pro, taking care to select the correct CMR models and capacities. In all cases the decision should be made at model level using current datasheets and pricing, not just brand reputation, and should be paired with a sensible RAID plan and an independent backup strategy, since neither vendor can remove the fundamental risk that any individual hard drive can fail.

Idle Seagate Ironwolf	Idle WD Red Plus	Active Seagate Ironwolf Pro	Active WD Red Pro

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Week 50 Tech Roundup – ReactSeagate Ironwolf vs WD Red (WhBlack Friday NAS Hard Drive DeBlack Friday Hard Drive Deals Black Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataWeek 46 Tech Roundup – SeagaWeek 44 Tech Roundup – TOS 7SYNOLOGY SUPPORT SEAGATE & WD Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro and Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Beelink ME Pro NAS Coming Soon

The Beelink ME Pro NAS is a compact, OS agnostic network storage enclosure that follows the earlier ME Mini, which became one of the most popular small NAS releases of 2025 and marked the brand’s first move into this category. I first heard about the ME Pro during a visit to the company headquarters in Shenzhen in November 2025, where staff outlined a broader NAS roadmap for 2026, with the ME Pro positioned as the first hybrid 3.5/2.5 inch plus M.2 unit in that series. As with the ME Mini, the focus is on a small footprint chassis for users who want to install their own NAS operating system, with an emphasis on power efficiency, flexible storage options and network performance that sits above traditional entry level enclosures.

Beelink ME Pro Design and Storage

The ME Pro uses a small vertical chassis with a footprint closer to a mini PC than a traditional 2 or 4 bay NAS, measuring 165.905 x 121 x 115.95 mm. The enclosure is built around a compact internal frame with a slide out lower section that exposes the mainboard side of the system for upgrades and troubleshooting. A separate removable metal base plate covers the M.2 area and doubles as a heatsink, allowing heat from the NVMe drives to be drawn out through the underside of the chassis rather than relying entirely on airflow over the motherboard.

At the front, the system provides 2 SATA bays that accept either 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch drives on individual caddies. These are described as hot swappable, with trays secured by thumb screws on the sides rather than a completely tool free click in mechanism. The intention is clearly that these front bays act as the primary mass storage area for larger and more cost effective HDD or SSD media, while keeping them accessible for maintenance, drive replacement and RAID rebuilds without needing to dismantle the rest of the unit.

Internally, storage is expanded further by 3 M.2 NVMe slots arranged on the mainboard, giving the chassis an effective total of 5 populated drive positions once the front bays are included. One of the M.2 slots is wired as PCIe 3.0 x2 and is expected to carry the bundled OS SSD, with the remaining 2 slots at PCIe 3.0 x1 for additional fast storage, cache, VM volumes or higher performance pools, depending on the operating system chosen by the user. This layout reflects the limits of the available PCIe lanes on the chosen Intel processor platform while still separating bulk SATA capacity from higher speed solid state media.

Beelink ME Pro – Internal Hardware

For processing, the Beelink ME Pro is built around Intel N series silicon, with configurations based on the N95 or N150. Both are 4 core, 4 thread CPUs aimed at low power desktop and embedded roles, and are already familiar from compact mini PCs and small DIY NAS builds in 2024 and 2025. The N150 sits slightly higher in the stack and is likely to be the more capable option for users planning heavier multi user file access, container workloads or light virtualisation, while the N95 variant is positioned as the more affordable entry tier. Integrated Intel graphics are used rather than a discrete GPU, which is typical in this class and sufficient for display output and hardware assisted media handling via the HDMI port.

Memory is specified as LPDDR5 at 4800 MHz, with Beelink listing 12 GB and 16 GB options, and the N150 configuration earmarked for the higher capacity tier. This aligns with the broader positioning of the two SKUs, with the N150 build intended for users expecting to run more demanding NAS operating systems, services or virtual machines in parallel. At the time of writing, Beelink has not confirmed whether this memory is socketed or permanently attached, and therefore whether end users will be able to upgrade it beyond the factory configuration.

The underlying platform also integrates several system level features that are relevant to 24/7 network appliance use. A hardware TPM 2.0 implementation is supported for operating systems that can make use of secure boot and encryption features, and the BIOS exposes options for real time clock scheduling, automatic power on after power loss and Wake On LAN, all of which are useful in a NAS role. Wireless connectivity is handled by a MediaTek MT7920 module in M.2 2230 format, providing WiFi and Bluetooth 5.4, while dedicated front panel buttons offer CMOS reset and system recovery, reflecting the design intent of a user-managed, OS agnostic appliance rather than a locked down turnkey NAS.

Beelink ME Pro – Ports and Connections

Physical connectivity on the Beelink ME Pro is split between data, display and management focused ports. For wired networking, the chassis provides 1x 5 GbE port based on the Realtek RTL8126 controller and 1x 2.5 GbE port using the Intel i226 V, giving users a choice between higher throughput on a single link or separate interfaces for LAN and dedicated services. HDMI output is available via a single port rated up to 4K at 60 Hz, covering roles such as local console access, lightweight media playback or direct system management without relying solely on network tools.

USB connectivity consists of 1x USB 3.2 port rated at 10 Gbps and 2x USB 2.0 ports at 480 Mbps on standard type A connectors, alongside 1x USB Type C port that is also specified for data and video at up to 10 Gbps. This mix allows for external backup media, peripheral input devices and additional adapters, with the faster ports suitable for high speed external drives or expansion units, and the slower USB 2.0 ports reserved for keyboard, mouse or low bandwidth accessories. The front facing power button is complemented by a white power LED that indicates system status during operation and startup.

Wireless networking is enabled by a MediaTek MT7920 module in an internal M.2 2230 slot, and the chassis provides 2 antenna connections labeled MAIN and AUX via FPC plus coaxial leads to external antenna points. This arrangement allows the unit to operate in environments where wired LAN is not available or convenient, while still prioritising Ethernet as the primary interface for sustained NAS traffic.

Beelink ME Pro – Worth Waiting For?

The Beelink ME Pro positions itself as a compact, OS agnostic NAS platform aimed at users who want more flexibility than a typical turnkey 2 bay appliance without moving to a full custom build. Its combination of mixed 3.5/2.5 inch SATA bays, 3 internal M.2 slots, paired 5 GbE and 2.5 GbE networking and low power Intel N series CPUs gives it a distinct profile within the current wave of small DIY NAS enclosures that usually stop at 2.5 GbE and either all SATA or all M.2 storage. The chassis layout, serviceable base and inclusion of RTC, recovery and CMOS controls further underline that it is designed to be opened, adjusted and reconfigured by the end user rather than treated as a sealed consumer appliance.

At the same time, there are still several unknowns that will decide how viable it is in practice. Final pricing, memory upgradability, PSU design, fan profile and sustained thermals will determine whether the ME Pro is a practical choice for 24/7 mixed workloads or better suited to lighter duties, and will influence how it compares against both the earlier ME Mini and established NAS brands once it reaches general availability. As part of a wider Beelink NAS roadmap for 2026, the ME Pro functions as an initial hybrid storage step in that series rather than a complete answer for every deployment scenario, and prospective buyers will need to weigh its compact footprint and flexible storage layout against the absence of a bundled NAS OS and the still evolving details of its final hardware implementation.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Beelink ME Pro NAS	Check AliExpress for the Beelink ME PRO NAS	Check the Official Beelink Site for the ME Pro NAS

7

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Beelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink NAS - Describe Your PeBeelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME Beelink Me Pro, S, X and MAX, Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink ME Mini NAS Review - aBeelink ME Mini NAS ReviewBeelink Android TV box or NAS? Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE    

WE LOVE COFFEE

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

     

Is the Sipeed NanoKVM Safe? On-board Microphone Identified

The Sipeed NanoKVM Cube is a low cost, network connected KVM built around the LicheeRV Nano RISC-V module, and recent reporting has drawn attention to the fact that this first generation hardware quietly inherited an onboard analog microphone from that core board. While the LicheeRV Nano documentation clearly lists audio input and output capabilities, the NanoKVM product materials initially focused on its KVM role and did not prominently call out the presence of a microphone on the internal PCB. That gap in presentation, combined with the device’s origin in China and its role as an always-on, remotely accessible appliance, has led to questions about transparency and potential privacy impact. This article reviews what is actually on the hardware, how Sipeed has responded, which issues have been addressed in software, and what residual risk remains for users who already have the NanoKVM Cube deployed.

The NanoKVM Cube and That Microphone – What We Learned?

The initial detailed public discussion of the NanoKVM Cube microphone came from a Telefoncek.si research article, which documented security testing of early units and highlighted the presence of a small, operational microphone on the device’s PCB. The NanoKVM Cube is built on the LicheeRV Nano platform, and that design decision is the origin of the audio hardware. The LicheeRV Nano specification explicitly lists an onboard analog silicon microphone for audio input and a PA amplifier for driving a small speaker, because the module is intended as a general purpose SBC for a range of embedded applications. When Sipeed used this module as the core of a consumer facing KVM, the Cube inherited that audio circuitry intact, including the tiny surface mount MEMS microphone, even though typical KVM usage does not require audio capture capabilities.

What Telefoncek.si article from Feb ’25  drew attention to was the combination of this hardware and a software stack that already contained working audio tooling. Researchers who obtained early NanoKVM units found that, with SSH access, standard ALSA tools such as amixer and arecord could be used to adjust gain and record ambient sound through the built in microphone, and that the resulting audio files could be copied or potentially streamed off the device. At that time, the NanoKVM product page described its relationship to the LicheeRV Nano SDK and resources in general terms, but did not highlight that a functioning microphone remained present on the KVM board. For many users, that gap between what the SBC documentation said and what the KVM product page emphasized was perceived as a lack of clear disclosure rather than a predictable consequence of module reuse.

The NanoKVM Security Concern and Presentation Issues

The initial concern around NanoKVM security was not limited to the microphone. Early firmware builds shipped with default credentials, SSH enabled, weak web security controls, and hardcoded encryption keys that were identical across devices. Researchers also found diagnostic and security utilities present on the system image that were more appropriate for development or lab use than for a small appliance likely to be exposed on home or small business networks. These findings created a picture of a product that had been moved from prototype to retail relatively quickly, with baseline functionality in place but limited attention paid to hardening or least privilege.

Presentation played a significant role in how the microphone issue was perceived. For the LicheeRV Nano SBC, the presence of audio input and output is clearly listed as part of the hardware specification, and that makes sense for a general purpose module. For NanoKVM Cube, the public facing documentation initially focused on KVM features, HDMI input, and compatibility with the LicheeRV Nano SDK, while leaving the inherited audio hardware implicit. Only later did the NanoKVM wiki entry gain explicit wording that the Cube retains display, touch, microphone, and amplifier circuits from the base module, and that newer firmware versions would remove the relevant drivers and future production runs would omit these components entirely.

Sipeed’s public responses combine these two aspects. On the one hand they point to the LicheeRV Nano documentation and the updated NanoKVM wiki as evidence that the microphone is not intended to be secret. On the other hand they argue that, from a threat model perspective, the presence of a board level microphone does not materially change risk once an attacker has obtained full control of the device, since they could already perform sensitive actions through the host system. For critics, the issue is less about the technical possibility of audio capture in a fully compromised scenario and more about expectation and trust: a network attached KVM marketed primarily on its remote control capabilities but not clearly calling out built in audio capture hardware is likely to be treated with more suspicion, especially when it comes from a vendor that has already needed several rounds of security fixes.

Reality Check – How Much of a Concern is this?

From a strict security engineering viewpoint, the onboard microphone in the NanoKVM Cube does not create a new, independent way into the device. An attacker still needs a working exploit, exposed service, or misconfiguration to gain sufficient access before any audio capture is possible. In that sense, the primary risk is still the usual set of issues that apply to any IP KVM: exposed management interfaces, weak credentials, unpatched firmware, or poor network segmentation. If those fundamentals are handled correctly, the probability that a remote attacker can turn the Cube into a listening device is significantly reduced, and using alternative firmware or a locked down software stack can further narrow the options.

The impact side of the equation is different. Once a NanoKVM Cube is compromised at a system level, the presence of a functional microphone increases the potential harm compared with a KVM that only relays keyboard, video, and mouse. A device that sits in a home office, lab, or equipment room and can capture ambient sound can turn a general compromise into a privacy incident that extends beyond the connected host system. For some users that incremental risk will be acceptable if the device is strictly isolated, regularly updated, and treated as an untrusted appliance at the edge of the network. For others, the residual possibility of room audio capture from a small, unattended box may be enough to justify either physical removal of the mic, replacement with a later hardware revision, or avoiding this particular model altogether.

Note. Here is the board view of the NanoKVM USB and NanaKVM Pro PCIe, with no microphone visible:

Asking Sipeed Questions about the NanoKVM Microphone Issue – How and Why This Occurred?

To clarify how the microphone ended up in a shipping KVM product and what Sipeed intends to do about it, I put a series of written questions to the company. The goal was not to reassess the technical findings already covered by independent research, but to obtain clear statements from the vendor on 4 points: how they view the documentation and disclosure around the microphone, which specific NanoKVM variants and hardware revisions include it, what mitigations they believe limit its security and privacy impact for existing deployments, and what concrete changes they are planning for future production runs. The questions and Sipeed’s responses are reproduced in full below. Thanks again to Caesar Wu for his time in answering my questions.

Why was there a microphone on the device, and how/why it’s absent from the documentation?

This premise contains a serious factual error made by the original article. The presence and rationale for the microphone are not undocumented; they are explicitly mentioned on the product’s main Wiki page: https://wiki.sipeed.com/hardware/en/kvm/NanoKVM/introduction.html#NanoKVM

Which Version/Batch/Revisions of NanoKVM feature this Microphone?

The microphone is featured on the NanoKVM Lite and NanoKVM Cube versions. These are derivative products based on the LicheeRV-Nano (RISC-V SBC core module) and consequently inherited its Single Board Computer (SBC) peripherals, including the microphone, speaker, and MIPI touchscreen support.

Is this present on other versions of NanoKVM (i.e PCIe, Pro, USB, etc)?

No. Other products use custom-designed boards dedicated solely to the KVM scenario. They do not reuse the SBC module and therefore do not include non-KVM-essential components.

Why was this microphone not eliminated at the point of production?

The core part of NanoKVM-Cube/Lite is LicheeRV Nano. We reuse LicheeRV Nano as a standard “SOM” in many different products, like AI Camera MaixCAM:    https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006912917562.html . And our toB customer also use it as a standard linux core board(Just like RPi CM4, CM5), they are very satisfied with the onboard microphone, speaker, and touch screen.  As stated in my previous email, we maintain that logically, the retention of the microphone on the board does not introduce any negative impact on security. While the onboard components (microphone, speaker power amplifier (PA), and touchscreen connector) introduce a slight increase in Bill of Materials (BoM) cost, this decision significantly simplifies inventory management.

In fact, the base LicheeRV Nano product already comes in 4 configuration variants (Basic, Eth, WiFi, and Ethe+WiFi).  If we were to further segment the inventory by adding options for the presence or absence of the microphone and touchscreen connector, the total number of SKUs  would increase exponentially(the number of SKUs multiplies by two for every added configuration options). Therefore, based on a comprehensive consideration of security, cost efficiency, and inventory management complexity, we maintain the microphone, speaker PA, and touchscreen connector as the default base configuration.

What steps are being taken to ensure that this does not pose a Security/Privacy threat to user who have the nanoKVM in active deployment?

Users must understand the threat model: an attacker can only listen via the onboard mic if the NanoKVM itself has already been fully compromised. The paradox is that once compromised, the attacker already has sufficient privileges to perform high-level operations (include record audio via PC’s own mic). Therefore, the presence of the onboard mic does not increase the inherent security risk of the device. We emphasize that proper network risk awareness and isolation configuration by the user are essential, regardless of whether the device is a NanoKVM, JetKVM, GL.iNet KVM, or PiKVM.

What further steps have been made/planned at Production to avoid this occurring again in future hardware releases?

As stated in Question 4, we plan to remove the microphone in the next batch of the Lite/Cube models purely for psychological comfort and ease of mind for our users. We acknowledge this step will inevitably increase our inventory management complexity due to the need for separate SKUs and production processes. We are also implementing more rigorous hardware audits to ensure compliance with the Principle of Least Privilege in future designs.

Conclusion – Should NanoKVM Owners Be Worried?

For current NanoKVM Cube owners, the level of concern depends largely on how and where the device is deployed. In a well segmented environment where the KVM sits on an isolated management network, with updated firmware and strong access controls, the presence of a dormant microphone on the board is a secondary issue behind the more general risk of any remote management appliance. In small or less structured setups where the NanoKVM has direct exposure to the internet or shares a LAN with everyday client devices, both the historical software weaknesses and the possibility of audio capture in a successful compromise are more relevant factors in deciding whether to keep using the unit unchanged.

Looking ahead, Sipeed has stated that newer firmware removes the audio drivers and that future Lite and Cube batches will omit the microphone and related circuitry entirely, which addresses the concern for new buyers over time. For existing devices, users who are uncomfortable with any residual audio capability have practical options: physically removing or disabling the mic at board level, reflashing with a minimal or community maintained software stack, or replacing the hardware with a later revision or a different KVM platform. The key is to treat the NanoKVM Cube as a high impact management tool rather than a neutral accessory, and to decide whether its cost and feature set justify the additional precautions it requires in a given environment.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...NanoKVM and it's 'Secret' MicrSipeed NanoKVM Pro KVM ReviewNanoKVM Pro KVM Review - A WHOGL.iNet Comet Pro Review - The Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

New KVMs, Travel Routers and WiFi 7 Tech on the way from Gl.iNet Soon

Gl.iNet is preparing several new devices for late 2025 and early 2026 that expand its presence in mobile networking, remote access management, and high speed home routing. These include the Beryl 7 travel router, the Comet 5G RedCap KVM with an integrated WiFi access point, and the Flint 3e dual band WiFi 7 desktop router. Each system is positioned to address a specific operational requirement, ranging from portable VPN-enabled wireless access to remotely deployable KVM control and multi gigabit home connectivity. The updated lineup also includes the Brume 3 high speed VPN security gateway, which builds on the Brume 2 by adding faster encrypted throughput and broader support for open VPN standards such as AmneziaVPN. Collectively, these releases indicate that Gl.iNet is prioritising more capable processors, improved wireless performance, and tighter integration between VPN features and local network tools.

Beryl 7 Travel Router (GL-MT3600BE)

The Beryl 7 is positioned as an updated travel router that builds on the feature set of the original Beryl while shifting to a more capable Qualcomm quad core processor running at 1.1GHz and 256MB of DDR4 memory. It uses IEEE 802.11a, b, g, n, ac, ax and be wireless standards and supports dual band WiFi 7 operation on the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands. Although it does not include 6GHz support, it delivers higher throughput than its predecessor, reaching 688Mbps on 2.4GHz and 2882Mbps on 5GHz. The unit also integrates two foldable external antennas and two 2.5GbE ports that can be configured as WAN plus LAN or as dual LAN for specific on-the-go deployment requirements.

The system maintains the travel-focused design of the original model by keeping compact dimensions, low power requirements and USB-C power delivery suitable for laptops, power banks and small chargers. The physical toggle switch remains, allowing quick selection between standard routing and VPN operation without navigating menus. VPN capability is supported by OpenVPN DCO, WireGuard and AmneziaVPN, enabling users to run a VPN server at home and connect to it through the Beryl 7 when travelling. As noted during the demonstration, the WiFi 7 implementation prioritises improved packet handling and multi-link operation rather than wide-band 6GHz performance, which keeps the device compatible in regions where 6GHz availability is limited or restricted.

The Beryl 7 aims to retain pricing similar to the original Beryl while scaling both its internal hardware and wireless capabilities. It uses a gigabit-class Ethernet configuration, supports sub-18W peak power draw and retains a form factor suited for hotel WiFi, temporary offices and public hotspot environments. The inclusion of 2.5GbE, higher throughput on both bands and broader VPN support allows it to operate as a compact edge router for users needing reliable encrypted access across multiple devices. Despite carrying a WiFi 7 label, it does not support the 6GHz band, mirroring the Slate 7, and instead focuses on maximising performance within the 2.4GHz and 5GHz ranges. Nevertheless, this is going to be a disappointment to users who were hoping to see ‘full fat’ WiFi 7 with that 3rd frequency in play, and really maximize MLO use.

Comet 5G KVM with Redcap 5G SIM/LTE Support (GL-RM10RC)

The Comet 5G is a RedCap-based KVM device that integrates remote management, HDMI capture and mobile connectivity into a single compact unit. It uses a quad core ARM Cortex-A53 processor, 1GB of DDR3 memory and 64GB of eMMC storage, matching the hardware profile of the existing Comet Pro. The device includes both HDMI in and HDMI out, allowing it to be used for remote console access, system monitoring and basic pass-through scenarios. A 2.22-inch touchscreen provides local visual feedback including IP address, active WiFi status and connection indicators. Wireless capability is delivered through 802.11a/n/ac/ax at 150Mbps on 2.4GHz and 286Mbps on 5GHz, supported by an external dual band WiFi 6 antenna rather than a WiFi 7 module.

A key addition to this model is the integrated 5G RedCap SIM slot. This allows the device to operate independently of the local network when deployed on-site, which is relevant for administrators or engineers who need to access remote systems without relying on customer-provided WiFi or Ethernet. The mobile connection also supports failover for situations where the primary network becomes unavailable, ensuring that remote KVM access remains possible. During the demonstration, it was highlighted that this improves usability for workloads such as multi-day monitoring or configuration tasks performed in locations where network restrictions or firewall rules prevent direct access.

The Comet 5G retains a familiar selection of ports including USB-C for power, USB-A for peripherals, a gigabit Ethernet port for direct LAN connection and a SIM slot for mobile data. The device is not PoE-powered, although an injector or adapter is expected to be offered as an accessory. This approach keeps the unit closer in design to a travel-friendly tool rather than a fixed enterprise appliance. It remains suited to users who already deploy compact KVM units as part of their field equipment and who require a method of accessing remote devices through either wired, wireless or cellular links.

The combination of 5G failover and HDMI-based remote access positions it as a small-scale management device for distributed environments, temporary field sites or systems that require out-of-band connectivity. Many users will make comparisons between this and the recently crowdfunded ‘Comet Pro’ device (very similar, but alongside a few small changes internally and adjustable antennae, also does not support a 5G SIM CARD/LTE), as well as the Comet PoE device recently released. This is largely the same, but tailored towards a different, decidedly more mobile deployment.

Flint 3e Dual Band WiFi 7 Router (GL-BE5600)

The Flint 3e is a dual band WiFi 7 router aimed at users who want higher wireless throughput and multi gigabit Ethernet connectivity without moving to a full tri band system. It is built around a Qualcomm quad core processor running at 1.5GHz with 1GB of DDR4 memory and 512MB of NAND storage. Wireless support covers IEEE 802.11a, b, g, n, ac, ax and be, delivering 688Mbps on 2.4GHz and 5764Mbps on 5GHz. The unit includes four external foldable antennas, a dual colour LED indicator and a housing designed for stable operation in home or small office environments. Connectivity is centred around five 2.5GbE ports, with one operating as a dedicated WAN input and the remainder configurable as LAN. This gives the router a faster wired backbone than earlier consumer models from the brand.

The router maintains a focus on local performance and low latency operation rather than offering the widest possible spectrum support. It does not include 6GHz capability, placing it closer to the Beryl 7 and Slate 7 in terms of band allocation. However, the higher 5GHz ceiling and improved channel management provide an upgrade path for users moving from WiFi 6 or earlier models who still want to take advantage of WiFi 7 features such as improved modulation and multi link operation. USB 3.0 support is included for storage or tethering tasks, and the system integrates the company’s familiar software stack with options for AdGuard Home, parental controls and fast VPN throughput, including WireGuard and OpenVPN DCO at speeds up to 680Mbps.

The Flint 3e is presented as a more accessible alternative to the full tri band Flint 3, offering similar processing power and Ethernet flexibility while reducing overall wireless complexity. Its design suits users who require multi gigabit wired networking for NAS systems, workstations or mesh uplinks, while maintaining predictable WiFi coverage within standard two band environments. Power consumption remains below 25W without USB load and below 37.2W with active USB devices. This allows the router to operate efficiently in homes with multiple connected devices, including smart home hubs, streaming systems and personal storage servers.

When comparing the Flint 3e with the currently available Flint 3, the key distinction lies in wireless scope and deployment scale. The Flint 3 includes an additional 6GHz band with a 5765Mbps ceiling, a larger 8GB eMMC module and the same five port 2.5GbE layout. This gives the Flint 3 wider spectrum availability, higher aggregate throughput and more headroom for larger properties or higher density environments. The Flint 3e, by contrast, focuses on delivering similar processor performance and identical wired networking while intentionally omitting the 6GHz band to reduce cost and complexity. The result is a model suited for medium sized homes or users who rely primarily on 5GHz and wired backhaul, while the Flint 3 is positioned for broader coverage, multi floor layouts and deployments with more simultaneous wireless clients.

When will the Comet 5G, Beryl 7 and Flint 3e Be Released and What Price?

Gl.iNet’s forthcoming device trio is designed to cover distinct deployment needs across travel, remote management and wired-performance routing. The Beryl 7 travel router brings dual-band WiFi 7, USB-C power, 2.5GbE wired ports and VPN switch functionality; it is estimated to launch at a price similar to the original Beryl AX model. The Comet 5G KVM device increases flexibility by adding 5G RedCap connectivity, HDMI I/O, gigabit Ethernet and WiFi 6, positioning it in terms of design and feature set somewhere between the Comet Pro and the Slate 7; pricing is yet to be confirmed. The Flint 3e desktop router offers dual-band WiFi 7 and five 2.5GbE ports while foregoing the 6GHz band, making it more affordable than the tri-band Flint 3; this pricing strategy targets users seeking strong wired and wireless performance without full spectrum coverage. All models are expected to be formally announced at CES 2026 and become available in Q1 2026.

Gl.iNet Comet KVM Series on Amazon HERE	Gl.iNet Slate 7 Mobile Router on Amazon HERE

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...New Gl.iNet Beryl 7, Comet 5G GL.iNet Comet Pro Review - TheGL.iNet Comet Pro ReviewDo You NEED a WiFi 7 Travel RoGl.iNet Slate 7 WiFi 7 Travel GL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) PoGL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) PoGL.iNet Puli AX Mobile Router GL.iNet Puli AX Mobile Router Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE    

WE LOVE COFFEE

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

     

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra – The First 48 Hours

The MS-02 Ultra is the latest workstation from Minisforum, and is currently undergoing testing and review here at NASCompares. However, even after just 48 hours, a whole bunch of interesting design choices and unique qwerks to the arcitecture have emerged that I wanted to cover in the meantime before the full review is complete. The MS-02 Ultra essentially trying to recapture the magic and impact of the incredibly popular MS-01 – and it is attempting this by doubling, trippling and (in some cases) quadrupling the base specifications! The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra arrives as a compact workstation that incorporates a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX processor, up to 256 GB of ECC DDR5 memory, internal 350 W power delivery, multiple PCIe expansion options, and a network configuration that includes dual 25GbE, 10GbE, and 2.5GbE. After 48 hours of initial testing, several hardware behaviors have emerged regarding thermals, acoustics, lane distribution, storage configuration, and chassis layout. The following sections outline these early observations, supported by confirmed specifications and hands-on inspection. Stay tuned for the full review, but at least for now, let’s discuss the early highlights and low lights!

Design of the MS-02 Ultra

The internal design of the MS-02 Ultra differs considerably from earlier Minisforum workstation models and moves away from the layout used in the MS-S1 Max. Although the system retains a slide-out internal frame, the mechanism is less streamlined than the earlier S-series implementation because of how densely the components are arranged.

The interior resembles a compressed micro-tower layout, with the CPU cooling assembly, PSU, PCIe risers, and storage positions layered closely together. A dual-fan ventilation chamber spans the frontal section of the chassis, pulling air through a vented intake and directing it across the primary cooling hardware before forcing it out the rear. This arrangement appears to be a necessary response to the higher thermal output of the Ultra 9 285HX and the inclusion of multiple expansion slots, both of which require more directed airflow than Minisforum’s previous compact workstation designs.

The placement of internal components reflects the limited spatial tolerance of the 4.8-liter enclosure. The internal 350 W PSU occupies a significant section of the lower frame and includes additional power leads intended for low-profile GPU or accelerator cards, something rarely present in machines of this size. The motherboard runs across most of the horizontal section and positions the CPU vapor-chamber cooler toward the middle, while memory slots, NVMe connectors, and the PCIe riser for the combo NIC occupy the remaining pockets of available space.

Because cooling pipes and the ventilation housing sit directly above the CPU-side memory slots, Minisforum added a custom angled heatsink to ensure airflow reaches these modules. This results in a serviceable layout but one that requires more deliberate disassembly, as the compact structure prioritizes component density and thermal guidance over ease of access or open internal spacing.

Early Heat, Noise and Power Use of the MS-02 Ultra

Initial thermal behavior suggests the MS-02 Ultra is managing its compact layout with a cooling strategy built around a dual-fan chamber and a six-heatpipe radiator assisted by phase-change material. During the first setup period, surface temperatures around the chassis varied, with readings near the side ventilation panels and case edges settling around the low-to-mid 40s, while the front intake area measured lower due to the direct airflow path.

Early internal temperature checks, taken before any sustained workloads were applied, showed values consistent with a system that is heavily packed but actively cooled across multiple zones. These readings align with Minisforum’s stated 5000 RPM maximum fan speed and the intention to maintain a 100 W to 140 W CPU power envelope depending on configuration. However, because these measurements were taken during routine preparation rather than stress testing, they provide only a preliminary indication of how the system will manage long-duration loads.

Noise levels during this early period ranged from the low 30s dBA while performing software installations and background operations, with no significant fluctuations unless brief bursts of activity occurred. This behavior suggests fan control may be tied primarily to BIOS-level thermal triggers rather than granular OS-side control, something that will require further testing.

Power consumption during light activity remained in the 50 to 60 W range, which is consistent with a workstation-class system running the Ultra 9 285HX while idle or handling moderate foreground tasks. Removing the dual-25GbE combo card or disabling its slot reduced power draw by roughly 10 to 11 W, highlighting the overhead associated with multi-lane NICs and onboard controllers. These early figures provide a baseline for comparison against heavier benchmarks that will be performed in the full review.

The 25GbE, 10GbE and WiFi 7 Network Card in the MS-02 Ultra

The MS-02 Ultra’s networking implementation is centered around a PCIe-based combo card that integrates dual 25GbE SFP+ ports with two additional M.2 NVMe slots. This card is installed in the PCIe 4.0 x16 position rather than the PCIe 5.0 slot, and it includes a dedicated controller with active cooling and heatsinks that cover both the networking and storage components.

Early inspection shows the card draws a notable amount of power, which corresponds with the increased thermal and electrical requirements of Intel’s E810-class 25GbE controllers. Because of this, Minisforum’s inclusion of dedicated airflow and structural reinforcement around the card is necessary within the constrained 4.8-liter chassis. The presence of this dual-purpose add-in card also means the MS-02 Ultra’s total NVMe count depends on whether the system is configured with the 285HX version, as the lower-tier CPUs remove the combo module entirely.

Beyond the 25GbE configuration, the system includes onboard 10GbE and 2.5GbE RJ45 ports, the latter supported by Intel’s i226-LM with vPro capabilities, allowing BIOS-level remote management. The combination of high-speed SFP+, copper-based multi-gigabit ports, and embedded management options positions the system for lab, server, or virtualization roles rather than conventional desktop use.

Wireless capability is supplied via a WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 module connected through an M.2 E-Key slot, providing high-throughput wireless performance alongside its wired interfaces. Together, these connectivity features expand the system’s potential use cases, particularly for users planning to deploy virtualized environments or bandwidth-intensive tasks such as shared storage testing or multi-system clustering.

How m.2 Storage on the MS-02 Ultra is Done

The MS-02 Ultra distributes its four NVMe slots across two different locations, with two mounted on the mainboard and two integrated into the dual-25GbE combo card. The pair located on the system board are positioned on the underside, near the memory and CPU assembly, and both are listed as PCIe 4.0 x4 according to Minisforum’s documentation.

Early inspection suggests that one of these may have a PCIe 5.0 lane path available at the hardware level, though software restrictions or lane bifurcation rules may currently limit it to Gen 4 behavior. This is an area that requires further validation using a Gen 5 SSD, as the lane layout on the 285HX platform allows various allocation possibilities depending on how Minisforum assigned bandwidth between CPU, chipset, and expansion slots. These internal slots have modest vertical clearance, meaning SSDs with tall heatsinks cannot be used without removing or replacing the pre-fitted cooling structures.

The remaining two NVMe slots reside on the network combo card alongside the 25GbE controllers. These operate under different bandwidth rules depending on SSD capacity: drives up to 4 TB operate at PCIe 4.0 x4, while larger 8 TB models shift down to PCIe 3.0 x4. This behavior appears to be related to the card’s onboard controller and how its internal bifurcation splits resources between the NIC and storage lanes.

Physical space is also restricted on the card, requiring low-profile SSDs in certain positions to avoid obstruction of the cooling shroud and airflow channel. Minisforum includes an additional heatsink in the package for users installing their own drives, but using SSDs with taller factory heatsinks may be impractical. Altogether, storage layout on the MS-02 Ultra is functional and high-capacity, but with lane behaviors and physical constraints that require attention during configuration.

Memory on the MS-02 Ultra

The MS-02 Ultra provides four DDR5 SODIMM slots, but their distribution within the chassis is unconventional due to the system’s compact thermal layout. Two slots sit on the mainboard near the CPU-side M.2 positions, placed directly in the airflow path of the vapor-chamber cooler and its dual-fan assembly. Because of this, Minisforum has added a custom angled heatsink that draws air from the primary cooling channel across the modules and nearby components.

This arrangement is intended to compensate for the thermal density around the CPU area, where heat buildup would otherwise be more likely. These two slots support both ECC and non-ECC memory, though ECC functionality is active only on the 285HX model. Their placement suggests Minisforum prioritized consistent airflow over ease of access, making upgrades possible but less straightforward than on more open workstation layouts.

The remaining pair of SODIMM slots is located on the opposite side of the board, positioned away from the CPU cooling assembly and closer to the chassis frame. These modules have more breathing room but rely on passive airflow from the system’s general ventilation rather than a focused cooling path. All four slots support speeds up to 4800 MHz, with XMP profiles unavailable due to Minisforum’s implementation and Intel’s platform limitations.

During early testing, memory installation worked as expected, though the arrangement of these slots means users planning maximum 256 GB configurations will need to work within the physical constraints of the layout. Overall, the memory design reflects a tradeoff between supporting high-capacity ECC configurations and fitting the necessary cooling infrastructure into a small volume.

PCIe Card Support on the MS-02 Ultra

The MS-02 Ultra incorporates three PCIe slots arranged to maximize flexibility within its compact chassis: a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, and a PCIe 4.0 x4 slot. The PCIe 5.0 slot is left unoccupied by default, allowing users to install a low-profile GPU or accelerator card that fits within the airflow and power constraints of the 350 W internal PSU.

Minisforum includes auxiliary power cables within the system, which is uncommon for small-form-factor workstations and indicates that the chassis is intended to support cards that require supplemental power. Because of the chassis height and width, only dual-slot, low-profile cards with modest cooling requirements are viable, but this still introduces options for compute or media workloads that benefit from hardware acceleration.

The PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is occupied in the 285HX configuration by the dual-25GbE plus dual-M.2 combo card, which introduces additional thermal and power considerations. This leaves the PCIe 4.0 x4 slot available for further expansion, provided the card used meets the system’s spatial limitations. The layout demonstrates Minisforum’s approach to balancing lane allocation between CPU, storage, and networking, especially given the 24 available PCIe lanes on the Ultra 9 platform.

Although the physical presence of three slots in such a compact volume is unusual, the arrangement is functional, and power delivery from the internal PSU supports moderate add-in card configurations. Users will need to consider airflow direction, card length, and slot occupation carefully to avoid restricting internal ventilation.

Conclusion and Verdict on the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra (So Far…)

The MS-02 Ultra presents a compact workstation design that integrates a high-core-count CPU, multiple NVMe storage options, high-speed networking, and an internal PSU within a tightly arranged chassis. Early testing indicates that the system’s thermal behavior, noise profile, and power draw are consistent with its component density, though the long-term performance of its cooling strategy requires extended benchmarking before reaching definitive conclusions. The design choices, such as the split placement of memory slots, the use of a large dual-fan cooling chamber, and the reliance on a densely packed internal layout, all reflect Minisforum’s effort to fit workstation-grade hardware into a constrained volume.

In terms of features, the dual-25GbE plus dual-M.2 combo card remains the most distinctive element, expanding the system’s potential for virtualized environments, NAS roles, and bandwidth-heavy workflows. PCIe allocation, memory configuration, and storage behavior introduce several considerations for users planning upgrades or specialized deployments. While these early observations indicate a capable and flexible platform, further testing is necessary to determine sustained thermal performance, PCIe stability under load, and real-world throughput of the networking and storage subsystems. The forthcoming full review will provide those extended results, but for now, the system presents a feature-rich design with several areas that merit deeper evaluation.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Minisforum MS-02 Ultra ReviewMinisforum MS-02 Ultra - EarlyAoostar WTR Max NAS vs MinisfoMinisforum N5 vs Aoostar WTR MMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewMinisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 - WhMinisforum MS-R1 POWERHOUSE ARMinisforum MS-R1 POWERHOUSE ARMinisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 PC - Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Best NAS You Can Buy Right Now for Under $249 at the end of 2025

Important Disclaimer and Notes Before You Buy!

Before looking at specific NAS models, it helps to understand the common limits of systems in this price tier. Most units under 249 dollars arrive without drives, and rely on NVMe or SATA bays that must be filled separately. Some include small onboard storage such as 32GB to 64GB eMMC that only covers the operating system. This means the total cost of a usable setup will usually be higher than the base price. These devices are aimed at home users and personal cloud tasks rather than heavier business workloads. Several models also lack a full NAS operating system and instead use lightweight platforms such as CasaOS or ZimaOS, or provide only a simple interface for local file access and containers. These options are improving, yet they may not offer advanced RAID tools, snapshot automation, or detailed permission control found on systems like Synology DSM or TrueNAS. Overall, these NAS units suit users with some technical confidence or anyone who wants a simple setup with limited depth.

Beelink ME Mini NAS – 6 Bay SSD NAS

$209 – Intel N150 – 12GB – No SSD (64GB eMMC Only) – 2x 2.5GbE + WiFi 6 – No OS / User Install – BUY HERE

The Beelink ME Mini is a compact NAS designed for anyone who wants fast SSD storage in a very small enclosure. It measures 99mm on each side and includes six M.2 2280 NVMe slots that can deliver as much as 24TB when fully populated. The system uses an Intel N150 processor with 12GB of LPDDR5 memory, which provides a solid mix of performance and low power draw. Connectivity includes two 2.5GbE ports, WiFi 6, and Bluetooth 5.2, giving it flexibility for both wired and wireless use. Cooling is handled passively and the unit contains its own power supply, which keeps noise and cable clutter to a minimum and makes it a good fit for living rooms or compact office spaces.

Terramaster F2-425 2- Bay Intel Value Turnkey NAS

$249 – Intel N5105 – 4GB – TOS 6 Software – 1x 2.5GbE – 2x SATA – BUY HERE

The Terramaster F2-424 is a two bay NAS that sits near the upper edge of the 249 dollar bracket and focuses on providing a more traditional turnkey experience. It uses an Intel Celeron class x86 quad core processor with 4GB of memory that can be upgraded, which allows it to handle general home NAS tasks and hardware assisted 4K decoding for applications such as Plex, Emby, and Jellyfin.

The system supports two SATA drives for a total capacity of up to 60TB and includes TRAID for flexible expansion and space management. Connectivity is limited to a single 2.5GbE port, which is sufficient for most home use but less flexible than some other systems in this list that offer two LAN ports. The unit runs TOS 6, which provides RAID options, snapshots, cloud sync, and a broad selection of built in apps for backup, media, and light productivity needs.

Setup can be completed through the TNAS Mobile app, which also supports automatic photo and video backups from mobile devices. Local AI driven sorting for photos is included, and cross platform access is available through the TNAS client or standard network mapping. TerraSync enables PC backups with version history, and security features include OTP authentication, firewall controls, DoS protections, snapshots, and HyperLock WORM for ransomware resistance. The chassis is quiet in operation and uses tool free push lock trays that allow quick installation or replacement of drives.

Terramaster also offers the F2-425 Plus at roughly 130 dollars more. That model increases CPU and memory resources and is aimed at users who want stronger performance and scalability. For those who want to remain within the 249 dollar limit, the F2-424 provides a straightforward Intel based platform with a familiar OS, upgradable memory, and native HDD support, as long as the single network port meets the user’s needs.

GMKTec G9 NAS – 4 Bay M.2 NAS @ The lowest Price

$185.99 – Intel N150 – 12GB – No SSD (64GB eMMC Only) – 2x 2.5GbE + WiFi 6 – Ubuntu 24.10 (Preloaded, Switchable) – BUY HERE

The GMKTec G9 provides hardware that closely matches the Beelink ME Mini, since it also uses the Intel N150 processor and 12GB of LPDDR5 memory. It arrives in a more traditional rectangular enclosure and includes four M.2 2280 NVMe slots instead of six. The system contains 64GB of onboard eMMC storage that is mainly used to boot Ubuntu 24.10, and it can dual boot into Windows 11 when an additional SSD is installed. As with the Beelink, there is no SATA support, so all storage relies on NVMe drives up to 4TB each. Cooling is handled by an active fan and the device includes two HDMI outputs, which makes it a stronger option for anyone who wants a small desktop system or direct media output as part of their NAS setup. The manufacturer issued a refresh in summer 2025 that improved the cooling layout with better vent placement and more efficient airflow.

Synology BeeStation 4TB NAS – ALL IN ONE!

$199 – Realtek RTD1619B – 1GB – 4TB SINGLE BAY – 1x 1GbE – BeeStation Manager (BSM) – BUY HERE

The Synology BeeStation 4TB is a single bay NAS designed for users who want a ready to use system with no installation work. It arrives with a pre installed 4TB hard drive and a sealed enclosure, so there is no need to source or fit storage. The system uses a Realtek RTD1619B ARM processor with 1GB of DDR4 memory and connects through a single 1GbE port. It runs BeeStation Manager, which focuses on beginner friendly features such as cloud style file access, simple photo management, and smooth integration with Synology mobile apps. Synology also released the BeeStation Plus model in 2025 with an Intel processor, more memory, and 8TB of storage, but it sits at roughly double the price. If you are willing to spend more, that model gives you greater performance and capacity.

UGREEN NASync DXP2800 NAS – The New Challenger!

$249 – Intel N100 – 8GB – No Storage (32GB eMMC) – 1x 2.5GbE – UGOS Pro – BUY HERE

The UGREEN DXP2800 sits in the NASync series and targets users who want a mix of expandability and value. It supports both hard drives and SSDs through two 3.5 inch SATA bays and two M.2 NVMe slots that can be used for caching or fast active data work. The system uses an Intel N100 processor from the twelfth generation energy efficient N series and pairs it with 8GB of DDR5 memory that can be upgraded. A 32GB eMMC module holds the UGOS Pro operating system. Connectivity is built around a single 2.5GbE port with several USB ports on the front and rear including USB C and 10Gbps USB A. UGOS Pro offers a clean web interface with containers, RAID options such as zero, one, and JBOD, simple multimedia features, and remote file access.

UGREEN recently released the DH2300 two bay NAS at a noticeably lower price of roughly 100 to 120 dollars below the DXP2800. That model uses a lower power ARM processor, far less memory, and only one 1GbE port. It is acceptable for very light duties, but most users will benefit from spending a little more on the DXP2800 due to its stronger CPU, memory capacity, and networking.

Although UGOS Pro does not match the ecosystem depth of Synology DSM or QNAP QTS, the DXP2800 remains one of the few turnkey systems in this bracket that supports SSD and HDD storage in a flexible layout without proprietary limits. Users will still need to supply their own drives and configure storage pools, yet the combination of hardware capability and manageable software makes it a strong choice for anyone comfortable handling a modest amount of setup work.

ZimaBoard 2 (832 Version) – DIY Enthusiast’s DREAM!

$199 – Intel N150 – 8GB – No Storage (32GB eMMC) – 2x 2.5GbE – ZimaOS – BUY HERE

The ZimaBoard 2 (832) is a compact single board NAS platform built for users who want flexibility and modular control rather than a traditional enclosure based system. It arrives as a bare embedded board with all interfaces exposed, which makes it ideal for custom builds. The system uses the Intel N150 quad core processor with 8GB of LPDDR5x memory and includes 32GB of onboard eMMC storage for ZimaOS. The device ships with a lifetime ZimaOS license, which is notable at this price level. It also stands out by providing two powered SATA 3.0 ports, giving it native support for hard drives without any need for USB to SATA adapters. The product is now sold on Amazon, although the price can move between 249 and 349 dollars depending on current stock and promotions, so it is worth watching for discounts.

Connectivity is strong for a low profile platform. It offers two 2.5GbE ports, USB 3.1, a PCIe 3.0 x4 slot, and a Mini DisplayPort output that can deliver 4K60 video. The PCIe slot opens the door for add on networking, storage controllers, or accelerators, although most users will start by using the SATA ports for core NAS storage. The large passive heatsink keeps the board silent, although thermal results will depend on the case you choose and the surrounding environment.

This system suits DIY builders who want to create their own NAS, firewall appliance, lightweight media server, or container host. ZimaOS provides a simple web interface and allows the user to switch to CasaOS or other Linux based platforms if preferred. It is aimed at users who want maximum control and are comfortable managing their own setup rather than those seeking a plug and play NAS.

Each NAS covered in this guide delivers its own mix of hardware capability, expansion potential, and overall usability while staying within the 249 dollar limit. Users who want a fully prepared option with minimal setup will likely prefer the Synology BeeStation, and anyone who wants a small SSD focused system with stronger customisation features may find the Beelink ME Mini or GMKTec G9 more suitable. The UGREEN DXP2800 stands out for its combination of HDD and SSD support and a more developed software platform, while the ZimaBoard 2 is aimed at technical users who want full control over every layer of the build. None of these devices is a perfect all rounder, yet each one provides a practical entry into local storage, self hosted media, and personal backup without exceeding a modest budget

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Jonsbo N6 NAS Case ReviewBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBest Low-Cost / Value NAS of tBest Cheap NAS of 2025Best 4/5/6 Bay NAS of 2025Best PLEX or Jellyfin NAS of 2The Best NAS of the Year - 202Best NAS of the Year 20255 Mistakes New NAS Buyers ALWA Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Black Friday 2025 NAS Deals – UGREEN NAS

Black Friday has brought some of the strongest discounts yet on UGREEN NASync systems, making it an ideal time for new users and homelab builders to step into the NAS ecosystem or upgrade to a more powerful and future proof setup. This year’s lineup ranges from compact and affordable 2-bay models for simple backups and family cloud storage to high performance all-flash and 10GbE systems aimed at media creators, home labs, and virtualisation workloads. Whether you need a quiet personal cloud, a fast Plex server, an NVMe-accelerated photo workflow, or a full 8-bay system capable of running containers, VMs, TrueNAS, or UnRAID, UGREEN’s NASync range covers every tier with significant holiday savings. Below is a detailed breakdown of each model on offer, including their best use cases and current Black Friday pricing.

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus – $594.99 

The UGREEN DXP4800 Plus is a 4 bay NAS running UGOS Pro and built around an Intel Pentium Gold 8505 processor with 5 cores and 6 threads, paired with 8GB DDR5 memory that can be expanded to 64GB. It includes a 128GB system SSD, 4 SATA bays, and 2 M.2 slots, allowing a maximum combined capacity of 136TB for mixed HDD and SSD storage. RAID options include JBOD, Basic, 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10, giving users flexible data protection choices. Connectivity is a strong point, with both 2.5GbE and 10GbE network ports, front USB C and USB A ports at 10Gb per second, additional rear USB ports, an SD 3.0 card reader, and 4K HDMI output for direct console access. With a compact footprint of 10.1 inches by 7.0 inches by 7.0 inches and power usage of 42.36W during disk access, the DXP4800 Plus is a high performance prosumer NAS that fits well into creative, home lab, and small business environments.

UGREEN 120W NAS UPS – 15% OFF, NOW $84.99

UGREEN NASync DH4300 Plus – $364.99 

Regular price$429.99

The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is a simple and affordable 4 bay NAS designed as a reliable backup hub and a private cloud alternative for homes and small offices. It uses an 8 core Rockchip ARM processor with 8GB LPDDR4X memory and a 32GB eMMC system disk, providing enough performance for file sync, photo and video backup, family cloud storage, and basic media streaming through UGOS Pro. The 4 SATA bays support up to 120TB with RAID options including JBOD, Basic, 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10, making it easy to choose between capacity and data protection. A single 2.5GbE port offers fast network transfers, while front USB 3.2 ports and 4K HDMI allow quick file import and local access when needed. With compact dimensions of 155 by 155 by 215.7 mm and low power draw of 22.89W during drive access, the DH4300 Plus is a cost effective way to move away from subscription cloud services and take full control of your own backup and storage system.

UGREEN NASync DXP480T Plus – $849.99 

Regular price$999.99

The UGREEN DXP480T Plus is a high speed 4 slot NVMe NAS built around the Intel Core i5 1235U processor, designed for users who want the performance benefits of full flash storage rather than traditional SATA drives. With 4 M.2 NVMe slots supporting up to 32TB, the system delivers extremely fast read and write speeds that are ideal for photo and video editing, virtual machines, database work, AI workloads, and low latency cloud sync tasks. UGOS Pro supports RAID modes including JBOD, Basic, 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10, allowing both performance and data protection on NVMe media. Connectivity is equally strong with a 10GbE port for high bandwidth transfers and dual Thunderbolt 4 ports that operate at 40Gb per second for fast external storage or workstation integration. The system includes 8GB DDR5 memory, expandable to 64GB, along with built in WiFi and 8K HDMI output for direct console use. With compact dimensions of 7.05 by 5.59 by 2.05 inches and efficient power consumption, the DXP480T Plus is a compelling option for anyone who wants the speed and responsiveness of an all flash NAS.

UGREEN DXP6800 PRO – 20% OFF, Now £799

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 – $499.99 

Regular price$549.99

The UGREEN DXP4800 is a 4 bay SATA NAS designed for users who want an affordable and straightforward media server for Plex, Jellyfin, or Emby. It runs on an Intel N100 processor with 8GB DDR5 memory and includes 2 M.2 slots for SSD caching, which helps speed up library scanning and artwork retrieval across large media collections. With space for up to 136TB and RAID options covering JBOD, Basic, 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10, it offers plenty of room and flexibility for growing libraries of movies, TV shows, and music. Dual 2.5GbE ports provide more than enough throughput for multiple streams on the local network, and the HDMI 4K output allows direct playback or simple setup without a separate computer. Front and rear USB ports make it easy to import media from external drives, while UGOS Pro supports popular self hosted media applications through containers or native apps. Compact dimensions of 10.1 by 7.0 by 7.0 inches and low power use make the DXP4800 a practical, quiet, and efficient platform for home media streaming with Plex, Jellyfin, or Emby.

UGREEN NASync DH2300 – $188.99 

Regular price$209.99

The UGREEN DH2300 is one of the most affordable and compact NAS options in the lineup, making it an ideal entry point for anyone who wants simple personal backups or a small private cloud without a large upfront cost. It runs on an efficient 8 core Rockchip A72 plus A53 processor with 4GB LPDDR4X memory and includes 2 SATA bays that support up to 60TB with JBOD, Basic, 0, or 1 for easy data protection. Despite its budget friendly price, it offers useful connectivity including 1GbE networking, front USB C and USB A ports for quick file import, and a 4K 60Hz HDMI output for local setup or direct playback. With a very small footprint at 151 by 98 by 213.7 mm and power use of only 13.72W during drive access, the DH2300 fits comfortably on a shelf or desk and provides a quiet, low cost alternative to cloud subscriptions for photos, documents, and home backups.

UGREEN DXP4800 PLUS – 20% OFF, NOW $559.99

UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro – $1,019.99 

Regular price$1,199.99

The UGREEN DXP6800 Pro is a powerful 6 bay NAS designed for photographers and media professionals who need fast ingest, responsive editing, and reliable large scale storage. It uses an Intel Core i5 1235U processor with 10 cores and 12 threads and includes 8GB DDR5 memory, expandable to 64GB, giving it enough performance for handling RAW photo workflows, large Lightroom or Capture One catalogs, and multi-stream media projects. With 6 SATA bays and 2 M.2 slots, the system can reach up to 196TB of combined storage, allowing long term archives, active project folders, and SSD cache acceleration for quicker preview loading. Dual 10GbE ports provide the bandwidth needed for teams or for editing directly from the NAS over a fast network, while the dual Thunderbolt 4 ports at 40Gb per second allow very rapid transfers from workstations or external drives. A front SD 4.0 card reader simplifies importing photos and footage, and the 8K HDMI output allows direct console access for quick management. Compact at 11.54 by 10.16 by 7.87 inches, the DXP6800 Pro is a high performance, creator focused storage solution that comfortably supports demanding photo and video workflows.

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus + UPS Add On – $639.99 

Regular price$799.99

The UGREEN DXP4800 Plus is a powerful and flexible 4-bay NAS built on the Intel Pentium Gold 8505 with 5 cores and 6 threads, paired with 8GB DDR5 memory and support for up to 64GB. It includes a 128GB system SSD, 4 SATA bays, and 2 M.2 SSD slots, giving the system a maximum capacity of 136TB for mixed HDD and NVMe setups. Connectivity is strong with both 2.5GbE and 10GbE ports for high-speed file transfers, media streaming, and multi-user access on UGOS Pro. This Black Friday bundle also includes the UGREEN US3000 UPS, a compact 120W lithium-ion backup module with 0s transfer time, 43.2Wh rated energy, and 12,000mAh capacity. It protects the NAS from sudden power loss, prevents file system corruption, and enables safe shutdown during outages. With front 10Gbps USB-C and USB-A ports, an SD 3.0 card reader, 4K HDMI output, and a compact 10.1 × 7.0 × 7.0 inch chassis, the DXP4800 Plus and included UPS form a reliable, high-performance storage solution for home and professional users.

UGREEN NASync DXP2800 – $319.99 

Regular price$349.99

The UGREEN DXP2800 is one of the best value NAS options in the lineup, offering full access to all UGOS Pro software features while keeping hardware costs low. It runs on the Intel N100 processor with 4 cores and 4 threads, paired with 8GB DDR5 memory and support for up to 16GB, making it capable of running file sharing, photo backup, cloud sync, container apps, and media servers without difficulty. The system includes 2 SATA bays and 2 M.2 SSD slots, giving a maximum storage capacity of 76TB, which is more than enough for home backups or small office data. A 2.5GbE port provides fast transfers for laptops, desktops, and media players, while the front USB-C and USB-A ports at 10Gbps make external storage import easy. With 4K HDMI output for direct console access and a low power draw of only 16.38W during drive access, the DXP2800 delivers the full UGOS Pro experience, including AI photo sorting, mobile backup, cloud sync, and app store functionality, all within a compact 9.1 × 4.3 × 7.0 inch chassis. It is an affordable and highly capable entry point for anyone wanting full NAS functionality without the premium price.

UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus – $1,274.99 

Regular price$1,499.99

The UGREEN DXP8800 Plus is the ultimate UGREEN NAS server for users who want maximum power, flexibility, and room to grow. It runs on the Intel Core i5 1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads, paired with 8GB DDR5 memory and support for up to 64GB, making it ideal for large scale virtual machines, Docker workloads, and advanced homelab setups including TrueNAS or UnRAID installations. With 8 SATA bays and 2 M.2 SSD slots, the system supports up to 256TB of total storage, which is enough for professional video archives, multi user environments, and massive Plex libraries. Dual 10GbE ports provide extremely fast network throughput for direct editing from the NAS in applications like DaVinci Resolve or Adobe Premiere, while the 2 Thunderbolt 4 ports at 40Gb per second allow rapid offload and workstation integration. A front SD 4.0 reader simplifies media ingest for photographers and editors, and the 8K HDMI output allows direct console access when needed. With a compact 7.05 by 5.59 by 2.05 inch design and strong performance under UGOS Pro, the DXP8800 Plus is the most capable and full featured UGREEN NAS platform for creators, homelab users, virtualisation workloads, Plex servers, and demanding professional storage environments.

Amazon Deals

UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Plus 6-Bay NAS –  $899..99

The UGREEN DXP6800 Pro is a high performance 6 bay NAS aimed at creators and production teams who need fast ingest, smooth editing, and dependable storage for large projects. It runs on an Intel Core i5 1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads and includes 8GB DDR5 memory with support for up to 64GB, giving it the power required for RAW photo sets, large catalog libraries, and demanding video work. The 6 SATA bays and 2 M.2 SSD slots allow a total capacity of 196TB, making it suitable for long term archives, active project folders, and fast SSD caching to speed up preview generation and media scrubbing. Dual 10GbE ports enable direct editing over the network, while the 2 Thunderbolt 4 ports operating at 40Gb per second support extremely fast transfers from workstations or external storage. A front SD 4.0 card reader streamlines importing footage from cameras, and the 8K HDMI output provides simple local access for setup and management. With a compact footprint of 11.54 by 10.16 by 7.87 inches, the DXP6800 Pro delivers a powerful and efficient workflow platform for photographers, videographers, and studio environments.

UGREEN NASync DH4300 Plus Value Class NAS – $364.99

UGREEN NASync DXP2800 2-Bay NAS – $319.99

UGREEN NASync DH2300 2-Bay Tiny Impact NAS – $188..99

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Jonsbo N6 NAS Case ReviewBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBest Low-Cost / Value NAS of tBest Cheap NAS of 2025Best 4/5/6 Bay NAS of 2025Best PLEX or Jellyfin NAS of 2The Best NAS of the Year - 202Best NAS of the Year 20255 Mistakes New NAS Buyers ALWA Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Sipeed NanoKVM Pro KVM Review

The NanoKVM Pro from Sipeed represents the latest iteration in the company’s growing range of remote management devices, developed as a more capable successor to the original NanoKVM. Building on the lessons learned from its earlier RISC-V model, this version introduces a dual-core ARM architecture and significantly enhanced system resources. The design focus shifts toward higher-resolution capture, faster data handling, and improved remote-access functionality, all within a self-contained form factor that can sit on a desk or integrate into rack systems. Supported by an open-source PiKVM-based software environment, it provides the same level of control normally associated with enterprise IPMI solutions, including BIOS access, remote mounting of ISOs, and full keyboard-video-mouse interaction through a browser interface. Unlike many entry-level devices in its category, it supports 4K capture up to 30 fps, 1080p up to 60 fps, and HDMI loop-out for simultaneous local display. Optional features such as Wi-Fi 6, PoE input, and ATX power control expand its deployment flexibility across both professional and hobbyist environments. With 1 GB of LPDDR4X memory, 32 GB of onboard eMMC storage, and the ability to run either NanoKVM OS or full PiKVM firmware, the Pro model aims to balance affordability with advanced functionality suited to modern remote administration setups. But is it any good? Let’s find out if the NanoKVM Pro deserves your money and your data.

*UPDATE 9/12/25* The original NanoKVM (so, not the device in this video/article, but the first development version) features a small on board microphone that can be activated over SSH. This *looks* like it was a case of the brand reusing an existing board and it having the mic onboard (the LicheeRV Nano – which DID mention the microphone in it’s hardware specifications, but it is not detailed on the NanoKVM spec sheets at the time of discovery). I am currently going over the NanoKVM Pro device in this video for any further issues of hardware irregularities or issues discovered since this video was published (the device has been in action for 3 weeks more now), but even early checking has shown up negative/nothing. Bottom line, that device was not released finished, and early reviews of that device absolutely SLAMMED it for security issues (again, see Aparld’s vid linked in the description!) largely related to poor practices (plain text passwords, chinese DNS, etc), so no one should be deploying it on mission-critical clients anyway. Nevertheless, this sounds like (at best) a stupid mistake by the brand, and (at worst) poorly developed and badly baked hardware. I have reached out to the brand for more on this and will add here as/when it arrives. In the meantime, check out Jeff’s Level 2 channel for his video on this, which does a solid job of nailing the salient points! You can find the original investigation of the device HERE .

NanoKVM Pro KVM Review – Quick Conclusion

The NanoKVM Pro from Sipeed is a compact, Linux-based IP-KVM device that brings enterprise-grade remote management features into an affordable, open-source package designed for homelab enthusiasts, technicians, and small-scale administrators. Built around a dual-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor with 1 GB of LPDDR4X memory and 32 GB of onboard eMMC storage, it supports 4K capture at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, and HDMI loop-through for simultaneous local display, while maintaining low latency and stable frame delivery over gigabit Ethernet or Wi-Fi 6. The device integrates ATX control for power and reset functionality, allowing full BIOS-level access and system reboots without physical interaction, and can be powered via USB-C, PoE, or motherboard header connection. A 1.47-inch touchscreen with rotary encoder provides local control and monitoring, supported by an intuitive browser-based interface that enables ISO mounting, firmware updates, and encrypted remote access through built-in Tailscale VPN integration. It runs either Sipeed’s NanoKVM firmware or a full PiKVM stack, both of which are open-source and compatible with community-developed extensions, including AI-assisted features that perform local OCR and screen automation. The aluminum body ensures passive cooling and silent operation, with power draw averaging 3 to 7 watts depending on load. While early firmware builds lacked full 4K45 and H.265 support, continued updates have addressed most of these gaps, and the open nature of the platform allows for further improvement. Its minor drawbacks—such as inconsistent cable bundles, a lightweight dial, and limited CPU overhead during heavy 4K sessions—are outweighed by its flexibility, performance, and independence from proprietary cloud control. Overall, the NanoKVM Pro stands out as one of the most capable and customizable IP-KVM solutions in its price range, offering real out-of-band management power in a device smaller than a deck of cards.

Sipeed NanoKVM Pro on AliExpress	Sipeed NanoKVM Pro on Amazon

---

NanoKVM Pro KVM Review – Design & Storage

The NanoKVM Pro adopts a compact aluminum enclosure that measures 65 by 65 by 28 millimeters, emphasizing passive cooling and durability over aesthetic design. The casing doubles as a heat spreader, transferring thermal load from the PCB through its metal base and dissipating it through the chassis surface. This construction allows it to maintain stable temperatures around 50–55°C during typical use, even with extended operation or PoE power input. The metal build makes it suitable for permanent desktop placement or rack integration, and Sipeed provides 3D printable mounting templates for both single and triple-unit configurations. Despite its small footprint, the front panel includes a 1.47-inch 320×172 capacitive touch display and a rotary encoder that enables system navigation and control without needing to connect a keyboard or mouse. The LCD serves both as a configuration interface and as a secondary monitoring screen, capable of displaying live HDMI capture, resource utilization, or user-defined Python applications.

Storage performance represents a notable improvement over the earlier NanoKVM, which relied on a microSD card for its operating system. The Pro integrates 32 GB of eMMC storage rated at approximately 300 MB/s read speeds, providing faster ISO mounting and firmware updates, as well as the ability to host lightweight scripts or utilities locally. The onboard storage can be expanded through a microSD slot positioned beside the HDMI input, supporting additional media up to 512 GB. This expansion capability allows users to keep multiple boot images or installation media accessible directly through the web interface, making it useful for managing test systems or recovery environments. In practice, transferring a 1 GB ISO via a gigabit network takes about a minute, which is considerably faster than previous microSD-based units.

Externally, the NanoKVM Pro’s layout balances density and accessibility. All primary I/O connections, including HDMI input and output, dual USB-C ports for power and HID control, and a gigabit Ethernet port, are aligned along the rear edge to simplify cable routing in both rack and desktop configurations. The USB-C design allows for flexible power sourcing, supporting either direct 5V input, PoE via Ethernet, or ATX line integration through the bundled adapter board. This modularity is complemented by a detachable ATX control board that connects through a flat ribbon cable, enabling power, reset, and LED signal passthrough from a host motherboard. When connected correctly, this board allows remote hard resets and complete power cycling through the web interface, replicating the hardware-level management seen in dedicated IPMI modules.

On the front of the device, the rotary dial and touchscreen offer combined tactile and touch control options. Short presses, rotations, and swipes allow for full system interaction, while long presses bring up system menus and app selections. The screen can also operate as a secondary display via USB connection on Windows systems, acting as a miniature monitor that mirrors or supplements the primary display output. Through custom scripts, users can configure the display to show diagnostic data, resource graphs, or network metrics, further extending the device’s use beyond remote management.

Sipeed’s packaging reflects the device’s development-oriented nature. The kit typically includes two USB-C to USB-A cables, a short HDMI cable, and an ATX interface adapter with DIP cables, although early Kickstarter units reportedly shipped with incomplete cable sets. Documentation is provided through QR-linked web guides rather than printed manuals, directing users to detailed online setup instructions and firmware repositories. This approach aligns with Sipeed’s community-driven model, where updates, firmware images, and user scripts are hosted on GitHub for open access.

Finally, the overall footprint and passive cooling design allow the NanoKVM Pro to run silently, drawing between 3 to 5 watts depending on load, or up to 7 watts when AI functions or ambient lighting are enabled. While compact enough for portable or field use, it performs best when placed on conductive or ventilated surfaces, such as a metal case or rack shelf. The Pro model’s focus on internal storage, heat management, and flexible installation makes it notably more practical than most low-cost USB KVMs and positions it closer to a self-contained remote administration terminal.

NanoKVM Pro KVM Review – Ports and Connectivity

The NanoKVM Pro provides several configuration options for both local and remote access, reflecting its design for flexible integration across various network types. Wired connectivity is managed through a full gigabit Ethernet interface, which supports both data transfer and Power over Ethernet (PoE) in certain configurations. This upgrade from the previous model’s 100 Mbps port reduces latency and ensures smoother 4K capture and ISO mounting operations across a local area network.

For environments where wired access is unavailable, Sipeed also offers Wi-Fi 6 variants that include built-in wireless support, allowing users to connect through a temporary access point and configure the device from a phone or laptop. Initial setup is handled through DHCP, displaying the assigned IP address directly on the front LCD screen. From there, users can access the web interface by entering the device’s IP address in a browser such as Chrome, with HTTPS enabled by default through a self-signed certificate.

For secure remote administration, the NanoKVM Pro includes native support for Tailscale, enabling encrypted VPN-style access across different networks without manual port forwarding. Once linked to a Tailscale account, the unit automatically joins the same virtual LAN as other connected devices, simplifying access to systems behind firewalls or NAT routers. This makes it suitable for home users who need unattended access to remote PCs or small business administrators managing distributed systems.

The device also supports USB-NCM network connections for direct link setups, as well as traditional SSH sessions for users who prefer command-line management. Because the underlying operating system is based on Ubuntu, it can also host additional networking utilities such as ZeroTier or Cloudflare Tunnels, giving users a range of choices for secure remote links depending on their existing infrastructure.

The NanoKVM Pro also supports HDMI loop-through, allowing users to connect both the target computer and a local display simultaneously. The input captures up to 4K at 30 frames per second, while the output can pass through up to 4K at 60 frames per second, depending on the connected monitor and signal mode. This dual-mode setup enables simultaneous viewing and control without interrupting the host system’s display, which is particularly useful for remote diagnostics or shared monitoring environments. In practice, the captured video stream can be viewed in near real time, with local testing showing roughly three frames of latency difference on a gigabit network connection. Combined with audio capture and bidirectional USB-HID control, the NanoKVM Pro provides a complete interface for headless or offsite system management.

NanoKVM Pro KVM Review – Internal Hardware

Internally, the NanoKVM Pro is based on the AX630C processor, a dual-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC operating at 1.2 GHz. This represents a significant step up from the previous NanoKVM’s single-core RISC-V SG2002 processor, which struggled with multitasking and heavier video capture workloads. The new chip enables both 4K video input and real-time encoding in H.264 or H.265, as well as MJPEG for lower-latency streaming. It is paired with 1 GB of LPDDR4X memory and 32 GB of onboard eMMC storage, providing a notable improvement in performance and responsiveness when handling ISO uploads, live video feeds, or concurrent network sessions. In operation, CPU utilization typically sits around 25 to 35 percent during local access, rising to 50 to 60 percent when performing 4K capture or running AI-assisted functions.

Thermal management relies entirely on the metal enclosure acting as a passive heatsink. The system consumes roughly 3 to 4 watts at idle and up to 7 watts when AI processing or 4K capture is active. During extended use, surface temperatures can reach the mid-50 °C range, while internal readings may approach 70 °C under continuous workloads. Despite this, thermal throttling has not been observed in regular use, provided the device is placed on a conductive or ventilated surface. Users operating in warmer environments can improve dissipation by resting it on a metallic case or rack shelf, as the aluminum body is designed to transfer heat evenly across its underside. The device remains silent throughout, as no active fan is used.

Internally accessible interfaces add to its adaptability. Two USB-C ports handle power and human interface device connections, while a microSD slot offers external storage expansion or alternate firmware booting. A small 0.1 mm header provides access to two RS-232 serial ports, allowing direct console communication with servers, switches, or other serial-based equipment. This makes the NanoKVM Pro suitable not only for managing desktop systems but also for integrating with embedded or industrial hardware that lacks graphical interfaces.

Combined with the ATX breakout board for power management and the option to use the unit’s LCD as a miniature USB secondary display, these features extend its application well beyond that of a standard KVM switch.

NanoKVM Pro KVM Review – Software and Services

The NanoKVM Pro runs on a customized Linux environment built around the open-source PiKVM framework, allowing users to operate within Sipeed’s own NanoKVM interface or switch to a full PiKVM installation through the system menu. The preinstalled NanoKVM environment provides a more streamlined interface tailored to less experienced users, offering web-based management with HTTPS, user authentication, and direct BIOS-level control of connected systems. It supports remote mounting of ISO images, firmware updates, and automated scripts, all handled through an integrated file manager accessible via browser. The software operates entirely locally by default, without mandatory cloud connections, which is a notable distinction compared with many modern remote-access appliances that rely on vendor relay servers.

Once configured, users can log in through a web browser using the device’s IP address, with the default credentials set to “admin” for both username and password. The interface prompts password change on first login and provides granular control over network settings, storage, user accounts, and ATX power functions. Most settings can be modified directly through the web GUI without command-line access, although advanced users can enable SSH for deeper configuration or script automation. Firmware updates are managed via the same interface, with an option to enable preview builds for early access to experimental features such as H.265 encoding or AI integrations. The NanoKVM Pro also includes support for WebSSH, allowing browser-based terminal access to the device itself or to the connected host.

One of the most distinctive aspects of the NanoKVM Pro is its front-panel software ecosystem. The 1.47-inch touchscreen runs its own UI layer with interactive menus, swipes, and rotary input for navigation. It displays real-time system metrics such as CPU load, IP address, and network status, and can also serve as a live HDMI preview display. Beyond these default utilities, users can install small Python-based applications that render custom data on the screen. Three example apps—“coin,” “conway,” and “hello”—are included to demonstrate this feature, and advanced users can upload their own code to the /userapp directory to display statistics, weather, or system messages. Through this approach, the NanoKVM Pro acts not just as a control interface but as a miniature programmable display for local or rack-mounted setups.

Remote management services are another major focus. Tailscale is preinstalled, providing quick setup for secure, encrypted remote sessions without the need for static IP addresses or manual port forwarding. For users preferring other approaches, the device’s Ubuntu base supports additional VPN tools such as ZeroTier, WireGuard, or Cloudflare Tunnels, which can be manually installed through apt. This flexibility ensures compatibility with existing enterprise or homelab networks. The system also includes Wake-on-LAN, remote reboot, and full ATX control options, allowing users to perform power cycling or forced shutdowns directly through the web interface. The integration of these features means the NanoKVM Pro functions as an accessible alternative to server-grade remote management tools, at a fraction of their cost and complexity.

Finally, Sipeed has begun introducing experimental AI-driven functions in its firmware. These include smart assistant options that use basic optical character recognition (OCR) and contextual automation to simplify KVM operations such as copying text from the remote screen or assisting with troubleshooting prompts. Although early and limited in scope, the AI feature demonstrates the company’s effort to integrate local intelligence without relying on external cloud processing. This is complemented by the open-source nature of the platform, where both NanoKVM and PiKVM firmware images are publicly available for inspection and customization. Users can adapt the system to their own needs, extending its functionality through community scripts or integrating it into larger automation frameworks for testing, monitoring, or remote maintenance tasks.

NanoKVM Pro KVM Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The NanoKVM Pro marks a substantial improvement over its predecessor, combining more capable ARM hardware with higher capture quality, local storage, and multiple remote-access options. It bridges the gap between budget IP-KVMs and more professional management tools, delivering features like ATX control, HDMI loop-out, Tailscale connectivity, and a programmable touchscreen interface within a single, compact unit. The open-source base allows users to adapt it for highly specific workflows, whether for homelab management, small business system maintenance, or integration into test benches and automation setups. In day-to-day operation, latency and video performance remain strong over gigabit connections, with the interface proving responsive and stable. While early firmware versions lacked some advertised features such as full 4K45 capture and H.265 encoding, updates have continued to expand the system’s capabilities over time.

As a whole, the NanoKVM Pro is best understood as an evolving platform rather than a fixed appliance. Its combination of hardware versatility and accessible software design positions it as one of the more flexible low-cost KVM options available, even if certain elements, such as the dial build quality and early AI features, feel unfinished. For users seeking an independent, locally managed solution for BIOS-level control and remote diagnostics without vendor lock-in, it represents one of the strongest value offerings in its class.

Sipeed NanoKVM Pro on AliExpress	Sipeed NanoKVM Pro on Amazon

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...NanoKVM and it's 'Secret' MicrNanoKVM (Original) and it's 'SNanoKVM Pro KVM Review - A WHOGL.iNet Comet Pro Review - The Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN Reveal Two New 4-Bay NAS – The DXP4800 Pro and DXP4800S

UGREEN DXP4800S NAS Specifications

The DXP4800S is seemingly positioned as an updated variant of the original DXP4800, retaining the same core hardware layout while adopting Intel’s newer N150 processor and faster DDR5 memory. The shift to the N150 provides a modest frequency increase over the N100 but maintains identical core count, thread count and power behaviour. Memory remains user accessible through a single slot, with support for up to 16GB. The rest of the internal structure is unchanged, including four SATA bays, two NVMe slots and the same Gen three by one PCIe wiring. The system is intended as a compact x86 home server with improved AI-assisted photo indexing and modest efficiency gains over the standard model.

Externally, the device keeps the original USB layout, HDMI output and 2.5GbE gigabit LAN. The SD card reader remains SD 3.0 and the flash storage stays at 32GB. The overall focus of this model is small refinements rather than a re-engineered platform. Users familiar with the DXP4800 will find the same physical design and the same expandability, but with slightly higher supported memory frequency and a newer entry class processor that aligns with Intel’s Twin Lake manufacturing cycle.

UGREEN DXP4800 Pro NAS Specifications

The DXP4800 Pro introduces more substantial hardware changes than the S variant. It replaces the Pentium Gold processor found in the DXP4800 Plus with the Intel Core i3-1315U, which provides additional cores, higher thread count and improved frequency. This positions the Pro as the most capable four bay x86 model in UGREEN’s lineup. The system also upgrades its SD card reader to SD 4.0 and increases maximum supported memory to 96GB through two DDR5 slots. Internal storage layout remains unchanged, with four SATA drive bays and two NVMe slots, both fully accessible without modifying the chassis. Connectivity mirrors the Plus model by retaining 1x 10GbE and 1x 2.5GbE USB connectivity remains a mix of Gen two front ports and a Gen one rear port. HDMI output continues to support 4K at 60Hz. These choices maintain consistency with the previous model and allow the CPU upgrade to be the primary differentiator rather than a broader redesign of the platform.

UGREEN DXP4800S vs DXP4800 NAS Specifications

The DXP4800S is a small technical update to the original DXP4800. Both systems use the same chassis, the same storage layout and the same port arrangement, including four SATA bays, two NVMe slots, a single 2.5GbE network port and the same USB configuration. The primary distinction is the CPU. The older DXP4800 uses the Intel N100, while the DXP4800S switches to the Intel N150, which increases maximum frequency but retains the same four core and four thread structure. Memory configuration also remains largely the same but the S model supports up to 5600MHz DDR5 rather than 4800MHz. All other hardware behaviour is unchanged. Both systems include 32GB of onboard flash, HDMI with 4K60 output and an SD 3.0 card reader. Drive support continues to allow up to 30TB per SATA bay and up to 8TB per NVMe slot. Because of these similarities, the DXP4800S functions as a direct incremental revision of the DXP4800 rather than a new performance tier, and the difference in everyday workloads will be minimal outside of small frequency gains.

Component	DXP4800	DXP4800S
Processor	Intel N100, 4 cores and 4 threads, up to 3.4GHz	Intel N150, 4 cores and 4 threads, up to 3.6GHz
Architecture	x86, Intel 7	x86, Intel 7
Memory	8GB DDR5, 1 slot, up to 16GB, 4800MHz	8GB DDR5, 1 slot, up to 16GB, 5600MHz
SATA Bays	4, supports 2.5 inch and 3.5 inch drives	4, supports 2.5 inch and 3.5 inch drives
NVMe Slots	2 x M.2 NVMe 2280, up to 8TB each	2 x M.2 NVMe 2280, up to 8TB each
Flash Storage	32GB	32GB
Network	1 x 2.5GbE	1 x 2.5GbE
USB	Front USB 3.2 Gen2 Type A and Type C, rear USB 3.2 Gen1	Same ports and speeds
USB2	2 rear ports	2 rear ports
SD Reader	SD 3.0	SD 3.0
HDMI	4K60	4K60

UGREEN DXP4800 Pro vs DXP4800 Plus NAS Specifications

The DXP4800 Pro introduces a more significant hardware step forward compared with the DXP4800 Plus. The Plus model uses the Intel Pentium Gold 8505, while the Pro replaces it with the Intel Core i3 1315U which increases the number of cores, improves thread count and provides higher boost frequencies. Memory capacity also expands from a maximum of 64GB on the Plus to 96GB on the Pro, and the Pro continues to use DDR5 at 5600MHz as its upper supported speed. Flash storage capacity increases from 128GB on the Plus to the same 128GB on the Pro, and internal drive support remains unchanged with four SATA bays and two NVMe slots. Both units maintain the same network arrangement with one 10GbE port and one 2.5GbE port. USB connectivity also remains the same with front USB 3.2 Gen2 Type A and Type C ports and a rear USB 3.2 Gen1 port supplemented by two USB2 ports. The one external difference is the SD card reader which moves from SD 3.0 on the Plus to SD 4.0 on the Pro. The rest of the platform remains identical which makes the CPU, memory ceiling and SD reader the factors that separate the two models.

Component	DXP4800 Plus	DXP4800 Pro
Processor	Intel Pentium Gold 8505, 5 cores and 6 threads, up to 4.4GHz	Intel Core i3 1315U, 6 cores and 8 threads, up to 4.5GHz
Architecture	x86, Intel 7	x86, Intel 7
Memory	8GB DDR5, 2 slots, up to 64GB, 4800MHz	8GB DDR5, 2 slots, up to 96GB, 5600MHz
SATA Bays	4, supports 2.5 inch and 3.5 inch drives	4, supports 2.5 inch and 3.5 inch drives
NVMe Slots	2 x M.2 NVMe 2280, up to 8TB each	2 x M.2 NVMe 2280, up to 8TB each
Flash Storage	128GB	128GB
Network	1 x 10GbE and 1 x 2.5GbE	1 x 10GbE and 1 x 2.5GbE
USB	Front USB 3.2 Gen2 Type A and Type C, rear USB 3.2 Gen1	Same ports and speeds
USB2	2 rear ports	2 rear ports
SD Reader	SD 3.0	SD 4.0
HDMI	4K60	4K60

UGREEN DXP4800 Pro and DXP4800S NAS Release and Price

Both the DXP4800 Pro and DXP4800S are currently listed only in selected Asian regions, with no confirmed schedules for North America, Europe or Australia. Early pricing shows the DXP4800S positioned above the original DXP4800 and the DXP4800 Pro positioned above the DXP4800 Plus, reflecting the newer processors and higher memory ceilings. Regional pricing is based on local currency and tax structures, and the values shown in early listings cannot be treated as indicators of final western pricing. Availability outside these regions is expected to depend on component inventory and on UGREEN’s wider rollout plans, and any potential release is unlikely before early 2026.

Interested in buying a UGREEN NAS, and want to support what me and Ed do at NASCompares easily? Use the links below and we get a small commission (and costs you nothing extra) and helps us  keep doing what we do!

UGREEN DH4300 NAS	UGREEN DH4300 NAS	UGREEN DH4300 NAS

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Jonsbo N6 NAS Case ReviewBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBest Low-Cost / Value NAS of tBest Cheap NAS of 2025Best 4/5/6 Bay NAS of 2025Best PLEX or Jellyfin NAS of 2The Best NAS of the Year - 202Best NAS of the Year 20255 Mistakes New NAS Buyers ALWA Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Share Your Thoughts on a Perfect NAS – Best Feedback Wins One of x200 Beelink ME Mini NAS’

Why This Matters to the NAS Industry?

Beelink’s decision to crowdsource input for its upcoming NAS models reflects a wider shift in how smaller hardware manufacturers are shaping their design and development pipelines. Instead of relying solely on internal research or reseller feedback, Beelink is turning directly to the end users who actively deploy and experiment with NAS systems in home labs, media servers, and small business setups. This approach allows the company to collect detailed, practical insights on what real-world users value most, such as the balance between performance and noise, ease of access for upgrades, power efficiency, and thermal control. In context, this campaign follows Beelink’s rapid emergence as a new competitor in the DIY NAS space. The ME Mini gained traction in 2025 precisely because it delivered features that users had long requested from other compact NAS vendors—such as M.2-only storage layouts, 2.5GbE networking, and an affordable price point around the $200 mark. Now, by seeking public feedback, Beelink appears to be validating the direction of its upcoming models like the ME Pro, ME Pro X, and ME Pro Max, which are expected to feature higher networking speeds, larger capacity support, and improved cooling systems.

The company’s move also suggests it is actively testing which hardware configurations resonate most with a global user base that is increasingly focused on compact, high-throughput NAS systems rather than proprietary ecosystems. Gathering opinions on airflow, dust resistance, and modular design is likely to influence how future Beelink devices are built, potentially leading to products that better address the maintenance challenges of small enclosures and the demand for quieter yet more powerful systems. For a brand still new to network storage, this kind of direct engagement could accelerate its path toward becoming a recognised name in the wider NAS market.

Remember. Entering a comment in this article will not be picked up by Beelink (probably), so if you want to participate in this, head over to the relavent post via the links below:

FACEBOOK LINK

TWITTER / X LINK

YOUTUBE SOCIAL POST LINK

INSTAGRAM POST LINK

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Beelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME Beelink Me Pro, S, X and MAX, Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink ME Mini NAS Review - aBeelink ME Mini NAS ReviewBeelink Android TV box or NAS? Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Is RAID 5 or RAID 6 Best For You and Your NAS?

When setting up a NAS, one of the most important and long-lasting decisions you’ll make is choosing the right RAID level. This choice directly impacts how much protection you have against drive failures, how much usable storage space you retain, and how long rebuilds will take when things go wrong. Among the most debated options are RAID 5 and RAID 6, both of which use parity for data protection but differ in how much risk they can tolerate. RAID 5 offers single-drive failure protection with better capacity efficiency, while RAID 6 provides dual-drive fault tolerance at the cost of more storage overhead and longer rebuild times. It’s worth noting that although you can graduate a RAID 5 into a RAID 6 later if your needs change, this is a slow and resource-heavy process. On the other hand, RAID 6 cannot be reversed back into RAID 5, so it’s a decision that requires careful planning from the outset. The balance of speed, safety, capacity, and risk tolerance will determine which configuration is truly best for your setup.

IMPORTANT – It is essential to understand that RAID, whether RAID 5 or RAID 6, should never be considered a true backup solution. RAID protects against drive failures, but it cannot safeguard you from accidental deletion, malware, hardware faults beyond the disks, or disasters like fire and theft.

The TL;DR Short Answer – Over-Simplified, but….

• Under 8 Bays = RAID 5
• 8 Bays or Over = RAID 5, or RAID 6 with Bigger HDDs
• 12 Bays or Over = RAID 6

If you are looking for simplicity, RAID 5 will usually give you the best balance of speed, storage efficiency, and cost, but it comes with higher risk. RAID 6 is slower to rebuild, consumes more usable capacity, and involves heavier parity calculations, but it provides a much stronger safety net against drive failures. For smaller arrays with modest drive sizes, RAID 5 can be entirely sufficient, especially when paired with reliable backups. However, as drive capacities continue to grow and rebuild times stretch into days, RAID 6 becomes more attractive because it can withstand the failure of two drives without losing the array. In essence, RAID 5 is about maximizing space and performance with a moderate level of safety, while RAID 6 is about maximizing resilience and peace of mind at the expense of capacity and speed. Choosing between them comes down to how valuable your data is, how large your drives are, and how much risk you are willing to tolerate during rebuild windows.

For systems with fewer than 8 bays, RAID 5 will usually be sufficient unless you are running especially large-capacity drives or operating at a business scale where data loss cannot be tolerated. Once you reach 8 bays or higher, RAID 6 should be seriously considered, as the chances of a second drive failing during a rebuild increase along with the overall storage pool size and the scale of potential loss. At 12 bays and beyond, RAID 6 is effectively mandatory, as relying on RAID 5 at that scale means gambling with too many points of failure and too much at stake if something goes wrong.

RAID 5 vs RAID 6 – Build Time and RAID Recovery Time

The initial creation of a RAID array, sometimes called synchronization or initialization, is one of the first differences you’ll notice between RAID 5 and RAID 6. A RAID 5 setup generally completes its initial build faster because it only has to calculate and assign a single parity block across the drives. RAID 6, by contrast, has to generate and distribute two independent parity values on every stripe, which increases the workload on the system. This means that on a fresh setup, RAID 6 will take longer to complete the synchronization process before the array is fully operational, though this is usually a one-time inconvenience at the beginning of deployment. For home and small office setups, this extra build time might not matter too much, but in larger systems with many terabytes of data, it can mean several hours or even days of extra initialization work compared with RAID 5.

The difference becomes more significant when a drive fails and a rebuild is needed. In RAID 5, the system only needs to reconstruct the missing data using the surviving disks and a single parity calculation, which usually makes recovery noticeably faster. RAID 6, however, must perform double parity calculations and restore both sets of parity information onto the replacement drive, extending the recovery window. On large modern HDDs where rebuilds can take dozens of hours, or sometimes multiple days, this extra time becomes a major factor. The trade-off is that RAID 6 offers much stronger resilience while this rebuild is in progress, because the system can continue to operate and survive even if another disk fails during the process. In other words, RAID 5 rebuilds faster but carries more risk, while RAID 6 rebuilds slower but provides a crucial safety margin during the vulnerable degraded state.

Here is a recent video (using the UniFi server platform) that talks about RAID 5/6 vs RAID 10 build times and parity from 777 or 404:

RAID 5 vs RAID 6 – Protection and Vulnerability

The most important factor when comparing RAID 5 and RAID 6 is how well they protect data when drives fail. RAID 5 uses single parity, meaning the system can survive one drive failure without losing data. However, if a second drive fails during the rebuild, the entire array is lost. RAID 6 adds dual parity, which allows the system to tolerate the loss of two drives simultaneously. This extra layer of protection is especially valuable during rebuild windows, which can take many hours or days on modern high-capacity HDDs. In practice, RAID 6 dramatically reduces the risk of catastrophic data loss, at the expense of slower rebuilds and less usable capacity. A subtle but often overlooked vulnerability is the issue of batch manufacturing. Many users buy multiple drives at once, often from the same supplier, meaning the disks may come from the same production batch. If there was a hidden flaw introduced during manufacturing, it is possible that more than one disk could develop problems around the same time. With RAID 5, this creates a dangerous scenario: a second disk failure during a rebuild results in complete data loss. RAID 6 provides a safety margin against these correlated failures by protecting the array even if two drives fail close together in time. Another major risk comes from unrecoverable read errors (UREs) that can occur during rebuilds. Because every sector of every remaining drive must be read to restore the lost disk, the chance of encountering a read error rises significantly with larger drives. In RAID 5, a single URE during rebuild can corrupt the recovery process, whereas RAID 6 has an additional layer of parity to compensate, making it much more reliable during rebuilds. This is especially important in arrays of 8 or more drives, where the probability of encountering at least one problematic sector grows. For users with large arrays or very high-capacity drives, RAID 6’s extra fault tolerance is the difference between a successful rebuild and complete data loss.

RAID 5 vs RAID 6 – Capacity and Price per TB

One of the clearest differences between RAID 5 and RAID 6 lies in how much usable capacity you end up with. RAID 5 only sacrifices the equivalent of a single drive’s worth of storage to parity, which makes it the more space-efficient option. In a six-bay system with 10TB drives, RAID 5 would deliver 50TB of usable storage, while RAID 6 would only provide 40TB. That 10TB difference can be substantial when you are working with large libraries of data such as media collections, surveillance archives, or backups. For users trying to maximize every terabyte of their investment, RAID 5 makes the most efficient use of available space. However, RAID 6’s higher storage overhead translates directly into a higher effective cost per terabyte. Since two drives are always reserved for parity, the total usable space is reduced, and the price you pay for storage per TB goes up. For small home users, this may feel like wasted potential, but the trade-off is the additional layer of fault tolerance. In environments where the cost of downtime or data loss far outweighs the cost of an extra disk, RAID 6 provides stronger long-term value despite the higher price per terabyte. Ultimately, the decision comes down to whether you are more concerned with minimizing cost and maximizing space, or ensuring redundancy and peace of mind.

RAID 6 vs RAID 5 + Hot Spare Drive?

Some users prefer to run RAID 5 with a dedicated hot spare drive rather than choosing RAID 6 outright. In this setup, a single extra disk sits idle until one of the active drives fails, at which point the spare is automatically used for the rebuild. This reduces the amount of time the array spends in a degraded and vulnerable state, since the rebuild begins immediately without waiting for a replacement disk to be manually installed. While this approach still leaves you with only single-drive fault tolerance, it can feel like a middle ground between RAID 5 and RAID 6. In terms of capacity, RAID 5 with a hot spare sacrifices the same amount of usable space as RAID 6, but it does not provide the same dual-drive protection. For arrays of six to eight drives, this compromise can make sense if you prioritize capacity efficiency and faster automated recovery, but once you move into larger-scale storage systems, RAID 6 remains the safer and more resilient option.

RAID 5 vs RAID 6 – Conclusion and Verdict

When choosing between RAID 5 and RAID 6, the decision comes down to weighing efficiency against resilience. RAID 5 is faster to rebuild, provides more usable storage, and costs less per terabyte, which makes it well suited to smaller NAS setups or users who prioritize capacity and speed. RAID 6, on the other hand, offers stronger protection against drive failures, making it far more reliable for larger arrays and higher-capacity drives where rebuild times are long and risks multiply. The general consensus is that RAID 5 can still be a smart choice for arrays under eight bays, but RAID 6 becomes the clear recommendation for systems of eight drives or more, and an essential requirement at twelve drives and beyond. Above all else, it is critical to remember that RAID is not a backup. Neither RAID 5 nor RAID 6 will protect you against accidental deletion, ransomware, hardware faults beyond the disks, or disasters such as fire or theft. RAID is a safety net that improves availability, but it must always be paired with a proper backup strategy if your data truly matters.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Should You Use RAID 5 or RAID Terramaster Release TRAID+, AnRAID 0 vs RAID 5 vs RAID 6 - WWD Red Pro 22TB and Synology NWD Red Pro 22TB and QNAP NAS 1Synology DS1522+ NAS + WD Red A Buyers Guide to Thunderbolt Adding a 4th drive to WD 4-bayThe Best 6-Bay or RAID 6 NAS -Drivestor 4 NAS Drive Review - Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Beelink Me Pro, S, X and MAX, 9x M.2, 10GbE, 5GbE NAS – NEW DIY NAS!

Note – Original Beelink ME Mini from June ’25. Written Review HERE and YouTube Video Review HERE

It has been around a year since Beelink made a major impact in the NAS sector with their $200+ 6-bay flash-based system, the Beelink ME Mini. Although the company already had a strong reputation in the Mini PC space, the ME Mini was their first dedicated NAS, and it ticked all the boxes for many users in terms of price, size, efficiency, performance, and footprint. Fast forward to Q4 2025, and I visited Beelink’s headquarters in Shenzhen, China, to learn more about their “Phase 2” NAS strategy and their expansion into a broader DIY-oriented lineup. This new wave includes several systems under the ME family, designed to remain compact and power-efficient while improving thermal management and scalability. The new range introduces the Beelink ME S, ME X, and ME Max, alongside an upgraded ME Mini Pro that refines the original platform. These systems increase NVMe capacity, introduce 3.5-inch SATA support, and feature a wider range of Intel and AMD processors.

Beelink’s roadmap spans the next 12 months, with initial launches planned for late Q4 2025 and early Q1 2026. It is clear that the company has not been idle since the success of the first ME Mini. The DIY NAS market is growing rapidly, with many users seeking OS-free prebuilt systems that balance simplicity and performance. Since Beelink Mini PCs are already popular among Proxmox and self-hosting enthusiasts, this transition into storage-focused systems could be exactly what those users have been waiting for.

Important 1: Beelink did not fund or sponsor my visit to their headquarters. They did not pay for travel or accommodation, and they have no editorial control over this article or its accompanying video.

Hardware Specifications of the Beelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME X and ME Max

The following information is based on a two-hour meeting with Beelink’s founder, product manager, and several engineers at the Shenzhen office, supported by translators. Notes were cross-checked against early prototype visuals and chassis designs. Some translation inaccuracies may exist, but the core technical details are accurate. It is especially notable how much performance Beelink has achieved from Intel’s N150 (Twin Lake) platform and the planned AMD FP8-series processors.

Details about the 2-bay and 4-bay systems were drawn from early 3D models and mock-up shells shared during the meeting.

Important 2: These specifications refer to devices still in development and undergoing testing, so some aspects may change before launch.

Beelink ME Mini Gen 2

• 6x M.2 NVMe SSD slots (Gen 3×1, 2280 length)

• Intel N150 CPU (4 cores, 4 threads, x86 architecture)

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots (upgrade from fixed on-board memory)

• Enhanced heat pipe cooling system

• USB Type-A and Type-C ports (10 Gb/s)

• Dual 5 GbE network ports (upgrade from dual 2.5 GbE)

• Internal PSU retained

• TDP increased from 15 W to 25 W

• eMMC storage removed due to minimal user adoption

Beelink ME Mini 9 Bay Upgrade

• 9x M.2 NVMe SSD slots (speed TBC, likely Gen 3×1, though bandwidth may be tight on the N150)

• Choice of Intel N150 or AMD FP8-series CPU

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots

• New 120 W PSU, relocated horizontally (replacing the vertical design in the original ME Mini)

• Denser central heat sink assembly (possible translation ambiguity here)

• 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE connectivity (notable if achieved alongside nine SSDs on this platform) – TBC

Beelink ME Pro

• Desktop form factor with 2 or 4 x 3.5-inch SATA bays

• Intel N-series CPU

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots

• 2–4 x M.2 NVMe 2280 SSD slots (likely CPU-dependent)

• 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE network ports

• Removable base tray for simplified drive access and maintenance

• Compact metal external chassis

Beelink ME Pro S

• Desktop form factor with 2 or 4 x 3.5-inch SATA bays

• Intel 12th/13th/14th/15th Gen CPU

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots

• 2–4 x M.2 NVMe 2280 SSD slots (likely CPU-dependent)

• 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE network ports

• Removable base tray for simplified drive access and maintenance

• Compact metal external chassis

Beelink ME Pro X

• Desktop form factor with 2 or 4 x 3.5-inch SATA bays

• Intel N150 or AMD FP8-series CPU

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots

• 2–4 x M.2 NVMe 2280 SSD slots (likely CPU-dependent)

• 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE network ports

• Removable base tray for simplified drive access and maintenance

• Compact metal external chassis

Beelink ME Max (AI-Ready NAS)

• AMD Ryzen  AI Max 395 CPU

• Storage configuration, network layout, and full specifications still TBC

Will the New Beelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME X or ME Max Include Turnkey NAS Software?

This remains unconfirmed. The current ME Mini includes Ubuntu installed on a small eMMC partition, but this will be removed in the new systems. Beelink is evaluating integration of Feiniu/fnOS, a semi-open-source NAS operating system from China, though this would likely only be pre-installed on configurations that ship with drives. Users would still have the freedom to install TrueNAS, Unraid, ZimaOS, or OpenMediaVault. The software decision is not finalized yet.

Why You Should Care About the Beelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME X and ME Max

Beelink surprised the NAS industry in early 2025 with the ME Mini, which outperformed other compact NVMe NAS units despite being their first attempt at this market. It was roughly 60 percent cheaper than the Asustor Flashstor 6, offered more storage bays and lower temperatures than the GMKtec G9 NucBox, and provided stronger base specifications than the Terramaster D8, all while undercutting UGREEN’s offerings. While Beelink is not yet in the same league as Synology or QNAP, their rapid iteration and innovative hardware design suggest they could become a key player in compact flash-based storage solutions through 2026.

Interested in Buying a Beelink NAS or Mini PC? Support the work we do here at NASCompares, by using the links below.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Beelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink NAS - Describe Your PeBeelink Me Pro, S, X and MAX, Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink ME Mini NAS Review - aBeelink ME Mini NAS ReviewBeelink Android TV box or NAS? Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Can We Forgive and Forget The Synology HDD Compatibility Flip Flop?

Synology’s recent reversal on hard drive compatibility has reopened a larger debate about whether its NAS systems remain a trustworthy and sensible choice for both new buyers and long-term users. Throughout most of 2025, the company faced sustained criticism after enforcing strict drive verification checks that prevented users from installing or operating third-party HDDs and SSDs from major brands like Seagate and Western Digital. This policy, applied to the new Plus-series NAS models such as the DS925+, DS1525+, and DS1825+, effectively forced customers to purchase Synology’s own branded media or risk an unusable system. For a company long regarded as the industry standard for dependable and user-friendly storage solutions, the move appeared both unexpected and self-defeating. Although Synology later justified the decision as a way to ensure system stability and reliability, the backlash was immediate and global, with declining sales and widespread frustration among users who saw the change as a form of corporate overreach. Now, with the brand having confirmed a full rollback through the DSM 7.3 update—restoring support for non-Synology drives and removing prior warning prompts—the discussion has shifted. While the reversal is seen as a victory for users, it also highlights how fragile consumer confidence has become, and how a single policy misstep can redefine a company’s relationship with its community.

Below, my original video after the change by Synology after 6 months of their strict HDD media stance:

What Did Synology Do Wrong?

Synology’s critical mistake was implementing a restrictive hardware policy that undermined one of its key historical strengths: flexibility. For years, the company had built its reputation on offering an intuitive software platform, DSM, that ran on a wide variety of hardware configurations. By deciding to enforce hard drive compatibility restrictions in the 2025 generation of Plus-series NAS systems, Synology effectively turned once-open devices into closed platforms. The systems refused to initialise DSM or create storage pools when non-Synology drives were detected, and even when users managed to proceed, the interface was flooded with persistent warnings labelling third-party media as “unverified” or “at risk.” This move frustrated not only home users who wanted affordable upgrade options, but also small businesses that relied on Synology NAS for their daily operations. It created unnecessary technical and financial barriers at a time when alternative NAS vendors were offering greater compatibility and value. The brand’s own messaging made the situation worse: early statements focused on “system integrity” and “firmware optimisation” but failed to acknowledge that the change mainly benefited Synology’s hardware sales rather than the end user.

The second major error lay in how the company managed the fallout. Synology’s communication strategy throughout the controversy was inconsistent, fragmented, and in some regions almost non-existent. Different regional branches released conflicting press materials, with some hinting that compatibility with Seagate and Western Digital drives would soon return, while others maintained silence. No clear timeline or explanation was given for the testing process or the reasoning behind such aggressive enforcement. As a result, long-standing partners and distributors were left unsure of how to address customer concerns. Meanwhile, the online community—particularly on Reddit, NAS forums, and YouTube—quickly filled the information vacuum, fuelling frustration and speculation. Instead of clarifying the company’s intentions, Synology appeared defensive and disengaged, disabling comments on some of its own videos and refusing to directly address mounting criticism. This combination of restrictive policy and poor communication not only hurt its reputation but also suggested a growing disconnect between the brand’s leadership and its user base.

Why Are Users Mad at Synology?

Many users felt betrayed by Synology’s actions because the company had long marketed itself as the reliable, user-first alternative to more complex or DIY storage solutions. For years, Synology’s systems were praised for their openness—allowing customers to build their NAS setups using widely available components from trusted brands like Seagate, WD, and Toshiba. The introduction of hard drive restrictions in 2025 fundamentally altered that relationship. Suddenly, the same users who had invested heavily in Synology’s ecosystem found themselves unable to upgrade, expand, or even install DSM without purchasing the brand’s own drives, which were often rebranded versions of existing enterprise models sold at a premium. The move was viewed as a breach of trust, and the lack of transparency surrounding it only made things worse. Many saw it as an attempt to create a closed ecosystem that prioritised recurring hardware profits over customer freedom. This frustration was compounded by the timing—during a period when users were already facing higher hardware costs and tighter IT budgets, making Synology’s restrictive approach feel especially tone-deaf.

The Alerts and ‘Warnings’ that users have gotten used to up tll now (i.e pre DSM 7.3 roll out):

Another major source of anger came from how the policy rollout created confusion and inconsistency across Synology’s product lineup. While the Plus-series desktop NAS models received the strictest restrictions, larger RackStation and XS-series devices remained unaffected, creating the impression that Synology viewed its home and small-business customers as expendable. Even after announcing the rollback with DSM 7.3, many users noted that the company’s official compatibility lists still failed to mention Seagate or WD drives, and that public communication about the change was minimal. For those outside tech circles, this meant that the situation looked unchanged—product pages still implied that only Synology drives were supported, and many older negative reviews remained visible online. As a result, even with the restrictions now lifted, the perception of Synology as a brand willing to prioritise profit over user loyalty persists. The long delay in addressing community backlash, combined with inconsistent messaging, has left many customers sceptical that this U-turn represents a genuine shift rather than damage control.

What Did Synology Do to Fix This?

Synology’s eventual fix came in the form of a full policy reversal integrated into DSM 7.3, the company’s next major software update. With this version, users of the 2025 generation of Plus-series NAS devices—including models such as the DS925+, DS1525+, and DS1825+—regained the ability to freely use third-party hard drives and SSDs. The update removed not only the installation barriers but also the persistent “unverified drive” and “at risk” warnings that had previously appeared in Storage Manager. For most users, this restored full functionality, allowing them to initialise DSM, create and expand RAID arrays, use hot spares, and assign SSDs for caching without restrictions. The change essentially returned Synology’s systems to the state they were in before the controversial policy was introduced earlier in the year. The reversal applied primarily to desktop-class NAS systems rather than rackmount or XS-series models, suggesting that Synology wanted to restore goodwill among its core consumer and small-business audience first.

However, the way Synology implemented this reversal has drawn mixed responses. Instead of releasing a simple compatibility database update, which could have resolved the issue quickly, the company bundled the fix into a full DSM version upgrade. That meant users had to install an entirely new operating system build to regain third-party drive support, even if they were otherwise satisfied with their existing DSM 7.2 installations. For those managing multiple NAS units or enterprise environments, this created complications, especially since DSM 7.3 initially lacked a public beta and required careful validation before deployment.

The company also issued few direct statements about the rollback, opting instead for limited press communications that focused on “listening to customer feedback.” Despite the importance of the change, Synology’s product pages still make little mention of renewed Seagate and WD compatibility, leaving potential buyers to rely on external coverage or word of mouth. While the technical fix was effective, the manner of its rollout showed that Synology’s communication strategy remains cautious, reactive, and focused on damage limitation rather than proactive transparency.

What were/are the benefits of Buying Synology-branded Hard Drives and SSDs?

In parallel with the policy adjustments introduced in DSM 7.3, Synology has also begun expanding a series of benefits and incentives aimed at customers who purchase Synology NAS systems together with Synology-branded storage media. These initiatives are part of the company’s ongoing effort to strengthen its vertically integrated ecosystem, ensuring optimal performance and reliability when all components come from the same source. In selected markets, buyers who purchase Synology HAT, HAS, or SAT series drives on the same invoice as their NAS hardware now receive extended warranty coverage of up to five years, administered directly through authorized distributors and resellers. In addition, Synology has introduced an Express Replacement program, allowing for immediate drive swaps during the warranty period without waiting for the defective unit to be shipped and inspected, effectively mirroring the convenience of a premium RMA service. These benefits are available at no extra cost when drives are purchased through approved channels. The initiative is designed to make Synology’s validated ecosystem more appealing to businesses seeking predictable lifecycle management and faster recovery in the event of hardware failure, while also providing an incentive for users to standardize on Synology-branded components rather than mixing third-party storage.

Head over to Blackvoid HERE to read Luka’s great write-up on DSM 7.3 below:

Why Are Some Users Unconvinced?

Many long-time Synology owners remain sceptical because the company’s pattern of restrictive decision-making has not been limited to hard drives. Over the years, Synology has gradually tightened control over hardware support in other areas, such as M.2 NVMe SSD usage, network adapters, and GPU compatibility. Even though the recent rollback allows full use of third-party HDDs and SSDs in Plus-series models, the same freedom does not apply to NVMe storage. Users still cannot create storage pools or volumes on M.2 drives unless they are Synology-branded, which reinforces the perception that the company is only willing to compromise when it faces enough public pressure. Critics point out that while Synology deserves credit for reversing the hard drive restrictions, it has shown no similar flexibility in other parts of its ecosystem. This selective openness suggests a tactical move designed to repair short-term reputation damage rather than a genuine shift toward more open hardware policies. As a result, many users fear that future DSM updates could easily reintroduce similar restrictions under a different justification.

Another concern is that Synology has not done enough to communicate these changes clearly to new buyers. Even after the DSM 7.3 announcement, the company’s official compatibility lists for 2025 models still prioritise its own drives, with no explicit mention of Seagate or WD models being supported again. For first-time users who rely on these lists for purchasing decisions, there is no clear indication that the policy has changed.

This lack of transparency undermines confidence in Synology’s commitment to openness. Furthermore, the decision to tie the rollback to a major DSM update rather than a smaller patch raises worries that the company could use similar tactics in the future to control hardware functionality through software revisions. Many see the reversal as a necessary correction rather than an act of goodwill, and that distinction matters. Users may accept Synology’s reasoning for now, but the brand’s reputation for reliability has been replaced by a lingering doubt about whether it can be trusted to keep its platform open and user-focused.

Should You Trust Synology NAS Again?

Trusting Synology again depends largely on how much users value its software ecosystem compared to its corporate behaviour. The company’s DSM operating system remains one of the most advanced and stable NAS platforms available, offering a wide range of applications for backup, surveillance, multimedia, and virtualization that are unmatched by most competitors. For those who prioritise reliability, ease of use, and integration over raw hardware flexibility, Synology still provides a compelling product. The reintroduction of unrestricted hard drive support in DSM 7.3 restores much of the practical functionality that users lost earlier this year, and for many, that will be enough to justify purchasing a new NAS. From a technical standpoint, the Plus-series devices are still capable and efficient, with consistent performance, strong data protection features, and excellent long-term support. In short, the hardware remains solid, and the software continues to define Synology’s market dominance in turnkey storage solutions.

Below, references to the change in hard drive support policy are either absent in release notes or severely underplayed on the compatibility pages as of 3rd Nov 2025.

However, from a consumer trust perspective, caution is still warranted. The brand’s repeated pattern of restricting features, followed by later partial reversals, has left many wary that similar policies could return in future product generations. Even though DSM 7.3 represents a positive correction, Synology has not issued any long-term assurances that it will maintain this open stance. There is also concern about how much influence profit margins and proprietary hardware incentives continue to have over product decisions. For experienced users, the safest approach may be to treat Synology as a premium but increasingly closed ecosystem—one that delivers outstanding software at the cost of long-term flexibility. Whether it is “okay” to buy a Synology NAS now depends on priorities: if you value a polished interface and dependable system behaviour above everything else, Synology is still one of the best options available. But if transparency, open standards, and full hardware freedom matter more, then the company’s recent U-turn should be seen not as a full restoration of trust, but as a cautious and temporary concession to public pressure.

If/When you do wish to purchase a Synology NAS, please do use the links below in order to purchase your NAS. Doing so results in a small commission coming to me and Ed here at NASCompares, and it allows us to keep doing what we do here, and is the most frictionless and zero-cost way for you to support our articles, reviews, videos, guides, support systems and more.

Synology DS925+ NAS	Synology DS1525+ NAS	Synology DS1825+ NAS
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS925+ NAS	Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS1525+ NAS @ $799	Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS1825+ NAS @ $1149
heck B&H for the Synology DS925+ NAS	B&H for the Synology DS1525+ NAS @ $1149.99	B&H for the Synology DS1825+ NAS @ $1149.99

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Best Cheap NAS of 2025Best 4/5/6 Bay NAS of 2025Best PLEX or Jellyfin NAS of 2Best NAS of the Year 20255 Mistakes New NAS Buyers ALWA100 Reasons DIY NAS (TrueNAS, 100 Reasons Turnkey (Synology/Black Friday 2025 NAS Deals - Black Friday Deals on CPU+MothDIY NAS Mobo+CPU Combo Black F Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Review of the Sharge Disk Pro Mobile Hub and Docking Station

The Sharge Disk Pro is a compact external SSD and multifunction USB hub aimed at users who need additional high-speed storage and connectivity for their mobile or desktop devices. Measuring roughly the size of a credit card and just 11mm thick, it merges solid-state storage, data transfer, and video output within a single enclosure. The device is equipped with an integrated USB-C cable, a fan-assisted thermal system, and a magnetic mounting design that allows it to attach securely to compatible smartphones, handheld gaming consoles, or laptops. Available in 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB versions, it uses 162-layer 3D TLC NAND flash and supports sustained 10Gbps transfers via USB 3.2 Gen 2. The Disk Pro also includes active and automatic fan modes designed to regulate temperature during extended operation. Unlike a standard enclosure, it has no option for user-upgradeable storage, with Sharge citing the closed design as essential for cooling performance. The product is currently being crowdfunded through Kickstarter, with early pricing beginning at $189 for the 1TB model and scaling to $469 for the 4TB version, and retail availability expected after the campaign concludes.

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Quick Conclusion

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Design and Storage

The Sharge Disk Pro adopts a slim, rectangular chassis with a transparent, cyberpunk-style exterior typical of the brand’s product line. At just 11mm thick and weighing approximately 150g, it remains small enough to slip into a pocket or attach directly to the rear of a device via its magnetic backplate. Sharge provides several self-adhesive magnetic rings that enable mounting on laptops, smartphones, and handheld consoles, including MagSafe or Qi2-compatible models. This mounting flexibility is particularly useful when connecting the device to mobile systems with limited space or single-port connectivity, allowing it to remain flush with the device body during use rather than dangling on a cable.

Internally, the Disk Pro integrates TLC NAND flash storage that is permanently sealed within the casing. It comes in 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB configurations, but does not support user replacement or expansion. Sharge has stated that opening the casing would compromise the structural integrity of the fan-assisted cooling system, which directs airflow directly across the SSD and controller. While this closed design limits user flexibility, it contributes to improved durability and controlled thermals during sustained data operations, addressing a common weakness in other compact SSDs that tend to throttle under heavy load.

Externally, the unit uses an aluminium frame combined with a transparent plastic shell that reveals parts of its internal structure. The materials provide both aesthetic appeal and heat dissipation, with the aluminium core helping to channel heat away from the NAND and controller components. The integrated USB-C cable is short and reinforced, designed for use with laptops, tablets, and mobile phones without introducing unnecessary slack. Although the compactness is one of the Disk Pro’s strongest traits, it does come at the cost of expandability and limited repair potential due to the permanently sealed housing.

From a storage standpoint, Sharge’s choice of 162-layer 3D TLC NAND provides a balance of endurance and sustained performance, suitable for large data transfers, video capture, or use as external storage for gaming devices. Each model is preformatted for exFAT to ensure cross-platform compatibility between Windows, macOS, Android, and Linux systems. The inclusion of integrated power management also means the SSD can draw adequate power even when connected to low-output ports, with the fan and SSD operating efficiently under mobile conditions.

The Disk Pro’s overall form factor and integrated features place it closer to a high-performance portable hub than a simple external SSD. Its sealed construction, integrated active cooling, and additional connectivity are intended to reduce heat buildup, protect data integrity, and simplify on-the-go workflows. For professionals working with large 4K or 8K media files, or gamers seeking extended storage without extra cables, this design approach represents a different balance of portability and utility compared with most standard SSD enclosures on the market.

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Ports and Connections

The Sharge Disk Pro is built around a compact yet functional hub layout that integrates five active ports alongside the internal SSD. These include one HDMI 2.1 output, one USB-C port, one USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 port, and one USB-A 2.0 port, all managed by independent controller chips to prevent bottlenecks when multiple peripherals are in use. The inclusion of an HDMI 2.1 output enables video output up to 8K at 30Hz or 4K at 144Hz, depending on the connected device’s bandwidth. This makes it suitable for use with laptops, tablets, and compatible gaming consoles where both data access and display output are needed simultaneously. The USB-C port provides up to 100W input for power delivery passthrough, while the SSD and downstream ports can output up to 80W, allowing users to charge connected devices while maintaining full data and display functionality.

The built-in USB-C cable is one of the device’s defining physical features. Permanently attached to the chassis, it eliminates the need for separate cabling, reducing potential signal degradation and clutter. The short length ensures a secure connection with minimal strain, making it well-suited for handhelds and mobile phones where portability is essential. However, because it is non-removable, users have no option to replace the cable if it wears out or becomes damaged. The Disk Pro operates entirely over USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps), meaning it cannot exceed around 1GB/s transfer speeds, but remains fast enough for sustained high-volume workloads and video file handling.

Sharge also includes a 100W USB Power Delivery pass-through system designed for multi-device setups. When connected to a charger, the Disk Pro can simultaneously power a laptop or smartphone and operate as an SSD hub. The system manages current allocation automatically between the SSD, active ports, and the connected host device, maintaining stability under load. Users can switch the SSD off using a built-in hardware toggle to conserve NAND lifespan or operate solely as a docking station. This is a useful inclusion for those who primarily use the Disk Pro as a connectivity bridge rather than as continuous storage.

Despite its small dimensions, the hub’s port spacing and layout are designed for accessibility. Each connection point is positioned to avoid cable overlap, which can be problematic in other compact hubs. The HDMI port sits at the rear next to the USB-C power input, while the USB-A ports are side-mounted to support accessories such as flash drives, keyboards, or game controllers. This arrangement allows the device to function as both a desktop companion and an attachable expansion unit for mobile platforms.

• Interface Standard: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)

• Integrated Cable: Built-in USB-C, fixed length

• USB Ports: 1 x USB-C PD (100W input / 80W output), 1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 1 x USB-A 2.0

• Video Output: HDMI 2.1 supporting 4K 144Hz / 8K 30Hz

• Power Delivery: 100W input passthrough, 80W total output

• Controller Architecture: Three independent controller chips for port load management

• SSD Disable Switch: Hardware button to disable SSD for hub-only use

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Performance Tests

In practical testing, the Sharge Disk Pro delivered performance that closely aligned with its stated specifications. Using AJA System Test on a Windows 11 PC, sustained read speeds averaged between 800 and 900 MB/s, while write speeds remained consistent at around 700 to 800 MB/s across multiple test cycles. These results are in line with expectations for a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) interface, which typically caps out at 1,000 MB/s due to bus limitations. During repeated five-minute transfer tests using 256MB file blocks, there was no noticeable performance degradation or thermal throttling, confirming that the integrated fan and heatsink design effectively maintained stable throughput even under extended workloads. Sequential transfers performed best, while random 4K operations showed typical limitations of USB-based external drives, making it more suited for large media file transfers rather than small transactional data.

Thermal performance was a key focus of Sharge’s design, and testing showed the fan to be highly effective at maintaining low SSD temperatures. With the fan disabled, idle temperatures hovered around 35–37°C, rising only slightly during short file operations.

When the fan was activated in Auto mode, the device maintained temperatures around 34–35°C externally, and the SSD’s internal sensors never exceeded 40°C during prolonged testing. In Turbo mode, which spins the fan up to 10,000 RPM, the system achieved an additional reduction of around 5°C compared to passive cooling. For comparison, typical compact SSDs of similar capacity can reach over 60°C under similar workloads, confirming that active cooling provides tangible longevity and stability benefits for the NAND and controller components.

Noise measurements taken during operation showed moderate but noticeable levels. With the fan off, the Disk Pro was entirely silent, as expected for a solid-state design. When active cooling was engaged, noise levels ranged between 42 and 43 dBA at a one-meter distance, roughly equivalent to a quiet office environment. Although audible, it was far from intrusive and balanced against the benefit of consistent thermal performance. The fan’s automatic speed curve effectively adjusted to thermal demands, rarely ramping to maximum unless under sustained high-intensity transfers. Users who prioritize silence can manually disable the fan when operating in cooler environments or when using the device primarily for intermittent transfers.

The internal SSD uses 162-layer 3D TLC NAND with a proprietary controller tuned for consistent throughput rather than peak burst speeds. The design choice ensures reliable operation across mixed workloads such as 4K video capture, game installation, and system backups. The integrated power delivery circuitry also maintained stability under simultaneous port loads, allowing the SSD and connected peripherals to perform consistently without power drops. While the lack of hardware encryption may be a drawback for enterprise or security-focused users, the drive remains fully compatible with software encryption solutions available on Windows, macOS, and Android.

• Interface Speed: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps, ~1,000 MB/s theoretical)

• Measured Read Speed: 800–900 MB/s sustained

• Measured Write Speed: 700–800 MB/s sustained

• NAND Type: 162-layer 3D TLC NAND (BiCS6)

• Cooling System: Active fan with Auto (7,000 RPM) and Turbo (10,000 RPM) modes

• Operating Temperatures: 34–40°C under sustained load

• Noise Levels: 42–43 dBA under fan operation, 0 dBA passive

• Power Draw: 60W power input for device and fan operation, 100W passthrough charging support

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The Sharge Disk Pro represents a deliberate departure from conventional external SSDs, offering a hybrid approach that merges high-speed storage with full USB hub functionality in a portable form factor. Its sealed, magnetically mountable chassis and integrated fan system address the common issue of heat buildup in compact SSDs, maintaining reliable performance over long transfers. While its 10Gbps interface limits absolute throughput to around 1GB/s, the consistent sustained speeds and controlled thermals make it suitable for demanding use cases such as 4K editing, live data capture, or console game storage. The fixed internal SSD and integrated cable limit upgradeability and repair potential, but they also contribute to its streamlined design and compact efficiency.

For users seeking a versatile storage expansion that also replaces a traditional docking station, the Disk Pro’s multi-port setup and cooling design provide clear practical benefits. However, those wanting modular storage or hardware encryption will find its closed system less appealing. Ultimately, it’s a well-engineered portable hub that balances mobility, temperature management, and performance more effectively than most devices in its class. If the retail version maintains the same build and stability demonstrated in testing, it will fill a distinct niche for creators and professionals needing fast, thermally stable external storage in a highly compact form.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Sharge Disk Pro ReviewThe Sharge Loomos AI Glasses ?The Sharge Loomos AI Glasses -Sharge Disk Plus SSD EnclosureSharge Disk Plus SSD Enclosure Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN NASync vs UniFi UNAS – Which Should You Buy?

In the evolving landscape of network-attached storage, the arrival of UGREEN and UniFi (Ubiquiti) marks one of the more interesting shifts in consumer and prosumer data management over the last two years. Both brands, previously recognised for their strength in peripheral hardware and networking respectively, officially entered the NAS sector around late 2023 to early 2024, each taking distinct approaches to design, functionality, and ecosystem integration. UGREEN, following a successful crowdfunding launch in early 2024, built its NASync series around desktop and SSD-based solutions for home, creative, and prosumer users seeking all-in-one local storage, virtualization, and multimedia platforms. Its portfolio now includes systems ranging from the ARM-based DXP2800 to the Intel-powered DXP8800 Plus, offering performance tiers from modest home use to compact workstation-class environments.

Meanwhile, UniFi, a brand with a long history in professional networking and surveillance infrastructure, released its UNAS family within the same timeframe, targeting users already invested in its ecosystem of routers, cameras, and switches. The UNAS lineup now spans from the compact UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 desktop units to the rackmount UNAS Pro 4 and Pro 8 systems, with each designed for straightforward deployment and remote integration within the UniFi Network and Protect platforms. Despite arriving from very different sectors, both companies have effectively lowered the cost of entry to reliable NAS storage while redefining how integrated ecosystems can extend storage functionality. This comparison explores their respective design choices, hardware capabilities, software environments, and operational scope to assess which platform is best suited to different user scenarios in 2025 and 2026.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – The TL;DR

In comparing the UniFi and UGREEN NAS platforms, it becomes clear that each brand represents a different vision of what modern network storage should be. UniFi’s UNAS series builds on the company’s heritage in networking and surveillance, delivering a range of efficient, ARM-powered NAS systems that integrate tightly within the UniFi ecosystem. Models such as the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, and UNAS Pro 8 prioritize reliability, centralized management, and long-term stability rather than raw compute power or expandability. Their hardware is deliberately fixed—non-upgradable memory, ARM Cortex-A55 or A57 CPUs, and limited caching support for NVMe drives—but balanced by advanced network connectivity, including dual 10G SFP+ ports, PoE+++ power options, and redundant power supplies. UniFi’s storage OS focuses on core NAS fundamentals: multiple RAID levels, snapshots, encryption, and secure remote access via the UniFi controller. It is intentionally simple, relying on integration with other UniFi products for extended functionality such as surveillance and automation. In contrast, UGREEN’s NASync line follows an open, performance-driven approach designed for flexibility and standalone capability.

Ranging from the DXP2800 with its 8-core ARM processor to the flagship DXP8800 Plus powered by Intel’s i5-1240P, these systems cover every segment from entry-level home use to prosumer and light enterprise workloads. UGREEN’s hardware offers user-upgradable DDR4/DDR5 memory, PCIe expansion, NVMe storage pooling, and multi-gig connectivity, with higher-end models adding dual 10GbE, Thunderbolt 4, and even GPU compatibility. Its UGOS Pro operating system transforms the NAS into a hybrid server capable of running Docker containers, virtual machines, and AI-based indexing, alongside comprehensive backup and synchronization tools across cloud and local environments. While UniFi emphasizes simplicity, low maintenance, and enterprise-grade network reliability, UGREEN delivers a richer feature set and greater hardware freedom at the expense of long-term enterprise validation. In essence, UniFi NAS suits users already invested in UniFi’s ecosystem who value cohesion, predictable performance, and integrated security, whereas UGREEN NAS appeals to those seeking raw performance, versatility, and independent control without ecosystem constraints.

Why Buy UniFi NAS?	Why Buy UGREEN NAS?
Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!
Ecosystem Integration: Seamlessly integrates with UniFi Network, Protect, and Access systems, allowing unified management through a single controller interface. Centralized Management: Designed for administrators managing multiple UniFi sites or devices, providing consistent firmware, remote access, and monitoring from one dashboard. Reliable, Efficient Design: ARM-based architecture ensures low power draw, cool operation, and stable long-term performance with minimal maintenance. Enterprise-Grade Networking: Equipped with up to dual 10G SFP+ and 10GBase-T ports, plus USP-RPS redundancy for professional deployments. Proven Security Framework: Benefits from Ubiquiti’s mature network security infrastructure, signed firmware updates, and NDAA-compliant hardware.	Superior Hardware Performance: Offers a full range from ARM to Intel Core i5 CPUs, with upgradable RAM, NVMe storage pools, and optional PCIe expansion. Versatile Software (UGOS Pro): Supports Docker, virtual machines, AI photo indexing, and multi-platform backups out of the box. All-in-One Standalone System: Functions independently without relying on an external ecosystem, ideal for users wanting a complete server in one unit. Advanced Connectivity: Includes 2.5 GbE and 10 GbE networking, USB 4/Thunderbolt 4, and support for direct-attached workflows like video editing or large-file transfer. Rapid Development and Updates: Frequent firmware releases continually add new features, broader hardware support, and improved backup and security options.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Design, Storage and Range

When comparing UGREEN and UniFi’s NAS portfolios, the first and most visible difference lies in how each brand approaches system design and deployment environment. UGREEN’s NASync series is focused entirely on desktop enclosures, reflecting the brand’s consumer electronics background and intent to cater primarily to home users, prosumers, and creative professionals. Each model, such as the DXP2800, DXP4800 Plus, and DXP8800 Plus, follows a compact, upright chassis layout with attention to quiet cooling and minimal footprint. The aesthetic is consistent across the range—metallic finishes, clear drive bay accessibility, and understated branding—intended to fit easily on a desk or in a studio environment. By contrast, UniFi’s UNAS range adopts both desktop and rackmount designs, depending on model class. The UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 are designed for smaller workspaces and integrate PoE+++ power options to simplify installation, while the UNAS Pro 4 (1U) and UNAS Pro 8 (2U) are full rackmount systems made from SGCC steel, reflecting their professional and data-center-friendly construction standards.

UGREEN’s systems emphasize flexibility and user-level expandability within their desktop footprint. Most models in the NASync line support 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch SATA drives, dual NVMe SSD slots, and optional PCIe or Thunderbolt expansion, allowing them to function as both storage servers and active editing platforms. The DXP480T Plus, for example, is an all-SSD NAS with four M.2 NVMe bays that appeals to users seeking maximum I/O performance for tasks such as 4K video editing or database caching. The DXP8800 Plus, the flagship, extends this design language with eight SATA bays, dual Gen 4 M.2 SSD slots, dual 10 GbE networking, and Thunderbolt 4 connectivity, making it one of the most powerful turnkey NAS options in the consumer space. In comparison, UniFi’s UNAS systems prioritize structural consistency and network integration over expandability. Even though all models provide dual or single NVMe slots, these are limited to caching duties. Drive capacity across the lineup scales more linearly, from two to eight 3.5-inch bays, maintaining a clear size-to-performance progression while focusing on rack density and cooling efficiency.

From a usability perspective, UGREEN’s design philosophy focuses on standalone versatility. Each NASync model is built to function independently as a complete storage and application host, with optional integration through standard network protocols. Physical accessibility is a clear design consideration, with quick-release trays, front USB ports, and in some models, SD card readers for direct media offload. The visual and acoustic design is optimized for open environments, with whisper-quiet fan systems and smart temperature management, making them suitable for use beside workstations or in living spaces. UniFi’s design philosophy, however, centers on infrastructure harmony rather than isolation. The rackmount models are designed to slide directly into existing UniFi network installations, using standard 1U or 2U spacing and consistent power integration with UniFi’s USP-RPS redundant supply network. Even the desktop UNAS 4 maintains visual continuity with UniFi routers and switches, using similar matte finishes, front-facing status LEDs, and clean ventilation lines.

In terms of product range, UGREEN currently offers at least seven NASync models, each targeting a specific performance segment. These include the DXP2800 (2-bay ARM), DXP4800 (4-bay N100), DXP4800 Plus (4-bay N305), DXP6800 Pro (6-bay N305), DXP480T Plus (SSD-only, N305), DH4300 Plus (4-bay ARM), and DXP8800 Plus (8-bay i5-1240P). Each generation introduces more advanced CPUs, faster interfaces, and expanded media capabilities. UniFi’s current UNAS range, while smaller, has diversified rapidly since its launch. The confirmed models include the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, UNAS Pro 8, and the earlier UNAS Pro 7-Bay, all of which use ARM-based processors and fixed memory configurations. A larger ENAS 16-Bay ZFS system is already in development, targeting enterprise and datacenter deployments in 2026. Compared with UGREEN’s more gradual tiered approach, UniFi’s product scaling is defined by form factor and network bandwidth rather than by CPU class or user workload.

Price segmentation further highlights their opposing strategies. UniFi’s UNAS line is priced aggressively to attract users into its broader ecosystem, starting at $199 for the UNAS 2, rising to $799 for the Pro 8, and including mid-tier models like the UNAS 4 ($379) and Pro 4 ($499). The pricing aligns with UniFi’s established model of offering capable hardware at low margins to encourage ecosystem investment across switches, cameras, and controllers. UGREEN, by contrast, positions its NASync devices as feature-rich all-rounders, with prices reflecting performance class: from $279 for the DXP2800 to around $1,299 for the DXP8800 Plus. The difference in pricing structure is significant but reflects how each company defines value—UniFi through integrated ecosystem scaling, and UGREEN through standalone hardware strength and included functionality.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Hardware Range

The internal hardware philosophy of UniFi and UGREEN reflects two distinct interpretations of what a modern NAS should prioritize: efficiency and integration versus performance and versatility. UniFi’s UNAS series relies entirely on ARM-based architecture, a deliberate decision aligned with the company’s emphasis on low power consumption, predictable thermal characteristics, and embedded system reliability. Every model in the current UNAS lineup, including the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, and UNAS Pro 8, is built around a quad-core ARM processor—the A55 at 1.7 GHz for the smaller systems and the A57 at 2.0 GHz for the rackmount models. These CPUs deliver modest compute performance but strong stability and power efficiency, allowing for sustained 24/7 operation without requiring active thermal management beyond standard fan arrays. This design philosophy mirrors UniFi’s broader network device ecosystem, where embedded ARM SoCs dominate routers, gateways, and cameras, ensuring unified firmware management and hardware compatibility across all product categories.

UGREEN’s NASync architecture takes the opposite route, aiming to deliver workstation-grade power in compact form factors. The entry-level DXP2800 features an octa-core ARM CPU, already outpacing UniFi’s top models in raw processing capability, while the remainder of the series transitions to x86 platforms from Intel’s latest low-power and mid-tier lines. The DXP4800 uses Intel’s N100 processor, the DXP4800 Plus and DXP6800 Pro adopt the more capable N305 with improved iGPU performance, and the flagship DXP8800 Plus integrates the 12th Gen Intel Core i5-1240P, offering hybrid performance and support for hardware transcoding, virtualization, and PCIe Gen 4 NVMe. This variation in processor choice underlines UGREEN’s strategy of providing scalable compute resources for different workloads, from basic backup operations to multi-user virtualization and AI-assisted indexing. Unlike UniFi, UGREEN’s systems can operate as full Linux servers, running multiple containers or virtual machines without external dependencies.

Memory and expansion options further highlight the divergence in hardware scope. UniFi’s systems employ fixed memory configurations—ranging from 4 GB on the UNAS 2 and 4 to 16 GB on the Pro 8—with no user-accessible upgrade paths. This aligns with their embedded design approach, where firmware optimization and unified memory management are prioritized over modularity. In contrast, UGREEN’s NASync devices all support user-upgradable SO-DIMM DDR4 or DDR5 modules, typically allowing capacities between 8 GB and 64 GB, depending on the model. This flexibility benefits users running memory-intensive services such as Docker containers, Plex transcoding, or AI indexing. Moreover, many of UGREEN’s x86 systems support PCIe expansion cards, offering pathways to add 10 GbE NICs, NVMe storage adapters, or GPU accelerators, while UniFi’s systems are intentionally non-upgradable to maintain uniform hardware control and firmware consistency across the UNAS ecosystem.

Networking and connectivity options serve as another key point of differentiation. UniFi has leaned on its networking pedigree, offering up to three 10 GbE connections (two SFP+ and one RJ45) on the UNAS Pro 8, with lower-tier models still providing 2.5 GbE or Gigabit connectivity. Power integration is also a hallmark of their design. The UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 use PoE+++, allowing single-cable deployment through UniFi switches, while the Pro series employs redundant power via USP-RPS or hot-swappable PSUs, reducing downtime in managed networks. UGREEN, on the other hand, focuses on local performance flexibility, providing multi-interface options like 10 GbE, 2.5 GbE, USB 4, and Thunderbolt 4, depending on model class. This allows their systems to double as direct-attached storage (DAS) for editors or content creators, particularly when used via Thunderbolt, an option not present in any UniFi NAS. Power designs in UGREEN systems are conventional but efficient, ranging from compact external adapters on smaller models to integrated supplies on higher-end devices.

The overall hardware comparison reveals two clear user archetypes. UniFi’s hardware suits IT administrators and network professionals seeking dependable, uniform, low-maintenance appliances that integrate natively with UniFi controllers and services. UGREEN’s NASync hardware, meanwhile, targets prosumers, creative professionals, and small business users requiring computational headroom and direct system control. Where UniFi builds closed but predictable infrastructure devices, UGREEN delivers open and adaptable machines capable of serving as both NAS and lightweight servers. The contrast is not one of quality but of philosophy—UniFi favoring consistency and system management efficiency, UGREEN focusing on flexibility and computational breadth.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Software, Services and Apps

The most significant distinction between UGREEN and UniFi’s NAS platforms lies in their software ecosystems and the broader intent behind their development. UniFi’s UNAS software mirrors the brand’s overarching approach to product design: lightweight, efficient, and designed to integrate seamlessly into the UniFi Network and Protect ecosystems. The UNAS interface focuses almost exclusively on storage management and file security. It provides the fundamental NAS feature set, including multiple RAID configurations, volume encryption, snapshot management, and user-based permission control. Files can be accessed through SMB, NFS, with remote management possible via the UniFi portal or mobile app. However, beyond core storage functionality, UniFi’s NAS software remains deliberately minimal. It lacks support for virtual machines, Docker containers, or app installation frameworks, relying instead on integration with other UniFi devices for broader capabilities such as video surveillance, network management, or cloud relay services.

UGREEN’s UGOS Pro platform adopts a far more expansive, multifunctional design. The software is built on a modern Linux kernel and supports both ARM and x86 architectures, allowing for a full-featured environment with native support for containers, virtual machines, and AI-enhanced media indexing. Out of the box, users can deploy Docker, Portainer, Kubernetes-compatible containers, and KVM-based virtual machines, enabling workloads that go far beyond traditional NAS operations. Backup and synchronization options are also more diverse, with support for rsync, S3, WebDAV, iSCSI, OneDrive, Google Drive, Dropbox, and two-way synchronization across multiple NAS units. The interface emphasizes transparency and customization, giving users direct access to system-level configuration that UniFi’s more streamlined interface omits. Features such as storage tiering (using both HDD and NVMe), application sandboxing, and external GPU detection on select models position UGREEN’s UGOS Pro as one of the most open and flexible NAS operating systems currently available outside of enterprise-class environments.

In client and access support, the contrast continues. UniFi’s ecosystem is designed for centralized control and consistent performance across its product range. The UNAS systems can be monitored via the same UniFi Controller interface used for switches, gateways, and access points, creating a single-pane-of-glass environment that appeals to IT administrators managing multiple UniFi sites. Remote access and firmware updates are handled automatically through UniFi Cloud, and security is strengthened by integration with two-factor authentication, device certificates, and network isolation policies inherited from the company’s professional networking hardware. UGREEN, conversely, provides a more conventional NAS interface that supports multiple access clients and cross-platform tools. In addition to browser access and mobile apps for Android and iOS, users can mount shared drives directly within macOS, Windows, and Linux, while also leveraging a dedicated UGREEN Drive application for photo management and AI-based face/object recognition. Where UniFi’s UNAS feels like an extension of a larger network ecosystem, UGREEN’s software operates as a complete standalone server environment.

Security and maintenance are handled very differently between the two brands. UniFi benefits from a mature background in network device hardening, employing signed firmware, rolling updates, and extensive beta testing through its large enterprise user base. Features such as encrypted storage volumes, HTTPS enforcement, and VLAN isolation come preconfigured with minimal user intervention. However, the trade-off for this controlled environment is reduced user autonomy, as firmware customization and software-side experimentation are discouraged. UGREEN, while newer to the enterprise security space, implements encryption standards such as AES-256, offers built-in 2FA, and continues to expand its ransomware prevention and snapshot recovery tools. Updates arrive frequently and often include feature additions alongside security patches, though the brand still lacks a formal bug bounty or transparency reporting system comparable to UniFi’s. Overall, UGREEN’s software offers greater flexibility and control, while UniFi’s remains more mature and hardened within its controlled network framework.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Verdict and Conclusion

Both UGREEN and UniFi have entered the NAS sector from distinct starting points and continue to move in different directions, each targeting a particular type of user. UniFi’s UNAS series delivers consistency, predictable performance, and dependable integration with the broader UniFi ecosystem. Its software is stable, lightweight, and well-suited to users who prioritize straightforward storage management, reliable data handling, and unified control across routers, switches, and surveillance systems. While the hardware is limited to fixed ARM configurations and non-expandable memory, it is efficient, quiet, and designed for continuous operation with minimal maintenance. For organizations already invested in UniFi infrastructure, the UNAS systems provide a logical expansion that keeps management centralized and operational risk low. However, their value depends heavily on ecosystem synergy; outside of that environment, the systems remain competent but relatively inflexible standalone NAS options.

UGREEN’s NASync platform, on the other hand, appeals to users seeking broader performance capability and independence. Its x86-based models, upgradable memory, and open software environment allow it to serve as a hybrid between NAS and compact server, capable of running applications, containers, and virtual machines alongside storage tasks. The design language is more suited to individual or small business use than datacenter deployment, but the hardware range—from ARM to Core i5—covers a far wider performance spectrum than UniFi’s. Software maturity continues to evolve quickly, with new features added frequently, and the systems provide extensive compatibility with third-party clients and backup services. The trade-off is that long-term reliability and enterprise-level security validation are still developing.

Ultimately, UniFi NAS suits users who already rely on UniFi’s networking ecosystem and value simplicity, predictability, and centralized management, while UGREEN NAS caters to those prioritizing flexibility, compute power, and open software capability. Both brands have lowered the entry barrier into reliable NAS ownership, but they embody opposing philosophies: UniFi focuses on integration and control, whereas UGREEN emphasizes capability and independence.

Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi Black Friday Deals - SwiUniFi Black Friday Deals - SwiUGREEN NAS Black Friday 2025 DUGREEN NAS Black Friday 2025 DBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataUniFi UNAS Series of NAS DevicUniFi UNAS - 1 Year Later. ShoUniFi UPS Tower Review - DULL UGREEN vs UniFi NAS - Which Ne Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

The Minisforum MS-02 Workstation – FINALLY A MS-01 KILLER?

Note – Massive thanks to PCWatch for their coverage of the Japan IT Week 2025 Event. They made an excellent article on the Minisforum MS-02 HERE and was the source for today’s article. Check them out!

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is a compact 4.8-liter workstation revealed at Japan IT Week Autumn 2025, marking a major upgrade over the earlier MS-01 model. Built around Intel’s 24-core Core Ultra 9 285HX processor, it merges high-end mobile CPU performance with features traditionally reserved for full-size desktops. The system includes support for up to 256 GB of ECC DDR5 memory, four PCIe 4.0 NVMe slots, and three PCIe expansion slots, one of which supports PCIe 5.0 ×16. Network connectivity options extend up to dual 25 GbE SFP28 ports, alongside 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE (vPro) Ethernet. Designed to serve as a workstation or mini-server, the MS-02 Ultra incorporates an internal 350 W Flex PSU, a slide-out chassis for maintenance, and advanced front-to-rear cooling architecture.

Category	Brief Specification
Processor	Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (24 cores 8P + 16E, 36 MB cache, up to 5.5 GHz)
Memory	4 × DDR5 SO-DIMM slots (up to 256 GB 4800 MHz, ECC supported)
Storage	4 × M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 ×4 slots (up to 16 TB total)
Expansion	1 × PCIe 5.0 ×16, 1 × PCIe 4.0 ×16 (25 GbE NIC installed by default), 1 × PCIe 4.0 ×4
Networking	2 × 25 GbE SFP28, 1 × 10 GbE RJ-45 (Realtek RTL8127), 1 × 2.5 GbE (vPro Intel i226-LM)
USB Ports	2 × USB4 v2 Type-C (80 Gbps), 1 × USB4 Type-C (40 Gbps), 3 × USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (10 Gbps)
Display Output	1 × HDMI 2.1 (up to 8K 60 Hz / 4K 120 Hz support)
Audio	1 × 3.5 mm combo jack (TRRS)
Wireless	M.2 2230 E-Key slot (Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 support)
Power Supply	350 W internal Flex PSU (100–240 V AC input)
Dimensions	221.5 × 225 × 97 mm (≈ 4.8 liters)

Minisforum MS-02 – Internal Hardware

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is built around Intel’s Arrow Lake-HX platform, with the Core Ultra 9 285HX serving as its central processor. This 24-core CPU combines eight performance cores and sixteen efficiency cores, reaching up to 5.5 GHz while maintaining a 140 W thermal design power. It incorporates an integrated Intel Arc GPU with four Xe cores and an NPU capable of up to 13 TOPS for AI acceleration. The CPU provides 24 PCIe lanes in total, which are distributed among the system’s multiple expansion and storage options.

Memory capacity is one of the most notable upgrades over its predecessor. The MS-02 Ultra offers four DDR5 SO-DIMM slots, supporting up to 256 GB of 4800 MHz memory, with full ECC functionality for stability in continuous workloads. Two modules are located on the CPU side of the board, and two on the reverse, optimizing thermal spacing and service access. This capacity places it closer to entry-level server configurations than typical mini PCs, reinforcing its suitability for virtualization or compute-heavy tasks.

Storage expansion is handled through four M.2 2280 NVMe slots, each supporting PCIe 4.0 ×4 bandwidth. Combined, these slots can accommodate up to 16 TB of SSD storage. The system’s slide-out chassis design allows quick installation or replacement of drives, simplifying maintenance. Minisforum has also introduced a small debug LED and clear CMOS button on the board, indicating that the model is targeted toward users familiar with system-level configuration and troubleshooting.

Expansion flexibility extends far beyond most small form factor workstations. The system includes three PCIe slots: one PCIe 5.0 ×16, one PCIe 4.0 ×16 (often occupied by a 25 GbE NIC in standard configurations), and one PCIe 4.0 ×4. The top slot can host dual-slot desktop graphics cards, drawing up to 140 W through an included 8-pin auxiliary connector. This allows for the addition of mid-range GPUs such as the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada or workstation accelerators, while still retaining physical compactness.

Power delivery is managed through a built-in 350 W Flex PSU that eliminates the need for an external brick. This internal supply was a deliberate shift from the MS-01’s external adapter and helps sustain higher CPU and GPU draw without additional clutter. The unit supports 100–240 V AC input, giving it universal deployment flexibility for both workstation and light server scenarios.

Minisforum MS-02 – Ports and Connections

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra includes a broad range of connectivity options intended to support both workstation and server workloads. Front access is optimized for frequent use, featuring two USB4 Version 2.0 Type-C ports offering 80 Gbps bandwidth each, a 10 Gbps USB Type-A port, a 3.5 mm audio combo jack, and the system power button. These front USB4 v2 ports also support DisplayPort Alternate Mode and Power Delivery up to 15 W per port, making them suitable for high-speed data transfer or direct monitor output without additional adapters.

The rear I/O layout is designed for permanent peripheral and network connections. It includes a third USB4 Type-C port rated at 40 Gbps, three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports at 10 Gbps each, and a single HDMI 2.1 output supporting up to 8K at 60 Hz or 4K at 120 Hz. For network communication, the MS-02 Ultra integrates four ports in total: two 25 GbE SFP28, one 10 GbE RJ-45, and one 2.5 GbE RJ-45. The 2.5 GbE interface uses Intel’s i226-LM controller and supports vPro remote management for BIOS-level administration, which is beneficial for enterprise or headless operation.

Wireless connectivity is provided by an M.2 2230 E-Key slot supporting Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 modules, enabling flexible configuration for wireless networks or peripheral pairing. The combination of USB4 v2, multiple Ethernet options, and RDMA capability positions the MS-02 Ultra as a system ready for both high-performance workstation setups and compact server deployments. Its port layout, with both front and rear accessibility, ensures straightforward use in horizontal or vertical orientations.

Minisforum MS-02 – Cooling and Temperature Management

The cooling system of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is designed to manage sustained high thermal loads while maintaining compact dimensions. The chassis follows a front-intake and rear-exhaust airflow pattern, similar to rackmount servers. A six-heatpipe radiator combined with phase-change material (PCM) ensures efficient heat dissipation from both the CPU and expansion slots. This design enables the system to maintain stable operation at a 140 W CPU TDP, even when fully populated with PCIe cards and NVMe storage. Airflow direction also varies depending on the unit’s orientation, with side-mounted intakes feeding the expansion slots and rear vents handling exhaust when the unit is placed horizontally or vertically.

The internal layout is structured to prevent thermal overlap between major components. The CPU and memory modules are cooled through a direct-contact heat spreader, while GPU and add-in cards draw intake air from the left side and expel it from the right or top, depending on placement. The inclusion of an internal 350 W Flex PSU was balanced with this design, ensuring sufficient clearance and airflow. This approach allows the MS-02 Ultra to sustain continuous high-load performance without external cooling solutions or the noise levels typical of larger tower workstations.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Workstation – Worth waiting for?

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra represents a substantial progression from the original MS-01 workstation, addressing nearly every limitation of its predecessor. The earlier model, released in 2023, gained attention for integrating desktop-class performance into a small form factor but was constrained by its single-slot PCIe design, limited memory capacity, and reliance on an external power brick. The MS-02 Ultra resolves these issues with four DDR5 SO-DIMM slots supporting up to 256 GB ECC memory, a dual-slot PCIe 5.0 ×16 slot for graphics or accelerator cards, and a fully internal 350 W Flex PSU. These refinements, along with the addition of 25 GbE networking and USB4 v2 connectivity, elevate the system into a new category that bridges high-end workstation and compact enterprise server design.

Performance and versatility are at the center of this system’s concept. The inclusion of a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX CPU and up to four PCIe 4.0 NVMe drives positions it for continuous workloads such as virtualization, software development, or AI inference without the thermal or structural compromises typical of small PCs. Minisforum’s decision to adopt ECC memory and RDMA-capable networking also underlines a shift toward reliability and professional usage scenarios rather than enthusiast or gaming audiences.

In terms of market placement, pricing has yet to be confirmed, but early indications suggest the MS-02 Ultra will likely start around $1,500, with higher configurations approaching or exceeding $2,000 depending on memory, storage, and NIC options. This aligns it with compact workstations like the ASRock DeskMeet X600 and high-end mini servers from OEM integrators, though the Minisforum model’s density and component flexibility set it apart. Overall, the MS-02 Ultra shows how far the brand’s SFF engineering has advanced since the MS-01, turning a well-liked prototype concept into a fully realized professional-grade workstation built for sustained heavy use.

Note – Massive thanks to PCWatch for their coverage of the Japan IT Week 2025 Event. They made an excellent article on the Minisforum MS-02 HERE and was the source for today’s article. Check them out!

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Cloud Subscription Killer

The UGREEN DH2300 is a compact two-bay NAS system positioned within the company’s value-focused lineup, intended for users moving away from cloud-based storage platforms toward affordable private solutions. Priced around the $200 mark, it is aimed at those who prioritize simplicity and convenience over raw performance or enterprise-level control. Designed for users who typically rely on Google Drive, iCloud, or Dropbox subscriptions, the DH2300 seeks to provide a self-contained alternative with no recurring fees, offering scheduled backups, remote file synchronization, and integrated media access through UGREEN’s proprietary UGOS Pro operating system. Internally, the system is built around an ARM-based processor combining a quad-core Cortex-A72 and quad-core Cortex-A53 architecture, clocked at up to 2.2GHz, with 4GB of LPDDR4 memory and a built-in 32GB eMMC for the OS. This hardware places the DH2300 in direct competition with entry-level models such as the Synology DS223 and QNAP TS-233, though its Rockchip RK3576 processor, G52 MC3 GPU, and 6 TOPS NPU give it a modest edge in AI-assisted photo recognition, multimedia indexing, and energy efficiency. As a compact, preconfigured NAS designed for first-time adopters, the DH2300’s real focus is not to replace professional systems but to bridge the gap between mainstream cloud users and personal storage ownership, reflecting UGREEN’s broader strategy of simplifying NAS technology for general consumers.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

The UGREEN DH2300 is a compact, affordable two-bay NAS designed to bridge the gap between cloud storage and local data ownership for everyday users. Built around the Rockchip RK3576 processor—featuring two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A72 and A53 cores at up to 2.2GHz—and paired with 4GB of LPDDR4X memory, the system offers reliable ARM-level performance with efficient thermals and low noise output. Its design prioritizes simplicity, with vertical drive insertion, a single rear cooling fan, and a dedicated 32GB eMMC for UGOS Pro, which separates the OS from user data. Connectivity includes a 1GbE port, multiple USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, and HDMI 4K60 output, while the software delivers key NAS essentials such as RAID management, snapshot recovery, cloud and USB backups, Docker support, and AI-powered photo indexing via its 6 TOPS NPU. Power consumption remains low at 9–13W depending on workload, and noise levels stay within 31–45 dBA under varying fan speeds. Although the fixed memory, single LAN port, and ambiguous CPU marketing reduce its appeal for enthusiasts, the DH2300 stands out as an efficient, straightforward, and well-priced solution for users seeking a dependable private cloud alternative without technical complexity.

SOFTWARE - 7/10

HARDWARE - 8/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 10/10

VALUE - 9/10

8.2

PROS

Efficient Rockchip RK3576 processor (dual quad-core ARM design) provides strong performance for a low-power NAS.
Integrated 6 TOPS NPU enables local AI functions such as face, text, and object recognition without cloud reliance.
UGOS Pro offers an intuitive, user-friendly interface with features like RAID management, snapshots, Docker, and backups.
Low noise output (31–45 dBA) and excellent power efficiency (9–13W typical use) suit 24/7 home operation.
Dedicated 32GB eMMC system drive keeps the OS separate from data volumes for better reliability.
HDMI 2.0 4K60 output allows direct media playback and display management.
Competitive pricing around $200 makes it a strong entry-level NAS alternative to subscription cloud storage.

CONS

Single 1GbE LAN port limits transfer speeds and network scalability.
Fixed 4GB memory restricts heavy multitasking or Docker use.
Spending just $100-150 more gets you much, much more capable x86 powered systems

Buy the UGREEN DH300 on Amazon @209	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on B&H
	STORE

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Design and Storage

The UGREEN DH2300 adopts a clean, vertical form factor made entirely of plastic, emphasizing practicality and low cost over premium materials. The enclosure is lightweight yet well-ventilated, featuring a magnetic plastic top panel with slotted air channels that promote consistent airflow across both drive bays. The overall construction favors simplicity, with drive access positioned vertically rather than through traditional caddies. This layout helps minimize the unit’s footprint, making it suitable for desktop environments where noise and vibration are key considerations. While the plastic frame lacks the rigidity of aluminum enclosures seen in higher-end NAS models, it contributes to lower noise resonance and reduced amplification of mechanical drive vibration. The minimalist aesthetic, consistent with UGREEN’s other recent NAS releases, reflects its target audience: users seeking a consumer-friendly device that blends into a home office or living space rather than a server rack.

Internally, the DH2300 supports two 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch SATA drives, each connecting directly to fixed SATA connectors mounted on the board. The drive trays are basic but functional, requiring manual screw installation rather than tool-less mechanisms. Although UGREEN has not explicitly advertised hot-swapping as an official feature, testing showed that it is technically possible to replace drives without powering down, though such actions are not recommended without confirmation from official documentation. The NAS supports standard RAID configurations, including JBOD, RAID 0, and RAID 1, as well as individual drive modes, providing adequate flexibility for redundancy or performance-based setups. Storage initialization is straightforward within UGOS, with pool creation and volume setup guided by a wizard interface that fits the product’s “set-and-forget” philosophy.

Cooling is handled by a single rear-mounted fan positioned behind the drive bays, ensuring that heat generated by mechanical disks is efficiently extracted from the enclosure. The system’s vertical drive layout assists in natural convection, drawing air from the lower portion and expelling it from the top and rear. Despite being a plastic chassis, thermal management remains effective due to the extensive side and rear ventilation grilles, which circulate air across both drives and the mainboard components. In long-term use, the design demonstrated stable internal temperatures under typical file access and synchronization loads, maintaining drive and board thermals within an expected operational range even during extended testing periods.

From a functional standpoint, the DH2300 includes an internal 32GB eMMC module reserved for UGOS, preventing users from needing to dedicate part of their main storage array to system files. This separation simplifies setup and improves reliability by isolating the operating system from data drives. However, there are no M.2 or NVMe expansion slots available, meaning caching or SSD-tiered storage cannot be implemented. This is consistent with UGREEN’s entry-level positioning for the model, and the omission helps reduce production cost while keeping the power footprint low. The 32GB internal storage performs adequately for OS updates, indexing data, and temporary system operations.

The device’s storage capacity can reach up to two 30TB drives, allowing a maximum theoretical total of 60TB raw capacity, though most users will likely configure it in RAID 1 for redundancy. This makes the DH2300 a practical fit for home backup, photo archiving, and small-scale media libraries, especially when paired with the system’s built-in applications for photos, video, and document management. Overall, the DH2300’s design and storage layout reflect its goal of balancing ease of use with functional flexibility, providing just enough configurability to support typical home NAS workloads without introducing complexity that would deter less technical users.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Internal and External Hardware

Internally, the UGREEN DH2300 is powered by the Rockchip RK3576 processor, a hybrid 8-core ARM SoC that combines four high-performance Cortex-A72 cores with four efficiency-focused Cortex-A53 cores, running at up to 2.2GHz. While UGREEN markets this configuration as an “8-core processor,” it is technically composed of two separate quad-core clusters, something the company’s documentation does not clearly explain. This lack of clarity can mislead users into expecting a single unified 8-core design, whereas in practice the chip functions as two 4-core groups optimized for different workloads. The RK3576, built on an 8nm process, delivers a solid balance between efficiency and multitasking, keeping thermals low while maintaining adequate throughput for home NAS tasks. Its integrated ARM G52 MC3 GPU supports up to 8K H.265/H.264 decoding and HDR rendering through Rockchip’s dedicated Picture Quality Engine, which also supports ACM and DCI color profiles. These capabilities allow the DH2300 to output 4K60 video via HDMI, offering lightweight media playback directly from the system interface—an uncommon inclusion in this price class. Additionally, the CPU’s built-in 6 TOPS NPU enables AI-assisted indexing and face recognition within UGOS Pro, processing such tasks locally instead of relying on cloud services.

Memory allocation on the DH2300 is fixed at 4GB of LPDDR4X, soldered to the mainboard with no expansion slot available. This restriction aligns with the model’s consumer-grade purpose, though it naturally caps Docker container and multitasking potential. The onboard memory is sufficient for file serving, indexing, and moderate background services, while the 32GB eMMC 5.1 storage is dedicated to UGOS Pro and ensures stable OS operations without user intervention. There are no NVMe or UFS storage options, which simplifies the hardware layout but limits potential caching or high-speed data tiers. Nevertheless, the RK3576’s low power draw and balanced architecture ensure consistent operation under typical workloads, even during prolonged use, with minimal heat output and silent operation under idle conditions.

Externally, the NAS presents a modest selection of connectivity options suitable for its market position. The rear hosts a single 1GbE LAN port—adequate for most home users but a notable downgrade from the 2.5GbE interface found on UGREEN’s larger models like the DH4300 PLUS. File transfers, backups, and streaming functions remain well within the limits of 1GbE for single-user environments, though network saturation can occur during multi-user access. Peripheral connectivity is handled by two USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 ports and one USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 port, all operating at 5Gbps, supporting external drives, UPS communication, or backup targets. An HDMI 2.0 port on the rear supports 4K60 output for local playback or display configuration, while system LEDs provide visual feedback for drive activity, system status, and network connection. Power is supplied by a 50W external adapter that connects via a barrel plug, keeping internal temperatures and noise low by externalizing the PSU.

The inclusion of HDMI output in such a budget-focused system underscores UGREEN’s attempt to merge NAS and home entertainment functions. Although the RK3576 chipset supports a wider range of display interfaces—including DisplayPort, MIPI, and eDP—these are not implemented in the DH2300’s design, reflecting deliberate simplification for cost and usability. The absence of multi-gigabit networking, PCIe expansion, or additional LAN redundancy limits its potential for advanced setups, yet for its intended audience the configuration remains practical. In short, the DH2300’s internal layout, despite its simplified design and some ambiguous marketing around the CPU, delivers an efficient and capable platform for mainstream home users seeking affordable private storage.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – UGOS NAS Software and Services

UGREEN’s DH2300 runs the company’s proprietary UGOS Pro, a Linux-based operating system tailored for simplicity and everyday use. The interface mirrors the design language of mainstream consumer cloud platforms, featuring a desktop-style environment with drag-and-drop file management, live system monitoring, and user account controls. Although UGOS Pro shares much of its design and functionality with that found on UGREEN’s larger DH4300 PLUS model, a few service limitations appear due to the ARM-based architecture of the DH2300. These include the absence of virtual machine support and limited resource capacity for multiple Docker containers, stemming from the 4GB of fixed memory. Nonetheless, the software remains fully featured for file storage, synchronization, multimedia management, and light AI applications, and receives regular over-the-air updates that refine usability and security. The desktop and mobile clients also synchronize settings seamlessly, allowing users to manage their NAS both locally and remotely.

From a user management perspective, UGOS provides fine-grained control of accounts, permissions, and network access. Administrators can create user groups, apply password complexity policies, and define shared-folder privileges with ease. The system supports multiple file transfer protocols, including SMB, AFP, NFS, and Rsync, as well as optional WebDAV and FTP for broader compatibility. Remote access can be configured either through UGREEN’s own relay service or via LAN-only mode for tighter network security. The security dashboard consolidates features such as auto-block for repeated failed logins, two-factor authentication, firewall configuration, and selective port access rules. SSH and Telnet access are disabled by default, a responsible design choice for less experienced users, but can be enabled manually for advanced administration. These features bring the DH2300 close in functionality to entry-level NAS systems from Synology or QNAP, even though it remains less configurable overall.

Storage management is one of UGOS Pro’s more mature components. Users can create storage pools and volumes in JBOD, RAID 0, or RAID 1, with scheduled drive tests, SMART diagnostics, and Seagate IronWolf Health integration for supported drives. The storage manager also includes rebuild and repair settings that allow users to prioritise either RAID reconstruction speed or system performance during rebuilds. Snapshot protection is integrated at the folder level, with both versioned and scheduled snapshots available for data recovery. Although the system does not offer full OS-level backups, users can schedule NAS-to-NAS, NAS-to-USB, and NAS-to-Cloud synchronisation tasks using Rsync or proprietary tools. These backups can include filters for file type, size, and modification date, making them adaptable to both personal and small office usage. In practice, the storage controls are intuitive and well-implemented for a first-generation NAS platform, with sufficient safeguards for casual users who might otherwise rely on third-party cloud apps.

Application availability has steadily improved since UGREEN’s NAS debut in 2023 (at least, in the ‘west’, as they have been a NAS name in the east since 2020/2021). The App Center now includes a range of first-party utilities such as a file manager, photo station, video station, and music library, as well as third-party options like Plex, Jellyfin, and Docker containers. AI-based features such as face, text, and object recognition are supported thanks to the 6 TOPS NPU in the RK3576, though performance varies depending on workload size. The integrated Vault app provides encrypted storage areas secured by password or downloadable key, which can be auto-locked on reboot for privacy. Meanwhile, the mobile companion app mirrors almost every desktop function, from user and storage administration to Docker control and media playback. Having all management tasks accessible within a single unified mobile app, rather than separate applications for photos or video, demonstrates UGREEN’s streamlined approach to usability, positioning UGOS Pro as a consumer-friendly OS that hides most of the NAS complexity from first-time users. However, I cannot stress enough that this software is still a decent way behind long-established players such as Synology DSM and QNAP QTS in terms of features, maturity and client support. Additionally, as one of the newest names in the world of NAS, the brand has yet to be truly ‘tested’ when it comes to security strength and how they handle/respond to a larger scale security incident. So wheat we find here is good enough for hte price point, but is only a small step or two above what users have come to expect from privately owned NAS nonetheless in 2025/2026.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Heat, Noise and Power Consumption Tests

Thermal and acoustic performance on the UGREEN DH2300 is generally stable and consistent with expectations for a low-power ARM-based NAS. The system uses a single rear-mounted fan that automatically adjusts its RPM in response to internal temperature sensors, aided by the ventilated top and side panels. During extended operation, the fan demonstrated smooth, gradual speed transitions rather than abrupt cycling, which helped minimize background noise. With two 4TB Seagate IronWolf drives installed, the system recorded approximately 31–32 dBA in idle mode with the fan set to “Low” in UGOS. When switched to “Auto,” and under light file activity, readings rose to 33–35 dBA, while heavier read and write operations increased noise levels to 38–41 dBA. Under maximum fan speed, levels peaked at 44–45 dBA, making the fan audible but still within acceptable limits for a desktop environment. The use of plastic housing reduces the resonance that typically amplifies drive vibration in metal enclosures, although some low-frequency hum remains during heavy disk access.

Temperature readings taken over a 24-hour mixed-use test period show that the chassis maintains good internal thermal balance, aided by vertical airflow and efficient low-wattage components. The NAS was powered down overnight before the test, then reactivated for hourly upload and backup tasks, simulating intermittent real-world usage. During idle periods, the drives stabilized at 35–37°C, while moderate access cycles pushed them to 42°C. The motherboard and surrounding airflow remained at approximately 34–35°C, with rear exhaust temperatures registering slightly higher. Despite the passive nature of some cooling zones, heat accumulation around the CPU remained minimal, peaking around 50–60°C during sustained transfer activity. These figures suggest that UGREEN’s internal airflow design, while basic, is sufficient for continuous operation with standard HDDs. Users in warmer climates or those employing higher-RPM drives might consider increasing fan control sensitivity via UGOS to maintain consistent thermals.