UGREEN NASync vs UniFi UNAS – Which Should You Buy?

In the evolving landscape of network-attached storage, the arrival of UGREEN and UniFi (Ubiquiti) marks one of the more interesting shifts in consumer and prosumer data management over the last two years. Both brands, previously recognised for their strength in peripheral hardware and networking respectively, officially entered the NAS sector around late 2023 to early 2024, each taking distinct approaches to design, functionality, and ecosystem integration. UGREEN, following a successful crowdfunding launch in early 2024, built its NASync series around desktop and SSD-based solutions for home, creative, and prosumer users seeking all-in-one local storage, virtualization, and multimedia platforms. Its portfolio now includes systems ranging from the ARM-based DXP2800 to the Intel-powered DXP8800 Plus, offering performance tiers from modest home use to compact workstation-class environments.

Meanwhile, UniFi, a brand with a long history in professional networking and surveillance infrastructure, released its UNAS family within the same timeframe, targeting users already invested in its ecosystem of routers, cameras, and switches. The UNAS lineup now spans from the compact UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 desktop units to the rackmount UNAS Pro 4 and Pro 8 systems, with each designed for straightforward deployment and remote integration within the UniFi Network and Protect platforms. Despite arriving from very different sectors, both companies have effectively lowered the cost of entry to reliable NAS storage while redefining how integrated ecosystems can extend storage functionality. This comparison explores their respective design choices, hardware capabilities, software environments, and operational scope to assess which platform is best suited to different user scenarios in 2025 and 2026.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – The TL;DR

In comparing the UniFi and UGREEN NAS platforms, it becomes clear that each brand represents a different vision of what modern network storage should be. UniFi’s UNAS series builds on the company’s heritage in networking and surveillance, delivering a range of efficient, ARM-powered NAS systems that integrate tightly within the UniFi ecosystem. Models such as the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, and UNAS Pro 8 prioritize reliability, centralized management, and long-term stability rather than raw compute power or expandability. Their hardware is deliberately fixed—non-upgradable memory, ARM Cortex-A55 or A57 CPUs, and limited caching support for NVMe drives—but balanced by advanced network connectivity, including dual 10G SFP+ ports, PoE+++ power options, and redundant power supplies. UniFi’s storage OS focuses on core NAS fundamentals: multiple RAID levels, snapshots, encryption, and secure remote access via the UniFi controller. It is intentionally simple, relying on integration with other UniFi products for extended functionality such as surveillance and automation. In contrast, UGREEN’s NASync line follows an open, performance-driven approach designed for flexibility and standalone capability.

Ranging from the DXP2800 with its 8-core ARM processor to the flagship DXP8800 Plus powered by Intel’s i5-1240P, these systems cover every segment from entry-level home use to prosumer and light enterprise workloads. UGREEN’s hardware offers user-upgradable DDR4/DDR5 memory, PCIe expansion, NVMe storage pooling, and multi-gig connectivity, with higher-end models adding dual 10GbE, Thunderbolt 4, and even GPU compatibility. Its UGOS Pro operating system transforms the NAS into a hybrid server capable of running Docker containers, virtual machines, and AI-based indexing, alongside comprehensive backup and synchronization tools across cloud and local environments. While UniFi emphasizes simplicity, low maintenance, and enterprise-grade network reliability, UGREEN delivers a richer feature set and greater hardware freedom at the expense of long-term enterprise validation. In essence, UniFi NAS suits users already invested in UniFi’s ecosystem who value cohesion, predictable performance, and integrated security, whereas UGREEN NAS appeals to those seeking raw performance, versatility, and independent control without ecosystem constraints.

Why Buy UniFi NAS?	Why Buy UGREEN NAS?
Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!
Ecosystem Integration: Seamlessly integrates with UniFi Network, Protect, and Access systems, allowing unified management through a single controller interface. Centralized Management: Designed for administrators managing multiple UniFi sites or devices, providing consistent firmware, remote access, and monitoring from one dashboard. Reliable, Efficient Design: ARM-based architecture ensures low power draw, cool operation, and stable long-term performance with minimal maintenance. Enterprise-Grade Networking: Equipped with up to dual 10G SFP+ and 10GBase-T ports, plus USP-RPS redundancy for professional deployments. Proven Security Framework: Benefits from Ubiquiti’s mature network security infrastructure, signed firmware updates, and NDAA-compliant hardware.	Superior Hardware Performance: Offers a full range from ARM to Intel Core i5 CPUs, with upgradable RAM, NVMe storage pools, and optional PCIe expansion. Versatile Software (UGOS Pro): Supports Docker, virtual machines, AI photo indexing, and multi-platform backups out of the box. All-in-One Standalone System: Functions independently without relying on an external ecosystem, ideal for users wanting a complete server in one unit. Advanced Connectivity: Includes 2.5 GbE and 10 GbE networking, USB 4/Thunderbolt 4, and support for direct-attached workflows like video editing or large-file transfer. Rapid Development and Updates: Frequent firmware releases continually add new features, broader hardware support, and improved backup and security options.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Design, Storage and Range

When comparing UGREEN and UniFi’s NAS portfolios, the first and most visible difference lies in how each brand approaches system design and deployment environment. UGREEN’s NASync series is focused entirely on desktop enclosures, reflecting the brand’s consumer electronics background and intent to cater primarily to home users, prosumers, and creative professionals. Each model, such as the DXP2800, DXP4800 Plus, and DXP8800 Plus, follows a compact, upright chassis layout with attention to quiet cooling and minimal footprint. The aesthetic is consistent across the range—metallic finishes, clear drive bay accessibility, and understated branding—intended to fit easily on a desk or in a studio environment. By contrast, UniFi’s UNAS range adopts both desktop and rackmount designs, depending on model class. The UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 are designed for smaller workspaces and integrate PoE+++ power options to simplify installation, while the UNAS Pro 4 (1U) and UNAS Pro 8 (2U) are full rackmount systems made from SGCC steel, reflecting their professional and data-center-friendly construction standards.

UGREEN’s systems emphasize flexibility and user-level expandability within their desktop footprint. Most models in the NASync line support 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch SATA drives, dual NVMe SSD slots, and optional PCIe or Thunderbolt expansion, allowing them to function as both storage servers and active editing platforms. The DXP480T Plus, for example, is an all-SSD NAS with four M.2 NVMe bays that appeals to users seeking maximum I/O performance for tasks such as 4K video editing or database caching. The DXP8800 Plus, the flagship, extends this design language with eight SATA bays, dual Gen 4 M.2 SSD slots, dual 10 GbE networking, and Thunderbolt 4 connectivity, making it one of the most powerful turnkey NAS options in the consumer space. In comparison, UniFi’s UNAS systems prioritize structural consistency and network integration over expandability. Even though all models provide dual or single NVMe slots, these are limited to caching duties. Drive capacity across the lineup scales more linearly, from two to eight 3.5-inch bays, maintaining a clear size-to-performance progression while focusing on rack density and cooling efficiency.

From a usability perspective, UGREEN’s design philosophy focuses on standalone versatility. Each NASync model is built to function independently as a complete storage and application host, with optional integration through standard network protocols. Physical accessibility is a clear design consideration, with quick-release trays, front USB ports, and in some models, SD card readers for direct media offload. The visual and acoustic design is optimized for open environments, with whisper-quiet fan systems and smart temperature management, making them suitable for use beside workstations or in living spaces. UniFi’s design philosophy, however, centers on infrastructure harmony rather than isolation. The rackmount models are designed to slide directly into existing UniFi network installations, using standard 1U or 2U spacing and consistent power integration with UniFi’s USP-RPS redundant supply network. Even the desktop UNAS 4 maintains visual continuity with UniFi routers and switches, using similar matte finishes, front-facing status LEDs, and clean ventilation lines.

In terms of product range, UGREEN currently offers at least seven NASync models, each targeting a specific performance segment. These include the DXP2800 (2-bay ARM), DXP4800 (4-bay N100), DXP4800 Plus (4-bay N305), DXP6800 Pro (6-bay N305), DXP480T Plus (SSD-only, N305), DH4300 Plus (4-bay ARM), and DXP8800 Plus (8-bay i5-1240P). Each generation introduces more advanced CPUs, faster interfaces, and expanded media capabilities. UniFi’s current UNAS range, while smaller, has diversified rapidly since its launch. The confirmed models include the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, UNAS Pro 8, and the earlier UNAS Pro 7-Bay, all of which use ARM-based processors and fixed memory configurations. A larger ENAS 16-Bay ZFS system is already in development, targeting enterprise and datacenter deployments in 2026. Compared with UGREEN’s more gradual tiered approach, UniFi’s product scaling is defined by form factor and network bandwidth rather than by CPU class or user workload.

Price segmentation further highlights their opposing strategies. UniFi’s UNAS line is priced aggressively to attract users into its broader ecosystem, starting at $199 for the UNAS 2, rising to $799 for the Pro 8, and including mid-tier models like the UNAS 4 ($379) and Pro 4 ($499). The pricing aligns with UniFi’s established model of offering capable hardware at low margins to encourage ecosystem investment across switches, cameras, and controllers. UGREEN, by contrast, positions its NASync devices as feature-rich all-rounders, with prices reflecting performance class: from $279 for the DXP2800 to around $1,299 for the DXP8800 Plus. The difference in pricing structure is significant but reflects how each company defines value—UniFi through integrated ecosystem scaling, and UGREEN through standalone hardware strength and included functionality.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Hardware Range

The internal hardware philosophy of UniFi and UGREEN reflects two distinct interpretations of what a modern NAS should prioritize: efficiency and integration versus performance and versatility. UniFi’s UNAS series relies entirely on ARM-based architecture, a deliberate decision aligned with the company’s emphasis on low power consumption, predictable thermal characteristics, and embedded system reliability. Every model in the current UNAS lineup, including the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, and UNAS Pro 8, is built around a quad-core ARM processor—the A55 at 1.7 GHz for the smaller systems and the A57 at 2.0 GHz for the rackmount models. These CPUs deliver modest compute performance but strong stability and power efficiency, allowing for sustained 24/7 operation without requiring active thermal management beyond standard fan arrays. This design philosophy mirrors UniFi’s broader network device ecosystem, where embedded ARM SoCs dominate routers, gateways, and cameras, ensuring unified firmware management and hardware compatibility across all product categories.

UGREEN’s NASync architecture takes the opposite route, aiming to deliver workstation-grade power in compact form factors. The entry-level DXP2800 features an octa-core ARM CPU, already outpacing UniFi’s top models in raw processing capability, while the remainder of the series transitions to x86 platforms from Intel’s latest low-power and mid-tier lines. The DXP4800 uses Intel’s N100 processor, the DXP4800 Plus and DXP6800 Pro adopt the more capable N305 with improved iGPU performance, and the flagship DXP8800 Plus integrates the 12th Gen Intel Core i5-1240P, offering hybrid performance and support for hardware transcoding, virtualization, and PCIe Gen 4 NVMe. This variation in processor choice underlines UGREEN’s strategy of providing scalable compute resources for different workloads, from basic backup operations to multi-user virtualization and AI-assisted indexing. Unlike UniFi, UGREEN’s systems can operate as full Linux servers, running multiple containers or virtual machines without external dependencies.

Memory and expansion options further highlight the divergence in hardware scope. UniFi’s systems employ fixed memory configurations—ranging from 4 GB on the UNAS 2 and 4 to 16 GB on the Pro 8—with no user-accessible upgrade paths. This aligns with their embedded design approach, where firmware optimization and unified memory management are prioritized over modularity. In contrast, UGREEN’s NASync devices all support user-upgradable SO-DIMM DDR4 or DDR5 modules, typically allowing capacities between 8 GB and 64 GB, depending on the model. This flexibility benefits users running memory-intensive services such as Docker containers, Plex transcoding, or AI indexing. Moreover, many of UGREEN’s x86 systems support PCIe expansion cards, offering pathways to add 10 GbE NICs, NVMe storage adapters, or GPU accelerators, while UniFi’s systems are intentionally non-upgradable to maintain uniform hardware control and firmware consistency across the UNAS ecosystem.

Networking and connectivity options serve as another key point of differentiation. UniFi has leaned on its networking pedigree, offering up to three 10 GbE connections (two SFP+ and one RJ45) on the UNAS Pro 8, with lower-tier models still providing 2.5 GbE or Gigabit connectivity. Power integration is also a hallmark of their design. The UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 use PoE+++, allowing single-cable deployment through UniFi switches, while the Pro series employs redundant power via USP-RPS or hot-swappable PSUs, reducing downtime in managed networks. UGREEN, on the other hand, focuses on local performance flexibility, providing multi-interface options like 10 GbE, 2.5 GbE, USB 4, and Thunderbolt 4, depending on model class. This allows their systems to double as direct-attached storage (DAS) for editors or content creators, particularly when used via Thunderbolt, an option not present in any UniFi NAS. Power designs in UGREEN systems are conventional but efficient, ranging from compact external adapters on smaller models to integrated supplies on higher-end devices.

The overall hardware comparison reveals two clear user archetypes. UniFi’s hardware suits IT administrators and network professionals seeking dependable, uniform, low-maintenance appliances that integrate natively with UniFi controllers and services. UGREEN’s NASync hardware, meanwhile, targets prosumers, creative professionals, and small business users requiring computational headroom and direct system control. Where UniFi builds closed but predictable infrastructure devices, UGREEN delivers open and adaptable machines capable of serving as both NAS and lightweight servers. The contrast is not one of quality but of philosophy—UniFi favoring consistency and system management efficiency, UGREEN focusing on flexibility and computational breadth.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Software, Services and Apps

The most significant distinction between UGREEN and UniFi’s NAS platforms lies in their software ecosystems and the broader intent behind their development. UniFi’s UNAS software mirrors the brand’s overarching approach to product design: lightweight, efficient, and designed to integrate seamlessly into the UniFi Network and Protect ecosystems. The UNAS interface focuses almost exclusively on storage management and file security. It provides the fundamental NAS feature set, including multiple RAID configurations, volume encryption, snapshot management, and user-based permission control. Files can be accessed through SMB, NFS, with remote management possible via the UniFi portal or mobile app. However, beyond core storage functionality, UniFi’s NAS software remains deliberately minimal. It lacks support for virtual machines, Docker containers, or app installation frameworks, relying instead on integration with other UniFi devices for broader capabilities such as video surveillance, network management, or cloud relay services.

UGREEN’s UGOS Pro platform adopts a far more expansive, multifunctional design. The software is built on a modern Linux kernel and supports both ARM and x86 architectures, allowing for a full-featured environment with native support for containers, virtual machines, and AI-enhanced media indexing. Out of the box, users can deploy Docker, Portainer, Kubernetes-compatible containers, and KVM-based virtual machines, enabling workloads that go far beyond traditional NAS operations. Backup and synchronization options are also more diverse, with support for rsync, S3, WebDAV, iSCSI, OneDrive, Google Drive, Dropbox, and two-way synchronization across multiple NAS units. The interface emphasizes transparency and customization, giving users direct access to system-level configuration that UniFi’s more streamlined interface omits. Features such as storage tiering (using both HDD and NVMe), application sandboxing, and external GPU detection on select models position UGREEN’s UGOS Pro as one of the most open and flexible NAS operating systems currently available outside of enterprise-class environments.

In client and access support, the contrast continues. UniFi’s ecosystem is designed for centralized control and consistent performance across its product range. The UNAS systems can be monitored via the same UniFi Controller interface used for switches, gateways, and access points, creating a single-pane-of-glass environment that appeals to IT administrators managing multiple UniFi sites. Remote access and firmware updates are handled automatically through UniFi Cloud, and security is strengthened by integration with two-factor authentication, device certificates, and network isolation policies inherited from the company’s professional networking hardware. UGREEN, conversely, provides a more conventional NAS interface that supports multiple access clients and cross-platform tools. In addition to browser access and mobile apps for Android and iOS, users can mount shared drives directly within macOS, Windows, and Linux, while also leveraging a dedicated UGREEN Drive application for photo management and AI-based face/object recognition. Where UniFi’s UNAS feels like an extension of a larger network ecosystem, UGREEN’s software operates as a complete standalone server environment.

Security and maintenance are handled very differently between the two brands. UniFi benefits from a mature background in network device hardening, employing signed firmware, rolling updates, and extensive beta testing through its large enterprise user base. Features such as encrypted storage volumes, HTTPS enforcement, and VLAN isolation come preconfigured with minimal user intervention. However, the trade-off for this controlled environment is reduced user autonomy, as firmware customization and software-side experimentation are discouraged. UGREEN, while newer to the enterprise security space, implements encryption standards such as AES-256, offers built-in 2FA, and continues to expand its ransomware prevention and snapshot recovery tools. Updates arrive frequently and often include feature additions alongside security patches, though the brand still lacks a formal bug bounty or transparency reporting system comparable to UniFi’s. Overall, UGREEN’s software offers greater flexibility and control, while UniFi’s remains more mature and hardened within its controlled network framework.

UniFi vs UGREEN NAS – Verdict and Conclusion

Both UGREEN and UniFi have entered the NAS sector from distinct starting points and continue to move in different directions, each targeting a particular type of user. UniFi’s UNAS series delivers consistency, predictable performance, and dependable integration with the broader UniFi ecosystem. Its software is stable, lightweight, and well-suited to users who prioritize straightforward storage management, reliable data handling, and unified control across routers, switches, and surveillance systems. While the hardware is limited to fixed ARM configurations and non-expandable memory, it is efficient, quiet, and designed for continuous operation with minimal maintenance. For organizations already invested in UniFi infrastructure, the UNAS systems provide a logical expansion that keeps management centralized and operational risk low. However, their value depends heavily on ecosystem synergy; outside of that environment, the systems remain competent but relatively inflexible standalone NAS options.

UGREEN’s NASync platform, on the other hand, appeals to users seeking broader performance capability and independence. Its x86-based models, upgradable memory, and open software environment allow it to serve as a hybrid between NAS and compact server, capable of running applications, containers, and virtual machines alongside storage tasks. The design language is more suited to individual or small business use than datacenter deployment, but the hardware range—from ARM to Core i5—covers a far wider performance spectrum than UniFi’s. Software maturity continues to evolve quickly, with new features added frequently, and the systems provide extensive compatibility with third-party clients and backup services. The trade-off is that long-term reliability and enterprise-level security validation are still developing.

Ultimately, UniFi NAS suits users who already rely on UniFi’s networking ecosystem and value simplicity, predictability, and centralized management, while UGREEN NAS caters to those prioritizing flexibility, compute power, and open software capability. Both brands have lowered the entry barrier into reliable NAS ownership, but they embody opposing philosophies: UniFi focuses on integration and control, whereas UGREEN emphasizes capability and independence.

Want to support us NASCompares? Use the links/buttons below, and anything you purchase results in a small commission coming to me and Eddie @NASCompares. It really is just the two of us doing everything, and purchasing things via these links will allow you to passively support creators like us (as well as allow us to keep making videos, providing support, running the forum, making tutorials and more) at no extra cost to yourself!

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UPS Tower Review - DULL UGREEN vs UniFi NAS - Which NeUniFi UPS Tower ReviewWeek 39 Tech Digest – Wi-Fi UniFi Launch the New UNAS 2, UUniFi UNAS Pro 8 ReviewUniFi UNAS 2 ReviewUniFi Launch the New UNAS 2, UUniFi UNAS Pro 8 ReviewUniFi UNAS 2 Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

J’ai déménagé récemment, et je me suis très vite rendu compte que je manquais de multiprise, rapport que je suis un Geek avec un bureau franchement très encombré de produits tech divers et variés qui ont besoin d’énergie. L’ami Korben a eu la gentillesse de me dépanner d’une multiprise, mais franchement, elle fait un peu peur, dans son jus bien vintage. Du coup je suis parti à la recherche de multiprises un peu sympa, et comme souvent, je me suis arrêté sur une proposions de la marque UGREEN …

Donc UGREEN, j’en parle souvent, vous connaissez sûrement pour leurs câbles et leurs chargeurs GaN de qualité, a sorti une multiprise 10-en-1 . Et franchement, après quelques jours de test, j’en suis bien content.

Le concept n’a rien d’original, un seul bloc qui offre dix sorties. D’abord, vous avez six prises AC (les bonnes vieilles prises 220V). Le point crucial ? Le bloc encaisse une puissance totale de 3680W. En gros, vous pouvez y brancher votre PC gaming avec son alim de 1000W, votre écran 4K, votre imprimante 3D et même la bouilloire pour le café sans foutre le feu à votre baraque.

Mais le vrai plus, ce qui fait la différence avec la rallonge moche que Korben m’a filé (punaise mais je suis d’une ingratitude moi…), c’est la partie chargeur intégrée. On se retrouve avec trois ports USB-A pour les accessoires, et surtout, un port USB-C. Et là, UGREEN n’a pas fait les choses à moitié. Ce port USB-C n’est pas un gadget anémique ; il envoie 20W en Power Delivery. Traduction : il recharge votre iPhone (compatible 17, 16, 15…) ou votre Galaxy (S25, S24…) franchement rapidement, et c’est très bien.

Alors vous allez me dire que des multiprises avec des ports USB et même USB-C ça existe déjà, mais en général ils sont franchement lents. Alors que là, non. Le bloc est équipé d’une puce GaN. Le Nitrure de Gallium, pour les intimes. C’est plus petit, ça chauffe beaucoup moins qu’un chargeur silicium classique, et c’est bien plus efficace énergétiquement. C’est ce qui permet au bloc de ne pas se transformer en radiateur d’appoint tout en délivrant sa puissance. On valide fort.

Au-delà de la puissance, c’est sobre, c’est noir, ça fait “pro” sur un bureau. Les prises sont bien espacées, on peut enfin brancher ces satanés adaptateurs secteur sans jouer à Tetris. UGREEN a même pensé à un interrupteur indépendant (avec un petit clic satisfaisant) pour tout couper d’un coup. Des petits patins en silicone sous le bloc l’empêchent de glisser sur le bureau. C’est bête, mais ça évite de tout arracher en tirant sur un câble.

Niveau sécurité, c’est du solide. Ce n’est pas une simple rallonge, c’est un bloc parafoudre et surtension. Il embarque aussi toutes les protections habituelles (surcharge, court-circuit, etc.). Vos précieux joujoux sont à l’abri. Le câble de 1,3m est bien épais, on sent que c’est fait pour durer.

Franchement, pour un setup propre, que ce soit au bureau, derrière la TV du salon ou sous la table de chevet, c’est parfait. On branche tout, on recharge tout (rapidement !), et on le fait en sécurité, et on limite un peu le “cable management” de l’enfer et la multiplication des blocs chargeurs.

Et le meilleur pour la fin : le prix. D’habitude, ce genre de bestiole bien finie avec du GaN et du Power Delivery 20W tourne autour de 40€, c’est d’ailleurs son prix habituel, mais en ce moment sur Amazon, elle est à moins de 30 euros . Je viens d’en commander deux de plus, et c’est la raison pour laquelle je pense à vous rédiger ce petit test :p

Article invité publié par Vincent Lautier . Vous pouvez aussi faire un saut sur mon blog , ma page de recommandations Amazon , ou lire tous les tests que je publie dans la catégorie “Gadgets Tech” , comme cette liseuse Android de dingue ou ces AirTags pour Android !

[Deal du jour] Comme avec un AirTag d’Apple, cette balise Bluetooth du fabricant Ugreen sert à retrouver les objets sur lesquels elle est placé, et n'a pas besoin d'un accessoire supplémentaire pour s'accrocher à vos clés. En promotion, elle a vraiment tout pour elle.

UGREEN poursuit sa stratégie de simplification du stockage en réseau avec l’arrivée d’un nouveau NAS : DH2300. Disponible depuis hier, ce nouveau produit est conçu pour rendre la gestion locale des données plus accessibles. Son prix de lancement : 209,99€…

UGREEN DH2300, un NAS pensé pour le grand public

Après un lancement en toute discrétion du DH4300 Plus, UGREEN nous revient avec ce nouveau modèle. Le DH2300 s’adresse aux utilisateurs de disques durs externes ou de services cloud souhaitant reprendre le contrôle de leurs données. Ce modèle à 2 baies supporte jusqu’à 60 To de stockage, permettant d’héberger sans effort des vidéos Ultra HD/4K, photos en haute résolution ou documents professionnels. Il est construit autour d’un processeur huit cœurs ARM Rockchip RK3576 cadencé à 2,2 GHz et épaulé par 4 Go de RAM DDR4 (non extensible).

Connectique

Côté interface de connexion, le DH2300 dispose de :

• 1* port USB 3.0 (Type-C) en façade ;
• 2* port USB 3.0 (Type-A) à l’arrière ;
• 1* sortie HDMI Ultra HD/4K 60Hz ;
• 1 port réseau 1 Gb/s.

Petite déception, nous aurions préféré qu’il embarque directement du 2,5 Gb/s comme le modèle 4 baies. On notera également la présence d’une puce NFC en façade, permettant de simplifier l’accès ou le partage de documents.

Système

Le NAS fonctionne avec UGOS Pro, le système propriétaire de la marque, déjà utilisé sur les autres modèles UGREEN. Ce dernier propose les mêmes applications maison. Le fabricant met en avant une installation guidée en moins de dix minutes et une application mobile tout-en-un (gestion de fichiers, sauvegarde automatique des photos, etc.). Voila qui devrait plaire à ceux qui doute des capacités d’UGREEN.

UGREEN met l’accent sur la sécurité locale : stockage entièrement privé, chiffrement TLS/SSL, RSA et AES, authentification à deux facteurs et certifications TÜV et TRUSTe. Un « Security Manager » serait intégré dont le rôle est d’assurer une surveillance en continu et des analyses programmées contre les menaces.

En synthèse

Avec le NASync DH2300, UGREEN adresse un besoin croissant de disposer d’un espace de stockage personnel, performant et indépendant des grandes plateformes. Avec un tarif de lancement de 209,99€, nul doute que ce produit va trouver son public.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Cloud Subscription Killer

The UGREEN DH2300 is a compact two-bay NAS system positioned within the company’s value-focused lineup, intended for users moving away from cloud-based storage platforms toward affordable private solutions. Priced around the $200 mark, it is aimed at those who prioritize simplicity and convenience over raw performance or enterprise-level control. Designed for users who typically rely on Google Drive, iCloud, or Dropbox subscriptions, the DH2300 seeks to provide a self-contained alternative with no recurring fees, offering scheduled backups, remote file synchronization, and integrated media access through UGREEN’s proprietary UGOS Pro operating system. Internally, the system is built around an ARM-based processor combining a quad-core Cortex-A72 and quad-core Cortex-A53 architecture, clocked at up to 2.2GHz, with 4GB of LPDDR4 memory and a built-in 32GB eMMC for the OS. This hardware places the DH2300 in direct competition with entry-level models such as the Synology DS223 and QNAP TS-233, though its Rockchip RK3576 processor, G52 MC3 GPU, and 6 TOPS NPU give it a modest edge in AI-assisted photo recognition, multimedia indexing, and energy efficiency. As a compact, preconfigured NAS designed for first-time adopters, the DH2300’s real focus is not to replace professional systems but to bridge the gap between mainstream cloud users and personal storage ownership, reflecting UGREEN’s broader strategy of simplifying NAS technology for general consumers.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

The UGREEN DH2300 is a compact, affordable two-bay NAS designed to bridge the gap between cloud storage and local data ownership for everyday users. Built around the Rockchip RK3576 processor—featuring two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A72 and A53 cores at up to 2.2GHz—and paired with 4GB of LPDDR4X memory, the system offers reliable ARM-level performance with efficient thermals and low noise output. Its design prioritizes simplicity, with vertical drive insertion, a single rear cooling fan, and a dedicated 32GB eMMC for UGOS Pro, which separates the OS from user data. Connectivity includes a 1GbE port, multiple USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, and HDMI 4K60 output, while the software delivers key NAS essentials such as RAID management, snapshot recovery, cloud and USB backups, Docker support, and AI-powered photo indexing via its 6 TOPS NPU. Power consumption remains low at 9–13W depending on workload, and noise levels stay within 31–45 dBA under varying fan speeds. Although the fixed memory, single LAN port, and ambiguous CPU marketing reduce its appeal for enthusiasts, the DH2300 stands out as an efficient, straightforward, and well-priced solution for users seeking a dependable private cloud alternative without technical complexity.

SOFTWARE - 7/10

HARDWARE - 8/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 10/10

VALUE - 9/10

8.2

PROS

Efficient Rockchip RK3576 processor (dual quad-core ARM design) provides strong performance for a low-power NAS.
Integrated 6 TOPS NPU enables local AI functions such as face, text, and object recognition without cloud reliance.
UGOS Pro offers an intuitive, user-friendly interface with features like RAID management, snapshots, Docker, and backups.
Low noise output (31–45 dBA) and excellent power efficiency (9–13W typical use) suit 24/7 home operation.
Dedicated 32GB eMMC system drive keeps the OS separate from data volumes for better reliability.
HDMI 2.0 4K60 output allows direct media playback and display management.
Competitive pricing around $200 makes it a strong entry-level NAS alternative to subscription cloud storage.

CONS

Single 1GbE LAN port limits transfer speeds and network scalability.
Fixed 4GB memory restricts heavy multitasking or Docker use.
Spending just $100-150 more gets you much, much more capable x86 powered systems

Buy the UGREEN DH300 on Amazon @209	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on B&H
	STORE

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Design and Storage

The UGREEN DH2300 adopts a clean, vertical form factor made entirely of plastic, emphasizing practicality and low cost over premium materials. The enclosure is lightweight yet well-ventilated, featuring a magnetic plastic top panel with slotted air channels that promote consistent airflow across both drive bays. The overall construction favors simplicity, with drive access positioned vertically rather than through traditional caddies. This layout helps minimize the unit’s footprint, making it suitable for desktop environments where noise and vibration are key considerations. While the plastic frame lacks the rigidity of aluminum enclosures seen in higher-end NAS models, it contributes to lower noise resonance and reduced amplification of mechanical drive vibration. The minimalist aesthetic, consistent with UGREEN’s other recent NAS releases, reflects its target audience: users seeking a consumer-friendly device that blends into a home office or living space rather than a server rack.

Internally, the DH2300 supports two 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch SATA drives, each connecting directly to fixed SATA connectors mounted on the board. The drive trays are basic but functional, requiring manual screw installation rather than tool-less mechanisms. Although UGREEN has not explicitly advertised hot-swapping as an official feature, testing showed that it is technically possible to replace drives without powering down, though such actions are not recommended without confirmation from official documentation. The NAS supports standard RAID configurations, including JBOD, RAID 0, and RAID 1, as well as individual drive modes, providing adequate flexibility for redundancy or performance-based setups. Storage initialization is straightforward within UGOS, with pool creation and volume setup guided by a wizard interface that fits the product’s “set-and-forget” philosophy.

Cooling is handled by a single rear-mounted fan positioned behind the drive bays, ensuring that heat generated by mechanical disks is efficiently extracted from the enclosure. The system’s vertical drive layout assists in natural convection, drawing air from the lower portion and expelling it from the top and rear. Despite being a plastic chassis, thermal management remains effective due to the extensive side and rear ventilation grilles, which circulate air across both drives and the mainboard components. In long-term use, the design demonstrated stable internal temperatures under typical file access and synchronization loads, maintaining drive and board thermals within an expected operational range even during extended testing periods.

From a functional standpoint, the DH2300 includes an internal 32GB eMMC module reserved for UGOS, preventing users from needing to dedicate part of their main storage array to system files. This separation simplifies setup and improves reliability by isolating the operating system from data drives. However, there are no M.2 or NVMe expansion slots available, meaning caching or SSD-tiered storage cannot be implemented. This is consistent with UGREEN’s entry-level positioning for the model, and the omission helps reduce production cost while keeping the power footprint low. The 32GB internal storage performs adequately for OS updates, indexing data, and temporary system operations.

The device’s storage capacity can reach up to two 30TB drives, allowing a maximum theoretical total of 60TB raw capacity, though most users will likely configure it in RAID 1 for redundancy. This makes the DH2300 a practical fit for home backup, photo archiving, and small-scale media libraries, especially when paired with the system’s built-in applications for photos, video, and document management. Overall, the DH2300’s design and storage layout reflect its goal of balancing ease of use with functional flexibility, providing just enough configurability to support typical home NAS workloads without introducing complexity that would deter less technical users.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Internal and External Hardware

Internally, the UGREEN DH2300 is powered by the Rockchip RK3576 processor, a hybrid 8-core ARM SoC that combines four high-performance Cortex-A72 cores with four efficiency-focused Cortex-A53 cores, running at up to 2.2GHz. While UGREEN markets this configuration as an “8-core processor,” it is technically composed of two separate quad-core clusters, something the company’s documentation does not clearly explain. This lack of clarity can mislead users into expecting a single unified 8-core design, whereas in practice the chip functions as two 4-core groups optimized for different workloads. The RK3576, built on an 8nm process, delivers a solid balance between efficiency and multitasking, keeping thermals low while maintaining adequate throughput for home NAS tasks. Its integrated ARM G52 MC3 GPU supports up to 8K H.265/H.264 decoding and HDR rendering through Rockchip’s dedicated Picture Quality Engine, which also supports ACM and DCI color profiles. These capabilities allow the DH2300 to output 4K60 video via HDMI, offering lightweight media playback directly from the system interface—an uncommon inclusion in this price class. Additionally, the CPU’s built-in 6 TOPS NPU enables AI-assisted indexing and face recognition within UGOS Pro, processing such tasks locally instead of relying on cloud services.

Memory allocation on the DH2300 is fixed at 4GB of LPDDR4X, soldered to the mainboard with no expansion slot available. This restriction aligns with the model’s consumer-grade purpose, though it naturally caps Docker container and multitasking potential. The onboard memory is sufficient for file serving, indexing, and moderate background services, while the 32GB eMMC 5.1 storage is dedicated to UGOS Pro and ensures stable OS operations without user intervention. There are no NVMe or UFS storage options, which simplifies the hardware layout but limits potential caching or high-speed data tiers. Nevertheless, the RK3576’s low power draw and balanced architecture ensure consistent operation under typical workloads, even during prolonged use, with minimal heat output and silent operation under idle conditions.

Externally, the NAS presents a modest selection of connectivity options suitable for its market position. The rear hosts a single 1GbE LAN port—adequate for most home users but a notable downgrade from the 2.5GbE interface found on UGREEN’s larger models like the DH4300 PLUS. File transfers, backups, and streaming functions remain well within the limits of 1GbE for single-user environments, though network saturation can occur during multi-user access. Peripheral connectivity is handled by two USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 ports and one USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 port, all operating at 5Gbps, supporting external drives, UPS communication, or backup targets. An HDMI 2.0 port on the rear supports 4K60 output for local playback or display configuration, while system LEDs provide visual feedback for drive activity, system status, and network connection. Power is supplied by a 50W external adapter that connects via a barrel plug, keeping internal temperatures and noise low by externalizing the PSU.

The inclusion of HDMI output in such a budget-focused system underscores UGREEN’s attempt to merge NAS and home entertainment functions. Although the RK3576 chipset supports a wider range of display interfaces—including DisplayPort, MIPI, and eDP—these are not implemented in the DH2300’s design, reflecting deliberate simplification for cost and usability. The absence of multi-gigabit networking, PCIe expansion, or additional LAN redundancy limits its potential for advanced setups, yet for its intended audience the configuration remains practical. In short, the DH2300’s internal layout, despite its simplified design and some ambiguous marketing around the CPU, delivers an efficient and capable platform for mainstream home users seeking affordable private storage.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – UGOS NAS Software and Services

UGREEN’s DH2300 runs the company’s proprietary UGOS Pro, a Linux-based operating system tailored for simplicity and everyday use. The interface mirrors the design language of mainstream consumer cloud platforms, featuring a desktop-style environment with drag-and-drop file management, live system monitoring, and user account controls. Although UGOS Pro shares much of its design and functionality with that found on UGREEN’s larger DH4300 PLUS model, a few service limitations appear due to the ARM-based architecture of the DH2300. These include the absence of virtual machine support and limited resource capacity for multiple Docker containers, stemming from the 4GB of fixed memory. Nonetheless, the software remains fully featured for file storage, synchronization, multimedia management, and light AI applications, and receives regular over-the-air updates that refine usability and security. The desktop and mobile clients also synchronize settings seamlessly, allowing users to manage their NAS both locally and remotely.

From a user management perspective, UGOS provides fine-grained control of accounts, permissions, and network access. Administrators can create user groups, apply password complexity policies, and define shared-folder privileges with ease. The system supports multiple file transfer protocols, including SMB, AFP, NFS, and Rsync, as well as optional WebDAV and FTP for broader compatibility. Remote access can be configured either through UGREEN’s own relay service or via LAN-only mode for tighter network security. The security dashboard consolidates features such as auto-block for repeated failed logins, two-factor authentication, firewall configuration, and selective port access rules. SSH and Telnet access are disabled by default, a responsible design choice for less experienced users, but can be enabled manually for advanced administration. These features bring the DH2300 close in functionality to entry-level NAS systems from Synology or QNAP, even though it remains less configurable overall.

Storage management is one of UGOS Pro’s more mature components. Users can create storage pools and volumes in JBOD, RAID 0, or RAID 1, with scheduled drive tests, SMART diagnostics, and Seagate IronWolf Health integration for supported drives. The storage manager also includes rebuild and repair settings that allow users to prioritise either RAID reconstruction speed or system performance during rebuilds. Snapshot protection is integrated at the folder level, with both versioned and scheduled snapshots available for data recovery. Although the system does not offer full OS-level backups, users can schedule NAS-to-NAS, NAS-to-USB, and NAS-to-Cloud synchronisation tasks using Rsync or proprietary tools. These backups can include filters for file type, size, and modification date, making them adaptable to both personal and small office usage. In practice, the storage controls are intuitive and well-implemented for a first-generation NAS platform, with sufficient safeguards for casual users who might otherwise rely on third-party cloud apps.

Application availability has steadily improved since UGREEN’s NAS debut in 2023 (at least, in the ‘west’, as they have been a NAS name in the east since 2020/2021). The App Center now includes a range of first-party utilities such as a file manager, photo station, video station, and music library, as well as third-party options like Plex, Jellyfin, and Docker containers. AI-based features such as face, text, and object recognition are supported thanks to the 6 TOPS NPU in the RK3576, though performance varies depending on workload size. The integrated Vault app provides encrypted storage areas secured by password or downloadable key, which can be auto-locked on reboot for privacy. Meanwhile, the mobile companion app mirrors almost every desktop function, from user and storage administration to Docker control and media playback. Having all management tasks accessible within a single unified mobile app, rather than separate applications for photos or video, demonstrates UGREEN’s streamlined approach to usability, positioning UGOS Pro as a consumer-friendly OS that hides most of the NAS complexity from first-time users. However, I cannot stress enough that this software is still a decent way behind long-established players such as Synology DSM and QNAP QTS in terms of features, maturity and client support. Additionally, as one of the newest names in the world of NAS, the brand has yet to be truly ‘tested’ when it comes to security strength and how they handle/respond to a larger scale security incident. So wheat we find here is good enough for hte price point, but is only a small step or two above what users have come to expect from privately owned NAS nonetheless in 2025/2026.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Heat, Noise and Power Consumption Tests

Thermal and acoustic performance on the UGREEN DH2300 is generally stable and consistent with expectations for a low-power ARM-based NAS. The system uses a single rear-mounted fan that automatically adjusts its RPM in response to internal temperature sensors, aided by the ventilated top and side panels. During extended operation, the fan demonstrated smooth, gradual speed transitions rather than abrupt cycling, which helped minimize background noise. With two 4TB Seagate IronWolf drives installed, the system recorded approximately 31–32 dBA in idle mode with the fan set to “Low” in UGOS. When switched to “Auto,” and under light file activity, readings rose to 33–35 dBA, while heavier read and write operations increased noise levels to 38–41 dBA. Under maximum fan speed, levels peaked at 44–45 dBA, making the fan audible but still within acceptable limits for a desktop environment. The use of plastic housing reduces the resonance that typically amplifies drive vibration in metal enclosures, although some low-frequency hum remains during heavy disk access.

Temperature readings taken over a 24-hour mixed-use test period show that the chassis maintains good internal thermal balance, aided by vertical airflow and efficient low-wattage components. The NAS was powered down overnight before the test, then reactivated for hourly upload and backup tasks, simulating intermittent real-world usage. During idle periods, the drives stabilized at 35–37°C, while moderate access cycles pushed them to 42°C. The motherboard and surrounding airflow remained at approximately 34–35°C, with rear exhaust temperatures registering slightly higher. Despite the passive nature of some cooling zones, heat accumulation around the CPU remained minimal, peaking around 50–60°C during sustained transfer activity. These figures suggest that UGREEN’s internal airflow design, while basic, is sufficient for continuous operation with standard HDDs. Users in warmer climates or those employing higher-RPM drives might consider increasing fan control sensitivity via UGOS to maintain consistent thermals.

Power consumption results were equally conservative. With two 4TB mechanical drives installed and the system idle at below 5% CPU utilization, the DH2300 drew roughly 9.5W, a competitive figure for a two-bay NAS. During typical data transfers and 50% CPU load, draw increased modestly to 12–13W, remaining far below that of comparable x86-based systems. The external 50W power adapter ensures the NAS operates efficiently while reducing internal heat buildup. Users employing SSDs instead of HDDs could expect overall consumption to drop by an additional 4–5W, further improving energy efficiency. These results confirm the DH2300’s suitability for continuous operation, including 24/7 use as a network backup target or low-impact media server.

Its minimal noise and low thermal footprint make it a non-intrusive addition to a home or small office environment, aligning with its purpose as a budget, always-on NAS solution.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The UGREEN DH2300 represents a carefully positioned step in the company’s ongoing effort to make private storage approachable for non-technical users. Its hardware configuration, led by the Rockchip RK3576 processor and 4GB of fixed memory, provides solid baseline performance for a two-bay ARM-powered NAS at this price point. Although its single 1GbE network port may limit throughput for larger file transfers, the system compensates with a highly efficient power profile, quiet operation, and full support for common RAID configurations. The inclusion of a dedicated 32GB eMMC system drive, HDMI 4K60 output, and an NPU capable of AI-based photo indexing places it above most similarly priced entry-level alternatives from QNAP and Synology. However, certain aspects of UGREEN’s marketing—particularly the way the dual quad-core CPU clusters are presented as a single 8-core design—could be clearer. Likewise, the absence of upgradeable memory or faster networking options limits its long-term scalability for users seeking to expand their NAS environment beyond basic media and backup tasks.

From a broader standpoint, the DH2300’s strongest appeal lies in its simplicity and low operational overhead. UGOS Pro, though still developing in maturity, has evolved into a competent, user-friendly platform offering the key features needed for home data management, multimedia access, and scheduled backups. The OS’s stability, combined with efficient hardware and lightweight design, makes this NAS a practical alternative to annual cloud subscriptions for users who simply want local control over their data. It is not a system aimed at enthusiasts or professionals demanding virtual machines, multi-gig networking, or broad third-party OS support, but rather those seeking a self-contained, reliable, and low-maintenance device. Within that niche, the DH2300 delivers strong value and performs consistently well for the intended demographic—serving as an accessible first step into local storage ownership.

Buy the UGREEN DH300 on Amazon @209	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on B&H
	STORE

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Weekly Tech Digest – Week 43Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS ReTerramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS ReTerramaster F4-425 PLUS and F2Terramaster F4-425 PLUS and F2Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vUGREEN NASync vs UniFi UNAS - UGREEN DH2300 NAS ReviewSynology DSM 7.3 NAS - HDD/SSDSynology DSM 7.3 NAS - Full De Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN dévoile une nouvelle ligne de serveurs NAS : la série DH. Visant le Grand Public, elle se compose de deux modèles dont le NASync DH2300

Cet article NASync DH2300, UGREEN promet un NAS simple et sécurisé a été publié en premier par GinjFo.

Review of the UGREEN NAS UPS – Is the US3000 120W UPS Any Good?

The UGREEN US3000 is a 120 W DC uninterruptible power supply developed specifically for UGREEN NAS devices that rely on an external DC power brick. Unlike conventional UPS systems that convert AC to DC, this model outputs direct 12 V DC power with a zero-second transfer time, ensuring there is no interruption during a power loss. It is equipped with a 12,000 mAh lithium-ion battery pack made up of four 3000 mAh cells, providing a rated energy of 43.2 Wh and up to around ten minutes of backup time depending on workload. Measuring 120.6 × 80.5 × 29.6 mm and weighing approximately 439 g, the US3000 is compact enough for desktop environments where space is limited. Beyond supplying short-term emergency power, it integrates with UGOS Pro software via a USB communication cable, allowing automated shutdown, timed standby, and restart once power is restored. This focus on seamless hardware and software compatibility makes the US3000 notable for users running UGREEN NAS systems that need to mitigate risks of data corruption caused by sudden outages.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Quick Conclusion

The UGREEN US3000 is a purpose-built DC UPS that prioritizes seamless integration with UGREEN NAS systems over broad flexibility. Its compact aluminum chassis houses a 12,000 mAh lithium-ion battery pack capable of delivering 120 W output with zero-second transfer time, ensuring that a connected NAS continues running long enough to perform a safe shutdown. Unlike traditional AC-based UPS units, it avoids conversion inefficiency by supplying direct DC power, while its USB link with UGOS Pro enables automatic shutdown, timed standby, and restart functions. Testing confirmed reliable operation across scenarios from immediate power loss to scheduled shutdowns, with system logs capturing events in under two seconds. However, its design is deliberately narrow in scope: it supports only one NAS at a time, does not extend to routers or switches, and offers limited runtime of around ten minutes under load. For users operating within the UGREEN ecosystem, it provides an efficient and well-integrated safeguard against data corruption during outages. For those needing multi-device protection or long-duration backup, its constrained design and compatibility limit its broader applicability.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

EASE OF USE - 10/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 9/10

9.2

PROS

Zero-second transfer time ensures uninterrupted NAS operation during outages.
Compact and lightweight aluminum chassis with integrated heat dissipation.
Direct DC pass-through eliminates inefficient AC/DC conversion.
Full integration with UGOS Pro, including shutdown automation and restart control.
Lithium-ion battery pack provides higher energy density than lead-acid designs.
Purpose-built for UGREEN NAS systems with native USB communication support

CONS

Limited compatibility, works only with UGREEN NAS models that use external DC input.
Short runtime and single-device capacity make it unsuitable for extended or multi-system protection.

Why the UGREEN US3000 UPS is Important/Interesting

Uninterruptible power supplies are not new, but most consumer models are designed for general computing and rely on bulky lead-acid batteries with AC pass-through. The UGREEN US3000 differs by offering a DC-to-DC solution that matches the external power design of UGREEN NAS units. This means it eliminates the inefficiency of double conversion and avoids the audible transfer delays that can occur with traditional UPS hardware. With a 120 W output ceiling, it is tailored for single-device use rather than multiple systems, but that specificity ensures closer integration with the NAS’s power and shutdown controls. From a technical perspective, its lithium-ion battery pack offers greater energy density than lead-acid, allowing the device to remain compact while still covering several minutes of safe system operation during an outage.

The importance of this UPS becomes clearer when examining how it interacts with UGOS Pro. Unlike generic solutions, the US3000 communicates directly with the NAS operating system via a USB connection, exposing monitoring and automation options in the control panel. Users can configure automatic shutdown after a set period, trigger standby to conserve remaining charge, or enable auto-restart once mains power returns. These features are not just convenient but directly address the risks of corrupted writes, incomplete backups, or damaged RAID arrays during sudden power loss. Given that UGREEN NAS systems are designed for small offices and home use, where environments may not include larger enterprise-grade UPS equipment, the US3000 effectively bridges that gap by offering a purpose-built, compact, and integrated safeguard.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Design

The UGREEN US3000 follows a compact, rectangular form factor with dimensions of 120.6 mm in length, 80.5 mm in width, and 29.6 mm in thickness. Its weight of just under 440 g makes it relatively lightweight for a UPS, reflecting its focus on portability and single-device deployment rather than large-scale power protection. The outer chassis is made from anodized and sandblasted aluminum alloy, which gives it improved durability compared with plastic housings and also aids in passive heat dissipation. The choice of materials ensures a consistent finish that aligns visually with UGREEN’s NAS enclosures, providing an integrated appearance when the two devices are used together on a desktop.

Connectivity is handled entirely through DC and USB ports positioned on a single side of the device. The panel includes a DC input, a DC output, a USB-C port for data communication, and a power button. The fixed DC cable has a length of approximately 28 cm, while the included USB-A to USB-C cable measures around 53 cm, allowing flexible placement next to a NAS system without excess cabling. Each port and control is clearly labeled with printed icons, reducing the likelihood of incorrect setup. Unlike conventional UPS systems that feature multiple AC sockets, the US3000 focuses on a single dedicated output, reflecting its intended role as a companion unit for UGREEN NAS models rather than a general-purpose UPS.

The packaging of the device mirrors UGREEN’s approach with its NAS line, offering clear product imagery and specification highlights on the box exterior. Inside, the unit is provided with a base stand for stable positioning, the aforementioned data cable, and basic documentation. This is a minimalist package compared to conventional UPS units, which often include multiple adaptors or accessories, but the streamlined approach ensures that setup remains straightforward for the intended NAS integration. The inclusion of a stand is particularly useful given the slim design, as it helps keep the UPS stable in vertical placement while maintaining airflow around the chassis.

From a design perspective, the emphasis is on simplicity and integration rather than flexibility. The device does not feature multiple voltage outputs, nor does it support powering unrelated devices such as routers or switches. Instead, its DC pass-through design, small footprint, and single-device orientation mark it as a specialized tool. This aligns with UGREEN’s approach of building a controlled ecosystem around its NAS systems, where accessories are engineered for direct compatibility. The US3000 therefore sits between consumer-grade battery packs and enterprise UPS units, offering a focused solution that fits into a narrow but clearly defined usage scenario.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Internal Power Design

Inside the UGREEN US3000 is a straightforward but carefully constructed layout built around a 12,000 mAh lithium-ion battery pack. The pack consists of four SunPower INR18650-3000 cells, each rated at 3000 mAh and 11.1 Wh, connected in series to deliver a combined rated energy of 43.2 Wh at 14.4 V. The cells are wrapped in foam insulation and secured with adhesive to minimize movement, with spot-welded nickel strips linking them. Additional barley paper insulation is applied around the terminals for added protection. This design choice allows the UPS to maintain compact dimensions while ensuring sufficient runtime for controlled NAS shutdowns.

Battery management is handled by a Chipsea CBM8580KV6NT protection IC. This chip monitors voltage, current, and temperature across the pack, ensuring safe charging and discharge cycles. It communicates with the system host via SMBus 3.1, which enables the UPS to relay real-time status to the NAS when connected through USB. Supporting components include current sense resistors, thermistors, and MOSFETs for switching and power regulation. Together, these ensure not only that the battery operates safely but also that the UPS can reliably deliver 120 W maximum output without voltage instability.

Voltage conversion is performed by a dual-stage arrangement. A Texas Instruments TPS55289 synchronous buck-boost converter handles a wide input range up to 30 V and can output between 0.8 V and 22 V. Alongside this, a SouthChip SC8002 synchronous buck controller manages current limiting and efficiency across dual channels. Power MOSFETs from CR MICRO and NCEPower are used for pass-through control and output switching, while a GigaDevice GD32F303RCT6 Cortex-M4 microcontroller coordinates the overall system, including communication with the NAS. Passive cooling, adhesive reinforcement on inductors and capacitors, and fuses at both input and battery ends further underline the design focus on stability and safety.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Testing with UGREEN NASync Systems

To evaluate the UGREEN US3000, three operational scenarios were simulated: immediate power loss with continued operation, automatic shutdown under UPS control, and timed shutdown with automatic restart when power returned. In each case, the NAS was connected to the UPS using both the DC input and USB communication cable to ensure full integration with UGOS Pro. The first test involved disconnecting mains power to replicate an outage. The NAS continued running without interruption, with the transfer to battery occurring instantly. System logs registered the event in under two seconds, and normal file access, media playback, and downloads remained available until the battery level dropped to the configured threshold.

In the second test, the system was configured to shut down automatically as soon as the UPS switched to battery mode. Once power was removed, the NAS immediately began its shutdown process. This test showed that the UPS integration with UGOS Pro allowed a fast and orderly shutdown sequence, preventing data corruption or incomplete writes. The reaction time was near instantaneous, and the system was powered down safely without user intervention. This mode may be best suited for environments where uptime during an outage is less critical than ensuring rapid data protection.

A third test focused on timed shutdown, with the UPS set to keep the NAS running for five minutes before initiating a safe power-off. Once mains power was disconnected, the NAS continued operating for the specified period, then shut down as configured. After power was restored, the UPS automatically triggered a restart of the NAS, returning it to full operation within a few minutes. This confirmed the UPS’s ability not only to handle outages but also to manage recovery without manual restart, which is beneficial for users who may not be present during a power failure.

During all tests, the device’s limitations became apparent. With a 120 W maximum output and battery capacity limited to 43.2 Wh, it cannot sustain extended operation. Its role is restricted to ensuring controlled shutdowns and short bridging periods rather than providing long-term backup. Furthermore, it supports only one NAS system via DC pass-through, so it cannot protect additional hardware such as routers or switches. Nevertheless, within its defined parameters, the UPS consistently delivered seamless transitions and executed software-triggered events reliably, confirming that its functionality matches its intended scope.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Conclusion & Verdict

The UGREEN US3000 fills a specific role: protecting UGREEN NAS devices from sudden power loss. Its design avoids the bulk and inefficiency of conventional AC-based UPS units by delivering DC pass-through power with zero transfer time. In practice, it provides just enough runtime for the NAS to perform a controlled shutdown, while its software integration ensures automation of both power-off and restart processes. With lithium-ion cells, a compact aluminum chassis, and close alignment with UGOS Pro features, it is engineered as a dedicated accessory rather than a universal power backup solution.

As a result, its usefulness is limited to scenarios where a single UGREEN NAS is the priority. It does not offer multiple outputs or extended backup duration, making it unsuitable for wider network coverage or enterprise requirements. Instead, the US3000 should be viewed as a narrowly focused safeguard that addresses one problem reliably: preventing data corruption and incomplete writes during outages. For users within the UGREEN ecosystem, it is an effective solution, but for broader applications, its scope remains intentionally constrained.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UGREEN NASync vs UniFi UNAS - UGREEN DH2300 NAS ReviewUGREEN DH2300 NAS ReviewUGREEN vs UniFi NAS - Which NeUGREEN DXP4800 PLUS vs DH4300 UGREEN DH4300 vs DXP4800 PLUS How to Make the UGREEN US3000 UGREEN US3000 NAS UPS ReviewDS1825+ vs DXP8800 PLUS NAS - Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXP Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Why are NAS Systems not 10GbE as Standard Right Now?

It is 2025, yet the majority of NAS systems on the market continue to ship with 1GbE or, at best, 2.5GbE networking, leaving many users questioning why 10GbE has not become a standard feature. Over the past decade, the cost of 10GbE networking equipment, including switches, NICs, and adapters, has steadily declined, and the technology has long since moved from being an enterprise-only option into mainstream availability. Home labs, creative professionals, and small businesses are increasingly working with 4K and 8K media, large VM environments, and multi-terabyte datasets, all of which can easily saturate a 1GbE or even 2.5GbE connection. Despite this shift, when browsing the portfolios of Synology, QNAP, Asustor, TerraMaster, or even newer DIY-friendly NAS brands, the entry-level and mid-tier systems remain locked at bandwidth speeds that are already dwarfed by modern SSD arrays and multi-bay RAID configurations.

asdasd

This gap between user expectations and manufacturer offerings has become more striking as affordable consumer motherboards and even some mini-PCs now integrate 5GbE or 10GbE as standard. By contrast, NAS vendors still tend to position 10GbE as a high-end add-on or restrict it to flagship models, often requiring costly proprietary NIC upgrades. For the average buyer, this creates the perception that NAS devices are lagging behind broader networking trends and are artificially constrained to maintain price tiers. The reality is more complex. The question of why 10GbE has not become universal in NAS hardware cannot be answered solely by pointing to falling market prices of controllers and switches. Instead, the explanation lies in a mix of economics, hardware design limitations, CPU lane allocations, and the fact that networking itself is evolving beyond 10GbE into alternatives like 25GbE and USB4. All of these factors together show why the integration of 10GbE into NAS devices remains more complicated than it may first appear.

Discussing the Issue / Barriers to Manufacturers

One of the most persistent barriers to universal 10GbE adoption in NAS systems is the economic reality of how these devices are positioned. Vendors like Synology, QNAP, and Asustor operate in a layered product ecosystem, where each tier is designed to push customers toward more expensive models. Entry-level devices often compete on affordability rather than raw performance, meaning that features like 10GbE are deliberately held back to differentiate mid-range and enterprise systems. The actual bill of materials (BOM) cost for including 10GbE hardware is lower than it was five years ago, but manufacturers still view it as a premium feature that justifies higher price points. By holding 10GbE in reserve for upper tiers, vendors protect their margins, avoid cannibalising sales of more profitable models, and keep upgrade paths clear for customers as their needs grow. This is not simply technical gatekeeping but a conscious market segmentation strategy.

A second, more technical challenge comes from CPU and chipset design. The processors used in affordable NAS devices are almost always low-power embedded models—Intel Celeron, Atom, or entry-level AMD Ryzen Embedded chips—which provide only a limited number of PCIe lanes. These lanes must be distributed across storage controllers, NVMe slots, expansion slots, and network interfaces. Introducing 10GbE requires not only dedicating at least two, and often four, PCIe lanes, but also ensuring that the CPU can handle the higher throughput without becoming the bottleneck. If a vendor reallocates lanes to add 10GbE, they may have to reduce the number of NVMe slots, cut down on SATA ports, or compromise expansion card bandwidth. For many manufacturers, it is simpler to leave 10GbE out of the base design than to risk producing a system that looks good on paper but struggles to deliver in practice.

Beyond lane allocation, there is also the issue of power, thermals, and board layout. 10GbE controllers typically draw more power and generate more heat than 1GbE or 2.5GbE chips. In compact NAS enclosures designed for low-noise operation, this can force more aggressive cooling solutions or tighter thermal management. For brands already working within strict acoustic and energy efficiency limits, especially in home or small office NAS devices, the integration of 10GbE becomes a balancing act between speed and stability. Higher thermal load can also reduce the overall lifespan of components or require larger enclosures, both of which erode the appeal of entry-level systems where buyers expect compact and efficient designs.

Another factor that discourages widespread 10GbE adoption is ecosystem alignment. NAS vendors are keenly aware that a large percentage of their target audience does not yet operate in 10GbE-ready environments. Even though 10GbE switches and NICs are more affordable in 2025, many households and small offices still rely on routers and switches with 1GbE or 2.5GbE uplinks. For these users, the inclusion of 10GbE would have little practical benefit, since the rest of the network infrastructure cannot support it. From the manufacturer’s perspective, bundling 10GbE into a device that will simply be throttled by the customer’s network backbone risks making the feature look pointless, or worse, “non-functional.” As such, 10GbE tends to be reserved for prosumer and enterprise segments, where it is more likely that users already have or are willing to invest in compatible infrastructure.

Finally, there is a subtle but important business factor at play: vendor ecosystems and upsell opportunities. Many NAS brands sell proprietary 10GbE upgrade cards or branded NICs, which can only be used with their systems. By omitting onboard 10GbE but providing expansion slots, vendors create an additional revenue stream while giving customers flexibility to upgrade later. This model also ensures that users who truly require 10GbE end up spending more within the brand’s ecosystem, while casual buyers stick to lower-cost systems that do not overdeliver. In this sense, the absence of 10GbE on affordable NAS units is not only about technical limitations, but also about preserving a staged upgrade model that aligns with each brand’s long-term revenue strategy.

The Solution – How Can 10GbE Be More Accessible?

The landscape for 10GbE networking hardware has improved significantly in the last few years, with controllers becoming cheaper, more efficient, and easier to integrate into consumer systems. Early 10GbE relied heavily on costly Intel or Mellanox chipsets designed primarily for enterprise servers, often priced in the hundreds of dollars per card. Today, vendors such as Realtek, Aquantia (now under Marvell), and Broadcom produce consumer-focused 10GbE controllers that are smaller, run cooler, and consume less power. These newer chipsets are also designed to integrate more smoothly with mainstream CPUs and motherboards, reducing the need for complex PCB layouts. The result has been a marked reduction in the cost of standalone NICs and USB-to-10GbE adapters, which now frequently sell for under $100, making them accessible even for home users experimenting with faster networking.

Even with this progress, manufacturers remain hesitant to make 10GbE a baseline feature across all NAS devices. Part of the reason lies in how modern NAS systems must juggle limited resources. As CPUs have shifted to PCIe Gen 4 and Gen 5, the available bandwidth has increased, but vendors are also using these lanes to expand NVMe storage pools, enable GPU acceleration, or add AI-focused co-processors for surveillance, indexing, or media analysis. In many cases, vendors see greater value in offering more M.2 slots, dual PCIe expansion options, or flexible NIC bays than in permanently dedicating space to 10GbE. This explains why hybrid designs are now common: devices shipping with 2.5GbE or 5GbE onboard, with a dedicated slot for an optional 10GbE card. Such configurations give users a faster-than-gigabit baseline, but also keep upgrade paths open for power users who truly need multi-gigabit networking.

The state of 10GbE is also being influenced by the rapid adoption of adjacent technologies. 2.5GbE has become the de facto standard in new consumer motherboards and mid-tier switches, offering a cheap and widely compatible upgrade path for everyday users who want more than 1GbE without changing their cabling. At the other end of the spectrum, higher-speed networking such as 25GbE or 40GbE is filtering down from data centres to advanced prosumer setups, while direct-connect solutions like Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 offer bandwidth well beyond 10GbE with less CPU overhead and simpler plug-and-play deployment. Software optimisation is also playing a role: modern NAS operating systems increasingly support IP over Thunderbolt or USB4, which provides a parallel path to multi-gigabit performance without the traditional reliance on Ethernet standards. As a result, 10GbE finds itself squeezed in the middle—too expensive to be a no-brainer at the entry level, but increasingly overshadowed by faster alternatives at the top end. It remains a critical sweet spot for small businesses and creative professionals, but its window of dominance is being challenged by the pace of networking innovation.

Verdict and Conclusion – Buy a 10GbE NAS Now or Wait?

The question of why 10GbE has not become a standard feature across NAS devices in 2025 does not have a single answer, but rather a convergence of factors. Manufacturers face technical challenges in CPU lane allocation, thermal management, and system design, while also making deliberate market choices to protect product segmentation and encourage upsell opportunities. At the same time, 10GbE sits in an awkward position within the networking landscape: cheaper and more efficient than ever, yet increasingly bypassed by the widespread adoption of 2.5GbE on the low end and the emergence of 25GbE, Thunderbolt, and USB4 on the high end. For now, this means that 10GbE remains reserved for higher-tier NAS systems where the hardware can genuinely sustain its throughput and where the user base is prepared to invest in compatible infrastructure. While prices will continue to fall and adoption will grow, it is unlikely that every NAS will adopt 10GbE as standard before other technologies begin to replace it as the next performance baseline.

5 affordable Turnkey 10GbE NAS Solutions (Between $499 and $699)

For years, 10GbE networking has been seen as a premium feature reserved for high-end or enterprise-grade NAS devices, often pushing total system costs well beyond the reach of home users and small businesses. However, as controller prices have dropped and demand for faster data transfers has grown, a new wave of affordable NAS solutions has started to appear with built-in 10GbE. These systems no longer require expensive proprietary upgrade cards or third-party NICs, and many sit comfortably below the $699 / £599 price point. They cover a range of use cases, from compact SSD-based NAS devices to rackmount storage appliances and versatile desktop units. Below is a selection of some of the most notable options currently available, each offering a balance of performance, connectivity, and affordability for users who want to move beyond 1GbE or 2.5GbE without breaking the bank.

UniFi UNAS Pro (7-Bay, Rackmount)

I keep coming back to two words for the UniFi UNAS Pro—fundamentals and consistency. UniFi has clearly focused on making this system a strong addition to their ecosystem, prioritizing the essential storage needs of a NAS. They’ve succeeded in this, but comparisons with long-established competitors are inevitable. While solid, reliable, and stable, the UniFi UNAS Pro will take time to be competitive on the software front. If you’re deeply invested in the UniFi ecosystem, you’ll appreciate its ease of use and integration. However, outside of a UniFi network, it may feel feature-light compared to alternatives. The pricing is competitive for a launch product at $499, and while it’s not the best NAS on the market, it’s the most user-friendly and UniFi-ready. It will likely satisfy many users’ needs. I can certainly see this being integrated into existing UniFi networks as a 2nd stage backup alongside their already existing 3rd party NAS solution, with the potential to graduating to their primary storage as Ubiquiti continue to evolve this platform above and beyond the fundamentals their have nailed down in the UNAS Pro system.

• Approx. Price: $499 / £400

• Specs: ARM Cortex-A57 quad-core CPU, 8 GB RAM, seven 2.5″/3.5″ SATA bays, 1×10GbE SFP+ and 1×1GbE.

• Why It Stands Out: Exceptional price-to-performance for pure storage needs. Lacks advanced multimedia or container apps but ideal for high-speed backups in a rackmount setup.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.2

PROS

Nails down the fundamentals of NAS Storage very well
Easy to use GUI and well suited in the UniFi Ecosystem/UX
Complete Offline Use is supported
Use of a UI account is NOT compulsory
Excellently deployed Snapshot Features
10GbE out-the-box
Open HDD Compatibility, but also 1st party options too
Backup and Restoration Options Nailed down perfectly
Very power efficient and CPU/, Memory utilization rarely high
Compact, Quite and well designed chassis
The LCD controls are completely \'different level\' compared to other brands in the market
Promised competitive pricing
FAST deployment (3-5mins tops)
Reactive Storage expandability and easy-to-understand storage failover options
Mobile app deployment is intuitive/fast
Feels stable, secure and reliable at all times
Performance is respectable (considering SATA Bay count and CPU) but also sustained performance is very good
Single screen dashboard is clear and intuitive
Ditto for the native file explorer

CONS

7 Bays is a bit unusual, plus feels like the existing UNVR with different firmware
Additional App installation (eg. \'Protect\') not currently supported. So no container support for 3rd party apps
Network Controls are limited
Works at it\'s best in an existing UniFi managed network, feels a little limited in \'standalone\'
Multiple storage pools not supported (nor is RAID 0)
Lack of Scheduled On/Off
Lack of redundant PSU
Only 1 10Gb port and 1x 1GbE, no USBs for expanded storage or an expansion

Asustor Flashstor 12 Gen 1 (Compact NVMe NAS)

The Asustor Flashstor Gen 2 12-Bay NAS is a robust and versatile solution for users with demanding storage needs. Its combination of high-performance hardware, extensive connectivity options, and compact design makes it a standout choice for content creators, small businesses, and enthusiasts. With dual 10GbE ports, USB 4.0 connectivity, and support for up to 12 M.2 NVMe drives, it offers exceptional speed and scalability. While the device has a few quirks, such as its mixed PCIe slot speeds and lack of M.2 heat sinks, these are manageable with proper planning and aftermarket solutions. The Flashstor Gen 2 excels in raw performance, handling intensive workflows with ease and maintaining low noise levels even under load. Its power efficiency and robust thermal management further enhance its appeal for 24/7 operation. For users prioritizing hardware capabilities and performance, the Flashstor Gen 2 delivers on its promises. While its complexity may deter less experienced users, those with the technical expertise to configure and optimize the system will find it a valuable addition to their workflow.

• Approx. Price: $750 / £600

• Specs: Intel Celeron N5105, 12×M.2 NVMe slots, single 10GbE port, compact form factor.

• Notable Traits: High-density SSD storage in a small desktop chassis. Excellent value for SSD-heavy builds.

SOFTWARE - 6/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 10/10

PRICE - 7/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.0

PROS

Exceptional Performance: Dual 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports and USB 4.0 connectivity deliver fast and reliable data transfer speeds, ideal for 4K editing and collaborative environments.
Extensive Storage Options: Supports up to 12 M.2 NVMe SSDs, allowing for large-scale, high-speed storage arrays.
ECC Memory Support: Includes 16GB of DDR5-4800 ECC memory (expandable to 64GB), ensuring data integrity for critical applications.
Compact Design: Small footprint makes it perfect for workspaces with limited room.
Quiet Operation: Dual-fan system keeps noise levels low, even under heavy loads.
Flexible Connectivity: Features two USB 4.0 Type-C ports and three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports for direct storage access and peripheral integration.
Power Efficiency: Low power consumption (32.2W idle, 56W under load) makes it economical to run, even for 24/7 operation.
Thermal Management Enhancements: Dual fans and copper heat pipes efficiently dissipate heat, ensuring stable performance.
Support for Third-Party Operating Systems: Compatible with platforms like TrueNAS and Unraid for advanced customization.

CONS

Mixed PCIe Slot Speeds: Inconsistent PCIe bandwidth across M.2 slots complicates unified RAID configurations.
Lack of M.2 Heat Sinks: NVMe slots do not include heat sinks, requiring aftermarket cooling solutions for intensive workloads.
No Integrated Graphics: The AMD Ryzen V3C14 processor lacks integrated graphics, limiting hardware transcoding and multimedia capabilities.
Steep Price: The 12-bay model’s cost ($1,300–$1,400) and the six-bay version’s lack of ECC memory make them expensive compared to alternatives.

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus

BOTTOM LINE – The UGREEN NASYnc DXP4800 Plus does not feel ‘finished’ yet and still needs more time in the over, but UGREEN have been very clear with me that this product is not intended for release and fulfilment till summer 2024 and improvements, optimization and product completion is still in progress. Judging the UGREEN NAS systems, when what we have is a pre-release and pre-crowdfunding sample, was always going to be tough. The DXP4800 PLUS is a very well put-together NAS solution, arriving with a fantastic launching price point (arguably even at its RRP for the hardware on offer). UGREEN has clearly made efforts here to carve out their own style, adding their own aesthetic to the traditional 4-bay server box design that plagues NAS boxes at this scale. Equally, although they are not the first brand to consider Kickstarter/Crowdfunding for launching a new product in the NAS/personal-cloud sector, this is easily one of the most confident entries I have seen yet. The fact that this system arrives on the market primarily as a crowdfunded solution (though almost certainly, if successful, will roll out at traditional retail) is definitely going to give users some pause for thought. Equally, the UGREEN NAS software, still in beta at the time of writing, although very responsive and nailing down the basics, still feels like it needs more work to compete with the bigger boys at Synology and QNAP. Hardware architecture, scalability, and performance are all pretty impressive, though the performance of the Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe slots didn’t seem to hit the numbers I was expecting. Perhaps a question of PCIe bottlenecking internally, or a need for further tweaking and optimization as the system continues development. Bottom line, with expected software updates to roll out closer to launch and fulfillment, such as an expanded App center and mobile client, the UGREEN DXP4800 Plus is definitely a device worth keeping an eye on in the growing Turnkey and semi-DIY NAS market. As an alternative to public cloud services, this is a no-brainer and worth the entry price point. As an alternative to established Turnkey NAS Solutions, we will hold off judgment till it is publicly released.

• Approx. Price: $595 / £475

• Specs: Intel Pentium Gold 8505 (6-thread), 8 GB DDR5, 4×SATA + 2×M.2 slots, 1×10GbE and 1×2.5GbE, plus HDMI, USB-C, USB-A, and SD reader.

• Why It’s Attractive: Well-rounded design with rich connectivity and media support, undercuts most rivals on price and features.

SOFTWARE - 6/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 6/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

7.6

PROS

Exceptional Hardware for the Price
4 HDDs + 2x Gen 4x4 M.2 in 1 box under $400
Good Balanced CPU choice in the Pentium Gold 8505
10GbE and 2.5GbE as standard
An SD Card Slot (wielrd rare!)
10/10 Build Quality
Great Scalability
Fantastic Mobile Application (even vs Synology and QNAP etc)
Desktop/Browser GUI shows promise
Established Brand entering the NAS Market
Not too noisy (comparatively)
Very Appealing retail package+accessories

CONS

10GbE Performance was underwhelming
Crowdfunding choice is confusing
Software (still in Beta) is still far from ready 22/3/24
non-UGREEN PSU is unexpected

TerraMaster F4-424 Max / F6-424 Max

The TerraMaster F4-424 Max is a robust 4-bay NAS system that offers a powerful mix of features and flexibility for a wide range of tasks. Powered by the Intel i5-1235U CPU with 10 cores and 12 threads, the F4-424 Max excels at resource-intensive applications such as Plex media streaming, 4K hardware transcoding, and virtual machine hosting. Its dual M.2 NVMe slots running at PCIe Gen 4 speeds significantly improve storage performance, especially when used for caching, while the two 10GbE ports offer high-speed networking environments, allowing for 20Gbps throughput via link aggregation.

In terms of software, TOS 6 brings notable improvements, although it still lags behind the more polished ecosystems of Synology DSM and QNAP QTS. That said, TerraMaster’s continuous software evolution with each new version of TOS ensures that users have access to more robust tools and security features. For its price point of $899.99, the F4-424 Max is a compelling option for those seeking high-performance NAS solutions with scalability in mind. While the Pro model offers competitive performance, the Max takes it a step further with advanced networking, making it ideal for environments where speed is a priority.

• Approx. Price: $675 / £550 (F4-424 Max, during sale) – $899 / £700 (F6-424 Max, regular)

• Specs: Intel Core i5-1235U (10-core), 8 GB RAM, dual 10GbE ports, dual M.2, with 4 or 6 SATA bays depending on model.

• Why It Helps: The F4-424 Max frequently drops below the $800 mark in promotions, offering unusually strong CPU performance and dual 10GbE at a mid-range price point.

SOFTWARE - 6/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.2

PROS

Powerful Hardware: Intel i5-1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads for resource-heavy tasks.
Dual 10GbE Ports: High-speed networking capabilities with link aggregation for up to 20Gbps, ideal for large file transfers.
PCIe Gen 4 NVMe Support: Two M.2 NVMe slots offering exceptional performance for caching or additional high-speed storage.
Efficient Cooling: The large 120mm fan ensures quiet and effective cooling, making it suitable for home and office environments.
Improved TOS 6 Software: Enhancements in GUI, backup tools, and overall security bring TOS closer to its competitors.

CONS

Higher Price Tag: At $899.99, it’s more expensive than TerraMaster’s other models, which may deter budget-conscious buyers.
No PCIe Expansion: Lack of a PCIe slot limits potential for future upgrades, such as adding 10GbE cards or more M.2 drives.
Presentation: The software has improved a lot, but still feels inconsistent in places compared with alternatives from brands such as Synology and QNAP.

Summary Table

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...N7 AMD 2x 10GbE NAS MotherboarN7 AMD 8845HS 2x 10GbE NAS MotCWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS BoCWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS BoN305 6-Bay 10GbE NAS MotherboaN305 6-Bay 10GbE NAS MotherboaTopton N100 10GbE NAS MotherboTopton N100 10GbE NAS MotherboThe Best 10GbE NAS Drives - 20QNAP TBS-h574TX Thunderbolt 4 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

QNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAS Coming Soon for Home and SMB Users

QNAP has officially launched the QuX05 series in the Eastern market, introducing three new desktop NAS systems: the Qu405 (4-bay), Qu605 (6-bay), and Qu805 (8-bay). Designed to refresh QNAP’s mid-range portfolio, these models target home users seeking centralised storage, creative professionals handling large-scale multimedia, and small to medium-sized businesses in need of reliable file servers with room to grow. Hardware configurations are offered in two processor options, with the Intel Core 3 N355 eight-core chip running up to 3.9 GHz for higher performance workloads, and the Intel N150 quad-core option at up to 3.6 GHz for cost-conscious deployments. All units adopt DDR5 memory, available in 8 GB or 16 GB SKUs, with support capped at 16 GB via a single slot, which while modest, still provides a step up in bandwidth over DDR4 used in older NAS systems. Storage capacity scales with the number of bays, from four in the Qu405 to eight in the Qu805, and each model also includes two M.2 PCIe Gen3 slots that can be assigned for cache acceleration or used as part of the storage pool. Connectivity has been modernised with dual 2.5GbE ports supporting SMB Multichannel and Port Trunking, USB 3.2 Gen2 across Type-A and Type-C, and a dedicated HDMI output capable of 4K60 playback or VM projection, ensuring these systems can function as both storage appliances and multimedia platforms.

The QuX05 series also benefits from QNAP’s dual operating system approach, allowing users to deploy either the established QTS software environment or the QuTS hero ZFS-based platform for improved data protection, inline deduplication, and snapshot functionality. Integrated AI-powered tools such as QuMagie for photo organisation, Qsirch for semantic search, and Qfiling for automated archiving further extend the usability of the series, making it suitable for both consumer and business applications. The timing of this release is notable, as QNAP’s TS-x64 and TS-x53E systems, including the TS-264, TS-464, and TS-664, are now over three years old, and while still supported, they increasingly feel dated in comparison to more recent offerings. At the same time, competition has intensified with new entrants such as UGREEN, Minisforum and Aoostar, which has gained traction in the NAS sector with aggressive pricing and updated hardware designs, underlining the demand for innovation. Against this backdrop, the Qu405, Qu605, and Qu805 arrive as QNAP’s latest response, bringing updated architecture, refined airflow and thermal design, modernised connectivity, and versatile system features to a market that is both more competitive and more demanding than before.

QNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAS Hardware Specifications

The Qu405, Qu605, and Qu805 are built around the latest Intel processors, with each model available in two distinct variants. The high-performance option uses the Intel Core 3 N355, an eight-core processor with a maximum turbo frequency of 3.9 GHz, paired with Intel UHD Graphics supporting 32 execution units. This CPU is part of Intel’s Twin Lake platform and offers a modest set of PCIe Gen3 lanes, sufficient for supporting dual 2.5GbE controllers, two M.2 NVMe slots, and other onboard I/O. The Lite models, intended for users with lighter requirements or stricter budgets, adopt the Intel N150 quad-core processor running at up to 3.6 GHz, paired with a reduced integrated graphics configuration and fewer available PCIe lanes overall. Both CPU options support AES-NI hardware-accelerated encryption, ensuring data security is handled with minimal performance impact, while the choice between N355 and N150 provides a balance between performance scaling and affordability across the QuX05 range.

Model	Qu405	Qu605	Qu805
Drive Bays	4 × 3.5″ SATA (hot-swappable, also supports 2.5″ SATA SSDs)	6 × 3.5″ SATA (hot-swappable, also supports 2.5″ SATA SSDs)	8 × 3.5″ SATA (hot-swappable, also supports 2.5″ SATA SSDs)
M.2 Slots	2 × M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen3 ×1	2 × M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen3 ×1	2 × M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen3 ×1
CPU Options	Intel® Core 3 N355 (8-core, up to 3.9 GHz) or Intel® N150 (4-core, 3.6 GHz)	Intel® Core 3 N355 (8-core, up to 3.9 GHz) or Intel® N150 (4-core, 3.6 GHz)	Intel® Core 3 N355 (8-core, up to 3.9 GHz) or Intel® N150 (4-core, 3.6 GHz)
Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics (32 EU for N355, reduced EU for N150)	Intel UHD Graphics (32 EU for N355, reduced EU for N150)	Intel UHD Graphics (32 EU for N355, reduced EU for N150)
Memory	DDR5 SODIMM: 8 GB or 16 GB (1 slot, max 16 GB)	DDR5 SODIMM: 8 GB or 16 GB (1 slot, max 16 GB)	DDR5 SODIMM: 8 GB or 16 GB (1 slot, max 16 GB)
Flash	8 GB eMMC NAND	8 GB eMMC NAND	8 GB eMMC NAND
Networking	2 × 2.5 GbE RJ45 (supports SMB Multichannel, Link Aggregation)	2 × 2.5 GbE RJ45 (supports SMB Multichannel, Link Aggregation)	2 × 2.5 GbE RJ45 (supports SMB Multichannel, Link Aggregation)
USB Ports	1 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C (front, one-touch copy) + 2 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (rear)	1 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C (front, one-touch copy) + 2 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (rear)	1 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C (front, one-touch copy) + 2 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (rear)
HDMI	1 × HDMI (2.0 or 2.1 depending on SKU, up to 4K 60 Hz)	1 × HDMI (2.0 or 2.1 depending on SKU, up to 4K 60 Hz)	1 × HDMI (2.0 or 2.1 depending on SKU, up to 4K 60 Hz)
Cooling	Redesigned airflow with improved heat dissipation	Redesigned airflow with improved heat dissipation	Redesigned airflow with improved heat dissipation
Power Supply	96 W external adapter, typical ~63 W under load	120 W external adapter, typical ~84 W under load	150 W external adapter, typical ~103 W under load
Dimensions	165 × 217 × 168 mm	165 × 217 × 226 mm	165 × 217 × 285 mm
Weight	Net 2.15 kg / Gross 4.1 kg	Net 2.52 kg / Gross 4.82 kg	Net 3.1 kg / Gross 5.7 kg
Operating System	QTS or QuTS hero (ZFS-based, supports inline deduplication, compression, snapshots)	QTS or QuTS hero (ZFS-based, supports inline deduplication, compression, snapshots)	QTS or QuTS hero (ZFS-based, supports inline deduplication, compression, snapshots)
Other Features	AES-NI encryption, hot-swap support, RAID protection, QuFirewall, 2FA, Malware Remover, Qsirch/Qfiling AI search, QuMagie photo AI, QVR Pro with 8 free camera channels	Same as Qu405	Same as Qu405
Ports Image

Memory is standardised across the series, with all three devices supporting DDR5 SODIMM modules operating at up to 4800 MHz. SKUs are available with either 8 GB or 16 GB preinstalled, and although only a single memory slot is provided, limiting maximum capacity to 16 GB, the use of DDR5 brings notable improvements in throughput and responsiveness compared to the DDR4 used in older generations. The memory arrangement also highlights the target audience of the QuX05 series: home and SMB users who need fast but manageable workloads rather than large-scale enterprise deployments that require extensive memory pools. The systems also include 8 GB of onboard eMMC NAND for essential system functions, ensuring that firmware and OS-level features remain responsive even during heavy storage activity. Unlike some higher-end SMB-focused NAS devices, there is no dedicated PCIe expansion slot for upgrades such as 10GbE, HBAs, or GPU cards. This omission is likely linked to the reduced lane count of the N150 and N355 processors, which restricts available bandwidth for add-in cards. Instead, QNAP has chosen to distribute available lanes across built-in features such as dual 2.5GbE ports and dual NVMe slots, a trade-off that prioritises out-of-the-box functionality over modular expansion.

Storage options are one of the main areas where the QuX05 series differentiates itself by bay count. The Qu405 provides four 3.5-inch SATA bays, the Qu605 six, and the Qu805 eight, with each also capable of accommodating 2.5-inch SATA SSDs for flexible configurations. All bays support hot-swapping, allowing drives to be replaced without shutting down the system. Alongside the main drive bays, every model includes two M.2 2280 NVMe slots running at PCIe Gen3 x1. While not offering the bandwidth of Gen3 x4 or Gen4, these slots are sufficient for cache acceleration or tiered storage, with QNAP’s Qtier software automatically balancing frequently accessed files between SSDs and hard drives. This approach provides both capacity and performance, especially for environments that mix multimedia storage with frequent small file access.

Connectivity is consistent across all three models. Networking is based on dual 2.5GbE RJ45 ports, supporting link aggregation for bandwidth scaling and redundancy as well as SMB Multichannel for improved multi-session performance. Local I/O includes two USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A ports at the rear, a front-facing USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C port with one-touch copy, and HDMI output capable of 4K at 60 Hz. Most SKUs list HDMI 2.1, while some Lite versions list HDMI 2.0, so capabilities vary depending on configuration. Power requirements scale with chassis size, from a 96 W adapter for the Qu405, to 120 W for the Qu605, and 150 W for the Qu805, with reported average consumption under full drive load measured at approximately 63 W, 84 W, and 103 W respectively. Additional features include system buzzers for hardware alerts, Kensington lock slots for physical security, and redesigned airflow systems that improve cooling efficiency compared to older QNAP mid-range hardware. Together, these specifications establish the QuX05 series as a modernised platform that balances capacity, performance, and power efficiency across three scalable sizes.

Comparison Between the QuX05 Series and TS-x64 & TS-x53E Series

The arrival of the QuX05 range marks a generational update in QNAP’s mid-tier NAS catalog, directly inviting comparison with the company’s established TS-x64 series (TS-264, TS-464, TS-664) and the TS-x53E line (TS-253E, TS-453E). While the older models remain capable and still receive firmware updates, they are now over three years old and show their age in several areas. The TS-x64 units rely on Intel Celeron N5095/N5105 processors, DDR4 memory, and single 1GbE networking as standard, with expansion slots required for faster networking or NVMe storage. The TS-x53E series, launched in 2022, provided an alternative path with dual 2.5GbE ports and built-in M.2 NVMe slots, though they were capped at DDR4 memory and lacked PCIe upgrade slots, restricting long-term flexibility. In contrast, the QuX05 systems use Intel’s newer N355 and N150 processors, move to DDR5 memory, and integrate features such as dual 2.5GbE, NVMe SSD caching, and HDMI 4K output directly into the base platform, reducing the reliance on add-in cards or optional upgrades.

Another major distinction lies in how QNAP has approached expandability. The TS-x64 devices maintain a traditional PCIe slot for upgrades such as 10GbE networking or storage accelerators, something absent from both the QuX05 and TS-x53E series. In the QuX05 range, the limited PCIe lanes of the chosen Intel processors have been redistributed to provide onboard dual NVMe slots and dual 2.5GbE networking, effectively prioritising out-of-the-box functionality over modular expansion. For many home users and SMBs, this built-in approach is practical, but for environments needing high-speed networking or specialised PCIe hardware, the TS-x64 remains more adaptable. Overall, the QuX05 line represents QNAP’s attempt to modernise its mainstream desktop NAS range by integrating features previously seen only in higher-end or expansion-reliant models, offering a balance of performance, efficiency, and simplified setup against the backdrop of older but more expandable TS systems.

Feature / Model	QuX05 Series (Qu405 / Qu605 / Qu805)	TS-x64 Series (TS-264 / TS-464 / TS-664)	TS-x53E Series (TS-253E / TS-453E)
CPU	Intel Core 3 N355 (8-core, up to 3.9 GHz) or N150 (4-core, up to 3.6 GHz)	Intel Celeron N5095/N5105 (4-core, up to 2.9 GHz)	Intel Celeron J6412 (4-core, up to 2.6 GHz)
Memory	DDR5 SODIMM, 8 GB or 16 GB, single slot (max 16 GB)	DDR4 SODIMM, up to 16 GB (dual-slot)	8 GB DDR4 onboard, not expandable
Network Interfaces	Dual 2.5 GbE built-in with SMB Multichannel and Port Trunking	Dual 2.5GbE , PCIe upgrade needed for 5/10 GbE Upgrades	Dual 2.5 GbE built-in
Drive Bays (SATA 3.5″)	Qu405:4	Qu605:6	Qu805:8, hot-swappable
M.2 NVMe Slots	2 × M.2 PCIe Gen3 x1 slots built-in	Requires optional PCIe card	2 × M.2 PCIe Gen3 x2 built-in
Ports
PCIe Expansion Slot	None (lanes redirected to onboard features)	1 PCIe slot for network/storage cards	None
USB Connectivity	USB 3.2 Gen2: 1 front Type-C (one-touch), 2 rear Type-A	USB 3.2 Gen1 ports, front/rear, no one-touch copy	USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A ports
HDMI Output	HDMI 2.0/2.1, 4K60 depending on SKU	HDMI 2.0 or none (model dependent)	Dual HDMI 1.4b, 4K30
Cooling / Design	Redesigned airflow and thermal efficiency	Traditional chassis design	Traditional chassis design
Power Consumption (Typical)	Qu405 ~63 W; Qu605 ~84 W; Qu805 ~103 W (fully populated)	TS-464 ~44 W, TS-664 ~70 W (approximate)	TS-453E ~36 W typical

QNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAS

Early reports from Eastern markets suggest that QNAP intends to position the QuX05 series at a highly competitive level, targeting the same price bracket traditionally occupied by mid-range consumer and SMB NAS devices. Instead of focusing on premium pricing, QNAP appears to be bundling enterprise-class features such as DDR5 memory, dual 2.5GbE connectivity, and built-in NVMe caching into systems expected to fall within the reach of prosumers and small studios. This approach contrasts with past strategies where certain features were locked behind higher-end models or optional expansion cards. The Qu405 and Qu605 are anticipated to scale more affordably due to their lower bay counts, while the Qu805 represents the higher-capacity option. All systems ship with QNAP’s standard two-year warranty, with the option to extend coverage to five years, which remains an important consideration for business users seeking predictable long-term support. Early indications also point to launch bundles or promotional packages, including potential accessories or service benefits, underlining QNAP’s intention to add value in a market that has become crowded with alternatives from newer NAS vendors.

In terms of release timing, the Qu405, Qu605, and Qu805 have already been introduced to the Eastern region, with wider international distribution expected before the close of 2025. Based on QNAP’s established release cycle, this typically means North American and European availability will follow within one or two months of the initial rollout. The timing reflects both market demand and competitive pressure, as the TS-x64 and TS-x53E families are now over three years old, and users have been increasingly vocal about the need for refreshed hardware. With rival solutions from UGREEN, Asustor, and other consumer-oriented NAS makers gaining attention, QNAP’s scheduling suggests an urgency to reassert its role in the mainstream NAS segment. The QuX05 series therefore not only modernises QNAP’s desktop lineup but also aims to arrive quickly enough to counter competing releases, ensuring it remains a viable choice for prosumers, creative teams, and small business deployments into 2026 and beyond.

Feature / Model	QuX05 Series (Qu405 / Qu605 / Qu805)	TS-x64 Series (TS-264 / TS-464 / TS-664)	TS-x53E Series (TS-253E / TS-453E)
Check Amazon
Check AliExpress
Check B&H

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Pwn2Own Ireland 2025: SynologyQNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAWhere IS QNAP RIGHT NOW???Week 32 Tech Digest – PCIe 6QNAP NAS Port Reference Guide Buy QNAP on B&HBuy QNAP on AmazonQNAP vs UGREENQNAP 2025 - EVERYTHING NEW forQNAP Launches TVR-AI200 Smart Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

UGREEN vient d’annoncer la disponibilité de l’US3000, un onduleur (UPS) spécialement conçu pour ses NAS. Derrière ce petit boîtier compact se cache une solution pensée pour protéger vos données en cas de coupure ou de surtension électrique. Mais si l’idée est séduisante, le produit présente aussi quelques limites…

UGREEN pour NAS US3000

Depuis un peu plus d’un an, UGREEN a fait une entrée remarquée sur le marché des NAS. Si le nouvel entrant n’arrive pas encore au niveau d’un Synology ou Qnap, il séduit de plus en plus d’utilisateurs grâce à un rapport qualité/prix agressif et un design travaillé.

Dans cette logique, l’US3000 vient compléter l’écosystème du fabricant avec un accessoire indispensable : l’onduleur. En effet, tout utilisateur de NAS sait combien il est important de protéger ses données des aléas électriques. Ce dernier permet de sécuriser le matériel face aux surtensions, aux micro-coupures ou autres pannes de courant. L’onduleur communique avec le NAS pour transmettre des informations clés (via une prise USB ou à travers le réseau) comme le niveau de batterie ou la durée d’autonomie restante… et l’appareil connecté peut déclencher l’extinction automatique du système pour éviter toute perte de données.

UGREEN US3000

Mais revenons à notre actualité… L’US3000 surprend d’abord par son format ultra-compact : 12 × 8 × 3 cm pour seulement 439 g. Avec son châssis en aluminium reprenant le design des NAS UGREEN, il s’intègre parfaitement à la gamme.

Conçu pour être inséré entre l’alimentation externe (hors modèles DXP6800 et DXP8800) et le NAS, il n’est toutefois pas compatible avec la plupart des modèles. C’est une première limitation à prendre en compte. Le fabricant a fait le choix de l’USB Type C pour la communication avec le NAS (le câble est fourni).

Sur le plan technique, l’US3000 dispose :

• Une capacité de batterie de 12 000 mAh ;
• Une puissance maximale délivrée de 120 W ;
• Une autonomie annoncée d’environ 10 minutes.

Autrement dit, il est conçu pour protéger un seul appareil à la fois (ici le NAS). L’autonomie est faible, mais suffisante pour permettre au système de se mettre en sécurité et de s’éteindre proprement. Rien n’indique si le boitier émet un son ou autre alerte lorsqu’il entre en fonction.

Prix et disponibilité

L’UGREEN US3000 peut séduire par son format miniature et sa simplicité d’intégration avec les NAS de la marque. Toutefois, son autonomie réduite et son tarif limitent son intérêt face à des solutions plus polyvalentes.

L’US3000 est disponible dès maintenant sur la boutique officielle de la marque au prix de 99,99 €. Un tarif qui peut sembler élevé, puisqu’il existe sur le marché des onduleurs plus complets et moins cher (ou pour quelques euros supplémentaires).

Néanmoins, pour les utilisateurs déjà séduits par l’écosystème UGREEN et à la recherche d’une solution compacte, ce produit reste une option pratique pour sécuriser leurs données.

Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur la page officielle…

Are Chinese DIY NAS Devices Worth Your Time, Money, and Data?

Over the last 2 years, I have discussed at length multiple different Chinese-built NAS solutions in one form or another. From DIY NAS motherboards from brands like Topton and CWWK to pre-built solutions arriving both with and without NAS software from brands like Ugreen, Terramaster, Aoostar, and more. Thanks to the miniaturisation and power efficiency improvements in a multitude of different kinds of PC hardware, a lot of brands originally developing mini PCs, tablets, and laptops have started including developments towards NAS systems in their portfolios. Some brands, like Ugreen and Terramaster, have gone into this with significantly more energy than others, including and further developing their very own NAS software that is included with the hardware. But regardless of whether you are looking at a Chinese DIY NAS that does or does not include its software, it still raises the question of whether these solutions are worth your time and money. Are they as reliable as some of the long-established players providing solutions from Taiwan or the US? Can you trust it with your data? Let’s discuss.

Chinese NAS Brands That I Recommend

These are the brands I would personally recommend if you are considering a China-based NAS brand. These are 6 brands that I have used many of their products (NAS and others) that I have found the best experiences with, as well as, on balance,e the best online support and communication. No brand is perfect, and look hard enough and you will find good and bad on any brand, really, but these are six examples of brands that stand out from the others.

Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their Own Store	Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store
Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store	Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store
Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store	Buy Here on Amazon

The TL;DR – Are Chinese DIY NAS Devices Worth It?

• Chinese NAS popularity is rising due to affordability, broader hardware variety, and greater accessibility in Asia.

• Brands like Ugreen and Terramaster have built their own NAS software, adding credibility to their name in the eyes of consumers and long-term support potential that a lot of other options seem to tangebly lack.

• Mini PC brands (e.g., Minisforum, GMKTec) are repurposing their platforms into NAS devices, leveraging existing consumer trust.

• Many Chinese NAS systems are hardware-only, allowing users to install platforms like TrueNAS or UnRAID.

• DIY-friendly: Chinese NAS devices often support third-party OS installs without voiding warranty—unlike many Western brands.

• Hardware value: You can expect up to 25–30% lower prices compared to similar US/Taiwan/Japan-made systems.

• Tech culture: China has a more tech-literate consumer market, visible in high street and airport advertising.

• Security concerns exist, largely due to past incidents of spyware or malware embedded in hardware from some Chinese vendors.

• Using trusted open-source OS platforms can reduce risks—but can’t fully eliminate them if vulnerabilities are in firmware/hardware.

• Not all Chinese brands are equal—research brand background, online presence, and operational transparency.

• Some no-name brands just rebrand OEM hardware (e.g., from CWWK), but offer poor support and minimal warranty backing.

Support issues include:

• No regional presence

• Language/cultural barriers

• Long RMA turnaround

• Tax/import delays for returns

Brands with better reputations for support include: CWWK, Jonsbo, and Terramaster.
Be wary of AliExpress-only brands with no official website or global support—these often lack accountability.

Ultimately: Yes, you can buy a NAS from China—just stick to reputable brands, do your research, and stay security-conscious.

$169 n150 4x M.2 NVMe SSD NAS – The GMKTek G9

Why Have Chinese NAS Systems Rapidly Grown in Popularity?

The easy answer to this would be to say that they tend to be a lot cheaper than NAS products that are built in the US, Europe, or surrounding Eastern countries like Taiwan or Japan. Indeed, that is true, and you tend to find that NAS systems made in China are typically offered at great value price points and hardware value compared to anywhere else in the world. However, the popularity of Chinese NAS systems is actually a little bit more nuanced and about a lot more than simply money.

The UGREEN DXP NASync Series Now Globally Available

For a start, some of the brands that are currently moving into providing their own network-attached storage solutions are brands that already had a well-established presence in homes and offices around the globe for other peripherals. A great example of this would be Ugreen. Ugreen has provided accessories for PCs, power adaptors, and portable docking stations for quite a few years and is probably one of the most recognisable names for this kind of technology from China around the world.

The Aoostar WTR N305 4 Bay NAS Drive

Therefore, in early 2024, when the brand announced it was entering the world of NAS in the Western world, the brand already had a fairly solid and well-documented audience in place. That is likely why the brand, although still pretty good value, is actually slightly more expensive than the majority of other Chinese NAS brands.

The Terramaster F6-424 Max NAS – 2x 10GbE, 2x Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe & Intel i5 CPU

Alternatively, you have brands like Terramaster, who have been in the network-attached storage industry for over half as long as the likes of QNAP and Synology, and during that time have built up a fairly solid audience base long before the arguably heavy influx of smaller, lesser-known brands entering the world of NAS from China.

The Terramaster F6-424 Max NAS – 2x 10GbE, 2x Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe & Intel i5 CPU

Chiefly purchased for its hardware until now, Terramaster is a brand that has a fairly comprehensive and well-detailed software platform in TOS. Of course, both of these brands provide much better value for money than alternatives in the market from other countries, but in a lot of cases, people are purchasing these solutions for more than just the bottom-line price.

The Lincplus Lincstation N1 & N2 4x M.2 and 10GbE NAS

Alternatively, there is the now heavily saturated market of mini PC vendors who have modified a lot of their existing production and systems to now leverage towards storage. In many cases, some of these brands—such as Minisforum and GMKTec—already have a healthy relationship with consumers thanks to their mini PCs, and that brand awareness has clearly transferred over to NAS products.

The Minisforum N5 Pro NAS – AMD i9 HX370 / ECC Memory / 10+5GbE / 5 SATA and 3 M.2 NVMe

The other thing that makes these Chinese NAS products very appealing to new and even old NAS buyers is that a lot of them arrive without software included. This allows users to get just the hardware at a lower price and then go ahead and install software such as TrueNAS or UnRAID, because they want to take advantage of those more flexible (if slightly more intimidating) platforms. The majority of NAS products that arrive from other countries tend to arrive with their own NAS software included and, more often than not, do not allow the warranty to continue being supported if you install a third-party operating system. Whereas practically all NAS products that are developed in China tend to allow you to use third-party operating systems—even when they include their own OS (again, see Terramaster and Ugreen).

What Are the Benefits of Chinese NAS Systems?

Ultimately—and it’s kind of a shame that this is the headline here—but it is, of course, that NAS systems from China will generally give you much better hardware at a lower price tag. That isn’t to say that these systems are always going to be universally the lowest price, but it is simply that the average price tag of the system configuration and hardware, compared across multiple regions, will generally always end in the product being cheaper when it is manufactured in China.

UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS – 10GbEx2, Intel i5 CPU, Gen 4×4 NVMe

More often than not, whether you’re looking at a fairly modest entry-level Intel Celeron / Intel Alder Lake / Intel Twin Lake-based NAS system or scaling it up all the way towards Intel Core and AMD Ryzen systems, you will tend to find that NAS solutions built in China are as much as 25 to 30% lower in price than those made in the rest of the world.

The UnifyDrive UP6 6x NM.2 NVMe SSD Portable NAS

I guess you could also add that if you are based in the Eastern part of the world, there are also tremendous benefits to these solutions being so readily available and accessible. Indeed, on a recent trip to Shenzhen, I noticed how there were significantly more DIY NAS solutions available on the high street and in the tech malls than anywhere else in the world. A big part of this is that the general average standard understanding of tech hardware is higher out there than in a lot of Western regions. That isn’t to say that we don’t have a tremendously high volume of users who understand this kind of technology in the US and Europe, but the way it is framed to the consumer is notably different.

So, for example, if you walk around an airport in China, Hong Kong, or Taiwan, you will often see advertisements of a pretty technical nature with regard to CPUs and graphics cards on the back of trolleys, billboards, and on the sides of public vehicles. Whereas in America and Europe—although this is still not completely absent—adverts are much more focused on the end product, such as phones, tablets, laptops, and domestic client hardware.

Why Are People So Concerned About Chinese NAS System Security?

It is a pretty bloody valid concern! In recent years, tensions between large countries with regards to trade have been on the rise—one of the biggest being the US–China trade war, which, although it has ebbed and flowed over the last seven or eight years, is actually something that has existed for a few decades now. It largely boils down to the import and export of this kind of technology. However, the breaking point came when several Chinese products were found to contain spyware and malware that was hard-baked into the hardware and allowed for remote collection of user data. Numerous brands were implicated, and the fact that there is a degree of ambiguity between numerous Chinese brands in the eyes of the world—regarding how many of them cross over at the point of manufacture and how many of them are on the same production line filtering toward various brands—all added up to increased tensions and, eventually, several companies and organisations being barred from sale in the US.

Source – https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366622023/NCSC-issues-warning-over-Chinese-Moonshine-and-BadBazaar-spyware/

How much this has been respected by certain Chinese players in the past—I am not going to blanket-tarnish all Chinese brands with this, as that would be both unfair and hugely incorrect. Nevertheless, a small group of bad apples has certainly soured the mood for many when it comes to purchasing Chinese NAS products in terms of security, especially when it is noted that these systems will be on 24/7, contain all of your data, and, in many cases, are directly or indirectly connected to the internet depending on your own personal setup.

Source: https://www.security.com/threat-intelligence/us-china-espionage/

This is one of the main reasons why a lot of users will purchase a Chinese NAS product specifically if it does not arrive with any kind of included operating system. A lot of users would rather trust established and Western-orientated NAS brands such as TrueNAS and UnRAID, as these have a proven track record of firmware updates and security tools, but also have recognised vulnerability and security disclosure programs that they work with to be held accountable in the event of any security incident being recognised. Nevertheless, on numerous occasions, it has been noted that security vulnerabilities—and the aforementioned spyware, when it has been recognised—have been hard-baked into the hardware components and physical controllers, which means that regardless of the NAS software you use, some of these devices still have the potential to contain security vulnerabilities.

Now, playing devil’s advocate, it could actually be possible for any hardware manufacturer in any country in the world to implement these kinds of security breach methodologies into their hardware. When you really break it down, the architecture of a NAS device—regardless of where it is built in the world—is going to be largely similar to that of a standard PC, and therefore the opportunities for exploitation and manipulation are still going to be on the table. Nevertheless, although it has been recognised that different regions of the world have had their own bad actors who have introduced vulnerable devices into the market unbeknownst to end users, there is still no avoiding that the lion’s share of the manufacturers found culpable for this have been based in China.

However, we also have to be slightly reasonable in that, given the larger share of hardware that is manufactured and distributed from China, then statistically, they are always going to have the larger number of incidents. The propaganda machine of numerous nations will always be at play to present a particular picture of the safety of imported devices, but all that aside, it does still seem that—despite instances of systems with inbuilt vulnerabilities decreasing all the time—they do crop up more frequently in products made in China than anywhere else in the world.

Here – https://www.tomshardware.com/desktops/mini-pcs/mini-pc-maker-ships-systems-with-factory-installed-spyware-acemagic-says-issue-was-contained-to-the-first-shipment/

Should this be a reason to completely disregard purchasing a NAS solution from China? No, I don’t think so. I think it is a good reason to investigate the brand or organisation that you’re choosing to purchase from. I think it is a good reason to investigate how long a company has been in operation and to find out more about their offices and operations before making a purchase. And I do think it is all the more reason why organisations should not automatically assume that any piece of hardware from anywhere in the world is automatically the most secure out of the box, and should be implementing their own firewalls, VPNs, authentication methods, and security protocols regardless.

Remote Accessing My Chinese NAS – Alternatives to the Host OS

If you’re hesitant to use the default remote access features provided by your Chinese-made NAS due to privacy, transparency, or security concerns, you’re not alone—and thankfully, there are much safer and more trusted options available.

One of the most popular and user-friendly tools in this space is Tailscale, a modern mesh VPN built on WireGuard. Tailscale allows you to securely access your NAS (or any other device on your network) from anywhere in the world—without the need for risky port forwarding, dynamic DNS, or vendor cloud logins. With just a few clicks, you can create a private, end-to-end encrypted network between your NAS, phone, tablet, and computers, all managed via a clean web dashboard. It works across firewalls, NAT, and even CGNAT (carrier-grade NAT), which makes it ideal for less technical users looking for peace of mind when accessing their files remotely.

For those who want more customization or are working in slightly more advanced environments, there are other powerful self-hosted or cloud-assisted VPN solutions worth considering. Tools like ZeroTier allow for flexible, programmable virtual networks with global peer-to-peer routing. Meanwhile, OpenVPN and WireGuard (standalone) offer rock-solid, time-tested security for users comfortable with deploying and managing their own VPN servers. These services can be installed directly on your NAS or hosted on another home server or Raspberry Pi on the same network, offering complete control over who gets access and how. If you’re running TrueNAS, UnRAID, or even Debian/Ubuntu-based DIY NAS software, many of these can be installed natively or through Docker containers. This means you can completely bypass the vendor-supplied cloud services, eliminating a major attack surface while retaining secure access from anywhere.

Here are some of the most reliable and widely recommended remote access alternatives:

• Tailscale – Simple, secure mesh VPN using WireGuard; ideal for non-technical users

• ZeroTier – Virtual network overlay with programmable access control and P2P routing

• WireGuard (standalone) – Lightweight, fast, and secure VPN for advanced users

• OpenVPN – A well-established, highly configurable VPN solution

• Dockerized Access Tools – Solutions like Headscale (Tailscale self-hosted), PiVPN, or Cloudflare Tunnel

• Cloudflare Tunnel (Argo Tunnel) – Secure reverse proxy with public access protection

• FRP (Fast Reverse Proxy) – Lightweight self-hosted tunnel service often used in Chinese networks

• Syncthing – Peer-to-peer file sync tool for remote file access without VPN (for specific folders)

Using any of these tools, you can confidently disable or ignore the default remote access features provided by your NAS vendor and instead implement a hardened, trusted, and fully auditable solution. In doing so, you’re minimizing potential exposure, maintaining privacy, and ensuring that your remote access setup is under your control—not in the hands of a third-party vendor.

Should Users Be Concerned About Support?

Alongside the ever-present concerns around security, the other big issue that users tend to mention about purchasing Chinese NAS products is to do with support. It’s not unusual for a product or solution that you purchase in the market to not have a local or regional office that you can talk to in the event of hardware faults or software difficulties. Just because a product is manufactured in China doesn’t mean it’s the only one that suffers from the geographical hurdles of purchasing a system built in a completely different country than your own.

For example, there are plenty of American manufacturers that do not have any regional offices in Europe, and most support is provided remotely. In those cases, what puts support for products made in China into a different category for many is:

1. Language and cultural differences in communication between end users and the brand, and

2. The logistical difficulties of replacing a malfunctioning device with a replacement or repair.

Most of us are quite familiar with—and are happy to accept—that issues occur in the day-to-day operations of most large-scale mass manufacturing production lines. Even high production lines with a 0.01% failure rate, once you break into the million units, are still going to result in a handful of users who might receive a unit that is less than fully operational. But alongside the delays of swapping a bad device for a good one, other hurdles such as time zone differences and potential tax issues upon devices travelling internationally need to be considered. Many of these issues are not any one country’s fault and are just part and parcel of global trade that’s ever-present in any technology. However, it is how certain Chinese brands negotiate these many hurdles when selling goods to the US and Europe that very quickly sets apart the good organisations from the bad ones.

In my years reviewing and installing different Chinese NAS solutions, some brands have definitely stood out more than others in terms of their support. For example, in the past 2 years, I have heard significantly more positive warranty/repair threads for CWWK, Jonsbo, and Terramaster than I have for brands like GMKtec, B-Link, or pretty much any brand that only seems to exist on AliExpress and Alibaba but has practically no in-house website or Western presence. That isn’t to say that those first few companies I mentioned have a 100% success rate—definitely not. Some simple Googling will always find you both good and bad instances. However, broadly, I’ve had better feedback from people I have provided support for and from numerous NAS subreddits for those brands than I have for some of the lesser-known and far more isolated organisations.

Another point to highlight is that some of the lesser-known brands are simply reusing existing designs and hardware architecture provided by an original manufacturer and relabelling it as their own. For example, CWWK manufactures a large amount of the hardware solutions you may see in the market, but it just so happens that they are sold to contractors and lesser-known providers who then apply their own manufacturer’s badge.

Where this becomes a problem with support is that if you encounter an issue with your hardware, the relabelled and rebadged name that’s been applied to that CWWK product can only provide limited support and even weaker hardware repair, as they are heavily reliant on the original manufacturer and their own production lines.

In these cases, I once again heavily recommend that if you are going to purchase any Chinese NAS product, that you go to the source. And circling back to the issue of security I mentioned earlier on, you tend to find that when spyware has been found on some hardware systems, it has been due to software that was applied to the hardware after it left the original manufacturer—more often than not, applied within an .exe found autoloading in the included copy of Windows.

So once again, double-check that the brand you’re talking to is the original manufacturer before you purchase a Chinese NAS solution, and double-check that they have some kind of Western presence first. It may seem almost obvious and naïve to say this, but ultimately, a lot of these organisations operate on tremendously thin profit margins. This means that the cost of manpower and hiring sufficiently skilled people to create these Western websites and English-understood points of sale is often left by the wayside by the less scrupulous organisations, as they simply do not have a clear enough print-to-profit or long-term strategy to provide solutions they can trust in order to engage with this.

Should I Buy a NAS from China?

The short answer? Yes, I think you can. You should be as security-aware as (frankly) you should be with any NAS product—as any 24/7 data storage solution is only one vulnerability away from being compromised. But as long as you know the risks and understand that support is not going to be as “next day” as it would be if you purchased a local product, I do genuinely think that you are okay to buy a Chinese NAS solution from the more well-known and reputable brands in the market. If the brand doesn’t have much of an online presence outside of China—even doesn’t really have much of its own website outside of AliExpress, Amazon, or Alibaba—avoid them like the plague! Because those brands that aren’t prepared to make even the token effort to have much of an online presence outside of a retail website have certainly not got the profit margin to provide any kind of meaningful support and are more likely to cut corners. Worse still, it is those organisations that have such slim profit margins that are almost certainly going to be the ones that may be more susceptible to influence in installing exploitative or malware software components on their systems for an additional backhand payment.

Chinese NAS Brands That I Recommend

These are the brands I would personally recommend if you are considering a China-based NAS brand. These are 6 brands that I have used many of their products (NAS and others) that I have found the best experiences with, as well as, on balance,e the best online support and communication. No brand is perfect, and look hard enough and you will find good and bad on any brand, really, but these are six examples of brands that stand out from the others.

Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their Own Store	Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store
Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store	Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store
Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store	Buy Here on Amazon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...fnOS Beta Review - I Tried OutAre Chinese NAS Devices Safe? I Visited a Chinese NAS Factor Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Cela fait maintenant un an que le fabricant UGREEN a fait son entrée sur le marché des NAS. Aujourd’hui, nous recevons en test le DXP4800 Plus. Dans cet article, nous allons tout d’abord explorer le matériel, puis nous nous attarderons sur la partie logicielle, enfin place aux tests de performance sur notre banc de mesure. Annoncé à moins de 600€, que vaut ce nouveau NAS ?

Test UGREEN NAS DXP4800 Plus

UGREEN est un fabricant chinois bien connu pour ses accessoires destinés aux smartphones, tablettes et ordinateurs. Sa réputation repose sur des produits fiables et performants. En 2024, la marque s’est lancée sur le marché des NAS via une campagne de financement participatif (Kickstarter). C’était un pari maîtrisé, qui a rencontré un vif succès, avec une communauté active autour du projet.

Le lancement a été relativement rapide. Entre l’annonce du Kickstarter et l’envoi des premières unités, tout cela s’est fait en 6 mois. Grâce à ses usines et ressources internes, Ugreen a su maîtriser sa production. Initialement réservée à certains pays, la commercialisation s’est aujourd’hui étendue.

Une concurrence qui s’interroge

D’abord ignoré par les acteurs historiques, le projet Ugreen a rapidement attiré l’attention. Certains fabricants ont même sollicité notre avis. Derrière une façade de désintérêt apparent, les leaders du secteur ont perçu l’impact de ce nouvel entrant, désormais considéré avec une certaine prudence.

Le Forum des NAS propose une section UGREEN, ce qui en fait la première communauté francophone pour des NAS de la marque.

DXP4800 Plus

Après ce rappel, intéressons nous de plus près au DXP4800 Plus. Il y a quelques semaines, un membre de la communauté Cachem avait partagé ses premières impressions. Le fabricant nous a envoyé le même modèle afin d’approfondir cette première approche.

Contenu de la boîte

À l’ouverture, on retrouve :

• Le DXP4800 Plus en lui-même ;
• 2 câble réseau RJ45 Cat. 7 ;
• L’alimentation externe et son câble ;
• Des vis pour les SSD avec un tournevis ;
• 2 blocs de pâte thermique pour les SSD NVMe ;
• Un guide de démarrage rapide en anglais, allemand et chinois ;
• Une feuille sur la garantie de 2 ans.

L’emballage est très soigné, avec plusieurs niveaux de protection. On note un effort de présentation proche de celui d’Apple.

Design et connectivité

Nous sommes en présence d’un NAS bien lourd. En effet, le boitier est en une pièce en aluminium bleu-gris (unibody à la façon d’Apple). Son poids impressionne avec 4,1 kg sur la balance. À l’arrière, un ventilateur de 140 mm souffle de l’air vers l’intérieur du boîtier, contrairement à la plupart des fabricants qui extraient l’air chaud.

En façade, on a 4 emplacements pour disques durs (ou SSD SATA). On retrouve également le bouton marche/arrêt en bas à gauche, ainsi que des diodes (LAN et disques).

Côté connectique :​

• 1 port 10 Gb/s RJ45 ;
• 1 porte 2,5 Gb/s RJ45 ;
• 1 port USB 3.0 (à l’arrière)
• 2 ports USB 2.0 (à l’arrière) ;
• 1 sortie audio-vidéo HDMI compatible 4K ;
• 1 port USB 3.1 Gen.2 (type-A à l’avant)
• 1 port USB 3.1 Gen.2 (type-C à l’avant)
• 1 emplacement pour carte SD.

Une connectivité complète et bien pensée.

Intérieur du DXP4800 Plus

Le DXP4800 Plus repose sur un processeur Intel Pentium Gold 8505 cadencé à 3,3 GHz (5 cœurs, 6 threads, jusqu’à 4,4 GHz en Burst) avec iGPU intégré. Il est épaulé par 8 Go de RAM DDR5 (extensibles à 64 Go). Le score PassMark est de 9220 points, plutôt prometteur !!!

Installation du NAS

Les disques dur 3,5″ s’installent sans outils. Les chariots, bien que différents des standards Synology ouQNAP, sont fonctionnels.

Pour les SSD, il faut retirer une fixation via un outil fourni. Malheureusement, il faut forcer légèrement sur une pièce en plastique fragile. Sur 4 chariots, l’une s’est abîmée pour nous.

Le NAS propose 2 emplacements pour SSD NVMe, accessibles via une trappe sous l’appareil. L’ajout de pâte thermique (fournie) et le rôle de dissipateur thermique du capot en aluminium sont des points positifs.

Petit défaut, le NAS n’est pas suffisamment surélevé.  Les patins dessous sont trop bas, ce qui limite la circulation de l’air et favorise les vibrations. De nombreux utilisateurs recommandent l’ajout de petits amortisseurs en élastomère pour corriger ce léger défaut.

UGOS

Vous êtes nombreux à vouloir en savoir plus sur le système embarqué UGOS. Nous allons être transparents de ce côté : le bon, voire très bon et le moins bon. Nous avons bien conscience que Ugreen est encore jeune sur le marché et il faut savoir être indulgent. Le fabricant met à jour très régulièrement son système afin de rivaliser avec les ténors du marché.

Installation d’UGOS

Après la découverte positive du matériel, la deuxième étape de l’installation est importante. L’utilisateur découvre pour la première fois ce qu’Ugreen va lui proposer. Le fabricant a bien compris l’importance d’accompagner l’utilisateur dès ses premiers pas avec UGOS. On vous laisse découvrir les étapes ci-dessous…

On regrettera que l’installation ne soit qu’en anglais. Cette première étape est pourtant cruciale… Après ces 4 premiers écrans, il faut ensuite patienter…

Comme vous pouvez le constater, les écrans d’attente jouent un rôle crucial pour anticiper les étapes suivantes du processus. Il est donc impératif qu’Ugreen les traduise rapidement afin d’améliorer l’expérience utilisateur.

Une fois l’installation terminée, le NAS a redémarré… en changeant d’adresse IP pour nous. Initialement configuré sur 192.168.1.151, il est passé sans avertissement à 192.168.1.191. Un comportement pour le moins surprenant, qui pourrait facilement passer inaperçu si vous accédez au NAS via son nom réseau ou si vous utilisez l’application officielle d’Ugreen que nous vous recommandons.

Pour retrouver son NAS sur le réseau, vous pouvez utiliser l’application ou taper dans votre navigateur find.ugnas.com

Découverte d’UGOS

L’écran de connexion permet de s’authentifier par identifiant et mot de passe classique… ou de cliquer en haut à droite pour obtenir un QR Code à utiliser avec l’application mobile.

Premier lancement

Au démarrage, un tutoriel se lance pour vous faire rapidement le tour du propriétaire. C’est simple, rapide et en français cette fois.

Volume de stockage

Ensuite, on est guidé vers la création du premier volume de stockage.

Là encore, on appréciera l’accompagnement d’UGOS… Beaucoup d’informations importantes et cruciales pour la suite, bravo à Ugreen.

Comme on peut le constater, le système ne prend pas le volume (unique) par défaut. C’est à l’utilisateur de le sélectionner.

Tout n’est pas parfait, mais l’utilisateur est bien accompagné.

Robot d’accompagnement

Sur l’écran principal, vous noterez la présence d’un robot virtuel en bas à droite. Ce dernier fournit des informations (plus ou moins importantes). En cliquant dessus, voici les informations affichées :

Il disparaitra une fois toutes les étapes finalisées. A noter qu’il faut aller jusqu’au bout pour le faire disparaitre (donc cliquer sur activer l’accès à distance).

Création d’un dossier partagé

On clique sur le bouton Créer pour la création du premier dossier…

Ici encore, un tutoriel se lance pour vous accompagner. UGOS utilise 3 terminologies différentes :

1. Dossier personnel : privé, accessible à un seul utilisateur ;
2. Dossier partagé : visible selon les autorisations définies ;
3. Dossier utilisateur (réservé à l’admin) : ensemble des dossiers personnels

Si vous avez déjà manipulé d’autres NAS, ces notions ne vous seront pas inconnues. La différence entre dossier personnel et dossier partagé, c’est que le dossier personnel n’est que pour un et un seul utilisateur. Alors que le dossier partagé sera partagé avec les autres utilisateurs.

Synthèse de l’installation et premiers pas

L’accompagnement est plutôt bien réalisé de la part d’Ugreen. L’utilisateur n’a qu’à se laisser guider. On regrettera l’absence d’un “mode expert” pour les utilisateurs avancés, et l’impossibilité de désactiver certains assistants. Ne soyons pas trop dur, on ne peut que les féliciter du travail réalisé.

Usage au quotidien

UGOS est un système Linux optimisé pour le stockage en réseau. Il propose un ensemble de fonctionnalités, qui sont complétées par des applications via le Centre d’applications : Antivirus, Download Center, Text Edit, etc. Nous sommes encore loin des capacités d’un NAS Synology ou QNAP. Ugreen a fait le choix de privilégier Docker pour compléter plusieurs de ses lacunes.

Au moment où nous écrivons ses lignes, les snapshots (instantanés avec Btrfs) viennent d’arriver, mais les capacités sont encore limitées. Il n’y a toujours pas la possibilité de chiffrer un dossier, pas de reverse proxy en natif, absence de planificateur de tâches, pas de sauvegarde vers un support externe… plutôt frustrant.

Cloud Drive permet des sauvegardes et synchronisations vers OneDrive ou Google Drive, mais l’outil reste perfectible (pas de chiffrement, filtrage limité, pas de planification).

Espérons que le fabricant corrige ces petits défauts agaçants dans les prochaines semaines.

Applications pour ordinateur, téléphone…

UGREEN propose une application de bureau (Windows et macOS) ce qui est une excellente idée. Il y a également une application mobile complète (Android et iOS), compatible également avec Apple TV et Android TV. Elles permettent d’accéder aux fichiers, au statut du NAS, aux notifications… mais aussi à la sauvegarde de photos, au visionnage de vidéo, etc. Tout y est, un véritable couteau suisse.

Mises à jour régulières

Ugreen déploie fréquemment des mises à jour pour corriger des bugs et soucis de traductions, mais aussi pour améliorer les performances et ajouter des fonctionnalités. La dernière en date vient d’introduire une protection contre les attaques DDoS.

Un NAS est coûteux, c’est un investissement sur le long terme. Aujourd’hui, les NAS sont régulièrement mis à jour… et surtout pendant de nombreuses années.

Nouvel entrant : doit-on faire preuve de tolérance ?

Ugreen est nouveau sur le marché des NAS, mais ce n’est pas un novice. L’entreprise possède une solide expérience industrielle et maîtrise déjà la conception matérielle et logicielle. Le fabricant savait dans quoi il s’engageait avec ce secteur exigeant, dominé par des acteurs comme Synology et QNAP.

Côté matériel, le produit tient la route. Mais c’est sur la partie logicielle que le bât blesse : UGOS reste limité pour un usage avancé. Si certains parient sur des mises à jour futures pour corriger le tir, d’autres estiment qu’un NAS doit être pleinement opérationnel dès l’achat, pas dans 6 mois. Ugreen en est conscient… Aussi, il propose l’installation de systèmes alternatifs comme OMV, TrueNAS, Unraid… Une approche ouverte, appréciée des utilisateurs.

L’essentiel est là : une base matérielle fiable et une volonté claire d’évoluer. À Ugreen maintenant de consolider son positionnement logiciel.

Performances du DXP4800 Plus

Dans la première partie des tests, nous allons évaluer les performances des transferts à travers un réseau 10 Gb/s (entre le NAS et des ordinateurs). Ensuite, nous regarderons les capacités du processeur, en analysant ses performances globales…

Vitesses dans les transferts

Depuis plusieurs années, nous avons mis en place un protocole de tests rigoureux fournissant des données fiables et comparables avec les performances des autres NAS. Pour cela, nous utilisons 4 applications de mesure différentes (2 sous macOS et 2 sous Windows) et réalisons en plus des transferts de fichiers de tailles variées dans les deux sens (NAS -> Ordinateur puis Ordinateur -> NAS) :

• Petites tailles : 100 fichiers de 500 Ko à 12 Mo (MP3, photos, documents Office)
• Tailles moyennes : 30 fichiers de 12 à 350 Mo (DivX, images RAW, archives ZIP)
• Fichiers volumineux : 10 fichiers avec une taille comprise entre 4 et 10 Go (MKV, ISO)

À la suite des tests, une moyenne des transferts est calculée et nous la représentons sous forme de graphiques exprimée en mégaoctets par seconde (Mo/s). Plus le nombre est élevé, plus le NAS est rapide. Pour notre évaluation du DXP4800 Plus, nous avons configuré un premier volume avec 2 SSD NVMe en RAID 0, puis un second volume avec 3 SSD SATA en RAID 5.

RAID 0

En RAID 0, nous devrions profiter pleinement des performances avec 2 SSD NVMe combinés. Comme vous pouvez le constater, les performances sont bonnes, mais pas exceptionnelles en lecture comme en écriture. On s’attendait à mieux au vu de la configuration.

RAID 5

En RAID 5, les performances en lecture restent stables, proches du RAID 0. En écriture c’est correct, mais on s’attendait à mieux également.

Performances générales

Ugreen a misé sur une architecture solide avec le processeur Intel Pentium Gold 8505 (sorti en 2022), qui a largement fait ses preuves. Son score PassMark de 9148 points témoigne de ses capacités. Ce choix lui permet d’assurer efficacement des tâches variées comme la conteneurisation, la virtualisation ou encore le transcodage vidéo. Seul regret, la présence de seulement 8 Go de RAM.. C’est un peu juste pour exploiter pleinement le potentiel de ce type de machine. 16 Go auraient été préférables pour offrir plus de marge, notamment en usage avancé.

Vous pourrez facilement trouver de la RAM compatible :

• Kingston 8 Go à 32€ 
• Kingston 16 Go à 50€
• Corsair 16 Go à 47€

Consommation électrique et nuisance sonore

LeDXP4800 Plus dispose d’un ventilateur de 140 mm à l’arrière, qui peut se faire entendre. Contrairement aux ventilateurs des principaux fabricants de NAS, ce dernier n’extrait pas l’air, mais souffle à l’intérieur du NAS. Certains l’ont remplacé par un Noctua NF-A14 afin de gagner quelqus décibels. Un ventilateur est présent au niveau du processeur, mais difficilement accessible. En fonctionnement normal avec 5 SSD, la consommation est de 27 W en fonctionnement normal. En cas de forte charge, elle monte à environ 64 W, ce qui peut surprendre pour ce type de produit.

The Synology DS925+ versus QNAP TS-464 – Buy NEW or Buy QNAP?

Every so often in the NAS market, a new model arrives that challenges not just its predecessors but also its closest competitors. With the 2025 release of the Synology DS925+, buyers now face an interesting dilemma: go with Synology’s latest compact powerhouse, or choose QNAP’s TS-464—a device that has already proven itself since its release in 2022/2023 and offers a wide array of features at a competitive price. The DS925+ brings notable upgrades to CPU architecture, system memory scalability, and integration within Synology’s tightly controlled ecosystem. Meanwhile, the TS-464 has spent years benefiting from firmware maturity, PCIe expandability, and a more open hardware approach that appeals to power users and tinkerers alike. But which device is ultimately the better buy in 2025? Should you embrace Synology’s ecosystem with its newer, high-performance release, or does QNAP’s more versatile and budget-friendly offering still hold strong in the face of newer competition? Let’s dive into the details to help you decide which NAS deserves your next investment.

Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464 – Hardware Specifications

When placing the 2025 Synology DS925+ alongside the 2022/2023 QNAP TS-464, one might expect the newer model to clearly dominate in every area. But hardware comparisons in the NAS market are rarely so simple. While both units are aimed at tech-savvy home users and small businesses looking for reliable, always-on storage solutions, their approaches to hardware—and the user needs they prioritize—are noticeably different. The DS925+ emphasizes streamlined performance, reduced noise, and integration within Synology’s tightly managed ecosystem. The QNAP TS-464, meanwhile, leans into raw hardware flexibility, DIY expandability, and a more open feature set for power users. Below is a detailed hardware breakdown of both NAS devices, showing where each shines and where compromises were made.

The DS925+ delivers a refined hardware experience out of the box, with its newer AMD Embedded Ryzen V1500B 4 Core/ 8 thread processor, dual 2.5GbE ports for faster LAN connectivity, and modern I/O including USB-C. It features two M.2 NVMe slots (for cache only, unless you use the Synology SNV3400 drives from Synology), dual memory slots supporting up to 32GB of ECC DDR4 RAM, and a compact metal chassis designed for quiet, efficient operation. It also runs cooler and quieter than many of its rivals, making it an ideal fit for environments where noise levels matter—such as living rooms, home studios, or small offices. This makes the DS925+ a “plug-and-play” NAS with premium internal components and minimal need for user intervention.

By contrast, the QNAP TS-464 takes a more modular, expandable approach. Powered by the Intel Celeron N5105/N5095 CPU (a quad-core processor with integrated graphics, but only 4 threads), it offers HDMI 2.0 output, two M.2 PCIe Gen3 x1 slots (which can be used for either caching or storage pools), and a PCIe Gen3 x2 slot for optional 10GbE or more M.2s, USB expansion, or even GPU cards. QNAP also includes dual 2.5GbE ports, putting it on par with the DS925+ in terms of network speed, but it edges ahead in overall hardware adaptability. Want multimedia output via HDMI? QNAP has it. Want to add NVMe storage pools or real-time transcoding? QNAP supports that too. That said, the TS-464 is based on a slightly older CPU architecture, lacks ECC memory support, and typically generates more fan noise under load. Additionally, its OS and ecosystem are broader in scope but often require more manual setup. Ultimately, the DS925+ is purpose-built for those who prioritize a quiet, polished, and simplified experience with modern performance. The TS-464, on the other hand, remains an excellent choice for users who prefer control, multimedia support, and greater hardware flexibility. Choosing between them largely depends on whether you value Synology’s stability and turnkey design, or QNAP’s freedom and potential.

AMD V1500B vs Intel N5105 – CPU Specifications (Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464)

In any NAS system, the processor plays a pivotal role in determining the scope of functionality—whether it’s managing multiple concurrent users, running virtual machines, powering AI-driven applications, or simply handling encrypted transfers and background tasks efficiently. The Synology DS925+ and the QNAP TS-464 take noticeably different approaches in this regard. The DS925+ features the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B, a server-grade SoC designed for sustained multi-threaded workloads. The TS-464, on the other hand, runs on the Intel Celeron N5105, a more consumer-oriented chip that prioritizes integrated multimedia support and power efficiency. While both CPUs are quad-core, their architecture, instruction set, and target use cases diverge sharply—affecting not only raw processing, but also the capabilities unlocked within DSM and QTS/QuTS, respectively.

In terms of raw specs, the V1500B offers 4 cores and 8 threads with a base clock of 2.2GHz and support for ECC memory—a key advantage for mission-critical environments. This CPU is built for multitasking and thrives in scenarios involving virtual machines, container services, and intensive file indexing or backup operations. As a result, the DS925+ supports up to 8 concurrent virtual machines, 8 virtual DSM instances, and higher thresholds for connected users across Synology apps. It is better suited to offices or power users who rely on services like Synology Office, Drive, or Surveillance Station running in tandem. The system handles up to 150 Synology Chat users, 80 Office users, and 80 Drive users, offering excellent multitasking performance with low overhead.

The QNAP TS-464’s Intel N5105 is a 10nm Jasper Lake processor, also quad-core but without hyper-threading and with a slightly lower base clock (2.0GHz). However, it includes integrated Intel UHD Graphics, giving it one key advantage the DS925+ lacks: hardware-accelerated video transcoding via QNAP’s own QuMagie, Video Station, and especially Plex Media Server with support for on-the-fly 1080p and 4K decoding when paired with proper client-side licensing. This makes the TS-464 ideal for multimedia-heavy environments. Beyond media, the N5105 powers QTS and QuTS hero with access to QNAP’s broader and often more modular ecosystem. This includes Hybrid Backup Sync (HBS 3) for unified backup and disaster recovery, QuDedup for deduplicated snapshot replication, QVR Elite and QVR Pro for professional-grade surveillance (supporting multiple IP camera licenses natively), and AI Core features like face recognition and event detection when paired with the QuMagie or QVR Human apps. The TS-464 also supports Virtualization Station, enabling users to run lightweight Linux or Windows VMs with direct passthrough access to USB or PCIe devices, and Container Station, which offers both Docker and LXC container compatibility with GPU passthrough for NPU-based AI inference workloads. Thanks to the included PCIe Gen 3 x2 slot, the system supports optional upgrades like 10GbE NICs, QM2 expansion cards (for M.2 SSD or additional 2.5GbE/10GbE ports), or even Wi-Fi 6 cards, something entirely absent in the DS925+. Additionally, QNAP allows direct output to an external display via HDMI 2.0, enabling standalone use of HD Station apps like Chrome, LibreOffice, Kodi, and even Linux desktop environments — a feature highly prized in HTPC and security NVR deployments. Users can leverage Linux Station to run full Ubuntu VMs locally, or install Ubuntu Core through the App Center for custom development or edge AI inference scenarios.

Taken together, the TS-464 may not support the same high virtual machine/user count as the DS925+, but it compensates with a broader set of integrated appliances catering to power users, home labs, edge AI, and media-heavy deployments. It’s a more “tinker-friendly” platform, favoring flexibility and breadth over centralized system control and vertical integration. If you need an appliance that works across entertainment, security, and hybrid cloud workflows, with room for add-on functionality via hardware or apps, the TS-464 is hard to beat for the price. That said, the Synology DS925+ ultimately offers greater headroom for enterprise workflows, heavier VM usage, and large-scale hybrid deployments. It sacrifices media transcoding and graphical acceleration, but gains a server-class CPU that ensures consistent performance under heavier load conditions. Meanwhile, the TS-464 excels in edge-case versatility, offering more multimedia flexibility and richer expansion potential via PCIe. If your priorities lie in business-class performance, ECC memory support, and robust multi-user capacity, the DS925+ is the clear winner. But for media streaming, home lab tinkering, and a wider hardware feature set, the TS-464 remains a very compelling alternative.

Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464 – Software Specifications

When it comes to NAS platforms, hardware is only half the story—what truly determines a system’s long-term value is the strength, maturity, and flexibility of its software. Synology’s DSM (DiskStation Manager) and QNAP’s QTS/QuTS Hero are two of the most advanced NAS operating systems available today, offering extensive suites of services for backup, virtualization, hybrid cloud, media streaming, and AI-assisted surveillance. But while both OS platforms cover similar ground, their design philosophies, application depth, and supported workloads differ substantially. The Synology DS925+ and QNAP TS-464, though comparable in price and both aimed at prosumers and SMBs, unlock very different software experiences depending on the deployment goals—be it centralized IT infrastructure, media-rich home labs, or container-based edge computing.

With the DS925+, Synology leans into its strength in unified management and vertical integration. DSM 7.2 is optimized for reliability, simplicity, and scalability within Synology’s ecosystem. The DS925+ supports up to 8 virtual machines and 8 Virtual DSM instances through Virtual Machine Manager, offers extensive group and user quotas, and enables full integration with Synology’s cloud services (such as Synology C2 Backup, C2 Identity, and Hybrid Share). Its higher hardware ceiling allows for more active users: 150 on Synology Chat, 80 on Synology Drive and Office, and up to 8 simultaneous VPN connections. Backup capabilities are similarly robust, with a higher threshold of shared folder sync tasks and superior support for incremental snapshot replication. Surveillance Station on the DS925+ supports up to 40 IP cameras and benefits from reduced CPU overhead during continuous recording, even while handling concurrent backup or media indexing operations. DSM’s elegant UI, consistent updates, and tightly integrated packages make it ideal for organizations that value centralized IT administration and long-term platform stability.

On the other hand, the QNAP TS-464 running QTS 5 or QuTS Hero offers a more open and modular software ecosystem. While the Intel N5105 CPU imposes lower multitasking ceilings than the V1500B, QNAP compensates with a broader set of feature-specific applications and customization paths. The TS-464 supports virtualization through Virtualization Station (for VMs) and Container Station (for Docker + LXC), and unlike the DS925+, can output video directly via HDMI 2.0—allowing the NAS to act as a standalone Linux desktop, NVR, or HTPC via HybridDesk Station. QNAP also differentiates itself with Hybrid Backup Sync (HBS3), which enables multi-destination sync, deduplicated backup via QuDedup, and real-time disaster recovery tools not found in DSM. QVR Pro and QVR Elite offer an expansive surveillance suite with optional AI-powered analytics (e.g., face recognition, people counting) when paired with compatible QNAP AI apps. The inclusion of ZFS with QuTS Hero (an optional OS for the TS-464) enables inline compression, self-healing file systems, and block-level snapshots, which can be critical for data integrity in business scenarios.

QNAP also encourages expansion through its App Center, which includes over 150+ native and third-party apps, from Node.js and GitLab to Home Assistant, Ubuntu Station, and even Mattermost for self-hosted chat. While the system supports fewer concurrent users and VMs than the DS925+, its strength lies in feature breadth and system-level flexibility. Add-ons like 10GbE NICs, QM2 SSD accelerators, or Wi-Fi 6 cards via PCIe further extend its versatility, especially for hybrid edge workloads or multi-role deployments that evolve over time. In short, the Synology DS925+ is designed for administrative simplicity and long-term scaling, excelling in consistent performance across multi-user deployments with deep DSM integration. The QNAP TS-464, meanwhile, is a powerful sandbox for customization, offering greater freedom, multimedia functionality, and third-party integration—at the cost of some operational polish and software limits. Choosing between them depends on whether your priorities lie in predictable enterprise-grade execution or a more adaptable, feature-dense platform.

Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464 – Hard Drive and SSD Compatibility

In 2025, Synology has taken its most aggressive step yet toward locking down hardware compatibility, and nowhere is this more evident than in the DS925+. Following years of gradual restrictions—starting with warnings for unverified drives and progressing to default white-listing only Synology-branded media—the DS925+ now represents a firm line in the sand. At the time of writing, this system will not allow DSM initialization if it detects hard drives or SSDs that are not officially listed on Synology’s compatibility list. This list includes exclusively Synology HAT5300/HAT3310 HDDs and SAT5200 SSDs, with no third-party Seagate, WD, Toshiba, Samsung, or Kingston media currently supported. Regardless of drive quality or performance, unsupported models will be outright blocked during system setup. While Synology claims this guarantees optimal reliability and performance within DSM 7.2, the move drastically reduces flexibility for users and integrators alike.

In stark contrast, the QNAP TS-464 embraces an open compatibility philosophy. It supports virtually all major consumer and enterprise drives—from Seagate IronWolf and Exos, to WD Red, Red Plus, and Ultrastar, as well as Toshiba N300/X300 and Samsung/Kingston SSDs—up to 24TB per drive (or higher as of late 2025). QNAP also maintains a regularly updated compatibility list, but crucially, this list is advisory rather than mandatory. Users can install any 3.5″ or 2.5″ SATA HDD/SSD, and as long as it meets the physical and electrical standards, the TS-464 will initialize without issue. This means integrators, home users, or small businesses can reuse existing drives or select from the most cost-effective options in their region—something that’s increasingly difficult to do on newer Synology units. Moreover, QNAP allows mixing and matching of drive brands and capacities within the same storage pool (especially under QuTS hero’s ZFS environment), giving users granular control over redundancy, performance tuning, and cache layering with non-proprietary M.2 NVMe SSDs. This openness also applies to QNAP expansion units, many of which continue to work even with completely mixed-brand storage configurations—something Synology’s newer expansion policies have started to restrict.

For users in regions where Synology-branded media is expensive, hard to find, or simply not justified for non-critical applications, this policy shift on the DS925+ can be a deal-breaker. It positions the system closer to an appliance model, where Synology controls not only the hardware and software, but the storage medium itself. While that vertical integration may improve long-term reliability for some enterprise users, it’s difficult to reconcile with the broader DIY NAS community that values choice and modularity. Ultimately, this creates a philosophical divide: QNAP remains open, modular, and adaptable, trusting users to make informed decisions about their storage media. Synology, in contrast, is consolidating control, with the DS925+ exemplifying a move toward a closed ecosystem—potentially alienating users who previously praised DSM for its balance of simplicity and flexibility. Prospective buyers need to weigh not just performance and features, but how tightly they want to be tied to a single vendor’s hardware roadmap.

Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464 NAS – Which Should You Buy?

The Synology DS925+ is a 2025 refresh designed with clear intent: push performance, tighten control, and streamline the out-of-box experience. In contrast, the QNAP TS-464—released in late 2022—is a Swiss Army knife of NAS flexibility, packed with customization options, open compatibility, and enough horsepower to meet the needs of both power users and small business deployments. Choosing between them ultimately comes down to what kind of NAS experience you’re after: a controlled, polished, and tightly integrated environment, or an open, adaptable, and hardware-friendly platform. On raw performance, the DS925+ has the edge. Its quad-core, 8-thread AMD V1500B CPU delivers higher throughput for multitasking, virtual machines, and heavier concurrent services, and DSM’s user/service thresholds are notably higher as a result. Add in dual 2.5GbE ports by default, and it’s clearly a step ahead of the DS923+ predecessor 1GbE-only base configuration, and you are looking at a healthy upgrade in several ways in this refresh. However, QNAP claws back ground with its PCIe Gen3 x2 slot, allowing 10GbE upgrades, Wi-Fi cards, and even GPU acceleration in select use cases—something Synology removed entirely from the DS925+. In QNAP’s favor is also its support for real-time hardware transcoding, HDMI 2.0 video output, and direct-attached monitor access—making it a better fit for media-centric environments where local playback, Plex, or Kodi usage matters.

Synology DS925+ NAS		QNAP TS-464 NAS
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS925+ NAS	Check B&H for the Synology DS925+ NAS	Check Amazon in Your Region for the QNAP TS-464 NAS	Check B&H for the QNAP TS-464 NAS

But perhaps the most significant dividing line is drive compatibility. The DS925+ will only initialize DSM with Synology-validated drives—locking out nearly all third-party HDDs and SSDs unless explicitly approved. This hardline stance means limited flexibility for users wanting to build using existing drives or regional market alternatives. Meanwhile, the TS-464 supports virtually all consumer and enterprise drives, from Seagate to Toshiba to Kingston, giving users total control over their storage budget and deployment roadmap. This open-ecosystem approach extends to M.2 NVMe usage too, where QNAP allows storage pool creation, caching, and tiering with off-the-shelf modules, while Synology restricts pool creation to only their branded NVMes. If you’re an IT administrator, content creator, or SMB looking for a polished, performance-forward NAS and you’re fully on board with Synology’s ecosystem—including its branded drives—then the DS925+ offers a streamlined, high-ceiling experience with excellent multitasking potential and cleaner UI/UX polish under DSM 7.2. But if you’re someone who values flexibility, upgrade paths, media support, or simply wants to control your storage choices without vendor lock-in, the QNAP TS-464 is an incredibly compelling alternative—offering strong performance for its price, an open architecture, and a deeper toolbox under QTS/QuTS Hero.

NAS Solutions	NAS Solutions
+ Better Software (In almost every respect!) + Much Better Global Support Presence + More business desirable + Larger Range of solutions – Compatibility restrictions on HDD and Upgrades More and more – Underwhelming hardware (comparatively)	+ Better Hardware for Price + Wider Variety of Solutions and Hardware Profiles + Supports ZFS and/or EXT4 (with ZFS platform now available on latest Intel Celeron Systems) + Wide accessory range and compatibility – Software can often feel inconsistent – Hit by Security Issues if the past
Check Amazon By Clicking Below:	Check Amazon By Clicking Below:

The Synology DS925+ is the better plug-and-play NAS for prosumers and SMBs who want a high-performance, low-maintenance experience—provided they’re comfortable buying into Synology’s tightly controlled ecosystem of software and storage hardware. On the other hand, the QNAP TS-464 remains the better choice for users who value flexibility, hardware freedom, and scalability—especially if media features, drive compatibility, or future upgrades are part of the plan. Ultimately, the DS925+ is the sharper tool, but the TS-464 is the more versatile one.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Week 33 Tech Roundup – TerraSynology AI Console ReviewSynology AI Console Review - GWeek 32 Tech Digest – PCIe 6DS1825+ vs DXP8800 PLUS NAS - Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXPWeek 31 Tech Roundup – 245TBUsing Unverified HDD/SSD on a How to Use Unverified HDDs andSynology DS425+ NAS Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Best NAS You Can Buy Right Now (Mid-2025) for Under $499

As of mid-2025, the sub-$499 NAS market is more competitive than ever, with several brands offering systems that deliver strong hardware, dedicated operating systems, and multiple drive bays within a modest budget. For home users, prosumers, and small teams looking to centralize data, manage backups, or stream media locally, this price bracket now includes options that would have cost significantly more just a few years ago. From rackmount storage appliances to compact flash-based servers, there are now choices to suit a wide variety of workloads and network environments.

This article examines five out-of-the-box NAS systems that are currently available for $499 or less. While each system takes a slightly different approach—whether prioritizing raw bandwidth, containerization, virtualization support, or software simplicity—they all represent viable solutions for users seeking value without compromising core functionality.

Important Disclaimer and Notes Before You Buy

All of the NAS systems featured in this list are diskless, meaning they do not include storage media by default. Users will need to purchase compatible 3.5″ HDDs, 2.5″ SSDs, or M.2 NVMe drives separately depending on the system’s configuration. This significantly affects the total cost of ownership, particularly for all-flash systems where NVMe drives are required. Some devices also use onboard flash or eMMC storage to house the operating system, but this is not sufficient for general file storage. Buyers should also consider the cost of drives, RAID redundancy planning, and any accessories (e.g., cables or cooling enhancements) when budgeting for deployment.

Another consideration is the variation in NAS operating systems provided. While most models come with a vendor-specific OS—such as Synology DSM, TerraMaster TOS, UGOS, or Unraid—some platforms allow or even encourage the installation of third-party alternatives like TrueNAS or Unraid without voiding hardware warranties. However, in cases where the software stack is less mature or limited in features, users may need to invest more time configuring services such as Plex, Docker, or SMB sharing manually. As such, these systems are best suited to users who are comfortable managing basic network services or are willing to explore more advanced functionality over time.

UniFi UNAS Pro 7-Bay NAS

$499 – ARM Cortex-A57 – 8GB – 7x 3.5″ SATA – 1x 10GbE SFP+, 1x 1GbE – UniFi OS – BUY HERE

The UniFi UNAS Pro is a 2U rackmount NAS solution designed primarily for high-speed, large-scale data storage. It features seven hot-swappable 2.5″/3.5″ SATA drive bays and is built around a quad-core ARM Cortex-A57 processor running at 1.7GHz, paired with 8GB of onboard DDR4 memory. Unlike general-purpose NAS systems that include container support or multimedia features, this device is focused purely on network file storage. It offers robust network connectivity with both a 10GbE SFP+ port and a 1GbE RJ45 port, making it suitable for use cases where bandwidth is a priority—such as centralized backups, archival storage, or high-volume file transfers within a UniFi-managed network.

The system is managed via UniFi’s Drive app within the UniFi OS ecosystem, and supports standard RAID configurations including RAID 0, 1, 5, and 6. Power redundancy is provided via a dual-input system—an internal 200W AC/DC PSU and support for USP-RPS DC failover. There’s also a 1.3-inch front panel touchscreen for quick diagnostics and system status at the rack. While it lacks container support, virtualization, or media server capabilities, it integrates easily with other UniFi products or can operate as a standalone storage node in a mixed environment. For users who require reliable, scalable storage with 10GbE connectivity but can forego app extensibility, the UNAS Pro represents a straightforward, hardware-driven option in the sub-$500 space.

Component	Specification
CPU	Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1.7GHz
Memory	8GB DDR4
Drive Bays	7x 2.5″/3.5″ SATA HDD/SSD
Networking	1x 10GbE SFP+, 1x 1GbE
Power	200W internal PSU + USP-RPS redundancy
OS	UniFi OS / Drive App
Display	1.3″ touchscreen
Form Factor	2U Rackmount
Dimensions	442 x 325 x 87 mm
Weight	9.5 kg with brackets

---

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 NAS

$499 – Intel N100 – 8GB – 4x 3.5″ SATA + 2x M.2 NVMe – 2x 2.5GbE – UGOS Pro – BUY HERE

The UGREEN NASync DXP4800 is a desktop 4-bay NAS that combines hybrid storage architecture with modern I/O and a maturing proprietary OS. It is powered by an Intel N100 quad-core processor from Intel’s 12th-gen Alder Lake-N series, paired with 8GB of DDR5 memory and 32GB of onboard eMMC storage for the operating system. In addition to its four SATA bays, it includes two M.2 NVMe SSD slots, enabling users to build a fast caching tier or SSD-only volumes for improved application performance. Network connectivity includes dual 2.5GbE LAN ports, and the system supports link aggregation for higher throughput or failover scenarios.

On the software side, the unit runs UGOS Pro, UGREEN’s in-house NAS operating system. It includes support for RAID 0/1/5/6/10, Docker containers, Plex, remote access, and cloud sync tools. While UGOS is less mature than systems like DSM or TrueNAS, it has improved over successive updates and includes a clean web UI for file sharing, snapshots, and media streaming. Front and rear USB 3.2 ports (including USB-C) and an SD 3.0 card reader add to its usability for media professionals. For users who prefer a GUI-based setup with broad feature support and hybrid storage flexibility, the DXP4800 offers substantial value in the under-$500 bracket—especially when discounted.

Component	Specification
CPU	Intel N100 (4 cores, up to 3.4GHz)
Memory	8GB DDR5 (upgradable to 16GB)
Drive Bays	4x SATA (3.5″/2.5″) + 2x M.2 NVMe
Networking	2x 2.5GbE LAN
Ports	1x USB-C (10Gbps), 2x USB-A, SD Card Reader
Video Output	1x HDMI (4K)
OS	UGOS Pro
Power Consumption	35.18W (access), 15.43W (hibernation)
Dimensions	257 x 178 x 178 mm (approx.)

LincStation N2 NAS

$399 – Intel N100 – 16GB – 2x 2.5″ SATA + 4x M.2 NVMe – 1x 10GbE – Unraid OS – BUY HERE

The LincStation N2 is a compact, all-SSD NAS that delivers a high-performance spec sheet at a relatively low price. Powered by an Intel N100 processor and equipped with 16GB of LPDDR5 memory, it supports a mix of two 2.5″ SATA SSDs and four M.2 2280 NVMe drives. This six-bay design—entirely SSD-based—is geared toward users who require faster IOPS, quieter operation, and lower power draw than traditional hard drive-based systems. Network connectivity is handled by a single 10GbE RJ45 port, a rare inclusion in this price bracket and especially valuable for direct workstation or multi-client environments.

The device ships with an Unraid Starter license pre-installed, giving users access to advanced features like Docker container support, virtual machines, hardware passthrough, and flexible storage management. While Unraid requires some learning curve for new users, it offers a high degree of customization and adaptability compared with fixed software stacks. The system also includes HDMI output, USB-C, USB 3.2, and multiple USB 2.0 ports, making it suitable for use as a lightweight home server or media workstation. For users prioritizing SSD storage, 10GbE, and virtualization support, the LincStation N2 delivers a capable platform that’s uncommon at this price point.

TerraMaster F4 SSD NAS

$399 – Intel N95 – 8GB – 4x M.2 NVMe – 1x 5GbE – TOS (TerraMaster OS) – BUY HERE

The TerraMaster F4 SSD is a 4-bay, all-flash NAS designed for high-speed home storage, media streaming, and photo management. It is equipped with an Intel N95 processor, an entry-level quad-core CPU from Intel’s Alder Lake-N family, and 8GB of DDR5 memory via a single SODIMM module. Storage is handled via four M.2 NVMe slots: two operating at PCIe 3.0 x2 speeds and two at PCIe 3.0 x1. These are designed for SSDs only—no support for SATA drives is provided. On the network side, the unit includes a single 5GbE port, offering a higher single-link bandwidth than systems using dual 2.5GbE, and can be directly connected to 10GbE networks at reduced speeds.

The system runs TerraMaster’s TOS operating system, which supports multimedia applications like Plex and Emby, cloud sync, photo AI tagging, user account control, and flexible backup solutions. TOS includes support for Btrfs and TRAID (TerraMaster RAID), along with remote access features and mobile apps for file synchronization and photo uploads. With three high-speed USB ports (2x Type-A and 1x Type-C), HDMI output, and low-noise fan operation (~19 dB), the F4 SSD targets users looking for a quieter, flash-based NAS for home environments. It lacks 2.5″/3.5″ bay support but offers fast SSD performance in a small form factor with minimal configuration requirements.

Synology DiskStation DS425+ NAS

$499 – Intel Celeron J4125 – 2GB – 4x 3.5″ SATA + 2x M.2 NVMe – 1x 2.5GbE, 1x 1GbE – DSM 7.x – BUY HERE

The Synology DS425+ is a 4-bay NAS designed to serve as an entry point into Synology’s DSM ecosystem, offering a balance between hardware efficiency and access to a mature, enterprise-grade operating system. It runs on the Intel Celeron J4125 processor, a quad-core chip with a base frequency of 2.0GHz and a burst frequency of 2.7GHz. The system ships with 2GB of DDR4 non-ECC memory, expandable up to 6GB, and supports both 3.5″/2.5″ SATA drives and two M.2 NVMe SSDs for caching or storage volumes. For networking, it includes one 2.5GbE port and one standard 1GbE port, giving users some flexibility depending on their switching infrastructure.

DSM (DiskStation Manager) remains one of the most advanced NAS operating systems available, offering built-in apps for file management, media streaming, surveillance, and virtualization. Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) is supported for flexible storage management, along with Btrfs file system benefits such as snapshots and data integrity checks. The DS425+ is part of Synology’s 2025 refresh lineup, which enforces stricter compatibility with Synology-branded drives. Users should confirm drive support in advance, particularly if planning to reuse existing disks. Despite these limitations, for users seeking reliability, security features, and long-term OS support, the DS425+ remains a strong choice at the $499 price point.

The NAS market under $499 in mid-2025 presents a broad spectrum of options tailored to different storage priorities and technical requirements. Whether you’re looking for high-capacity traditional RAID storage, SSD-focused performance, or a feature-rich operating system, there are viable choices within this price bracket. The UniFi UNAS Pro stands out as a pure storage appliance with 10GbE connectivity and seven bays, suited for high-throughput archival or backup scenarios. Meanwhile, the UGREEN DXP4800 and LincStation N2 offer hybrid and full-flash storage respectively, with both systems supporting modern features like Docker, virtualization, and optional third-party OS deployment. For those focused on user-friendly software ecosystems and long-term support, Synology’s DS425+ remains a leading contender, albeit with stricter drive compatibility requirements. On the other hand, the TerraMaster F4 SSD delivers compact all-SSD storage with high-speed 5GbE networking and a growing feature set in TOS, including AI photo management and multimedia tools. All five models require user-supplied storage media and, in some cases, benefit from user familiarity with setup or configuration processes. Ultimately, the best choice depends on how much weight you place on performance, expandability, software polish, and overall system control within this tightly priced segment.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Best NAS for $500Best NAS for Under $249Best NAS for Under $249 in 202The Best NAS for $500 / £500 The Best NAS Hard Drive BuyersThe BEST NAS Enclosures on AliThe Best NAS Enclosure Cases oThe Best NAS for Just $100-150The Best NAS for Just $100-150Best NAS for Under $250 of 202 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Best NAS You Can Buy Right Now (Mid-2025) for Under $249

As personal data storage needs continue to grow in 2025, more users are seeking cost-effective alternatives to cloud services and monthly subscription platforms. Whether you’re backing up years of photos, hosting your own video library, or managing light business data locally, a dedicated NAS (Network Attached Storage) device offers greater privacy and control without recurring fees. Fortunately, the sub-$249 price point now includes a variety of surprisingly capable systems. Thanks to developments in low-power processors, DDR5 memory adoption, and more efficient operating systems, these devices can now handle everything from Plex streaming to light container workloads with relative ease. In this article, we explore five NAS solutions currently available at or below this price point, offering a balance of performance, connectivity, and storage potential for those looking to build their own storage solution on a modest budget.

Important Disclaimer and Notes Before You Buy!

Before diving into the specific NAS models, it’s important to understand the limitations and shared characteristics of devices in this price range. Most sub-$249 NAS units do not include any hard drives or SSDs, and many rely on M.2 NVMe slots or 2.5″/3.5″ SATA bays that must be populated separately. Some models ship with basic onboard storage (e.g., 32GB–64GB eMMC) sufficient only for the operating system. As such, the actual cost of getting a fully operational NAS with adequate storage for your needs may exceed the base unit price. Buyers should also be aware that these devices are best suited for home users, personal cloud use, and entry-level tasks, rather than intensive business or enterprise workloads. Additionally, several of the devices covered in this list do not come with a full-featured NAS operating system. Instead, they either rely on lightweight Linux-based platforms like CasaOS or ZimaOS, or they provide a basic UI designed for local file access and container management. While these OS options are improving in terms of user-friendliness, they may lack advanced features like comprehensive RAID management, automated snapshots, or multi-user file permission systems found in higher-end platforms like Synology DSM or TrueNAS. These NAS units are most appropriate for users with some technical confidence, or for those looking for a basic plug-and-play setup with limited customization needs.

Beelink ME Mini NAS – 6 Bay SSD NAS

$209 – Intel N150 – 12GB – No SSD (64GB eMMC Only) – 2x 2.5GbE + WiFi 6 – No OS / User Install – BUY HERE

The Beelink ME Mini is a compact NAS device aimed at users who want high-speed, SSD-based storage in a minimal footprint. Measuring just 99mm on each side, it features six M.2 2280 NVMe slots, providing up to 24TB of total capacity when fully populated. Powered by the Intel N150 processor and paired with 12GB of LPDDR5 memory, it offers a decent balance between performance and energy efficiency. Connectivity is handled via dual 2.5GbE LAN ports, WiFi 6, and Bluetooth 5.2, making it suitable for both wired and wireless environments. The unit is cooled passively and contains an integrated power supply, reducing cable clutter and making it ideal for placement in home media setups or small offices.

However, the device does not include an operating system, and users will need to install a preferred NAS OS themselves — whether that’s CasaOS, Ubuntu Server, or something container-based. There’s also no bundled storage beyond the 64GB eMMC system partition, so the overall cost will rise depending on your NVMe selections. It lacks support for traditional 3.5″ or 2.5″ SATA drives, making this NAS most suitable for users seeking a quiet, SSD-only setup with strong networking performance and flexibility for custom OS installation.

GMKTec G9 NAS – 4 Bay M.2 NAS @ The lowest Price

$185.99 – Intel N150 – 12GB – No SSD (64GB eMMC Only) – 2x 2.5GbE + WiFi 6 – Ubuntu 24.10 (Preloaded, Switchable) – BUY HERE

The GMKTec G9 offers similar internal hardware to the Beelink ME Mini, including the same Intel N150 processor and 12GB of LPDDR5 memory, but with a more rectangular chassis and fewer SSD slots — four instead of six. The system includes 64GB of onboard eMMC storage, primarily used for booting Ubuntu 24.10, with the option to dual-boot into Windows 11 if a suitable SSD is installed. Like the Beelink, it lacks traditional SATA support and focuses on high-speed NVMe storage via M.2 2280 slots, up to 4TB per drive. The unit is cooled actively and includes dual HDMI outputs, making it more appealing for those who may want to use it as a lightweight desktop or media output device in addition to a NAS.

One of the notable differences is its broader OS support and better I/O variety, including three USB 3.2 ports and a DisplayPort-capable USB-C connector. This NAS is best suited to users looking for a more configurable or multi-purpose system with better visual output options. However, as with the Beelink, users must add their own NVMe storage, and setup requires a basic understanding of system boot configuration and OS installation. Note – this one GETS HOT, so get SSD heatsinks and ensure a good active airflow wherever you deploy it!

Synology BeeStation 4TB NAS – ALL IN ONE!

$199 – Realtek RTD1619B – 1GB – 4TB SINGLE BAY – 1x 1GbE – BeeStation Manager (BSM) – BUY HERE

The Synology BeeStation 4TB is a fully integrated, single-bay NAS aimed squarely at users who want a no-setup-required solution. Unlike most NAS devices in this price range, it comes pre-configured with a 4TB internal hard drive and a sealed chassis, meaning users don’t need to source or install any storage themselves. It runs on a Realtek RTD1619B ARM-based processor, includes 1GB of DDR4 memory, and connects over a single 1GbE port. The included BeeStation Manager (BSM) OS is designed specifically for beginners, offering cloud-style file access, photo management, and mobile app integration with minimal technical effort.

This NAS is best suited to individuals or households that want a simple local backup and file-sharing solution that behaves more like a smart external hard drive than a customizable NAS. It supports basic multimedia functions, Synology mobile apps, and remote access features, but does not allow for internal expansion or RAID redundancy. The included USB-A and USB-C ports can be used for manual backups to external drives. However, because it’s a sealed single-drive unit with no RAID options, users should plan to back up to another location—either cloud or USB—to ensure data protection. Despite these limitations, its all-in-one design, 3-year warranty, and simple user experience make it one of the few truly plug-and-play NAS systems under $250.

UGREEN NASync DXP2800 NAS – The New Challenger!

$249 – Intel N100 – 8GB – No Storage (32GB eMMC) – 1x 2.5GbE – UGOS Pro – BUY HERE

The UGREEN DXP2800 is part of the company’s NASync lineup, aimed at users who want a blend of expandability and affordability. It combines the practicality of traditional HDD storage with the performance benefits of SSDs, offering two 3.5″ SATA bays alongside two M.2 NVMe SSD slots for faster caching or active data operations. At the heart of the system is an Intel N100 processor, a 12th-generation quad-core chip from Intel’s energy-efficient N-series lineup, which supports both basic virtualization and multimedia streaming. This is paired with 8GB of DDR5 memory, non-ECC but upgradable, and a 32GB eMMC used solely for the preloaded UGOS Pro operating system. Connectivity is handled through a single 2.5GbE LAN port and a mix of USB ports on both front and rear panels — including USB-C and 10Gbps-capable USB-A. UGOS Pro, while relatively new, features a clean web-based interface with container support, RAID management (0, 1, JBOD), remote file sharing, and basic multimedia services.

While it lacks the ecosystem polish of Synology DSM or QNAP QTS, it is one of the few turnkey options in this price range that supports both SSD and HDD usage in a flexible, non-proprietary layout. However, buyers should still account for the need to install their own drives and configure the storage pools manually. It’s a solid balance of raw hardware potential and modest software capability for users willing to manage their setup beyond the initial boot.

ZimaBoard 2 (832 Version) – DIY Enthusiast’s DREAM!

$199 – Intel N150 – 8GB – No Storage (32GB eMMC) – 2x 2.5GbE – ZimaOS – BUY HERE

The ZimaBoard 2 (832) is a low-profile, single-board NAS platform designed for flexibility and modularity rather than out-of-the-box convenience. Unlike traditional NAS systems with enclosures and tool-less drive bays, this unit is a bare embedded board that offers direct access to interfaces for those who want to build or customize their own setup. It is powered by the same Intel N150 quad-core processor used in other compact NAS systems, paired here with 8GB of LPDDR5x memory and 32GB of onboard eMMC storage for its pre-installed ZimaOS. This board features two powered SATA 3.0 ports, making it one of the few sub-$250 NAS options that supports HDDs natively without requiring USB-to-SATA adapters or expansion modules.

In terms of connectivity, the ZimaBoard 2 includes dual 2.5GbE LAN ports, USB 3.1, a PCIe 3.0 x4 slot, and a Mini DisplayPort output supporting 4K60 video. While the PCIe slot expands potential use cases (e.g., additional networking, storage, or accelerator cards), most users will opt to use the SATA ports for reliable storage first. The board is passively cooled with a large integrated heatsink and operates silently, but thermal performance may vary based on enclosure design and ambient temperature. It is particularly well-suited to DIY users looking to build a lightweight NAS, firewall, media server, or container host. ZimaOS includes a web-based UI and supports CasaOS and Linux-based OS alternatives, but configuration still requires basic familiarity with system setup and storage configuration. It’s not intended for users looking for plug-and-play simplicity, but rather those who want total control over their NAS hardware and software environment.

Each of the NAS options presented here offers a different balance of hardware, expandability, and ease of use, while remaining under the $249 price threshold. Users who prefer pre-configured simplicity may lean toward the Synology BeeStation, while those seeking customization and SSD-focused performance might opt for the Beelink ME Mini or GMKTec G9. The UGREEN DXP2800 provides hybrid storage flexibility with a more developed software interface, and the ZimaBoard 2 appeals to technically inclined users who want complete control over their system stack. While no single device is perfect, all five represent viable paths toward local data ownership and self-hosted media or backup solutions without breaking the bank.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Best NAS for $500Best NAS for Under $499Best NAS for Under $249 in 202The Best NAS for $500 / £500 The Best NAS Hard Drive BuyersThe BEST NAS Enclosures on AliThe Best NAS Enclosure Cases oThe Best NAS for Just $100-150The Best NAS for Just $100-150Best NAS for Under $250 of 202 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

If Not Synology? Which Other NAS Brand Should You Choose?

It’s an odd question, but with Synology arguably making some rather higher business and enterprise decisions in recent years, there have been increasing queries about who would fill the void if they moved onwards and upwards. As Synology holds such a powerful position in the NAS market, their absence would certainly lead to quite the battle of strength from other players. The obvious answer would be QNAP, a brand that has a similar history to Synology (over two decades in the business, Taiwan-based, in-house OS, numerous 1st-party tools, home and business solutions, etc.), but in 2025, the reality is nowhere near as clear-cut. Younger established brands that have jockeyed for 3rd position, such as Asustor and Terramaster, have been challenged by several startups (ZimaCube and Zimaboard 2, Orico’s Cyberdata Vault, to name just two) entering the fray, as well as established brands like UGREEN, which are expanding their business into the NAS sector. If Synology, for whatever reason, ceased to occupy this important user class of private turnkey server ownership, who would be best placed to occupy it?

How, Where and Why Has Synology Changed?

Synology’s rapid change in business stance to be more enterprise/hyperscale-focused comes at the same time as their frequency of more entry-level, small business, prosumer, and enthusiast solutions has dropped. The regularity of smaller 2-Bay and 4-Bay solutions has noticeably decreased, and the hardware they feature has changed to accommodate more business-type use. This by no means suggests that the brand is making moves to exit these user groups (indeed, support of DSM and the latest revision DSM 7.2.2 extends to all existing users up to many systems released in the late 2010s). However, there has been plenty of user outcry from existing users and potential customers on the architecture of both DSM and the recent releases that exacerbate users to move away from the brand and spend their allocated budgets elsewhere. Synology still comfortably sits ahead of its competitors in terms of software, features, and the UX of their platform, but many changes in policy and support mentioned below have started this trend:

• Changes in 3rd-party HDD compatibility on systems above the 8-Bay scale, prioritizing their own 1st-party labeled HDDs and SSDs, as well as reducing the presentation and compatibility listings on their site significantly.
• Changes in the choice of internal hardware featured in their systems to be more focused on business file processes and less on multimedia use.
• Comparatively smaller increases in base hardware between refreshes of individual series (e.g., J4125 and V1500B CPUs in 2024 launch devices, despite first appearing in 2019/2020).
• Considerable increased focus on software enhancements over hardware (not a bad thing, but an undeniable fact).
• Increased proprietary hardware support over 3rd-party (e.g., Synology-only Memory modules, custom 10GbE adapters like the E10G22-T1, Synology-only M.2 SSDs for Pool Use).
• An increasing number of cloud subscription services getting newer features, while local services remain secure and stable but static.
• New product focus shifting towards newer larger-scale solutions like the evolving GridStation series, Active Protect subscription system, and C2 innovations.
• The predicted elimination of the J entry-level series in favor of the pre-populated and software-streamlined BeeStation.

All of the above are small factors in themselves, but add them all up, and you see small but important stepping stones toward a gear shift in Synology’s target demographic. So, if Synology were to intentionally or inadvertently begin to move outside of these user groups of home, small business, and enthusiast, who stands to fill this space and grow?

QNAP vs Synology?

As mentioned earlier, QNAP stands to be the most likely contender to fill this space. With over 20 years of history, a larger range of hardware solutions than Synology, and software that does pretty much everything Synology’s does, they have been consistent competitors. However, inconsistencies in user experience, conflicting UIs, and a tendency to try to do “too much” have resulted in their losing ground to Synology in terms of software. Add to this the negative brand impact of security incidents in 2020-2022, which tarnished their reputation around security and safety, requiring serious improvement. To the brand’s credit, they have made considerable internal culture changes on this subject, adding bounty programs, tightening system defaults, increasing pen testing, introducing several system security scanning tools, disabling things like SSH and admin super user accounts as standard, and more.

Value Series	Best All Rounder	Prosumer NAS
TS-233 2-Bay NAS	TS-464 4-Bay NAS	TVS-h874 8-Bay NAS
$189 on Amazon (Check Here)	$549 on Amazon (Check Here)	$2499 on Amazon (Check Here)

In terms of hardware, they have mostly stuck to what works, refreshing existing product families at the same rate of 2.5-3 years for desktop small-medium scale, and 3-5 years for larger scale. They have also introduced significantly more recent CPUs from both Intel and AMD, as well as 2.5GbE as standard on their solutions at the same price point as 1GbE. If it weren’t for the damaging brand harm caused by the Deadbolt/QSnatch/Qlocker ransomware attacks, I think Synology would have been significantly challenged by QNAP in the last 2-3 years across all fronts. However, the setback to QNAP’s reputation reduced this growth potential significantly, and in the last two years, we have seen an increasing number of new names pop up in NAS that have also harmed QNAP’s appeal to users in terms of hardware value, the thing they could always be relied upon to beat Synology on. QNAP would still stand to become the ‘top dog’ in the event of a Synology exit (Synexit?) from the low-to-medium tiers of NAS storage, but many new players have entered the field, such as…

UGREEN vs QNAP?

Largely known for their power adapters and PC accessories, a year ago UGREEN had practically no real presence in the world of NAS. They had a smaller scale and more entry-level range of solutions that were limited to the East, but aside from that, they were complete outsiders. Fast forward to now, and following a successful and well-marketed Kickstarter campaign that raised millions of dollars, they are now a provider of genuinely impressive turnkey NAS solutions—the NASync series. The key word there is “turnkey”, as in they are providing both the hardware and the software. They could have just rolled out their hardware and made it OS-free (i.e., “Here’s a ready-built server, now go install UnRAID or TrueNAS”), but instead, they opted to produce and include an impressively responsive NAS OS in UGOS. Genuinely challenging the feature set of the likes of Asustor and Terramaster, as well as the design of Synology and the hardware level of QNAP, UGREEN has made a rapidly growing name for itself in the small-to-medium NAS sector.

Value Series	Best All Rounder	Prosumer NAS
DXP2800 2-Bay NAS	DXP4800 PLUS 4-Bay NAS	DXP8800 PLUS 8-Bay NAS
$399 on Amazon (Check Here)	$699 on Amazon (Check Here)	$1499 on Amazon (Check Here)

They definitely lack the range of solutions that those other brands offer, with only 6 solutions currently available (the DXP2800, DXP4800/PLUS, DXP6680, DXP8800, and DXP480T), and no rackmount solutions yet, but it’s a solid start. Equally, their software, although fluid and responsive in nailing down the NAS fundamentals, lacks many of the more impressive AAA+ solutions that are offered by the bigger brands. Lastly, although they raised a considerable sum during the crowdfunding, they do not have the global support, offices, or availability of their long-running NAS competitors—with solutions only being available in two regions, the US and Germany. All of these factors add up to a brand that is poised to make even bigger splashes in the years to come but is perhaps not quite ready to replace the big dog, Synology, just yet!

ASUSTOR vs Synology?

Always the bridesmaid, but never the bride, Asustor is a brand that has been around in the world of NAS in one shape or form for quite a few years. They are one of the mainstream Taiwanese brands in NAS that has always ‘been there’, but it is only in the last 4-5 years that they have been making sizable moves to take on both Synology and QNAP. One of the main ways in which they pursued this is by developing numerous features in both hardware and software that are available from their competitors individually. So features such as M.2 NVMe-focused storage systems, BTRFS support, WORM locking, 2.5GbE/5GbE support, HDMI output via a dedicated GUI, and more are features available on Synology and QNAP to some extent, but only Asustor rolls them under one brand umbrella. So, how poised are they to fill a void if Synology moved out of this space?

Well, from a hardware standpoint, Asustor is in a very good position. Them being Taiwan-based will certainly soothe concerns that have grown around Chinese companies and data storage solutions. Equally, their hardware has evolved rapidly in their last two generations to feature some genuinely unique solutions that are either specific to the platform or priced at a level that makes them genuinely competitive against DIY and BYO solutions. Systems such as the Flashstor series, Lockerstor series, and even value offerings like the Drivestor are surprisingly well equipped. They are not quite on the same level of hardware as QNAP (who have a significantly more diverse hardware portfolio), but they are fleshing it out very well.

Value Series	Best All Rounder	Prosumer NAS
Nimbustor Gen 2 2-Bay NAS	Flashstor Gen 1 12-Bay NAS	Lockerstor Gen 3 8/10-Bay NAS
$369 on Amazon (Check Here)	$449-749 on Amazon (Check Here)	$1999 on Amazon (Check Here)

However, it is the software of Asustor (ADM) that is unfortunately where the brand is a little more timid. They have a NAS OS, numerous client tools for Windows, Mac, iOS, and Android—and they nail down the bulk of the application fundamentals for storage management, multi-site backup handling, multimedia playback, containers, and more. But the platform lacks a few of the more AAA/desirable services, such as AI-powered photo recognition, a 1st-party VM tool, ZFS support, and ultimately is a little more reliant on 3rd-party applications to fill the gaps. They have recently countered this by officially detailing that they support users who buy Asustor hardware to go ahead and install 3rd-party NAS software like TrueNAS or UnRAID without it harming your warranty—so they know they are not leading the pack in terms of their own ADM NAS software but do make noticeable user concessions. With new hardware on the horizon in the Lockerstor Gen3 and Flashstor Gen2 (both of which see a significant bump in hardware profiles), we might see some impressive moves from Asustor in 2025. I just think they still have some ways to go before they can fill any potential void that Synology might leave.

TERRAMASTER vs Synology?

Terramaster has been jockeying for the NAS 3rd place spot with Asustor for well over a decade at this point, and much like their opponent, they have been good at integrating individual features from both QNAP and Synology into their own NAS hardware and TOS platform, but to a larger degree than Asustor. For example, their OS provides largely everything that Asustor ADM does (including TrueNAS/UnRAID support without voiding your warranty) but adds to this with an AI photo recognition platform, their own VM tool, and an impressive Isolation Mode that can sever the system at the click of a button from remote access, 3rd-party PHP, and any external requests (necessitating a restart to disable). However, as this brand is a Chinese brand, there will always be question marks raised by users about how this system compares with Taiwanese-based systems. This is a little unfair, given that Terramaster, Asustor, and QNAP were all successfully hit by the same ransomware attack (Deadbolt) a few years back, so there was plenty of ‘vulnerability’ to spread around!

In terms of hardware, Terramaster has been making some impressive and aggressive strides in this area—with the recent launch of their 3-part F4-424 Intel NAS series (Standard, Pro, and MAX), the release of two 8-bay M.2 NVMe 10GbE equipped systems (the F8 PLUS and F8 SSD PLUS), and new desktop and rackmounts hot on their heels. They have also scaled up the design to better improve cooling, efficiency, and just general visual appeal.

Value Series	Best All Rounder	Prosumer NAS
F2-424 2-Bay NAS	F4-424 Max 4-Bay NAS	T9-500 Pro 9-Bay NAS
$369 on Amazon (Check Here)	$819 on Amazon (Check Here)	$1499 on Amazon (Check Here)

However, much like Asustor, their software is just not able to challenge the standard that Synology has set. For buyers looking for smooth and easy utilization like Synology, Terramaster’s TOS has the danger of feeling a little clunky. Their latest release, TOS6, brings new features, software standards, and design to the mix, but it lacks the range of mobile applications, desktop client tools, and consistent UX/presentation that Synology seems to do so well. Terramaster is a fantastic value-for-money choice, and I would argue they have significantly scaled up the level of hardware and software utility they provide year on year. But they still have a way to go before they can hit the same notes as Synology DSM yet.

WD / Netgear vs Synology?

This is a pretty short one! The answer is no! Both WD and Netgear have regularly reduced their hardware ranges and the frequency of software updates these last few years, and although there are a decent range of business file server systems still being released, the general home/enthusiast/prosumer level of hardware is pretty poor and uninteresting compared to everyone else on this list so far. I cannot help but get the feeling that, aside from some basic backup NAS systems that are still listed at the majority of retailers, the bulk of their range has been in circulation for 5-6 years now without any refresh in sight. For basic target file/folder storage, these systems still provide some limited modern NAS utility, but overall, they are a fairly weak alternative to Synology’s offerings in 2025.

A UniFi NAS?

With increased mentions and leaks online towards a potential NAS in the works from UniFi, this could be a very credible alternative to Synology in terms of software UX and presentation. UniFi, and its incredibly user-friendly UX featured on their Switch, Router, NVR, and Dream Machine combination systems, is where UniFi shines. No doubt any UniFi NAS solution would need to similarly blend into their ecosystem to the same degree. That said, if they were to launch a system, all their experience in the fields of network management, router security, and surveillance systems might not necessarily translate into a similar pedigree in network-attached storage. It’s hard to discuss how or if UniFi could fill any market space that a potential Synology absence would create, as they do not have any systems out in the market to make an informed decision. This is for the “To Be Continued…” pile!

Drobo vs Synology?

No…just…no. See Video Below:

IceWhale / ZimaCube

This is a very interesting one. 2023 and 2024 saw several companies arrive in the turnkey NAS space via the crowdfunding route (we already discussed UGREEN as the biggest example), wanting to break into the market. However, IceWhale benefits from having already launched two previous successfully fulfilled campaigns and is just completing their third one with the ZimaCube NAS system. Arriving with the lightweight containerized platform Zima OS (a modified version of their existing Casa OS), this new series is pretty impressive for its scale and price point at launch. Add to that the significantly unique design, impressive use of 10GbE and Thunderbolt over IP, and a 6x HDD / 4x NVMe system in a compact case, and you can see why they have made a fairly significant splash for a brand that is comparatively unheard of compared to Synology, QNAP, etc.

However, as robust as their range of solutions is (ZimaBoard, ZimaBlade, and ZimaCube), the software is still very rudimentary compared to the bulk of other browser GUI and more “operating system”-stylized UX. There are virtually no client applications, except for their own system search and connection client tools. An eventual successor to Synology, if they moved upwards toward bigger and more business-oriented solutions, would need to hit the software functionality and user experience exceedingly early and exceedingly well.

Mini PC Brands – Lincplus, Aoostar, etc.

This is an odd one. There have been a large number of solutions appearing on sites such as AliExpress that arrive as “OS-Free” services, allowing a user to get a pre-built NAS hardware solution (i.e., no need to build one yourself, which takes longer and requires a degree of technical understanding). The end user can then choose to install popular and well-established solutions like TrueNAS, UnRAID, OpenMediaVault, and more.

Value Option	Best All Rounder	SSD Focused NAS
Aoostar WTR Pro 4-Bay NAS	Minsiforum MS-01 3/6-Bay NAS	Lincplus Lincstation N1 6-Bay NAS
$399-799 on Amazon (Check Here)	$399 on Amazon (Check Here)	$399 on Amazon (Check Here)

This serves as an impressively economical solution and has significantly grown in popularity in 2023/2024, but these 3rd-party software platforms lack a lot of the ease of use and quality of life client tools for modern devices that Synology features. Indeed, despite efforts like UnRAID 7 making its day-to-day use much easier, and TrueNAS working with HexOS for a more user-friendly output, these still pale in comparison to DSM and will also require a greater degree of technical user input in the long term to maintain stability, versus Synology’s rather more “it takes care of itself” design.

Synology vs EVERYONE ELSE – Conclusion and Verdict

If Synology were to leave the home/enthusiast/prosumer/small business tier very soon, I do think QNAP would stand to reoccupy this ground. However, give it 2-3 years, and I do think players like Terramaster, Asustor, and yes—even UGREEN—are poised to give QNAP some serious consumer competition. No doubt Synology is still keeping an eye on their competition (big and small) and would not willingly or easily give up this sector without a fight. However, there is no denying that the turnkey NAS industry is no longer the 2-3 horse race it was just five years ago!

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Week 31 Tech Roundup – 245TBGMKTec G9 NAS (New Improved CoTerramaster F4 SSD NAS ReviewHow to Use Unverified HDDs andSynology DS425+ NAS Review - SSynology DS225+ NAS Review - SN7 AMD 8845HS 2x 10GbE NAS MotUGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewUGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewSynology DS1525+ NAS Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Synology VS Terramaster NAS Drives in 2025 – Which One Deserves Your Data?

Synology and TerraMaster are two well-established brands in the network-attached storage (NAS) industry, each targeting a range of users from home enthusiasts to small and medium-sized businesses. Synology, a Taiwanese company with over two decades in the field, is widely recognized for its DSM (DiskStation Manager) software, which emphasizes stability, security, and integration within a tightly controlled ecosystem. TerraMaster, while newer to the market, has steadily gained ground by offering hardware-focused, cost-effective solutions with increasing software support via its TOS (TerraMaster Operating System) platform.

I want to provide a side-by-side comparison between Synology and TerraMaster as they stand in 2025, focusing on the real-world differences in hardware, storage, software, and security. The goal is to outline the practical strengths and weaknesses of each brand without leaning heavily toward subjective preferences or historical bias. This is especially relevant for users reevaluating Synology due to recent policy shifts, or for those considering TerraMaster as a flexible and affordable alternative.

When evaluating Synology’s hardware catalog, the company demonstrates a clear strategy of segmenting performance tiers through tightly integrated systems. The FS (FlashStation) series targets ultra-low latency workloads with powerful multi-core CPUs and all-flash designs. For instance, the FS6400 and FS3600 offer 240,000 and 195,000+ 4K random write IOPS respectively, built for high-throughput environments. The HD series goes a different direction, pushing density with up to 300 drives in models like the HD6500, which pair with dual 10-core CPUs and provide over 6,600 MB/s throughput. Meanwhile, the SA and XS/XS+ series address scalable performance and redundancy needs, offering dual-controller setups, high RAM ceilings, and optional Fibre Channel or 25/40GbE expansion. Synology’s Plus and Value series provide consumer-grade flexibility, but these are becoming increasingly closed ecosystems with limited hardware compatibility and optional expansion cards restricted to specific interfaces or models.

Category	Synology Example Models	TerraMaster Example Models	CPU & RAM Range	Typical Use Case
Entry-Level (2-4 Bay)	DS223, DS423, DS224+, DS423+	F2-212, F4-223, F4-210	Quad-core 1.7–2.2GHz, up to 32GB ECC	Personal cloud, backups, media streaming
Mid-Range (4-6 Bay)	DS1621+, DS1522+, DS1821+	F4-424, F6-424, F4-424 Pro	Quad-core 2.2GHz, up to 32GB ECC, NVMe cache	SOHO/SMB file sharing, light virtualization
Performance Tier (6-8 Bay)	RS1221+, RS2423+, DS3622xs+, DS1823xs+	U4-423, T6-423, T9-423	Quad to Octa-core Xeon, up to 64GB+, 10GbE support	Heavy multi-user access, surveillance, VM use
Enterprise / Rackmount	RS4021xs+, SA6400, SA3610, UC3200	U12-500 Plus, U16-722-2224, T12-450	10–12 core CPUs, 128GB+ RAM, SAS, PCIe expandability	Virtualization clusters, iSCSI SAN, backups at scale
All-Flash / NVMe Focused	FS2500, FS3600, FS6400, SA3400D	F8 SSD Plus, U8-522-9400, U24-722-2224	8–24 cores, all-SSD, 10/25/40GbE, NVMe-only storage	High IOPS databases, virtualization, low-latency workloads

TerraMaster, in contrast, focuses its value proposition heavily on maximizing hardware capabilities per dollar. Even in their midrange, systems like the F6-424 Max or F4-424 Pro include Intel Celeron or i3 CPUs, 2.5GbE or 10GbE connectivity, NVMe SSD support, and upgradeable RAM—all within sub-$700 price ranges. Larger units like the T12-500 Pro or U24-722-2224 scale storage up to 24 bays or beyond, while still offering competitive CPUs and abundant connectivity options. TerraMaster also maintains a vast lineup of hybrid RAID-capable DAS and NAS systems, including USB 3.2 Gen 2 enclosures for fast, direct-attached storage. Unlike Synology, TerraMaster maintains open compatibility with third-party drives and offers more consistent support for M.2 NVMe storage expansion, SSD caching, and even integrated GPU support in some models.

Synology DS925+ NAS		Terramaster F4-424 / Max / Pro
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology NAS Solutions	Check B&H for the Synology NAS Solutions	Check Amazon in Your Region for the Terramaster NAS Solutions	Check B&H for the Terramaster NAS Solutions

Overall, while Synology’s premium hardware—especially in enterprise segments like FS, HD, and SA series—is clearly capable and built with specific high-performance use cases in mind, the general direction of the brand has shifted toward tightly controlled environments with gradual upgrades. In contrast, TerraMaster’s approach offers broader hardware scalability and modularity across more price points, with emphasis on high-speed networking and expansive storage configurations. For users who prioritize full hardware utilization, third-party component compatibility, or budget scalability, TerraMaster offers more flexibility. Meanwhile, users looking for tightly integrated, support-rich systems—especially in enterprise workloads—may lean toward Synology, albeit at a higher cost per feature.

Category	Feature	Synology DSM (7.2)	TerraMaster TOS (5.1 / optional 6.x)	Notes
Core OS	OS Version	DSM 7.2	TOS 5.1 standard, TOS 6 optional on newer models	TOS 6 has refreshed UI and app changes
	Alternate OS Install	Not supported	Allows Unraid, TrueNAS without voiding warranty	Huge flexibility advantage for TerraMaster
	Web Interface	Polished, modern DSM interface	Modern but simpler UI	DSM is more mature
	Mobile Apps	Many DS apps across mobile platforms	TNAS Mobile, limited scope	Synology has broader mobile toolset
File Services	SMB/NFS/AFP/WebDAV	Full support	Full support	Core services present on both
	iSCSI Support	Native GUI-based iSCSI manager	iSCSI support available	Parity here
RAID & Storage	RAID Options	RAID 0/1/5/6/10 + SHR (Hybrid RAID)	RAID 0/1/5/6/10 + TRAID (TerraMaster Hybrid RAID)	Both support flexible hybrid RAID
	Snapshots	Btrfs with scheduling/versioning	On Btrfs-capable models	Model-dependent on TOS
	Deduplication	Btrfs-based dedup	With Dedup Manager	Available on both with GUI
	Encryption	Volume/folder/drive encryption + WORM	Volume encryption + WORM	TerraMaster supports WORM as well
	SSD Caching	Read/write SSD caching	SSD caching supported	Hardware-dependent for both
Virtualization & Containers	Virtual Machines	Synology VMM (Virtual Machine Manager)	VirtualBox-based VM manager	Less integrated in TOS but available
	Docker Support	Full Docker with GUI	Available via App Center	Equal in function
	GPU Passthrough	Not supported	Not supported	Absent on both platforms
AI & Surveillance	AI Features	Facial/object detection via DVA models	Facial/object detection	DSM AI Services in NVR/CCTV xclusive to DVA NAS models or their own cameras
	Surveillance Suite	Surveillance Station with licensing	Surveillance App (Beta)	TOS app is newer and evolving
Media & Streaming	Plex Media Server	Native app	Native support	No difference
	Jellyfin	Docker/homebrew	Native Jellyfin app	Edge to TerraMaster
	Video Player App	Video Station EOL	No official native player	Use Plex/Jellyfin on both
Backup & Sync	Backup Solutions	Hyper Backup, Active Backup, USB/Cloud	TerraSync (Synology Drive-like), Rsync, USB, Cloud Backup	TOS has clear parity now
	Cloud Sync	Native Cloud Sync app	CloudSync app	Supported on both
Remote Access	DDNS + Tunnel	QuickConnect	TNAS.online	Both offer simplified remote access
Security & Access	Security Scanner	Malware, ransomware, audit, firewall tools	Full scanner + Isolation Mode	Both systems offer advanced security
	VPN Server	OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP via GUI	OpenVPN/L2TP support	GUI VPN tools available
	SSL Certificates	Let’s Encrypt + custom certs	Let’s Encrypt + certs	Equal support
	2FA Support	TOTP, authenticator app, email	TOTP 2FA	Parity on login security
App Ecosystem	App Center	Extensive native apps and 3rd party	App Center with essential tools	Synology has a larger catalog
	Package Manager	synopkg CLI + GUI	App Center (GUI only)	CLI package management is a Synology edge

 TerraMaster’s TOS (TerraMaster Operating System), currently in version 5.1 with version 6 available on select systems, has seen rapid growth in capabilities and usability over the last few years. While it doesn’t yet match DSM’s polish, it has made significant strides in offering equivalent functionality. TOS supports Btrfs-based snapshots, Rsync and CloudSync for cloud backup, Docker container deployment, and VirtualBox-based virtualization. While the latter is less tightly integrated than Synology’s VMM, it does allow for third-party VM deployment in a usable way.

TerraMaster has also developed TerraSync, a synchronization tool designed to rival Synology Drive, and supports both media management and AI-enhanced photo sorting with apps like Terra Photos. However, many of TOS’s functions rely more heavily on community-driven or open-source third-party applications, resulting in a slightly less unified experience overall.

In terms of application ecosystems, Synology’s App Center clearly offers the broader and deeper catalog, particularly for business users. First-party applications such as Synology Office, Chat, MailPlus, and Note Station deliver a productivity-focused alternative to cloud services, and their Surveillance Station software stands out as one of the most powerful NVR platforms in the NAS market.

TerraMaster’s App Center includes essential tools but lacks the same level of first-party development. However, it makes up for this in openness: TerraMaster supports a wide array of third-party and open-source platforms more freely, including Jellyfin and Unraid. Moreover, TerraMaster allows alternative operating systems like TrueNAS to be installed without voiding the warranty, which adds considerable flexibility for tech-savvy users. Overall, Synology delivers a more unified and polished software experience, while TerraMaster emphasizes adaptability, freedom, and cost

Synology vs Terramaster NAS – Security and Safety

Synology has long maintained a strong reputation in the NAS sector for prioritizing system security, and this is evident in how thoroughly security is integrated throughout DSM. Synology’s Security Advisor provides active scanning for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and password weaknesses, while its firewall, account protection, and IP auto-blocking features offer practical layers of defense against unauthorized access. Synology also supports comprehensive SSL certificate management via Let’s Encrypt and offers two-factor authentication (2FA) with TOTP and hardware key support. From a business continuity perspective, DSM includes native WORM (Write Once Read Many) capabilities and encrypted shared folders to protect sensitive data from tampering or deletion. Perhaps most critically, Synology operates a dedicated PSIRT (Product Security Incident Response Team), frequently publishes security advisories, and participates in high-profile vulnerability testing events like Pwn2Own—demonstrating a serious commitment to vulnerability discovery and remediation.

TerraMaster’s security offering has become more robust over recent years, particularly with the development of Isolation Mode—a unique feature allowing users to instantly sever all external access and remote services with a single click. This acts as a kill switch in the event of a suspected breach or malware event. TOS also includes a system-level security scanner that checks for basic vulnerabilities and enables 2FA, SSH restrictions, and SSL certificate deployment. While TerraMaster’s platform does not offer as many granular policy tools as DSM, it supports core protocols like OpenVPN and L2TP for secure remote access and regularly issues firmware updates in response to new threats. The company also now provides greater transparency regarding CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), though its advisory frequency and scope remain smaller than Synology’s.

Security Feature	Synology DSM	TerraMaster TOS	Notes
System Hardening	Proactive hardening (limited root access, secure defaults)	Moderately hardened; more configurable access	Synology limits risky configurations by design
Security Scanner	Built-in DSM Security Advisor with customizable scan depth	TOS Security Center (less detailed on TOS 5.x)	Synology provides more actionable alerts
2FA Support	TOTP-based (authenticator apps, email)	TOTP-based	Parity on two-factor authentication
SSL Certificate Support	Native Let’s Encrypt + custom certs via GUI	Let’s Encrypt + custom certs via GUI	Equal support, easy HTTPS setup
Firewall Management	GUI-based port/IP firewall with profiles	Firewall settings available (less granular)	Synology allows more granular firewall policy creation
Isolation Mode / Kill Switch	Not available	Isolation Mode disables all external access with one click	Advantage: TerraMaster for emergency lockdowns
Vulnerability Response (PSIRT)	Dedicated PSIRT, public advisories updated monthly	Less frequent disclosure, fewer details published	Synology actively discloses and patches
Security Bug Bounty Program	Yes – active white-hat reward program	No public bounty program known	Synology engages with global researchers
Third-Party App Restrictions	Limited for security; sandboxed services	More open but requires user discretion	Synology prioritizes closed ecosystem safety
Remote Access Protection	QuickConnect includes traffic relay + DDNS + 2FA	TNAS.online DDNS with isolation toggle	Both offer encrypted remote access, but Synology uses multiple layers
Malware Detection	Real-time malware scanner, browser warnings	Included scanner, but simpler in scope	DSM scanner is more active and integrated
Backup Verification	Integrity verification in Active Backup	TerraSync + cloud/USB support (manual checks)	DSM offers automated backup health reports
Surveillance Hardening	Encrypted video storage + HTTPS + IP blocklist	Surveillance App with HTTPS, still evolving	Synology Surveillance Station is more mature and secure
Ransomware History	2014 “SynoLocker” (quickly patched)	2021–22 “Deadbolt” attacks (multiple waves)	TerraMaster more affected in recent years
Update Frequency	Frequent monthly patches	Less frequent, varies by model	DSM has a consistent schedule and transparency

Despite these advancements, TerraMaster’s security record has faced scrutiny in the past due to incidents like the Deadbolt ransomware attacks. These incidents, which also affected other NAS vendors, prompted significant user backlash and a push for more proactive security updates and faster patching. TerraMaster has since responded by improving software integrity and introducing layered protection features, but the lingering perception remains that Synology maintains a stronger and more proactive security posture overall.

This perception is reinforced by Synology’s investment in ongoing vulnerability research, bug bounty programs, and a broader portfolio of security-focused tools. As it stands in 2025, Synology continues to lead in NAS security maturity, while TerraMaster has made meaningful progress—especially with unique features like Isolation Mode—but still has ground to cover in enterprise-level protections and threat response.

Synology vs Terramaster NAS – Conclusion and Verdict

Comparing Synology and TerraMaster in 2025 ultimately highlights a clear philosophical divide between the two NAS brands. Synology continues to build upon a long-standing focus on refined software, tight integration, and enterprise-grade security. Its DSM platform remains one of the most polished and feature-rich operating systems in the NAS space, offering a wide selection of first-party tools for backup, surveillance, virtualization, and secure access. However, this ecosystem is increasingly closed, with stricter hardware compatibility requirements and limited support for third-party drives, SSDs, and expansions. For users who prioritize reliability, ease of use, and support from a mature software ecosystem, Synology remains a compelling—if sometimes restrictive—option.

TerraMaster, by contrast, leans into flexibility and hardware value. Its broad portfolio includes NAS units ranging from entry-level to high-performance multi-bay SSD systems, often at lower price points than Synology’s equivalents. TOS 5.1 and the newer TOS 6 have brought meaningful improvements in UI and functionality, while still maintaining a more open approach to compatibility and user customization. Features like native Jellyfin support, VirtualBox VM deployment, and the ability to install TrueNAS or Unraid without voiding warranty make TerraMaster a standout for DIY-leaning users or those with niche requirements. However, its software, while improving, does not yet match the polish or depth of Synology DSM, especially in areas like virtualization, surveillance, and enterprise security.

In the end, choosing between Synology and TerraMaster depends heavily on user needs and expectations. Synology suits users who want a highly stable, all-in-one solution with minimal configuration and long-term support. TerraMaster offers greater adaptability and value for power users who are comfortable managing third-party apps and want to stretch their hardware investment further. Neither approach is inherently better—each has its strengths and trade-offs. Buyers seeking a tightly controlled, secure environment may gravitate toward Synology, while those who value hardware scalability, open software choices, and affordability may find more freedom with TerraMaster.

Synology DS925+ NAS		Terramaster F4-424 / Max / Pro
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology NAS Solutions	Check B&H for the Synology NAS Solutions	Check Amazon in Your Region for the Terramaster NAS Solutions	Check B&H for the Terramaster NAS Solutions

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...How to Use Unverified HDDs andSynology DS425+ NAS Review - SSynology DS225+ NAS Review - SSynology DS1525+ NAS ReviewSynology DS1825+ NAS ReviewSynology DS1525+ NAS ReviewSynology DS1825+ NAS ReviewTerramaster Prime Day 2025 - ATerramaster Prime Day 2025 - AWeek 26 Tech Roundup – Compa Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE