Is Synology Moving Away From Routers?

Synology is still best known for NAS hardware, DSM, backup software, private cloud storage, surveillance, and business data management, but its router range has always been an interesting side branch of the wider ecosystem and one that I have genuinely enjoyed reviewing. Products such as the RT2600ac, MR2200ac, WRX560 and RT6600ax appealed to users who liked the Synology software experience and wanted a router interface that felt closer to DSM than the usual consumer router web panel. SRM, or Synology Router Manager, gave users features such as Safe Access, Threat Prevention, VPN tools, mesh support, VLANs, firewall controls and relatively clean network management. For a while, that made Synology routers a sensible option for home users, families, home offices and smaller businesses that wanted more control without stepping fully into UniFi, MikroTik, pfSense or enterprise networking territory. However, with rising competitive options from UniFi that also raise the bar for hardware/software expectations AND troubling performance/stability reports appearing online by users, multiple times I have been asked by users “are Synology giving up on routers?”.

If it were just my own idle thoughts on the subject, I would not have made this article, but recently there has been a spate of posts online (several linked below) on this subject that range from references to unconfirmed conversations with Synology saying the router range is canned, to deeper discussions online about the performance of SRM (Synology router Manager) on the modestly powered current range of routers the brand offers:

Recent Synology Reddit Posts for Example: Some questions about switching to a Synology router – HERE Synology WRX560 — 75-day formal complaint, RAM deficit confirmed by Synology’s own data. Full timeline, evidence, and statutory route taken – HERE Synology Router family? – HERE Synology Exiting Router Market… Now What – HERE

In 2026, the question being asked by parts of the Synology community is whether the router range still has a meaningful future. This does not come from an official Synology statement saying the range is discontinued (and I can confirm that no-one at Synology has ever stated this to me – though the amount of Synology router hardware at tech events has diminished rapidly and stock levels outside of their official stores seems patchy). The concern is instead based on what users are seeing around the product line: older hardware, no WiFi 7 model, limited visible roadmap, and mesh products that feel increasingly dated compared with newer alternatives. Synology still publicly lists the RT6600ax and WRX560, and both remain WiFi 6/6e products rather than WiFi 7 replacements. The RT6600ax is listed as a tri-band WiFi 6 router with a 2.5GbE port, while the WRX560 is listed as a dual-band WiFi 6 router with a configurable 2.5GbE WAN/LAN port. It does seem oddly quiet when you consider the extent of availability of WiFi 7 routers in the market right now.

Why Users Are Asking Questions About the Router Roadmap

The recent discussion on Reddit shows the problem clearly: users are not only asking whether Synology routers are still good today, but whether buying into the range now is sensible if there is no obvious next step. One user asked directly whether Synology is “sunsetting” its router family, pointing out that the RT6600ax is from 2022, that the MR2200ac mesh extender has become hard to find in some places, and that there has been no public sign of WiFi 7 hardware. That is the core issue. A router can continue to work well for existing owners, but new buyers are usually looking for some confidence that the platform will still be developed over the next few years.

The discussion is also not entirely one-sided. Some users are still happy with Synology routers, especially those who value the firewall tools, Threat Prevention, Safe Access, VPN features and the familiar SRM interface. One user in the same Reddit discussion said their RT6600ax and older RT2600ac wired mesh setup had been “100% stable” with more than 50 devices, which shows that not every owner is unhappy or affected by the same problems. Others, however, are already recommending UniFi, MikroTik, Firewalla, ASUS or other alternatives, not always because Synology routers have stopped working, but because the range feels static. This is an important distinction for the article: the community concern is real, but it is still a mixture of user experience, market comparison and speculation rather than a confirmed end-of-life announcement.

Hardware Age, WiFi 7 and the Competitive Gap

The larger market has moved quickly since the RT6600ax and WRX560 arrived. WiFi 7 routers and access points are now widely available from several consumer and prosumer brands, and multi-gig networking is becoming more common in home and small business internet connections. That puts Synology in a slightly awkward position. The RT6600ax does include a 2.5GbE port, and the WRX560 also has a configurable 2.5GbE WAN/LAN port, but neither product provides the broader WiFi 7 and multi-gig direction that buyers may expect in 2026. For users with 1Gb internet and modest LAN needs, this may not matter much. For users with faster fibre, 2.5GbE switches, 10GbE NAS systems, or WiFi 7 client devices, it becomes much harder to justify investing in older WiFi 6 router hardware unless the price or software experience is especially compelling.

This is where Synology’s router range starts to look more exposed than its NAS range. In NAS, Synology can still lean heavily on DSM, Synology Drive, Hyper Backup, Active Backup, Surveillance Station, Snapshot Replication and long-term software familiarity. In routers, SRM is still a strength, but the hardware competition is more aggressive and refresh cycles matter more visibly. UniFi, ASUS, TP-Link, Netgear and others are fighting hard around WiFi 7, 2.5GbE, 10GbE, mesh, gateway appliances and app-based management. Synology does not need to match every one of those brands feature-for-feature, but the absence of any announced WiFi 7 router or updated mesh range makes the product family feel less active. That is not the same as proof of abandonment, but for buyers spending money today, perception matters.

SRM Support, Security Features and Reported WRX560 Problems

The software side is more complicated. Synology has not simply stopped updating SRM. Its official SRM release notes show SRM 1.3.2-9366 in 2026, and Synology’s Download Center for the RT6600ax still lists SRM 1.3 Series for the product. That matters, because it means “abandoned” would be too strong as a factual description. There is a big difference between a product line that is no longer moving quickly and a product line that has stopped receiving maintenance. Synology also still markets router features such as parental controls, web filtering, traffic control, threat prevention, VPN tools and network segmentation on current product pages.

At the same time, several user reports raise questions about whether the hardware resources in some Synology routers are enough for the full SRM feature set under real-world conditions. One detailed Reddit post from a WRX560 owner claimed that 2 WRX560 routers became unstable when running Safe Access and Threat Prevention, with diagnostic evidence pointing to RAM exhaustion and swap usage rather than CPU saturation. The post claims that CPU idle remained high, while available RAM dropped heavily and swap use increased, causing network instability and local device dropouts. The same user also stated that Synology Support confirmed there was no confirmed firmware fix or patch available to fully resolve the described behaviour, and that the suggested remedy was to disable marketed security features or reduce the number of connected devices. This remains a user report, not an independent lab test, but it is detailed enough that it should not simply be dismissed as a vague complaint.

No Official Discontinuation, But Confidence Is Clearly Being Tested

The strongest counterpoint is that there is still no public Synology announcement saying the router family has been retired. In fact, one Reddit thread discussing the topic was removed by moderators, with comments asking for proof and warning against unsupported claims. Several users in the discussion specifically asked where Synology had officially announced an exit from routers, and others pointed out that no such announcement had been found. That is why the wording here matters. It is fair to say that Synology’s router roadmap looks unclear. It is fair to say that users are questioning the future of the range. It is fair to say that the lack of WiFi 7 hardware is becoming harder to ignore. But it would not be fair to state that Synology has officially discontinued routers unless Synology confirms it.

There is also the SRM life cycle angle. Synology’s Software Life Cycle Policy lists SRM 1.3 as having reached general availability in April 2022, with the End of Maintenance Phase listed as December 2026 and the End of Extended Life Phase still “to be announced.” This does not automatically mean SRM is ending, because policies can be extended and new SRM versions can appear. However, in the absence of new router hardware or a clearly communicated SRM 1.4 direction, it adds to the uncertainty. For existing owners, this means the practical advice is not to panic if the router is stable and still receiving updates. For new buyers, the calculation is different. Buying into a router ecosystem is not just about whether the current product works today, but whether the platform looks active enough to support future devices, faster internet connections, newer WiFi standards and ongoing security expectations.

Overall, Synology’s router range appears to be in a holding pattern rather than an officially abandoned state. Existing RT6600ax, WRX560, RT2600ac and MR2200ac owners may still have stable, useful systems, especially if they are not pushing the routers hard with advanced traffic inspection and larger mesh environments. But for new buyers in 2026, the case is less comfortable than it used to be. The lack of WiFi 7 hardware, no clear public roadmap, ageing mesh options, user complaints around advanced SRM features, and stronger competition from UniFi, ASUS, MikroTik, Firewalla and others all make Synology networking harder to recommend without caveats. Until Synology either releases new router hardware or clearly explains where SRM and its router ecosystem are going next, the question is not whether Synology routers still work, but whether the company is still treating routers as an active long-term product line.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

TP Link BE3600 WiFi 7 Travel Router Review (TL-WR3602BE)

The TP-Link TL-WR3602BE is a Wi-Fi 7 travel router built for situations where you want your own network layer on top of whatever internet you can get at the time, such as hotel Ethernet, public Wi-Fi with a captive portal, or a phone acting as a tether. The basic appeal is practical rather than flashy: it aims to reduce friction when you are carrying multiple devices, sharing a single connection, or switching between different uplinks while keeping the same SSID and settings for your own gear. It is a dual band BE3600 model limited to 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, so it does not add a 6 GHz option, but it does support Wi-Fi 7 features like Multi-Link Operation when paired with compatible clients, which matters more for stability and real-world throughput than headline speeds. On the wired side it pairs a 2.5 Gbps WAN port with a 1 Gbps LAN port, and it can repurpose ports depending on how you set it up, which helps when the “internet source” is not always a standard WAN feed. The USB layout also fits the travel focus: USB-C for power from a wall adapter, laptop, or power bank, plus a USB 3.0 Type-A port that can be used for tethering or basic file sharing from attached storage. VPN support is another key part of the pitch, with WireGuard and OpenVPN available in client and server roles, and a physical button that can be mapped to VPN on and off or other functions, which is useful when you want a quick change without digging through menus. This review looks at what the device actually does in common travel scenarios, including setup flow, captive portal onboarding, mode switching, failover between uplinks, power draw, heat, and the way the web UI and mobile app handle day-to-day control at a price that has moved from its initial launch range down to around the 99 level depending on retailer and promotions.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Quick Conclusion

f you want a travel router that can take hotel Ethernet, public Wi-Fi, or phone tethering and turn it into a single private network for all your devices, the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE largely does that job without much fuss: it is small enough to live in a bag, runs off USB-C power with low wattage draw, stays relatively cool during longer use, and it supports the common travel modes plus VPN features that let you protect traffic across multiple devices from one place, including a physical button you can map to VPN on and off. The wired setup is sensible for travel, with a 2.5 Gbps port plus a 1 Gbps port that can be reassigned depending on how you configure it, and the USB 3.0 port is genuinely useful because it can handle tethering, some USB modem scenarios, or basic file sharing from attached storage. The main downsides are straightforward: there is no 6 GHz band, so you lose the cleanest spectrum option and the widest Wi-Fi 7 channel widths, it has no internal battery so you always need an external power source, and while Multi-Link Operation is supported, it is not “free” on the hardware side and can push CPU and RAM usage higher, which matters if you are stacking MLO with VPN and other features at the same time. The interface and management tools cover most settings people would expect, but the web UI can feel less polished than the mobile app, and switching between operating modes can take a short while to settle. At a street price around the 99 level depending on retailer promotions, it reads as a budget-friendly way into Wi-Fi 7 travel routing with a good set of real-world travel features, as long as you are comfortable with dual-band Wi-Fi 7 and the limits of a USB-powered, small-hardware platform.

Buy the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE for $99 on Amazon	Buy the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE for $99 on B&H

---

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Design and Storage

The TL-WR3602BE is built around a pocketable, rounded plastic shell that is meant to survive being thrown into a bag without snagging on other gear. It is not the smallest travel router in this category, but it stays within the same general footprint and avoids sharp edges, which makes it easier to pack alongside cables, adapters, and power banks. In day-to-day use, it feels closer to a compact accessory than a “mini home router,” which fits the travel intent.

A noticeable design choice is ventilation. In addition to the usual venting on the base, it has venting around the sides and a vented front panel, which is not always present on small travel models. The external chassis is still plastic, but the amount and placement of venting suggests the device is built with sustained operation in mind, not just short sessions in a hotel room.

The overall finish is smooth and practical, with no gloss surfaces that look good on a product page but show scuffs quickly.

The antennas are mounted on either side and fold with up to 180 degrees of articulation, letting you flatten them for packing or angle them for a better signal path when the router is sitting behind a TV or on a desk.

This style of antenna hinge is common on travel routers, but the travel benefit is straightforward: the unit stores flatter, then quickly shifts into a more usable orientation once powered. There is also a physical toggle button on the body, which adds to the “quick control” feel without relying entirely on an app or web UI.

For storage and carry, the main practical detail is that the router has no internal battery, so it always travels with at least a USB-C power source. That slightly changes what “portable” means here: the router is easy to pack, but the full setup is the router plus a short cable and either the included adapter, a laptop port, or a power bank. If you already carry USB-C power for other devices, it fits into that routine cleanly, but it is not a self-contained unit you can pull out and run without accessories.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Ports and Connections

The TL-WR3602BE uses a simple physical layout: 1× 2.5 Gbps Ethernet port, 1× 1 Gbps Ethernet port, 1× USB-C power input, and 1× USB 3.0 Type-A port. The Ethernet ports are labeled WAN and LAN, but the router can be configured so the roles are swapped, and in some setups you can treat both as LAN-facing ports if you want a small wired pocket network. The 2.5 Gbps port is mainly there to avoid bottlenecking faster hotel or office uplinks and to give headroom for local wired transfers, while the 1 Gbps port covers the typical “plug a laptop in” use case. As with any multi-gig device, you only see 2.5 Gbps link rates if the upstream gear, cabling, and the connected device all support it.

The USB 3.0 Type-A port is intended as a multi-purpose expansion point rather than a “nice to have.” It supports USB tethering from a phone, USB modem internet in the supported modem mode, and external storage sharing across the local network. On storage, the router can expose attached drives to other devices using common network file methods such as SMB and FTP, which is enough for basic file drop and backup tasks without needing a separate NAS on the road. The trade-off is that storage performance and feature depth tend to be limited by the router’s processor and memory, and it is not positioned as an app-driven platform where you add services on demand. Compatibility is also a real consideration with USB modems and phone tethering, since support can vary by device and carrier behavior.

Power is delivered only through USB-C and the router has no internal battery, so stability depends on the power source you provide. TP-Link specifies 5V/3A, and in normal terms that means it is designed to run from a decent USB-C wall adapter, a laptop USB port, or a power bank that can hold 5V output without sagging under load. In practical use, its low wattage draw makes it easier to keep running from portable power, but it also means you need to plan around power availability in the environment. If the power source is shared, switched off, or flaky, the router will reboot and you lose the session, which can matter if you are mid-meeting or relying on it to stay logged into a captive portal.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Internal Hardware

Inside the TL-WR3602BE, TP-Link uses a dual-core MediaTek platform (MediaTek 981B) clocked at 1.3 GHz, paired with 512 MB of memory. In plain terms, this is a midrange setup for a travel router: enough to run a full router feature set, basic QoS, VPN, and multi-mode operation without the device feeling underpowered in light to moderate use.

It is not the kind of hardware you see in newer, higher-priced models that use faster quad-core chips, and that difference tends to show up when you stack heavier features at the same time, such as high-throughput VPN, multiple clients, and Wi-Fi 7 Multi-Link Operation. The upside of the more modest platform is that it helps keep power draw down, which matters more on a travel router than it does on a mains-powered home unit.

On the wireless side, it is a dual-band Wi-Fi 7 design offering 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz service, with rated speeds of 688 Mbps on 2.4 GHz and 2882 Mbps on 5 GHz under ideal conditions. It supports Wi-Fi 7 features like Multi-Link Operation, 4K-QAM, and Multi-RU behavior, but real benefit depends on client support because those features require Wi-Fi 7-capable devices to negotiate them. The lack of a 6 GHz radio is a meaningful design constraint because it removes the cleanest spectrum option and the ability to use 320 MHz channels, so the top-end “Wi-Fi 7 showcase” configurations are off the table. In return, the 160 MHz support on 5 GHz still gives it room for high practical throughput in environments that are not too congested, and dual-band keeps the radio design simpler and typically easier on thermals.

The hardware also includes a physical button that can be mapped to functions such as VPN activation, which is a small feature but relevant to how the device is used on the move. Under feature load, the limiting factors tend to be CPU cycles and memory headroom rather than raw link rates. In testing with Multi-Link Operation enabled, the device showed sustained CPU and RAM utilization in the 50% to 60% range with a single MLO client connected over a sustained period, which is a useful indicator that Wi-Fi 7 aggregation is not “free” on the router side. That does not automatically translate into a problem, but it does explain why performance and responsiveness can dip if you combine MLO, VPN, and heavier management features at the same time.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Software, Services & Tests

Management is available through a web-based admin interface and the TP-Link Tether mobile app, with the app generally feeling like the more streamlined option for quick changes. The feature set is closer to what you would expect from a small home router than a minimal travel gadget, including guest networks, client management, IPv4 and IPv6 options, port forwarding and related routing controls, plus basic QoS by device. It also supports multiple working modes, so the same unit can act as a router, access point, range extender, client, hotspot (WISP), USB tethering router, or USB modem router depending on what the environment provides. Remote access through a TP-Link ID is optional, and the core configuration does not depend on subscribing to anything.

For VPN use, the router supports both client and server roles across several protocols, including WireGuard and OpenVPN, and it also lists PPTP and L2TP options. The practical angle here is that you can run a VPN for specific situations without changing settings on every connected device, and the physical button can be used as a quick on-off for VPN rather than hunting through menus. TP-Link’s own performance ratings list WireGuard up to 450 Mbps and OpenVPN up to 350 Mbps, which helps set expectations that encrypted throughput will be lower than a direct connection. In normal use, that means it is suitable for typical travel workloads like browsing, work apps, and streaming, but it is not aimed at sustaining multi-gig speeds through a VPN tunnel.

In basic travel workflow, two timings stood out. From a cold boot, measured from connecting USB power through to a laptop joining the router Wi-Fi and reaching the admin dashboard, the process took 1 minute and 43 seconds. With the router already powered and a laptop already connected to its Wi-Fi, joining a public Wi-Fi network and reaching the captive portal login page took 42 seconds using the built-in connection tools. Put together, that places the “out of the bag to captive portal page” path at a little over 2 minutes and 30 seconds in that scenario, which is relevant because travel routers are often judged by how quickly they become usable rather than by peak throughput claims.

Mode switching was more variable than initial boot. The router tends to retain the last operating mode used, which helps if your routine is consistent, but switching between modes on the fly could require roughly 30 to 45 seconds to reconfigure and settle.

Failover behavior between uplinks was generally quick: in a setup where the router had both a public Wi-Fi uplink and a tethered phone connection available, removing the tethered phone did not drop the active session, and reintroducing tethering was followed by about a 5 second delay before the router picked it back up. The practical takeaway is that dual-uplink travel setups can work without long interruptions, but the device may make its own decisions about which uplink is preferred at a given moment.

Power draw and heat behavior were both measured under a multi-device load. With 3 Wi-Fi 7 clients connected and 2 wired clients connected, observed power use ranged from about 2.84 W to about 4.12 W, which keeps it within easy range for laptop power or a modest power bank. Under Multi-Link Operation, the internal platform showed sustained CPU and memory use around 50% to 60% with 1 MLO client over a 10 minute window, suggesting the feature has a real processing cost even at low client counts.

Thermals stayed controlled over several hours of mixed use, with readings around 32°C on the top, 33°C to 34°C around ports, about 34°C on the side panels, and about 29°C to 30°C on the vented front panel, which aligns with the heavy venting built into the chassis. There is also an eco mode system that lets you shift between boost, balanced, and eco behavior, which is not essential for most users but does provide a manual lever for trading responsiveness for lower power use.

TP Link BE3600 Router Review – Conclusion and Verdict

The TL-WR3602BE lands as a practical travel router with a modern headline feature set, but it is clearly built around a few deliberate trade-offs. You get Wi-Fi 7 support in a dual-band design, plus the flexibility of multiple operating modes, a usable mix of wired and wireless connectivity, and VPN options that can be controlled without much friction. The constraints are easy to define up front: there is no 6 GHz band, so you are not getting the cleanest spectrum option or the wider 320 MHz channels that some people associate with “full” Wi-Fi 7 setups. It also has no internal battery, so the travel setup always includes a power source, and under Multi-Link Operation the device can show noticeably higher CPU and memory load, which is worth keeping in mind if you plan to run MLO alongside VPN and other services at the same time.

On balance, it comes across as a router that prioritizes travel usability over chasing the highest spec sheet ceiling. The measured behavior supports that, with reasonable boot and captive-portal onboarding times, quick recovery when a tethering source is removed and reintroduced, low wattage draw that fits typical USB power situations, and controlled temperatures during longer sessions. The main “con” side is less about any single flaw and more about expectations: if you are buying specifically for 6 GHz, or you want more processing headroom for heavier, always-on features, this is not the most future-proof option even if it is labeled Wi-Fi 7. At a street price around the 99 level depending on retailer and promotions, it makes sense as a cost-focused way into Wi-Fi 7 travel routing, especially for people who want a consistent personal network when moving between hotels, cafés, and tethering, and who are comfortable with the limits of a dual-band, USB-powered design.

Buy the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE for $99 on Amazon	Buy the TP-Link TL-WR3602BE for $99 on B&H

PROs of the TP-Link BE3600 Travel Router

CONs of the TP-Link BE3600 Travel Router

Dual-band Wi-Fi 7 (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) with Multi-Link Operation support for compatible clients Wide set of travel-focused modes: Router, Hotspot (WISP), USB Tethering, USB Modem, Access Point, Range Extender, Client 2.5 Gbps Ethernet plus 1 Gbps Ethernet, with flexible port role assignment depending on setup USB-C power input makes it easy to run from a wall adapter, laptop, or power bank Low measured power draw in multi-device use, making portable power practical Good sustained thermals in longer sessions, helped by extensive chassis ventilation VPN support in client and server roles, including WireGuard and OpenVPN, with a configurable physical button for quick actions USB 3.0 port can be used for tethering or basic network file sharing from external storage

No 6 GHz band, which limits spectrum options and rules out 320 MHz channel operation No internal battery, so it always depends on an external power source and cable Higher CPU and RAM load observed with Multi-Link Operation, which can reduce headroom for stacked features Web interface can feel dated compared with the mobile app, and mode switching may take 30 to 45 seconds

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE