Beelink Me Pro, S, X and MAX, 9x M.2, 10GbE, 5GbE NAS – NEW DIY NAS!

Note – Original Beelink ME Mini from June ’25. Written Review HERE and YouTube Video Review HERE

It has been around a year since Beelink made a major impact in the NAS sector with their $200+ 6-bay flash-based system, the Beelink ME Mini. Although the company already had a strong reputation in the Mini PC space, the ME Mini was their first dedicated NAS, and it ticked all the boxes for many users in terms of price, size, efficiency, performance, and footprint. Fast forward to Q4 2025, and I visited Beelink’s headquarters in Shenzhen, China, to learn more about their “Phase 2” NAS strategy and their expansion into a broader DIY-oriented lineup. This new wave includes several systems under the ME family, designed to remain compact and power-efficient while improving thermal management and scalability. The new range introduces the Beelink ME S, ME X, and ME Max, alongside an upgraded ME Mini Pro that refines the original platform. These systems increase NVMe capacity, introduce 3.5-inch SATA support, and feature a wider range of Intel and AMD processors.

Beelink’s roadmap spans the next 12 months, with initial launches planned for late Q4 2025 and early Q1 2026. It is clear that the company has not been idle since the success of the first ME Mini. The DIY NAS market is growing rapidly, with many users seeking OS-free prebuilt systems that balance simplicity and performance. Since Beelink Mini PCs are already popular among Proxmox and self-hosting enthusiasts, this transition into storage-focused systems could be exactly what those users have been waiting for.

Important 1: Beelink did not fund or sponsor my visit to their headquarters. They did not pay for travel or accommodation, and they have no editorial control over this article or its accompanying video.

---

Hardware Specifications of the Beelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME X and ME Max

The following information is based on a two-hour meeting with Beelink’s founder, product manager, and several engineers at the Shenzhen office, supported by translators. Notes were cross-checked against early prototype visuals and chassis designs. Some translation inaccuracies may exist, but the core technical details are accurate. It is especially notable how much performance Beelink has achieved from Intel’s N150 (Twin Lake) platform and the planned AMD FP8-series processors.

Details about the 2-bay and 4-bay systems were drawn from early 3D models and mock-up shells shared during the meeting.

Important 2: These specifications refer to devices still in development and undergoing testing, so some aspects may change before launch.

---

Beelink ME Mini Gen 2

• 6x M.2 NVMe SSD slots (Gen 3×1, 2280 length)

• Intel N150 CPU (4 cores, 4 threads, x86 architecture)

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots (upgrade from fixed on-board memory)

• Enhanced heat pipe cooling system

• USB Type-A and Type-C ports (10 Gb/s)

• Dual 5 GbE network ports (upgrade from dual 2.5 GbE)

• Internal PSU retained

• TDP increased from 15 W to 25 W

• eMMC storage removed due to minimal user adoption

---

Beelink ME Mini 9 Bay Upgrade

• 9x M.2 NVMe SSD slots (speed TBC, likely Gen 3×1, though bandwidth may be tight on the N150)

• Choice of Intel N150 or AMD FP8-series CPU

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots

• New 120 W PSU, relocated horizontally (replacing the vertical design in the original ME Mini)

• Denser central heat sink assembly (possible translation ambiguity here)

• 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE connectivity (notable if achieved alongside nine SSDs on this platform) – TBC

---

Beelink ME Pro

• Desktop form factor with 2 or 4 x 3.5-inch SATA bays

• Intel N-series CPU

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots

• 2–4 x M.2 NVMe 2280 SSD slots (likely CPU-dependent)

• 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE network ports

• Removable base tray for simplified drive access and maintenance

• Compact metal external chassis

---

Beelink ME Pro S

• Desktop form factor with 2 or 4 x 3.5-inch SATA bays

• Intel 12th/13th/14th/15th Gen CPU

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots

• 2–4 x M.2 NVMe 2280 SSD slots (likely CPU-dependent)

• 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE network ports

• Removable base tray for simplified drive access and maintenance

• Compact metal external chassis

---

Beelink ME Pro X

• Desktop form factor with 2 or 4 x 3.5-inch SATA bays

• Intel N150 or AMD FP8-series CPU

• DDR5 SODIMM memory slots

• 2–4 x M.2 NVMe 2280 SSD slots (likely CPU-dependent)

• 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE network ports

• Removable base tray for simplified drive access and maintenance

• Compact metal external chassis

---

Beelink ME Max (AI-Ready NAS)

• AMD Ryzen  AI Max 395 CPU

• Storage configuration, network layout, and full specifications still TBC

---

Will the New Beelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME X or ME Max Include Turnkey NAS Software?

This remains unconfirmed. The current ME Mini includes Ubuntu installed on a small eMMC partition, but this will be removed in the new systems. Beelink is evaluating integration of Feiniu/fnOS, a semi-open-source NAS operating system from China, though this would likely only be pre-installed on configurations that ship with drives. Users would still have the freedom to install TrueNAS, Unraid, ZimaOS, or OpenMediaVault. The software decision is not finalized yet.

---

Why You Should Care About the Beelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME X and ME Max

Beelink surprised the NAS industry in early 2025 with the ME Mini, which outperformed other compact NVMe NAS units despite being their first attempt at this market. It was roughly 60 percent cheaper than the Asustor Flashstor 6, offered more storage bays and lower temperatures than the GMKtec G9 NucBox, and provided stronger base specifications than the Terramaster D8, all while undercutting UGREEN’s offerings. While Beelink is not yet in the same league as Synology or QNAP, their rapid iteration and innovative hardware design suggest they could become a key player in compact flash-based storage solutions through 2026.

Interested in Buying a Beelink NAS or Mini PC? Support the work we do here at NASCompares, by using the links below.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Beelink ME Mini NAS 2TB + 12GB

Check AliExpress for the Beelink ME Mini NAS 16GB + 64GB

Check the Official Beelink Site for the ME Mini NAS ($209 4/6)

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

UniFi UNAS – 1 Year Later. Should You Buy Now?

It has now been one full year since Ubiquiti made its formal debut in the NAS market with the launch of the UniFi UNAS Pro, a 7-bay rackmount storage system designed to integrate seamlessly within the existing UniFi ecosystem. At launch, the device was seen as a bold but limited step into a space traditionally dominated by established brands such as Synology and QNAP, focusing more on straightforward network storage than application-heavy server functions. Over the following twelve months, the company has steadily expanded the UNAS lineup and rolled out numerous firmware and software updates, refining its NAS operating system, UniFi Drive, and addressing user feedback gathered through real-world testing. From introducing multiple new RAID configurations, encryption, fan control, and USB backup capabilities, to expanding cloud backup support and improving system responsiveness, UniFi has demonstrated a consistent approach to building out the platform incrementally rather than replacing hardware prematurely. Today, the UNAS family includes five systems spanning both desktop and rackmount designs, with capacity options ranging from 2-bay PoE-powered units to 8-bay multi-10GbE solutions. Taken together, these changes illustrate a deliberate evolution of UniFi’s NAS portfolio from a proof of concept into a structured, multi-tier ecosystem with increasing competitiveness in the storage market.

Here are all the current UniFi NAS Solutions & Prices: UniFi UNAS 2 (2 Bay, $199) – HERE UniFi UNAS 4  (4 Bay + 2x M2, $379) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro 4 (4 Bay + 2x M.2, $499) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro (7 Bay, $499) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro 8 (8-Bay + 2x M.2, $799) HERE

Unifi UNAS, 1 Year Later – THE TL;DR:

In a rush and just want the cold facts? Here’s a clear TL;DR breakdown of all major UniFi UNAS product and software changes over the past 12 months, based entirely on your three video transcripts (3 months, 6 months, 1 year). It captures both software and hardware evolution, along with remaining limitations and future signals.

Initial Launch (UNAS Pro, Oct 2024)

• First UniFi NAS, priced at $499, 7-bay rackmount, ARM CPU, 10GbE networking.

• Marketed as “pure storage” for UniFi ecosystem integration, not an app-rich NAS.

• Praised for value, build quality, and easy setup.

• Criticized for missing features: iSCSI, RAID 6, multiple pools, containerization, USB ports, UniFi Protect integration, and limited cloud backup (Google Drive only).

• Early software lacked advanced admin control, backup management, and multi-user oversight.

• SMB performance and file integrity inconsistencies appeared during large data transfers.

• Frequent backend updates released in first quarter, addressing GUI layout, alignment, and minor stability fixes.

---

3-Month Mark (Jan 2025)

• Rapid patching cycle began: RAID 6 added, marking UniFi’s first major new feature.

• Ongoing bugs fixed in the Drive OS interface and file manager.

• Still missing key functionality like iSCSI and multiple pools.

• Admin-level restrictions persisted; super admins could not manage user backups.

• File browser inconsistencies fixed only partially (e.g., trash handling, SMB sync).

• Backups limited to other UNAS or Google Drive, no AWS or S3 options yet.

• Users frustrated by Safari bug (incomplete file downloads on iPhone, later acknowledged by UniFi).

• Performance still below expectations on large SMB transfers; memory leaks and “skipped file” issues noted.

• Despite flaws, praised for value and ongoing support rather than abandonment.

---

6-Month Mark (Apr 2025)

• Software maturity improving, most updates focused on stability rather than new features.

• RAID 6 officially released across all devices, with migration tools from RAID 5 + hot spare.

• New cloud backup options: Dropbox and OneDrive added.

• Admin control improved: super admins could now manage user backups and shared drives.

• File sharing responsiveness and accuracy improved significantly in the GUI.

• New file activity monitor added, showing per-folder change history.

• Apple Time Machine backups now officially supported.

• Fixed .exe execution issue when accessed via SMB.

• Ongoing quality-of-life improvements: faster interface, better consistency, fewer sync issues.

• Remaining issues:

  • Still no iSCSI, no fan control, no scheduled power management, and occasional temperature irregularities.

  • GUI bug showed 20,000 days uptime (fixed later).

• System temperatures remained high (~68–72°C CPU under light load), highlighting poor thermal automation.

• No new NAS hardware yet announced at this point.

---

1-Year Mark (Oct 2025)

• Major expansion: full UNAS lineup introduced.

  • UNAS 2: 2-bay PoE++ desktop ($199).

  • UNAS 4: 4-bay desktop with M.2 slots.

  • UNAS Pro 4: 1U rackmount, 4-bay, dual PSU support.

  • UNAS Pro 8: 8-bay, 3x10GbE ports, 2x M.2 slots ($799).

• Core software improvements across all models:

  • Multiple RAID levels and hot-spare support expanded.

  • Multiple pools and clustered RAID pools introduced (first time UniFi allowed split or mixed pools).

  • M.2 NVMe caching added on larger models (read/write caching only).

  • Encrypted volumes now supported and integrated into backup routines.

  • Fan control added, both manual and automatic.

  • USB-C mounting and backup support for desktop models (UNAS 2, UNAS 4).

  • Expanded cloud backup integration (Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive).

  • Snapshot performance improved, faster rollback and lower latency.

  • SMB and NFS protocols optimized for better throughput and reduced latency.

  • Improved admin tools for shared drives and user management.

---

Software Features Added/Improved in UniFi UNAS in 12 Months

In the twelve months since the release of the original UNAS Pro, UniFi Drive OS has developed from a relatively simple file server interface into a more complete NAS management platform. Early releases of the Drive software offered only basic storage creation and sharing options, limited to single-pool RAID 5 or mirror configurations with few administrative tools. Over time, multiple key features have been introduced, including support for RAID 6, multiple storage pools, clustered RAID pools, and hot spare functionality, each of which was implemented through system firmware updates and confirmed through beta and public release candidates. The platform now supports encrypted volumes, user-defined snapshots, and restoration features, offering greater resilience and improved recovery options after system events or accidental deletions. These updates collectively mark a notable improvement in fault tolerance and customization, allowing the UNAS range to better serve both small business and advanced home deployments that require multiple storage tiers or redundancy strategies.

Beyond storage structure, UniFi Drive has also introduced new tools for day-to-day administration and external connectivity. Cloud backup support has expanded to include Dropbox, OneDrive, and Google Drive, replacing the early limitation to only local or UNAS-to-UNAS replication. Shared drive management now includes central administrative oversight, allowing super admins to configure and monitor user-level backup routines across all profiles. The graphical interface itself has become more responsive, adding a file activity monitor that provides timeline-based access logs for folders and files. Support for Apple Time Machine has been added, as well as improved handling of executable files via SMB, and overall network protocol efficiency has increased through back-end adjustments to Samba and NFS. With these refinements, UniFi Drive OS now feels less like an experimental branch and more like a unified part of the broader UniFi management ecosystem, with greater parity across its networking, surveillance, and storage products.

---

Hardware Products Added/Improved in UniFi UNAS in 12 Months

Since the launch of the original UniFi UNAS Pro in late 2024, Ubiquiti has expanded the UNAS product line into a full hardware family, each model tailored for different deployment scales and power requirements. The first expansion arrived with the compact UNAS 2, a two-bay desktop NAS powered by PoE++, marking the brand’s first use of Power-over-Ethernet as a primary power source for network storage. This device, built around a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 CPU and 4 GB of LPDDR4 memory, aimed to serve as a lightweight edge storage unit for small offices or UniFi network environments that rely on central power distribution. Its 2.5GbE connection and USB-C port (5 Gbps) provided moderate performance for local transfers and basic backup operations, while its non-hot-swappable dual-drive cage emphasized affordability over convenience. This smaller system demonstrated UniFi’s intent to create entry-level options that could still operate within their ecosystem while maintaining core integration with UniFi Drive OS and cloud management via ui.com.

The next step up in the product family is the UNAS 4, a four-bay desktop NAS that builds directly on the UNAS 2’s design but adds more flexibility. It retains the same ARM Cortex-A55 processor and 4 GB RAM, but introduces dual M.2 NVMe slots for SSD caching or storage expansion and four 3.5-inch SATA bays for larger arrays. It still uses 2.5GbE with PoE+++ as its main power and data input, though at the time of writing, UniFi has not confirmed if the final retail version will include a secondary Ethernet port for redundancy or faster link aggregation. This model brings the UniFi storage ecosystem closer to small business-level performance, allowing for RAID 6 redundancy and improved cooling through a refined chassis design. While compact, the inclusion of NVMe caching and full integration into UniFi Drive 3.3 makes it a practical choice for users who want local storage with minimal cabling and higher data throughput.

At the higher end, the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 extend the lineup into the rackmount segment, reinforcing UniFi’s move toward professional and enterprise environments. The UNAS Pro 4 adopts a 1U form factor, supporting four 3.5-inch SATA drives and two M.2 NVMe slots, while maintaining the same ARM Cortex-A57 CPU and 16 GB LPDDR4 memory as its larger sibling. It also supports dual hot-swappable PSUs for redundancy and arrives with improved thermal airflow optimized for data center racks. The flagship UNAS Pro 8 offers eight 3.5-inch bays, two rear M.2 NVMe bays, and three 10GbE ports (one RJ45 and two SFP+), making it the highest-performing UniFi NAS to date. The system consumes up to 200W under load, uses Btrfs as the primary file system, and integrates the most comprehensive cooling and failover options in the UniFi NAS lineup. Together, these models illustrate UniFi’s full-tier hardware strategy: from PoE-powered desktop storage to rackmount systems supporting multi-gigabit networking and dual redundant power.

---

Fixes, Changes and Improvements in UniFi UNAS in 12 Months

Over the past year, UniFi has steadily refined the UNAS operating environment, addressing a number of software and usability issues identified by early adopters of the original UNAS Pro. Many of these improvements were released through incremental firmware updates across both the Drive OS and UniFi Controller platforms. Among the most significant early fixes was the resolution of file handling inconsistencies between the built-in web file manager and SMB-based network access, which previously caused discrepancies when deleting or restoring data.

This issue, which affected synchronization between the NAS GUI and mapped network shares, has now been corrected. Similarly, early memory leak and permission errors during large-scale SMB transfers have been resolved through back-end optimization, reducing skipped files and improving overall data reliability. Updates to the system logs and storage integrity checks also brought clearer reporting of failed transfers and RAID rebuild activity, ensuring that users now receive consistent system notifications and warnings.

Another key focus for UniFi’s development team over the last twelve months has been user management, network integration, and environmental control. Earlier versions of Drive OS restricted backup operations to individual users, preventing the super admin from managing backups or schedules across the system. This has since been rectified, allowing full central backup management, while user permission hierarchies have been expanded to distinguish between local-only accounts, remote accounts, and enterprise identity-linked users.

Environmental improvements include the long-requested fan control interface, which gives users the option to manually adjust fan speeds or keep automatic control active depending on temperature thresholds. The addition of real-time thermal monitoring, more accurate CPU and drive temperature reporting, and improved resource graphs now make it easier to track system health. The Drive 3.3 release also introduced a refined GUI with more responsive dashboard elements, consistent data updates in the system console, and a correction to the long-standing uptime reporting bug that falsely displayed “20,000 days active.”

---

 

Missing Features and Planned Features in UniFi UNAS in the Next 12 Months

Despite significant progress since the launch of the original UNAS Pro, several key features are still missing from the UniFi Drive OS ecosystem. The most frequently requested addition from users continues to be iSCSI target and initiator support, a capability that would allow direct block-level storage mapping for virtual machines and professional applications. Its absence limits the UNAS series to traditional network file protocols such as SMB and NFS, which are less efficient for tasks requiring raw storage access or integration with virtualization platforms. Equally, the continued lack of RAID 0 support restricts high-performance users who are willing to trade redundancy for speed. While RAID 6 and clustered pools have been introduced, there is still no configuration option that prioritizes sequential throughput over redundancy. Another omission is a native UniFi Drive client tool for Windows, macOS, or Linux that would allow direct desktop synchronization, local file pinning, and on-demand streaming similar to Synology Drive or Dropbox. At present, users must rely on the web interface or manually mapped drives, which limits productivity and offline access.

Looking forward, UniFi has hinted through developer notes and recent firmware structure that the ENAS (Enterprise NAS) line will introduce ZFS file system support, marking a major shift toward high-end storage with data integrity and snapshot efficiency beyond Btrfs. This aligns with the observed trend of UniFi testing ZFS integration within their enterprise roadmap, possibly extending limited functionality to future revisions of the Pro 4 and Pro 8. The upcoming UniFi Drive 3.3 and 3.4 updates are also expected to expand fan and power scheduling, allowing users to define specific system on/off cycles and control Ethernet port activation schedules, effectively creating customizable air-gap routines. Additionally, UniFi’s roadmap includes exploring expansion connectivity, potentially leveraging unused 10GbE interfaces for network-based expansion enclosures or storage clustering between UNAS units. This would mirror the high-availability (HA) or expansion behavior of established NAS brands, though implemented entirely over the UniFi network layer.

UniFi is also expected to refine NVMe handling, particularly the ability to use installed M.2 drives as standalone storage pools rather than just as cache devices. The introduction of pool-level tiering and dynamic storage balancing could allow users to automatically assign workloads between SSD and HDD pools, improving I/O efficiency without manual adjustment. Beyond hardware-level improvements, there is ongoing demand for the integration of UniFi Protect within the NAS family, allowing video surveillance to run on the same physical storage units rather than on separate NVRs. Although UniFi has historically separated its Protect and Drive ecosystems, internal hardware similarities between the UNAS Pro and UNVR Pro systems suggest eventual compatibility is possible. Finally, more advanced backup filters, bandwidth scheduling, and automated snapshot policies are likely to appear in the next major OS iteration as part of UniFi’s effort to close the gap with traditional NAS brands while maintaining its minimalist network-first design approach.

---

Conclusion and Verdict – Is the UniFi UNAS Good Now?

One year after the launch of the original UniFi UNAS Pro, the UniFi NAS platform has evolved from a single experimental product into a diversified ecosystem that spans both desktop and rackmount storage. The introduction of the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, and UNAS Pro 8 demonstrates that Ubiquiti is committed to building a scalable product range capable of serving both home users and small business environments. On the software side, the development of UniFi Drive OS has been steady and deliberate, with a focus on improving reliability, expanding RAID options, and tightening cloud and local backup integration. These changes, combined with improved temperature management, admin-level control, and performance tuning for SMB and NFS, have resulted in a more mature and dependable NAS experience than the early versions from 2024. However, the range remains deliberately streamlined, prioritizing simplicity and ecosystem integration over third-party app support or virtualization features.

Looking ahead, the next phase of the UniFi NAS roadmap appears to focus on deeper enterprise integration and feature parity with long-standing NAS brands. The likely addition of iSCSI, ZFS, and network-based expansion options will determine how far UniFi can move beyond entry and mid-range use cases. The hardware continues to rely on ARM processors rather than x86, which reinforces UniFi’s focus on efficiency and security but limits advanced workloads such as containerization and VM hosting. Even so, the value proposition remains strong, particularly given the aggressive pricing across the entire UNAS range and its seamless compatibility with the existing UniFi infrastructure. Overall, UniFi’s NAS systems are no longer a novelty—they represent a serious and rapidly developing branch of the company’s portfolio that has gained stability, utility, and confidence within just one year.

You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 8 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

Here are all the current UniFi NAS Solutions & Prices: UniFi UNAS 2 (2 Bay, $199) – HERE UniFi UNAS 4  (4 Bay + 2x M2, $379) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro 4 (4 Bay + 2x M.2, $499) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro (7 Bay, $499) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro 8 (8-Bay + 2x M.2, $799) HERE

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Le TerraMaster F4-425 est un NAS à 4 baies qui se positionne comme une solution abordable pour tous ceux qui recherchent de bonnes performances sans exploser leur budget. Il embarque un processeur Intel N5095 pouvant atteindre 2,9 GHz, épaulé par 4 Go de mémoire vive. Sur le papier, ce petit boîtier promet des performances solides à un tarif compétitif. Voyons ce qu’il vaut réellement…

Test du TerraMaster F4-425

Cela faisait plusieurs jours que nous utilisons ce nouveau NAS TerraMaster. Le moins que l’on puisse dire, c’est qu’il ne laisse pas indifférent. Sur le papier, il faut avouer qu’il a tout pour plaire… mais est-il vraiment à la hauteur ?

Contenu de la boîte

À l’ouverture, on trouve :

• Le NAS TerraMaster F4-425 ;
• 1 câble réseau RJ45 ;
• Des vis de fixation pour les SSD ;
• Une alimentation externe avec son câble ;
• Un guide de démarrage rapide ;
• Un livret de garantie.

Rien de superflu, mais tout ce qu’il faut pour commencer.

Construction du NAS et design

Le F4-425 arbore un design sobre et classique à la fois. Entièrement conçu en plastique noir rigide, il mesure 222 x 179 x 154 mm pour un poids de 2,1 kg. À l’arrière, on retrouve un ventilateur imposant de 12 cm, chargé de maintenir le boîtier au frais.

Connectique

Côté connectique, le NAS propose l’essentiel :

• 1 port USB 3.0 (à l’arrière) ;
• 2 ports USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gb/s), dont un à l’avant ;
• 1 port RJ45 2,5 Gb/s ;
• 1 sortie HDMI.

Un ensemble simple mais suffisant pour la majorité des utilisateurs domestiques ou professionnels légers.

Intérieur du F4-425

Le TerraMaster F4-425 est construit autour d’un processeur Quad Core Intel N5095 cadencé à 2 GHz (jusqu’à 2,9 GHz en mode turbo). Ce processeur est bien connu (et un peu ancien) puisque les premiers NAS à le proposer ont plus de 4 ans. Selon le site PassMark, il obtient un score 4011 points, au-dessous de la moyenne actuelle (autour de 5500 points).

Côté RAM, on regrette un peu que TerraMaster se limite encore à 4 Go en 2025. Heureusement, il est possible d’étendre la RAM jusqu’à 16 Go, mais attention… un seul emplacement est disponible.

TOS 6

Le NAS fonctionne sous TOS 6.0, le système d’exploitation maison de TerraMaster. Il propose une interface claire, plusieurs applications préinstallées et un assistant de démarrage accessible via http://tnas.local/

Après avoir passé le guide de démarrage, le système lance automatiquement son Conseiller de sécurité. Ce dernier permet de rechercher d’éventuel problème de configuration ou de sécurité. C’est une excellente idée, mais le novice aura peut-être des difficultés à comprendre certains termes. Si on clique dessus, on accède automatiquement à plus de détail, ainsi qu’un lien pour corriger cette alerte…

Par défaut, TOS 6 crée un groupe de stockage TRAID (une forme de RAID évolutif propre à TerraMaster) avec le système de fichiers Btrfs. Cette configuration peut être modifiée par la suite, mais il est bon de le savoir avant de lancer l’installation. TRAID, c’est l’équivalent du SHR chez Synology.

TOS 6 reste encore légèrement derrière ses concurrents directs, mais il progresse rapidement. D’ailleurs, TOS 7 a déjà été annoncé…s ans date de sortie officielle pour le moment.

Applications

Le centre d’applications de TOS recense actuellement 52 applications (au moment du test). On y retrouve des solutions maison pour la sauvegarde, la gestion de photos, la vidéosurveillance, mais aussi des outils populaires comme Docker, Portainer, Jellyfin, Plex, WordPress, VirtualBox ou encore Transmission.

Pour les utilisateurs avancés, il est également possible d’installer des applications communautaires, élargissant un peu plus les possibilités du NAS.

Performances du F4-425

Dans la première partie de nos tests, nous allons évaluer les performances des transferts à travers un réseau 2,5 Gb/s (entre le NAS et des ordinateurs). Ensuite, nous regarderons les capacités du processeur, en analysant ses performances dans la virtualisation et le transcodage vidéo.

Vitesses dans les transferts

Depuis plusieurs années, nous avons mis en place un protocole de tests rigoureux fournissant des données fiables et comparables avec les performances des autres NAS. Pour cela, nous utilisons 4 applications de mesure différentes (2 sous macOS et 2 sous Windows) et réalisons en plus des transferts de fichiers de tailles variées dans les deux sens (NAS -> Ordinateur puis Ordinateur -> NAS) :

• Petites tailles : 100 fichiers de 500 Ko à 12 Mo (MP3, photos, documents Office)
• Tailles moyennes : 30 fichiers de 12 à 350 Mo (DivX, images RAW, archives ZIP)
• Fichiers volumineux : 10 fichiers avec une taille comprise entre 4 et 10 Go (MKV, ISO)

À partir de ces tests, nous calculons une moyenne des transferts que nous représentons sous forme de graphiques, exprimée en mégaoctets par seconde. Plus le nombre est élevé, plus le NAS est rapide. Pour notre évaluation du F4-425, nous avons configuré un premier volume avec 2 SSD en RAID 0, puis en RAID 0 avec le chiffrement des données et enfin avec 3 SSD en RAID 5.

RAID 0

Le NAS configuré en RAID 0 offrent de jolies performances, plutôt bien équilibrées dans l’ensemble. On aurait aimé atteindre (voire dépasser) les 270 Mo/s en lecture, mais on n’est pas loin.

RAID 0 + Crypt

 

Avec le chiffrement des données, on perd en écriture (ce qui est logique)… mais avec ce NAS, on perd également en lecture.

RAID 5

En RAID 5, les performances sont là… mais encore ici, elles n’impressionnent pas.

Performances générales

Le F4-425 est compatible avec VirtualBox, permettant la création de machines virtuelles (Windows ou Linux). Cependant, son processeur montre rapidement ses limites pour la virtualisation lourde. Il est bien plus à l’aise avec des conteneurs Docker, qui consomment beaucoup moins de ressources.

Grâce à son iGPU intégré, le NAS prend en charge le transcodage matériel pour la vidéo. Il peut ainsi gérer plusieurs flux simultanés sans ralentissements, un vrai atout pour ceux qui utilisent Plex ou Jellyfin !

Consommation électrique et nuisance sonore

Le ventilateur arrière reste discret dans la plupart des situations, même s’il devient audible de près. Côté consommation, le F4-425 affiche entre 15 et 17 W en utilisation normale (avec trois SSD) et jusqu’à 22 W lors de tâches intensives.

Can We Forgive and Forget The Synology HDD Compatibility Flip Flop?

Synology’s recent reversal on hard drive compatibility has reopened a larger debate about whether its NAS systems remain a trustworthy and sensible choice for both new buyers and long-term users. Throughout most of 2025, the company faced sustained criticism after enforcing strict drive verification checks that prevented users from installing or operating third-party HDDs and SSDs from major brands like Seagate and Western Digital. This policy, applied to the new Plus-series NAS models such as the DS925+, DS1525+, and DS1825+, effectively forced customers to purchase Synology’s own branded media or risk an unusable system. For a company long regarded as the industry standard for dependable and user-friendly storage solutions, the move appeared both unexpected and self-defeating. Although Synology later justified the decision as a way to ensure system stability and reliability, the backlash was immediate and global, with declining sales and widespread frustration among users who saw the change as a form of corporate overreach. Now, with the brand having confirmed a full rollback through the DSM 7.3 update—restoring support for non-Synology drives and removing prior warning prompts—the discussion has shifted. While the reversal is seen as a victory for users, it also highlights how fragile consumer confidence has become, and how a single policy misstep can redefine a company’s relationship with its community.

Below, my original video after the change by Synology after 6 months of their strict HDD media stance:

What Did Synology Do Wrong?

Synology’s critical mistake was implementing a restrictive hardware policy that undermined one of its key historical strengths: flexibility. For years, the company had built its reputation on offering an intuitive software platform, DSM, that ran on a wide variety of hardware configurations. By deciding to enforce hard drive compatibility restrictions in the 2025 generation of Plus-series NAS systems, Synology effectively turned once-open devices into closed platforms. The systems refused to initialise DSM or create storage pools when non-Synology drives were detected, and even when users managed to proceed, the interface was flooded with persistent warnings labelling third-party media as “unverified” or “at risk.” This move frustrated not only home users who wanted affordable upgrade options, but also small businesses that relied on Synology NAS for their daily operations. It created unnecessary technical and financial barriers at a time when alternative NAS vendors were offering greater compatibility and value. The brand’s own messaging made the situation worse: early statements focused on “system integrity” and “firmware optimisation” but failed to acknowledge that the change mainly benefited Synology’s hardware sales rather than the end user.

The second major error lay in how the company managed the fallout. Synology’s communication strategy throughout the controversy was inconsistent, fragmented, and in some regions almost non-existent. Different regional branches released conflicting press materials, with some hinting that compatibility with Seagate and Western Digital drives would soon return, while others maintained silence. No clear timeline or explanation was given for the testing process or the reasoning behind such aggressive enforcement. As a result, long-standing partners and distributors were left unsure of how to address customer concerns. Meanwhile, the online community—particularly on Reddit, NAS forums, and YouTube—quickly filled the information vacuum, fuelling frustration and speculation. Instead of clarifying the company’s intentions, Synology appeared defensive and disengaged, disabling comments on some of its own videos and refusing to directly address mounting criticism. This combination of restrictive policy and poor communication not only hurt its reputation but also suggested a growing disconnect between the brand’s leadership and its user base.

Why Are Users Mad at Synology?

Many users felt betrayed by Synology’s actions because the company had long marketed itself as the reliable, user-first alternative to more complex or DIY storage solutions. For years, Synology’s systems were praised for their openness—allowing customers to build their NAS setups using widely available components from trusted brands like Seagate, WD, and Toshiba. The introduction of hard drive restrictions in 2025 fundamentally altered that relationship. Suddenly, the same users who had invested heavily in Synology’s ecosystem found themselves unable to upgrade, expand, or even install DSM without purchasing the brand’s own drives, which were often rebranded versions of existing enterprise models sold at a premium. The move was viewed as a breach of trust, and the lack of transparency surrounding it only made things worse. Many saw it as an attempt to create a closed ecosystem that prioritised recurring hardware profits over customer freedom. This frustration was compounded by the timing—during a period when users were already facing higher hardware costs and tighter IT budgets, making Synology’s restrictive approach feel especially tone-deaf.

The Alerts and ‘Warnings’ that users have gotten used to up tll now (i.e pre DSM 7.3 roll out):

Another major source of anger came from how the policy rollout created confusion and inconsistency across Synology’s product lineup. While the Plus-series desktop NAS models received the strictest restrictions, larger RackStation and XS-series devices remained unaffected, creating the impression that Synology viewed its home and small-business customers as expendable. Even after announcing the rollback with DSM 7.3, many users noted that the company’s official compatibility lists still failed to mention Seagate or WD drives, and that public communication about the change was minimal. For those outside tech circles, this meant that the situation looked unchanged—product pages still implied that only Synology drives were supported, and many older negative reviews remained visible online. As a result, even with the restrictions now lifted, the perception of Synology as a brand willing to prioritise profit over user loyalty persists. The long delay in addressing community backlash, combined with inconsistent messaging, has left many customers sceptical that this U-turn represents a genuine shift rather than damage control.

What Did Synology Do to Fix This?

Synology’s eventual fix came in the form of a full policy reversal integrated into DSM 7.3, the company’s next major software update. With this version, users of the 2025 generation of Plus-series NAS devices—including models such as the DS925+, DS1525+, and DS1825+—regained the ability to freely use third-party hard drives and SSDs. The update removed not only the installation barriers but also the persistent “unverified drive” and “at risk” warnings that had previously appeared in Storage Manager. For most users, this restored full functionality, allowing them to initialise DSM, create and expand RAID arrays, use hot spares, and assign SSDs for caching without restrictions. The change essentially returned Synology’s systems to the state they were in before the controversial policy was introduced earlier in the year. The reversal applied primarily to desktop-class NAS systems rather than rackmount or XS-series models, suggesting that Synology wanted to restore goodwill among its core consumer and small-business audience first.

However, the way Synology implemented this reversal has drawn mixed responses. Instead of releasing a simple compatibility database update, which could have resolved the issue quickly, the company bundled the fix into a full DSM version upgrade. That meant users had to install an entirely new operating system build to regain third-party drive support, even if they were otherwise satisfied with their existing DSM 7.2 installations. For those managing multiple NAS units or enterprise environments, this created complications, especially since DSM 7.3 initially lacked a public beta and required careful validation before deployment.

The company also issued few direct statements about the rollback, opting instead for limited press communications that focused on “listening to customer feedback.” Despite the importance of the change, Synology’s product pages still make little mention of renewed Seagate and WD compatibility, leaving potential buyers to rely on external coverage or word of mouth. While the technical fix was effective, the manner of its rollout showed that Synology’s communication strategy remains cautious, reactive, and focused on damage limitation rather than proactive transparency.

What were/are the benefits of Buying Synology-branded Hard Drives and SSDs?

In parallel with the policy adjustments introduced in DSM 7.3, Synology has also begun expanding a series of benefits and incentives aimed at customers who purchase Synology NAS systems together with Synology-branded storage media. These initiatives are part of the company’s ongoing effort to strengthen its vertically integrated ecosystem, ensuring optimal performance and reliability when all components come from the same source. In selected markets, buyers who purchase Synology HAT, HAS, or SAT series drives on the same invoice as their NAS hardware now receive extended warranty coverage of up to five years, administered directly through authorized distributors and resellers. In addition, Synology has introduced an Express Replacement program, allowing for immediate drive swaps during the warranty period without waiting for the defective unit to be shipped and inspected, effectively mirroring the convenience of a premium RMA service. These benefits are available at no extra cost when drives are purchased through approved channels. The initiative is designed to make Synology’s validated ecosystem more appealing to businesses seeking predictable lifecycle management and faster recovery in the event of hardware failure, while also providing an incentive for users to standardize on Synology-branded components rather than mixing third-party storage.

Head over to Blackvoid HERE to read Luka’s great write-up on DSM 7.3 below:

Why Are Some Users Unconvinced?

Many long-time Synology owners remain sceptical because the company’s pattern of restrictive decision-making has not been limited to hard drives. Over the years, Synology has gradually tightened control over hardware support in other areas, such as M.2 NVMe SSD usage, network adapters, and GPU compatibility. Even though the recent rollback allows full use of third-party HDDs and SSDs in Plus-series models, the same freedom does not apply to NVMe storage. Users still cannot create storage pools or volumes on M.2 drives unless they are Synology-branded, which reinforces the perception that the company is only willing to compromise when it faces enough public pressure. Critics point out that while Synology deserves credit for reversing the hard drive restrictions, it has shown no similar flexibility in other parts of its ecosystem. This selective openness suggests a tactical move designed to repair short-term reputation damage rather than a genuine shift toward more open hardware policies. As a result, many users fear that future DSM updates could easily reintroduce similar restrictions under a different justification.

Another concern is that Synology has not done enough to communicate these changes clearly to new buyers. Even after the DSM 7.3 announcement, the company’s official compatibility lists for 2025 models still prioritise its own drives, with no explicit mention of Seagate or WD models being supported again. For first-time users who rely on these lists for purchasing decisions, there is no clear indication that the policy has changed.

This lack of transparency undermines confidence in Synology’s commitment to openness. Furthermore, the decision to tie the rollback to a major DSM update rather than a smaller patch raises worries that the company could use similar tactics in the future to control hardware functionality through software revisions. Many see the reversal as a necessary correction rather than an act of goodwill, and that distinction matters. Users may accept Synology’s reasoning for now, but the brand’s reputation for reliability has been replaced by a lingering doubt about whether it can be trusted to keep its platform open and user-focused.

NAS Series	Drives on Compatibility List	Drives Not Listed	Drives on Incompatibility List
RS Plus (e.g., RS2423+, RS422+)	Supported for new installation, storage pool creation, and migration	Supported only for migration; cannot create new storage pools or caches	Fully blocked from all operations
DVA/NVR Series (e.g., DVA1622, DVA3221, NVR1218)	Supported for installation and migration	Supported only for migration; cannot create new storage pools	Fully blocked from all operations
Supported Drive Types	HDD and 2.5″ SATA SSD	HDD and 2.5″ SATA SSD (migration only)	All drive types blocked
Drive Example Notes	Synology HAT5300/HAT3300 verified; select enterprise drives	Seagate IronWolf, SkyHawk, WD Purple not yet verified for use	Drives failing thermal or firmware tests
Use Case	Rackmount and surveillance workloads requiring consistent write throughput	Data migration or backup restoration	Unsupported entirely

Should You Trust Synology NAS Again?

Trusting Synology again depends largely on how much users value its software ecosystem compared to its corporate behaviour. The company’s DSM operating system remains one of the most advanced and stable NAS platforms available, offering a wide range of applications for backup, surveillance, multimedia, and virtualization that are unmatched by most competitors. For those who prioritise reliability, ease of use, and integration over raw hardware flexibility, Synology still provides a compelling product. The reintroduction of unrestricted hard drive support in DSM 7.3 restores much of the practical functionality that users lost earlier this year, and for many, that will be enough to justify purchasing a new NAS. From a technical standpoint, the Plus-series devices are still capable and efficient, with consistent performance, strong data protection features, and excellent long-term support. In short, the hardware remains solid, and the software continues to define Synology’s market dominance in turnkey storage solutions.

Below, references to the change in hard drive support policy are either absent in release notes or severely underplayed on the compatibility pages as of 3rd Nov 2025.

However, from a consumer trust perspective, caution is still warranted. The brand’s repeated pattern of restricting features, followed by later partial reversals, has left many wary that similar policies could return in future product generations. Even though DSM 7.3 represents a positive correction, Synology has not issued any long-term assurances that it will maintain this open stance. There is also concern about how much influence profit margins and proprietary hardware incentives continue to have over product decisions. For experienced users, the safest approach may be to treat Synology as a premium but increasingly closed ecosystem—one that delivers outstanding software at the cost of long-term flexibility. Whether it is “okay” to buy a Synology NAS now depends on priorities: if you value a polished interface and dependable system behaviour above everything else, Synology is still one of the best options available. But if transparency, open standards, and full hardware freedom matter more, then the company’s recent U-turn should be seen not as a full restoration of trust, but as a cautious and temporary concession to public pressure.

If/When you do wish to purchase a Synology NAS, please do use the links below in order to purchase your NAS. Doing so results in a small commission coming to me and Ed here at NASCompares, and it allows us to keep doing what we do here, and is the most frictionless and zero-cost way for you to support our articles, reviews, videos, guides, support systems and more.

Synology DS925+ NAS	Synology DS1525+ NAS	Synology DS1825+ NAS
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS925+ NAS	Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS1525+ NAS @ $799	Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS1825+ NAS @ $1149
heck B&H for the Synology DS925+ NAS	B&H for the Synology DS1525+ NAS @ $1149.99	B&H for the Synology DS1825+ NAS @ $1149.99

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

TerraMaster est un fabricant de solutions de stockage qui propose notamment des NAS. Ce dernier vient d’annoncer l’arrivée de TOS 7, son nouveau système maison. Le constructeur promet une refonte majeure avec de nouvelles fonctionnalités, une interface revue et plus fluide. Regardons ensemble les évolutions de ce dernier…

TOS 7, le nouveau TerraMaster

TerraMaster vient d’annoncer une mise à jour importante de son système (TerraMaster Operating System) : TOS 7. Actuellement, c’est TOS 6 qui anime les NAS du fabricant et il faut avouer que cette précédente version avait apporté un vent de fraicheur. Un an après, la nouvelle version est annoncée…

Quelles nouveautés attendre dans TOS 7 ?

TOS 7 devrait marquer une véritable évolution pour les utilisateurs de NAS TerraMaster. Le fabricant annonce plus de 50 nouvelles fonctionnalités et plus de 1 000 optimisations. L’interface utilisateur a été entièrement revue : design modernisé, navigation simplifiée et expérience plus cohérente.

L’objectif : rendre l’utilisation des NAS TerraMaster plus intuitive et agréable, tant pour les particuliers que pour les professionnels. Cette refonte place désormais la marque dans la course face aux acteurs historiques du secteur.

TerraMaster a mis en ligne une page dédiée sur TOS 7 et une vidéo… et le moins que l’on puisse dire, c’est que le fabricant a mis la barre très haute.

Interface et ergonomie

Avec TOS 7, TerraMaster revoit l’expérience utilisateur. On passe rapidement sur les icônes qui ont été redessinées… on appréciera d’apprendre que plus de 50 nouvelles fonctionnalités ont été ajoutées et 1 000 optimisations destinées à améliorer la fluidité et la réactivité du système. L’interface propose une navigation totalement personnalisable. Le fabricant annonce une hausse de 60 % de l’efficacité globale.

Productivité et collaboration

Le gestionnaire de fichiers évolue en profondeur avec l’apparition des modules My Files et Desktop, permettant notamment le montage à distance simplifié et une navigation plus rapide via des vues par onglets ou fractionnées. TerraMaster annonce la prise en charge native des fichiers ISO (sans passer par Dossier partagé), ainsi qu’une corbeille unifiée.

TOS 7 intègre aussi de nouveaux outils de collaboration en ligne : il est désormais possible d’éditer en temps réel des documents Word, Excel et PowerPoint sans téléchargement préalable.

Administration et sécurité

Sur le plan de la gestion au quotidien, TOS 7 introduit une refonte complète du gestionnaire de stockage. L’utilisateur bénéficie de vues visuelles claires des volumes, d’outils de migration et de suppression de disques améliorés, ainsi que d’une optimisation adaptative des grappes RAID.

La gestion des permissions devient plus fine, avec jusqu’à 13 types de droits personnalisables, répondants aux exigences des utilisateurs dans les environnements de plus en plus complexes. Autre nouveauté importante, TOS 7 propose un contrôle réseau précis, en offrant la possibilité de limiter la vitesse des ports et d’allouer la bande passante par service ou par appareil. Ce système évite qu’un seul service ne monopolise les ressources et garantit une utilisation équilibrée du réseau.

Développement et personnalisation

Le Centre d’applications s’enrichit de 10 nouvelles catégories, d’un déploiement Docker en un clic et d’un suivi détaillé des journaux pour une meilleure supervision. Pour les utilisateurs avancés, TerraMaster introduit un mode développeur complet : accès root, compatibilité avec Ubuntu et prise en charge des machines virtuelles (VM), sans passer par un logiciel tiers.

Cette ouverture à la virtualisation permet d’isoler des applications ou de tester des environnements distincts.

En synthèse

Avec TOS 7, TerraMaster franchit un cap en combinant refonte graphique, performance accrue et nouvelles fonctionnalités. Les outils de collaboration, la gestion réseau avancée et la virtualisation rapprochent les NAS TerraMaster des solutions professionnelles les plus complètes.

Pour l’instant, TOS 7 n’est disponible qu’en version Preview, réservée aux volontaires et pouvant contenir des bugs. Aucune date de sortie officielle n’a été annoncée… et il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs mois avant la version finale, comme ce fut le cas pour TOS 6.

source

Synology vient d’annoncer la sortie de SRM 1.3.1 Update 14, la dernière version de son logiciel interne dédié à ses routeurs. Cela faisait plusieurs mois que le fabricant n’avait pas donner de nouvelle… Regardons ensemble ce que contient cette nouvelle mouture.

Synology SRM 1.3.1 Update 14

Synology continue d’assurer le suivi de ses routeurs, mais force est de constater que les mises à jour se font rares. La précédente datait de mars 2025, et avant cela, il faut remonter à octobre 2024. Autrement dit, environ deux mises à jour par an, souvent sans grandes nouveautés.

Cette Update 14 ne déroge pas à la règle. Le journal des modifications ne mentionne qu’une seule ligne :

• Optimisation du mécanisme de vérification de la connectivité réseau.

Rien de plus, rien de moins… Une note de version particulièrement succincte, qui laisse perplexe quant à la nature exacte de l’amélioration. Synology reste avare en détails techniques. Si on appréciera le suivi logiciel, on aimerait aussi que les mises à jour apportent de réelles évolutions fonctionnelles.

Pour rappel, cela fait maintenant 3 ans que les routeurs Synology tournent sous SRM 1.3.1, sans qu’une nouvelle version majeure ne voie le jour.

Télécharger et installer SRM 1.3.1 Update 14

Cette mise à jour est disponible pour tous les routeurs Synology, à l’exception du modèle RT1900ac. 2 options s’offrent à vous pour l’installation :

• Mise à jour automatique :
  Installez-la directement depuis l’interface d’administration de votre routeur.
• Mise à jour manuelle :
  Téléchargez le fichier .PAT correspondant à votre modèle depuis la page officielle de Synology ou depuis l’archive en ligne.

Le fichier d’installation pèse environ 71 Mo.

Si la mise à jour automatique ne vous est pas encore proposée, voici la procédure d’installation manuelle :

1. Téléchargez le fichier .PAT adapté à votre modèle de routeur
2. Accédez à l’interface d’administration du routeur
3. Allez dans : Panneau de configuration > Système > Mise à jour et restauration
4. Cliquez sur Mise à jour manuelle de SRM
5. Sélectionnez le fichier téléchargé précédemment et suivez les instructions affichées à l’écran
6. Patientez pendant le processus de mise à jour : le routeur redémarrera automatiquement.

En synthèse

SRM 1.3.1 Update 14 est une mise à jour surprenante, surtout par sa discrétion. Si l’on peut saluer l’effort de Synology de continuer à maintenir ses produits, l’absence de nouveautés concrètes laisse s’interroger sur l’avenir de la gamme de routeurs Synology, dont le rythme d’évolution semble aujourd’hui très limité.

Review of the Sharge Disk Pro Mobile Hub and Docking Station

The Sharge Disk Pro is a compact external SSD and multifunction USB hub aimed at users who need additional high-speed storage and connectivity for their mobile or desktop devices. Measuring roughly the size of a credit card and just 11mm thick, it merges solid-state storage, data transfer, and video output within a single enclosure. The device is equipped with an integrated USB-C cable, a fan-assisted thermal system, and a magnetic mounting design that allows it to attach securely to compatible smartphones, handheld gaming consoles, or laptops. Available in 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB versions, it uses 162-layer 3D TLC NAND flash and supports sustained 10Gbps transfers via USB 3.2 Gen 2. The Disk Pro also includes active and automatic fan modes designed to regulate temperature during extended operation. Unlike a standard enclosure, it has no option for user-upgradeable storage, with Sharge citing the closed design as essential for cooling performance. The product is currently being crowdfunded through Kickstarter, with early pricing beginning at $189 for the 1TB model and scaling to $469 for the 4TB version, and retail availability expected after the campaign concludes.

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Quick Conclusion

The Sharge Disk Pro is a compact 10Gbps external SSD and USB hub that stands out for its active cooling system, magnetic mounting, and integrated cable design. It delivers sustained read and write speeds of around 800–900MB/s without thermal throttling, even under prolonged load, thanks to its effective fan-assisted cooling. Its multi-port layout, including HDMI 2.1, USB-C PD, and USB-A connectivity, makes it suitable for both laptops and mobile devices, functioning as a miniature docking station. However, it has several trade-offs: the internal SSD cannot be upgraded or replaced, there is no hardware encryption, and the fixed USB-C cable limits repairability. Noise from the fan is noticeable during heavy use, and while its 10Gbps limit caps peak performance, overall reliability and heat management make it a strong all-in-one solution for portable data and connectivity needs.

Note – The Sharge Disk Pro is NOW LIVE HERE

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Design and Storage

The Sharge Disk Pro adopts a slim, rectangular chassis with a transparent, cyberpunk-style exterior typical of the brand’s product line. At just 11mm thick and weighing approximately 150g, it remains small enough to slip into a pocket or attach directly to the rear of a device via its magnetic backplate. Sharge provides several self-adhesive magnetic rings that enable mounting on laptops, smartphones, and handheld consoles, including MagSafe or Qi2-compatible models. This mounting flexibility is particularly useful when connecting the device to mobile systems with limited space or single-port connectivity, allowing it to remain flush with the device body during use rather than dangling on a cable.

Internally, the Disk Pro integrates TLC NAND flash storage that is permanently sealed within the casing. It comes in 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB configurations, but does not support user replacement or expansion. Sharge has stated that opening the casing would compromise the structural integrity of the fan-assisted cooling system, which directs airflow directly across the SSD and controller. While this closed design limits user flexibility, it contributes to improved durability and controlled thermals during sustained data operations, addressing a common weakness in other compact SSDs that tend to throttle under heavy load.

Externally, the unit uses an aluminium frame combined with a transparent plastic shell that reveals parts of its internal structure. The materials provide both aesthetic appeal and heat dissipation, with the aluminium core helping to channel heat away from the NAND and controller components. The integrated USB-C cable is short and reinforced, designed for use with laptops, tablets, and mobile phones without introducing unnecessary slack. Although the compactness is one of the Disk Pro’s strongest traits, it does come at the cost of expandability and limited repair potential due to the permanently sealed housing.

From a storage standpoint, Sharge’s choice of 162-layer 3D TLC NAND provides a balance of endurance and sustained performance, suitable for large data transfers, video capture, or use as external storage for gaming devices. Each model is preformatted for exFAT to ensure cross-platform compatibility between Windows, macOS, Android, and Linux systems. The inclusion of integrated power management also means the SSD can draw adequate power even when connected to low-output ports, with the fan and SSD operating efficiently under mobile conditions.

The Disk Pro’s overall form factor and integrated features place it closer to a high-performance portable hub than a simple external SSD. Its sealed construction, integrated active cooling, and additional connectivity are intended to reduce heat buildup, protect data integrity, and simplify on-the-go workflows. For professionals working with large 4K or 8K media files, or gamers seeking extended storage without extra cables, this design approach represents a different balance of portability and utility compared with most standard SSD enclosures on the market.

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Ports and Connections

The Sharge Disk Pro is built around a compact yet functional hub layout that integrates five active ports alongside the internal SSD. These include one HDMI 2.1 output, one USB-C port, one USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 port, and one USB-A 2.0 port, all managed by independent controller chips to prevent bottlenecks when multiple peripherals are in use. The inclusion of an HDMI 2.1 output enables video output up to 8K at 30Hz or 4K at 144Hz, depending on the connected device’s bandwidth. This makes it suitable for use with laptops, tablets, and compatible gaming consoles where both data access and display output are needed simultaneously. The USB-C port provides up to 100W input for power delivery passthrough, while the SSD and downstream ports can output up to 80W, allowing users to charge connected devices while maintaining full data and display functionality.

The built-in USB-C cable is one of the device’s defining physical features. Permanently attached to the chassis, it eliminates the need for separate cabling, reducing potential signal degradation and clutter. The short length ensures a secure connection with minimal strain, making it well-suited for handhelds and mobile phones where portability is essential. However, because it is non-removable, users have no option to replace the cable if it wears out or becomes damaged. The Disk Pro operates entirely over USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps), meaning it cannot exceed around 1GB/s transfer speeds, but remains fast enough for sustained high-volume workloads and video file handling.

Sharge also includes a 100W USB Power Delivery pass-through system designed for multi-device setups. When connected to a charger, the Disk Pro can simultaneously power a laptop or smartphone and operate as an SSD hub. The system manages current allocation automatically between the SSD, active ports, and the connected host device, maintaining stability under load. Users can switch the SSD off using a built-in hardware toggle to conserve NAND lifespan or operate solely as a docking station. This is a useful inclusion for those who primarily use the Disk Pro as a connectivity bridge rather than as continuous storage.

Despite its small dimensions, the hub’s port spacing and layout are designed for accessibility. Each connection point is positioned to avoid cable overlap, which can be problematic in other compact hubs. The HDMI port sits at the rear next to the USB-C power input, while the USB-A ports are side-mounted to support accessories such as flash drives, keyboards, or game controllers. This arrangement allows the device to function as both a desktop companion and an attachable expansion unit for mobile platforms.

• Interface Standard: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)

• Integrated Cable: Built-in USB-C, fixed length

• USB Ports: 1 x USB-C PD (100W input / 80W output), 1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 1 x USB-A 2.0

• Video Output: HDMI 2.1 supporting 4K 144Hz / 8K 30Hz

• Power Delivery: 100W input passthrough, 80W total output

• Controller Architecture: Three independent controller chips for port load management

• SSD Disable Switch: Hardware button to disable SSD for hub-only use

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Performance Tests

In practical testing, the Sharge Disk Pro delivered performance that closely aligned with its stated specifications. Using AJA System Test on a Windows 11 PC, sustained read speeds averaged between 800 and 900 MB/s, while write speeds remained consistent at around 700 to 800 MB/s across multiple test cycles. These results are in line with expectations for a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) interface, which typically caps out at 1,000 MB/s due to bus limitations. During repeated five-minute transfer tests using 256MB file blocks, there was no noticeable performance degradation or thermal throttling, confirming that the integrated fan and heatsink design effectively maintained stable throughput even under extended workloads. Sequential transfers performed best, while random 4K operations showed typical limitations of USB-based external drives, making it more suited for large media file transfers rather than small transactional data.

Thermal performance was a key focus of Sharge’s design, and testing showed the fan to be highly effective at maintaining low SSD temperatures. With the fan disabled, idle temperatures hovered around 35–37°C, rising only slightly during short file operations.

When the fan was activated in Auto mode, the device maintained temperatures around 34–35°C externally, and the SSD’s internal sensors never exceeded 40°C during prolonged testing. In Turbo mode, which spins the fan up to 10,000 RPM, the system achieved an additional reduction of around 5°C compared to passive cooling. For comparison, typical compact SSDs of similar capacity can reach over 60°C under similar workloads, confirming that active cooling provides tangible longevity and stability benefits for the NAND and controller components.

Noise measurements taken during operation showed moderate but noticeable levels. With the fan off, the Disk Pro was entirely silent, as expected for a solid-state design. When active cooling was engaged, noise levels ranged between 42 and 43 dBA at a one-meter distance, roughly equivalent to a quiet office environment. Although audible, it was far from intrusive and balanced against the benefit of consistent thermal performance. The fan’s automatic speed curve effectively adjusted to thermal demands, rarely ramping to maximum unless under sustained high-intensity transfers. Users who prioritize silence can manually disable the fan when operating in cooler environments or when using the device primarily for intermittent transfers.

The internal SSD uses 162-layer 3D TLC NAND with a proprietary controller tuned for consistent throughput rather than peak burst speeds. The design choice ensures reliable operation across mixed workloads such as 4K video capture, game installation, and system backups. The integrated power delivery circuitry also maintained stability under simultaneous port loads, allowing the SSD and connected peripherals to perform consistently without power drops. While the lack of hardware encryption may be a drawback for enterprise or security-focused users, the drive remains fully compatible with software encryption solutions available on Windows, macOS, and Android.

• Interface Speed: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps, ~1,000 MB/s theoretical)

• Measured Read Speed: 800–900 MB/s sustained

• Measured Write Speed: 700–800 MB/s sustained

• NAND Type: 162-layer 3D TLC NAND (BiCS6)

• Cooling System: Active fan with Auto (7,000 RPM) and Turbo (10,000 RPM) modes

• Operating Temperatures: 34–40°C under sustained load

• Noise Levels: 42–43 dBA under fan operation, 0 dBA passive

• Power Draw: 60W power input for device and fan operation, 100W passthrough charging support

Sharge Disk Pro Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The Sharge Disk Pro represents a deliberate departure from conventional external SSDs, offering a hybrid approach that merges high-speed storage with full USB hub functionality in a portable form factor. Its sealed, magnetically mountable chassis and integrated fan system address the common issue of heat buildup in compact SSDs, maintaining reliable performance over long transfers. While its 10Gbps interface limits absolute throughput to around 1GB/s, the consistent sustained speeds and controlled thermals make it suitable for demanding use cases such as 4K editing, live data capture, or console game storage. The fixed internal SSD and integrated cable limit upgradeability and repair potential, but they also contribute to its streamlined design and compact efficiency.

For users seeking a versatile storage expansion that also replaces a traditional docking station, the Disk Pro’s multi-port setup and cooling design provide clear practical benefits. However, those wanting modular storage or hardware encryption will find its closed system less appealing. Ultimately, it’s a well-engineered portable hub that balances mobility, temperature management, and performance more effectively than most devices in its class. If the retail version maintains the same build and stability demonstrated in testing, it will fill a distinct niche for creators and professionals needing fast, thermally stable external storage in a highly compact form.

Note – The Sharge Disk Pro is NOW LIVE HERE

Sharge Disk Pro PROS

Sharge Disk Pro CONS

Compact, magnetically attachable design ideal for mobile and laptop use. Integrated active cooling system maintains SSD temperatures below 40°C during sustained transfers. Delivers consistent 800–900MB/s read and 700–800MB/s write speeds over USB 3.2 Gen 2. Includes HDMI 2.1 port supporting up to 8K 30Hz or 4K 144Hz video output. Built-in USB-C cable and multiple ports (USB-C PD, USB-A 3.2, USB-A 2.0) provide hub-level versatility. Hardware switch to disable SSD extends lifespan and allows hub-only operation. Sturdy construction with efficient thermal design and magnetic mounting accessories included.

Non-upgradeable internal SSD limits long-term flexibility. Noticeable fan noise (around 42–43 dBA) under heavy cooling load. Lack of hardware encryption may deter professional or security-focused users.

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

UmbrelOS est un système open source qui permet de transformer un simple ordinateur ou Raspberry Pi en serveur personnel. Idéal pour l’auto-hébergement, il offre une interface intuitive, un App Store intégré et un large choix d’applications. Découvrons ensemble ses fonctionnalités, ses avantages… et ses limites.

UmbrelOS, c’est quoi ?

UmbrelOS permet de créer un serveur domestique en seulement quelques minutes. Grâce à son interfacesimplifiée et à son App Store intégré, il devient facile d’héberger tout type d’application, notamment :

• Stockage et partage de fichiers : Nextcloud, Syncthing
• Protection de la vie privée : Pi-hole, AdGuard Home
• Streaming multimédia : Jellyfin, Plex
• Nœuds Bitcoin et outils liés aux cryptomonnaies
• Applications web diverses

À l’heure où nous écrivons ces lignes, umbrelOS propose plus de 255 applications.

Il prend également en charge le partage de fichiers SMB (Samba/CIFS), mais avec des performances limitées… Ce service est géré via un conteneur Docker, ce qui le rend moins efficace. À noter également que Time Machine n’est pas pris en charge.

UmbrelOS : OS ou application ?

Contrairement à certaines alternatives comme CasaOS, umbrelOS n’est pas qu’une simple surcouche logicielle, il est livré avec un système d’exploitation complet basé sur Debian, ce qui facilite grandement son installation. Il se rapproche davantage de ZimaOS, tout en conservant une philosophie propre axée sur la simplicité.

UmbrelOS repose sur Docker pour la gestion de ses conteneurs applicatifs. L’objectif est clair : simplifier l’auto-hébergement tout en restant accessible aux utilisateurs débutants.

Son code source est entièrement ouvert et disponible sur GitHub, garantissant transparence et possibilité de personnalisation avancée.

Les origines de projet umbrelOS

UmbrelOS est un projet indépendant conçu à l’origine pour simplifier le déploiement de nœuds Bitcoin. Rapidement, la communauté l’a fait évoluer vers une plateforme d’auto-hébergement polyvalente, capable d’exécuter un grand nombre de services, bien au-delà de la sphère des cryptomonnaies.

Pourquoi utiliser umbrelOS ?

UmbrelOS s’adresse à celles et ceux qui souhaitent disposer d’un serveur domestique à la fois simple à installer, agréable à administrer et respectueux de la vie privée. Ses principaux avantages :

Avantage	Description
Installation rapide et simplifiée	Un simple script permet d’installer umbrelOS en quelques minutes
Interface conviviale	Une interface web ergonomique et accessible aux débutants
Large compatibilité avec Docker	Intégration d’applications variées via Docker
Sécurité et confidentialité renforcées	Permet de s’affranchir des services cloud tiers
Écosystème en expansion	Un App Store en constante évolution avec de nouvelles applications

Grâce à sa structure ouverte, il est possible d’ajouter des applications manuellement, même en dehors du catalogue officiel.

Est-ce qu’umbrelOS peut fonctionner sur un NAS ?

Oui, à condition que le NAS permette l’installation d’un système Linux alternatif. C’est une excellente option pour redonner vie à un ancien matériel ou optimiser un serveur existant.

En synthèse

UmbrelOS est une solution pratique et accessible pour ceux qui souhaitent héberger leurs propres services sans trop de complexité. Grâce à son interface moderne et son écosystème. Cependant, certaines fonctionnalités avancées manque encore : gestion native du RAID, partage réseau anémique, compatibilité avec certains matériels compliqués…

À tester sans hésiter ! Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur le site officiel : umbrel.com

UGREEN NASync vs UniFi UNAS – Which Should You Buy?

In the evolving landscape of network-attached storage, the arrival of UGREEN and UniFi (Ubiquiti) marks one of the more interesting shifts in consumer and prosumer data management over the last two years. Both brands, previously recognised for their strength in peripheral hardware and networking respectively, officially entered the NAS sector around late 2023 to early 2024, each taking distinct approaches to design, functionality, and ecosystem integration. UGREEN, following a successful crowdfunding launch in early 2024, built its NASync series around desktop and SSD-based solutions for home, creative, and prosumer users seeking all-in-one local storage, virtualization, and multimedia platforms. Its portfolio now includes systems ranging from the ARM-based DXP2800 to the Intel-powered DXP8800 Plus, offering performance tiers from modest home use to compact workstation-class environments.

Meanwhile, UniFi, a brand with a long history in professional networking and surveillance infrastructure, released its UNAS family within the same timeframe, targeting users already invested in its ecosystem of routers, cameras, and switches. The UNAS lineup now spans from the compact UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 desktop units to the rackmount UNAS Pro 4 and Pro 8 systems, with each designed for straightforward deployment and remote integration within the UniFi Network and Protect platforms. Despite arriving from very different sectors, both companies have effectively lowered the cost of entry to reliable NAS storage while redefining how integrated ecosystems can extend storage functionality. This comparison explores their respective design choices, hardware capabilities, software environments, and operational scope to assess which platform is best suited to different user scenarios in 2025 and 2026.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – The TL;DR

In comparing the UniFi and UGREEN NAS platforms, it becomes clear that each brand represents a different vision of what modern network storage should be. UniFi’s UNAS series builds on the company’s heritage in networking and surveillance, delivering a range of efficient, ARM-powered NAS systems that integrate tightly within the UniFi ecosystem. Models such as the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, and UNAS Pro 8 prioritize reliability, centralized management, and long-term stability rather than raw compute power or expandability. Their hardware is deliberately fixed—non-upgradable memory, ARM Cortex-A55 or A57 CPUs, and limited caching support for NVMe drives—but balanced by advanced network connectivity, including dual 10G SFP+ ports, PoE+++ power options, and redundant power supplies. UniFi’s storage OS focuses on core NAS fundamentals: multiple RAID levels, snapshots, encryption, and secure remote access via the UniFi controller. It is intentionally simple, relying on integration with other UniFi products for extended functionality such as surveillance and automation. In contrast, UGREEN’s NASync line follows an open, performance-driven approach designed for flexibility and standalone capability.

Ranging from the DXP2800 with its 8-core ARM processor to the flagship DXP8800 Plus powered by Intel’s i5-1240P, these systems cover every segment from entry-level home use to prosumer and light enterprise workloads. UGREEN’s hardware offers user-upgradable DDR4/DDR5 memory, PCIe expansion, NVMe storage pooling, and multi-gig connectivity, with higher-end models adding dual 10GbE, Thunderbolt 4, and even GPU compatibility. Its UGOS Pro operating system transforms the NAS into a hybrid server capable of running Docker containers, virtual machines, and AI-based indexing, alongside comprehensive backup and synchronization tools across cloud and local environments. While UniFi emphasizes simplicity, low maintenance, and enterprise-grade network reliability, UGREEN delivers a richer feature set and greater hardware freedom at the expense of long-term enterprise validation. In essence, UniFi NAS suits users already invested in UniFi’s ecosystem who value cohesion, predictable performance, and integrated security, whereas UGREEN NAS appeals to those seeking raw performance, versatility, and independent control without ecosystem constraints.

Why Buy UniFi NAS?	Why Buy UGREEN NAS?
Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!
Ecosystem Integration: Seamlessly integrates with UniFi Network, Protect, and Access systems, allowing unified management through a single controller interface. Centralized Management: Designed for administrators managing multiple UniFi sites or devices, providing consistent firmware, remote access, and monitoring from one dashboard. Reliable, Efficient Design: ARM-based architecture ensures low power draw, cool operation, and stable long-term performance with minimal maintenance. Enterprise-Grade Networking: Equipped with up to dual 10G SFP+ and 10GBase-T ports, plus USP-RPS redundancy for professional deployments. Proven Security Framework: Benefits from Ubiquiti’s mature network security infrastructure, signed firmware updates, and NDAA-compliant hardware.	Superior Hardware Performance: Offers a full range from ARM to Intel Core i5 CPUs, with upgradable RAM, NVMe storage pools, and optional PCIe expansion. Versatile Software (UGOS Pro): Supports Docker, virtual machines, AI photo indexing, and multi-platform backups out of the box. All-in-One Standalone System: Functions independently without relying on an external ecosystem, ideal for users wanting a complete server in one unit. Advanced Connectivity: Includes 2.5 GbE and 10 GbE networking, USB 4/Thunderbolt 4, and support for direct-attached workflows like video editing or large-file transfer. Rapid Development and Updates: Frequent firmware releases continually add new features, broader hardware support, and improved backup and security options.

 

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Design, Storage and Range

When comparing UGREEN and UniFi’s NAS portfolios, the first and most visible difference lies in how each brand approaches system design and deployment environment. UGREEN’s NASync series is focused entirely on desktop enclosures, reflecting the brand’s consumer electronics background and intent to cater primarily to home users, prosumers, and creative professionals. Each model, such as the DXP2800, DXP4800 Plus, and DXP8800 Plus, follows a compact, upright chassis layout with attention to quiet cooling and minimal footprint. The aesthetic is consistent across the range—metallic finishes, clear drive bay accessibility, and understated branding—intended to fit easily on a desk or in a studio environment. By contrast, UniFi’s UNAS range adopts both desktop and rackmount designs, depending on model class. The UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 are designed for smaller workspaces and integrate PoE+++ power options to simplify installation, while the UNAS Pro 4 (1U) and UNAS Pro 8 (2U) are full rackmount systems made from SGCC steel, reflecting their professional and data-center-friendly construction standards.

UGREEN’s systems emphasize flexibility and user-level expandability within their desktop footprint. Most models in the NASync line support 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch SATA drives, dual NVMe SSD slots, and optional PCIe or Thunderbolt expansion, allowing them to function as both storage servers and active editing platforms. The DXP480T Plus, for example, is an all-SSD NAS with four M.2 NVMe bays that appeals to users seeking maximum I/O performance for tasks such as 4K video editing or database caching. The DXP8800 Plus, the flagship, extends this design language with eight SATA bays, dual Gen 4 M.2 SSD slots, dual 10 GbE networking, and Thunderbolt 4 connectivity, making it one of the most powerful turnkey NAS options in the consumer space. In comparison, UniFi’s UNAS systems prioritize structural consistency and network integration over expandability. Even though all models provide dual or single NVMe slots, these are limited to caching duties. Drive capacity across the lineup scales more linearly, from two to eight 3.5-inch bays, maintaining a clear size-to-performance progression while focusing on rack density and cooling efficiency.

From a usability perspective, UGREEN’s design philosophy focuses on standalone versatility. Each NASync model is built to function independently as a complete storage and application host, with optional integration through standard network protocols. Physical accessibility is a clear design consideration, with quick-release trays, front USB ports, and in some models, SD card readers for direct media offload. The visual and acoustic design is optimized for open environments, with whisper-quiet fan systems and smart temperature management, making them suitable for use beside workstations or in living spaces. UniFi’s design philosophy, however, centers on infrastructure harmony rather than isolation. The rackmount models are designed to slide directly into existing UniFi network installations, using standard 1U or 2U spacing and consistent power integration with UniFi’s USP-RPS redundant supply network. Even the desktop UNAS 4 maintains visual continuity with UniFi routers and switches, using similar matte finishes, front-facing status LEDs, and clean ventilation lines.

In terms of product range, UGREEN currently offers at least seven NASync models, each targeting a specific performance segment. These include the DXP2800 (2-bay ARM), DXP4800 (4-bay N100), DXP4800 Plus (4-bay N305), DXP6800 Pro (6-bay N305), DXP480T Plus (SSD-only, N305), DH4300 Plus (4-bay ARM), and DXP8800 Plus (8-bay i5-1240P). Each generation introduces more advanced CPUs, faster interfaces, and expanded media capabilities. UniFi’s current UNAS range, while smaller, has diversified rapidly since its launch. The confirmed models include the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, UNAS Pro 8, and the earlier UNAS Pro 7-Bay, all of which use ARM-based processors and fixed memory configurations. A larger ENAS 16-Bay ZFS system is already in development, targeting enterprise and datacenter deployments in 2026. Compared with UGREEN’s more gradual tiered approach, UniFi’s product scaling is defined by form factor and network bandwidth rather than by CPU class or user workload.

Price segmentation further highlights their opposing strategies. UniFi’s UNAS line is priced aggressively to attract users into its broader ecosystem, starting at $199 for the UNAS 2, rising to $799 for the Pro 8, and including mid-tier models like the UNAS 4 ($379) and Pro 4 ($499). The pricing aligns with UniFi’s established model of offering capable hardware at low margins to encourage ecosystem investment across switches, cameras, and controllers. UGREEN, by contrast, positions its NASync devices as feature-rich all-rounders, with prices reflecting performance class: from $279 for the DXP2800 to around $1,299 for the DXP8800 Plus. The difference in pricing structure is significant but reflects how each company defines value—UniFi through integrated ecosystem scaling, and UGREEN through standalone hardware strength and included functionality.

 

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Hardware Range

The internal hardware philosophy of UniFi and UGREEN reflects two distinct interpretations of what a modern NAS should prioritize: efficiency and integration versus performance and versatility. UniFi’s UNAS series relies entirely on ARM-based architecture, a deliberate decision aligned with the company’s emphasis on low power consumption, predictable thermal characteristics, and embedded system reliability. Every model in the current UNAS lineup, including the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, and UNAS Pro 8, is built around a quad-core ARM processor—the A55 at 1.7 GHz for the smaller systems and the A57 at 2.0 GHz for the rackmount models. These CPUs deliver modest compute performance but strong stability and power efficiency, allowing for sustained 24/7 operation without requiring active thermal management beyond standard fan arrays. This design philosophy mirrors UniFi’s broader network device ecosystem, where embedded ARM SoCs dominate routers, gateways, and cameras, ensuring unified firmware management and hardware compatibility across all product categories.

UGREEN’s NASync architecture takes the opposite route, aiming to deliver workstation-grade power in compact form factors. The entry-level DXP2800 features an octa-core ARM CPU, already outpacing UniFi’s top models in raw processing capability, while the remainder of the series transitions to x86 platforms from Intel’s latest low-power and mid-tier lines. The DXP4800 uses Intel’s N100 processor, the DXP4800 Plus and DXP6800 Pro adopt the more capable N305 with improved iGPU performance, and the flagship DXP8800 Plus integrates the 12th Gen Intel Core i5-1240P, offering hybrid performance and support for hardware transcoding, virtualization, and PCIe Gen 4 NVMe. This variation in processor choice underlines UGREEN’s strategy of providing scalable compute resources for different workloads, from basic backup operations to multi-user virtualization and AI-assisted indexing. Unlike UniFi, UGREEN’s systems can operate as full Linux servers, running multiple containers or virtual machines without external dependencies.

Memory and expansion options further highlight the divergence in hardware scope. UniFi’s systems employ fixed memory configurations—ranging from 4 GB on the UNAS 2 and 4 to 16 GB on the Pro 8—with no user-accessible upgrade paths. This aligns with their embedded design approach, where firmware optimization and unified memory management are prioritized over modularity. In contrast, UGREEN’s NASync devices all support user-upgradable SO-DIMM DDR4 or DDR5 modules, typically allowing capacities between 8 GB and 64 GB, depending on the model. This flexibility benefits users running memory-intensive services such as Docker containers, Plex transcoding, or AI indexing. Moreover, many of UGREEN’s x86 systems support PCIe expansion cards, offering pathways to add 10 GbE NICs, NVMe storage adapters, or GPU accelerators, while UniFi’s systems are intentionally non-upgradable to maintain uniform hardware control and firmware consistency across the UNAS ecosystem.

Networking and connectivity options serve as another key point of differentiation. UniFi has leaned on its networking pedigree, offering up to three 10 GbE connections (two SFP+ and one RJ45) on the UNAS Pro 8, with lower-tier models still providing 2.5 GbE or Gigabit connectivity. Power integration is also a hallmark of their design. The UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 use PoE+++, allowing single-cable deployment through UniFi switches, while the Pro series employs redundant power via USP-RPS or hot-swappable PSUs, reducing downtime in managed networks. UGREEN, on the other hand, focuses on local performance flexibility, providing multi-interface options like 10 GbE, 2.5 GbE, USB 4, and Thunderbolt 4, depending on model class. This allows their systems to double as direct-attached storage (DAS) for editors or content creators, particularly when used via Thunderbolt, an option not present in any UniFi NAS. Power designs in UGREEN systems are conventional but efficient, ranging from compact external adapters on smaller models to integrated supplies on higher-end devices.

The overall hardware comparison reveals two clear user archetypes. UniFi’s hardware suits IT administrators and network professionals seeking dependable, uniform, low-maintenance appliances that integrate natively with UniFi controllers and services. UGREEN’s NASync hardware, meanwhile, targets prosumers, creative professionals, and small business users requiring computational headroom and direct system control. Where UniFi builds closed but predictable infrastructure devices, UGREEN delivers open and adaptable machines capable of serving as both NAS and lightweight servers. The contrast is not one of quality but of philosophy—UniFi favoring consistency and system management efficiency, UGREEN focusing on flexibility and computational breadth.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Software, Services and Apps

The most significant distinction between UGREEN and UniFi’s NAS platforms lies in their software ecosystems and the broader intent behind their development. UniFi’s UNAS software mirrors the brand’s overarching approach to product design: lightweight, efficient, and designed to integrate seamlessly into the UniFi Network and Protect ecosystems. The UNAS interface focuses almost exclusively on storage management and file security. It provides the fundamental NAS feature set, including multiple RAID configurations, volume encryption, snapshot management, and user-based permission control. Files can be accessed through SMB, NFS, with remote management possible via the UniFi portal or mobile app. However, beyond core storage functionality, UniFi’s NAS software remains deliberately minimal. It lacks support for virtual machines, Docker containers, or app installation frameworks, relying instead on integration with other UniFi devices for broader capabilities such as video surveillance, network management, or cloud relay services.

UGREEN’s UGOS Pro platform adopts a far more expansive, multifunctional design. The software is built on a modern Linux kernel and supports both ARM and x86 architectures, allowing for a full-featured environment with native support for containers, virtual machines, and AI-enhanced media indexing. Out of the box, users can deploy Docker, Portainer, Kubernetes-compatible containers, and KVM-based virtual machines, enabling workloads that go far beyond traditional NAS operations. Backup and synchronization options are also more diverse, with support for rsync, S3, WebDAV, iSCSI, OneDrive, Google Drive, Dropbox, and two-way synchronization across multiple NAS units. The interface emphasizes transparency and customization, giving users direct access to system-level configuration that UniFi’s more streamlined interface omits. Features such as storage tiering (using both HDD and NVMe), application sandboxing, and external GPU detection on select models position UGREEN’s UGOS Pro as one of the most open and flexible NAS operating systems currently available outside of enterprise-class environments.

In client and access support, the contrast continues. UniFi’s ecosystem is designed for centralized control and consistent performance across its product range. The UNAS systems can be monitored via the same UniFi Controller interface used for switches, gateways, and access points, creating a single-pane-of-glass environment that appeals to IT administrators managing multiple UniFi sites. Remote access and firmware updates are handled automatically through UniFi Cloud, and security is strengthened by integration with two-factor authentication, device certificates, and network isolation policies inherited from the company’s professional networking hardware. UGREEN, conversely, provides a more conventional NAS interface that supports multiple access clients and cross-platform tools. In addition to browser access and mobile apps for Android and iOS, users can mount shared drives directly within macOS, Windows, and Linux, while also leveraging a dedicated UGREEN Drive application for photo management and AI-based face/object recognition. Where UniFi’s UNAS feels like an extension of a larger network ecosystem, UGREEN’s software operates as a complete standalone server environment.

Security and maintenance are handled very differently between the two brands. UniFi benefits from a mature background in network device hardening, employing signed firmware, rolling updates, and extensive beta testing through its large enterprise user base. Features such as encrypted storage volumes, HTTPS enforcement, and VLAN isolation come preconfigured with minimal user intervention. However, the trade-off for this controlled environment is reduced user autonomy, as firmware customization and software-side experimentation are discouraged. UGREEN, while newer to the enterprise security space, implements encryption standards such as AES-256, offers built-in 2FA, and continues to expand its ransomware prevention and snapshot recovery tools. Updates arrive frequently and often include feature additions alongside security patches, though the brand still lacks a formal bug bounty or transparency reporting system comparable to UniFi’s. Overall, UGREEN’s software offers greater flexibility and control, while UniFi’s remains more mature and hardened within its controlled network framework.

 

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Verdict and Conclusion

Both UGREEN and UniFi have entered the NAS sector from distinct starting points and continue to move in different directions, each targeting a particular type of user. UniFi’s UNAS series delivers consistency, predictable performance, and dependable integration with the broader UniFi ecosystem. Its software is stable, lightweight, and well-suited to users who prioritize straightforward storage management, reliable data handling, and unified control across routers, switches, and surveillance systems. While the hardware is limited to fixed ARM configurations and non-expandable memory, it is efficient, quiet, and designed for continuous operation with minimal maintenance. For organizations already invested in UniFi infrastructure, the UNAS systems provide a logical expansion that keeps management centralized and operational risk low. However, their value depends heavily on ecosystem synergy; outside of that environment, the systems remain competent but relatively inflexible standalone NAS options.

UGREEN’s NASync platform, on the other hand, appeals to users seeking broader performance capability and independence. Its x86-based models, upgradable memory, and open software environment allow it to serve as a hybrid between NAS and compact server, capable of running applications, containers, and virtual machines alongside storage tasks. The design language is more suited to individual or small business use than datacenter deployment, but the hardware range—from ARM to Core i5—covers a far wider performance spectrum than UniFi’s. Software maturity continues to evolve quickly, with new features added frequently, and the systems provide extensive compatibility with third-party clients and backup services. The trade-off is that long-term reliability and enterprise-level security validation are still developing.

Ultimately, UniFi NAS suits users who already rely on UniFi’s networking ecosystem and value simplicity, predictability, and centralized management, while UGREEN NAS caters to those prioritizing flexibility, compute power, and open software capability. Both brands have lowered the entry barrier into reliable NAS ownership, but they embody opposing philosophies: UniFi focuses on integration and control, whereas UGREEN emphasizes capability and independence.

Why Buy UniFi NAS?

Why Buy UGREEN NAS?

Ecosystem Integration: Seamlessly integrates with UniFi Network, Protect, and Access systems, allowing unified management through a single controller interface. Centralized Management: Designed for administrators managing multiple UniFi sites or devices, providing consistent firmware, remote access, and monitoring from one dashboard. Reliable, Efficient Design: ARM-based architecture ensures low power draw, cool operation, and stable long-term performance with minimal maintenance. Enterprise-Grade Networking: Equipped with up to dual 10G SFP+ and 10GBase-T ports, plus USP-RPS redundancy for professional deployments. Proven Security Framework: Benefits from Ubiquiti’s mature network security infrastructure, signed firmware updates, and NDAA-compliant hardware.

Superior Hardware Performance: Offers a full range from ARM to Intel Core i5 CPUs, with upgradable RAM, NVMe storage pools, and optional PCIe expansion. Versatile Software (UGOS Pro): Supports Docker, virtual machines, AI photo indexing, and multi-platform backups out of the box. All-in-One Standalone System: Functions independently without relying on an external ecosystem, ideal for users wanting a complete server in one unit. Advanced Connectivity: Includes 2.5 GbE and 10 GbE networking, USB 4/Thunderbolt 4, and support for direct-attached workflows like video editing or large-file transfer. Rapid Development and Updates: Frequent firmware releases continually add new features, broader hardware support, and improved backup and security options.

Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

AppFlowy est une solution alternative et open source à Notion. Elle permet de créer un véritable espace de travail numérique modulable : prise de notes, gestion de projets, bases de données, tableaux Kanban, wikis et calendriers. Conçue pour offrir la même puissance que Notion, AppFlowy mise avant tout sur la transparence, la confidentialité et la flexibilité. L’utilisateur peut ainsi gérer ses informations en local, personnaliser son environnement de travail et même auto-héberger sa propre instance serveur.

AppFlowy, alternative à Notion

Notion s’est imposé comme un outil incontournable pour structurer ses connaissances et collaborer en équipe. Sa force réside dans sa polyvalence : un seul espace pour connecter idées, tâches et documents. Mais sa gratuité trouve vite ses limites : le travail en équipe devient payant et les données restent stockées sur un cloud propriétaire, souvent éloigné des exigences européennes en matière de protection de la vie privée.

AppFlowy : un espace de travail open source et local

AppFlowy répond à ces limites en proposant une approche décentralisée et open source. L’application fonctionne en local, sans dépendance à un service tiers, et offre une compatibilité multiplateforme : Windows, macOS, Linux, mais aussi Android et iOS. Les utilisateurs peuvent également accéder à leurs espaces depuis le navigateur web.

Mieux encore, AppFlowy peut être déployé sur un serveur personnel via Docker, sur un NAS ou toute autre machine. Cette architecture ouverte garantit confidentialité, indépendance et pérennité des données, des critères essentiels pour les entreprises comme pour les utilisateurs soucieux de leur souveraineté numérique.

L’éditeur décrit sa solution comme « l’espace de travail IA qui vous permet d’en faire plus sans perdre le contrôle de vos données ».

Communauté engagée et évolutions rapides

En tant que projet open source, AppFlowy repose sur une communauté de développeurs et d’utilisateurs actifs. Les contributions sont nombreuses : amélioration des performances, ajout de modules, intégration de fonctionnalités d’intelligence artificielle. Cette approche collaborative permet à la solution de progresser rapidement, sans dépendre d’un éditeur unique.

Reprendre la main sur ses outils

Comme Penpot, alternative libre à Figma, AppFlowy illustre un mouvement de fond vers des solutions ouvertes et auto-hébergées. Dans un contexte où la protection des données devient stratégique, ces projets offrent une réponse concrète aux organisations cherchant à allier productivité et souveraineté. Attention, certaines fonctionnalités AppFlowy sont payantes…

Synology vient de déployer une nouvelle version de son système interne : DSM 7.3.1-86003. Cette mise à jour ne propose aucune nouveauté, mais elle corrige plusieurs bugs apparus avec la version précédente. Un correctif attendu, notamment par les utilisateurs confrontés à ces dysfonctionnements…

Synology DSM 7.3.1

Il y a tout juste 20 jours, Synology mettait en ligne DSM 7.3, une version marquante car elle revenait sur la restriction concernant les disques durs tiers (en particulier Western Digital et Seagate) pour la gamme DSx25. Une décision perçue comme une prise de conscience bienvenue par certains, mais comme un aveu d’échec (voire une perte de confiance) pour d’autres.

Problème : cette version 7.3 a introduit plusieurs bugs gênants, ce qui reste assez rare chez Synology. DSM 7.3.1 vient justement les corriger.

Ce que corrige DSM 7.3.1

Si on regarde le journal des modifications, voici ce que l’on peut lire :

• Correction d’un bug empêchant l’ajustement de la luminosité des voyants LED sur certains modèles ;
• Correction d’un problème pouvant empêcher l’affichage des périphériques externes lors de la sélection de fichiers ou de dossiers ;
• Correction d’une erreur générant de fausses alertes liées aux périphériques de stockage externes ;
• Correction d’un problème pouvant empêcher le fonctionnement d’un onduleur connecté en USB après une mise à jour.

À noter : DSM 7.3.1 remplace entièrement la version précédente, d’où un fichier .pat d’environ 350 Mo.

Comment télécharger et installer DSM 7.3.1

Si votre NAS ne vous propose pas automatiquement cette mise à jour, voici comment l’installer manuellement en suivant ces étapes :

1. Téléchargement du fichier
   Allez sur la page officielle du Centre de téléchargement de Synology ou sur le site d’archive officiel.
2. Installation manuelle
   • Connectez-vous à l’interface d’administration de votre NAS.
   • Accédez à Panneau de configuration > Mise à jour et restauration.
   • Cliquez sur Mise à jour manuelle de DSM.
   • Sélectionnez le fichier téléchargé via le bouton Parcourir.
   • Cliquez sur OK et attendez environ 3 minutes.
3. Redémarrage obligatoire
   Une fois la mise à jour terminée, votre NAS redémarrera automatiquement.

Attention, cette mise à jour est assez longue… comptez entre 5 et 25 minutes suivant la configuration. Plusieurs paquets sont également mis à jour avec DSM 7.3.1.

source

Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vs CWWK P6 SSD NAS Showdown

The compact and SSD-focused NAS landscape has grown increasingly competitive, with new models targeting users who require silent operation, efficient performance, and small-scale virtualization or media serving capabilities. Devices like the GMKTec G9, Beelink ME Mini, and CWWK P6 represent a distinct shift from traditional 3.5” HDD-based systems, instead favoring M.2 NVMe SSD storage in compact chassis designs. These systems are marketed toward home users, prosumers, and developers looking for a balance between cost, flexibility, and low-noise operation, often for roles such as Plex servers, UnRAID deployments, or containerized environments.

Each unit in this comparison leverages low-power Intel Twin Lake processors (notably the N150), offers at least dual 2.5GbE connectivity, and supports multiple M.2 drives, but their implementations vary widely in thermal handling, expandability, and internal architecture. As the line between DIY NAS builds and pre-built options continues to blur, the GMKTec G9, Beelink ME Mini, and CWWK P6 provide a snapshot of how different brands interpret the needs of modern users who prioritize energy efficiency, small footprints, and SSD-based storage workflows. This article evaluates these three devices across pricing, storage architecture, design, and real-world usability to provide a clear overview of their relative strengths and compromises.

CWWK P6 SSD NAS	Beelink ME Mini SSD NAS – HERE	GMKTec G9 SSD NAS

Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vs CWWK P6 SSD NAS – Price and Value

The GMKTec G9 enters the market at around $199 for its 12GB RAM base configuration, positioning it as one of the more accessible SSD-based NAS units available. It includes a Windows 11 Pro license and Ubuntu Linux pre-installed, which can be attractive to users interested in general computing as well as NAS tasks. However, these operating systems are not tailored for storage-focused functionality, and the burden falls on the user to install and configure something like TrueNAS or UnRAID for proper NAS use. Additionally, the system uses non-upgradable LPDDR5 memory and features a plastic chassis, suggesting a design focus on affordability over long-term flexibility. While value is present in terms of included software and passive SSD-ready operation, its entry-level design limits appeal to users planning to scale or repurpose the device beyond its initial setup.

The Beelink ME Mini NAS, typically available at $209 on Beelink’s own storefront, offers a slightly higher upfront cost but balances that with integrated features aimed at simplifying deployment. Unlike the GMKTec G9, the ME Mini comes with an internal power supply and Crucial-branded SSDs in pre-built configurations, offering a greater level of assurance for storage reliability and plug-and-play readiness. The system supports Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, and features a silent fan-assisted cooling design that makes it more suitable for living rooms or office environments. Though it also utilizes soldered 12GB LPDDR5 memory, its form factor, passive aesthetics, and better thermals make it more appealing to users who want a quiet and tidy NAS solution that requires minimal tinkering post-installation. When compared to generic prebuilds, the ME Mini offers greater refinement and turnkey usability in exchange for a modest premium.

The CWWK P6 NAS sets itself apart with a lower base price of $195 for the N150 version, but this does not include memory or storage. Instead, the system is designed for users who prefer sourcing their own SO-DIMM DDR5 RAM and M.2 SSDs, potentially reducing costs if spare components are available. Its use of a single SO-DIMM slot enables expansion up to 48GB, which is considerably more than either the GMKTec or Beelink models. However, this flexibility comes at the cost of initial convenience. Users will need to handle their own OS installation, BIOS configuration, and possibly even resolve SATA recognition issues via firmware tweaks. The CWWK P6 also lacks wireless connectivity by default, and its use of a barrel connector rather than USB-C for power delivery may feel dated. Still, for users with a higher comfort level in DIY environments, the P6 offers a customizable platform with greater headroom for VMs, Plex, and containers.

When considering long-term value, each NAS appeals to a different kind of buyer. The GMKTec G9 is best suited for users who want a simple, functional NAS with minimal setup, though they may run into its limits quickly if performance expectations rise. The Beelink ME Mini justifies its price by offering a more thought-out design, silent thermals, and premium SSD options out of the box—better suited to users who want a clean and quiet system that can be set up rapidly. Meanwhile, the CWWK P6 represents a builder’s NAS: inexpensive upfront, highly scalable, and intended for users who value control over convenience. Ultimately, while price differences between these units are small, the total value depends heavily on user intent and whether ease of deployment, expansion, or component choice takes priority.

Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vs CWWK P6 SSD NAS – Storage & Memory

All three NAS systems in this comparison rely exclusively on M.2 NVMe SSDs for internal storage, reflecting a growing emphasis on silent, high-speed flash-based configurations in compact enclosures. The GMKTec G9 features four M.2 NVMe slots, each limited to PCIe Gen 3 x2, offering a theoretical maximum of 2GB/s per drive. In contrast, the Beelink ME Mini supports six M.2 NVMe slots, with five operating at PCIe Gen 3 x1 and one—typically reserved for the OS—at Gen 3 x2. The CWWK P6 matches the G9 in having four slots, though each operates at PCIe Gen 3 x1 speeds, reducing peak bandwidth per drive. This difference in PCIe lane allocation directly impacts aggregate read/write performance, especially in RAID configurations or during high-traffic file operations.

The GMKTec G9’s storage slots are laid out beneath a plastic panel with no included heatsinks, a decision that raises concerns about sustained thermal performance. While it technically supports up to 32TB of total storage across its four bays, the lack of passive or active SSD cooling can lead to throttling unless third-party heatsinks are installed. The Beelink ME Mini, in contrast, integrates a large aluminum heatsink with pre-applied thermal pads on all six slots, ensuring consistent heat transfer and reduced risk of SSD overheating. Though five of its six slots are bandwidth-limited to Gen 3 x1, the thermal design makes it better suited for prolonged uptime and high-usage environments. The CWWK P6 also features a metal enclosure that acts as a passive heat sink, but ships with notably thin thermal pads and relies on an optional USB-powered fan for improved airflow.

Memory configuration is another key area of differentiation. The GMKTec G9 and Beelink ME Mini both ship with 12GB of soldered LPDDR5 memory running at 4800MHz. This fixed memory cannot be upgraded, limiting their long-term viability in RAM-intensive use cases such as virtualization or large-scale container deployment. The CWWK P6, by contrast, includes a single SO-DIMM slot that supports up to 32GB of DDR5 4800MHz memory, making it the most flexible of the three for VM hosting, ZFS-based NAS operating systems, or other memory-sensitive applications. The tradeoff is that buyers must provide their own RAM, adding to the setup cost but allowing for performance tuning based on workload.

Boot and operating system storage configurations differ subtly across the three units. The GMKTec G9 includes a 64GB eMMC drive with pre-installed Windows 11 Pro and Ubuntu, though the eMMC capacity is insufficient for most NAS deployments beyond initial setup. The Beelink ME Mini also offers a 64GB eMMC module but encourages users to install the OS on the Gen 3 x2 slot, especially in bundled configurations that include Crucial P3 SSDs. The CWWK P6 does not include any pre-installed OS or eMMC storage but does allow booting from any of its four NVMe slots, giving advanced users greater freedom to optimize OS installation, especially when using UnRAID or TrueNAS SCALE.

Ultimately, the memory and storage architecture of each system reflects different user priorities. The GMKTec G9 aims for simplicity but is hindered by non-upgradable memory and inadequate SSD cooling. The Beelink ME Mini offers better thermal management and storage capacity, albeit with limited PCIe bandwidth on most slots. The CWWK P6 provides the greatest upgrade potential with socketed RAM and M.2 flexibility, but demands user familiarity with thermal solutions, BIOS configuration, and peripheral sourcing.

The physical construction of these three NAS units reflects differing priorities in material choice, ventilation, and power integration. The GMKTec G9 uses a lightweight plastic chassis, which helps reduce cost but limits heat dissipation across its four M.2 SSDs. The unit relies on internal airflow generated by laptop-style fans, but its design lacks direct ventilation over the SSD bays, and the use of a plastic cover above the M.2 slots reduces thermal transfer. In contrast, the Beelink ME Mini is housed in a symmetrical 99mm³ cube with an internal aluminum heatsink and integrated fan. Its minimalist cube layout includes top and bottom ventilation for vertical airflow and maintains a more enclosed, consistent cooling environment that better suits SSD longevity in passive setups.

The CWWK P6 offers the most robust build quality of the three, using a solid aluminum alloy chassis that doubles as a passive heat sink. It includes a base-level fan mounted beneath the CPU and an optional USB-powered fan for SSD cooling. However, the included thermal pads are extremely thin, reducing their effectiveness under prolonged load unless replaced. Despite this, the chassis is designed to tolerate higher ambient temperatures and shows consistent performance in enclosed spaces. One drawback is the lack of airflow across the top panel unless the optional fan is mounted—without it, SSDs tend to accumulate heat more rapidly, especially during concurrent write operations or large file transfers.

Power delivery also differentiates these devices. The GMKTec G9 uses a USB-C power connector with an external 65W power brick, aligning with modern standards and reducing desktop clutter. The Beelink ME Mini further improves on this with a built-in PSU, removing the need for external adapters altogether and simplifying cable management in home setups. The CWWK P6 reverts to a more traditional 12V barrel connector, which, while functional, feels outdated compared to the USB-C or internal PSU solutions. This design choice may require users to carry a dedicated power supply, limiting flexibility in mobile deployments or environments with shared power infrastructure.

In testing, all three systems showed efficient power usage, though their idle and peak wattages differ slightly due to cooling, CPU behavior, and drive count. The GMKTec G9 drew 19–20W at idle and peaked at 28–30W under sustained load. The Beelink ME Mini demonstrated the lowest idle consumption at 6.9W with no drives, increasing to around 30W when fully populated with six SSDs under heavy activity. The CWWK P6 consumed approximately 18W at idle and peaked at 34–35W with three active VMs and four SSDs. These figures indicate that, despite modest differences in architecture, each system remains power-efficient and suitable for 24/7 use, especially in home environments with low thermal tolerance and energy cost sensitivity.

Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vs CWWK P6 SSD NAS – Conclusion and Verdict

When assessed across all key metrics, the GMKTec G9, Beelink ME Mini, and CWWK P6 occupy distinct positions within the low-cost, all-flash NAS landscape, each catering to different user expectations and levels of technical comfort. The GMKTec G9 is the most turnkey in terms of initial usability, with pre-installed Windows and Ubuntu providing a base for users new to NAS setups or simply looking to use the device as a low-power desktop or file server. Its plastic chassis and lack of thermal optimization limit its suitability for intensive tasks, and the fixed 12GB LPDDR5 memory restricts performance scaling for containers or virtualization. That said, the G9 offers predictable behavior and basic capabilities that will satisfy those seeking an easy, entry-level NAS with minimal setup time, especially for local media streaming or light SMB file services. That said, the G9 is getting rather notorious for it’s poor cooling abilities – so much so that the brand has rolled out an improved cooling verion (see images below). There DO help, but the G9 is still the poorest of the three NAS in this comparison in terms of active cooling and long term temps!

The Beelink ME Mini, though only marginally more expensive, adopts a more premium approach to internal design and build quality. The integrated fan and large aluminum heatsink ensure more consistent SSD temperatures under sustained workloads, and the system is noticeably quieter at idle compared to the G9. Its six M.2 NVMe slots provide greater storage density potential, even though five are limited to PCIe Gen 3 x1 speeds. The soldered memory mirrors the G9’s limitations in upgradeability, but its inclusion of Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth, and an internal PSU adds notable convenience for deployment in mixed-use environments like offices, bedrooms, or AV cabinets. It will appeal to users who value quiet, thermally reliable operation in a system that arrives largely preconfigured and ready for use with minimal additional hardware.

In contrast, the CWWK P6 forgoes polish and plug-and-play readiness in favor of maximum flexibility and user control. It is the only device in this group to feature upgradable RAM, allowing users to install up to 48GB of DDR5 memory, which opens the door to heavier workloads like virtual machines, ZFS-based NAS operating systems, or multiple Docker containers. The lack of included wireless, OS storage, or bundled RAM/SSD keeps the entry cost low but shifts responsibility onto the buyer to source compatible components. This extends to thermal management—while the chassis is solid aluminum, effective SSD cooling often requires replacing the thin stock pads and adding the optional USB-powered fan. These additional steps will deter less technical users but make the P6 a strong contender for builders, hobbyists, or professionals seeking a flexible platform they can adapt over time.

Ultimately, choosing between these three NAS units comes down to balancing ease of setup, long-term scalability, and thermal reliability. The GMKTec G9 suits users who want to get started quickly with a general-purpose device and accept limitations in memory and thermal design. The Beelink ME Mini delivers a more refined package, ideal for those who prioritize noise, storage density, and out-of-box functionality. The CWWK P6, meanwhile, is the most modular and scalable option, but requires technical confidence and additional investment in compatible components. Each has clear strengths and trade-offs, and the best choice depends on whether the user prioritizes convenience, passive reliability, or long-term upgradability in their NAS setup.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

TerraMaster enrichit son catalogue avec 2 nouveaux NAS : les F2-425 Plus et F4-425 Plus. Ces modèles reprennent une architecture commune articulée autour d’un processeur Intel N150 et de mémoire DDR5, tout en introduisant un nouveau design et quelques surprises. Le prix public de départ est fixé à 429,99 € (hors promotion).

TerraMaster F2-425 Plus et F4-425 Plus

TerraMaster s’est fait connaitre avec des NAS simple d’utilisation et accessible par rapport aux ténors du marché. Depuis quelques mois, il prend de plus en plus de place et fait de l’ombre aux Synology, QNAP et Asustor.

Design et capacité de stockage

Les deux NAS adoptent un nouveau coloris blanc, une évolution par rapport aux précédentes générations noires. Le F2-425 Plus dispose de 2 baies pour disques durs ou SSD, tandis que le F4-425 Plus propose 4 baies. Mais la vraie nouveauté c’est que ces modèles intègre 3 emplacements NVMe. Cela permettra de combiner SSD NVMe (pour les performances, par exemple en virtualisation) et disques durs classiques (pour la capacité de stockage, comme les photos ou vidéos). Une approche hybride particulièrement intéressante…

Architecture interne

Les 2 NAS reposent sur un processeur Intel N150 Quad Core cadencé jusqu’à 3,6 GHz. Le F2-425 Plus est livré avec 8 Go de RAM DDR5, alors que le F4-425 Plus dispose de 16 Go de RAM DDR5. La mémoire peut être étendue jusqu’à 32 Go, mais un seul emplacement est disponible. L’architecture n’est pas la plus récente du marché, mais elle a largement fait ses preuves. L’iGPU intégré facilitera le transcodage vidéo. Selon PassMark, le processeur atteint un score de 5 440 points…

Connectique

Du côté des interfaces de connexion, les 2 NAS possèdent :

• 3× USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (dont 1 en façade)
• 1× USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C
• 1× sortie HDMI
• 2× ports réseau 5 Gb/s

C’est assez rare pour le noter, on a bien ici 2 ports réseau capable d’atteindre 5 Gb/s

Système TOS 6

Les nouveaux NAS tournent sous TOS 6, le système maison de TerraMaster. Une mise à jour vers TOS 7 est prévue dans les prochains mois. TOS 6 offre déjà un large éventail de fonctionnalités (tout ce que doit faire un NAS en 2025), un magasin d’applications intégré et la prise en charge de Docker. TerraMaster utilise ses propres technologies de gestion de volumes TRAID et TRAID+, équivalents aux SHR et SHR+ de Synology.

Prix et disponibilité

Les nouveaux NAS TerraMaster F2-425 Plus et F4-425 Plus sont d’ores et disponible à la vente. On les trouve respectivement à :

• F2-425 Plus : 429,99€ (actuellement en promotion à 365,49€)
• F4-425 Plus : 599,99€

Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur le site officiel…

Chaque année, Pwn2Own rassemble la communauté d’expert en cybersécurité autour de la découverte de vulnérabilités critiques dans des appareils et logiciels du quotidien. Du 21 au 23 octobre dernier, l’édition irlandaise de Pwn2Own à Dublin a réuni des experts et hackers éthiques pour tester la sécurité de nombreux équipements : NAS, routeurs, caméras IP, imprimantes, smartphones… utilisés par les entreprises et les particuliers. Les principaux sponsors de cette édition étaient Meta, Synology et QNAP. Nous ne reviendrons pas sur l’ensemble des failles découvertes (elles sont nombreuses), mais nous allons nous concentrer sur celles touchant Synology et QNAP.

Qu’est-ce que le Pwn2Own ?

Pwn2Own est une compétition internationale de cybersécurité créée par la Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), un programme de recherche en sécurité géré par Trend Micro. Son objectif, c’est d’encourager les chercheurs en sécurité à identifier et exploiter des vulnérabilités dans des logiciels, systèmes d’exploitation ou matériels populaires. Les fabricants fournissent eux-mêmes les appareils à tester, afin de les soumettre à des attaques contrôlées et sécurisées. Les participants tentent de découvrir des failles “zero-day”, c’est-à-dire non documentées et non corrigées. À la clé, des récompenses financières plutôt conséquentes, proportionnelles à la gravité et à l’impact des failles découvertes. Pour cette édition, la cagnotte globale s’élevait à 2 millions de dollars.

Synology

Dès les premières heures, plusieurs produits Synology ont été compromis :

• BeeStation Plus : débordement de pile permettant un accès root — gain de 40 000 $
• DS925+ : exploitation de deux bugs combinés pour obtenir une exécution de code arbitraire — gain de 40 000 $
• DP320 : là encore, deux bugs exploités conjointement — gain de 50 000 $
• Caméra IP CC400W : faille déjà connue du fabricant (non corrigée et non documentée à ce jour) — gain de 30 000 $
• DS925+ (nouvelle attaque) : exploitation de deux bugs pour contourner l’authentification et exécuter du code en tant que root — gain de 40 000 $
• BeeStation Plus (hors scope) : vulnérabilité découverte mais non récompensée, car en dehors du périmètre de la compétition.

QNAP

Les appareils QNAP ont eux aussi été la cible de plusieurs exploits notables au cours de la compétition.

• Une équipe est parvenue à compromettre les QHora-322 et TS-453E grâce à la combinaison de huit vulnérabilités, incluant plusieurs injections — gain de 100 000 $.
• Une autre équipe a exploité sur le TS-453E un enchaînement d’injections multiples et un bug de chaîne de format, permettant une exécution de code — gain de 40 000 $.
• Une faille d’injection de code unique a ensuite permis à des chercheurs de prendre le contrôle du TS-453E — gain de 40 000 $.
• Enfin, une autre vulnérabilité, liée à un identifiant codé en dur combiné à une injection, a conduit à une nouvelle compromission du TS-453E — gain de 40 000 $.

Autres fabricants concernés

D’autres marques ont également vu leurs produits compromis :

• Canon et Lexmark (imprimantes)
• Philips Hue (lampes connectées)
• Sonos (enceintes connectées)
• Samsung (smartphones Galaxy)
• Ubiquiti (systèmes de surveillance AI Pro)

En synthèse

L’édition 2025 de Pwn2Own Dublin a une nouvelle fois démontré la richesse et la pertinence de ce type d’événement pour l’industrie. Il faut saluer les constructeurs qui acceptent d’exposer leurs produits à ce niveau de test (et donc de risque financier). Le fait que QNAP et Synology soient co-sponsors, aux côtés de Meta, illustre clairement leur engagement en faveur de la cybersécurité et leur volonté d’adopter une démarche proactive dans la protection de leurs utilisateurs.

The Minisforum MS-02 Workstation – FINALLY A MS-01 KILLER?

Note – Massive thanks to PCWatch for their coverage of the Japan IT Week 2025 Event. They made an excellent article on the Minisforum MS-02 HERE and was the source for today’s article. Check them out!

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is a compact 4.8-liter workstation revealed at Japan IT Week Autumn 2025, marking a major upgrade over the earlier MS-01 model. Built around Intel’s 24-core Core Ultra 9 285HX processor, it merges high-end mobile CPU performance with features traditionally reserved for full-size desktops. The system includes support for up to 256 GB of ECC DDR5 memory, four PCIe 4.0 NVMe slots, and three PCIe expansion slots, one of which supports PCIe 5.0 ×16. Network connectivity options extend up to dual 25 GbE SFP28 ports, alongside 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE (vPro) Ethernet. Designed to serve as a workstation or mini-server, the MS-02 Ultra incorporates an internal 350 W Flex PSU, a slide-out chassis for maintenance, and advanced front-to-rear cooling architecture.

Minisforum MS-02 – Internal Hardware

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is built around Intel’s Arrow Lake-HX platform, with the Core Ultra 9 285HX serving as its central processor. This 24-core CPU combines eight performance cores and sixteen efficiency cores, reaching up to 5.5 GHz while maintaining a 140 W thermal design power. It incorporates an integrated Intel Arc GPU with four Xe cores and an NPU capable of up to 13 TOPS for AI acceleration. The CPU provides 24 PCIe lanes in total, which are distributed among the system’s multiple expansion and storage options.

Memory capacity is one of the most notable upgrades over its predecessor. The MS-02 Ultra offers four DDR5 SO-DIMM slots, supporting up to 256 GB of 4800 MHz memory, with full ECC functionality for stability in continuous workloads. Two modules are located on the CPU side of the board, and two on the reverse, optimizing thermal spacing and service access. This capacity places it closer to entry-level server configurations than typical mini PCs, reinforcing its suitability for virtualization or compute-heavy tasks.

Storage expansion is handled through four M.2 2280 NVMe slots, each supporting PCIe 4.0 ×4 bandwidth. Combined, these slots can accommodate up to 16 TB of SSD storage. The system’s slide-out chassis design allows quick installation or replacement of drives, simplifying maintenance. Minisforum has also introduced a small debug LED and clear CMOS button on the board, indicating that the model is targeted toward users familiar with system-level configuration and troubleshooting.

Expansion flexibility extends far beyond most small form factor workstations. The system includes three PCIe slots: one PCIe 5.0 ×16, one PCIe 4.0 ×16 (often occupied by a 25 GbE NIC in standard configurations), and one PCIe 4.0 ×4. The top slot can host dual-slot desktop graphics cards, drawing up to 140 W through an included 8-pin auxiliary connector. This allows for the addition of mid-range GPUs such as the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada or workstation accelerators, while still retaining physical compactness.

Power delivery is managed through a built-in 350 W Flex PSU that eliminates the need for an external brick. This internal supply was a deliberate shift from the MS-01’s external adapter and helps sustain higher CPU and GPU draw without additional clutter. The unit supports 100–240 V AC input, giving it universal deployment flexibility for both workstation and light server scenarios.

 

Minisforum MS-02 – Ports and Connections

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra includes a broad range of connectivity options intended to support both workstation and server workloads. Front access is optimized for frequent use, featuring two USB4 Version 2.0 Type-C ports offering 80 Gbps bandwidth each, a 10 Gbps USB Type-A port, a 3.5 mm audio combo jack, and the system power button. These front USB4 v2 ports also support DisplayPort Alternate Mode and Power Delivery up to 15 W per port, making them suitable for high-speed data transfer or direct monitor output without additional adapters.

The rear I/O layout is designed for permanent peripheral and network connections. It includes a third USB4 Type-C port rated at 40 Gbps, three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports at 10 Gbps each, and a single HDMI 2.1 output supporting up to 8K at 60 Hz or 4K at 120 Hz. For network communication, the MS-02 Ultra integrates four ports in total: two 25 GbE SFP28, one 10 GbE RJ-45, and one 2.5 GbE RJ-45. The 2.5 GbE interface uses Intel’s i226-LM controller and supports vPro remote management for BIOS-level administration, which is beneficial for enterprise or headless operation.

Wireless connectivity is provided by an M.2 2230 E-Key slot supporting Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 modules, enabling flexible configuration for wireless networks or peripheral pairing. The combination of USB4 v2, multiple Ethernet options, and RDMA capability positions the MS-02 Ultra as a system ready for both high-performance workstation setups and compact server deployments. Its port layout, with both front and rear accessibility, ensures straightforward use in horizontal or vertical orientations.

Minisforum MS-02 – Cooling and Temperature Management

The cooling system of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is designed to manage sustained high thermal loads while maintaining compact dimensions. The chassis follows a front-intake and rear-exhaust airflow pattern, similar to rackmount servers. A six-heatpipe radiator combined with phase-change material (PCM) ensures efficient heat dissipation from both the CPU and expansion slots. This design enables the system to maintain stable operation at a 140 W CPU TDP, even when fully populated with PCIe cards and NVMe storage. Airflow direction also varies depending on the unit’s orientation, with side-mounted intakes feeding the expansion slots and rear vents handling exhaust when the unit is placed horizontally or vertically.

The internal layout is structured to prevent thermal overlap between major components. The CPU and memory modules are cooled through a direct-contact heat spreader, while GPU and add-in cards draw intake air from the left side and expel it from the right or top, depending on placement. The inclusion of an internal 350 W Flex PSU was balanced with this design, ensuring sufficient clearance and airflow. This approach allows the MS-02 Ultra to sustain continuous high-load performance without external cooling solutions or the noise levels typical of larger tower workstations.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Workstation – Worth waiting for?

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra represents a substantial progression from the original MS-01 workstation, addressing nearly every limitation of its predecessor. The earlier model, released in 2023, gained attention for integrating desktop-class performance into a small form factor but was constrained by its single-slot PCIe design, limited memory capacity, and reliance on an external power brick. The MS-02 Ultra resolves these issues with four DDR5 SO-DIMM slots supporting up to 256 GB ECC memory, a dual-slot PCIe 5.0 ×16 slot for graphics or accelerator cards, and a fully internal 350 W Flex PSU. These refinements, along with the addition of 25 GbE networking and USB4 v2 connectivity, elevate the system into a new category that bridges high-end workstation and compact enterprise server design.

Performance and versatility are at the center of this system’s concept. The inclusion of a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX CPU and up to four PCIe 4.0 NVMe drives positions it for continuous workloads such as virtualization, software development, or AI inference without the thermal or structural compromises typical of small PCs. Minisforum’s decision to adopt ECC memory and RDMA-capable networking also underlines a shift toward reliability and professional usage scenarios rather than enthusiast or gaming audiences.

In terms of market placement, pricing has yet to be confirmed, but early indications suggest the MS-02 Ultra will likely start around $1,500, with higher configurations approaching or exceeding $2,000 depending on memory, storage, and NIC options. This aligns it with compact workstations like the ASRock DeskMeet X600 and high-end mini servers from OEM integrators, though the Minisforum model’s density and component flexibility set it apart. Overall, the MS-02 Ultra shows how far the brand’s SFF engineering has advanced since the MS-01, turning a well-liked prototype concept into a fully realized professional-grade workstation built for sustained heavy use.

Note – Massive thanks to PCWatch for their coverage of the Japan IT Week 2025 Event. They made an excellent article on the Minisforum MS-02 HERE and was the source for today’s article. Check them out!

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Après une année de développement et de tests intensifs, Jellyfin 10.11.0 marque l’une des évolutions les plus importantes du projet open source. Cette nouvelle version met l’accent sur la performance, la fiabilité et la préparation du futur, avec une refonte du système de gestion des métadonnées, de nouveaux outils d’administration et plusieurs améliorations côté utilisateur. Regardons de plus près cette nouvelle version…

Jellyfin 10.11.0 : le changement, c’est maintenant

Visuellement, Jellyfin 10.11.0 n’apporte que peu de modifications. Les véritables avancées se situent à l’intérieur du moteur : la base de données de la bibliothèque a été entièrement migrée vers EF Core.

Concrètement, Jellyfin abandonne les requêtes SQLite dispersées au profit d’une gestion centralisée des données. Résultat :

• des requêtes plus rapides,
• des migrations plus sûres,
• et une base bien plus facile à faire évoluer.

Cette refonte ouvre également la voie à la prise en charge future d’autres moteurs de base de données, comme PostgreSQL, pour plus de flexibilité et de robustesse.

Maintenance simplifiée

La migration des bibliothèques s’accompagne d’un processus de déduplication et de nettoyage des données (suppression d’entrées orphelines ou doublons). Selon la taille et l’ancienneté de la base, cette étape peut durer de quelques minutes à plusieurs heures.
Avant toute mise à jour, il est impératif de :

• sauvegarder manuellement les dossiers de données et de configuration,
• être déjà sur la version 10.10.7,
• et ne jamais interrompre la migration en cours.

Autre nouveauté appréciable : la fonction de sauvegarde et restauration intégrée. Elle permet de créer des instantanés (snapshots) de la base de métadonnées et de les restaurer facilement, un vrai plus pour la maintenance et la sécurité des données.

Performances et consommation mémoire

Le moteur de base de données tire désormais parti d’un cache en mémoire plus agressif, ce qui réduit les accès disque et améliore nettement la réactivité, notamment sur les grandes bibliothèques. En contrepartie, Jellyfin utilise davantage de RAM, mais cette mémoire est libérée automatiquement si d’autres processus en ont besoin. De nouveaux modes de verrouillage (locking) viennent aussi améliorer la stabilité dans les environnements sollicités.

Compatibilité et évolutions techniques

Jellyfin abandonne définitivement le support des systèmes ARM 32 bits (armhf). Pour continuer à bénéficier des mises à jour, il faut désormais utiliser un système d’exploitation ARM64.

Autre changement annoncé : la suppression prochaine du support TLS/SSL interne (prévue pour la version 10.12.0). Les développeurs recommandent désormais d’utiliser un reverse proxy (comme Nginx ou Caddy) pour la gestion des certificats, plus fiable et plus simple à maintenir.

Nouvelles fonctionnalités et améliorations clés

Parmi les nouveautés les plus notables de Jellyfin 10.11.0 :

• Recherche plus rapide et gestion enrichie des favoris (Live TV, clips, albums photo, saisons, etc.) ;
• Support HEVC dans Firefox 134+ et option pour désactiver le style natif des sous-titres ;
• Affichage en collections des séries et ajout d’un splash screen personnalisable sur la page de connexion ;
• Tableau de bord enrichi, avec statistiques médias et suivi de l’espace disque ;
• Support AV1 via VideoToolbox et passage à FFmpeg 7.1, pour de meilleures performances en décodage et transcodage ;
• Amélioration du rendu HDR et Dolby Vision sur certains matériels compatibles ;
• Nouvelle API de sauvegarde (BackupApi) et migration complète des plugins vers EF Core.

Cette version corrige également plusieurs failles de sécurité, y compris des correctifs issus de projets externes.

En synthèse

Jellyfin 10.11.0 pose des fondations solides pour l’avenir du projet. Plus rapide, plus stable et mieux structurée, cette version facilite la maintenance tout en préparant de futures innovations. Une mise à jour vivement conseillée, à condition de la planifier avec soin…. pensez aux sauvegardes.

source

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – The New $500+ NAS Standard?

The TerraMaster F4-425 Plus represents a significant step forward in the brand’s 4-bay NAS lineup, targeting users who demand capable hardware and broad feature support at a mid-range price point. Retailing at $569.99, or $484.99 during its introductory discount, it is positioned to compete directly with systems like the Synology DS925+ and QNAP TS-464, both of which occupy similar price and hardware tiers. TerraMaster’s intention with this model is to deliver a “jack of all trades” device that suits both home multimedia environments and small business offices. Internally, it uses Intel’s quad-core N150 processor, part of the newer Twin Lake architecture, with a base clock of 1 GHz and a turbo frequency up to 3.6 GHz. This CPU is paired with 16GB of DDR5 memory, offering a notable upgrade in bandwidth and responsiveness compared to previous DDR4-based TerraMaster models.

Complementing that performance core are three PCIe 3.0 x1 M.2 NVMe slots and four SATA drive bays, supporting a combined raw capacity of up to 144TB when fully populated. This configuration allows the device to accommodate both large-scale HDD storage for bulk data and high-speed SSD arrays for caching or dedicated performance pools. Dual 5GbE network ports on the rear enable theoretical aggregate transfer speeds exceeding 1,000 MB/s, aligning with the system’s positioning as a performance-focused yet affordable NAS. TerraMaster’s TOS 6 operating system comes preinstalled, providing modernized storage management, AI-based photo organization, and security tools like HyperLock WORM protection and isolation mode. Altogether, the F4-425 Plus arrives as one of the most fully featured mid-tier NAS options available in 2025, combining strong hardware, software maturity, and quiet, power-efficient design suited to both personal and professional use cases.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

The TerraMaster F4-425 Plus delivers one of the most complete mid-tier NAS packages currently available, balancing strong hardware, efficient design, and flexible software at a highly competitive price. Its Intel N150 processor, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and dual 5GbE ports provide ample speed for data-heavy workloads, while three M.2 NVMe slots add rare versatility for caching or SSD-based pools. The all-metal enclosure maintains low temperatures and quiet operation, and the TOS 6 operating system has matured into a capable platform with snapshot protection, Docker, virtualization, and AI photo management. Although it lacks premium details such as drive locks and redundant fans, and the interface remains less refined than Synology DSM or QNAP QTS, the F4-425 Plus stands out as a practical and forward-looking NAS. It bridges affordability and professional capability, making it suitable for home users, content creators, and small offices that need reliable, fast, and adaptable network storage.

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS
Amazon in Your Region for the Terramaster F4 SSD NAS @ $569 ($489.99 till 19th Nov)	Terramaster F4-425 PLUS – $569	B&H for the Terramaster F4-425 plus NAS @ $569.99

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Design & Storage

The exterior design of the TerraMaster F4-425 Plus maintains the brand’s familiar compact metal chassis but introduces small refinements that improve both usability and thermals. Measuring 150 by 181 by 219 millimeters and weighing just under 3 kilograms, it fits comfortably into a home office or studio setup without generating significant heat or noise. The enclosure is almost entirely metal, with a brushed silver finish that enhances rigidity and passive cooling compared with earlier plastic-faced designs. Four individual drive trays occupy the front panel, each featuring a simple click-and-load mechanism for 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch drives. Although there are no locking latches or LCD displays, the trays are tool-free and straightforward to handle. A single 120mm fan at the rear provides adjustable cooling across smart, low, and high-speed profiles, maintaining an operational noise level as low as 20.9 dB(A) when idle with drives installed, according to TerraMaster’s own test figures.

From a structural perspective, the F4-425 Plus has clearly benefited from improved thermal management. The metal shell acts as a heat spreader, with typical external temperatures ranging from 25 to 27°C across the enclosure after extended operation, even under multi-day workload testing. Internal drive bays were observed to maintain around 27 to 29°C, while the rear ports and fan area registered between 36 and 38°C during prolonged use. These figures indicate an efficient heat dissipation design, aided by the more conductive chassis material and smart fan calibration. For users concerned with energy efficiency, the power draw remains modest thanks to the Intel N150 processor’s low TDP, allowing the system to idle at roughly 13 watts with SSDs installed and scale to around 60 watts under sustained load with four enterprise-class HDDs spinning.

In terms of drive configuration, the NAS supports up to four SATA 6Gb/s drives and three M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs. This combination provides a theoretical maximum raw capacity of 144TB, assuming four 30TB HDDs and three 8TB SSDs. The inclusion of three NVMe slots rather than the more typical one or two is a notable strength. Each operates on a PCIe 3.0 x1 lane, delivering real-world throughput of approximately 800 to 900 MB/s per SSD, suitable for caching or storage pools. This setup makes it possible to allocate two drives for cache acceleration while dedicating the third to an independent SSD-based pool for high-speed operations like video editing or database hosting. Such flexibility is rare at this price point and broadens the system’s appeal to users with both large data sets and high-performance requirements.

Storage management is handled through TOS 6, TerraMaster’s web-based operating system, which supports a wide range of RAID configurations including TRAID, TRAID+, JBOD, and traditional RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10. TOS 6 also enables SSD caching, snapshots, and HyperLock write-once-read-many functionality for data integrity. Users can assign storage pools to specific workloads, such as separating SSD-based scratch space from HDD archival volumes. Combined with the new graphical interface and more detailed health monitoring tools, it provides a much more transparent overview of drive temperatures, utilization, and S.M.A.R.T. status. For additional flexibility, the system supports online RAID migration and expansion, meaning users can start small and scale capacity over time without data loss.

Beyond local storage, the device integrates directly with TerraMaster’s CloudSync service, which connects to providers like Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, and Baidu Cloud. Hybrid storage configurations allow partial replication or tiered backup between the NAS and the cloud, offering an extra level of redundancy for professional workflows. External connectivity through USB 3.2 ports also supports direct backups to DAS enclosures or portable drives. Altogether, the F4-425 Plus’s design emphasizes efficient cooling, solid construction, and versatile storage architecture, making it a flexible foundation for both data-heavy projects and long-term digital archiving.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Internal Hardware

Internally, the TerraMaster F4-425 Plus is structured around Intel’s N150 processor, a 4-core, 4-thread CPU from the Twin Lake generation. Built on a 6W TDP architecture, this chip delivers a significant efficiency advantage over the previous N5095-based systems while offering a higher burst clock of up to 3.6 GHz. The CPU integrates Intel UHD Graphics, allowing 4K hardware decoding for H.264, H.265, VC-1, and MPEG-4, which is particularly beneficial for Plex, Emby, or Jellyfin users who want native transcoding without GPU add-ons.

This combination makes the system viable not only as a file server but also as a local multimedia hub, capable of decoding and streaming 4K video at up to 60 frames per second. Despite being a low-power chip, its instruction set includes AES-NI hardware encryption, ensuring efficient data security without notable throughput loss when encryption is enabled.

The system’s memory architecture uses a single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot, populated with a 16GB non-ECC module by default and expandable up to 32GB. The adoption of DDR5 over DDR4 marks a generational improvement in bandwidth and latency, leading to faster multitasking, smoother virtualization performance, and reduced overhead when handling multiple users or services. The memory module is non-ECC but benefits from on-die error correction at the hardware level, offering stability improvements over standard DDR4 implementations. This approach aligns with the unit’s target demographic of small offices, creators, and advanced home users who want server-grade responsiveness without enterprise complexity.

Storage connectivity within the system is distributed between four SATA III 6Gb/s interfaces managed by an ASMedia controller and three PCIe 3.0 x1 lanes dedicated to M.2 NVMe SSDs. This configuration ensures balanced throughput for simultaneous HDD and SSD activity. Internally, the layout is straightforward, providing easy access to both the memory slot and M.2 bays via the removable top panel. The power supply is a single 90W external brick, keeping internal temperatures lower and simplifying maintenance.

Together, the hardware configuration represents a thoughtful balance between efficiency, expandability, and performance, aimed at users who need consistent data access, multimedia capabilities, and reliable long-term operation without excess noise or heat.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Ports and Connections

The TerraMaster F4-425 Plus offers a broad range of connectivity designed to meet both high-speed networking and general expansion needs. On the rear panel, two 5GbE RJ-45 network ports serve as the central performance feature. These are among the first dual 5GbE implementations in a mid-tier NAS, and each port operates through its own dedicated PCIe 3.0 x1 lane, avoiding bandwidth contention. In testing, each port achieved full theoretical throughput, confirming proper lane allocation. Users can enable link aggregation or SMB multichannel for multi-user workloads, although saturating both ports simultaneously requires fast SSD or hybrid storage configurations. These ports support IPv4/IPv6, VLAN tagging, link aggregation, and Wake-on-LAN, making the system suitable for both small office environments and direct workstation connections.

Complementing the network interfaces, the F4-425 Plus includes four USB 3.2 ports: three Type-A and one Type-C, all operating at 10Gbps. These ports can handle external DAS enclosures, UPS devices, or high-capacity backup drives. The inclusion of a front-mounted USB port improves convenience for ad hoc backups or quick file transfers, addressing a long-standing omission in earlier TerraMaster models. Additionally, an HDMI 2.1 output is positioned on the rear, though its practical use remains limited within TOS, which lacks a native display interface. It may, however, prove useful for third-party operating systems such as Unraid or TrueNAS, where direct console access or local media playback is desired.

Overall, the port layout is clean and efficient, optimized for straightforward cable management. The system’s single large fan sits adjacent to the networking array, allowing for effective airflow without excessive cable obstruction. Power is supplied through a standard barrel connector linked to an external 90W adapter, which helps reduce internal heat buildup. Though it lacks built-in 10GbE or PCIe expansion, the dual 5GbE setup provides more than enough bandwidth for its class, especially when paired with NVMe caching. Users can also connect the NAS to TerraMaster’s USB-based DAS units for storage expansion or off-site replication, offering flexibility without compromising portability or noise levels.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Tests, Noise, Heat and Power Consumption

Performance testing on the TerraMaster F4-425 Plus showed that the system comfortably meets its advertised speed class, particularly when networked over a single 5GbE connection. Using four Toshiba MG-series 7200 RPM enterprise hard drives configured in RAID 5, the system achieved full saturation of one 5GbE port during both AJA and ATTO benchmark tests, reaching consistent read and write speeds around 500 to 520 MB/s. When tested with mixed media files totaling 50.5 GB, it completed the transfer in approximately 3 minutes and 45 seconds, equating to an average throughput of about 224 MB/s.

This is a strong result for a mechanical-drive setup, reflecting efficient caching and balanced SATA bandwidth. SMB Multichannel and link aggregation are supported, though the CPU’s available PCIe lanes limit simultaneous dual-port saturation. Even so, the system handles multiple concurrent transfers and backups without a noticeable decline in throughput.

Testing with NVMe SSDs improved overall responsiveness considerably. The three M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0 x1 slots each sustained sequential transfer rates between 800 and 900 MB/s, allowing the NAS to maintain a high level of random IOPS for metadata-heavy workloads. When used as cache devices, these drives accelerated small-file transfers and application access times, especially when paired with the system’s 16GB of DDR5 memory.

TerraMaster’s TOS 6 supports flexible use of these drives, enabling independent storage pools or hybrid cache layers, depending on the task. In sustained transfers over SMB and iSCSI, the system achieved write speeds close to 950 MB/s and reads near 1020 MB/s when using SSD-based arrays, validating the advantage of dual 5GbE interfaces for all-flash or mixed-tier environments.

Power consumption during operation remained modest, aligning with the platform’s efficient design. With no hard drives installed and three SSDs active, idle draw measured around 13.3 watts. Adding four 7200 RPM HDDs increased idle power to 55 watts and full-load consumption to roughly 61–63 watts under concurrent read/write activity. These figures indicate a well-balanced design that prioritizes power efficiency without restricting performance. Fan speed settings affect both thermals and acoustics predictably: in low-speed mode, the NAS operated near 33 dB(A), while mid and high-speed profiles raised that figure to 37 and 39 dB(A) respectively. During heavy disk operations, readings peaked briefly at around 43 dB(A), which is reasonable given the metal chassis and high-RPM drives used in testing.

Thermal results further underscored the system’s stability. Surface readings from the aluminum body remained between 25°C and 27°C on average, while drive bays hovered at 28–30°C after extended workload sessions. The rear fan exhaust area reached approximately 36–38°C under sustained load. The efficient heat dispersion of the chassis prevented thermal throttling during prolonged transfers or virtualization testing, even with all seven storage devices active. This consistent temperature range indicates that TerraMaster’s choice of single-fan cooling and full-metal housing achieves a practical balance between noise, airflow, and longevity.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The TerraMaster F4-425 Plus demonstrates how far the company’s mid-range NAS lineup has progressed in terms of hardware refinement and real-world usability. By combining Intel’s efficient N150 processor with 16GB of DDR5 memory, dual 5GbE connectivity, and triple M.2 NVMe slots, it provides a specification normally reserved for higher-priced units. The build quality, centered around a full-metal chassis and quiet cooling design, contributes to consistent thermals and low power usage even under multi-day workloads. While the design omits premium touches like drive locks or redundant fans, the emphasis on practicality and efficient cooling makes it a dependable solution for continuous operation. From a user experience perspective, the integration of TOS 6 represents TerraMaster’s most stable and capable operating system to date, offering improved security features, cloud synchronization tools, snapshot management, and flexible storage configurations that appeal to both home and small office users.

From a value standpoint, the F4-425 Plus stands out as one of the most competitively priced NAS units in its category. At $569.99, or $484.99 during the initial discount period, it delivers strong network and storage performance that aligns closely with rivals from Synology and QNAP while retaining open installation flexibility for third-party platforms such as Unraid or TrueNAS. Its combination of high-speed connectivity, compact design, and mature software environment makes it an appealing option for anyone seeking a 4-bay system capable of multitasking across media streaming, data backup, and light virtualization. Although it cannot fully match the polish of Synology DSM or the plugin ecosystem of QNAP QTS, TerraMaster has successfully positioned this device as a bridge between affordability and professional performance, solidifying its place as one of the more balanced NAS releases of 2025.

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS
Amazon in Your Region for the Terramaster F4 SSD NAS @ $569 ($489.99 till 19th Nov)	Terramaster F4-425 PLUS – $569	B&H for the Terramaster F4-425 plus NAS @ $569.99

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS PROs

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS CONs

• Dual 5GbE network ports with full independent bandwidth for high-speed transfers + lots of USB-to-5GbE $30 upgrades in the market now • Three PCIe 3.0 x1 M.2 NVMe slots supporting cache or storage pool configurations • Intel N150 processor with integrated graphics enabling 4K hardware decoding and AES-NI encryption • 16GB DDR5 memory (expandable to 32GB) offering improved bandwidth and multitasking performance • Full-metal chassis with efficient thermals, low noise levels, and minimal vibration • Comprehensive RAID and storage management through TOS 6 with snapshot and HyperLock-WORM protection • Supports Docker, virtual machines, Plex, Emby, and Jellyfin natively within TOS 6 • Competitive pricing with strong value relative to Synology and QNAP alternatives

• Cheaper N150 NAS Systems have arrived earlier in 2025 • 5GbE adoption is low, so only larger 10GbE ready groups (via auto-negotiation) will enjoy the benefits of 5GbE • TOS 6 interface and app ecosystem remain less polished than top-tier NAS platforms

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Bonjour à tous,

J’espère que vous allez bien ! Pour ma part, les jours défilent à une vitesse folle… Il va clairement falloir que je lève un peu le pied (sur mon vrai boulot), sinon je risque de finir en mode surchauffe

Comme vous avez pu le constater, les NAS sont au cœur de toutes les conversations ces dernières semaines… et ce n’est pas fini ! Septembre et octobre ont été particulièrement chargés en annonces, mais d’autres nouveautés sont encore à venir… et du lourd, paraît-il.

Il fut un temps où le trio Synology, QNAP et Asustor dominait sans partage. Mais cette époque semble révolue. Le marché évolue vite et les challengers bousculent sérieusement la hiérarchie. Pour ne pas se faire dépasser (voire avaler) par la nouvelle garde, les leaders historiques vont devoir redoubler d’innovation. Le simple stockage en réseau ne suffit plus. Aujourd’hui, tous les fabricants proposent des solutions polyvalentes, puissantes et ultra-connectées. Prenez Ugreen (au hasard), en un an, ils ont totalement rebattu les cartes avec des NAS complets, performants, dotés d’un OS solide, d’apps bien pensées… et surtout d’un rapport qualité/prix redoutable.

Je n’ai pas vu de films récemment. Côté Séries TV, on m’a conseillé Painkiller sur la crise des opioïdes aux États-Unis. C’est pas mal, mais personnellement (sur le même thème) ma préférence va à Dopesick plus percutante et bien plus prenante à mon goût. J’ai aussi tenté House of Guiness dont les décors sont somptueux, les acteurs assez convaincants… mais honnêtement, je me suis un ennuyé. Je pense m’arrêter à la saison 1. Enfin j’ai terminé Néro, une série française qui démarre sur les chapeaux de roue avant de vite retomber à plat. À voir, mais ce n’est pas la série de l’année.

Je me rends compte que les 3 dernières séries Netflix sont plutôt… moyennes. La qualité sur la plateforme baisse clairement. Il reste bien quelques pépites, mais à ce prix, on est en droit d’en attendre plus. Et vous, quelles sont vos séries du moment ? Vos coups de cœur récents ?

Je vous souhaite une excellente journée.
FX

With Synology ‘Hurt’, Where Is QNAP Right Now?

In the rapidly shifting world of network-attached storage (NAS), QNAP remains one of the most established and technically capable names in the field, yet its place in the market has never felt more uncertain. While Synology has spent much of 2025 dealing with backlash over its increasingly closed-ecosystem strategy—restricting support for third-party drives and limiting upgrade paths—QNAP’s relative quietness has been equally striking. Rather than taking advantage of Synology’s missteps to present itself as the more open and flexible alternative, QNAP has maintained a notably low public profile. This has led many in the community to wonder whether the company is missing a rare opportunity to redefine the market narrative in its favour. Meanwhile, the NAS landscape itself has become more fragmented than ever, with emerging brands such as UGREEN entering the space aggressively, and DIY-friendly systems like ZimaOS, CasaOS, and TrueNAS reshaping what users expect from network storage. In this increasingly complex environment, QNAP’s silence raises an important question: where does the company stand today, and what direction is it heading next?

What Stops QNAP from Achieving Market Dominance?

For much of the last decade, QNAP and Synology were the twin pillars of consumer and SMB NAS. Both set the standards for design, functionality, and software maturity. But while Synology’s restrictive policies have alienated parts of its user base, QNAP has struggled to control the narrative. The company’s openness to third-party hardware remains one of its strongest selling points, yet it has failed to capitalise on that advantage through clear messaging or aggressive marketing. Instead, the brand has allowed the spotlight to drift toward newcomers offering simpler, more modern experiences. Without stronger communication, QNAP risks being seen not as the flexible choice, but as the complicated one. At the same time, the entry-level NAS market is shifting under QNAP’s feet. UGREEN’s arrival has changed expectations by blending appealing industrial design, approachable software, and low price points that attract first-time buyers. Asustor and Terramaster have also expanded their share through steady, incremental improvements that emphasise usability and value over complexity. These competitors are building ecosystems designed for beginners, while QNAP’s traditional focus on advanced workflows can appear intimidating to casual users. For those who simply want a plug-and-play media server or backup appliance, QNAP’s power and depth can feel like overkill.

The DIY and Open-Source Challenge

Beyond traditional competitors, the DIY NAS scene has exploded. Open-source operating systems and flexible, modular hardware are giving enthusiasts and professionals more freedom than ever. Platforms like ZimaOS, CasaOS, and LincStation deliver near-commercial polish at minimal cost, while established heavyweights such as TrueNAS and Unraid continue to dominate the prosumer and homelab segments. Even projects like HexOS, which simplifies TrueNAS for newcomers, show how far the DIY ecosystem has evolved toward user-friendliness. These developments put pressure on QNAP from two directions: on one side, budget newcomers promising simplicity; on the other, flexible open-source solutions offering near-unlimited control. QNAP’s traditional middle-ground position—balancing enterprise-grade features with consumer usability—has never been more difficult to defend.

Where Is the QNAP TS-464 Refresh?

One of the clearest signs of uncertainty around QNAP’s current direction is the lack of a follow-up to the widely praised TS-464 series. Three years after its launch, this model remains one of QNAP’s most balanced and popular NAS systems, yet there has been no formal announcement of a successor. During a recent QNAP partner event in London, attended by distributors and sales partners, several new devices were discussed—such as the USB-to-Dual-10GbE adapter, a 60-bay enterprise expansion chassis, and the QUTS-based AI systems shown earlier at Computex—but no mention was made of a new desktop refresh. What has been confirmed is the upcoming TS-62A series, effectively a value-tier alternative built on the same Intel Celeron N5095 processor found in the TS-464. While this helps QNAP reach a lower price point, it also highlights the absence of real progress in its mainstream lineup. More advanced models, such as the QU504, QU506, and QU508, featuring Intel’s newer Twin Lake N150 and N355 CPUs, have been spotted—but these are confirmed to be China-only releases, likely replacing the “C” series that previously served that region. This means global customers remain without a direct 464 successor in 2025.

The Twin Lake CPUs represent a notable improvement over the Celeron family, offering higher efficiency, DDR5 memory support, and lower power draw, though they are limited to a single memory channel and a maximum of 16GB. Their PCIe layout offers nine Gen3 lanes, potentially allowing QNAP to scale network speeds to 5GbE or even dual-5GbE configurations. However, insiders suggest the company may delay such upgrades until its World Partner Tour later this year, possibly aligning a new desktop rollout with that event. If true, the earliest a genuine TS-464 refresh might appear is early-to-mid-2026, leaving the current model to carry the banner longer than expected. This gap has created visible frustration within the NAS community. While competitors like UGREEN and Minisforum push out new models with 2023–2024 generation CPUs, QNAP continues to rely on hardware first introduced in 2021. The TS-464 remains capable, but QNAP’s silence about its replacement feeds the perception that the brand has slowed its consumer-level innovation cycle.

---

QNAP Is Doing More Than People Think

Despite appearances, QNAP has not been idle. At the 2025 Tech Summit in Taipei, the company showcased several major initiatives reinforcing its enterprise and AI ambitions. Highlights included the TVR-AI200 intelligent NVR, high-availability rackmount systems, and updates to QuTS hero, its ZFS-based OS. These developments show that QNAP is not chasing the beginner market but doubling down on performance, scalability, and professional reliability. Its quietness in consumer circles may therefore reflect a strategic pivot toward enterprise and prosumer deployments where its technology already excels. QNAP’s continued support for both QTS (EXT4) and QuTS hero (ZFS) remains one of its key differentiators. Few other vendors offer users this level of choice between consumer simplicity and enterprise-grade data integrity. Meanwhile, hardware flexibility continues to set QNAP apart: PCIe expansion, GPU support for AI and virtualization, 10GbE networking, and hybrid storage pools that combine HDD, SSD, and NVMe tiers. These factors allow QNAP to appeal to serious creators, labs, and businesses seeking more control than a typical turnkey NAS provides.

QNAP’s challenge now is less about technology and more about perception. To regain consumer trust and market visibility, it must simplify its message without diluting its strengths. Its dual-OS ecosystem, PCIe expandability, and AI integration are powerful advantages, but they must be communicated as accessible, not intimidating. Streamlining setup and maintenance could help QNAP reclaim the middle ground between Synology’s walled garden and the raw complexity of TrueNAS or UnRAID. A clearer consumer strategy is also essential. The company has the resources and product depth to compete head-to-head with UGREEN and Asustor, but a quiet marketing approach has allowed newer names to dominate the conversation. Reinforcing its openness to third-party drives, highlighting its unique Thunderbolt and ZFS support, and launching refreshed hardware with current-generation processors would go a long way toward rebuilding enthusiasm among home and prosumer users.

---

In Conclusion: Where Is QNAP in 2025?

QNAP stands at a pivotal point. Synology’s restrictive direction has created an opportunity for alternatives to flourish, yet QNAP has not fully seized it. Instead, it has focused on strengthening its enterprise and AI product lines while leaving a gap in its mainstream portfolio—most notably the missing TS-464 refresh. Meanwhile, challenger brands like UGREEN, Minisforum, and Aoostar are gaining traction with faster hardware and more aggressive pricing.

Still, QNAP retains unique advantages. Its dual-OS ecosystem, long-term software support, and deep hardware ecosystem remain unmatched in many respects. The TS-x64, TS-x62, and TVS-hx74 series may be ageing, but their ongoing QuTS hero updates show QNAP’s commitment to support longevity. The key now lies in timing: if QNAP can re-enter the consumer market in 2026 with refreshed Intel Twin Lake or similar platforms—balancing performance, energy efficiency, and modern connectivity—it could reassert itself as the most capable and open NAS brand available.

 

Until then, the silence surrounding its next-generation desktop NAS line speaks volumes. QNAP’s technical foundation remains solid, but in a market that rewards visibility and momentum, even the most capable brand cannot afford to stay quiet for long.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE