Gl.iNet MUDI 7  – The FIRST 48 HOURS! The Good, the Bad and the Surprising

I have been using the GL.iNet Mudi 7 almost non stop for the past 48 hours, putting it through a range of real-world scenarios including mobile data via SIM and eSIM, WiFi repeating from public hotspots, and handling multiple connected devices at the same time. This is not intended to be a full long-term review, but rather a set of early observations based on how the device performs in day-to-day use straight out of the box. The Mudi 7 is clearly aimed at users who need more than a basic travel router, combining 5G connectivity, WiFi 7, dual SIM and eSIM support, and a built-in battery into a single portable unit. It positions itself as an all-in-one solution for staying connected while travelling, working remotely, or managing multiple network sources. In this article, I will break down what stood out during those first 48 hours, focusing on practical strengths, limitations, and a few additional considerations drawn from the official specifications.

Hardware specification	GL.iNet Mudi 7
Product code	GL-E5800
5G platform	Qualcomm Dragonwing MBB Gen 3, X72
CPU	Qualcomm quad-core @ 2.2GHz
Memory	2GB LPDDR4X
Storage	8GB eMMC
WiFi standard	IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
WiFi type	WiFi 7, BE5800
WiFi bands	2.4GHz, 5GHz, 6GHz
WiFi speed	688Mbps at 2.4GHz, 2882Mbps at 5GHz, 5764Mbps at 6GHz
WiFi operating modes	2.4GHz only, 5GHz only, 6GHz only, 2.4GHz + 5GHz, 2.4GHz + 6GHz
Ethernet	1 x 2.5G WAN/LAN Ethernet port
Ethernet speed	100Mbps, 1000Mbps, 2500Mbps
SIM slots	2 x Nano SIM card slots
eSIM	1 x onboard eSIM chipset
Display	2.8 inch colour LCD touchscreen
USB-C ports	2 x USB-C
USB-C power port	Power only, input and output
USB-C data port	10Gbps USB 3.1, power input and output, USB tethering, USB OTG
Antenna ports	2 x TS-9 ports
Internal antennas	8 total, 6 cellular antennas and 2 WiFi antennas
Battery	3.85V / 5380mAh / 20.72Wh removable battery
Power input	USB PD/PPS 5V to 12V, 30W max
Power consumption	<30W
Buttons	Power button, reset button
Operating temperature	0°C to 40°C
Dimensions	157 x 75 x 22.8mm
Weight	300g

Gl.iNet MUDI 7 Review – Quick Conclusion

The GL.iNet Mudi 7 is a travel router aimed at users who need more than a simple portable hotspot. Its main strengths are the combination of 5G, WiFi 7, dual physical SIM slots, eSIM support, a removable battery, 2.5G Ethernet, USB tethering, OpenWrt-based software, and a surprisingly useful touchscreen interface. In practical use, the device feels mostly well built, offers a good range of connection options, and the battery performance was stronger than expected, lasting around 17 hours with 2 wireless clients connected alongside a physical 5G SIM, eSIM, and WiFi repeating from a public hotspot. At the same time, there are limitations that are important to understand before buying. The back panel feels weaker than the rest of the unit, the included travel case is useful but not especially space efficient, eSIM and physical SIM failover did not behave as flexibly as expected during testing, and the touchscreen cannot handle captive portal logins on its own. It also lacks WiFi 7 Multi Link Operation, cannot run 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz simultaneously, uses regional 5G band variants, ships without external antennas, and sits at a relatively high price point. Overall, the Mudi 7 offers a strong feature set for travel, remote working, and mobile networking, but it is best suited to users who will actually benefit from its advanced connectivity and software features rather than those who only need basic WiFi sharing.

SOFTWARE - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 7/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.6

PROS

Strong overall design and build quality
Included travel case
Compact and travel friendly form factor
Removable battery design
Strong real world battery performance, with around 17 hours of use using 2 wireless clients, 1 5G SIM, 1 eSIM, and WiFi repeating
Flexible dual SIM and eSIM connectivity
Comprehensive software and OpenWrt support
High end hardware in a portable device
Functional 2.8 inch touchscreen control interface
Versatile connectivity and multi use functionality, including SIM, eSIM, WiFi repeating, Ethernet WAN, USB tethering, VPN gateway use, and remote access

CONS

Travel case design is not especially space efficient
Back panel feels weaker than the rest of the device
Limited eSIM and physical SIM failover behaviour during testing
No WiFi 7 Multi Link Operation support
Regional 5G band limitations, with different NA and EU models
Touchscreen cannot handle captive portal login pages on its own
Dual band operation only, rather than full 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz simultaneous WiFi
SSH appeared to be enabled by default on the test unit
High purchase price compared with basic travel routers
No external antennas included in the box

Buy the Gl.iNet Mudi 7 from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Mudi 7 from the Official Store Below:

Gl.iNet Mudi 7 Pros and Strengths

The Mudi 7 has several clear strengths that became apparent during the first 48 hours of use. Most of these relate to its flexibility as a travel router, the amount of hardware built into a portable form factor, and how much control it gives users without needing to rely entirely on a phone app or browser interface.

Operational Temps after 8 Hours in my Bag = Very Good!

Judging the Mudi 7 on it’s heat and temps when in use was always going to be very difficult! Let’s face it, everyone’s use case scenario (and CLIMATE!!!) will be different, as well as the heat caused by where the device is kept. If you are stuffing it at the bottom of your back pack (spoiler alert – this will of course affect your cellular coverage) will result in a very different ambient environment for heat discipation compared with your back pocket” So, I can only tell you MY experience based on my own usage. I had the system up and running, and in my bag for a little over 8 hours on a journey around the UK for work. After 8hrs and 33 mins of operation (2 client devices, 1 SIM, 1 eSIM and repeating several train WiFi connections as well) the device was at 51% battery remaining, but crucially, the temps were actually prety great! Additionally, the system was kept inside my rucksack for 98% of the time (only removing to show to a few people – because I am a showy git!), so there was no active airflow to cool it down. Really pleased with this result, although I am very much looking forward to seeing how the device runs in the hot, humid temps of Taipei in June with COMPUTEX! TBC!

Strong overall design and build quality

The overall design of the Mudi 7 feels well considered for a travel-focused device and stands out compared to typical portable routers. The chassis has a solid, durable feel in hand, with a combination of materials that gives it a more premium and robust impression than many alternatives in this category. Practical details such as protective covers over key ports, including the Ethernet and antenna connectors, add a layer of reassurance when using it in transit or less controlled environments. The layout of the device is also straightforward, with everything positioned in a way that feels deliberate rather than cramped. Outside of a few weaker elements discussed later, the majority of the unit appears well built and capable of handling regular travel without raising immediate concerns about durability.

Included travel case

The inclusion of a travel case is a practical addition, especially for a device that is clearly intended to be used on the move. The case itself feels reasonably well made, with enough structure to protect the router during transport while also offering space for cables, adapters, and other small accessories. It helps keep everything in one place, which is useful when packing for travel or moving between locations. While there are some usability drawbacks covered later, the fact that a case is included at all adds immediate value and reinforces the portable nature of the device.

Removable battery design

The inclusion of a removable battery adds a level of practicality that is often missing from portable networking devices. It allows for easier long-term maintenance, as the battery can be replaced if performance degrades over time rather than requiring the entire unit to be serviced or replaced. This is particularly relevant for a device intended for travel, where exposure to heat and frequent charging cycles can impact battery health. It also provides flexibility in certain scenarios, such as running the device directly from power without relying on the battery, which can be useful for extended indoor use or when preserving battery lifespan.

Strong real world battery performance

In practical use, the internal battery performed better than expected during extended testing. With 2 wireless clients connected, a MacBook and a Google Pixel 8 Pro, alongside active use of both a physical 5G SIM and an eSIM, plus WiFi repeating from a public hotspot, the device lasted approximately 17 hours in near constant operation. This kind of mixed, real-world workload provides a more realistic indication of endurance than isolated testing, and suggests the battery is capable of supporting a full day of moderate to heavy use without needing a recharge. For a device combining multiple radios and network functions, this level of battery performance is a practical advantage.

Flexible SIM and eSIM connectivity

The Mudi 7 provides multiple options for mobile connectivity, combining dual physical SIM slots with built-in eSIM support in a single device. This allows for quick switching between carriers depending on location, signal strength, or data availability, without needing to physically swap cards in every scenario. It also opens up more flexible setups when travelling internationally, where different networks may offer better coverage or pricing. The ability to manage these connections within the same device simplifies what would otherwise require multiple hotspots or frequent manual changes, making it a practical feature for users who rely heavily on mobile data.

Comprehensive software and OpenWrt support

One of the more significant strengths of the Mudi 7 is its software environment, which goes beyond what is typically expected from a travel router. It runs on OpenWrt, giving access to a wide range of advanced networking features including VPN configuration, remote access, and more granular control over connections and services. This is supported by GL.iNet’s own applications and cloud tools, allowing both local and remote management depending on how the device is being used. For users familiar with this ecosystem, it enables a level of customization and control that is closer to a full network setup rather than a simple portable hotspot.

High end hardware in a portable device

The Mudi 7 integrates a level of hardware that is not typically found in devices of this size, combining 5G connectivity, WiFi 7 support, and a 2.5G Ethernet port within a single portable unit. This allows it to handle higher bandwidth scenarios and more demanding network setups than standard travel routers, which are usually limited to lower-tier wireless and wired performance. In practical terms, it means the device is capable of supporting multiple connected clients, higher throughput tasks, and more advanced use cases without immediately becoming a bottleneck. For users who need stronger networking capability while remaining mobile, this hardware configuration is a notable advantage.

Functional touchscreen control interface

The integrated 2.8 inch touchscreen provides a level of direct control that is not commonly found on travel routers. It allows you to manage connections, monitor network status, adjust settings, and handle tasks such as switching between networks or checking data usage without needing to log into a web interface or app. In practice, it covers a wide range of functions, including device management, connection priorities, and basic system monitoring, making it useful for quick adjustments while on the move. While it does not replace full software access entirely, it reduces reliance on external devices for many everyday tasks.

Versatile connectivity and multi use functionality

The Mudi 7 supports a wide range of connection types and operating modes, allowing it to function beyond a typical travel router. It can handle mobile data via SIM or eSIM, connect to existing networks through WiFi repeating, use wired WAN via Ethernet, or tether through USB, all within the same device. These options can also be combined with features such as failover and load balancing, depending on configuration. In practical use, this enables it to act as a central network hub for multiple devices, while also supporting roles such as a VPN gateway, remote access point, or even light network storage depending on setup. This level of flexibility makes it adaptable to different environments without requiring additional hardware.

Gl.iNet MUDI 7 Cons and Weaknesses

The Mudi 7 also has some limitations that are worth considering before buying. Some are design-related, while others relate to how the device handles WiFi 7, SIM failover, regional 5G support, and certain travel-specific situations such as captive portal logins.

Travel case design inefficiencies

Although the inclusion of a travel case is useful, the design introduces a few practical drawbacks. The case is relatively large compared to the size of the device itself, with a significant portion of the internal space allocated for accessories that may not always be necessary. This can make it feel less efficient when packing light. At the same time, the fit for the router is quite snug, which limits flexibility when quickly storing or removing the device. A more balanced layout or a smaller case option could have made it more practical for everyday travel use.

Weak back panel build quality

While most of the device feels solid, the removable back panel stands out as a weaker point in the overall construction. It relies on small plastic clips to stay in place, and in use it feels noticeably less robust than the rest of the chassis. This becomes more of a concern given that access to the SIM slots requires removing this panel, meaning it may be handled more frequently than other parts of the device. Over time, there is a possibility that repeated removal could wear down the clips or reduce how securely it stays attached, which contrasts with the otherwise sturdy design.

Limited eSIM and physical SIM failover behavior

During testing, the interaction between the eSIM and physical SIM did not appear to offer the same level of failover flexibility that is typically expected from this category of device. While both connection types are supported and can be used individually without issue, there was no clear option to configure them together in a seamless failover arrangement. This contrasts with other connection types on the device, such as WiFi, WAN, or USB tethering, which are generally more flexible in terms of prioritisation and backup. It is possible this may be addressed in firmware updates, but in its current state it represents a limitation for users expecting full redundancy between SIM options.

No WiFi 7 Multi Link Operation support

Despite supporting WiFi 7 across 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz bands, the device does not include support for Multi Link Operation, which is one of the defining features of the standard. This means it cannot combine multiple bands simultaneously to improve throughput, latency, or connection stability in the way that WiFi 7 is designed to enable. In practical terms, it behaves more like a traditional multi band router rather than taking full advantage of newer capabilities. While this may not affect basic usage, it does limit the overall benefit of having WiFi 7 hardware in the first place.

Regional 5G band limitations

The 5G support on the device is not universally consistent across all regions, with different hardware variants covering different frequency bands depending on the market. This means it is important to verify compatibility with the specific networks you intend to use, particularly when travelling between regions such as North America and Europe. While 4G support is generally less restrictive, 5G performance and availability may vary depending on the model purchased. This adds an extra step in the buying process and may limit flexibility for users who frequently move between regions with different network requirements.

Touchscreen cannot handle captive portals

The touchscreen provides useful direct control for many router functions, but it does not fully remove the need for another device in every situation. When connecting to public WiFi networks that require a captive portal login, such as those often found in hotels, airports, trains, cafés, or co-working spaces, the login process still needs to be completed through a connected phone, tablet, or laptop. This is understandable given the screen size and the difficulty of presenting a usable browser and keyboard on such a small display, but it does mean the Mudi 7 is not completely clientless in all travel scenarios.

Dual band operation rather than full tri-band simultaneous WiFi

Although the Mudi 7 supports 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz WiFi bands, the official specifications confirm that it operates using Dual-band Simultaneous WiFi 7 BE5800 rather than running all 3 bands at the same time. In practice, this means you can use single-band modes such as 2.4GHz only, 5GHz only, or 6GHz only, or dual-band combinations such as 2.4GHz + 5GHz or 2.4GHz + 6GHz. However, you cannot operate 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz simultaneously, despite the device technically supporting all 3 bands separately. For users expecting a full tri-band concurrent WiFi 7 setup, this is an important limitation to understand before buying.

SSH enabled by default (Possibly a Beta Software Thing – TBC)

On the unit tested, SSH appeared to be enabled by default, which is worth checking during initial setup. This may have been specific to the review sample, firmware version, or how the device had been prepared before shipping, so it should not be treated as a confirmed behaviour for every retail unit. Even so, SSH access is a sensitive setting, and users who do not need it should disable it to reduce unnecessary exposure. The option can be turned off fairly easily, but it is still something that should be reviewed before relying on the device in public or travel environments.

High purchase price

The Mudi 7 sits in a higher price category than most basic travel routers, which means it is not likely to be the best fit for every user. Early pricing started below the final expected retail level, but even those early access prices placed it firmly in premium territory. That pricing is easier to understand when considering the combination of 5G, WiFi 7, eSIM support, a touchscreen, battery operation, 2.5G Ethernet, and OpenWrt-based software, but it still makes the device a more considered purchase. Users who only need occasional hotel WiFi repeating or basic mobile hotspot functionality may find the cost difficult to justify.

No included external antennas

The Mudi 7 includes 2 TS-9 antenna ports, which is useful for improving mobile signal in weaker coverage areas, but external antennas are not included in the package. This means users who want to take advantage of that feature will need to purchase compatible antennas separately. For a travel router that places emphasis on 5G connectivity and use in more challenging signal environments, this feels like an extra cost worth noting. The ports add flexibility, but the out-of-box experience does not include everything needed to make use of them immediately.

Gl.iNet MUDI 7 5F SIM Router – Verdict & Conclusion

The GL.iNet Mudi 7 is a travel router aimed at users who need more than a simple portable hotspot. Its main strengths are the combination of 5G, WiFi 7, dual physical SIM slots, eSIM support, a removable battery, 2.5G Ethernet, USB tethering, OpenWrt-based software, and a surprisingly useful touchscreen interface. In practical use, the device feels mostly well built, offers a good range of connection options, and the battery performance was stronger than expected, lasting around 17 hours with 2 wireless clients connected alongside a physical 5G SIM, eSIM, and WiFi repeating from a public hotspot. At the same time, there are limitations that are important to understand before buying. The back panel feels weaker than the rest of the unit, the included travel case is useful but not especially space efficient, eSIM and physical SIM failover did not behave as flexibly as expected during testing, and the touchscreen cannot handle captive portal logins on its own. It also lacks WiFi 7 Multi Link Operation, cannot run 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz simultaneously, uses regional 5G band variants, ships without external antennas, and sits at a relatively high price point. Overall, the Mudi 7 offers a strong feature set for travel, remote working, and mobile networking, but it is best suited to users who will actually benefit from its advanced connectivity and software features rather than those who only need basic WiFi sharing.

Buy the Gl.iNet Mudi 7 from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Mudi 7 from the Official Store Below:

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Comet X KVM Host ReveaGl.iNet Comet X KVM Host ReveaGl.iNet MUDI 7 5G SIM WiFi 7 TGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Travel RouGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Should YouNew Gl.iNet Comet Q KVM RevealGl.iNet Comet Q USB-C KVM for TP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouTP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouGl.iNet Comet 5G Review - The Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Minisforum Expand Their NAS Range with 2 New Flash NAS – The S5 and S7 SSD Systems

Minisforum has revealed 2 new all-flash NAS systems, the Minisforum S5 and Minisforum S7, as part of a joint event with Intel in Xiamen, China. The announcement, covered in the official Minisforum press release and by VideoCardz, places both devices under the company’s “Agent NAS” branding, with a focus on SSD-only storage, local AI services, and compact edge computing rather than conventional HDD-based NAS design. The S5 is presented as the smaller and quieter model for environments where noise output is a priority, while the S7 is positioned as a larger all-flash system derived from Minisforum’s workstation platform, intended for users with higher storage density and network connectivity requirements.

Minisforum S5 NAS Hardware

The Minisforum S5 is the smaller of the 2 new all-flash NAS systems and is built around a compact, fanless design. Its storage configuration is based on 5 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x1 SSD slots, with no support for conventional 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch hard drives. This places the S5 closer to a silent flash storage appliance than a traditional desktop NAS, with the design clearly prioritising low noise, reduced mechanical vibration, and a smaller physical footprint.

The system uses an Intel Core Series 3 platform, identified in wider reporting as Wildcat Lake, alongside up to 16GB of LPDDR5X-7200 memory. The RAM appears to be soldered rather than user-upgradeable, which fits with the compact and fanless design. Connectivity is stronger than many small NAS systems, with 10GbE, 2.5GbE, USB4, HDMI, USB-A, and Wi-Fi 7 all listed. The use of PCIe 4.0 x1 per SSD slot means the device is not designed to deliver full-speed PCIe 4.0 x4 performance from each individual NVMe drive, but instead uses multiple SSDs for an all-flash pool in a low-noise enclosure.

Minisforum S7 NAS Hardware

The Minisforum S7 is the larger of the 2 systems and is based on the Minisforum MS-03 workstation platform. Unlike the S5, which is focused on passive cooling and compact silent operation, the S7 is aimed at higher-capacity all-flash storage and more advanced networking. It supports up to 7 NVMe SSDs, making it the more suitable model for users who need a denser flash-based storage pool in a small workstation-style chassis.

The S7 also has a more network-heavy configuration than the S5, with dual 10G SFP+ ports, 10GbE RJ45, 2.5GbE RJ45, and 2x USB4 40Gbps ports. Minisforum has also listed an LED status display for checking system and storage activity directly from the device. Full details on PCIe lane allocation for the 7 SSD slots have not yet been confirmed, so it is not currently clear whether all slots operate at the same speed or whether any of them receive more bandwidth than others.

Minisforum S5 NAS Price and Release Date

Minisforum has not confirmed pricing or a release date for the S5 NAS at the time of the announcement. The official material presents the system as part of the company’s new Agent NAS lineup, but does not include retail availability, regional rollout details, or launch pricing. Given the use of 5x NVMe SSD slots, 10GbE, USB4, Wi-Fi 7, soldered LPDDR5X memory, and a fanless chassis, the final price will be important in determining how it compares with both conventional HDD-based NAS systems and other compact all-flash NAS devices.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...A Look Around the Minisforum SMinisforum MS-03 Revealed - BeUGREEN DXP4800GT NAS Revealed QNAP TS-h265 and TS-h465 NAS RNew QNAP TS-h465 and TS-h265 NHow to Install Plex Media ServMinisforum MS-03: First Look aMinisforum at Computex 2026 - UGREEN DXP4800GT NAS Revealed UGREEN DXP4800GT NAS Revealed Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Terramaster D1 Buyers Guide – D1 SSD vs D1 SSD PLUS vs D1 SSD Pro

TerraMaster is a storage hardware brand best known for NAS, DAS, and direct-attached expansion products aimed at home users, content creators, small offices, and prosumer workloads. While NAS devices remain the better choice for shared network storage, remote access, multi-user collaboration, and always-on services, DAS products are often the more practical option when the priority is direct speed, portability, simplicity, and lower setup complexity. An M.2 NVMe SSD enclosure such as the TerraMaster D1 range is designed to connect directly to a host system over USB or Thunderbolt, making it more suitable for fast local transfers, field backup, editing work, boot drives, and quick storage expansion without the overhead of network configuration. The D1 range is currently split across 3 tiers: the D1 SSD, D1 SSD Plus, and D1 SSD Pro. All 3 are diskless single-slot M.2 2280 NVMe SSD enclosures supporting up to 8TB drives, but they differ significantly in interface bandwidth, chassis design, target workload, and price. The standard D1 SSD is the rugged USB 10Gbps option, the D1 SSD Plus moves to USB4 40Gbps for higher transfer speeds, and the D1 SSD Pro is the Thunderbolt 5 / USB 80Gbps model aimed at the fastest single-drive workflows.

TerraMaster D1 SSD – The 10Gb/s Budget One!

The TerraMaster D1 SSD is the entry-level model in the D1 range, using a single M.2 2280 NVMe SSD slot and a USB 10Gbps interface. This places it in a different category from the Plus and Pro models, as it is not intended to chase the highest possible external SSD speeds. Instead, it is aimed more at users who need a compact, portable NVMe enclosure for everyday transfers, local backups, field storage, and general-purpose expansion.

TerraMaster lists maximum sequential performance at up to 1020MB/s read and 1010MB/s write when tested with a Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSD, which is close to the expected practical limit of USB 3.2 Gen 2 storage.

The main point of difference with this model is the enclosure design. The D1 SSD uses a unibody aerospace-grade aluminum alloy shell and is rated at IP67 for dust and water resistance. TerraMaster also states that the enclosure can withstand up to 1.2 tons of pressure, which gives it a more rugged profile than a typical low-cost NVMe USB enclosure.

That makes it better suited to users who regularly move drives between locations, carry storage in a work bag, or need something for outdoor shoots, site work, travel, or emergency backups. It is still a single-drive enclosure, so it should not be treated as a complete backup strategy on its own, but the physical protection is clearly one of its main selling points.

Cooling is handled passively, with the metal body functioning as the heatsink rather than relying on a small internal fan. TerraMaster describes the design as offering 2.5x the usual heat dissipation area, and the lack of a fan also means there is no operating noise from the enclosure itself. The D1 SSD supports PCIe 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs up to 8TB, although the external USB 10Gbps connection will cap performance long before a modern high-end NVMe SSD reaches its own internal limits. File system support includes NTFS, APFS, Mac OS, FAT32, EXT4, and exFAT, while official operating system support is listed for Windows, macOS, and Linux.

TerraMaster D1 SSD Plus – The Perfect Middle!

The TerraMaster D1 SSD Plus is the middle option in the D1 range, moving from the USB 10Gbps connection of the standard D1 SSD to a USB4 40Gbps interface. This makes it a more suitable choice for users who want a compact single-drive NVMe enclosure but need substantially higher transfer speeds for larger files. TerraMaster positions this model around portable creative workflows, Mac mini storage expansion, macOS boot drive use, Windows workstation cache storage, and general high-speed external storage.

The company lists tested speeds of up to 3853MB/s read and 3707MB/s write, though the formal specification table gives 3641MB/s read and 3498MB/s write with a Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSD.

The D1 SSD Plus keeps the same basic single-drive structure as the rest of the range, supporting 1 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD with PCIe 3.0, 4.0, or 5.0 compatibility and a maximum internal raw capacity of 8TB. The higher-speed USB4 connection makes a more obvious difference when working with large video files, project folders, image libraries, and other data sets where USB 10Gbps can become a bottleneck.

It is also compatible with Thunderbolt 5, Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 3, USB4, USB 3.2, USB 3.1, and USB 3.0, although real-world performance will depend heavily on the host port, cable, SSD, file system, and operating system. TerraMaster notes that some Windows computers with Thunderbolt 3 may have incomplete USB4 support, which can lead to recognition problems or reduced speeds.

The enclosure uses a fanless aluminum alloy chassis, with TerraMaster claiming 3x the typical heat dissipation area for passive cooling. This means the drive remains silent in use, while the metal body handles heat transfer from the installed NVMe SSD. At 246g, it is heavier than the standard D1 SSD, but still portable enough for laptop bags, travel kits, and desk-to-desk workflows. Unlike the rugged standard D1 SSD, the Plus model is not presented around IP67 protection or crush resistance, with the emphasis instead placed on speed, broad protocol compatibility, quiet cooling, and electrical protection against short circuits, voltage surges, and electrostatic discharge.

TerraMaster D1 SSD Pro – The INSANE one

The TerraMaster D1 SSD Pro is the highest-end model in the D1 range, moving the enclosure platform up to USB 80Gbps and Thunderbolt 5 class connectivity. This places it well above the D1 SSD Plus in available interface bandwidth and makes it the model most clearly aimed at professional creative workloads rather than general portable storage.

TerraMaster positions the D1 SSD Pro for 8K video editing, large project transfers, direct-edit external workflows, and users who want the fastest option in the range for a single M.2 NVMe drive. The listed performance reaches up to 7061MB/s read and 6816MB/s write when tested with a Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSD on a Mac M4 Pro system using AJA System Test.

Although the D1 SSD Pro supports PCIe 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs up to 8TB, the specification notes a single PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot. This means the enclosure can physically and logically accept a wide range of modern NVMe drives, including examples such as the Samsung 990 Pro and WD SN850X, but performance will still depend on the SSD installed, the host system, and the connection used.

It is compatible with Thunderbolt 5, Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 3, USB4, and USB 3.2/3.1/3.0, so it can step down for broader system support. TerraMaster also includes a color-coded connection indicator, using white for Thunderbolt or USB4 high-speed connections and orange for USB 3.2 or lower, which helps identify when the enclosure is not running at its intended performance level.

The chassis is built around an all-aluminum dual-fin passive cooling design rather than active cooling. TerraMaster describes the cooling system as using a built-in thermal pad, 38 fins, and a full aluminum-alloy shell to help control temperatures during sustained transfers or editing workloads. The enclosure remains fanless and silent, which may matter in audio-sensitive editing rooms or recording environments.

It also includes hardware protection against short circuits, voltage surges, and electrostatic discharge, along with a supplied protective case for travel. At 300g and 121 x 58 x 37mm, it is the largest and heaviest of the 3 models, but that size is tied to the higher-speed interface and more substantial passive heatsink design.

Backupper Software for PC/Mac/Mobile

TerraMaster’s D1 SSD range is also tied into the company’s backup software ecosystem, although the specific tools vary by platform. On Windows, the main utility is TPC Backupper, a free backup and synchronization tool for personal use. It can be used to back up a full operating system, entire disks, selected partitions, individual folders, application data, settings, and Microsoft Outlook emails. It supports full, incremental, and differential backup methods, along with file synchronization and disk or partition cloning. Backup destinations can include local disks, external USB storage, network shares, NAS systems, and cloud storage, which allows it to fit into a wider 3-2-1 backup routine rather than only working with TerraMaster hardware.

For mobile use, TerraMaster refers to the TDAS App for iOS and Android, allowing users to back up photos, videos, and other phone files to the connected private drive instead of relying only on cloud storage. The D1 SSD is listed as compatible with iOS 15.6 or later and Android 11 or later for this function. The D1 SSD Plus and D1 SSD Pro are also supplied with software-led backup features in their product positioning, though the clearest desktop backup support is on Windows through TPC Backupper. TerraMaster does not present the D1 range as a replacement for a NAS-based backup system, but the combination of portable NVMe storage and simple backup utilities gives the enclosures a role in local copies, travel backups, temporary project protection, and fast restores when connected directly to a host device.

Terramaster D1 SSD vs D1 SSD PLUS vs D1 SSD PRO – Which Is Best For You?

The TerraMaster D1 SSD is the most suitable option for users who want a low-cost, compact, and physically protected NVMe enclosure rather than the fastest possible external SSD. Its USB 10Gbps interface is enough for general file transfers, local backups, document libraries, photo collections, and moving data between systems, while the IP67-rated casing and crush-resistant design give it a stronger focus on travel, outdoor use, site work, and less controlled environments. For users who mainly need durable portable storage and do not work with very large media files every day, this is the most practical model in the range.

The TerraMaster D1 SSD Plus is the better fit for users who want a noticeable performance step up without moving to the cost of the Pro model. Its USB4 40Gbps interface makes more sense for content creators, photographers, video editors, Mac mini users, and laptop owners who regularly move large files or want fast external project storage. It lacks the rugged IP67 focus of the standard D1 SSD and the 80Gbps ceiling of the Pro, but it sits in the middle as the more balanced option for users who need high-speed storage in a portable, fanless enclosure.

The TerraMaster D1 SSD Pro is the model aimed at users with the most demanding workflows and the right host hardware to support it. Its USB 80Gbps and Thunderbolt 5 class positioning makes it the obvious choice for 8K video work, very large project files, high-speed scratch storage, and users who want the fastest enclosure in the D1 family. It is also the most expensive, largest, and heaviest of the 3, so it makes the most sense when the available bandwidth can actually be used. For everyday backup or standard portable storage, the lower models are easier to justify, but for performance-led creative work, the D1 SSD Pro is the clear top-tier option.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...TerraMaster D1 SSD Rugged EnclTerramaster D1 SSD (IP67 WaterTerramaster D1 Buyers Guide - Terramaster F2-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F2-425 NAS - BeforTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster D1 SSD Pro ReleaseTerramaster TOS 7 Public Beta Terramaster Launch the TOS 7 P Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN NASync Celebrates 2 Years – But Is UGREEN Ready for the Big Leagues?

Two years ago, the popular battery and PC accessory company UGREEN, launched their Kickstarter campaign for the NASync personal NAS series of devices. The brand already had a steadily growing foothold in China with their DX series of NAS devices, but were still a huge outsider in the world of NAS globally. Fast forward two years, a $6 Million crowdfunding campaign, 6 new NAS releases, a new NAS kickstarter in progress (the IDX6011 AI NAS) and generally undermining long-time players who have been in the NAS market for more than a decade – UGREEN is looking like quite a beast in the world of NAS! But two years, UGREEN now finds that along with an increased market position also comes increased demand, scrutiny and expectation. I went to Shenzhen, China, to speak directly with the teams who direct and create their NASync division to ask them them questions about the development of this series, lessons that were learnt, where they are going and what they still need to do to further establish their position in the turnkey NAS market.

Full Disclosure – this Q&A has NOT been sponsored, subsidised or creatively controlled by UGREEN. These questions are my own, submitted to UGREEN 48 hours prior to the interview, and the answers provided were directly from their team.

UGREEN was already a well-established company in its own right before it expanded into NAS systems. So, currently, what is the scale of the teams and resources that your company has allocated to this? R&D, Design, Development, Technical Support, etc?

UGREEN put together its NAS team back in 2018, released its first NAS product in China in 2021, and went global for the first time in 2024, bringing its NAS products to markets around the world. NAS is one of the company’s key strategic product lines, with a team of several hundred people working on it—including product, R&D, design, testing, security, and more. This doesn’t count shared support teams like industrial design, legal, or finance; we’re only talking about people directly focused on NAS. In this whole building, every floor is filled with NAS team members—except for the third floor, which is just the cafeteria.

What has been the biggest challenge in the continued development of your NASync/UGOS services in these last 2 years?

One challenge is resource allocation. We need to support international users at the same time, which means balancing different priorities and expectations. Another challenge is localization. It’s not just about language, but also understanding different user behaviors and usage scenarios. So we had to spend a lot more time to research and validate what users actually need in each region. Based on that, we’ve been continuously adjusting our product direction and improving UGOS to better fit a global audience. It’s definitely an ongoing process, but it’s helped us build a much clearer understanding of the market.

Two years on from your initial crowdfunding, your position in the ‘turnkey NAS market’ from comparative obscurity has catapulted to effectively being in the top 5 (if not top 3) – What do you think UGREEN have brought to the market (or change in the market as a whole) that caused this?

There are a few key things behind that.

Hardware DNA, Built for AI

UGREEN is a hardware company at heart. With our NAS products, we insist on solid hardware—high-performance CPUs, ample memory, high-performance CPUs and ample memory—not just for reliability, but for computing power. AI NAS demands serious performance. Without a strong hardware foundation, AI is nothing more than a concept. Our hardware is designed to make AI run stable and fast.

User-Centric, Not Just a Slogan

We’ve always put ourselves in our users’ shoes. We listen to every voice—on social media, in forums, through user interviews. Many of our features, like snapshots and SAN Manager, came directly from users telling us, “I need this.” Our products aren’t built in a vacuum; they’re shaped together with you.

R&D Investment, Bringing NAS to Everyone

We established our software R&D team, including an AI pre-research team, early on. User feedback has driven us to keep investing, with one goal in mind: to shorten the learning curve. NAS shouldn’t be just a toy for tech enthusiasts. We believe the future of NAS is for everyone—simple, smart, and accessible. This is the path we’re on, and it’s one we want to walk together with you.

The UGREEN IDX6011 AI NAS series has been in development for a long time, and will be headed to its own crowdfunding campaign shortly. What was the biggest challenge you faced in its development and/or lesson that you learned about this new profile of solution?

The biggest challenge was finding the right balance between AI capabilities and real user value. It’s relatively easy to add AI features from a technical perspective, but making them actually useful, stable, and well-integrated into everyday workflows is much harder. Especially on a NAS, NAS is essentially a local storage product, everything runs locally, so for us, it was important that AI features also run locally. But hardware resources and compute power are limited. So the question is, how do we build useful and stable AI features without affecting NAS core functionality like storage, backup and overall system performance? That’s very difficult.

And from product design perspective，it’s also challenging to define the right AI use cases. It’s not about adding more AI features, but making sure they are scenario-driven and actually solve real problems, like better file organization, smarter search, easier intraction… We need to keep the experience simple. Many users are still new to AI on a NAS, so we wanna make things natural and do not add extra complexity. So right now, we’re still in the process of refining and validating these ideas, and making sure we deliver something that’s both practical and reliable for users.

I think it would be fair to say that UGREEN has chiefly focused on Desktop NAS server ownership in their portfolio of solutions to date. But have you explored rackmount solutions, and/or is this something that could happen in the near future?

Actually we’ve done some internal research on rackmount solutions, it’s quite different from desktop NAS in terms of target audience, hardware, software and sales. So it’s not just an extension of what we’re doing now, it requires a different product strategy. For now, our focus is still on improving and expanding our desktop NAS lineup, in the short term, we don’t have a concrete plan for rackmount products, but it’s something we’ll continue to evaluate over time.

Now that UGREEN is a largely established player in the turnkey NAS market, there is a lot more scrutiny on the extent to which your brand preemptively prepares against cyber security threats. What is UGREEN doing to address (in terms of foundations on this platform and broader services) this to avoid a potential slow moving snowballing security incident?

Security is something we take very seriously. At the product level, we provide a range of built-in security features. For example, users can enable DoS protection to defend against network attacks, automatically block IP addresses after multiple failed login attempts, and set up firewall rules to control access from specific IP addresses and built-in Security app to scan for suspicious files We also have a dedicated internal security team and a well-established vulnerability handling process, so critical issues can be identified and resolved quickly. We also provide a vulnerability reporting channel on our official website. If users discover any potential security issues, they can report them to us, and we will assess and respond accordingly.

(Below is a snippet of the Security Disclosure page from UGREEN, available HERE)

At CES 2026, UGREEN unveiled its surveillance platform and edge AI cameras. At that time, your team was kind enough to allow me to see the early development of your NAS surveillance application that will allow full management, direct control and storage of these new Surveillance services. Is development still continuing on this and will this be a service that existing NASync owners will have access to in the future

Yes, development is still ongoing. The surveillance platform you saw at CES is actually a part we are exploring, and is still under active development. From what I understand, AIOT is a broad ecosystem that is going to feature ai NAS, ai-based home security cameras, and many more AI-empowered hardware devices for a smarter lifestyle. On the NAS side, we’re also building our own surveillance application for NASync. We plan to launch it within this year. In terms of compatibility, we aim to support both UGREEN cameras and third-party cameras, so users have more flexibility to build their setup. So overall, both sides are moving forward, but they are different products within the UGREEN ecosystem.

In the last year, UGREEN released two ARM RK chip-powered NAS solutions in the DH2300 and DH4300 – How easy/hard was scaling UGOS onto this more modest hardware base, and were there any useful lessons learned that have benefited your NAS development as a whole?

DH series is our entry-level lineup, designed mainly for NAS beginners and users with simpler needs. From a technical perspective, running UGOS on an ARM-based platform is definitely more constrained compared to x86, especially in terms of performance and resource availability. A lot of things can’t just be directly carried over, we need to re-adapt them for the ARM architecture, including the kernel, system services, and many core features. So we had to be more selective and thoughtful about which features to include and how to optimize them. And from a product perspective, it actually helped us become more focused. With the DXP series, we already emphasized user-friendliness, but with the DH series, we really wanted to take that further and make it as simple as possible, essentially positioning it as a user’s first NAS.

So in practice, we streamlined certain features based on the hardware and target users. For example, we simplified or did not include things like virtual machines and some AI capabilities, and instead focused on delivering a smooth and reliable core experience. One key lesson we learned is that not every product needs to do everything. It’s more important to match the right experience to the right user group. And that thinking has also helped us better define our overall NAS product lineup.

I canvased a large group of UGREEN NAS users (many of whom were part of your original Kickstarter campaign) who are still using their NASync systems to this day, and have followed you on your journey so far. I asked them which features or improvements they would like to see in future updates and revisions to UGOS. Are you able to share if these are features that are on the roadmap, or have been explored?

• Full Volume Encryption
• WORM support
• A mixed drive RAID storage system (comparable to Synology Hybrid RAID or Terramaster TRAID)
• A tiered storage system (unlike the copy system of ‘caching’, but a SSD+HDD composite pool that intelligently moves ‘hot’, ‘warm’ and ‘cold’ data to appropriate storage areas)
• ZFS as a file system choice
• A native Plex Media Server Application
• A local client application for Mac/Windows for file pinning, streaming, intelligent 30-day deletion (see Synology Drive, QNAP Qsync, etc)
• A more comprehensive security scanner (eg scanning for unsecure open ports, SSH being open, weak passwords, admin accounts, auto blocks disabled, etc)

We’ve actually seen many of these requests from our users as well, these are very valuable suggestions and we’ve already had internal discussions around most of them. But many of these features, like full volume encryption, hybrid RAID, or tiered storage are quite complex, they take time to design, develop and validate, especially we wanted to make them stable and reliable.

So at this stage, we don’t have a specific timeline we can share yet. But these are definitely things we take seriously, and we’ll plan them carefully based on user demand and overall product direction. If we see strong demand from users, we’ll absolutely prioritize them accordingly.

Thank you to the team at UGREEN for their time in this interview. As mentioned, the answers about were provided in their entirety and without prejudice. This will be a video soon that covers this, the tour of the facilities, as well as further discussion around the IDX6011 NAS Kickstarter and how this has been managed.

Want to Support the work me and Eddie do at NASCompares? If you found this article helpful and are going to buy a UGREEN NAS from the brand’s official site or from Amazon, use the links below. Using these links will result in a small commission coming to us (which costs you nothing extra) and it allows us to keep doing what we do! Thank you for keeping the internet a fair and sustainable place!

Buy the UGREEN NAS from your local Amazon Store	Buy the UGREEN NAS solutions Directly from UGREEN.COM

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UGREEN DXP4800GT NAS Revealed UGREEN DXP4800GT NAS Revealed UGREEN DXP4800GT NAS RevealedUGREEN DXP4800 GT NAS RevealedHow to Install OpenClaw on a UHow to Install OpenClaw on a UUGREEN NAS - 2 Years Later - IUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UGREEN DXP4800 PRO NAS Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Should You Upgrade to the UniFi Dream Machine Beast?

The UniFi Dream Machine Beast arrives as a more serious entry in the Dream Machine range, and that immediately raises the main question: who is it actually for? Existing UniFi users may look at it as a possible upgrade from a UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max, while new buyers may see it as a way to start with a more capable console from day 1. On paper, it is clearly built for larger and busier networks, but that does not automatically make it the right choice for every UniFi setup. Whether the Dream Machine Beast makes sense depends less on the headline specification and more on the network around it. For some users, it may offer useful headroom for faster internet, heavier security processing, larger Protect installations, or wider UniFi management. For others, it may be more hardware than the deployment can realistically use, especially once the cost of switches, cabling, cameras, access points, and redundancy are taken into account. This article looks at where the Beast is a practical upgrade, where it may be excessive, and what trade-offs should be considered before buying.

UniFi Dream Machine Beast – Should You Buy? (The tl;dr)

The UniFi Dream Machine Beast is best viewed as a higher-capacity UniFi OS console for larger UniFi networks, rather than a default upgrade for every Dream Machine user. Its main advantages are the 8-core Arm v9 processor, 16GB of memory, 10GbE RJ45 ports, 10G SFP+ connectivity, 25G SFP28 support, 25Gbps-class IDS/IPS throughput, support for 750+ managed UniFi devices, 7,500+ concurrent clients, and 2 3.5-inch NVR bays for larger UniFi Protect deployments. These upgrades make it a more suitable option for businesses, multi-site networks, heavier camera installations, faster WAN environments, and users who are starting to outgrow the UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max. It also makes sense where security inspection, VPN use, traffic analysis, and UniFi application hosting are all expected to run at a larger scale on the same appliance. However, the Beast is not a simple plug-in upgrade for every setup. The $1,499 price, lack of PoE, internal non-removable PSU, and dependency on wider 25GbE infrastructure all make the total cost higher than the unit alone suggests. Users with mostly 1GbE, 2.5GbE, or 10GbE networks may not see enough practical benefit to justify the move, especially if their existing Dream Machine is not close to its limits. In many smaller UniFi deployments, the better use of budget may be a UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max combined with stronger switches, more access points, improved camera coverage, larger storage, or backup power. The Dream Machine Beast is therefore a strong option for larger and more demanding UniFi environments, but it should be bought with a clear network plan rather than as an automatic upgrade.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 7/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.6

PROS

8-core Arm v9 processor: Gives the Beast more headroom for routing, firewall rules, VPNs, IDS/IPS, DPI, SD-WAN, and UniFi application hosting.
25Gbps-class IDS/IPS throughput: A major step up from earlier Dream Machine models, making it better suited to high-speed networks with security inspection enabled.
25G SFP28 connectivity: Provides a faster uplink path for aggregation switches, high-speed WAN, NAS systems, and larger network cores.
10GbE RJ45 ports as standard: Makes the device more practical for users with existing 10GBASE-T equipment, without relying entirely on SFP modules or adapters.
16GB of system memory: Helps the appliance manage heavier UniFi workloads when Network, Protect, VPNs, traffic analysis, and security services are active at the same time.
Higher UniFi device and client capacity: Supports 750+ managed UniFi devices and 7,500+ concurrent clients, making it more suitable for larger sites and busy business networks.
Larger UniFi Protect capability: Supports up to 100 HD cameras, 60 2K cameras, or 40 4K cameras.
Dual 3.5-inch NVR drive bays: Gives Protect users more flexibility for recording capacity or redundancy than a single-drive Dream Machine.

CONS

High price compared with other Dream Machines: At $1,499, it costs far more than the UDM Pro, UDM SE, and UDM Pro Max.
No built-in PoE: Cameras, access points, phones, and other powered UniFi devices require separate PoE switches or injectors.
25GbE can make the wider upgrade expensive: To properly benefit from the Beast’s 25GbE capability, users may also need 25GbE switches, SFP28 modules, DACs, faster servers, or upgraded aggregation links.

Infrastructure-Class CPU for Heavier Routing and Security Workloads

A key hardware change in the UniFi Dream Machine Beast is its move to an 8-core Arm v9 processor running at 2.1GHz. This is a notable step up from the older Dream Machine models, such as the UDM SE, which uses a quad-core Arm Cortex-A57 at 1.7GHz with 4GB of memory. The Beast is built around Arm Neoverse N2 architecture, which Arm describes as its 1st Arm v9 infrastructure CPU, designed for cloud-to-edge workloads with improved performance per watt and a claimed 40% scalar performance uplift over Neoverse N1.

In practical terms, the CPU matters because the gateway is not just passing traffic from 1 port to another. It may also be handling firewall rules, IDS/IPS inspection, VPN traffic, DPI, policy routing, SD-WAN, VLANs, and UniFi application management at the same time. The supplied specification lists IDS/IPS throughput at 24.9Gbps, which is far beyond the 3.5Gbps figure associated with the UDM Pro class. That does not mean every user will need this level of processing headroom, but for larger networks it reduces the chance that security features or encrypted traffic become the main limit before the ports themselves do.

25GbE Uplinks and 10GbE Copper as Standard

The Dream Machine Beast makes a clear jump in physical connectivity compared with the smaller Dream Machine models. Instead of treating 10GbE as the higher-end connection, it uses 10GbE RJ45 as the baseline for its main LAN ports, alongside 10G SFP+ and 25G SFP28 connectivity. This matters because it gives the unit enough port flexibility to sit between faster WAN services, high-speed switches, NAS systems, and larger UniFi deployments without immediately forcing everything through a single 10GbE bottleneck.

The 25G SFP28 port is the more significant part of the design, as it gives the Beast room to aggregate traffic from larger networks rather than simply serve a handful of local devices. For users with multi-gig internet, large camera deployments, heavy internal routing, or multiple downstream switches, this creates a more capable central gateway than the UDM Pro Max. However, the benefit depends heavily on the rest of the network. A 25GbE port only becomes useful when switches, cabling, transceivers, and connected systems can also take advantage of it.

16GB of Memory for Larger UniFi Workloads

The Dream Machine Beast also increases system memory to 16GB, which is a practical upgrade when compared with smaller Dream Machine models. RAM is not as visible as the ports on the front of the unit, but it matters when the console is managing routing, firewall rules, VPNs, IDS/IPS, traffic identification, UniFi Network, UniFi Protect, and other UniFi applications at the same time. More memory gives the system more room to handle these services without the same pressure on resources as deployments grow.

In real terms, this is reflected in the stated management limits. The Beast is rated for 750+ managed UniFi devices and 7,500+ simultaneous connected users, while also supporting larger Protect deployments of up to 100 HD cameras, 60 2K cameras, or 40 4K cameras. Those figures put it in a different class from a typical small office or prosumer Dream Machine setup. The benefit is not just that the Beast can run faster, but that it is better equipped to keep multiple UniFi workloads active at once without becoming constrained as quickly.

Dual Drive Bays Give Protect More Room to Scale

The Dream Machine Beast includes 2 3.5-inch NVR HDD bays, which makes storage a more serious part of the appliance rather than a minor add-on. This is most relevant for UniFi Protect users, because camera recording is where local storage capacity has the biggest day-to-day impact. With support for up to 100 HD cameras, 60 2K cameras, or 40 4K cameras, the Beast is clearly intended to handle larger surveillance deployments than a basic Dream Machine setup.

The 2-bay design also gives users more flexibility than a single-drive console. It allows for higher total recording capacity or a redundant storage configuration, depending on how the system is deployed. The built-in 128GB SSD is separate from this and is used to keep the UniFi OS experience responsive rather than acting as the main video archive. This does not turn the Beast into a dedicated high-bay NVR, but it does make it more practical for sites that want gateway, management, and Protect recording in 1 rackmount device.

The Price Gap Against Other Dream Machines

The main drawback with the Dream Machine Beast is the price. At the quoted $1,499 figure from the launch material, it sits well above the rest of the Dream Machine range. For comparison, the UDM Pro is listed by Ubiquiti’s UK store at £300 before VAT, while the UDM SE is listed at £395 before VAT and the UDM Pro Max at £475 before VAT. Those models are clearly lower in throughput and capacity, but the difference still matters because the Beast is not a small step up in cost.

That makes the buying decision less about whether the Beast is technically better, and more about whether the network will actually use what it offers. A UDM Pro Max already provides 5Gbps IPS routing, 2,000+ client support, 200+ UniFi device support, and 2 NVR drive bays, which is still enough for many UniFi deployments. The Beast makes more sense when the extra routing capacity, larger client count, 25GbE connectivity, and higher Protect ceiling are genuinely required. For smaller sites, the money saved by choosing a lower Dream Machine could be more useful if spent on switches, access points, cameras, or backup power instead.

No PoE Limits Its Use as a Self-Contained Console

The Dream Machine Beast does not include PoE ports, which is a noticeable omission for a device at this price and scale. This does not affect its role as a gateway, firewall, UniFi OS console, or NVR, but it does mean that access points, cameras, door access hardware, phones, and smaller UniFi devices will need power from a separate PoE switch, injector, or other power source. For larger deployments this may not be a major issue, because a dedicated PoE switch would usually be part of the design anyway.

The drawback is more obvious for users upgrading from a Dream Machine model that already includes PoE, such as the UDM SE. Even a small number of PoE ports can be useful for directly powering a nearby access point, test device, camera, or compact downstream switch. On the Beast, the lack of PoE reinforces the idea that it is not intended to be a self-contained all-in-one network box. It is better understood as the central gateway and controller for a wider UniFi installation, rather than a device that can power much of that installation on its own.

Internal Power Supply Makes Hardware Servicing Less Convenient

The Dream Machine Beast uses an internal AC/DC power supply rather than a removable PSU module. It does support DC power backup through UniFi’s RPS system, which gives it a path for power failover when used with the required external hardware. However, this is not the same as having a hot-swappable or easily replaceable PSU built into the unit itself. If the internal supply fails, servicing is likely to be less convenient than it would be on a rackmount device with a standard removable power module.

This matters more because the Beast is aimed at larger and more business-critical UniFi environments. At this level, some buyers may expect either dual onboard PSUs or at least a removable single PSU design for easier replacement and reduced maintenance time. The RPS option helps with continuity, but it also adds another device to the rack and another cost to the overall setup. For users planning around uptime, this is an area where the Beast is functional, but not as service-friendly as some enterprise-style rack hardware.

Be Aware – 25GbE Can Push the Rest of the Network Into a Costly Upgrade Path

The Dream Machine Beast’s 25GbE capability is useful, but it can also change the scale of the upgrade. To take proper advantage of a 25GbE gateway, the rest of the network needs to be able to feed it and receive traffic from it at similar speeds. That usually means 25GbE-capable switches, suitable SFP28 modules or DAC cables, and potentially faster links to servers, NAS systems, or aggregation switches. Without that supporting hardware, the 25GbE port may end up being useful mainly as future headroom rather than something the network benefits from immediately.

This is where the Beast can become more expensive than it first appears. A network built around 2.5GbE or 10GbE copper may not need to move to 25GbE yet, especially if most endpoints are access points, cameras, desktops, or smaller servers. In those cases, a lower-cost Dream Machine paired with better 2.5GbE or 10GbE switching may be the more balanced upgrade. The Beast makes more sense when the wider network is already moving toward 25GbE, or when there is a clear plan to scale into it, rather than when the 25GbE port is the only part of the setup ready for that speed.

Verdict: Highly Capable Hardware, High Scalability, But Not a Universal Upgrade for All

The UniFi Dream Machine Beast is a stronger fit for users who have already reached the limits of the existing Dream Machine models, or who can clearly see those limits approaching. Its faster processor, 16GB of memory, 25GbE connectivity, high IDS/IPS throughput, larger UniFi management capacity, and 2 NVR drive bays all point toward larger networks with heavier traffic, more cameras, more clients, or more demanding security features. In that context, it is not simply a faster UDM Pro Max. It is a more substantial gateway and UniFi OS console for deployments that need more headroom.

For everyone else, the value is less clear. The higher price, lack of PoE, internal non-removable PSU, and likely need for wider 25GbE infrastructure all make it a device that should be bought with a specific network plan in mind. Users running smaller UniFi systems, mostly 1GbE to 10GbE networks, or modest Protect installations may get better value from a UDM Pro, UDM SE, or UDM Pro Max with money left for switches, access points, storage, or backup power. The Beast is best judged as a targeted upgrade for larger UniFi environments, not as the default Dream Machine for every buyer.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UNVR Gen 2 Pro - Is It WUniFi UNVR Gen 2 ProUniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShNew UniFi Dream Machine BEAST,New UniFi UDM Beast, EnterprisUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MLUniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MUniFi UNAS 4 Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Terramaster D1 SSD (IP67 Waterproof & 1.2-Ton Crush Resistance and Silent)

April 28, 2026 | The Professional storage brand TerraMaster today officially introduces the all-new rugged portable SSD enclosure — D1 SSD. Designed for users who demand both data security and high-speed performance, the D1 SSD features an aircraft-grade all-metal chassis, IP67 water and dust resistance, and 1.2-ton crush resistance. Combined with high-speed data transfer, silent cooling, and broad platform compatibility, it becomes an ideal storage companion for photographers, outdoor professionals, and mobile workers.

Buy from Terramaster Official Site:	Buy from Your Local Amazon:
Specification	TerraMaster D1 SSD
Drive Bays	1
Supported SSD Type	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD
Maximum Capacity	8TB
Interface	USB 10Gbps
Max Read Speed	1020MB/s
Max Write Speed	1010MB/s
File Systems	NTFS, APFS, Mac OS, FAT32, EXT4, exFAT
Supported OS	Windows, macOS, Linux
Ingress Protection	IP67
Cooling	Fanless passive cooling
Noise Level	Noiseless
Power Consumption	3.2W read/write, 0.2W hibernation
Dimensions	113.6 x 45.0 x 21.0mm
Net Weight	146g
Warranty	2 years

Three Layers of Protection Build an Unbreakable Data Shield：

1. Solid All-Metal Chassis for High-Intensity Work Environments

 The D1 SSD adopts a unibody aircraft-grade aluminum alloy construction. The full-metal enclosure offers excellent scratch resistance and corrosion protection, making it well-suited for long-term, heavy-duty usage. Whether facing extreme temperature differences outdoors or constant wear from mobile work, the enclosure ensures stable operation, extended lifespan, and reliable storage performance for professional users.

2. IP67 Water & Dust Resistance for Harsh Conditions

 Equipped with precision silicone sealing rings, the D1 SSD meets IP67 certification standards. It can withstand submersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes and is fully protected against dust and splashes. From rainy outdoor shoots and desert environments to construction sites, the enclosure safeguards both the SSD and your data. Protection performance is verified by internationally recognized testing organizations such as SGS.

3. 1.2-Ton Crush Resistance with Shock & Drop Protection

 The aircraft-grade aluminum unibody structure enables the enclosure to withstand up to 1.2 tons of vehicle-level pressure. Its dedicated shock-resistant internal design absorbs impacts from drops and collisions during daily use. Even under extreme external force, internal drives and data remain fully protected—eliminating the fragility issues of ordinary enclosures.

High-Speed Performance with Silent Operation and Broad Compatibility

 The D1 SSD features a USB 3.2 Gen2 interface, supports UASP protocol and TRIM optimization, and delivers real-world sequential read/write speeds of up to 1020 MB/s. Transferring a 1GB file takes just seconds, making it ideal for 4K video editing and large photo backups. The all-metal housing provides 2.5× larger heat dissipation area, while the fanless passive cooling design ensures completely silent operation.

 The enclosure supports up to 8TB single-drive capacity and is compatible with M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs based on PCIe 3.0 / 4.0 / 5.0 standards. It can store up to 2.79 million high-resolution photos or 5,400 HD movies. Compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux, it also connects to computers, TVs, and OTG-enabled smartphones for true plug-and-play use.

Additionally, the D1 SSD supports one-touch photo backup via the TerraMaster TDAS mobile app. Once connected, photos are automatically synchronized from your smartphone, with data stored locally to prevent privacy leakage and enable efficient cross-device file management.

 Designed for Multiple Usage Scenarios:

• Photographers & Outdoor Professionals

Rugged protection handles complex environments, enabling fast backups and eliminating data loss risks. Ideal for field exploration, construction sites, and harsh outdoor conditions.

• Mobile Professionals & Students

Ultra-lightweight at only 146g, pocket-sized design, and instant file transfer create a portable “light office” anywhere.

• General Users & Mac Professionals

Perfect as an external expansion drive or boot drive—quiet, stable, and plug-and-play.

Availability & Service

The TerraMaster D1 SSD is now officially available through the TerraMaster website (https://www.terra-master.com/) and authorized global channels. Customers who purchase within the first two weeks of launch can enjoy a 15% discount. The product is backed by a two-year global warranty and lifetime technical support for a worry-free user experience.

Interested in the D1 SSD, or want to know more about the rest of the D1 SSD Range, below are the specs and prices for the D1 SSD (10Gb/s), D1 SSD PLUS (40Gb/s) and D1 SSD Pro (80Gb/s):

Specification	TerraMaster D1 SSD	TerraMaster D1 SSD Plus	TerraMaster D1 SSD Pro
Interface	USB 10Gbps	USB4 40Gbps	USB 80Gbps / Thunderbolt 5 class
Claimed Max Read	1020MB/s	3641MB/s specification, 3853MB/s listed in testing	7061MB/s
Claimed Max Write	1010MB/s	3498MB/s specification, 3707MB/s listed in testing	6816MB/s
SSD Support	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe	PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 M.2 2280 NVMe
Max Capacity	8TB	8TB	8TB
Cooling	Fanless aluminum passive cooling	Fanless aluminum passive cooling	Fanless aluminum body with finned passive cooling
Protection / Build	IP67, dustproof, waterproof, crush-resistant up to 1.2 tons	All-metal unibody chassis, short circuit, surge, and ESD protection	All-aluminum dual-fin design, smart status indicator, short circuit, surge, and ESD protection
Price Listed	$33.99 (15% OFF $39.99)	$76.99 (30% OFF $109.99)	$199.99 (20% OFF $199.99)

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Terramaster D1 SSD (IP67 WaterTerramaster D1 SSD Enclosure RTerramaster D1 Buyers Guide - Terramaster F2-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F2-425 NAS - BeforTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster D1 SSD Pro ReleaseTerramaster TOS 7 Public Beta Terramaster Launch the TOS 7 P Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Which Should You Buy?

The UniFi UNAS 4 and the UGREEN DH4300 Plus are being compared because they currently occupy a very similar part of the 4-bay NAS market, with both systems targeting buyers who want a relatively affordable turnkey storage solution with 2.5GbE connectivity, modern desktop design, and a lower entry price than many traditional NAS brands. On paper, they are close enough in price to be direct alternatives, but in practice they approach NAS deployment very differently. The UniFi UNAS 4 is built around tight integration with the wider UniFi ecosystem and focuses primarily on straightforward storage, backup, and remote file access, whereas the UGREEN DH4300 Plus is designed as a broader standalone NAS platform with more memory, a more powerful ARM processor, HDMI output, and a wider range of applications and services. That makes this comparison relevant not just because of the hardware and price overlap, but because each system reflects a different idea of what an entry to mid-range 4-bay NAS should be in 2026.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Brand vs Brand

Before I dig into which of the DH4300 or UNAS 4 is best for you, it is worth highlighting again that these are two comparatively new players in the NAS scene (compared with long time multi-decade vetrans such as Synology, QNAP, Asustor and Terramaster), so let’s talk about their priorities and focus at a brand level. Both UGREEN and UniFi have entered the NAS sector from distinct starting points and continue to move in different directions, each targeting a particular type of user. UniFi’s UNAS series delivers consistency, predictable performance, and dependable integration with the broader UniFi ecosystem. Its software is stable, lightweight, and well-suited to users who prioritize straightforward storage management, reliable data handling, and unified control across routers, switches, and surveillance systems. While the hardware is limited to fixed ARM configurations and non-expandable memory, it is efficient, quiet, and designed for continuous operation with minimal maintenance. For organizations already invested in UniFi infrastructure, the UNAS systems provide a logical expansion that keeps management centralized and operational risk low. However, their value depends heavily on ecosystem synergy; outside of that environment, the systems remain competent but relatively inflexible standalone NAS options.

UGREEN’s NASync platform, on the other hand, appeals to users seeking broader performance capability and independence. Its x86-based models, upgradable memory, and open software environment allow it to serve as a hybrid between NAS and compact server, capable of running applications, containers, and virtual machines alongside storage tasks. The design language is more suited to individual or small business use than datacenter deployment, but the hardware range—from ARM to Core i5—covers a far wider performance spectrum than UniFi’s. Software maturity continues to evolve quickly, with new features added frequently, and the systems provide extensive compatibility with third-party clients and backup services. The trade-off is that long-term reliability and enterprise-level security validation are still developing.

Ultimately, UniFi NAS suits users who already rely on UniFi’s networking ecosystem and value simplicity, predictability, and centralized management, while UGREEN NAS caters to those prioritizing flexibility, compute power, and open software capability. Both brands have lowered the entry barrier into reliable NAS ownership, but they embody opposing philosophies: UniFi focuses on integration and control, whereas UGREEN emphasizes capability and independence.

Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!

UGREEN DH4300 vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Design and Storage

From a physical design perspective, these 2 NAS systems take very different approaches. The UniFi UNAS 4 has a taller, narrower chassis with a more vertical layout, while the UGREEN DH4300 Plus uses a more cubic desktop design that will look more familiar to buyers coming from Synology, QNAP, or Asustor hardware. The UniFi system is also available in black or white, which gives it a more deliberate visual identity within the wider UniFi product range, whereas the UGREEN keeps to a more conventional single-finish enclosure. In both cases, the chassis material is primarily plastic, so neither is especially premium in material terms, but each is clearly trying to prioritize compactness and low manufacturing cost rather than metal construction.

The drive arrangement is also notably different. The UniFi UNAS 4 places its 4 SATA bays in the base of the chassis, with the drives inserted from underneath, while the UGREEN DH4300 Plus uses a top-loaded vertical bay arrangement hidden under a removable outer shell. Neither system uses a particularly enterprise-focused tray design, and neither is really built around frequent hot-swap use in the same way as more expensive rackmount or prosumer NAS systems. That said, the UniFi trays are easier to describe as straightforward click-in drive carriers, while the UGREEN trays feel more budget-oriented in construction and do not leave the same impression of robustness as more established NAS brands.

In storage flexibility, the UniFi has the more ambitious configuration. Alongside its 4 SATA bays, it also includes 2 dedicated M.2 NVMe slots for SSD cache. That gives it an advantage in hybrid storage architecture, since the hard drives can be used for capacity while the NVMe media handles read and write cache duties. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus does not include M.2 storage slots, so any SSD deployment has to consume one or more of the main SATA bays, which reduces total storage capacity. At the same time, UniFi currently limits those NVMe bays to cache use rather than general storage pools, so the practical advantage is still narrower than the raw hardware layout suggests.

The 2 brands also differ in RAID and storage management philosophy. The UGREEN supports a broader list of RAID modes, including JBOD, Basic, RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, which gives it more deployment flexibility for different user priorities around performance, redundancy, or simple linear storage. The UniFi platform supports RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, but its overall storage structure is more controlled and less flexible, with a stronger focus on a simplified single storage pool approach. For buyers who want fewer decisions and a cleaner setup process, that may be acceptable, but for users who want more granular control over how storage is arranged, the UGREEN is less restrictive.

In pure storage potential, the UGREEN is also easier to quantify because it officially supports up to 128TB across 4 bays using 32TB drives, whereas UniFi focuses more on supported drive compatibility and cache pairing than on headline raw capacity figures. The UniFi does have the practical advantage of SSD caching built in, which can improve responsiveness in repeated access and write-heavy workloads, but the UGREEN has the simpler storage proposition overall and does not tie part of its internal design to optional accessories such as UniFi’s separate M.2 tray approach. As a result, the UniFi has the more distinctive and technically layered storage design, while the UGREEN has the more conventional and broadly flexible one.

UniFi UNAS4 vs UGREEN DH 4300 – Internal Hardware & Connections

Internally, the UGREEN DH4300 Plus has the stronger hardware specification. It uses an 8-core Rockchip ARM processor based on Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores running at up to 2.0GHz, alongside 8GB of LPDDR4X memory and 32GB of eMMC for the system. By comparison, the UniFi UNAS 4 uses a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 processor at 1.7GHz with 4GB of memory. Both systems are clearly built around low-power ARM architecture rather than x86 processing, but the UGREEN has the more capable platform on paper and offers more headroom for multitasking, background services, and broader software functionality.

The UniFi system does, however, counter with a more unusual internal layout. In addition to its 4 SATA bays, it includes 2 M.2 NVMe slots dedicated to SSD cache, which gives it a storage acceleration feature that the UGREEN does not match natively. For users dealing with repeated file access, background synchronization, or burst-heavy write activity, that cache support has practical value. The UGREEN relies entirely on its 4 SATA bays for storage media, so although its CPU and memory are stronger, its internal storage architecture is less advanced in terms of tiered storage.

External connectivity is broader on the UGREEN. It includes 1x 2.5GbE LAN port, HDMI output at up to 4K 60Hz, 1x front USB 3.2 Gen 1 port at 5Gb/s, and 2 additional USB-A 5Gb/s ports. The UniFi UNAS 4 is much more limited, offering 1x 2.5GbE RJ45 port and 1x 5Gb/s USB-C port. This narrower I/O profile reflects the fact that UniFi has positioned the UNAS 4 as a focused network storage appliance rather than a multi-role NAS for media output, peripheral attachment, or application expansion. In direct hardware terms, the UGREEN is better equipped for users who expect more than basic file serving.

Power and deployment also separate these 2 systems. The UniFi UNAS 4 supports PoE+++ and includes a 90W PoE adapter, which allows both power and network connectivity over a single cable in supported environments. That is unusual in this part of the NAS market and makes it particularly relevant for users already invested in UniFi switching infrastructure or those deploying hardware in locations where simplified cabling matters. The UGREEN uses a more conventional external power arrangement, which is less distinctive but also less dependent on network infrastructure choices. Therefore, the UGREEN has the stronger internal compute hardware and broader physical connectivity, while the UniFi has the more specialized deployment advantage.

UGREEN DH4300 vs UniFi UNAS 4 – Software & Services

The biggest difference between these 2 NAS systems is not the chassis or the processor, but the software scope. The UniFi UNAS 4 runs UniFi Drive and is clearly built around a narrower storage-first brief, with support for SMB, NFS, snapshots, file encryption, Time Machine, share links, user groups, remote backup, cloud backup targets, and client apps. It covers the main NAS fundamentals expected by home users and small offices, but it does so within a more controlled environment that places simplicity and consistency ahead of feature breadth. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus, running UGOS Pro, aims much wider and includes not only file serving and backup tools, but also multimedia applications, container support, HDMI-based media playback, AI-assisted photo features, and broader service depth overall.

For pure storage management, UniFi Drive is cleaner and more focused, particularly for users who want the NAS to act primarily as private cloud storage, backup target, and centralized file repository. Its interface is built to align with the broader UniFi platform, and that gives it an advantage for users already running UniFi networking equipment and remote management tools. However, that same focus also means the UNAS 4 is less flexible as a general-purpose NAS. The UGREEN platform does not have the same ecosystem tie-in, but it operates more independently and gives the user more scope to use the system for different workloads beyond file storage.

Application support is where the gap becomes more obvious. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus supports Docker and has a noticeably broader service layer for media, backup, and user applications. That creates options for running third-party software, home media tools, and more customized services that simply are not part of the UniFi approach. The UniFi UNAS 4 does not currently try to compete in that area and instead presents itself as a dedicated NAS platform rather than an application host. For some users that will be a limitation, while for others it will be a benefit, because it reduces complexity and keeps the system centered on storage tasks rather than mixed workload experimentation.

In practical terms, the software decision comes down to whether the buyer values depth or focus. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus offers the broader NAS software experience and is better suited to users who want more features, more applications, and more ways to extend the system over time. The UniFi UNAS 4 offers the more controlled and storage-specific platform, with the clearest advantage appearing when it is deployed inside an existing UniFi environment. As a result, the UGREEN software stack is more versatile, while the UniFi software stack is more specialized.

UniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 NAS – Conclusion & Verdict

Taken as a whole, these 2 systems are aimed at a similar buyer in price terms, but they are not trying to solve the same problem in the same way. The UniFi UNAS 4 is a more specialized NAS that focuses on storage, backup, remote access, and integration within the UniFi ecosystem. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is a broader standalone NAS that gives the user more hardware resources, more software flexibility, and a wider overall role in the network. That difference matters more than the relatively small gap in price, because in day to day use they will appeal to different priorities. The UniFi UNAS 4 makes more sense for buyers who already use UniFi switches, gateways, and management tools, or for those who specifically want a NAS that stays focused on file storage instead of trying to become a media server or container host. Its built in NVMe cache support and PoE+++ deployment give it some useful differentiators, and its simpler software scope will suit users who want a more controlled experience. However, outside of the UniFi ecosystem, some of its strengths become less important, while its limitations in application support, connectivity, and hardware power become harder to ignore.

The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is the better fit for users who want a more traditional all-round NAS. It has the stronger CPU, more memory, broader external connectivity, more RAID options, HDMI output, Docker support, and a software platform with more room to scale into multimedia, backup variety, and third party services. It is the more capable choice for mixed home and small business use, particularly for buyers who are not tied to any specific network brand and want their NAS to handle more than just centralized storage. It is also the easier system to recommend to users comparing it against other established 4-bay NAS platforms in the same price bracket. So, in direct usage terms, the UniFi UNAS 4 is better for UniFi-centric deployments, cleaner storage-first use, and buyers who value NVMe caching and PoE-based installation. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is better for users who want stronger hardware, more software features, better connectivity, and a wider long term usage profile. If the question is which is the better pure value NAS for the largest number of users, the UGREEN DH4300 Plus is the stronger overall option. If the question is which fits better into a UniFi-led network and a simpler storage-focused role, the UniFi UNAS 4 is the more appropriate choice.

Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on Amazon @399	Buy the UniFi UNAS 4 on The UniFi Store for $379

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUGREEN vs UniFi NAS - Which NeWeek 39 Tech Digest – Wi-Fi UGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewUGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewNEW UniFi NAS - What Comes NexNEW UniFi NAS - What Comes NexUnifi NAS on YouTube Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

The Slate 7 Pro (GL-BE10000) is the latest travel router from GL.iNet, and it exists largely because the original Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) did not go quite far enough. The earlier model carried Wi Fi 7 branding but lacked 6GHz support, which for many users felt like a limitation rather than a stepping stone. The Slate 7 Pro corrects that by moving to full tri band Wi Fi 7, adding a dedicated 6GHz radio, expanding wireless bandwidth, and upgrading the touchscreen. It keeps the dual 2.5GbE ports and USB C powered design, but pushes the hardware and feature set further into premium territory.

I have reviewed and evaluated ALOT of travel routers over the years, and today I want to focus specifically on the pros and cons of the Slate 7 Pro (full detailed review still in progress, but this article will serve as the main focus good and bad bits). Rather than listing specifications alone, it looks at what those changes actually mean day to day, especially for travelers, remote workers, and users who rely heavily on VPN, captive portal access, and flexible networking. Some areas are clear improvements over the previous model, while others remain imperfect or introduce new trade offs. The goal here is to outline both sides clearly, without overselling what the device does well or ignoring where it still falls short.

Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Here for 169 (Early Bird Price) – HERE

Amazon HERE for the Gli.Net Slate 7 Pro – HERE

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Review – Quick Conclusion

The Slate 7 Pro (GL-BE10000) is a full tri band Wi Fi 7 travel router from GL.iNet that corrects the biggest limitation of the earlier Slate 7 by adding dedicated 6GHz support and 320MHz channel capability, delivering combined theoretical wireless bandwidth of 688Mbps on 2.4GHz, 2882Mbps on 5GHz, and 5764Mbps on 6GHz. It pairs this with dual 2.5GbE ports, high speed VPN performance up to 1100Mbps via WireGuard, integrated Deep Packet Inspection, a larger 2.8 inch touchscreen for on device management, and an optional active cooling system that engages only when thermals demand it. The OpenWrt based firmware remains one of the most flexible in the travel router space, supporting multi WAN failover, advanced traffic rules, plugin expansion, and remote management. However, it draws more power than the previous model, retains only 1 USB C data port with unreliable hub expansion, cannot handle captive portal login pages directly on the touchscreen, and implements single radio MLO rather than full multi radio aggregation. For users who want full spectrum Wi Fi 7 in a portable form, stronger VPN throughput, and granular network control while traveling or working remotely, it is a technically stronger and more complete option than the non 6GHz Slate 7, but it comes with higher power demands and a price premium that may not suit those who only need basic travel connectivity.

SOFTWARE - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 7/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.6

PROS

Full tri band Wi Fi 7 with dedicated 6GHz support and 320MHz channel capability
Combined theoretical wireless bandwidth of 688Mbps (2.4GHz), 2882Mbps (5GHz), and 5764Mbps (6GHz)
Dual 2.5GbE ports with configurable WAN/LAN and multi WAN failover support
High speed VPN performance up to 1100Mbps via WireGuard and 1000Mbps via OpenVPN DCO
2.8 inch color touchscreen for direct device level control and monitoring
Integrated Deep Packet Inspection for advanced traffic visibility and filtering
Active cooling system that engages only when required
OpenWrt based firmware with full customization, plugin support, and remote management

CONS

Touchscreen cannot handle captive portal login pages directly
Higher baseline power consumption compared to the earlier Slate 7
Only 1 USB C data port for storage or tethering
USB hub expansion remains unreliable for multi device use
MLO implementation is single radio coordination rather than full multi radio aggregation

Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Here for 169 (Early Bird Price) – HERE

Amazon HERE for the Gli.Net Slate 7 Pro – HERE

Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro from the Official Store Below:

6GHz Support Finally Brings Full Tri Band Wi Fi 7 to the Slate 7 Pro

One of the most significant changes in the Slate 7 Pro compared with the earlier Slate 7 is the addition of a dedicated 6GHz band. The previous model operated only on 2.4GHz and 5GHz, which meant it technically supported Wi Fi 7 features but did not deliver the full tri band experience many users associate with the standard. By adding 6GHz, the Slate 7 Pro increases total theoretical wireless throughput to 688Mbps on 2.4GHz, 2882Mbps on 5GHz, and 5764Mbps on 6GHz. More importantly, it allows access to wider 320MHz channels, which are not available on 5GHz in most regulatory regions.

In practical terms, 6GHz provides a cleaner spectrum with less congestion, particularly in dense environments such as hotels, conferences, or apartment buildings. When combined with Multi Link Operation, the router can distribute traffic more effectively across three bands rather than two. This does not automatically guarantee higher real world speeds for every client, but it does increase headroom and flexibility for multiple active devices. For users who dismissed the original Slate 7 due to its lack of 6GHz, this update addresses that limitation directly and aligns the Pro model more closely with what most would consider a complete Wi Fi 7 implementation.

Active Cooling in a Travel Router, but Only When It Is Needed

One of the more unusual additions in the Slate 7 Pro is the inclusion of an internal cooling fan. Most travel routers rely entirely on passive cooling due to their compact size and relatively low power processors. Under moderate use this is usually sufficient, but in warmer climates or during sustained high load activity such as heavy VPN use, multi device streaming, or extended 6GHz operation, temperatures can rise enough to cause throttling or instability. The Slate 7 Pro addresses this by integrating active cooling, which is not common in this category.

Importantly, the fan does not run continuously. It can be configured to activate only once the CPU reaches a defined temperature threshold. In standard operation, the device remains silent. The fan engages only when sustained workload or environmental conditions demand additional cooling. This approach attempts to balance reliability and acoustics, reducing the risk of heat related slowdowns without introducing constant background noise. For users who travel to high humidity or high temperature regions, this is a practical addition, though it also reflects the higher performance hardware and increased power demands of the Pro model.

Strong Wired and Physical Connectivity Without Additional Accessories

The Slate 7 Pro continues to offer dual 2.5GbE ports, with 1 configurable WAN and 1 LAN port, providing multi gig wired connectivity in a compact travel router form factor. This allows users to connect to high speed wired internet sources where available, while also supporting local high bandwidth transfers across a wired network. The ports can be reassigned depending on deployment needs, and multi WAN failover remains supported through combinations of wired, wireless repeater, and tethered connections. For users who frequently move between hotel networks, offices, or temporary workspaces, this flexibility remains one of the defining strengths of the device.

In addition to Ethernet, the Slate 7 Pro replaces the previous USB Type A data port with a USB C 3.0 data port, aligning it more closely with modern devices and accessories. This port supports storage devices and USB tethering, while power is delivered through a separate USB C PD input. The programmable hardware toggle button is retained for quick VPN or feature switching, and the reset button remains accessible. Overall, the physical connectivity is broad for a travel router, and the Pro model maintains compatibility with high speed wired networks while modernizing the data interface.

The Larger 2.8 Inch Touchscreen Adds Real Practical Control

The Slate 7 Pro includes a 2.8 inch color touchscreen on the front panel, replacing the smaller and more limited display found on the earlier Slate 7. While the previous model did introduce touchscreen control to the travel router category, the Pro version expands both the size and usability of the interface.

From the screen, users can view network status, generate QR codes for Wi Fi sharing, toggle VPN connections, monitor connection modes, and manage basic wireless settings without needing to open a browser or mobile app.

For short term or ad hoc setups, this makes a noticeable difference. When arriving at a new location, it is possible to power on the router, assign a Wi Fi password, enable or disable a VPN, and confirm connectivity directly from the device itself. It also provides real time visibility of WAN, repeater, tethering, and LAN states through clear indicators. The screen does not replace the full web interface for advanced configuration, but for quick adjustments and monitoring, it reduces reliance on a secondary device and simplifies routine tasks.

The OpenWrt Based Software Platform Remains One of the Strongest in This Category

The Slate 7 Pro continues to run the customized OpenWrt based firmware developed by GL.iNet, and this remains one of the defining advantages of the platform. The interface provides a structured and accessible front end for everyday tasks such as WAN configuration, repeater mode, VPN management, and client monitoring, while still allowing full access to the underlying OpenWrt environment for advanced users. This dual layer approach means the device can operate as a simple travel router for casual users, or as a highly configurable networking tool for those comfortable with deeper control.

Beyond standard routing functions, the firmware includes integrated VPN client and server options, multi WAN failover, traffic rules per SSID, and application support through an app center. The Pro model also introduces built in Deep Packet Inspection, adding another layer of visibility and filtering capability.

Users can assign the physical toggle button to trigger specific actions, switch to raw OpenWrt if desired, and manage the device remotely through GoodCloud. In terms of flexibility and feature depth within a travel form factor, the software stack remains one of the most complete available.

The Touchscreen Still Cannot Handle Captive Portal Logins

While the 2.8 inch touchscreen adds useful control and monitoring features, it does not eliminate the need for a secondary device when dealing with captive portals. In environments such as hotels, cafés, airports, or in flight Wi Fi systems, users often encounter web based login pages that must be completed before internet access is granted. The Slate 7 Pro cannot display or interact with these login portals directly on its screen. As a result, a phone, tablet, or laptop is still required to complete the authentication process.

This limitation reduces some of the independence that the touchscreen otherwise provides. In scenarios where the goal is to connect once and share access with multiple devices through the router, the expectation might be that everything could be handled directly on the unit itself. Instead, the workflow still requires connecting a client device to trigger and complete the portal login. Given that the hardware includes a capable display and processing power, the absence of even a basic embedded browser feels like a missed opportunity rather than a technical constraint.

Increased Power Consumption Compared to the Previous Model

The Slate 7 Pro draws more power than the earlier Slate 7, which is not unexpected given the addition of 6GHz, a larger LCD, integrated DPI processing, and an active cooling system. Even under light usage with a single wireless client connected and no wired WAN active, the Pro model typically operates above 5W. By comparison, the earlier Slate 7 generally sat between 3W and 4W under similar conditions. While these figures are not high in absolute terms, they are noticeably different when measured side by side.

For most users powering the router from a standard USB C PD adapter, this increase will not present an issue. However, in travel scenarios where power is sourced from lower output USB ports on buses, trains, aircraft seats, or compact power banks, the higher baseline draw could matter.

It also reflects the broader shift in the Pro model toward higher performance hardware. The device remains portable and reasonably efficient, but it is less power conservative than its predecessor.

Single USB Port Continues to Limit Expansion and Hub Compatibility

Despite moving to a USB C 3.0 data port, the Slate 7 Pro still provides only 1 USB data interface for peripherals. This means users must choose between connecting external storage, tethering a smartphone, or attaching another USB based device. In practical travel use, it is common to want both tethering and storage active at the same time, particularly when using the router as a small file sharing hub or media server. With only a single port, that flexibility remains constrained.

Attempts to expand the port using USB hubs continue to produce inconsistent results. While some powered hubs may partially function, stable multi device operation is not guaranteed. This mirrors behavior seen in earlier models and suggests that the limitation is architectural rather than cosmetic. For users who rely heavily on USB expansion, especially for simultaneous tethering and storage, this remains a practical restriction rather than a minor inconvenience.

MediaTek Platform Instead of Qualcomm Hardware

The Slate 7 Pro is powered by a MediaTek quad core processor running at 2.0GHz, rather than a Qualcomm chipset. In previous generations, Qualcomm based platforms were often associated with stronger power efficiency and broader upstream driver maturity within certain networking ecosystems. The move to MediaTek is not uncommon in this segment, but it does represent a shift in hardware positioning compared with devices that have relied on Qualcomm silicon.

From a performance perspective, the 2.0GHz MediaTek CPU provides the necessary headroom for tri band Wi Fi 7, high throughput VPN, and DPI processing. However, MediaTek platforms are generally viewed as slightly less power efficient than comparable Qualcomm solutions, which ties back to the higher baseline power draw observed in the Pro model. For most users, the practical difference will center on efficiency rather than raw capability, but it remains a consideration for those who closely follow chipset selection in networking hardware.

Multi Link Operation Is Present, but Not Full Multi Radio Aggregation

The Slate 7 Pro supports Wi Fi 7 Multi Link Operation across its 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz bands, allowing compatible clients to establish links over multiple frequencies. In practice, this improves connection stability and can help balance traffic dynamically between bands. However, it is important to clarify that this implementation follows the more common single radio MLO model, where traffic is coordinated across bands rather than fully aggregated simultaneously through independent radio chains.

This means the router does not deliver true parallel multi radio throughput in the way some marketing descriptions of Wi Fi 7 may imply. Instead, it prioritizes stability, latency reduction, and intelligent band switching. At present, very few consumer or travel routers implement full multi radio MLO aggregation, and the Slate 7 Pro is not an exception to that wider market reality. For most users, the benefit will be smoother performance under load rather than a simple multiplication of peak speeds.

Should You Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Travel Router? Conclusion and Verdict

The Slate 7 Pro builds directly on the foundation of the earlier Slate 7 by addressing its most discussed limitation, namely the absence of 6GHz. With full tri band Wi Fi 7 support, dual 2.5GbE ports, a larger 2.8 inch touchscreen, integrated DPI, high throughput VPN capabilities up to 1100Mbps via WireGuard, and optional active cooling, it positions itself as a more complete and performance oriented travel router. For users who were hesitant about the original model due to clipped wireless capability, the Pro version resolves that concern and expands overall functionality in a meaningful way.

That said, it is not without compromises. Power draw is higher than before, USB expansion remains limited to a single port with inconsistent hub support, the touchscreen cannot handle captive portal logins directly, and its MLO implementation reflects the broader limitations of current consumer Wi Fi 7 hardware rather than a fully parallel multi radio design. The MediaTek platform delivers the required performance, but it does not prioritize efficiency to the same degree as some Qualcomm based alternatives. For buyers deciding between the Slate 7 and the Slate 7 Pro, the Pro model is the technically stronger device, provided the increased price and power requirements align with their intended use case.

Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Here for 169 (Early Bird Price) – HERE

Amazon HERE for the Gli.Net Slate 7 Pro – HERE

Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro from the Official Store Below:

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Comet X KVM Host ReveaGl.iNet MUDI 7 5G SIM WiFi 7 TGl.iNet MUDI 7 5G SIM WiFi 7 TGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Should YouNew Gl.iNet Comet Q KVM RevealGl.iNet Comet Q USB-C KVM for TP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouTP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouGl.iNet Comet 5G Review - The Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 Tra Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

New Cost-Effective USB4, M.2 and PCIe Adapters from IOCREST/Lekuo for 2026 Revealed

IOCREST, also marketed under the Lekuo name for consumer channels, is preparing a broader range of USB4, M.2, and PCIe expansion products aimed at users who need higher speed networking, storage expansion, or more flexible external PCIe connectivity. Based on the product information provided and the accompanying interview material, the current lineup combines shipping devices with several products still in development or not yet formally listed on the company’s official product pages, reflecting a portfolio that spans compact 10GbE adapters, SFP+ connectivity, multi-drive enclosures, and USB4 based PCIe breakout designs.

Lekuo USB4 to 10GbE Hub

Buy HERE on Amazon – Buy HERE on AliExpress

The Lekuo DTB3R61 is a compact USB4 hub that combines 10GbE networking with basic peripheral and removable media expansion in a single enclosure. It is built around a USB4 upstream connection and is intended for hosts that support USB4 or Thunderbolt 3/4/5, rather than older USB 3.x only systems. In practical terms, this positions it as a multi function dock for users who need wired 10GbE, a small number of USB ports, and SD or TF card access without moving to a larger desktop class dock.

The port layout is relatively simple, consisting of 1x 10GbE RJ45 port, 3x 5Gbps USB Type A ports, and a TF/SD 3.0 card reader. The supplied specifications list a 40Gbps host link, support for Windows, macOS, and Linux, and a compact metal chassis. Although your transcript refers to a fanless design, the specification sheet provided here states an aluminum alloy casing with fan assisted cooling, so that distinction should be treated carefully in the article unless you want to frame it as pre release versus final spec variation.

Lekuo USB4 to 2x25GbE Adapter

Buy HERE on Amazon – Buy HERE on AliExpress

This unreleased Lekuo adapter is one of the more bandwidth focused products discussed in the interview material, built around a USB4 host connection and 2x 25GbE network ports. Based on the information provided, the design uses an SFP based approach rather than RJ45, which is consistent with the higher thermal and signal demands of 25GbE. It is positioned as a compact external network adapter for systems that need significantly more throughput than 10GbE, while still relying on USB4 as the host side connection.

The transcript also indicates several design details that help distinguish this unit from more common USB or Thunderbolt network adapters. It is described as a silent design with no active fan, includes an external barrel power input, and features a physical power button on the enclosure. The company indicated that the product was expected around Q2 and priced below $200 at the time of filming, but as it is not yet listed on the official product page, those details should be treated as pre release guidance rather than final retail specification.

Lekuo DTB3F21 USB4 to 2x10GbE Adapter

Buy HERE on Amazon – Buy HERE on AliExpress

The Lekuo DTB3F21 is a dual port USB4 network adapter designed around 2x 10GbE SFP+ connections. Unlike simpler USB to Ethernet devices that target single port RJ45 connectivity, this model is positioned for users who need higher density fibre or DAC based networking from a single external enclosure. The supplied specifications identify the Intel 82599 controller, placing it closer to a traditional server class 10GbE design than a lower cost USB NIC.

From the product information and transcript, this adapter is part of Lekuo’s broader push into USB4 based external networking, especially for systems that lack internal expansion but still need multi port high speed network access. The enclosure is described as compact and externally connected over USB Type C, with support across Windows, Windows Server, Linux distributions, and several enterprise networking features such as VLAN support, jumbo frames, interrupt moderation, and virtual machine queue support. In the transcript, a dual 10GbE version is also discussed alongside the dual 25GbE model as part of the same general product family.

Lekuo M.2 to 10G SFP+ Adapter

Buy HERE on Amazon – Buy HERE on AliExpress

Lekuo is also developing an M.2 to 10G SFP+ adapter, extending the same general idea seen in its M.2 to 10GbE RJ45 products toward fibre based networking. In the transcript, this product is described as a refined version of an existing concept rather than a completely new direction, aimed at compact systems that only have an M.2 slot available for expansion. That makes it relevant for small servers, mini PCs, and embedded platforms where a full PCIe slot is not available but higher speed network connectivity is still required.

The main distinction here is the move from copper 10GbE to SFP+, which allows use of fibre modules or DAC cabling depending on deployment requirements. That gives the adapter a different role from the RJ45 version, particularly in longer distance links or environments already using SFP+ switching infrastructure. Based on your notes, this product is not yet available on the official product page, so the current information is limited to what was shown and discussed during the visit rather than a finalized retail specification sheet.

Lekuo USB4 to 2x PCIe Gen4 x1 Slots Box

Buy HERE on Amazon – Buy HERE on AliExpress

This unreleased Lekuo USB4 expansion box is designed to expose 2x PCIe slots from a single external USB4 connection, using the same basic enclosure approach shown on the company’s 8x 1GbE adapter. In the transcript, the unit is described as a small PCIe dock originally used internally for testing, with the USB4 connection bridging to 2 separate PCIe paths inside the enclosure. The concept is straightforward: rather than delivering fixed networking or storage, it provides a more flexible external PCIe breakout for users who want to install their own cards.

That flexibility is the main point of interest here. The transcript suggests use cases such as network cards, SATA cards, and other compact PCIe devices, with bus power available over USB4 and a barrel power input included for cards that need more power than the host connection can provide on its own. Since this product is not yet listed on the official product page, the available information is still limited and some details remain unconfirmed. The requested naming of this section as a PCIe Gen4 x1 slot box reflects the intended lane configuration you provided, but that specific wording was not fully documented in the supplied official specification text, so it should be treated as based on your product notes.

Lekuo USB4 to 4 HDD and 1x Gen4 M.2 Box

Buy HERE on Amazon – Buy HERE on AliExpress

Lekuo is also preparing a multi drive USB4 enclosure that combines 4 HDD bays with a single PCIe Gen4 M.2 NVMe slot in the same chassis. Based on the transcript, this is a DAS rather than a NAS, so it is intended to provide direct attached storage expansion over USB4 instead of functioning as a self contained network appliance. The inclusion of the M.2 slot adds a layer of flexibility beyond a standard 4 bay enclosure, allowing for SSD caching, a dedicated fast volume, or a separate high speed workspace alongside the hard drive array.

The product is described as relying on software RAID rather than including a hardware RAID controller, and the transcript also notes a dual port TB4 style design for daisy chaining. At the same time, the core concept is clear: this is an external storage enclosure aimed at users who want a mix of larger capacity HDD storage and faster NVMe storage within a single USB4 connected device. As with several of the other products shown during the visit, this unit does not yet appear on the official product page, so the available details should be treated as pre release rather than final retail specifications.

Lekuo USB Expansion PCIe Card

Buy HERE on Amazon – Buy HERE on AliExpress

Lekuo is also developing a PCIe expansion card that combines USB and storage connectivity on a single board, aimed at systems where slot space is limited and adding multiple separate controller cards is not practical. In the transcript, the card is shown with 2x USB Type C ports, 1x USB Type A port, 4x SATA ports, and an integrated 2.5GbE network connection. Rather than focusing on a single function, it is intended as a compact multi purpose expansion card for small form factor systems, embedded builds, or storage focused PCs that still need additional external connectivity.

The card is described as operating over a PCIe Gen4 x1 connection, giving it a total host side bandwidth of 20Gbps to allocate across its various controllers. That does not mean every port can run at maximum speed simultaneously, but it does make the board suitable for mixed duty use where SATA connectivity, modest USB expansion, and basic 2.5GbE networking need to be consolidated into one slot. Based on the material you provided, this product was shown during the visit rather than backed by a full standalone specification sheet, so some lower level details remain unspecified.

Lekuo USB4 to 10G SFP+ Adapter

Buy HERE on Amazon – Buy HERE on AliExpress

Lekuo is also expanding its external 10GbE range with a USB4 to 10G SFP+ adapter, offering an alternative to the more common RJ45 based 10GbE designs already associated with the brand. In the transcript, this model is presented as a silent SFP based version of the company’s existing copper 10GbE adapter, intended for users who want fibre or DAC connectivity instead of 10GBASE T. That makes it more relevant for rackmount environments, structured fibre deployments, and users already working with SFP+ switching infrastructure.

The product appears to share the same broader design language as the other newer USB4 network adapters shown during the visit, including a compact metal enclosure, ventilation at each end, and an external power option. The transcript also notes a physical power button on this family of devices, which is relatively uncommon on compact external network adapters. As this specific single port USB4 to 10G SFP+ model is not included in the supplied formal product specification sheets, the current information is based on what was shown and described in the video rather than a final retail listing.

Who Are IOCREST/Lekuo?

IOCREST and Lekuo are effectively 2 market facing identities used by the same company. Based on the interview material, the business was founded in 2000 and has operated for more than 20 years in adapter, connectivity, and expansion hardware design. IOCREST appears more closely associated with the company’s long standing OEM and B2B activity, while Lekuo is the branding now being pushed more directly toward end users and consumer retail channels.

A key point from the interview is that the company states that most of its products are designed in house, including the internal engineering and development work behind its USB, USB4, M.2, and PCIe based solutions. It also describes its product planning as being driven by practical gaps in the market, particularly in compact systems where users need to add networking, storage, or expansion features that are not available on the base hardware. That helps explain why many of its products focus on niche but increasingly relevant use cases such as M.2 to 10GbE, USB4 to multi port networking, and external PCIe breakout designs.

The other defining part of the company’s position is that much of its historical business has been behind the scenes. In the interview, Lekuo states that before its more recent consumer push, most of its sales were B2B, with products often sold through partners, distributors, or other companies without prominent IOCREST or Lekuo branding on the product listing itself. The current shift appears to be less about changing what it makes and more about putting its own name in front of products that were previously sold in a more anonymous OEM style model.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...COOL M.2 & USB4 ADAPTERS IN 20QNAP 2x 10GbE to USB4 Adapter QNAP 2x 10GbE to USB4 Adapter Week 34 Tech Roundup – UnraiTerramaster D4 SSD USB4 Box ReUniFi USB4/TB4 to 10GbE AdapteUniFi USB4/TB4 to 10GbE AdapteAoostar TB4S-OC Review - USB4 IOCREST M.2 to 10GbE Adapter -The IOCREST M.2 to 10GbE Adapt Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

TP Link BE3600 WiFi 7 Travel Router Review (TL-WR3602BE)

The TP-Link TL-WR3602BE is a Wi-Fi 7 travel router built for situations where you want your own network layer on top of whatever internet you can get at the time, such as hotel Ethernet, public Wi-Fi with a captive portal, or a phone acting as a tether. The basic appeal is practical rather than flashy: it aims to reduce friction when you are carrying multiple devices, sharing a single connection, or switching between different uplinks while keeping the same SSID and settings for your own gear. It is a dual band BE3600 model limited to 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, so it does not add a 6 GHz option, but it does support Wi-Fi 7 features like Multi-Link Operation when paired with compatible clients, which matters more for stability and real-world throughput than headline speeds. On the wired side it pairs a 2.5 Gbps WAN port with a 1 Gbps LAN port, and it can repurpose ports depending on how you set it up, which helps when the “internet source” is not always a standard WAN feed. The USB layout also fits the travel focus: USB-C for power from a wall adapter, laptop, or power bank, plus a USB 3.0 Type-A port that can be used for tethering or basic file sharing from attached storage. VPN support is another key part of the pitch, with WireGuard and OpenVPN available in client and server roles, and a physical button that can be mapped to VPN on and off or other functions, which is useful when you want a quick change without digging through menus. This review looks at what the device actually does in common travel scenarios, including setup flow, captive portal onboarding, mode switching, failover between uplinks, power draw, heat, and the way the web UI and mobile app handle day-to-day control at a price that has moved from its initial launch range down to around the 99 level depending on retailer and promotions.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Quick Conclusion

f you want a travel router that can take hotel Ethernet, public Wi-Fi, or phone tethering and turn it into a single private network for all your devices, the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE largely does that job without much fuss: it is small enough to live in a bag, runs off USB-C power with low wattage draw, stays relatively cool during longer use, and it supports the common travel modes plus VPN features that let you protect traffic across multiple devices from one place, including a physical button you can map to VPN on and off. The wired setup is sensible for travel, with a 2.5 Gbps port plus a 1 Gbps port that can be reassigned depending on how you configure it, and the USB 3.0 port is genuinely useful because it can handle tethering, some USB modem scenarios, or basic file sharing from attached storage. The main downsides are straightforward: there is no 6 GHz band, so you lose the cleanest spectrum option and the widest Wi-Fi 7 channel widths, it has no internal battery so you always need an external power source, and while Multi-Link Operation is supported, it is not “free” on the hardware side and can push CPU and RAM usage higher, which matters if you are stacking MLO with VPN and other features at the same time. The interface and management tools cover most settings people would expect, but the web UI can feel less polished than the mobile app, and switching between operating modes can take a short while to settle. At a street price around the 99 level depending on retailer promotions, it reads as a budget-friendly way into Wi-Fi 7 travel routing with a good set of real-world travel features, as long as you are comfortable with dual-band Wi-Fi 7 and the limits of a USB-powered, small-hardware platform.

SOFTWARE - 7/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

7.6

PROS

Dual-band Wi-Fi 7 (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) with Multi-Link Operation support for compatible clients
Wide set of travel-focused modes: Router, Hotspot (WISP), USB Tethering, USB Modem, Access Point, Range Extender, Client
2.5 Gbps Ethernet plus 1 Gbps Ethernet, with flexible port role assignment depending on setup
USB-C power input makes it easy to run from a wall adapter, laptop, or power bank
Low measured power draw in multi-device use, making portable power practical
Good sustained thermals in longer sessions, helped by extensive chassis ventilation
VPN support in client and server roles, including WireGuard and OpenVPN, with a configurable physical button for quick actions
USB 3.0 port can be used for tethering or basic network file sharing from external storage

CONS

No 6 GHz band, which limits spectrum options and rules out 320 MHz channel operation
No internal battery, so it always depends on an external power source and cable
Higher CPU and RAM load observed with Multi-Link Operation, which can reduce headroom for stacked features
Web interface can feel dated compared with the mobile app, and mode switching may take 30 to 45 seconds
The MLO architecture is currently E-MLSR MLO (Enhanced Multi-Link Single Radio Operation Mode), which lacks the true aggregation of Sync MLMR (Synchronous Multi-Link Multi-Radio) MLO

Buy the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE for $99 on Amazon	Buy the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE for $99 on B&H

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Design and Storage

The TL-WR3602BE is built around a pocketable, rounded plastic shell that is meant to survive being thrown into a bag without snagging on other gear. It is not the smallest travel router in this category, but it stays within the same general footprint and avoids sharp edges, which makes it easier to pack alongside cables, adapters, and power banks. In day-to-day use, it feels closer to a compact accessory than a “mini home router,” which fits the travel intent.

A noticeable design choice is ventilation. In addition to the usual venting on the base, it has venting around the sides and a vented front panel, which is not always present on small travel models. The external chassis is still plastic, but the amount and placement of venting suggests the device is built with sustained operation in mind, not just short sessions in a hotel room.

The overall finish is smooth and practical, with no gloss surfaces that look good on a product page but show scuffs quickly.

The antennas are mounted on either side and fold with up to 180 degrees of articulation, letting you flatten them for packing or angle them for a better signal path when the router is sitting behind a TV or on a desk.

This style of antenna hinge is common on travel routers, but the travel benefit is straightforward: the unit stores flatter, then quickly shifts into a more usable orientation once powered. There is also a physical toggle button on the body, which adds to the “quick control” feel without relying entirely on an app or web UI.

For storage and carry, the main practical detail is that the router has no internal battery, so it always travels with at least a USB-C power source. That slightly changes what “portable” means here: the router is easy to pack, but the full setup is the router plus a short cable and either the included adapter, a laptop port, or a power bank. If you already carry USB-C power for other devices, it fits into that routine cleanly, but it is not a self-contained unit you can pull out and run without accessories.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Ports and Connections

The TL-WR3602BE uses a simple physical layout: 1× 2.5 Gbps Ethernet port, 1× 1 Gbps Ethernet port, 1× USB-C power input, and 1× USB 3.0 Type-A port. The Ethernet ports are labeled WAN and LAN, but the router can be configured so the roles are swapped, and in some setups you can treat both as LAN-facing ports if you want a small wired pocket network. The 2.5 Gbps port is mainly there to avoid bottlenecking faster hotel or office uplinks and to give headroom for local wired transfers, while the 1 Gbps port covers the typical “plug a laptop in” use case. As with any multi-gig device, you only see 2.5 Gbps link rates if the upstream gear, cabling, and the connected device all support it.

The USB 3.0 Type-A port is intended as a multi-purpose expansion point rather than a “nice to have.” It supports USB tethering from a phone, USB modem internet in the supported modem mode, and external storage sharing across the local network. On storage, the router can expose attached drives to other devices using common network file methods such as SMB and FTP, which is enough for basic file drop and backup tasks without needing a separate NAS on the road. The trade-off is that storage performance and feature depth tend to be limited by the router’s processor and memory, and it is not positioned as an app-driven platform where you add services on demand. Compatibility is also a real consideration with USB modems and phone tethering, since support can vary by device and carrier behavior.

Power is delivered only through USB-C and the router has no internal battery, so stability depends on the power source you provide. TP-Link specifies 5V/3A, and in normal terms that means it is designed to run from a decent USB-C wall adapter, a laptop USB port, or a power bank that can hold 5V output without sagging under load. In practical use, its low wattage draw makes it easier to keep running from portable power, but it also means you need to plan around power availability in the environment. If the power source is shared, switched off, or flaky, the router will reboot and you lose the session, which can matter if you are mid-meeting or relying on it to stay logged into a captive portal.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Internal Hardware

Inside the TL-WR3602BE, TP-Link uses a dual-core MediaTek platform (MediaTek 981B) clocked at 1.3 GHz, paired with 512 MB of memory. In plain terms, this is a midrange setup for a travel router: enough to run a full router feature set, basic QoS, VPN, and multi-mode operation without the device feeling underpowered in light to moderate use.

It is not the kind of hardware you see in newer, higher-priced models that use faster quad-core chips, and that difference tends to show up when you stack heavier features at the same time, such as high-throughput VPN, multiple clients, and Wi-Fi 7 Multi-Link Operation. The upside of the more modest platform is that it helps keep power draw down, which matters more on a travel router than it does on a mains-powered home unit.

On the wireless side, it is a dual-band Wi-Fi 7 design offering 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz service, with rated speeds of 688 Mbps on 2.4 GHz and 2882 Mbps on 5 GHz under ideal conditions. It supports Wi-Fi 7 features like Multi-Link Operation, 4K-QAM, and Multi-RU behavior, but real benefit depends on client support because those features require Wi-Fi 7-capable devices to negotiate them. The lack of a 6 GHz radio is a meaningful design constraint because it removes the cleanest spectrum option and the ability to use 320 MHz channels, so the top-end “Wi-Fi 7 showcase” configurations are off the table. In return, the 160 MHz support on 5 GHz still gives it room for high practical throughput in environments that are not too congested, and dual-band keeps the radio design simpler and typically easier on thermals.

The hardware also includes a physical button that can be mapped to functions such as VPN activation, which is a small feature but relevant to how the device is used on the move. Under feature load, the limiting factors tend to be CPU cycles and memory headroom rather than raw link rates. In testing with Multi-Link Operation enabled, the device showed sustained CPU and RAM utilization in the 50% to 60% range with a single MLO client connected over a sustained period, which is a useful indicator that Wi-Fi 7 aggregation is not “free” on the router side. That does not automatically translate into a problem, but it does explain why performance and responsiveness can dip if you combine MLO, VPN, and heavier management features at the same time.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Software, Services & Tests

Management is available through a web-based admin interface and the TP-Link Tether mobile app, with the app generally feeling like the more streamlined option for quick changes. The feature set is closer to what you would expect from a small home router than a minimal travel gadget, including guest networks, client management, IPv4 and IPv6 options, port forwarding and related routing controls, plus basic QoS by device. It also supports multiple working modes, so the same unit can act as a router, access point, range extender, client, hotspot (WISP), USB tethering router, or USB modem router depending on what the environment provides. Remote access through a TP-Link ID is optional, and the core configuration does not depend on subscribing to anything.

For VPN use, the router supports both client and server roles across several protocols, including WireGuard and OpenVPN, and it also lists PPTP and L2TP options. The practical angle here is that you can run a VPN for specific situations without changing settings on every connected device, and the physical button can be used as a quick on-off for VPN rather than hunting through menus. TP-Link’s own performance ratings list WireGuard up to 450 Mbps and OpenVPN up to 350 Mbps, which helps set expectations that encrypted throughput will be lower than a direct connection. In normal use, that means it is suitable for typical travel workloads like browsing, work apps, and streaming, but it is not aimed at sustaining multi-gig speeds through a VPN tunnel.

In basic travel workflow, two timings stood out. From a cold boot, measured from connecting USB power through to a laptop joining the router Wi-Fi and reaching the admin dashboard, the process took 1 minute and 43 seconds. With the router already powered and a laptop already connected to its Wi-Fi, joining a public Wi-Fi network and reaching the captive portal login page took 42 seconds using the built-in connection tools. Put together, that places the “out of the bag to captive portal page” path at a little over 2 minutes and 30 seconds in that scenario, which is relevant because travel routers are often judged by how quickly they become usable rather than by peak throughput claims.

Mode switching was more variable than initial boot. The router tends to retain the last operating mode used, which helps if your routine is consistent, but switching between modes on the fly could require roughly 30 to 45 seconds to reconfigure and settle.

Failover behavior between uplinks was generally quick: in a setup where the router had both a public Wi-Fi uplink and a tethered phone connection available, removing the tethered phone did not drop the active session, and reintroducing tethering was followed by about a 5 second delay before the router picked it back up. The practical takeaway is that dual-uplink travel setups can work without long interruptions, but the device may make its own decisions about which uplink is preferred at a given moment.

Power draw and heat behavior were both measured under a multi-device load. With 3 Wi-Fi 7 clients connected and 2 wired clients connected, observed power use ranged from about 2.84 W to about 4.12 W, which keeps it within easy range for laptop power or a modest power bank. Under Multi-Link Operation, the internal platform showed sustained CPU and memory use around 50% to 60% with 1 MLO client over a 10 minute window, suggesting the feature has a real processing cost even at low client counts.

Thermals stayed controlled over several hours of mixed use, with readings around 32°C on the top, 33°C to 34°C around ports, about 34°C on the side panels, and about 29°C to 30°C on the vented front panel, which aligns with the heavy venting built into the chassis. There is also an eco mode system that lets you shift between boost, balanced, and eco behavior, which is not essential for most users but does provide a manual lever for trading responsiveness for lower power use.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Conclusion and Verdict

The TL-WR3602BE lands as a practical travel router with a modern headline feature set, but it is clearly built around a few deliberate trade-offs. You get Wi-Fi 7 support in a dual-band design, plus the flexibility of multiple operating modes, a usable mix of wired and wireless connectivity, and VPN options that can be controlled without much friction. The constraints are easy to define up front: there is no 6 GHz band, so you are not getting the cleanest spectrum option or the wider 320 MHz channels that some people associate with “full” Wi-Fi 7 setups. It also has no internal battery, so the travel setup always includes a power source, and under Multi-Link Operation the device can show noticeably higher CPU and memory load, which is worth keeping in mind if you plan to run MLO alongside VPN and other services at the same time.

On balance, it comes across as a router that prioritizes travel usability over chasing the highest spec sheet ceiling. The measured behavior supports that, with reasonable boot and captive-portal onboarding times, quick recovery when a tethering source is removed and reintroduced, low wattage draw that fits typical USB power situations, and controlled temperatures during longer sessions. The main “con” side is less about any single flaw and more about expectations: if you are buying specifically for 6 GHz, or you want more processing headroom for heavier, always-on features, this is not the most future-proof option even if it is labeled Wi-Fi 7. At a street price around the 99 level depending on retailer and promotions, it makes sense as a cost-focused way into Wi-Fi 7 travel routing, especially for people who want a consistent personal network when moving between hotels, cafés, and tethering, and who are comfortable with the limits of a dual-band, USB-powered design.

Buy the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE for $99 on Amazon	Buy the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE for $99 on B&H

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet MUDI 7 5G SIM WiFi 7 TGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Travel RouTP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 TraGl.iNet Slate 7 vs Beryl 7 TraGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX TrGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX TrGl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro (GL-BE1000 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Minisforum N5 AIR NAS Review – A Lighter Better Way?

Minisforum entered the NAS market in Summer 2025 with the N5 and N5 Pro, 2 closely related 5 bay systems that stood out for combining a compact desktop form factor with relatively high-end AMD hardware, 10GbE plus 5GbE networking, and less common expansion features such as OCuLink and a PCIe slot. Between the 2, the N5 Pro drew more attention for its Ryzen AI CPU and ECC memory support, while the standard N5 was generally the more accessible option because it retained most of the same chassis design and connectivity at a much lower entry price. That first generation also established the basic identity of the range, namely a compact 5 bay NAS platform aimed more at prosumer and homelab users than at the usual entry-level turnkey NAS audience (albeit, with some bumps along the road in the first wave of devices – more on that in a bit).

The N5 Air now appears to take over that lower tier position in the lineup, sitting beneath the N5 Pro and alongside the higher end N5 Max that Minisforum previewed more recently. In practical terms, the N5 Air does not radically change the formula of the original N5, because it keeps the same Ryzen 7 255 CPU class, the same broad 5 bay plus NVMe storage approach, and the same expansion-minded design philosophy. What it changes is the balance of cost, materials, and positioning. The result is a system that looks intended to preserve the strengths of the original N5 platform while making the entry point slightly lower and the product identity within the range a little clearer.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Quick Conclusion

The Minisforum N5 Air is best viewed as a lower-cost refinement of the original N5 rather than a major new generation. It keeps the same core strengths that made the 2025 N5 notable, including a compact 5 bay design, Ryzen 7 255 CPU, Radeon 780M graphics, 10GbE plus 5GbE networking, 3x internal NVMe slots, OCuLink, and a PCIe x16 physical slot running at PCIe 4.0 x4, which still gives it a broader hardware feature set than many similarly sized NAS systems. The main changes are in positioning and materials, with a lighter plastic-led chassis, a more practical matte finish, and a lower entry price, making it easier to see as the current entry point in the N5 family. Storage flexibility remains one of its strongest points, with 5 SATA bays for bulk capacity and 3 NVMe slots for cache, containers, VMs, or faster working storage, while the slide-out internal design and socketed DDR5 memory up to 96 GB help keep the platform user-serviceable and upgrade-friendly. Performance appears solid for the class, with enough CPU and storage headroom for multi-hundred MB/s file operations, easy saturation of 10GbE from NVMe storage, reasonable idle power draw for an AMD-based NAS, and enough media capability for direct playback and general multimedia duties, even if AMD still lacks the same simple transcoding appeal as Intel in some setups.

The weaker side remains MinisCloud OS, which is functional and includes ZFS snapshots, compression, Docker, remote access, media tools, and mobile apps, but still does not feel as polished or mature as the hardware deserves, making the N5 Air easier to justify as a hardware-first purchase than as a fully rounded turnkey NAS appliance. That distinction matters, because buyers planning to use TrueNAS, Unraid, or another third-party NAS OS will likely find the value proposition much stronger than buyers expecting a highly refined out-of-box software experience. There is also some broader platform context, as early N5 and N5 Pro units drew user discussion online around first-wave storage and controller-related issues on some systems, though later production appeared more stable and there is no basis to treat that as a confirmed N5 Air problem. Overall, the N5 Air is a practical and well-specified NAS platform that retains most of what made the original N5 relevant, and while it is not the most polished turnkey NAS in software terms, it remains a strong option for users who prioritise compact size, flexible storage, multi-gig networking, and expansion over software maturity alone.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 8/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 8/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.2

PROS

5 bay SATA design in a relatively compact desktop footprint, in a space you would normamlly find 4x SATA
3x internal NVMe slots for cache, apps, VMs, or faster storage tiers
10GbE + 5GbE networking included as standard
PCIe x16 physical expansion slot wired at PCIe 4.0 x4
OCuLink support for external PCIe or eGPU expansion
User-upgradeable DDR5 SO-DIMM memory up to 96 GB
Lower entry price than the earlier N5 while keeping most of the same core hardware
Slide-out internal design makes memory and SSD upgrades easier than on many compact NAS systems
 Change in design has resulted in a price drop vs the original N5 Model and noticably cheaper than N5 Pro (2025)

CONS

MinisCloud OS still feels unfinished compared with more established NAS software platforms
Plastic-led chassis may be seen as a downgrade in build feel versus the earlier metal-heavy N5 design
No ECC memory support, unlike the N5 Pro
Included 64 GB OS drive occupies part of the internal SSD footprint

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Design & Storage

At a glance, the N5 Air remains very close to the chassis concept established by the earlier N5 and N5 Pro. It uses the same compact 199 × 202 × 252 mm footprint, the same 5 bay desktop layout, and the same slide-out internal assembly that allows access to memory, NVMe storage, and internal expansion without dismantling the whole enclosure. That layout still makes the system easier to service than many compact NAS designs in this size class, particularly for users who expect to upgrade memory or flash storage after purchase. Minisforum has kept the internal structure largely unchanged, so the Air still feels more like a revision of an existing platform than a ground-up redesign.

The main physical change is in the external construction. Where the earlier N5 and N5 Pro leaned more heavily on a metal outer shell, the N5 Air shifts to a more plastic-heavy chassis and a revised front finish. That change reduces the quoted weight from 5 kg to 4 kg, which is significant in relative terms for a desktop NAS of this size, but it also changes the character of the system.

The original front panel treatment on the N5 generation was prone to showing fingerprints quite easily, so the move to a more matte presentation is arguably more practical. At the same time, the change away from a more metal-heavy enclosure may lead some buyers to question long-term thermals and overall build perception, even if the basic form factor remains the same.

In storage terms, the N5 Air continues to offer 5 SATA drive bays for 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch media, with Minisforum quoting support for up to 30 TB per bay and a total raw HDD capacity of up to 150 TB. Alongside that, it includes 3 internal M.2 NVMe slots, with a claimed ceiling of up to 8 TB per slot, taking total flash capacity to a further 24 TB. As with the earlier N5 platform, the design is clearly intended to separate bulk storage and faster flash tiers in a flexible way, whether that is for caching, containers, VMs, or all-flash working datasets alongside larger HDD pools. The preinstalled 64 GB OS storage also occupies 1 of those internal SSD positions, which remains a practical inclusion for a turnkey setup but does still consume part of the internal flash footprint.

Minisforum continues to position the N5 Air around mixed media deployment and ZFS-oriented storage management, with support listed for RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5 or RAIDZ1, RAID 6 or RAIDZ2, snapshots, and LZ4 compression within MinisCloud OS. The system is therefore being presented less as a fixed-purpose home NAS and more as a compact storage platform that can be adapted for archive storage, media serving, backup tasks, and lighter virtualization.

It is also worth noting, as platform context rather than as a direct criticism of this model, that some early N5 and N5 Pro units drew user complaints online around SATA-side stability and storage behavior under certain workloads, although those reports appeared inconsistent across users and later production units seemed to fare better. That background does not confirm any equivalent issue on the N5 Air, but it remains part of the lineage around this hardware family.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Internal Hardware

The N5 Air is built around the AMD Ryzen 7 255, an 8-core, 16-thread processor with boost up to 4.9 GHz and a stated 45 W to 55 W operating range. In practical terms, this places it in the same compute tier as the original N5 rather than the N5 Pro, which used the more capable Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. That distinction matters because the N5 Air is not trying to move upmarket on raw CPU throughput. Instead, it keeps the same general processing profile as the earlier standard model, which is still relatively strong for a 5 bay NAS in this size class and substantially above the level of entry ARM or Intel N100 based systems.

Graphics are handled by the integrated Radeon 780M, again matching the original N5 and sitting below the Radeon 890M found in the Pro model. For NAS duties, that matters less in terms of display output and more in relation to media handling, accelerated workloads, and light edge compute. Minisforum continues to market the platform around AI-adjacent use cases, Docker deployments, and media serving, but the Air is clearly the more modest version of that vision. It can still support eGPU expansion over OCuLink and accepts a PCIe add-in card internally, so the compute story here is less about the onboard silicon alone and more about the range of hardware paths the system leaves open.

Memory remains user-upgradeable through 2 DDR5 SO-DIMM slots with support for up to 96 GB at 5600 MT/s, but unlike the N5 Pro there is no ECC support listed. That keeps the Air aligned with the original N5 and preserves one of the more important practical differences between the standard and Pro classes. In a market where some newer compact NAS systems are moving toward soldered memory, Minisforum retaining socketed DDR5 remains relevant because it gives buyers flexibility over cost and capacity at the point of purchase and later on. That said, buyers specifically looking for ECC-backed storage integrity or heavier VM density will still view the N5 Pro as the more appropriate tier in the lineup.

From a platform perspective, the N5 Air also appears to keep the same broad internal topology as the earlier N5 generation, including the split NVMe lane arrangement and the dedicated SATA controller architecture behind the 5 drive bays. That continuity is useful for understanding where the Air sits, but it also means some of the discussion around the earlier units still forms part of the background. In particular, some first-wave N5 and N5 Pro users reported online issues around controller behavior, power management, and storage-side stability under certain operating conditions, although those reports did not appear universal and later units seemed to be less affected. For the N5 Air, the important point is not to assume the same fault is present, but to recognise that this is still an evolution of an existing hardware platform rather than a completely new internal design.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Ports and Connections

The N5 Air keeps the same broad external I/O philosophy as the earlier N5 and N5 Pro, which is to say it offers a level of connectivity that is notably more flexible than most compact 5 bay NAS systems in this price bracket. On the rear, it includes 1x 10GbE RJ45 port, 1x 5GbE RJ45 port, 1x OCuLink port, 1x HDMI 2.1 output, 1x USB4 port, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 port, and 1x USB 2.0 port. On the front, there is an additional USB4 port and a further USB 3.2 Gen 2 port. Taken together, that gives the Air a more workstation-like I/O profile than a conventional closed NAS appliance.

Networking remains one of the more important features of the system. The N5 Air uses a 10GbE port based on the Realtek RTL8127 and a 5GbE port based on the Realtek RTL8126. Compared with the earlier N5 and N5 Pro, which paired the 5GbE port with Realtek but often used an AQC113 controller for 10GbE, this means the Air moves to a more consistent dual-Realtek controller setup. Functionally, the headline remains the same, namely that the system can support multi-gig client access well beyond standard 2.5GbE NAS territory, whether for direct workstation links, faster switch uplinks, or more demanding shared file workloads.

The USB4 and OCuLink support continue to define the range more than any of the USB-A ports do. Minisforum still positions the USB4 implementation not just as a display or peripheral connection, but also as part of direct host connectivity and higher speed external workflows. Alongside that, OCuLink remains unusual in a NAS at this level and gives the system a route toward external PCIe-based expansion such as eGPU support or other bandwidth-sensitive devices. Internally, the machine also retains a PCIe x16 physical slot wired at PCIe 4.0 x4, which means the external I/O is only part of the expansion story, not the whole of it.

Video output support is also unchanged in broad terms, with HDMI and USB4 both listed for high resolution display output, including up to 8K at 60 Hz or 4K at 144 Hz. For most NAS buyers this will not be a deciding factor in itself, but it does align with Minisforum’s attempt to present the N5 family as more than simple storage boxes. The Air can be used as a direct-attached media endpoint, a light desktop-style appliance, or a hybrid storage and compute system in ways that many traditional NAS systems do not attempt. Whether that added flexibility is necessary will depend on the deployment, but in terms of raw connectivity the N5 Air remains unusually well equipped for its class.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Noise, Heat, Power Use and Speed Tests

In testing, the N5 Air broadly behaves as expected for a NAS built around the same Ryzen 7 255 platform as the earlier N5. In day to day storage tasks, its behaviour is less defined by the CPU alone and more by the mix of storage media and network configuration being used. With HDD storage in place, the system was able to deliver around 650 MB/s read and roughly 500 to 525 MB/s write in RAID-based testing with 4 Seagate 4 TB drives, which is consistent with a multi-bay SATA array operating below the ceiling of the available 10GbE connection. When the system was tested with SATA SSDs instead, throughput moved closer to 800 MB/s in both directions, showing that the platform itself is not especially constrained at the CPU level in routine NAS workloads.

The internal NVMe storage naturally sits above that level and has little difficulty saturating the 10GbE interface. That is not especially surprising given the lane arrangement already seen in the earlier N5 generation, but it does reinforce the intended role of the 3 M.2 slots inside the Air. Used as fast working storage, cache, or application space, those slots allow the system to do more than simply serve as a 5 bay archive NAS. At the same time, buyers should remain realistic about the PCIe layout, because while the presence of 3 NVMe slots is useful, the available bandwidth is still split across x1, x1, and x2 links rather than full x4 across all slots. For NAS tasks that is generally acceptable, but it remains a design tradeoff rather than a fully unrestricted flash platform.

On acoustics and thermals, the N5 Air appears reasonably controlled. With SATA SSDs used to remove the variable of mechanical drive noise, idle noise was reported at around 35 to 38 dBA, while under higher CPU load and more aggressive fan settings this rose to around 46 to 48 dBA. Those figures place it in a fairly typical range for a compact performance-oriented desktop NAS, though not a silent one. Thermal imaging during testing showed mostly moderate external surface temperatures, generally in the high 20s to high 30s Celsius depending on area, which suggests that the cooling design remains broadly competent despite the move from a more metal-heavy chassis to a lighter plastic-led enclosure. Even so, the long-term thermal behaviour of the plastic revision is something that only extended real-world use will fully answer.

Power draw is one of the more practical areas where the N5 Air remains competitive. With SATA SSDs installed and the system otherwise idle, power use was around 26 to 27 W, rising to around 81 to 83 W under full CPU load. As always, those figures need context because populated HDD bays will raise the baseline by several watts per drive, especially with larger enterprise-class disks. Still, the base system draw is reasonable for this class of AMD-based NAS. In performance terms, media playback also looked acceptable for direct play workloads, with an 8K 60 fps test file reportedly using only around 9 to 11 percent CPU in playback, though transcoding remains a less clear-cut strength on AMD than on current Intel NAS platforms. The practical reading is that the N5 Air has enough performance for file serving, containers, lighter VMs, and media duties, but it is the storage and expansion balance that defines it more than any single benchmark figure.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Miniscloud OS NAS Software

The N5 Air ships with MinisCloud OS preinstalled on the included 64 GB system SSD, continuing Minisforum’s approach of treating the software stack as part of the out-of-box experience rather than expecting every buyer to start immediately with a third-party NAS OS. In practical terms, the platform remains centred on a ZFS-based storage model with built-in snapshots, LZ4 compression, multi-user account separation, remote access features, and container deployment. The interface is available across desktop, mobile, and local system access, and it is clearly intended to present the N5 Air as a turnkey NAS rather than only as bare hardware for TrueNAS, Unraid, or OpenMediaVault users.

In general use, MinisCloud OS appears functional but still not especially mature. Core tasks such as pool creation, snapshot management, file access, user permissions, and backup jobs are present and reasonably straightforward to work through, but the overall design still lacks the consistency seen in more established NAS platforms. Different parts of the interface can feel as though they were developed with different design priorities, and the result is a system that works in broad terms without always feeling cohesive. That does not make it unusable, but it does make it harder to treat the software as a primary buying reason in the same way buyers might with Synology DSM or QNAP QTS.

The feature set itself is relatively broad on paper. MinisCloud OS includes Docker deployment, VM tools, AI-assisted photo indexing, media playback, Time Machine support, remote sharing, and mobile-led backup functions, along with HDMI output management for local media use. Some of these features are more convincing than others.

The mobile application appears more polished and coherent than the desktop client in several areas, and basic backup or file access tasks seem better aligned there. By contrast, some system-level controls still feel incomplete, with examples including missing fan control in software, uneven interface presentation, and gaps around security and broader service maturity that make the platform feel like an actively developing beta rather than a fully settled NAS OS.

That remains the main software conclusion for the N5 Air just as it was for the earlier N5 and N5 Pro. MinisCloud OS is useful as an included baseline and may be enough for buyers who want simple storage, remote access, and a handful of bundled services without much setup effort.

However, it still feels secondary to the hardware rather than central to the value of the product. Most buyers considering this system are likely to be doing so because of the chassis, networking, expansion, and CPU platform first, with the included OS treated as a starting point rather than the final destination.

Minisforum N5 AIR Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The Minisforum N5 Air does not substantially reinvent the N5 formula, but that appears to be a deliberate choice rather than a limitation in itself. In hardware terms, it keeps most of what made the original N5 relevant, including the Ryzen 7 255 platform, 5 bay storage layout, 3 NVMe slots, 10GbE plus 5GbE networking, OCuLink support, and the internal PCIe expansion slot. What has changed is mostly around materials, controller choices, and pricing. The move to a lighter plastic-led chassis and a revised front finish helps separate it physically from the earlier model, while the controller revisions and lower asking price make it easier to position as the more accessible member of the current range. In that sense, the N5 Air is best understood as a practical rework of the standard N5 rather than a major new generation, and for many buyers that may be enough.

That said, the balance of this system depends heavily on what the buyer expects from it. The hardware remains the strongest part of the package, particularly for users who value expandability, multi-gig networking, and a compact chassis that does more than a conventional 5 bay NAS in the same price range. At the same time, the software side still feels less mature than the hardware deserves, and the shift away from the older metal-heavy chassis may not appeal to everyone. Buyers planning to install a third-party NAS OS will likely view the N5 Air as a strong value-oriented platform with relatively few direct alternatives at this size and price. Buyers looking for a polished turnkey NAS with refined software, longer platform maturity, and fewer open questions may take a more cautious view. Overall, the N5 Air is a capable and well-specified NAS platform with a clear use case, but it remains easier to recommend on hardware merits than as a fully rounded appliance.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Minisforum N5 Max - UPDATE & NMinisforum N5 Max - UPDATEMinisforum N5 AIR NAS ReviewMinisforum Reveal the New MiniMinisforum N5 MAX NAS RevealedAoostar WTR Max NAS vs MinisfoMinisforum N5 vs Aoostar WTR MMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewWeek 17 Tech Roundup – Lenov Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UniFi and the Airwire – Did Ubiquiti just SOLVE Everyone’s WiFi MLO Issue?

Ubiquiti has introduced the UniFi AirWire, a WiFi 7 client adapter designed to address one of the more limited areas of current WiFi 7 deployment: the client side. While WiFi 7 access points and routers have been marketed heavily around Multilink Operation, many currently available client devices still rely on single-radio implementations that switch between bands rather than maintaining simultaneous links. The AirWire is positioned as a dedicated external client that aims to deliver true STR MLO operation across 5 GHz and 6 GHz, with Ubiquiti claiming improved throughput, lower latency, and better resilience than conventional integrated client hardware.

At a hardware level, the AirWire is a USB-C connected WiFi 7 adapter with a 4-stream design, support for 5 GHz and 6 GHz 2 x 2 MU-MIMO operation, and a quoted uplink capability of up to 5.8 Gbps on 6 GHz and 4.3 Gbps on 5 GHz. It also adds a high-gain antenna design and a dedicated scanning radio for real-time spectrum analysis. At $199, this places it well above the cost of generic USB wireless adapters, but it is also targeting a more specific role: enabling multi-gigabit wireless client connectivity in environments that already have the access point infrastructure to support it.

You can buy the Airwire via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

UniFi Airwire – Design

The UniFi AirWire has a noticeably different physical design to the compact USB WiFi adapters that are typically associated with desktop or laptop client upgrades. At 117 x 117 x 42.5 mm and 537 g, it is much closer in appearance to a standalone wireless bridge or directional client than a conventional dongle. That larger enclosure is directly tied to its intended function, as Ubiquiti is clearly building around higher power operation, larger antenna structures, and the thermal requirements that come with sustained WiFi 7 activity across multiple radios.

The housing is made of polycarbonate and includes a fold-out top section that appears to be part of the antenna assembly and directional positioning of the unit. This gives the AirWire a more deliberate deployment profile, where placement and orientation are likely to matter more than they would with an internal laptop radio or a low-profile USB adapter. On the front, there is also a 0.96-inch status display, which provides at-a-glance information during setup and operation without needing to rely entirely on software feedback from the host system.

From a practical standpoint, the design reflects that this is not intended to be an invisible add-on for casual wireless use. It is an external client device built to sit on a desk or near a workstation, with a form factor that prioritizes radio performance and signal handling over portability. That makes it less discreet than mainstream client adapters, but it also aligns with the product’s stated purpose as a high-performance WiFi 7 endpoint for users trying to push beyond the limitations of standard integrated wireless hardware.

UniFi Airwire – Internal Hardware

Internally, the UniFi AirWire is built around a dual-band WiFi 7 architecture that focuses entirely on 5 GHz and 6 GHz operation, without any 2.4 GHz support. Ubiquiti rates the device as a 4-stream client, split across 2 x 2 MU-MIMO on 5 GHz and 2 x 2 MU-MIMO on 6 GHz.

This layout is central to its stated role as an STR MLO client, allowing both bands to be active simultaneously rather than relying on the more common single-radio behaviour seen in many current WiFi 7 client devices.

Ubiquiti also specifies a high-gain antenna design, with 11 dBi quoted on both 5 GHz and 6 GHz, which is significantly more aggressive than the antenna arrangements found in most integrated laptop or mobile WiFi hardware. Alongside this, the AirWire includes a dedicated scanning radio for real-time spectral analysis. That separate scanning capability is notable because it suggests the unit is not just focused on link speed, but also on monitoring local RF conditions and interference in parallel with normal client operation.

The trade-off for that hardware approach is power and thermals. Ubiquiti lists maximum power consumption at 18 W, with USB PD 5/9/12V support and separate normal and performance power profiles. In practical terms, that places the AirWire closer to a compact external network appliance than a typical USB wireless adapter. It also helps explain the larger chassis, the need for external power flexibility, and the expectation that sustained performance operation will demand more cooling headroom than a smaller bus-powered client device could realistically provide.

UniFi Airwire – Connectivity

The UniFi AirWire connects to the host system over USB-C, but from a networking perspective it is presented as a 5 GbE interface over USB 3.2 Gen 2. That distinction matters, because although the wireless side of the device is rated far higher in combined theoretical bandwidth, the host connection places an upper practical ceiling on what can be delivered to the attached PC, laptop, or workstation. In effect, the AirWire is designed to behave more like an external multi-gig network adapter than a conventional USB WiFi dongle.

On the wireless side, the AirWire operates on 5 GHz and 6 GHz only, with support for WiFi 7, WiFi 6, WiFi 5, and 802.11n data rates across a wide range of channel widths. Ubiquiti lists support for EHT 20/40/80/160/240/320 MHz, alongside HE, VHT, and HT modes on earlier standards. The maximum quoted link rates are 5.8 Gbps on 6 GHz using 320 MHz bandwidth and 4.3 Gbps on 5 GHz using 240 MHz bandwidth, though actual results will depend heavily on access point capability, spectrum availability, regional channel restrictions, and signal conditions.

Power delivery is also part of the connection design. Ubiquiti specifies USB PD 5/9/12V support, with 15 W in normal mode and 20 W in performance mode, while maximum device power consumption is listed at 18 W. This means that, depending on how the host system is connected and powered, full performance operation may require more than a single low-power USB port can reliably provide. That makes cable quality, port specification, and available USB power budget more relevant here than they would be for standard client adapters.

The AirWire also includes support for wireless meshing and real-time spectral analysis, which extends its connection role beyond basic client access. In a UniFi environment, setup is intended to be handled through UniFi AutoLink for rapid onboarding, reducing the need for separate client-side software installation. Even so, the broader connection experience will still depend on the surrounding infrastructure, particularly whether the connected UniFi access point supports the required WiFi 7 and 6 GHz features needed for the AirWire to operate in the way it is being marketed.

Specification	Details
Product Name	UniFi AirWire
Model	U-AirWire
Price	$199.00
Dimensions	117 x 117 x 42.5 mm
Dimensions (Imperial)	4.6 x 4.6 x 1.7 in
Weight	537 g
Weight (Imperial)	1.2 lb
WiFi Standard	WiFi 7
Spatial Streams	4
Uplink	WiFi
MIMO 6 GHz	2 x 2 (DL/UL MU-MIMO)
MIMO 5 GHz	2 x 2 (DL/UL MU-MIMO)
Max Data Rate 6 GHz	5.8 Gbps (BW320)
Max Data Rate 5 GHz	4.3 Gbps (BW240)
Antenna Gain 6 GHz	11 dBi
Antenna Gain 5 GHz	11 dBi
Max TX Power 6 GHz	20 dBm
Max TX Power 5 GHz	25 dBm
Supported Standards	802.11be, 802.11ax, 802.11ac, 802.11n
802.11be Data Rates	7.3 Mbps to 5.8 Gbps
802.11ax Data Rates	7.3 Mbps to 2.4 Gbps
802.11ac Data Rates	6.5 Mbps to 1.7 Gbps
802.11n Data Rates	6.5 Mbps to 300 Mbps
Wireless Meshing	Yes
Real-Time Spectral Analysis	Yes
Max Power Consumption	18 W
Power Supply	USB PD 5/9/12V, 15 W normal mode, 20 W performance mode
Networking Interface	1 x 5 GbE port (USB 3.2 Gen 2)
Management	USB-C
Enclosure Material	Polycarbonate
Display	0.96 in status display
Channel Bandwidth	HT 20/40, VHT 20/40/80/160, HE 20/40/80/160, EHT 20/40/80/160/240/320 MHz
NDAA Compliant	Yes
Certifications	CE, FCC, IC
Operating Temperature	-10 to 40 °C
Operating Humidity	5 to 95% non-condensing

UniFi Airwire – Verdict?

The UniFi AirWire is a more specialised product than its USB-C connection initially suggests. Rather than serving as a low-cost way to add basic WiFi 7 support to a system, it is designed to address a specific gap in the current client ecosystem: the lack of widely available true multi-radio MLO hardware on the device side. Its value therefore depends less on headline wireless specifications alone and more on whether the surrounding network environment is already capable of taking advantage of simultaneous 5 GHz and 6 GHz operation, wider channel support, and multi-gigabit client throughput.

On that basis, the AirWire appears to be an interesting but clearly targeted piece of hardware. The larger chassis, higher power requirements, directional design, and likely dependency on a strong WiFi 7 6 GHz deployment mean it is not a universal client upgrade for every user. However, for users already invested in UniFi WiFi 7 infrastructure and looking for a higher performance external client than the current mainstream market provides, it introduces a form factor and feature set that are still relatively uncommon. Whether that translates into a meaningful real-world advantage will depend on testing, particularly around sustained throughput, latency behaviour, thermal limits, and the practical impact of STR MLO outside of ideal conditions.

You can buy the Airwire via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShUniFi Dream Machine BEAST - ShNew UniFi Dream Machine BEAST,New UniFi UDM Beast, EnterprisUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 UniFi Airwire - REAL WiFi 7 MUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewUniFi UNAS 4 ReviewIs the UniFi Dream Router Stil Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

The Terramaster F2-425 – Should You Buy This NAS?

The TerraMaster F2-425 takes the same underlying hardware platform as the F4-425 and adapts it to a smaller 2 bay format aimed at simpler home and small office environments. With the same Intel Celeron N5095 processor, 4GB of upgradeable DDR4 memory, and single 2.5GbE connection, it delivers comparable compute capability in a more compact enclosure that prioritizes quiet operation and minimal physical footprint. The appeal of the F2-425 is less about expansion and more about practicality, targeting users who want centralized storage, backups, and media services without managing a larger multi drive system. It fits particularly well in scenarios where space, noise, and cost matter more than raw throughput or long term capacity growth. Rather than competing with higher end 2 bay NAS units that include NVMe caching or faster networking, the F2-425 focuses on providing a straightforward Intel based NAS experience that covers common use cases while leaving room for memory upgrades or alternative operating systems if requirements change later.

SOFTWARE - 8/10

HARDWARE - 6/10

PERFORMANCE - 6/10

PRICE - 10/10

VALUE - 9/10

7.8

PROS

Accessible Entry Into Intel NAS for Smaller Setups in the F2-425
Simplified Capacity Planning for Home Users on the F2-425
Quiet, Consistent Performance in a Compact Chassis of the F2-425
Straightforward Management for Individual and Family Use with the F2-425
Long Term Flexibility Beyond the Default Software of the F2-425

CONS

Network Bandwidth Ceiling Reached Quickly in the F2-425
No SSD Cache or High Speed Tier Options on the F2-425
Limited Headroom for Future Software Demands of the F2-425
Hardware Feature That Adds Little Day to Day Value in the F2-425
Narrow Upgrade Path Compared to Nearby Alternatives of the F2-425

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Amazon in Your Region	Terramaster F2-425 PLUS	B&H NAS Shop

Accessible Entry Into Intel NAS for Smaller Setups in the F2-425

The F2-425 stands out by bringing an Intel x86 platform into the more compact and cost sensitive 2 bay NAS category. Many 2 bay systems at this size and price rely on ARM processors, which can limit software compatibility and long term flexibility. By contrast, the F2-425 provides an Intel based environment that supports a broader range of applications, containers, and services, while remaining relatively affordable for home and small office users. Its value is less about raw performance and more about flexibility, giving users access to an x86 ecosystem without stepping up to more expensive 2 bay models that add NVMe caching or higher speed networking. For buyers who want a simple, compact NAS that can comfortably handle file sharing, backups, and media services, but who also want the option to expand functionality through third party applications or alternative operating systems, the F2-425 offers a balanced and practical entry point.

Simplified Capacity Planning for Home Users on the F2-425

On the F2-425, TRAID plays a slightly different role and aligns more closely with simplicity than scale. In a 2 bay NAS, users are often limited to RAID 1 or single disk configurations, which can make capacity upgrades feel restrictive. TRAID allows the F2-425 to handle mismatched drive sizes more gracefully, reducing the penalty of upgrading one drive at a time. This is particularly useful for home users who may start with smaller disks and later replace them individually rather than investing in a matched pair upfront.

The system abstracts much of the complexity away from the user, making storage expansion more approachable for those who do not want to manually manage RAID levels or rebuild arrays. While the absolute capacity ceiling is lower than on the 4 bay model, the F2-425 benefits from a storage system that prioritizes ease of use and gradual growth rather than strict optimization.

Quiet, Consistent Performance in a Compact Chassis of the F2-425

The F2-425 emphasizes steady and predictable performance rather than raw throughput, which aligns well with its smaller enclosure and typical use cases. With fewer drive bays and a lower likelihood of simultaneous high demand from multiple users, the Intel Celeron N5095 is generally sufficient for file serving, media playback, and routine background tasks. Hardware assisted video decoding allows the system to handle 4K media streaming with reduced CPU load, helping maintain responsiveness even during playback. The smaller chassis and lower overall thermal output also contribute to consistent behavior under everyday workloads, without aggressive fan ramping in most scenarios. For users placing the NAS in a living space or home office, this balance between performance and noise control can be more relevant than peak throughput figures.

Straightforward Management for Individual and Family Use with the F2-425

On the F2-425, the same TOS 6 platform is presented in a context that favors simplicity and accessibility. The interface is largely self contained and can be managed through a browser or the TNAS mobile application, which is useful for users who want basic control without learning advanced system administration. Features such as automated photo backups, shared folders, and user account isolation are easy to configure and align well with typical home usage.

In a smaller NAS, the emphasis is less on complex workflows and more on reliability and ease of access, and TOS 6 supports this by consolidating most tasks into a single interface. For users moving from external drives or cloud storage, the software environment on the F2-425 provides a relatively gentle transition into centralized network storage.

Long Term Flexibility Beyond the Default Software of the F2-425

The F2-425 also benefits from its openness as an x86 based system, which can be especially relevant in a smaller NAS that may change roles over time. While many users will initially deploy it as a simple file server or media box using TOS 6, the ability to switch to a different operating system later allows the hardware to be repurposed rather than replaced. This could include running a lightweight home server, experimenting with container workloads, or using it as a learning platform for NAS and Linux based systems. In a compact 2 bay device, this flexibility helps offset the more limited expansion options by giving the hardware multiple potential use cases across its lifespan. For users who want a small NAS that is not locked into a single software path, the F2-425 offers a degree of freedom that is less common in this size and price range.

Network Bandwidth Ceiling Reached Quickly in the F2-425

On the F2-425, the same single 2.5GbE port presents a different but still relevant constraint. Although a 2 bay NAS is less likely to push extreme throughput compared to a 4 bay system, even a pair of modern hard drives in RAID 0 or during parallel access can approach the limits of a 2.5GbE connection. This reduces the benefit of faster drives and makes performance gains from certain configurations less noticeable in real world use.

For users who plan to use SSDs or who already have a multi gigabit home network, the absence of faster native networking may feel restrictive. As with the F4-425, expansion via USB adapters is possible, but it adds another dependency rather than providing a clean, integrated solution. For a device positioned as an Intel based NAS, the networking capabilities may feel conservative relative to current expectations.

No SSD Cache or High Speed Tier Options on the F2-425

On the F2-425, the lack of NVMe support affects usability in a more subtle but still meaningful way. A 2 bay NAS often benefits from SSD caching to compensate for limited drive count, improving responsiveness during file browsing, small file access, and application use. Without NVMe slots, users are restricted to SATA based storage, and dedicating a drive bay to an SSD for caching or fast storage comes at the cost of usable capacity or redundancy. This reduces flexibility, especially for users who want to mix performance and safety in a compact system. While the F2-425 can still perform well for basic file serving and media playback, it does not offer a clear upgrade path for users who later want faster storage tiers without replacing the system entirely. In this size class, the absence of NVMe support reinforces its role as a straightforward storage appliance rather than a performance tunable platform.

Limited Headroom for Future Software Demands of the F2-425

In the F2-425, the same N5095 processor is generally adequate for its intended use cases, but it still represents a compromise when viewed against newer entry level Intel CPUs. For a compact NAS, the processor is sufficient for file sharing, backups, and media playback, but it offers less margin for expanding into additional services or more demanding applications. As operating systems and third party tools evolve, performance expectations tend to rise, and the older architecture may reach its limits sooner than more recent alternatives. This does not prevent the F2-425 from performing its current role effectively, but it does mean that users planning to grow their usage beyond basic tasks may encounter constraints earlier in the system’s lifespan. The CPU choice reinforces the device’s position as an entry level Intel NAS rather than a long term performance platform.

Hardware Feature That Adds Little Day to Day Value in the F2-425

On the F2-425, the HDMI port has even less practical relevance for most users. Given the device’s smaller size and typical placement in home environments, it is unlikely to be connected directly to a display for regular interaction. As with the larger model, the HDMI output does not provide access to a graphical interface or media center functionality under the default operating system. This limits its usefulness to diagnostics or alternative OS installation scenarios.

For users expecting local playback or direct control via a monitor and keyboard, the presence of HDMI may create expectations that are not met in practice. In everyday use, the port remains largely unused, making it more of a technical inclusion than a functional feature for the target audience.

Narrow Upgrade Path Compared to Nearby Alternatives of the F2-425

The F2-425 faces a similar issue within TerraMaster’s broader range, particularly when compared to other compact Intel based NAS models that include NVMe slots or more efficient processors. While the initial cost is lower, the lack of internal expansion options means users are largely locked into the performance profile they purchase on day 1. For buyers who later decide they want faster storage tiers, improved networking, or more responsive application performance, there is limited scope to evolve the system without replacing it entirely. In this context, the F2-425 works best for clearly defined and stable use cases, but it is less forgiving if requirements change. The presence of more flexible alternatives nearby in the lineup makes this limitation more noticeable when evaluating long term ownership.

Conclusion and Verdict of the F2-425 Review – Should You Buy?

The TerraMaster F2-425 offers a compact and accessible route into Intel based NAS ownership, focusing on everyday storage, backups, and media services rather than advanced performance tuning. Its smaller form factor, quieter operation, and simpler capacity planning align well with home and small office environments where space and ease of use matter more than throughput. The inclusion of TOS 6 and support for alternative operating systems provides flexibility at the software level, helping extend the usefulness of the hardware across different roles over time. However, like its 4 bay counterpart, the F2-425 has clearly defined limits. The lack of NVMe support and faster native networking means there is little room to grow into more demanding workloads, and the aging processor reinforces its position as an entry level Intel NAS. For users with modest, stable requirements, it can serve reliably as a central data hub. For those who anticipate expanding performance needs or experimenting with higher speed storage and networking, nearby alternatives may offer better long term value, even if they come at a higher initial cost.

Amazon in Your Region	Terramaster F2-425 PLUS	B&H NAS Shop

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...TerraMaster D1 SSD Rugged EnclTerramaster D1 SSD (IP67 WaterTerramaster D1 Buyers Guide - Terramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster F2-425 NAS - BeforTerramaster F4-425 NAS - ShoulTerramaster D1 SSD Pro ReleaseTerramaster TOS 7 Public Beta Terramaster Launch the TOS 7 P100 Reasons Why Users Choose T Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

The Lincstation E1 Review

The LincStation E1 is a compact 2-bay NAS from LincPlus aimed at users who want a simple way to move file storage, backups, and basic media access off third-party cloud services and onto local hardware. It is built around an ARM platform and combines 2 x SATA drive bays with 2 x NVMe slots, which gives it a433 storage layout that is more flexible than many entry-level NAS units in this price class. Rather than targeting enthusiasts who want extensive customization from day 1, the E1 is positioned as a ready-to-use system with LincPlus’s own LincOS software, desktop and mobile apps, and a feature set focused on everyday tasks such as file sharing, photo backup, remote access, and media browsing. From a review perspective, the main appeal of the E1 is not that it competes directly with higher-end NAS systems on raw performance or software maturity, but that it tries to offer a broad hardware and feature package at a very low entry cost. The combination of 1GbE networking, dual NVMe support, and a compact chassis makes it an interesting option for first-time NAS buyers, light home users, or anyone looking for a secondary backup device with low power usage. At the same time, its value depends heavily on expectations, especially around software polish and the realities of buying storage media separately, so it is best evaluated as a budget-oriented turnkey NAS with clear strengths and equally clear limitations.

Kickstarter Disclaimer!!! This is NOT traditional retail

At the time of review, the LincStation E1 is positioned as a crowdfunding product rather than a standard retail NAS, which means buyers should treat it differently from an item sold through normal retail channels with established return policies and support expectations. LincPlus is not an unknown brand and has released other NAS and computing products, but crowdfunding still carries delivery, software maturity, and post-launch support risks, so any purchase decision should factor in the reduced consumer protections compared with conventional retail.

Lincstation E1 NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

The LincStation E1 is a low-cost, compact 2-bay NAS that stands out mainly because it combines 2 x SATA bays and 2 x NVMe slots in a small ARM-based enclosure while still aiming to be a turnkey product rather than a DIY project, which makes it an appealing option for first-time NAS buyers or users who want a simple local backup/file server with low power draw and basic private cloud-style features; the hardware package is strong for the price category, the included accessories are unusually complete, and the overall design is practical for light home storage, media access, and phone backup use, but the key caveat is that the software experience (LincOS) is still developing, with the mobile app appearing more mature than the desktop and web interfaces and some expected security and usability features not yet fully in place in the reviewed build, so the E1 makes the most sense if it is judged as a budget-oriented NAS with good hardware value and a work-in-progress software platform rather than a polished replacement for established NAS ecosystems.

SOFTWARE - 5/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 10/10

VALUE - 9/10

7.6

PROS

Very low entry price (crowdfunding positioning) for a turnkey NAS-class device
Compact chassis with a small desktop footprint and low overall weight
Flexible storage layout with 2 x SATA bays + 2 x M.2 NVMe slots
Low-power ARM platform that supports relatively modest power consumption in real use
2.5GbE-class networking referenced in review testing (strong value if confirmed in final retail spec)
Front USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A port for faster external drive imports/backups
Good in-box accessory bundle (cables, screwdriver, screws, thermal pads, PSU)
LincOS includes a broad feature set for entry users (SMB sharing, backups, remote access, media features, mobile app control)

CONS

Software maturity is still a concern, especially desktop and web UI polish
Crowdfunding purchase model adds risk compared with normal retail buying
Single LAN port only, so no link aggregation or failover
Some expected NAS security/admin features were missing or underdeveloped in the reviewed build (for example, 2FA)

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Lincstation E1 NAS Review – Design & Storage

The LincStation E1 uses a compact vertical desktop chassis with a plastic outer shell and a front panel that keeps visible hardware elements to a minimum. At 218.5 x 88 x 140 mm and 907 g, it is physically smaller and lighter than many conventional 2-bay NAS systems, which affects both placement and cooling design. The front panel includes status LEDs for the 2 SATA bays (S1, S2), 2 NVMe slots (M1, M2), network activity/status, and the power button LED, so users can check basic drive and network state at a glance without opening the software interface. There is no front display panel, and the clean exterior design is clearly focused on compactness and low manufacturing complexity rather than service indicators or advanced controls.

The primary storage section is built around 2 top-loading drive trays that support both 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch SATA HDD/SSD media. These trays are accessed from the top of the chassis and use integrated pull handles that sit relatively flush when closed, which helps reduce accidental snagging and keeps the top surface visually tidy. The supplied accessory pack includes mounting screws and a screwdriver, which is relevant here because 2.5-inch drives require screw mounting rather than tool-less insertion. The tray design is simple and functional, but there is no locking mechanism, no front latch key, and no hot-swap enterprise-style caddy system, so the emphasis is clearly on basic home use rather than secure or high-frequency drive replacement.

A secondary storage layer is provided by 2 underside M.2 ports, both supporting M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs. These slots are located under the bottom panel rather than on an internal motherboard tray accessed from the side, which means initial installation is straightforward but drive swaps are less convenient than the top SATA bays. The box contents include 2 thermal pads for SSDs of different thicknesses, which is a notable detail at this price point because it indicates the NVMe area was designed with at least basic thermal contact in mind rather than treating the slots as purely optional expansion. Functionally, these NVMe slots can be used for cache or as storage pools, which gives the system more deployment flexibility than a standard 2-bay HDD-only NAS.

The storage layout is technically more ambitious than many entry-level NAS devices because it combines 2 x SATA bays for bulk capacity with 2 x NVMe slots for faster storage tiers in a very small chassis. Based on the provided CPU/PCIe layout, the system is built around the RK3568 platform with PCIe and SATA resources split across NVMe and SATA connectivity, with the SATA side also involving a JMB575 SATA controller path for the drive bay implementation. In practical terms, this means the E1 is designed to support mixed workloads such as HDD-based backups plus SSD cache, or separate SSD-backed application/media indexing storage alongside larger mechanical drives. This is still a consumer NAS layout, but from a hardware planning perspective it gives more options than a basic ARM 2-bay design that only exposes SATA.

From a mechanical and thermal design perspective, the main compromise is internal space density, especially around the underside NVMe area and the airflow path shared across the enclosure. The chassis uses a single base-mounted fan and passive ventilation openings around multiple sides, with the SATA bays above and the NVMe slots below, so the internal airflow strategy is relatively simple and constrained by the compact dimensions. This approach is consistent with the low-power RK3568 platform and the intended use of 2 local drives plus optional NVMe, but it also means there is limited room for large heatsinks, cable routing, or internal upgrades beyond the defined storage slots. As a result, the E1 offers a technically flexible storage layout for its class, but it remains a tightly integrated, compact NAS design rather than a modular enclosure built for extensive hardware modification.

Lincstation E1 NAS Review – Internal Hardware

The LincStation E1 is built around the Rockchip RK3568, a quad-core ARM SoC (Cortex-A55 class) running at up to 2.0 GHz. This is a low-power embedded platform commonly used in compact network and edge devices, and it is a practical fit for a NAS that prioritizes basic file services, light media tasks, and low idle power over high parallel compute performance. In this system, the RK3568 is paired with 4 GB of embedded DDR4 memory, with no indication of user-upgradeable RAM, which places the E1 firmly in the entry-level category for multitasking and container-heavy workloads.

From an architecture standpoint, the E1’s hardware is more interesting than a typical low-cost 2-bay ARM NAS because it exposes both SATA and NVMe storage within a single compact design. The provided block layout shows the RK3568 distributing PCIe lanes across NVMe connectivity and additional controller paths, while the SATA bays are implemented through a JMB575 SATA controller stage. This matters because the system is not simply attaching 2 SATA drives directly to a minimal embedded board, but instead using a more layered I/O design to support 2 x SATA bays plus 2 x NVMe slots within the limits of the SoC’s available interfaces.

The hardware platform also includes a 1GbE network interface, HDMI 2.1 (TMDS) output, and a mix of USB connectivity, which indicates that the E1 is designed as more than a headless file box even if its primary role is NAS storage. The CPU/PHY layout also reflects the shared nature of resources in compact ARM systems, where PCIe, USB, and SATA connectivity are allocated carefully to balance cost and capability. In practical terms, the hardware specification is broad for the class, but users should still view it as a constrained embedded platform, not as a substitute for x86 NAS hardware with higher throughput ceilings or large virtualization headroom.

At a system design level, the internal hardware choices are clearly optimized around low power draw, compact thermals, and cost efficiency. The RK3568 platform, embedded memory, and compact board-level integration reduce complexity and help keep the device small, while the storage expansion is pushed into the defined SATA and M.2 bays rather than broader internal upgrade options. This makes the E1 a purpose-built appliance with a relatively fixed hardware profile: flexible in storage configuration, but limited in CPU and memory scalability once deployed.

Lincstation E1 NAS Review – Ports and Connections

The LincStation E1 provides a basic but functional I/O layout split across the front and rear panels. On the front, there is 1 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A port, which is the highest-speed external USB connection on the unit and the most practical port for temporary storage imports, external backup drives, or direct file transfers. The front panel also includes the status LEDs for both SATA bays, both NVMe slots, network activity, and the power button with integrated LED, so operational state is visible from the main user-facing side of the device.

On the rear panel, the E1 includes 1 x RJ-45 LAN port, 2 x USB 2.0 Type-A ports, 1 x HDMI 2.1 (TMDS) port, a reset button, and a 12V/5A DC power input jack. The rear USB ports are limited to USB 2.0, which is sufficient for low-speed peripherals or occasional backup devices, but they are not ideal for sustained high-speed external storage workflows. The HDMI output is an important inclusion in specification terms because it expands potential use cases beyond standard NAS access, although the practical value of that port depends on software support and feature maturity.

In networking terms, the hardware specification lists 1 x Gigabit RJ-45, while the review transcript references 1GbE operation during testing and performance discussion, so this is an area where buyers should verify the final shipping specification and campaign listing before purchase. Regardless of the final Ethernet speed, the E1 only provides a single wired LAN port, which means no link aggregation, no failover path, and no dual-NIC network segmentation. The system does, however, also support Wi-Fi connectivity according to the review material, which may help with placement flexibility or initial setup, but wired Ethernet remains the primary connection for NAS use.

Lincstation E1 NAS Review – Software and Services

The LincStation E1 runs LincOS, which is positioned as an integrated NAS platform for file access, backup, remote connectivity, and media services rather than a bare system that requires users to install a third-party OS. Based on the provided feature overview, the core service set includes LincAccess for remote access without manual port forwarding, System Upgrade for background firmware updates, Secure Space for encrypted storage, Local Share over SMB, Backup Disk and Sync Disk for scheduled backup/sync tasks, Remote Download, Smart Album for local photo analysis/tagging, and Video Center for media browsing and playback. On paper, this gives the E1 a broad set of consumer NAS functions, especially for users who want a single interface for files, phone backups, and basic media management.

In practical use, the software experience appears to vary significantly depending on whether the system is accessed via desktop client, web browser, or mobile app. The review transcript describes the desktop client as functional but visually and structurally closer to a mobile-first interface, with some sections feeling sparse or less optimized for larger screens. The mobile application is described as the more mature experience, with better flow for common tasks such as file access, photo backup, service control, and SMB management. By contrast, the browser-based interface is described as much more limited, which is relevant because web UI access remains a standard workflow for many NAS users.

The main issue at the time of review is software maturity rather than feature absence alone. The transcript indicates that newer builds added functions that were missing in earlier testing, which suggests active development, but also confirms that the platform is still evolving and not yet fully polished. Specific concerns raised include weak desktop/web UX consistency, limited clarity in some backup/sync terminology for less experienced users, and missing or underdeveloped areas in security and administration workflows (for example, the absence of 2FA and other standard NAS security tooling in the tested build). As a result, the E1 software stack is best understood as a usable but still developing platform that may improve over time, but should not be evaluated as equivalent in maturity to long-established NAS operating systems.

Lincstation E1 NAS Review – Noise, Temp and Power Performance Tests

Testing in the review focused on real-world NAS usage with 2 x 4TB Seagate IronWolf HDDs installed in the SATA bays and 2 x 1TB NVMe SSDs in the M.2 slots. In this configuration, the unit was used for file transfers, mobile backups, and sustained read/write activity to observe behavior under load rather than synthetic benchmark-only results. The review also notes that the NVMe slots were constrained in practical throughput relative to full higher-lane NVMe operation, with observed expectations around a capped transfer range consistent with the platform and lane allocation.

Acoustically, the measured noise level was reported at around 41 to 43 dB at idle, and remained in a similar 42 to 43 dB range under heavier activity. That indicates a relatively stable acoustic profile during testing, likely due in part to the inability (at the time of recording) to directly tune fan behavior in the software build initially tested. The result is not silent, and the plastic chassis plus compact internal layout may contribute to audible drive and airflow presence, but the unit also did not show a major noise spike during CPU and storage activity in the tested setup.

Thermally, the system was run for about 4 hours under sustained read/write activity, including transfers involving attached USB storage and mobile device backup traffic. Reported external surface temperatures were around 38 to 41°C on the chassis sides, with perforated ventilation areas reaching about 43 to 44°C. The hottest areas were around the underside NVMe region and between the installed drives, which is consistent with the compact internal layout and base-mounted cooling approach. With the 4TB HDDs used in testing, the reported drive temperature was around 51°C during this sustained activity period, while other external port-side areas remained around the low-to-mid 40°C range.

Power consumption results were in line with a low-power ARM NAS platform. With low CPU utilization (below roughly 15%) and drives/SSDs in idle or light activity states, the measured draw was around 12 to 12.2 W. Under heavier use, with CPU utilization above roughly 75% and simultaneous HDD/NVMe read/write activity, reported power draw increased to about 19.4 to 19.7 W. SMB transfer performance over the network was reported at roughly 180 to 200 MB/s on HDD-based access, while NVMe-backed activity was described as saturating the available network path in testing, which is broadly consistent with the stated Ethernet and storage configuration constraints.

Lincstation E1 NAS Review – Conclusion & Verdict

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Lincstation E1 NAS Review - TOBest Cheap NAS of 2025Lincstation N2 NAS ReviewLincstation S1 NAS ReviewLincstation N2 NAS Review - BeLincstation S1 NAS ReviewNew Lincstation S1 and N2 NAS Best Cheap NAS of the YearBest Cheap NAS of the Year - 2Recommended Cheap NAS to Buy i Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UniFi UNAS 4 NAS Review – Simple Safe Storage?

The UniFi UNAS 4 is Ubiquiti’s desktop 4 bay NAS and part of the company’s growing UniFi storage portfolio. Positioned as a compact network storage appliance, it is designed to provide centralized file storage, backups, and shared access within a local network, while also integrating with the wider UniFi management platform. The 4 bay form factor is widely considered a practical starting point for NAS deployments, offering enough capacity for RAID redundancy while maintaining a relatively small physical footprint suitable for offices, home labs, and small business environments. At $379, the UNAS 4 enters the market as a relatively affordable turnkey NAS that includes both hardware and the UniFi Drive software platform. The system combines traditional SATA storage bays with NVMe SSD caching support and 2.5GbE networking, while also introducing PoE+++ power as a deployment option. On paper, the device aims to deliver a straightforward storage solution that focuses on core NAS functionality rather than attempting to compete directly with more feature heavy platforms.

UniFi UNAS 4 Review – Quick Conclusion

TLDR: The UniFi UNAS 4 is a compact $379 4 bay NAS aimed at straightforward file storage and backups, with a clean UniFi oriented deployment that includes PoE+++ power plus data over a single cable and a bundled 90W adapter for non PoE setups. It combines 4 SATA bays with 2 M.2 NVMe slots for SSD caching, simple click and load drive trays, and a small front status display, while UniFi Drive provides the expected NAS services such as SMB and NFS access, RAID options, snapshots, encryption, share links, and multi user management, plus backup support that can include other UNAS targets, SMB destinations, and several cloud providers. The main compromises are the single 2.5GbE port that caps throughput and offers no redundancy, NVMe trays not being included despite the slots being present, and a USB C port that currently functions mostly for basic external storage rather than broader expansion, so it fits best when the goal is uncomplicated storage within a UniFi managed environment rather than a more flexible, performance oriented NAS platform.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 9/10

8.2

PROS

$379 pricing is competitive for a turnkey 4 bay NAS with UniFi Drive included
4 bay 2.5 inch and 3.5 inch SATA support for flexible capacity planning
2 x M.2 NVMe slots for read and write SSD caching
PoE+++ support enables single cable power plus data deployment
90W PoE+++ mains adapter included, so PoE infrastructure is optional
Simple click and load HDD trays with straightforward access for drive installs and swaps
Front 1.47 inch color LCM display provides basic status and activity visibility
UniFi Drive software includes RAID options, snapshots, encryption, share links, and user management

CONS

Single 2.5GbE port limits throughput and provides no network redundancy or aggregation
M.2 NVMe trays not included, adding cost to use SSD caching
USB C port is currently limited in utility beyond basic external storage attachment

You can buy the UniFi UNAS 4 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

UniFi UNAS 4 Review – Design & Storage

The UniFi UNAS 4 uses a compact desktop chassis that differs from the more traditional box shaped NAS designs seen from many competing brands. The enclosure is relatively narrow and deep, giving it a vertical appearance that resembles some earlier consumer NAS designs. The casing itself is constructed from polycarbonate rather than metal, which keeps overall weight down to around 2.6 kg without drives installed. Ventilation is primarily handled through openings along the upper portion of the chassis, with airflow directed toward a rear mounted cooling fan.

At the front of the unit is a small 1.47 inch color LCM display that provides basic system information. This panel is not touch enabled but can show details such as drive activity, network activity, and general system status. It acts primarily as a quick visual reference rather than a full control interface. For most configuration and monitoring tasks, the system is intended to be managed through the UniFi Drive interface via a web browser or mobile application.

The primary storage configuration consists of 4 drive bays supporting either 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch SATA drives. Each drive uses an individual tray that slides into the chassis and clicks into place without requiring screws for 3.5 inch drives. The trays are ventilated and designed for relatively straightforward installation or replacement, although they are not lockable. Compared with earlier UniFi NAS designs that grouped multiple drives into a single tray, the use of separate trays simplifies drive access and improves hot swap usability.

In addition to the main hard drive bays, the system includes 2 M.2 NVMe slots intended for SSD caching. These slots are located in a separate compartment on the base of the device and can be accessed by removing a small cover using the included key. Once installed, these SSDs can be used to provide read and write caching to improve responsiveness when working with frequently accessed data. At the time of writing, these NVMe drives cannot be used as independent storage pools and are limited to caching roles.

One design choice that may affect installation is that the trays required to hold the NVMe SSDs are not included in the retail package. Instead, they must be purchased separately or obtained as part of pre populated SSD modules from Ubiquiti. While the M.2 slots themselves are built into the device, the lack of included trays adds an additional step and cost for users who intend to make use of SSD caching alongside the main hard drive storage.

UniFi UNAS 4 Review – Internal Hardware

Internally, the UniFi UNAS 4 is built around a quad core ARM Cortex A55 processor running at 1.7 GHz. This type of processor is commonly used in embedded networking hardware and lower power storage appliances, where efficiency and reliability are prioritized over raw processing performance. Ubiquiti has extensive experience deploying ARM architectures across its networking and infrastructure products, and the choice here aligns with the system’s intended role as a dedicated storage appliance rather than a general purpose server platform.

The system includes 4 GB of LPDDR4 memory, which is fixed and not user upgradeable. For the core functions the device is designed to handle, such as file transfers, backups, and storage management, this amount of memory is generally sufficient. However, the fixed memory configuration does place a ceiling on how much additional functionality the hardware could realistically support in the future, particularly if the software platform expands with additional services or heavier workloads.

From a power perspective, the system is designed to operate within a relatively modest power envelope. The maximum system power consumption is rated at 90 W, with a maximum drive power budget of 80 W. Power delivery is handled through PoE+++, allowing both data and power to be carried through the same Ethernet connection when used with compatible infrastructure. For deployments without PoE support, the device ships with a 90 W PoE+++ adapter, allowing it to be powered from a standard mains outlet while still maintaining the same connection layout.

UniFi UNAS 4 Review – Ports and Connections

The UniFi UNAS 4 keeps connectivity simple, with a single 2.5GbE RJ45 port handling both network data and PoE+++ power delivery. This allows the unit to be deployed with a single cable when used with compatible switches or injectors, which can reduce cable clutter and simplify placement compared with NAS systems that require separate power and network connections. The port supports 2.5G, 1G, 100M, and 10M link speeds, so it can operate in mixed networks even if 2.5GbE infrastructure is not available.

The main limitation is that there is only 1 network interface, with no secondary port for link aggregation, redundancy, or dedicated management traffic. In practical terms, this reduces options for failover and makes the network connection a single point of dependency. It also places a hard ceiling on throughput, which is relevant on a 4 bay system where aggregate drive performance can exceed what a single 2.5GbE link can sustain in some workloads.

For external expansion, the device includes a 5 Gbps USB C port intended for attaching external storage. In its current form, it functions primarily as a straightforward way to connect a USB drive for basic transfers rather than as a broader expansion interface. The hardware capability suggests potential for wider use cases, but the available functionality is mainly determined by what UniFi Drive supports at the software level.

UniFi UNAS 4 Review – Software and Services

The UNAS 4 runs UniFi Drive and is managed through the same UniFi style web interface used across the wider portfolio, with system status, storage, backups, and user access presented through a single dashboard. For typical NAS use, the core functions are in place: initializing drives, building RAID storage, creating shared and personal drives, enabling file services, and checking drive health information. The interface is mostly structured around completing common tasks quickly and keeping administration consistent with other UniFi products, rather than exposing a long list of granular configuration controls. That approach makes initial setup and day to day management relatively straightforward, but it also means experienced NAS users may notice limits in how far the system can be tuned.

File access is centered on SMB and NFS, with browser based file management available for basic upload, download, and folder navigation. The web file manager covers essential functions and includes share link creation plus thumbnail and preview handling, but it is not designed as a full productivity layer with collaborative editing or advanced file workflow tools. Client access is largely built around standard network shares and UniFi’s account-driven identity layer, and while the system can be deployed locally without relying on a UniFi account, the most integrated remote workflow is clearly designed around UniFi’s own UI and identity services rather than third party remote networking options.

Data protection features cover most of what is expected for a general purpose file NAS. UniFi Drive supports snapshots, encrypted storage, and configurable retention policies, which covers common rollback needs and basic ransomware recovery strategy when paired with sensible scheduling. Backup tooling is one of the stronger areas in terms of scope, supporting tasks to another UniFi NAS, to SMB targets, and to cloud services such as Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, and Wasabi. Time Machine support is also present for macOS environments, and Microsoft 365 backup is part of the broader UniFi Drive direction, even if the overall feature set remains more storage and protection focused than application focused.

The limitations are consistent with the UNAS 4’s role and its hardware profile. There is no iSCSI target support, which restricts certain virtualization, hypervisor, and block storage workflows, and there is no container or VM layer intended for running third party services directly on the device. NVMe support remains limited to SSD caching rather than separate pools, and on the UNAS 4 that caching is also constrained by the single 2.5GbE connection, which can cap how much of the cache benefit is visible over the network in sustained sequential transfers. More broadly, system level configuration remains relatively contained, with fewer advanced networking and scheduling controls than many established NAS platforms provide.

Client side tooling is also still relatively limited compared with ecosystems that offer a more developed sync, selective download, and offline pinning experience across desktop and mobile. UniFi Drive does provide client app support and identity driven access, but the overall workflow remains closer to traditional network share usage than to a full cloud drive style experience. As it stands, the software aligns with the UNAS 4’s positioning as a storage and backup appliance with a clean management layer, rather than a platform intended to replace a more feature dense NAS operating system.

UniFi UNAS 4 Review – Noise, Temp, Temp & Performance

In practical use, performance on the UNAS 4 is largely shaped by its single 2.5GbE connection. With mechanical drives, the system can deliver consistent transfer rates that sit within the expected ceiling of a 2.5GbE link, but it does not have the networking headroom to take full advantage of what a 4 drive array can potentially deliver under sustained sequential workloads. This is most noticeable when using higher capacity 7200 RPM drives, where the combined throughput of multiple disks can exceed the network limit even before SSD caching is factored in.

Testing with mixed file transfers showed typical throughput in the range of roughly 180 to 250 MB/s depending on file type and workload, with higher results generally observed once NVMe caching was enabled. A 50 GB Windows transfer completed at a pace that aligned with these figures, with sustained rates remaining stable rather than spiking briefly and then dropping sharply. The overall behaviour suggests that the device can maintain steady network limited transfers, but it is not designed to chase peak throughput beyond what 2.5GbE allows.

NVMe caching improved responsiveness and helped maintain higher sustained transfer speeds, particularly during repeated reads and writes where the cache could play an active role. However, the caching implementation is limited to acceleration rather than acting as a separate storage tier, and the benefit is workload dependent. Large sequential transfers still remain constrained by the network port, while smaller or more frequently accessed data sees more practical gains from the cache layer.

From an operational standpoint, power draw remained relatively modest for a 4 bay system. A baseline measurement with no drives installed was around 14.1 W. With 4 HDDs and 2 NVMe SSDs installed, idle power use was observed at around 46 W, rising to roughly 50 to 51 W under active read and write workloads with moderate CPU and memory utilization. The relatively small gap between idle and active indicates that drive idle draw forms a significant portion of the total consumption in typical day to day use.

UniFi UNAS 4 Review – Conclusion & Verdict

The UniFi UNAS 4 is a compact 4 bay NAS that prioritizes straightforward storage deployment, particularly for users already running UniFi hardware and UniFi management. Its pricing, PoE+++ support with an included adapter, NVMe caching capability, and generally simple physical drive access make it a practical option for core NAS tasks such as shared folders, backups, and centralized file storage. The hardware choices are consistent with that goal, and the platform is best assessed as a storage appliance rather than a general purpose server. On the software side, UniFi Drive provides the expected baseline services for this category, including SMB and NFS file access, RAID options, snapshots, encrypted storage, share links, and multi user management. Backup support is broader than the basics, with options that can include remote UNAS targets, SMB destinations, and several mainstream cloud services, along with Time Machine support for macOS. Management is clearly aimed at keeping configuration simple through a unified interface, but it also remains more limited than mature NAS platforms in areas such as deeper system tuning, third party remote access alternatives, and broader application style features.

The trade offs are easy to identify. A single 2.5GbE port limits peak throughput and removes options such as link aggregation or network failover, which matters more on a 4 bay system than it would on a smaller unit. The NVMe slots are limited to caching rather than independent pools, and using them adds cost due to trays not being included. Cooling behaviour can become more noticeable if fan speed increases, and the USB C port currently operates mainly as an external drive attachment point rather than a broader expansion interface. Overall, the UNAS 4 makes the most sense when its role is kept narrow, and when UniFi Drive’s storage and backup feature set, alongside UniFi ecosystem integration, is a meaningful part of the purchase decision.

You can buy the UniFi UNAS 4 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Unifydrive PixelMob - A Truly New UniFi Dream Machine BEAST,New UniFi UDM Beast, EnterprisNew QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX New QNAP TS-h666TX, TS-h866TX Zimacube 2 ReviewUGREEN NAS - 2 Years Later - IUGREEN DH4300 PLUS vs UniFi UNUniFi UNAS 4 vs UGREEN DH4300 Lockerstor Gen 2+ NAS Series - Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Gl.iNet Slate 7 vs Beryl 7 Travel Router – Which Should You Buy?

At first glance, the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) and the GL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) appear very closely matched. Both are compact dual band WiFi 7 travel routers, both include dual 2.5GbE ports, USB 3.0 expansion, OpenWrt based firmware, and support for VPN client and server deployment. They are designed for similar use cases such as securing public WiFi in hotels and airports, creating a private subnet for multiple personal devices, or acting as a portable gateway for temporary work setups. On paper, their wireless speed ratings are identical, and their overall feature sets overlap significantly. However, there is a clear price separation, with the Beryl 7 typically retailing at $139.99 and the Slate 7 positioned higher at $169.99. Given how similar they appear in specification tables, this comparison focuses on what justifies that difference, looking beyond headline WiFi 7 support and examining hardware platform choices, memory configuration, interface design, performance ceilings, and overall positioning within the travel router lineup.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router		Gl.iNet Slate 7 Travel Router
Buy From Gl.iNet	Buy From Amazon	Buy From Gl.iNet	Buy From Amazon

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 – Wireless Connectivity

Both the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) and the GL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) are dual band WiFi 7 routers operating across 2.4GHz and 5GHz, with identical rated wireless speeds of 688Mbps on 2.4GHz and 2882Mbps on 5GHz, for a combined 3600Mbps class rating. Neither device includes 6GHz support, which means both are technically WiFi 7 implementations without access to the expanded 6GHz spectrum or 320MHz channel widths. Instead, they focus on delivering WiFi 7 features such as improved OFDMA efficiency, 4K QAM, preamble puncturing, and Multi Link Operation within the existing 2 band framework.

In practical use, this means the wireless experience between the two routers is very similar when connecting modern WiFi 7 client devices. Multi Link Operation allows compatible devices to aggregate traffic across 2.4GHz and 5GHz simultaneously rather than choosing a single band. This can improve stability and reduce latency under load, particularly when multiple devices are active. However, because neither router supports 6GHz, both are limited to 160MHz channels, which caps the theoretical advantage compared to tri band WiFi 7 platforms. For most travel environments where surrounding networks are congested and spectrum is shared, the absence of 6GHz may not be the primary limiting factor.

It is also relevant that WiFi 7 client adoption is still developing, and many connected devices will continue to operate using WiFi 6 or earlier standards. In those cases, both routers fall back to backward compatible modes with similar performance characteristics. Since their radio specifications are aligned and both omit 6GHz, there is no material wireless generation advantage of one over the other. The distinction between these two models therefore lies less in raw WiFi 7 capability and more in the hardware platform and resource allocation that supports that wireless layer.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 – Wired Connectivity

From a wired networking perspective, both the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) and the GL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) are equipped with dual 2.5GbE ports. Each device includes 1 port typically designated as WAN and 1 as LAN, but both allow role reassignment within the software. This means either router can be configured to accept a multi gigabit internet uplink while simultaneously providing a 2.5G wired connection to a local client such as a workstation, NAS, or switch. In contrast to earlier travel routers limited to 1G LAN outputs, both of these models are capable of sustaining multi gigabit throughput on both ingress and egress.

In practical deployment, this gives both devices flexibility in scenarios where internet speeds exceed 1Gbps or where high speed local transfers are required. For example, a user connecting to a fiber service above 1G can feed that into the WAN port and still provide full 2.5G bandwidth to a wired LAN device. This configuration also supports load balancing or failover setups when combined with USB tethering or repeater modes. Since both routers share this dual 2.5G configuration, there is no structural limitation on either side in terms of raw Ethernet throughput.

The differences in wired behavior emerge more subtly in how the internal hardware handles sustained traffic across those ports, rather than in port specification alone. On paper, the Ethernet configuration is effectively matched between the two models. Both remove the earlier compromise seen in WiFi 6 travel routers where users had to choose between multi gigabit WAN or LAN, and both provide the same baseline flexibility for wired high speed connectivity in a compact travel format.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 – Internal Hardware

Although their wireless ratings and Ethernet layouts are nearly identical, the internal hardware platforms of the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) and the GL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) are based on different SoCs with distinct design goals. The Beryl 7 uses a MediaTek quad core processor operating at 2.0 GHz per core, paired with 512 MB of DDR4 memory and 512 MB of NAND flash. The Slate 7 instead uses the Qualcomm IPQ5018 platform, which integrates a quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 CPU running at about 1.0 GHz with additional packet processing and network subsystem features, and pairs that with 1 GB of DDR4 memory and 512 MB of NAND flash.

In real-world router workloads, CPU architecture and memory allocation each play a role. A higher clock speed like that in the Beryl 7 tends to benefit single threaded tasks such as some encryption operations and packet inspection. The Qualcomm IPQ5018’s emphasis on networking, hardware acceleration, and integrated network subsystem may offset its lower clock speed, particularly in tasks like NAT, traffic classification, or other system-level switching operations, and the doubled memory of the Slate 7 provides more space for concurrent services, queuing, and package expansions without immediate memory contention. In practice, the two platforms reflect different design priorities rather than a simple faster/ slower division.

Both devices provide a single USB 3.0 port for data expansion alongside a USB Type-C port for power input, meaning external storage, USB tethering, or a cellular dongle must share the same data port; using one function prevents the simultaneous use of the others. The Slate 7 also includes an integrated touchscreen display that provides real-time status information and direct toggling of features such as VPN or network mode, while the Beryl 7 relies solely on web and mobile app based controls. Internally, the distinction therefore is not just MediaTek versus Qualcomm, but a trade-off between frequency-focused CPU design, expanded system memory, and user interface enhancements.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 – Deployment

When translating specifications into practical deployment behavior, the most measurable difference between the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) and the GL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) appears in VPN throughput. The Beryl 7 is rated at up to 1100Mbps with WireGuard and up to 1000Mbps with OpenVPN DCO in client mode. The Slate 7, powered by the Qualcomm IPQ5018 platform, is rated at up to 490Mbps with WireGuard and up to 385Mbps with OpenVPN DCO. Although the Qualcomm platform is well optimized for routing and packet handling, the higher clock speed MediaTek processor in the Beryl 7 provides substantially more headroom for encrypted throughput. In scenarios where the internet connection exceeds 500Mbps and VPN encryption is permanently enabled, the Beryl 7 is less likely to become the limiting factor.

In raw LAN and WiFi performance, both devices operate within a similar ceiling due to identical wireless radios and dual 2.5GbE ports. Real world file transfers over 2.5GbE typically settle below theoretical maximums, often in the 230MB/s to 240MB/s range depending on workload and protocol overhead. Neither device consistently saturates the full 2.5GbE line rate under mixed routing and wireless conditions, which reflects internal processing overhead rather than port limitation. From a pure switching and routing standpoint without heavy encryption, both platforms are capable of sustaining high multi gigabit traffic within expected travel router boundaries.

Both units are rated to support up to 120 concurrent devices, which exceeds typical travel usage but provides insight into scheduler and resource allocation capacity. The Slate 7’s 1GB memory pool may provide additional stability when multiple OpenWrt services, monitoring tools, DNS filtering, and USB storage sharing are active simultaneously. The Beryl 7, meanwhile, demonstrates a clear advantage when encrypted traffic volume is high relative to available WAN bandwidth. As a result, the performance distinction depends less on wireless speed and more on whether the primary workload is VPN intensive broadband use or service heavy multi feature deployment.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 – Which One Should You Buy?

The GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) and the GL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) are closer in capability than their price difference might initially suggest. Both deliver dual band WiFi 7 across 2.4GHz and 5GHz, both provide dual 2.5GbE ports, both support OpenWrt with extensive plugin flexibility, and both are designed for securing public internet connections while travelling.

From a purely wireless and Ethernet standpoint, they are effectively matched. The practical separation appears in internal resource allocation and user interface design. The Beryl 7, priced at $139.99, offers significantly higher rated VPN throughput and a faster clocked processor, making it better suited to users with high speed broadband connections who intend to run persistent encrypted tunnels. The Slate 7, priced at $169.99, provides double the system memory and integrates a touchscreen interface that allows direct device control without relying entirely on a browser or mobile app.

The decision therefore depends on workload priorities rather than headline WiFi generation. If the primary requirement is maximizing encrypted throughput over fast WAN connections, the Beryl 7 presents stronger performance value at a lower price. If the focus is on memory headroom for multiple services, a more integrated on device interface, and a Qualcomm based networking platform, the Slate 7 may justify its higher cost. Neither device includes 6GHz support, meaning both are dual band WiFi 7 implementations rather than full tri band models.

For users specifically seeking 6GHz spectrum and 320MHz channel capability, a different tier of hardware would be required. Within the compact dual band travel router segment, the distinction between these two models is defined less by WiFi 7 itself and more by how each device balances CPU performance, memory allocation, and interface design within a portable form factor.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router		Gl.iNet Slate 7 Travel Router
Buy From Gl.iNet	Buy From Amazon	Buy From Gl.iNet	Buy From Amazon
PROs	CONs	PROs	CONs
+ Cheaper + Smaller & Lighter + Lower Power Consumption	– Less RAM – Lesser CPU	+ LCD Control Screen + Better Hardware Inside + Better Build Quality	– More Expensive – Larger – Slate Pro Model Coming Soon

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Travel RouGl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Should YouGl.iNet Comet Q USB-C KVM for Gl.iNet Comet 5G Review - The Gl.iNet Slate 7 vs Beryl 7 TraGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX TrGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX TrGl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router Gl.iNet Reveal the Flint 4 WiF Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UniFi Dream Router 7 – ONE YEAR LATER

A lot can change in 12 months with a router, especially one that launched with strong hardware and a lot of software ambition behind it. The UniFi Dream Router 7 (UDR7) arrived in February 2025 at $279 and immediately stood out on paper, but a year later the more useful question is not what it promised at launch, it is what it actually delivers now: is it better, worse, or largely the same after a full year of real-world use and updates? In this 1 year later review, I am looking at that from 3 angles: my own experience of using the UDR7 in a live home setup over the last 12 months, the wider experience of other users in home and business environments, and how Ubiquiti has supported the platform through UniFi OS and router software updates since release. The goal is to move beyond launch-day specs and first impressions and answer the more practical question for anyone considering an upgrade today: in early 2026, is the UniFi Dream Router 7 still worth $279?

My Own 12 Month Experience of the UniFi Dream Router 7

My own experience with the UDR7 over 12 months is slightly different from a short test bench review because this unit stayed deployed in my home for most of that time. After the original review, I kept it and ran it in a real environment rather than treating it as a temporary test device.

It was not my only wireless setup, so there was some unavoidable radio overlap in the house, and I was also running the UDR7 with 4 additional access points placed across different rooms. It was positioned behind a TV rather than in an ideal open location, which is worth stating because that kind of placement can affect both wireless behavior and thermals.

In terms of reliability, my own results were stable across the year. The UDR7 was set to install updates automatically, so it received every update as it arrived, and outside of planned interruptions for filming, firmware reboots, and a reprofile/reset around October for remote access preparation, it remained in service continuously.

Across that period it handled a regular set of around 12 active devices, while interacting with roughly 20 to 25 devices over time.

I did not run UniFi Protect on this unit in my own setup, so my long-term comments are focused on routing, wireless management, and day to day network operation rather than surveillance recording. In that role, it was dependable and I did not encounter recurring crashes or operational failures.

Resource use and thermals were also within a reasonable range for the way I deployed it. Internally, the system generally sat around 61 to 67°C depending on load, with CPU utilization commonly around 20 to 25% and RAM usage often around 40 to 50% when more security features and logging were enabled.

External temperatures were warmer than ambient but not excessive for a compact desktop gateway placed in a less than ideal location: roughly 48 to 49°C on the outer body, around 51°C near the top ventilation strip at peak use, and around 43 to 45°C at the base.

The copper ports remained cooler, while the SFP side ran hotter when used. None of this pointed to a thermal problem in my deployment, but it does reinforce that placement and ventilation still matter.

Traffic volume across the test period also helps frame the result. I put roughly 1.25TB of internet traffic through the unit, with just over 1TB downloaded and around 204GB uploaded, while also testing PoE output with a few APs.

The only PoE limitation I ran into was with a higher draw AP that exceeded what the port is designed to provide, which matched the published power limits rather than indicating a fault.

Taken strictly from my own 1 year usage, the UDR7 did what it was supposed to do at $279 in a mixed home environment with multiple APs, automatic updates, and steady day to day load. My experience was not a stress test of every feature, but as a long-running gateway deployment it remained reliable.

The Community Feedback on the UniFi Dream Router 7 in 1 Year

Looking at wider user feedback over the last 12 months, the most consistent pattern is that early criticism focused less on the hardware itself and more on launch readiness. Across UniFi Community threads, Reddit posts, and ISP forum discussions, many users described the UDR7 as capable hardware paired with software that felt immature in the first weeks and months after release. The phrase “unfinished at launch” appears repeatedly in community discussions, particularly from users who deployed it as a primary gateway rather than a simple single room router.

The most widely reported issue was selective connectivity behavior, especially on PPPoE connections using the RJ45 WAN port. Users reported situations where speed tests looked normal but specific services failed or behaved unreliably, including video calls, social media video loading, live camera feeds, and some VPN apps. Multiple threads also repeated the same temporary workarounds: moving WAN to the SFP+ port or enabling Smart Queues, with users noting the tradeoff in cost, added hardware, or reduced throughput. This issue appears frequently enough across separate threads and forums to be treated as a recurring launch-period problem rather than isolated misconfiguration.

A second recurring theme was inconsistent WiFi behavior in more demanding or more complex deployments. Community reports described unstable wireless performance, intermittent disconnects, poor range relative to expectations, and in some cases daily reboots or loss of connectivity requiring a full restart. Not every report points to the same root cause, and some users specifically tied their issues to WAN mode, AP combinations, or feature settings, but the overall pattern is clear: setups with heavier tuning, multiple APs, or more demanding coverage expectations were more likely to expose weaknesses during the early firmware cycle. Also, there was the expensive testing of ‘REAL’ MLO support by RTINGS last month, where the marketing materials around WiFi 7 routers and the level of currently MLO abilities vs the reality of client and router support.

By early 2026, community sentiment appears more mixed than uniformly negative. The strongest complaints are still easy to find, but there are also repeated updates from users saying behavior improved after firmware updates, manual upgrades, or configuration changes, especially in threads that started during the launch period. The broad shift is not that all criticism disappeared, but that the conversation moved from “basic reliability concerns” toward “specific deployment and tuning limitations,” which is a materially different position for a product that had a rougher first impression for many early adopters.

Changes, Fixes, Improvements on the UDR7 over 1 Year

The clearest difference between the UDR7 at launch and the UDR7 after 12 months is software maturity. Over the March 2025 to February 2026 period, UniFi OS and the router platform received a substantial number of additions, improvements, and fixes that changed the practical experience of using the device. This was not just a case of minor UI clean-up. The update history shows ongoing work across setup flow, backup and restore behavior, WAN resiliency, WiFi stability, VPN reliability, logging, storage handling, and administrative tooling. In simple terms, the software stack was actively developed throughout the year, which supports the wider view that the product improved materially after release.

The additions also indicate that Ubiquiti treated the platform as something to expand, not only stabilize. Over that period, support was added for features such as custom certificates, custom SMTP, packet captures, Hotspot 2.0/PassPoint, IPv6 traffic identification and DNS Shield support, SIEM integration, advanced mDNS options, Alarm Manager, CNAME DNS records, and additional identity and directory integration options. Some of these are more relevant to business or managed environments than typical home users, but they still matter in the context of value because the UDR7 is sold as a UniFi cloud gateway, not just a domestic WiFi router. The result is that 1 year later, the software feature set is broader and more aligned with the hardware’s original positioning.

Just as important are the fixes that directly overlap with common launch-era complaints. These include a specific fix for wireless throughput issues when using PPPoE on the RJ45 WAN port, fixes for MLO and guest portal interaction, WiFi and RF scanning related issues, stability improvements when using MLO, improved 2.4GHz client resiliency, improved minimum RSSI stability, and a long list of VPN, routing, and policy-based routing fixes. There were also repeated improvements to backup/restore resiliency, web UI stability, speed test stability, and hardware offloading. Taken together, this update history does not prove every user issue is resolved in every deployment, but it does show a sustained effort to address exactly the types of faults and inconsistencies that shaped the early reputation of the UDR7.

Is the UniFi Dream Router Better, Worse or the Same Value at $279 1 Year Later? (Verdict)

1 year on, the UniFi Dream Router 7 is easier to recommend than it was at launch, but for a different reason than the original review. The core hardware value proposition remains largely the same: at $279, it still offers an unusual combination of WiFi 7, multi-gig copper, 10G SFP+, 1 PoE output, UniFi application support, and a compact all-in-1 gateway design that many competing devices at this price either do not match or only match in narrower areas. What changed over the last 12 months is the software side. Early concerns around stability, selective connectivity, and inconsistent behavior in more demanding deployments were significant enough to affect the product’s reputation, and that criticism was not unreasonable. However, the volume and direction of updates over the year indicate that Ubiquiti has spent that time closing the gap between what the hardware promised and what the software delivered in practice.

The most accurate verdict in early 2026 is that the UDR7 is not a fundamentally different product than it was in February 2025, but it is a more complete one. In straightforward home and small business use, especially where the buyer wants a UniFi-managed gateway with room to scale, it now presents a stronger case than it did for early adopters. At the same time, buyers with more complex AP layouts, aggressive tuning requirements, or very specific expectations around WiFi 7 MLO behavior should still approach it with realistic expectations and pay attention to current firmware state and client compatibility. On balance, based on the hardware, the year of software support, my own long-term deployment experience, and the broader community trajectory, the UDR7 remains a valid purchase at $279 in 2026.

What I originally said about the UniFi Dream Router 7 in my Feb 2025 Review:

As appealing as the UniFi router and network software that this system is bundled with are, the main praise I have to give the UDR 7 is that everyone is going to feel the benefits of this router in their network at this price point. The small compromises it has compared to the previous UDR system (such as fewer PoE ports) are immediately outweighed by its versatility, which would be hard to find at a better price elsewhere. The fact that all LAN ports are 2.5G and that the two WAN/LAN ports are 2.5G and 10G SFP+ respectively puts this router massively ahead of most competitors in the sub-$300 market. Equally, support for the UniFi Protect surveillance software and the included WD Purple SD card storage are nice extras that you don’t commonly find elsewhere—let alone the inclusion of a PoE 2.5G port. The router and network management software is, of course, quintessentially UniFi in its presentation. Striking a balance between usability and information is a tough challenge, and the UniFi software almost succeeds. It excels in its presentation and management via the mobile app, though the desktop UI could be a touch more intuitive. How could you make wireless and wired network management truly user-friendly?

That said, the UDR 7 is a genuinely WiFi 7-ready router, offering 2×2 6GHz coverage and taking advantage of all the frequency and bandwidth benefits afforded to true WiFi 7 6GHz clients. Add a simple $20 USB WiFi 7 adapter to your system, and you can immediately enjoy base-level 2.8Gbps wireless connectivity, scaling this up substantially with the right WiFi 7 wireless NICs. Even if you’re not in love with the UniFi software platform or handing management of your services over to Ubiquiti’s remote services, you can still set up the device without a UI.com account. You do not need to deploy it with UniFi Network equipment, and VPN and encrypted protocol services can still be managed via popular third-party options if preferred. Buying a router for your home or business instead of relying on the one supplied by your ISP can often feel like an unnecessary expense. However, considering the price point and the network advantages the UDR 7 provides, I believe this system is worth it. Some of its services might require additional polish over time, and greater network capabilities on this router will be realized as technology progresses, but I wholeheartedly recommend the UDR 7 for the majority of setups.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 8/10

VALUE - 9/10

9.0

PROS

WiFi 7 Support – Offers Genuine 6GHz connectivity with 320MHz channels, enabling faster speeds and lower latency.
Multi-Gig Networking – Includes three 2.5GbE LAN ports and a 10GbE SFP+ WAN/LAN port, making it highly future-proof.
Comprehensive UniFi Software – Provides robust network management features, including VLANs, QoS, IDS/IPS security, and VPN support.
Integrated UniFi Protect Support – Comes with a pre-installed 64GB WD Purple SD card, allowing local video storage for security cameras.
Flexible WAN/LAN Configurations – Supports dual WAN for failover or load balancing, or repurposing the 10GbE SFP+ port as LAN.
High Customization & Security – Offers advanced firewall controls, application-aware filtering, and in-depth traffic analytics.
User-Friendly Mobile App – Easy setup and management via the UniFi mobile app, with intuitive controls and real-time monitoring.
No UI.com Account Required – Can be set up locally without requiring an online UniFi account, providing more control over network privacy.

CONS

Limited PoE Support – Only includes one PoE-enabled 2.5GbE port, which may be a drawback for users looking to power multiple UniFi cameras or access points.
6GHz Band Availability Varies by Region – While WiFi 7 delivers significant improvements, the 6GHz spectrum and 320MHz channels may not be fully available in all areas, limiting real-world performance.
Not the Most Budget-Friendly Option – Although competitively priced for a WiFi 7 router, there are still more cost-effective alternatives on the market, especially for users who don’t need UniFi’s ecosystem.
The MLO architecture is currently E-MLSR MLO (Enhanced Multi-Link Single Radio Operation Mode), which lacks the true aggregation of Sync MLMR (Synchronous Multi-Link Multi-Radio) MLO

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Gl.iNet Slate 7 Pro Travel RouUniFi Dream Router 7 - ONE YEATP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouTP Link TL-WR3602BE Travel RouGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Slate 7 TraGl.iNet Slate 7 vs Beryl 7 TraGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX TrGl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX TrGl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Asustor AS6704T v2 Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ NAS Hardware Review, Worth Your Data?

Asustor has always sat slightly off to one side of the mainstream NAS conversation. It does not chase the same marketing angles as the bigger names, but it has consistently tried to combine features that other brands often keep separated by model tier. The Lockerstor series is a good example of that approach, mixing prosumer hardware touches such as a metal chassis, HDMI output and multiple SSD bays with a fairly traditional four bay NAS layout. The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is not a clean-slate redesign. Instead, it is a mid-range refresh of the existing Lockerstor 4 Gen2, built on the same underlying platform. The CPU remains the Intel Celeron N5095, memory starts at 4 GB of DDR4, the four internal M.2 NVMe slots are unchanged, and the chassis and physical layout are effectively identical. The meaningful update in this revision is networking, with the Gen2+ moving from dual 2.5GbE ports to dual 5GbE. That change is intended to raise the usable network headroom for single users and small teams, particularly where SSD caching or multiple clients are involved, without forcing buyers straight into 10GbE. At the same time, the broader market has moved on since the original Gen2 launched. 2.5GbE is now common at this price point, and the N5095, while still stable and capable, is no longer the standout CPU it was in 2022 and 2023, with newer low power Intel platforms offering better efficiency and raw performance. Taken as a whole, the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is best viewed as a targeted update designed to keep the existing Lockerstor platform relevant for longer. It does not attempt to redefine what a mid-range four bay NAS should be, but instead focuses on addressing network performance as storage media and workflows continue to push beyond the limits of 2.5GbE.

Asustor AS6704T v2 Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ NAS Review, Quick Conclusion

The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is a competent and largely familiar system. From a hardware perspective, it remains solid, well built and flexible, with few outright weaknesses in isolation. The metal chassis, internal expandability and feature set still compare well against many competing four bay NAS systems. However, this revision does not materially change the overall character or capability of the platform beyond networking. The move from dual 2.5GbE to dual 5GbE is the defining update. For users who already have compatible network infrastructure, or who are working close to the limits of 2.5GbE with multiple clients, SSD caching or larger hard drives, this upgrade does provide tangible benefits. For others, particularly those still on gigabit or mixed networks, the improvement may be largely theoretical in day to day use. At the same time, the unchanged use of the Intel Celeron N5095 is more noticeable now than it was at the original Gen2 launch. While it remains stable and well supported, it no longer stands out in a market where newer low power Intel CPUs offer better efficiency and performance at similar price points. Combined with pricing that now faces stronger competition, the Gen2+ feels more like a stopgap refresh than a forward looking update. Overall, the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is a capable NAS that makes sense primarily for users who value its physical design, internal expandability and Asustor’s flexible hardware policy, and who can take advantage of 5GbE networking today. It is less compelling as a general upgrade for existing Gen2 owners, or as a default recommendation in a crowded mid-range market.

SOFTWARE - 6/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 6/10

VALUE - 7/10

6.6

PROS

Dual 5GbE networking provides higher aggregate and single client throughput than 2.5GbE when supported by the surrounding network
Four internal M.2 NVMe slots allow SSD caching, SSD storage pools, or mixed configurations without sacrificing SATA bays
Solid metal chassis and metal drive trays provide durability and assist passive heat dissipation
HDMI output with Asustor Portal enables direct media playback, VM interaction and local management without a client PC
Supports both EXT4 and Btrfs, including snapshot functionality for basic data protection and recovery
PCIe expansion slot allows future upgrade to 10GbE, extending the usable lifespan of the system
Flexible storage configuration, including use of NVMe drives as independent storage pools rather than cache only
Hardware warranty remains valid when installing third party NAS operating systems, supporting advanced and DIY users

CONS

Intel Celeron N5095 is now dated relative to newer low power CPUs available at similar price points (eg N100, N150, N355, etc) right now
ADM software is stable but lacks the depth, automation and flagship features found on some competing platforms
PCIe slot is shared between NVMe carrier and expansion cards, forcing a choice without a compatible combo card
Pricing faces stronger competition in 2026, reducing its appeal as a default mid range NAS option

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Amazon in Your Region	B&H NAS Shop

Asustor AS6704T v2 Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ NAS Review, Design

The physical design of the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is effectively unchanged from the earlier Gen2 model. Asustor has retained the same chassis, dimensions and layout, making this revision visually indistinguishable from its predecessor. This is a deliberate choice rather than an oversight, and it reflects Asustor’s preference for continuity in this product line.

The enclosure is almost entirely metal, including the outer shell and the individual drive trays. This gives the unit a robust, industrial feel and contributes to passive heat dissipation. It also differentiates the Lockerstor from many competing four bay NAS systems that rely more heavily on plastic for cost and noise reduction. The trade-off remains increased vibration and audible resonance when using higher capacity, faster spinning hard drives.

On the front of the unit, the Lockerstor retains its LCD display, a feature that has largely disappeared from this segment. The display provides system status information such as IP addresses, temperature readings and alert notifications. Beyond basic monitoring, it can also be used for initial system setup, allowing the NAS to be configured without a connected computer. While this will not replace web based administration for ongoing management, it remains useful for rapid deployment and troubleshooting, particularly when network access is limited.

Status LEDs are present alongside the display and drive bays, offering basic activity indicators. These are functional but secondary to the information provided by the LCD panel. A front mounted USB port with a dedicated copy button is also retained. This supports both manual and automatic backup tasks and has been upgraded in earlier Gen2 models to USB 3.2 Gen 2, allowing higher speed transfers to and from external storage devices.

The drive trays themselves are metal, ventilated and feature a locking mechanism. They support both 3.5 inch and 2.5 inch SATA drives and allow hot swapping where the configuration permits. The tray design prioritizes rigidity and airflow over acoustic dampening, which again reinforces the Lockerstor’s server-like character rather than a living room friendly one.

Ventilation is handled through a combination of tray perforation, side vents and a large rear mounted cooling fan. There have been minor adjustments over successive revisions to improve airflow around the M.2 area, but the overall cooling approach remains conservative and tuned for reliability rather than silence.

In summary, the design of the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ will appeal to users who value durability, serviceability and physical controls. It does not attempt to modernize its appearance or reduce its footprint, and buyers sensitive to noise or aesthetics should be aware of the compromises that come with this design philosophy.

Asustor AS6704T v2 Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ NAS Review, Ports and Connections

The rear connectivity of the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ closely resembles that of the earlier Gen2 model, with one important exception. The dual 2.5GbE ports have been replaced with dual 5GbE Ethernet, which represents the core purpose of this refresh. Everything else in the port layout remains largely the same, reinforcing that this is a targeted update rather than a rework of the platform.

The two 5GbE ports support standard Ethernet features including link aggregation and SMB Multichannel. In practical terms, this allows higher aggregate throughput when multiple clients are accessing the NAS simultaneously, or improved single client performance in supported environments. Asustor positions this as offering near 10GbE class performance without the cost or infrastructure demands of full 10GbE. In reality, the benefits depend heavily on the surrounding network hardware, client support and workload type. Users without compatible switches or clients will see little immediate advantage over 2.5GbE.

Alongside the Ethernet ports, the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ retains its HDMI output. This is used with Asustor Portal, a parallel interface that allows direct interaction with media playback, virtual machines and containerized applications when the NAS is connected to a display. Unlike some competing implementations, this HDMI output is actively supported, though it remains a secondary interface compared to the browser based ADM environment. Two rear USB ports provide USB 3.2 Gen 2 connectivity for high speed external storage, adapters and peripherals.

A PCIe expansion slot is also present and remains an important part of the Lockerstor design. In the Gen2+ series, this slot is described as no longer proprietary, allowing broader compatibility with third party 10GbE network cards. This adds flexibility for users who expect to outgrow 5GbE in the future, although it still requires choosing between PCIe expansion and the preinstalled M.2 carrier board.

The combination of four SATA bays, four internal NVMe slots and dual 5GbE networking provides sufficient internal and external bandwidth for many small office and creative workloads. However, it is worth noting that modern hard drives and NVMe SSDs can quickly approach or exceed the limits of a single 5GbE connection. In environments where sustained maximum throughput is a priority, the optional move to 10GbE may still be the more appropriate long term choice.

Overall, the port selection on the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is well rounded and flexible. The addition of dual 5GbE meaningfully updates the networking capability of the system, but it does not fundamentally change how the device integrates into a network compared to the earlier Gen2.

Asustor AS6704T v2 Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ NAS Review, Internal Hardware

Internally, the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is almost identical to the earlier Gen2 model. Asustor has not revised the core platform, and the internal layout, controller architecture and expansion approach remain the same. This consistency simplifies evaluation, but it also makes the age of some components more apparent in the current market.

The system is powered by the Intel Celeron N5095, a quad core processor based on Intel’s Jasper Lake architecture. At launch, this CPU was widely adopted in mid range NAS systems due to its balance of power consumption, integrated graphics and general purpose performance. It operates at a 2.0 GHz base frequency with burst speeds up to 2.9 GHz. In 2026 terms, the N5095 is no longer a standout choice. Newer low power Intel CPUs offer improved efficiency and stronger CPU side performance at similar price points, particularly for non media workloads.

The presence of integrated graphics remains relevant for hardware assisted video transcoding and HDMI based output, and the N5095 continues to handle typical NAS tasks, light virtualization and container workloads without issue. However, users planning heavier multi VM deployments or CPU intensive services may find the platform limiting compared to more recent alternatives.

Memory configuration starts at 4 GB of DDR4 2933 MHz SODIMM memory and can be expanded up to 16 GB. This is sufficient for most file serving, backup and multimedia tasks, and provides some headroom for virtualization and containers. ECC memory is not supported, which is worth noting given the pricing and the comparison to some competing systems in this segment.

One of the defining features of the Lockerstor platform remains the inclusion of four M.2 NVMe SSD slots. These support 2280 form factor drives and operate over PCIe Gen3. The slots can be used for SSD caching, dedicated storage pools, or a mixture of both, offering flexibility that is not universally available in this class. The practical throughput per slot is lower than modern x4 NVMe drives can deliver, but still significantly higher than SATA SSDs and more than sufficient for caching and high IOPS workloads. The NVMe slots are mounted on a dedicated PCIe carrier board that occupies the system’s expansion slot. This design choice means users must choose between using the four M.2 slots and installing a PCIe network card, unless a compatible combination card is used. While workable, it remains a compromise that should be considered when planning long term upgrades.

Overall, the internal hardware of the Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ remains capable and flexible, but it is clearly rooted in an earlier generation of mid range NAS design. The networking upgrade extends its usefulness, but it does not address the broader shifts in CPU and platform expectations that have emerged since the original Gen2 release.

Asustor AS6704T v2 Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ NAS Review, Software

The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ ships with the latest version of Asustor Data Master, commonly referred to as ADM. Functionally, the software experience is the same as on the earlier Gen2 models, with no Gen2+ specific changes or features introduced as part of this refresh. Any improvements are the result of ongoing platform updates rather than hardware driven differentiation.

ADM presents a desktop style interface accessed through a web browser, with windowed applications, user accounts and a traditional file manager. It is straightforward to navigate and generally stable in operation. Performance on the N5095 platform is consistent and predictable, with no major responsiveness issues during typical file serving, backup or media management tasks.

Asustor continues to support both EXT4 and Btrfs file systems. Btrfs brings snapshot support and data versioning for shared folders and iSCSI volumes, while EXT4 remains available for users who prefer a simpler, lower overhead file system. Snapshot Center integrates with Btrfs to provide scheduled and manual snapshots, offering basic protection against accidental deletion or ransomware scenarios.

The application ecosystem in ADM remains broad but uneven. Core first party applications for storage management, backups, media indexing and basic virtualization are present and generally reliable. However, a number of advanced functions rely heavily on third party software. Virtualization, for example, is still built around VirtualBox rather than a native hypervisor. Container support is provided through Docker and Portainer, which is flexible but assumes a degree of user familiarity.

Multimedia support is one of ADM’s stronger areas. Applications such as LooksGood, Photo Gallery and SoundsGood provide local media management and streaming, and hardware assisted video transcoding is available through the Intel integrated graphics. HDMI output via Asustor Portal runs in parallel to ADM and allows direct playback and interaction with selected applications. While this remains more fully featured than some competing HDMI implementations, it is clearly secondary to the browser based interface and receives fewer updates.

Backup and synchronization tools are comprehensive in scope. ADM supports local and remote backups via rsync, USB devices, NAS to NAS replication and a wide range of public cloud services. DataSync Center and Cloud Backup Center consolidate many of these functions into centralized tools, though configuration can feel fragmented compared to more tightly integrated platforms.

Security features have expanded steadily since earlier releases. ADM includes a firewall, automatic IP blocking, antivirus scanning through ClamAV, two step verification and encryption options for shared folders and MyArchive volumes. These features provide a reasonable baseline for small business and advanced home users, though they rely on manual configuration rather than automated policy driven protection.

Overall, the ADM software platform is stable, functional and capable of supporting a wide range of use cases. It does not stand out for innovation or advanced automation, and it lacks some of the higher level, tightly integrated services offered by competitors. For users seeking a dependable and flexible NAS operating system that prioritizes core functionality over novelty, ADM remains adequate. For those placing heavy emphasis on software features and ecosystem depth, it may feel comparatively restrained.

Asustor AS6704T v2 Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ NAS Review, Conclusion

The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ is best understood as a maintenance refresh rather than a new generation. Asustor has taken an existing and well established platform and updated it in one specific area, network connectivity, to better align with how storage performance and workloads have evolved since the original Gen2 launch. Outside of that change, the system remains fundamentally the same device. The move to dual 5GbE does meaningfully extend the usable lifespan of the Lockerstor 4 design for users who are already constrained by 2.5GbE, particularly in multi user environments or setups that make effective use of SSD caching and faster hard drives. For those users, the Gen2+ offers a tangible improvement without the immediate cost or complexity of moving to 10GbE. For others, especially those still on gigabit or mixed networks, the practical benefit may be limited.

At the same time, the unchanged internal platform is harder to ignore in 2026. The Intel Celeron N5095 remains stable and compatible with a wide range of workloads, but it no longer compares as favourably against newer low power CPUs now appearing in similarly priced systems. Combined with increased competition across this segment, the value proposition of the Gen2+ is narrower than it was when the original Gen2 launched. The Lockerstor 4 Gen2+ will appeal most to buyers who value its physical build quality, internal expandability, flexible storage configuration and Asustor’s relatively open hardware stance, including third party OS support. It is less compelling as an upgrade for existing Gen2 owners, and it is not a clear default choice in the current mid range NAS market unless its specific strengths align with the intended use case. In short, the Gen2+ succeeds in keeping the Lockerstor platform relevant for longer, but it does not redefine it.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

NOTIFY ME

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen 2+ NAWeek 48 Tech Roundup – myQNAAsustor Black Friday DealsAsustor Gen5 Lockerstor R Pro Asustor Gen5 Lockerstor R Pro Week 18 Tech Roundup – WD & The Asustor Lockerstor Gen 3 NThe Asustor Lockerstor Gen 3 NAsustor Lockerstor 4 Gen 3 NASAsustor Lockerstor 4 Gen 3 NAS Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

 

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE