Gl.iNet MUDI 7  – The FIRST 48 HOURS! The Good, the Bad and the Surprising

I have been using the GL.iNet Mudi 7 almost non stop for the past 48 hours, putting it through a range of real-world scenarios including mobile data via SIM and eSIM, WiFi repeating from public hotspots, and handling multiple connected devices at the same time. This is not intended to be a full long-term review, but rather a set of early observations based on how the device performs in day-to-day use straight out of the box. The Mudi 7 is clearly aimed at users who need more than a basic travel router, combining 5G connectivity, WiFi 7, dual SIM and eSIM support, and a built-in battery into a single portable unit. It positions itself as an all-in-one solution for staying connected while travelling, working remotely, or managing multiple network sources. In this article, I will break down what stood out during those first 48 hours, focusing on practical strengths, limitations, and a few additional considerations drawn from the official specifications.

Hardware specification	GL.iNet Mudi 7
Product code	GL-E5800
5G platform	Qualcomm Dragonwing MBB Gen 3, X72
CPU	Qualcomm quad-core @ 2.2GHz
Memory	2GB LPDDR4X
Storage	8GB eMMC
WiFi standard	IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
WiFi type	WiFi 7, BE5800
WiFi bands	2.4GHz, 5GHz, 6GHz
WiFi speed	688Mbps at 2.4GHz, 2882Mbps at 5GHz, 5764Mbps at 6GHz
WiFi operating modes	2.4GHz only, 5GHz only, 6GHz only, 2.4GHz + 5GHz, 2.4GHz + 6GHz
Ethernet	1 x 2.5G WAN/LAN Ethernet port
Ethernet speed	100Mbps, 1000Mbps, 2500Mbps
SIM slots	2 x Nano SIM card slots
eSIM	1 x onboard eSIM chipset
Display	2.8 inch colour LCD touchscreen
USB-C ports	2 x USB-C
USB-C power port	Power only, input and output
USB-C data port	10Gbps USB 3.1, power input and output, USB tethering, USB OTG
Antenna ports	2 x TS-9 ports
Internal antennas	8 total, 6 cellular antennas and 2 WiFi antennas
Battery	3.85V / 5380mAh / 20.72Wh removable battery
Power input	USB PD/PPS 5V to 12V, 30W max
Power consumption	<30W
Buttons	Power button, reset button
Operating temperature	0°C to 40°C
Dimensions	157 x 75 x 22.8mm
Weight	300g

Gl.iNet MUDI 7 Review – Quick Conclusion

The GL.iNet Mudi 7 is a travel router aimed at users who need more than a simple portable hotspot. Its main strengths are the combination of 5G, WiFi 7, dual physical SIM slots, eSIM support, a removable battery, 2.5G Ethernet, USB tethering, OpenWrt-based software, and a surprisingly useful touchscreen interface. In practical use, the device feels mostly well built, offers a good range of connection options, and the battery performance was stronger than expected, lasting around 17 hours with 2 wireless clients connected alongside a physical 5G SIM, eSIM, and WiFi repeating from a public hotspot. At the same time, there are limitations that are important to understand before buying. The back panel feels weaker than the rest of the unit, the included travel case is useful but not especially space efficient, eSIM and physical SIM failover did not behave as flexibly as expected during testing, and the touchscreen cannot handle captive portal logins on its own. It also lacks WiFi 7 Multi Link Operation, cannot run 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz simultaneously, uses regional 5G band variants, ships without external antennas, and sits at a relatively high price point. Overall, the Mudi 7 offers a strong feature set for travel, remote working, and mobile networking, but it is best suited to users who will actually benefit from its advanced connectivity and software features rather than those who only need basic WiFi sharing.

SOFTWARE - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 7/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.6

PROS

Strong overall design and build quality
Included travel case
Compact and travel friendly form factor
Removable battery design
Strong real world battery performance, with around 17 hours of use using 2 wireless clients, 1 5G SIM, 1 eSIM, and WiFi repeating
Flexible dual SIM and eSIM connectivity
Comprehensive software and OpenWrt support
High end hardware in a portable device
Functional 2.8 inch touchscreen control interface
Versatile connectivity and multi use functionality, including SIM, eSIM, WiFi repeating, Ethernet WAN, USB tethering, VPN gateway use, and remote access

CONS

Travel case design is not especially space efficient
Back panel feels weaker than the rest of the device
Limited eSIM and physical SIM failover behaviour during testing
No WiFi 7 Multi Link Operation support
Regional 5G band limitations, with different NA and EU models
Touchscreen cannot handle captive portal login pages on its own
Dual band operation only, rather than full 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz simultaneous WiFi
SSH appeared to be enabled by default on the test unit
High purchase price compared with basic travel routers
No external antennas included in the box

Buy the Gl.iNet Mudi 7 from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Mudi 7 from the Official Store Below:

Gl.iNet Mudi 7 Pros and Strengths

The Mudi 7 has several clear strengths that became apparent during the first 48 hours of use. Most of these relate to its flexibility as a travel router, the amount of hardware built into a portable form factor, and how much control it gives users without needing to rely entirely on a phone app or browser interface.

Operational Temps after 8 Hours in my Bag = Very Good!

Judging the Mudi 7 on it’s heat and temps when in use was always going to be very difficult! Let’s face it, everyone’s use case scenario (and CLIMATE!!!) will be different, as well as the heat caused by where the device is kept. If you are stuffing it at the bottom of your back pack (spoiler alert – this will of course affect your cellular coverage) will result in a very different ambient environment for heat discipation compared with your back pocket” So, I can only tell you MY experience based on my own usage. I had the system up and running, and in my bag for a little over 8 hours on a journey around the UK for work. After 8hrs and 33 mins of operation (2 client devices, 1 SIM, 1 eSIM and repeating several train WiFi connections as well) the device was at 51% battery remaining, but crucially, the temps were actually prety great! Additionally, the system was kept inside my rucksack for 98% of the time (only removing to show to a few people – because I am a showy git!), so there was no active airflow to cool it down. Really pleased with this result, although I am very much looking forward to seeing how the device runs in the hot, humid temps of Taipei in June with COMPUTEX! TBC!

Strong overall design and build quality

The overall design of the Mudi 7 feels well considered for a travel-focused device and stands out compared to typical portable routers. The chassis has a solid, durable feel in hand, with a combination of materials that gives it a more premium and robust impression than many alternatives in this category. Practical details such as protective covers over key ports, including the Ethernet and antenna connectors, add a layer of reassurance when using it in transit or less controlled environments. The layout of the device is also straightforward, with everything positioned in a way that feels deliberate rather than cramped. Outside of a few weaker elements discussed later, the majority of the unit appears well built and capable of handling regular travel without raising immediate concerns about durability.

Included travel case

The inclusion of a travel case is a practical addition, especially for a device that is clearly intended to be used on the move. The case itself feels reasonably well made, with enough structure to protect the router during transport while also offering space for cables, adapters, and other small accessories. It helps keep everything in one place, which is useful when packing for travel or moving between locations. While there are some usability drawbacks covered later, the fact that a case is included at all adds immediate value and reinforces the portable nature of the device.

Removable battery design

The inclusion of a removable battery adds a level of practicality that is often missing from portable networking devices. It allows for easier long-term maintenance, as the battery can be replaced if performance degrades over time rather than requiring the entire unit to be serviced or replaced. This is particularly relevant for a device intended for travel, where exposure to heat and frequent charging cycles can impact battery health. It also provides flexibility in certain scenarios, such as running the device directly from power without relying on the battery, which can be useful for extended indoor use or when preserving battery lifespan.

Strong real world battery performance

In practical use, the internal battery performed better than expected during extended testing. With 2 wireless clients connected, a MacBook and a Google Pixel 8 Pro, alongside active use of both a physical 5G SIM and an eSIM, plus WiFi repeating from a public hotspot, the device lasted approximately 17 hours in near constant operation. This kind of mixed, real-world workload provides a more realistic indication of endurance than isolated testing, and suggests the battery is capable of supporting a full day of moderate to heavy use without needing a recharge. For a device combining multiple radios and network functions, this level of battery performance is a practical advantage.

Flexible SIM and eSIM connectivity

The Mudi 7 provides multiple options for mobile connectivity, combining dual physical SIM slots with built-in eSIM support in a single device. This allows for quick switching between carriers depending on location, signal strength, or data availability, without needing to physically swap cards in every scenario. It also opens up more flexible setups when travelling internationally, where different networks may offer better coverage or pricing. The ability to manage these connections within the same device simplifies what would otherwise require multiple hotspots or frequent manual changes, making it a practical feature for users who rely heavily on mobile data.

Comprehensive software and OpenWrt support

One of the more significant strengths of the Mudi 7 is its software environment, which goes beyond what is typically expected from a travel router. It runs on OpenWrt, giving access to a wide range of advanced networking features including VPN configuration, remote access, and more granular control over connections and services. This is supported by GL.iNet’s own applications and cloud tools, allowing both local and remote management depending on how the device is being used. For users familiar with this ecosystem, it enables a level of customization and control that is closer to a full network setup rather than a simple portable hotspot.

High end hardware in a portable device

The Mudi 7 integrates a level of hardware that is not typically found in devices of this size, combining 5G connectivity, WiFi 7 support, and a 2.5G Ethernet port within a single portable unit. This allows it to handle higher bandwidth scenarios and more demanding network setups than standard travel routers, which are usually limited to lower-tier wireless and wired performance. In practical terms, it means the device is capable of supporting multiple connected clients, higher throughput tasks, and more advanced use cases without immediately becoming a bottleneck. For users who need stronger networking capability while remaining mobile, this hardware configuration is a notable advantage.

Functional touchscreen control interface

The integrated 2.8 inch touchscreen provides a level of direct control that is not commonly found on travel routers. It allows you to manage connections, monitor network status, adjust settings, and handle tasks such as switching between networks or checking data usage without needing to log into a web interface or app. In practice, it covers a wide range of functions, including device management, connection priorities, and basic system monitoring, making it useful for quick adjustments while on the move. While it does not replace full software access entirely, it reduces reliance on external devices for many everyday tasks.

Versatile connectivity and multi use functionality

The Mudi 7 supports a wide range of connection types and operating modes, allowing it to function beyond a typical travel router. It can handle mobile data via SIM or eSIM, connect to existing networks through WiFi repeating, use wired WAN via Ethernet, or tether through USB, all within the same device. These options can also be combined with features such as failover and load balancing, depending on configuration. In practical use, this enables it to act as a central network hub for multiple devices, while also supporting roles such as a VPN gateway, remote access point, or even light network storage depending on setup. This level of flexibility makes it adaptable to different environments without requiring additional hardware.

Gl.iNet MUDI 7 Cons and Weaknesses

The Mudi 7 also has some limitations that are worth considering before buying. Some are design-related, while others relate to how the device handles WiFi 7, SIM failover, regional 5G support, and certain travel-specific situations such as captive portal logins.

Travel case design inefficiencies

Although the inclusion of a travel case is useful, the design introduces a few practical drawbacks. The case is relatively large compared to the size of the device itself, with a significant portion of the internal space allocated for accessories that may not always be necessary. This can make it feel less efficient when packing light. At the same time, the fit for the router is quite snug, which limits flexibility when quickly storing or removing the device. A more balanced layout or a smaller case option could have made it more practical for everyday travel use.

Weak back panel build quality

While most of the device feels solid, the removable back panel stands out as a weaker point in the overall construction. It relies on small plastic clips to stay in place, and in use it feels noticeably less robust than the rest of the chassis. This becomes more of a concern given that access to the SIM slots requires removing this panel, meaning it may be handled more frequently than other parts of the device. Over time, there is a possibility that repeated removal could wear down the clips or reduce how securely it stays attached, which contrasts with the otherwise sturdy design.

Limited eSIM and physical SIM failover behavior

During testing, the interaction between the eSIM and physical SIM did not appear to offer the same level of failover flexibility that is typically expected from this category of device. While both connection types are supported and can be used individually without issue, there was no clear option to configure them together in a seamless failover arrangement. This contrasts with other connection types on the device, such as WiFi, WAN, or USB tethering, which are generally more flexible in terms of prioritisation and backup. It is possible this may be addressed in firmware updates, but in its current state it represents a limitation for users expecting full redundancy between SIM options.

No WiFi 7 Multi Link Operation support

Despite supporting WiFi 7 across 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz bands, the device does not include support for Multi Link Operation, which is one of the defining features of the standard. This means it cannot combine multiple bands simultaneously to improve throughput, latency, or connection stability in the way that WiFi 7 is designed to enable. In practical terms, it behaves more like a traditional multi band router rather than taking full advantage of newer capabilities. While this may not affect basic usage, it does limit the overall benefit of having WiFi 7 hardware in the first place.

Regional 5G band limitations

The 5G support on the device is not universally consistent across all regions, with different hardware variants covering different frequency bands depending on the market. This means it is important to verify compatibility with the specific networks you intend to use, particularly when travelling between regions such as North America and Europe. While 4G support is generally less restrictive, 5G performance and availability may vary depending on the model purchased. This adds an extra step in the buying process and may limit flexibility for users who frequently move between regions with different network requirements.

Touchscreen cannot handle captive portals

The touchscreen provides useful direct control for many router functions, but it does not fully remove the need for another device in every situation. When connecting to public WiFi networks that require a captive portal login, such as those often found in hotels, airports, trains, cafés, or co-working spaces, the login process still needs to be completed through a connected phone, tablet, or laptop. This is understandable given the screen size and the difficulty of presenting a usable browser and keyboard on such a small display, but it does mean the Mudi 7 is not completely clientless in all travel scenarios.

Dual band operation rather than full tri-band simultaneous WiFi

Although the Mudi 7 supports 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz WiFi bands, the official specifications confirm that it operates using Dual-band Simultaneous WiFi 7 BE5800 rather than running all 3 bands at the same time. In practice, this means you can use single-band modes such as 2.4GHz only, 5GHz only, or 6GHz only, or dual-band combinations such as 2.4GHz + 5GHz or 2.4GHz + 6GHz. However, you cannot operate 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz simultaneously, despite the device technically supporting all 3 bands separately. For users expecting a full tri-band concurrent WiFi 7 setup, this is an important limitation to understand before buying.

SSH enabled by default (Possibly a Beta Software Thing – TBC)

On the unit tested, SSH appeared to be enabled by default, which is worth checking during initial setup. This may have been specific to the review sample, firmware version, or how the device had been prepared before shipping, so it should not be treated as a confirmed behaviour for every retail unit. Even so, SSH access is a sensitive setting, and users who do not need it should disable it to reduce unnecessary exposure. The option can be turned off fairly easily, but it is still something that should be reviewed before relying on the device in public or travel environments.

High purchase price

The Mudi 7 sits in a higher price category than most basic travel routers, which means it is not likely to be the best fit for every user. Early pricing started below the final expected retail level, but even those early access prices placed it firmly in premium territory. That pricing is easier to understand when considering the combination of 5G, WiFi 7, eSIM support, a touchscreen, battery operation, 2.5G Ethernet, and OpenWrt-based software, but it still makes the device a more considered purchase. Users who only need occasional hotel WiFi repeating or basic mobile hotspot functionality may find the cost difficult to justify.

No included external antennas

The Mudi 7 includes 2 TS-9 antenna ports, which is useful for improving mobile signal in weaker coverage areas, but external antennas are not included in the package. This means users who want to take advantage of that feature will need to purchase compatible antennas separately. For a travel router that places emphasis on 5G connectivity and use in more challenging signal environments, this feels like an extra cost worth noting. The ports add flexibility, but the out-of-box experience does not include everything needed to make use of them immediately.

Gl.iNet MUDI 7 5F SIM Router – Verdict & Conclusion

The GL.iNet Mudi 7 is a travel router aimed at users who need more than a simple portable hotspot. Its main strengths are the combination of 5G, WiFi 7, dual physical SIM slots, eSIM support, a removable battery, 2.5G Ethernet, USB tethering, OpenWrt-based software, and a surprisingly useful touchscreen interface. In practical use, the device feels mostly well built, offers a good range of connection options, and the battery performance was stronger than expected, lasting around 17 hours with 2 wireless clients connected alongside a physical 5G SIM, eSIM, and WiFi repeating from a public hotspot. At the same time, there are limitations that are important to understand before buying. The back panel feels weaker than the rest of the unit, the included travel case is useful but not especially space efficient, eSIM and physical SIM failover did not behave as flexibly as expected during testing, and the touchscreen cannot handle captive portal logins on its own. It also lacks WiFi 7 Multi Link Operation, cannot run 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz simultaneously, uses regional 5G band variants, ships without external antennas, and sits at a relatively high price point. Overall, the Mudi 7 offers a strong feature set for travel, remote working, and mobile networking, but it is best suited to users who will actually benefit from its advanced connectivity and software features rather than those who only need basic WiFi sharing.

Buy the Gl.iNet Mudi 7 from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Mudi 7 from the Official Store Below:

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Comet X KVM Host ReveaGl.iNet MUDI 7 5G SIM WiFi 7 TGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Travel RouGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Should YouNew Gl.iNet Comet Q KVM RevealGl.iNet Comet Q USB-C KVM for TP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouTP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouGl.iNet Comet 5G Review - The Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 Tra Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Synology Free License and Subscription C2 Charge Changes AGAIN??? Here is Everything Affected

Synology has announced a set of changes to several of its online services, including Active Insight, C2 Storage, C2 Object Storage, C2 Identity, C2 Password, and C2 Transfer. Some of these changes are simple pricing or license adjustments, while others are larger service changes, including the launch of C2 OneStorage and the end-of-life process for C2 Password and C2 Transfer. Synology describes the move as a strategic realignment of its C2 cloud ecosystem, with C2 OneStorage becoming the new unified storage subscription for C2 Storage, Hybrid Share, and C2 Object Storage. I think the reason this matters is not simply that some prices are changing. Synology NAS systems have often carried a premium because of DSM and the surrounding software ecosystem, especially for home users, prosumers, and small businesses that value simplicity. In my video, I described this as another example of Synology reorganising its services while also creating concern about the gradual removal, restructuring, or monetisation of features that some users considered part of the wider platform value. The article below breaks down each affected service, what is changing, what is being renamed or merged, what is being discontinued, and which dates users need to pay attention to.

Active Insight Complimentary (Free) License Is Being Removed

The first major change is to Synology Active Insight, the cloud-based monitoring service used to keep an eye on Synology NAS systems remotely. Active Insight can show system status, performance information, backup status, login activity, and warning alerts from a central interface. Until now, many users had access to 3 complimentary licenses, which made it useful for smaller setups where someone might only have 1, 2, or 3 Synology devices to monitor. From June 22, 2026, Synology says complimentary licenses will no longer be available for new users, meaning new users will need to purchase subscribed licenses to monitor their hosts through Active Insight.

For existing users relying only on complimentary licenses, the service does not immediately stop. Synology’s timeline gives those users until June 22, 2027, after which the complimentary licenses will be fully removed. The new pricing model is listed at $29.99 USD per host per year, and a “host” means a Synology storage system monitored by Active Insight. In the video, I described this as probably the most widely felt change, not because every Synology user relies on Active Insight, but because it was a useful included extra for users managing systems remotely and it added to the wider feeling that Synology’s software ecosystem came bundled with the hardware.

C2 Storage and C2 Object Storage Are Becoming C2 OneStorage

The second major change is the move from separate C2 storage products into a new plan called C2 OneStorage. Previously, Synology had C2 Storage Basic, C2 Storage Advanced, and C2 Object Storage as separate or differently positioned services, with C2 Storage also being used for tools such as Hyper Backup and Hybrid Share. From June 22, 2026, Synology says C2 Storage will transition to C2 OneStorage, creating a single storage pool shared across multiple cloud and hybrid storage services. Synology’s own announcement describes this as a way to remove the need for separate storage plans and allow capacity to be used across C2 Storage for Hyper Backup, Hybrid Share, and C2 Object Storage.

I do think this part of the change is easier to understand than some of the others, because it is a genuine consolidation rather than a straight removal. In the video, I said this kind of C2 realignment was overdue, mainly because the old C2 naming and plan structure could be unclear for new users. However, the storage merge also changes the entry point. Existing 100 GB and 300 GB C2 Storage users are being moved to the C2 OneStorage 300 GB plan, while 1 TB users move to the 1 TB plan.

The listed C2 OneStorage pricing is $29.99 / €29.99 annually for 300 GB, and $77.99 / €77.99 per TB annually for 1 TB to 200 TB, with monthly pricing listed at $7.99 / €7.99 per TB. For users who only needed a small 100 GB plan, the new structure may be simpler, but it may also remove the lower-cost entry option.

C2 Identity Is Moving to a New License Model

The next change is to C2 Identity, Synology’s cloud identity and access management service. This is not being discontinued in the same way as C2 Password or C2 Transfer, but the old plan structure is being replaced. Synology says that from June 22, 2026, the new C2 Identity plan will be the only plan available to new subscribers. The existing C2 Identity Free plan is being deprecated on June 22, 2027, while C2 Identity Business is being deprecated on December 22, 2027. In place of the old model, C2 Identity will be available either through paid standard licenses or through limited lite licenses bundled with certain directory-dependent C2 services, such as C2 Backup Business.

The practical point is that C2 Identity is being restructured around paid access rather than keeping the old free and business split. Standard licenses are listed at $49.99 per year in North America, €49.99 per year in Europe, and NT$1,499 or $49.99 per year in Taiwan. C2 Backup Business subscriptions will include 250 lite licenses, but these are limited and cannot be purchased separately. Another important change is that the new C2 Identity plan no longer includes C2 Password Business. After conversion, C2 Identity and C2 Password Business become separate subscriptions, and existing C2 Password Business subscriptions cannot be converted or renewed.

C2 Password Is Being Discontinued, Not Merged

C2 Password is one of the services that is being fully retired rather than renamed or folded into a new product. This affects C2 Password Free, C2 Password Plus, and C2 Password Business. Synology says C2 Password will reach end of life on June 22, 2027, and after that date the service will no longer be available. New subscriptions can no longer be purchased from June 22, 2026, while existing C2 Password Free users can continue using the service until the end-of-life date. The important distinction here is that C2 Password is not becoming part of C2 OneStorage, and it is not being carried forward inside the new C2 Identity plan. In the C2 Identity changes, Synology states that the new C2 Identity plan does not include C2 Password Business, and after conversion C2 Identity and C2 Password Business become separate subscriptions. Existing C2 Password Business subscriptions cannot be converted or renewed, and they remain active only until the end of the current term before entering the grace period. For users, the practical advice is simple: export the vault data before the service reaches its end-of-life date.

C2 Transfer Is Reaching End of Life

C2 Transfer is also being discontinued rather than merged into another Synology service. This affects C2 Transfer Free, C2 Transfer Professional, and C2 Transfer Business. Synology says C2 Transfer will stop accepting new subscriptions from June 1, 2026, and the service will reach end of life on June 22, 2027. After that point, C2 Transfer will no longer be available. Unlike the C2 Storage changes, this is not a case of several services being renamed or placed under a shared storage pool. It is a straight retirement of the service. (kb.synology.com).  For existing C2 Transfer Professional and Business users, plan modifications such as upgrades, downgrades, and billing changes are no longer available after June 22, 2026. Renewals are available until December 22, 2026, and after that, users can continue using the service until their current subscription expires. Free users can continue until June 22, 2027, as long as the subscription remains active. Synology advises users to download and back up files, review shared links, and complete migration before the service ends. In the video, I noted that there is no clear indication that C2 Transfer is being absorbed into a replacement service, which means users should treat this as a service they need to move away from rather than wait for a renamed version.

Synology Account Is Becoming the Central Service Hub

Alongside the individual C2 service changes, Synology is also redesigning the Synology Account portal. This is not a discontinued product or a paid license change by itself, but it is still relevant because it shows how Synology is organising its wider service ecosystem. Synology says the redesigned Synology Account will act as the central hub for the C2 ecosystem, giving administrators a single place to view Synology resources, system and package licenses, active devices, services, and partner relationships. Synology also says current subscription workflows will remain intact during the transition, so this appears to be more of a management and visibility change than a direct service removal.

I see this as part of the same wider shift: Synology is making licenses, subscriptions, devices, and cloud services more central to the account experience. Synology’s existing account page already describes Synology Account as a place to manage device details, QuickConnect and DDNS information, warranty information, licenses, cloud subscriptions, group accounts, subscription management, and Active Insight information for group devices. In the video, I treated the redesigned account portal as an important signal, because improving license and subscription visibility at the same time as removing free tiers and changing paid plans suggests that Synology expects this kind of account-level service management to become more important going forward.

What These Changes Say About Synology’s Direction

Taken together, these changes point to a clearer split in Synology’s online service strategy. C2 Storage Basic, C2 Storage Advanced, and C2 Object Storage are being consolidated into C2 OneStorage, which should make the storage side of C2 easier to understand, but also changes the entry point for smaller users. C2 Identity is not being removed, but it is being moved into a new paid license structure with standard licenses and limited lite licenses. Active Insight is staying in place, but the 3 complimentary licenses are being removed and replaced by a per-host subscription model. C2 Password and C2 Transfer are different again, because these are not being merged into replacement services, they are being moved to end-of-life status. Synology’s official position is that this is a portfolio realignment focused on hybrid cloud, unified resource management, and business-critical workloads, with the main changes taking effect from June 22, 2026. For home users, prosumers, and smaller businesses, the main issue is not only whether any 1 service is worth paying for. It is whether the overall Synology value proposition is changing. In the video, I described this as another small cut to the lower and middle part of the user stack, where many people buy Synology primarily for DSM and the services around it rather than for the hardware alone. Cloud services do cost money to operate, and it is reasonable for any company to review pricing, free tiers, and product overlap over time. However, when free licenses are removed, lower-cost plans are reshaped, and entire services are discontinued, users need to check what they actually rely on before the relevant deadlines arrive. Active Insight users should check whether they want to pay for monitoring after the complimentary licenses end, C2 Storage users should compare their current plan against C2 OneStorage, C2 Identity users should review license and quota changes, and C2 Password or C2 Transfer users should plan a migration before June 22, 2027.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology Free License and SubsSynology Official Cameras Now Synology Beestation BST151-4T Synology Beestation BST151-4T Synology RS1626xs+ NAS - WorthSynology RS1626xs+ NAS RevealeSynology FS200T NAS RevealedSynology FS200T NAS Revealed100 Reasons Why Users Choose T100 Reasons Why Users Choose S Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

A New AMD Direction for UGREEN NAS – the DXP4800GT NAS

The UGREEN DXP4800 GT is a newly revealed 4-bay NAS that, at least for now, appears to be aimed at the Chinese market. It sits in the same broad family as UGREEN’s existing DXP4800 systems, but it takes the hardware in a different direction by moving away from the Intel processors used in much of the current NASync range and instead using an AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 platform. That matters because this is not just a slightly adjusted version of the earlier DXP4800, but a model that appears to be built around higher network throughput, stronger multi-threaded performance, and a more capable internal hardware layout. For users who have been watching UGREEN’s NAS range develop over the last year, this feels like a separate branch of the product line rather than a simple replacement.

I would not look at the DXP4800 GT as just another 4-bay storage box with a new colour scheme. The early specifications point toward a more performance-focused NAS, with dual 10GbE, 4 SATA bays, 2 M.2 NVMe slots, ECC memory support through compatible upgrades, and 64GB of eMMC system storage listed in the official specifications. It also appears to be aimed at users who want more than basic backup duties, including media handling, Docker, virtual machines, photo management, and faster direct network access. That does not automatically make it the right NAS for everyone, and there are still details that need confirming, especially around wider availability, final pricing, and how flexible the system will be for users who want to experiment with software. However, based on what has been shown so far, it is clearly a model worth separating from the standard DXP4800 line.

UGREEN DXP4800GT NAS – Design and Storage

The DXP4800 GT keeps to a 4-bay desktop NAS layout, but UGREEN appears to be putting more emphasis on the physical design than just the internal specification sheet. The official material describes an aerospace-grade aluminium casing, with a thicker metal body, a large 14cm fan, and a through-flow internal cooling design. There is also a child lock on the hard drive trays, which is a small detail, but useful if the NAS is going to sit somewhere accessible rather than hidden away in a network cabinet. The model shown in the launch material also uses a black and rose-gold style finish, which is more visually distinctive than most 4-bay NAS systems, although final regional colour options have not been confirmed.

On the storage side, the DXP4800 GT is not just relying on its 4 main SATA bays. Each bay supports 2.5-inch and 3.5-inch SATA drives, with the official specification listing up to 32TB per bay, giving the system a stated SATA capacity of 128TB before the M.2 slots are included. The NAS also has 2 M.2 NVMe 2280 slots, with up to 8TB per slot listed, bringing the total advertised maximum to 144TB. One of the more interesting details from the official product text is the mention of U.2 expansion support through the main drive bays, which could make the system more flexible for users who want higher-performance SSD storage, though the exact implementation and limitations still need proper confirmation in testing.

UGREEN DXP4800GT – Internal Hardware and External Connectivity

Inside the DXP4800 GT, the main change is the move to an AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 processor. This is a 4-core, 8-thread x86 CPU with a listed frequency range of 2.1GHz to 3.7GHz, and it also includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics. That makes it quite different from the Intel N100 used in the standard DXP4800, especially for users who care about heavier multitasking, virtual machines, Docker containers, and services running at the same time. UGREEN’s own comparison material claims a multi-core performance uplift over the DXP4800, though I would treat that as a useful early indicator rather than a replacement for independent testing.

Memory is another area where the DXP4800 GT looks more flexible than a basic home NAS. The official specifications list 8GB or 16GB of DDR4 memory as standard, with 2 memory slots and support for up to 64GB at 2666 MT/s. The product material also states that the platform supports ECC memory, but the included memory does not support ECC, so users would need to replace it with compatible ECC modules to use that feature. That distinction matters, because ECC support is often mentioned loosely in NAS marketing, but whether the system actually ships with ECC memory is a separate point.Note – it appears on the official China sales page that the DXP4800GT is shipping by default with either 8GB or 16GB of DDR4 3200MT/s RAM, but not not ECC RAM. It IS supported, but needs to be purchased seperately.

Networking is one of the clearest hardware upgrades. The DXP4800 GT includes 2 10GbE ports rather than the 2.5GbE ports found on the earlier DXP4800 model, and UGREEN’s material refers to aggregation and bridge modes for different network setups. For a 4-bay NAS, dual 10GbE is a strong specification, especially for users moving large video projects, working from SSD storage, or connecting directly to a 10GbE workstation without immediately needing a switch. Of course, the actual speeds will still depend on the drives used, the RAID configuration, the client device, and the rest of the network, so the ports alone do not guarantee 10Gb/s file transfers in every setup.

The external ports are also fairly broad for a desktop NAS. The front includes 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A port, 1 USB-C Gen 2 port, and an SD 3.0 card reader, while the rear includes 1 USB 3.2 Gen 1 port, 2 USB 2.0 ports, HDMI 2.0b with support for up to 4K at 60Hz, and the 2 10GbE network ports. The SD card slot is particularly relevant for photographers and video creators who want quick ingest after a shoot, while HDMI gives the system more flexibility for direct display use or local media output, depending on how UGREEN enables it in UGOS Pro. The listed 64GB of flash storage also suggests the operating system has its own onboard space, though I would still want to confirm how accessible or replaceable that storage is before drawing conclusions about third-party OS use.

Elephant in the room – DXP4800GT is China Only …for now?

For now, the DXP4800 GT appears to be a China-first product rather than a confirmed global release. The official material and early product information are focused on the Chinese UGREEN NAS site, and there has not yet been a clear international launch date, regional price, or confirmed global SKU. That is worth keeping in mind, because UGREEN’s NAS lineup can differ by region, and features shown in Chinese launch material do not always arrive in exactly the same form elsewhere. I would not assume the final global version, if it appears, will be identical in colour, bundled memory, app support, or software services.

That said, I would be surprised if this hardware platform remained China-only forever. The DXP4800 GT uses a noticeably different AMD-based architecture from the Intel-powered DXP models already sold more widely, and it includes features that would make sense for a broader prosumer NAS audience, especially dual 10GbE, higher memory support, ECC upgrade potential, and a more performance-focused storage layout. The more realistic question is not whether the hardware is interesting enough for wider release, but whether UGREEN chooses to bring this exact model outside China or uses the same platform as the basis for a later international NAS. Until that is confirmed, it should be treated as a revealed product rather than a globally available one.

An Early Verdict on the DXP4800 GT

The UGREEN DXP4800 GT looks like a more serious 4-bay NAS than the standard DXP4800, mainly because it combines an AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 processor, dual 10GbE, expandable DDR4 memory, 2 M.2 NVMe slots, HDMI, SD card access, and a higher-end chassis design in a single desktop system. From the information currently available, I would treat it as a NAS aimed more at creators, heavier home users, homelab users, and small teams than someone who only wants basic file backup. The remaining unknowns are important, especially global availability, price, third-party OS flexibility, and real-world thermal and network performance. Until those are confirmed, this is best viewed as a promising hardware reveal rather than a finished recommendation, but it is still one of the more interesting UGREEN NAS models shown so far.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...How to Install OpenClaw on a UHow to Install OpenClaw on a UUGREEN NAS – 2 Years Later ?UGREEN NAS - 2 Years Later - IUGREEN NAS Black Friday 2025 DUGREEN NAS Black Friday 2025 DUGREEN NASync vs UniFi UNAS - Buy UGREEN NAS on B&HUGREEN NASSynology vs UGREEN NAS (in 202 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

What is the Gl.iNet Comet Q KVM?

The Gl.iNet Comet Q is a compact KVM-over-IP device built around a different kind of deployment than most existing entries in this category. Instead of focusing on HDMI-connected desktops, servers, or rack hardware, the Comet Q is designed around a direct USB-C connection, allowing it to interface with smartphones, tablets, laptops, and other compatible host devices through a single pre-attached cable. Alongside local access, it also integrates WiFi-based networking, remote internet control, a built-in touchscreen, and USB-C pass-through for power delivery to the connected device. Based on the early demonstration shown during a visit to Gl.iNet in Shenzhen, the Comet Q appears to be aimed at portable remote access, field support, and off-site troubleshooting, while also expanding the wider Comet KVM range into a more mobile and lower-power form factor.

Gl.iNet Comet Q Hardware Specifications

The Gl.iNet Comet Q is built around a notably smaller hardware platform than the rest of the Comet KVM family. According to the specification sheet provided, it uses a dual-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor, paired with 512MB of LPDDR4 memory and 64GB of onboard storage. This places it below the Comet, Comet PoE, Comet Pro, and Comet 5G in raw system resources, but that appears consistent with its intended role as a highly compact USB-C based access device rather than a more traditional full-size KVM endpoint.

In terms of connectivity, the Comet Q differs significantly from the rest of the range. Rather than relying on HDMI input, it uses a USB-C connection with DisplayPort Alt Mode support for video input. This is the key functional distinction in the lineup, as it allows the device to connect directly to supported modern phones, tablets, and laptops without requiring a separate HDMI capture path. The copied specifications also indicate USB 2.0 Type-A and Type-C connectivity, alongside 1 x RJ45 Gigabit Ethernet port.

Wireless support is also listed as part of the Comet Q feature set. The specification sheet references 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax support, with 2.4GHz and 5GHz operation included across the lineup. Although the pasted table is clearly the result of OCR and contains some formatting inconsistencies, the Comet Q is positioned as a wireless-enabled KVM device rather than a purely wired one, which aligns with the functionality shown in the demonstration. This is important because the device is intended to support both local network access and wider remote access scenarios.

Power and physical design are clearly central to the Comet Q hardware profile. It is rated for Type-C power input at 5V/2A, with listed power consumption of less than 2.5W, making it the lowest-power device in the copied Comet family specifications. It also includes a 1.8-inch touchscreen, which is smaller than the displays used on some of the larger Comet models, but appropriate for quick status checks, local configuration, and access control on a device intended for portable use.

Environmental and physical figures place the Comet Q firmly in the compact end of the lineup. The operating temperature is listed as 0°C to 40°C, consistent with the rest of the family. The OCR copy of the table does not clearly preserve the final dimensions and weight entry for the Comet Q in the same way as the other models, but the wider specification set still makes clear that this is intended to be a lighter, lower-power, more travel-friendly device than the HDMI-based Comet units already in the range.

What is the Comet Q KVM bringing to the market that is new?

The main distinction of the Gl.iNet Comet Q is its physical design and target use case. Most KVM-over-IP devices are built around HDMI capture and are designed for desktops, servers, mini PCs, or rack-mounted hardware. The Comet Q instead shifts the concept toward a much smaller USB-C based form factor, with a pre-attached cable and integrated display in a body that is intended to be carried and deployed quickly. That makes it structurally different from the more static, cabling-heavy approach seen in much of the current KVM market.

Portability is another clear differentiator. The Comet Q is designed to operate from USB-C power at under 2.5W, which creates a very different deployment model from larger KVM appliances that often assume fixed placement, dedicated power, and a more permanent network setup. In practical terms, this makes the device easier to use in travel scenarios, temporary support jobs, meeting environments, mobile workstations, and short-term remote access situations where carrying a larger HDMI-based KVM would be less practical.

Its support for USB-C connected client devices also broadens the type of hardware that can be managed. The Comet Q is positioned not only for laptops and compact computers, but also for phones and tablets that support the necessary USB-C display and data standards. That gives it a role that is uncommon in the KVM-over-IP space, where Android phones, tablets, and similarly compact devices are not usually the primary focus. In that respect, the Comet Q is not just reducing size, but also changing the class of device a KVM can be attached to.

The single-cable approach is also important. Based on the demonstration and the listed hardware details, the Comet Q is intended to combine connection, control, and power handling through USB-C, while also supporting network access over LAN, WiFi, and remote internet connectivity. That creates a simpler deployment path than a conventional KVM setup that may require separate video, USB, power, and networking connections. The result is a product that appears to reduce setup complexity while extending KVM access to devices and environments that are not well served by existing HDMI-first designs.

How Does the Comet Q Compare with the Rest of the Gl.iNet KVM Lineup?

Within the wider Gl.iNet Comet series, the Comet Q sits as the most specialised and least traditional model in the range. The RM1 Comet, RM1PE Comet PoE, RM10 Comet Pro, and RM10RC Comet 5G are all built around a more conventional KVM design, using HDMI input and, in some cases, HDMI output for passthrough or expanded deployment. The Comet Q moves away from that approach by replacing HDMI capture with USB-C video input via DP Alt Mode, which changes both the kind of device it can connect to and the environments where it is likely to be used.

In hardware terms, the Comet Q is also the most lightweight system in the lineup. Its dual-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor and 512MB of LPDDR4 memory place it below the other Comet devices, which generally use quad-core ARM processors and 1GB of DDR3L memory. Its sub-2.5W power draw is also the lowest figure listed across the range. That lower hardware ceiling makes sense in context, as the Comet Q appears to prioritise mobility, compact deployment, and low power operation over the broader feature scope of the higher-end HDMI-based models.

The other Comet devices are more clearly structured for fixed installations or more complex remote management roles. The Comet PoE adds Power over Ethernet support for simpler networked deployment, the Comet Pro adds both HDMI input and output, and the Comet 5G extends this further with cellular connectivity through 4G LTE and 5G RedCap support. Compared with those, the Comet Q is not trying to be the most feature-rich model. Instead, it fills a separate position by targeting USB-C connected client hardware and a more portable usage model than the rest of the lineup.

This makes the Comet Q less of a direct replacement for the other Comet units and more of a complementary product. The HDMI-based models remain better suited to desktops, servers, fixed workstations, and network infrastructure where traditional video capture and broader connectivity options matter more. The Comet Q, by contrast, is better understood as a compact access tool for modern mobile and USB-C centric devices, where physical size, single-cable deployment, and lower power use are more important than maximum processing resources or infrastructure-oriented connectivity.

Gl.iNet Comet Q KVM Price & Release Date?

At the time of filming, Gl.iNet had not confirmed a final release schedule for the Comet Q, and availability was still being discussed internally. The device shown in Shenzhen appeared to be relatively close to completion from a hardware and interface perspective, but it was still clearly in a pre-release state, with software behaviour, feature scope, and final implementation details still being adjusted. Gl.iNet also indicated that the launch route under consideration could involve Kickstarter, which suggests the company is still assessing demand and market positioning for this particular model.

Pricing was also not final at the time of the demonstration. The only estimate provided was a broad target range of around $100 to $200, with the expectation that the final retail position would likely sit closer to the lower end of that range than the upper end. Until Gl.iNet confirms official launch pricing, regional availability, and a release timetable, the Comet Q remains a revealed but not yet fully commercialised addition to the wider Comet KVM lineup.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Comet X KVM Host ReveaGl.iNet MUDI 7 5G SIM WiFi 7 TGl.iNet MUDI 7 5G SIM WiFi 7 TGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Travel RouGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Should YouGl.iNet Comet Q USB-C KVM for Gl.iNet Comet 5G Review - The Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 TraGl.iNet Slate 7 vs Beryl 7 TraGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX Tr Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Minisforum Expand Their NAS Range with 2 New Flash NAS – The S5 and S7 SSD Systems

Minisforum has revealed 2 new all-flash NAS systems, the Minisforum S5 and Minisforum S7, as part of a joint event with Intel in Xiamen, China. The announcement, covered in the official Minisforum press release and by VideoCardz, places both devices under the company’s “Agent NAS” branding, with a focus on SSD-only storage, local AI services, and compact edge computing rather than conventional HDD-based NAS design. The S5 is presented as the smaller and quieter model for environments where noise output is a priority, while the S7 is positioned as a larger all-flash system derived from Minisforum’s workstation platform, intended for users with higher storage density and network connectivity requirements.

Minisforum S5 NAS Hardware

The Minisforum S5 is the smaller of the 2 new all-flash NAS systems and is built around a compact, fanless design. Its storage configuration is based on 5 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x1 SSD slots, with no support for conventional 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch hard drives. This places the S5 closer to a silent flash storage appliance than a traditional desktop NAS, with the design clearly prioritising low noise, reduced mechanical vibration, and a smaller physical footprint.

The system uses an Intel Core Series 3 platform, identified in wider reporting as Wildcat Lake, alongside up to 16GB of LPDDR5X-7200 memory. The RAM appears to be soldered rather than user-upgradeable, which fits with the compact and fanless design. Connectivity is stronger than many small NAS systems, with 10GbE, 2.5GbE, USB4, HDMI, USB-A, and Wi-Fi 7 all listed. The use of PCIe 4.0 x1 per SSD slot means the device is not designed to deliver full-speed PCIe 4.0 x4 performance from each individual NVMe drive, but instead uses multiple SSDs for an all-flash pool in a low-noise enclosure.

Minisforum S7 NAS Hardware

The Minisforum S7 is the larger of the 2 systems and is based on the Minisforum MS-03 workstation platform. Unlike the S5, which is focused on passive cooling and compact silent operation, the S7 is aimed at higher-capacity all-flash storage and more advanced networking. It supports up to 7 NVMe SSDs, making it the more suitable model for users who need a denser flash-based storage pool in a small workstation-style chassis.

The S7 also has a more network-heavy configuration than the S5, with dual 10G SFP+ ports, 10GbE RJ45, 2.5GbE RJ45, and 2x USB4 40Gbps ports. Minisforum has also listed an LED status display for checking system and storage activity directly from the device. Full details on PCIe lane allocation for the 7 SSD slots have not yet been confirmed, so it is not currently clear whether all slots operate at the same speed or whether any of them receive more bandwidth than others.

Minisforum S5 NAS Price and Release Date

Minisforum has not confirmed pricing or a release date for the S5 NAS at the time of the announcement. The official material presents the system as part of the company’s new Agent NAS lineup, but does not include retail availability, regional rollout details, or launch pricing. Given the use of 5x NVMe SSD slots, 10GbE, USB4, Wi-Fi 7, soldered LPDDR5X memory, and a fanless chassis, the final price will be important in determining how it compares with both conventional HDD-based NAS systems and other compact all-flash NAS devices.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UGREEN DXP4800GT NAS RevealedUGREEN DXP4800 GT NAS RevealedHow to Install OpenClaw on a UHow to Install OpenClaw on a UMinisforum S5 and S7 All-FlashCWWK N150 2x10GbE 3x NVMe 6 BaUnifydrive PixelMob - A Truly New QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX New QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX UGREEN NAS – 2 Years Later ? Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN NAS and OpenClaw – How to Install it, Setup Your AI and Understanding The Risks!

OpenClaw has now moved from a manual self-hosted setup into the UGREEN UGOS Pro App Center, making it possible to install the assistant gateway directly on supported UGREEN NASync systems rather than building it manually through a VM, terminal commands, or a separate always-on PC. In practical terms, OpenClaw is not the AI model itself. It is the local assistant layer that connects your NAS, files, tools, skills, and messaging channels to an LLM such as OpenAI, Gemini, DeepSeek, MiniMax, OpenRouter, or a local model where supported. This matters because a NAS is where many users already keep their long-term data, backups, media, documents, and project files, but it also means OpenClaw needs to be treated as a privileged automation tool rather than a simple chatbot. The App Center version lowers the installation barrier, but the real value and the real risk both come from what you allow it to access, what model you connect it to, and which skills or messaging channels you enable.

Security Considerations Before Giving OpenClaw NAS Access

OpenClaw should be approached as a privileged automation layer, not as a normal chat assistant. On UGREEN NAS, it runs through Docker and is designed to read, write, delete, move files, publish messages, and execute system-level operations depending on what folders, skills, and channels you enable. UGREEN’s own notes state that the application runs inside a Docker container with root privileges, which is necessary for broad automation but also increases the potential damage from incorrect commands, poor configuration, compromised plugins, or prompt-injection style attacks. The main rule before installation is therefore straightforward: do not give OpenClaw access to anything you are not prepared for it to modify, and make sure you have a working backup before testing it on real data.

The risks increase further if you connect OpenClaw to a remote LLM provider or public messaging platform. When using OpenAI, Gemini, MiniMax, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, or similar services, your prompts, file context, directory details, task instructions, logs, or extracted content may be sent outside the NAS depending on the action being performed. OpenClaw’s own GitHub description warns that real messaging surfaces should be treated as untrusted inputs, and recent reporting has also highlighted malicious third-party OpenClaw skills that attempted to steal credentials, wallet data, and browser information. For NAS use, the safest starting point is to use a test folder, avoid private or business-critical data, do not expose the service directly to the public internet, install only trusted skills, and treat WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord, Slack, or similar integrations as external access points into your NAS assistant.

Preparing Folders and Installing OpenClaw from UGOS Pro

Before installing OpenClaw, create the folders it will use and decide how much of the NAS it should be allowed to see. In Files, either create a dedicated shared folder or a personal folder for OpenClaw’s workspace, for example openclaw-data or openclaw-workspace. This should ideally be an empty folder, as it will be used for temporary files, generated content, working data, and task execution. Separately, create or identify the folder that OpenClaw will be allowed to access for real NAS file operations. For first-time testing, this should be a limited test directory rather than a folder containing live backups, sensitive documents, business files, or irreplaceable media. The workspace path and file access path should not overlap, and the access path should not sit inside the workspace folder. UGREEN also notes that Docker should be installed and updated first, as OpenClaw relies heavily on the Docker container environment.

Once the folders are ready, open App Center in UGOS Pro, find OpenClaw under the app list, and select Install. During the installation wizard, set the Workspace path to the empty folder created for OpenClaw’s internal working area, then set the File access path to the NAS folder or folders that the assistant is permitted to read or modify. Multiple access paths can be added, but this should be done deliberately, as these paths define the practical scope of what OpenClaw can act on. Next, create a Gateway token, which will be required when signing in to the OpenClaw web interface. After reviewing the risk notice, tick the confirmation box and start the installation. The package is installed through the App Center, but it still deploys and runs through Docker in the background, so installation time will depend on NAS performance, internet connection speed, and the state of the Docker environment. OpenClaw’s own Docker documentation also describes the gateway token and container-based control UI as central parts of the deployment model.

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open Files in UGOS Pro.
2. Create an empty folder for the OpenClaw workspace, such as openclaw-workspace.
3. Create a separate test folder for OpenClaw file access, such as openclaw-test-data.
4. Avoid selecting folders that contain private, business-critical, backup, password, financial, or personal archive data.
5. Open App Center.
6. Confirm Docker is installed and updated.
7. Search for OpenClaw under the app list.
8. Click Install.
9. Set the Workspace path to the empty OpenClaw working folder.
10. Set the File access path to the limited folder OpenClaw can manage.
11. Add additional access paths only if they are required.
12. Create and record a Gateway token.
13. Read the installation risk notice.
14. Tick the confirmation box.
15. Click Install and allow the deployment to complete.

Linking OpenClaw to an AI Model Provider

OpenClaw needs an AI model before it can act as an assistant. The UGREEN App Center installation can collect model details during setup, but these can also be managed later from the OpenClaw console under Model providers. The information required is usually the same across providers: a base URL or request endpoint, a model name, and an API key.

OpenAI’s current API reference lists https://api.openai.com/v1 as the standard API base, with chat completions available under /chat/completions, while Google documents Gemini’s OpenAI-compatible endpoint as https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/openai/. These details matter because a wrong endpoint, wrong model name, or invalid key will usually result in provider errors inside OpenClaw rather than a NAS-side installation problem.

For a UGREEN NAS setup, most users will start with a remote model provider such as OpenAI, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, MiniMax, Groq, OpenRouter, or another OpenAI-compatible API. iDX models with local AI model support may also allow local model use, but that depends on the local model service exposing a usable API endpoint and key.

A remote model is easier to configure, but it can send task instructions, file context, extracted text, and other prompts outside the NAS. A local model reduces this dependency, but it may require more RAM, more setup, and a compatible local inference service. OpenClaw supports model provider configuration and key rotation through its own provider system, so the NAS app should be treated as the deployment layer rather than the only place where model behaviour can be managed.

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open the OpenClaw shortcut from the UGREEN NAS desktop.
2. Sign in using the Gateway token created during installation.
3. Go to Model providers in the left-side menu.
4. Click Add provider.
5. Select the provider you want to use, such as OpenAI, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, MiniMax, or another supported provider.
6. Enter the provider’s Base URL or full API endpoint.
7. Enter the required API key from the provider’s developer console.
8. Enter or select the Model name that matches the provider’s supported model ID.
9. Save the provider configuration.
10. Go to the Default model area.
11. Select the model OpenClaw should use by default.
12. Click Save to apply the default model.
13. Open Chat and send a basic test prompt, such as What model are you running on?
14. If OpenClaw returns a provider error, check the API key, model name, endpoint format, account billing status, and provider rate limits.
15. If using a local model on an iDX system, use the local service IP address and port as the base URL rather than a public cloud endpoint.

Common examples:

Opening the OpenClaw Console and Testing the Assistant

Once installation and model configuration are complete, OpenClaw can be launched from the UGREEN NAS desktop. Clicking the OpenClaw shortcut opens the web console in a browser, where the first prompt will ask for the Gateway token created during installation. After signing in, the Overview page shows whether the gateway is active, along with container runtime details such as uptime, CPU usage, memory usage, gateway port, process information, and overall service status. If the service is running correctly, the status area should show an active or healthy state, and the Open OpenClaw button can be used to launch the native OpenClaw interface in a new browser tab.

The first test should be simple. Open the Chat page, send a basic message, and confirm that the configured model responds. After that, test only against the limited folder path selected during setup. For example, ask it to list files in the permitted test directory, create a new folder inside it, or summarize a non-sensitive test document. This confirms that OpenClaw, the model provider, and the NAS file permissions are all working together. If the model does not respond, check the model provider settings first. If file actions fail, check that the command references the correct mounted path shown in the OpenClaw app configuration rather than a folder name as displayed in the normal UGREEN Files interface.

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open the OpenClaw shortcut from the UGREEN NAS desktop.
2. Enter the Gateway token.
3. Click Sign in or Connect.
4. Open Overview.
5. Confirm the service status is active.
6. Check the runtime snapshot for CPU usage, memory usage, and uptime.
7. Click Open OpenClaw if you want to use the native OpenClaw interface.
8. Open Chat from the left-side menu.
9. Send a basic test message, such as Hello.
10. Ask which model is active, for example What model are you using?
11. Test file access only inside the approved test folder.
12. Use a low-risk command, such as Create a folder called OpenClaw Test in [your mounted test path].
13. Open Files in UGOS Pro and confirm the folder was created.
14. If the command fails, check the actual accessible path under Control Panel > About > Apps > OpenClaw.
15. Review Operation Logs if OpenClaw responds incorrectly, fails to access files, or reports a gateway or provider error.

Choosing Skills and Plug-ins for NAS-Based Use

OpenClaw skills and plug-ins extend what the assistant can do beyond basic chat. In a NAS environment, these additions should be chosen more cautiously than they might be on a laptop or test VM, because a skill may request access to files, shell commands, browser sessions, messaging platforms, or external services. OpenClaw’s public site describes it as an assistant that can act through channels such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and other chat apps, while community skill indexes now list thousands of available skills. That breadth is useful, but it also means the skill ecosystem should not be treated as automatically safe or suitable for storage systems. (openclaw.ai, clawskills.sh)

For a UGREEN NAS, the sensible starting point is to enable only the skills that match a specific NAS task. File management, system monitoring, web browsing, document parsing, OCR, and basic notification workflows are the most relevant categories. Avoid installing skills that request broad shell access, browser credential access, crypto wallet access, password manager access, or unclear third-party scripts unless they have been reviewed carefully. This is not theoretical. Reports in early 2026 documented malicious OpenClaw skills that attempted to steal browser data, SSH credentials, wallet information, and other sensitive data, which is particularly relevant when the assistant is being installed on a machine that stores personal or business files.

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open the OpenClaw console from the UGREEN NAS desktop.
2. Sign in with the Gateway token.
3. Open the native OpenClaw interface using Open OpenClaw, if required.
4. Go to the Skills, Plug-ins, or Skills Store area.
5. Search for skills by function rather than installing large bundles.
6. Start with NAS-relevant categories only.
7. Check the skill description, source, permissions, and install method.
8. Avoid any skill that asks you to run unclear terminal commands.
9. Install 1 skill at a time.
10. Test it only against the approved OpenClaw test folder.
11. Check Operation Logs after each test.
12. Remove any skill that behaves unexpectedly or asks for broader permissions than needed.
13. Avoid using “always allow” approvals until the workflow has been tested repeatedly.
14. Keep a note of which skills are installed and what each one can access.
15. Review installed skills periodically, especially after OpenClaw or UGOS Pro updates.

Recommended NAS-related starting points:

Connecting OpenClaw to WhatsApp, Discord, and Telegram

OpenClaw can be used through external messaging platforms so that commands can be sent to the NAS assistant without opening the UGREEN web interface each time. The supported channel list includes WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord, Slack, Google Chat, Signal, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, Feishu, LINE, Mattermost, Nextcloud Talk, and others, but WhatsApp, Telegram, and Discord are likely to be the most relevant for home and small-office users. OpenClaw’s own channel notes state that multiple channels can run at the same time, but they also warn that inbound messages should be treated as untrusted input and that DM pairing or allowlists are used for access control. (github.com, docs.openclaw.ai)

For NAS use, Telegram is usually the simplest starting point because it relies on a bot token from BotFather. WhatsApp normally uses QR pairing and stores more session state on disk, which means it may need more care during backups, container resets, or reinstallation. Discord is more useful when OpenClaw needs to operate inside a server, channel, or team context, but it should be restricted to private channels and trusted roles rather than broad server-wide access. The UGREEN console provides a channel management area where plugins can be enabled, configured, and monitored, but more advanced channel setup may still require working inside the OpenClaw interface or Docker container depending on the platform and plugin. (docs.openclaw.ai, openclaw-openclaw.mintlify.app)

Point-by-point setup:

1. Open the OpenClaw console from the UGREEN NAS desktop.
2. Sign in using the Gateway token.
3. Go to Channels.
4. Select the channel you want to enable, such as Telegram, WhatsApp, or Discord.
5. Click Enable for the required channel plugin.
6. Wait until the plugin status changes to Ready.
7. Click Add channel.
8. Enter the required account, bot, or pairing details.
9. Configure DM access rules, pairing mode, or allowlist behaviour where available.
10. Bind the channel to the correct OpenClaw agent or default assistant.
11. Send a low-risk test message from the external app.
12. Confirm that OpenClaw replies through the same channel.
13. Test with a harmless NAS action inside the approved test directory only.
14. Check Operation Logs if messages are received but not answered.
15. Disable the channel if unexpected users, groups, or servers can trigger the assistant.

Telegram setup:

1. Open Telegram.
2. Search for @BotFather.
3. Create a new bot using /newbot.
4. Copy the bot token provided by BotFather.
5. Return to OpenClaw > Channels.
6. Enable the Telegram plugin.
7. Add a Telegram channel.
8. Paste the bot token.
9. Configure whether the bot can respond in DMs, groups, or both.
10. Send a test message to the bot.

WhatsApp setup:

1. Open OpenClaw > Channels.
2. Enable the WhatsApp plugin.
3. Add a WhatsApp channel.
4. Enter the phone number or pairing account details requested by the setup window.
5. Generate the QR pairing code.
6. Open WhatsApp on your phone.
7. Go to linked devices.
8. Scan the QR code.
9. Wait for the WhatsApp channel status to become active.
10. Send a test message to confirm OpenClaw responds.

Discord setup:

1. Create or use a Discord server where you control permissions.
2. Create a dedicated private channel for OpenClaw commands.
3. Create a Discord bot in the Discord Developer Portal.
4. Copy the bot token.
5. Return to OpenClaw > Channels.
6. Enable the Discord plugin.
7. Add a Discord channel.
8. Paste the bot token.
9. Restrict the bot to trusted channels and roles.
10. Send a test command in the private OpenClaw channel.

UGREEN x OpenClaw: Useful, but Only with Controlled Access

OpenClaw on UGREEN NAS is a notable step towards making AI-assisted NAS management more accessible, mainly because the App Center version removes much of the older manual deployment work. Instead of installing Ubuntu in a VM, configuring Node.js, running installation scripts, and manually binding the gateway, supported UGREEN NASync users can now install OpenClaw through UGOS Pro and complete the main path, token, and model setup through a guided interface. That makes the initial process easier, but it does not make OpenClaw a basic consumer NAS feature. It is still an automation agent with access to files, tools, model providers, messaging channels, and potentially system commands.

The value depends on how tightly it is configured. Used against a limited folder, with a known model provider, a small number of trusted skills, and private messaging channels, OpenClaw can help with file organisation, document handling, system checks, reminders, and assistant-style NAS interaction. Given broad storage access, untested skills, exposed web access, or remote AI services without understanding the data flow, it becomes a much higher-risk deployment. For most users, the best approach is to begin with a test directory, avoid sensitive data, keep backups current, and expand access only after confirming exactly how OpenClaw behaves in day-to-day use.

Want to Support the work me and Eddie do at NASCompares? If you found this article helpful and are going to buy a UGREEN NAS from the brand’s official site or from Amazon, use the links below. Using these links will result in a small commission coming to us (which costs you nothing extra) and it allows us to keep doing what we do! Thank you for keeping the internet a fair and sustainable place!

Buy the UGREEN NAS from your local Amazon Store	Buy the UGREEN NAS solutions Directly from UGREEN.COM

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...How to Install OpenClaw on a UUGREEN NAS – 2 Years Later ?UGREEN NAS - 2 Years Later - IUGREEN iDX6011 Pro AI NAS ReviUGREEN iDX6011 Pro AI NAS ReviUGREEN NAS Black Friday 2025 DUGREEN NAS Black Friday 2025 DUGREEN NASync vs UniFi UNAS - Week 37 Tech Digest – ThundeWeek 33 Tech Roundup – Terra Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UniFi UNVR Gen 2 and UNVR Gen 2 Pro: What Has Actually Changed?

UniFi’s UNVR range has always occupied a fairly clear role in the Protect ecosystem: a dedicated rackmount recorder for users who have outgrown smaller gateway-based recording, or who want their surveillance storage separated from the rest of their network hardware. With the new UNVR Gen 2 and UNVR Gen 2 Pro, Ubiquiti is shifting that role further. These are still network video recorders first, but the hardware and software changes point toward a more active surveillance appliance, with higher camera support, local AI processing, HDMI output for live viewing, and closer integration with the newer direction of UniFi Protect. The issue is that this also comes with a much higher price than the previous UNVR and UNVR Pro, so the question is not simply whether the Gen 2 models are better, but whether the added hardware and features are relevant enough to justify the increase for different types of deployments.

UNVR G.2 and UNVR G.2 Pro – Specifications

The UNVR Gen 2 is the 1U model in the new range and keeps the same general rackmount class as the original UNVR, with 4 2.5/3.5″ HDD or SSD bays. Its camera support is rated at up to 50 HD cameras, 35 2K cameras, or 25 4K cameras, with support for 150+ Access Hubs. Networking is handled by 1 10G SFP+ port and 1 2.5GbE RJ45 port, while the chassis measures 442.4 x 43.7 x 325 mm.

Internally, it moves to a Qualcomm Kryo CPU built on Arm Cortex technology using a 4 nm process, with 1 Prime core at 3.2 GHz, 4 Performance cores at 2.8 GHz, and 3 Efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz. Memory is increased to 8 GB, drive power budget remains 75W, and maximum system power consumption is listed at 100W.

The UNVR Gen 2 Pro is the larger 2U model and increases the drive count to 8 2.5/3.5″ HDD or SSD bays, compared with 7 bays on the previous UNVR Pro. Its camera support is rated at up to 100 HD cameras, 70 2K cameras, or 50 4K cameras, again with support for 150+ Access Hubs. The Pro model uses the same Qualcomm Kryo CPU arrangement as the smaller Gen 2 model, but increases memory to 16 GB. Networking consists of 1 10G SFP+ port and 1 2.5GbE RJ45 port, with a listed chassis size of 442.4 x 87.4 x 325 mm. The drive power budget rises to 155W, while maximum power consumption is listed at 200W.

Both Gen 2 models also include HDMI output for the built-in ViewPort function, which allows a Protect multi-view to be assigned directly to a connected display rather than requiring a separate ViewPort device.

UNVR Gen 2 vs Original UNVR: Where the Price Increase Comes From

The clearest difference between the original UNVR and the UNVR Gen 2 is the change in hardware platform. The older UNVR uses a quad-core ARM Cortex-A57 processor at 1.7 GHz with 4 GB of memory, while the UNVR Gen 2 moves to the newer Qualcomm Kryo ARM-based CPU platform and 8 GB of memory. The network layout has also changed, with the older model using 1 GbE RJ45 alongside 10G SFP+, while the Gen 2 model upgrades the RJ45 connection to 2.5GbE. Storage bay count remains the same at 4 bays, but camera capacity changes from 60 HD, 30 2K, or 18 4K cameras on the original UNVR to 50 HD, 35 2K, or 25 4K cameras on the Gen 2 model. That means the newer system is not a straight increase across every camera category, but it does raise support for higher-resolution 2K and 4K deployments.

The pricing difference is more substantial than the specification changes would suggest if this were only a conventional recorder update. The original UNVR is positioned at $299, while the UNVR Gen 2 is positioned at $699. The explanation appears to be that UniFi is treating the Gen 2 model as a more complete Protect appliance rather than just a higher-performance version of the old 4-bay recorder.

The HDMI output effectively integrates ViewPort-style live display support, while the built-in Edge AI features shift part of the workload that would otherwise require additional hardware such as an AI Key. This does not make the older UNVR obsolete for simpler recording tasks, but it does change the buying decision. The Gen 2 model is aimed more clearly at deployments that need local AI search, image-based search, person re-identification, and direct live monitoring from the recorder itself.

Protect 7.1 and the Shift Toward Local AI Surveillance

UniFi Protect 7.1 is an important part of the UNVR Gen 2 release, because several of the headline hardware features depend on the newer Protect software stack. The Gen 2 recorders include built-in Edge AI functionality, with support for Natural Language Search, Object Indexing in Find Anything, Person ReID, and Search by Image. In practical terms, this changes how recorded footage can be searched. Instead of relying only on a timeline, motion events, or predefined smart detections, the system is designed to help users locate more specific events across stored footage using more descriptive search methods. The built-in AI functionality is local and license-free, but for larger or busier deployments, UniFi still recommends adding 1 or more AI Keys to expand processing capacity, reduce Edge AI latency, and lower the chance of missed events.

Protect 7.1 also expands the broader surveillance feature set beyond the Gen 2 recorders themselves. Custom Video Walls are now available in Site Manager, dashboard widgets have deeper customization, and live camera views can be configured with webhook shortcuts for triggering automations from the camera interface. Smart detections have been retrained for improved accuracy across UniFi cameras, PTZ tracking has been expanded to include vehicles, and 360 cameras now support native immersive downloads. ONVIF support is also more developed, with audio and motion detection support for third-party cameras, which is significant for sites migrating gradually from existing surveillance hardware into UniFi Protect. The update also introduces U.S.-only Noonlight dispatch services for sensor and video monitoring at $199 per year, DC-09 support for third-party monitoring integrations, and SuperLink Remote Control support for customizable site control. Below is a full breakdown of the feaures of UniFi Protect, and which require AI assistance (either edge based on the camera/AI-port, or local using an AI assisted server or AI-Key):

Bottom Line: A More Capable NVR, but Not a Like-for-Like Replacement

The UNVR Gen 2 and UNVR Gen 2 Pro make more sense when viewed as expanded Protect appliances rather than direct replacements for the older UNVR and UNVR Pro. The new models add faster processing, more memory, 2.5GbE RJ45 networking, HDMI output for built-in ViewPort use, higher 2K and 4K camera ceilings, and local Edge AI features that change how recorded footage can be searched and reviewed. The Pro model also gains an 8th drive bay, which makes it a cleaner fit for larger retention requirements than the older 7-bay UNVR Pro. For sites already planning to use AI search, Person ReID, image-based search, or a direct HDMI monitoring display, the higher price is easier to explain because those functions would otherwise involve additional hardware or a less integrated setup.

That does not mean the price increase will make sense for every Protect installation. The original UNVR and UNVR Pro remain better aligned with users who mainly need reliable recording, centralized Protect storage, and conventional camera management without paying for a broader AI-enabled appliance. The Gen 2 models are therefore best judged by deployment requirements rather than by bay count alone. For new or expanding surveillance environments with higher-resolution cameras, active monitoring, ONVIF migration plans, and a need to search footage more intelligently, the UNVR Gen 2 range has a clearer role. For simpler sites where AI features and HDMI ViewPort output are not a priority, the older UNVR models still have a practical argument, provided UniFi continues to keep them available.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UNVR Gen 2 ProUniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShUniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShNew UniFi Dream Machine BEAST,New UniFi UDM Beast, EnterprisUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MLUniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MUniFi UNAS 4 Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Terramaster D1 Buyers Guide – D1 SSD vs D1 SSD PLUS vs D1 SSD Pro

TerraMaster is a storage hardware brand best known for NAS, DAS, and direct-attached expansion products aimed at home users, content creators, small offices, and prosumer workloads. While NAS devices remain the better choice for shared network storage, remote access, multi-user collaboration, and always-on services, DAS products are often the more practical option when the priority is direct speed, portability, simplicity, and lower setup complexity. An M.2 NVMe SSD enclosure such as the TerraMaster D1 range is designed to connect directly to a host system over USB or Thunderbolt, making it more suitable for fast local transfers, field backup, editing work, boot drives, and quick storage expansion without the overhead of network configuration. The D1 range is currently split across 3 tiers: the D1 SSD, D1 SSD Plus, and D1 SSD Pro. All 3 are diskless single-slot M.2 2280 NVMe SSD enclosures supporting up to 8TB drives, but they differ significantly in interface bandwidth, chassis design, target workload, and price. The standard D1 SSD is the rugged USB 10Gbps option, the D1 SSD Plus moves to USB4 40Gbps for higher transfer speeds, and the D1 SSD Pro is the Thunderbolt 5 / USB 80Gbps model aimed at the fastest single-drive workflows.

TerraMaster D1 SSD – The 10Gb/s Budget One!

The TerraMaster D1 SSD is the entry-level model in the D1 range, using a single M.2 2280 NVMe SSD slot and a USB 10Gbps interface. This places it in a different category from the Plus and Pro models, as it is not intended to chase the highest possible external SSD speeds. Instead, it is aimed more at users who need a compact, portable NVMe enclosure for everyday transfers, local backups, field storage, and general-purpose expansion.

TerraMaster lists maximum sequential performance at up to 1020MB/s read and 1010MB/s write when tested with a Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSD, which is close to the expected practical limit of USB 3.2 Gen 2 storage.

The main point of difference with this model is the enclosure design. The D1 SSD uses a unibody aerospace-grade aluminum alloy shell and is rated at IP67 for dust and water resistance. TerraMaster also states that the enclosure can withstand up to 1.2 tons of pressure, which gives it a more rugged profile than a typical low-cost NVMe USB enclosure.

That makes it better suited to users who regularly move drives between locations, carry storage in a work bag, or need something for outdoor shoots, site work, travel, or emergency backups. It is still a single-drive enclosure, so it should not be treated as a complete backup strategy on its own, but the physical protection is clearly one of its main selling points.

Cooling is handled passively, with the metal body functioning as the heatsink rather than relying on a small internal fan. TerraMaster describes the design as offering 2.5x the usual heat dissipation area, and the lack of a fan also means there is no operating noise from the enclosure itself. The D1 SSD supports PCIe 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs up to 8TB, although the external USB 10Gbps connection will cap performance long before a modern high-end NVMe SSD reaches its own internal limits. File system support includes NTFS, APFS, Mac OS, FAT32, EXT4, and exFAT, while official operating system support is listed for Windows, macOS, and Linux.

TerraMaster D1 SSD Plus – The Perfect Middle!

The TerraMaster D1 SSD Plus is the middle option in the D1 range, moving from the USB 10Gbps connection of the standard D1 SSD to a USB4 40Gbps interface. This makes it a more suitable choice for users who want a compact single-drive NVMe enclosure but need substantially higher transfer speeds for larger files. TerraMaster positions this model around portable creative workflows, Mac mini storage expansion, macOS boot drive use, Windows workstation cache storage, and general high-speed external storage.

The company lists tested speeds of up to 3853MB/s read and 3707MB/s write, though the formal specification table gives 3641MB/s read and 3498MB/s write with a Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSD.

The D1 SSD Plus keeps the same basic single-drive structure as the rest of the range, supporting 1 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD with PCIe 3.0, 4.0, or 5.0 compatibility and a maximum internal raw capacity of 8TB. The higher-speed USB4 connection makes a more obvious difference when working with large video files, project folders, image libraries, and other data sets where USB 10Gbps can become a bottleneck.

It is also compatible with Thunderbolt 5, Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 3, USB4, USB 3.2, USB 3.1, and USB 3.0, although real-world performance will depend heavily on the host port, cable, SSD, file system, and operating system. TerraMaster notes that some Windows computers with Thunderbolt 3 may have incomplete USB4 support, which can lead to recognition problems or reduced speeds.

The enclosure uses a fanless aluminum alloy chassis, with TerraMaster claiming 3x the typical heat dissipation area for passive cooling. This means the drive remains silent in use, while the metal body handles heat transfer from the installed NVMe SSD. At 246g, it is heavier than the standard D1 SSD, but still portable enough for laptop bags, travel kits, and desk-to-desk workflows. Unlike the rugged standard D1 SSD, the Plus model is not presented around IP67 protection or crush resistance, with the emphasis instead placed on speed, broad protocol compatibility, quiet cooling, and electrical protection against short circuits, voltage surges, and electrostatic discharge.

TerraMaster D1 SSD Pro – The INSANE one

The TerraMaster D1 SSD Pro is the highest-end model in the D1 range, moving the enclosure platform up to USB 80Gbps and Thunderbolt 5 class connectivity. This places it well above the D1 SSD Plus in available interface bandwidth and makes it the model most clearly aimed at professional creative workloads rather than general portable storage.

TerraMaster positions the D1 SSD Pro for 8K video editing, large project transfers, direct-edit external workflows, and users who want the fastest option in the range for a single M.2 NVMe drive. The listed performance reaches up to 7061MB/s read and 6816MB/s write when tested with a Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSD on a Mac M4 Pro system using AJA System Test.

Although the D1 SSD Pro supports PCIe 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs up to 8TB, the specification notes a single PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot. This means the enclosure can physically and logically accept a wide range of modern NVMe drives, including examples such as the Samsung 990 Pro and WD SN850X, but performance will still depend on the SSD installed, the host system, and the connection used.

It is compatible with Thunderbolt 5, Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 3, USB4, and USB 3.2/3.1/3.0, so it can step down for broader system support. TerraMaster also includes a color-coded connection indicator, using white for Thunderbolt or USB4 high-speed connections and orange for USB 3.2 or lower, which helps identify when the enclosure is not running at its intended performance level.

The chassis is built around an all-aluminum dual-fin passive cooling design rather than active cooling. TerraMaster describes the cooling system as using a built-in thermal pad, 38 fins, and a full aluminum-alloy shell to help control temperatures during sustained transfers or editing workloads. The enclosure remains fanless and silent, which may matter in audio-sensitive editing rooms or recording environments.

It also includes hardware protection against short circuits, voltage surges, and electrostatic discharge, along with a supplied protective case for travel. At 300g and 121 x 58 x 37mm, it is the largest and heaviest of the 3 models, but that size is tied to the higher-speed interface and more substantial passive heatsink design.

Backupper Software for PC/Mac/Mobile

TerraMaster’s D1 SSD range is also tied into the company’s backup software ecosystem, although the specific tools vary by platform. On Windows, the main utility is TPC Backupper, a free backup and synchronization tool for personal use. It can be used to back up a full operating system, entire disks, selected partitions, individual folders, application data, settings, and Microsoft Outlook emails. It supports full, incremental, and differential backup methods, along with file synchronization and disk or partition cloning. Backup destinations can include local disks, external USB storage, network shares, NAS systems, and cloud storage, which allows it to fit into a wider 3-2-1 backup routine rather than only working with TerraMaster hardware.

For mobile use, TerraMaster refers to the TDAS App for iOS and Android, allowing users to back up photos, videos, and other phone files to the connected private drive instead of relying only on cloud storage. The D1 SSD is listed as compatible with iOS 15.6 or later and Android 11 or later for this function. The D1 SSD Plus and D1 SSD Pro are also supplied with software-led backup features in their product positioning, though the clearest desktop backup support is on Windows through TPC Backupper. TerraMaster does not present the D1 range as a replacement for a NAS-based backup system, but the combination of portable NVMe storage and simple backup utilities gives the enclosures a role in local copies, travel backups, temporary project protection, and fast restores when connected directly to a host device.

Terramaster D1 SSD vs D1 SSD PLUS vs D1 SSD PRO – Which Is Best For You?

The TerraMaster D1 SSD is the most suitable option for users who want a low-cost, compact, and physically protected NVMe enclosure rather than the fastest possible external SSD. Its USB 10Gbps interface is enough for general file transfers, local backups, document libraries, photo collections, and moving data between systems, while the IP67-rated casing and crush-resistant design give it a stronger focus on travel, outdoor use, site work, and less controlled environments. For users who mainly need durable portable storage and do not work with very large media files every day, this is the most practical model in the range.

The TerraMaster D1 SSD Plus is the better fit for users who want a noticeable performance step up without moving to the cost of the Pro model. Its USB4 40Gbps interface makes more sense for content creators, photographers, video editors, Mac mini users, and laptop owners who regularly move large files or want fast external project storage. It lacks the rugged IP67 focus of the standard D1 SSD and the 80Gbps ceiling of the Pro, but it sits in the middle as the more balanced option for users who need high-speed storage in a portable, fanless enclosure.

The TerraMaster D1 SSD Pro is the model aimed at users with the most demanding workflows and the right host hardware to support it. Its USB 80Gbps and Thunderbolt 5 class positioning makes it the obvious choice for 8K video work, very large project files, high-speed scratch storage, and users who want the fastest enclosure in the D1 family. It is also the most expensive, largest, and heaviest of the 3, so it makes the most sense when the available bandwidth can actually be used. For everyday backup or standard portable storage, the lower models are easier to justify, but for performance-led creative work, the D1 SSD Pro is the clear top-tier option.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...TerraMaster D1 SSD Rugged EnclTerramaster D1 SSD (IP67 WaterTerramaster D1 Buyers Guide - Terramaster F2-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F2-425 NAS - BeforTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster D1 SSD Pro ReleaseTerramaster TOS 7 Public Beta Terramaster Launch the TOS 7 P Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Synology Cameras Now Need a License for Surveillance Station

Synology has changed the licensing position for selected cameras in its 2026 surveillance camera range, with the newly listed BC510, TC510, and BC800Z now requiring a Surveillance Device License when used with Synology Surveillance Station. This marks a notable shift from the previous value proposition of Synology-branded cameras, which had been positioned as tightly integrated first-party devices that did not require an additional camera license. The new BC510 and TC510 have been introduced as AI-enabled bullet and turret cameras with 5MP resolution, 30 FPS recording, 110° horizontal field of view, IP66/IP67 protection, 30 m night vision, edge AI analytics, ONVIF support, and compatibility with Synology’s wider surveillance ecosystem, including its upcoming cloud-based surveillance platform. But why has Synology changed it’s stance on camera license requirements with this new series?

What Changed in Synology Cameras and the License Requirements?

Synology’s camera licensing policy has changed for part of its 2026 camera generation. The BC510, TC510, and BC800Z are now listed by Synology as requiring a Surveillance Device License, with Synology’s license documentation stating that these models require 1 license per camera. This means these Synology-branded cameras are now treated in the same basic licensing structure as regular IP cameras, where each camera consumes 1 available Surveillance Station camera license.

This is a significant change because Synology’s own cameras previously had a clear licensing advantage inside Surveillance Station. Earlier Synology camera models were positioned as first-party devices that worked directly with the platform without the need to buy an additional camera license. For users building a Synology-based surveillance setup, that made the cameras easier to justify even when comparable third-party ONVIF cameras were available at lower prices. The camera, platform integration, AI features, and license position were effectively part of the same value proposition.

With the 2026 generation, that arrangement has changed for the BC510, TC510, and BC800Z. Users will now need to account for the cost of a Surveillance Device License when deploying these cameras beyond the default licenses included with their Synology NAS, NVR, or DVA system. Synology NAS systems generally include 2 default licenses, Network Video Recorder systems include 4, and Deep Learning NVR systems include 8. Any deployment that exceeds the available default license count will require additional license packs, just as it would when adding third-party IP cameras or other supported surveillance devices.

According to Synology’s stated position around the new generation, the decision is connected to broader deployment flexibility. The BC510 and TC510 are being introduced not only as cameras for Surveillance Station, but also as devices designed to work across multiple surveillance environments. Synology states that these cameras support deployment within the native Synology ecosystem, third-party NVR and VMS infrastructures through ONVIF, and its upcoming cloud-based surveillance platform. In that context, Synology appears to be separating the camera hardware from the Surveillance Station license entitlement, rather than treating the license as implicitly bundled with the camera.

The advantage Synology presents is that this approach allows the cameras to be used more flexibly outside Synology-only deployments. In theory, a lower hardware price can reduce the entry cost for users who want to deploy the cameras in third-party systems, where a Synology Surveillance Station license would not be relevant. For mixed environments, installers, managed service providers, or businesses migrating between platforms, the cameras can be positioned as ONVIF-capable AI cameras rather than hardware tied primarily to a Synology NAS or NVR. Synology’s argument is therefore less about removing value from Surveillance Station users, and more about aligning the cameras with wider interoperability, third-party infrastructure support, and future cloud surveillance services.

Which Cameras are Affected, and What About Older Synology Cameras?

The affected 2026 Synology camera models listed as requiring a Surveillance Device License are the BC800Z, BC510, and TC510. The BC800Z is the higher-end 8MP model with PoE connectivity, optical zoom coverage, longer night vision range, IP66/IP67/IK10 protection, a 5-year warranty, and additional analytics such as License Plate Recognition and Smoke Detection. The BC510 and TC510 are 5MP PoE cameras, offered in bullet and turret designs respectively, with 2880×1620 resolution, 30 FPS video, a 110° horizontal field of view, 30 m night vision, people and vehicle detection, intrusion detection, audio detection, tampering detection, motion detection, people and vehicle counting, Instant Search, and people-based auto tracking. The CC400W is not listed as requiring a Surveillance Device License, and remains separate from the licensing change affecting the BC800Z, BC510, and TC510.

At this stage, the licensing change appears to apply to the newer 2026 generation models listed by Synology, rather than being presented as a wider retrospective change across all previous Synology cameras. Older Synology camera models are less prominent on Synology’s current product pages following the arrival of the refreshed range, so the long-term public positioning of those older models is less clear from the current camera comparison material. Based on the available details, there is no indication in the supplied information that previously released Synology cameras are being newly reclassified in the same way, but buyers and existing users should still check the official Synology Camera Support List and license documentation for their exact model before expanding or changing a deployment.

Why Has Synology Made This Decision?

Synology’s stated reasoning appears to centre on making its newer cameras more flexible across different deployment environments. The BC510 and TC510 are being positioned not only as Surveillance Station cameras, but also as cameras for third-party NVR and VMS systems through ONVIF, as well as Synology’s upcoming cloud-based surveillance platform. By separating the camera hardware from the Surveillance Station license entitlement, Synology can sell the cameras into environments where a bundled Surveillance Station license would not be useful, while also lowering the hardware entry price for users who are not deploying them directly with Synology’s own platform. There may also be a wider commercial consideration around Synology’s position as a Taiwanese camera manufacturer. In some government, education, public sector, and official institutional deployments, the country of origin of surveillance hardware can be a factor in procurement, security review, and long-term platform approval.

This may give Synology an advantage over some Chinese-made camera brands, particularly in environments where hardware from certain vendors is harder to approve or deploy. In that context, Synology may see an opportunity to position the BC510, TC510, and BC800Z as more broadly deployable surveillance cameras for institutions that want ONVIF-compatible hardware without relying on brands that may face additional scrutiny. For Synology-only users, however, the practical result is different: the license cost now needs to be considered separately when adding the BC510, TC510, or BC800Z to a deployment that has already used its default license allowance. This does not remove the cameras’ first-party integration benefits, edge AI features, or official support inside the Synology ecosystem, but it does change the overall value calculation compared with older Synology cameras that did not require a separate Surveillance Device License.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN NASync Celebrates 2 Years – But Is UGREEN Ready for the Big Leagues?

Two years ago, the popular battery and PC accessory company UGREEN, launched their Kickstarter campaign for the NASync personal NAS series of devices. The brand already had a steadily growing foothold in China with their DX series of NAS devices, but were still a huge outsider in the world of NAS globally. Fast forward two years, a $6 Million crowdfunding campaign, 6 new NAS releases, a new NAS kickstarter in progress (the IDX6011 AI NAS) and generally undermining long-time players who have been in the NAS market for more than a decade – UGREEN is looking like quite a beast in the world of NAS! But two years, UGREEN now finds that along with an increased market position also comes increased demand, scrutiny and expectation. I went to Shenzhen, China, to speak directly with the teams who direct and create their NASync division to ask them them questions about the development of this series, lessons that were learnt, where they are going and what they still need to do to further establish their position in the turnkey NAS market.

Full Disclosure – this Q&A has NOT been sponsored, subsidised or creatively controlled by UGREEN. These questions are my own, submitted to UGREEN 48 hours prior to the interview, and the answers provided were directly from their team.

UGREEN was already a well-established company in its own right before it expanded into NAS systems. So, currently, what is the scale of the teams and resources that your company has allocated to this? R&D, Design, Development, Technical Support, etc?

UGREEN put together its NAS team back in 2018, released its first NAS product in China in 2021, and went global for the first time in 2024, bringing its NAS products to markets around the world. NAS is one of the company’s key strategic product lines, with a team of several hundred people working on it—including product, R&D, design, testing, security, and more. This doesn’t count shared support teams like industrial design, legal, or finance; we’re only talking about people directly focused on NAS. In this whole building, every floor is filled with NAS team members—except for the third floor, which is just the cafeteria.

What has been the biggest challenge in the continued development of your NASync/UGOS services in these last 2 years?

One challenge is resource allocation. We need to support international users at the same time, which means balancing different priorities and expectations. Another challenge is localization. It’s not just about language, but also understanding different user behaviors and usage scenarios. So we had to spend a lot more time to research and validate what users actually need in each region. Based on that, we’ve been continuously adjusting our product direction and improving UGOS to better fit a global audience. It’s definitely an ongoing process, but it’s helped us build a much clearer understanding of the market.

Two years on from your initial crowdfunding, your position in the ‘turnkey NAS market’ from comparative obscurity has catapulted to effectively being in the top 5 (if not top 3) – What do you think UGREEN have brought to the market (or change in the market as a whole) that caused this?

There are a few key things behind that.

Hardware DNA, Built for AI

UGREEN is a hardware company at heart. With our NAS products, we insist on solid hardware—high-performance CPUs, ample memory, high-performance CPUs and ample memory—not just for reliability, but for computing power. AI NAS demands serious performance. Without a strong hardware foundation, AI is nothing more than a concept. Our hardware is designed to make AI run stable and fast.

User-Centric, Not Just a Slogan

We’ve always put ourselves in our users’ shoes. We listen to every voice—on social media, in forums, through user interviews. Many of our features, like snapshots and SAN Manager, came directly from users telling us, “I need this.” Our products aren’t built in a vacuum; they’re shaped together with you.

R&D Investment, Bringing NAS to Everyone

We established our software R&D team, including an AI pre-research team, early on. User feedback has driven us to keep investing, with one goal in mind: to shorten the learning curve. NAS shouldn’t be just a toy for tech enthusiasts. We believe the future of NAS is for everyone—simple, smart, and accessible. This is the path we’re on, and it’s one we want to walk together with you.

The UGREEN IDX6011 AI NAS series has been in development for a long time, and will be headed to its own crowdfunding campaign shortly. What was the biggest challenge you faced in its development and/or lesson that you learned about this new profile of solution?

The biggest challenge was finding the right balance between AI capabilities and real user value. It’s relatively easy to add AI features from a technical perspective, but making them actually useful, stable, and well-integrated into everyday workflows is much harder. Especially on a NAS, NAS is essentially a local storage product, everything runs locally, so for us, it was important that AI features also run locally. But hardware resources and compute power are limited. So the question is, how do we build useful and stable AI features without affecting NAS core functionality like storage, backup and overall system performance? That’s very difficult.

And from product design perspective，it’s also challenging to define the right AI use cases. It’s not about adding more AI features, but making sure they are scenario-driven and actually solve real problems, like better file organization, smarter search, easier intraction… We need to keep the experience simple. Many users are still new to AI on a NAS, so we wanna make things natural and do not add extra complexity. So right now, we’re still in the process of refining and validating these ideas, and making sure we deliver something that’s both practical and reliable for users.

I think it would be fair to say that UGREEN has chiefly focused on Desktop NAS server ownership in their portfolio of solutions to date. But have you explored rackmount solutions, and/or is this something that could happen in the near future?

Actually we’ve done some internal research on rackmount solutions, it’s quite different from desktop NAS in terms of target audience, hardware, software and sales. So it’s not just an extension of what we’re doing now, it requires a different product strategy. For now, our focus is still on improving and expanding our desktop NAS lineup, in the short term, we don’t have a concrete plan for rackmount products, but it’s something we’ll continue to evaluate over time.

Now that UGREEN is a largely established player in the turnkey NAS market, there is a lot more scrutiny on the extent to which your brand preemptively prepares against cyber security threats. What is UGREEN doing to address (in terms of foundations on this platform and broader services) this to avoid a potential slow moving snowballing security incident?

Security is something we take very seriously. At the product level, we provide a range of built-in security features. For example, users can enable DoS protection to defend against network attacks, automatically block IP addresses after multiple failed login attempts, and set up firewall rules to control access from specific IP addresses and built-in Security app to scan for suspicious files We also have a dedicated internal security team and a well-established vulnerability handling process, so critical issues can be identified and resolved quickly. We also provide a vulnerability reporting channel on our official website. If users discover any potential security issues, they can report them to us, and we will assess and respond accordingly.

(Below is a snippet of the Security Disclosure page from UGREEN, available HERE)

At CES 2026, UGREEN unveiled its surveillance platform and edge AI cameras. At that time, your team was kind enough to allow me to see the early development of your NAS surveillance application that will allow full management, direct control and storage of these new Surveillance services. Is development still continuing on this and will this be a service that existing NASync owners will have access to in the future

Yes, development is still ongoing. The surveillance platform you saw at CES is actually a part we are exploring, and is still under active development. From what I understand, AIOT is a broad ecosystem that is going to feature ai NAS, ai-based home security cameras, and many more AI-empowered hardware devices for a smarter lifestyle. On the NAS side, we’re also building our own surveillance application for NASync. We plan to launch it within this year. In terms of compatibility, we aim to support both UGREEN cameras and third-party cameras, so users have more flexibility to build their setup. So overall, both sides are moving forward, but they are different products within the UGREEN ecosystem.

In the last year, UGREEN released two ARM RK chip-powered NAS solutions in the DH2300 and DH4300 – How easy/hard was scaling UGOS onto this more modest hardware base, and were there any useful lessons learned that have benefited your NAS development as a whole?

DH series is our entry-level lineup, designed mainly for NAS beginners and users with simpler needs. From a technical perspective, running UGOS on an ARM-based platform is definitely more constrained compared to x86, especially in terms of performance and resource availability. A lot of things can’t just be directly carried over, we need to re-adapt them for the ARM architecture, including the kernel, system services, and many core features. So we had to be more selective and thoughtful about which features to include and how to optimize them. And from a product perspective, it actually helped us become more focused. With the DXP series, we already emphasized user-friendliness, but with the DH series, we really wanted to take that further and make it as simple as possible, essentially positioning it as a user’s first NAS.

So in practice, we streamlined certain features based on the hardware and target users. For example, we simplified or did not include things like virtual machines and some AI capabilities, and instead focused on delivering a smooth and reliable core experience. One key lesson we learned is that not every product needs to do everything. It’s more important to match the right experience to the right user group. And that thinking has also helped us better define our overall NAS product lineup.

I canvased a large group of UGREEN NAS users (many of whom were part of your original Kickstarter campaign) who are still using their NASync systems to this day, and have followed you on your journey so far. I asked them which features or improvements they would like to see in future updates and revisions to UGOS. Are you able to share if these are features that are on the roadmap, or have been explored?

• Full Volume Encryption
• WORM support
• A mixed drive RAID storage system (comparable to Synology Hybrid RAID or Terramaster TRAID)
• A tiered storage system (unlike the copy system of ‘caching’, but a SSD+HDD composite pool that intelligently moves ‘hot’, ‘warm’ and ‘cold’ data to appropriate storage areas)
• ZFS as a file system choice
• A native Plex Media Server Application
• A local client application for Mac/Windows for file pinning, streaming, intelligent 30-day deletion (see Synology Drive, QNAP Qsync, etc)
• A more comprehensive security scanner (eg scanning for unsecure open ports, SSH being open, weak passwords, admin accounts, auto blocks disabled, etc)

We’ve actually seen many of these requests from our users as well, these are very valuable suggestions and we’ve already had internal discussions around most of them. But many of these features, like full volume encryption, hybrid RAID, or tiered storage are quite complex, they take time to design, develop and validate, especially we wanted to make them stable and reliable.

So at this stage, we don’t have a specific timeline we can share yet. But these are definitely things we take seriously, and we’ll plan them carefully based on user demand and overall product direction. If we see strong demand from users, we’ll absolutely prioritize them accordingly.

Thank you to the team at UGREEN for their time in this interview. As mentioned, the answers about were provided in their entirety and without prejudice. This will be a video soon that covers this, the tour of the facilities, as well as further discussion around the IDX6011 NAS Kickstarter and how this has been managed.

Want to Support the work me and Eddie do at NASCompares? If you found this article helpful and are going to buy a UGREEN NAS from the brand’s official site or from Amazon, use the links below. Using these links will result in a small commission coming to us (which costs you nothing extra) and it allows us to keep doing what we do! Thank you for keeping the internet a fair and sustainable place!

Buy the UGREEN NAS from your local Amazon Store	Buy the UGREEN NAS solutions Directly from UGREEN.COM

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UGREEN DXP4800GT NAS RevealedUGREEN DXP4800 GT NAS RevealedHow to Install OpenClaw on a UHow to Install OpenClaw on a UUGREEN NAS - 2 Years Later - IUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UGREEN DXP4800 PRO NAS ReviewUGREEN DXP4800 PRO NAS ReviewUGREEN iDX6011 Pro AI NAS Revi Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Sharge Go Back to the Drawing Board, with the Disk Pro 2

The Sharge Disk Pro 2 is an upcoming portable storage and connectivity device that combines the functionality of a USB hub with external SSD support in a compact, credit card-sized form factor. Developed by Sharge, the device is designed to address the increasing demand for high-speed data access, external storage expansion, and multi-port connectivity across mobile and desktop platforms. Unlike conventional USB-C hubs or portable SSDs, the Disk Pro 2 merges both roles into a single unit, while also incorporating active cooling to maintain consistent performance under sustained workloads. At launch, it will be available in two variants, Lite and Ultra, which differ in display capability and power efficiency, introducing a tiered approach not seen in the previous model.

Positioned as a follow-up to the earlier Sharge Disk Pro, this new iteration shifts away from fixed internal storage and instead introduces support for user-installed SSDs in multiple M.2 form factors. Alongside this change, the device retains key characteristics such as 10Gbps data throughput, integrated power delivery, and video output capabilities, while adding refinements including magnetic attachment and a lanyard-style data cable. The Lite version features HDMI 2.0 and a higher power draw of around 4W, while the Ultra version includes HDMI 2.1 and operates at approximately 1W, providing a more efficient option with expanded display support. The Disk Pro 2 is scheduled to launch via Kickstarter, continuing the company’s established approach of introducing new hardware through crowdfunding platforms.

Sharge Disk Pro 2 – Design & Storage

The Sharge Disk Pro 2 maintains a compact footprint, measuring approximately 90 × 61 × 11 mm, aligning closely with the dimensions of a standard credit card. This size places it firmly in the category of ultra-portable accessories, designed to be carried alongside a smartphone or laptop without requiring additional space typically associated with external drives or docking stations. The chassis follows a flat, rectangular layout with integrated components distributed to maximize internal efficiency while preserving a slim profile. A defining aspect of the design is its transparent enclosure, which exposes internal components in a style often associated with “cyberpunk” aesthetics. This approach is not purely cosmetic, as it also highlights the inclusion of active cooling hardware within a device of this size. The visible fan and internal layout reinforce the product’s positioning as a performance-oriented device rather than a passive accessory, distinguishing it from more conventional sealed USB hubs. The external design remains consistent across both Lite and Ultra variants, with no physical differentiation beyond internal configuration.

The Disk Pro 2 introduces a magnetic mounting system intended for direct attachment to compatible devices. This includes native support for MagSafe-enabled smartphones, as well as the option to use included magnetic rings for broader compatibility with non-MagSafe hardware. The goal is to reduce cable strain and improve portability by allowing the hub and connected device to function as a single unit during use, particularly in mobile workflows such as handheld video capture or on-the-go file transfers. Another physical design element is the inclusion of a detachable lanyard-style cable that supports both data and power delivery. This integrated approach removes the need for users to carry separate cables for connectivity, while also doubling as a carrying mechanism. The included cable is specified as a 24-pin pure copper design, supporting up to 10Gbps data transfer, power delivery, and DisplayPort signal passthrough.

Sharge Disk Pro 2 – Internal Hardware

At the core of the Sharge Disk Pro 2 is a multi-controller architecture described as an independent 4-chip control system. Each major function, including storage access, USB expansion, video output, and power delivery, is handled by a dedicated controller. This separation is intended to improve stability and reduce bandwidth contention when multiple ports are in use simultaneously, particularly under sustained workloads such as file transfers while outputting video and supplying power. A central feature of the internal design is the active cooling system, referred to as the “Ice-storm” fan. Operating at speeds of up to 10,000 RPM, the fan is designed to maintain consistent thermal conditions during extended data transfers. The system includes three operational modes: OFF, Auto, and Turbo. In Auto mode, fan speed adjusts based on internal temperatures, while Turbo maintains maximum cooling performance. This approach addresses a common limitation in compact hubs and SSD enclosures, where passive cooling can lead to thermal throttling under load. The cooling system is consistent across both Lite and Ultra variants, with no differentiation in thermal hardware between the two models.

Sharge Disk Pro 2 – Ports & Connections

The Sharge Disk Pro 2 integrates a total of 6 ports, combining data transfer, display output, and power delivery within a single device. These include 2 USB-C ports, 1 USB-A port, 1 HDMI output, and dual card reader slots for SD and microSD media. This configuration positions the device as a compact alternative to larger desktop docking stations, while maintaining compatibility with a wide range of peripherals and storage formats. The primary USB-C interface (USB-C1) supports 10Gbps data transfer alongside up to 100W power input, allowing the connected host device to be charged while the hub is in use. A secondary USB-C port (USB-C2) provides up to 80W power output, enabling downstream charging for connected devices. The inclusion of both input and output power delivery allows the hub to function as an intermediary between a power source and multiple connected devices without interrupting data throughput. This overall port layout remains consistent across both Lite and Ultra variants.

Sharge Disk Pro vs Sharge Disk Pro 2

The transition from the original Sharge Disk Pro to the Sharge Disk Pro 2 represents a shift in both hardware architecture and product segmentation. The Disk Pro is fundamentally an all-in-one device, combining fixed internal NVMe storage with a compact multi-port hub and active cooling, positioned as a self-contained solution for users who want storage and connectivity without additional components. It integrates storage capacities up to 4TB and was originally sold in tiered pricing depending on capacity . In contrast, the Disk Pro 2 removes onboard storage entirely and instead supports user-installed M.2 SSDs up to 8TB, changing the device into a modular enclosure and hub hybrid rather than a pre-configured storage product. This also alters the pricing structure significantly, as the Disk Pro 2 is sold as a standalone unit starting at $49 for the Lite version and $69 for the Ultra version, separating the cost of storage from the hardware itself.

Beyond storage, the Disk Pro 2 introduces clearer product tiering with Lite and Ultra variants, something not present in the original model. The Lite version reduces cost by using HDMI 2.0 and operating at a higher power draw of around 4W, while the Ultra version includes HDMI 2.1 and lowers power consumption to approximately 1W. Both retain the same core concept of combining data transfer, display output, and power delivery into a compact device, but the newer model expands connectivity with additional ports, including SD and microSD slots. Both generations maintain active cooling as a central feature, designed to prevent thermal throttling during sustained transfers, a capability that has been demonstrated in testing of the original device where performance remained stable under load . Physically, both devices share a similar credit card-sized footprint and transparent design, but the Disk Pro 2 refines usability with a detachable lanyard cable and broader magnetic compatibility. Overall, the original model prioritizes simplicity and integration, while the newer version emphasizes flexibility, lower entry cost, and configurable storage.

Sharge Disk Pro 2 – Launch Date and Price?

The Sharge Disk Pro 2 is scheduled to launch via a crowdfunding campaign on Kickstarter, with the campaign planned to go live on June 9. As with previous releases from Sharge, this approach places the product in an early-access phase prior to wider retail availability, meaning final specifications and delivery timelines may still be subject to change. The device will be offered in two distinct variants, allowing users to choose between different feature sets and efficiency profiles at launch. The entry-level Lite version is priced at $49 and features HDMI 2.0 output with a higher reported power consumption of around 4W. The higher-tier Ultra version is priced at $69 and includes HDMI 2.1 support, alongside a lower power draw of approximately 1W. Both versions are expected to ship with a 24-pin pure copper lanyard-style cable that supports data transfer, charging, and DisplayPort signal transmission. This tiered pricing structure introduces a lower entry point compared to earlier expectations, while still separating features such as display capability and power efficiency between the two models.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Sharge Disk Pro 2 RevealedSharge Disk Pro ReviewSharge Disk Pro ReviewThe Sharge Loomos AI Glasses ?The Sharge Loomos AI Glasses -Sharge Disk Plus SSD EnclosureSharge Disk Plus SSD Enclosure Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Should You Upgrade to the UniFi Dream Machine Beast?

The UniFi Dream Machine Beast arrives as a more serious entry in the Dream Machine range, and that immediately raises the main question: who is it actually for? Existing UniFi users may look at it as a possible upgrade from a UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max, while new buyers may see it as a way to start with a more capable console from day 1. On paper, it is clearly built for larger and busier networks, but that does not automatically make it the right choice for every UniFi setup. Whether the Dream Machine Beast makes sense depends less on the headline specification and more on the network around it. For some users, it may offer useful headroom for faster internet, heavier security processing, larger Protect installations, or wider UniFi management. For others, it may be more hardware than the deployment can realistically use, especially once the cost of switches, cabling, cameras, access points, and redundancy are taken into account. This article looks at where the Beast is a practical upgrade, where it may be excessive, and what trade-offs should be considered before buying.

UniFi Dream Machine Beast – Should You Buy? (The tl;dr)

The UniFi Dream Machine Beast is best viewed as a higher-capacity UniFi OS console for larger UniFi networks, rather than a default upgrade for every Dream Machine user. Its main advantages are the 8-core Arm v9 processor, 16GB of memory, 10GbE RJ45 ports, 10G SFP+ connectivity, 25G SFP28 support, 25Gbps-class IDS/IPS throughput, support for 750+ managed UniFi devices, 7,500+ concurrent clients, and 2 3.5-inch NVR bays for larger UniFi Protect deployments. These upgrades make it a more suitable option for businesses, multi-site networks, heavier camera installations, faster WAN environments, and users who are starting to outgrow the UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max. It also makes sense where security inspection, VPN use, traffic analysis, and UniFi application hosting are all expected to run at a larger scale on the same appliance. However, the Beast is not a simple plug-in upgrade for every setup. The $1,499 price, lack of PoE, internal non-removable PSU, and dependency on wider 25GbE infrastructure all make the total cost higher than the unit alone suggests. Users with mostly 1GbE, 2.5GbE, or 10GbE networks may not see enough practical benefit to justify the move, especially if their existing Dream Machine is not close to its limits. In many smaller UniFi deployments, the better use of budget may be a UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max combined with stronger switches, more access points, improved camera coverage, larger storage, or backup power. The Dream Machine Beast is therefore a strong option for larger and more demanding UniFi environments, but it should be bought with a clear network plan rather than as an automatic upgrade.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 7/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.6

PROS

8-core Arm v9 processor: Gives the Beast more headroom for routing, firewall rules, VPNs, IDS/IPS, DPI, SD-WAN, and UniFi application hosting.
25Gbps-class IDS/IPS throughput: A major step up from earlier Dream Machine models, making it better suited to high-speed networks with security inspection enabled.
25G SFP28 connectivity: Provides a faster uplink path for aggregation switches, high-speed WAN, NAS systems, and larger network cores.
10GbE RJ45 ports as standard: Makes the device more practical for users with existing 10GBASE-T equipment, without relying entirely on SFP modules or adapters.
16GB of system memory: Helps the appliance manage heavier UniFi workloads when Network, Protect, VPNs, traffic analysis, and security services are active at the same time.
Higher UniFi device and client capacity: Supports 750+ managed UniFi devices and 7,500+ concurrent clients, making it more suitable for larger sites and busy business networks.
Larger UniFi Protect capability: Supports up to 100 HD cameras, 60 2K cameras, or 40 4K cameras.
Dual 3.5-inch NVR drive bays: Gives Protect users more flexibility for recording capacity or redundancy than a single-drive Dream Machine.

CONS

High price compared with other Dream Machines: At $1,499, it costs far more than the UDM Pro, UDM SE, and UDM Pro Max.
No built-in PoE: Cameras, access points, phones, and other powered UniFi devices require separate PoE switches or injectors.
25GbE can make the wider upgrade expensive: To properly benefit from the Beast’s 25GbE capability, users may also need 25GbE switches, SFP28 modules, DACs, faster servers, or upgraded aggregation links.

Infrastructure-Class CPU for Heavier Routing and Security Workloads

A key hardware change in the UniFi Dream Machine Beast is its move to an 8-core Arm v9 processor running at 2.1GHz. This is a notable step up from the older Dream Machine models, such as the UDM SE, which uses a quad-core Arm Cortex-A57 at 1.7GHz with 4GB of memory. The Beast is built around Arm Neoverse N2 architecture, which Arm describes as its 1st Arm v9 infrastructure CPU, designed for cloud-to-edge workloads with improved performance per watt and a claimed 40% scalar performance uplift over Neoverse N1.

In practical terms, the CPU matters because the gateway is not just passing traffic from 1 port to another. It may also be handling firewall rules, IDS/IPS inspection, VPN traffic, DPI, policy routing, SD-WAN, VLANs, and UniFi application management at the same time. The supplied specification lists IDS/IPS throughput at 24.9Gbps, which is far beyond the 3.5Gbps figure associated with the UDM Pro class. That does not mean every user will need this level of processing headroom, but for larger networks it reduces the chance that security features or encrypted traffic become the main limit before the ports themselves do.

25GbE Uplinks and 10GbE Copper as Standard

The Dream Machine Beast makes a clear jump in physical connectivity compared with the smaller Dream Machine models. Instead of treating 10GbE as the higher-end connection, it uses 10GbE RJ45 as the baseline for its main LAN ports, alongside 10G SFP+ and 25G SFP28 connectivity. This matters because it gives the unit enough port flexibility to sit between faster WAN services, high-speed switches, NAS systems, and larger UniFi deployments without immediately forcing everything through a single 10GbE bottleneck.

The 25G SFP28 port is the more significant part of the design, as it gives the Beast room to aggregate traffic from larger networks rather than simply serve a handful of local devices. For users with multi-gig internet, large camera deployments, heavy internal routing, or multiple downstream switches, this creates a more capable central gateway than the UDM Pro Max. However, the benefit depends heavily on the rest of the network. A 25GbE port only becomes useful when switches, cabling, transceivers, and connected systems can also take advantage of it.

16GB of Memory for Larger UniFi Workloads

The Dream Machine Beast also increases system memory to 16GB, which is a practical upgrade when compared with smaller Dream Machine models. RAM is not as visible as the ports on the front of the unit, but it matters when the console is managing routing, firewall rules, VPNs, IDS/IPS, traffic identification, UniFi Network, UniFi Protect, and other UniFi applications at the same time. More memory gives the system more room to handle these services without the same pressure on resources as deployments grow.

In real terms, this is reflected in the stated management limits. The Beast is rated for 750+ managed UniFi devices and 7,500+ simultaneous connected users, while also supporting larger Protect deployments of up to 100 HD cameras, 60 2K cameras, or 40 4K cameras. Those figures put it in a different class from a typical small office or prosumer Dream Machine setup. The benefit is not just that the Beast can run faster, but that it is better equipped to keep multiple UniFi workloads active at once without becoming constrained as quickly.

Dual Drive Bays Give Protect More Room to Scale

The Dream Machine Beast includes 2 3.5-inch NVR HDD bays, which makes storage a more serious part of the appliance rather than a minor add-on. This is most relevant for UniFi Protect users, because camera recording is where local storage capacity has the biggest day-to-day impact. With support for up to 100 HD cameras, 60 2K cameras, or 40 4K cameras, the Beast is clearly intended to handle larger surveillance deployments than a basic Dream Machine setup.

The 2-bay design also gives users more flexibility than a single-drive console. It allows for higher total recording capacity or a redundant storage configuration, depending on how the system is deployed. The built-in 128GB SSD is separate from this and is used to keep the UniFi OS experience responsive rather than acting as the main video archive. This does not turn the Beast into a dedicated high-bay NVR, but it does make it more practical for sites that want gateway, management, and Protect recording in 1 rackmount device.

The Price Gap Against Other Dream Machines

The main drawback with the Dream Machine Beast is the price. At the quoted $1,499 figure from the launch material, it sits well above the rest of the Dream Machine range. For comparison, the UDM Pro is listed by Ubiquiti’s UK store at £300 before VAT, while the UDM SE is listed at £395 before VAT and the UDM Pro Max at £475 before VAT. Those models are clearly lower in throughput and capacity, but the difference still matters because the Beast is not a small step up in cost.

That makes the buying decision less about whether the Beast is technically better, and more about whether the network will actually use what it offers. A UDM Pro Max already provides 5Gbps IPS routing, 2,000+ client support, 200+ UniFi device support, and 2 NVR drive bays, which is still enough for many UniFi deployments. The Beast makes more sense when the extra routing capacity, larger client count, 25GbE connectivity, and higher Protect ceiling are genuinely required. For smaller sites, the money saved by choosing a lower Dream Machine could be more useful if spent on switches, access points, cameras, or backup power instead.

No PoE Limits Its Use as a Self-Contained Console

The Dream Machine Beast does not include PoE ports, which is a noticeable omission for a device at this price and scale. This does not affect its role as a gateway, firewall, UniFi OS console, or NVR, but it does mean that access points, cameras, door access hardware, phones, and smaller UniFi devices will need power from a separate PoE switch, injector, or other power source. For larger deployments this may not be a major issue, because a dedicated PoE switch would usually be part of the design anyway.

The drawback is more obvious for users upgrading from a Dream Machine model that already includes PoE, such as the UDM SE. Even a small number of PoE ports can be useful for directly powering a nearby access point, test device, camera, or compact downstream switch. On the Beast, the lack of PoE reinforces the idea that it is not intended to be a self-contained all-in-one network box. It is better understood as the central gateway and controller for a wider UniFi installation, rather than a device that can power much of that installation on its own.

Internal Power Supply Makes Hardware Servicing Less Convenient

The Dream Machine Beast uses an internal AC/DC power supply rather than a removable PSU module. It does support DC power backup through UniFi’s RPS system, which gives it a path for power failover when used with the required external hardware. However, this is not the same as having a hot-swappable or easily replaceable PSU built into the unit itself. If the internal supply fails, servicing is likely to be less convenient than it would be on a rackmount device with a standard removable power module.

This matters more because the Beast is aimed at larger and more business-critical UniFi environments. At this level, some buyers may expect either dual onboard PSUs or at least a removable single PSU design for easier replacement and reduced maintenance time. The RPS option helps with continuity, but it also adds another device to the rack and another cost to the overall setup. For users planning around uptime, this is an area where the Beast is functional, but not as service-friendly as some enterprise-style rack hardware.

Be Aware – 25GbE Can Push the Rest of the Network Into a Costly Upgrade Path

The Dream Machine Beast’s 25GbE capability is useful, but it can also change the scale of the upgrade. To take proper advantage of a 25GbE gateway, the rest of the network needs to be able to feed it and receive traffic from it at similar speeds. That usually means 25GbE-capable switches, suitable SFP28 modules or DAC cables, and potentially faster links to servers, NAS systems, or aggregation switches. Without that supporting hardware, the 25GbE port may end up being useful mainly as future headroom rather than something the network benefits from immediately.

This is where the Beast can become more expensive than it first appears. A network built around 2.5GbE or 10GbE copper may not need to move to 25GbE yet, especially if most endpoints are access points, cameras, desktops, or smaller servers. In those cases, a lower-cost Dream Machine paired with better 2.5GbE or 10GbE switching may be the more balanced upgrade. The Beast makes more sense when the wider network is already moving toward 25GbE, or when there is a clear plan to scale into it, rather than when the 25GbE port is the only part of the setup ready for that speed.

Verdict: Highly Capable Hardware, High Scalability, But Not a Universal Upgrade for All

The UniFi Dream Machine Beast is a stronger fit for users who have already reached the limits of the existing Dream Machine models, or who can clearly see those limits approaching. Its faster processor, 16GB of memory, 25GbE connectivity, high IDS/IPS throughput, larger UniFi management capacity, and 2 NVR drive bays all point toward larger networks with heavier traffic, more cameras, more clients, or more demanding security features. In that context, it is not simply a faster UDM Pro Max. It is a more substantial gateway and UniFi OS console for deployments that need more headroom.

For everyone else, the value is less clear. The higher price, lack of PoE, internal non-removable PSU, and likely need for wider 25GbE infrastructure all make it a device that should be bought with a specific network plan in mind. Users running smaller UniFi systems, mostly 1GbE to 10GbE networks, or modest Protect installations may get better value from a UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max with money left for switches, access points, storage, or backup power. The Beast is best judged as a targeted upgrade for larger UniFi environments, not as the default Dream Machine for every buyer.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UNVR Gen 2 Pro - Is It WUniFi UNVR Gen 2 ProUniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShNew UniFi Dream Machine BEAST,New UniFi UDM Beast, EnterprisUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MLUniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MUniFi UNAS 4 Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Terramaster D1 SSD (IP67 Waterproof & 1.2-Ton Crush Resistance and Silent)

April 28, 2026 | The Professional storage brand TerraMaster today officially introduces the all-new rugged portable SSD enclosure — D1 SSD. Designed for users who demand both data security and high-speed performance, the D1 SSD features an aircraft-grade all-metal chassis, IP67 water and dust resistance, and 1.2-ton crush resistance. Combined with high-speed data transfer, silent cooling, and broad platform compatibility, it becomes an ideal storage companion for photographers, outdoor professionals, and mobile workers.

Buy from Terramaster Official Site:	Buy from Your Local Amazon:
Specification	TerraMaster D1 SSD
Drive Bays	1
Supported SSD Type	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD
Maximum Capacity	8TB
Interface	USB 10Gbps
Max Read Speed	1020MB/s
Max Write Speed	1010MB/s
File Systems	NTFS, APFS, Mac OS, FAT32, EXT4, exFAT
Supported OS	Windows, macOS, Linux
Ingress Protection	IP67
Cooling	Fanless passive cooling
Noise Level	Noiseless
Power Consumption	3.2W read/write, 0.2W hibernation
Dimensions	113.6 x 45.0 x 21.0mm
Net Weight	146g
Warranty	2 years

Three Layers of Protection Build an Unbreakable Data Shield：

1. Solid All-Metal Chassis for High-Intensity Work Environments

 The D1 SSD adopts a unibody aircraft-grade aluminum alloy construction. The full-metal enclosure offers excellent scratch resistance and corrosion protection, making it well-suited for long-term, heavy-duty usage. Whether facing extreme temperature differences outdoors or constant wear from mobile work, the enclosure ensures stable operation, extended lifespan, and reliable storage performance for professional users.

2. IP67 Water & Dust Resistance for Harsh Conditions

 Equipped with precision silicone sealing rings, the D1 SSD meets IP67 certification standards. It can withstand submersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes and is fully protected against dust and splashes. From rainy outdoor shoots and desert environments to construction sites, the enclosure safeguards both the SSD and your data. Protection performance is verified by internationally recognized testing organizations such as SGS.

3. 1.2-Ton Crush Resistance with Shock & Drop Protection

 The aircraft-grade aluminum unibody structure enables the enclosure to withstand up to 1.2 tons of vehicle-level pressure. Its dedicated shock-resistant internal design absorbs impacts from drops and collisions during daily use. Even under extreme external force, internal drives and data remain fully protected—eliminating the fragility issues of ordinary enclosures.

High-Speed Performance with Silent Operation and Broad Compatibility

 The D1 SSD features a USB 3.2 Gen2 interface, supports UASP protocol and TRIM optimization, and delivers real-world sequential read/write speeds of up to 1020 MB/s. Transferring a 1GB file takes just seconds, making it ideal for 4K video editing and large photo backups. The all-metal housing provides 2.5× larger heat dissipation area, while the fanless passive cooling design ensures completely silent operation.

 The enclosure supports up to 8TB single-drive capacity and is compatible with M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs based on PCIe 3.0 / 4.0 / 5.0 standards. It can store up to 2.79 million high-resolution photos or 5,400 HD movies. Compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux, it also connects to computers, TVs, and OTG-enabled smartphones for true plug-and-play use.

Additionally, the D1 SSD supports one-touch photo backup via the TerraMaster TDAS mobile app. Once connected, photos are automatically synchronized from your smartphone, with data stored locally to prevent privacy leakage and enable efficient cross-device file management.

 Designed for Multiple Usage Scenarios:

• Photographers & Outdoor Professionals

Rugged protection handles complex environments, enabling fast backups and eliminating data loss risks. Ideal for field exploration, construction sites, and harsh outdoor conditions.

• Mobile Professionals & Students

Ultra-lightweight at only 146g, pocket-sized design, and instant file transfer create a portable “light office” anywhere.

• General Users & Mac Professionals

Perfect as an external expansion drive or boot drive—quiet, stable, and plug-and-play.

Availability & Service

The TerraMaster D1 SSD is now officially available through the TerraMaster website (https://www.terra-master.com/) and authorized global channels. Customers who purchase within the first two weeks of launch can enjoy a 15% discount. The product is backed by a two-year global warranty and lifetime technical support for a worry-free user experience.

Interested in the D1 SSD, or want to know more about the rest of the D1 SSD Range, below are the specs and prices for the D1 SSD (10Gb/s), D1 SSD PLUS (40Gb/s) and D1 SSD Pro (80Gb/s):

Specification	TerraMaster D1 SSD	TerraMaster D1 SSD Plus	TerraMaster D1 SSD Pro
Interface	USB 10Gbps	USB4 40Gbps	USB 80Gbps / Thunderbolt 5 class
Claimed Max Read	1020MB/s	3641MB/s specification, 3853MB/s listed in testing	7061MB/s
Claimed Max Write	1010MB/s	3498MB/s specification, 3707MB/s listed in testing	6816MB/s
SSD Support	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe
Max Capacity	8TB	8TB	8TB
Cooling	Fanless aluminum passive cooling	Fanless aluminum passive cooling	Fanless aluminum body with finned passive cooling
Protection / Build	IP67, dustproof, waterproof, crush-resistant up to 1.2 tons	All-metal unibody chassis, short circuit, surge, and ESD protection	All-aluminum dual-fin design, smart status indicator, short circuit, surge, and ESD protection
Price Listed	$33.99 (15% OFF $39.99)	$76.99 (30% OFF $109.99)	$199.99 (20% OFF $199.99)

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Terramaster D1 SSD (IP67 WaterTerramaster D1 SSD Enclosure RTerramaster D1 Buyers Guide - Terramaster F2-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F2-425 NAS - BeforTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster D1 SSD Pro ReleaseTerramaster TOS 7 Public Beta Terramaster Launch the TOS 7 P Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

New Thunderbolt 5 NVMe Storage Solution Revealed – The OWC 4M2 Ultra

OWC has introduced the Express 4M2 Ultra at NAB 2026 as a compact 4 bay NVMe enclosure built around Thunderbolt 5. It is designed as a DIY storage solution for users who want to install their own M.2 SSDs and configure the enclosure for different RAID modes, including RAID 0, 1, 4, 5, 10, and JBOD. OWC positions it as a high performance option for media production, post production, and other bandwidth intensive workloads that benefit from fast external solid state storage.

The enclosure supports up to 4 NVMe M.2 drives in 2280 or 2242 formats and is rated for up to 6622MB/s in RAID 0 when paired with PCIe 4.0 or newer SSDs on Thunderbolt 5 systems. It also retains backward compatibility with Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 3 on Mac, and USB4 hosts, though throughput is lower on 40Gb/s connections. Capacity starts with whatever drives the user installs, with support for up to 32TB in a single unit based on current 8TB SSD support, while additional units can be daisy chained for larger storage pools.

OWC Express 4M2 Ultra – Design & Storage

The Express 4M2 Ultra uses a compact aluminum enclosure with a vertical desktop form factor intended to keep its footprint relatively small. OWC states that the chassis is built from aircraft grade aluminum, which serves both as the structural housing and as part of the thermal design. The unit measures 12.3 cm tall, 11.7 cm long, and 6.0 cm wide, with a listed weight of 900 g.

Internally, the enclosure provides 4 drive bays for NVMe M.2 SSDs and supports both 2280 and 2242 form factors. It accepts single sided and double sided drives, though SSDs with integrated heatsinks are not supported. OWC specifies support for PCIe Gen 3 and later SSDs, with Gen 4 and newer drives recommended for higher performance. Each bay operates at PCIe 4.0 x1, and single drive performance is rated at up to 1600MB/s.

From a storage flexibility standpoint, the enclosure is aimed at users who prefer to source and install their own drives rather than buy a preconfigured array. That allows the capacity and performance profile to vary depending on the SSDs installed. With current 8TB drives, the maximum listed capacity is 32TB in a single enclosure, while future higher capacity drives could increase that figure without requiring a new chassis.

RAID support is handled in software rather than through a dedicated hardware RAID controller. The Express 4M2 Ultra supports RAID 0, 1, 4, 5, 10, and JBOD, with OWC highlighting SoftRAID as its main management option. This gives users a wider range of configuration choices depending on whether they prioritize throughput, redundancy, usable capacity, or a balance between those factors.

Thermal management is handled by a 40mm cooling fan with multiple speed thresholds tied to internal temperature. According to OWC’s listed profile, the fan remains off below 35°C, then ramps progressively from 40% to 100% as temperatures rise from 35°C to 55°C and above. The stated approach is to reduce unnecessary noise under lighter workloads while maintaining SSD performance during sustained transfers.

OWC Express 4M2 Ultra – Ports and Connections

The Express 4M2 Ultra uses Thunderbolt 5 as its primary host interface, with 1 USB C host port rated for up to 80Gb/s. OWC also lists support for USB Attached SCSI Protocol, and the enclosure is designed to work across Thunderbolt 5, Thunderbolt 4, USB4, and Thunderbolt 3 on supported Mac systems. In practice, that gives it a broader compatibility range than a Thunderbolt 5 only accessory, though maximum throughput depends on the bandwidth available from the connected system.

A second Thunderbolt 5 port is included for downstream connectivity. OWC states that this allows users to daisy chain up to 5 additional Thunderbolt devices, along with 1 USB peripheral, from the same connection path. The same port can also be used to connect additional Express 4M2 Ultra units, with OWC positioning that as a way to build larger storage volumes without treating each enclosure as an entirely separate destination.

Compatibility varies by platform and interface generation. On newer Thunderbolt 5 Macs and PCs, OWC rates the enclosure at up to 6622MB/s, while Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 systems are listed at up to 3200MB/s. Intel Macs with Thunderbolt 3 are rated up to 2800MB/s, and OWC notes that Thunderbolt 3 support is Mac only. No driver is required, and the enclosure is listed as compatible with macOS 14.x Sonoma, macOS 15.x Sequoia, macOS 26.x Tahoe, Windows 11, and Linux, with some features depending on OS version and connection type.

OWC Express 4M2 Ultra – Price and Release date

OWC has set the starting price of the Express 4M2 Ultra at $399.99 for the standard non SoftRAID version. A version bundled with SoftRAID is priced at $549.99. As a result, the enclosure enters the market as a premium DIY storage option rather than a low cost external SSD enclosure, with the final overall build cost depending heavily on the NVMe drives a buyer installs.

The company says the Express 4M2 Ultra is available for pre order now following its reveal at NAB 2026 in Las Vegas. OWC lists shipping for Q3 2026, so early buyers will still be waiting several months for general availability. That places the launch window firmly in the second half of the year, even though orders have already opened.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...New OWC 4M2 Ultra Revealed - GOWC Thunderbolt 5 Dock - Are WOWC Thunderbolt 5 Dock - Are WRealtek to Showcase Full RangeOWC Thunderbolt 3 ThunderBay 8 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Seagate Shows Off It’s 44TB Hard Drive at NAB 2026

At the 2026 NAB Show 2026, Seagate Technology formally introduced its latest generation of high-capacity enterprise hard drives built on the Mozaic 4+ platform. These drives, (model ID ST4400NM002M)  reaching up to 44TB, represent the current peak of commercially deployed hard disk capacity and are already being shipped to select hyperscale cloud providers. The announcement reflects ongoing demand for higher-density storage as data generation continues to accelerate, particularly in artificial intelligence and large-scale cloud environments.

Rather than targeting general consumers, these drives are designed specifically for hyperscale data centres where efficiency, density, and cost per terabyte are critical considerations. The Mozaic 4+ platform is also notable for its reliance on heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR), a technology that has moved from experimental development into production-scale deployment. With broader qualification underway, the 44TB model serves as both a milestone in current storage capabilities and a step toward projected capacities approaching 100TB in future generations.

Everything we know about the Seagate 44TB Hard Drives

The 44TB drives are built on Seagate’s Mozaic 4+ platform, which represents the company’s production-ready implementation of heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR). Unlike earlier perpendicular magnetic recording approaches, HAMR uses localized heating via a nanophotonic laser to temporarily reduce the coercivity of the disk surface, allowing data to be written at much higher densities. This enables significantly greater areal density without requiring a complete redesign of the underlying hard drive architecture, allowing Seagate to scale capacity incrementally across generations.

At a physical level, the drives use a multi-platter design, widely understood to consist of 10 platters, each delivering over 4TB of capacity. This results in the total 44TB figure within a standard 3.5-inch enterprise form factor. The spindle speed is expected to remain at 7200 RPM, consistent with other enterprise-capacity drives, balancing throughput, reliability, and power consumption. Early estimates suggest sustained transfer rates in the region of 300 MB/s, though final performance characteristics depend on deployment conditions and firmware tuning. I think we are likely much more liekly to hit 280MB/s or so, such as you find in the 30TBs.

A key aspect of the Mozaic 4+ design is its vertically integrated photonics system. Seagate has developed its own laser components in-house, embedding them directly into the recording head. This allows precise, nanosecond-scale heating during write operations, which is critical for maintaining data integrity at such high densities. Vertical integration also gives Seagate tighter control over manufacturing consistency, yield, and long-term reliability, all of which are essential when deploying drives at hyperscale volumes.

The recording stack itself incorporates several advanced components. These include a Gen 2 superlattice platinum-alloy media designed for improved magnetic stability, a Gen 2 plasmonic writer responsible for delivering the heat-assisted write process, and a Gen 8 spintronic reader that improves read accuracy from increasingly smaller data bits. Together, these components enable higher density while maintaining error rates and durability within enterprise requirements.

Supporting these physical advancements is a 7nm integrated controller, which manages drive operations with improved precision. This controller enhances servo control, allowing the read/write heads to maintain accurate positioning over narrower tracks. It also contributes to improved power efficiency, reducing watts per terabyte and helping data centres optimize energy usage at scale. These gains are particularly relevant in large deployments where power and cooling costs scale with capacity.

From a manufacturing perspective, the Mozaic platform is designed to scale without requiring disruptive architectural changes between generations. Each iteration builds on existing processes, allowing Seagate to increase per-platter capacity over time. The company has indicated a roadmap toward 10TB per platter, which would enable drives approaching 100TB within a similar physical footprint. This approach prioritizes continuity in deployment while steadily increasing storage density.

Seagate 44TB HDDs – SMR or CMR?

Despite the push toward higher capacities, the 44TB drives based on the Mozaic 4+ platform use conventional magnetic recording (CMR) rather than shingled magnetic recording (SMR). This distinction is relevant because SMR typically achieves higher capacities by overlapping data tracks, which can negatively impact rewrite performance and latency in certain workloads. By retaining CMR, Seagate is prioritising predictable performance characteristics, particularly for enterprise environments where consistent throughput and low latency are required.

This approach also differentiates Seagate’s offering from competing high-capacity drives, such as those being developed by Western Digital, which have explored SMR and related technologies like UltraSMR to reach similar capacity points. While SMR can be effective for archival or sequential workloads, CMR remains better suited to mixed or write-intensive applications commonly found in hyperscale deployments. In this context, the use of HAMR allows Seagate to increase density without relying on SMR trade-offs, maintaining compatibility with existing data centre workloads and software stacks.

The introduction of 44TB hard drives based on the Mozaic 4+ platform reflects a continued focus on increasing storage density within the constraints of existing data centre infrastructure. By combining HAMR with incremental architectural improvements, Seagate Technology has demonstrated that higher capacities can be achieved without fundamental changes to form factor or deployment models. The emphasis remains on scaling capacity per rack and per watt, which aligns with the operational priorities of hyperscale environments.

At the same time, these drives remain firmly positioned within enterprise and cloud use cases, with limited relevance to consumer or small-scale storage in the near term. Factors such as cost, workload requirements, and integration complexity restrict their adoption outside large data centres. However, as with previous generations, advancements at this level are likely to influence broader storage markets over time, particularly as manufacturing scales and newer technologies mature.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Seagate 44TB Hard Drives ReveaWeek 50 Tech Roundup – ReactChoosing Between WD Red and SeSeagate Ironwolf vs WD Red (WhBlack Friday NAS Hard Drive DeBlack Friday Hard Drive Deals Black Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataWeek 46 Tech Roundup – SeagaWeek 44 Tech Roundup – TOS 7 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

New UniFi UDM Beast, Enterprise FG Core, Enterprise 100G and Enterprise S Revealed

At NAB 2026 in Las Vegas, Ubiquiti Inc. showcased a number of rackmount UniFi devices that have not yet been formally announced or released. These systems were presented alongside existing products, making it necessary to distinguish between current hardware and what appears to be forthcoming or experimental equipment. The devices observed represent a noticeable increase in port density, throughput capability, and overall positioning compared to the current UniFi lineup.

Four specific devices stand out from this showcase: the UniFi Dream Machine Beast, the Enterprise Fortress Gateway Core, the Enterprise 100G switch, and the Enterprise S PoE switch. Based on available observations and supporting information, these products appear to form a cohesive expansion of the UniFi ecosystem into higher-performance enterprise and datacenter environments. However, specifications remain unconfirmed and should be considered provisional until officially published.

UniFi Dream Machine BEAST – A 25GbE UDM!

The UniFi Dream Machine BEAST appears to be a significant evolution of the existing Dream Machine platform, extending beyond the capabilities of current models such as the UniFi Dream Machine Pro Max. Based on observed hardware, this device integrates substantially higher port density, particularly in 10G and 25G connectivity, while also introducing onboard storage via dual SATA bays. This suggests a continued emphasis on combining routing, switching, and application hosting within a single appliance, including UniFi OS services such as Protect and other controller-based functions.

Compared to previous Dream Machine models, the BEAST shifts closer toward an enterprise-focused deployment, particularly in environments requiring direct multi-gigabit connectivity without reliance on additional aggregation switches. However, key system details such as CPU architecture, memory capacity, and throughput performance remain unconfirmed. The absence of official documentation indicates that this device is still in a pre-release or prototype stage, and its final positioning within the UniFi portfolio is not yet defined.

UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway Core – Truly Enterprise

The UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway Core appears to extend the capabilities of the existing UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway into a significantly higher performance tier. While the current Enterprise Fortress Gateway is already positioned as a high-end UniFi routing platform, the Core variant introduces substantially greater port density and bandwidth, including support for 100G connectivity. This suggests a shift from traditional edge gateway roles toward deployment in core or aggregation layers within larger enterprise or datacenter environments.

The observed hardware indicates a design focused on high-throughput routing and multi-layer network integration, with a combination of 10G copper, 25G SFP28, and 100G QSFP28 interfaces. This represents a notable departure from existing UniFi gateway designs, which typically rely on lower port counts and external switching for aggregation. As with the Dream Machine BEAST, critical specifications such as processing architecture, memory configuration, and pricing remain undisclosed, reinforcing the likelihood that this device is still in a pre-release stage.

UniFi Enterprise 100G – Next-Level Connections

The UniFi Enterprise 100G appears to be a high-density aggregation or spine switch designed for environments requiring large-scale bandwidth distribution. Its configuration, centered around 25G access ports and 100G uplinks, aligns with common leaf-spine architectures used in enterprise and datacenter networks. Within the current UniFi portfolio, the closest comparison would be aggregation-focused switches such as the UniFi Switch Enterprise Aggregation, although the observed specifications of this device significantly exceed existing models in both port count and total throughput capacity.

This device is likely intended for deployment deeper within network infrastructure rather than at the edge, acting as a central switching layer connecting multiple high-speed access or distribution switches. The combination of 48 × 25G and 6 × 100G ports suggests a focus on scalability and backbone connectivity rather than end-device access. As with the other devices observed, no official documentation, pricing, or detailed hardware specifications have been released, and its final role within the UniFi ecosystem remains unconfirmed.

UniFi Enterprise S – PoE Powerhouse

The UniFi Enterprise S appears to be a high-density access switch focused on multi-gigabit connectivity and high-power PoE delivery. Its configuration combines a large number of 2.5G and 10G copper ports, all supporting PoE+++, alongside 25G uplinks for upstream connectivity. Within the current UniFi lineup, there is no direct equivalent, although products such as the UniFi Switch Pro XG 48 PoE operate in a similar space with lower overall port density and more limited PoE capability. The Enterprise S extends this concept by standardising high-power PoE across all access ports.

This design suggests deployment in environments with dense endpoint requirements, including wireless access points, cameras, and AV equipment, where both bandwidth and power delivery are critical. The combination of 2.5G and 10G ports allows for flexibility across different device classes, while the inclusion of 25G uplinks supports integration into higher-speed aggregation layers. As with the other devices observed, there is no confirmed information regarding total power budget, internal hardware, or release timeline, and the device should be considered pre-release.

The four devices observed at NAB 2026 indicate a broader shift in the UniFi portfolio toward higher-performance networking tiers. Collectively, they introduce increased port density, support for 25G and 100G connectivity, and in some cases, significantly expanded power delivery capabilities. Compared to currently available products such as the UniFi Enterprise Fortress Gateway and UniFi Dream Machine Pro Max, these systems represent a move beyond traditional edge and SMB-focused deployments into roles typically associated with enterprise core, aggregation, and high-density access layers.

However, all four devices remain unannounced and lack confirmed specifications, pricing, and release timelines. As a result, their final positioning and availability cannot be determined with certainty. While the observed hardware suggests a structured expansion into a more complete end-to-end networking stack, any conclusions remain provisional until formal details are released by Ubiquiti Inc..

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UNVR Gen 2 Pro - Is It WUniFi UNVR Gen 2 ProUniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShUniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShNew UniFi UDM Beast, EnterprisUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MLUniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MUniFi UNAS 4 Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

New QNAP TS-xh66TX SERIES – Intel i3, USB4, 2x 10GbE, M.2/E1.S, SATA, U.2, PCIe and MORE

QNAP’s TS h666TX, TS h866TX and TS h966TX arrive at a point where the company’s tower portfolio has had a fairly visible split between mainstream QTS systems such as the TS 464 and TS 664, and higher tier QuTS hero models such as the TVS h674. The older TS x64 family remains relevant, but those systems are built around the Intel Celeron N5095 with DDR4 memory and a lower ceiling for memory expansion, while the TVS h674 moves into a more performance led and more expensive part of the range with desktop class Intel Core processors and QuTS hero support. Against that backdrop, a new ZFS focused series with Intel Core i3 1215U, DDR5 memory, integrated 10GbE and USB4 has a clear role in the lineup, at least on paper.

That is also why these systems are likely to attract attention from buyers who want more than the current TS 464 or TS 664 can offer, but who may not need, or want to pay for, a TVS h674 class solution. The i3 1215U itself is a 6 core, 8 thread mobile processor with 2 Performance cores, 4 Efficient cores and boost speeds up to 4.40 GHz, which places it well above the older Celeron class hardware used in the TS x64 generation. Combined with QuTS hero’s ZFS platform and the broader move toward hybrid HDD and SSD storage layouts, these new TS h66xTX models appear designed to address demand for a more modern mid range NAS that balances file services, high speed networking and SSD aware storage without immediately stepping into QNAP’s more workstation style hero systems.

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Design & Storage

The clearest design distinction in this series is that QNAP is not treating all 3 models as simple capacity variants of the same enclosure. The TS h666TX and TS h866TX appear to share the same newer tower styling, with the standard 3.5 inch bays on the front and a separate area for the solid state media, while the TS h966TX moves into the denser mixed media format that QNAP has used before on some of its hybrid hero systems. That already places the range closer to a purpose built QuTS hero family than a straightforward update of the older TS 464 and TS 664, which used a more conventional compact tower layout with 4 or 6 HDD bays and 2 internal M.2 slots rather than externally accessible SSD facing bays.

From a storage layout perspective, the TS h666TX and TS h866TX are the more direct and easier models to position. They combine either 4 or 6 SATA HDD bays with 2 additional E1.S or M.2 NVMe capable bays, effectively giving each system a built in hybrid structure for HDD capacity and SSD tiering or fast pool allocation. That is a notable step away from the TS 464 and TS 664 approach, where the SSD element is present but still secondary, with 2 x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3 x1 slots intended mainly for caching or separate SSD storage rather than being presented as a more central part of the overall bay count.

The TS h966TX is the more unusual model in the group because it uses a 5 plus 4 arrangement, with 5 SATA HDD bays and 4 U.2 or SATA 2.5 inch bays. In practical terms, that design is less about scaling raw HDD capacity and more about offering a denser mixed media platform for users who want heavier SSD integration without moving into a full flash chassis. That layout is more in line with some of QNAP’s existing hybrid hero systems, where ZFS storage is paired with a more deliberate split between bulk HDD storage and higher speed SSD media, rather than the simpler HDD plus cache model seen in entry and lower mid range systems.

This is also where the new series starts to sit in a more defined position between the TS x64 range and the TVS h674 class. The TS 464 and TS 664 are still marketed as compact and affordable towers with M.2 support, but their storage design remains closer to mainstream SMB and prosumer use. The TVS h674, by comparison, is a 6 bay QuTS hero platform with 2 x M.2 NVMe slots and a much more traditional premium desktop NAS structure, focused on higher end ZFS deployment and PCIe expansion. The TS h666TX and TS h866TX seem to introduce a middle route, where the chassis and bay layout are more SSD aware and more explicitly hybrid than the TS x64 generation, but without fully mirroring the larger TVS hero desktop approach.

Overall, the design language here suggests that QNAP is targeting users who want direct access to both hard drive and flash storage in a tower form factor without relying entirely on internal motherboard mounted SSD slots. For QuTS hero in particular, that matters because ZFS benefits from clearer separation of storage roles, whether for high speed pools, application storage, read intensive workloads or automated tiering as QNAP continues to develop Qtier support in its ZFS platform. As a result, the storage design of the TS h666TX, TS h866TX and TS h966TX is not just a matter of adding more bays, but of shifting the product family toward more structured hybrid storage deployment than the older TS 464 and TS 664 offered.

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Internal Hardware

Internally, the most important shift in this series is the move to Intel Core i3 1215U. This is a 6 core, 8 thread processor with a hybrid layout of 2 Performance cores and 4 Efficient cores, up to 4.40 GHz boost, and a 15 W base power profile. In broad terms, that puts it above the Intel Celeron N5095 used in the TS 464 and TS 664 generation, which is a 4 core, 4 thread chip with a lower performance ceiling and no hybrid core structure. For a QuTS hero platform, that matters because ZFS services, snapshots, background data operations, deduplication related overhead where applicable, and multi user file handling all benefit from having more CPU headroom than the older Celeron class systems can typically provide.

Memory is the other clear upgrade point. According to the revealed specification, all 3 systems arrive with 8GB DDR5 and support expansion up to 64GB. That is a substantial change in class compared with the TS 464, which uses DDR4 and officially tops out at 16GB, and it aligns more closely with the expectations of a ZFS based system where memory capacity can have a direct effect on caching behaviour, data services and overall responsiveness under heavier workloads. It does not place these models at the same level as QNAP’s higher end QuTS hero hardware with larger default memory pools or ECC focused enterprise positioning, but it does move them noticeably beyond the entry and lower mid range segment.

That leaves these systems in an interesting middle position when compared with the TVS h674. The TVS h674 is still the more powerful desktop hero system overall, with Intel Core desktop CPUs such as the Core i5 12400 or Core i3 12100 depending on configuration, higher default memory allocations, and a more overtly performance focused design. At the same time, the new TS h666TX, TS h866TX and TS h966TX seem to be aiming for a more efficient balance of modern CPU architecture, ZFS support and hybrid storage flexibility without moving fully into that higher cost workstation style category. In other words, the internal hardware does not suggest a direct replacement for the TVS h674, but it does suggest a clear move away from the older TS x64 class and toward a more serious mid tier hero platform.

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Ports and Connectivity

Connectivity is one of the areas where this series separates itself most clearly from the older TS x64 generation. The TS h666TX and TS h866TX both combine 2 x 10GbE with 2 x USB 10Gb/s and 2 x USB4, alongside a PCIe Gen 3 x4 expansion slot. That is a substantial step forward from systems such as the TS 464, which provides 2 x 2.5GbE as standard and relies on PCIe expansion if higher bandwidth networking is needed. In practical terms, that means the new h66xTX models are being positioned for multi user editing, faster backup windows and direct attached workflows in a way that the mainstream TS line was not originally built around.

The inclusion of USB4 is particularly relevant here because QNAP has already used this kind of connectivity in creator focused products such as the TVS h674T, where Thunderbolt 4 is presented as a direct host connection option for Mac and Windows systems. While QNAP will still need to confirm the exact implementation and host workflow support on these new NAB 2026 systems, the presence of 2 x USB4 on all 3 models suggests that direct high bandwidth connection is a deliberate part of their design, rather than a secondary feature. That places these units closer to QNAP’s media and production focused hardware than to the more general office and home NAS segment.

The TS h966TX is slightly different, and arguably less aggressive, in its network configuration. Instead of the dual 10GbE arrangement of the h666TX and h866TX, the h966TX is listed with 1 x 10GbE and 1 x 2.5GbE, while still retaining 2 x USB 10Gb/s and 2 x USB4. That means the 9 bay model has the most storage flexibility in the family, but not the strongest network specification on paper. If that specification is accurate at launch, it makes the h966TX a more storage led hybrid platform rather than the highest bandwidth model in the group, which is not the usual assumption buyers would make when looking at the largest chassis first.

Specification:
TS h666TX: 2 x 10GbE, 2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4, 1 x PCIe Gen 3 x4
TS h866TX: 2 x 10GbE, 2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4, 1 x PCIe Gen 3 x4
TS h966TX: 1 x 10GbE, 1 x 2.5GbE, 2 x USB 10Gb/s, 2 x USB4

QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX and TS-h966TX – Price and Release Date

At the time of writing, QNAP does not appear to have published final retail pricing or a formal product page for the TS h666TX, TS h866TX or TS h966TX on its main product catalogue or 2026 newsroom pages, so both availability and price should still be treated as unconfirmed. Based on the information shared at NAB 2026, the current indication is a target launch window around Q2 to Q3 2026, but that remains provisional until QNAP publishes official listings, regional store pages or a formal press release. QNAP’s own 2026 newsroom and product comparison pages currently show no live retail entry for these 3 systems, which supports the view that the series is still in the pre release stage rather than being commercially available now. In pricing terms, the most reasonable expectation is that this range will sit above the TS x64 family and below the TVS h74 class, assuming QNAP keeps the rest of its tower lineup structured in the same way. The TS 464 is still positioned by QNAP as a mainstream high performance tower option in its 2026 buying guide, while the current TVS h674 remains a more premium QuTS hero desktop platform with stronger CPU options and a generally higher specification tier. Given that the new TS h666TX and TS h866TX introduce QuTS hero, DDR5, Intel Core i3 1215U, integrated 10GbE and USB4, they would logically land between those 2 product families rather than alongside either one directly.

That said, the TS h966TX may prove harder to price neatly because its storage configuration is more specialised than the other 2 models. Its 5 plus 4 hybrid layout, mixed 10GbE and 2.5GbE networking, and heavier SSD oriented design could place it closer to existing hybrid hero systems in value, even if its processor remains the same. Until QNAP confirms MSRPs, any exact figure would be speculative, but the broader market position appears to be that these are intended as a mid tier QuTS hero tower family, not a direct budget replacement for the TS 464 and TS 664, and not a full substitute for the TVS h674 or TVS h674T either.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...New QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX QNAP 2x 10GbE to USB4 Adapter 100 Reasons Why Users Choose T100 Reasons Why Users Choose S100 Reasons DIY NAS (TrueNAS, 100 Reasons Turnkey (Synology/Week 48 Tech Roundup – myQNAWeek 47 Tech Roundup – SynolBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - Data Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Which Should You Buy?

The UniFi UNAS 4 and the UGREEN DH4300 Plus are being compared because they currently occupy a very similar part of the 4-bay NAS market, with both systems targeting buyers who want a relatively affordable turnkey storage solution with 2.5GbE connectivity, modern desktop design, and a lower entry price than many traditional NAS brands. On paper, they are close enough in price to be direct alternatives, but in practice they approach NAS deployment very differently. The UniFi UNAS 4 is built around tight integration with the wider UniFi ecosystem and focuses primarily on straightforward storage, backup, and remote file access, whereas the UGREEN DH4300 Plus is designed as a broader standalone NAS platform with more memory, a more powerful ARM processor, HDMI output, and a wider range of applications and services. That makes this comparison relevant not just because of the hardware and price overlap, but because each system reflects a different idea of what an entry to mid-range 4-bay NAS should be in 2026.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Brand vs Brand

Before I dig into which of the DH4300 or UNAS 4 is best for you, it is worth highlighting again that these are two comparatively new players in the NAS scene (compared with long time multi-decade vetrans such as Synology, QNAP, Asustor and Terramaster), so let’s talk about their priorities and focus at a brand level. Both UGREEN and UniFi have entered the NAS sector from distinct starting points and continue to move in different directions, each targeting a particular type of user. UniFi’s UNAS series delivers consistency, predictable performance, and dependable integration with the broader UniFi ecosystem. Its software is stable, lightweight, and well-suited to users who prioritize straightforward storage management, reliable data handling, and unified control across routers, switches, and surveillance systems. While the hardware is limited to fixed ARM configurations and non-expandable memory, it is efficient, quiet, and designed for continuous operation with minimal maintenance. For organizations already invested in UniFi infrastructure, the UNAS systems provide a logical expansion that keeps management centralized and operational risk low. However, their value depends heavily on ecosystem synergy; outside of that environment, the systems remain competent but relatively inflexible standalone NAS options.

UGREEN’s NASync platform, on the other hand, appeals to users seeking broader performance capability and independence. Its x86-based models, upgradable memory, and open software environment allow it to serve as a hybrid between NAS and compact server, capable of running applications, containers, and virtual machines alongside storage tasks. The design language is more suited to individual or small business use than datacenter deployment, but the hardware range—from ARM to Core i5—covers a far wider performance spectrum than UniFi’s. Software maturity continues to evolve quickly, with new features added frequently, and the systems provide extensive compatibility with third-party clients and backup services. The trade-off is that long-term reliability and enterprise-level security validation are still developing.

Ultimately, UniFi NAS suits users who already rely on UniFi’s networking ecosystem and value simplicity, predictability, and centralized management, while UGREEN NAS caters to those prioritizing flexibility, compute power, and open software capability. Both brands have lowered the entry barrier into reliable NAS ownership, but they embody opposing philosophies: UniFi focuses on integration and control, whereas UGREEN emphasizes capability and independence.

Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!

UGREEN DH4300 vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Design and Storage

From a physical design perspective, these 2 NAS systems take very different approaches. The UniFi UNAS 4 has a taller, narrower chassis with a more vertical layout, while the UGREEN DH4300 Plus uses a more cubic desktop design that will look more familiar to buyers coming from Synology, QNAP, or Asustor hardware. The UniFi system is also available in black or white, which gives it a more deliberate visual identity within the wider UniFi product range, whereas the UGREEN keeps to a more conventional single-finish enclosure. In both cases, the chassis material is primarily plastic, so neither is especially premium in material terms, but each is clearly trying to prioritize compactness and low manufacturing cost rather than metal construction.

The drive arrangement is also notably different. The UniFi UNAS 4 places its 4 SATA bays in the base of the chassis, with the drives inserted from underneath, while the UGREEN DH4300 Plus uses a top-loaded vertical bay arrangement hidden under a removable outer shell. Neither system uses a particularly enterprise-focused tray design, and neither is really built around frequent hot-swap use in the same way as more expensive rackmount or prosumer NAS systems. That said, the UniFi trays are easier to describe as straightforward click-in drive carriers, while the UGREEN trays feel more budget-oriented in construction and do not leave the same impression of robustness as more established NAS brands.

In storage flexibility, the UniFi has the more ambitious configuration. Alongside its 4 SATA bays, it also includes 2 dedicated M.2 NVMe slots for SSD cache. That gives it an advantage in hybrid storage architecture, since the hard drives can be used for capacity while the NVMe media handles read and write cache duties. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus does not include M.2 storage slots, so any SSD deployment has to consume one or more of the main SATA bays, which reduces total storage capacity. At the same time, UniFi currently limits those NVMe bays to cache use rather than general storage pools, so the practical advantage is still narrower than the raw hardware layout suggests.

The 2 brands also differ in RAID and storage management philosophy. The UGREEN supports a broader list of RAID modes, including JBOD, Basic, RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, which gives it more deployment flexibility for different user priorities around performance, redundancy, or simple linear storage. The UniFi platform supports RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, but its overall storage structure is more controlled and less flexible, with a stronger focus on a simplified single storage pool approach. For buyers who want fewer decisions and a cleaner setup process, that may be acceptable, but for users who want more granular control over how storage is arranged, the UGREEN is less restrictive.

In pure storage potential, the UGREEN is also easier to quantify because it officially supports up to 128TB across 4 bays using 32TB drives, whereas UniFi focuses more on supported drive compatibility and cache pairing than on headline raw capacity figures. The UniFi does have the practical advantage of SSD caching built in, which can improve responsiveness in repeated access and write-heavy workloads, but the UGREEN has the simpler storage proposition overall and does not tie part of its internal design to optional accessories such as UniFi’s separate M.2 tray approach. As a result, the UniFi has the more distinctive and technically layered storage design, while the UGREEN has the more conventional and broadly flexible one.

UniFi UNAS4 vs UGREEN DH 4300 – Internal Hardware & Connections

Internally, the UGREEN DH4300 Plus has the stronger hardware specification. It uses an 8-core Rockchip ARM processor based on Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores running at up to 2.0GHz, alongside 8GB of LPDDR4X memory and 32GB of eMMC for the system. By comparison, the UniFi UNAS 4 uses a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 processor at 1.7GHz with 4GB of memory. Both systems are clearly built around low-power ARM architecture rather than x86 processing, but the UGREEN has the more capable platform on paper and offers more headroom for multitasking, background services, and broader software functionality.

The UniFi system does, however, counter with a more unusual internal layout. In addition to its 4 SATA bays, it includes 2 M.2 NVMe slots dedicated to SSD cache, which gives it a storage acceleration feature that the UGREEN does not match natively. For users dealing with repeated file access, background synchronization, or burst-heavy write activity, that cache support has practical value. The UGREEN relies entirely on its 4 SATA bays for storage media, so although its CPU and memory are stronger, its internal storage architecture is less advanced in terms of tiered storage.

External connectivity is broader on the UGREEN. It includes 1x 2.5GbE LAN port, HDMI output at up to 4K 60Hz, 1x front USB 3.2 Gen 1 port at 5Gb/s, and 2 additional USB-A 5Gb/s ports. The UniFi UNAS 4 is much more limited, offering 1x 2.5GbE RJ45 port and 1x 5Gb/s USB-C port. This narrower I/O profile reflects the fact that UniFi has positioned the UNAS 4 as a focused network storage appliance rather than a multi-role NAS for media output, peripheral attachment, or application expansion. In direct hardware terms, the UGREEN is better equipped for users who expect more than basic file serving.

Power and deployment also separate these 2 systems. The UniFi UNAS 4 supports PoE+++ and includes a 90W PoE adapter, which allows both power and network connectivity over a single cable in supported environments. That is unusual in this part of the NAS market and makes it particularly relevant for users already invested in UniFi switching infrastructure or those deploying hardware in locations where simplified cabling matters. The UGREEN uses a more conventional external power arrangement, which is less distinctive but also less dependent on network infrastructure choices. Therefore, the UGREEN has the stronger internal compute hardware and broader physical connectivity, while the UniFi has the more specialized deployment advantage.

UGREEN DH4300 vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Software & Services

The biggest difference between these 2 NAS systems is not the chassis or the processor, but the software scope. The UniFi UNAS 4 runs UniFi Drive and is clearly built around a narrower storage-first brief, with support for SMB, NFS, snapshots, file encryption, Time Machine, share links, user groups, remote backup, cloud backup targets, and client apps. It covers the main NAS fundamentals expected by home users and small offices, but it does so within a more controlled environment that places simplicity and consistency ahead of feature breadth. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus, running UGOS Pro, aims much wider and includes not only file serving and backup tools, but also multimedia applications, container support, HDMI-based media playback, AI-assisted photo features, and broader service depth overall.

For pure storage management, UniFi Drive is cleaner and more focused, particularly for users who want the NAS to act primarily as private cloud storage, backup target, and centralized file repository. Its interface is built to align with the broader UniFi platform, and that gives it an advantage for users already running UniFi networking equipment and remote management tools. However, that same focus also means the UNAS 4 is less flexible as a general-purpose NAS. The UGREEN platform does not have the same ecosystem tie-in, but it operates more independently and gives the user more scope to use the system for different workloads beyond file storage.

Application support is where the gap becomes more obvious. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus supports Docker and has a noticeably broader service layer for media, backup, and user applications. That creates options for running third-party software, home media tools, and more customized services that simply are not part of the UniFi approach. The UniFi UNAS 4 does not currently try to compete in that area and instead presents itself as a dedicated NAS platform rather than an application host. For some users that will be a limitation, while for others it will be a benefit, because it reduces complexity and keeps the system centered on storage tasks rather than mixed workload experimentation.

In practical terms, the software decision comes down to whether the buyer values depth or focus. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus offers the broader NAS software experience and is better suited to users who want more features, more applications, and more ways to extend the system over time. The UniFi UNAS 4 offers the more controlled and storage-specific platform, with the clearest advantage appearing when it is deployed inside an existing UniFi environment. As a result, the UGREEN software stack is more versatile, while the UniFi software stack is more specialized.

UniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 NAS – Conclusion & Verdict

Taken as a whole, these 2 systems are aimed at a similar buyer in price terms, but they are not trying to solve the same problem in the same way. The UniFi UNAS 4 is a more specialized NAS that focuses on storage, backup, remote access, and integration within the UniFi ecosystem. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is a broader standalone NAS that gives the user more hardware resources, more software flexibility, and a wider overall role in the network. That difference matters more than the relatively small gap in price, because in day to day use they will appeal to different priorities. The UniFi UNAS 4 makes more sense for buyers who already use UniFi switches, gateways, and management tools, or for those who specifically want a NAS that stays focused on file storage instead of trying to become a media server or container host. Its built in NVMe cache support and PoE+++ deployment give it some useful differentiators, and its simpler software scope will suit users who want a more controlled experience. However, outside of the UniFi ecosystem, some of its strengths become less important, while its limitations in application support, connectivity, and hardware power become harder to ignore.

The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is the better fit for users who want a more traditional all-round NAS. It has the stronger CPU, more memory, broader external connectivity, more RAID options, HDMI output, Docker support, and a software platform with more room to scale into multimedia, backup variety, and third party services. It is the more capable choice for mixed home and small business use, particularly for buyers who are not tied to any specific network brand and want their NAS to handle more than just centralized storage. It is also the easier system to recommend to users comparing it against other established 4-bay NAS platforms in the same price bracket. So, in direct usage terms, the UniFi UNAS 4 is better for UniFi-centric deployments, cleaner storage-first use, and buyers who value NVMe caching and PoE-based installation. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is better for users who want stronger hardware, more software features, better connectivity, and a wider long term usage profile. If the question is which is the better pure value NAS for the largest number of users, the UGREEN DH4300 Plus is the stronger overall option. If the question is which fits better into a UniFi-led network and a simpler storage-focused role, the UniFi UNAS 4 is the more appropriate choice.

Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on Amazon @399	Buy the UniFi UNAS 4 on The UniFi Store for $379

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUGREEN vs UniFi NAS - Which NeWeek 39 Tech Digest – Wi-Fi UGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewUGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewNEW UniFi NAS - What Comes NexNEW UniFi NAS - What Comes NexUnifi NAS on YouTube Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

What is the Synology BeeStation BST151-4T NAS?

The Synology BeeStation BST151-4T is a 4 TB single drive personal cloud device that sits somewhere between an external hard drive and a traditional NAS, targeting users who want centralized storage, photo backup, file syncing, and remote access without dealing with a conventional multi bay server setup. It follows the original BST150-4T BeeStation, first released in February 2024, and appears to be a light refresh of that earlier model rather than a full redesign. As with the first version, the focus is on quick deployment, simple management, and a more consumer friendly software experience, using Synology’s BeeStation platform instead of the broader and more configurable DSM system found on the company’s standard NAS lineup.

Synology BeeStation BST151-4T Hardware Specifications

At a hardware level, the BST151-4T remains a very compact single bay network storage appliance with a fixed 4 TB hard drive, built around the Realtek RTD1619B platform and a 1GbE network connection. Physical connectivity is unchanged from the earlier BeeStation, with 1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 port, 1 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 port, and 1 x RJ-45 LAN port, all housed in the same 148.0 x 62.6 x 196.3 mm enclosure weighing 820 g.

That hardware profile makes clear where the BeeStation sits in Synology’s lineup. This is not a flexible NAS chassis with room for drive upgrades, SSD cache, multi bay expansion, or faster networking. The internal disk is part of the appliance design, so there is no meaningful path to RAID redundancy, easier drive level recovery, or long term capacity scaling in the way there is on a conventional 2 bay or 4 bay NAS.

Power and thermals are also modest, which is consistent with a low power, always on personal cloud device. Synology lists power consumption at about 7.85 W during access and 1.65 W in HDD hibernation, with a 36 W external power adapter. The system continues to use a single HAT3300-4T drive, and Synology’s current 4 TB HAT3300 model is a 5400 RPM class disk rather than a faster 7200 RPM unit.

The one specification that requires care is memory. Synology’s March 30, 2026 product specification PDF and the current BeeStation comparison page both list the BST151-4T with 1 GB DDR4, but Synology’s newer BST151-4T datasheet, published later in March 2026 and mirrored across multiple regional versions, lists 2 GB DDR4 instead. On balance, the later datasheet appears to reflect the intended refresh specification, but Synology’s own published material is not yet fully consistent. (UPDATE – RAM on the BST151-4T is CONFIRMED as 2GB)

Assuming the 2 GB figure in the later datasheet is the correct final spec, the BST151-4T is best understood as a minimal revision of the BST150-4T rather than a new hardware generation. The enclosure, CPU, ports, networking, and drive class are effectively the same, while the main change is the move from the predecessor’s 1 GB memory configuration to 2 GB. That could simply reflect practical component economics as much as performance tuning, since lower density memory packages can become less cost effective over time as supply shifts. In either case, this still appears to be fixed onboard memory, not a user upgradeable SO-DIMM arrangement, so the platform remains closed in the same way as the original model.

Synology BeeStation in 2026 – What can it do?

In 2026, the BeeStation platform is no longer limited to basic remote file access. Synology positions it as a consumer focused private cloud for storing, syncing, and sharing files and photos, with web, desktop, and mobile access, support for sign in via Google Account, Apple ID, or Synology Account, and shared access for up to 8 users on a single device. It is designed to pull together data from phones, computers, external drives, and selected cloud services into one managed location rather than acting only as a simple networked hard drive.

Photo handling is one of the more developed parts of the platform. Synology states that BeeStation can back up mobile photos, import content from sources such as Google Photos and iCloud Photos, and organize images with local AI based recognition for people, subjects, and places. The software also supports timeline and map based browsing, album creation, and controlled photo sharing, which places the BST151-4T closer to a private cloud photo hub than to a basic USB backup box.

Its data protection features have also expanded since launch. BeeStation now supports internal restore points based on snapshots, backups to BeeProtect, Synology NAS, and external drives, plus a 3 year Acronis True Image Essentials license for 1 computer. BeeStation OS 1.5 also added BeeCamera support, but Synology limits that feature to BeeStation Plus models rather than the standard 4 TB unit, so the BST151-4T does not currently gain the surveillance role that the higher tier model has started to take on.

Where the BeeStation still differs from a DSM based NAS such as the DS124 or DS223 is in breadth and flexibility. Synology’s DS124 and DS223 product pages explicitly advertise broader DSM functions including Synology Drive based private cloud workflows, Btrfs snapshot features, ShareSync between Synology systems, full Surveillance Station support, and the wider DSM application platform. By contrast, BeeStation remains a curated appliance with a narrower software stack, no general DSM Package Center environment, no broad package driven expansion path, and on the standard 4 TB model no BeeCamera surveillance support either. In other words, it can cover the main personal cloud tasks, but it still does not replace the wider role of even Synology’s entry level DSM NAS systems.

The BST151-4T looks like a modest revision of the original BeeStation rather than a substantially new product. Its appeal remains the same: a preconfigured, low friction private cloud for users who want basic file storage, photo backup, syncing, sharing, and remote access without moving into a full DSM based NAS environment. The hardware envelope is still narrow, with a fixed internal 4 TB drive, 1GbE networking, and no real upgrade path for storage expansion or RAID style redundancy, but that is consistent with its role as an entry level turnkey appliance rather than a general purpose NAS. Synology’s own later datasheet points to 2 GB of RAM on the new model, which would make the BST151-4T a small but practical refresh of the BST150-4T rather than a platform shift. Pricing is the main unknown at the time of writing. Synology’s support status page already lists the BST151-4T as generally available, but public retail pricing is still not clearly established. On that basis, the safest expectation is that it will land close to the earlier 4 TB BeeStation, which launched around $199 in the US and about £209 in the UK, while more recent BST150-4T retail listings have also appeared higher depending on seller and region, sat around $309 without TAX. That likely places the BST151-4T will land in excess of $300 and maybe closer to $350 when factoring the RAM increase.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology’s C2 and License ChSynology Free License and SubsSynology Official Cameras Now Synology Beestation BST151-4T Synology RS1626xs+ NAS - WorthSynology RS1626xs+ NAS RevealeSynology FS200T NAS RevealedSynology FS200T NAS Revealed100 Reasons Why Users Choose T100 Reasons Why Users Choose S Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE