De plus en plus, l'actualité se lit sous forme de courbes de probabilité dopées aux paris en ligne. Polymarket, Myriad, Kalshi et compagnie connaissent une croissance fulgurante et s’imposent, discrètement, comme de nouveaux acteurs de l’information. Le public, comme les médias, leur font de plus en plus confiance.
Note – the video on this fix will be published soon and I will update this article with images ASAP.
Synology’s 2025 refresh brought the DS225+ and DS425+ with the familiar Intel Celeron J4125, but it also quietly removed the kernel graphics driver support that Plex, Jellyfin, and Emby use for hardware transcoding of H.264 and HEVC. This guide explains what changed, why it matters for real-world streaming, and how you can restore GPU-accelerated transcoding on these models using an unofficial SSH method shared by the community. If you rely on your NAS to reshape 4K or high bitrate files for phones, tablets, hotel TVs, or limited connections, this walkthrough will help you get that efficiency back.
IMPORTANT – Massive credit to RROrg group over on Github for ‘cracking the nut’ on this with their latest repo HERE
Additionally, credit to Luka @ Blackvoid, who made this great article, covered this first and gave me permission to use his guide here and in my upcoming video. Read his article HERE
When Synology launched the 2025 “x25” lineup, users expected a minor refresh of familiar models like the DS225+ and DS425+. Instead, they discovered that Synology had removed the i915 graphics driver from DSM, effectively disabling hardware transcoding on the Intel Celeron J4125 CPU. This meant that Plex, Jellyfin, and Emby could no longer tap into the iGPU’s Quick Sync Video capabilities. Synology confirmed the change in support tickets, explaining that both H.264 (AVC) and H.265 (HEVC) transcoding had been deliberately blocked at the kernel driver level. The company cited licensing costs for HEVC, even though AVC is license-free, and argued that most client devices already support native playback. The earliest and longest discucssions on this topic are HERE on this Plex Forum thread.
|
|
The result is a significant downgrade for users who bought these models expecting the same multimedia performance as their predecessors. Instead of 10–20% CPU usage during hardware-accelerated transcoding, users now see 80–100% CPU utilization when reshaping video on the fly. For remote streaming, converting 4K to 1080p or 720p becomes slow, inefficient, and often unworkable. This change undermines the value proposition of the J4125 platform and leaves Plex and Jellyfin users with hardware that is technically capable but artificially restricted, creating frustration across the Synology community.
Before diving into the workaround, it is important to understand that this method is not supported by Synology and involves altering core system modules via SSH. These steps rely on community-compiled drivers and are provided “as is,” without warranty. Making changes at the kernel level can cause instability, break after DSM updates, or in the worst case, lead to data loss if mistakes are made. You should always keep verified backups of your data before proceeding, and only attempt this if you are comfortable working with the command line and root-level access. Proceed entirely at your own risk.
Download the Source Code
Go to Dave Russell’s GitHub repo (007revad) and download the Source Code (.zip) for the graphics driver fix.
Do not unpack the archive on your computer.
Create a Folder on Your NAS
Log into DSM and create a new Shared Folder (e.g. scripts) on your main volume.
Make sure your DSM account has full access, since root privileges will be needed later.
Upload the Archive
Use File Station or SMB to upload the .zip file into the new scripts shared folder.
Once uploaded, extract it on the NAS by right-clicking and selecting Extract Here.
If extraction creates subfolders, move the relevant script files (such as transcode_4_x25.sh) directly into the main scripts directory for easier referencing.
Create a Scheduled Task
Open Control Panel > Task Scheduler.
Select Create > Triggered Task > User-defined Script.
Give the task a name (e.g. Synogfx).
Set the User to root.
Set the event to Boot-up so the script runs every time the NAS restarts.
Point to the Script
In the task settings, paste the full path to the script file, for example:
Connexionsh /volume1/scripts/transcode_4_x25.sh
If unsure, right-click the .sh file in File Station, select Properties, and copy the full directory path.
Confirm and Save
DSM will warn you about using root and non-standard scripts. Acknowledge this and proceed.
Enter your DSM admin password when prompted.
The scheduled task will now appear in the list.
Run the Script
Right-click the new task and select Run to execute it immediately.
Optionally, reboot your NAS to confirm that the driver loads automatically on startup.
Verify Hardware Transcoding
Open Plex (or Jellyfin/Emby) and play a file requiring transcoding.
Check playback statistics: you should now see HW (hardware transcoding) instead of CPU-only usage.
Synology’s decision to remove iGPU drivers from the 2025 DS225+ and DS425+ left many users frustrated, especially those who rely on Plex or Jellyfin for remote streaming. While the company cites licensing costs and client-side decoding as justification, the hardware itself remains fully capable of transcoding. Thanks to community-driven efforts, it is possible to re-enable Quick Sync on these models with an SSH-based workaround. This fix restores the efficiency and functionality users expected, though it comes with risks and requires maintenance after reboots. For multimedia enthusiasts who value hardware transcoding, this unofficial solution may be the only way to unlock the true potential of these NAS systems.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
The landscape of 10 Gigabit Ethernet networking has a significant shift over the past few years, with hardware that was once considered enterprise-only gradually trickling down to the consumer and prosumer market. Affordable multi-gig switches, particularly those with 2.5G or SFP-only configurations, are now commonplace. However, the search becomes much more complicated when you’re looking for a compact, budget-friendly 10GbE switch that combines both RJ45 copper and SFP+ fiber ports — and adds basic managed features to the mix. This is precisely where the Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE Managed Switch positions itself, offering four 10GBase-T ports, two SFP+ ports, and a claimed 120Gbps backplane bandwidth, all for around $140 on AliExpress.
At this price point, it’s important to approach products like this with realistic expectations. The Goodtop switch is not aiming to compete with the likes of Cisco, Aruba, or even MikroTik in terms of long-term support or security posture. Like many white-label or lesser-known brands shipping out of China, concerns around firmware transparency, update frequency, and potential vulnerabilities are valid. This is particularly relevant for users planning to expose management interfaces to external networks or integrate these switches into larger, more sensitive environments. Still, for isolated use in lab setups, home networks, or behind firewall-protected infrastructure, devices like this can offer compelling value — if they deliver on core functionality. This review takes a closer look at the Goodtop switch’s physical design, port configuration, internal hardware, software interface, and performance characteristics. Rather than focusing on theoretical specs alone, this analysis is based on hands-on testing to determine where the unit succeeds, where it cuts corners, and what kind of buyer it’s realistically suited for.
The Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE Managed Switch delivers impressive value by combining four 10GBase-T and two 10G SFP+ ports in a compact, low-cost form factor, making it one of the most affordable mixed-media 10GbE switches on the market. It performs reliably under load, supports a full set of essential Layer 2 features like VLANs, link aggregation, and QoS, and provides a practical way for home lab users or small setups to adopt 10G networking without overspending. However, the switch’s low price is reflected in its build quality, fixed-speed noisy fan, and a barebones, unintuitive web interface that may challenge less experienced users. Security features are minimal, with no HTTPS, 2FA, or multi-user support, making it best suited for isolated, firewall-protected environments rather than critical infrastructure. For technically confident users seeking affordable, high-speed connectivity in a controlled setting, the Goodtop switch is a capable and cost-effective option—as long as its limitations are clearly understood.
Need a Budget 10GbE Switch? RECOMMENDED TO BUY:
|
The Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE switch adopts a compact footprint and minimalist industrial design that aligns with many of the budget-friendly networking products emerging from OEMs in the Chinese market. Its chassis measures 200mm x 118mm x 44mm and is constructed from a thin, painted sheet metal. At just under 700 grams, the device is easy to handle and unobtrusive on a desk or shelf. It supports both desktop placement and wall mounting, the latter made possible by a pair of hook points integrated into the casing. While the construction is adequate for light to moderate use, it doesn’t offer the heft or rigidity seen in more enterprise-leaning gear.
There are no rubber feet to reduce surface vibration, nor any rack-mounting ears included by default. The paint finish is clean but basic, and minor flexing of the panels is possible under moderate pressure. These design choices reflect an emphasis on affordability rather than robustness, and users intending to deploy this switch in harsher physical environments may want to consider added enclosure or structural reinforcement. Still, for indoor use where vibration and temperature control are consistent, the physical form is entirely serviceable.
Thermal management is handled by a single small-diameter fan mounted laterally inside the chassis, supported by perforated ventilation cutouts on the opposing side. This active cooling setup is necessary given the heat output of the internal 10GbE components, particularly when all ports are under load.
During testing, the fan proved effective in maintaining safe thermal levels across typical workloads, with internal temperature readings ranging between 31°C and 36°C depending on ambient conditions and port usage. However, the fan’s acoustic characteristics are worth noting: it operates at a fixed RPM, regardless of system temperature or network activity.
This results in a constant hum that registers between 38 and 41 dBA — not excessive, but certainly noticeable in quiet environments. There are no accessible fan speed controls in the management interface, and the unit lacks thermal sensors or thresholds that would allow for adaptive fan curves.
For users operating this switch in a studio, home office, or any acoustically sensitive environment, the persistent fan noise could be a drawback. Modifications, such as third-party silent fan replacements, may be feasible but would require disassembly and some DIY effort. Overall, the cooling solution works, but its implementation is clearly a compromise between function and cost.
The Goodtop switch is equipped with a total of six 10-Gigabit-capable ports, split between four RJ45 (10GBase-T) and two SFP+ slots. This particular configuration is uncommon at this price tier, especially among switches that offer web-based management. The inclusion of both copper and fiber interfaces in one device provides flexibility for mixed network environments — ideal for users bridging legacy copper infrastructure with newer fiber deployments or integrating NAS devices and uplinks with varying interface standards. All six ports are located on the front panel, clearly labeled and spaced far enough apart to accommodate bulkier cables and transceivers without interference.
The RJ45 ports support standard multi-gig Ethernet protocols, with backward compatibility for 100Mb, 1G, 2.5G, and 5GBase-T connections, depending on cabling. According to the manufacturer’s specs, Cat6 or better is recommended for full 10GBase-T performance up to 100 meters.
The SFP+ ports accept a wide range of 10G transceivers, including DACs (Direct Attach Copper), SR/LR fiber modules, and media converters, offering strong compatibility with third-party optics and hardware.
Despite its low cost, the switch claims a 120Gbps backplane switching capacity and a non-blocking architecture capable of 89.28 million packets per second. While exact benchmarking under full simultaneous port saturation wasn’t possible due to hardware limitations during testing, four concurrent 10GBase-T connections were tested successfully with sustained bidirectional transfers.
Under load, the unit handled transmission reliably without packet loss or obvious performance degradation. Power consumption scales with usage: idle draw sits at approximately 7.5 watts with no connected clients, while active use with four 10G copper links under sustained read/write activity peaked around 19.8 watts.
These values are in line with expectations for a full-10G switch operating with active cooling, and while not low, they are acceptable for most desktop or lab environments. It’s worth noting that due to heat generation and airflow limitations, users may experience rising internal temperatures if all six ports are driven continuously, especially in poorly ventilated setups. However, the flexibility to use either media type and the stable throughput on tested ports suggest that the internal switching logic and port handling are effectively implemented, given the device’s pricing and market position.
Internally, the Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE switch is built around a Realtek chipset configuration comprising the RTL9303 switch controller and RTL8264B PHYs, a pairing commonly found in recent budget and white-label 10G networking products. These components are designed to deliver basic Layer 2 managed functionality with support for VLAN tagging, link aggregation, and other expected switching features. Two medium-sized aluminum heatsinks cover the main chips, with thermal paste applied to ensure contact and heat dissipation, albeit passively reliant on the unit’s single fan for airflow. There is no internal battery backup, surge suppression beyond nominal protection, or modular power regulation — design choices consistent with its low cost.
The unit includes a modest 12Mbit of packet buffer memory and supports a MAC address table size of up to 16K entries, which should be sufficient for most small-to-medium environments. There are no removable components or visible debugging headers, and the board layout is straightforward with no major thermal bottlenecks observed during operation. Overall, the hardware design is minimal but appropriate for the target use case: non-critical environments requiring inexpensive multi-gig connectivity without expectations of advanced redundancy or hardware resilience. While it doesn’t compete with enterprise-class internals in terms of engineering quality or extensibility, it does reflect a competent implementation of entry-level switching silicon with functional thermal management.
The Goodtop switch ships with a built-in web-based management interface that allows users to configure a range of Layer 2 features typical of entry-level managed switches. The interface is accessible via a browser once an IP address is assigned, and no additional software is required. However, the overall presentation and usability of the software are quite basic. The UI lacks visual polish, contextual help, or guided configuration tools. Navigation is functional but unintuitive, with much of the terminology and layout appearing generic and unbranded — a likely result of the firmware being repurposed from a reference design or OEM platform.
There are no wizards or safety prompts to prevent misconfiguration, which could make the switch challenging for less experienced users to manage safely. Additionally, there is no mobile optimization or official companion app, and the interface does not support HTTPS out of the box. Firmware updates are possible via the web console, though update channels or changelogs are not provided, and documentation is sparse.
Despite its limited interface design, the switch includes a solid range of features that are normally found in more expensive units. These include core Layer 2 controls and essential traffic management capabilities, offering flexibility for VLAN segmentation, link aggregation, and network troubleshooting. While these features are mostly geared toward technical users, they cover a surprisingly broad spectrum of functionality for a switch in this price bracket. However, it’s worth noting that the interface offers no access controls beyond a single user account, no two-factor authentication, and no role-based access — all of which may concern users deploying this switch in sensitive or multi-user environments. Fan speed control, system logs, or SNMP monitoring are also absent, limiting the unit’s viability for more advanced administrative needs. Key supported features include:
VLAN support (802.1Q, VLAN IDs 1–4094)
Port-based VLAN assignment
Link Aggregation (LACP)
Loop detection
Jumbo frame support (up to 9K bytes)
MAC address filtering
Port mirroring
Broadcast storm control
QoS / Port-based priority settings
Traffic statistics monitoring
Basic firmware upgrade support
These tools are adequate for static network environments or those with fixed segmentation needs, but administrators seeking dynamic configuration, remote logging, or integration with monitoring platforms will find the software lacking in depth.
The Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE Managed Switch offers an appealing combination of features that are rarely found together in a product at this price point. With four 10GBase-T copper ports and two 10G SFP+ fiber slots, it caters to users who need to bridge different media types without investing in multiple specialized devices. The unit delivers consistent throughput, a practical management interface, and baseline Layer 2 capabilities suitable for most small-scale, static deployments. For those building or expanding home labs, adding high-speed links between servers and NAS devices, or testing 10GbE equipment without committing to enterprise-level budgets, this switch is a very practical and accessible option. The price tag — typically hovering between $130 and $140 — is particularly compelling when compared with similar switches from established brands, which often cost two to three times as much while offering fewer ports or omitting management functionality.
However, it’s important to understand what trade-offs make that low cost possible. Physically, the unit is built with budget-grade materials, and although the compact design is functional, the thin metal chassis lacks the rigidity and passive cooling features seen in more expensive models. The inclusion of active cooling is necessary given the switch’s full 10GbE capability, but the fixed-speed fan results in a persistent acoustic presence that may not be acceptable in quiet workspaces. In terms of power usage and thermal output, the switch performs within expectations, though it naturally draws more power than multi-gig or 1G devices — something to consider if operating in environments sensitive to power efficiency or heat buildup.
On the software side, the web-based management interface includes a reasonably full feature set for configuring VLANs, link aggregation, QoS, and port monitoring, but the UI is visually dated, lacking intuitive navigation, helpful prompts, or contextual explanations. For seasoned users comfortable with networking terminology and manual configuration, this isn’t a major obstacle. However, newcomers may find the software overwhelming or difficult to use without external guidance. Security is another area where the switch shows its limitations. The absence of HTTPS access, multi-user management, or basic features like two-factor authentication limits its suitability for exposed or multi-tenant environments. Firmware updates are possible, but no public update path or official support channels are offered, making long-term update viability uncertain.
Ultimately, this is a product built around value — and that value is real, as long as buyers know what they’re getting into. The Goodtop switch does not pretend to be a polished enterprise-grade solution, nor does it offer the ecosystem integration or long-term support found in more expensive alternatives. Instead, it provides raw functionality: six full-speed 10GbE ports, a working management layer, and compatibility with a wide range of copper and optical transceivers. For environments that are self-contained, technically managed, and not security-critical, this device offers performance that aligns well with its low cost. For those willing to make small compromises on build quality and user experience, it’s an excellent option for extending 10G connectivity without overspending.
Need a Budget 10GbE Switch? RECOMMENDED TO BUY:
|
| PROS | CONS |
|
|
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
In recent years, Synology has steadily moved toward a more vertically integrated hardware ecosystem, and the arrival of the 2025 generation of NAS systems marks a significant escalation in that approach. With a much stricter verification process for compatible storage media—covering both hard drives and SSDs—Synology now appears to heavily prioritize its own branded storage. This shift has sparked widespread debate across the NAS community, particularly as many long-time users of Seagate IronWolf, WD Red, and Toshiba NAS drives find themselves increasingly locked out of certain key features like RAID expansion, hot spare assignment, and recovery operations unless using “verified” drives. What’s more, while some of Synology’s media are rebranded and firmware-modified versions of familiar drives from Seagate and Toshiba, the pricing and compatibility limitations often leave users puzzled—and frustrated.
| Want to Support What We Do? Use the Links Below to Buy your NAS and/or HDD and SSD Media. Clicking these links will result in a small commission for anything you purchase, heading to me and Eddie @NASCompares and allows us to keep doing this! It’s just us two here and between this and ads, it’s the most passive way to keep us sailing! Thanks |
In response to growing user concern, we conducted a comparison of Synology’s drive lineup against the current offerings from Seagate, WD, and Kingston—analyzing each in terms of price per terabyte, real-world performance, durability specifications, and availability. Drawing from direct benchmarking, manufacturer datasheets, and controlled NAS testing environments, this article aims to answer a key question: is Synology’s branded media actually worth the premium? While some users may welcome the simplicity of a one-brand ecosystem, others are understandably wary of higher costs, limited SKU availability, and the potential long-term implications of vendor lock-in. Let’s break down what Synology drives really offer—and where they fall short—compared to the tried and tested alternatives on the market.
Synology’s storage media catalog is divided across value, prosumer, enterprise SATA, and SAS hard drives, alongside both SATA and NVMe SSDs. While these drives carry the Synology name and firmware, they are not designed or manufactured in-house. Instead, Synology rebrands OEM hardware from established vendors: Toshiba for the enterprise SATA and SAS drives, Seagate for the value-tier NAS HDDs, and Phison-based platforms for SSDs. The internal firmware is customized by Synology to integrate tightly with DSM, and in some cases, to restrict compatibility to only their branded drives within the latest 2025 NAS systems.
The naming scheme makes it easier to distinguish between drive classes:
HAT for SATA NAS hard drives
HAS for SAS enterprise drives
SAT for SATA SSDs
SNV for NVMe SSDs
This segmentation aims to help users align their hardware with expected durability (e.g. workload in TB/year), power loss protection, and RAID integration. However, it’s worth noting that several of these drives are virtually identical to third-party counterparts—particularly in the HAT3300 and HAT3310 lines, which closely mirror Seagate IronWolf models down to mechanical structure and spec. Despite this, third-party versions of those drives remain incompatible with key RAID features on the latest Synology systems unless they are officially “verified.”
Synology NAS HDDs – HAT Series (SATA) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Capacity | Price (USD) | $/TB |
| HAT3300 | 2TB | $84.99 | $42.50 |
| 4TB | $99.99 | $25.00 | |
| 6TB | $149.99 | $25.00 | |
| HAT3310 | 8TB | $199.99 | $25.00 |
| 12TB | $269.99 | $22.50 | |
| 12TB (2-Pack) | $539.98 | $22.50 | |
| 16TB | $299.99 | $18.75 | |
|
|||
| HAT5300 (Enterprise, Toshiba) | 12TB | $449.99 | $37.50 |
| 16TB | $579.99 | $36.25 | |
| HAT5310 | 8TB | $299.99 | $37.50 |
| 20TB | $719.99 | $36.00 | |
Synology SAS HDDs – HAS Series |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Capacity | Price (USD) | $/TB |
| HAS5300 | 8TB | $299.99 | $37.50 |
| 12TB | $459.99 | $38.33 | |
| 16TB | $699.99 | $43.75 | |
| HAS5310 | 20TB | $829.99 | $41.50 |
Synology SATA SSDs – SAT Series |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Capacity | Price (USD) | $/TB |
| SAT5210 | 7TB | $1,859.99 | $265.71 |
| SAT5221 | 480GB | $169.99 | $354.15 |
| 960GB | $299.99 | $312.49 | |
| 1.92TB | $529.99 | $276.04 | |
| 3.84TB | $979.99 | $255.20 | |
Synology NVMe SSDs – SNV Series |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Capacity | Price (USD) | $/TB |
| SNV3410 | 400GB | $139.99 | $349.98 |
| 800GB | $269.99 | $337.49 | |
|
|||
| SNV3510 | 400GB | $174.99 | $437.48 |
| 800GB | $299.99 | $374.99 | |
While Synology’s branding suggests ecosystem cohesion, it’s essential to recognize that their drive firmware is not engineered for general-purpose systems. These drives are optimized—and in some cases restricted—for Synology NAS environments. However, performance benchmarks show that Synology drives often perform equivalently or slightly below their third-party counterparts in synthetic and real-world tests. Moreover, price comparisons reveal a 5–15% markup on average in the value tier, and significantly higher deltas—often exceeding 30–40%—in the enterprise-class and SSD segments. Combined with regional supply inconsistencies and limited SKU availability, the value proposition of Synology-branded drives remains hotly debated, especially when identical hardware from Seagate or Toshiba can be purchased for less—if only the 2025 NAS series would support them natively.
When it comes to entry-level NAS hard drives, the price differences between Synology’s HAT3300 and HAT3310 series and their third-party equivalents—such as Seagate IronWolf and WD Red Plus—are generally modest. In most cases, the cost per terabyte (TB) stays within a 0% to 15% margin, with Synology’s versions sitting slightly higher. For casual or home users who just want a drive that “just works” out of the box and benefits from firmware-level integration with DSM, that small premium might feel justifiable.
But the story changes dramatically as we move into prosumer and enterprise territory. Drives like the Synology HAT5300 and HAS5300 series can cost 40%–50% more than Seagate IronWolf Pro, WD Red Pro, or Seagate Exos alternatives—despite sharing the same mechanical internals in many cases. These aren’t just marginal differences; when you’re building a multi-drive RAID array with 12TB or 16TB drives, that pricing gap quickly snowballs into hundreds or even thousands of dollars extra. And this is particularly frustrating when, for example, Synology’s 12TB HAT5300 (built on Toshiba hardware) costs nearly double what a comparable IronWolf Pro sells for, despite similar endurance ratings and warranty terms.
| Synology Model | Capacity | Synology Price | Synology $/TB | 3rd Party Equivalent | 3rd Party Price | $/TB | % Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAT3300 | 2TB | $84.99 | $42.50 | WD Red Plus 2TB | $79.99 | $40.00 | -5.9% |
| HAT3300 | 4TB | $99.99 | $25.00 | Seagate IronWolf 4TB | $84.99 | $21.25 | -15.0% |
| HAT3300 | 4TB | $99.99 | $25.00 | WD Red Plus 4TB | $99.99 | $25.00 | 0.0% |
| HAT3300 | 6TB | $149.99 | $25.00 | Seagate IronWolf 6TB | $139.99 | $23.33 | -6.7% |
| HAT3310 | 8TB | $199.99 | $25.00 | WD Red Plus 8TB | $179.99 | $22.50 | -10.0% |
| HAT3310 | 12TB | $269.99 | $22.50 | Seagate IronWolf 12TB | $239.99 | $20.00 | -11.1% |
| Synology Model | Capacity | Synology Price | Synology $/TB | 3rd Party Equivalent | 3rd Party Price | $/TB | % Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAT5300 | 12TB | $449.99 | $37.50 | IronWolf Pro 12TB | $249.99 | $20.83 | -44.4% |
| HAT5300 | 16TB | $579.99 | $36.25 | WD Red Pro 16TB | $349.99 | $21.87 | -39.7% |
| HAT5310 | 20TB | $719.99 | $36.00 | Seagate IronWolf Pro 20TB | $399.99 | $20.00 | -44.4% |
| Synology Model | Capacity | Synology Price | Synology $/TB | 3rd Party Equivalent | 3rd Party Price | $/TB | % Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAS5300 | 8TB | $299.99 | $37.50 | Seagate Exos 7E10 | $259.99 | $32.50 | -13.3% |
| HAS5300 | 16TB | $699.99 | $43.75 | Seagate Exos X18 | $369.99 | $23.12 | -47.1% |
| HAS5310 | 20TB | $829.99 | $41.50 | Exos X20 | $499.99 | $25.00 | -39.8% |
| Synology Model | Capacity | Synology Price | Synology $/TB | 3rd Party Equivalent | 3rd Party Price | $/TB | % Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAT5221 | 480GB | $169.99 | $354.15 | Kingston DC600M | $102.99 | $214.56 | -39.4% |
| SAT5221 | 3.84TB | $979.99 | $255.21 | Kingston DC600M | $522.99 | $136.20 | -46.6% |
| SAT5210 | 7TB | $1859.99 | $265.71 | Kingston DC600M (7.68TB) | $955.99 | $124.48 | -48.6% |
| Synology Model | Capacity | Synology Price | Synology $/TB | 3rd Party Equivalent | 3rd Party Price | $/TB | % Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNV3410 | 800GB | $269.99 | $337.49 | WD Red SN700 1TB | $139.99 | $139.99 | -48.1% |
| SNV3510 | 800GB | $299.99 | $374.99 | WD Red SN700 1TB | $139.99 | $139.99 | -53.3% |
In short, while Synology’s drives are built on reputable platforms and do offer advantages like verified DSM integration and predictable firmware behavior, the value proposition becomes questionable—especially in higher capacities and enterprise deployments. For many users, especially SMBs and home power users deploying multi-drive setups, that extra 40–50% markup can be hard to justify. When the mechanical hardware is near-identical and the only major differentiator is firmware control, it’s no wonder many are pushing back against this pricing structure.)
Zoom in to see the results. IMPORTANT that you keep in mind that these SSDs and HDDs are different capacities and therefore direct comparison and correlation between their performance is not fair – I include these because I think it is important to compare the general gist of using Synology HDD media in a system and then alternatives, but measured with Synology’s in-system tools. Larger capacities mostly tend to yeald better results in any brand of drive (not a ‘do-or-die’ rule, but generally true).
| SYNOLOGY HAT3300 HDD | Seagate Ironwolf HDD |
|
|
| SYNOLOGY HAT5300 HDD | Seagate EXOS HDD |
|
|
| SYNOLOGY SAT5200 SSD | Kingston DC600 SATA SSD |
|
|
| SYNOLOGY M.2 NVMe SSD | TeamGroup T-Create Gen3 M.2 SSD |
|
|
IMPORTANT – In the process of upscaling the test result images (as there is a lot crammed in, so I have included the slightly blurred ones here) but I and will replace these with upscaled versions as soon as possible.
When it comes to performance, Synology’s hard drives and SSDs generally stay within expected ranges for their class—but with some caveats. Most of their HDDs mirror the performance of the OEM drives they’re based on, particularly in the HAT3300 and HAT3310 lines, which perform nearly identically to WD Red Plus and Seagate IronWolf models. You’re looking at familiar specs here: 5400–7200 RPM spin speeds, ~200–280MB/s sequential transfer rates, and ~180TB/yr workload ratings. That’s no surprise, considering these are essentially Seagate or Toshiba drives with Synology firmware and branding. Where things start to scale up, like in the HAT5300 and HAS5300 series, the specs remain on par with their higher-end third-party equivalents. These drives offer 550TB/year workloads, 7200 RPM motors, and MTBF figures around 2.5 million hours—just like IronWolf Pro, WD Red Pro, or Seagate Exos. But Synology currently tops out at 20TB in both SATA and SAS drives, while the competition is already pushing 22TB, 24TB, and even 26TB models. So, if you’re planning a high-capacity build, Synology might already be limiting your options on sheer scale alone.
| Model | Capacity Range | Max Transfer Rate | Spindle Speed | Workload | MTBF | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synology HAT3300 | 2–6TB | 202 MB/s | 5400/7200 RPM | 180 TB/yr | 1M hrs | Entry NAS |
| WD Red Plus | 2–14TB | 260 MB/s | 5400/7200 RPM | 180 TB/yr | 1M hrs | Entry NAS |
| Seagate IronWolf | 2–12TB | 210 MB/s | 5400/7200 RPM | 180 TB/yr | 1M hrs | Entry NAS |
| Synology HAT3310 | 8–16TB | 281 MB/s | 7200 RPM | 180 TB/yr | 1M hrs | Entry NAS |
| Synology HAT5300 | 4–20TB | 281 MB/s | 7200 RPM | 550 TB/yr | 2.5M hrs | Prosumer |
| IronWolf Pro | 2–24TB | 285 MB/s | 7200 RPM | 550 TB/yr | 2.5M hrs | Prosumer |
| WD Red Pro | 2–26TB | 287 MB/s | 7200 RPM | 550 TB/yr | 2.5M hrs | Prosumer |
| Synology HAS5300 | 8–20TB | 281 MB/s | 7200 RPM | 550 TB/yr | 2.5M hrs | Enterprise SAS |
| Seagate Exos | 12–24TB | 285 MB/s | 7200 RPM | 550 TB/yr | 2.5M hrs | Enterprise SAS |
Performance parity continues with Synology’s SATA SSDs. The SAT5221 and SAT5210 series are very close in spec to Kingston’s DC600M drives, offering similar read/write speeds, IOPS performance, and endurance levels. The SAT5210 even pushes into ultra-DWPD territory, boasting up to 10,000 TBW and higher daily write thresholds, which is competitive in the enterprise space. If you need high write endurance and steady power loss protection, these drives tick the right boxes.
The gap, however, opens up in the NVMe tier. Synology’s SNV3400 and SNV3500 drives fall short compared to third-party NVMe SSDs like the WD Red SN700. While Synology focuses on endurance, PLP (power loss protection), and integration with DSM caching features, the performance ceiling on these drives is noticeably lower—both in terms of sequential throughput and IOPS. Capacities also top out at 800GB, while others offer 1TB and beyond with faster read/write performance. So if you’re after speed or larger NVMe caching pools, Synology’s current options may feel behind the curve.
| Model | Interface | Capacity Range | Max R/W (MB/s) | IOPS (R/W) | Endurance (TBW) | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAT5221 | SATA 6Gb/s | 480GB–3.84TB | 500 / 500 | 90K / 30K | 900–7,000 | Enterprise |
| SAT5210 | SATA 6Gb/s | 7TB | 530 / 500 | 97K / 50K | 10,000 | Enterprise (Ultra DWPD) |
| Kingston DC600M | SATA 6Gb/s | 480GB–7.68TB | 560 / 530 | 94K / 34–78K | 876–14,016 | Enterprise |
| SNV3400 | NVMe PCIe 3.0 | 400–800GB | 3,000 / 3,100 | 225K–400K / 45K–70K | 491–1,022 | Entry NVMe Cache |
| SNV3500 | NVMe PCIe 3.0 | 400–800GB | 3,000 / 3,100 | 225K–400K / 45K–70K | 491–1,022 | Entry NVMe + PLP |
In short, Synology’s drives generally deliver solid, reliable performance that matches their third-party foundations—but the benefits of full DSM compatibility come with a trade-off. While the SATA range holds its ground, the NVMe lineup is due for an update if Synology wants to stay competitive against higher-capacity, higher-speed SSDs now widely available elsewhere. If performance is your main concern, particularly for NVMe caching or flash-heavy tasks, third-party options may be a better fit unless full integration is a must-have.
|
|
In reviewing Synology’s lineup of hard drives and SSDs, it’s clear that the hardware itself is solid—built on trusted OEM foundations and tuned to work seamlessly within DSM environments. From a compatibility and reliability standpoint, these drives do offer advantages, particularly for users who want an integrated, no-hassle deployment. That said, these benefits come with notable trade-offs. In many cases, Synology’s drives are mechanically identical to models from Seagate, Toshiba, or Phison, yet priced significantly higher—especially in the enterprise and NVMe tiers. While some of that premium may be justified by firmware-level integration, PLP, or simplified support paths, the cost disparity is hard to ignore for experienced users already comfortable with third-party hardware.
Ultimately, the decision to adopt Synology-branded drives will depend on your priorities. If you’re building a system where out-of-the-box compatibility, long-term support, and unified ecosystem control are paramount, Synology’s media may be a safe bet—albeit at a higher packaged price. But if your focus is on maximizing performance per dollar, scaling capacity, or customizing your setup beyond Synology’s verified list, third-party alternatives remain the more flexible and cost-effective choice. Until Synology expands their verified media list and adjusts regional pricing or availability, many users will continue to see these drives not as a value-add, but as an imposed requirement.
| Want to Support What We Do? Use the Links Below to Buy your NAS and/or HDD and SSD Media. Clicking these links will result in a small commission for anything you purchase, heading to me and Eddie @NASCompares and allows us to keep doing this! It’s just us two here and between this and ads, it’s the most passive way to keep us sailing! Thanks |
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER Join Inner Circle Subscribe
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT
Terms and Conditions
Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver
Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
|
|
|
