Vue normale

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

NAS Compares
ZimaCube 2 Design Update + Q&A with the Zima Founder
6 avril 2026 à 18:00

ZimaCube 2 Design Update + Q&A with the Zima Founder

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

6 avril 2026 à 18:00

Update on the ZimaCube 2 NAS + Your Questions Answered

Following the original ZimaCube and ZimaCube Pro, IceWhale is now preparing the ZimaCube 2 range as a more mature follow-up to its first desktop NAS platform, combining the same broad idea of a compact, open, software-defined personal cloud with clearer attention paid to refinement, validation, and retail readiness. Based on the specifications revealed so far, the standard $799 ZimaCube 2, the $1,299 ZimaCube 2 Pro, and the $2,499 Creator Pack continue to target users who want a turnkey system that still leaves room for alternative operating systems, PCIe expansion, direct Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 connectivity, and mixed storage workloads, but the second generation also arrives in the shadow of the first model’s early issues around cooling, power handling, and hardware compatibility, all of which IceWhale now says informed the redesign. Rather than presenting the ZimaCube 2 as a radically different product category, the company appears to be positioning it as a more stable and better validated version of the same formula, with a stronger base model, revised cooling, closer hardware and software integration, and a retail launch path instead of another crowdfunding campaign.

Remember to use the NASCompares Channel Discount Code: ‘NASCOMPARES50’

Zimacube 2 First Look at the Design

In physical terms, the ZimaCube 2 remains very close to the original system. The listed chassis dimensions are still 240 x 221 x 220 mm, and the overall layout continues to center on a compact desktop enclosure with 6 front-facing drive bays, a removable front panel, and a secondary internal sled for the 7th-bay M.2 storage section. That means this is not a major departure in footprint or format, but rather a continuation of the same small-tower NAS concept that IceWhale introduced with the first ZimaCube generation.

The external build also keeps the same broad industrial approach, with an all-metal enclosure and a design that is intended to be visible on a desk rather than hidden away. Based on the Shenzhen hands-on material, the finish has been revised to a silver tone rather than the darker look associated with earlier models, and there are still decorative touches such as copper-coloured screws and RGB lighting. The magnetic front cover also remains part of the design language, although the hands-on notes suggest that removability is still not especially refined, with no obvious front handle to make access easier.

Internally, the most significant design revision appears to be in thermals rather than structure. The original ZimaCube family drew recurring criticism over cooling behaviour and fan noise, and IceWhale itself later issued optimisation guidance and revised cooling components for early units. On the ZimaCube 2, the cooling assembly appears to have been reworked substantially, with a much larger vapor-chamber style module, extended heatpipe routing, and a direct airflow path toward a rear-mounted fan. In practical terms, this is one of the clearest visible signs that the company is treating thermal control as a first-order design issue rather than a secondary adjustment.

The storage layout remains one of the most recognisable elements of the platform. At the front are 6 SATA bays for 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch drives, while the separate 7th-bay board carries 4 M.2 slots. What has changed is the clarification around performance tiers. Following the post-video corrections, both the standard and Pro use PCIe Gen 4 for the 7th-bay architecture, but the actual throughput differs because of the ASMedia bridge hardware: the standard model is rated for 800MB/s R/W, while the Pro and Creator Pack are rated for 3200MB/s R/W. So although the physical design remains familiar, the storage subsystem is now segmented more clearly by model.

Taken together, the ZimaCube 2’s design changes are best understood as a revision rather than a clean-sheet rethink. The enclosure, bay structure, general scale, and visual concept are all recognisably derived from the earlier ZimaCube, but the thermal hardware, finish, and some of the internal implementation details suggest a product that has been adjusted in response to first-generation feedback. From a design perspective, the main story is not reinvention. It is that IceWhale appears to have revisited the same chassis idea with greater emphasis on cooling headroom, validation, and long-term use as a retail product rather than a first-wave crowdfunded device.

Zimacube 2 Internal Hardware Confirmation

The internal hardware changes are more substantial than the exterior suggests, particularly at the lower end of the range. The standard ZimaCube 2 now moves from the original ZimaCube’s Intel N100 to a 12th Gen Intel Core i3-1215U, giving the base model 6 cores, 8 threads, and a much stronger starting point for mixed storage and application workloads.

The ZimaCube 2 Pro and Creator Pack both use the 12th Gen Intel Core i5-1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads, which keeps the Pro class in the same broad processor tier as the earlier ZimaCube Pro, but still gives the second-generation lineup a more balanced split between entry and higher-tier models. Memory has also shifted upward in platform terms, with DDR5 SODIMM support and upgradeable slots rather than fixed memory, allowing the standard model to start at 8GB, the Pro at 16GB, and the Creator Pack at 64GB.

One of the more important details here is that IceWhale is not presenting the hardware purely as a NAS board with attached storage, but as a compact compute platform that also happens to handle large-scale local storage. The system still uses an internal NVMe SSD for the operating system, with 256GB on the standard and Pro and 1TB on the Creator Pack, while retaining dual PCIe slots on a Mini-ITX based custom board. That means the core platform is still built around expandability, and not just in a theoretical sense. IceWhale continues to point toward GPU cards, AI accelerators, network cards, and SSD-focused upgrades as intended use cases, which places the ZimaCube 2 somewhere between a traditional NAS, a compact home server, and a turnkey prosumer workstation-style storage appliance.

At the same time, the scale of the internal upgrade depends on which earlier model is being used as the reference point. Against the original non-Pro ZimaCube, the jump is obvious: newer CPU class, higher memory ceiling, improved internal segmentation, and a platform that appears better prepared for virtualization, media handling, and direct-attached workloads. Against the original ZimaCube Pro, however, the advance is more limited, because the Pro remains on the same Core i5-1235U family and much of the underlying capability was already present in some form. So while the internal hardware is clearly stronger overall, especially in the standard model, this still reads more as a focused revision of the existing architecture than a complete hardware reset.

Zimacube 2 Final Ports and Connectivity

Externally, the ZimaCube 2 continues to position itself as something broader than a conventional NAS, and the port layout reflects that. On the rear, the standard model includes 2 x 2.5GbE network ports alongside 2 x Thunderbolt 4 or USB4-capable USB-C connections, which gives it both networked and direct-attached workflow options. That matters because IceWhale is still treating direct host connection as one of the platform’s defining features, particularly for users who want local high-speed access without routing everything through standard Ethernet alone. It also keeps the ZimaCube 2 distinct from many turnkey NAS systems that rely almost entirely on network connectivity as the primary access path.

The separation between the standard and Pro models is more visible in networking than in external appearance. The standard ZimaCube 2 is limited to 2 x 2.5GbE, while the ZimaCube 2 Pro adds an additional 10GbE port. That makes the Pro the more complete option for users intending to deploy the system as shared high-speed network storage, while the standard model leans more heavily on its direct-connect Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 story to offset the absence of 10GbE. In practical terms, this is an important distinction, because although both systems look closely related on paper, the network capabilities create a clear difference in how they are likely to be used in creative or multi-user environments.

The rest of the I/O remains relatively conventional but still useful for a system of this class. IceWhale lists 4 x USB-A 3.0 ports, 1 x USB-C 3.0 port, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, and a 3.5mm audio jack, while the internal platform also keeps 2 PCIe expansion slots available for broader configuration. None of these ports alone are unusual, but taken together they reinforce the same point as the rest of the hardware: this is not being framed as a sealed appliance. It is being framed as a turnkey system with room for local expansion, direct attachment, and mixed workload deployment, even if the actual value of that depends on whether the buyer is choosing the standard model’s lower-cost balance or the Pro model’s more complete network specification.

Next, I spent some time with the founder of Icewhale (the company behind the Zimacube and ZimaOS, as well as the popular Zimaboard and Zimablade) and put forward a few questions about the current development of Zimacube 2 and their recent pricing changes to ZimaOS.

What is the ZimaCube 2 bringing to the market that your previous ZimaCube/ZimaCube Pro does not?

Based on the hands-on session and Lauren Pan’s comments, IceWhale is not presenting the ZimaCube 2 as a completely new product category, but rather as a more refined and better balanced version of the same idea. The biggest practical difference is that the standard model is no longer a clearly compromised entry point in the way the original N100-based ZimaCube often appeared next to the first Pro. The move to a Core i3-1215U, DDR5 memory, dual Thunderbolt 4 or USB4, 6 SATA bays, 4 M.2 slots, 2 PCIe slots, and upgradeable SODIMM memory means the base model now looks much closer to the wider prosumer NAS and compact server market, instead of acting mainly as the cheaper route into the ecosystem. That gives the range a stronger starting point and makes the standard unit a more serious option in its own right.

The second major difference is maturity rather than raw specification. IceWhale is tying the ZimaCube 2 more directly to the lessons learned from the first generation, especially around cooling, stability, hardware validation, and closer coordination between hardware and software development. The revised thermal module, the stronger emphasis on compatibility testing, the claim of more OS-level control over system parameters such as fans, and the move away from crowdfunding toward direct retail all suggest that the ZimaCube 2 is intended to arrive as a more settled product. So while the overall concept remains familiar, what IceWhale appears to be bringing to market this time is a more fully developed turnkey platform, not just in hardware terms, but in how the product is being prepared, sold, and supported.

What lessons were learnt in the development of the original ZimaCube that are going to be applied in the development of ZimaCube 2?

The clearest lesson appears to have been that the original ZimaCube needed tighter coordination between hardware and software from the outset. According to Lauren Pan, one of the main internal changes for the second generation is that both teams now work far more closely together, discussing hardware and software details in the same development cycle rather than treating them as separate tracks. In practical terms, that matters because the first-generation platform showed that a NAS or personal cloud product is not defined by hardware alone. It also depends heavily on how well thermals, fan control, storage behaviour, connectivity, and OS-level management are integrated into a single system.

A second lesson concerns validation and first-batch readiness. The original ZimaCube attracted feedback around cooling, fan behaviour, drive compatibility, and power-related issues, and IceWhale now appears to be treating those areas much more seriously in the ZimaCube 2. Pan specifically pointed to a redesigned thermal module, more extensive compatibility testing, and additional work with drive manufacturers such as Seagate and Western Digital after earlier issues emerged. The broader implication is that ZimaCube 2 is being developed less like an experimental first-generation product and more like a revision intended to reduce the kind of early hardware and integration problems that affected the first release.

What was the biggest challenge that you have faced in the development of ZimaCube 2?

According to Lauren Pan, the biggest challenge in developing the ZimaCube 2 was production cost. That answer fits the wider context of the current hardware market, where CPU, memory, SSD, and other component pricing has remained a significant pressure on system builders. In the case of the ZimaCube 2, IceWhale appears to have been trying to hold onto several features that are often reduced or removed in competing products at this price level, including upgradeable SODIMM memory, bundled system storage, dual Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 connectivity, PCIe expansion, and a more substantial cooling solution. So the challenge was not simply making a new box, but doing so while keeping the product within a price band that still looked competitive against other turnkey and semi-DIY NAS systems in 2026.

That issue appears especially relevant to the standard model. IceWhale is trying to position the $799 ZimaCube 2 as a stronger base platform than the original non-Pro unit, while still including a Core i3-1215U, 8GB of DDR5, 256GB of NVMe storage, 6 SATA bays, 4 M.2 slots, and full ZimaOS licensing as part of the package. In that respect, the development challenge seems to have been balancing specification, manufacturability, and margin without moving the product out of reach of the same buyers it is trying to attract. The result is that cost control appears to have shaped not just pricing, but also the way IceWhale talks about the ZimaCube 2 as a price versus performance compromise rather than an attempt to maximise specifications at any cost.

What has the user response been to your switch towards a free/paid $29 model of your ZimaOS software since the announcement?

According to Lauren Pan, the response to the move from a fully free model to the current free tier plus $29 lifetime ZimaOS+ model has been mixed, but not unexpected. Some community members were confused by the change or felt the software should have remained fully free, while others accepted that the platform needed a sustainable business model if development was going to continue over the long term.

That split is fairly typical for software that begins as a no-cost offering and later introduces paid licensing, particularly when it has built much of its reputation through community use, testing, and feedback. In IceWhale’s case, the company’s position is that the low-cost lifetime fee is intended to make the software commercially sustainable without undermining its accessibility.

IceWhale has also tried to frame the pricing change as part of a broader community model rather than just a revenue switch. Pan said the company had explained the reasoning publicly in late 2025 and described a plan under which 33% of license revenue would be directed back toward community contributors, including moderators, app maintainers, and users helping support the wider ZimaOS and CasaOS ecosystem.

Whether that model proves sustainable over time remains to be seen, but the immediate point is that IceWhale does not appear to be treating the $29 fee as a traditional software upsell. Instead, it is presenting it as a low-cost, lifetime contribution intended to keep development active while maintaining a relatively low barrier to entry compared with other paid NAS software platforms.

Will ZimaCube 2 be headed for crowdfunding, or direct to traditional retail?

IceWhale says the ZimaCube 2 is going direct to traditional retail rather than returning to crowdfunding. In Lauren Pan’s explanation, Kickstarter is something the company now sees as useful in 2 specific cases: either when a product concept still needs market validation, or when production costs are high enough that outside funding is needed to get the first batch built. IceWhale’s position is that the original ZimaCube fit that earlier stage of the company, when the product was more expensive to bring to market and the business itself was still proving demand for this kind of home server and personal cloud hardware. With the ZimaCube 2, the company appears to believe it no longer needs crowdfunding for either of those reasons.

That change is also part of the wider message around the second generation. Moving straight to store-based pre-orders gives the impression that IceWhale wants the ZimaCube 2 to be seen less as an experimental or community-funded device and more as a normal retail product. Pan also described the early response as active, with roughly 200 to 300 community applications tied to testing and usage scenarios, suggesting that demand discovery is now happening around a product that already exists, rather than one still needing crowdfunding to justify its creation. In practical terms, the retail-first approach supports IceWhale’s broader attempt to position the ZimaCube 2 as a more mature follow-up to the first generation.

The NASCompares Conclusion and Verdict so Far on ZimaCube 2

Taken as a whole, the ZimaCube 2 looks less like a dramatic reinvention of the original platform and more like a deliberate correction and refinement of it. The overall chassis concept, storage layout, and broader product identity remain familiar, but IceWhale appears to have focused this second generation on the areas that mattered most after the first release: a stronger base model, revised thermals, closer hardware and software coordination, more validation around compatibility, and a direct retail launch rather than another crowdfunding cycle. That means the scale of change is uneven depending on which earlier model it is compared against, but the direction is clear enough. The ZimaCube 2 does not appear to be trying to replace the original with a wholly different vision. Instead, it looks like IceWhale is trying to turn the ZimaCube formula into a more complete and commercially mature turnkey platform, with ZimaOS, direct Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 connectivity, PCIe expansion, and hybrid storage still forming the core of its appeal.

Remember to use the NASCompares Channel Discount Code: ‘NASCOMPARES50’

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

[contact-form-7]

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

NAS Compares
Zimacube 2 NAS Revealed – Everything We Know
18 mars 2026 à 16:30

Zimacube 2 NAS Revealed – Everything We Know

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

18 mars 2026 à 16:30

ZimaCube 2 NAS Announced – Bigger? Better? The Same?

IceWhale’s original ZimaCube and ZimaCube Pro established the company’s move beyond compact single-board servers and into desktop NAS hardware aimed at prosumers, creators, and home lab users. The standard ZimaCube launched at $699 with an Intel N100, while the ZimaCube Pro raised the ceiling with an Intel Core i5-1235U, 10GbE, Thunderbolt 4, faster 7th-bay M.2 performance, and broader appeal for heavier workloads. Both systems were positioned less as closed NAS appliances and more as flexible personal cloud platforms, with ZimaOS pre-installed and support for alternative operating systems such as TrueNAS, Unraid, Proxmox, pfSense, and Linux distributions. As with many crowdfunded hardware products, the first generation also required some early post-launch refinement, particularly around areas such as fan behaviour, thermal tuning, and broader system optimisation, which was reflected in community support discussions and early optimisation guidance from IceWhale.

Remember to use the NASCompares Channel Discount Code: ‘NASCOMPARES50’

The newly revealed ZimaCube 2 family builds directly on that same idea, but with a clearer emphasis on higher-performance local storage, hybrid workloads, and hardware expansion. The new range starts with the $799 ZimaCube 2 Standard, moves to the $1,299 ZimaCube 2 Pro, and extends to a $2,499 Creator Pack that adds 64GB of memory, 1TB of SSD storage, and an NVIDIA RTX Pro 2000 GPU. Based on the specifications revealed so far, IceWhale is positioning this generation as a more capable platform for media serving, virtualization, containers, AI-assisted workloads, and direct-attached creative workflows, while continuing to stress open hardware, multi-OS support, and the absence of ecosystem lock-in. Unlike the first ZimaCube generation, which began as a Kickstarter-era product, the ZimaCube 2 line is already being presented through standard pre-order retail channels ahead of its expected March 30 shipment window.

ZimaCube 2 – Design & Storage

From a design standpoint, the ZimaCube 2 family appears to retain the same broad desktop form factor as the earlier models, with listed dimensions of 240 x 221 x 220 mm. IceWhale is continuing with the same general visual approach: a compact metal chassis, magnetic front panel, and a visible RGB lighting element rather than the more utilitarian styling used by many conventional NAS systems. The company is also still presenting the system as something intended to sit on a desk rather than be hidden away, which places equal weight on appearance, acoustics, and accessibility alongside storage capacity.

The storage layout remains one of the more distinctive parts of the design. As before, the system uses a 6-bay SATA arrangement for 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch drives, but it is paired with a separate 7th-bay expansion structure built around 4 M.2 slots.

IceWhale continues to frame this as a hybrid storage design, separating bulk-capacity HDD storage from faster solid-state tiers for cache, active project data, applications, or virtualised workloads. In practical terms, that gives the ZimaCube 2 a broader remit than a basic backup NAS, since it is being positioned to handle both long-term storage and higher-speed local workloads within the same enclosure.

What is different in this generation is less the physical layout itself and more the way IceWhale is defining its purpose. The company is now pushing the 6+4 architecture more explicitly as a tiered storage platform for creators, self-hosters, and home lab users, with references to 164TB+ capacity, active “hot zone” NVMe storage, and room for long-term archive duties. That said, the overall storage philosophy is still familiar rather than radically new: the ZimaCube 2 appears to refine and repackage an existing concept instead of introducing a fundamentally different chassis or bay arrangement. The main change is that IceWhale is placing greater emphasis on workflow separation, SSD acceleration, and long-term expandability than it did with the original launch material.

ZimaCube 2 – Internal Hardware

Internally, the ZimaCube 2 range is split more clearly than the first generation. The base ZimaCube 2 moves to an Intel Core i3-1215U with 8GB of DDR5 memory, while the ZimaCube 2 Pro uses an Intel Core i5-1235U with 16GB of DDR5. At the top end, the Creator Pack keeps the same Core i5 platform but adds 64GB of memory, 1TB of NVMe storage, and a discrete NVIDIA RTX Pro 2000. That gives IceWhale a broader spread than before, from an entry configuration that is still positioned above the original N100-based ZimaCube to a much more workstation-like variant aimed at GPU-assisted workloads.

The wider platform also reflects a shift in how IceWhale wants these systems to be used. The first ZimaCube family already supported alternative operating systems, containers, media serving, and some expansion, but the ZimaCube 2 line places far more emphasis on concurrent mixed workloads. IceWhale is explicitly framing the hardware around virtual machines, Docker containers, AI tools, real-time media handling, and direct high-speed project access, which explains the move to newer mobile Intel processors, DDR5 memory, and a more aggressive expansion story. In that sense, the second generation is less a conventional NAS refresh and more an attempt to position the product as a compact storage server with broader compute utility.

CPU spec	ZimaCube 2	ZimaCube 2 Pro
Processor	Intel Core i3-1215U	Intel Core i5-1235U
Generation	12th Gen Intel Core U-series	12th Gen Intel Core U-series
Total cores	6	10
Performance cores	2	2
Efficient cores	4	8
Threads	8	12
Max turbo frequency	4.40GHz	4.40GHz
P-core max turbo	4.40GHz	4.40GHz
E-core max turbo	3.30GHz	3.30GHz
Intel Smart Cache	10MB	12MB
Processor base power	15W	15W
Maximum turbo power	55W	55W
Integrated graphics	Intel UHD Graphics	Intel Iris Xe Graphics

In practical terms, the main difference is not clock speed, since both chips top out at 4.40GHz, but core count and thread count. The i5-1235U adds 4 more Efficient cores, 4 more threads, and 2MB more cache, which should make it noticeably better suited to heavier multitasking, containers, background services, and mixed NAS plus VM workloads.

Model	CPU	Key CPU difference
ZimaCube 2	Intel Core i3-1215U	Lower-tier chip with 6 cores and 8 threads
ZimaCube 2 Pro	Intel Core i5-1235U	Higher-tier chip with 10 cores and 12 threads, better suited to heavier parallel workloads

At the same time, the headline changes need to be read carefully. The ZimaCube 2 Pro remains on the same Core i5-1235U class processor as the previous ZimaCube Pro, so not every model represents a major CPU leap. The more meaningful changes are in how the range is tiered, the addition of a pre-configured GPU-equipped Creator Pack, and the clearer effort to make higher-end use cases part of the official positioning rather than secondary possibilities. For buyers comparing model to model, the internal hardware story is therefore partly about real platform flexibility and partly about IceWhale packaging familiar capabilities into more defined product tiers.

Specification	ZimaCube 2	ZimaCube 2 Pro	ZimaCube 2 Creator Pack
Processor	Intel Core i3-1215U	Intel Core i5-1235U	Intel Core i5-1235U
CPU cores / threads	6 cores	10 cores / 12 threads	10 cores / 12 threads
Max clock	Up to 4.4GHz	Up to 4.4GHz	Up to 4.4GHz
GPU	Integrated graphics	Intel Iris Xe	NVIDIA RTX Pro 2000
Memory	8GB DDR5-4800	16GB DDR5-4800	64GB DDR5-4800
Max memory	64GB	64GB	64GB
System storage	256GB NVMe SSD	256GB NVMe SSD	1TB NVMe SSD
PCIe expansion	PCIe 4.0 x4 + PCIe 3.0 x2	PCIe 4.0 x4 + PCIe 3.0 x2	PCIe 4.0 x4 + PCIe 3.0 x2
M.2 support	1 onboard + 4 in 7th bay	1 onboard + 4 in 7th bay	1 onboard + 4 in 7th bay
SATA drive support	6 bays	6 bays	6 bays
Rated power	247W	247W	247W

ZimaCube 2 – Ports & Connections

The connectivity story is one of the clearer areas where IceWhale is trying to separate the ZimaCube 2 family from entry-level NAS hardware. Across the new range, the headline feature is the inclusion of 2 rear Thunderbolt 4 or USB4-class USB-C connections rated at 40Gbps on both the standard and Pro tier, which IceWhale is positioning for direct Mac or PC attachment as well as high-speed external expansion. That is a notable distinction from many mainstream NAS products, which typically rely on Ethernet alone for primary high-speed access. Here, IceWhale is clearly trying to support both networked storage use and direct-attached workflow scenarios from the same box.

Networking is also relatively strong on paper. Based on the revealed specifications, the ZimaCube 2 family includes 2 x Intel i226 2.5GbE ports and 1 x Marvell AQC113 10GbE port exclusively on the Pro model. In practical terms, that allows for several deployment options, including direct multi-gig connections, use as a higher-speed shared storage node, or separation of management and data traffic. For users comparing it with the previous generation, the main point is that higher-end network capability now appears to be treated as a core part of the wider ZimaCube 2 platform rather than something reserved only for the Pro model.

The rest of the external I/O is fairly conventional but functional. IceWhale lists 4 x USB-A 3.0 ports, 1 x USB-C 3.0 port, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, and a 3.5mm audio jack. Combined with the PCIe expansion support inside the chassis, that gives the platform a broader connection profile than a typical sealed NAS appliance. Even so, the real significance here is not any single port in isolation, but the fact that IceWhale continues to present the ZimaCube 2 as a hybrid device that sits somewhere between a NAS, a small server, and a compact workstation-class storage platform.

Connection	ZimaCube 2 family
Ethernet	2 x Intel i226 2.5GbE, 1 x Marvell AQC113 10GbE (Pro Only)
Thunderbolt / USB4	2 x rear USB-C, up to 40Gbps
USB-A	4 x USB-A 3.0
USB-C	1 x USB-C 3.0
Display outputs	1 x DisplayPort 1.4, 1 x HDMI 2.0
Audio	1 x 3.5mm audio jack
PCIe expansion support	PCIe 4.0 x4 in physical x16, PCIe 3.0 x2 in physical x8

ZimaCube 2 vs ZimaCube 1 – What Has Changed?

The biggest change is at the bottom of the range. The original ZimaCube was built around Intel’s N100, DDR4 memory, Gen 3 expansion, and 2 x 2.5GbE, which made it the more basic model in the lineup. By contrast, the new ZimaCube 2 raises the baseline to a Core i3-1215U with DDR5 memory, while keeping the same overall 6-bay chassis concept and hybrid storage approach. That is a meaningful improvement in entry-level compute capability, but it does not completely remove the gap between standard and Pro variants, since the non-Pro ZimaCube 2 still stops at 2 x 2.5GbE and does not gain the extra 10GbE port.

The Pro side is a more mixed story. The original ZimaCube Pro already offered a Core i5-1235U, DDR5, 10GbE, Thunderbolt 4, and faster M.2 performance in the 7th bay, so the ZimaCube 2 Pro does not represent the same kind of obvious jump seen on the standard model. In CPU terms, it appears to stay in essentially the same class, which makes this look more like a product refinement than a full hardware reset. IceWhale is clearly pushing the second generation more aggressively toward creator workflows, virtualization, AI-related use cases, and direct-attached high-speed storage, but that broader messaging should not be mistaken for a major leap in every core hardware area.

That leaves the ZimaCube 2 generation looking unevenly improved depending on which model is being compared. The standard ZimaCube 2 is substantially more capable than the first non-Pro system, while the ZimaCube 2 Pro looks more like a cleaner, more retail-ready continuation of what the first Pro already set out to do. The new Creator Pack is the main addition that materially changes the shape of the lineup, since it introduces a pre-configured GPU-equipped option rather than leaving that path entirely to user expansion. So while IceWhale is presenting the ZimaCube 2 family as a broader second-generation platform, the actual extent of change varies quite sharply between the base and Pro tiers.

Specification	ZimaCube	ZimaCube 2	ZimaCube Pro	ZimaCube 2 Pro
Launch price	$699	$799	$1,099	$1,299
Processor	Intel N100	Intel Core i3-1215U	Intel Core i5-1235U	Intel Core i5-1235U
CPU class change	Baseline	Clear upgrade over ZimaCube	Higher-end original model	Largely same CPU tier as ZimaCube Pro
Memory	8GB DDR4-3200	8GB DDR5-4800	16GB DDR5-4800	16GB DDR5-4800
Max memory	16GB	64GB	32GB	64GB
System storage	256GB NVMe SSD	256GB NVMe SSD	256GB NVMe SSD	256GB NVMe SSD
6-bay SATA storage	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
7th bay	4 x M.2	4 x M.2	4 x M.2	4 x M.2
7th-bay speed	800MB/s R/W	800MB/s R/W listed	3200MB/s R/W	3200MB/s R/W listed
PCIe expansion	Gen 3	PCIe 4.0 x4 + PCIe 3.0 x2	Gen 4 + Gen 3	PCIe 4.0 x4 + PCIe 3.0 x2
Networking	2 x 2.5GbE	2 x 2.5GbE	2 x 2.5GbE + 1 x 10GbE	2 x 2.5GbE + 1 x 10GbE
Thunderbolt 4 / USB4	No	2 x rear USB-C	2 x rear USB-C	2 x rear USB-C
USB	More limited	4 x USB-A 3.0, 1 x USB-C 3.0	4 x USB-A 3.0, 1 x USB-C 3.0	4 x USB-A 3.0, 1 x USB-C 3.0
Display outputs	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0
Dimensions	240 x 221 x 220 mm	240 x 221 x 220 mm	240 x 221 x 220 mm	240 x 221 x 220 mm

ZimaOS – The Software that is included with the ZimaCube 2 (Is it actually any good?)

ZimaOS is IceWhale’s Linux-based NAS operating system, developed out of the earlier CasaOS foundation and originally tied closely to the ZimaCube hardware before becoming available more broadly as a standalone platform. In practical terms, its main appeal is that it tries to lower the barrier to entry for first-time NAS users without stripping away too much of the flexibility expected from a self-hosted system. Based on the information provided, the software combines a browser-based management interface with a dedicated Zima Client application for desktop and mobile, giving it a more guided and consumer-facing feel than many free NAS operating systems.

Installation appears relatively straightforward, using a standard image-writing process and USB boot method, and the platform is light enough to run on modest boot media rather than requiring a large dedicated SSD. The interface focuses heavily on accessibility: native file browsing, straightforward share creation, basic RAID setup, network management, cloud and LAN storage integration, drive mapping, local backup jobs, and remote access are all presented in a simplified GUI rather than being heavily dependent on command line work. That simplicity is one of its clearest points of distinction from platforms such as TrueNAS and OpenMediaVault, which can offer deeper storage control but are often more intimidating to less experienced users.

At the same time, ZimaOS is not being positioned as a stripped-down toy platform. IceWhale is clearly treating it as a full software layer for a turnkey NAS or personal cloud deployment, with support for app containers, developer mode, SSH access, SMB sharing, Time Machine compatibility, AI-assisted semantic search, and direct Thunderbolt connectivity on supported hardware. The client application is also an important part of the package, since it extends the platform beyond simple browser access by adding local discovery, mapped access, backup synchronisation, and peer-to-peer file transfer in a way that many free NAS platforms do not include by default.

However, the software still has some visible limits: configuration depth remains lighter than enterprise-oriented rivals, some features appear to be more polished than others, and direct Thunderbolt or USB4 support may still depend heavily on driver compatibility and the exact hardware being used. Its RAID tools are deliberately simple, but do not currently match the flexibility of more mature systems in areas such as mixed-drive storage schemes.

Pricing also shows how IceWhale is segmenting the platform in 2026: the base ZimaOS Free tier includes core features, the Zima Client for mobile and PC, Thunderbolt support, developer mode, support for up to 4 disks, and 3 members, while ZimaOS+ adds unlimited disks and unlimited users for a $29 lifetime license (to confirm, any ZimaCube, Zimaboard and ZimaBlade device includes the lifetime license). Taken together, ZimaOS appears to sit in a useful middle ground: more approachable than many traditional NAS operating systems, more complete than many lightweight hobbyist options, and increasingly viable both as bundled software for ZimaCube hardware and as a standalone OS for low-cost custom systems.

ZimaCube 2 – Worth it? Price and Release Date?

Taken at face value, the ZimaCube 2 family looks more like a measured revision of the original concept than a major generational leap. Compared with the first ZimaCube, there are clear upgrades in entry-level processor choice, memory platform, expansion framing, and product segmentation, but the broader structure remains very familiar. The unchanged chassis dimensions, continued 6-bay plus 7th-bay layout, and the fact that the Pro model remains in essentially the same CPU class as before all make this feel closer to the kind of 2 to 3 year refresh cycle often seen from established turnkey NAS vendors such as Synology and QNAP, rather than a wholly new platform that significantly expands the portfolio or redefines what the product is.

That said, this does not make the ZimaCube 2 underwhelming in absolute terms. Even if the scale of change appears evolutionary rather than transformative, it is still a notably well-equipped system on paper, with ZimaOS included, direct Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 connectivity, PCIe expansion, hybrid storage flexibility, and a full hardware and software turnkey approach that many DIY alternatives do not offer in one package. The result is a platform that may not radically depart from the first ZimaCube’s formula, but still presents a relatively complete and capable storage server solution for users who want open deployment options without having to assemble and integrate everything themselves.

In pricing terms, IceWhale is placing the ZimaCube 2 range above the original entry model but still within the upper end of the prosumer NAS and compact server market. The ZimaCube 2 starts at $799, the ZimaCube 2 Pro rises to $1,299, and the Creator Pack reaches $2,499 with its added GPU, memory, and larger SSD allocation. That means the new range is not being introduced as a low-cost disruption, but rather as a more fully specified turnkey platform aimed at users who want performance, flexibility, and direct connectivity in a single package. IceWhale is currently listing the systems as pre-orders, with shipping expected to begin from March 30, suggesting that the second generation is being brought to market through a more conventional retail path than the original crowdfunding-led launch.

Remember to use the NASCompares Channel Discount Code: ‘NASCOMPARES50’

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

[contact-form-7]

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

NAS Compares
Minsforum MS-S1 Max Review – Who Is This For???
23 janvier 2026 à 18:00

Minsforum MS-S1 Max Review – Who Is This For???

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

23 janvier 2026 à 18:00

Ever Wanted a Modern Mac Mini, but Windows? And for AI? The MS-S1 Max Review

The Minisforum MS-S1 Max is one of those mini workstations that looks straightforward on paper, but starts to feel unusual once you look at how it is put together and who it seems to be aimed at. It is built around AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395, pairing a 16C/32T CPU with Radeon 8060S integrated graphics and an NPU that contributes to a quoted platform total of up to 126 TOPS. The big differentiator is the memory design: 128GB of LPDDR5x-8000 UMA, shared between the CPU and GPU, which changes the usual limits you hit on iGPU systems where VRAM is the first bottleneck. Minisforum also leans into “serious deployment” features here, including dual 10GbE, WiFi 7, USB4 v2, a slide-out chassis for maintenance, and even references to clustering and 2U rack mounting. The result is a machine that can make sense for creators, power users, and AI-focused workloads, but it also comes with a price level that forces the obvious question: what are you actually getting for that money beyond raw specs.

Spec	Details
Model	MS-S1 Max (128GB + 2TB bundle)
Price (USD)	$2,639
CPU	AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16C/32T, up to 5.1GHz)
GPU	AMD Radeon 8060S (40 CUs, up to 2900MHz)
AI performance	NPU up to 50 TOPS; total up to 126 TOPS
Memory	128GB LPDDR5x-8000, 256-bit UMA (shared CPU/GPU)
Storage included	2TB SSD (bundle listing)
M.2 expansion	2x M.2 2280 (1x PCIe 4.0 x4 up to 8TB, 1x PCIe 4.0 x1 up to 8TB)
PCIe expansion	PCIe x16 physical slot (PCIe 4.0 x4 electrical)
Wired networking	2x 10GbE RJ45 (Realtek RTL8127)
Wireless	WiFi 7, Bluetooth 5.4
Front I/O	2x USB4 (40Gbps, DP Alt Mode, 15W PD), 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10Gbps), 1x 3.5mm TRRS combo, 2x DMIC, power button (LED)
Rear I/O	2x USB4 v2 (80Gbps, DP Alt Mode, 15W PD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10Gbps), 2x USB 2.0, 2x 10GbE RJ45, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, BIOS reset hole
Video output	HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K@60Hz / 4K@120Hz), DP Alt Mode over USB4/USB4 v2
Cooling	6 heat pipes + phase change material, dual turbine fans (max 3600 RPM)
Power	Internal PSU, 320W max (100-240V ~6A 50-60Hz)
TDP modes	Performance: 130W, Balanced: 95W, Quiet: 60W
Dimensions	222.1 x 206.3 x 77.1 mm
Weight	2.8 kg
OS support	Windows 11 Pro; Windows 11 24H2 Pro/Home

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Quick Conclusion

The Minisforum MS-S1 Max is best understood as a compact Strix Halo workstation rather than a conventional mini PC, because its value is tied to the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 APU, the Radeon 8060S iGPU, and especially the 128GB LPDDR5x-8000 UMA memory pool that helps avoid the usual iGPU VRAM ceiling in creation, GPU-accelerated work, and local AI experimentation. It pairs that core platform with unusually strong external connectivity for its size, including dual 10GbE RJ45, WiFi 7, and a mix of USB4 and USB4 v2 ports that make high-bandwidth docks and storage setups practical, while the internal 320W PSU and heavy cooling stack are clearly built for sustained loads rather than short bursts. In testing, the system’s behavior has a few quirks that matter in daily use, particularly the way the chassis can feel hot to the touch in idle until the fan profile becomes more reactive under load, and the fact that noise ramps into the low 50 dBA range once the cooling really gets going, even if idle acoustics are more modest. Expandability is also a mixed bag: the slide-out design is convenient, but the storage layout includes a PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot alongside a second M.2 limited to PCIe 4.0 x1, and the PCIe x16 slot is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, so it rewards buyers who already know what they plan to add. The price is the real gatekeeper here, because it only makes sense if you will actually use the UMA memory capacity, the iGPU performance, and the high-speed networking and USB bandwidth, but for that narrower audience, it offers a rare combination of compact form factor, strong APU compute, and connectivity that is difficult to match without moving to a much larger desktop or adding a discrete GPU.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 10/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 6/10

VALUE - 7/10

8.4

PROS

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16C/32T) delivers workstation-class CPU performance in a compact chassis

Radeon 8060S (40 CUs) iGPU is capable enough for 1080p gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads without a dGPU

128GB LPDDR5x-8000 UMA reduces typical iGPU VRAM limitations for creation and local AI tasks

Strong idle efficiency with power draw observed around 13 to 16W in light desktop use

Dual 10GbE RJ45 enables high-throughput workflows without needing add-in NICs

WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 provide fast wireless connectivity for setups where wired is not practical

4 total USB4-class ports (2x USB4 40Gbps + 2x USB4 v2 80Gbps) support high-speed docks and storage

Slide-out chassis design improves serviceability compared with many compact desktops

Multiple power and fan modes (Performance/Balanced/Quiet/Rack) allow tuning for noise vs sustained load

CONS

High price puts it outside typical mini PC value expectations

Storage expansion is uneven (1x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x4 + 1x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x1), limiting the second slot for high-performance SSD use

Exterior can feel very hot at idle, with fan response seeming less aggressive until load begins

PCIe x16 slot is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, and physical space constraints limit card choices

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Check AliExpress or the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Design & Storage

The MS-S1 Max feels like Minisforum took the general “mini workstation” idea and then built a thicker, more industrial version of it to cope with the Strix Halo platform. The chassis is metal and noticeably more substantial than the smaller MS-series boxes, with ventilation cut across multiple sides rather than relying on a single intake and exhaust path. It can be used vertically or horizontally thanks to feet on more than one face, which makes sense given how much of the marketing leans toward desk use one day and rack or shelf use the next.

Minisforum also keeps the slide-out structure here, and it is clearly intended to make maintenance less annoying than a traditional small desktop. In practice, it is still a compact, dense build, but you are not dismantling the entire enclosure just to access the main service areas. The system also has a couple of physical touches that make it feel more “deployment aware” than most mini PCs, like the mounting points underneath and the general emphasis on stacking, shelving, or grouping more than 1 unit together.

Storage is one of the areas where the MS-S1 Max shows both its strengths and its compromises. You get 2 internal M.2 2280 slots, but they are not equal: 1 is PCIe 4.0 x4 and the other is PCIe 4.0 x1. That means you can have a fast primary NVMe for OS and active work, but the second slot is better treated as capacity storage, warm data, or a secondary pool where peak throughput matters less. Minisforum ships the reviewed configuration with a 2TB Gen 4 SSD, so you can start testing immediately, but once you begin planning expansion, that lane split becomes a real consideration.

Physically, the M.2 placement is functional but not especially convenient. The slots sit low in the chassis near the base and tucked behind a lot of the cooling hardware, which makes upgrades feel more fiddly than they need to be. There is airflow down there, but it is not the kind of open, easy-access layout you get in a larger desktop. It also does not really encourage tall, pre-fitted heatsinks on SSDs, since clearance is limited and the space around the cooling assembly is tight. If you plan to run heavy sustained writes, you will probably end up choosing low-profile drives or slim heatsinks simply because it is the easiest fit.

On the expansion side, the MS-S1 Max includes a full-length PCIe x16 physical slot, but it is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, and that matters if you are buying cards based on the x16 shape alone. The form factor also pushes you toward half-height, half-length cards in most practical installs, and even then it can get cramped depending on cabling and where the PSU wiring runs.

In other words, the slot is useful for NICs, storage adapters, capture cards, and some compact accelerators, but it is not a “drop in any x16 card” situation, and the system rewards planning ahead before you buy hardware for it.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Internal Hardware

At the heart of the MS-S1 Max is AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395, and the main thing to understand is that it is an APU platform built to behave more like a compact workstation than a typical integrated-graphics mini PC. You are getting a 16C/32T Zen 5 CPU with boost up to 5.1GHz, paired with an on-die Radeon 8060S GPU with 40 CUs and up to 2900MHz. In real use, that combination shifts the expectations around what “no discrete GPU” actually means, because the compute and graphics capability are designed to scale together rather than feeling like a strong CPU with an afterthought iGPU.

The most defining hardware choice is memory, because you do not get SODIMM slots here at all. The system uses up to 128GB LPDDR5x-8000 on a 256-bit bus, and it is shared between CPU and GPU via UMA. That has practical implications in workloads that normally hit VRAM limits first, like GPU-accelerated creative work or local AI inference, where the ability to allocate a much larger pool to the GPU can matter more than raw shader count. It also means your “upgrade path” is basically decided at purchase, so the value proposition depends heavily on whether 128GB UMA is something you will genuinely use, rather than just admire on a spec sheet.

On the AI side, the platform is marketed around a combined figure of up to 126 TOPS, with the NPU itself rated up to 50 TOPS. In day-to-day terms, that does not automatically translate into every app running faster, because it depends on whether your software actually targets the NPU, the GPU, or the CPU. What is clear from the positioning, and from how similar Strix Halo systems are being used, is that this design is meant to handle local model work without immediately forcing you into a discrete GPU purchase. That also explains why Minisforum leans into “run large models locally” messaging more than it usually does on its mainstream mini PCs.

Cooling and power delivery are tightly linked to the internal hardware decisions. Minisforum rates the system at 130W in Performance mode, 95W in Balanced, and 60W in Quiet, and the cooling stack is built around a copper base, 6 heat pipes, phase change material, and dual turbine fans, with a max fan speed of 3600 RPM. The PSU is internal and rated up to 320W, which helps explain why the chassis is thicker than many of Minisforum’s earlier workstations. In practice, that internal PSU choice also supports the idea that this box is expected to hold higher sustained loads than a typical mini PC without relying on a large external power brick.

There are also a few platform-level details that shape how “workstation-like” it feels. The system supports Windows 11 Pro and Windows 11 24H2 Pro/Home, and the BIOS is positioned as feature-rich, with fan monitoring and tuning options plus platform toggles that matter to power users. This is relevant because the MS-S1 Max is not just built for one narrow purpose, it is built for people who will switch between modes, tweak profiles, and repurpose it across different roles over time. If you treat it like a sealed appliance, you will still get high performance, but you are leaving a lot of what the platform is trying to offer on the table.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Ports & Connections

The MS-S1 Max is one of the more connectivity-heavy systems Minisforum has put out, and it is clearly designed around the assumption that it will sit in a workstation or lab environment rather than acting as a living-room mini PC. On the front, you get 2 USB4 ports at 40Gbps, a USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A at 10Gbps, and a 3.5mm TRRS combo jack, plus 2 built-in DMIC mics that are pitched for voice and AI-assisted capture use. In practice, that front layout feels aimed at day-to-day convenience: fast external storage, a dock or capture device, and simple headset or mic options without needing to reach around the back.

On the rear, Minisforum doubles down on bandwidth. There are 2 USB4 v2 ports at 80Gbps, which is the kind of future-proofing that only really makes sense if you plan to use high-speed docks, external storage, or potentially GPU enclosures over time. The review experience lines up with that idea: the ports work as normal USB4 for most peripherals, but the value is really in the headroom, because 80Gbps devices and adapters are still not common in most studios. Alongside those, you get 2 USB 3.2 Gen2 ports at 10Gbps and 2 USB 2.0 ports, which is a more practical mix than it sounds, because it means you are not “wasting” high-speed ports on low-speed peripherals like keyboards, UPS management cables, or dongles.

Networking is a major selling point here, but it is also a slightly divisive one depending on your setup. The MS-S1 Max provides 2 10GbE RJ45 ports, both using Realtek RTL8127 controllers, and it also includes WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4. In use, the wired ports are straightforward and do what you would expect in a compact workstation, including saturating 10GbE when paired with storage that can keep up.

WiFi 7 is also immediately usable, and the practical takeaway is that you can get multi-gig wireless performance without much effort if you already have a WiFi 7 router, but it is still not a replacement for wired 10GbE if you are treating this as part of a storage or production workflow.

Video output is handled through 1 HDMI 2.1 FRL port plus DisplayPort Alt Mode over USB4 and USB4 v2, which makes multi-display setups easy without any additional hardware. Minisforum rates these outputs up to 8K@60Hz and 4K@120Hz, and in the real world that means you can run high-refresh 4K displays or multiple monitors with less compromise than most iGPU-based mini PCs. The only real caveat is that the system leans heavily on USB4 for flexible display and peripheral expansion, so the people who get the most out of the port selection are the ones already planning to use docks, external storage, or high-bandwidth accessories, rather than just plugging in a keyboard and a single monitor.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Performance & Tests

In day-to-day use, the MS-S1 Max feels less like a typical mini PC and more like a compact workstation that happens to have an iGPU. General desktop operation is consistently responsive, and the platform’s bandwidth-heavy design shows up most clearly when you start stacking tasks that normally push integrated graphics systems into obvious slowdown. One thing that stood out early is how “hot to the touch” the exterior can feel when the system is sitting idle, with thermal imaging showing roughly 55 to 60°C around sections of the chassis and vents in that state. At the same time, internal sensor readings were not presenting anything alarming, which suggests the metal body is doing what it is meant to do as part of heat dissipation, but the idle fan curve behavior did not feel especially reactive until a workload actually kicked in.

Once the system is put under load, the cooling behavior becomes easier to understand and, in practice, more reassuring. During active workloads, the external readings dropped notably in many areas, with measurements around 31 to 34°C being observed on parts of the casing once sustained tasks were running, and internal hot spots that had looked extreme during idle did not remain in that range once the fan profile ramped. Noise levels followed the same pattern: at idle the system sat around 39 to 41 dBA, but under heavier load it ramped to roughly 51 to 53 dBA. It is not silent, but it is also not unexpectedly loud for a high-power APU system with multiple fans and a chassis that is clearly built to move air.

Power draw is one of the more interesting parts of the MS-S1 Max story because it is unusually low when the system is doing very little, then rises quickly once the GPU side is engaged. Idle consumption landed around 13 to 16 W, which is striking given the CPU, GPU, memory bandwidth, and overall positioning of the device. More moderate CPU-oriented workloads pushed consumption into roughly the 45 to 58 W range, with brief spikes into the 70 to 80 W area depending on thread behavior in the test. Once the Radeon 8060S was hit hard in GPU-heavy testing, total system power moved into triple digits, with figures around 141 to 158 W being recorded, which lines up with the idea that this chassis is designed to translate a lot of electrical budget into sustained APU performance rather than short bursts.

Benchmarking results were strong, but the platform’s newness made comparison data less useful than usual in several tools. PCMark produced a score of 8,353, and a run through 3DMark showed a wide spread depending on the test: Solar Bay scored 5,200, Speedway landed at 1,900 with frame rates around 18 to 19 FPS, and Steel Nomad Light cleared 11,000 with an average of 82.3 FPS. Night Raid, which is a better fit for integrated graphics platforms, came in at 70,000 overall, with a graphics score of 130,522 and a CPU score of 19,312. The practical takeaway from these results is that the MS-S1 Max can behave like a “real” gaming-capable APU system in the right workloads, but it also sits in a strange middle ground where some benchmark suites still struggle to place it cleanly against older mini PCs or discrete-GPU desktops.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Verdict & Conclusion

The MS-S1 Max is easier to understand once you stop thinking of it as a “mini PC with good specs” and instead treat it as a purpose-built Strix Halo workstation in a compact chassis. The big wins are the APU design and the 128GB UMA memory pool, because that combination changes what is practical on integrated graphics, especially for workloads that normally fall over due to VRAM limits. In use, it shows up as a system that can handle serious creative and compute tasks without immediately forcing you into a discrete GPU upgrade path, while still giving you enough connectivity to fit into faster workflows through dual 10GbE, WiFi 7, and USB4 v2. It is not flawless though: the system can feel surprisingly hot to the touch in idle despite internal sensors looking fine, and the fan behavior seems more tuned for “react under load” than “stay cool at rest,” which is a real-world usability detail you notice when it is sitting on a desk near you.

Where things get more complicated is the value discussion. At pricing around the mid/high $2,000 range depending on configuration, this is not competing with mainstream mini PCs at all, and it is not trying to. The audience is much narrower: people who want a high-bandwidth APU platform, who will actually use the memory capacity and fast external connectivity, and who are comfortable paying for that kind of compact engineering. If your workload is mostly general office, light creation, or basic homelab tasks, it is difficult to justify over more conventional systems, including Minisforum’s own smaller workstations. But if you are specifically chasing a compact workstation that can credibly do gaming, content work, and local AI experimentation without a discrete GPU, the MS-S1 Max is one of the few systems that makes that argument feel realistic, even if it comes with the usual early-platform quirks and a price tag that will still put off most buyers.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Check AliExpress or the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Minisforum MS-S1 Max PROs

Minisforum MS-S1 Max CONs

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16C/32T) delivers workstation-class CPU performance in a compact chassis
Radeon 8060S (40 CUs) iGPU is capable enough for 1080p gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads without a dGPU
128GB LPDDR5x-8000 UMA reduces typical iGPU VRAM limitations for creation and local AI tasks
Strong idle efficiency with power draw observed around 13 to 16W in light desktop use
Dual 10GbE RJ45 enables high-throughput workflows without needing add-in NICs
WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 provide fast wireless connectivity for setups where wired is not practical
4 total USB4-class ports (2x USB4 40Gbps + 2x USB4 v2 80Gbps) support high-speed docks and storage
Slide-out chassis design improves serviceability compared with many compact desktops
Multiple power and fan modes (Performance/Balanced/Quiet/Rack) allow tuning for noise vs sustained load

High price puts it outside typical mini PC value expectations
Storage expansion is uneven (1x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x4 + 1x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x1), limiting the second slot for high-performance SSD use
Exterior can feel very hot at idle, with fan response seeming less aggressive until load begins
PCIe x16 slot is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, and physical space constraints limit card choices

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

[contact-form-7]

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

Cachem
Le forum des NAS fête ses 12 ans
23 janvier 2026 à 07:00

Le forum des NAS fête ses 12 ans

Cachem

Par : Fx

23 janvier 2026 à 07:00

Le Forum des NAS fête aujourd’hui son 12ᵉ anniversaire. Douze années d’engagement, de passion et d’entraide au service des utilisateurs de NAS, qu’ils soient débutants ou experts.

Créé en janvier 2014, le forum s’est progressivement imposé comme une référence francophone pour l’installation, la configuration et le dépannage des NAS. Chaque jour, des milliers d’utilisateurs y trouvent des réponses concrètes, des solutions ou tout simplement un espace d’échange convivial autour du stockage réseau et…

anniversaire forum 2026 - Le forum des NAS fête ses 12 ans

12 ans, déjà !

Lancé à l’origine sous le nom forum.cachem.fr, le projet a rapidement évolué pour devenir le Forum des NAS tel que vous le connaissez aujourd’hui, avec son propre nom de domaine : forum-nas.fr.

Cette évolution n’était pas qu’un simple changement d’adresse. Elle a permis de renforcer l’identité du forum et d’affirmer clairement sa mission : proposer un espace entièrement dédié aux NAS, indépendant, durable et orienté communauté.

Modeste, avec de grandes ambitions

Dès le départ, l’objectif était simple : créer une plateforme d’échange efficace et facile à utiliser. À l’époque, les commentaires sur le site Cachem.fr ne permettaient pas de véritables discussions structurées. Contrairement aux groupes Facebook, où les informations se perdent rapidement et restent dépendantes des règles du réseau social, le forum offrait une solution pérenne, indépendante et évolutive. Avec le recul, je pense sincèrement que c’était le meilleur choix.

forum cachem - Le forum des NAS fête ses 11 ans — Forum au lancement (2014)

Défis techniques

Créer un forum était alors un véritable défi pour moi. N’ayant jamais administré de forum auparavant, j’ai dû apprendre sur le tas : gestion des utilisateurs, modération, sécurité, sauvegardes…

Le choix s’est porté sur phpBB (comme moteur pour le forum), plutôt que sur WordPress avec une extension comme bbPress. Ce choix s’est avéré judicieux : phpBB offrait une structure solide, pensée dès l’origine pour la gestion de communautés. Ces premières années ont été extrêmement formatrices et ont posé les bases du forum tel qu’il existe aujourd’hui.

Amélioration continue au fil des années

Le Forum des NAS n’a jamais cessé d’évoluer. En 2021, une étape majeure a été franchie avec la migration vers XenForo, un moteur de forum plus moderne et plus performant.

Cette transition a permis :

une meilleure expérience utilisateur,
des fonctionnalités avancées,
un confort accru pour les modérateurs et administrateurs.

Le forum s’est ainsi adapté aux attentes d’une communauté toujours plus active et exigeante.

forum nas 2020 - Le forum des NAS fête ses 11 ans — 2018

forum nas 2021 - Le forum des NAS fête ses 11 ans — 2020

forum nas 2025 - Le forum des NAS fête ses 11 ans — 2024

Passion, entraide et bonne humeur

Depuis le premier jour, le Forum des NAS repose sur trois valeurs fondamentales :

le partage,
l’entraide,
la convivialité.

Animer et gérer un forum demande du temps et de l’investissement. Très vite, il est devenu évident que cela ne pouvait pas se faire seul. Après quelques années, un premier modérateur m’a rejoint. Aujourd’hui, une équipe de 5 personnes assure le bon fonctionnement du forum au quotidien : modération, assistance technique et échanges avec les membres.

Indépendant et neutre

Le Forum des NAS revendique pleinement son indépendance. Les échanges y sont transparents, sans parti pris commercial… et chacun peut partager librement ses expériences et connaissances. Cette neutralité est essentielle pour garantir des discussions constructives et fiables et contribue à maintenir un espace sain, exempt de spam. On ne va pas se mentir, cela demande un sacré investissement au quotidien.

Il n’y a aucune publicité et aucun tracker… comme sur Cachem

Gouvernance partagée pour assurer la pérennité

Depuis un an, l’administration du forum est désormais partagée entre 3 administrateurs. Cette organisation renforce la pérennité du site et garantit sa continuité, quelles que soient les circonstances.

Quel avenir pour le Forum des NAS ?

L’avenir du Forum des NAS s’inscrit dans la continuité :

continuer à innover pour répondre aux besoins des utilisateurs,
proposer de nouvelles fonctionnalités,
élargir la communauté tout en conservant l’esprit qui fait sa force.

Que vous soyez novice ou expert, le forum restera un lieu d’échange ouvert, bienveillant et orienté solutions.

Merci à la communauté

L’histoire du Forum des NAS ne fait que commencer. Un immense merci à toutes celles et ceux qui participent, posent des questions, apportent des réponses et font vivre cette communauté depuis 12 ans.

Rendez-vous pour les prochaines étapes de cette belle aventure… et pour fêter ensemble les prochains anniversaires !

NAS Compares
Minisforum Reveal the New Minisforum N5 Max and N5 Air NAS
7 janvier 2026 à 14:52

Minisforum Reveal the New Minisforum N5 Max and N5 Air NAS

NAS Compares

Par : Rob Andrews

7 janvier 2026 à 14:52

Minisforum New Minisforum N5 Max and N5 Air NAS Revealed

Minisforum used CES 2026 to extend its 5 bay N5 NAS lineup with 2 new models, the N5 Max and the N5 Air, building on the original N5 and the better known N5 Pro that arrived in Summer 2025. The N5 Pro drew a lot of attention in the small form factor NAS space because it combined a compact 5 drive chassis with higher end AMD mobile silicon, 10 GbE plus 5 GbE networking, and expansion options like OCuLink and a PCIe slot, all in a system that was positioned as approachable for homelab and prosumer storage. That visibility also meant its weaker points were discussed publicly, including practical items such as drive tray security and the use of an external power brick, alongside broader questions about how far the platform could scale without changing the chassis concept.

The CES 2026 announcements read as an attempt to answer those conversations while keeping the core N5 identity intact. The N5 Max is framed as the scale up option, keeping the modular approach but shifting to a higher tier CPU platform, moving to 128 GB of onboard LPDDR5x at 8000 MT/s, expanding internal NVMe options, and switching to a built-in 250 W PSU rather than an external adapter. Minisforum also points to a larger internal thermal solution, which fits the idea of sustaining heavier compute and storage workloads. In parallel, the N5 Air effectively replaces the originally positioned base N5, keeping the same overall layout and I/O concept but aiming at a more cost conscious configuration while still retaining features that defined the series, including multi-gig Ethernet and the same general expansion philosophy.

Category	Minisforum N5 Max	Minisforum N5 Air
CPU	Up to AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16C/32T)	AMD Ryzen 7 255 (8C/16T)
GPU	Radeon 8060S (per CPU platform)	Radeon 780M
NPU / AI	AMD specs: up to 50 TOPS NPU, up to 126 TOPS overall	N/A listed
Memory	128 GB LPDDR5x, 256-bit, 8000 MT/s (soldered)	2x DDR5 SO-DIMM (non-ECC)
SATA bays	5x 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch SATA 3.0, up to 30 TB each	5x 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch SATA 3.0, up to 22 TB each
NVMe / U.2 storage	1x M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 x4 (capacity listed as “BTB”); 1x M.2 2230/2280 NVMe up to 8 TB PCIe 4.0 x1; 3x M.2 2280 NVMe up to 8 TB each PCIe 4.0 x1	1x M.2 2230/2280/22110 NVMe up to 4 TB PCIe 4.0 x1; 1x U.2 or M.2 2280/22110 NVMe up to 15 TB PCIe 4.0 x1; 1x U.2 or M.2 2280/22110 NVMe up to 15 TB PCIe 4.0 x2
Ethernet	1x 5 GbE (Realtek RTL8126) + 1x 10 GbE (Realtek RTL8127)	1x 5 GbE (Realtek RTL8126) + 1x 10 GbE (Realtek RTL8127)
Rear ports	1x USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x OCuLink, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB 2.0	1x USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x OCuLink, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB 2.0
Front ports	1x USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2	1x USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2
Internal expansion	1x PCIe x16 slot (PCIe 4.0 x4), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 header/port	1x PCIe x16 slot (PCIe 4.0 x4), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 header/port
Display notes	HDMI 2.1 (4K 60); USB4 Type-C 40 Gbps (Alt DP 2.0); USB4 v2 Type-C 80/120 Gbps (Alt DP 2.0)	HDMI up to 8K 60 Hz or 4K 144 Hz; USB4 up to 8K 60 Hz or 4K 144 Hz
Audio	Via HDMI and Type-C (Alt DP)	Via HDMI and USB4
Power	Built-in 250 W PSU; secondary input USB-C PD 140 W (20 V 7 A)	DC 5525, 19 V 14.73 A, 280 W
OS listed	Linux, Windows 11	MinisCloud OS, Windows 11 Pro, Linux
Size	199 x 202.4 x 252.3 mm	199 x 202 x 252 mm class

Minisforum N5 Max and N5 Air NAS Design & Storage

Across the N5 family, the core physical concept remains a compact 5 bay enclosure designed around 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch SATA drive trays, with the internal platform arranged to keep compute, cooling, and expansion in a relatively dense footprint. The N5 Max keeps that same overall direction but applies several practical design revisions that align with feedback around the earlier models. One visible change is the inclusion of lockable drive trays, addressing a small but commonly noted omission on the original implementation. Minisforum also continues to lean into a modular internal layout, where key components and storage areas are organized around a pull-out or service-friendly mechanism rather than a fully fixed internal frame.

For bulk storage, the N5 Max increases the stated per-bay ceiling to 30 TB per drive across its 5 SATA bays, compared with 22 TB per drive on the N5 Air, N5 Pro, and original N5 specifications. In practical terms, that suggests the Max is being positioned for higher raw capacity targets without changing the 5 bay limit, which keeps it in the same general footprint category as the earlier systems. The N5 Air retains the same 5 bay arrangement and chassis approach as the prior N5 tier, intended to preserve the basic storage layout while shifting the internal bill of materials. The N5 Pro and N5 remain closely aligned on the SATA side, both being specified for 5 bays and the same 22 TB per disk guidance (realistically, this is just a compatibility on HDDs that needs updating on the docs!).

The larger differentiation in this generation is on flash storage density and placement. The N5 Pro and original N5 were defined by a mix of 1 standard M.2 slot and 2 additional high capacity NVMe positions that could be populated via U.2 or longer M.2 formats, allowing up to 15 TB on those larger bays depending on configuration. The N5 Air keeps that general storage strategy, with an M.2 slot plus 2 NVMe positions that can be used as U.2 or longer M.2, including a PCIe 4.0 x2 lane allocation on 1 of those slots. The N5 Max shifts the emphasis toward multiple M.2 placements instead, listing 5 total NVMe positions across 2230 and 2280 formats with PCIe 4.0 lanes spread between x4 and multiple x1 links, and also highlighting that the additional NVMe options are split across both sides of the internal assembly rather than being confined to a single board-facing area.

Minisforum N5 Max and N5 Air Internal Hardware

The main divider between these systems is the compute platform. The N5 Max moves to an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, a 16 core, 32 thread Zen 5 processor with boost up to 5.1 GHz and a default 55 W TDP, with configurable TDP listed at 45 to 120 W. It also integrates Radeon 8060S graphics with 40 compute units and advertises an AI engine capability up to 126 TOPS overall, including up to 50 TOPS on the NPU. By comparison, the N5 Air is specified with an AMD Ryzen 7 255 and Radeon 780M graphics, matching the original N5 tier orientation rather than the higher end Pro or Max positioning. The earlier N5 Pro used an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, pairing a higher class CPU with Radeon 890M graphics and an NPU rating up to 50 TOPS, while the original N5 stayed in the Ryzen 7 255 class without an NPU listed.

Memory design is also handled differently across the lineup. The N5 Max is specified with 128 GB of LPDDR5x on a 256-bit interface running at 8000 MT/s, and it is described as soldered rather than socketed. That approach fixes capacity at the factory but aligns with the CPU platform’s native support for LPDDR5x-8000 and the 128 GB maximum in AMD’s published specifications. The N5 Pro and original N5 both used 2 DDR5 SO-DIMM slots with a stated ceiling of 96 GB at up to 5600 MT/s, with the key difference being ECC support on the N5 Pro and non-ECC on the N5. The N5 Air follows the same SO-DIMM approach and is specified as non-ECC, aligning it more closely with the original N5 than the N5 Pro.

Power delivery and thermals are presented as a direct area of revision on the N5 Max. It is specified with a built-in 250 W PSU, replacing the external power brick approach used on the N5 Air, N5 Pro, and original N5, which are listed with a DC 5525 19 V 14.73 A 280 W adapter. The N5 Max also adds a secondary power input option via USB-C PD at up to 140 W (20 V 7 A), which is described separately from the internal PSU. On cooling, the N5 Max is described as having a larger heatsink and a scaled-up cooling solution compared with earlier N5 designs, positioned to better match the higher tier CPU platform and the denser NVMe configuration.

Minsforum N5 Max and N5 Air – Ports and Connections

Minisforum keeps a consistent external I/O layout across the N5 family, centered on a mix of high speed USB, direct display output, and storage or expansion links. The N5 Max and N5 Air are both listed with a rear HDMI 2.1 FRL output and USB4 Type C that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode (DP 2.0). Both also retain OCuLink on the rear, which is typically used for attaching external PCIe storage or expansion hardware, plus additional USB ports split between rear and front for local peripherals and service access. Audio output is handled through HDMI and USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode rather than separate analog jacks.

Networking is positioned as a key feature, but the exact N5 Max configuration depends on which source you reference. The show floor description referenced 2 copper 10 GbE ports, while the specification set provided lists 1x 10 GbE (Realtek RTL8127) and 1x 5 GbE (Realtek RTL8126). The N5 Air matches the broader series approach with 1x 10 GbE (Realtek RTL8127) plus 1x 5 GbE (Realtek RTL8126). For the earlier N5 Pro and N5, the published configuration is also dual ports at 10 GbE plus 5 GbE, with the 10 GbE module listed as Marvell AQtion AQC113 and the 5 GbE module as Realtek RTL8126. Functionally, all of these configurations target multi-gig wired networking for faster client access, direct workstation links, or higher throughput to a switch.

USB4 capability is another differentiator on the N5 Max. The general port list shows USB4 on both the front and rear panels, while the additional connectivity notes for the Max indicate a combination of 2x USB4 v2 Type C ports capable of 80 Gbps or 120 Gbps operation, plus 1x USB4 Type C at 40 Gbps. Alongside USB4, the rear I/O includes USB 3.2 Gen 2 and USB 2.0, and the front adds another USB 3.2 Gen 2. Internally, all the N5 variants listed include a PCIe x16 physical slot wired for PCIe 4.0 x4, plus an internal USB 3.2 Gen 2 header or port, keeping the option open for add-in cards or internal devices without relying only on external ports.

Specification

Minisforum N5 Max

LAN: 1x 10 GbE (RTL8127) + 1x 5 GbE (RTL8126) listed, 2x 10 GbE described in show floor discussion
Rear: 1x USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x OCuLink, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB 2.0
Front: 1x USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2
Internal: 1x PCIe x16 slot (PCIe 4.0 x4), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 header/port
Video notes: HDMI 2.1 (4K 60), USB4 Type C 40 Gbps (Alt DP 2.0), USB4 v2 Type C up to 80/120 Gbps (Alt DP 2.0)

Minisforum N5 Air

LAN: 1x 10 GbE (RTL8127) + 1x 5 GbE (RTL8126)
Rear: 1x USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x OCuLink, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB 2.0
Front: 1x USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2
Internal: 1x PCIe x16 slot (PCIe 4.0 x4), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 header/port
Video notes: HDMI up to 8K 60 Hz or 4K 144 Hz, USB4 up to 8K 60 Hz or 4K 144 Hz

Minsforum N5 Max vs N5 Air vs N5 Pro NAS

For a straightforward view of where the lineup sits now, I compare the N5 Max, N5 Air, and the earlier N5 Pro side by side because they represent the clearest tiering of the platform. The N5 Max is the top spec option, built around the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and a fixed 128 GB LPDDR5x-8000 memory configuration, with a built-in 250 W PSU and a storage layout that shifts toward multiple M.2 slots alongside the 5 SATA bays. The N5 Air stays closer to the original N5 concept with a Ryzen 7 255 and 2 DDR5 SO-DIMM slots (non-ECC), while keeping the same general chassis approach, dual multi-gig networking, and the same style of rear I/O and expansion features. The N5 Pro remains the point of reference from Summer 2025 because it pairs a higher tier Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 with 2 DDR5 SO-DIMM slots that support ECC, while retaining the same 5 bay layout and the same overall connectivity concept. Where there are spec conflicts in early CES coverage, such as how many 10 GbE ports the N5 Max ultimately ships with, I treat the provided spec sheet values as the baseline and note the discrepancy separately.

Category	Minisforum N5 Max	Minisforum N5 Air	Minisforum N5 Pro
CPU	Up to AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16C/32T)	AMD Ryzen 7 255 (8C/16T)	AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (12C/24T)
GPU	Radeon 8060S (per CPU platform)	Radeon 780M	Radeon 890M
NPU / AI	AMD specs: up to 50 TOPS NPU, up to 126 TOPS overall	N/A listed	Up to 50 TOPS
Memory	128 GB LPDDR5x, 256-bit, 8000 MT/s (soldered)	2x DDR5 SO-DIMM (non-ECC), up to 96 GB, up to 5600 MT/s	2x DDR5 SO-DIMM (ECC supported), up to 96 GB, up to 5600 MT/s
SATA bays	5x 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch, up to 30 TB each	5x 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch, up to 22 TB each	5x 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch, up to 22 TB each
NVMe layout	5x M.2 total: 1x 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 (capacity listed as “BTB”), 1x 2230/2280 up to 8 TB PCIe 4.0 x1, 3x 2280 up to 8 TB each PCIe 4.0 x1	1x M.2 2230/2280/22110 up to 4 TB PCIe 4.0 x1; 1x U.2 or M.2 2280/22110 up to 15 TB PCIe 4.0 x1; 1x U.2 or M.2 2280/22110 up to 15 TB PCIe 4.0 x2	1x M.2 2230/2280/22110 up to 4 TB PCIe 4.0 x1; 1x U.2 or M.2 2280/22110 up to 15 TB PCIe 4.0 x1; 1x U.2 or M.2 2280/22110 up to 15 TB PCIe 4.0 x2
Ethernet	1x 10 GbE (Realtek RTL8127) + 1x 5 GbE (Realtek RTL8126) listed; show floor discussion referenced 2x 10 GbE	1x 10 GbE (RTL8127) + 1x 5 GbE (RTL8126)	1x 10 GbE (AQC113) + 1x 5 GbE (RTL8126)
Rear ports	USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), HDMI 2.1 FRL, OCuLink, USB 3.2 Gen 2, USB 2.0	USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), HDMI 2.1 FRL, OCuLink, USB 3.2 Gen 2, USB 2.0	USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), HDMI 2.1 FRL, OCuLink, USB 3.2 Gen 2, USB 2.0
Front ports	USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), USB 3.2 Gen 2	USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), USB 3.2 Gen 2	USB4 (Alt DP 2.0), USB 3.2 Gen 2
Internal expansion	PCIe x16 slot (PCIe 4.0 x4), USB 3.2 Gen 2 header/port	PCIe x16 slot (PCIe 4.0 x4), USB 3.2 Gen 2 header/port	PCIe x16 slot (PCIe 4.0 x4), USB 3.2 Gen 2
Display notes	Listed: HDMI 2.1 (4K 60); USB4 Type-C 40 Gbps; USB4 v2 Type-C 80/120 Gbps (Alt DP 2.0)	HDMI up to 8K 60 Hz or 4K 144 Hz; USB4 up to 8K 60 Hz or 4K 144 Hz	HDMI up to 8K 60 Hz or 4K 144 Hz; USB4 up to 8K 60 Hz or 4K 144 Hz
Power	Built-in 250 W PSU; secondary input USB-C PD 140 W (20 V 7 A)	DC 5525, 19 V 14.73 A, 280 W	DC 5525, 19 V 14.73 A, 280 W
OS listed	Linux, Windows 11	MinisCloud OS, Windows 11 Pro, Linux	MinisCloud OS, Windows 11 Pro, Linux
Size	199 x 202.4 x 252.3 mm	199 x 202 x 252 mm class	199 x 202 x 252 mm

Minsforum N5 Max and N5 Air – Conclusion

Taken together, the CES 2026 updates split the N5 lineup into clearer tiers than before. The N5 Max is positioned as the upper configuration, combining a higher class CPU platform with a fixed 128 GB memory design and a stronger emphasis on internal NVMe density. The N5 Air sits closer to the original N5 tier in processor class and upgrade flexibility, while keeping the same general chassis direction and expansion approach that defined the earlier models. The practical tradeoffs follow from those choices. The N5 Max concentrates capability into a more integrated build, which can simplify ownership but reduces user control over memory configuration and may increase base cost due to the included LPDDR5x. The N5 Air, N5 Pro, and original N5 retain socketed DDR5 and a more traditional external power arrangement, which can be easier to service or adjust over time. The series overall remains defined by a compact 5 bay layout paired with multi-gig networking and expansion options, with the main differences now centered on compute tier, memory strategy, and how far the platform is intended to scale.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

[contact-form-7]

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category?

Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.

Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7]

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a

Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.