Vue normale

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

NAS Compares
Synology NAS vs EVERYONE ELSE – Which Is Best?
20 juin 2025 à 18:00

Synology NAS vs EVERYONE ELSE – Which Is Best?

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

20 juin 2025 à 18:00

If Not Synology? Which Other NAS Brand Should You Choose?

It’s an odd question, but with Synology arguably making some rather higher business and enterprise decisions in recent years, there have been increasing queries about who would fill the void if they moved onwards and upwards. As Synology holds such a powerful position in the NAS market, their absence would certainly lead to quite the battle of strength from other players. The obvious answer would be QNAP, a brand that has a similar history to Synology (over two decades in the business, Taiwan-based, in-house OS, numerous 1st-party tools, home and business solutions, etc.), but in 2025, the reality is nowhere near as clear-cut. Younger established brands that have jockeyed for 3rd position, such as Asustor and Terramaster, have been challenged by several startups (ZimaCube and Zimaboard 2, Orico’s Cyberdata Vault, to name just two) entering the fray, as well as established brands like UGREEN, which are expanding their business into the NAS sector. If Synology, for whatever reason, ceased to occupy this important user class of private turnkey server ownership, who would be best placed to occupy it?

How, Where and Why Has Synology Changed?

Synology’s rapid change in business stance to be more enterprise/hyperscale-focused comes at the same time as their frequency of more entry-level, small business, prosumer, and enthusiast solutions has dropped. The regularity of smaller 2-Bay and 4-Bay solutions has noticeably decreased, and the hardware they feature has changed to accommodate more business-type use. This by no means suggests that the brand is making moves to exit these user groups (indeed, support of DSM and the latest revision DSM 7.2.2 extends to all existing users up to many systems released in the late 2010s). However, there has been plenty of user outcry from existing users and potential customers on the architecture of both DSM and the recent releases that exacerbate users to move away from the brand and spend their allocated budgets elsewhere. Synology still comfortably sits ahead of its competitors in terms of software, features, and the UX of their platform, but many changes in policy and support mentioned below have started this trend:

Changes in 3rd-party HDD compatibility on systems above the 8-Bay scale, prioritizing their own 1st-party labeled HDDs and SSDs, as well as reducing the presentation and compatibility listings on their site significantly.
Changes in the choice of internal hardware featured in their systems to be more focused on business file processes and less on multimedia use.
Comparatively smaller increases in base hardware between refreshes of individual series (e.g., J4125 and V1500B CPUs in 2024 launch devices, despite first appearing in 2019/2020).
Considerable increased focus on software enhancements over hardware (not a bad thing, but an undeniable fact).
Increased proprietary hardware support over 3rd-party (e.g., Synology-only Memory modules, custom 10GbE adapters like the E10G22-T1, Synology-only M.2 SSDs for Pool Use).
An increasing number of cloud subscription services getting newer features, while local services remain secure and stable but static.
New product focus shifting towards newer larger-scale solutions like the evolving GridStation series, Active Protect subscription system, and C2 innovations.
The predicted elimination of the J entry-level series in favor of the pre-populated and software-streamlined BeeStation.

All of the above are small factors in themselves, but add them all up, and you see small but important stepping stones toward a gear shift in Synology’s target demographic. So, if Synology were to intentionally or inadvertently begin to move outside of these user groups of home, small business, and enthusiast, who stands to fill this space and grow?

QNAP vs Synology?

As mentioned earlier, QNAP stands to be the most likely contender to fill this space. With over 20 years of history, a larger range of hardware solutions than Synology, and software that does pretty much everything Synology’s does, they have been consistent competitors. However, inconsistencies in user experience, conflicting UIs, and a tendency to try to do “too much” have resulted in their losing ground to Synology in terms of software. Add to this the negative brand impact of security incidents in 2020-2022, which tarnished their reputation around security and safety, requiring serious improvement. To the brand’s credit, they have made considerable internal culture changes on this subject, adding bounty programs, tightening system defaults, increasing pen testing, introducing several system security scanning tools, disabling things like SSH and admin super user accounts as standard, and more.

Value Series	Best All Rounder	Prosumer NAS

TS-233 2-Bay NAS	TS-464 4-Bay NAS	TVS-h874 8-Bay NAS
$189 on Amazon (Check Here)	$549 on Amazon (Check Here)	$2499 on Amazon (Check Here)

In terms of hardware, they have mostly stuck to what works, refreshing existing product families at the same rate of 2.5-3 years for desktop small-medium scale, and 3-5 years for larger scale. They have also introduced significantly more recent CPUs from both Intel and AMD, as well as 2.5GbE as standard on their solutions at the same price point as 1GbE. If it weren’t for the damaging brand harm caused by the Deadbolt/QSnatch/Qlocker ransomware attacks, I think Synology would have been significantly challenged by QNAP in the last 2-3 years across all fronts. However, the setback to QNAP’s reputation reduced this growth potential significantly, and in the last two years, we have seen an increasing number of new names pop up in NAS that have also harmed QNAP’s appeal to users in terms of hardware value, the thing they could always be relied upon to beat Synology on. QNAP would still stand to become the ‘top dog’ in the event of a Synology exit (Synexit?) from the low-to-medium tiers of NAS storage, but many new players have entered the field, such as…

UGREEN vs QNAP?

Largely known for their power adapters and PC accessories, a year ago UGREEN had practically no real presence in the world of NAS. They had a smaller scale and more entry-level range of solutions that were limited to the East, but aside from that, they were complete outsiders. Fast forward to now, and following a successful and well-marketed Kickstarter campaign that raised millions of dollars, they are now a provider of genuinely impressive turnkey NAS solutions—the NASync series. The key word there is “turnkey”, as in they are providing both the hardware and the software. They could have just rolled out their hardware and made it OS-free (i.e., “Here’s a ready-built server, now go install UnRAID or TrueNAS”), but instead, they opted to produce and include an impressively responsive NAS OS in UGOS. Genuinely challenging the feature set of the likes of Asustor and Terramaster, as well as the design of Synology and the hardware level of QNAP, UGREEN has made a rapidly growing name for itself in the small-to-medium NAS sector.

Value Series	Best All Rounder	Prosumer NAS

DXP2800 2-Bay NAS	DXP4800 PLUS 4-Bay NAS	DXP8800 PLUS 8-Bay NAS
$399 on Amazon (Check Here)	$699 on Amazon (Check Here)	$1499 on Amazon (Check Here)

They definitely lack the range of solutions that those other brands offer, with only 6 solutions currently available (the DXP2800, DXP4800/PLUS, DXP6680, DXP8800, and DXP480T), and no rackmount solutions yet, but it’s a solid start. Equally, their software, although fluid and responsive in nailing down the NAS fundamentals, lacks many of the more impressive AAA+ solutions that are offered by the bigger brands. Lastly, although they raised a considerable sum during the crowdfunding, they do not have the global support, offices, or availability of their long-running NAS competitors—with solutions only being available in two regions, the US and Germany. All of these factors add up to a brand that is poised to make even bigger splashes in the years to come but is perhaps not quite ready to replace the big dog, Synology, just yet!

ASUSTOR vs Synology?

Always the bridesmaid, but never the bride, Asustor is a brand that has been around in the world of NAS in one shape or form for quite a few years. They are one of the mainstream Taiwanese brands in NAS that has always ‘been there’, but it is only in the last 4-5 years that they have been making sizable moves to take on both Synology and QNAP. One of the main ways in which they pursued this is by developing numerous features in both hardware and software that are available from their competitors individually. So features such as M.2 NVMe-focused storage systems, BTRFS support, WORM locking, 2.5GbE/5GbE support, HDMI output via a dedicated GUI, and more are features available on Synology and QNAP to some extent, but only Asustor rolls them under one brand umbrella. So, how poised are they to fill a void if Synology moved out of this space?

Well, from a hardware standpoint, Asustor is in a very good position. Them being Taiwan-based will certainly soothe concerns that have grown around Chinese companies and data storage solutions. Equally, their hardware has evolved rapidly in their last two generations to feature some genuinely unique solutions that are either specific to the platform or priced at a level that makes them genuinely competitive against DIY and BYO solutions. Systems such as the Flashstor series, Lockerstor series, and even value offerings like the Drivestor are surprisingly well equipped. They are not quite on the same level of hardware as QNAP (who have a significantly more diverse hardware portfolio), but they are fleshing it out very well.

Value Series	Best All Rounder	Prosumer NAS

Nimbustor Gen 2 2-Bay NAS	Flashstor Gen 1 12-Bay NAS	Lockerstor Gen 3 8/10-Bay NAS
$369 on Amazon (Check Here)	$449-749 on Amazon (Check Here)	$1999 on Amazon (Check Here)

However, it is the software of Asustor (ADM) that is unfortunately where the brand is a little more timid. They have a NAS OS, numerous client tools for Windows, Mac, iOS, and Android—and they nail down the bulk of the application fundamentals for storage management, multi-site backup handling, multimedia playback, containers, and more. But the platform lacks a few of the more AAA/desirable services, such as AI-powered photo recognition, a 1st-party VM tool, ZFS support, and ultimately is a little more reliant on 3rd-party applications to fill the gaps. They have recently countered this by officially detailing that they support users who buy Asustor hardware to go ahead and install 3rd-party NAS software like TrueNAS or UnRAID without it harming your warranty—so they know they are not leading the pack in terms of their own ADM NAS software but do make noticeable user concessions. With new hardware on the horizon in the Lockerstor Gen3 and Flashstor Gen2 (both of which see a significant bump in hardware profiles), we might see some impressive moves from Asustor in 2025. I just think they still have some ways to go before they can fill any potential void that Synology might leave.

TERRAMASTER vs Synology?

Terramaster has been jockeying for the NAS 3rd place spot with Asustor for well over a decade at this point, and much like their opponent, they have been good at integrating individual features from both QNAP and Synology into their own NAS hardware and TOS platform, but to a larger degree than Asustor. For example, their OS provides largely everything that Asustor ADM does (including TrueNAS/UnRAID support without voiding your warranty) but adds to this with an AI photo recognition platform, their own VM tool, and an impressive Isolation Mode that can sever the system at the click of a button from remote access, 3rd-party PHP, and any external requests (necessitating a restart to disable). However, as this brand is a Chinese brand, there will always be question marks raised by users about how this system compares with Taiwanese-based systems. This is a little unfair, given that Terramaster, Asustor, and QNAP were all successfully hit by the same ransomware attack (Deadbolt) a few years back, so there was plenty of ‘vulnerability’ to spread around!

In terms of hardware, Terramaster has been making some impressive and aggressive strides in this area—with the recent launch of their 3-part F4-424 Intel NAS series (Standard, Pro, and MAX), the release of two 8-bay M.2 NVMe 10GbE equipped systems (the F8 PLUS and F8 SSD PLUS), and new desktop and rackmounts hot on their heels. They have also scaled up the design to better improve cooling, efficiency, and just general visual appeal.

Value Series	Best All Rounder	Prosumer NAS

F2-424 2-Bay NAS	F4-424 Max 4-Bay NAS	T9-500 Pro 9-Bay NAS
$369 on Amazon (Check Here)	$819 on Amazon (Check Here)	$1499 on Amazon (Check Here)

However, much like Asustor, their software is just not able to challenge the standard that Synology has set. For buyers looking for smooth and easy utilization like Synology, Terramaster’s TOS has the danger of feeling a little clunky. Their latest release, TOS6, brings new features, software standards, and design to the mix, but it lacks the range of mobile applications, desktop client tools, and consistent UX/presentation that Synology seems to do so well. Terramaster is a fantastic value-for-money choice, and I would argue they have significantly scaled up the level of hardware and software utility they provide year on year. But they still have a way to go before they can hit the same notes as Synology DSM yet.

WD / Netgear vs Synology?

This is a pretty short one! The answer is no! Both WD and Netgear have regularly reduced their hardware ranges and the frequency of software updates these last few years, and although there are a decent range of business file server systems still being released, the general home/enthusiast/prosumer level of hardware is pretty poor and uninteresting compared to everyone else on this list so far. I cannot help but get the feeling that, aside from some basic backup NAS systems that are still listed at the majority of retailers, the bulk of their range has been in circulation for 5-6 years now without any refresh in sight. For basic target file/folder storage, these systems still provide some limited modern NAS utility, but overall, they are a fairly weak alternative to Synology’s offerings in 2025.

A UniFi NAS?

With increased mentions and leaks online towards a potential NAS in the works from UniFi, this could be a very credible alternative to Synology in terms of software UX and presentation. UniFi, and its incredibly user-friendly UX featured on their Switch, Router, NVR, and Dream Machine combination systems, is where UniFi shines. No doubt any UniFi NAS solution would need to similarly blend into their ecosystem to the same degree. That said, if they were to launch a system, all their experience in the fields of network management, router security, and surveillance systems might not necessarily translate into a similar pedigree in network-attached storage. It’s hard to discuss how or if UniFi could fill any market space that a potential Synology absence would create, as they do not have any systems out in the market to make an informed decision. This is for the “To Be Continued…” pile!

Drobo vs Synology?

No…just…no. See Video Below:

IceWhale / ZimaCube

This is a very interesting one. 2023 and 2024 saw several companies arrive in the turnkey NAS space via the crowdfunding route (we already discussed UGREEN as the biggest example), wanting to break into the market. However, IceWhale benefits from having already launched two previous successfully fulfilled campaigns and is just completing their third one with the ZimaCube NAS system. Arriving with the lightweight containerized platform Zima OS (a modified version of their existing Casa OS), this new series is pretty impressive for its scale and price point at launch. Add to that the significantly unique design, impressive use of 10GbE and Thunderbolt over IP, and a 6x HDD / 4x NVMe system in a compact case, and you can see why they have made a fairly significant splash for a brand that is comparatively unheard of compared to Synology, QNAP, etc.

However, as robust as their range of solutions is (ZimaBoard, ZimaBlade, and ZimaCube), the software is still very rudimentary compared to the bulk of other browser GUI and more “operating system”-stylized UX. There are virtually no client applications, except for their own system search and connection client tools. An eventual successor to Synology, if they moved upwards toward bigger and more business-oriented solutions, would need to hit the software functionality and user experience exceedingly early and exceedingly well.

Mini PC Brands – Lincplus, Aoostar, etc.

This is an odd one. There have been a large number of solutions appearing on sites such as AliExpress that arrive as “OS-Free” services, allowing a user to get a pre-built NAS hardware solution (i.e., no need to build one yourself, which takes longer and requires a degree of technical understanding). The end user can then choose to install popular and well-established solutions like TrueNAS, UnRAID, OpenMediaVault, and more.

Value Option	Best All Rounder	SSD Focused NAS

Aoostar WTR Pro 4-Bay NAS	Minsiforum MS-01 3/6-Bay NAS	Lincplus Lincstation N1 6-Bay NAS
$399-799 on Amazon (Check Here)	$399 on Amazon (Check Here)	$399 on Amazon (Check Here)

This serves as an impressively economical solution and has significantly grown in popularity in 2023/2024, but these 3rd-party software platforms lack a lot of the ease of use and quality of life client tools for modern devices that Synology features. Indeed, despite efforts like UnRAID 7 making its day-to-day use much easier, and TrueNAS working with HexOS for a more user-friendly output, these still pale in comparison to DSM and will also require a greater degree of technical user input in the long term to maintain stability, versus Synology’s rather more “it takes care of itself” design.

Synology vs EVERYONE ELSE – Conclusion and Verdict

If Synology were to leave the home/enthusiast/prosumer/small business tier very soon, I do think QNAP would stand to reoccupy this ground. However, give it 2-3 years, and I do think players like Terramaster, Asustor, and yes—even UGREEN—are poised to give QNAP some serious consumer competition. No doubt Synology is still keeping an eye on their competition (big and small) and would not willingly or easily give up this sector without a fight. However, there is no denying that the turnkey NAS industry is no longer the 2-3 horse race it was just five years ago!

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

[contact-form-7]

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

NAS Compares
Synology vs Terramaster NAS – Which Should You Buy?
18 juin 2025 à 18:00

Synology vs Terramaster NAS – Which Should You Buy?

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

18 juin 2025 à 18:00

Synology VS Terramaster NAS Drives in 2025 – Which One Deserves Your Data?

Synology and TerraMaster are two well-established brands in the network-attached storage (NAS) industry, each targeting a range of users from home enthusiasts to small and medium-sized businesses. Synology, a Taiwanese company with over two decades in the field, is widely recognized for its DSM (DiskStation Manager) software, which emphasizes stability, security, and integration within a tightly controlled ecosystem. TerraMaster, while newer to the market, has steadily gained ground by offering hardware-focused, cost-effective solutions with increasing software support via its TOS (TerraMaster Operating System) platform.

I want to provide a side-by-side comparison between Synology and TerraMaster as they stand in 2025, focusing on the real-world differences in hardware, storage, software, and security. The goal is to outline the practical strengths and weaknesses of each brand without leaning heavily toward subjective preferences or historical bias. This is especially relevant for users reevaluating Synology due to recent policy shifts, or for those considering TerraMaster as a flexible and affordable alternative.

Area	Synology DSM	TerraMaster TOS
OS Flexibility	Locked DSM ecosystem	Allows TrueNAS/Unraid without voiding warranty
RAID System	SHR Hybrid RAID	TRAID Hybrid RAID
AI & Surveillance	DVA Series supports real-time AI detection	Surveillance App still in beta
Virtual Machines	VMM with full GUI	VirtualBox-based, less integrated
Deduplication	Btrfs-based, native to DSM	Supported with “Dedup Manager”
Media Streaming	No native Jellyfin, Video Station discontinued	Jellyfin included natively
Security	Malware, ransomware, firewall + audit	Includes Isolation Mode, detailed scanner
Mobile/Remote Tools	Broadest mobile app suite + QuickConnect	Core mobile app + TNAS.online DDNS

Synology vs Terramaster NAS – Hardware Solutions Compared

When evaluating Synology’s hardware catalog, the company demonstrates a clear strategy of segmenting performance tiers through tightly integrated systems. The FS (FlashStation) series targets ultra-low latency workloads with powerful multi-core CPUs and all-flash designs. For instance, the FS6400 and FS3600 offer 240,000 and 195,000+ 4K random write IOPS respectively, built for high-throughput environments. The HD series goes a different direction, pushing density with up to 300 drives in models like the HD6500, which pair with dual 10-core CPUs and provide over 6,600 MB/s throughput. Meanwhile, the SA and XS/XS+ series address scalable performance and redundancy needs, offering dual-controller setups, high RAM ceilings, and optional Fibre Channel or 25/40GbE expansion. Synology’s Plus and Value series provide consumer-grade flexibility, but these are becoming increasingly closed ecosystems with limited hardware compatibility and optional expansion cards restricted to specific interfaces or models.

Category	Synology Example Models	TerraMaster Example Models	CPU & RAM Range	Typical Use Case
Entry-Level (2-4 Bay)	DS223, DS423, DS224+, DS423+	F2-212, F4-223, F4-210	Quad-core 1.7–2.2GHz, up to 32GB ECC	Personal cloud, backups, media streaming
Mid-Range (4-6 Bay)	DS1621+, DS1522+, DS1821+	F4-424, F6-424, F4-424 Pro	Quad-core 2.2GHz, up to 32GB ECC, NVMe cache	SOHO/SMB file sharing, light virtualization
Performance Tier (6-8 Bay)	RS1221+, RS2423+, DS3622xs+, DS1823xs+	U4-423, T6-423, T9-423	Quad to Octa-core Xeon, up to 64GB+, 10GbE support	Heavy multi-user access, surveillance, VM use
Enterprise / Rackmount	RS4021xs+, SA6400, SA3610, UC3200	U12-500 Plus, U16-722-2224, T12-450	10–12 core CPUs, 128GB+ RAM, SAS, PCIe expandability	Virtualization clusters, iSCSI SAN, backups at scale
All-Flash / NVMe Focused	FS2500, FS3600, FS6400, SA3400D	F8 SSD Plus, U8-522-9400, U24-722-2224	8–24 cores, all-SSD, 10/25/40GbE, NVMe-only storage	High IOPS databases, virtualization, low-latency workloads

TerraMaster, in contrast, focuses its value proposition heavily on maximizing hardware capabilities per dollar. Even in their midrange, systems like the F6-424 Max or F4-424 Pro include Intel Celeron or i3 CPUs, 2.5GbE or 10GbE connectivity, NVMe SSD support, and upgradeable RAM—all within sub-$700 price ranges. Larger units like the T12-500 Pro or U24-722-2224 scale storage up to 24 bays or beyond, while still offering competitive CPUs and abundant connectivity options. TerraMaster also maintains a vast lineup of hybrid RAID-capable DAS and NAS systems, including USB 3.2 Gen 2 enclosures for fast, direct-attached storage. Unlike Synology, TerraMaster maintains open compatibility with third-party drives and offers more consistent support for M.2 NVMe storage expansion, SSD caching, and even integrated GPU support in some models.

Synology DS925+ NAS

Terramaster F4-424 / Max / Pro

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology NAS Solutions

Check B&H for the Synology NAS Solutions

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Terramaster NAS Solutions

Check B&H for the Terramaster NAS Solutions

Overall, while Synology’s premium hardware—especially in enterprise segments like FS, HD, and SA series—is clearly capable and built with specific high-performance use cases in mind, the general direction of the brand has shifted toward tightly controlled environments with gradual upgrades. In contrast, TerraMaster’s approach offers broader hardware scalability and modularity across more price points, with emphasis on high-speed networking and expansive storage configurations. For users who prioritize full hardware utilization, third-party component compatibility, or budget scalability, TerraMaster offers more flexibility. Meanwhile, users looking for tightly integrated, support-rich systems—especially in enterprise workloads—may lean toward Synology, albeit at a higher cost per feature.

Synology vs Terramaster NAS – Storage, Compatibility and Scalability

Storage functionality is a critical part of any NAS system, and both Synology and TerraMaster offer a wide range of capabilities here—but with distinct philosophies. Synology employs its own hybrid RAID system known as Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR), which provides flexibility in mixing different drive sizes while still maintaining redundancy. SHR is available in both single- and dual-disk fault-tolerant configurations and is fully integrated with their Btrfs-based file system, offering advanced features like snapshots, deduplication, and WORM (Write Once, Read Many). Their enterprise-class devices also support more traditional RAID configurations (RAID 0/1/5/6/10) and incorporate proprietary features like Synology RAID F1 for flash endurance. However, Synology has increasingly restricted drive compatibility on newer models such as the DS925+, requiring only their own branded HAT or SAT series drives for initialization or full functionality—a move that limits storage choices for end users.

Feature	Synology	TerraMaster	Notes
Drive Compatibility	Limited to Synology-branded drives on newer models (e.g. DS925+)	Open support: WD, Seagate, Toshiba, Samsung, etc.	Synology enforces verified drive policy; TerraMaster is open
RAID Support	RAID 0/1/5/6/10, SHR (Synology Hybrid RAID)	RAID 0/1/5/6/10, TRAID (TerraMaster RAID)	Both offer flexible hybrid RAID options
File Systems	Btrfs and EXT4 (model-dependent)	Btrfs and EXT4 (model-dependent)	Parity here; both support snapshotting on Btrfs
Snapshots	Supported on all Btrfs-enabled models, with versioning & scheduling	Supported on Btrfs-enabled models; varies by model	Synology has more mature snapshot UI
Deduplication	Btrfs-native deduplication on select models	GUI-based “Dedup Manager” app available	Both platforms now offer this
WORM (Write Once Read Many)	Supported on all recent DSM models	Available on compatible TOS models	Important for compliance environments
SSD Caching	Available via M.2 or 2.5” SSD (read/write)	Available via M.2 or 2.5” SSD (read/write)	Hardware support needed on both
Storage Pool Creation via M.2 SSDs	DSM 7.2+ allows with Synology-branded SSDs only	TOS 5.x+ allows with most 3rd-party M.2 SSDs	TerraMaster has more flexibility here
Expansion Units	Proprietary only (e.g. DX517, DX525 via eSATA/USB-C)	Wider variety including hybrid M.2/HDD enclosures	Synology expansion limited to official units
Third-Party Expansion Enclosures	Not supported or blocked in DSM	Fully supported via USB or DAS	TerraMaster supports open expansion ecosystem
Max Capacity (Consumer Units)	Up to 180–300TB on XS+/SA series (w/ expansions)	Up to 264TB+ on Pro/Enterprise systems	Similar potential; depends on model
Storage Protocols	iSCSI, SMB Multichannel, NFS, AFP, WebDAV	iSCSI, SMB Multichannel, NFS, AFP, WebDAV	Parity on protocols
Storage Analytics / Monitoring	Detailed UI with health, lifespan & usage stats	Less polished UI, but includes drive info & warnings	Synology more user-friendly; TerraMaster more technical

TerraMaster offers a more open storage environment, supporting standard RAID types (RAID 0/1/5/6/10) and introducing its own hybrid RAID option, TRAID, designed to dynamically balance storage allocation when using mismatched drives. Like Synology, TerraMaster has implemented Btrfs in its newer systems and supports snapshots, volume encryption, and deduplication (via its Dedup Manager) across many models. However, unlike Synology, TerraMaster places no restrictions on drive brands or third-party SSDs—users are free to populate their systems with Seagate, Western Digital, Toshiba, Kingston, or Samsung drives without concern for compatibility blocks. This openness extends to M.2 NVMe support, where TerraMaster allows NVMe drives to be used not only for cache but also for primary storage pools, something Synology currently reserves for specific enterprise-class devices or limits to caching only in most consumer models.

Where Synology shines is in the management and monitoring of storage. DSM’s Storage Manager provides a clean, user-friendly interface with visualized health metrics, smart monitoring, and snapshot replication tools. Advanced features such as scheduled integrity checks, automatic repair routines, and near-seamless volume expansion contribute to its appeal in professional environments. TerraMaster’s storage UI is functional but somewhat less polished; it provides access to core tools like volume creation, SMART diagnostics, and snapshot management, but lacks some of the refined monitoring granularity found in DSM. Still, for users who prioritize freedom of storage deployment, drive variety, and full hardware utilization, TerraMaster’s openness may outweigh DSM’s slightly more mature GUI design. Ultimately, the storage advantage between the two depends on whether the user values tight software integration or broader hardware flexibility.

Synology DSM vs Terramaster TOS NAS – Software Comparison

Synology’s DSM (DiskStation Manager) remains one of the most mature NAS operating systems available today, known for its polished interface, smooth navigation, and deep integration across features. DSM offers a fully modular, desktop-like GUI accessible through a browser, with a broad suite of first-party applications such as Synology Drive for file synchronization, Hyper Backup for multi-destination backups, and Active Backup for Business, a highly regarded solution for PC, server, and VM backups.

These tools often match or exceed the capabilities of dedicated commercial backup solutions. DSM also includes native virtualization (Virtual Machine Manager), Docker container support, surveillance management (Surveillance Station), and numerous file-sharing services including WebDAV, FTP, iSCSI, and SMB multi-channel. Overall, DSM’s ecosystem is not just well-developed—it is increasingly self-contained, with Synology focusing on reducing third-party dependencies by developing in-house alternatives for productivity, security, and media apps.

Category	Feature	Synology DSM (7.2)	TerraMaster TOS (5.1 / optional 6.x)	Notes
Core OS	OS Version	DSM 7.2	TOS 5.1 standard, TOS 6 optional on newer models	TOS 6 has refreshed UI and app changes
	Alternate OS Install	Not supported	Allows Unraid, TrueNAS without voiding warranty	Huge flexibility advantage for TerraMaster
	Web Interface	Polished, modern DSM interface	Modern but simpler UI	DSM is more mature
	Mobile Apps	Many DS apps across mobile platforms	TNAS Mobile, limited scope	Synology has broader mobile toolset
File Services	SMB/NFS/AFP/WebDAV	Full support	Full support	Core services present on both
	iSCSI Support	Native GUI-based iSCSI manager	iSCSI support available	Parity here
RAID & Storage	RAID Options	RAID 0/1/5/6/10 + SHR (Hybrid RAID)	RAID 0/1/5/6/10 + TRAID (TerraMaster Hybrid RAID)	Both support flexible hybrid RAID
	Snapshots	Btrfs with scheduling/versioning	On Btrfs-capable models	Model-dependent on TOS
	Deduplication	Btrfs-based dedup	With Dedup Manager	Available on both with GUI
	Encryption	Volume/folder/drive encryption + WORM	Volume encryption + WORM	TerraMaster supports WORM as well
	SSD Caching	Read/write SSD caching	SSD caching supported	Hardware-dependent for both
Virtualization & Containers	Virtual Machines	Synology VMM (Virtual Machine Manager)	VirtualBox-based VM manager	Less integrated in TOS but available
	Docker Support	Full Docker with GUI	Available via App Center	Equal in function
	GPU Passthrough	Not supported	Not supported	Absent on both platforms
AI & Surveillance	AI Features	Facial/object detection via DVA models	Facial/object detection	DSM AI Services in NVR/CCTV xclusive to DVA NAS models or their own cameras
	Surveillance Suite	Surveillance Station with licensing	Surveillance App (Beta)	TOS app is newer and evolving
Media & Streaming	Plex Media Server	Native app	Native support	No difference
	Jellyfin	Docker/homebrew	Native Jellyfin app	Edge to TerraMaster
	Video Player App	Video Station EOL	No official native player	Use Plex/Jellyfin on both
Backup & Sync	Backup Solutions	Hyper Backup, Active Backup, USB/Cloud	TerraSync (Synology Drive-like), Rsync, USB, Cloud Backup	TOS has clear parity now
	Cloud Sync	Native Cloud Sync app	CloudSync app	Supported on both
Remote Access	DDNS + Tunnel	QuickConnect	TNAS.online	Both offer simplified remote access
Security & Access	Security Scanner	Malware, ransomware, audit, firewall tools	Full scanner + Isolation Mode	Both systems offer advanced security
	VPN Server	OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP via GUI	OpenVPN/L2TP support	GUI VPN tools available
	SSL Certificates	Let’s Encrypt + custom certs	Let’s Encrypt + certs	Equal support
	2FA Support	TOTP, authenticator app, email	TOTP 2FA	Parity on login security
App Ecosystem	App Center	Extensive native apps and 3rd party	App Center with essential tools	Synology has a larger catalog
	Package Manager	synopkg CLI + GUI	App Center (GUI only)	CLI package management is a Synology edge

TerraMaster’s TOS (TerraMaster Operating System), currently in version 5.1 with version 6 available on select systems, has seen rapid growth in capabilities and usability over the last few years. While it doesn’t yet match DSM’s polish, it has made significant strides in offering equivalent functionality. TOS supports Btrfs-based snapshots, Rsync and CloudSync for cloud backup, Docker container deployment, and VirtualBox-based virtualization. While the latter is less tightly integrated than Synology’s VMM, it does allow for third-party VM deployment in a usable way.

TerraMaster has also developed TerraSync, a synchronization tool designed to rival Synology Drive, and supports both media management and AI-enhanced photo sorting with apps like Terra Photos. However, many of TOS’s functions rely more heavily on community-driven or open-source third-party applications, resulting in a slightly less unified experience overall.

In terms of application ecosystems, Synology’s App Center clearly offers the broader and deeper catalog, particularly for business users. First-party applications such as Synology Office, Chat, MailPlus, and Note Station deliver a productivity-focused alternative to cloud services, and their Surveillance Station software stands out as one of the most powerful NVR platforms in the NAS market.

TerraMaster’s App Center includes essential tools but lacks the same level of first-party development. However, it makes up for this in openness: TerraMaster supports a wide array of third-party and open-source platforms more freely, including Jellyfin and Unraid. Moreover, TerraMaster allows alternative operating systems like TrueNAS to be installed without voiding the warranty, which adds considerable flexibility for tech-savvy users. Overall, Synology delivers a more unified and polished software experience, while TerraMaster emphasizes adaptability, freedom, and cost

Synology vs Terramaster NAS – Security and Safety

Synology has long maintained a strong reputation in the NAS sector for prioritizing system security, and this is evident in how thoroughly security is integrated throughout DSM. Synology’s Security Advisor provides active scanning for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and password weaknesses, while its firewall, account protection, and IP auto-blocking features offer practical layers of defense against unauthorized access. Synology also supports comprehensive SSL certificate management via Let’s Encrypt and offers two-factor authentication (2FA) with TOTP and hardware key support. From a business continuity perspective, DSM includes native WORM (Write Once Read Many) capabilities and encrypted shared folders to protect sensitive data from tampering or deletion. Perhaps most critically, Synology operates a dedicated PSIRT (Product Security Incident Response Team), frequently publishes security advisories, and participates in high-profile vulnerability testing events like Pwn2Own—demonstrating a serious commitment to vulnerability discovery and remediation.

TerraMaster’s security offering has become more robust over recent years, particularly with the development of Isolation Mode—a unique feature allowing users to instantly sever all external access and remote services with a single click. This acts as a kill switch in the event of a suspected breach or malware event. TOS also includes a system-level security scanner that checks for basic vulnerabilities and enables 2FA, SSH restrictions, and SSL certificate deployment. While TerraMaster’s platform does not offer as many granular policy tools as DSM, it supports core protocols like OpenVPN and L2TP for secure remote access and regularly issues firmware updates in response to new threats. The company also now provides greater transparency regarding CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), though its advisory frequency and scope remain smaller than Synology’s.

Security Feature	Synology DSM	TerraMaster TOS	Notes
System Hardening	Proactive hardening (limited root access, secure defaults)	Moderately hardened; more configurable access	Synology limits risky configurations by design
Security Scanner	Built-in DSM Security Advisor with customizable scan depth	TOS Security Center (less detailed on TOS 5.x)	Synology provides more actionable alerts
2FA Support	TOTP-based (authenticator apps, email)	TOTP-based	Parity on two-factor authentication
SSL Certificate Support	Native Let’s Encrypt + custom certs via GUI	Let’s Encrypt + custom certs via GUI	Equal support, easy HTTPS setup
Firewall Management	GUI-based port/IP firewall with profiles	Firewall settings available (less granular)	Synology allows more granular firewall policy creation
Isolation Mode / Kill Switch	Not available	Isolation Mode disables all external access with one click	Advantage: TerraMaster for emergency lockdowns
Vulnerability Response (PSIRT)	Dedicated PSIRT, public advisories updated monthly	Less frequent disclosure, fewer details published	Synology actively discloses and patches
Security Bug Bounty Program	Yes – active white-hat reward program	No public bounty program known	Synology engages with global researchers
Third-Party App Restrictions	Limited for security; sandboxed services	More open but requires user discretion	Synology prioritizes closed ecosystem safety
Remote Access Protection	QuickConnect includes traffic relay + DDNS + 2FA	TNAS.online DDNS with isolation toggle	Both offer encrypted remote access, but Synology uses multiple layers
Malware Detection	Real-time malware scanner, browser warnings	Included scanner, but simpler in scope	DSM scanner is more active and integrated
Backup Verification	Integrity verification in Active Backup	TerraSync + cloud/USB support (manual checks)	DSM offers automated backup health reports
Surveillance Hardening	Encrypted video storage + HTTPS + IP blocklist	Surveillance App with HTTPS, still evolving	Synology Surveillance Station is more mature and secure
Ransomware History	2014 “SynoLocker” (quickly patched)	2021–22 “Deadbolt” attacks (multiple waves)	TerraMaster more affected in recent years
Update Frequency	Frequent monthly patches	Less frequent, varies by model	DSM has a consistent schedule and transparency

Despite these advancements, TerraMaster’s security record has faced scrutiny in the past due to incidents like the Deadbolt ransomware attacks. These incidents, which also affected other NAS vendors, prompted significant user backlash and a push for more proactive security updates and faster patching. TerraMaster has since responded by improving software integrity and introducing layered protection features, but the lingering perception remains that Synology maintains a stronger and more proactive security posture overall.

This perception is reinforced by Synology’s investment in ongoing vulnerability research, bug bounty programs, and a broader portfolio of security-focused tools. As it stands in 2025, Synology continues to lead in NAS security maturity, while TerraMaster has made meaningful progress—especially with unique features like Isolation Mode—but still has ground to cover in enterprise-level protections and threat response.

Synology vs Terramaster NAS – Conclusion and Verdict

Comparing Synology and TerraMaster in 2025 ultimately highlights a clear philosophical divide between the two NAS brands. Synology continues to build upon a long-standing focus on refined software, tight integration, and enterprise-grade security. Its DSM platform remains one of the most polished and feature-rich operating systems in the NAS space, offering a wide selection of first-party tools for backup, surveillance, virtualization, and secure access. However, this ecosystem is increasingly closed, with stricter hardware compatibility requirements and limited support for third-party drives, SSDs, and expansions. For users who prioritize reliability, ease of use, and support from a mature software ecosystem, Synology remains a compelling—if sometimes restrictive—option.

Synology NAS– 5 Strengths vs TerraMaster in 2025

Superior software polish: DSM offers a more consistent, responsive, and user-friendly interface, ideal for beginners and pros alike.
Better security infrastructure: Features like a dedicated PSIRT, frequent vulnerability disclosures, and a bug bounty program give Synology the edge in system safety.
Mature first-party apps: Key tools like Active Backup for Business, Surveillance Station, and Synology Drive are more refined and feature-rich than their TOS counterparts.
Streamlined management: Built-in tools for snapshots, monitoring, and backup offer a more centralized and automated experience.
Longer ecosystem stability: Greater long-term support for software versions and consistent patch cycles provide peace of mind for business use.

Cons:

Strict hardware compatibility: Recent models (e.g., DS925+) restrict use of non-Synology drives and SSDs, frustrating users seeking flexibility.
Less hardware value per dollar: Generally more expensive for equivalent CPU, RAM, and port configurations.

TerraMaster, by contrast, leans into flexibility and hardware value. Its broad portfolio includes NAS units ranging from entry-level to high-performance multi-bay SSD systems, often at lower price points than Synology’s equivalents. TOS 5.1 and the newer TOS 6 have brought meaningful improvements in UI and functionality, while still maintaining a more open approach to compatibility and user customization. Features like native Jellyfin support, VirtualBox VM deployment, and the ability to install TrueNAS or Unraid without voiding warranty make TerraMaster a standout for DIY-leaning users or those with niche requirements. However, its software, while improving, does not yet match the polish or depth of Synology DSM, especially in areas like virtualization, surveillance, and enterprise security.

TerraMaster NAS – 5 Strengths vs Synology in 2025

Better hardware value: Offers more powerful CPUs, RAM, M.2 slots, and 10GbE in the same or lower price bracket.
Flexible OS options: Users can install TrueNAS, Unraid, or other OSes without voiding the warranty, offering unmatched flexibility.
Open storage support: No restrictions on drive brand or SSD use, supporting Seagate, WD, Toshiba, Samsung, and more.
More aggressive expansion options: TOS systems often support more USB and hybrid expansion units across the portfolio.
Integrated Jellyfin support: TerraMaster includes native Jellyfin installation without relying on Docker or community packages.

Cons:

Less mature software ecosystem: TOS apps are less polished and lack some advanced features found in DSM tools.
Weaker track record on security: Past vulnerabilities (e.g. Deadbolt) and slower public patching place more responsibility on the user for hardening.

In the end, choosing between Synology and TerraMaster depends heavily on user needs and expectations. Synology suits users who want a highly stable, all-in-one solution with minimal configuration and long-term support. TerraMaster offers greater adaptability and value for power users who are comfortable managing third-party apps and want to stretch their hardware investment further. Neither approach is inherently better—each has its strengths and trade-offs. Buyers seeking a tightly controlled, secure environment may gravitate toward Synology, while those who value hardware scalability, open software choices, and affordability may find more freedom with TerraMaster.

Synology DS925+ NAS

Terramaster F4-424 / Max / Pro

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology NAS Solutions

Check B&H for the Synology NAS Solutions

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Terramaster NAS Solutions

Check B&H for the Terramaster NAS Solutions

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

[contact-form-7]

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

Cachem
Synology DS725+ : du 2,5 GbE enfin au programme, mais peu d’autres changements
19 juin 2025 à 07:00

Synology DS725+ : du 2,5 GbE enfin au programme, mais peu d’autres changements

Cachem

Par : Fx

19 juin 2025 à 07:00

Synology officialise le DS725+, successeur direct du DS723+. Ce NAS 2 baies vient compléter la nouvelle gamme DSx25+, aux côtés du DS225+ présenté récemment. Malgré un air de déjà-vu, le DS725+ intègre quelques ajustements clés. Regardons. de plus près…

DS725+

DS725+ : évolution en douceur du DS723+

Le DS725+ conserve la philosophie du DS723+ : un NAS compact, évolutif et taillé pour les utilisateurs exigeants à la recherche de performances et de flexibilité. Il dispose de 2 emplacements en façade et il est possible de lui en ajouter 5 supplémentaires via l’ajout d’une unité d’extension DX525. Le DS725+ possède également 2 emplacements NVMe pour des SSD.

Sous le capot, on retrouve le même processeur dual-core AMD Ryzen R1600 cadencée à 2,6 GHz (mode boost à 3,1 GHz). Aucun changement ici : Synology mise encore sur ce processeur récent et efficace, notamment pour les usages orientés virtualisation, chiffrement ou services cloud. La mémoire vive reste également identique avec 2 Go de RAM DDR4 ECC (extensibles jusqu’à 32 Go). Un vrai plus pour les utilisateurs avancés…

Connectique : (enfin) du 2,5 Gb/s

DS725 arriere - Synology DS725+ : du 2,5 GbE enfin au programme, mais peu d'autres changements

La grande nouveauté, c’est la connectique réseau. Le DS725+ abandonne enfin les 2 ports 1 GbE au profit de 1 port 2,5 GbE et 1 port 1 GbE (comme le DS225+). Une amélioration logique, voire attendue, face à une concurrence qui propose du multi-Gig depuis plusieurs générations. Le NAS dispose également de 1 port USB 3.0 en façade et 1 port USB-C réservé à l’usage exclusif du DX525.

Compatibilité des disques : toujours verrouillée

Comme pour les autres modèles de la série DSx25+, Synology maintient sa politique de compatibilité stricte. Officiellement, seuls les disques Synology sont supportés sur le DS725+ (pour l’instant ?).

Prix et disponibilité

Le Synology DS725+ se présente comme une évolution très mesurée du DS723+. Le nouveau NAS devrait arriver prochainement. Le prix n’a pas encore été communiqué.

Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur la page officielle de Synology…

Cachem
Synology DS225+ : une évolution timide pour le remplaçant du DS224+
17 juin 2025 à 07:00

Synology DS225+ : une évolution timide pour le remplaçant du DS224+

Cachem

Par : Fx

17 juin 2025 à 07:00

Synology vient d’annoncer l’arrivée prochaine du DS225+. Ce nouveau NAS vient remplacer le DS224+ et compléter la série DSx25+ (il ne manque désormais plus que le DS725+). Jetons un œil à ce nouveau modèle pour voir ce qu’il apporte réellement par rapport à son prédécesseur à deux baies.

Synology DS225+

Synology DS225+, un air de déjà-vu

Le DS225+ succède directement au DS224+. Et comme on le constate rapidement, les différences entre les deux modèles sont minimes. À noter d’emblée : aucun emplacement NVMe n’est présent sur ce modèle.

Ce NAS à deux baies peut accueillir des disques durs ou SSD. Il est équipé d’un processeur quad-core Intel Celeron J4125 cadencé à 2 GHz (jusqu’à 2,7 GHz en mode Burst) et dispose de 2 Go de RAM DDR4 (non ECC), extensibles jusqu’à 6 Go. Il s’agit exactement de la même architecture que celle du DS224+.

Même s’il est fiable, ce processeur ne brille pas par ses performances. Selon PassMark, il obtient un score modeste de 2939 points. Rien d’étonnant, il s’agit d’un modèle sorti en 2019, qui commence sérieusement à accuser son âge.

Connectique : un pas en avant

La seule vraie nouveauté de ce DS225+, c’est l’ajout d’un port RJ45 2,5 Gb/s, qui vient compléter le port Gigabit Ethernet déjà présent. C’est une avancée bienvenue, mais tardive, surtout face à une concurrence qui propose du multi-Gig depuis plusieurs années.

DS225 arriere - Synology DS225+ : une évolution timide pour le remplaçant du DS224+

On retrouve également 2 ports USB 3.0, dont un en façade.

Politique de compatibilité restrictive

Depuis la série DSx25+, Synology a renforcé sa politique de compatibilité matérielle, notamment celle pour les disques. Aujourd’hui, seuls les modèles estampillés Synology sont officiellement supportés. En pratique, cela exclut des références bien établies sur le marché des NAS, comme les Seagate IronWolf ou les WD Red.

Espérons que cette politique évoluera avec le temps pour réintégrer davantage de modèles tiers, sans compromis sur la stabilité.

Prix et disponibilité

Le Synology DS225+ vient tout juste d’être annoncé. Il faudra attendre encore quelques jours afin de le voir apparaitre dans les boutiques en France. Son prix n’a pas encore été dévoilé.

Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur la page officielle…

Cachem
Synology Office 3.7 : la suite bureautique dopée à l’IA
16 juin 2025 à 07:00

Synology Office 3.7 : la suite bureautique dopée à l’IA

Cachem

Par : Fx

16 juin 2025 à 07:00

Synology poursuit sa montée en puissance avec la sortie de Synology Office 3.7 Bêta. Cette nouvelle version intègre pour la première fois une couche d’intelligence artificielle. Disponible pour les NAS sous DSM 7.2.2, cette mise à jour s’intègre à Synology AI Console 1.1 et étend les capacités IA de la suite Office et de MailPlus.

Synology Office 3.7

IA et Synology Office

Synology Office 3.7 Bêta intègre un assistant IA conçu pour enrichir les 3 applications clés de la suite bureautique :

Documents : relecture intelligente, correction stylistique, traduction de fichiers entiers, génération de contenu contextuel à partir de documents existants. Une icône flottante permet d’accéder rapidement à des actions, comme la reformulation ou la traduction de paragraphes.
Tableurs : assistance à la création de fonctions, explication de formules en temps réel, aperçu contextuel, prise en charge du RTL (Right-To-Left), recherche dans les onglets masqués, filtrage amélioré pour les cellules fusionnées.
Slides : relecture, reformulation, traduction intégrale, zoom dans le volet de prévisualisation, déplacement simplifié des commentaires.

Tout n’est pas parfait, mais l’intégration est prometteuse… il faut bien l’avouer. Attention, Synology prévient qu’après l’installation de cette version Bêta, vous ne pourrez pas revenir à une version officielle antérieure.

Synology Office 3.7 - Synology Office 3.7 : la suite bureautique dopée à l’IA

Limitations

Comme précisé par Synology, l’assistant IA ne fonctionne pas en local. Il nécessite un compte payant chez un fournisseur d’IA tiers. Aussi, les données traitées sont envoyées dans le Cloud, ce qui peut soulever des questions légitimes en matière de confidentialité et de sécurité des données.

Aussi, vous l’aurez certainement compris, l’IA dans Synology Office 3.7 fonctionne avec Synology AI Console. Cette application est également disponible en Bêta depuis le Centre de paquets.

En synthèse

Synology Office 3.7 Bêta marque un tournant : la bureautique sur NAS devient proactive et contextuelle grâce à l’intelligence artificielle. Si certaines fonctions restent à peaufiner, l’apport de l’IA est concret. Toutefois, l’accès à ces fonctionnalités suppose plusieurs conditions : utilisation d’un NAS compatible, installation de l’AI Console et ajout d’au moins un fournisseur de services IA externe (Amazon Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Baidu AI Cloud, Google AI Studio, Google Vertex AI, OpenAI). Synology ne propose pas de moteur IA intégré.

Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur la page officielle du journal des modifications de cette Bêta.

Synology Deep Search… avec BeeDrive 2.0

Cachem

Par : Fx

10 juin 2025 à 07:00

Synology franchit une nouvelle étape dans la gestion des données personnelles avec le lancement de BeeDrive 2.0, désormais en version bêta sur macOS. Cette mise à jour majeure introduit « Deep Search », un moteur de recherche intelligent fonctionnant entièrement en local, sans connexion Internet ni transfert vers le Cloud. Une avancée intéressante pour les utilisateurs soucieux de leur vie privée et de l’efficacité de leurs recherches…

synology search engine 2025 - Synology Deep Search... avec BeeDrive 2.0

Synology Deep Search

Avec Deep Search, Synology intègre des capacités d’intelligence artificielle directement dans son dispositif de stockage BeeDrive. Ce moteur permet d’effectuer des recherches avancées en langage naturel sur l’ensemble des fichiers stockés, qu’il s’agisse de documents ou d’images. Grâce à la reconnaissance optique de caractères (OCR), il est possible de retrouver des textes présents dans des images ou des documents scannés. De plus, l’IA génère des descriptions d’images basées sur les scènes, objets ou thèmes, facilitant ainsi la recherche de photos à partir de requêtes telles que « lever de soleil à la plage ».

L’ensemble du processus d’indexation et de recherche s’effectue localement sur l’ordinateur de l’utilisateur, garantissant ainsi la confidentialité des données. Cette approche « local first » répond aux préoccupations croissantes concernant la protection de la vie privée et l’utilisation des données personnelles.

Compatibilité et exigences techniques

La version bêta de BeeDrive 2.0 est actuellement disponible pour les utilisateurs de macOS 15 ou supérieur, équipés de puces Apple Silicon et disposant d’au moins 16 Go de RAM. La prise en charge de Windows est prévue ultérieurement. Le moteur Deep Search prend en charge plusieurs formats de fichiers : PDF, DOCX, PPTX, JPG, PNG, HEIC et certains fichiers RAW. Il est également capable de gérer des fichiers dans différentes langues, dont le français, l’anglais, l’allemand et le japonais.

Une solution de stockage polyvalente

Au-delà de ses nouvelles capacités de recherche, BeeDrive reste un dispositif de stockage direct (DAS) performant, offrant jusqu’à 4 To de capacité via une connexion USB 3.2 Gen 2. Il permet la sauvegarde automatique des ordinateurs, le transfert de fichiers depuis les appareils mobiles (grâce à la fonction BeeDrop) et la synchronisation de dossiers. Sa conception compacte et légère en fait un outil idéal pour les professionnels en déplacement ou les particuliers souhaitant sécuriser leurs données sans dépendre du Cloud.

Une stratégie tournée vers l’IA

Le lancement de Deep Search s’inscrit dans une stratégie plus large de Synology visant à intégrer l’intelligence artificielle dans ses produits. Après l’introduction de l’AI Console pour DSM & MailPlus et l’annonce d’améliorations à venir pour la suite Office, BeeDrive devient le dernier produit en date à bénéficier de ces avancées technologiques. Cette orientation vers l’IA démontre la volonté de Synology de rester à la pointe de l’innovation tout en répondant aux besoins croissants de ses utilisateurs en matière de gestion intelligente et sécurisée des données.

En proposant une solution alliant performance, confidentialité et intelligence, Synology confirme sa position de leader sur le marché du stockage personnel et professionnel. Avec BeeDrive 2.0, l’entreprise offre une réponse concrète aux défis posés par la gestion croissante des données numériques. Si seulement le Deep Search pouvait arriver sur nos NAS…

Synology DS1525+ vs DS1522+ NAS

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

9 juin 2025 à 18:00

Synology DS1525+ vs DS1522+ NAS Comparison – Get It Right, FIRST TIME!

With the arrival of the Synology DS1525+ in 2025, many users are now weighing it against its immediate predecessor, the DS1522+, released in 2022. On the surface, both NAS units share the same 5-bay form factor, nearly identical chassis design, and very similar price points—typically between $699 and $799 at launch. However, a deeper dive reveals a number of meaningful changes in hardware resources, storage expansion policies, and how Synology now handles drive compatibility and system flexibility. While the DS1525+ does offer better networking and CPU core count, it also introduces tighter restrictions on what drives can be used, how storage pools are formed, and what options are available to users looking to migrate data from older systems. By contrast, the DS1522+ retains a far more open approach to hardware, offering greater freedom for enthusiasts and IT professionals. In this article, we’ll break down the internal hardware, ports, storage support, DSM software capabilities, and system behavior of these two NAS systems—giving you the context you need to make the right decision the first time, and avoid buyer’s regret later.

Synology DS1525+ vs DS1522+ NAS Comparison – Internal Hardware

The most noticeable hardware difference between the DS1525+ and DS1522+ lies in their processors. The DS1522+ is powered by a dual-core AMD Ryzen R1600 CPU, which operates at a base frequency of 2.6 GHz and can boost up to 3.1 GHz. This chip delivers strong single-threaded performance and is very power efficient, making it well-suited for environments where tasks are sequential or lightly parallelized—such as SMB file sharing, surveillance, or general-purpose storage. The DS1525+, in contrast, uses a quad-core AMD Ryzen V1500B processor running at a fixed 2.2 GHz. While it lacks boost frequency, the additional cores and threads make it the more capable option for multitasking-intensive DSM deployments. Workloads like hosting multiple Docker containers, running several VMs, or operating high-volume backup jobs are handled more smoothly by the V1500B thanks to its stronger concurrent throughput. While synthetic benchmarks might show the R1600 ahead in single-threaded operations, in day-to-day NAS usage, the V1500B’s multitasking benefits are more relevant—particularly for users aiming to centralize many services on one box.

Component	Synology DS1522+	Synology DS1525+
CPU Model	AMD Ryzen R1600	AMD Ryzen V1500B
CPU Architecture	64-bit, Dual-Core, 4-Thread	64-bit, Quad-Core, 8-Thread
Base / Turbo Frequency	2.6 GHz / 3.1 GHz	2.2 GHz (no boost)
Hardware Encryption	AES-NI	AES-NI
Pre-installed Memory	8 GB DDR4 ECC SODIMM (1×8 GB)	8 GB DDR4 ECC SODIMM (1×8 GB)
Total RAM Slots	2	2
Max Supported Memory	32 GB (2×16 GB)	32 GB (2×16 GB)
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
System Cooling	2 × 92mm fans	2 × 92mm fans
Noise Level (Idle)	22.90 dB(A)	22.60 dB(A)
Power Supply	120W External Adapter	120W External Adapter
Power Consumption (Access)	52.06 W	44.56 W
Power Consumption (Idle)	16.71 W (HDD Hibernation)	13.63 W (HDD Hibernation)
Chassis Dimensions (H×W×D)	166 × 230 × 223 mm	166 × 230 × 223 mm
Weight	2.7 kg	2.67 kg

Memory configurations between the two models appear similar at first glance. Both ship with 8 GB of DDR4 ECC SODIMM memory installed in a single stick and support up to 32 GB using both slots. ECC memory is a staple of Synology’s Plus series, designed to catch and correct single-bit memory errors on the fly—an important safeguard in RAID arrays, collaborative file editing, and database hosting. However, in practical use, the DS1525+ has more headroom to take advantage of this memory due to its quad-core CPU, making it more responsive when multiple DSM services are running concurrently. For example, users running Surveillance Station with 10+ cameras, Synology Drive, and a virtual DSM guest will find the DS1525+ holds up better under load, whereas the DS1522+ may begin to show bottlenecks unless its RAM is upgraded early. Despite these differences, both systems provide adequate memory for general use and can be expanded easily if workload demands grow.

Beyond raw processing and RAM, the DS1525+ also refines power and noise efficiency. It has a slightly lower noise floor at 22.60 dB(A) compared to the DS1522+ at 22.90 dB(A)—a small but welcome reduction for those placing the NAS in workspaces or home offices. Power consumption is another area of subtle improvement. The DS1525+ draws just 44.56 watts under active use and 13.63 watts in HDD hibernation, making it more efficient than the DS1522+, which consumes 52.06 watts and 16.71 watts, respectively. This improvement may be attributed to internal board optimizations and more efficient firmware tuning. Physically, both NAS systems share identical chassis dimensions, cooling layout, and component arrangement, including dual 92mm fans for thermal management. In sum, while neither model introduces radical hardware changes over the other, the DS1525+ provides a better balance of multitasking power and efficiency for modern DSM deployments—particularly when scaling beyond light usage.

Synology DS1525+ vs DS1522+ NAS Comparison – Ports and Connections

The differences between the DS1525+ and DS1522+ become more apparent when examining their networking and expansion connectivity. The DS1522+ is equipped with four 1GbE RJ-45 LAN ports, which support link aggregation for up to 4 Gbps combined bandwidth when used with a managed switch. This configuration provides solid redundancy and flexible port allocation, especially for environments where isolating traffic across different services (e.g., backups, media, surveillance) is desirable. However, in 2024 and beyond, 1GbE is increasingly viewed as a bottleneck—particularly for users working with 4K video editing, large VM images, or fast local backups. The DS1525+ addresses this issue by shifting to 2 × 2.5GbE RJ-45 LAN ports, allowing up to 5 Gbps total bandwidth through link aggregation, and faster speeds on a per-connection basis, even when using unmanaged 2.5GbE switches that are now more common and affordable. This change aligns the DS1525+ with modern mid-tier NAS expectations and offers improved real-world performance, especially for multi-user workloads and high-speed transfers from SSD caches or NVMe pools.

Feature	Synology DS1522+	Synology DS1525+
LAN Ports	4 × 1GbE RJ-45	2 × 2.5GbE RJ-45
Link Aggregation / Failover	Yes	Yes
USB Ports	2 × USB 3.2 Gen 1	2 × USB 3.2 Gen 1
Expansion Ports	2 × eSATA (for DX517)	2 × USB Type-C (for DX525)
PCIe Slot	1 × PCIe Gen3 x2 (for 10GbE upgrade)	1 × PCIe Gen3 x2 (for 10GbE upgrade)
Wake on LAN / WAN	Yes	Yes
Scheduled Power On / Off	Yes	Yes
Hot-Swappable Drive Bays	5 × SATA HDD/SSD (M.2 not hot-swappable)	5 × SATA HDD/SSD (M.2 not hot-swappable)
M.2 NVMe Slots	2 × M.2 2280 (cache only, 3rd-party SSDs supported)	2 × M.2 2280 (cache and storage, Synology SSDs only)
Expansion Compatibility	DX517 (eSATA interface)	DX525 (USB-C interface)

In terms of USB connectivity, both models include two USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, suitable for attaching external drives, UPS units, or compatible USB printers. These ports remain unchanged between models and offer no direct performance advantage to either system. Where the expansion capability does change significantly is in the port type for connecting additional storage enclosures. The DS1522+ includes two eSATA ports, allowing it to connect up to two DX517 expansion units, adding 10 more drive bays. The DS1525+, however, replaces these with two USB Type-C expansion ports, which interface with the newer DX525 expansion units. While the overall expansion capacity remains the same (15 total bays), the move to USB-C reflects a generational shift in Synology’s design language. USB-C may offer slightly more flexible cable routing and future-proofing, but it also introduces a hard cutoff between older and newer ecosystems. For users with existing DX517s or other eSATA-based gear, this limits backwards compatibility and locks the DS1525+ into the latest hardware infrastructure.

Additionally, both units include a PCIe Gen3 x2 slot for optional 10GbE network upgrades. Synology’s E10G22-T1-Mini card is supported on both models and provides a compact, cost-effective way to future-proof network performance. However, given the DS1525+ already starts with 2.5GbE, users may find less urgency to upgrade immediately compared to the DS1522+, where a 10GbE card may be needed sooner to break past 1GbE limitations. Both models support Wake-on-LAN and scheduled power events, and both feature dual rear fans for effective cooling regardless of network traffic or drive load. From a connectivity standpoint, the DS1525+ represents a forward step toward higher-speed networking and modern expansion methods—but it does so at the cost of legacy compatibility, which may matter for users with established infrastructure. In contrast, the DS1522+ offers broader port coverage and flexibility but risks becoming dated more quickly in high-throughput environments.

Synology DS1525+ vs DS1522+ NAS Comparison – Storage

At first glance, storage capacity and physical layout appear virtually identical between the DS1525+ and DS1522+. Both systems offer five main drive bays that support 3.5″ SATA HDDs and 2.5″ SATA SSDs, as well as two M.2 NVMe SSD slots for caching or, in the case of the DS1525+, full storage pool creation. Each NAS can be expanded up to a total of 15 bays using two proprietary Synology expansion units (DX517 for the DS1522+, DX525 for the DS1525+), enabling up to 240 TB of raw storage assuming maximum capacity drives. However, a major divergence emerges when we examine drive compatibility policies. The DS1522+ follows Synology’s older, more permissive approach: users may install third-party drives from brands like Seagate, Western Digital, or Toshiba with only warning messages shown during setup. Storage pools, RAID arrays, and DSM installation all proceed without functional restrictions, making it a flexible platform for users with existing drives or cost-sensitive deployments.

Storage Feature	Synology DS1522+	Synology DS1525+
Drive Bays	5 × 3.5″/2.5″ SATA HDD/SSD (Hot-swappable)	5 × 3.5″/2.5″ SATA HDD/SSD (Hot-swappable)
M.2 NVMe Slots	2 × M.2 2280 (Cache only, 3rd-party SSDs allowed)	2 × M.2 2280 (Cache & Storage Pool, Synology SSDs only)
Maximum Drive Bays (with Expansion)	15 (with 2 × DX517 via eSATA)	15 (with 2 × DX525 via USB-C)
Supported RAID Types	SHR, Basic, JBOD, RAID 0/1/5/6/10	SHR, Basic, JBOD, RAID 0/1/5/6/10
Max Internal Volumes	64	32
Max Volume Size	108 TB	200 TB (requires 32 GB RAM)
NVMe Storage Pool Support	Not supported	Supported (Synology SNV drives only)
3rd-Party Drive Support	Fully supported (with warnings)	Blocked (DSM install/expansion/recovery restricted)
RAID Recovery with Unverified Drives	Supported	Not allowed
Storage Pool Expansion (Unverified)	Supported	Blocked
Hot Spare Assignment (Unverified)	Supported	Blocked
Drive Migration (with 3rd-party drives)	Functional, with warnings	Allowed, but persistent warnings & blocked expansion

The DS1525+, by contrast, enforces the strict drive verification policy introduced in Synology’s newer Plus series models, like the DS925+ and DS1825+. At launch, only Synology-branded drives (HAT3300, HAT5300, SAT5200, and SNV3400 series) are listed as officially compatible. If users attempt to initialize DSM using unverified HDDs—such as a standard WD Red Plus or Seagate IronWolf—the installation process will be blocked entirely. This represents a significant limitation for long-time Synology users who are accustomed to broader hardware flexibility. Even after successful DSM setup, the system will not allow users to expand storage pools, rebuild degraded RAID arrays, or assign hot spares using non-verified drives. Persistent warnings and degraded status indicators in Storage Manager will appear even for migrated volumes, making the DS1525+ less accommodating for mixed-media configurations or DIY upgrades. SATA SSDs, while slightly more flexible in some scenarios, are still subject to similar warning behaviors post-install.

Further separating the two models is support for NVMe-based storage pools. The DS1522+ only allows M.2 NVMe SSDs to be used for read/write caching, and it permits the use of third-party SSDs for this function, giving users a cost-effective route to performance acceleration. The DS1525+, however, allows these NVMe slots to be used for full DSM storage volumes—but only when using Synology-verified SNV-series SSDs. This enables the creation of fast, low-latency storage pools using NVMe media, which is a compelling advantage for certain workflows (like media scratch disks or high-speed sync folders). Still, the restricted compatibility policy limits practical utility for those who already own quality NVMe drives from other vendors. In short, while the DS1525+ technically offers more advanced storage architecture, the DS1522+ offers far more freedom, especially for users managing legacy systems, migrating data from older Synology devices, or sourcing their own HDDs and SSDs independently.

Synology DS1525+ vs DS1522+ NAS Comparison – DSM Capabilities

Both the DS1525+ and DS1522+ run Synology’s DSM 7.2 operating system and provide access to the same broad library of official and third-party packages. This includes core applications such as Synology Drive for file sync and access, Synology Office for collaborative documents, and Active Backup for Business for system-wide backup management. The app experience is largely identical on both devices, with support for Virtual Machine Manager, Hyper Backup, Snapshot Replication, Synology Photos, and Surveillance Station. However, the differences in system hardware and compatibility enforcement subtly influence how DSM behaves and what features remain available under different configurations. For example, both models support up to 256 snapshots per shared folder and a system-wide maximum of 4,096 snapshots, but users on the DS1525+ will be subject to stricter compatibility enforcement in DSM’s Storage Manager if using drives that aren’t on Synology’s approved list.

DSM Feature / Capability	Synology DS1522+	Synology DS1525+
DSM Version	DSM 7.2+	DSM 7.2+
Max Internal Volumes	64	32 ▼
Max Single Volume Size	108 TB	200 TB (requires 32 GB RAM) ▲
Snapshot Replication	256 per shared folder / 4,096 total system snapshots	256 per shared folder / 4,096 total system snapshots
Synology Drive Users	Up to 60	Up to 80 ▲
Synology Office Users	Up to 60	Up to 80 ▲
Virtual Machine Manager (VMs)	Up to 4 Virtual Machines	Up to 8 Virtual Machines ▲
Virtual DSM Instances (Licensed)	Up to 4	Up to 8 (1 free license) ▲
Hybrid Share Folder Limit	10	10
Surveillance Station (H.265)	40 cameras / up to 1200 FPS	40 cameras / up to 1200 FPS
Maximum SMB Connections (RAM Expanded)	30	40 ▲
RAID Recovery with 3rd-Party Drives	Supported	Blocked
Storage Expansion with Unverified Drives	Supported	Blocked
Hot Spare (Unverified Drives)	Supported	Blocked
M.2 NVMe Caching (3rd-Party SSDs)	Supported	Blocked
NVMe Storage Pool Creation	Not supported	Supported (Synology SNV SSDs only)
DSM Storage Manager Behavior (Unverified)	Warnings only, all features functional	Persistent alerts, blocks expansions and rebuilds
High Availability Support	Yes	Yes
Full System Backup (Hyper Backup)	Yes (DSM 7.2+)	Yes (DSM 7.2+)

Where this becomes particularly relevant is during system migration or advanced storage scenarios. The DS1522+ handles drive migration and unverified HDDs without functional limitation. DSM will display minor warnings but still permit RAID recovery, storage pool expansion, hot spare assignments, and cache creation—even with mixed-brand hardware. By contrast, the DS1525+ introduces active blocks within DSM for unsupported drives. Users migrating from older Synology NAS devices using drives like WD Red Plus or Seagate IronWolf will find that, while the DS1525+ may import the pool, DSM will flag the drives as unverified and prevent future RAID rebuilds or expansions unless all disks are from Synology’s supported list. These alerts cannot be disabled, and they will persist across the user interface, making the system appear at risk even if the drives themselves are healthy. This creates a significant difference in administrative experience, especially for IT professionals managing multiple systems or resellers integrating legacy hardware.

In terms of user and service scalability, the DS1525+ supports slightly higher limits overall. It allows for up to 80 Synology Drive users and Office users (versus 60 each on the DS1522+) and can support up to 8 concurrent virtual machines versus 4 on the DS1522+, assuming sufficient RAM is installed. Surveillance Station camera and FPS limits are virtually identical, and both models support High Availability, Hybrid Share, SAN Manager, and central management features. However, the DS1525+ supports larger single volume sizes—up to 200 TB if upgraded to 32 GB RAM—compared to the DS1522+’s 108 TB ceiling. In return, the DS1522+ offers more internal volume flexibility with support for up to 64 volumes, double the DS1525+’s 32 volume limit. This trade-off reflects Synology’s shifting priorities in DSM: the DS1525+ favors fewer, denser volumes and more centralized control, while the DS1522+ gives power users finer-grained storage separation. Both systems excel with DSM, but your experience will differ depending on whether you prioritize scalability and structure—or open, hardware-flexible operation.

Synology DS1525+ vs DS1522+ NAS Comparison – Conclusion

The Synology DS1525+ and DS1522+ may look nearly identical on the outside, but they diverge sharply in philosophy, system behavior, and long-term value. The DS1522+, launched in 2022, stands as one of the last truly flexible 5-bay NAS systems in Synology’s portfolio. It offers a dual-core AMD Ryzen R1600 processor with excellent single-thread performance and supports up to 15 drives with two DX517 expansions. More importantly, it retains the traditional Synology approach to third-party drive compatibility—meaning users can install and operate a wide range of HDDs and SSDs (Seagate, WD, Toshiba, etc.) without system blocks. DSM will issue warnings if a drive isn’t officially listed, but critical features like RAID recovery, storage pool expansion, and hot spare assignment continue to function. That level of hardware openness makes the DS1522+ particularly attractive to power users, budget-conscious builders, and small IT teams looking to repurpose existing hardware. The DS1525+, released in 2025, represents a subtle but significant shift in Synology’s design strategy. On paper, it offers solid upgrades: a quad-core AMD Ryzen V1500B processor that enables better multitasking, faster 2.5GbE LAN ports for improved data throughput, lower noise and power consumption, and full NVMe storage pool support (with Synology SSDs). These improvements make the DS1525+ a better fit for users running multiple simultaneous services—such as Surveillance Station, Synology Drive, and Docker containers—all while maintaining smooth operation. However, these benefits come with stricter limitations. The unit enforces Synology’s 2025-era drive verification policy, which outright blocks DSM installation or RAID operations with unverified drives. Migration is allowed, but users will be met with persistent warnings, degraded system status indicators, and feature restrictions that can’t be bypassed. The flexibility to reuse older drives, expand arrays freely, or mix hardware brands has been systematically curtailed.

In essence, the choice between these two NAS systems reflects more than just performance—it’s a decision between openness and control. The DS1522+ remains a strong all-rounder for users who want to build their system on their own terms, manage diverse storage needs, or repurpose hardware they already trust. It’s well-suited to small businesses, creators, and experienced users who value transparency and adaptability. The DS1525+, by comparison, is more refined, but also more prescriptive. It favors users willing to commit fully to Synology’s ecosystem—those who prioritize simplicity, tighter integration, and long-term consistency, even at the expense of flexibility. It’s a better fit for turnkey environments where reliability and vendor support matter more than customization. Both NAS devices are excellent in their own right, but the right choice depends entirely on how much control you’re willing to trade for convenience—and whether your NAS should be a platform you shape, or a solution that shapes your workflow.

Aspect	Synology DS1522+	Synology DS1525+
Pros	– Broad 3rd-party HDD/SSD compatibility	– 2.5GbE LAN ports for faster networking out of the box
	– Fully supports RAID recovery, expansion, and hot spares with any drive	– NVMe SSDs can be used for storage pools (Synology SSDs only)
	– Better suited for drive migration from older NAS systems	– Quad-core CPU enables better multitasking and virtualization
	– More internal volumes supported (up to 64)	– Lower power draw and slightly quieter operation
	– Ideal for budget-conscious users and mixed-brand deployments	– Slightly higher user caps in DSM apps (Drive, Office, VMM)
Cons	– Only 1GbE networking unless upgraded	– Blocks DSM install and critical functions with unverified drives
	– No support for NVMe storage pools	– Only Synology SSDs supported for caching or NVMe volumes
	– Lower VM performance ceiling (dual-core CPU)	– Fewer internal volumes supported (32 max)
		– Less suitable for users with existing 3rd-party storage hardware
Buy on Amazon
Buy on B&H

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

Cachem
Synology DS425+ vs DS423+ : Faut-il craquer pour le nouveau NAS 4 baies ?
6 juin 2025 à 07:00

Synology DS425+ vs DS423+ : Faut-il craquer pour le nouveau NAS 4 baies ?

Cachem

Par : Fx

6 juin 2025 à 07:00

Synology vient d’officialiser leDS425+, le successeur du DS423+. Cette nouvelle itération s’inscrit dans la stratégie de renouvellement de la gamme DSx25+, marquée par l’introduction tant attendue du 2,5 Gb/s. Cependant, au-delà de cette amélioration réseau, les évolutions restent modestes. Ce nouveau venu justifie-t-il réellement un investissement ?

Synology DS423+ vs DS425+

Synology DS425+ vs DS423+

Processeur : Même Combat

Les 2 NAS partagent rigoureusement la même architecture. C’est le processeur Quad-Core Intel Celeron J4125 cadencé à 2,0 GHz (boost à 2,7 GHz) qui équipe aussi bien le DS425+ que le DS423+. Ce choix peut surprendre dans un contexte où la concurrence mise sur des puces plus récentes.

Ce processeur J4125 date un peu, mais il a fait ses preuves. Il présente aussi l’avantage d’intégrer un iGPU (processeur graphique) Intel UHD Graphics 600, une caractéristique importante pour les utilisateurs souhaitant faire du transcodage vidéo matériel avec Plex ou Jellyfin… ce qui n’est pas possible avec les processeurs AMD Ryzen Embedded des autres modèles DSx25+

Mémoire : Configuration inchangée

Du côté de la mémoire vive, la configuration demeure strictement identique. Chaque modèle embarque 2 Go de RAM DDR4 non-ECC soudée sur la carte mère, avec un slot d’extension permettant d’atteindre un maximum de 6 Go. Si cela reste suffisant pour les usages classiques, cette configuration peut rapidement montrer ses limites dans des scénarios plus exigeants : machines virtuelles, conteneurs Docker, nombreux flux de vidéosurveillance simultanés, etc.

Connectique

La principale nouveauté du DS425+ réside dans sa connectique réseau modernisée. Là où le DS423+ propose 2 ports RJ45 1 Gb/s, le DS425+ introduit un port 2,5 Gb/s accompagné d’un autre port 1 Gb/s.

Cette évolution, longtemps réclamée par la communauté, permet enfin d’exploiter pleinement les switchs 2,5 Gb/s ou supérieur qui se démocratisent dans tous les foyers. Pour les transferts de gros volumes ou la synchronisation Cloud, cette amélioration se traduit par des gains de temps substantiels, particulièrement appréciables dans les environnements multi-utilisateurs.

Politique de compatibilité plus stricte

À ce jour, seuls les disques Synology sont officiellement compatibles avec la série DSx25+, une politique qui risque d’alourdir le coût total de possession. Cette approche s’aligne sur celle observée précédemment, suggérant une stratégie globale de contrôle de l’écosystème.

Tableau comparatif DS425+ vs DS423+

	DS425+	DS423+
Modèle du processeur	Intel J4125	Intel J4125
Fréquence du processeur	Quad Core (2,0 – 2,7 GHz)	Quad Core (2,0 – 2,7 GHz)
iGPU	Oui	Oui
Mémoire vive	2 Go DDR4 (extensible jusqu’à 6)	2 Go DDR4 (extensible jusqu’à 6)
Emplacements HDD	4	4
Emplacements SSD NVME	2	2
Unité d’expansion	–	–
Port USB 3.0	2 (dont 1 en façade)	2 (dont 1 en façade)
Port réseau 1 Gb/s	1	2
Port réseau 2,5 Gb/s	1	–
Port réseau 10 GbE	–	–
Consommation électrique	60,1 W (Accès) et 18,34 W (Hibernation disque dur)	59,8 W (Accès) et 26,18 W (Hibernation disque dur)
Score CPU Benchmark	2941 points	2941 points
Disponibilité	À venir	Immédiate
Prix au lancement	À confirmer	475€

Faut-il passer au DS425+ ?

Le Synology DS425+ s’inscrit davantage dans une logique de rafraîchissement que d’une véritable révolution technologique. L’ajout du port 2,5 Gb/s constitue indéniablement l’amélioration la plus significative, répondant enfin aux attentes des utilisateurs équipés d’infrastructures réseau modernes.

Si vous possédez déjà un DS423+, la migration ne se justifie que dans des scénarios très spécifiques (besoin absolu de débits réseau supérieurs). Pour les nouveaux acquéreurs, le choix dépendra essentiellement de leur approche vis-à-vis de la politique de disques certifiés.

Cyberguerre
Comment Synology bouscule le petit monde de la vidéosurveillance avec C2 Backup for Surveillance [Sponso]
4 juin 2025 à 14:50

Comment Synology bouscule le petit monde de la vidéosurveillance avec C2 Backup for Surveillance [Sponso]

Cyberguerre

Par : humanoid xp

4 juin 2025 à 14:50

Cet article a été réalisé en collaboration avec Synology

Lors du salon Computex 2025 qui se tenait à Taïwan il y a quelques jours, Synology a dévoilé une solution de surveillance, C2 Backup for Surveillance, à destination des entreprises. Ses points forts : elle est très simple à mettre en place, peu coûteuse et s’appuie sur l’expertise de Synology dans le stockage de données.

Cet article a été réalisé en collaboration avec Synology

Il s’agit d’un contenu créé par des rédacteurs indépendants au sein de l’entité Humanoid xp. L’équipe éditoriale de Numerama n’a pas participé à sa création. Nous nous engageons auprès de nos lecteurs pour que ces contenus soient intéressants, qualitatifs et correspondent à leurs intérêts.

NAS Compares
I went to Synology HQ and Asked About Hard Drives…
2 juin 2025 à 18:00

I went to Synology HQ and Asked About Hard Drives…

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

2 juin 2025 à 18:00

Synology Explain WHY They Changed Drive Support and Verification in 2025 NAS

During a recent visit to Taipei for Computex 2025, I took the opportunity to visit Synology’s headquarters and speak directly with company representatives about one of the most discussed and divisive topics in the NAS community today — the company’s increasingly strict stance on hard drive compatibility. With the rollout of Synology’s latest generation of hardware, users have been met with significant limitations on the use of third-party drives, prompting concern over reduced flexibility, potential e-waste, and the future direction of Synology’s hardware ecosystem. This article provides a can overview of that visit, beginning with the HQ tour, but mainly it is about putting several big questions users have about the brand’s change in support of Seagate, WD, etc on their 2025 devices.

Four core questions — based on direct community feedback — were put forward, addressing the motivation, risks, and future implications of Synology’s current drive support policy. Each answer is presented exactly as delivered. Note, this article is not sponsored by Synology and they have no control over the editorial stance and output! For users, partners, and industry observers alike, understanding these policy shifts is essential for making informed decisions about Synology systems moving forward.

Touring the Synology Headquarters

The Synology headquarters tour took place during a coordinated visit arranged alongside the Computex 2025 trade event. Approximately 30 to 40 individuals were in attendance, a mix that included official Synology partners, resellers, independent media, and technology commentators. The tour began with a structured company overview presentation outlining Synology’s operational history, business units, and market positioning.

While much of this information was familiar to long-term observers, it served to reinforce the company providing integrated storage and data management solutions. The presentation also included a brief overview of Synology’s global distribution and the evolving structure of its enterprise product lines.

Attendees were then guided through various areas of the facility, which covered several floors within a shared building. Synology does not occupy the entire structure, but the portions shown during the tour were substantial, comprising office sections, collaborative workspaces, logistics coordination areas, and support-related operations. Notably, many desks were temporarily unoccupied due to staff presence at Computex’s Nangang Exhibition Center.

Nonetheless, the offices remained populated with active terminals and systems undergoing live testing.

A significant portion of the tour focused on the environmental and durability testing facilities, including designated zones for acoustic profiling, thermal analysis, and dust resilience. The diversity of units being tested suggested coverage across multiple device classes, including both rackmount and desktop models.

The most extensive portion of the tour was the dedicated test and burn-in area. This floor was almost entirely devoted to long-term performance and diagnostic evaluations. Numerous Synology NAS units — some dating back to the early 2010s — were in continuous operation, either running synthetic workloads or undergoing compatibility assessments with the current DSM operating system.

The presence of so many legacy devices in active testing underscored the company’s emphasis on software longevity and cross-generational hardware support. However, it also provided a contrast to Synology’s new strict verification policies, especially given the mixed hardware environments visible during testing. The tour was led by ZP Kao, Sales Director at Synology, and Chad Chiang, Regional Manager for the UK and Germany, who offered clarification and responded to several direct inquiries during the walkthrough.

Why Has Synology Changed Its HDD Support Policy? Questions and Answers

Chad Chiang | NTU Overseas Internship Program 臺大國際引水人計畫

Questions I put to Synology about their change in policy regarding verifying and supporting drive media being used on their 2025 and later series of NAS devices. I based these on the comments and suggestions from videos on the YouTube channel and comments on previous articles. I am under no illusions that these changes by Synology in their drive support policies have financial justifications (ranging from Support efficiency and it’s financial overhead, to the simple profitability of prioritizing their own labelled firmware optimized storage media choices over those of other brands), but I wanted to know if these were the only reasons for this? What other reasons could Synology provide to support this large and unpopular move. Thank you once again to Chad Chiang for taking the time to answer these questions.

Note – for a better understanding of the current DSM Support of Unverified media, as well as test scenarios detailing each setup and how DSM handles it, you can read it HERE in my Test Article.

How has the verification process changed for which drives you can use on Synology systems moving forward? And are there drive options from WD and Seagate currently undergoing support verification?

Answer – At Synology, we constantly reflect on a core question: Why do people choose a NAS? We believe the answer lies in the need for secure, reliable, and hassle-free data storage. This belief has guided our mission for over a decade. When analyzing our support history, the data clearly shows that systems using Synology-branded drives experience 40% fewer issues compared to those with third-party HDDs. This insight underscores the importance of using thoroughly tested drives. As for which third-party vendors are currently undergoing drive verification, we’re unable to disclose details. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, we recommend reaching out directly to the respective manufacturers.

The response positions Synology’s verification changes as a reliability-focused initiative and smooth platform running as the chief reasoning for them, referencing internal data that suggests a 40% reduction in support issues when Synology-branded drives are used. However, as mentioned previously, the statement does not provide supporting metrics such as sample size, timeframes, or specific failure modes, making it difficult to assess the scope or significance of this claim. I do not doubt that it is true, but without the X/Y and details of how this result was achieved, we are only getting half the story here. The policy shift is framed as a precautionary measure aimed at minimizing user disruption, but the absence of transparency regarding ongoing verifications with WD or Seagate limits clarity for users seeking alternatives – which is why users are seeing this more as a means for the brand to increase profitability in the 2025 series as a bundled utility purchase – not as a means of system stability.

Ultimately, discussing the technical standards or benchmarks involved in the verification process in paramount here. It largely confirms that responsibility for future third-party compatibility lies with the drive manufacturers themselves, effectively shifting the onus of transparency to them. While it is understandable that Synology might want to mitigate support complexity, the lack of specificity about how the verification criteria have evolved or what steps vendors must follow leaves key questions unanswered for both users and third-party storage providers. I reached out to representatives from Seagate and WD to see if they could elaborate further on this new media side verification process with their respective NAS/Server class media – neither was able to provide further details at this time.

UPDATED 07-05-25 = Added Unverified HDD and SSD (Migrated) Storage Pool RAID Repair, RAID POOL Expansion and Hot Spare Tests. Right now, the following is what works and what does not (between pre-2025 Series and the 2025 Series that is releasing now):

Feature / Function	Pre-2025 Synology NAS<br>(e.g., DS1821+, DS920+, DS923+)	2025 Synology NAS<br>(e.g., DS1825+, DS925+, DS1525+)
DSM Installation – Verified Drives	Full support	Full support
DSM Installation – Non-Verified Drives	Allowed (with warnings)	Blocked completely
Drive Migration (Non-Verified Drives)	Fully functional, minor alerts	Works, but shows persistent warnings
Storage Pool Creation – Verified Drives	Fully supported	Fully supported
Storage Pool Creation – Non-Verified Drives	Allowed (with warnings)	Blocked
Storage Pool Expansion – Verified Drives	Fully supported	Fully supported
Storage Pool Expansion – Non-Verified Drives	Allowed (mixed arrays supported)	Blocked – drives flagged as incompatible
Hot Spare Assignment – Verified Drives	Fully supported	Fully supported
Hot Spare Assignment – Non-Verified Drives	Allowed	Blocked
RAID Recovery – Verified Drives	Supported	Supported
RAID Recovery – Non-Verified Drives	Supported	Blocked – system will not rebuild with unverified media
M.2 NVMe Cache – Synology SSDs	Supported	Supported
M.2 NVMe Cache – 3rd Party SSDs	Supported	Blocked
M.2 NVMe Storage Pools – Synology SSDs	Not supported	Supported
M.2 NVMe Storage Pools – 3rd Party SSDs	Not supported	Blocked
SMART Monitoring – Verified Drives	Full support	Full support
SMART Monitoring – Non-Verified Drives	Full support	Limited or blocked (TBC)
Storage Manager Alerts – Non-Verified Drives	Warnings, dismissible	Persistent, cannot be cleared
Overall Compatibility Flexibility	High – mix-and-match drives allowed	Low – walled-garden enforcement

Users are able to migrate existing storage arrays that feature Unverified/unsupported drive media in previous Synology systems into 2025 Plus series devices and still use DSM services – however once they do so, they are unable to use the same model ID of drives to perform RAID recovery, RAID expansion or introduced a hot spare, unless that drive is on the verified drive list. Why is this?

Answer- Advanced operations such as RAID recovery, expansion, or hot spare assignment are technically intensive and carry a higher risk of data loss if inconsistencies arise. Drives that haven’t been validated through Synology’s verification process may behave unpredictably under stress, impacting array stability or performance. For this reason, support for these functions is limited to verified drives—a precaution designed to safeguard user data and maintain long-term system reliability.

So, this answer outlines Synology’s rationale for restricting critical RAID operations on unverified drives and It emphasizes the increased risk associated with advanced storage operations, particularly when performed on drives that may not have been tested under stress or fault conditions. The justification focuses on data integrity and system reliability, suggesting that verified drives have undergone stress testing scenarios that others have not. However, the lack of granularity in what defines “unpredictable behavior” makes it difficult to independently evaluate the severity or frequency of these issues. Much like the statistics point earlier, this seems a remarkable stretch in terms of reaction to what many users would consider a very, very low % risk factor. Equally, though there is an argument that some drive media is less suitable for NAS usage (eg the WD Red SMR drives, desktop single drive use media like Seagate Barracuda and high power draw HDDs/SSDs in some cases), these make up a very small % of drive media in the market and using this as a reasoning to effectively bar the continued support of drive media that has been supported/used in Synology server use over the last 2 decades to prevent RAID recovery and Expansion in the latest gen for those carrying them over seems insane overkill.

The policy effectively limits upgradability and flexibility in mixed-drive environments. While it is technically reasonable to restrict risky operations on unvalidated components, the ability to migrate but not expand or rebuild a RAID introduces a half-measure — allowing users to enter unsupported configurations while restricting them mid-cycle. The result is a system state that may appear functional at first but ultimately lacks key functionality unless users conform to the verified list. For long-term users upgrading from older systems, this shift can lead to unexpected limitations without adequate warning, particularly in small or home office deployments. The messaging has been poor and though I made a video about these limitations (embedded above), there is practically no other clear and transparent information about this online (with incongruous detailson the Synology Knowledge base that could stand to be a lot clearer and louder).

HOT TAKE, and hear me out – If Synology do not allow support of RAID repair/Expansion on drives that have been migrated over from older NAS systems where the drives WERE originally supported (unless they use 2025 verified drives) because of reasons of stability, I have a somewhat extreme suggestion. As unpopular as it might have been, Synology should have just BARRED the support of migration from older generation Synology NAS devices with unverified drives entirely. I personally think they should have allowed for RAID repair/Expansion of unverified drives, but if they are going to pursue this for reasons of system stability, they should have committed to this fully and not allowed this grey area with migration. As it just looks bad for the brand, as means of ensuring people can upgrade/remain in the ecosystem, but then have limited scalability when those older drives require replacement/growth.

Were pre-populated Synology NAS devices considered, given the strict verified support stance that this new Synology hardware generation contains?

Answer – Regarding pre-populated NAS solutions, there hasn’t been significant internal discussion or a formal strategy around this model. As such, I don’t have a concrete answer at this time. The focus remains on ensuring that any storage media used—whether user-installed or bundled—is fully verified to meet Synology’s reliability standards.

Not much to unpack here. It makes sense. I imagine they DID discuss this as an option (as they are already engaging with this with systems like the Beestation), but at least for now, it seems off the table. As unpopular as this might have been, in some ways it could have solved a lot of this friction for some users. Provide the 2025 PLUS series as an empty/enclosure-only solution with similar compatibility as the 2024 and earlier generation – but then also supply several pre-populated options that feature Synology drive media as standard. However, that would be a different discussion entirely (eg logistics, SKUs, viability, ROI by offering this alongside flexible options).

Can you provide example(s) of critical system issues that using unverified drives caused, that were the tipping point for this new strict HDD support policy?

Examples of what stepped up our verification process moving forward:

Performance Issues: Unverified drives may function under light workloads but can suffer serious performance drops (e.g., IOPS decline) under multi-user access or when running demanding services like virtualization, backup, or databases. This can lead to poor user experience or service disruptions (e.g., iSCSI timeouts).

Stability Risks: Without thorough testing, unverified drives are more prone to failures under stress conditions such as unexpected power loss or long-duration file transfers—leading to timeouts, reboot failures, or data integrity issues in high-load or long-term operations.

Compatibility Problems: Drives not validated for compatibility may show unstable behavior with certain NAS controllers, resulting in drive drops, RAID instability, or data access interruptions over time.

Advanced Feature Failures: Unverified drives may fail during operations like SMART testing or Secure Erase, especially after unexpected power outages. Some drives may not respond properly under frequent access or specific command sets, affecting system stability.

Drive Failures Under High Load or Density: Some drives may become unresponsive under high data density or I/O intensity, with issues persisting even after a reset.

The examples provided by Synology highlight a variety of operational issues associated with unverified drives, most of which relate to performance degradation, system instability, or failure of advanced features under stress. These scenarios focus on workloads involving sustained I/O, power fluctuations, and controller-level interactions. In isolation, many of the issues described are plausible for lower-tier or unsuitable drive models, particularly in demanding or enterprise-like environments. That said, that are very low margins (eg 0.01% or lower) when you look at the traditional deployment of many Synology NAS solution in the Plus series. Again though, the scale and frequency of these issues remain unclear. There is no indication of how widespread such failures are across Synology’s user base, nor whether they represent rare edge cases or common occurrences. The examples also apply more logically to enterprise or high-density configurations, whereas the same strict policies now affect all tiers — including two-bay and four-bay systems used by home and prosumer users. Without concrete statistics or clearer thresholds, it is difficult to assess whether these issues justify the breadth of the policy. The policy appears to target potential worst-case scenarios, but may have broader consequences for user flexibility than the risk profile necessarily warrants.

Additional Information and Details from the MyBroadband Article

Data is at the heart of every industry's transformation, and this is where Synology has a profoundly important role to play”: Michael Chang - Express Computer

Further context on Synology’s new drive compatibility policy was provided in an interview between MyBroadband journalist Daniel Puchert (click to read) and Michael Chang, Synology’s Regional Sales Manager. The discussion reinforced many of the points raised during the HQ visit, while also offering additional information into the motivations behind Synology’s stricter approach to drive support in their latest generation of NAS systems. Chang explained that Synology’s primary objective was to ensure product reliability and reduce system-level faults that were increasingly traced back to third-party hard drives. According to Chang, complaints received by Synology often involved third-party drive issues, yet Synology would still be held accountable by users due to their role as the NAS provider. This prompted the company to centralize responsibility and tighten control over supported hardware configurations. While Synology-branded drives are currently the only models certified, Chang noted that other vendors are being invited to participate in the compatibility validation program — provided they meet the same testing standards.

(In the case of the NAS drives) “..because Synology’s product would typically facilitate the usage of third-party hard drives, it would also be the scapegoat for any faults with the entire system.”

“..complaints received by Synology regarding issues relating to its NAS devices were most often caused by faulty hard drives.

“severe storage anomalies have decreased by up to 88%” for hard drive models that have adopted its hard drive compatibility policy, compared to older models.”

“We still welcome third parties to join Synology’s ecosystem and have invited vendors to join our validation program,”

Michael Chang, Synology Regional Sales Manager – full article HERE

The article also mentioned that Synology-certified drives undergo over 7,000 hours of testing, and systems using those drives reportedly experience 40% fewer failures than those using uncertified media. Additionally, Synology claims that severe storage anomalies have dropped by up to 88% in systems following its compatibility policy. Although Chang confirmed that third-party compatibility may expand in the future, it will only do so under strict adherence to Synology’s internal benchmarks. These statements align with Synology’s position during the HQ tour, further emphasizing a shift toward a closed, highly controlled ecosystem that prioritizes consistent performance over hardware flexibility.

Synology and HDD Support and Verification – Conclusion and the Long Term

My biggest issue with all this is that, almost certainly, we are going to see Seagate, WD, Toshiba and more slow (slooooooooowly) appear on the compatibility lists for a number of the 2025 generation of devices over the coming months. So, what was all this for? The PR damage and likely early sales damage of the Synolgoy 2025 Series because of this change of support I would estimate is going to be pretty substantial – and all the reports and reactions to this online are not going to go away as soon as a Seagate Ironwolf or WD Red drive appears on the support lists. Also, Synology work on these devices for a very, very long time before launch – why is all this happening now – and not before launch. The cynic in me wants to just assume it was pure profitability and that Synology want to maximize profits, and if when this does begin to U-Trun ,that the brand can say that it was the plan all along. But whether that is true or not, the damage to the brand in the eyes of a substantial % of their long term fans is notable, and with many more players in the market (UniFi, QNAP, UGREEN and more) launching new products in Q3 and Q4 – is this all going to be a gamble by the brand that ends up costing them more than just leaving the support status quo where it was? Only time will tell.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

[contact-form-7]

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE If you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

IT-Connect
Comment installer LanguageTool sur un NAS Synology ?
2 juin 2025 à 18:00

Comment installer LanguageTool sur un NAS Synology ?

IT-Connect

Par : Florian BURNEL

2 juin 2025 à 18:00

Dans ce tutoriel, nous allons installer LanguageTool sur un NAS Synology avec un conteneur Docker, afin de bénéficier d'un correcteur de fautes self-hosted.

The post Comment installer LanguageTool sur un NAS Synology ? first appeared on IT-Connect.

Cachem
Computex 2025 : Les nouvelles solutions Synology, QNAP et ASUSTOR
2 juin 2025 à 07:00

Computex 2025 : Les nouvelles solutions Synology, QNAP et ASUSTOR

Cachem

Par : Fx

2 juin 2025 à 07:00

Lors du Computex 2025 à Taipei, plusieurs annonces importantes ont été faites dans l’univers des NAS avec Synology, QNAP et ASUSTOR. Ces 3 fabricants taiwanais ont présenté des solutions allant du NAS domestique aux serveurs de stockage pour les entreprises avec des avancées sur les performances et l’intégration de l’intelligence artificielle.

synology qnap asustor - Computex 2025 : Les nouvelles solutions Synology, QNAP et ASUSTOR

Synology : Stockage NVMe enterprise et la nouvelle Série DS+

PAS7700 : Un PAS décisif vers le stockage Flash Enterprise

synology PAS7700 - Computex 2025 : Les nouvelles solutions Synology, QNAP et ASUSTOR

Synology passe à la vitesse supérieure avec le lancement de sa gamme Parallel Active Station (PAS), inaugurée par le modèle PAS7700. Ce système 4U en cluster dual-node, entièrement NVMe, marque un tournant dans la stratégie de la marque vers les solutions de stockage hautes performances pour l’entreprise.

Le PAS7700 affiche des performances impressionnantes annoncées : jusqu’à 2 millions d’IOPS en lecture aléatoire 4K et 30 Go/s en lecture séquentielle 64 KB. Chaque nœud embarque 24 emplacements pour les nouveaux SSD U.3 NVMe conçus en interne par Synology, une première pour le constructeur. L’unité peut être étendue via le PAX224, pour atteindre jusqu’à 8 Po de capacité logique, grâce à une technologie de réduction de données intégrée affichant un ratio moyen de 5:1.

Renouvellement de la série DS+ avec du 2,5 GbE

- Computex 2025 : Les nouvelles solutions Synology, QNAP et ASUSTOR

Synology a également dévoilé 6 nouveaux modèles de sa série DSx25+, incluant les DS225+, DS425+, DS725+, DS925+, DS1525+ et DS1825+. La principale nouveauté réside dans l’arrivé du port réseau 2,5 Gb/s sur l’ensemble de la gamme, répondant enfin aux attentes des utilisateurs.

À noter qu’il se murmure que Synology sortirait ses propres switchs (estampillés Synology) d’ici la fin de l’année.

Politique controversée des disques certifiés

Une décision qui fait débat concerne la nouvelle politique de Synology imposant l’utilisation de disques testés et validés par ses soins. Ivan Lebowski, Sales Team Leader France et Afrique de Synology, justifie cette approche : « nous voyons trop d’utilisateurs venir vers nous parce qu’ils rencontrent des problèmes avec des disques pour lesquels nous ne pouvons pas leur apporter de support ».

QNAP : innovation autour de l’IA et du stockage évolutif

QuTS Mega et stockage à l’échelle du PétaOctet

QNAP a impressionné avec QuTS Mega, son système d’exploitation NAS évolutif (scale-out) conçu pour les déploiements haute capacité. Cette architecture permet à plusieurs nœuds NAS de fonctionner dans un environnement clusterisé unique, supportant une mise à l’échelle linéaire de la capacité et des performances.

Le système supporte jusqu’à 96 nœuds avec une capacité totale utilisable pouvant atteindre 45 PétaOctets. QNAP a démontré cette technologie avec un boîtier JBOD de 60 baies compatibles SAS ou SATA, offrant un débit de 12 Gb/s par lien.

Solutions IA et connectivité Thunderbolt 5

QNAP TVS AIh1688ATX - Computex 2025 : Les nouvelles solutions Synology, QNAP et ASUSTOR — Image NASCompares

On continue avec le TVS-AIh1688ATX. Il s’agit d’un NAS équipé d’un Intel Core Ultra (24 cœurs) accompagné d’unités de traitement neuronal (NPU 13 TOPS). Il est compatible Thunderbolt 5 (en option) destiné aux workflows de travail à destination des créatifs. Ce QNAP dispose de 2 ports USB 4 (par défaut) et 2 ports réseau 10 Gb/s.

RAG Search QSIRCH - Computex 2025 : Les nouvelles solutions Synology, QNAP et ASUSTOR

QNAP a fait plusieurs démonstrations de la prochaine version de QSirch basée sur l’IA pour retrouver facilement des documents, pouvant également lire le contenu de ces derniers… tout en respectant la confidentialité. En effet, l’IA fonctionne en local et n’a pas besoin d’accès extérieur pour fonctionner.

Nouveaux modèles d’entrée de gamme

TS 462A TS 262A - Computex 2025 : Les nouvelles solutions Synology, QNAP et ASUSTOR

Les TS-262A et TS-462A renouvellent l’entrée de gamme avec un processeur Intel N5095 à 2,2 GHz (boost jusqu’à 2,9GHz), avec jusqu’à 16 Go de RAM DDR4 et avec 2 emplacements M.2 NVMe. On notera la présence de 2 ports USB 2.0, 2 ports USB 3.2 Gen 2, ainsi qu’un port 2,5 Gb/s. Ces modèles abandonnent le port HDMI et l’emplacement PCIe présents sur la génération précédente.

ASUSTOR : évolutions mesurées, mais ciblées

Lockerstor Gen2+ : Amélioration de la connectivité

Au Computex 2025, ASUSTOR a dévoilé des mises à jour ciblées de ses NAS, à commencer par le Lockerstor 6 Gen2+ (AS6706T). Ce modèle voit sa connectivité évoluer avec le remplacement des ports 2,5 GbE (rouges) par des ports 5 GbE (bleus), offrant une bande passante doublée tout en restant rétrocompatible avec les réseaux existants.

Solutions rackables professionnelles

Côté entreprises, ASUSTOR renforce sa présence sur le segment professionnel avec les Lockerstor 12R Pro Gen2, déclinés en formats 3U et 4U. Ces NAS rackables embarquent des processeurs AMD Ryzen 7 Pro, 16 Go de mémoire DDR5 ECC et 2 ports réseau 10 Gb/s, visant les infrastructures virtualisées ou les besoins en stockage à haute disponibilité.

En synthèse

Le Computex 2025 confirme la transformation du marché du NAS vers des solutions plus performantes et spécialisées. Synology mise sur le stockage flash enterprise et l’écosystème fermé, QNAP pousse l’innovation vers l’IA et le stockage évolutif, tandis qu’ASUSTOR se concentre sur l’amélioration ciblée de ses produits existants. Ces évolutions répondent aux besoins croissants en performances et en capacité des utilisateurs professionnels, tout en soulevant des questions sur l’ouverture des écosystèmes et la compatibilité des composants tiers.

NAS Compares
Synology vs QNAP in 2025
30 mai 2025 à 11:30

Synology vs QNAP in 2025

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

30 mai 2025 à 11:30

Synology vs QNAP NAS – Which Should You Buy in 2025?

When choosing a NAS solution in 2025, two brands dominate the conversation: Synology and QNAP. These Taiwan-based companies have evolved their offerings significantly over the years, adapting to changing user needs in backup, multimedia, virtualization, and enterprise storage. Synology, with a strong emphasis on software polish and ecosystem integration, continues to appeal to users who prioritize stability and consistency. QNAP, by contrast, leans into offering higher-spec hardware, customization, and flexibility, targeting tech-savvy users who want granular control over their system. This article explores how the two compare across hardware, storage capabilities, software platforms, security, pricing, and overall value. Both Synology and QNAP share a lot of baseline features: multi-platform support across Windows, Mac, and Linux; mobile apps for Android and iOS; web-based GUIs; encryption; multi-user access; and strong community ecosystems. Yet important distinctions emerge as you look deeper. These differences often boil down to Synology delivering a more consistent, “appliance-like” experience, while QNAP offers broader hardware choices and wider compatibility. Neither brand is universally better, but each fits different user priorities. Let’s break down how Synology and QNAP stack up in detail for 2025.

Synology vs QNAP NAS – Hardware Comparison

In terms of hardware variety and specification, QNAP clearly maintains an advantage in 2025. QNAP offers a wider range of NAS models across every price tier, providing more options for users looking for features like 2.5GbE or 10GbE ports, Thunderbolt connectivity, PCIe expandability, and support for AI or GPU cards. Many QNAP systems at even mid-tier levels offer multi-core CPUs, 2.5GbE as a minimum, and M.2 NVMe slots for caching or storage pools. Synology, while offering a hardware range from ARM-based entry units to Xeon-powered enterprise models, typically emphasizes efficiency and stability over raw horsepower, often shipping systems with lower-core-count processors and 1GbE networking by default.

Hardware Feature	Synology	QNAP
M.2 NVMe SSD Slots	✓	✓
Dedicated Flash/SSD NAS Systems	✓ (Only in Rackmount)	✓
PCIe Expansion Slots	✓	✓
10GbE / 25GbE Network Support	✓	✓
Thunderbolt Connectivity		✓
Dual-Controller NAS Models	✓	✓
Support for SAS Drives	✓	✓
ZFS File System Support		✓
Btrfs File System Support	✓
Flexible/Hybrid RAID	✓ (SHR)	✓ (QTier)
HDMI Output for Direct Media Playback		✓
Tool-less Drive Installation	✓	✓
Integrated GPU for Media Transcoding	✓ (only on the low tier PLUS range)	✓
External GPU Support (PCIe GPU Expansion)		✓
U.2 NVMe SSD Support		✓
Redundant Power Supply Options	✓	✓
High-Capacity Scalability (Over 1PB)	✓	✓
Dedicated Out-of-Band Management (IPMI/iKVM)	✓
USB 4.0 Ports		✓
2.5GbE	✓ (But only on x25 Models)	✓
5GbE LAN Support		✓
Thunderbolt-to-Ethernet Bridging		✓
M.2 NVMe Storage Pool Creation	(only on new models) ✓	✓
Hot-Swappable Drives	✓	✓
AI Accelerator Card Support (TPU/NPU cards)		✓
Edge AI/Surveillance AI Built-in Modules	(only DVA series) ✓	✓

However, Synology’s hardware strategy is tightly coupled to its software-first philosophy. Devices are designed to maximize compatibility, power efficiency, and seamless operation with DSM. Some newer 2025 Synology models do offer improvements — such as M.2 NVMe storage pools and optional 10GbE upgrades — but their pace remains slower compared to QNAP’s frequent hardware refresh cycles. For users whose priority is high performance, customization, or bleeding-edge hardware, QNAP offers far more compelling options. For those seeking low-power, quiet, turnkey systems, Synology still provides highly reliable appliances.

Synology vs QNAP NAS – Storage Services and Scalability

Storage capabilities represent a growing area of divergence. Synology’s storage ecosystem emphasizes stability and data integrity through Btrfs file systems, SHR (Synology Hybrid RAID), fast RAID rebuilds, and snapshot technology. However, Synology has dramatically tightened its drive compatibility rules from 2025 onwards, particularly in the Plus series and higher, limiting users to certified Synology drives for initialization. This hardline approach restricts flexibility, as users cannot freely install third-party HDDs or SSDs. Meanwhile, users still benefit from technologies like SHR, making mixed-drive RAID arrays easier to manage, though concerns remain about SHR’s future viability under Synology’s evolving drive policies.

	SERVICE	SYNOLOGY	QNAP	Notes
File Services	SMB, AFP, NFS			Cross-platform sharing
	WebDAV			Remote access
	FTP/FTPS			Standard protocols
	Rsync/Remote Sync			Sync across systems
RAID & Storage	Basic, JBOD, RAID 0/1/5/6/10			Core RAID support
	SHR (Hybrid RAID)			Synology-exclusive
	Qtier Auto-Tiering			QNAP-exclusive SSD/HDD tiering
	ZFS Support	(DSM 7.2+ select models)	(QuTS hero)	Synology uses Btrfs more widely
	Storage Pools			Pool-based management
	Thin Provisioning			On supported file systems
	Storage Snapshots	(Btrfs-based)	(ZFS/ext4-based)	Both support snapshot schedules
	Inline Deduplication	(Btrfs)	(ZFS)	Both support dedup, method differs
	SSD Cache (Read/Write)			Model-dependent
	Encryption (AES-256)			Volume/folder-level encryption
Backup & Sync	Hyper Backup / HBS3	(Hyper Backup)	(Hybrid Backup Sync 3)	Functionally equivalent
	Active Backup for Business			Enterprise-grade backup (free)
	Snapshot Replication			Data versioning support
	Cloud Sync			Multi-cloud sync integration

QNAP’s storage flexibility is far greater. Users can utilize almost any NAS-rated or server-class drive from vendors like Seagate, Toshiba, and WD, without vendor lock-in. Beyond standard RAID levels, QNAP offers Qtier for intelligent auto-tiering between SSDs and HDDs and supports ZFS through its QuTS hero operating system. ZFS integration introduces enterprise-grade features such as inline deduplication, compression, triple-parity RAID options, and even faster rebuilds. Expansion is another strong suit for QNAP, with broad support for external expansion enclosures over USB and PCIe, while Synology supports far fewer expansion units. In short, QNAP offers a more powerful, flexible storage environment but demands more technical knowledge to manage effectively.

Synology DSM vs QNAP QTS/QuTS – Software Compared

Synology’s DSM (DiskStation Manager) remains the benchmark for NAS operating systems in terms of polish, consistency, and ease of use. Its streamlined UI, consistent app design, and stable system management tools make it highly user-friendly. DSM’s integration with Synology Drive, Hyper Backup, Active Backup for Business, and its Office suite provide turnkey productivity and backup solutions. However, Synology is moving increasingly toward a closed ecosystem, prioritizing first-party apps and services over broader third-party integration. Applications like Surveillance Station remain best-in-class, but recent trends — such as discontinuing Video Station — indicate Synology’s increasing control over its ecosystem.

Category	Feature	Synology	QNAP	Notes
Core OS	OS	DSM (DiskStation Manager)	QTS / QuTS hero	QuTS hero is ZFS-based
	Web GUI Dashboard			Both have polished interfaces
	Mobile Apps			DS apps (Synology), Qfile/Qmanager (QNAP)
Virtualization & Containers	Docker Support			QNAP supports LXC too
	Virtual Machines	(VMM)	(Virtualization Station)	QNAP offers GPU passthrough
	GPU Passthrough	(limited)		QNAP supports more virtualization use cases
AI / Surveillance	Surveillance Station		(QVR Pro/Elite)	QNAP includes more free camera licenses
	AI Facial Recognition	(DVA series)	(QVR Face Tiger)	Hardware-dependent
	Smart Object Detection			Both support this in premium models
Media Services	Plex Media Server			Supported by both
	DLNA/UPnP Streaming			Basic media server support
	Video Transcoding (HW Acceleration)	(some models)	(broader support)	QNAP supports external GPUs
	Audio Station / Music Station			Web/mobile access to music
Cloud & Remote Access	QuickConnect / myQNAPcloud	(QuickConnect)	(myQNAPcloud)	Brand-specific DDNS/remote access services
	HybridShare / HybridMount	(HybridShare)	(HybridMount)	Mount cloud storage as local; brand equivalent
Productivity & Apps	Synology Office (Docs, Sheets, Slides)			Google Docs-like suite for Synology only
	Notes / Tasks / Calendar			Productivity tools
	Mail Server & Chat			Business collaboration tools
App Ecosystem	App Center			QNAP has a broader variety
	Package Manager CLI	(`synopkg`)	(`qpkg`)	Command-line support for installs

QNAP’s QTS and QuTS hero systems offer greater flexibility and third-party support at the cost of consistency. Users can deploy a much wider range of apps, including those for AI recognition, media streaming, and backup tasks, often with deeper customization options. QNAP’s app ecosystem embraces both QNAP-native and third-party applications, with tools like HybridMount and Hybrid Backup Sync offering robust cloud and backup integrations.

However, design inconsistencies and a more complex setup process make QNAP platforms better suited to technically proficient users. QNAP systems offer more functionality out of the box but can feel less cohesive than Synology’s more curated environment.

Synology vs QNAP NAS – Security

Synology continues to lead in NAS security in 2025. The company’s multi-layered approach — including an in-house Security Response Team, bug bounty programs, pen-testing partnerships, and rapid patching policies — maintains its reputation as one of the most secure NAS ecosystems. Security Advisor, SSL certificate management, encrypted folders, and proactive system audits are standard across DSM systems. Remote access via QuickConnect is tightly controlled to minimize exposure. This emphasis on hardening and responding quickly to vulnerabilities makes Synology a strong choice for users prioritizing security with minimal manual intervention.

	Service	Synology	QNAP	Notes
Security & Access	2FA (Two-Factor Authentication)			User-level protection
	VPN Server (OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP)			Standard features
	Firewall + IP Blocking			Security policy management
	SSL Certificate Management			Let’s Encrypt, custom certs
	Security Advisor			Built-in vulnerability scanner

QNAP has made substantial strides in recent years to bolster its security posture, responding to earlier criticisms following ransomware incidents. The introduction of its own PSIRT team, participation in Pwn2Own, and improvements to myQNAPcloud services represent real progress. However, QNAP’s security tools, like Security Counselor, often need to be manually installed and configured. While they now offer multi-factor authentication and SSL options, the user experience around setting up and maintaining a secure environment still lags slightly behind Synology. Power users comfortable with managing network-level protections can achieve strong security on QNAP, but casual users may find Synology’s default setup safer out of the box.

Synology vs QNAP NAS – Price Point and Value

QNAP consistently offers better raw hardware value for the price across its product range. A mid-tier QNAP NAS typically features higher-core CPUs, 2.5GbE or 10GbE networking, and expandability features like PCIe slots and multiple M.2 NVMe slots — features that, with Synology, are only available at much higher price points.

Additionally, QNAP’s lack of strict HDD compatibility listing (as currently the case for the Synology 2025 series, at the time of writing) and broader compatibility with storage and memory components can significantly reduce the total cost of ownership for DIY-minded users. Synology’s pricing, while generally higher, reflects its software development investment and the overall polish of its systems.

Buyers are paying for a more turnkey experience, better documentation, and consistent performance across the board. Moreover, Synology’s inclusion of powerful free tools like Active Backup for Business and Synology Drive adds enterprise-grade features without additional licensing costs, which in some cases offsets the hardware premium. Nonetheless, for users whose priority is maximum hardware performance and component freedom, QNAP usually offers a stronger return on investment.

Synology vs QNAP NAS – Conclusion and Verdict

Choosing between Synology and QNAP in 2025 depends largely on user priorities. Synology remains the best choice for users seeking a polished, consistent, stable, and secure NAS experience. Its streamlined DSM platform, reliable first-party apps, and strong support infrastructure make it ideal for small businesses, prosumers, and general users who want a “set it and forget it” solution. However, Synology’s movement toward hardware and software lock-in may be off-putting to users who value flexibility or those unwilling to buy only Synology-branded components. QNAP, by contrast, excels in offering more powerful hardware, greater configuration freedom, and broader third-party app support. Users who want to customize, expand, virtualize, and maximize their system’s capabilities — and who are comfortable managing more complex setups — will find QNAP to be the more empowering platform. While its software consistency and security history lag slightly behind Synology, the gap has narrowed considerably. Ultimately, Synology is the stronger pick for users valuing simplicity and long-term stability, while QNAP offers more opportunities for those willing to trade simplicity for flexibility and raw performance.

NAS Solutions

+ Better Software (In almost every respect!)

+ Much Better Global Support Presence

+ More business desirable

+ Larger Range of solutions

– Compatibility restrictions on HDD and Upgrades More and more

– Underwhelming hardware (comparatively)

+ Better Hardware for Price

+ Wider Variety of Solutions and Hardware Profiles

+ Supports ZFS and/or EXT4 (with ZFS platform now available on latest Intel Celeron Systems)

+ Wide accessory range and compatibility

– Software can often feel inconsistent

– Hit by Security Issues if the past

Check Amazon By Clicking Below:

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

[contact-form-7]

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

Cachem
Synology BeeStation Plus : une alternative simplifiée au NAS… mais à quel prix ?
28 mai 2025 à 07:00

Synology BeeStation Plus : une alternative simplifiée au NAS… mais à quel prix ?

Cachem

Par : Fx

28 mai 2025 à 07:00

Après le BeeDrive et BeeStation, Synology dévoile le BeeStation Plus, un boîtier de stockage réseau qui monte en gamme. Avec 8 To de stockage, un processeur Intel plus performant, 4 Go de RAM, cette nouvelle version a de quoi séduire. Mais est-ce suffisant pour justifier son prix ? Et surtout, à qui s’adresse vraiment ce produit ?

Synology BeeStation Plus

Retour sur la gamme BeeStation

Avant d’entrer dans le détail de cette version « Plus », rappelons rapidement ce qu’est BeeStation.

Synology est un acteur reconnu dans le monde du NAS depuis de nombreuses années. Son succès repose sur la fiabilité de ses produits et un écosystème logiciel robuste, basé sur DSM, une interface web riche en fonctionnalités : sauvegarde, partage, sécurité, streaming, collaboration, etc.

Mais l’univers du NAS reste trop souvent associé aux professionnels ou aux utilisateurs avancés. Pour élargir son public, Synology a lancé BeeStation : un NAS simplifié, prêt à l’emploi, avec un disque dur intégré et une interface allégée. Le but ? Proposer une solution de stockage cloud privé pour le grand public, sans les complexités d’un NAS traditionnel.

Synology ne mentionne jamais le terme « NAS » dans sa communication autour de BeeStation. L’objectif est clair : offrir une alternative simple aux solutions cloud comme Google Drive ou iCloud, sans les problèmes de confidentialité des données.

BeeStation Plus : une montée en gamme bien pensée

La BeeStation Plus reprend les bases du modèle précédent, mais les améliore significativement :

Stockage intégré : 8 To en standard
Processeur : Intel Celeron J4125 Quad-Core à 2,0 GHz (burst jusqu’à 2,7 GHz)
Mémoire vive : 4 Go de RAM DDR4
Connectique :
- 1 port USB 3.0 Type-A
- 1 port USB 3.0 Type-C
- 1 port Ethernet RJ45 Gigabit (1 Gb/s)

Synology BeeStation Plus arriere - Synology BeeStation Plus : une alternative simplifiée au NAS… mais à quel prix ?

L’autre nouveauté, c’est la prise en charge native de Plex, la célèbre application de streaming multimédia. De quoi transformer ce boîtier en serveur multimédia personnel, sans configuration complexe. Attention, afin de profiter pleinement de Plex et de l’accélération matérielle offerte par le BeeStation Plus, il faudra souscrire au Plex Pass.

Un produit simple, mais pas simpliste

Là où Synology continue de se démarquer, c’est dans sa gestion avancée des données, même sur un produit grand public. On retrouve des fonctionnalités rares chez la concurrence à ce niveau de gamme :

Chiffrement AES-256 des données avant sauvegarde externe
Sauvegarde centralisée de services cloud tiers (Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, etc.)
Accès distant sécurisé sans configuration réseau complexe

C’est ce genre de détails qui rend le produit intéressant pour des utilisateurs exigeants, sans les noyer dans des paramètres techniques.

Prix et disponibilité

La Synology BeeStation Plus (version 8 To) est disponible dès maintenant en commande, au prix public conseillé de 443,94 € TTC. Cela peut sembler un peu cher pour un produit aussi fermé, surtout comparé à un NAS classique, qui offre plus de flexibilité, d’évolutivité et souvent de meilleures performances.

BeeStation Plus semble être une solution idéale pour les utilisateurs à la recherche d’un stockage simple, prêt à l’emploi et sans configuration technique. Mais face à un NAS classique, le boiter apparaît comme une option trop fermée et peu évolutive, pour un prix assez important.

Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur la page dédié au BeeStation Plus…

IT-Connect
NAS Synology : comment installer un serveur Headscale avec Docker ?
26 mai 2025 à 17:55

NAS Synology : comment installer un serveur Headscale avec Docker ?

IT-Connect

Par : Florian BURNEL

26 mai 2025 à 17:55

Découvrez comment auto-héberger un serveur de contrôle Tailscale avec Headscale sur un NAS Synology, grâce à un conteneur Docker et du reverse proxy de DSM.

The post NAS Synology : comment installer un serveur Headscale avec Docker ? first appeared on IT-Connect.

NAS Compares
Synology PS Series Managed 10GbE PoE Network Switches Revealed
26 mai 2025 à 10:00

Synology PS Series Managed 10GbE PoE Network Switches Revealed

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

26 mai 2025 à 10:00

Synology (Finally) Reveals Managed PoE 10GbE Switches – The PS Series

At Computex 2025, Synology formally unveiled its new PS Series of PoE switches—marking the company’s first venture into dedicated network switching hardware. Designed specifically for surveillance environments, these switches are not meant to replace general-purpose managed switches, but rather to complement Synology’s Surveillance Station ecosystem. The lineup includes three models: the high-capacity PS2600+, the compact PS1000+, and the entry-level PS500. Each model is tailored for powering PoE cameras and streamlining IP surveillance setups, with features like centralized control through Surveillance Station and fanless operation. While this launch addresses a long-standing gap in Synology’s ecosystem, it is clear that these devices are intended for a niche surveillance role rather than enterprise-wide or enthusiast-grade switching solutions.

Why is a Synology Switch so Highly Demanded? And Why is This Not Quite What Everyone Wanted?

For years, users of Synology’s NAS and surveillance solutions have speculated about the company expanding into networking hardware, particularly switches. Given Synology’s existing ecosystem of NAS units, cameras, routers, and software like Surveillance Station and SRM, a managed PoE switch seemed like the logical next step to unify its offerings under a single, tightly integrated platform. Many envisioned a Synology switch that could serve not just surveillance but also general-purpose networking, VLAN management, and broader SMB/enterprise deployments—effectively competing with established names like Ubiquiti, Netgear, or QNAP.

However, the PS Series unveiled at Computex 2025 diverges from that expectation. The PS2600+ and PS1000+ are exclusively intended for use with Synology’s Surveillance Station, lacking broader Layer 3 management tools outside of this context. Meanwhile, the PS500 is a basic, unmanaged unit aimed more at simple deployments than network optimization. There are no bundled camera licenses, limited software extensibility, and no SRM integration. As a result, while these switches will likely appeal to users looking for a seamless Synology surveillance setup, they fall short of the more versatile, all-encompassing switch that many long-time Synology users were hoping for.

Synology PS2600+ 26 Port L2+ Managed PoE Switch

The PS2600+ is the flagship switch in Synology’s new lineup, featuring 24 PoE+ ports and 2 additional 10GbE SFP+ uplink ports. Designed for rackmount or desktop use, the PS2600+ is completely fanless, making it suitable for noise-sensitive environments. It delivers a total PoE power budget of 185W, allowing it to power multiple IP cameras, particularly in larger surveillance setups. It is fully managed and integrates directly with Synology’s Surveillance Station for centralized control, including power management, port diagnostics, and network topology mapping.

In terms of network performance, the PS2600+ offers a switching bandwidth of 88 Gbps and a forwarding rate of 65.47 Mpps. It supports Layer 2+ features, including inter-VLAN routing and DHCP server capabilities, allowing it to segment and route traffic in more complex surveillance deployments. However, its software integration is limited exclusively to Surveillance Station, and it lacks any compatibility with Synology’s SRM (Router OS) or general-purpose network management tools. It is best suited for installations where the switch, NAS, and cameras are all part of a single, unified Synology surveillance environment.

Feature	PS2600+
Ports (Total)	26
RJ45 1GbE Ports	24 (PoE+)
10GbE SFP+ Ports	2
Console Port	Yes (RS-232 over RJ45)
Switching Bandwidth	88 Gbps
Forwarding Performance	65.47 Mpps
MAC Address Table	16K
Jumbo Frame Support	10,000 Bytes
Available PoE Power	185W
Extended Mode	Yes
Power Supply	Internal
Dimensions (H x W x D)	44 x 441 x 270 mm
Cooling	Fanless
Mounting	Rackmount / Desktop
L3 Features	Static Routing, Inter-VLAN Routing, DHCP
Surveillance Integration	Yes (via Surveillance Station CMS)

Synology PS500 5 Port Unmanaged PoE Switch

The PS500 is the most basic model in Synology’s PS Series and is designed primarily for entry-level surveillance setups. It offers a total of five ports, four of which support PoE+ for powering IP cameras or other devices. Unlike the other models, the PS500 is completely unmanaged—there is no software-based configuration, no VLAN support, and no integration with Surveillance Station CMS. It is intended for plug-and-play functionality, making it suitable for simple installations where centralized management is not required.

Despite its simplicity, the PS500 still delivers up to 60W of total PoE power and supports jumbo frames up to 9000 bytes. It is passively cooled and uses an external power supply, emphasizing its role as a compact, low-maintenance switch for desktop or wall-mounted deployments. While it doesn’t offer the flexibility or control of the PS2600+ or PS1000+, it fills a gap for users seeking a straightforward power delivery solution for small-scale IP camera installations.

Feature	PS500
Ports (Total)	5
RJ45 1GbE Ports	5 (4 PoE+)
SFP Ports	None
Console Port	No
Switching Bandwidth	10 Gbps
Forwarding Performance	7.44 Mpps
MAC Address Table	2K
Jumbo Frame Support	9000 Bytes
Available PoE Power	60W
Extended Mode	No
Power Supply	External (72W)
Dimensions (H x W x D)	26 x 121 x 75 mm
Cooling	Fanless
Mounting	Desktop / Wall-mount
L3 Features	None
Surveillance Integration	No

Synology PS1000+ 10 Port L2+ Managed PoE Switch

The PS1000+ serves as the mid-range offering in Synology’s PS Series, targeting smaller surveillance deployments that still benefit from centralized management. It includes 8 PoE+ RJ45 ports and 2 standard 1GbE SFP ports for uplink or fiber connectivity. Like the PS2600+, this model is fanless and supports both rackmount and desktop installations. It offers a total PoE power budget of 65W, which is sufficient for a modest number of IP cameras or access points in home or SMB setups.

From a network performance standpoint, the PS1000+ provides 20 Gbps of switching bandwidth and a forwarding rate of 14.88 Mpps. It also supports VLANs, static routing, and DHCP services, and is managed entirely through Synology’s Surveillance Station interface. Its role is clearly focused—bridging NAS units and IP cameras under one platform, without offering broader Layer 3 functionality or third-party network integration. For users with Synology NAS-based NVR setups and fewer cameras, the PS1000+ provides a compact, low-noise, managed switch option.

Feature	PS1000+
Ports (Total)	10
RJ45 1GbE Ports	8 (PoE+)
1GbE SFP Ports	2
Console Port	Yes (RS-232 over RJ45)
Switching Bandwidth	20 Gbps
Forwarding Performance	14.88 Mpps
MAC Address Table	Not Listed
Jumbo Frame Support	10,000 Bytes
Available PoE Power	65W
Extended Mode	Yes
Power Supply	Internal
Dimensions (H x W x D)	44 x 265 x 183 mm
Cooling	Fanless
Mounting	Rackmount / Desktop
L3 Features	Static Routing, Inter-VLAN Routing, DHCP
Surveillance Integration	Yes (via Surveillance Station CMS)

Synology PS Series Switches, Conclusion and Verdict

Synology’s entry into the network switch market with the PS Series marks a significant, though narrowly focused, expansion of its surveillance ecosystem. These switches are clearly designed with Surveillance Station users in mind, offering streamlined power and network management for PoE camera deployments. While the PS2600+ and PS1000+ provide useful managed features for larger and mid-sized surveillance environments, and the PS500 delivers a simple plug-and-play option, none of these models address general networking needs outside of Synology’s surveillance scope. For those seeking a unified Synology environment for NVR deployments, these switches may be a welcome addition—but broader adoption will likely remain limited until Synology delivers more versatile, multi-role networking solutions.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

[contact-form-7]

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.