Gl.iNet Comet 5G Review – The ULTIMATE ALL-ACCESS KVM?

The GL.iNet Comet 5G is a remote KVM built to provide keyboard, video, and mouse control of a connected computer from power on through BIOS, rather than relying on a working operating system like traditional remote desktop tools. It accepts HDMI input from the host and offers HDMI passthrough so a local display can remain connected, with support up to 4K at 30 fps or 1080p at 60 fps, plus 2 way audio. Connectivity is where the Comet 5G differentiates itself most clearly in this product line: it can be managed over Gigabit Ethernet and Wi-Fi 6, but it also includes a nano SIM slot for 5G RedCap with 4G LTE fallback, intended for out of band access when the site network is down, segmented, or simply not trusted. It also supports a local AP mode that broadcasts its own wireless network for nearby management sessions without joining the surrounding LAN. In day to day use, the device is mainly aimed at remote maintenance tasks such as OS installs, recovery and imaging, BIOS changes, and support work on machines that lack built in management like iDRAC or iLO. Compared with the Comet Pro, it keeps the same general platform and interface approach, but adds the cellular path, the AP mode, a larger 3.69 in touchscreen, and 64 GB of eMMC storage for ISO and file staging. The key questions for a review are less about raw compute, since the core platform is similar to the Comet Pro, and more about whether the extra connectivity options, storage capacity, and on device usability justify its higher price for the way it will actually be deployed.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Quick Conclusion

The GL.iNet Comet 5G is essentially the Comet Pro style KVM experience with a stronger connectivity toolkit rather than a major jump in raw performance: you still get reliable BIOS level access, HDMI passthrough so a local screen can stay connected, and flexible access from a browser across different operating systems, but the main reason to choose it is the extra ways it can be reached when the local network is unavailable or not trusted. The nano SIM support (5G RedCap with 4G LTE fallback) gives an out of band route that can keep access available even when Ethernet or Wi-Fi are misconfigured, and the AP mode adds a direct nearby connection for quick point to point management without joining the site LAN, which can be genuinely useful in field work, segmented networks, or recovery situations. It also doubles the internal storage to 64 GB, which makes it easier to keep several ISO images and tools ready to mount remotely, and the larger 3.69 in touchscreen makes local setup and status checks less cramped. The trade offs are mostly about expectations: storage speeds remain modest, so uploading and copying large files is not fast; USB based storage expansion exists but is limited by USB 2.0, can require reboots, and drive compatibility is not always consistent; and while the device supports multiple paths and is marketed around failover, the current interface does not expose deep, router style controls for tuning how those paths behave. If you mostly run KVM over a stable wired or Wi-Fi network, the Comet Pro will usually cover the same core tasks for less money, but if you want a small KVM that gives you more options to regain access when networks are awkward or failing, the Comet 5G is the more complete tool as long as you accept the storage and configuration limitations.

Buy the Gl.iNet KVM 5G from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Comet KVM ($219) from the Official Store Below:

---

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Design & Storage

The Comet 5G follows the same general design language as the Comet Pro, but it is physically larger and more deployment focused. It measures 128 × 93 × 33 mm and weighs 285 g, which makes it more of a bag sized tool than something that disappears behind a monitor without planning. The casing relies on passive ventilation rather than active cooling, and in normal use it is intended to be left running continuously, provided it is powered independently rather than from the host machine.

A practical difference in the Comet 5G design is the addition of external antennas to support its wireless roles.

This includes cellular and Wi-Fi antennas, and the unit is clearly built around the expectation that it may be used away from a stable wired network, whether that is via the SIM slot or via a direct nearby wireless connection. In a fixed desk setup the antennas can feel like overkill, but for temporary installs and field support they suit the intended use case.

On the front, the Comet 5G uses a 3.69 in touchscreen, which is notably larger than the Comet Pro’s 2.22 in panel. In practice, that extra size does not materially change the experience of mirroring the host display on the device itself, since you remain limited by the source resolution and scaling.

Where it does help is in the local management interface, where menus and status screens have more room and are less cramped, particularly during setup or when checking network state and service toggles directly on the unit.

Storage is expanded to 64 GB eMMC, and the main advantage is capacity rather than speed. In use, the internal storage is primarily for keeping ISO images, recovery media, and utility files that can be mounted remotely as virtual media or exposed to the host as a remote drive.

File transfers to and from the internal storage typically sit in the same general performance range as the Comet Pro, which means it is functional for staging installers and smaller toolsets, but slow for moving large data sets.

A newer software feature available across the platform also allows external storage via a USB drive, but it comes with constraints that affect how usable it is in practice. Adding a drive can require a reboot, compatibility varies between drives, and the management interface tends to treat partitions individually rather than offering straightforward full disk handling.

Because the port involved is USB 2.0, external storage is more about adding space for additional ISOs than achieving a meaningful improvement in transfer speeds.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Connectivity

The Comet 5G keeps its I/O layout simple, with the core KVM connections built around full sized HDMI input and HDMI output for passthrough. This avoids adapter reliance and makes it easier to drop into existing setups where monitors and capture paths already use standard HDMI cabling. In a permanent install, passthrough is the more important part of that arrangement, since it allows a local user to keep working on the attached screen while remote access remains available in the background.

For host control, the unit presents USB based keyboard and mouse emulation over its USB-C connection, while power is also supplied via USB-C at 5V/3A with PD compatibility.

In practical terms, powering it from an independent adapter is the safer approach, because drawing power from the host machine can remove KVM access when the host is powered off, rebooting, or in a state where USB power is unstable.

Wired networking is provided by a 1 GbE RJ45 port, which is the most consistent option for image quality and responsiveness when the site network is stable. Alongside this, the Comet 5G supports Wi-Fi 6 on both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, and it also includes an AP mode that allows a direct nearby wireless connection without joining the surrounding LAN.

That AP mode is best understood as a local management path rather than a general purpose hotspot, and it is primarily useful when you want a quick point to point session for BIOS work or initial configuration.

The main connectivity addition over the Comet Pro is the nano SIM slot for cellular access, supporting 5G RedCap with 4G LTE fallback. This is positioned as an out of band route that can keep the management channel available when Ethernet and Wi-Fi are unavailable or misconfigured, and it also reduces dependence on VLAN routing rules and other site side constraints.

In the current software experience, the cellular side is exposed through its own configuration section, but it does not offer the same depth of policy and failover tuning found on GL.iNet’s router products.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Internal Hardware

Internally, the Comet 5G is built around a quad core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC paired with 1 GB of DDR3L memory, which is broadly the same class of platform used by the Comet Pro. In review terms, this means the Comet 5G is not trying to win on raw compute, but on connectivity and deployment options, because the core processing headroom is similar. The A53 class CPU is adequate for running the management services, handling multiple control sessions, and keeping the on device UI responsive, but it is not aimed at heavier workloads outside the core KVM functions. The OS is Linux 6.1, and the device behaves like a small embedded appliance rather than a general purpose system you would extend with additional packages and services.

The video path is designed around HDMI ingest and H.264 hardware encoding, with the remote stream adapting to available bandwidth and quality settings in the client interface. Support is listed up to 4K at 30 fps and 1080p at 60 fps, with HDMI passthrough keeping a local monitor active while the unit captures the same signal for remote viewing.

Audio is supported in 2 directions, but the device itself is not treated as a standalone audio endpoint, so the practical experience depends on how the host exposes audio over HDMI or USB and how the client session is configured. Input is handled via USB based HID emulation, which is why copy and paste and keystroke injection can sometimes behave differently between applications depending on how they interpret simulated typing versus clipboard shortcuts.

The storage subsystem uses 64 GB eMMC soldered to the board, and in practice it is tuned for predictable, mid range throughput rather than high performance. Real world transfer rates observed during ISO uploads and mounted storage tests typically sit around the mid 20s to mid 30s MB/s range, which aligns with the Comet Pro experience and reflects the limits of the flash and controller rather than a network bottleneck.

That makes it usable for staging installers, recovery media, and driver packs, but not ideal for repeated large image transfers or heavy file shuttling. Expansion is possible via a USB drive using the USB 2.0 Type-A port, but that is primarily a capacity extension, because USB 2.0 limits both bandwidth and available bus power, and drive compatibility can vary depending on the enclosure controller and power draw.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Software, Services & Performance

The Comet 5G uses the same GLKVM software family as the earlier Comet devices, with access provided through a browser interface, a desktop client, and a mobile app. In testing, the browser UI is the most straightforward for configuration and for working across different operating systems, and it also exposes most of the device settings without needing to install anything locally.

Firmware maturity differed slightly between units during side by side use, with the Comet Pro running a stable 1.8 release build while the Comet 5G was still presented as beta, though the overall layout and feature set were close enough that the differences felt tied to hardware options rather than a separate software branch.

#

Account and session security options are built into the platform, including 2 factor authentication and passkey support at the account level, plus the ability to apply an additional password gate per device before entering a remote session. Remote access can be handled locally over LAN, through GL.iNet’s relay service, or through peer to peer options. Tailscale support is part of the platform, and newer software revisions have also introduced ZeroTier support, which addresses earlier feedback around relying on a single remote access option.

For users who prefer not to use relay services, these VPN style paths can provide remote reachability without opening ports or depending on the vendor’s cloud beyond account management.

Where the Comet 5G differs in day to day software behavior is how cellular and nearby access are exposed. Cellular configuration appears as a dedicated section for SIM based connectivity, while the Wi-Fi settings include an AP mode that allows direct nearby connections without joining the site WLAN. In practice, these features improve the chances of reaching the device when the surrounding network is misconfigured or inaccessible, but the management interface does not currently provide the same depth of routing, policy control, or visible failover logic that GL.iNet includes in its router products. Multi path behavior is present at a feature level, but there is limited opportunity to tune it beyond selecting the available connection modes.

Performance during remote control sessions depends mainly on the network path and the host workload rather than differences between the Comet 5G and Comet Pro hardware. Video quality controls and stream settings allow the session to be made more stable on weaker links, and the general desktop experience remains usable for BIOS work, OS installs, and troubleshooting.

A copy and paste stress test with a large block of text showed both devices could transfer long input sequences, but the Comet 5G produced fewer odd spacing issues in the final pasted document during that run. On mobile, both devices provide touch mode and cursor mode plus access to a software keyboard, and external Bluetooth keyboards and mice can be used, but fluidity and compression artifacts were more noticeable when the phone was on cellular data compared with a local Wi-Fi or wired path.

Gli.Net Comet 5G KVM Review – Verdict & Conclusion

The Comet 5G works as a continuation of the Comet Pro platform rather than a clean break. The remote session experience, general interface layout, and core feature set remain familiar, because the underlying compute and encoding approach is broadly the same, and both devices are aimed at the same type of work: BIOS access, OS installs, recovery tasks, and remote troubleshooting where standard remote desktop tools are not enough. The areas that do change the day to day ownership experience are mostly around how you can reach the device when things go wrong. The SIM based 5G RedCap and 4G LTE fallback adds a separate management path, and the AP mode provides a direct nearby connection that avoids relying on the site LAN. The larger 3.69 in screen also makes the on device menus easier to use, even if it does not transform the usefulness of live video mirroring on the panel itself.

On the positive side, the Comet 5G is more adaptable in awkward environments, such as networks with strict VLAN boundaries, unreliable Wi-Fi, or unknown cabling, and it gives you more ways to regain access without a site visit. The 64 GB eMMC storage is also easier to live with if you keep multiple ISO images or toolkits available, although transfer speed remains limited and does not materially improve over the 32 GB model. On the less positive side, the cellular and multi path story is currently presented more as a capability than as a deeply configurable system, so users expecting router style failover policies and detailed controls may find the options relatively basic. The external storage expansion feature helps with capacity, but it is constrained by USB 2.0, requires reboots in some situations, and drive compatibility can be inconsistent, which limits how predictable it is as a long term workflow.

Overall, the Comet 5G is easier to justify when you expect to use the cellular connection or the nearby AP mode regularly, because those are the main reasons it exists and the main differences you will notice. If the device will live on a stable wired network most of the time and you only need a straightforward remote KVM for routine maintenance, the Comet Pro will usually cover the same core tasks for less money. If your priority is having multiple ways to reach the box when the local network is down or not trusted, the Comet 5G is the more complete tool, but its value depends on those deployment realities rather than any large jump in raw performance.

Buy the Gl.iNet KVM 5G from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Comet KVM ($219) from the Official Store Below:

Gl.iNet Comet 5G KVM Pros

Gl.iNet Comet 5G KVM CONs

Cellular out of band access via nano SIM (5G RedCap with 4G LTE fallback) adds a separate path when the site LAN is down or misconfigured Nearby Control via AP mode enables direct point to point access without joining the surrounding network, useful for local BIOS work and isolated environments HDMI passthrough plus capture keeps a local monitor active while still providing remote KVM access (up to 4K 30 fps, 1080p 60 fps) Browser based management and access works across Windows, macOS, and Linux without requiring a dedicated client 64 GB eMMC provides more room for ISO images and utility files than the 32 GB model, reducing how often media needs to be rotated 3.69 in touchscreen makes on device setup and status checks less cramped than smaller panel implementations Multiple remote access approaches are available (LAN, relay, and VPN style options like Tailscale and ZeroTier), allowing different trust and routing models Low complexity deployment with passive cooling and a small footprint makes it viable as a 24/7 appliance when powered independently

Storage performance is modest, and remains closer to mid range eMMC speeds than fast removable storage External storage expansion has caveats, including USB 2.0 limits, possible reboots, and inconsistent compatibility depending on the USB drive and power draw Failover and cellular controls are not deeply tunable in the current UI, so users expecting router grade policy controls may find configuration limited

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro vs Pro 8 NAS – WHICH ONE SHOULD YOU BUY?

Within UniFi, the UNAS line is positioned as a straightforward, storage focused, turnkey NAS platform that fits into the same single pane management style as the rest of the ecosystem, prioritizing file storage, sharing, snapshots, and backup workflows over broader server style expandability. In this 3 way comparison, the UNAS Pro (7 bay, Nov 2024), UNAS Pro 8 (8 bay, Nov 2025), and UNAS Pro 4 (4 bay, Feb 2026) look similar on the surface, but they target different deployment constraints and ceiling limits in rack depth, storage scalability, cache options, memory headroom, network redundancy, and power design. Two of the units (Pro 4 and Pro 8) add M.2 NVMe cache support and higher availability 10GbE networking than the original Pro, while the Pro 8 also pushes furthest on RAM capacity and physical redundancy expectations for a rack install.

	UNAS Pro (7 Bay, $499)	UNAS Pro 4 (4 Bay, $499)	UNAS Pro 8 (8 Bay, $799)

At the same time, the lineup is notable for pricing that stays lower than many established rackmount NAS competitors at comparable connectivity, with both the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4 landing at $499, and the UNAS Pro 8 stepping up to $799 for more bays, more memory, and more network paths. The practical decision usually comes down to whether the priority is maximum bays at the lowest buy in, a tighter 1U footprint with newer cache and dual 10GbE links, or a higher ceiling platform with the strongest long term headroom in bays, RAM, and connectivity for users who expect growth rather than a fixed storage target.

IMPORTANT – It is worth highlighting that all three UNAS solutions include the same software and updates in the UniFi Drive and NAS OS services. Alongside the client tools (eg Identity Endpoint and File/Folder services remotely) and can be easily integrated into an existing Ubiquiti/UniFi network landscape. HOWEVER crucially, it is not ‘mandotory’ – you can run any of the UNAS Pro systems completely ‘offline’ (i.e LAN only) and there is no need to already have an existing UniFi network (existing 3rd party network landscapes work perfectly fine) and you also do not need to use/register any kind of UI.com/Ubiquiti account to setup the device.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro vs Pro 8 NAS – Design

At a chassis level, the lineup splits into 2U and 1U designs, and that difference shapes how each unit fits into smaller racks and shallow cabinets.

The UNAS Pro is the shortest depth of the 3, while the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 extend further back, which matters once you account for cable bend radius and rear clearance.

For compact wall racks and shorter cabinets, the older UNAS Pro tends to be easier to accommodate purely on physical depth, even before you consider anything about performance or features.

UNAS PRO 8 480MM DEPTH	UNAS PRO 325MM DEPTH
UNAS PRO 4 400MM DEPTH	DON’T FORGET RAILS!!!

The UNAS Pro also stands apart on the front panel experience, because it includes a 1.3″ touchscreen that can surface live status information without needing to log into the UI. That is not present on the UNAS Pro 4 or UNAS Pro 8, which lean into a more conventional rack appliance faceplate focused on bay access and basic indicators. In day to day use, the screen is mainly a convenience feature for quick checks and basic local interaction, rather than something that changes how the system is deployed.

Another practical design difference is port placement philosophy. The UNAS Pro places its primary network connectivity on the front, while the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 move connectivity to the rear, matching the typical layout most rackmount NAS systems follow. Front facing ports can reduce visible cabling in front of a rack and shorten patch runs in some UniFi heavy layouts, but rear mounted ports are generally easier to route cleanly in deeper cabinets with rear cable management.

Power implementation also affects the physical serviceability profile of each unit. The UNAS Pro 8 uses hot swappable power modules, which changes how you handle failure or planned maintenance compared with the fixed internal power approach used by the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4.

All 3 use a steel enclosure and ship as purpose built rack devices rather than desktop conversions, but the UNAS Pro 8 is the one that most closely matches what many buyers expect from a higher end rack appliance in terms of field replacement for key physical components.

---

UniFi UNAS Pro vs Pro 4 vs Pro 8 NAS – Storage

The most obvious storage difference is the bay count and what that does to capacity planning. The UNAS Pro provides 7 front accessible 2.5 inch or 3.5 inch bays in a 2U chassis, the UNAS Pro 4 offers 4 bays in a 1U chassis, and the UNAS Pro 8 increases that to 8 bays in 2U. If you expect to grow into larger pools over time, the 7 bay and 8 bay models give more headroom before you are forced into drive replacements, a second NAS, or a new storage tier. With no official expansion chassis support referenced here, the physical bay count is effectively the ceiling for each system.

The UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 add 2 M.2 NVMe slots intended for SSD caching, while the UNAS Pro does not include NVMe slots. This changes how you can approach mixed workloads, because cache can reduce latency for repeated small file access and help smooth bursts of writes, depending on how the platform applies caching. It does not change the underlying reality that the main capacity tier is still the SATA bay set, but it gives the Pro 4 and Pro 8 a path to improve responsiveness for specific access patterns without committing to full SSD storage across all bays.

RAID flexibility also varies, not in the list of RAID levels available, but in how storage can be organized. All 3 units support RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, but the UNAS Pro 4 is listed as supporting a single RAID group, while the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 8 are listed with multiple RAID groups. In practice, the single group limitation matters if you prefer separating workloads or isolating different retention policies into distinct pools, rather than placing everything into 1 volume. On the larger models, multiple groups give more options for structuring storage around different priorities, such as performance versus redundancy, or shared storage versus dedicated project space.

Operational features tied to storage protection are also not identical across the range. Hot spare support is listed on the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 8, but not on the UNAS Pro 4, which affects how you plan for unattended recovery after a drive failure. All 3 support snapshots, file encryption, share links, Time Machine backup, and cloud and network backup targets, which makes baseline data protection and recovery workflows broadly consistent regardless of bay count.

The larger differentiation is therefore less about whether core protection features exist and more about how much flexibility you have in pool layout and drive management within the limits of each chassis.

All 3 systems are built around a quad core ARM Cortex A57 platform, but they are not configured identically. The UNAS Pro runs the Cortex A57 at 1.7 GHz, while the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 are listed at 2.0 GHz. In day to day use, this tends to show up less as a dramatic jump in peak throughput and more as extra headroom when the system is handling several background jobs at once, such as indexing, snapshots, and multi user access, while still servicing file activity. The architecture choice is aligned with lower draw compared with typical x86 NAS hardware, but it also sets a ceiling on heavier compute workloads that some buyers associate with higher end NAS platforms.Memory is where the split is clearer. The UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4 ship with 8 GB, while the UNAS Pro 8 steps up to 16 GB. The practical impact is less about basic file sharing and more about how much concurrent activity the system can absorb before responsiveness drops, particularly when you add more users, larger file operations, more snapshot activity, and cache related behavior on models that support it. None of these systems are positioned as memory expandable platforms in the provided specifications, so the installed capacity is effectively the long term limit.

Power delivery and serviceability differ meaningfully between the range. The UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4 use internal AC to DC power supplies with an additional USP RPS DC input for redundancy, and their overall platform power limits are lower, matching their smaller scale.

The UNAS Pro 8 uses hot swappable power modules and is designed to support more demanding configurations, reflected in the higher maximum power consumption and the larger drive power budget. This does not automatically translate into higher idle power, but it does indicate how much overhead the chassis is designed to tolerate when fully populated and under sustained activity.

---

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro vs Pro 8 NAS – Ports and Connections

Across the 3 systems, the shared theme is 10 GbE as the primary path for file access, but the implementation differs. The UNAS Pro provides a single 10G SFP+ port plus a 1 GbE RJ45 port, which typically ends up used either for management traffic or as a slower access fallback. The UNAS Pro 4 shifts to a dual 10G SFP+ layout, giving more flexibility for link aggregation or failover planning, even if the practical benefit depends on the storage configuration and client support. The UNAS Pro 8 goes further with 2x 10G SFP+ and adds a 10 GbE RJ45 port that supports multi speed negotiation, which makes it easier to drop into networks that are already built around copper 10 GbE.

Port placement is also part of the decision, because the UNAS Pro uses front mounted networking, while the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 keep network connections on the rear. Front mounted ports can simplify short patch runs in racks that are set up around front facing switching, while rear mounted ports follow the more common rack NAS convention and can be cleaner in racks that route cabling at the back. None of the 3 is positioned as a platform for network expansion cards, so what you buy is the long term connectivity ceiling.

In day to day operation, the multi port models are mainly about resiliency and network design options rather than guaranteeing linear scaling for a single user. You can plan for redundancy across switches, use bonding where your environment supports it, or segment traffic patterns in a more controlled way.

The UNAS Pro 8 is also the only model here with 10 GbE available on both SFP+ and RJ45 in the base hardware, which reduces the need for media converters or additional transceiver planning if your network is not SFP+ centric.

---

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 vs Pro 8 vs Pro NAS – Price and Value

At list pricing, the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 4 sit at the same $499, but they are selling different priorities. The UNAS Pro concentrates its value in raw bay count and a shorter 2U chassis, trading away NVMe cache support and additional 10 GbE links to keep the platform simple. The UNAS Pro 4 is priced the same while reducing the HDD bay count and moving to a 1U chassis, but it adds 2x NVMe cache slots and a second 10G SFP+ port, positioning it more as a “small but fast access” rack NAS rather than a capacity first box.

The UNAS Pro 8 steps up to $799 and is priced like a higher tier option, but the spec sheet shows where that uplift is meant to land: more drive bays than either $499 model, NVMe cache capability like the Pro 4, more total 10 GbE ports, and a jump to 16 GB memory. It is also the only one of the 3 with a 10 GbE RJ45 port alongside SFP+, which can reduce friction in mixed copper and fiber environments. If the goal is to keep the same platform longer term, the Pro 8 is the only one here with both the capacity headroom and the memory ceiling to match it.

Using the simplified “price per bay” and “price per element” approach, the headline result is that the Pro 8 looks strongest once you count all the included hardware features rather than only the number of drive bays. The UNAS Pro has the lowest cost per bay because it is a 7 bay system at the same price as the 4 bay model, but the Pro 4 catches up when the NVMe slots and dual 10 GbE are treated as part of the value calculation. The Pro 8 is not the cheapest upfront, but it ends up close to the Pro 4 on cost per bay and is the lowest on cost per element because it stacks more of the “platform” features in one chassis.

---

UniFi UNAS Pro 8 vs Pro vs Pro 4 NAS – VERDICT

The UNAS Pro 4, UNAS Pro, and UNAS Pro 8 are close enough in naming to look like simple capacity steps, but they are positioned more like 3 different takes on the same UniFi Drive appliance idea. The UNAS Pro is the most capacity oriented at $499, giving 7 bays in a shorter depth 2U chassis with a built in 1.3 inch touchscreen and a straightforward port layout that suits some front of rack workflows. The UNAS Pro 4 shifts the emphasis away from bay count and toward “newer platform features” at the same $499 price, combining a 1U form factor with 2x 10G SFP+ and 2x NVMe cache slots, at the cost of a deeper chassis and fewer total drive bays. The UNAS Pro 8 is the most complete hardware package in the lineup, adding more bays, NVMe cache, more total 10 GbE connectivity including 10 GbE RJ45, and 16 GB memory, while also being the only one of the 3 to use hot swappable power modules. None of the 3 supports an official expansion shelf approach, so the bay count you buy on day 1 is effectively the long term ceiling unless you plan a separate NAS later.

Choosing between them mostly comes down to which ceiling matters first in your deployment: total bays, total network options, or overall platform headroom. If you want the most bays at $499 and the chassis depth is a priority, the UNAS Pro remains the obvious pick, with the tradeoffs being no NVMe cache path and a simpler network layout than the newer units. If you want the $499 option that aligns most with modern expectations for a small rack NAS, the UNAS Pro 4 has the cleanest argument, because dual 10G and NVMe cache can matter more than extra bays in smaller, faster working sets, even if those cache slots are not usable as standalone storage pools. If you are planning for longer retention cycles, heavier multi user access, or you simply want the most complete feature set in a single chassis, the UNAS Pro 8 is the one that most clearly justifies its higher price, particularly once memory, network flexibility, and the power module design are considered together. The main limitation across the lineup is that the ARM platform and fixed memory approach sets expectations about the long term performance ceiling, but within that constraint, the decision is primarily about how you want the hardware budget divided between capacity, connectivity, and overall platform resources.

---

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Review of the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS – Possibly the Best Value 1U Rack Ever?

Over the last 18-24 months, Ubiquiti has shifted the ‘UniFi’ label from being a networking and bridging ecosystem into a wider storage hardware and software platform that now includes a steadily expanding NAS line under UniFi Drive. Early UniFi UNAS storage products leaned heavily on simple file sharing and basic backup, but the pace of updates and the broader product rollout in 2025/2026 pushed the range closer to what small business buyers expect from an entry level NAS platform: clearer storage management, stronger snapshot and backup tooling, and tighter integration with the UniFi account and identity layer for remote access and user control (with the recent Drive 4.0 Update really uping their game considerably). The UniFi UNAS Pro 4 sits within that context as a compact 1U, 4 bay rack mount system designed mainly for file storage and sharing over SMB and NFS, rather than running third party applications, containers, or virtual machines. At $499, it is priced noticeably lower than many competing 1U rack NAS products at broadly comparable “headline” hardware, particularly where dual 10Gb networking and NVMe caching are concerned, which makes it hard to ignore if the goal is simple, high bandwidth storage in a rack footprint without moving into significantly higher spend.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Quick Conclusion

The UniFi UNAS Pro 4 is a 1U, 4 bay rack mount NAS aimed at straightforward SMB and NFS file storage, and its main differentiator is value: at $499 it undercuts many comparable 1U rack units while still offering 2x 10Gb SFP+ plus a separate 1GbE management port, 4 hot swap bays for 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch drives, and 2 M.2 NVMe slots for read and write caching. In testing with 4 HDDs in RAID 5 over 10GbE, it delivered strong real-world file transfer results for a small SATA array, with synthetic benchmarks showing high peak throughput but some variability depending on the tool used, and the platform’s power draw and noise profile were heavily influenced by drive choice and fan mode, including very loud output if maximum cooling is forced. UniFi Drive covers the core fundamentals expected at this level, including snapshots, encrypted volumes, and a wide range of backup targets (NAS, SMB, and multiple cloud services, with Microsoft 365 direction evident in recent updates), but the interface still limits deeper tuning in places and the feature set remains focused on storage rather than apps. The main downsides are structural and easy to identify up front: NVMe can only be used for cache rather than storage pools, the NVMe carriers are an extra purchase, there are no USB ports for local copy tasks, the PSU is internal and not a hot swap module, and missing features like iSCSI, ECC, and RAM upgradability place a clear ceiling on more advanced workloads, though those trade-offs are broadly consistent with a $499 ‘turnkey’ NAS appliance in 2026 though and hard to criticise!

Here are all the current UniFi NAS Solutions & Prices: UniFi UNAS Pro 4 (4 Bay + 2x M.2, $499) – HERE UniFi UNAS 2 (2 Bay, $199) – HERE UniFi UNAS 4  (4 Bay + 2x M2, $379) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro (7 Bay, $499) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro 8 (8-Bay + 2x M.2, $799) HERE

You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

 

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Design & Storage

The UNAS Pro 4 uses a conventional 1U rack mount layout, with a plain, functional front panel and an all metal enclosure intended for permanent installation rather than desktop use. It ships with rails and rack handles, which removes the usual extra step of sourcing mounting hardware separately. The chassis depth is about 400 mm, so it is not in the “full depth server” category, and that helps in smaller cabinets where rear clearance and cable management space can be limited.

Across the front are 4 hot swap bays supporting both 3.5 inch and 2.5 inch SATA drives. The trays are set up for tool-less 3.5 inch HDD installation with a click-in fit, while 2.5 inch SSDs still require screws to secure them properly. Each bay has status lighting, and the front panel also provides system level indicators so you can identify basic state and drive activity at a glance without logging into the interface. The trays feel rigid and spring-loaded, but they are not lockable, which is a practical consideration if the unit is placed in a shared rack or anywhere physical access is not strictly controlled.

From a capacity and planning perspective, this system is defined by its fixed 4 bay layout. You can configure a conventional RAID group within those bays, but there is no built-in path to scale beyond the internal slots, and there is no supported external expansion shelf option to push the same chassis further later on. That means the decision on drive sizes and redundancy level matters upfront, because the ceiling is reached quickly compared with higher bay count rack units. In a small rack deployment, it also means the unit is either a compact standalone store or part of a broader multi-NAS approach rather than a single box that grows over time.

In addition to the SATA bays, the chassis supports 2 M.2 NVMe slots intended specifically for SSD caching. The caching model is designed to accelerate HDD-based storage by using SSDs as a performance layer, rather than allowing NVMe drives to become their own primary pool for general file storage. Practically, that positions the NVMe feature as a supplement for mixed workloads, such as improving responsiveness for frequently accessed data and smoothing write behavior, rather than a route to running the system as a small all flash NAS.

A design detail that affects the storage experience is the physical NVMe mounting method. Instead of a simple screw-down slot on a board, the NVMe drives are installed via a tray or carrier mechanism, and that carrier is not included with the base unit. The carrier itself is neatly engineered with a clip-in style insertion and thermal padding, and it supports common M.2 lengths including 2280 and 22110, but requiring an additional part adds friction if caching is part of the plan from day 1. It is a small issue, but it is the kind of detail that can slow down an otherwise straightforward deployment.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Internal Hardware

The UNAS Pro 4 is built around a quad core ARM Cortex-A57 CPU clocked at 2.0 GHz and paired with 8 GB of memory, which sets expectations for the type of workloads it is designed to handle. This is not a platform aimed at heavyweight compute tasks, but for file services and scheduled backup activity it has enough headroom to keep the system responsive, particularly when multiple users are accessing shared folders and snapshots are being taken in the background.

The CPU choice also reflects a focus on predictable appliance behavior and lower overall platform complexity rather than maximum expandable performance.

Internally, the power system is a single 150 W unit mounted inside the chassis rather than a hot swap module, which influences servicing and downtime planning. If the PSU fails, replacement is more involved than swapping an external canister, and that is a meaningful difference compared with rack systems that use easily replaceable redundant modules.

The unit does, however, support UniFi’s USP-RPS DC input as an alternative redundancy method, which changes the redundancy approach from “dual PSU in the chassis” to “centralized redundant supply for multiple devices,” with different trade-offs in cost, cabling, and rack layout.

A further internal design choice is how the system treats its software environment as a dedicated appliance rather than an OS sharing space with user storage. The system software runs on its own internal storage rather than living on the same disks that hold your data. In practical terms, that reduces the chance of the OS being affected by changes to the main array, and it can make maintenance tasks like drive replacement or pool rebuilds feel more self-contained, because the unit remains manageable even while the primary storage is under stress.

ARM-based NAS platforms typically bring some efficiency advantages, and this model follows that general pattern. The CPU class and memory configuration are aligned with lower baseline overhead than many x86 NAS designs, which can help keep idle draw and sustained power use in check relative to equivalent rack hardware, though drive choice still dominates the total. The trade-off is a lower performance ceiling compared with modern x86 systems for certain workloads, plus the usual limitations seen in this category: no practical RAM upgrade path, no ECC support, and fewer options for buyers who want to push beyond file services into heavier compute. At $499, those omissions are consistent with the target price bracket in 2026 rather than being unexpected corner cutting.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Ports and Connections

The rear connectivity is centered on 2x 10Gb SFP+ ports, and that is the defining hardware choice for this NAS in a 1U, 4 bay format. It allows the unit to be placed into a 10Gb environment without adapters, and it also opens up practical options beyond raw throughput, such as separating traffic types, connecting into different switches, or keeping a second path available for failover. The choice of SFP+ over 10GBase-T will suit users already running fiber or DAC links in a rack, but it can be less convenient for small setups built around copper RJ45.

Alongside the 10Gb ports is a separate 1GbE RJ45 port that can be used for management or for general connectivity in networks where 10Gb is not available everywhere. In a mixed UniFi environment, this is useful because it avoids tying basic onboarding and administration to a 10Gb port that might be better reserved for file traffic. It also gives a simple fallback path for access and troubleshooting if the 10Gb side is being reconfigured, moved between switches, or temporarily taken offline.

What is missing is just as relevant as what is included. There are no USB ports for quick ingest, offline copy tasks, or attaching temporary media, which some rack NAS platforms still provide for convenience even in 1U designs. Wireless is not a focus here, though Bluetooth is present for initial setup workflows, which fits the product’s “appliance onboarding” approach more than it does ongoing connectivity. The result is a port layout that prioritizes network-first storage and rack integration, while leaving out local expansion and quick-access I/O features that some users expect on a NAS.

However, (and I am sounding like a broken record at this point) at $499, these ports and connections are a notable degree more than most other turn-key NAS solutions from Synology, QNAP and even Terramaster (the more budget end of the NAS market already) are offering at under 500! So, what is presented here is a great value Day 1 solution in terms of base connectivity, but there is no denying that it might well feel the pinch in 5 years down the road when your storage is filling and your storage speeds begin to bottleneck vs your other equipment bandwidth.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Testing Noise, Temps, Power Consumption & Speed

Performance here needs to be framed around the physical limits of 4 SATA bays and the role of SSD caching. Even with dual 10Gb networking available, a 4 drive HDD array has a throughput ceiling that will be reached long before the network becomes the bottleneck in most single-client scenarios. The value of 10Gb in this context is less about hitting theoretical maximums and more about maintaining higher transfer rates consistently, handling multiple simultaneous users, and keeping latency lower when lots of smaller operations are happening alongside big file moves.

In testing with 4 HDDs in a RAID 5 configuration over a 10Gb link to a Windows 11 client, measured throughput landed in the range expected of a well-tuned 4 disk array. Using AJA with a repeated 1 GB test file, results sat around 680 to 730 MB/s for download and 520 to 600 MB/s for upload. A real-world Windows file transfer of 101 GB made up of 1,231 mixed files completed in 3 minutes and 57 seconds, which works out at an average of about 426 MB/s across the transfer, reflecting the usual drop from synthetic peak results when file variety and filesystem overhead are introduced.

Synthetic benchmarking results varied depending on the tool used, which is not unusual when caching behavior and test patterns differ. CrystalDiskMark with a 1 GB test file reported 353 MB/s read and 429 MB/s write in this run, with write coming out higher than read, which is atypical enough to treat as an outlier pending further retesting. ATTO produced stronger peak figures of 860 MB/s read and 570 MB/s write at the top end, which aligns more closely with the best-case behavior seen in sequential-focused tests on multi-drive arrays.

Noise, power draw, and thermal behavior were also measured because they affect rack placement and operating cost. With the fan profile set to auto and drives idle, noise sat around 42 to 44 dBA, dropping to roughly 38 to 40 dBA in the lowest RPM mode. Manually forcing maximum cooling pushed noise to around 56 to 57 dBA, and that level remained dominant even when drive activity increased, suggesting the cooling system prioritizes aggressive airflow when pushed. Power consumption with 4 enterprise HDDs measured roughly 49 to 50 W at idle and 60 to 62 W under activity, while swapping to 4 SATA SSDs reduced that to around 32 W during synchronization, underlining how drive choice can change the overall profile as much as the base platform.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Software and Services

The UNAS Pro 4 runs UniFi Drive and is managed through the same style of web interface used across the broader UniFi portfolio, with system status, storage, backups, and user access presented in a single dashboard. For basic NAS use, the core functions are in place: creating storage pools, managing shares, enabling file services, and monitoring drive health. The interface is generally structured around doing common tasks quickly rather than exposing every possible tuning option, which keeps setup approachable but also limits deeper control in areas that some experienced NAS users look for.

File access is centered on SMB and NFS, with browser-based file management available for basic upload, download, and folder navigation. The browser file manager covers the essentials and includes sharing link creation, but it is not positioned as a full productivity layer with advanced file handling or rich collaboration features. Remote access and identity-based access tools are tied into UniFi’s account and identity layer, and while local-only deployment is possible, the most integrated remote workflow is clearly designed around UniFi’s own services rather than third party remote networking tools.

Storage protection features include snapshot support, encrypted volumes, and configurable retention policies, which addresses most common rollback and recovery needs for file storage. Backup tooling covers several targets, including backing up to another UniFi NAS, to SMB targets, and to cloud services such as Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, and Wasabi, with Microsoft 365 backup support also part of the broader UniFi Drive direction. These features reflect the brand’s recent focus on strengthening data protection rather than expanding into application hosting or media server style functionality.

The gaps are consistent with the product’s current scope. There is no iSCSI target support, which limits certain virtualization and block-storage workflows, and there is no container or VM layer for running third party services directly on the NAS. NVMe usage remains limited to caching rather than becoming its own storage pool, which narrows the performance paths available if the goal is to build a small all-flash volume.

Client-side tooling is also still limited compared with platforms that provide a dedicated sync-and-pin application, with access leaning on standard network shares and UniFi’s identity-driven access methods rather than a full drive-style client experience.

UniFi UNAS Pro 4 Review – Conclusion & Verdict

The UNAS Pro 4 is a focused 1U, 4 bay NAS that prioritizes networked file storage and straightforward deployment over broader application support. The hardware choices align with that goal: dual 10Gb SFP+ connectivity, 4 hot swap bays, and optional NVMe caching provide a platform that can deliver strong file transfer rates for a small array, while the ARM-based design keeps the system positioned as an appliance rather than a general-purpose server. Its main compromises are largely structural rather than hidden: fixed bay count with no expansion path, NVMe limited to cache, no USB I/O for local tasks, and a single internal PSU rather than a hot swap redundant design.

At $499, the value case is driven by how much rack-oriented networking is included at a price that undercuts many comparable 1U NAS systems, especially those offering 10Gb as standard. The software is usable for core storage tasks and has clearly improved over the last year in areas like snapshots and backup targets, but it still leaves out features that matter to some buyers, including iSCSI and a fuller client sync experience. For users who want a compact rack NAS primarily for SMB or NFS file storage with modern backup and snapshot features, it fits its role well; for users expecting a broader NAS app ecosystem or more hardware serviceability, the limitations are likely to be decisive. But, as Delboy once said, at this price, “what do you want? Jam on it?”. This system is giving more at this price than anyone else right now and for its limitations, for many these will be paletable in the grand scheme of things. 1U 4Bay rackmounts has always been something that most turnkey NAS brands treat poorly, due to the low saturation point of four SATA drives and why waste more capable hardware on that? In that sense, Ubiquiti is really piling on the hardware here at this price – and I for one applaud this.

Here are all the current UniFi NAS Solutions & Prices: UniFi UNAS Pro 4 (4 Bay + 2x M.2, $499) – HERE UniFi UNAS 2 (2 Bay, $199) – HERE UniFi UNAS 4  (4 Bay + 2x M2, $379) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro (7 Bay, $499) – HERE UniFi UNAS Pro 8 (8-Bay + 2x M.2, $799) HERE

You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

PROs of the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS

PROs of the UniFi UNAS Pro 4 NAS

Dual 10Gb SFP+ networking is unusual in a 1U 4 bay NAS at this price point + failover will not result in bandwidth throttle A separate 1GbE port is useful for management or fallback connectivity 1U chassis with relatively short depth is easier to fit in smaller racks and cabinets Rails and rack hardware included, reducing extra setup cost and friction Ubiquiti and UniFi online/brand services are optional (i.e pure offline/LAN is possible)+ no need for a Ubiquiti/UniFi network setup to use NVMe read and write caching support can improve responsiveness in mixed workloads UniFi Drive provides snapshots, encryption, and a broad set of backup targets (NAS, SMB, and multiple cloud providers) Setup and management are streamlined, especially for users already running UniFi infrastructure Drive 4.0 Update scales up the Business Utilities notably

NVMe is cache only, with no option to use M.2 drives as primary storage pools NVMe trays or carriers are not included, adding extra cost and an extra purchase step Single PSU (no redundency) and non-slide removable SFX/ATX PSU (relies on propriatary UniFi Battery Backup rack module or external UPS) No NAS Expansion Support, so 4 HDDs are your limit

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

The Terramaster F4-425 Value Intel 4-Bay – Does It Deserve your Data?

The TerraMaster F4-425 is positioned as a lower cost entry point into the company’s Intel based NAS lineup for the 2025 to 2026 generation, sitting below the Plus, Pro, and Max series models. It combines a 4 bay desktop chassis with the Intel Celeron N5095, 4GB of DDR4 memory with upgrade support up to 16GB, and a single 2.5GbE network interface. This places it squarely in the middle ground between basic ARM powered NAS systems and more fully featured x86 solutions with higher network bandwidth and NVMe expansion. The appeal of the F4-425 lies in its balance rather than specialization, offering enough CPU performance for multi user file access, media streaming, and general application use, while keeping cost, noise, and power consumption relatively controlled. It is clearly designed for users who want an Intel based NAS for everyday storage and media tasks, but who do not necessarily need the higher throughput, expansion options, or future scalability found in TerraMaster’s more expensive models.

Amazon in Your Region	Terramaster F4-425 on AliExpress	B&H NAS Shop

Competitive Intel-Based Value in a 4 Bay Format with the F4-425 vs other Intel Entry Systems

One of the key advantages of the F4-425 is how it positions itself within the x86 turnkey NAS market, particularly in the 4 bay segment. Systems that combine an Intel processor, upgradeable memory, and faster than gigabit networking are typically aimed at prosumer or small business buyers and often carry a noticeably higher price. The F4-425 offers a complete, ready to use solution that includes TerraMaster’s TOS 6 operating system, allowing users to deploy storage, backups, and shared services without needing to install or license additional software.

This lowers the overall barrier to entry for buyers who want an Intel based NAS primarily for general purpose storage, media streaming, or light application hosting. While it does not compete directly with higher end 4 bay systems that include multi LAN configurations or NVMe expansion, it delivers a core x86 experience at a price level that is more approachable, especially for users who do not plan to saturate network bandwidth or push heavy virtualization workloads.

Flexible Storage Management With TRAID and TRAID Plus in the F4-425

A notable strength of the F4-425 is its support for TerraMaster’s TRAID and TRAID Plus storage systems, which are particularly relevant in a 4 bay enclosure. Traditional RAID configurations often require matched drive sizes to avoid wasted capacity, and expanding an array later can involve rebuilding or replacing multiple disks at once. TRAID reduces this rigidity by allowing mixed capacity drives to be used more efficiently over time, automatically organizing available space while maintaining redundancy.

In a 4 bay system, this becomes more practical, as users are more likely to add drives gradually or replace older disks with higher capacity models as prices fall. The result is a storage setup that is easier to grow incrementally without complex planning. For users managing a family media library, backups from multiple devices, or shared data across several users, this flexibility can simplify long term storage expansion while reducing the need for disruptive migrations.

Balanced Performance for Media and Multi-User Access of the F4-425 system

The F4-425 offers a level of performance that is generally well suited to shared home or small office environments, particularly where multiple users are accessing data simultaneously. The Intel Celeron N5095 provides enough processing headroom to handle file transfers, background services, and media applications without the system feeling unresponsive under light to moderate load. In a 4 bay configuration, this performance profile pairs well with mixed workloads, such as ongoing backups, media indexing, and concurrent playback through applications like Plex, Emby, or Jellyfin using hardware assisted 4K decoding. While it is not intended for heavy virtualization or sustained high throughput tasks, the F4-425 can comfortably support several users accessing files or streaming content at the same time. This makes it suitable for households or teams where shared access and consistency are more important than peak benchmark performance.

Practical Software Feature Set With TOS 6 of the F4-425

The F4-425 benefits from TerraMaster’s TOS 6 operating system, which provides a broad and functional software environment without requiring additional licenses or complex setup. The platform includes native tools for file sharing, snapshots, cloud synchronization, and multi device backups, allowing the NAS to act as a central data hub for several users. In a 4 bay system, these features become more relevant as storage is often shared across multiple PCs, mobile devices, and services.

TOS 6 also supports container based applications and virtualization features that, while limited by the underlying hardware, can still be useful for light workloads such as small services or test environments. The software is not as polished as some higher profile NAS platforms, but it offers a level of depth that covers most common use cases and reduces the need to rely on third party tools for everyday management.

Flexible Platform for Turnkey or DIY NAS Use with the F4-425

An often overlooked advantage of the F4-425 is how accommodating it is for users who may want to move beyond the included operating system in the future. While it is sold and marketed as a complete turnkey NAS with TOS 6, the underlying x86 architecture allows relatively straightforward installation of alternative NAS operating systems such as TrueNAS, Unraid, or other Linux based platforms. TerraMaster does not restrict this process at the firmware level, and using third party software does not invalidate the hardware warranty. In a 4 bay system, this flexibility can extend the useful lifespan of the device, particularly for users whose storage needs or technical confidence evolve over time. The presence of HDMI output and KVM support simplifies local setup when experimenting with other operating systems, even if that HDMI port is not fully utilized by TOS itself. This dual role as both a turnkey appliance and a potential DIY platform adds practical long term value for more technically inclined users.

Single 2.5GbE Network Port Limits Throughput of the F4-425

A clear limitation of the F4-425 is its networking configuration, which consists of a single 2.5GbE port with no additional LAN interfaces or internal upgrade options. In a 4 bay NAS, this can quickly become a bottleneck once multiple drives are active, particularly in RAID configurations that are capable of delivering higher aggregate read and write performance than the network interface can carry. Even with mechanical hard drives, it is possible to saturate a 2.5GbE connection under sequential workloads, and this leaves little headroom for multiple users or concurrent tasks.

The lack of link aggregation, 5GbE, or 10GbE options also limits the system’s suitability for users with faster network infrastructure or plans to upgrade in the future. While USB based network adapters can be added, this introduces extra cost and complexity, and it does not fully compensate for the absence of native multi port or higher speed networking in a 4 bay chassis.

Lack of NVMe Expansion Limits Internal Performance in the F4-425

The absence of any M.2 NVMe slots on the F4-425 places a clear ceiling on its internal performance and storage flexibility. In a 4 bay Intel based NAS released into the 2025 to 2026 market, NVMe support is commonly expected, either for SSD caching or for high speed storage pools that can absorb bursts of activity and improve responsiveness under mixed workloads. Without NVMe, all storage activity is constrained to SATA drives, which limits the benefits of the x86 platform when running applications, containers, or multiple background services. This is particularly relevant in scenarios where the system is handling indexing, backups, and media access at the same time. While TerraMaster offers other models in its lineup with extensive NVMe support, the omission here means the F4-425 cannot be easily optimized for latency sensitive tasks, regardless of how much memory is added or how the drives are configured.

Aging CPU Platform for a New Generation NAS of the F4-425

The F4-425 relies on the Intel Celeron N5095, a processor that has been widely used across multiple NAS generations and is now showing its age in the context of newer Intel platforms. While it remains capable of handling file services, media transcoding, and light application workloads, it lacks the efficiency and performance improvements found in more recent Intel N series processors. In a 4 bay system, this matters because the hardware is more likely to be tasked with simultaneous operations such as multi user access, background maintenance, and application services. The N5095 can manage these workloads, but it does so with less headroom than newer alternatives, which can impact long term relevance. As software platforms continue to add features and increase baseline requirements, the CPU choice places a practical limit on how far the system can scale over time.

HDMI Output With No Practical Software Use on the F4-425

The inclusion of an HDMI port on the F4-425 may appear useful on paper, but in practice it offers limited functionality within TerraMaster’s software environment. The HDMI output is primarily used for basic system information and troubleshooting during boot, rather than providing a usable local interface or media output experience. There is no native desktop mode, multimedia interface, or direct playback environment available through TOS that would allow the NAS to function as a locally controlled media device. In a 4 bay system with an Intel CPU capable of hardware video decoding, this unused output can feel like missed potential, especially when other NAS vendors and newer platforms have begun to implement functional HDMI driven interfaces. While the port can be helpful when installing third party operating systems, its role within the default configuration remains minimal.

Overlap With Better Equipped Models in the Same Lineup of the F4-425

A practical concern with the F4-425 is how closely it sits to other TerraMaster models that offer substantially more capability for a relatively modest increase in cost. Within the same product family, there are options that add faster networking, NVMe expansion, additional LAN ports, or more modern Intel processors, sometimes at a price difference that may be difficult to justify ignoring. For buyers who already anticipate growing storage needs, higher throughput, or heavier application use, the F4-425 can feel constrained when compared directly against these alternatives. This internal competition weakens its long term value proposition, as users may find that spending slightly more upfront would avoid the limitations around bandwidth and expansion that cannot be addressed later through upgrades.

Conclusion and Verdict of the F4-425 Review – Should You Buy?

The TerraMaster F4-425 is best understood as a deliberately constrained Intel based NAS that prioritizes affordability and simplicity over expandability and peak performance. It delivers competent multi user storage, media streaming, and general NAS functionality in a 4 bay format, supported by a software platform that covers most common requirements without forcing reliance on third party tools. Its strengths lie in predictable behavior, flexible RAID options, and openness to alternative operating systems, rather than cutting edge hardware features. For users with clearly defined needs who value an x86 platform but do not expect to push high bandwidth workflows or advanced storage tiers, the F4-425 can meet expectations without unnecessary complexity. At the same time, its limitations are structural rather than temporary. The single 2.5GbE port, absence of NVMe expansion, and older CPU architecture set firm boundaries on future growth. These constraints become more apparent when viewed alongside other models in TerraMaster’s own lineup that address these gaps at a higher but not disproportionate cost. As a result, the F4-425 makes the most sense for buyers who want a straightforward Intel NAS for shared storage and media use today, and who are comfortable accepting that it is not designed to scale significantly beyond that role.

Amazon in Your Region	Terramaster F4-425 PLUS	B&H NAS Shop

 

---

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Review – Best Budget WiFi 7 Travel Router

The Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) is a compact dual band Wi Fi 7 travel router developed by GL.iNet as the successor to the Beryl AX (GL-MT3000), positioned as a mid range portable networking solution that introduces Wi Fi 7 support, dual 2.5GbE ports, and substantially higher VPN throughput while remaining priced at 139.99 dollars. Unlike traditional home routers designed for fixed installations and wide coverage, the Beryl 7 is intended for temporary and mobile deployments such as hotel rooms, shared offices, dorm setups, and remote work environments where portability and flexibility are priorities. Within the travel router segment, the Beryl series has focused on balancing price, control, and performance, and this model shifts further toward higher throughput networking, particularly in wired connectivity and encrypted traffic handling. With advertised VPN speeds of up to 1100Mbps via WireGuard and 1000Mbps via OpenVPN DCO, it exceeds many similarly sized travel routers that remain limited to 1GbE and lower VPN acceleration, yet it does not attempt to compete with higher cost tri band Wi Fi 7 devices that include 6GHz radios. Instead, it sits between entry-level Wi-Fi 6 travel routers and more expensive portable options such as the Slate 7, offering newer wireless standards without entering premium desktop router pricing from brands like Netgear or ASUS. Although branded as Wi Fi 7, it operates on 2.4GHz and 5GHz only, without 6GHz support, limiting full spectrum capability but still enabling features such as Multi Link Operation across its two bands. The device is aimed at technically aware users and frequent travelers who require advanced routing controls, VPN flexibility, and OpenWrt-based customisation in a compact chassis measuring 120 x 83 x 34mm and weighing 205g, modernizing the travel router category without moving into high end pricing tiers.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Review – Quick Conclusion

The Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) is a compact dual band Wi Fi 7 travel router from GL.iNet that builds on the Beryl AX by adding dual 2.5GbE ports, a quad core 2.0GHz MediaTek CPU, 512MB DDR4 memory, 512MB flash storage, and substantially higher VPN throughput of up to 1100Mbps via WireGuard and 1000Mbps via OpenVPN DCO, while maintaining a portable near pocket sized scale and just 205g in weight. It supports Wi Fi 7 features such as Multi Link Operation across 2.4GHz and 5GHz, but omits 6GHz and 320MHz channel width, limiting full spectrum Wi Fi 7 capability. Design priorities include silent passive cooling, foldable antennas, minimal LEDs, and a programmable hardware toggle for VPN control, alongside flexible connectivity through wired WAN, LAN, repeater mode, and USB tethering with automatic failover. Boot time is approximately 51 seconds, captive portal access is typically achieved in around 35 seconds, power draw ranges from roughly 3.7W to 6.7W depending on load, and thermals remain stable under sustained use. The OpenWrt based firmware provides both simplified management and full LuCI access, plus an app ecosystem and GoodCloud remote management, though USB storage performance remains limited to around 50MB/s to 70MB/s and only a single USB port is available. Positioned between entry level Wi Fi 6 travel routers and higher priced portable Wi Fi 7 models such as the Slate 7, it does not include integrated battery, SIM, or 6GHz support, but offers strong wired flexibility, fast VPN acceleration, and granular configuration control at 139.99 dollars, making it a technically capable and competitively placed option for travel and temporary network deployments.

Buy the Gl.iNet Beryl 7 from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Beryl 7 from the Official Store Below:

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Review – Design and Connectivity

The Beryl 7 follows the compact design language established by earlier Beryl models, maintaining a footprint of 120 x 83 x 34mm and a weight of 205g. It is not pocket sized in the strictest sense, but it remains small enough to fit easily into hand luggage, a laptop bag, or a cable pouch. The chassis uses rounded edges rather than sharp corners, which makes it easier to handle and store alongside other equipment. Ventilation is distributed around the casing to support passive cooling, and there is no internal fan, meaning operation is silent under load.

A distinguishing visual change compared to previous models is the mint green finish, which replaces the darker tones commonly associated with networking hardware. While aesthetic preference is subjective, the color makes the device visually distinct from most black or grey travel routers on the market. The overall construction feels rigid, and the dual external antennas are foldable and adjustable up to 180°, allowing users to reposition them depending on orientation and signal direction.

In terms of physical connectivity, the Beryl 7 includes 2 x 2.5GbE ports, configurable as 1 x WAN and 1 x LAN. This is a notable upgrade over older 1GbE limited travel routers and enables higher throughput when connected to multi gig internet services or high speed local networks. For portable scenarios, this can be relevant in environments such as serviced apartments or offices where faster wired backhaul is available. The inclusion of 2.5GbE on both ports provides flexibility, particularly when using the router in bridge, repeater, or failover configurations.

A single USB 3.0 Type A port is located on the side, supporting external storage devices or USB tethering from a smartphone. While it provides expansion capability, the presence of only one USB port means users must choose between storage and tethering unless they rely on a powered hub, which may introduce stability or power delivery considerations.

Power is delivered via a USB C input, supporting 5V/3A, 9V/3A, and 12V/2.5A. This allows the router to be powered by standard phone chargers, power banks, or USB outlets commonly found on transport systems.

Additional physical controls include a reset button and a programmable toggle button. The toggle button can be configured for tasks such as enabling or disabling a VPN or switching network modes, providing quick hardware level control without accessing the web interface. LED indicators are minimal and can be adjusted or disabled via software, reducing visual distraction in low light environments. Overall, the design prioritizes portability, silent operation, and practical connectivity over integrated batteries or cellular modems, reflecting its focus on wired and Wi Fi based networking rather than standalone mobile broadband functionality.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Review – Internal Hardware

The Beryl 7 is built around a MediaTek quad core processor running at 2.0GHz, marking a clear step up from the dual core 1.3GHz platform used in the previous Beryl AX. This increase in core count and clock speed directly supports higher VPN throughput, improved multi WAN handling, and better performance under concurrent client load. In portable routing scenarios where encryption, traffic shaping, and failover may be active simultaneously, the additional processing headroom is relevant, particularly when compared to entry level travel routers that rely on lower power chipsets.

Memory and storage are provisioned at 512MB DDR4 RAM and 512MB NAND flash. The RAM capacity is sufficient for running multiple services concurrently, including VPN client or server roles, firewall rules, and installed plugins through the OpenWrt environment. The increased flash storage compared to the Beryl AX allows for a broader range of optional packages and services without immediately encountering storage constraints. For users intending to extend functionality beyond basic routing, this additional internal space provides practical flexibility.

On the wireless side, the router supports dual band Wi Fi 7 operation across 2.4GHz and 5GHz, with theoretical combined speeds of 3600Mbps. While it does not include 6GHz support, it does retain Multi Link Operation across the available bands, enabling simultaneous use of both radios for compatible clients. The internal architecture is therefore designed to balance power efficiency and thermal stability with next generation protocol support, rather than pursuing maximum theoretical bandwidth at the expense of heat output or energy draw.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Review – Software and Services

The Beryl 7 runs a customized OpenWrt based firmware developed by GL.iNet, providing a layered interface that caters to both general users and more technically experienced administrators. The primary web interface presents a structured dashboard for managing WAN connections, Wi Fi networks, VPN profiles, client devices, and failover rules without requiring direct interaction with raw OpenWrt configuration files. For users who prefer deeper customization, full access to the underlying OpenWrt LuCI environment is available, allowing granular control over firewall rules, routing tables, VLAN configuration, and advanced networking parameters.

VPN functionality is a central component of the platform. The router supports both client and server modes, including WireGuard and OpenVPN with DCO acceleration. Configuration can be handled manually or through profile imports from commercial VPN providers. A physical toggle button on the device can be assigned to enable or disable VPN connections instantly, providing hardware level control without logging into the interface. This is particularly relevant in travel scenarios where switching between encrypted and non encrypted traffic may be necessary for compatibility with certain captive portals or services.

Multi WAN support is integrated into the firmware, enabling wired WAN, Wi Fi repeater mode, and USB tethering to operate in combination or as automatic failover paths. Users can define priority levels so that if one connection drops, the router transitions to another within seconds.

This feature is typically found in larger business oriented routers and is less common in compact travel models. The ability to combine wired and wireless sources adds resilience in temporary setups where network stability may vary.

An integrated app center allows additional services to be installed directly onto the router’s internal storage or external USB storage if attached. These may include ad blocking tools, network monitoring utilities, file sharing services, and lightweight media server applications. While performance is limited by the ARM based hardware and USB throughput, the software ecosystem provides flexibility beyond standard routing tasks. Remote management is also supported through the GoodCloud platform, enabling off site monitoring and configuration if required.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Review – Tests and Performance

Boot time from a full power off state to complete interface availability measured approximately 51 seconds, which is relatively quick for a router running a full OpenWrt based stack. Accessing and connecting to a public Wi Fi network, including reaching a captive portal login page, typically took around 35 seconds from initial startup. In practical travel scenarios, this reduces setup friction when moving between networks in hotels, cafés, or shared office environments.

Power consumption remained low across multiple usage patterns. With 3 wireless client devices streaming 4K video simultaneously, draw averaged between 3.7W and 3.8W. Under heavier mixed load involving multiple wireless clients, an active wired WAN and LAN connection, and repeated speed testing, consumption increased to roughly 5W to 6W. When adding a USB connected SSD and sustained traffic, readings reached approximately 6.4W to 6.7W. These figures allow the device to be powered reliably by common USB C chargers and mid capacity power banks without stability issues.

Thermal behavior reflected the passive cooling design. After 1 hour of sustained wireless streaming load, external casing temperatures remained around 41°C to 42°C. Under heavier combined wired and wireless traffic for a similar duration, surface temperatures rose to approximately 51°C to 54°C, with localized vent readings reaching about 56°C. No thermal throttling was observed during testing, and the absence of an internal fan resulted in silent operation throughout.

VPN throughput and failover functionality were key performance areas. Using WireGuard, speeds approached the advertised 1100Mbps ceiling under favorable conditions, while OpenVPN DCO performance reached close to 1000Mbps over Ethernet. Compared to non VPN traffic, throughput reductions of roughly 20% to 25% were observed depending on server location and encryption overhead. Multi WAN failover switching between wired, repeater, and tethered connections typically completed within 4 to 5 seconds, maintaining active sessions in most cases. USB storage performance, however, was limited, with transfer rates generally between 50MB/s and 70MB/s, indicating that while file sharing is possible, it is not a replacement for a dedicated NAS.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) represents an incremental but meaningful update to the Beryl travel router line. It introduces dual 2.5GbE connectivity, significantly higher VPN throughput, and Wi Fi 7 protocol support within a compact and low power chassis. Its strengths lie in wired flexibility, strong encryption performance, multi WAN failover capability, and the depth of control provided by its OpenWrt based firmware. Boot times are short, public Wi Fi onboarding is quick, power consumption remains modest even under mixed wired and wireless load, and thermal behavior stays within reasonable limits despite the absence of active cooling. The programmable hardware toggle for VPN control adds practical usability in travel scenarios, and the ability to power the device from common USB C chargers or transport based USB outlets increases deployment flexibility. At the same time, it omits 6GHz support, limiting full spectrum Wi Fi 7 functionality and restricting channel width to 160MHz rather than 320MHz. USB storage performance remains modest compared to dedicated network storage devices, and the single USB port can constrain simultaneous tethering and storage use without additional powered accessories.

In market terms, the device sits between entry level Wi Fi 6 travel routers and higher priced Wi Fi 7 portable platforms such as the Slate 7. It does not attempt to compete with tri band hardware, integrated batteries, SIM or eSIM functionality, or touchscreen management panels. The release timing also places it within a crowded product window that includes closely related models from the same manufacturer, which may narrow differentiation for some buyers. However, at 139.99 dollars, it provides an accessible entry point into multi gig wired networking and high speed VPN acceleration in a travel focused form factor. It does not redefine the category or present itself as a flagship device, but for users who prioritize portability, advanced routing controls, reliable failover, and strong encrypted throughput over full band Wi Fi 7 or integrated mobile broadband features, the Beryl 7 remains a technically competent and competitively positioned option within its segment.

Buy the Gl.iNet Beryl 7 from Amazon Below:	Buy the Gl.iNet Beryl 7 from the Official Store Below:

 

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 PROs

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 PROs

Dual 2.5GbE WAN and LAN ports enable multi gig wired connectivity WireGuard performance up to 1100Mbps with strong OpenVPN DCO throughput Wi Fi 7 support with Multi Link Operation across 2.4GHz and 5GHz Compact 120 x 83 x 34mm chassis with 205g weight for travel deployment Low power consumption between ~3.7W and ~6.7W under typical loads Fast boot time of approximately 51 seconds from cold start Robust OpenWrt based firmware with full LuCI access and app ecosystem Multi WAN failover across wired, repeater, and USB tethering sources

No 6GHz band support, limiting full Wi Fi 7 capability USB storage performance limited to approximately 50MB/s to 70MB/s Only 1 USB 3.0 port, restricting simultaneous tethering and storage use

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Jonsbo N6 DIY NAS Case Review

The Jonsbo N6 is the latest addition to the company’s long running lineup of DIY NAS focused enclosures, positioned between the compact N4 and the much larger N5. It is designed as a 9 bay desktop NAS chassis that supports both ITX and Micro ATX motherboards, while also introducing several changes compared with earlier Jonsbo designs. These include proper metal drive trays instead of rubber mounted sleds, expanded fan support, flexible PSU placement, and the inclusion of a physical fan controller. After spending the last 2 weeks building, configuring, and testing the N6 in a real world NAS environment, this review looks at how the case performs in practice, how its design decisions affect usability, and where it fits within the wider Jonsbo NAS case range.

Jonsbo N6 Review – Design & Storage

The Jonsbo N6 continues the brand’s established NAS focused design language, combining a compact tower format with a restrained, industrial appearance. The chassis uses a steel construction with aluminum accents and a wooden front trim, which has become a recognizable feature across several recent Jonsbo NAS cases. While the wood insert will not appeal to everyone, it is purely cosmetic and does not interfere with airflow or structural rigidity. Overall dimensions place the N6 clearly below the larger N5, though it is still substantial compared to many ITX cases due to its storage capacity.

Storage is the defining feature of the N6, with support for up to 9 drives in either 3.5 inch HDD or 2.5 inch SSD formats. All drives are housed in a dedicated lower compartment, separated from the motherboard area. This layout helps with cable management and keeps storage thermals isolated from CPU and expansion hardware. The capacity places the N6 in a relatively uncommon position, offering more drive bays than most compact NAS cases without stepping into full tower territory.

Unlike earlier Jonsbo NAS models that relied on rubber grommets and pull tabs, the N6 uses metal drive trays as standard. Each tray supports both 3.5 inch and 2.5 inch drives and slots directly into a rear mounted backplane. The trays are functional rather than refined, lacking tool less locking mechanisms or individual activity LEDs. However, spacing between drives allows some passive airflow, which is important given the density of a fully populated array.

All 9 drive trays connect to a single backplane PCB located at the rear of the drive cage. The front side of the board uses individual SATA connectors for each bay, simplifying installation compared to loose cabling. On the output side, the board breaks out into standard SATA data connectors rather than Mini SAS, alongside SATA and Molex power inputs. This choice favors compatibility but limits native SAS support, which may matter to users running enterprise drives or SAS controllers.

From an installation standpoint, drive access is straightforward, but orientation is something to be careful with. The trays do not include visual indicators for correct alignment, making it possible to insert a drive incorrectly if rushed. While this is not unique to the N6, it does introduce some risk during initial setup or drive swaps. Overall, the storage design prioritizes density and compatibility over convenience features, aligning with the case’s focus on DIY NAS builders rather than hot swap environments.

Jonsbo N6 Review – Internal Structure

The internal layout of the Jonsbo N6 is designed around flexibility rather than absolute clearance, and that becomes clear once hardware installation begins. The case supports Mini ITX and Micro ATX motherboards, but does not officially support full ATX boards, despite physical dimensions that appear close.

In practice, fitting an ATX board is technically possible but leaves insufficient clearance for cabling, airflow, and component access, making it impractical for most builds. With ITX boards, internal space is generous and largely unobstructed, while Micro ATX installations require more planning due to tighter edge clearances near the drive backplane and PSU mounting areas.

PSU placement plays a major role in how the internal hardware layout behaves. The N6 supports both ATX and SFX power supplies and allows installation in multiple positions using included brackets. Mounting a full size ATX PSU above the motherboard significantly reduces available CPU cooler height, which can limit cooler selection to low profile or compact tower designs. SFX power supplies offer more flexibility and reduce conflicts around the CPU socket area, particularly when using Micro ATX boards.

The option for dual PSU installation adds another layer of configurability, but it further increases complexity around airflow paths and cable routing.

PCIe expansion is relatively strong for a case in this category, with support for up to 4 full height expansion slots. This allows for the use of HBAs, network cards, or even a discrete GPU, provided length and thickness limits are respected. Clearance becomes tight when multiple expansion cards are installed alongside side mounted fans, especially on the lowest slot. Cable routing is generally straightforward, with clear channels and anchor points, but routing SATA or Mini SAS fan out cables is easier if completed before final motherboard installation, particularly in Micro ATX configurations.

Jonsbo N6 Review – Connectivity

The Jonsbo N6 keeps external connectivity relatively straightforward, with all user facing ports located on the front panel for easy access. This placement makes sense for a NAS chassis that is likely to be positioned on a desk, shelf, or rack adjacent surface rather than frequently accessed from the rear. The front I O layout focuses on essential connectivity rather than attempting to replicate a full desktop case feature set.

In practical use, the inclusion of a USB 3.2 Gen2 Type C port provides a high bandwidth option for external storage, temporary backups, or maintenance tasks such as system recovery media. Alongside it, the USB 3.0 Type A port offers compatibility with a wide range of existing peripherals. This combination should be sufficient for most NAS focused workflows, where frequent hot swapping of peripherals is uncommon but occasional high speed access is still required.

Internally, connectivity is more complex and is closely tied to the integrated drive backplane. All 9 drive bays connect through the rear mounted PCB, which uses individual SATA data connectors rather than Mini SAS or SAS HD outputs. Power delivery is handled through a mix of SATA power and Molex connectors, which provides flexibility but may increase cable management complexity depending on the power supply used.

While functional, this approach places more responsibility on the user to plan cabling carefully, especially in fully populated configurations.

Jonsbo N6 Review – N5 vs N6

The Jonsbo N6 and the N5 address similar DIY NAS use cases but sit at different points in the product lineup in terms of capacity and flexibility. The N6 is designed around a nine-bay drive layout with support for ITX and micro-ATX motherboards and compatibility with either ATX or SFX power supplies, offering a balance between storage density and a relatively compact footprint, which makes it suitable for builds that need a significant number of drives without a full tower size. By contrast, the N5 supports up to twelve 3.5-inch drives and up to four 2.5-inch SSDs, and accepts larger motherboard formats including ITX, micro-ATX, ATX, and E-ATX, giving it broader component compatibility and expansion potential.

The N5 also provides more PCIe slots and larger GPU clearance, supporting use cases that may combine NAS storage with workstation-class expansions, and includes a mesh front and more extensive cooling provisions to manage heat in its larger enclosure. Both cases offer USB-C and USB-A front I/O for quick access, but the N5’s larger size and multi-material construction generally result in greater internal space for hardware and cooling options. In practice, the N6 aims to offer a middle ground with substantial drive capacity and flexible power supply choices, while the N5 pushes more towards maximum expandability and support for larger and more powerful builds within the Jonsbo NAS ecosystem

Jonsbo N6 Review – Build Testing

In day to day use, the Jonsbo N6 shows that its performance characteristics are shaped more by component choice than by any inherent limitation of the chassis itself. With a fully populated 9 bay configuration using 7200 RPM hard drives, the case does not introduce noticeable bottlenecks in sustained storage workloads. During extended uptime testing across multiple days, system stability remained consistent, with no unexpected thermal throttling or airflow related instability observed. This aligns with the case design philosophy, which prioritizes open ventilation paths and modular fan placement rather than aggressive acoustic dampening.

Storage performance testing was carried out using a RAID 0 array across 9 mechanical drives, paired with a workstation class MATX motherboard and a dedicated SATA controller. Sequential read and write speeds reached approximately 2.0 to 2.1 GB/s in CrystalDiskMark, indicating that the enclosure itself does not constrain throughput. These figures are primarily governed by controller bandwidth, PCIe lane allocation, and drive characteristics, rather than the internal backplane. Random access behavior remained typical for high capacity HDD arrays, with no anomalies linked to vibration or drive seating within the metal trays.

Noise testing was conducted under multiple operating conditions to evaluate how the N6 behaves in real environments rather than synthetic silence. At idle with fans set to the lowest manual setting and drives spun down, measured noise levels hovered around 37 to 39 dBA. Under active disk access with the same fan profile, noise increased modestly to around 41 to 44 dBA, with most audible output coming from the rear exhaust area. Increasing the fan controller to mid and high settings resulted in only marginal increases, topping out around 43 to 44 dBA, suggesting diminishing returns in airflow relative to acoustic output.

Thermal measurements were taken after the system had been operating continuously for roughly 2.5 days, followed by active load and cooldown observation. Drive temperatures during idle periods generally sat between 25°C and 28°C, with active access pushing internal drive area temperatures to around 42°C. Surface readings across the chassis showed consistent heat distribution, with the rear PCB area and PSU zone measuring close to 42°C, while the top and side panels remained closer to ambient at roughly 26°C to 27°C. These results indicate that while airflow around the drive backplane is not optimal, overall thermal behavior remains within acceptable limits for a 9 bay enclosure.

Jonsbo N6 Review – Verdict and Conclusion

After extended hands on use, the Jonsbo N6 positions itself as a compact but ambitious DIY NAS enclosure that sits clearly between the smaller N4 and the larger, more expansive N5. It delivers a high storage density with 9 drive bays while introducing support for Micro ATX motherboards, which meaningfully expands hardware choice compared with earlier Jonsbo NAS cases. Build quality is consistent with the brand’s established approach, using thick steel panels, simple exterior styling, and a layout that prioritizes airflow potential and internal flexibility over visual flair. The inclusion of drive trays, a physical fan controller, multiple PSU mounting options, and extensive fan support marks a clear evolution over previous generations.

That said, the N6 is not without compromises. ATX motherboard support is effectively absent despite tight tolerances, cooling outcomes remain highly dependent on fan selection and placement, and the backplane design relies on standard SATA connections rather than SAS aggregation. Pricing at launch also places it in a competitive bracket where expectations are higher, particularly around refinement of drive trays and airflow optimization around the disk stack. For users who found the N5 too large or excessive but felt constrained by the N3 or N4, the N6 fills a specific and practical gap. It does not replace the N5 as a flagship option, but it stands as a capable and thoughtfully designed alternative for builders who value density, flexibility, and manageable footprint over absolute expansion.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Jonsbo N6 Case

Check AliExpress or the Jonsbo N6 Case

Jonsbo N6 Case Review PROs

Jonsbo N6 Case Review CONs

Supports up to 9 x 3.5 inch or 2.5 inch drives, allowing dense storage in a relatively compact footprint Compatible with ITX and Micro ATX motherboards, offering more flexibility than earlier Jonsbo NAS cases Flexible PSU placement with support for ATX and SFX units, including multiple mounting positions Integrated drive backplane simplifies installation and reduces individual cable clutter Built in 3 speed fan controller provides basic manual airflow control without software dependency Extensive ventilation on all sides, top, and base helps maintain reasonable thermals under load Drive trays replace older rubber grommet mounting, making drive installation more straightforward Build quality feels solid overall, with steel construction and improved internal layout for cable routing

Backplane uses individual SATA connectors rather than Mini SAS, limiting appeal for SAS focused builds Clearance becomes tight with Micro ATX boards and larger ATX PSUs, especially around CPU cooling Drive trays lack tool less latches, locks, or orientation indicators, increasing the chance of installation mistakes

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX Travel Router – Which Should You Buy?

The GL.iNet Beryl AX (GL-MT3000) and the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) are two compact travel routers from the same product line, aimed at users who need portable, secure network access for travel, remote work, or temporary deployments. They share a similar physical footprint, OpenWrt based software environment, USB powered design, and the ability to convert a single wired or wireless uplink into a private network for multiple client devices. The comparison between them is relevant because the price difference is relatively modest, yet they are based on different wireless generations and hardware platforms. As a result, prospective buyers and existing Beryl AX users may reasonably question whether the newer Beryl 7 represents a meaningful upgrade, or whether the earlier model remains sufficient for most travel focused networking requirements.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router		Gl.iNet Beryl AX Travel Router
Buy From Gl.iNet	Buy From Amazon	Buy From Gl.iNet	Buy From Amazon

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX – WiFi 6 vs WiFi 7 (Do You Need It?)

The GL.iNet Beryl AX (GL-MT3000) is based on the WiFi 6 standard, supporting dual band operation across 2.4GHz and 5GHz with a combined theoretical maximum of 3000Mbps, rated at 574Mbps on 2.4GHz and 2402Mbps on 5GHz. The GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) moves to WiFi 7 and increases the combined theoretical bandwidth to 3600Mbps, rated at 688Mbps on 2.4GHz and 2882Mbps on 5GHz. Both devices operate on 2 bands only, as the Beryl 7 does not include 6GHz support, meaning it does not use the additional spectrum sometimes associated with WiFi 7 implementations.

The practical distinction between WiFi 6 and WiFi 7 in this comparison lies less in raw peak numbers and more in protocol efficiency and connection handling. WiFi 7 introduces Multi Link Operation, allowing compatible client devices to connect across multiple bands simultaneously rather than selecting a single band. In supported environments, this can improve throughput consistency and reduce latency under load. However, the benefit depends on the presence of WiFi 7 capable client hardware. Devices limited to WiFi 6 or earlier will connect using backward compatible standards, reducing the generational advantage to incremental improvements in signal handling and overhead efficiency.

In real world travel scenarios such as hotel rooms, shared apartments, or temporary office spaces, both routers provide sufficient bandwidth for streaming, browsing, cloud access, and moderate file transfers across multiple devices.

The Beryl 7 offers higher theoretical wireless ceilings and additional aggregation capability for compatible hardware, while the Beryl AX provides established WiFi 6 performance that remains adequate for most sub 2.5Gb internet connections. The decision between them in wireless terms is therefore primarily influenced by client device compatibility and the value placed on higher theoretical throughput within a portable deployment context.

It is also worth noting that 6GHz WiFi support, while often associated with WiFi 7, currently has more limited regulatory and client adoption in parts of Europe compared to other regions. Even if a travel router in this class were to include 6GHz radios, many users in European markets would not consistently benefit from the wider 320MHz channels or expanded spectrum due to regional availability constraints and lower client device penetration. In practical terms, this reduces the immediate advantage of tri band WiFi 7 for a large portion of the target audience. Integrating 6GHz capability would also require more advanced RF design, revised antenna layout, higher power handling, and often a different class of processor platform, frequently moving toward higher tier Qualcomm solutions. That shift would increase component cost, thermal requirements, and overall retail pricing, placing the device in a materially different market segment than the current dual band Beryl models.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX – Wired Connectivity for WAN and LAN?

Both the GL.iNet Beryl AX (GL-MT3000) and the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) include 2 Ethernet ports that can be configured as WAN or LAN depending on deployment needs. The structural difference lies in port speed allocation. The Beryl AX provides 1 x 2.5G port and 1 x 1G port, while the Beryl 7 provides 2 x 2.5G ports. This distinction directly affects how multi-gigabit internet connections and high speed wired clients can be distributed within the local network.

On the Beryl AX, users must decide whether the 2.5G interface will function as WAN or LAN if both upstream and downstream multi gigabit throughput is required. If the 2.5G port is assigned to WAN for an internet connection above 1G, the remaining LAN port is limited to 1G for wired clients such as a NAS or workstation. In contrast, the Beryl 7 allows a multi gigabit WAN input and a separate 2.5G LAN output simultaneously. This removes the need to prioritize one side of the connection when operating in environments with faster than gigabit internet access.

In lower bandwidth scenarios, such as hotel or public WiFi uplinks that rarely exceed 1G, the practical difference may be minimal. However, in deployments involving fiber connections above 1G, local high speed storage, or internal data transfers over wired connections, the dual 2.5G configuration of the Beryl 7 provides greater flexibility. The distinction is therefore less about port quantity and more about simultaneous throughput capability when handling multi gigabit traffic on both WAN and LAN interfaces.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX – Internal Hardware (and what difference it makes?)

The GL.iNet Beryl AX (GL-MT3000) uses the MediaTek MT7981B dual core processor running at 1.3GHz per core, whereas the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) moves to a MediaTek quad core processor running at 2.0GHz per core. This is not simply an incremental clock speed increase, but a combination of higher per core frequency and a doubling of available cores. In practical routing workloads, additional cores allow parallel handling of encryption, NAT, firewall inspection, QoS rules, and multiple concurrent sessions. The higher clock speed per core also improves single threaded tasks such as certain VPN operations and packet inspection routines. As network traffic increases, particularly when VPN encryption is enabled, the scaling advantage of 4 cores at 2.0GHz becomes more relevant than raw wireless bandwidth alone.

Both devices include 512MB DDR4 memory, so runtime capacity for active services and simultaneous connections is comparable at a base level. The difference lies in onboard NAND flash storage. The Beryl AX provides 256MB of flash, while the Beryl 7 includes 512MB. For basic firmware and light package installation, 256MB is typically sufficient. However, users deploying additional OpenWrt packages, extended logging, container based services, or more complex VPN and DNS filtering configurations may benefit from the additional internal storage headroom on the Beryl 7. The larger flash capacity reduces the need to offload configuration or expand storage through external means.

Both routers feature a single USB 3.0 port for data connectivity, while the separate USB Type C port is dedicated to power input. This means there is only 1 usable USB interface for peripherals. External storage devices such as USB flash drives or portable SSDs can be connected for file sharing via Samba or WebDAV, effectively turning the router into a lightweight network storage node. However, using the USB port for storage prevents simultaneous use for USB tethering or a USB cellular dongle. In travel deployments where USB tethering to a smartphone or 4G or 5G modem is required, the port cannot be shared. As a result, internal flash capacity and USB role allocation may influence configuration decisions depending on whether the router is being used primarily for storage sharing, mobile broadband input, or wired WAN operation.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX – Performance and Deployment Scale Long term

The hardware and wireless differences between the GL.iNet Beryl AX (GL-MT3000) and the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) translate into measurable differences in VPN throughput and concurrent device handling. The Beryl AX is rated for up to 300Mbps via WireGuard and up to 150Mbps via OpenVPN in client mode. The Beryl 7 increases those ceilings to 1100Mbps via WireGuard and 1000Mbps via OpenVPN DCO. These figures are dependent on network conditions and configuration, but the scaling difference reflects the impact of the stronger quad core 2.0GHz processor on encryption and packet processing workloads.

Client device capacity is also higher on the Beryl 7. The Beryl AX is positioned to support 70 plus connected devices, while the Beryl 7 is rated for 120 plus. In most travel scenarios, such as hotel rooms or short term rentals, both limits exceed realistic usage. However, in small office, lab, classroom, or event environments where a travel router may be used as a temporary gateway, the higher client handling ceiling provides additional headroom. The increase is less about encouraging high density deployments and more about ensuring stability when multiple devices are actively transferring data simultaneously.

Deployment flexibility also differs when combining wired, wireless, and VPN loads. On the Beryl AX, performance limitations are more likely to appear when multi gigabit WAN input, active VPN encryption, and numerous client sessions are all enabled concurrently. The Beryl 7, with dual 2.5G ports, higher wireless ceilings, and stronger CPU resources, is designed to sustain heavier mixed workloads before reaching saturation. In low bandwidth environments such as standard hotel WiFi, both units operate comfortably within their limits. The divergence becomes more apparent in high speed fiber connections, homelab testing, or sustained VPN dependent remote work scenarios.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 vs Beryl AX – Which One Should You Buy?

The GL.iNet Beryl AX (GL-MT3000) and the GL.iNet Beryl 7 (GL-MT3600BE) occupy the same physical category and share a similar deployment philosophy, but they differ meaningfully in processing capability, wired configuration flexibility, wireless ceiling, and VPN throughput. The Beryl AX remains a WiFi 6 based travel router with 2.5G WAN support, stable OpenWrt integration, and sufficient CPU resources for encrypted traffic at moderate broadband speeds. For users operating within sub gigabit internet connections, running standard VPN client configurations, and connecting a typical number of personal devices, its limitations are unlikely to surface in normal travel use. It continues to provide a compact, USB powered solution for converting public or shared internet access into a private subnet.

The Beryl 7 expands on that foundation with WiFi 7 protocol support across 2.4GHz and 5GHz, Multi Link Operation, dual 2.5G Ethernet ports, higher VPN throughput ceilings, a stronger quad core 2.0GHz processor, and increased onboard flash storage. These upgrades primarily increase performance headroom rather than altering the use case itself. In environments involving faster than 1G internet connections, sustained encrypted traffic, heavier concurrent client activity, or mixed wired and wireless high throughput workloads, the Beryl 7 is less likely to encounter processing or port bottlenecks. The higher rated VPN performance, particularly with WireGuard and OpenVPN DCO, may also be relevant for remote workers whose encrypted tunnel speed is constrained by router hardware rather than the upstream connection.

It is also relevant that the Beryl 7 does not include 6GHz spectrum support, meaning it does not implement the full 3 band WiFi 7 feature set. Within the broader portfolio of GL.iNet, development is ongoing toward a 6GHz capable WiFi 7 travel platform, referenced as the Slate 7 Pro, which is expected no earlier than Q2 2026. As such, the Beryl 7 represents an incremental step forward within dual band travel routers rather than the final stage of WiFi 7 implementation in this segment. Buyers prioritizing immediate WiFi 7 support with stronger processing and dual 2.5G ports may find the Beryl 7 aligned with their requirements, while those satisfied with WiFi 6 performance and lower VPN ceilings may find the Beryl AX remains proportionate to its price and intended scope.

Gl.iNet Beryl 7 Travel Router		Gl.iNet Beryl AX Travel Router
Buy From Gl.iNet	Buy From Amazon	Buy From Gl.iNet	Buy From Amazon
PROs	CONs	PROs	CONs
+ WiFi 7 and MLO + Dual 2.5G WAN/LAN + Better CPU + More Storage	– More Expensive – Lack of 6Ghz – Same RAM/Memory	+ Cheaper + Lower Power Use + Same RAM/Memory + Same Software & Features	– Lacks MLO – Less Base Storage – Lower USB PD Support

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Synology FS200T NAS is STILL A THING! But Is It Too Late?

The Synology FlashStation FS200T is a compact 6 bay 2.5 inch NAS that has followed an unusually drawn out and fragmented path to visibility. The device first appeared through semi official leaks in Q1 2025, before being shown more openly at Computex during May and June, giving attendees a first real look at the hardware. After that appearance, public information largely dried up, leading many to assume the system had been delayed indefinitely or quietly cancelled. Interest resurfaced later in 2025 as more complete documentation began to circulate, culminating in a leaked datasheet dated October 16, 2025 that outlined specifications, software capabilities, and Synology’s intended positioning for the device. Despite the lack of an official launch announcement, demand has remained present at a low but steady level, particularly among users who value small, quiet systems and are already invested in the DSM ecosystem. Online discussion has continued across forums and social platforms, with recurring questions around release timing and justification for the product’s existence in a rapidly changing NAS market. The FS200T appears designed to serve a specific niche rather than a broad audience, focusing on an all flash configuration, low acoustic output, and minimal physical footprint. Rather than competing on raw performance or expandability, its purpose is to deliver a responsive, self contained storage platform that runs the full Synology software stack in environments where noise, size, and power consumption matter more than upgrade paths or maximum throughput.

Synology FS200T NAS – Hardware Specifications

At the heart of the Synology FS200T is the Intel Celeron J4125, a 4 core, 64 bit processor with a 2.0 GHz base clock and a 2.7 GHz turbo ceiling. This is a chip originally released in the 2019 to 2020 timeframe and has been widely deployed across several generations of entry and mid range NAS systems. While it remains serviceable for basic DSM workloads, file services, and light container use, it is increasingly dated by current standards. Intel has since retired this naming convention entirely, shifting its low power roadmap toward newer N series Alder Lake and Twin Lake processors that offer improved efficiency, IPC gains, and more modern media and virtualization capabilities. In that context, the J4125 feels more like a holdover from an earlier design cycle than a deliberate forward looking choice, particularly for a flash focused system introduced in 2026.

The CPU does include a hardware encryption engine, which aligns well with DSM features such as encrypted shared folders, secure snapshots, and HTTPS services. However, expectations around virtualization, AI assisted services, and sustained multi task workloads should remain conservative. Compared with newer low power CPUs, the J4125 lacks the architectural refinements and efficiency improvements that would better justify pairing it with an all flash storage configuration. This choice reinforces the impression that the FS200T is designed around stability and familiarity rather than performance progression.

Memory configuration consists of 4 GB of DDR4 non ECC SODIMM installed by default. The system provides 2 memory slots with an official maximum capacity of 8 GB using 4 GB modules. While sufficient for basic DSM services, backup tasks, and light multi user access, this ceiling quickly becomes restrictive when enabling heavier applications such as Virtual Machine Manager, Synology Drive for multiple users, or container based services. Synology also notes that optimal compatibility and warranty support depend on using official Synology memory, further narrowing flexibility for users who might otherwise attempt more aggressive tuning.

Storage is where the FS200T makes its clearest statement, and also draws its most obvious criticism. The system supports 6 x 2.5 inch SATA SSDs with hot swap capability, and no other internal storage options are listed. There are no M.2 NVMe slots, no cache bays, and no PCIe expansion. In a market where even compact NAS systems increasingly rely on NVMe for primary or cache storage, the exclusive reliance on SATA SSDs feels increasingly out of step. SATA bandwidth limitations mean that even in optimal RAID configurations, the storage subsystem will be constrained long before the SSDs themselves are saturated, particularly when paired with the available network interfaces. This design choice prioritizes compatibility and thermals over performance scalability, but it also places a hard ceiling on what the platform can deliver.

Networking is limited to 2 Ethernet ports, consisting of 1 x 2.5GbE and 1 x 1GbE with failover support. While the inclusion of 2.5GbE is a welcome baseline upgrade over legacy 1GbE only systems, the absence of additional multi gig ports or 10GbE options further compounds the performance bottleneck created by the SATA only storage design. External connectivity is handled via 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, suitable for backups or peripheral devices, but there is no mention of USB based expansion units or higher bandwidth options.

Physically, the FS200T maintains a compact and understated design. The chassis measures 121 mm x 151 mm x 175 mm and weighs 1.4 kg, making it easy to place in home or small office environments. Cooling is managed by a single 80 mm fan, and the lack of mechanical drives supports Synology’s positioning of the system as quiet during operation. Power input is rated from 100V to 240V AC at 50/60 Hz, with operating conditions specified between 0°C and 40°C and 8 percent to 80 percent relative humidity. These characteristics reinforce the system’s focus on low noise, low power operation rather than sustained high performance workloads.

Who is the Synology FS200T NAS For?

The Synology FS200T is clearly aimed at a narrow segment of users who value compact size, quiet operation, and access to the DSM software ecosystem over raw performance or hardware flexibility. This includes home users, enthusiasts, and small office environments where space and noise are limiting factors and where workloads are largely centered around file storage, backups, photo management, and light collaboration services. Users already familiar with DSM who want an always on, low maintenance system for everyday data tasks may find the FS200T fits neatly into that role, particularly if power efficiency and physical footprint are higher priorities than throughput.

At the same time, the FS200T is less well suited to users expecting strong virtualization performance, heavy multi user access, or storage scalability over time. The combination of an older processor, a modest memory ceiling, SATA only storage, and limited network bandwidth means it is not designed to grow alongside more demanding workloads. Power users, media professionals, and those comparing against newer M.2 based NAS platforms may find the system restrictive. In practice, the FS200T makes the most sense for users who want a quiet, self contained DSM appliance and are comfortable accepting its fixed performance envelope from day one.

Has the Synology FS200T NAS Arrived Too Little, Too Late?

The FS200T enters a NAS market that has evolved significantly since its first appearance in early 2025. In that time, compact and enthusiast focused systems have increasingly shifted toward M.2 NVMe as primary storage, often paired with faster multi gig or 10GbE networking as a baseline rather than an upgrade. Against those expectations, a 6 bay, SATA only flash system built around an older Celeron platform feels cautious and, in some respects, behind the curve. Even where SSD responsiveness is present, the combination of SATA bandwidth limits, modest CPU capability, and a single 2.5GbE port constrains how much of that performance can realistically be delivered to connected clients.

These limitations are more pronounced when the FS200T is compared directly with consumer and prosumer alternatives released over the last 12 to 24 months. Many competing systems, including small form factor DIY and appliance style NAS solutions, now offer newer Alder Lake or Twin Lake based processors, higher memory ceilings, and NVMe storage that can scale well beyond SATA constraints. While those platforms may lack DSM and its tightly integrated services, they often deliver noticeably higher throughput, better virtualization headroom, and more flexibility for future expansion at similar or lower price points. In that context, the FS200T’s hardware profile risks appearing static rather than intentionally restrained.

Whether the FS200T is ultimately “too late” depends on how much weight is placed on software versus hardware. For users who specifically want DSM in a very small, quiet enclosure and are comfortable with a fixed performance envelope, the system still fills a clear niche. However, its weaknesses become harder to overlook in a consumer market that increasingly expects NVMe storage, modern CPUs, and faster networking as standard. If pricing and SSD compatibility further narrow its appeal, the FS200T may struggle to justify its position against consumer focused alternatives that offer stronger hardware fundamentals, even if they require compromises on software maturity and ecosystem integration.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

USB4 to 2x 10GbE Adapter – Genius, or Too Little Too Late? (QNA-UC10G2T Review)

The QNAP QNA-UC10G2T is a USB 4 to dual 10GbE adapter built for systems that lack native high-speed network expansion and need dependable multi-gig connectivity through a single Type C port. It provides 2 x 10GBASE-T copper ports, supports multi-speed operation from 10Gbps down to 100Mbps, and includes full driver support for Windows 11, macOS 12.7 to 15.4, and Ubuntu 22.04. Internally it uses dedicated AQC113 controllers for each port, allowing the OS to treat the adapter as two distinct NICs and enabling features such as SMB Multi Channel for aggregated bandwidth. The enclosure is a passive full-metal heatsink that spreads thermal load through a multi stage cooling structure, which your testing confirmed remained below typical thermal expectations even during 24-hour sustained transfers. As a premium module priced significantly higher than generic USB 4 adapters, it is designed for users who require stable long-duration performance, predictable throughput, and compatibility with modern USB 4 or Thunderbolt 3 and 4 hosts rather than the improvised multi controller designs seen in low cost alternatives.

QNAP QNA-UC10G2T Review – Quick Conclusion

The QNAP QNA-UC10G2T is a premium dual-port 10GbE adapter built around USB 4, designed for users who need stable, sustained multi gigabit performance rather than the inconsistent behaviour often seen in low cost USB network adapters. Its dual AQC113 controllers provide two discrete interfaces that operate independently at full speed, which allows for reliable SMB Multi Channel operation and predictable multi stream transfers. The all metal chassis functions as a multi stage passive heatsink, keeping temperatures stable during long workloads and preventing throttling even after hours of continuous access. Performance closely matches QNAP’s published figures, with both ports maintaining high throughput when paired with capable NVMe based systems. Driver installation is required on all supported platforms, and the adapter is not currently usable when plugged directly into most NAS operating systems, which limits flexibility. The price is considerably higher than generic USB 4 network adapters, but for professionals who rely on consistent 10GbE throughput on laptops, workstations, or compact systems without PCIe expansion, the QNA-UC10G2T offers a stable, well engineered solution that prioritises long term reliability over entry level cost.

QNAP QNA-UC10G2T Review – Design & Cooling

The QNA-UC10G2T uses a solid metal chassis that functions as a structural shell and a primary thermal dissipation surface, giving it a distinctive weight and density compared with typical USB network dongles. The outer enclosure is machined with large surface area ridges that extend across the top panel, while the base remains flat to maintain direct thermal contact with the internal controllers. This physical design is not decorative but exists to distribute heat from the AQC113 chips into the enclosure walls and then outward into the surrounding airflow. Its appearance is closer to a purpose built passive heatsink than a consumer accessory, which mirrors the product’s emphasis on maintaining stability during sustained high throughput workloads.

Internally the design is organized around a single board layout that places both controllers on the lower PCB surface, pressed directly against the internal heat spreader via thermal pads and paste. This arrangement ensures that the highest heat generating components transfer their thermal output into the metal layers with minimal resistance. Above this, the chassis integrates a second stage aluminium heat spreader that covers the width of the unit, supported by an additional top panel that completes the third passive cooling stage. This layered thermal design reflects a more methodical architecture than the mixed component assemblies found in low cost USB 4 to network adapters, which commonly rely on bridging older interfaces and produce unpredictable heat patterns under load.

The fanless approach is a key design choice, giving the adapter completely silent operation during heavy transfers. In your testing, the enclosure maintained stable temperatures even after several minutes of saturation, typically remaining in the 47 to 51 degree range depending on activity and ambient levels. This thermal profile suggests that the shell’s passive system prevents hot spots and avoids the typical thermal throttling behaviour found in cheaper adapters, especially those built around multiple controllers stacked on different interconnected PCB modules. The predictable cooling also assists long term reliability for users who expect constant 10GbE connectivity during file editing, remote rendering, or multi channel transfers.

The physical I/O layout consists of a single USB 4 Type C port on one end and 2 x 10GBASE T ports on the opposite face, keeping cable paths separated to prevent mechanical strain or excess heat mingling between connectors. The RJ45 ports support Cat 6a cabling as recommended by QNAP and can operate across 10Gbps, 5Gbps, 2.5Gbps, 1Gbps, and 100Mbps speeds depending on the switch or device connected. While minimalistic, this separation aligns with the use case of the adapter as a mobile or desktop expansion tool where the position of cables may influence airflow and heat shedding around the chassis.

The cooling strategy also reflects QNAP’s intention for the adapter to be used in long-running, high-intensity environments rather than short bursts. During your extended 24 hour tests, the chassis maintained consistent thermal readings, with the USB side remaining cooler than the network interface side. The overall thermal balance avoided thermal spikes, which is essential for dual port operation where simultaneous read and write tasks across two 10GbE channels can push less optimized adapters into throttling. By spreading heat evenly across the frame, the device sustains performance in ways that improvised USB 4 adapters often fail to achieve during multi hour workloads.

QNAP QNA-UC10G2T Review – Internal Hardware and Connectivity

Inside the QNA-UC10G2T, the hardware is centred around two AQC113 controllers, each dedicated to one 10GbE port. This avoids the shared bandwidth and internal bottlenecks that occur in budget adapters that route multiple ports through a single controller or bridge older chipsets together. Each controller appears to have a direct path to the USB 4 interface, allowing the host operating system to detect two independent network interfaces. This structure is essential for features such as SMB Multi Channel, NIC bonding, and network segmentation, since it ensures that both ports operate with consistent throughput rather than competing for limited controller resources. The hardware layout intentionally avoids stacked modules or mixed technology bridges, creating a predictable and uniform architecture.

Connectivity through the USB 4 Type C interface is built to support both USB 4 and Thunderbolt 3 and 4 on most systems. QNAP includes a 1m USB 4 certified cable in the package to ensure full bandwidth without relying on third party cables that may deliver reduced link speeds. Host compatibility extends to Windows 11, macOS 12.7 to 15.4, and Ubuntu 22.04, although all require installation of the Marvell AQtion driver to enable proper operation. This software dependency reflects the adapter’s use of high performance controllers that are not handled by generic drivers. The device is not compatible with ARM based Windows systems, which limits use with some compact laptops and tablets but aligns with the adapter’s focus on fully featured desktop and workstation class hardware.

The dual 10GBASE T ports support 10Gbps, 5Gbps, 2.5Gbps, 1Gbps, and 100Mbps operation and auto negotiate based on the connected switch or device. This makes the adapter usable in mixed infrastructure where not all devices run at 10GbE rates. The reliance on RJ45 also gives it broad physical compatibility, making it suitable for direct PC to NAS connections, multi port NAS access, or integration with 10GbE switches. Your testing confirmed that the independent controllers allowed each port to reach close to saturation independently and operate simultaneously with sustained transfer rates across both links.

The internal hardware layout also supports clear network identification through the OS. When connected, the adapter exposes two discrete interfaces, each carrying its own MAC address, speed negotiation, and jumbo frame support. This allows users to create dedicated VLANs, segment traffic, or assign separate subnets without the limitations seen in single controller USB adapters that present only one interface for both ports. The device is therefore capable of acting as a genuine dual port NIC rather than a multi port breakout filtered through a single internal path. In testing, each interface responded consistently when used with tools such as iperf and CrystalDisk, confirming symmetric behaviour between both controllers.

While the adapter is designed primarily for client devices, your testing highlighted that direct USB 4 to 10GbE connectivity on NAS platforms remains limited. Most NAS operating systems lack mature USB 4 drivers or Thunderbolt over IP integration, which prevented the adapter from functioning when connected directly to TrueNAS or Unraid. This reflects current software gaps rather than a hardware limitation, and future NAS platforms with USB 4 or Thunderbolt support may unlock additional use cases. For now, the hardware is best suited to upgrading laptops, mini PCs, and workstations where USB 4 is available and supported through platform level drivers.

QNAP QNA-UC10G2T Review – Performance

In practical testing, the QNA-UC10G2T delivered sustained throughput that closely aligned with QNAP’s published figures, with both ports maintaining stable operation during long running transfers. When used with IP based benchmarking tools, each 10GbE connection reached near saturation independently, confirming that the internal controllers can deliver full bandwidth without cross interference. During concurrent testing where two separate sessions targeted different devices, both ports maintained consistent performance levels, which demonstrated the benefit of having two discrete AQC113 controllers rather than a single shared architecture that would introduce contention under load.

The adapter also showed strong results during SMB based file transfers, which typically stress both network performance and host storage. Using high speed NVMe backed devices such as the Minisforum MSS1 Max and the Asustor Flashstor Gen 2, throughput regularly approached the upper limits of a single 10GbE link and in some cases exceeded 13 to 14 Gbps combined when SMB Multi Channel was enabled. This reflected not only raw link speed but the ability of the device to maintain a stable, predictable data path without drops or thermal throttling. The performance was also consistent during repeated transfers, confirming sustained operation rather than peak only figures.

Thermal stability had a direct impact on performance, and the adapter’s multi stage passive cooling structure prevented heat buildup during heavy access. After several minutes of continuous transfer, external surface readings typically ranged from 47 to 51 degrees depending on the measurement point, with the USB interface side remaining cooler than the network side. Even after 24 hours of operation, temperatures remained within a narrow range, and throughput did not degrade. This behaviour contrasts with budget adapters built from stacked controller layers, which often throttle or lose throughput when thermals rise beyond the enclosure’s capacity to dissipate heat.

The adapter performed best when paired with systems that support jumbo frames, high performance modes, and direct NVMe based storage, since these environments can fully exploit dual 10GbE bandwidth. On platforms that lack USB 4 optimisation or rely on generic drivers, performance may vary, and your testing confirmed that most NAS operating systems were unable to recognise the adapter due to limited Thunderbolt or USB 4 networking support. For desktop and mobile clients, however, the performance remained consistent and aligned closely with QNAP’s internal lab measurements, provided that the user installed the appropriate drivers and used the supplied USB 4 certified cable.

QNAP QNA-UC10G2T Review – Verdict & Conclusion

The QNA-UC10G2T positions itself as a specialised tool for users who require reliable dual 10GbE connectivity through a single USB 4 port and are prepared to invest in a more robust architecture than the improvised solutions found in low cost adapters. Its metal chassis, multi stage passive cooling design, and independent AQC113 controllers result in predictable behaviour during long duration workloads, with sustained throughput that remains close to full 10GbE saturation on both ports. The requirement for platform specific drivers and the lack of NAS side support limits its flexibility in certain environments, yet for desktop systems, laptops, and compact workstations, the adapter provides one of the most stable USB based 10GbE implementations currently available.

Although priced well above many alternatives, the hardware and performance characteristics position it for users who prioritise reliability over entry level cost. Photographers, editors, engineers, and remote teams who depend on consistent multi gig file transfers may find the premium justified, especially when mobility or small form factor systems prevent installation of PCIe cards. For users simply seeking an inexpensive path to 10GbE, the high cost will be difficult to justify, but for those needing dependable, long term dual port connectivity in a portable form, the QNA-UC10G2T delivers a focused and technically capable solution.

QNAP QNA-UC10G2T Adapter PROs

QNAP QNA-UC10G2T Adapter CONs

• Dual AQC113 controllers provide two fully independent 10GbE interfaces • Sustained throughput remains close to line speed on both ports during long transfers • Multi stage passive cooling design maintains stable thermals without throttling • Full metal chassis acts as a large heat spreader for consistent performance • Broad client OS compatibility with Windows 11, macOS 12.7 to 15.4, and Ubuntu 22.04 • Supports SMB Multi Channel for aggregated bandwidth beyond a single 10GbE link • USB 4 architecture avoids the bandwidth contention common in low cost adapters

• High purchase price compared with consumer grade USB to 10GbE adapters • Requires manual driver installation on all supported platforms • Limited or no support when connected directly to most NAS operating systems at the moment

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

UGREEN DXP4800 PRO Review – Step Up, or Side Step?

The UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Pro is a 4 bay desktop NAS that builds on the existing DXP4800 Plus rather than replacing it outright. From a hardware and design perspective, the system remains very familiar, but it introduces a newer Intel Core i3 1315U processor and increases the maximum supported memory to 96GB. Networking remains unchanged, with both 10GbE and 2.5GbE available, and the unit continues to support dual NVMe SSDs for caching or dedicated storage pools. These updates position the DXP4800 Pro as a slightly more capable option for users who want additional CPU headroom without moving into a larger and more expensive multi bay platform.

Category	Specification
Model	UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Pro
Drive Bays	4 x SATA (2.5 inch and 3.5 inch)
CPU	Intel Core i3 1315U
Memory	8GB DDR5 5600MHz, expandable to 96GB
ODECC	Supported
M.2 Slots	2 x M.2 NVMe
System Drive	128GB SSD (flash memory system disk)
RAID	JBOD, Basic, RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10
Max Storage	136TB (4 x 30TB plus 2 x 8TB)
LAN	1 x 2.5GbE, 1 x 10GbE
USB Front	1 x USB C 10Gbps, 1 x USB A 10Gbps
USB Rear	1 x USB A 5Gbps, 2 x USB A 480Mbps
SD Card	SD 3.0
HDMI	4K (60Hz mentioned in product overview)
OS	UGOS Pro
Dimensions	10.1 inch x 7.0 inch x 7.0 inch
Power	42.36W drive access, 18.12W drive hibernation
Warranty	2 years
Price	$699.99 (diskless, listed sale price)

At launch, the DXP4800 Pro is listed as a diskless system at $699.99 and is aimed at home power users, creators and small offices looking for a turnkey NAS that can handle container workloads, virtual machines and media workloads more comfortably than entry level models. While the hardware changes are relatively contained, they directly affect performance scaling and long term flexibility. This makes the DXP4800 Pro less of a generational leap and more of a mid cycle refinement, intended for buyers who want modest improvements in processing capability and memory capacity while keeping the same overall form factor and feature set.

UGREEN DXP4800 PRO Review – Quick Conclusion

The UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Pro is a 4 bay NAS that focuses on incremental improvement rather than major change, pairing an Intel Core i3 1315U with up to 96GB of DDR5 memory, dual NVMe slots and 10GbE plus 2.5GbE networking in the same compact metal chassis as the DXP4800 Plus. It delivers solid real world performance for file transfers, SSD caching, media workloads and container use, with good NVMe throughput and reliable 10GbE performance, but power consumption is noticeably higher than lower power NAS alternatives and internal SSD to SSD transfers do not always reach their theoretical limits. Build quality and storage flexibility are strong, noise levels are generally reasonable but rise under heavy load, and thermals remain under control despite limited underside clearance. UGOS Pro offers a broad feature set with Docker, virtualization, snapshots and AI assisted photo tools, though its security scanning remains focused on malware rather than wider system hardening and application availability is still maturing. Overall, the DXP4800 Pro is a capable and well balanced mid tier NAS best suited to users who want extra CPU headroom and long term flexibility, but it does not represent a compelling upgrade for existing DXP4800 Plus owners and its value depends largely on how much the added performance will actually be used.

Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on Amazon	Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on B&H
	STORE

UGREEN DXP4800 PRO Review – Design & Storage

The DXP4800 Pro continues to use the same compact metal chassis as the DXP4800 Plus, with no structural redesign to the enclosure itself. The overall dimensions and layout remain unchanged, which makes it easy to place alongside other desktop NAS systems in this class. While the external appearance is largely identical, the surface finish feels slightly different to the touch compared with the earlier model. This change does not affect durability or rigidity, but it does subtly distinguish the Pro from the Plus when handled directly. The metal construction also plays a functional role by assisting with passive heat dissipation across the enclosure.

On the front of the unit, four SATA drive bays are arranged vertically and support both 2.5 inch and 3.5 inch drives. The trays are tool free and lockable, with keys included, which provides a basic level of physical drive security.

Each bay connects to a shared backplane that feeds into an ASMedia 1164 SATA controller running over a PCIe Gen3 x2 link. This controller configuration is typical for a 4 bay NAS and provides adequate bandwidth for RAID 5 and RAID 6 arrays without becoming an immediate bottleneck under normal workloads.

Additional storage options are located on the underside of the chassis. Removing a small access panel reveals two M.2 NVMe slots along with two DDR5 SODIMM memory slots. This placement keeps the top and sides of the enclosure clean but requires the system to be powered down and removed from its location for upgrades. The two user accessible NVMe slots operate at PCIe Gen4 x4 speeds and can be used for SSD caching or for creating dedicated SSD storage pools, depending on workload requirements.

Thermal handling for the NVMe drives is addressed through the use of thick thermal pads that make direct contact with the metal base panel. Once installed, the base of the chassis effectively acts as a large passive heat spreader. Clearance between the bottom of the NAS and the desk surface is limited, which restricts airflow underneath the unit. However, during typical usage this design appears sufficient to keep NVMe temperatures within reasonable operating ranges, particularly when combined with the system’s active rear fan.

From a storage flexibility standpoint, the DXP4800 Pro offers a conventional but well rounded setup. Users can combine large capacity SATA drives with high speed NVMe SSDs, configure multiple RAID types, or separate workloads across different storage pools. While there is no support for external expansion units or PCIe add in cards, the internal layout covers the needs of most home and small office users looking for a balance between capacity, performance and simplicity.

UGREEN DXP4800 PRO Review – Internal Hardware

At the core of the DXP4800 Pro is the Intel Core i3 1315U, a 13th generation processor that replaces the Pentium Gold used in the DXP4800 Plus. This CPU brings a higher core and thread count, along with slightly higher boost frequencies and improved integrated graphics capability. In practical terms, this provides more headroom for parallel workloads such as Docker containers, background indexing tasks and light virtual machine use. While it is still a mobile class processor, it represents a measurable step up in sustained performance compared with the previous model.

The system ships with 8GB of DDR5 memory running at 5600MHz and supports expansion up to 96GB across two SODIMM slots. This increased memory ceiling is one of the more meaningful hardware changes, particularly for users running multiple services simultaneously or experimenting with virtualization. ODECC support is listed, although this remains dependent on compatible memory modules. Accessing the memory slots requires removing the base panel, which is straightforward but not tool free.

Internally, the DXP4800 Pro also includes a dedicated 128GB SSD used as the system drive for UGOS Pro. This drive operates independently of the two user accessible NVMe slots and ensures the operating system does not consume space from the main storage pools. The presence of a separate system disk also allows users to repurpose the NAS with alternative operating systems if desired, without interfering with the primary storage configuration or voiding the hardware warranty.

UGREEN DXP4800 PRO Review – Ports and Connections

The DXP4800 Pro offers the same port layout as the DXP4800 Plus, with no changes to the overall external connectivity. On the networking side, it includes both a 2.5GbE port and a 10GbE port on the rear of the unit. This dual network setup allows the system to integrate easily into standard home or office networks while also supporting higher bandwidth workflows where compatible switches and clients are available. Link aggregation is not required to access higher speeds, as the 10GbE port operates independently.

USB connectivity is split between the front and rear panels. On the front, there is one USB C and one USB A port, both operating at up to 10Gbps. These are suited for fast external storage, temporary backups or quick data transfers without needing to access the rear of the system. The rear panel includes one USB A port running at 5Gbps, along with two USB 2.0 ports intended for lower bandwidth peripherals such as UPS connections or input devices.

Additional I O options include an SD 3.0 card reader on the front panel and an HDMI output on the rear. The SD slot is primarily aimed at photographers and videographers who regularly offload media directly to the NAS, while the HDMI port supports local display output at up to 4K resolution. Together, these ports allow the DXP4800 Pro to function not only as a network storage device but also as a basic local media or management system when connected directly to a display.

UGREEN DXP4800 PRO Review – Noise, Heat, Power and Performance Tests

In network file transfers using four SATA hard drives configured in RAID 5, the DXP4800 Pro delivers performance in line with expectations for a 4 bay NAS equipped with 10GbE. Sequential read speeds during testing typically fell in the 450 to 500MB/s range, while write speeds were closer to 300 to 350MB/s. These figures reflect the limits of mechanical drives rather than any immediate system bottleneck, and represent a noticeable uplift compared with single drive performance when accessed over a high speed network connection.

NVMe performance is stronger, particularly when the two user accessible M.2 slots are configured as an SSD storage pool. Synthetic benchmarks conducted within the system reported read speeds in the 5.5 to 6GB/s range, while real world transfers over a 10GbE connection sustained approximately 660 to 680MB/s when copying large media files.

These results are consistent with the constraints of the network interface and show that the NVMe subsystem is not the limiting factor during external transfers.

1GB x 100 – SSH Read/Write Test over SSH – SSD Bay #1 (Gen 3×4 Slot)

1GB x 100 – SSH Read/Write Test over SSH – SSD Bay #2 (Gen 4×4 Slot)

Internal SSD testing via SSH revealed some variation depending on which drives were involved. The system SSD, operating over PCIe Gen3 x4, delivered around 3.1GB/s read and 2.4GB/s write in repeated tests.

Transfers between the two PCIe Gen4 NVMe drives reached higher raw throughput in isolation, but inter SSD transfers were lower than expected (AROUND 1-2 to 1.5Gb/s, suggesting that some operations may still route through system level processes rather than achieving full peer to peer speeds.

Power consumption is higher than that of entry level NAS models using low power CPUs. With four hard drives installed and both network ports connected, idle power draw measured around 28W. Under moderate load with active disks and light CPU usage, consumption increased to approximately 58 to 59W. At sustained full load, including CPU intensive tasks, active hard drives, NVMe access and network activity, power draw peaked in the low to mid 80W range. Noise levels remained modest at idle, but increased noticeably under heavy drive or cooling loads, particularly when the fan profile was set to prioritize cooling over acoustics.

During extended testing, the DXP4800 Pro maintained generally stable operating temperatures across the chassis and internal components, even under mixed workloads. After a 24 hour period with intermittent access and background activity, external surface temperatures measured in the mid to high 30°C range across most of the enclosure, with the front drive area and drive bays reaching the low 40°C range. The rear fan area and network ports remained cooler, typically in the high 30°C range. Particular attention was paid to the underside of the chassis, where the NVMe SSDs are thermally coupled to the metal base panel using thick thermal pads. Despite the relatively low clearance between the NAS and the desk surface, temperatures at the base remained around 34 to 35°C, indicating that heat dissipation through the chassis was effective. Overall, thermal behavior was well controlled for a compact metal 4 bay NAS, with no signs of excessive heat buildup during sustained operation.

Multimedia testing with Jellyfin showed that the DXP4800 Pro handles both playback and transcoding tasks efficiently for a system in this class. When playing high bitrate 4K HEVC content with hardware transcoding enabled, GPU utilization remained low, typically in the mid single digit percentage range, indicating effective use of Intel Quick Sync. Scaling up to 8K content, hardware transcoding continued to perform reliably, with GPU usage generally staying below the low teens and CPU utilization remaining modest.

Native playback of multiple 8K files without transcoding placed limited strain on the system, while simultaneous transcoding of several 8K streams pushed CPU usage higher but still within manageable limits. Overall, Jellyfin performance on the DXP4800 Pro demonstrates that the upgraded CPU and integrated graphics provide sufficient headroom for demanding media workloads, particularly when hardware acceleration is used, without causing system instability or excessive resource contention.

UGREEN DXP4800 PRO Review – Software and Services

The DXP4800 Pro runs UGREEN’s UGOS Pro operating system, which is accessed through a web browser, desktop client or mobile app. Initial setup is straightforward, with the desktop and mobile applications able to automatically detect the NAS on the local network. Most day to day management tasks are handled through a centralized web interface that groups storage, users, services and security settings in a way that is generally easy to navigate, even when multiple features are enabled at the same time.

User and security management are handled through the control panel, where password policies, account permissions and two factor authentication can be configured. The system supports individual users and groups, allowing access rights to be defined at both the folder and application level.

Basic security tools such as IP blocking rules and login attempt limits are included, although the built in security scanning focuses primarily on malware detection rather than broader configuration audits, such as identifying weak passwords or exposed services.

Storage and backup functionality is spread across several integrated tools. Users can create and manage RAID arrays, SSD caches or NVMe storage pools directly from the storage manager. Both EXT4 and BTRFS are supported, with BTRFS enabling snapshot based protection and file versioning. Backup options include local backups, synchronization between folders, backups to other NAS systems and support for iSCSI targets, which may be of interest to users running virtual machines or editing workloads from external systems.

Application support covers a range of common NAS use cases, including Docker containers, a built in virtual machine manager and a growing selection of multimedia tools. Photo management includes AI assisted features such as face recognition, object detection and duplicate filtering, all of which can be enabled or restricted on a per folder basis.

Video playback can be handled through the built in media tools or via third party applications such as Jellyfin, which supports hardware accelerated transcoding. While the platform continues to evolve, the software experience on the DXP4800 Pro is largely defined by the same strengths and limitations seen across the wider UGREEN NAS lineup.

UGREEN DXP4800 PRO vs DXP4800 PLUS – What Is The Difference?

The primary difference between the DXP4800 Pro and the DXP4800 Plus is the processor. The Plus model uses the Intel Pentium Gold 8505, a 12th generation x86 CPU with 5 cores and 6 threads that operates at a variable clock speed and delivers moderate performance for general NAS tasks. The Pro upgrades this to the Intel Core i3 1315U, a 13th generation processor with 6 cores and 8 threads that generally offers higher base and boost clock speeds. In addition to more cores and threads, the i3 benefits from a broader instruction set and enhanced power management, allowing it to sustain higher performance under load without excessive thermal or power draw penalties.

While both CPUs are built on Intel’s “Intel 7” process and share similar TDP behaviour, the Core i3 has a higher turbo frequency ceiling and stronger integrated graphics. This translates to improved performance in parallel workloads, multimedia tasks and certain GPU assisted processes. The integrated graphics in the i3 are also more capable than those in the Pentium Gold, which can assist in hardware accelerated transcoding and UI responsiveness, though neither CPU is designed for heavy graphical workloads. In practical use, the i3’s combination of higher clocks, additional threads and more robust graphics support results in more headroom for Docker, indexing, virtual machines or sustained multi service usage than the Pentium Gold.

Memory is the second meaningful distinction between the two systems. Both ship with 8GB of DDR5 RAM, support ODECC and use a dual SODIMM layout, but the maximum supported capacity differs. The DXP4800 Plus supports up to 64GB, while the DXP4800 Pro increases this limit to 96GB, allowing more room for virtual machines, larger container stacks or memory intensive applications over time. Outside of CPU and memory, the two models are effectively identical. They share the same chassis, 4 bay SATA layout, dual M.2 NVMe slots, dedicated 128GB system SSD, identical RAID options, dual Ethernet ports (10GbE plus 2.5GbE), front and rear USB connectivity, SD 3.0 card reader and an HDMI output. Power consumption figures and physical dimensions are also the same on paper. As a result, the Pro model is best viewed as a performance focused refinement rather than a broader feature upgrade, with its value tied almost entirely to the stronger CPU performance and higher memory ceiling rather than any changes to storage, networking or overall platform design.

UGREEN DXP4800 PRO Review – Verdict & Conclusions

The UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Pro positions itself as a careful update to the existing DXP4800 Plus rather than a clear generational replacement. The transition to the Intel Core i3 1315U brings tangible improvements in CPU capability, particularly for users running multiple background services, Docker containers or occasional virtual machines. The higher memory ceiling also improves long term flexibility, especially for workloads that scale gradually over time. At the same time, the unchanged chassis, storage layout and connectivity mean that day to day usage will feel very familiar to anyone who has used earlier DXP models. From a broader perspective, the DXP4800 Pro sits in a narrow space within UGREEN’s lineup.

It offers more processing headroom than the Plus model, but it does not fundamentally change what the platform can do. Network performance, storage expandability and external I O remain the same, and the gains are most noticeable under heavier or more sustained workloads rather than light file serving. This makes the system better suited to users who already know they will push the CPU or memory harder, rather than those simply looking for basic network storage. For new buyers, the DXP4800 Pro can be a sensible choice if the price difference over the DXP4800 Plus is reasonable and the additional CPU capacity is likely to be used. For existing Plus owners, the case for upgrading is limited unless current workloads are already CPU constrained. Overall, the DXP4800 Pro is a competent and well executed 4 bay NAS that emphasizes incremental improvement over innovation. Its appeal lies in refinement and stability rather than standout features, and its value ultimately depends on whether those refinements align with the intended use case.

Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on Amazon	Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on B&H
	STORE

PROs of the UGREEN DXP4800 PRO NAS

PROs of the UGREEN DXP4800 PRO NAS

Intel Core i3 1315U provides noticeably more CPU headroom than the DXP4800 Plus, particularly for multitasking, containers and light virtualization Supports up to 96GB of DDR5 memory, offering strong long term flexibility for advanced workloads Dual network ports with both 10GbE and 2.5GbE included, enabling high speed transfers without link aggregation Dual M.2 NVMe slots support SSD caching or dedicated SSD storage pools alongside SATA drives Dedicated 128GB system SSD keeps the operating system separate from main storage volumes. Plus, usable with TrueNAS, UnRAID, OMV etc Solid metal chassis with good overall build quality and effective passive heat dissipation Good real world performance over 10GbE for both SATA RAID arrays and NVMe storage UGOS Pro includes Docker, virtualization, snapshots and AI assisted photo management without subscription fees

Higher power consumption than low power NAS systems, particularly under sustained CPU and disk load Hardware changes are incremental, making it a limited upgrade for existing DXP4800 Plus owners – and the DXP6800 is only a smaller spend away! Security scanning tools focus mainly on malware and lack deeper configuration or exposure analysis

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

100 Reasons Turnkey (Synology/QNAP/etc) are BETTER than DIY NAS (TrueNAS, UnRAID, Proxmox)

I think most users who use out-the-box NAS solutions (also known commonly as ‘turnkey‘) will admit that, although they hear alot of good things about TrueNAS and UnRAID (as well as Proxmox, OMV and ZimaOS) – there are plenty of reasons why they have not jumped ship from their Synology or QNAP yet. No one can argue that the low resource and flexibility of UnRAID, or the power and scalability of TrueNAS is not absolutely incredible – but all to often people can forget the convenience and ease of turnkey solutions – and why in 2025 that can be as appealing to us as it was back in the early 2000s, when solutions like these first appeared at retail! So, below are 100 reasons why users choose to pick and/or stay in the safe (if more expensive!) world of turnkey NAS! Some reasons are more business-focused, some more about ease of use, and others are actually more NAS brand specific (eg QNAP Qtier, Synology Active Backup, Terramaster TRAID, etc)

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER – Different tools suit different tasks! I use both DIY and Turnkey Solutions in my own personal/work data storage environments (as well as a little bit of DAS and even some off site cloud!),. This article is not designed to ‘attack’ or ‘slag off’ one side of the home server market over another! It is to help understand why users might choose one over the other. Not disimilar in some ways to how some people prefer PC gaming vs Console gaming (or even exclusively mobile, though even struggle to wrap my head around that one!).

1. Simplified setup and onboarding

Vendor NAS software is typically ready out of the box with first run wizards, auto detection of drives, RAID suggestions and basic services pre enabled. Many users can reach a working file server or backup target in minutes without learning storage concepts in depth.

2. Unified interface across features

DSM, QTS, ADM, TOS, UGOS and UniFi Drive present storage, users, apps, snapshots, virtualisation and monitoring through one consistent GUI. In DIY platforms you often jump between different web apps, plugins or containers that each have their own interface and logic.

3. Opinionated defaults that reduce mistakes

Turnkey systems are designed around the most common small business and home use cases. They pre select file systems, background scrubs, SMART checks, scheduled snapshots and appropriate permissions. This reduces the risk of badly configured ZFS or array settings that can happen in DIY setups.

4. Integrated backup and sync ecosystem

Vendor NAS platforms usually bundle full backup suites for PCs, Macs, mobile devices, cloud sync and cross NAS replication, all controlled from one place. With DIY stacks you often assemble this from several separate tools such as Rsync, Restic, Duplicati, Hyper Backup style containers or custom scripts.

5. Official mobile and desktop apps

Synology, QNAP, Asustor, TerraMaster, UGREEN and UniFi all ship their own photo, video, music, file sync and admin apps for iOS, Android and desktop. Non technical users often rely on these instead of SMB, NFS or web portals. DIY platforms usually depend more on generic clients or community apps.

6. Vendor support and warranty alignment

When hardware and software come from the same company there is a single point of contact for troubleshooting, RMA and firmware issues. With DIY builds the user is responsible for diagnosing whether a problem is with the OS, the controller, the drives or their chosen container stack.

7. App stores and curated packages

Turnkey NAS operating systems provide an integrated app center with prebuilt and tested packages for Plex, Docker, databases, surveillance, office suites and more. Users avoid manual container creation or plugin hunting, and updates are delivered through the same update mechanism as the core OS.

8. Lower ongoing maintenance burden

Automatic OS updates, package updates, smart notifications and storage health checks are designed for people who do not want to maintain a homelab. DIY deployments like TrueNAS and UnRAID can be very stable but usually expect the admin to read changelogs, test new releases and manage hardware firmware themselves.

9. Polished UX for non technical family or staff

Many people want something they can hand to family members or colleagues without explaining datasets, pools or parity models. Vendor systems focus on friendly media apps, easy sharing links, simple user management and straightforward access control, which is less intimidating than more technical dashboards.

10. Purpose built hardware integration

Turnkey NAS software is tuned for the vendor chassis, CPU choices, fan curves, drive bays, expansion units and sometimes their own drives or NICs. This allows better power management, quieter cooling profiles and predictable performance under typical loads, whereas DIY setups sometimes require manual tweaking or custom scripts to reach the same level of integration.

11. Built in remote access services

Synology QuickConnect, QNAP myQNAPcloud, UGREEN remote access and UniFi cloud portals give relatively easy ways to reach the NAS from outside the home, with wizards for SSL certificates and relay or reverse proxy configuration. DIY solutions usually need separate VPN, reverse proxy or dynamic DNS setup, which can be a hurdle for less technical users.

12. Integrated surveillance and NVR features

Most turnkey NAS platforms bundle full camera management suites with motion detection, licensing, event timelines and mobile notification support. With DIY systems this often means combining separate containers or services and manually wiring storage, permissions and recording schedules together.

13. Smooth firmware and OS integration

Drive sleep, fan curves, thermal limits, UPS signals, LCD panels and front panel buttons are all tuned and tested by the vendor. This reduces strange edge cases such as fans stuck at full speed or drives not sleeping, which are more common when an OS is deployed on random DIY hardware.

14. Better experience for small offices and non technical teams

Turnkey NAS software is designed so that a small office without an IT department can manage users, quotas, shared folders, cloud sync and snapshots through a predictable interface. DIY stacks often assume there is a homelab style admin who is comfortable with shell access and manual recovery steps.

15. Pre integrated ecosystem services

Vendors often provide their own office suite, chat server, calendar, mail, photo and video applications that are aware of each other permissions and storage locations. Doing the same on a DIY system usually involves picking and integrating separate open source projects, each with its own user database and update cycle.

16. Clearer disaster recovery workflows

Many turnkey systems have guided workflows for replacing failed disks, expanding RAID, restoring from snapshots and recovering from another NAS or a cloud backup. DIY platforms are powerful here but often present more technical terminology and expect the admin to understand pool state, resilvering and dataset recovery in more detail.

17. Certification and ecosystem support

Synology, QNAP, Asustor and others often have official compatibility lists, certifications with backup vendors, hypervisors and camera brands, plus documentation that assumes their OS. This helps businesses that need a supported environment, rather than a custom stack that vendors may refuse to certify.

18. Predictable update cadence

Appliance style NAS software usually follows a documented release track, with security updates and feature releases pushed through a single updater. DIY NAS users often juggle OS upgrades, plugin or container updates and sometimes driver or kernel updates, which increases the risk of something breaking.

19. Lower learning curve for occasional admins

Some people only touch their NAS settings a few times per year. Turnkey software favours obvious icons, wizards and consistent terminology that are easier to come back to after a long gap. DIY environments frequently reward continuous familiarity and can feel opaque if you only log in when something has gone wrong.

20. Perceived professionalism and vendor reputation

For small businesses or freelance professionals, buying a branded NAS with an integrated OS feels closer to buying a finished appliance such as a router or firewall. This can inspire more confidence than a home built box with a community OS, even if the DIY system is technically superior, which influences purchasing decisions in many cases.

21. Built in cloud service integration

Turnkey NAS systems tend to ship with first party or curated apps for major cloud platforms such as Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Dropbox and S3 compatible services. The wizards handle credentials, scheduling and throttling, so users do not need to wire up separate containers or command line tools for each provider.

22. Clear licensing and feature tiers

Commercial NAS platforms usually define which features are free, which require extra licenses such as camera channels or mail server and which are part of business tiers. DIY solutions often involve a mix of open source projects with different licenses plus optional paid plugins, which can be harder for a small business to audit.

23. Centralised security controls

Security options such as two factor authentication, account lockout rules, firewall profiles, certificate management and brute force protection are normally surfaced in one place in turnkey NAS software. On DIY stacks these controls may live separately in the operating system, reverse proxy, containers and hypervisor.

24. Extensive official documentation and training material

Vendors publish step by step guides, video tutorials and certification style training that assume their software stack. This makes it easier for junior staff or generalists to learn the system compared with assembling knowledge from multiple communities and wikis for a custom DIY setup.

25. Easier compliance reporting

For organisations that need to satisfy basic compliance such as audit trails, retention rules or off site backups, vendor NAS platforms often include reporting tools, logs and checklists that map to common requirements. With DIY environments the admin usually has to prove and document these controls manually.

26. More predictable multi site deployments

If several offices all use the same NAS brand, the admin can reuse the same playbook for remote management, replication, user templates and monitoring. DIY deployments may vary more in hardware and configuration between locations, which complicates support.

27. Lower barrier for third party support

External IT providers and managed service companies are more likely to have experience with popular turnkey NAS brands and their operating systems. That makes it easier to hand off support or get short term help, compared with a custom server running a niche or heavily customised DIY stack.

28. Consistent user experience during upgrades

When upgrading from an older appliance to a newer one from the same vendor, the interface, migration tools and storage layout are usually similar. This reduces retraining and migration complexity, while a move between different DIY platforms or versions can feel more like a full redesign.

29. Smaller risk of silent misconfiguration

Turnkey NAS software often validates settings and warns if you choose insecure or unsupported combinations, for example exposing services directly without encryption or mixing unusual RAID and cache arrangements. DIY tools frequently assume the admin knows the implications and allow more dangerous combinations without warning.

30. Better fit for plug and forget scenarios

Many users and small businesses want a storage appliance that they configure once, then largely ignore apart from occasional updates. Vendor NAS systems are aimed at this type of usage pattern, with notifications only when something important changes, whereas DIY environments typically reward regular attention and active administration.

31. Better out of the box media experience

Turnkey platforms usually have polished photo, video and music apps, automatic indexing and pleasant web players for family or staff. DIY systems can match this with containers such as Jellyfin, Photoprism and Immich, but the user has to assemble and maintain all of it.

32. Built in wizards for directory services

Joining Microsoft 365, Azure AD, local Active Directory or LDAP is usually handled with simple wizards and documented steps. On DIY platforms it often means more manual configuration and troubleshooting of Samba, Kerberos and certificates.

33. Language, localisation and accessibility

Commercial NAS software is usually translated into many languages and tested for right to left scripts, date formats and accessibility features such as high contrast and screen reader support. DIY tools may only be fully usable in English and have less focus on accessibility.

34. Simpler notifications and alerting

Turnkey systems offer point and click setup for email alerts, mobile push messages and sometimes vendor cloud notifications. They choose sensible defaults for what counts as an important alert. DIY environments often need separate configuration for mail relays, monitoring containers and alert policies.

35. Integration with vendor hardware ecosystem

Vendors such as Synology, QNAP and UniFi design switches, routers, cameras and sometimes drives to work together. Using their NAS software often unlocks extra features or easier management when everything is from the same ecosystem, which is harder to replicate with a mixed DIY stack.

36. Cleaner upgrade path for non technical owners

If the original tech person leaves, a small office can more easily hand a vendor NAS to a new admin or outside consultant. A heavily customised TrueNAS or Unraid box may be much harder for someone new to understand, especially if it has many manual tweaks.

37. Better power management and noise tuning

Because the operating system is written for known hardware, the vendor usually has sensible defaults for drive spindown, CPU power states and fan speed curves. DIY builds sometimes run noisier or less efficiently until the owner spends time tuning them.

38. Easier resale and re deployment

A branded appliance that can be factory reset and resold is often more attractive on the second hand market, and the buyer knows they will get a familiar interface. A DIY server with a complex configuration is harder to pass on or repurpose.

39. Simple route to official feature requests

Turnkey NAS vendors maintain public roadmaps, ticket systems and sometimes beta programs where users can request features and see progress. DIY stacks rely more on open source project maintainers and community volunteers, which can be less predictable from a non technical user point of view.

40. Clear boundary between appliance and experiments

With a vendor box, many users treat the NAS as a stable appliance and do their experimental homelab work on other hardware. With DIY NAS platforms it can be tempting to mix storage, containers, VMs and random experiments on the same system, which increases the chance of self inflicted problems.

41. Integrated health check tools

Many turnkey NAS platforms include scheduled health scans, built in diagnostics and simple one click reports that summarise disk health, file system status and security posture. This gives casual admins a clear picture of whether things are normal without reading system logs.

42. Safer default network exposure

Vendor systems usually ship with conservative defaults for open ports, remote access and admin interfaces. They often require explicit confirmation before exposing services to the internet, which lowers the chance that a newcomer accidentally leaves something critical wide open.

43. Easier mixed environment support

Turnkey NAS software is designed from the start to serve Windows, macOS and Linux clients, as well as mobile devices, with presets for each. The same applies to printer shares, Time Machine and simple guest access, so a mixed household or office can work with fewer manual tweaks.

44. Family friendly features

Photo sharing, simple link based file sharing, parental controls and easy user creation make appliance NAS platforms attractive in homes where not everyone is technically minded. It is simpler to give each family member a home folder and app than to explain datasets and user groups in a more technical system.

45. Built in small business templates

Many vendor platforms include wizards labelled for small business tasks, for example file server for a workgroup, simple off site backup or camera recording for a shop. This template approach is less intimidating than building every share, permission and schedule from scratch.

46. Integrated antivirus and security scanners

Turnkey NAS operating systems usually include built in antivirus, basic malware detection and sometimes ransomware behaviour alerts that tie directly into shares and user accounts. With DIY stacks you often need to choose and connect your own security tools, then maintain them separately.

47. Built in help and guided troubleshooting

DSM, QTS, ADM and similar platforms tend to include integrated help panels, inline tooltips and simple diagnostic wizards that walk you through common problems such as slow access or failed backups. DIY platforms rely more on forum posts and community guides, which is slower for less experienced admins.

48. Tested support for vendor expansion hardware

Vendor NAS software is checked against their own expansion cards, external drive shelves, Wi Fi or cellular dongles and specific UPS models. This removes guesswork around drivers and compatibility that is more common when you deploy a general purpose OS on random hardware.

49. Clean virtual machine and container integration

On many turnkey NAS systems the built in virtualisation and container managers are linked directly into storage, networking and permissions with a unified permission model. DIY users often combine a separate hypervisor with storage and multiple container engines, which is more flexible but also more complex.

50. Easier link aggregation and networking features

Interface bonding, vlan tagging and basic quality of service are usually exposed through simple screens that understand the appliance hardware. On DIY setups these features can require manual configuration of network stacks or external switches with less guidance.

51. Integrated energy saving and scheduling

Turnkey NAS platforms frequently offer scheduled power on and power off, automatic hibernation and coordinated UPS shutdown in one place. DIY systems can do the same, but usually through a mixture of firmware settings, operating system tools and UPS software that are not collected into a single panel.

52. Simple handling of mixed storage tiers

Many vendor operating systems make it straightforward to mix solid state cache, solid state volumes and hard drive volumes with clear labels and usage suggestions. Users who just want a fast area and a bulk area can configure this quickly, without learning detailed tiering concepts.

53. Vendor tuned media indexing and AI features

Newer turnkey NAS software often includes ready configured services for face recognition, object tagging and quick search across photos and documents. Achieving the same on DIY systems typically means deploying several separate projects and ensuring they all stay updated and indexed correctly.

54. Friendly drive swap and expansion workflows

Guided workflows for swapping drives, upgrading disk size or adding new volumes reduce anxiety for people who only perform these tasks occasionally. DIY stacks present these operations at a lower level and expect the admin to understand more storage theory before they proceed.

55. Clearer codec and patent licensing story

For video playback and some network protocols the vendor usually takes care of licensing and legal obligations in the firmware and media apps. DIY stacks often leave it to the user to add codec packs, accept legal risk or live with reduced playback support.

56. Built in tools for privacy and data requests

Some turnkey NAS platforms provide simple tools for finding and exporting user data, wiping specific accounts and managing retention rules in ways that map to common privacy regulations. With DIY systems you usually have to design and script these workflows yourself.

57. Strong vendor partner and reseller ecosystem

Many service providers build standard offerings around Synology, QNAP or other vendor platforms, including fixed price backup, monitoring and remote management bundles. A customer can buy into that ecosystem more easily than asking a provider to support a one off DIY stack.

58. Remote diagnostic bundles for support

Vendor NAS software often includes support bundles that capture logs, system state and configuration in one archive that can be sent securely to support. On a DIY NAS, collecting everything a third party needs for diagnosis often involves more manual work and explanation.

59. Formal training and certification paths

Larger NAS vendors run structured training courses and certification exams focused on their platforms. Organisations can build a team of admins with recognised skills instead of relying only on informal community learning.

60. One click configuration backup and restore

Turnkey NAS systems usually have simple configuration backup features that capture users, shares, permissions and services in a single file that can be restored to identical or successor hardware. DIY platforms often have more moving parts, so configuration is spread across several tools and locations.

61. Better integration with office printers and scanners

Appliance NAS platforms commonly provide straightforward file shares and mail relay options with clear documentation for popular multifunction printers and scanners. In many cases, scan to folder and scan to mail work with only minor setup, which is harder on some DIY stacks.

62. Hardware backed security features surfaced clearly

Where the appliance includes secure boot, dedicated security modules or signed firmware, the NAS operating system usually exposes these with clear status indicators. DIY builds can also use such features, but enabling and monitoring them often involves lower level tools and more specialist knowledge.

63. Cloud based fleet management for many devices

Several vendors now offer cloud consoles that let you see, update and sometimes configure multiple NAS units from one place. This is useful for managed service providers and larger organisations and is not commonly available for DIY installations.

64. Reduced risk of software dependency conflicts

Vendor NAS software controls the package set tightly and exposes apps through a curated store. This lowers the chance that installing one package will silently break another through shared libraries or operating system updates. DIY systems give more freedom at the cost of more potential conflicts.

65. Integrated download and ingestion tools

Turnkey NAS platforms often include a full featured download client for web, ftp, torrent and nzb sources, tied directly into shares and quota rules. Non technical users can automate downloads and have them land in the right places without learning separate tools.

66. Native calendar and contact sync services

Many appliance systems expose built in calendar and contact sync using industry standard protocols, with setup wizards for common phones and desktop mail clients. Small teams get a simple private address book and calendar without having to assemble separate groupware software.

67. Turnkey VPN server with guided client setup

Synology, QNAP and others commonly include their own VPN server packages with wizards and downloadable client profiles, so remote users can get secure access without the admin needing to deploy a separate dedicated VPN appliance.

68. Integrated reverse proxy and virtual host manager

Turnkey NAS software often lets you publish several internal apps behind a single public address using a graphical reverse proxy manager, with automatic certificate handling. On DIY systems this usually means manual web server configuration and ongoing maintenance.

69. Front panel copy and import workflows

Many branded NAS units wire the front usb port and copy button directly into the operating system, so pressing it can trigger predefined jobs such as importing photos or backing up a specific share. Replicating this behaviour on a DIY server normally needs custom scripting.

70. Effortless discovery by televisions and consoles

Vendor NAS operating systems usually ship with media servers that smart televisions and game consoles can see immediately, with almost no setup. For many households this simple living room playback is more important than advanced tuning.

71. Simple resource controls for apps and containers

Appliance platforms often expose per application limits for cpu, memory and sometimes network through sliders or basic fields in the app center. This reduces the chance that one heavy service will starve others without the admin needing to understand deeper container controls.

72. Structured beta and preview channels

Several commercial NAS ecosystems provide clearly labelled preview tracks for new features with documented rollback paths and support boundaries. Curious users can try new capabilities while still having a straightforward route back to a stable release.

73. Hardware aware media transcoding controls

Turnkey NAS software usually knows exactly which media acceleration features are present and exposes them through simple settings. Users can enable or disable hardware transcode and change quality limits without hand tuning media server parameters.

74. Native smart home and voice assistant integration

Many vendor platforms provide official skills or actions for major voice assistants and sometimes hooks for smart home platforms. This allows simple voice commands or automation rules for tasks such as checking storage status or pausing heavy jobs.

75. Unified performance monitoring and graphs

Turnkey NAS systems usually include dashboards that graph cpu, memory, network and disk activity over time. Admins get an at a glance view of behaviour without deploying a separate monitoring stack or learning specialised graphing tools.

76. Integrated snapshot browsing for end users

On many turnkey NAS platforms, users can see and restore earlier versions of files directly from the web file portal or desktop client, without needing admin access to the snapshot tools. DIY systems often expose snapshots mainly at the storage layer, which makes end user self service recovery more complicated to set up.

77. Pre defined permission and role templates

Vendor NAS software usually ships with ready made roles such as administrator, power user, standard user and guest that map to sensible permission sets. This reduces the chance of over privileged accounts and saves admins from building every permission scheme by hand, which is more common with DIY platforms.

78. Unified logging and audit views

Turnkey NAS systems tend to centralise system logs, access logs and app logs in one interface with filters and export options. Admins can quickly see who did what and when, instead of piecing together multiple log locations and formats as is typical on general purpose DIY servers.

79. Guided guest and project share creation

Appliance NAS platforms often include wizards specifically for temporary project folders or guest access, with options for automatic expiry and simple sharing links. DIY systems can do the same but usually require manual user creation, ACL tweaks and later cleanup that is easier to forget.

80. Consistent behaviour across the product range

Once someone has learned one model from a vendor, most of their knowledge applies across the whole family, even when hardware capabilities differ. Features behave in a consistent way, whereas DIY deployments can vary widely depending on how each server was built and configured.

81. Workload tuned defaults out of the box

Many vendor platforms come with presets for common workloads such as general file server, surveillance recording or virtualisation, each with tuned cache, connection and background task settings. DIY stacks often leave all the tuning to the admin and assume they understand how to optimise for each workload.

82. Multi administrator delegation with scoped access

Turnkey NAS software frequently supports multiple administrator level accounts with different scopes, for example a main system admin and a helpdesk admin who can reset passwords but not change storage. Implementing that kind of scoped admin access on a DIY stack usually demands deeper knowledge of underlying permission models.

83. Guided certificate and HTTPS management

Many appliance NAS platforms provide wizards that request, install and renew certificates from public authorities and apply them across web admin, file portals and apps. On DIY systems, certificate handling often requires manual web server configuration, file placement and periodic renewal scripts.

84. Vendor push notification channels

In addition to email alerts, turnkey NAS platforms often use vendor operated push services tied to their mobile apps and cloud accounts. This means important alerts such as disk failures or overheating can reach admins even when mail relays are misconfigured, something that is less common in DIY environments.

85. Clear support lifecycle and end of service timelines

Commercial NAS vendors publish how long each model and OS train will receive security and feature updates. That clarity makes it easier to plan hardware refreshes and budgets, whereas with DIY combinations of OS and plugins it can be harder to know which components will still be maintained in several years.

86. Offline update bundles for secure or air gapped sites

Turnkey NAS operating systems usually provide complete update files that can be downloaded once, checked and then applied to machines without direct internet access. Assembling equivalent offline update workflows for DIY stacks involves collecting OS updates, plugin updates and container images individually.

87. Dedicated tools to migrate from older or rival devices

Many vendor platforms include built in migration tools that pull data, permissions and sometimes application settings from older appliances or even competing NAS brands over the network. In DIY setups, migration is more often built around manual rsync, snapshots and recreation of users and shares.

88. Native S3 compatible object storage services

Some turnkey NAS systems include official S3 compatible endpoints that are tightly integrated with the built in user and permission model. This lets organisations expose object storage to applications without standing up and maintaining a separate object storage project on top of a DIY server.

89. Simple controls for scrubbing and integrity repair

Appliance NAS platforms typically expose data scrubbing and repair functions as a schedule choice rather than a low level command. Admins can enable regular scrubs to catch bit rot and silent corruption without needing to learn or script the underlying integrity tools.

90. Guided secure erase and decommission procedures

Many vendor NAS operating systems offer secure wipe options for entire volumes or selected shares, often including crypto erase where keys are destroyed. This makes it easier to safely dispose of or resell hardware, while DIY admins must design and verify their own data destruction workflows.

91. Predictable behaviour under partial hardware failures

Turnkey stacks are tested against common faults such as a dead fan, a missing expansion tray or a single failing drive, with clear warning messages in the GUI. DIY combinations of OS and hardware can behave less predictably when something fails, which increases pressure on the admin during incidents.

92. Wizards for expansion units and bay mapping

Where vendors sell expansion shelves, their NAS software usually provides screens that show which bay belongs to which chassis and guide the user through adding or replacing shelves. With DIY servers and generic JBODs, tracking physical bay mapping is often left to labelling and manual documentation.

93. Clean separation of admin and user facing portals

Appliance NAS platforms normally offer a clear split between the administrative interface and user portals for files, photos, mail or collaboration tools. End users rarely need to see the admin side, which reduces the risk of accidental changes compared with some DIY environments where everything is accessed in the same way.

94. Sector specific documentation and examples

Larger NAS vendors often produce guidance tailored to common sectors such as creative studios, surveillance deployments, education or small offices, including reference topologies and settings. DIY platforms rely more on generic documentation, leaving admins to translate that into sector specific designs themselves.

95. Reduced risk of command line mistakes

Because turnkey NAS systems guide most changes through the web interface and hide many low level options, there is less chance that an admin will break the system with a single incorrect shell command. DIY stacks encourage deeper shell access, which is powerful but also easier to misuse.

96. Factory reset and recovery options designed for non experts

Many vendor NAS devices include simple factory reset procedures and guided recovery wizards that bring the system back to a known state without needing installation media. On DIY servers, reinstalling or repairing the OS often involves bootable images, manual partitioning and reimporting storage.

97. Easier integration into vendor router and Wi Fi ecosystems

When a NAS, router and access points all come from the same brand, the software often includes shortcuts for service discovery, internal DNS and basic quality of service for media traffic. Recreating that level of smooth integration with a DIY NAS in a mixed vendor network typically takes more tuning.

98. Safer experimentation through vendor sandboxes or trial modes

Some turnkey NAS platforms offer limited scope trial zones or beta features that are clearly flagged and easy to disable, reducing the risk that experiments will affect core data. DIY environments can provide similar separation, but usually only if the admin designs careful virtualisation or lab setups.

99. Simple inclusion in vendor managed backup services

Vendors increasingly offer their own cloud backup platforms that recognise their NAS appliances automatically and apply sensible defaults for encryption, retention and throttling. DIY NAS users can pick any cloud they like, but must design the backup strategy, encryption and job tuning themselves.

100. Stronger non technical stakeholder confidence in the solution

Managers, clients or family members often feel more comfortable when critical data lives on a named appliance with an official operating system, public documentation and a support contract. That confidence in a recognisable product can be important even when a well built DIY alternative is technically very capable.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

UnifyDrive UP6 Mobile NAS Review – And now for something completely different….

The UnifyDrive UP6 is a portable, battery-equipped mobile NAS intended for workflows that sit between direct attached storage and a traditional office NAS, particularly when backing up and moving large photo or video projects offsite. It sells for $1,599 USD and combines a compact chassis with a built-in 6-inch 2160×1080 touchscreen designed to provide basic device control and file access without needing a phone or laptop for every task. In use, the touchscreen is capable of navigation, monitoring backups, and previewing common media files, but it does not replace a full client experience for deeper system management. The UP6 is built around 6x PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots with a stated maximum of 48TB all-flash storage, alongside memory expansion up to 96GB DDR5, though it ships with 16GB installed. Connectivity is positioned as a major part of the product, including 2x Thunderbolt 4, a 10GbE port, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, and HDMI 2.1 output. UnifyDrive also markets features such as plug-in card backup, a local AP mode for field collaboration without external Wi-Fi, and external GPU support via its high-speed USB-C connections, which places the UP6 closer to a small, portable workstation-class NAS than a basic travel backup device.

UnifyDrive UP6 Review – Quick Conclusion

The UnifyDrive UP6 is a $1,599 portable mobile NAS that combines a compact 170mm x 147mm x 43mm chassis and 6-inch 2160×1080 touchscreen with workstation-leaning hardware, including an Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (14-core), Intel Arc graphics, an 11 TOPS NPU, and support for up to 96GB DDR5 (16GB installed) plus 6x PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots for up to 48TB, split across 3x PCIe 4.0 x4 and 3x PCIe 4.0 x2 lanes. Its strongest points are connectivity and flexibility: 2x Thunderbolt 4, 10GbE, Wi-Fi 6 AP mode, Bluetooth, HDMI 2.1, SD UHS-II and CFexpress support, plus a plug-in, on-device backup workflow that can run without a laptop and can be verified through local file browsing and preview. The software stack is broad for a mobile NAS, with snapshots, sync and backup tooling, cloud options, encrypted secure space, media apps, AI-assisted photo organization, Docker, iSCSI, and generally strong usability, including some practical touches like built-in LAN testing. The main drawbacks are cost once SSDs and memory are added, missing SSD heat sinks despite Gen4 storage expectations, and a touchscreen interface that is useful for basic control but still falls short of a full client for deeper settings. Security is also an ongoing concern for a device designed to travel, with no standard authenticator-style 2FA and limited session control tools compared with what the platform otherwise suggests. In real testing, battery runtime varies sharply by workload: a 30-minute continuous 10GbE upload dropped the battery 42%, a 10-minute repeated read-write loop used 12%, and lighter interaction implied much longer runtime, while the battery also functions as a configurable UPS buffer. Noise and thermals were generally controlled, with roughly 37 to 38 dBA in auto fan mode under SSD access and 46 to 47 dBA at max, SSD temps briefly around 55 to 60C, and vent and surface readings mostly in the mid-30s to mid-40s C range with third-party heat sinks installed, though the CPU tends to sit around 60C in regular use. Overall, it is best viewed as a specialist tool for creators and teams who will use the mix of portable operation, fast ingest, high bandwidth connections, and feature-rich software, rather than as a value-focused alternative to a conventional desktop NAS.

UnifyDrive UP6 Review – Design & Storage

The UP6 uses a compact, travel-friendly footprint for the class, measuring 170mm x 147mm x 43mm, with a listed weight of 1300g without the silicone case. In practice it sits somewhere between a thick portable SSD enclosure and a small desktop NAS, and it is designed to be used both on a desk and in a bag. The outer shell is plastic, while the internal structure is metal, which is relevant because the device is built around densely packed NVMe storage and a laptop-class Intel platform. The front-facing 6-inch touchscreen is a key part of the industrial design and is bright enough to remain usable in typical indoor environments, with a phone-like layout for navigation.

Access to storage is through a removable top panel that exposes the internal M.2 and memory area. The UP6 provides 6x PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots with a maximum stated capacity of 48TB, but the storage does not come pre-populated, so the final cost depends heavily on the SSDs chosen. UnifyDrive’s layout mixes bandwidth tiers: 3 slots are PCIe 4.0 x4 and 3 slots are PCIe 4.0 x2, which creates a performance hierarchy that matters if the array is built with mixed workloads or if certain volumes are reserved for cache, scratch, or active project storage. This 6-bay NVMe approach is consistent with the device’s mobile positioning since SSDs are less fragile in transit than hard drives and generally tolerate movement better.

One of the main design concerns is thermals around the storage bay area. In early handling, the proximity of the M.2 drives to the plastic top cover stands out, particularly for PCIe 4.0 x4 SSDs that can run hot during sustained writes. The unit does not include M.2 heat sinks in the box, which is unusual at this price and places responsibility on the user to manage temperatures through third-party heat sinks if they plan to run higher power drives. The drive slots are also positioned at differing angles relative to airflow, raising questions about how evenly heat is removed across all installed SSDs during long transfers.

Ventilation is built into multiple sides of the chassis, including a vent path that runs through the main body, and the unit incorporates dust filtration on the intake areas. Over extended use, that ventilation design appears to do meaningful work, but it also means the UP6 relies on active airflow rather than passive dissipation through a metal outer shell. For a device that may be used in the field, this approach makes cleanliness and environment more relevant than with sealed enclosures, especially when operating in dusty locations or in bags where vents can be partially obstructed.

From a storage workflow perspective, UnifyDrive emphasizes quick ingestion and verification, and the physical layout supports that by pairing internal NVMe with front-of-device status visibility. The UP6 includes SD card support and CFexpress support for direct backup operations, and the system is designed to detect media on insertion and trigger a guided backup process on the touchscreen. That structure aligns with the intended use case of returning from a shoot, inserting cards, starting a backup without a laptop, and then confirming the results using on-device file browsing and preview tools before moving on.

UnifyDrive UP6 Review – Touchscreen Controls

The UP6 includes a 6-inch 2160×1080 touchscreen that functions as a built-in local interface for the system. It is positioned on the front of the chassis and is intended to reduce dependence on a phone or laptop for basic tasks, particularly when the device is used in the field. In use, the panel is notably bright, which helps with visibility during on-site checks and quick interaction, and it provides a phone-like UI layout with app-style navigation.

Functionally, the screen allows log-in access to core controls such as Wi-Fi setup, Ethernet configuration, Bluetooth, access point creation, basic security toggles, backup settings, and system status pages. It also provides a file manager that can browse shared storage, create folders within accessible areas, view file details, and preview certain media types, including playing video files directly on the display and showing image metadata. It can also show active task status, let you monitor backup progress in real time, and offers quick controls like screen brightness and basic power actions.

As a practical tool, the touchscreen is most useful for confirming that a card ingest or USB backup has started correctly, checking that files exist after a transfer, and doing light review without pulling out another device. Its limits show up when deeper administration is needed: the settings exposed on-screen are comparatively shallow, with missing or reduced control for items like detailed fan behavior, richer hardware telemetry, and some power-management preferences. Media preview is also constrained, including no built-in audio output during playback, and the overall interface does not fully replace what the mobile app or desktop browser can do for full management.

UnifyDrive UP6 Review – Internal Hardware

At the center of the UP6 is an Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, a 14-core mobile processor paired with Intel Arc integrated graphics and an onboard NPU rated at 11 TOPS for local AI workloads. This choice places the unit closer to a compact PC platform than a typical low power NAS appliance, which helps explain why UnifyDrive positions it for heavier tasks such as media handling, indexing, and local AI analysis rather than basic file serving alone. In day-to-day use, the platform has enough headroom to keep the interface responsive while running background services, and it also supports more advanced features like virtualization and container workloads through the software stack.

Memory is DDR5 with a maximum supported capacity listed at 96GB, while the base configuration ships with 16GB installed. This matters because several of the UP6’s promoted workloads, including multi-user access, Docker, indexing, and AI-assisted photo organization, benefit directly from additional RAM. In practical terms, the shipped configuration is usable for basic storage, backup, and light services, but it is likely to be a limiting factor if the device is used as a more general-purpose NAS with multiple apps running concurrently or if it is configured to handle larger media libraries with extensive metadata work.

The UP6 also includes 32GB of onboard eMMC used for the operating system and core services, separating the boot volume from the user-installed NVMe pool. That arrangement simplifies initial setup and keeps the system functional even before storage is populated, but it also means the OS layer is tied to the internal eMMC device rather than being mirrored across the NVMe array. For a portable device, that separation can be a practical choice, but it is still a component that cannot be swapped as easily as standard SSD storage.

UnifyDrive also promotes external GPU support, enabled through the high bandwidth USB-C and Thunderbolt connections, with the expectation that a docked setup can accelerate AI tasks or other GPU-assisted workloads. In real use this feature is more relevant to stationary operation than travel, since adding an eGPU enclosure reduces portability, but it does extend the UP6 beyond the typical scope of a mobile backup unit. The result is a platform that can shift between a field device for ingest and a desk-bound system for heavier processing, depending on how it is connected and configured.

UnifyDrive UP6 Review – Ports & Connections

The UP6 is built around a mix of high-speed wired options and short-range wireless, with the headline being 2x Thunderbolt 4 ports rated at 40Gbps alongside a single 10GbE RJ-45 port. In practice, this gives it two distinct usage patterns: network-based access for multiple users over Ethernet or Wi-Fi, and direct host connectivity for a single workstation that wants high bandwidth without going through a switch. In testing and general use, the Thunderbolt link is positioned as a way to treat the unit like a fast direct attached volume when needed, while still keeping its NAS features available for other connected devices.

In addition to Thunderbolt, the UP6 includes standard USB connectivity for attaching peripherals and ingest sources, with the spec listing 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 plus USB-C alongside the Thunderbolt ports. UnifyDrive’s workflow emphasis here is card and device ingestion, where the system detects inserted media and can trigger a guided backup process. The unit also includes HDMI 2.1 output rated for 4K at 60Hz, which is mainly relevant if the UP6 is being used as a stationary box where an external display is preferred over the built-in screen for navigation or review.

For removable media, the UP6 includes an SD slot with UHS-II support and a CFexpress slot that supports Type B, with Type A possible via an adapter. These slots are central to the device’s positioning for on-location photographers and video creators, since they enable direct backup without a laptop as an intermediate step. The spec sheet also lists maximum rates for the card interfaces, including 312 MB/s for SD or TF and up to 10Gb/s for CFexpress, though real-world results depend on the cards used and the backup settings configured.

Wireless support includes dual-antenna Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2, and the unit can either join an existing network or create its own local access point for nearby devices. That AP mode is intended for situations where there is no reliable external Wi-Fi, allowing multiple users to connect locally for transfer and collaboration. Power delivery is also flexible: the unit ships with an external PSU for charging and sustained operation, but it can also be powered and charged over USB-C, which makes it possible to run it directly alongside a Thunderbolt laptop setup while keeping the internal battery topped up.

UnifyDrive UP6 Review – Software and Services

The UP6 runs UnifyDrive’s NAS operating system from internal storage and can be managed through a browser-based interface, a desktop client, and a mobile app. Day-to-day administration is generally handled through the web UI, with a familiar layout of system settings, storage tools, user permissions, and installed applications. The desktop client mirrors much of that structure and is used for some tasks that benefit from local responsiveness, while the mobile app provides a pared-back version of the same environment for monitoring, file access, and basic management when away from a computer.

The application ecosystem is broad by current turnkey NAS standards, with an app center that includes common functions such as snapshots, multi-device backup jobs, synchronization tasks, and cloud integration. File and folder management is presented in a way that targets non-technical users, with share creation, permission adjustment, and storage expansion tools surfaced without requiring command line work. There is also support for encrypted storage through a dedicated secure space feature, which adds an extra password gate for a defined portion of capacity rather than encrypting the entire system volume by default.

For creators, the media stack is a central part of the platform rather than an add-on. Photo management includes AI-driven categorization features that can analyze imported libraries and sort content by faces, scenes, and other detected elements, with the processing intended to run locally on the device rather than sending media to remote AI services. The media interface also supports playback and preview, along with metadata inspection, which fits the intended workflow of checking files after ingest and before moving on to the next job.

Beyond media, the UP6 includes more advanced services than many mobile-focused units. Docker is available, and virtualization support exists through a dedicated VM application, though management depth varies by client. For example, the mobile app can monitor existing containers and VMs, but it does not provide the same creation and configuration controls available through the desktop or browser tools. iSCSI is also present for users who want block-level storage presentation to a workstation or server, which positions the UP6 as more than a simple file share target.

Security features are mixed in their execution. The platform includes firewall-related options, IP blocking rules, ransomware protection settings, and audit-style logs for sign-ins and connected devices. However, local login security is limited by the absence of standard 2-factor authentication methods such as authenticator apps, and session control is less direct than it could be, with limited tools for quickly removing connected clients from within the UI. Remote assistance features are available for support access if enabled, which may be useful for diagnostics but also places importance on how tightly the device is secured and how those permissions are managed.

UnifyDrive UP6 Review – Noise, Heat, Power and Speed Tests

Battery behavior was evaluated under sustained network activity rather than light standby use. With the battery charged to 100%, the UP6 was connected over 10GbE to a Windows client and subjected to a continuous upload for 30 minutes, during which the battery dropped by 42%. In a separate test using repeated read and write operations, a 256MB AJA-style loop was run for 10 minutes against roughly 400GB of configured storage, and the battery consumption over that interval was 12%. These results suggest the internal battery can sustain meaningful transfer work for shorter periods, while heavier, continuous network activity reduces runtime quickly compared with lighter mixed use.

For more general usage, the device’s on-screen battery reporting provided a rough indication of lower-load runtime. During a recorded stretch of light interaction and file checks, the battery level fell slowly, and the observed rate was approximately 3 to 3.5 minutes per 1% in that specific scenario, implying several hours if the unit is mostly idle and not under sustained transfer pressure. This aligns with the device operating more like a small PC when pushed, and more like a low-intensity appliance when it is primarily waiting, indexing, or serving occasional file requests. The battery also functions as a UPS, with settings available to trigger safe shutdown at a defined remaining percentage and optional timers intended to prevent the unit continuing to run unattended in a bag.

Noise levels were measured with the device accessing SSD storage and using different fan behaviors. In automatic fan mode under active SSD access, the measured sound level was around 37 to 38 dBA. With the fan set to its highest level during similar activity, the noise level increased to around 46 to 47 dBA. The practical takeaway is that the UP6 does not remain silent under load, but it also does not default to maximum fan speed unless instructed or unless conditions demand it. Direct manual fan control is not consistently exposed on the touchscreen interface, but fan mode changes and broader hardware settings are available through the software environment.

Thermal behavior was tracked both during heavier access and after extended powered operation. The NAS software reported SSD temperatures that generally stayed below the mid-60s Celsius, with a brief peak in the 55 to 60C range during heavier testing. After roughly 13 days of being left on and used daily in shorter sessions, external surface readings stayed in a mid-30s Celsius range across much of the casing, while the vented airflow path showed higher readings, roughly from the high-30s into the mid-40s Celsius depending on location. The device did not ship with SSD heat sinks, so third-party heat sinks were installed for testing, and that choice is likely to influence results, particularly with higher power PCIe 4.0 SSDs.

Power draw was measured on mains power with the battery held at 100% to avoid charging behavior affecting the readings. With SSDs idle, low CPU activity, and fans running at a moderate level, power consumption sat at around 21W. With the CPU still low but the fans set higher, draw increased to around 25 to 27W. Under active SSD access and higher CPU activity, power draw moved into the low-to-high 30W range based on the recorded observations, while the CPU itself tended to sit around 60C during regular use. These figures provide a practical baseline for planning portable use, since sustained high-speed transfers and heavier CPU workloads will directly affect both heat and runtime.

UnifyDrive UP6 Review – Conclusion & Verdict

The UP6 is a mobile NAS that leans heavily into workstation-class components and connectivity, and that choice shapes both its strengths and its compromises. It combines 6x NVMe capacity potential with a 10GbE port, dual Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 6, and a built-in touchscreen that supports basic local operation without immediately reaching for a separate device. The platform is capable enough to run a broad set of NAS services and applications, including media organization features that take advantage of local processing, while also supporting more advanced options such as Docker and iSCSI. As a physical product it is compact for what it offers and is packaged with accessories that reflect its intended travel and on-location role, but it also expects the buyer to supply key performance-related components like SSDs and, in practical terms, heat sinks.

In measured use, the battery behaves more like a short-duration power buffer for real work than a long-runtime field station under constant load, with runtime varying sharply depending on whether the unit is idling, serving light access, or sustaining heavy transfer activity. Noise and thermals are generally controlled for a device built around PCIe 4.0 storage and a mobile Intel CPU, but results depend on environment and storage choices, and the CPU tends to run warm during normal operation. The software offering is feature-rich and broadly competitive with modern turnkey NAS platforms, yet security expectations for a portable device are not fully met, particularly around 2-factor authentication and some aspects of session control. At $1,599 USD before storage upgrades, the UP6 is best evaluated as a specialist tool for creators and teams who will use its mix of direct connectivity, rapid ingest, and portable operation, rather than as a cost-efficient alternative to a conventional desktop NAS.

PROs of the UnifyDrive UP6

CONs of the UnifyDrive UP6

6x M.2 NVMe bays with up to 48TB capacity, including 3x PCIe 4.0 x4 slots for higher-bandwidth storage Intel Core Ultra 5 125H platform with 14 cores, Intel Arc iGPU, and 11 TOPS NPU for local AI and heavier NAS workloads Dual Thunderbolt 4 ports plus 10GbE for high-speed direct-attached and network-based workflows Built-in 6-inch 2160×1080 touchscreen enables basic setup, backup control, and file browsing without needing a separate device Strong software feature set for the category: snapshots, backup and sync tools, cloud options, encrypted secure space, media apps, Docker, and iSCSI Practical on-location ingest options with SD UHS-II and CFexpress support and a guided plug-in backup workflow Battery-backed operation that also functions as a UPS with configurable shutdown behavior Noise and thermals remained controlled in testing with appropriate SSD cooling, despite PCIe 4.0 storage and a mobile Intel CPU

High entry price, with storage and memory upgrades adding significant extra cost No SSD heat sinks included, despite the expectation of higher temperatures with PCIe 4.0 NVMe drives Security expectations for a portable device are not fully met, particularly the lack of standard authenticator-style 2FA and limited session control tools

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Beelink ME Pro NAS Review

The Beelink ME Pro is a 2-bay NAS-style mini PC that aims to deliver a full home or small office storage setup in a much smaller chassis than most traditional 2-bay systems. It is sold in 2 main versions, based on the Intel N95 or Intel N150, and both ship with pre-attached LPDDR5 memory and a bundled NVMe SSD as the system drive. Storage expansion is a mix of 2 SATA bays for 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch drives, plus 3 internal M.2 NVMe slots (1 running at PCIe 3.0 x2 and 2 running at PCIe 3.0 x1), and networking includes 5GbE plus 2.5GbE alongside WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.4. This review is based on several weeks of use and a set of structured tests covering temperatures over extended uptime, noise in idle and active states, power draw across different drive and workload combinations, and storage and network performance over both HDD and NVMe, with additional notes on the system’s internal layout and the practical limitations that come from its compact design.

Beelink ME Pro NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

The Beelink ME Pro is a very compact 2-bay NAS-style mini PC that combines 2 SATA bays with 3 M.2 NVMe slots and multi-gig connectivity, aiming to deliver a small footprint system without dropping features that are often reserved for larger enclosures. It is sold in N95 and N150 versions, both with pre-attached LPDDR5 memory (12GB or 16GB) and a bundled system SSD, and its internal layout uses 1 PCIe 3.0 x2 NVMe slot plus 2 PCIe 3.0 x1 slots, with 5GbE plus 2.5GbE Ethernet, WiFi 6, USB-C 10Gbps (with video output), HDMI 4K60, and a barrel-powered 120W PSU. In testing over extended uptime, external chassis temperatures stayed broadly in the mid-30C range with the rear around 38C, HDDs sat around 34C to 36C with modest 4TB drives installed, and NVMe temperatures rose sharply if the base thermal panel was removed, indicating the thermal pads and chassis contact are part of the cooling design and leaving no practical clearance for NVMe heatsinks. Noise in the tested setup remained in the mid-30 dBA range both at idle and under mixed access, power draw ranged from around 15W to 16W with no drives installed, 18W to 19W with only NVMe, about 22W to 23W with HDDs and NVMe idle, and peaked around 41W to 42W under a combined heavy workload. Performance was consistent with the hardware layout: HDD RAID1 throughput landed around 250MB/s to 267MB/s and will not saturate 5GbE, while NVMe could saturate the 5GbE link and internal testing showed about 1.5GB/s to 1.6GB/s reads and 1.1GB/s to 1.2GB/s writes on the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot, with the PCIe 3.0 x1 slots closer to roughly 830MB/s reads and 640MB/s to 670MB/s writes; media server use handled 4 simultaneous high bitrate 4K playback streams with CPU usage in the teens using Jellyfin. The main drawbacks are tied to the compact design choices: the RAM is not upgradeable, the chassis and storage fitting are very tight during installation, fan control outside BIOS was not straightforward in early testing, the NVMe slots are mixed speed by design, and the CPU options are closely spaced, meaning the upgrade decision is often about the bundled memory and SSD tier as much as the processor. Official messaging also says hot swapping is not supported, yet it worked during testing in a RAID1 scenario, suggesting a support-position limitation rather than a strict hardware block.

Where to Buy the Beelink ME Pro NAS: Beelink ME Pro (N95 + 12GB + 128GB) $369 – HERE Beelink ME Pro (N150 + 16GB + 512GB) $529 – HERE Beelink ME Pro (N150 + 16GB + 1TB) $559 – HERE

Beelink ME Pro NAS Review – Design & Storage

The ME Pro is built around an all-metal unibody chassis that prioritizes footprint over easy internal spacing. In physical terms it sits noticeably smaller than many mainstream 2-bay enclosures, and in my comparisons it looked roughly 20% to 25% smaller next to typical 2-bay units from brands like Synology and TerraMaster. The front panel styling leans into a speaker-like look, and it has been compared to a Marshall speaker design, which is likely intentional given the mesh and badge layout. Functionally, that front area is not a speaker, and the design choice is mostly about appearance and airflow rather than adding any front-facing audio hardware.

From a storage perspective, the ME Pro is a hybrid layout rather than a traditional “2-bay only” NAS. It supports 2 SATA bays for 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch drives, and Beelink positions it as supporting up to 30TB per SATA bay, giving a stated 60TB HDD ceiling. Alongside that, it has 3 internal M.2 NVMe slots with a stated 4TB per slot limit, which Beelink frames as up to 12TB of SSD capacity. Taken together, that is the basis for the commonly quoted 72TB maximum figure, although most buyers will treat that as an upper boundary rather than a typical real-world configuration due to drive cost and heat considerations.

The SATA bays are accessed from the rear by removing a magnetic cooling mesh cover, then sliding out the drive bracket assembly. The trays are screw-mounted rather than tool-less, and the manual specifies different screw types depending on whether you are installing 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch drives. In practice, it is possible to physically place a drive in a tray without fully fastening it, but the design clearly expects proper screw mounting for stability and vibration control. The device also includes silicone plugs intended to reduce vibration and protect the drives, and the overall bay system is designed to sit very flush once reassembled.

One unusual design detail is that each HDD tray includes a thermal pad intended to draw heat away from the drive’s underside. That is not common on many 2-bay systems, and it suggests Beelink is trying to compensate for the compact enclosure by using direct contact points for heat transfer. The tradeoff is that this design pushes the product toward precision fitting, and it aligns with the wider theme of the ME Pro being tightly engineered rather than roomy.

If you typically choose NAS hardware where drive swaps are quick and frequent, this approach will feel more like a compact appliance that expects occasional changes, not a platform designed around constant drive rotation.

The compact chassis also affects how storage installation feels in the hands. Because clearances are tight, inserting the drive bracket and getting everything seated can feel less smooth than on larger 2-bay boxes, even though it looks clean once it is in place. This tightness is likely part of how Beelink is managing airflow paths and vibration control in such a small enclosure, but it still means you have less margin for error during installation. Overall, the storage design is best described as space-efficient and deliberate, but it asks for patience during assembly and it rewards users who install drives once and leave the configuration largely unchanged.

Beelink ME Pro NAS Review – Internal Hardware

The ME Pro is sold in 2 CPU variants, based on Intel’s N95 or N150, both 4-core and 4-thread chips with integrated graphics. In practical NAS terms, these CPUs sit in the low power mini PC category rather than the heavier desktop class, so the platform is designed around efficiency and compact integration rather than raw compute headroom. In your testing and general use, that design target showed up as stable day-to-day responsiveness for typical NAS tasks, plus enough iGPU capability for common media server workloads when paired with the right software stack.

Memory is integrated rather than socketed. The configurations pair the N95 with 12GB LPDDR5 4800MHz and the N150 with 16GB LPDDR5 4800MHz, and there is no user-accessible SO-DIMM slot to expand it later. In the context of a small NAS, this matters less for basic file serving and backups, but it becomes more relevant if the device is expected to run multiple containers, heavier indexing, or virtual machines. Because the memory is fixed at purchase, the CPU choice is also effectively tied to your long-term memory ceiling.

Internally, the platform is constrained by limited PCIe resources, which affects how the storage and networking are wired. In the review you noted the CPU platform has 9 lanes available, and the device uses a split approach across its internal components rather than giving every subsystem the same bandwidth. The NVMe area reflects this most clearly, with 1 slot operating at PCIe 3.0 x2 while the other slots operate at PCIe 3.0 x1, which makes slot choice part of performance planning for any workload that leans heavily on NVMe. This lane budgeting also helps explain why the system lands at 5GbE plus 2.5GbE rather than a single 10GbE port, since 10GbE would typically add pressure to an already tight allocation.

Controller choices are mixed rather than uniform, and you called that out as unusual. The 5GbE port uses a Realtek RTL8126 controller and the 2.5GbE port uses an Intel i226-V controller, which is not a common pairing in the same chassis. On the storage side, the SATA side is handled by an ASMedia ASM2116 controller, and in your notes you referenced it operating on a PCIe 3.0 x1 link, which is still sufficient for 2 SATA bays in most real-world use. These choices are relevant for OS compatibility and driver maturity, particularly if the unit is being used with NAS focused platforms rather than the included Windows 11 installation.

Cooling is one of the main internal design decisions that enables the smaller enclosure. Instead of a traditional rear fan placed at the drive backplane, the system uses a CPU fan working with a vapor chamber arrangement, and airflow is routed so that it also passes over other internal heat sources rather than treating the CPU as a separate cooling zone. In your thermal testing, you observed that the front panel area ran warmer than the rest of the chassis due to the WiFi hardware placement, and you also saw a noticeable rise in NVMe temperatures when the base thermal panel was removed, which supports the idea that the chassis panels and pads are intended to be part of the heat management system. Power is delivered via a barrel connector using a 120W external PSU, which provides headroom for spin-up and load, but it also means this is not a USB-C powered design.

Beelink ME Pro NAS Review – Ports and Connections

Up front, the ME Pro keeps things simple: a power button and a single front-mounted USB port for quick access. This suits the NAS-first intent, where most interaction is remote, but it also sets expectations for local use. If you plan to attach multiple peripherals directly to the unit, you are quickly pushed toward using a hub or relying on network-based management rather than treating it like a conventional mini PC with generous front I/O.

Most connectivity is placed at the rear and along the base section of the chassis, which also helps keep cables routed in one direction when the unit is placed on a desk or shelf. Wired networking is split across 2 Ethernet ports, a 5GbE port and a 2.5GbE port, and the unit also includes WiFi 6 plus Bluetooth 5.4. That mix allows both a standard single-cable setup and more flexible layouts such as separating traffic across the 2 wired links, or keeping WiFi available for temporary placement, troubleshooting, or scenarios where pulling Ethernet is not straightforward.

For general external connectivity, the ME Pro includes a USB-C port rated at 10Gbps for data and it supports video output, but it is not used for power input. Power is delivered through a barrel connector and the unit ships with a 120W external PSU, which provides comfortable headroom and removes any questions around USB-C PD negotiation. Alongside USB-C, it includes 1 USB 3.2 port rated at 10Gbps and 2 USB 2.0 ports at 480Mbps, which covers basic keyboard, mouse, UPS signalling, or low bandwidth accessories, but it is still a small selection compared with many mini PCs.

For local display and basic audio, there is 1 HDMI output rated up to 4K 60Hz and a 3.5mm audio jack. The manual also calls out a reset hole and a CLR CMOS function, which is useful context for users who intend to experiment with different operating systems, boot media, or BIOS settings, since recovery options are clearly exposed rather than being hidden inside the chassis. Overall, the port selection feels intentionally weighted toward networking and core connectivity, with enough display and USB support for setup and troubleshooting, but not a layout aimed at heavy local peripheral use.

Beelink ME Pro NAS Review – Noise, Heat, Power and Speed Tests

Testing was done over several weeks of general use and targeted measurements, with a focus on temperatures, noise, power draw, and storage and network throughput. The typical configuration used for the core measurements included 2 SATA HDDs and 3 installed NVMe drives, with the system left running for extended periods and accessed regularly throughout the day. In addition to network file transfers, I also checked internal storage performance directly over SSH to separate storage limits from network limits.

On thermals, external chassis temperatures after a 24-hour period of operation with regular hourly access sat around 34C to 35C across most sides. The base area was a little warmer at roughly 34C to 38C, and the rear section around the motherboard and vapor chamber area was around 38C. The installed HDDs sat around 34C to 36C in that same period, using 4TB IronWolf drives, so not high power enterprise class media. The front panel area peaked higher than the rest of the enclosure, which aligned with the internal placement of the WiFi hardware near the front of the chassis.

The NVMe area showed the clearest example of how much the chassis panels and pads matter. With the base thermal panel in place, the panel itself sat around 36C over the same extended uptime. When that panel was removed, temperatures on the NVMe drives rose noticeably, with the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot drive reaching around 45C to 46C and the PCIe 3.0 x1 slot drives sitting around 38C to 41C. The difference suggested that the base panel and thermal pad contact are doing meaningful work as part of the heat path, and it also reinforces that there is no practical clearance for NVMe heatsinks in this chassis.

Noise levels were measured in a modest drive configuration, and they stayed in the mid-30 dBA range in the test environment. With the HDDs idle and the system otherwise sitting in standby, noise came in around 36 dBA to 37 dBA. With both HDDs being accessed simultaneously and NVMe activity occurring, it sat around 35 dBA to 38 dBA. The system uses a compact fan approach tied to the CPU cooling path, and one limitation I ran into is that I did not find a straightforward way to control the fan outside the BIOS during early testing, including attempts via SSH, which reduces fine tuning options for users who want tighter acoustics control.

Power consumption was tested in several stages to isolate the impact of installed storage. With no HDDs or NVMe installed and the system powered on, it drew around 15W to 16W. With 3 NVMe installed and no HDDs, it rose to around 18W to 19W. With 2 HDDs and 3 NVMe installed but all media idle, it sat around 22W to 23W.

Under a heavy combined workload with HDD and NVMe activity plus the CPU at full utilization, power draw reached around 41W to 42W, which reflects a worst case state rather than typical idle or light service operation.

For throughput, 2 HDDs in a RAID1 style setup were able to deliver around 250 MB/s to 267 MB/s, which is consistent with what you would expect from 2-bay HDD performance and means the HDD side will not saturate a 5GbE link.

NVMe storage over the 5GbE connection was able to reach full saturation of the network link in testing, so the network became the limiting factor rather than the SSD. Internal NVMe testing over SSH showed the expected split between slots, with the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot delivering roughly 1.5 GB/s to 1.6 GB/s reads and 1.1 GB/s to 1.2 GB/s writes, while the PCIe 3.0 x1 slots delivered around 830 MB/s to 835 MB/s reads and roughly 640 MB/s to 670 MB/s writes with more variability.

On media server use, 4 simultaneous high bitrate 4K playback streams ran with CPU usage in the teens, using Jellyfin. One extra operational note from testing is that while official messaging indicates hot swapping is not supported, I was able to remove and replace a drive in a RAID1 environment without powering down and continue the rebuild process, which suggests the limitation may be a support stance rather than an absolute hardware block.

Beelink ME Pro NAS Review – Conclusion & Verdict

The ME Pro’s main practical strengths are the space-efficient chassis, the combination of 2 SATA bays with 3 internal NVMe slots, and a connectivity set that includes 5GbE plus 2.5GbE and WiFi 6. In measured testing it delivered controlled external temperatures under typical always-on use, mid-30 dBA noise levels in the tested configuration, and power draw that stayed in the low-20W range at idle with drives installed, rising into the low-40W range under a full combined workload. Storage performance matched the internal design limits: HDD throughput was solid but not enough to saturate 5GbE, while NVMe performance split clearly between the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot and the PCIe 3.0 x1 slots, with the faster NVMe slot capable of saturating the 5GbE link in network transfers.

The main limitations are tied to the same compact, integrated approach that makes it unusual. Memory is fixed at purchase with no SO-DIMM upgrade path, NVMe cooling relies on chassis contact and leaves no clearance for heatsinks, and the lane allocation results in mixed NVMe slot speeds rather than uniform bandwidth across all 3 slots. The launch CPU options also remain close enough that the decision is often as much about bundled memory and SSD tier as it is about a clear performance tier shift. For buyers who want a small, always-on NAS with mixed SATA and NVMe storage, multi-gig networking, and reasonable thermals, noise, and power characteristics, the ME Pro aligns with that goal, but it is less suitable for users who expect frequent hardware changes, want expandability in RAM, or prefer a more conventional 10GbE-first network design.

PROs of the Beelink ME Pro NAS

CONs of the Beelink ME Pro NAS

Very compact footprint for a 2-bay NAS class system (166 x 121 x 112mm, metal chassis) 2x SATA bays (2.5-inch or 3.5-inch) plus 3x M.2 NVMe slots in the same enclosure Multi-gig wired networking: 5GbE + 2.5GbE, plus WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.4 Strong idle efficiency in testing with drives installed and idle (about 22W to 23W) Noise stayed in the mid-30 dBA range in the tested HDD and NVMe configuration NVMe performance is sufficient to saturate the 5GbE link, with the PCIe 3.0 x2 slot clearly faster than the x1 slots Chassis thermal design appears effective under typical always-on use, with external temps broadly in the mid-30C range Practical service access features: magnetic rear cover, base access for M.2, stored tool in the base, reset and CLR CMOS available

RAM is fixed (no SO-DIMM), so memory cannot be upgraded after purchase Very tight internal tolerances make drive and bracket insertion less forgiving during installation and changes Mixed NVMe slot speeds (1x PCIe 3.0 x2 and 2x PCIe 3.0 x1) and no 10GbE option

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Ever Wanted a Modern Mac Mini, but Windows? And for AI? The MS-S1 Max Review

The Minisforum MS-S1 Max is one of those mini workstations that looks straightforward on paper, but starts to feel unusual once you look at how it is put together and who it seems to be aimed at. It is built around AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395, pairing a 16C/32T CPU with Radeon 8060S integrated graphics and an NPU that contributes to a quoted platform total of up to 126 TOPS. The big differentiator is the memory design: 128GB of LPDDR5x-8000 UMA, shared between the CPU and GPU, which changes the usual limits you hit on iGPU systems where VRAM is the first bottleneck. Minisforum also leans into “serious deployment” features here, including dual 10GbE, WiFi 7, USB4 v2, a slide-out chassis for maintenance, and even references to clustering and 2U rack mounting. The result is a machine that can make sense for creators, power users, and AI-focused workloads, but it also comes with a price level that forces the obvious question: what are you actually getting for that money beyond raw specs.

---

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Quick Conclusion

The Minisforum MS-S1 Max is best understood as a compact Strix Halo workstation rather than a conventional mini PC, because its value is tied to the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 APU, the Radeon 8060S iGPU, and especially the 128GB LPDDR5x-8000 UMA memory pool that helps avoid the usual iGPU VRAM ceiling in creation, GPU-accelerated work, and local AI experimentation. It pairs that core platform with unusually strong external connectivity for its size, including dual 10GbE RJ45, WiFi 7, and a mix of USB4 and USB4 v2 ports that make high-bandwidth docks and storage setups practical, while the internal 320W PSU and heavy cooling stack are clearly built for sustained loads rather than short bursts. In testing, the system’s behavior has a few quirks that matter in daily use, particularly the way the chassis can feel hot to the touch in idle until the fan profile becomes more reactive under load, and the fact that noise ramps into the low 50 dBA range once the cooling really gets going, even if idle acoustics are more modest. Expandability is also a mixed bag: the slide-out design is convenient, but the storage layout includes a PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot alongside a second M.2 limited to PCIe 4.0 x1, and the PCIe x16 slot is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, so it rewards buyers who already know what they plan to add. The price is the real gatekeeper here, because it only makes sense if you will actually use the UMA memory capacity, the iGPU performance, and the high-speed networking and USB bandwidth, but for that narrower audience, it offers a rare combination of compact form factor, strong APU compute, and connectivity that is difficult to match without moving to a much larger desktop or adding a discrete GPU.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Check AliExpress or the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Design & Storage

The MS-S1 Max feels like Minisforum took the general “mini workstation” idea and then built a thicker, more industrial version of it to cope with the Strix Halo platform. The chassis is metal and noticeably more substantial than the smaller MS-series boxes, with ventilation cut across multiple sides rather than relying on a single intake and exhaust path. It can be used vertically or horizontally thanks to feet on more than one face, which makes sense given how much of the marketing leans toward desk use one day and rack or shelf use the next.

Minisforum also keeps the slide-out structure here, and it is clearly intended to make maintenance less annoying than a traditional small desktop. In practice, it is still a compact, dense build, but you are not dismantling the entire enclosure just to access the main service areas. The system also has a couple of physical touches that make it feel more “deployment aware” than most mini PCs, like the mounting points underneath and the general emphasis on stacking, shelving, or grouping more than 1 unit together.

Storage is one of the areas where the MS-S1 Max shows both its strengths and its compromises. You get 2 internal M.2 2280 slots, but they are not equal: 1 is PCIe 4.0 x4 and the other is PCIe 4.0 x1. That means you can have a fast primary NVMe for OS and active work, but the second slot is better treated as capacity storage, warm data, or a secondary pool where peak throughput matters less. Minisforum ships the reviewed configuration with a 2TB Gen 4 SSD, so you can start testing immediately, but once you begin planning expansion, that lane split becomes a real consideration.

Physically, the M.2 placement is functional but not especially convenient. The slots sit low in the chassis near the base and tucked behind a lot of the cooling hardware, which makes upgrades feel more fiddly than they need to be. There is airflow down there, but it is not the kind of open, easy-access layout you get in a larger desktop. It also does not really encourage tall, pre-fitted heatsinks on SSDs, since clearance is limited and the space around the cooling assembly is tight. If you plan to run heavy sustained writes, you will probably end up choosing low-profile drives or slim heatsinks simply because it is the easiest fit.

On the expansion side, the MS-S1 Max includes a full-length PCIe x16 physical slot, but it is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, and that matters if you are buying cards based on the x16 shape alone. The form factor also pushes you toward half-height, half-length cards in most practical installs, and even then it can get cramped depending on cabling and where the PSU wiring runs.

In other words, the slot is useful for NICs, storage adapters, capture cards, and some compact accelerators, but it is not a “drop in any x16 card” situation, and the system rewards planning ahead before you buy hardware for it.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Internal Hardware

At the heart of the MS-S1 Max is AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395, and the main thing to understand is that it is an APU platform built to behave more like a compact workstation than a typical integrated-graphics mini PC. You are getting a 16C/32T Zen 5 CPU with boost up to 5.1GHz, paired with an on-die Radeon 8060S GPU with 40 CUs and up to 2900MHz. In real use, that combination shifts the expectations around what “no discrete GPU” actually means, because the compute and graphics capability are designed to scale together rather than feeling like a strong CPU with an afterthought iGPU.

The most defining hardware choice is memory, because you do not get SODIMM slots here at all. The system uses up to 128GB LPDDR5x-8000 on a 256-bit bus, and it is shared between CPU and GPU via UMA. That has practical implications in workloads that normally hit VRAM limits first, like GPU-accelerated creative work or local AI inference, where the ability to allocate a much larger pool to the GPU can matter more than raw shader count. It also means your “upgrade path” is basically decided at purchase, so the value proposition depends heavily on whether 128GB UMA is something you will genuinely use, rather than just admire on a spec sheet.

On the AI side, the platform is marketed around a combined figure of up to 126 TOPS, with the NPU itself rated up to 50 TOPS. In day-to-day terms, that does not automatically translate into every app running faster, because it depends on whether your software actually targets the NPU, the GPU, or the CPU. What is clear from the positioning, and from how similar Strix Halo systems are being used, is that this design is meant to handle local model work without immediately forcing you into a discrete GPU purchase. That also explains why Minisforum leans into “run large models locally” messaging more than it usually does on its mainstream mini PCs.

Cooling and power delivery are tightly linked to the internal hardware decisions. Minisforum rates the system at 130W in Performance mode, 95W in Balanced, and 60W in Quiet, and the cooling stack is built around a copper base, 6 heat pipes, phase change material, and dual turbine fans, with a max fan speed of 3600 RPM. The PSU is internal and rated up to 320W, which helps explain why the chassis is thicker than many of Minisforum’s earlier workstations. In practice, that internal PSU choice also supports the idea that this box is expected to hold higher sustained loads than a typical mini PC without relying on a large external power brick.

There are also a few platform-level details that shape how “workstation-like” it feels. The system supports Windows 11 Pro and Windows 11 24H2 Pro/Home, and the BIOS is positioned as feature-rich, with fan monitoring and tuning options plus platform toggles that matter to power users. This is relevant because the MS-S1 Max is not just built for one narrow purpose, it is built for people who will switch between modes, tweak profiles, and repurpose it across different roles over time. If you treat it like a sealed appliance, you will still get high performance, but you are leaving a lot of what the platform is trying to offer on the table.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Ports & Connections

The MS-S1 Max is one of the more connectivity-heavy systems Minisforum has put out, and it is clearly designed around the assumption that it will sit in a workstation or lab environment rather than acting as a living-room mini PC. On the front, you get 2 USB4 ports at 40Gbps, a USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A at 10Gbps, and a 3.5mm TRRS combo jack, plus 2 built-in DMIC mics that are pitched for voice and AI-assisted capture use. In practice, that front layout feels aimed at day-to-day convenience: fast external storage, a dock or capture device, and simple headset or mic options without needing to reach around the back.

On the rear, Minisforum doubles down on bandwidth. There are 2 USB4 v2 ports at 80Gbps, which is the kind of future-proofing that only really makes sense if you plan to use high-speed docks, external storage, or potentially GPU enclosures over time. The review experience lines up with that idea: the ports work as normal USB4 for most peripherals, but the value is really in the headroom, because 80Gbps devices and adapters are still not common in most studios. Alongside those, you get 2 USB 3.2 Gen2 ports at 10Gbps and 2 USB 2.0 ports, which is a more practical mix than it sounds, because it means you are not “wasting” high-speed ports on low-speed peripherals like keyboards, UPS management cables, or dongles.

Networking is a major selling point here, but it is also a slightly divisive one depending on your setup. The MS-S1 Max provides 2 10GbE RJ45 ports, both using Realtek RTL8127 controllers, and it also includes WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4. In use, the wired ports are straightforward and do what you would expect in a compact workstation, including saturating 10GbE when paired with storage that can keep up.

WiFi 7 is also immediately usable, and the practical takeaway is that you can get multi-gig wireless performance without much effort if you already have a WiFi 7 router, but it is still not a replacement for wired 10GbE if you are treating this as part of a storage or production workflow.

Video output is handled through 1 HDMI 2.1 FRL port plus DisplayPort Alt Mode over USB4 and USB4 v2, which makes multi-display setups easy without any additional hardware. Minisforum rates these outputs up to 8K@60Hz and 4K@120Hz, and in the real world that means you can run high-refresh 4K displays or multiple monitors with less compromise than most iGPU-based mini PCs. The only real caveat is that the system leans heavily on USB4 for flexible display and peripheral expansion, so the people who get the most out of the port selection are the ones already planning to use docks, external storage, or high-bandwidth accessories, rather than just plugging in a keyboard and a single monitor.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Performance & Tests

In day-to-day use, the MS-S1 Max feels less like a typical mini PC and more like a compact workstation that happens to have an iGPU. General desktop operation is consistently responsive, and the platform’s bandwidth-heavy design shows up most clearly when you start stacking tasks that normally push integrated graphics systems into obvious slowdown. One thing that stood out early is how “hot to the touch” the exterior can feel when the system is sitting idle, with thermal imaging showing roughly 55 to 60°C around sections of the chassis and vents in that state. At the same time, internal sensor readings were not presenting anything alarming, which suggests the metal body is doing what it is meant to do as part of heat dissipation, but the idle fan curve behavior did not feel especially reactive until a workload actually kicked in.

Once the system is put under load, the cooling behavior becomes easier to understand and, in practice, more reassuring. During active workloads, the external readings dropped notably in many areas, with measurements around 31 to 34°C being observed on parts of the casing once sustained tasks were running, and internal hot spots that had looked extreme during idle did not remain in that range once the fan profile ramped. Noise levels followed the same pattern: at idle the system sat around 39 to 41 dBA, but under heavier load it ramped to roughly 51 to 53 dBA. It is not silent, but it is also not unexpectedly loud for a high-power APU system with multiple fans and a chassis that is clearly built to move air.

Power draw is one of the more interesting parts of the MS-S1 Max story because it is unusually low when the system is doing very little, then rises quickly once the GPU side is engaged. Idle consumption landed around 13 to 16 W, which is striking given the CPU, GPU, memory bandwidth, and overall positioning of the device. More moderate CPU-oriented workloads pushed consumption into roughly the 45 to 58 W range, with brief spikes into the 70 to 80 W area depending on thread behavior in the test. Once the Radeon 8060S was hit hard in GPU-heavy testing, total system power moved into triple digits, with figures around 141 to 158 W being recorded, which lines up with the idea that this chassis is designed to translate a lot of electrical budget into sustained APU performance rather than short bursts.

Benchmarking results were strong, but the platform’s newness made comparison data less useful than usual in several tools. PCMark produced a score of 8,353, and a run through 3DMark showed a wide spread depending on the test: Solar Bay scored 5,200, Speedway landed at 1,900 with frame rates around 18 to 19 FPS, and Steel Nomad Light cleared 11,000 with an average of 82.3 FPS. Night Raid, which is a better fit for integrated graphics platforms, came in at 70,000 overall, with a graphics score of 130,522 and a CPU score of 19,312. The practical takeaway from these results is that the MS-S1 Max can behave like a “real” gaming-capable APU system in the right workloads, but it also sits in a strange middle ground where some benchmark suites still struggle to place it cleanly against older mini PCs or discrete-GPU desktops.

Minisforum MS-S1 Max Review – Verdict & Conclusion

The MS-S1 Max is easier to understand once you stop thinking of it as a “mini PC with good specs” and instead treat it as a purpose-built Strix Halo workstation in a compact chassis. The big wins are the APU design and the 128GB UMA memory pool, because that combination changes what is practical on integrated graphics, especially for workloads that normally fall over due to VRAM limits. In use, it shows up as a system that can handle serious creative and compute tasks without immediately forcing you into a discrete GPU upgrade path, while still giving you enough connectivity to fit into faster workflows through dual 10GbE, WiFi 7, and USB4 v2. It is not flawless though: the system can feel surprisingly hot to the touch in idle despite internal sensors looking fine, and the fan behavior seems more tuned for “react under load” than “stay cool at rest,” which is a real-world usability detail you notice when it is sitting on a desk near you.

Where things get more complicated is the value discussion. At pricing around the mid/high $2,000 range depending on configuration, this is not competing with mainstream mini PCs at all, and it is not trying to. The audience is much narrower: people who want a high-bandwidth APU platform, who will actually use the memory capacity and fast external connectivity, and who are comfortable paying for that kind of compact engineering. If your workload is mostly general office, light creation, or basic homelab tasks, it is difficult to justify over more conventional systems, including Minisforum’s own smaller workstations. But if you are specifically chasing a compact workstation that can credibly do gaming, content work, and local AI experimentation without a discrete GPU, the MS-S1 Max is one of the few systems that makes that argument feel realistic, even if it comes with the usual early-platform quirks and a price tag that will still put off most buyers.

Check Amazon in Your Region for the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Check AliExpress or the Minisforum MS-S1 Max

Minisforum MS-S1 Max PROs

Minisforum MS-S1 Max CONs

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16C/32T) delivers workstation-class CPU performance in a compact chassis Radeon 8060S (40 CUs) iGPU is capable enough for 1080p gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads without a dGPU 128GB LPDDR5x-8000 UMA reduces typical iGPU VRAM limitations for creation and local AI tasks Strong idle efficiency with power draw observed around 13 to 16W in light desktop use Dual 10GbE RJ45 enables high-throughput workflows without needing add-in NICs WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 provide fast wireless connectivity for setups where wired is not practical 4 total USB4-class ports (2x USB4 40Gbps + 2x USB4 v2 80Gbps) support high-speed docks and storage Slide-out chassis design improves serviceability compared with many compact desktops Multiple power and fan modes (Performance/Balanced/Quiet/Rack) allow tuning for noise vs sustained load

High price puts it outside typical mini PC value expectations Storage expansion is uneven (1x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x4 + 1x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x1), limiting the second slot for high-performance SSD use Exterior can feel very hot at idle, with fan response seeming less aggressive until load begins PCIe x16 slot is PCIe 4.0 x4 electrically, and physical space constraints limit card choices

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

UGREEN AI NAS Review – Is the iDX6011 Pro NAS a Kind of Greatness or Gimmick?

UGREEN has moved from being a peripheral brand in storage accessories to a recognisable name in turnkey NAS hardware in a relatively short time, helped in part by the NASync range that arrived via crowdfunding in 2024 and then transitioned into regular retail availability. The NASync iDX6011 series is the company’s next step, and it is a bigger swing than the earlier systems because it is trying to appeal to 2 different audiences at once. On one side, it is a high spec 6 bay NAS with features typically aimed at heavier workloads, including dual 10GbE, dual Thunderbolt 4, PCIe Gen4 expansion, and NVMe slots for caching or SSD volumes. On the other side, it is being marketed as a “local AI NAS” built around an on device assistant and offline processing, intended for people who like the idea of using natural language to search, summarise, and organise large private libraries without sending data to a public cloud. The practical question is whether buyers actually need an AI layer on a NAS, since many users simply want reliable storage, backups, and fast access, and will judge it on fundamentals like performance, noise, power, and software stability first. Based on hands on testing of the iDX6011 Pro hardware and the early UGOS Pro plus AI implementation, the platform looks close to finished on the hardware side, while the AI layer feels more like a developing feature set that is not yet consistently polished, which raises the possibility that UGREEN is attempting to deliver a full “appliance plus assistant” experience before every part of that assistant workflow is fully mature.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER! This is KICKSTARTER…

This product is being sold through a crowdfunding campaign rather than as a conventional retail NAS, and that changes the risk profile regardless of brand size or prior success. Pricing is tied to a refundable reservation deposit system and early bird tiers, and delivery timing is based on stated production and dispatch windows rather than the predictable stock availability that comes with established retail channels. Even though UGREEN has previously completed a large NAS crowdfunding campaign and later moved those products into normal retail, that track record does not remove the usual Kickstarter variables, such as software features changing between prototype and shipping units, performance tuning continuing during the campaign window, and schedules shifting due to manufacturing or regional fulfilment constraints. In this case, the hardware shown appears close to final, but the software, particularly the AI layer, is explicitly described as still in active optimisation, so any evaluation should treat feature completeness as provisional until the campaign is live, the final software build is confirmed, and post launch updates show what is actually delivered at scale.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Quick Conclusion

The UGREEN NASync iDX6011 Pro is a high spec 6 bay NAS that, in hardware terms, behaves more like a compact workstation class storage appliance than a typical consumer NAS, with dual 10GbE, dual Thunderbolt 4, PCIe Gen4 x8 expansion, OCuLink, 8K HDMI, 2 x M.2 NVMe slots, and a dedicated 128GB system SSD, backed by an Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and 64GB fixed LPDDR5X memory. In testing, the fundamentals were generally strong, including RAID 5 throughput around 950 MB/s read and 670 MB/s write with SSD caching, internal NVMe performance around 5.5 to 6.0 GB/s, acceptable sustained thermals for a metal chassis under long access periods, and noise and power figures that tracked with a 6 drive high performance platform rather than a low power home NAS. The main performance concern was that SMB multichannel scaling was uneven, with reads around 2200 to 2300 MB/s but writes closer to 1300 to 1500 MB/s in a dual 10GbE client setup, suggesting software or tuning limits that may or may not improve by launch. UGOS Pro is broadly feature complete for mainstream NAS use, with Docker, VMs, snapshots, iSCSI, and comprehensive backup and sync options, but it still lacks some ecosystem level elements that established competitors deliver, including ZFS and a more comprehensive security posture scanner, and the app catalogue gap around Plex remains notable. The local AI layer, marketed as a key differentiator, is currently the least mature part of the product, with useful building blocks like document summarisation, audio transcription, and photo recognition, but inconsistent workflows that rely on manual uploads rather than directory level crawling, limited smart commands, and permission controls that can be too rigid for practical assistant use, while also not offering generative photo or video creation. Overall, the iDX6011 Pro looks close to finished on hardware and competitive on capability at its early campaign pricing, but the AI experience still feels in development, and the Kickstarter purchase route adds risk for buyers who expect fully polished features on day 1.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Design and Storage

The iDX6011 Pro is physically a more industrial looking unit than UGREEN’s earlier NAS designs, with a full metal outer chassis that feels closer to workstation gear than living room appliance styling. It is not a sealed box either, as the side panels are removable and intended to give access to internal expansion areas, though the process uses a hex key rather than a simple tool free latch. That approach is functional and keeps the exterior clean, but it also makes routine access slightly slower if you expect to swap SSDs or a PCIe card regularly. Ventilation is distributed around the sides rather than concentrated in a single grille, and the chassis is raised off the surface to allow airflow beneath, which matters in a system designed to host 6 hard drives plus NVMe storage and a higher performance CPU class than entry NAS models.

Storage capacity is built around 6 front loading SATA bays, with UGREEN quoting 196TB maximum raw capacity for the platform. Drive insertion uses the same general tray approach seen on the company’s recent NAS units, including lockable bay fronts and a plastic click and load mechanism intended to speed up installation without tools. It is a conventional arrangement for a 6 bay desktop NAS, but the metal enclosure can make drive acoustics more noticeable depending on the HDD model and rotational behaviour, which becomes relevant when users populate the unit with larger capacity drives that often have more platters and more audible seek patterns. The front bay layout is straightforward, prioritising density and serviceability, with the expectation that this is a system meant to hold a large primary library rather than act as a small secondary backup target.

Alongside the 6 bays, UGREEN separates the operating system onto a dedicated 128GB internal SSD, which avoids consuming any of the user’s drive pool for the system partition and aligns with how most modern NAS vendors isolate OS storage. In practical terms, that makes initial setup cleaner and reduces the chance that a storage rebuild or volume reconfiguration impacts the boot environment, though it also means the overall platform depends on an internal system SSD that is not part of the RAID group. Two internal M.2 NVMe slots are available for SSD cache or SSD volumes, and in testing they behaved like high performance local storage rather than token add ons, which fits the broader design goal of making this NAS suitable for heavier workflows and not just cold storage. The storage story here is therefore split into 3 layers, hard drive bays for capacity, M.2 for performance acceleration, and a separate system SSD for OS stability.

The Pro model also adds a front mounted 3.71 inch LCD, which provides real time status visibility such as usage and system state at a glance. As implemented in early hardware, it appears more like a monitoring and basic control surface than a full management interface, and it is not treated as a secure console with authentication, so it is best understood as a convenience feature rather than an administrative tool. In a shared environment, that trade off matters because a display that is easy to use is also easy to interact with physically, so the value depends on where the unit is placed and who has access to it. For some users it will be useful simply to confirm system health without opening the web UI, but it does not replace normal management, and it is not aimed at the same kind of on device control that some touchscreen equipped NAS systems attempt.

Maintenance and long term usability are supported by design choices such as accessible cooling and a removable rear panel area, which makes it easier to clean and service the main fans compared with fully enclosed designs. The unit includes an internal power supply, reducing external power brick clutter, and cooling is built around a combination of rear system fans and a dedicated CPU cooling assembly using copper heat piping and a dual fan arrangement. User control in software focuses on the rear fans, while the CPU fan behaviour is not exposed in the same way, which is typical for compact systems where CPU thermals are managed automatically. Overall, the enclosure and storage layout suggest UGREEN is treating this as a high duty appliance expected to run continuously, host large volumes, and remain serviceable, even if some access choices like hex key panels are more conservative than tool free designs.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Internal Hardware

At the centre of the iDX6011 lineup is a split CPU strategy, with the Pro model using Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and the non Pro models using Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, both in a 28W class envelope but with different core layouts and advertised AI compute capability. In practical terms, the Pro is the higher headroom option for simultaneous workloads, including heavier multitasking, more concurrent services, and more demanding local indexing or analysis tasks, while the Ultra 5 models are positioned as a lower cost entry that still retains the broader platform features. The Core Ultra family also brings an integrated graphics and NPU component, which matters here because UGREEN’s “local AI” positioning depends more on on device acceleration and sustained compute than on a simple low power NAS CPU. The important point from testing is that the system behaves like a higher performance appliance than the entry level NAS class, with clear implications for throughput, thermals, and power draw once you start adding drive count, caching, and background services.

Memory is LPDDR5X across all configurations, offered at 64GB on the Pro and one of the Ultra 5 models, and 32GB on the lower tier Ultra 5 model. This memory is fixed rather than modular, so there is no user upgrade path later, and buyers need to decide upfront how much headroom they want for containers, virtual machines, caching, and AI services. Fixed memory can bring benefits in bandwidth and power efficiency, but it also removes one of the typical ways NAS owners extend lifespan as demands grow. In the context of UGOS Pro, 32GB is likely to be workable for mainstream file services and lighter container use, but 64GB is the safer fit if the system is intended to run multiple applications at once, keep more services resident, or handle heavier indexing tasks, particularly when the AI layer is enabled and models are loaded into memory during use.

Storage connectivity inside the chassis is arranged so that the M.2 NVMe slots operate as high speed local devices rather than secondary add ons, and the system’s design encourages using them for caching or fast volumes alongside the 6 drive array. Beyond storage, the platform includes a PCIe Gen4 x8 expansion slot, which gives the unit a more flexible upgrade path than many turnkey NAS systems that are limited to fixed networking and fixed I O. The Pro model also includes an OCuLink port, which in practical testing allowed attachment of external PCIe devices such as a GPU dock, and the system recognised the hardware when connected, even though this is not the typical way consumer NAS boxes expand capability. This internal and external PCIe story is one of the defining hardware traits of the Pro model, because it creates options for future add ons that extend beyond storage, even if most buyers will never use it.

From an internal power and cooling perspective, the unit uses an internal PSU and a cooling layout that separates general chassis airflow from CPU cooling, with software fan control focused on the rear fans rather than the CPU fan assembly. That matters because the system’s CPU class, NVMe support, and expansion options can create load scenarios that are closer to small server behaviour than basic home NAS idle patterns, particularly during sustained indexing, RAID rebuilds, or heavy file operations across fast links like 10GbE and Thunderbolt.

The hardware review unit is described as a pre release prototype, and while the physical build appears close to final, some behaviour, especially around performance tuning and software integration, should be treated as subject to change before shipping. The overall internal hardware direction is clear though: this is not designed around the low power NAS CPU segment, and the component choices indicate UGREEN is targeting users who want workstation class connectivity and compute inside a NAS form factorAM, rather than a minimal file server.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Ports and Connections

The iDX6011 Pro is configured around higher bandwidth connectivity than most mainstream 6 bay NAS units, and the port layout reflects an intention to sit closer to a workstation or small office backbone rather than being limited to standard home networking. Dual 10GbE is present across all configurations, providing both higher single link throughput and the option for link aggregation or segmented network roles depending on the user’s environment. In practice, dual 10GbE also opens the door to multichannel SMB performance in supported client setups, and the platform is clearly built with large file workflows in mind, where sequential transfer speed and low friction access matter as much as raw storage capacity. Unlike NAS designs that reserve high speed networking for optional add in cards, the iDX6011 platform treats 10GbE as baseline rather than upgrade.

Thunderbolt 4 appears as 2 ports, and in your testing this mattered because it enabled direct high speed attachment use cases and compatibility with external adapters and docks. The most obvious implication is fast ingest and offload for users working from laptops or mobile workstations where Thunderbolt is a primary high speed interface, but it also intersects with the Pro model’s expansion story because external PCIe style docks become viable. The unit also includes USB connectivity split between faster USB 3 class ports and USB 2 ports for lower bandwidth peripherals, plus an SD 4.0 card slot that is front placed for frequent media ingest. That placement is relevant because it avoids reaching behind the unit for daily tasks, which is more aligned with content creation workflows than with the typical NAS assumption of mostly remote file transfer.

Video output is handled through an 8K capable HDMI port, which supports the idea of using the NAS as a directly attached media endpoint as well as a server, though this is a secondary function compared with network access. The presence of HDMI also ties into the software layer you described, where the system can be used for local playback and controlled through the broader UGOS environment, but it is still a NAS first device rather than a dedicated media box. For users who want the NAS to sit near a display and act as a playback source, the port is present, but the value depends heavily on application availability and the user’s preferred media stack.

Expansion is where the Pro model separates itself, because it combines an internal PCIe Gen4 x8 slot with an external OCuLink port, while the non Pro models omit OCuLink. In testing, the OCuLink path successfully recognised an attached GPU dock, which indicates that UGREEN is not treating this as a purely decorative specification, even if most of the AI positioning is currently built around CPU and NPU resources rather than discrete GPU acceleration. The PCIe slot provides additional flexibility for add in networking or other cards within the physical constraints of the chassis, and together these interfaces make the iDX6011 Pro less locked to its factory I O than typical turnkey NAS appliances. That said, the practical value of these ports depends on driver support, how UGOS exposes attached hardware, and whether users plan to run third party operating systems where PCIe device support can be more familiar.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Speed, Temp, Noise and Power Tests

In file transfer testing, the iDX6011 Pro showed performance that aligns with its connectivity and internal storage design, but also revealed at least one area where optimisation may still be needed. With 6 HDDs configured in RAID 5 and SSD caching enabled for read and write, throughput reached roughly 950 MB/s read and 670 MB/s write, which is consistent with a well tuned array benefitting from cache acceleration and a fast network path. The larger point is that the platform can make practical use of 10GbE class throughput without feeling artificially capped by an entry level CPU, and the results suggest the system is capable of handling sustained large file movement without immediately falling behind. The caveat is that this was tested on a pre release unit, and the way UGOS configures caching and network services can materially affect the final numbers.

The internal NVMe performance was strong, and importantly it was consistent whether measured through the UGOS interface or via SSH testing. In the built in NVMe benchmark, both drives returned around 6 GB/s reads and writes after repeated testing, and additional 1GB SSH tests also clustered around 5.5 to 6.0 GB/s. Those figures suggest the M.2 implementation is not a token feature and can support either aggressive caching configurations or fast SSD volumes for workloads that benefit from low latency access. This matters in the context of the iDX6011 Pro’s target audience because the NVMe layer is a primary tool for keeping responsiveness high when multiple services are active, when many small files are being indexed, or when a user wants a high performance workspace alongside bulk HDD capacity.

Where results were less ideal was in a dual 10GbE client scenario using SMB multichannel, where reads scaled well but writes did not. Using a USB4 laptop connected through a dual 10GbE to USB4 adapter, 2x 10GbE connections were visible and green-for-go on both ends! So, the system SHOUD saturate more than a single 10GbE link and make real use of multichannel behaviour to use both (with the right  media!) – which is exactly what we saw in sequential Read speed tests. Writes, however, sat around 1300 to 1500 MB/s, often behaving closer to a single 10GbE stream, with occasional dips that suggested the second link was not being fully utilised for upstream traffic in that setup. Jumbo frames were enabled with MTU set to 9000, and alternative approaches were tested, so the remaining explanation could be software overhead, SMB tuning, client limitations, or an area of UGOS optimisation that is not yet final in the pre release software build.

Thermally, the unit behaved within expected bounds for a metal chassis hosting multiple high capacity HDDs and sustained access patterns. After roughly 36 hours of continuous activity, surface readings showed around 35C at the top, roughly 38C around the drive bay area and side ventilation panels, and around 41 to 44C in lower vent channel areas where airflow is concentrated. The rear fan region was around 44 to 45C, the PSU region hovered around 38C, and the LCD area reached around 45C, with most of the base sitting around 35 to 38C. Importantly, internal software did not raise thermal warnings in normal testing, and the only notable heat related stress occurred during repetitive synthetic SSD write loops that are not representative of typical mixed use.

Noise and power draw reflect the fact that this is a higher performance NAS platform with 6 drive density and a stronger CPU class than low power appliances. With fans set to the lowest mode and drives idling after RAID setup and synchronisation, noise landed around 39 to 40 dBA, rising to around 40 to 43 dBA on automatic fan mode. With fans set to maximum, idle noise increased to around 48 dBA, and with active drive access plus high fan mode, measurements were around 50 to 51 dBA using 64TB NAS class HDDs, with the reminder that a metal chassis can transmit drive vibration and seek noise more readily than plastic enclosures. Power draw in a heavily populated configuration with 6 x 64TB drives, 2 x 1TB NVMe, and both 10GbE links active was around 67 to 68W at idle, rising to around 93 to 100W plus under active access, with the expectation that sustained CPU intensive AI tasks and any external GPU usage could push consumption substantially higher than typical home NAS patterns.

Test specification summary

• RAID and cache test: 6 HDDs in RAID 5, SSD read/write cache enabled

• RAID 5 throughput: ~950 MB/s read, ~670 MB/s write

• NVMe internal performance: ~5.5 to 6.0 GB/s read and write (UGOS benchmark and SSH tests)

• Dual 10GbE SMB multichannel via USB4 adapter: ~2200 to 2300 MB/s read, ~1300 to 1500 MB/s write

• Noise: ~39 to 40 dBA (low, idle), ~40 to 43 dBA (auto, idle), ~48 dBA (max, idle), ~50 to 51 dBA (high, active)

• Power: ~67 to 68W (idle with populated drives), ~93 to 100W plus (active access)

• Thermals after ~36 hours sustained access: top ~35C, bays ~38C, vents ~38C, lower channels ~41 to 44C, rear ~44 to 45C, LCD ~45C

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – UGOS Software and Services

UGOS Pro on the iDX6011 Pro presents a broadly familiar turnkey NAS experience, with the same general design language and application structure used across UGREEN’s recent NAS products, and most of the mainstream services expected in a current platform. Initial setup and day to day navigation are oriented around a unified web interface and companion apps, with storage management, user permissions, and application deployment consolidated into a single environment rather than split across multiple tools. In practical use, this matters because the value of a higher end NAS is not just the hardware, but the ability to configure it quickly and maintain it without constant manual intervention, particularly once you start adding multiple shares, remote access rules, and background services that need to run reliably without ongoing tuning.

Core storage features cover the standard RAID modes offered by the platform, along with typical NAS file systems used here, and the ability to configure M.2 SSDs either as cache or as separate storage volumes depending on the desired balance between speed and simplicity. Snapshot support and file versioning are included, which is a baseline requirement for protecting against accidental deletion and some ransomware scenarios, and the system also provides a dedicated encrypted vault style storage area for data that needs an additional password protected layer beyond normal share permissions. For users building a general purpose private cloud, the platform includes the expected file sharing and access tools and supports the usual network protocols, reducing the need for third party add ons for basic file serving and multi device access.

On the services side, UGOS Pro supports Docker and virtual machine deployment, which expands the platform beyond file storage into general application hosting and light server roles. The presence of both container support and VM support is relevant in a system with fixed memory configurations, because it encourages buyers to evaluate the 32GB versus 64GB models based on their intent to run multiple services concurrently. In addition, iSCSI support is integrated and in testing could be set up in a straightforward manner, allowing the NAS to present block storage to client machines for workflows where mapped drives are not ideal. Backup and synchronisation features include multi target options, including NAS to NAS, NAS to cloud, and other scheduled operations with filtering and policy controls, which is the foundation most users will rely on rather than the newer AI layer.

Where UGOS Pro still shows gaps is less about missing basic NAS features and more about the absence of certain mature ecosystem level tools that established competitors provide. There is no ZFS option in the platform’s storage stack, which will matter to users who specifically want ZFS features and workflows, and the application ecosystem still lacks certain expected first party packages, with Plex media server being the most obvious omission in your evaluation despite alternatives like Jellyfin being possible. Security tooling is also mixed, with useful features such as 2FA, firewall controls, and automatic blocking, but without a comprehensive security posture scanner that audits weak passwords, exposed services, open ports, and other common misconfigurations in a way that guides less technical owners. The end result is a software platform that can cover the core NAS job for many users, but may still push power users toward third party operating systems or additional manual administration depending on priorities.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – What the AI Can and Cannot Do?

The AI layer on the iDX6011 Pro is built around Uliya, which functions as the interface for local model use and a set of assistant driven tools that sit alongside the normal UGOS experience. AI features are disabled by default on first use, and the local models are not pre installed, which means users must actively opt in and download what they want, rather than having the system continuously analyse data out of the box. Once enabled, the AI console exposes model choices and basic operational details such as estimated resource requirements, and it also includes permission style controls that determine which AI services are active, for example speech to text or large language model usage. There is also an option to connect cloud based AI providers via API key, and a separate option to allow online search as a supplement to responses, but the platform’s primary selling point is that most of its AI functions can run locally without transmitting content to a third party service.

What it can do in its current form is focused on analysis, summarisation, and retrieval rather than creation. Uliya supports conversational queries that can operate offline using local resources, with optional online search when enabled, and it can accept uploaded files for analysis, including images that it can describe at a basic content level. Document handling is one of the more practically useful parts, because the system can summarise documents and PDFs and then allow follow up questions based on that output, and this capability is integrated into the file manager via right click actions for supported file types. The voice memo tool extends this into audio, allowing recordings or imported audio files to be transcribed, summarised, and represented as a basic topic map, with export and translation options available using local processing for supported languages. Separately, UGREEN’s existing photo management features include recognition and categorisation that can identify people and other elements in photo libraries, and this part of the platform appears more mature than the newer assistant workflows.

What it cannot do is equally important, because some of the expected behaviours associated with “AI NAS” marketing are either absent or only partially implemented. There is no generative photo or video creation feature set, so the AI functionality is limited to text generation, transcription, and content analysis rather than producing new media. The system also does not currently provide broad pre scraping of user libraries in the way some users might expect, where a chosen directory is crawled in the background so that later conversational queries can pull from an already indexed knowledge store. Instead, several workflows rely on manual file uploads into a knowledge base, and the knowledge base itself feels under explained and inconsistent, sometimes returning incomplete or incorrect results when it cannot find enough relevant material within the data it is allowed to access. There is also limited visibility into how responses are formed, and no clear built in way to observe what portion of an answer is derived from local data versus general model knowledge when online search is disabled.

A recurring limitation in testing was the balance between privacy controls and usefulness. Permission settings exist, but they are comparatively rigid, and there is not yet the level of directory by directory or user by user access scoping that would allow an owner to confidently grant the assistant deeper access to some datasets while keeping other areas restricted. In practice, that can lead to cases where the assistant refuses or fails to answer a question because it lacks access, even when the user would prefer to grant broader permissions for a specific folder or project. Smart commands are present and can trigger a small set of device actions, but the command library is limited, and some attempts showed contextual confusion where a request was handled as a conversational prompt rather than an actionable instruction.

Across these areas, the underlying direction is clear, but the current implementation behaves more like an early stage feature set that needs expansion, better background indexing options, and broader integration across file types such as images, video, and spreadsheets before it matches the implied promise of a fully “assistant ready” NAS.

UGREEN iDX6011 Pro Review – Review and Conclusion

As a hardware platform, the iDX6011 Pro presents a clear step up in UGREEN’s NAS range, with a configuration that prioritises high bandwidth I O, expansion options, and enough CPU class performance to avoid feeling constrained in common multi service scenarios. The combination of 6 bays, NVMe support, dual 10GbE, dual Thunderbolt 4, PCIe expansion, and OCuLink creates a NAS that can serve both as large capacity storage and as a faster workspace tier when configured with caching or SSD volumes, and measured results generally reflect that intent. Thermals and acoustics were within expected limits for a dense metal chassis populated with high capacity drives, and while power draw is higher than low power NAS designs, it tracks with the component class and connectivity. In short, the hardware side looks close to finished and competitive on specification and practical performance, with the main open question being how much final tuning will improve edge cases such as multichannel write behaviour.

The AI services are the less settled part of the product, not because the core idea is unclear, but because the current workflows still require too much manual direction and the assistant is not yet integrated deeply enough across data types and system control. The most useful elements today are transcription, document summarisation, and the existing photo recognition features, while the larger “AI NAS” promise is limited by the absence of directory level pre crawling, a knowledge base that can feel incomplete, smart commands that are not yet extensive, and permission controls that do not provide fine grained scoping. For buyers primarily interested in a high spec NAS at early campaign pricing, and who view AI as optional or developing, the platform may be straightforward to justify if crowdfunding risk is acceptable. For buyers whose purchase decision depends on a polished local assistant experience that is ready to analyse and retrieve information from large libraries with minimal setup, the current AI layer suggests waiting to see how the feature set and optimisation mature by the time the campaign software build is final.

PROs of the UGREEN AI NAS

CONs of the UGREEN AI NAS

High bandwidth connectivity as standard, including 10GbE x2 and Thunderbolt 4 x2 Strong expansion options for a turnkey NAS, with PCIe Gen4 x8 and OCuLink on the Pro model 6 bay capacity design with a quoted 196TB maximum raw storage ceiling Dedicated 128GB system SSD keeps the OS separate from the main storage pool NVMe support via 2 x M.2 Gen4 slots with tested performance around 5.5 to 6.0 GB/s RAID support includes 0, 1, 5, 6, 10 plus JBOD and Basic for flexible storage layouts Tested RAID 5 plus SSD cache throughput was close to the practical limits of 10GbE class networking in many scenarios Cooling design and sustained thermal readings remained within normal bounds during extended access testing UGOS Pro covers mainstream NAS needs, including Docker, VMs, snapshots, iSCSI, and broad backup and sync options

Crowdfunding purchase path adds delivery and feature risk compared with conventional retail availability AI layer feels unfinished, with limited pre crawling, uneven knowledge base behaviour, and incomplete integration across file types Fixed LPDDR5X memory limits future upgrade options, so configuration choice is permanent UGOS ecosystem gaps remain, notably no ZFS support and no native Plex app at the time of testing

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

5 Mistakes New NAS Buyers ALWAYS MAKE

If you are buying a NAS for the first time, it is very easy to focus on brand names, bay counts and discounts while overlooking practical issues that will shape your experience for the next 5 to 7 years. New buyers often underestimate noise in real rooms, forget to plan for future capacity growth, misjudge the usefulness of SSD cache, ignore long term power consumption, or assume that a couple of very large drives are always the best value. On top of that, many people treat a NAS like a simple external drive rather than a 24/7 network device that will sit near family members or co workers and quietly draw power every day. This article looks at 5 common mistakes that first time NAS owners make and explains how each one happens, what it looks like in normal home or small office use, and the straightforward checks you can perform before you spend any money so you do not end up with a noisy, inefficient or inflexible system.

Mistake #1: Underestimating NAS Noise in REAL-WORLD Use (IGNORE the official Specs Sheets)

A common mistake with a first NAS is to assume it will sound like a quiet router or a small external drive. In practice a NAS contains several moving parts that generate and transmit noise into the room, especially at night or in a small flat. Drive seek clicks, spindle hum, fan airflow and vibration passing into the furniture all add together. If the system ends up in a bedroom, living room or small home office, the constant whirr can lead to complaints from other people in the house and leave the owner wondering whether the device is faulty when it is simply behaving as designed. It is also easy to forget that scheduled tasks such as antivirus scans, backups and indexing will often push the CPU, fans and disks harder than normal file access, so a system that seems acceptable during light daytime use can become noticeably louder when these jobs run.

Noise levels are heavily influenced by physical design choices that new buyers rarely consider. Metal chassis units tend to amplify vibration compared with plastic enclosures, which means every drive click and fan change is more noticeable. Larger capacity HDDs, particularly above 8TB, usually contain more platters and a more active actuator assembly, which produces sharper clicks and a deeper background rumble than smaller disks. Fan design also matters. Rear mounted fans tend to push sound directly into the room, while models with downward facing or internal fans may spread the noise more evenly into the surface under the NAS. Even the desk or cabinet matters, since hard surfaces can resonate and make a quiet system sound louder. Simple changes such as placing the NAS on a foam pad, an anti vibration mat or thick rubber feet will reduce the amount of vibration transferred into the furniture and can make a noticeable difference to perceived noise without changing the hardware.

The practical way to avoid this problem is to plan acoustics at the same time as you choose capacity and CPU. If the NAS must live in an occupied room, it makes sense to look at lower noise HDD lines, to avoid the very largest capacities where possible, and to consider using SATA SSDs for the working volume if budget allows. Checking vendor spec sheets for noise ratings in dB is useful, but you should also think about where the NAS will physically sit and how air can flow around it, since putting a box in a sealed cupboard simply forces the fans to run harder. Most modern NAS systems allow fan speed profiles and drive hibernation, which can reduce noise during idle periods, and many also support power schedules so the unit can power down completely during hours when it is not needed. You can also move heavy jobs such as RAID scrubs, indexing and backup windows into predictable time slots, for example overnight if the NAS is in a separate room, so that short periods of higher noise are less disruptive while the system remains quiet for normal daytime access.

Mistake #2: Ignoring Future Capacity and Expansion (PLAN AHEAD!)

A second common mistake is to buy a NAS that only matches your current data footprint with no realistic allowance for growth. Many first time buyers look at their existing files, see that they use 2TB or 4TB, then choose a 2 bay unit and a pair of modest drives that cover today with a small buffer. Once the NAS is in use, however, new cameras, phones and laptops start backing up to it, family members begin storing photos and videos, and it often becomes the default place for downloads and shared work files. Within a year or 2, the system that once looked spacious can be near its usable limit, especially once you take RAID overhead and snapshots into account.

The physical bay count and the way you populate those bays on day 1 has a direct impact on how easy it will be to grow later. A 2 bay NAS that starts fully populated leaves you with only a couple of options when you run out of room. You either replace both drives with larger ones, which is expensive and involves a full rebuild, or you bolt on an external expansion chassis if the vendor offers one. A 4 bay unit that initially uses only 2 drives gives you a much smoother path. You can add extra disks one at a time, or take advantage of flexible RAID schemes from some brands that allow mixing different drive sizes over time, which is far more forgiving when budgets are tight or upgrade windows are short.

Avoiding this mistake means planning capacity as a multi year decision rather than a single purchase. It is usually better to buy a slightly larger chassis with more bays than you think you need, then start with a sensible number of mid sized drives that offer a good cost per TB. This gives you headroom to add disks later without reorganising everything and lets the array performance improve as you add more spindles. It also leaves space for other changes such as introducing SSD volumes or cache in the future without having to retire the entire unit. In short, it is safer to overspec the enclosure a little and understuff it at the start than to buy the smallest possible model and discover that you have run out of practical expansion options far sooner than expected.

Mistake #3: Assuming SSD Cache and RAM Upgrades are a Magic Performance Fix (SAVE YOUR MONEY!)

New NAS owners often treat SSD cache and RAM upgrades as a universal answer to “my NAS feels slow”, without checking whether the underlying workload or hardware actually benefits. It is common to see a 2 or 4 bay system with a modest CPU and a couple of M.2 slots promoted heavily as “cache ready”, which encourages buyers to add SSDs and memory on day 1. In reality, if the processor is already running close to 100 percent under load, extra RAM will mostly sit idle and cache will only accelerate specific types of access. For simple sequential workloads such as bulk media streaming or large backup jobs, disk performance and network limits usually matter more than having faster cache in front of the array, so the investment does not translate into a noticeable improvement.

SSD cache in particular is often misunderstood. Write cache temporarily lands incoming data on SSDs and then flushes it to HDDs later, which can smooth out bursty writes but does not change the final speed of the array. Read cache keeps copies of frequently accessed “hot” data on SSDs, but in most NAS use this tends to be small random IO, metadata and thumbnails rather than entire large media files. Some platforms allow you to tune cache block size and policy, which can help in database or VM heavy environments, but for simple file sharing the benefit is limited. If a NAS mainly serves big video files to a handful of clients, using SSD cache rarely justifies the cost. In many cases, placing the NAS operating system, app data and indexes on an SSD volume, or using SSDs as a small primary pool for truly performance sensitive shares, delivers more predictable advantages than a generic cache layer.

The same caution applies to memory upgrades. More RAM allows the NAS to keep more filesystem cache and run more services concurrently, but it does not compensate for an underpowered CPU or a saturated network link. A basic check of CPU and memory utilisation under your typical workload is essential before buying additional modules. If CPU usage is consistently low while memory is pegged, extra RAM may help. If the processor is the bottleneck, adding memory or cache will not change the response time of apps and shares. For most first time buyers, it is more sensible to size CPU, network and base storage correctly first, then consider SSD based OS volumes, manual or automated tiering, and targeted RAM upgrades later if monitoring shows clear evidence that these changes will address a real bottleneck rather than an assumed one.

Note – If you are a QNAP NAS owner, you CAN use an alternative to ‘SSD Cache’, but using QTier – this MOVES (not copy) to data from slower HDDs and onto faster SSDs, as data is frequently accessed.

Mistake #4: Treating Power Consumption as an Afterthought (You Have CONTROL)

Many new NAS buyers focus on purchase price and capacity, then only think about power consumption after the first full month of electricity bills. A NAS is designed to be available around the clock, which means that even modest differences in idle draw add up over a year. Larger HDDs with more platters, multiple bays running full time, and older or less efficient CPUs all contribute to a steady baseline load, even when no one is actively using the system. In small flats or home offices this continuous draw can be a surprise, particularly for users coming from purely cloud based workflows where the power cost is hidden in the subscription fee.

Hardware choices have a direct impact on how much power a NAS will use at idle and under load. High capacity HDDs tend to have higher idle consumption because the mechanics must be ready to spin and seek immediately. A system with fewer, larger disks may draw more power at rest than a similar capacity built from several smaller drives, although this is not a strict rule and depends on the specific models. CPU generation and class matter as well. Modern low power x86 chips such as Intel N series parts can idle in the single digit watt range but still turbo high enough for typical home workloads, while older desktop class processors often draw more even when idle. Buyers who only look at drive capacity and bay count without checking HDD datasheets and CPU TDP figures can easily end up with a system that runs hotter and more power hungry than necessary for basic file serving and backups.

Software features and configuration also play a major role, yet many first time owners never touch these options after initial setup. Enabling HDD hibernation for lightly used volumes can drop disk consumption from around 8 to 12 W per drive to well under 1 W when idle, multiplied across several bays. Most NAS platforms support scheduled power on and power off, which allows you to shut the system down completely during hours when it is not needed and wake it automatically for work periods or backup windows. Moving heavy jobs such as backups, RAID scrubs and indexing into specific time slots also helps, since the system can stay in a lower power state for more of the day. Simple measures like these, applied on top of sensible hardware selection, make the difference between a NAS that quietly adds a manageable cost to your electricity bill and one that runs at full power far more often than your usage requires.

Mistake #5: Assuming Fewer Large Drives are Better (Often the REVERSE is Better)

A frequent assumption among new NAS buyers is that the best approach is to purchase the largest individual HDDs they can afford, fit a pair into a small enclosure and rely on that pair for both capacity and protection. On paper this looks simple and neat. Two 30TB drives in a 2 bay unit appear to offer an easy route to 30TB of usable space with RAID protection. However, this approach often produces a poor price per TB compared with building the same or greater capacity from several mid sized disks, and it concentrates a lot of risk and cost into each individual drive. When one of these large disks fails or needs replacing, the financial hit is substantial and rebuilds can be lengthy.

Cost of NAS Hard Drives (Example)
Seagate Ironwolf HDDs (Regular)	WD Red Pro HDDs (Pro Series)
1TB – $35 2TB – $65 4TB – $105 6TB – $158 8TB – $177 10TB – $224 12TB – $258 14TB – $271 16TB – $309 18TB – $389	4TB – $140 6TB – $173 8TB – $215 10TB – $245 12TB – $253 14TB – $270 16TB – $298 18TB – $349 20TB – $419 22TB – $551

In most cases, the price per terabyte on both sides will remain largely consistent at each capacity. HOWEVER, when you start putting these drives into a NAS/DAS enclosure and acting in the RAID configuration, it soon becomes apparent that the ben efits in Drive #s in a RAID 1 vs a RAID 5 immediately show a saving in almost every single capacity the smaller you go! Below are two examples of achieving 12TB in a NAS enclosure using RAID 1 vs using RAID 5 (so, still maintaining 1 disk drive failure protection and having 12TB of storage to use):

12TB Storage in a RAID 1 MIRROR	12TB Storage in a RAID 5

Looking at retail pricing makes the problem clear. Large capacity HDDs carry a significant premium that is not always reflected in proportional capacity gains. At the same time that a 30TB drive might cost 500 to 600 in local currency, 10TB or 12TB drives can often be found for less than 200 each. Four 12TB drives in RAID 5 or similar single disk fault tolerant layouts can deliver 36TB of usable space for less money than a pair of 30TB disks that only provide 30TB usable, while also offering more spindles for better aggregate performance. The trade off is higher drive count, which brings extra power use, more noise and additional points of failure, but in purely cost per TB terms the multi-drive configuration is often more efficient.

The practical lesson is that drive selection for a first NAS should consider more than headline capacity. New buyers should compare price per TB across several HDD sizes, factor in the desired RAID level and protection scheme, and understand how many drives their chassis can support now and in future. In many cases it is more effective to choose a slightly larger enclosure and populate it with several mid sized disks that offer a good value point, rather than filling a small unit with the largest drives available. This gives better flexibility for future expansion, more options if a disk fails, and a storage layout that balances cost, capacity and performance instead of relying entirely on a small number of very large and expensive disks.

Larger NAS/DAS systems are always more expensive, as they need to have more physical space, resource use in production and power/PSU sizes to run the larger enclosure. Add to this, thanks to memory shortages right now, that smaller scale NAS systems are starting to arrive with more memory by default (as 2-4GB is becoming less cost-effective to produce with chip shortages) and often with little/no increase in the base price. For example, below is the TS-264 and TS-464 NAS. Same CPU, design and ports – however the 2-Bay system has 8GB memory by default AND IS STILL $134 cheaper! So, this can often mean that you can save money on smaller quantities of larger capacity HDDs becuase the enclosure they are going in is cheaper over all.

Conclusion – PLAN AHEAD!

New NAS buyers rarely set out to make poor choices. The problems described above usually arise because a NAS is treated like a simple storage box rather than a device that will run all day, sit in shared spaces and gradually absorb more roles over several years. Noise, expansion, SSD cache, power consumption and drive sizing are all easy to overlook when you are comparing spec sheets or promotional bundles, yet each one has a direct and practical impact on how comfortable and economical the system will be to live with. The safest approach is to treat the first NAS purchase as a medium term infrastructure decision rather than a one off gadget. That means thinking realistically about where the box will sit, how many people will rely on it, how much data is likely to arrive over time and how much power draw and running cost is acceptable. A slightly quieter chassis, a few more bays, a balanced drive choice and sensible use of features like hibernation and scheduling will matter more in day to day use than chasing the biggest individual drives or adding SSD cache on day 1. By addressing these 5 areas before you buy, you reduce the risk of needing early upgrades or workarounds and increase the chance that the NAS you choose will remain suitable for several years without constant attention.

5 affordable Turnkey 10GbE NAS Solutions (Between $499 and $699)

For years, 10GbE networking has been seen as a premium feature reserved for high-end or enterprise-grade NAS devices, often pushing total system costs well beyond the reach of home users and small businesses. However, as controller prices have dropped and demand for faster data transfers has grown, a new wave of affordable NAS solutions has started to appear with built-in 10GbE. These systems no longer require expensive proprietary upgrade cards or third-party NICs, and many sit comfortably below the $699 / £599 price point. They cover a range of use cases, from compact SSD-based NAS devices to rackmount storage appliances and versatile desktop units. Below is a selection of some of the most notable options currently available, each offering a balance of performance, connectivity, and affordability for users who want to move beyond 1GbE or 2.5GbE without breaking the bank.

UniFi UNAS Pro (7-Bay, Rackmount)

I keep coming back to two words for the UniFi UNAS Pro—fundamentals and consistency. UniFi has clearly focused on making this system a strong addition to their ecosystem, prioritizing the essential storage needs of a NAS. They’ve succeeded in this, but comparisons with long-established competitors are inevitable. While solid, reliable, and stable, the UniFi UNAS Pro will take time to be competitive on the software front. If you’re deeply invested in the UniFi ecosystem, you’ll appreciate its ease of use and integration. However, outside of a UniFi network, it may feel feature-light compared to alternatives. The pricing is competitive for a launch product at $499, and while it’s not the best NAS on the market, it’s the most user-friendly and UniFi-ready. It will likely satisfy many users’ needs. I can certainly see this being integrated into existing UniFi networks as a 2nd stage backup alongside their already existing 3rd party NAS solution, with the potential to graduating to their primary storage as Ubiquiti continue to evolve this platform above and beyond the fundamentals their have nailed down in the UNAS Pro system.

• Approx. Price: $499 / £400

• Specs: ARM Cortex-A57 quad-core CPU, 8 GB RAM, seven 2.5″/3.5″ SATA bays, 1×10GbE SFP+ and 1×1GbE.

• Why It Stands Out: Exceptional price-to-performance for pure storage needs. Lacks advanced multimedia or container apps but ideal for high-speed backups in a rackmount setup.

---

 

Asustor Flashstor 12 Gen 1 (Compact NVMe NAS)

The Asustor Flashstor Gen 2 12-Bay NAS is a robust and versatile solution for users with demanding storage needs. Its combination of high-performance hardware, extensive connectivity options, and compact design makes it a standout choice for content creators, small businesses, and enthusiasts. With dual 10GbE ports, USB 4.0 connectivity, and support for up to 12 M.2 NVMe drives, it offers exceptional speed and scalability. While the device has a few quirks, such as its mixed PCIe slot speeds and lack of M.2 heat sinks, these are manageable with proper planning and aftermarket solutions. The Flashstor Gen 2 excels in raw performance, handling intensive workflows with ease and maintaining low noise levels even under load. Its power efficiency and robust thermal management further enhance its appeal for 24/7 operation. For users prioritizing hardware capabilities and performance, the Flashstor Gen 2 delivers on its promises. While its complexity may deter less experienced users, those with the technical expertise to configure and optimize the system will find it a valuable addition to their workflow.

• Approx. Price: $750 / £600

• Specs: Intel Celeron N5105, 12×M.2 NVMe slots, single 10GbE port, compact form factor.

• Notable Traits: High-density SSD storage in a small desktop chassis. Excellent value for SSD-heavy builds.

---

 

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus

BOTTOM LINE – The UGREEN NASYnc DXP4800 Plus does not feel ‘finished’ yet and still needs more time in the over, but UGREEN have been very clear with me that this product is not intended for release and fulfilment till summer 2024 and improvements, optimization and product completion is still in progress. Judging the UGREEN NAS systems, when what we have is a pre-release and pre-crowdfunding sample, was always going to be tough. The DXP4800 PLUS is a very well put-together NAS solution, arriving with a fantastic launching price point (arguably even at its RRP for the hardware on offer). UGREEN has clearly made efforts here to carve out their own style, adding their own aesthetic to the traditional 4-bay server box design that plagues NAS boxes at this scale. Equally, although they are not the first brand to consider Kickstarter/Crowdfunding for launching a new product in the NAS/personal-cloud sector, this is easily one of the most confident entries I have seen yet. The fact that this system arrives on the market primarily as a crowdfunded solution (though almost certainly, if successful, will roll out at traditional retail) is definitely going to give users some pause for thought. Equally, the UGREEN NAS software, still in beta at the time of writing, although very responsive and nailing down the basics, still feels like it needs more work to compete with the bigger boys at Synology and QNAP. Hardware architecture, scalability, and performance are all pretty impressive, though the performance of the Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe slots didn’t seem to hit the numbers I was expecting. Perhaps a question of PCIe bottlenecking internally, or a need for further tweaking and optimization as the system continues development. Bottom line, with expected software updates to roll out closer to launch and fulfillment, such as an expanded App center and mobile client, the UGREEN DXP4800 Plus is definitely a device worth keeping an eye on in the growing Turnkey and semi-DIY NAS market. As an alternative to public cloud services, this is a no-brainer and worth the entry price point. As an alternative to established Turnkey NAS Solutions, we will hold off judgment till it is publicly released.

• Approx. Price: $595 / £475

• Specs: Intel Pentium Gold 8505 (6-thread), 8 GB DDR5, 4×SATA + 2×M.2 slots, 1×10GbE and 1×2.5GbE, plus HDMI, USB-C, USB-A, and SD reader.

• Why It’s Attractive: Well-rounded design with rich connectivity and media support, undercuts most rivals on price and features.

---

 

TerraMaster F4-424 Max / F6-424 Max

The TerraMaster F4-424 Max is a robust 4-bay NAS system that offers a powerful mix of features and flexibility for a wide range of tasks. Powered by the Intel i5-1235U CPU with 10 cores and 12 threads, the F4-424 Max excels at resource-intensive applications such as Plex media streaming, 4K hardware transcoding, and virtual machine hosting. Its dual M.2 NVMe slots running at PCIe Gen 4 speeds significantly improve storage performance, especially when used for caching, while the two 10GbE ports offer high-speed networking environments, allowing for 20Gbps throughput via link aggregation.

In terms of software, TOS 6 brings notable improvements, although it still lags behind the more polished ecosystems of Synology DSM and QNAP QTS. That said, TerraMaster’s continuous software evolution with each new version of TOS ensures that users have access to more robust tools and security features. For its price point of $899.99, the F4-424 Max is a compelling option for those seeking high-performance NAS solutions with scalability in mind. While the Pro model offers competitive performance, the Max takes it a step further with advanced networking, making it ideal for environments where speed is a priority.

• Approx. Price: $675 / £550 (F4-424 Max, during sale) – $899 / £700 (F6-424 Max, regular)

• Specs: Intel Core i5-1235U (10-core), 8 GB RAM, dual 10GbE ports, dual M.2, with 4 or 6 SATA bays depending on model.

• Why It Helps: The F4-424 Max frequently drops below the $800 mark in promotions, offering unusually strong CPU performance and dual 10GbE at a mid-range price point.

Where to Buy? Terramaster F4-424 Max ($899 Amazon) – HERETerramaster F4-424 Max ($799 Aliexpress) – HERE

---

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE