The Beelink ME Pro NAS – Should You Buy

After the surprising hit that was the Beelink ME Mini NAS in 2025, a lot of users were looking forward to seeing what the brand would do next in the NAS space. In January 2026, the brand responded with the launch of the Beelink ME Pro: an Intel N95/N150 powered system with DDR5 memory, 5GbE plus 2.5GbE connectivity, 2 SATA HDD bays, 3 M.2 NVMe bays, and one of the smallest physical footprints in this device class that I have seen. I have a full detailed review in progress on the ME Pro, but even after several days of use, several pros and cons have already emerged that may influence whether this is the right purchase for a homelab. While the review comes together, this article will outline the good, the bad, and the weird aspects of the Beelink ME Pro NAS.

Bonus Point: Really Nice Logistics Design

This is a minor point, but it is worth noting how the ME Pro arrives. The chassis box is unusually small for a 2-bay NAS, and at first glance it can look like the packaging contains little more than the unit itself. In practice, the accessory items are stored inside the drive bracket area in small internal boxes, which helps avoid loose parts moving around in transit and reduces wasted packaging volume.

The device also arrives with the M.2 thermal pads already positioned in place, so the initial storage installation process is more direct. It is not a major buying factor, but it is a practical packaging decision that avoids the excessive empty space and material waste that is common in this product category.

Reasons you Should Buy the Beelink ME Pro NAS

The ME Pro is positioned as a compact, high-connectivity 2-bay NAS that also provides NVMe expansion and local display capability, with hardware aimed at users who want more than basic file serving in a small footprint. It combines dual-port networking, integrated wireless connectivity, and multiple internal storage options in a chassis designed for straightforward access and cleaning, while also introducing a motherboard drawer concept that Beelink claims will support future platform upgrades. If those priorities match your setup goals, the ME Pro has several practical advantages that can justify its price and design choices.

#1 Man alive – this 2 Bay NAS is TINY!

The ME Pro’s most immediate differentiator is its physical footprint. The chassis measures 166 x 121 x 112mm and uses an all metal unibody design, which is notably smaller than most 2-bay NAS boxes that also include NVMe storage and dual network ports. In person it reads closer to a compact mini PC enclosure than a traditional NAS, and that difference matters if you are placing it on a crowded desk, a media shelf, or anywhere you are trying to keep cabling and hardware out of the way.

That compactness is not just cosmetic, it directly shapes how the hardware is arranged and how it feels to work with. Storage bays, the NVMe area, networking, and the cooling hardware are densely packed, so clearances are tight and the device is designed around precision fit rather than roomy access. The upside is that it is easy to place in small spaces without needing the usual NAS sized footprint. The tradeoff is that installations and maintenance are likely to feel more constrained than they would on a larger, more conventional 2-bay enclosure.

#2 Arrives with 5GbE and WiFi6, when everyone else is still on 2.5GbE

On networking, the ME Pro ships with 2 wired Ethernet ports and integrated wireless. The wired setup is a 5GbE Realtek RTL8126 port alongside a 2.5GbE Intel i226-V port, and the unit also includes WiFi 6 plus Bluetooth 5.4. For a compact 2-bay NAS, that is a broader mix of connectivity than the many systems that still top out at dual 2.5GbE, and it gives you more options for how the device fits into an existing home or small office network.

In practical terms, this provides flexibility rather than guaranteeing a specific performance outcome. A 5GbE port can be useful for faster transfers if you already have compatible switching or direct attach options, while the 2.5GbE port can serve as a secondary link for a different subnet, failover, or a separate device path depending on the OS and network configuration you choose. WiFi 6 is not a replacement for wired networking in a NAS role, but it can be relevant for temporary placement, initial setup, or use cases where running a cable is not straightforward, and the manual indicates the antenna is integrated into the front panel design rather than using an external antenna.

#3 Maintenance and Internal Access is a work of art!

The ME Pro is built around user access rather than treating the internals as a sealed appliance. The manual’s process is simple: remove the magnetic cooling mesh cover, unscrew and pull out the hard drive bracket, and use the bottom access panel to reach the M.2 slots. A screwdriver is stored in the base under a silicone pad, so the tool required for basic access is physically included with the device. The ports and recovery related features also acknowledge user servicing, with items like a reset hole and a CLR CMOS function shown in the manual.

In day to day handling, the layout is designed to slide out and reassemble in a specific order, and it generally supports the idea of quick cleaning and drive installation without full disassembly. At the same time, access relies on small screws and tight tolerances, so it is not a tool-less experience. In your first impressions, the mechanism for sliding the internal assembly out felt solid and precisely aligned, but you also noted that the included tool is very small and can be fiddly to use. The result is a design that prioritizes compact service access, but still expects careful handling during installation and maintenance.

#4 Great Base Memory Quantity at a time when RAM costs are BONKERS

From the start, the ME Pro is configured with either 12GB LPDDR5 4800MHz on the N95 models or 16GB LPDDR5 4800MHz on the N150 models, rather than shipping with a minimal memory pool that immediately pushes users toward an upgrade. In practical NAS use, that baseline capacity is relevant because it can influence how comfortably the system handles common add-ons such as containers, light virtualization, background indexing, and multiple concurrent services, depending on the operating system and workload. It also reduces the likelihood that memory becomes the first immediate bottleneck for typical home and small office setups.

The tradeoff is that this approach is linked to the way the memory is implemented. In your inspection of the unit, you noted there is no SO-DIMM slot and the RAM appears soldered to the board, which means users are effectively choosing their memory tier at purchase rather than treating it as a later upgrade (more on that in a bit). This makes the initial configuration choice more important, especially for buyers who already know they will run heavier applications or multiple VMs over time.

#5 Genuinely unique modularisation and upgradability in a pre-built solution, which I have ever seen

The ME Pro’s most unusual design claim is the swappable modular motherboard. Beelink markets the system as supporting interchangeable boards across Intel, AMD, and ARM options, using a drawer style layout intended to let the main compute board slide out rather than being permanently fixed inside the chassis. The product page frames this as a way to avoid replacing the entire enclosure when you want a different CPU platform, and instead treat the chassis, drive housing, and general structure as the long-term part of the purchase.

In practical terms, this concept will only matter if Beelink actually sells the alternative boards at sensible pricing and maintains availability over time, but the physical architecture appears to be built around the idea. Your first look showed a clear internal separation between the board assembly and the rest of the enclosure, and you also observed hints of planned scale-up hardware, such as layout markings that suggest different future storage or platform variants. For buyers who like the idea of extending a system’s usable life without a full rebuild, the ME Pro is one of the few pre-built NAS style devices currently trying to formalize that upgrade path rather than leaving it to a full case swap.

Reasons You Might Want to Skip the Beelink ME Pro NAS

The ME Pro’s compact design and connectivity focused feature set come with tradeoffs that will matter to some buyers more than others. Several of the core choices are linked together, meaning you get the small chassis, the storage density, and the modular drawer approach, but you also accept limits around upgrades, physical handling, and how the platform is configured from the factory. This is not a device where every part is meant to be user replaceable or easily swapped in the way a DIY small form factor build would be.

It is also worth treating the launch configuration and roadmap as part of the buying decision. The product is being introduced with very similar Intel CPU options and fixed memory tiers, while the company is already pointing toward future AMD and ARM variants and possible expanded layouts. For some buyers, that is a reason to wait until the wider range exists and the upgrade parts are actually available. For others, the current design constraints are enough to prefer a more conventional 2-bay NAS that is larger, simpler to work on, and has clearer long-term upgrade paths.

The RAM is FIXED (i.e cannot be upgraded or changed)!!!

The ME Pro uses LPDDR5 memory (12GB on the N95 models, 16GB on the N150 models), and based on the internal layout you inspected, there is no SO-DIMM slot for user upgrades. In other words, the memory appears to be soldered to the motherboard rather than installed as a replaceable module. That makes the initial purchase configuration more important than on many small NAS builds where memory can be upgraded later as needs change.

The practical impact shows up when your usage grows beyond basic file storage. If you plan to run multiple containers, heavier indexing tasks, or virtual machines, memory headroom can become a limiting factor long before CPU or network does, depending on the OS and services you deploy. With this platform, there is no simple path to increase RAM after purchase, so anyone unsure about future requirements may prefer a system with upgradeable memory, or may want to treat the 16GB model as the safer long-term option by default.

The design is so, so very tight!

The ME Pro’s small enclosure is achieved through very tight internal tolerances. That is visible in how the drive bracket, motherboard drawer area, and storage zones are packed together, and it influences the overall experience during installation and servicing. The system relies on screw mounting for drives rather than a click-in tray approach, and while the manual provides clear steps, the process assumes careful alignment rather than quick, tool-less handling. This level of precision fit is likely part of how Beelink is trying to control airflow and improve thermal transfer in a compact space, and it also aligns with their noise and vibration messaging around tightened mounting and silicone dampening.

In the first impressions, that tightness showed up most clearly when inserting and removing components. Slotting the hard drive bracket and drives could feel rough at times, with very little clearance to work with, and the internal assembly can require a firmer push to seat correctly. Even if the compact fit is helping with heat dissipation and vibration control, it remains a very tight build, and it is less forgiving if you are frequently swapping drives, testing different storage combinations, or repeatedly opening the chassis. The end result is a device that looks clean and flush when assembled, but can feel constrained during hands-on work compared with a larger enclosure with more physical margin.

Launching the N95 version and N150 version was an odd choice (i.e very similar processors)

At launch, the ME Pro is offered in N95 and N150 variants, and on paper these CPUs sit very close to each other. Both are 4-core, 4-thread Intel N-series parts with 6MB cache, and the headline frequency difference is modest: up to 3.4GHz on the N95 and up to 3.6GHz on the N150. For many NAS workloads that are constrained by storage or network throughput rather than CPU, this kind of gap may not translate into a clearly different experience, especially once real world thermal and power limits are applied.

This tight spacing makes the product stack less clear than it could be, because the pricing difference between the entry and higher tier configurations is not simply paying for a meaningfully different platform. In practice, buyers are also paying for the memory and SSD tier attached to each CPU option, and in your case the non-upgradeable memory makes that choice more permanent. If the goal is to segment the lineup, the N95 and N150 pairing may feel like a small step that leaves some users waiting for a more distinct higher performance option rather than choosing between two closely related CPUs. Given the noise that Beelink has made about this expanding range, that only further encourages some users who think these CPUs a little timid, to remain on the fence a bit longer….

There are other CPU/Architecture versions coming

As mentioned, Beelink is already signalling that the ME Pro chassis is intended to outlive the initial Intel configurations. The official product messaging highlights a swappable modular motherboard concept and explicitly references future boards beyond the current Intel N-series options, including AMD and ARM. In your first look, you also noted visible hints inside the unit that suggest the internal layout has been planned with other variants in mind, rather than being a one-off design limited to the launch hardware.

For buyers, this creates a timing question. If those alternative boards and models arrive soon, they may offer clearer performance separation, different feature priorities, or a better match for specific workloads. At the same time, the current purchase decision depends on what is available today, not what is promised, and the value of the modular approach only becomes real once the upgrade boards can actually be bought at reasonable pricing. Until the roadmap becomes a shipping product line, some users may prefer to wait, while others will simply evaluate the current N95 and N150 models on their own merits.

Mixed M.2 Speeds at PCIe 3.0 x2 and PCIe 3.0 x1? Was 10GbE and uniform lanes discussed instead?

The ME Pro’s 3 M.2 NVMe slots are not equal. Slot 1 is PCIe 3.0 x2, while slots 2 and 3 are PCIe 3.0 x1, and the manual specifically recommends using slot 1 for the system drive because it is the fastest slot. In practical terms, this creates a tiered NVMe layout where one drive has higher potential bandwidth than the other 2, which can influence how you plan cache, containers, VM storage, or scratch workloads. It also means peak NVMe performance depends heavily on which slot you choose, not just the SSD you buy.

That design choice raises an obvious tradeoff question: whether the platform would have been better served by a different allocation, such as keeping all 3 M.2 slots at PCIe 3.0 x1 in exchange for other connectivity, or prioritizing a different network tier such as 10GbE (though arguably, it might well have to sit at 3×1 and potentially be bottlenecked to 800-900MB/s, unless that lowered the m.2 to x2 bays). The ME Pro already includes 5GbE plus 2.5GbE, so the networking is not low end, but the mixed NVMe lane widths still make the storage side feel uneven by design. For a NAS focused build, the practical impact will depend on real testing: whether the internal topology causes contention under mixed loads, and whether the faster slot meaningfully benefits common tasks once network and SATA throughput are considered.

Conclusion & Verdict – Should You Buy the Beelink ME Pro NAS?

The Beelink ME Pro is a compact 2-bay NAS platform that combines SATA storage with 3 M.2 NVMe slots, dual wired networking, and integrated wireless in an enclosure that prioritizes density and internal access. It also introduces a modular motherboard drawer concept that, if supported with real upgrade boards over time, could change how long the chassis remains useful compared with typical pre-built NAS systems. As a hardware package, it is aimed at users who want high connectivity and mixed storage options without moving to a larger box.

At the same time, several of its main limitations are set at purchase and cannot be easily changed later. The memory appears fixed, the internal fit is very tight during drive and bracket handling, and the launch CPU options are closely spaced rather than clearly separated performance tiers. The NVMe layout is also mixed speed by design, which affects how you should plan drive placement and workloads. Whether these tradeoffs are acceptable depends largely on how much you value the enclosure size, the network ports, and the promised modular roadmap versus the more conventional upgrade flexibility of larger or more established NAS designs.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Beelink ME Pro NAS - Should YoBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink ME Pro NAS RevealedBeelink NAS - Describe Your PeBeelink ME Mini Pro, ME S, ME Beelink Me Pro, S, X and MAX, Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vBeelink ME Mini NAS Review - aBeelink ME Mini NAS Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red (Which is Best in 2025/2026)?

In late 2025, choosing between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red for a NAS is less about raw performance and more about secondary factors such as noise, power consumption, pricing, and ecosystem. Both brands now offer broadly similar SATA performance in their mainstream and Pro lines once you reach 7200 RPM, 256 MB cache, and CMR recording, and both quote comparable workload ratings and multi bay support for NAS use. Durability claims in MTBF, workload per year, and 24 by 7 operation are also effectively at parity on paper, and the underlying engineering around vibration control, error recovery, and NAS specific firmware has converged to a large extent. Where meaningful technical differences still exist is in the maximum capacities on offer and how they are positioned. Seagate currently leads on headline capacity in the NAS tier with IronWolf Pro drives up to 30 TB, while WD Red Pro tops out slightly lower but overlaps most of the mainstream size points that home and small business users are likely to deploy. As a result, the decision for many buyers is less about which brand is objectively better and more about how each behaves in real deployments in terms of acoustics, energy use, long term running costs, warranty extras such as bundled recovery services, and regional pricing patterns at specific capacities.

Seagate vs WD (and Toshiba!) Market Share in 2025/2026?

Across the HDD industry in 2024 and early 2025, Western Digital and Seagate remain closely matched, with Western Digital holding a slight lead by several common measures. Public breakdowns of exabytes shipped in 2024 put Western Digital at roughly 38.6 percent of HDD capacity shipped worldwide, Seagate at about 37 percent, and Toshiba at around 24.4 percent, confirming that the market is effectively a 2 vendor race with a smaller but still significant third player. Although the exact percentages vary depending on whether you look at units, capacity, or revenue, the pattern is consistent, with Western Digital marginally ahead and Seagate following closely behind.

Recent industry and financial reporting also shows Western Digital gaining momentum in high capacity nearline drives, particularly in data center and cloud deployments, with disk based revenue and shipped capacity outpacing Seagate in at least some recent quarters. At the same time, Seagate retains a leadership position in very large capacity models, including 30 TB HAMR based NAS and nearline drives that are already commercially available and aimed at the same high density markets.

Taken together, these data points indicate a tightly contested landscape where Western Digital currently leads in overall shipped capacity and revenue, while Seagate pushes the capacity envelope and remains highly competitive in large scale deployments.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red NAS Hard Drives – Price

In late 2025 there is a clear pattern in how Seagate and WD position their HDDs on price, even if individual deals move around constantly. In general Seagate tends to be slightly cheaper per terabyte across many mainstream retailers and regions, particularly for larger 16 TB to 24 TB IronWolf and Exos capacities. WD pricing is often a little higher at like for like capacity in third party channels, especially for newer Red Plus and Red Pro models, although temporary sales can narrow or reverse this gap. Both brands are heavily discounted during seasonal events, so headline price screenshots are only ever a snapshot rather than a permanent rule.

Where WD changes the picture is through its own direct store. WD sells Red, Red Plus and Red Pro drives through its retail site and often undercuts third party resellers by a noticeable margin, especially during promotions. That means in some regions the cheapest way to buy WD is directly from WD, while Seagate relies entirely on partner channels and keeps relatively steady discounting through Amazon and similar outlets. As a result it is common to see Seagate come out cheaper in most general marketplaces while WD can be the lowest price only on its own store, which is not available in every country.

Once you move up into Pro and nearline class drives, such as IronWolf Pro versus WD Red Pro or WD Gold, pricing becomes more fragmented. Seagate keeps a fairly consistent capacity step pricing model where higher capacities scale in a relatively predictable way. WD on the other hand often runs multiple Red Pro and enterprise SKUs at the same capacity with different cache sizes or internal designs, which leads to overlapping prices and large swings between models that appear similar on paper. In practice this means that at the Pro tier Seagate is usually easier to price compare, while WD may offer good value on specific model IDs or capacities but requires more careful checking of part numbers and current discounts before purchase.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red – Noise Level Comparison

Capacity	Idle Seagate Ironwolf	Idle WD Red Plus	Idle Winner	Seek Seagate Ironwolf Pro	Seek WD Red Pro	Seek Winner
30TB	28 dBA (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate	32 dBA (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate
28TB	28 dBA (ST28000NT000)	25 dBA (WD281KFGX)	WD	32 dBA (ST28000NT000)	32 dBA (WD281KFGX)	Tie
26TB	no Seagate model	25 dBA (WD260KFGX)	WD	no Seagate model	32 dBA (WD260KFGX)	WD
24TB	28 dBA (ST24000NT002)	25 dBA (WD241KFGX), 20 dBA (WD240KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST24000NT002)	32 dBA (WD241KFGX), 32 dBA (WD240KFGX)	Seagate
22TB	28 dBA (ST22000NT001)	32 dBA (WD221KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST22000NT001)	32 dBA (WD221KFGX)	Seagate
20TB	28 dBA (ST20000NT001)	20 dBA (WD202KFGX, WD201KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST20000NT001)	32 dBA (WD202KFGX, WD201KFGX)	Seagate
18TB	28 dBA (ST18000NT001)	20 dBA (WD181KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST18000NT001)	36 dBA (WD181KFGX)	Seagate
16TB	28 dBA (ST16000NT001)	20 dBA (WD161KFGX)	WD	26 dBA (ST16000NT001)	36 dBA (WD161KFGX)	Seagate
14TB	20 dBA (ST14000NT001)	20 dBA (WD142KFGX), 20 dBA (WD141KFGX)	Tie	26 dBA (ST14000NT001)	36 dBA (WD142KFGX), 36 dBA (WD141KFGX)	Seagate
12TB	28 dBA (ST12000NT001)	20 dBA (WD121KFBX), 34 dBA (WD122KFBX)	WD	26 dBA (ST12000NT001)	36 dBA (WD121KFBX), 39 dBA (WD122KFBX)	Seagate
10TB	28 dBA (ST10000NT001)	20 dBA (WD102KFBX), 34 dBA (WD103KFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST10000NT001)	36 dBA (WD102KFBX), 39 dBA (WD103KFBX)	Seagate
8TB	28 dBA (ST8000NT001)	20 dBA (WD8003FFBX, WD8005FFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST8000NT001)	36 dBA (WD8003FFBX, WD8005FFBX)	Seagate
6TB	28 dBA (ST6000NT001)	21 dBA (WD6003FFBX, WD6005FFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST6000NT001)	36 dBA (WD6003FFBX, WD6005FFBX)	Seagate
4TB	28 dBA (ST4000NT001)	20 dBA (WD4003FFBX), 29 dBA (WD4005FFBX)	WD	30 dBA (ST4000NT001)	36 dBA (WD4003FFBX, WD4005FFBX)	Seagate
2TB	28 dBA (ST2000NT001)	21 dBA (WD2002FFSX)	WD	30 dBA (ST2000NT001)	31 dBA (WD2002FFSX)	Seagate

The difference becomes more apparent once you move beyond a simple 1 or 2 bay NAS and start populating 4, 6 or 8 bay chassis. Multiple Seagate drives running together produce a slightly harsher mechanical sound profile, with more pronounced click and clunk patterns during head movements, as well as higher cumulative vibration. WD drives, particularly Red Plus and most of the more recent Red Pro helium models, lean toward a smoother background hum with less sharp seek noise and lower ambient vibration. For users placing a NAS in a living room, bedroom or under a desk, this cumulative effect can be significant, even if each individual drive only differs by a couple of dBA on paper.

It is worth noting that not every capacity behaves identically. Lower capacities and some air filled WD Red Plus models idle very quietly and can be comparable with the quietest Seagate SKUs, while some high capacity Red Pro variants with 7200 RPM motors and larger caches approach IronWolf Pro levels of seek noise. However, when you average across the current CMR product stacks in late 2025, WD holds a small but consistent advantage in both idle and seek acoustics, especially in multi bay deployments where background noise and vibration build up over time.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red – Power Consumption (Idle / Active)

Looking purely at spec sheets, both Seagate and WD publish idle and seek values that cluster in similar bands, typically around the low 20 dBA range at idle and high 20 to mid 30 dBA under seek as capacities and spindle speeds rise. In practice though, the character of the noise differs between the brands. IronWolf and IronWolf Pro models tend to produce a sharper mechanical click pattern during head seeks and a more noticeable spin up profile, while WD Red Plus and Red Pro lines usually present as a smoother hum with less abrupt transitions between idle and active states. In a quiet room this difference in tone can matter as much as the numeric dBA rating itself.

Capacity	Idle Seagate Ironwolf	Idle WD Red Plus	Idle Winner	Active Seagate Ironwolf Pro	Active WD Red Pro	Active Winner
30TB	6.8W (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate	8.3W (ST30000NT011)	no WD equivalent	Seagate
28TB	6.8W (ST28000NT000)	3.6W (WD281KFGX)	WD	8.3W (ST28000NT000)	6.0W (WD281KFGX)	WD
26TB	no Seagate model	3.6W (WD260KFGX)	WD	no Seagate model	6.0W (WD260KFGX)	WD
24TB	6.3W (ST24000NT002)	3.6W (WD241KFGX), 3.9W (WD240KFGX)	WD	7.8W (ST24000NT002)	6.0W (WD241KFGX), 6.4W (WD240KFGX)	WD
22TB	6.0W (ST22000NT001)	3.4W (WD221KFGX)	WD	7.9W (ST22000NT001)	6.8W (WD221KFGX)	WD
20TB	5.7W (ST20000NT001)	2.8W (WD202KFGX), 3.6W (WD201KFGX)	WD	7.7W (ST20000NT001)	6.1W (WD202KFGX), 6.9W (WD201KFGX)	WD
18TB	5.0W (ST18000NT001)	3.0W (WD181KFGX)	WD	7.5W (ST18000NT001)	3.6W (WD181KFGX)	WD
16TB	5.0W (ST16000NT001)	3.6W (WD161KFGX)	WD	7.6W (ST16000NT001)	6.1W (WD161KFGX)	WD
14TB	5.0W (ST14000NT001)	3.0W (WD141KFGX), 3.6W (WD142KFGX)	WD	7.6W (ST14000NT001)	3.0W (WD141KFGX), 6.4W (WD142KFGX)	WD
12TB	5.0W (ST12000NT001)	2.8W (WD121KFBX), 6.1W (WD122KFBX)	WD	7.6W (ST12000NT001)	2.8W (WD121KFBX), 8.8W (WD122KFBX)	WD
10TB	7.8W (ST10000NT001)	2.9W (WD102KFBX), 3.0W (WD103KFBX)	WD	10.1W (ST10000NT001)	4.6W (WD101KFBX), 6.1W (WD103KFBX)	WD
8TB	7.8W (ST8000NT001)	4.0W (WD8003FFBX), 4.9W (WD8005FFBX)	WD	10.1W (ST8000NT001)	4.6W (WD8003FFBX), 6.9W (WD8005FFBX)	WD
6TB	7.1W (ST6000NT001)	3.7W (WD6003FFBX), 4.0W (WD6005FFBX)	WD	9.3W (ST6000NT001)	3.7W (WD6003FFBX), 6.9W (WD6005FFBX)	WD
4TB	7.8W (ST4000NT001)	3.7W (WD4003FFBX), 4.0W (WD4005FFBX)	WD	8.7W (ST4000NT001)	3.7W (WD4003FFBX), 5.8W (WD4005FFBX)	WD
2TB	6.7W (ST2000NT001)	6.0W (WD2002FFSX)	WD	6.7W (ST2000NT001)	7.8W (WD2002FFSX)	Seagate

At lower capacities, especially in the 2 TB to 6 TB range where air filled designs and lower spindle speeds are common, WD Red Plus models are often among the quietest options, with idle noise figures that sit at the lower end of the published spectrum and relatively soft seek sounds. Seagate standard IronWolf drives in these capacities are not especially loud by absolute numbers, but they generally sit slightly higher at idle and under random activity. Once you move into high capacity Pro class drives, WD Red Pro and IronWolf Pro become more comparable, although WD still often maintains a small advantage in idle noise on the newest helium filled models, while seek noise can be quite close on some capacities.

Noise differences increase as you add more bays and drives. A 2 bay or 4 bay NAS with mixed workloads may only expose a modest gap in acoustic behaviour between the brands, but 8 bay and larger systems can amplify any small variations. Multiple Seagate drives seeking at once will create more noticeable cumulative chatter and vibration inside a metal chassis, which can transfer into desks or shelving if the NAS is not well isolated. WD units with otherwise similar specifications and workload ratings usually generate less overall vibration, so the aggregate sound from a populated chassis can be easier to live with in shared spaces.

For users planning deployments in noise sensitive environments, such as a living room media setup or a small office where the NAS will sit in the same room as desks, these differences can be a factor in the buying decision once capacity and performance requirements are defined. Seagate remains attractive where price per terabyte and maximum capacity are the main priorities, and users are able to position the NAS in a cupboard, loft or separate room. WD drives typically suit scenarios where the system will remain close to people for long periods, sacrificing a small amount of price advantage in favour of lower background noise and a slightly less intrusive acoustic profile at both idle and under sustained activity.

Seagate Ironwolf vs WD Red – Verdict & Conclusion

From a technical perspective Seagate and WD now sit very close to one another in most core HDD metrics, particularly in the NAS focused IronWolf, IronWolf Pro, Red Plus and Red Pro ranges. Both brands use CMR recording on their NAS lines, have comparable workload ratings in each class, and converge around similar sustained transfer rates once you reach 7200 RPM and larger cache sizes. The main structural differences are that Seagate currently pushes higher maximum capacities into the consumer and prosumer space and includes bundled rescue data recovery on many NAS models, while WD tends to retain a small advantage in power consumption and acoustic behaviour at equivalent capacities, especially in multi bay systems. Historical issues such as WD Red SMR drives and Seagate high failure rate models at specific points in time are still relevant for older stock, but the current generation NAS ranges for both vendors are broadly aligned in specification and intended workload.

In practical terms the choice between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red often comes down to priority order rather than any single clear winner. Users aiming for the lowest cost per terabyte and the highest capacities available in the near term will usually find Seagate more attractive, particularly in larger IronWolf Pro and Exos class drives, accepting higher power draw and a more noticeable acoustic profile. Users who are sensitive to noise, want marginally lower long term energy usage or prefer WD’s clearer product segmentation may gravitate toward Red Plus or Red Pro, taking care to select the correct CMR models and capacities. In all cases the decision should be made at model level using current datasheets and pricing, not just brand reputation, and should be paired with a sensible RAID plan and an independent backup strategy, since neither vendor can remove the fundamental risk that any individual hard drive can fail.

Idle Seagate Ironwolf	Idle WD Red Plus	Active Seagate Ironwolf Pro	Active WD Red Pro

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Week 50 Tech Roundup – ReactSeagate Ironwolf vs WD Red (WhBlack Friday NAS Hard Drive DeBlack Friday Hard Drive Deals Black Friday 2025 Deals - DataBlack Friday 2025 Deals - DataWeek 46 Tech Roundup – SeagaWeek 44 Tech Roundup – TOS 7SYNOLOGY SUPPORT SEAGATE & WD Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro and Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

En bon geek accro au shopping, vous avez claqué des centaines d'euros dans un SSD NVMe PCIe 5.0 qui promet d'atteindre des vitesses de ouf, mais malheureusement, vous avez l'impression que votre Windows n'en tire pas tout le potentiel... snif... Et ce n'est pas qu'une impression, vous avez raison, et youpi, Microsoft vient enfin de faire quelque chose pour corriger ça.

Le problème, c'est que depuis des années, Windows traite tous les périphériques de stockage comme s'ils étaient de vieux disques SCSI des années 80. En effet, Windows convertit toutes les commandes à destination de votre SSD NVMe ultrarapide, en langage SCSI avant de les exécuter. Un peu comme si vous deviez traduire du français vers le latin puis vers l'anglais à chaque fois que vous voulez dire bonjour. C'est inutilement compliqué et forcément plus lent.

Du coup, Microsoft a décidé de moderniser tout ça avec Windows Server 2025 qui supporte enfin le NVMe natif. Concrètement, plus de traduction SCSI, le système communique maintenant directement avec votre SSD dans sa langue maternelle et les résultats sont plutôt impressionnants !

Car si on en croit Microsoft, en termes de performances, ça représente une augmentation de 80% des IOPS (opérations d'entrée/sortie par seconde) par rapport à Windows Server 2022. Pour vous donner un ordre de grandeur, on passe d'environ 1,8 million d'IOPS à 3,3 millions sur un SSD PCIe 5.0. Et en bonus, le CPU consomme environ 45% de cycles en moins pour chaque opération I/O. Bref, c'est plus rapide ET plus efficace.

Et il y a bien sûr, une raison technique à ces gains massifs. Les SSD NVMe modernes supportent jusqu'à 64 000 files d'attente avec 64 000 commandes chacune. Sauf que l'ancien système SCSI était conçu pour des disques rotatifs avec une seule file et 32 commandes max. Ouch...

Pour l'instant, cette amélioration est disponible uniquement sous Windows Server 2025 et elle est désactivée par défaut. Donc faut l'activer manuellement via le registre avec une commande PowerShell mais Microsoft précise que Windows 11 devrait aussi en bénéficier dans une future mise à jour, une fois que la techno aura fait ses preuves côté serveur.

Voici la fameuse commande :

reg add HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Policies\Microsoft\FeatureManagement\Overrides /v 1176759950 /t REG_DWORD /d 1 /f

The Synology Solution 2025/2026 Event – What Was There?

Before We Go Any Further – We STILL Have to Discuss Synology Hard Drive Compatibility!

Synology’s hard drive support policy was a recurring topic throughout the event and in direct conversations with staff. The subject was formally addressed in the opening session, where the company framed its approach as a strategic decision to validate and support selected drives for reliability and lifecycle assurance. In a later Q&A with a large Synology customer, the policy came up again, though the exchange felt somewhat staged. Away from the stage, I spoke with almost a dozen Synology team members on and off the record. The consistent message was that verification of Seagate and Western Digital drives is still in progress, but I also received conflicting off-the-record remarks about how validation and support could be expanded in the future. A follow-up article and video from me on this subject will be published soon to explore the matter further.

“As workloads scale and data becomes even more critical. We’ve made the strategic decision to fully validate and support scenario drives in our solution.
This means that we take an end to end responsibility for performance, reliability and long-term availability by managing both hardware and the software stack.
We intend to show you that we can deliver deeper integration, such as real-time health monitoring, predictive risk analysis and seamless firmware updates, all designed to reduce risk and maximise uptime.

This change is not about limiting choice, it’s about accountability. When you deploy a Synology solution, you can be confident that we stand behind every component and that you’ll receive a system optimised for performance and reliability over its entire lifestyle. And for our partners, this also means fewer unknowns of deployment and support, greater predictability and stronger value for your customers. Together, we can focus less on troubleshooting and more on helping businesses innovate, securely.”

The official position is that tighter control of hardware compatibility will improve integration features like predictive monitoring and firmware management, while reducing deployment risks. However, Synology repeatedly stressed that the policy is not yet final, with feedback from customers and partners still under review. From my discussions, the messaging suggests that although Synology’s stance is rooted in system accountability, the practical implications for users—particularly regarding Seagate and WD models such as IronWolf and Red or surveillance-focused drives like SkyHawk and Purple—remain unsettled. The lack of clarity points to an ongoing process where official announcements may evolve, but for now customers are being told the policy is about creating a more reliable platform rather than restricting options.

Introduction to Synology – 25 Years On

The opening session of Synology’s UK Solutions Exhibition marked the company’s 25th anniversary with a review of its history, current reach, and overall strategy. Synology reported that it has 14 million installations worldwide, is protecting around 25 million entities and servers, and manages more than 2 million accounts. Case examples were used to illustrate different applications, including the Imperial War Museum’s video archive workflows, Toyota’s use of scalable backup and disaster recovery, and surveillance and crowd management deployments using Synology cameras and DVA units. The presentation also provided background on the company’s origins in 2000 and the development of DSM as its Linux-based operating system. DSM was described as having grown from a small-business storage platform into a wider environment that spans file management, surveillance, backup, cloud services, and productivity, positioned between consumer-focused devices and enterprise systems.

The session also focused on the conditions in which these systems now operate. Trends highlighted included increasing architectural complexity from hybrid and cloud deployments, stricter compliance and regulatory requirements, persistent security threats, and ongoing budget constraints. Synology framed its approach around four design principles: integrating hardware and software into a single platform, embedding security features from the outset, simplifying management to reduce reliance on specialist expertise, and ensuring predictable long-term costs rather than shifting expenses over time. A notable point was the company’s drive compatibility and accountability policy. Synology stated that it will validate and support specific hard drives and SSDs to provide real-time monitoring, firmware updates, and lifecycle assurances. However, the company also acknowledged that it is still assessing customer and partner feedback on the subject of drive and SSD verification, indicating that its position may continue to evolve. The presentation ended with an invitation to engage with Synology staff during the event and a transition to the next session on data protection.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• Synology’s drive compatibility and accountability policy, with integrated monitoring, firmware management, and lifecycle support.

• Synology confirmed it is still assessing customer and partner feedback on hard drive and SSD verification, leaving open the possibility of adjustments.

Synology and Data Storage Now/Future

Active Protect and the DP series was once again a heavy presence at this event and was more formally presented as Synology’s hardware-plus-software backup appliance family, structured around three guarantees: isolation, visibility, and auditability. It combines technologies such as high-rate deduplication (up to 80%), btrfs checksums with self-healing, immutability at the primary backup layer tied to retention policies, VM-based backup verification and sandboxing, and software-driven offline air-gap replication. These measures are positioned as protection against common and combined attack chains, including phishing, stolen credentials, ransomware, insider threats, and zero-day exploits. Large-scale management is enabled through clustering (tested with over 2,500 nodes and 150,000 endpoints), protection plans, and failover between backup servers to avoid single points of failure. Audit logs can be forwarded to external SIEMs and long-term retention is supported via Synology’s Secure Scalable Storage with WORM. Case studies included a Japanese bank with six appliances across DR sites, a Taiwanese logistics company consolidating over ten devices, and Toyota, which migrated away from tape to Active Protect in 2025, citing reduced costs and improved resilience.

The presentation framed the wider context as one where 70% of organisations have experienced data loss or attacks and 88% of those were unable to recover. The strategy was outlined as layered: employee education, least-privilege delegated administration, and backup as the final line of defence. Technical implementation details highlighted cloning instead of full copying, policy-driven immutability, VM-based verification, and software-controlled air-gap mechanisms as ways to achieve isolation and restore confidence. Visibility was addressed through centralized portals, cluster management, and protection plan broadcasting across sites, while auditability was achieved through extensive telemetry, monitoring, and immutable log storage. The brand also noted that it is working to further improve connectivity between Active Protect appliances and Active Backup for Business-equipped devices, aiming to strengthen multi-site operations and incremental migration paths. Deployment was described as end-to-end through Synology appliances, with hot spares and replacement hardware options to maintain recovery point objectives. The solution was positioned as an integrated alternative to mixed third-party systems, with the trade-off being a reliance on Synology’s single-vendor model for both hardware and software.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• Active Protect appliance family: integrated hardware-plus-software backup solution with isolation, visibility, and auditability features.

• Protection plans and clustering: centralized policies for managing thousands of endpoints and enabling cross-site disaster recovery.

• Software-based air-gap replication: offline replication without tape media, controlled through software and network port management.

• VM-based backup verification and sandboxing: integrated hypervisor for validating and testing backups.

• Planned improvements to connectivity between Active Protect and Active Backup devices to strengthen multi-site operations and integration.

Robust, Scalable and Fast Storage Now and the Future

This session focused on Synology’s enterprise storage portfolio and its positioning across security, efficiency, scalability, and performance requirements. The company reported that it currently manages around 350 exabytes across roughly 260,000 businesses and highlighted product families for flash, hybrid, and high-capacity storage. Security was presented as a three-stage process (protect, detect, recover), incorporating measures such as multi-factor sign-in, encryption, immutable snapshots, Active Insight monitoring, and replication. This was also where we saw a reference (2nd time this year) to the multi-site storage tiering service ‘Synology Tiering’ – catchy name, right? Sadly, this does not appear to be a deployment model that can be done inside a single system (ala QNAP QTier).

Efficiency claims included up to 5:1 data reduction, thin provisioning, automated tiering, and hybrid cloud integration with C2 and Hybrid Share. Hybrid Share adoption was noted at over 1,400 enterprises and 3,500 sites, with features such as edge caching and global file locking to support multi-site collaboration. The GS series (notably GS3400) was introduced as a scale-out solution for unstructured data, supporting up to 48 nodes, 11.5 PB per cluster, SMB and S3 protocols, and managed centrally with the GridStation Manager software and its dedicated Cluster Manager GUI.

At the performance end, Synology presented the PAS series, including the PAS 7700 all-NVMe U.3 rackmount system and a 12-bay SATA SSD version. PAS systems run on new Parallel Active Manager software and feature active-active dual controllers, RAID TP (triple parity), rate bitmap rebuilds, and cache protection. Demonstrations covered VDI boot storms, large-scale SQL databases, and EDA simulations, with claims of sub-millisecond latency and throughput in the tens of gigabytes per second. Security measures include network isolation, VLANs, and self-encrypting drives. The GS and PAS series were described as extending Synology’s ecosystem from large-scale archival storage to ultra-low-latency mission-critical workloads, all linked through C2 cloud services, Active Insight monitoring, and policy-driven automation. The company also indicated that further improvements are underway to enhance connectivity between Active Protect appliances and Active Backup devices, enabling more integrated multi-site operations.

The demonstrations of the PAS 7700 system were used to illustrate performance under realistic enterprise workloads. In one scenario, a virtual desktop infrastructure with 1,000 desktops was booted simultaneously to highlight predictable behavior during “boot storm” events. A second demonstration focused on SQL database operations, where over 1,000 concurrent users generated mixed read/write activity, reportedly sustaining more than one million IOPS at approximately one millisecond latency. The third example involved an electronic design automation (EDA) simulation handling around 1,300 jobsets, used to demonstrate the system’s ability to maintain consistent throughput and ultra-low latency under computationally intensive conditions. These scenarios were intended to show how the all-NVMe architecture and active-active controller design could deliver stable, high-performance output across diverse mission-critical environments.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• GS series (GridStation): scale-out storage, GS3400 unit, up to 48-node clusters and 11.5 PB per cluster, managed by GridStation Manager with Cluster Manager GUI.

• PAS series: new enterprise rackmount systems, including the PAS 7700 all-NVMe U.3 48-bay system and a 12-bay SATA SSD version, with active-active controllers.

• Parallel Active Manager software: new management layer for PAS systems.

• Planned improvements to connectivity between Active Protect and Active Backup devices for enhanced multi-site integration.

Synology Surveillance Station, New DVA3000, DVA7400, Synology SD Card, Switches and More

This section outlined Synology’s surveillance strategy, built on two platforms: the on-premises Surveillance Station VMS and the new cloud-based Synology C2 Cloud VSaaS. Both are designed to scale across large environments, with CMS central management tested at around 3,000 hosts and 30,000 cameras, and real-world deployments exceeding these figures. Features include open APIs for third-party integration, drag-and-drop monitoring, E-maps, and bulk provisioning tools for rapid deployment.

AI capabilities are available on-camera and on-appliance, with functions such as people/vehicle detection, face recognition, license plate recognition, dynamic mosaic (privacy blurring), and smoke detection. An upcoming semantic video search will enable natural-language style queries across historical footage, and is cited as one reason for higher-capacity DVA models.

New hardware introduced includes the DVA3000 (4-bay, 40 cameras, 6 AI tasks) and the DVA7400 (12-bay rackmount, up to 100 cameras, 40 AI tasks, with a GPU included), both expected in early 2026. Additional components include three PoE switches and an industrial-grade microSD card designed for continuous edge recording and health monitoring, though final specifications such as SD card class remain unconfirmed.

C2 Cloud was described as a cloud-managed surveillance option requiring no local NAS or NVR, with built-in AI analytics, centralized access via browser or mobile, and failover to local peer-to-peer streaming when internet is down. The on-premises and cloud platforms are intended to remain separate at launch, though hybrid interoperability is planned in later updates to unify workflows. Security is built into both models, including encryption, MFA, granular access roles, privacy controls, and a product security incident response team supported by a bug bounty program.

Customer examples ranged from schools and stadiums to large government deployments, highlighting scalability, API-based third-party integration, and operational improvements such as automated crowd counting and smoke detection. Licensing continues to follow Synology’s low-overhead approach for on-prem setups, with cloud plans bundling AI features directly. The roadmap places new cameras in Q4 2025 and the DVA models in early 2026, with hybrid operation features to follow.

When asked directly about the status of hard drive compatibility in the new surveillance systems, including whether support would be limited to Synology-branded HDDs or extend to commonly used models such as WD Purple and Seagate SkyHawk, Synology was unable to provide a clear confirmation. The company indicated that final details on drive verification and supported models for these upcoming surveillance platforms remain under review.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• DVA3000: 4-bay surveillance appliance, 40 camera feeds, 6 AI operations, expected early 2026.

• DVA7400: 12-bay rackmount model with GPU, up to 100 cameras and 40 AI tasks, expected early 2026.

• Upcoming semantic video search: natural-language video query functionality.

• Three new PoE switches for simplified deployment and management.

• Industrial microSD card with edge recording and health reporting (specifications still unconfirmed).

• Synology C2 Cloud(cloud VSaaS): cloud-managed surveillance platform, launching with AI features included.

• Planned hybrid interoperability between Surveillance Station (on-prem) and C2 Cloud (cloud) in future updates.

Synology and AI – New GPU-Equipped Local AI NAS in Development and More Optional AI Integration in Synology NAS

This session focused on Synology’s Office Suite, which is positioned as a private-cloud productivity and communication platform designed to offer enterprises 100% data ownership, on-premises deployment, and long-term cost control. Core services include Drive and Office for file storage and real-time collaboration, Mail Plus for enterprise email, and the upcoming Chat & Meet for messaging and video conferencing. A new AI Console was also introduced, intended to manage and audit AI usage within the suite. The platform targets organizations concerned about rising cloud subscription costs—especially with Microsoft’s announced October 2025 price increases—data sovereignty, and security risks introduced by unsanctioned use of generative AI. Adoption figures cited include over 600,000 businesses and 80 million users.

Synology Drive and Office were presented as tools for structured file management and collaborative editing of documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. Features include file requests, configurable link sharing, audit logs, watermarking, and remote wiping. A case study from Yonsei University Medical Center highlighted the replacement of a Windows-based file system with Synology Drive, enabling centralized permission management, endpoint oversight, and synchronization across 15,000 employee devices. Mail Plus adds enterprise-grade email features, such as domain sharing for multi-site deployments, active-active clustering for high availability, delegated role management, auditing, and moderation workflows. Together, these services are designed to offer core collaboration and communication functions while preserving organizational control of data and infrastructure.

The roadmap extends the suite with Chat & Meet, an on-premises platform for real-time messaging and video conferencing. It is designed to support over 10,000 simultaneous chat users and 7,000 video participants, integrating channels, group messaging, and video sessions into a single interface. Administrative tools include permission management and migration utilities to ease transitions from existing platforms. Parallel to this, Synology is introducing the AI Console, which addresses risks such as content injection, jailbreaks, and data leakage by providing de-identification, provider management, permission settings, and auditing. The console will also support on-prem GPU-backed AI models for tasks such as semantic search, OCR, and speech-to-text, and is planned to integrate with OpenAI-compatible and self-hosted LLMs via MSCP.

The overarching message is that Synology is extending its productivity ecosystem to address enterprise concerns about cost, security, and compliance while enabling new collaboration and AI capabilities. The suite’s design emphasizes continuity through high-availability clustering, role-based administration, and unified consoles for policy enforcement and auditing. With the AI Console, Synology seeks to embed governance into AI usage, allowing enterprises to adopt advanced tools without exposing sensitive data to uncontrolled environments. Looking forward, further integration of GPU-enabled AI features and the addition of Chat & Meet mark key developments in Synology’s private-cloud strategy, aimed at providing alternatives to mainstream SaaS ecosystems while maintaining operational control.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• Chat & Meet: on-premises messaging and video conferencing platform, supporting large-scale deployments.

• AI Console: centralized AI governance with de-identification, provider management, permissions, and auditing.

• Planned GPU-backed AI models: semantic search, OCR, image recognition, and speech-to-text.

• Integration with third-party and on-prem AI servers: OpenAI-compatible and self-hosted models via MSCP.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Pwn2Own Ireland 2025: SynologyWeek 41 Tech Digest – SynoloSynology DSM 7.3 - Should You Synology DSM 7.3 - Should You Synology DSM 7.3 NAS - HDD/SSDSynology DSM 7.3 NAS - Full DeSYNOLOGY SUPPORT SEAGATE & WD SYNOLOGY REVERSE THE HARD DRIVSynology DSM Firewall Bug BlocHow to Get Hardware Transcodin Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE   If you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver   Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

WE LOVE COFFEE

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US