Test du OPPO Reno14 FS 5G : design premium, écran AMOLED 120 Hz, autonomie XXL et stockage 512 Go. Un milieu de gamme séduisant à 429 euros hors promotion !

The post Test OPPO Reno14 FS 5G : faut-il craquer pour ce smartphone ? first appeared on IT-Connect.

UGREEN DXP4800 PLUS vs DH4300 NAS – Which Should You Buy?

UGREEN’s emergence into the NAS market has been notably rapid, expanding from its early DXP series Kickstarter campaigns in 2024 to a full retail presence in 2025. Among its growing portfolio, two models now define the entry and mid-range segments of the company’s lineup: the DH4300 Plus and the DXP4800 Plus. Both are 4-bay NAS systems built around UGREEN’s in-house UGOS Pro operating system, offering cross-platform client access, RAID options, and remote synchronization. However, beneath their similar exteriors lie significant differences in design philosophy, hardware architecture, and expandability. The DH4300 represents the brand’s low-power ARM-based solution focused on simplicity and efficiency, while the DXP4800 Plus adopts an Intel x86 platform that aims to deliver higher throughput, broader software compatibility, and long-term scalability. This comparison examines each system in detail to identify where their strengths diverge and which one may better align with different user priorities.

UGREEN DXP4800 PLUS NAS		UGREEN DH4300 NAS
Buy the UGREEN DXP4800 on Amazon @599	Buy the UGREEN DXP4800 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on Amazon @409	Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on UGREEN.COM

DH4300 vs DXP4800 PLUS – Design and Storage

Both the DH4300 Plus and DXP4800 Plus are 4-bay NAS systems, yet their physical execution and approach to storage differ substantially. The DH4300 Plus adopts a compact vertical cube form, measuring just 155mm per side, prioritizing low noise and minimal desk footprint. It uses plastic top-loading trays that can house either 2.5-inch SSDs or 3.5-inch HDDs. Drives are inserted vertically from the top, secured internally via SATA connectors. This layout helps keep the system small and easy to position in tighter setups but limits front-access servicing and restricts the unit’s suitability for hot-swap drive replacement. The DXP4800 Plus, by contrast, uses a more conventional front-loading 4-bay metal chassis that resembles traditional NAS systems from Synology or QNAP. Each tray includes a locking mechanism, supports hot-swapping, and accepts both 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch media. The metal body contributes to improved heat dissipation and rigidity, though it also results in higher weight and slightly higher fan noise. The chassis design clearly targets users expecting long-term durability and easier drive maintenance.

Beyond the drive trays themselves, the DXP4800 Plus expands the internal storage configuration by adding two M.2 NVMe slots. These can be assigned for SSD caching or as additional high-speed storage pools. This flexibility is absent in the DH4300 Plus, which is limited to its four SATA bays. The M.2 capability allows the DXP4800 Plus to create tiered storage setups that combine large-capacity HDDs with SSD acceleration, a feature relevant to media libraries or multi-user data environments requiring rapid retrieval. A key architectural distinction lies in their system drives. The DH4300 Plus relies on a 32GB eMMC flash module, while the DXP4800 Plus integrates a 128GB NVMe SSD dedicated to UGOS Pro. The SSD delivers faster system responsiveness, reduced latency, and provides enough capacity to install alternative operating systems if the user chooses. The eMMC module, while efficient, is considerably slower and less flexible for advanced tasks such as dual-boot environments or virtualized OS installations.

Both systems officially support up to 30TB drives per bay, giving the DH4300 Plus a theoretical ceiling of 120TB, while the DXP4800 Plus extends to 136TB when the NVMe bays are included. The practical implication is straightforward: the DXP4800 Plus provides more room to grow, both in capacity and performance scaling. For users seeking long-term expandability and tiered storage, the Intel-based unit presents the more adaptable platform. Meanwhile, those prioritizing compactness, lower power draw, and quiet operation may find the DH4300 Plus’ simplified vertical design sufficient for modest home or small-office workloads.

DXP4800 PLUS vs DH4300 – Internal Hardware

The UGREEN DH4300 Plus is powered by a Rockchip ARM processor built on a big.LITTLE configuration consisting of four Cortex-A76 and four Cortex-A55 cores, clocked at up to 2.0GHz. This eight-core design is efficient and well-suited for basic NAS tasks such as file sharing, backups, and light multimedia use. The processor is paired with 8GB of LPDDR4X memory that is soldered to the mainboard and non-upgradable. Power efficiency is a major strength of this configuration, typically consuming less than half the power of Intel-based systems when idle. However, its ARM architecture inherently restricts compatibility with x86 applications, virtual machines, and certain Docker containers, limiting its scope for heavier workloads.

By contrast, the DXP4800 Plus employs an Intel Pentium Gold 8505, a five-core, six-thread processor from Intel’s 12th Generation “Alder Lake” family. This hybrid x86 chip combines a single Performance core and four Efficient cores, supporting hardware virtualization, AVX2 instruction sets, and Intel UHD Graphics. Paired with 8GB of DDR5 memory, expandable up to 64GB, the DXP4800 Plus accommodates far more demanding tasks, including Docker deployments, Plex hardware transcoding, and multiple concurrent user operations. The use of DDR5 not only increases bandwidth but also introduces on-die error correction (ODECC) for improved data integrity, especially under sustained workloads.

Thermally, the two models are built with different cooling philosophies. The DH4300 Plus relies on its plastic housing and a single rear fan to quietly manage airflow, maintaining modest heat output even under continuous drive access. The DXP4800 Plus uses a metal chassis with enhanced thermal conduction and larger active cooling components to handle its higher power draw and CPU thermal output. As a result, it operates at a higher baseline wattage but sustains performance under extended heavy loads without throttling.

The difference between these platforms is clear: the DH4300 Plus targets efficiency and affordability, while the DXP4800 Plus prioritizes raw performance, expandability, and compatibility. The ARM-based model functions effectively as a quiet, low-cost personal cloud, whereas the Intel-powered alternative transitions closer to a professional or prosumer NAS capable of handling heavier workloads and future expansion.

DH4300 vs DXP4800 PLUS – Connectivity

The connectivity options on these two NAS systems reinforce their differing design priorities. The UGREEN DH4300 Plus offers a minimal, streamlined interface aimed at simplicity. It features a single 2.5GbE LAN port, sufficient for small network environments or home setups. This port provides adequate throughput for multi-user file access, media streaming, and backups, but limits scalability for link aggregation or 10GbE network integration. On the front, the DH4300 Plus includes one USB-C (5Gb/s) and two USB-A (5Gb/s) ports for connecting external storage or peripheral devices. Around the back, a 4K HDMI 2.0 output is provided, allowing direct media playback or access to the NAS desktop interface through a monitor and keyboard. Although compact and functional, the absence of additional network interfaces or expansion options means the DH4300 Plus is a closed system with limited upgrade flexibility.

The DXP4800 Plus presents a markedly broader I/O profile. Networking is handled by both a 2.5GbE and a 10GbE RJ45 port, enabling dual-network configurations, link aggregation, or high-speed connectivity to 10GbE switches and workstations. This combination provides a clear advantage for environments with large data transfers, such as video editing, virtualization, or backup synchronization across multiple systems. USB connectivity is also improved, with a front USB-C and USB-A port (each 10Gb/s), plus three additional rear USB-A ports—one at 5Gb/s and two at USB 2.0 speeds for legacy devices. The inclusion of an SD 3.0 card reader on the front panel enhances convenience for photographers or media professionals who regularly import content.

Both models offer HDMI output supporting 4K display, but only the DXP4800 Plus benefits from Intel’s integrated UHD Graphics, allowing smoother playback and better compatibility with third-party applications such as Plex, Jellyfin, or VLC in a connected display mode. The DH4300’s ARM GPU can output a graphical interface but struggles with higher bitrates and complex codec formats. Neither system includes PCIe or Thunderbolt expansion, although the DXP4800 Plus is more likely to support future USB-based expansion storage, given its higher USB bandwidth and processing headroom.

The result is a distinct separation in capability: the DH4300 Plus offers the essentials for simple network storage and direct access, while the DXP4800 Plus is engineered to serve as a central node in more advanced home or office networks, handling high-speed workflows and multi-interface operations with ease.

DH4300 vs DXP4800 PLUS – Software and Services

Both NAS systems operate on UGREEN’s UGOS Pro, the company’s in-house Linux-based operating system that has evolved considerably since its debut. UGOS Pro delivers a browser-accessible interface and companion apps for desktop and mobile devices, providing cross-platform file management, media streaming, and remote synchronization. Both the DH4300 Plus and DXP4800 Plus share the same core software experience, including snapshot protection, multi-tier backup utilities, RAID configuration tools, and cloud synchronization with popular platforms such as Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive. Remote access can be achieved through relay services or secure connections such as Tailscale VPN, enabling users to maintain access without direct port forwarding.

Where the differences begin to emerge is in application scope and performance. The ARM-based DH4300 Plus supports a subset of the total UGOS Pro app library, running core services such as file sharing, photo management, and music/video playback, but it is limited when it comes to containerization and virtualization. Its CPU architecture prevents the use of virtual machines and restricts Docker to lightweight ARM-compatible containers. This makes it a suitable platform for personal data hosting or small-scale media libraries but less appropriate for professional or experimental use cases.

The DXP4800 Plus, leveraging its Intel x86 CPU and larger memory capacity, unlocks the full UGOS Pro ecosystem. It supports Docker for containerized applications and a dedicated Virtual Machine Manager, allowing users to run Windows, Ubuntu, or Android environments directly on the NAS. This hardware advantage extends to AI-based services integrated into UGOS Pro, including facial and object recognition within the Photo app. The DXP4800 Plus processes these functions locally at higher speed and with greater precision, while the DH4300 Plus delivers only basic recognition due to its lower AI compute capability.

Media handling is another clear differentiator. Both NAS units can run the native UGREEN Theater app for video playback, but the DXP4800 Plus benefits from hardware-accelerated 4K transcoding via Intel UHD Graphics. This enables smooth playback across Plex, Jellyfin, and Emby, even for HEVC or high-bitrate formats. The DH4300 Plus lacks equivalent hardware decoding support and therefore relies on software rendering, which can lead to stuttering or incompatibility when streaming demanding media.

Overall, UGOS Pro maintains functional parity across both systems at the surface level, yet the DXP4800 Plus unlocks a broader range of use cases—from virtualization to heavier AI and multimedia workloads. The DH4300 Plus remains best suited to users seeking a straightforward, reliable network storage environment without advanced compute or scalability expectations.

DXP4800 PLUS vs DH4300 – Verdict & Conclusion

The UGREEN DH4300 Plus and DXP4800 Plus ultimately cater to two very different categories of users, despite sharing the same UGOS Pro ecosystem and similar 4-bay configurations. The DH4300 Plus is built for simplicity, energy efficiency, and quiet continuous operation. Its ARM-based design consumes far less power and generates minimal heat, which is appealing for users who want a NAS that can run 24/7 in a home or office without significant energy cost or noise impact. It handles standard NAS duties—file storage, scheduled backups, photo management, and light multimedia playback—without issue. However, its hardware limitations restrict its suitability for more advanced workloads such as containerized apps, virtual machines, or high-resolution video transcoding. This makes the DH4300 Plus ideal for users seeking dependable, local network storage that functions as a personal cloud or central backup hub, not as an extensible compute platform.

The DXP4800 Plus, on the other hand, occupies a very different space in UGREEN’s product strategy. Its x86 Intel processor, DDR5 memory, dual-network connectivity (including 10GbE), and support for NVMe caching elevate it closer to what many would consider a professional-grade NAS system. It offers faster response times, wider compatibility with third-party applications, and a platform that supports future scalability through additional storage, memory, and software deployments. This system also opens the door to real virtualization, Docker-based workloads, and higher performance in media services thanks to Intel’s hardware-accelerated graphics. While it requires more power and a higher upfront investment, it delivers a measurable leap in flexibility, stability under heavier loads, and long-term performance headroom.

In practical terms, the DH4300 Plus will satisfy users who simply want to move away from cloud reliance, consolidate data locally, and maintain low running costs. The DXP4800 Plus suits those who expect their NAS to perform as both a data server and an active processing node for AI indexing, 4K media handling, or business-level file operations. Both systems are well-built, and UGOS Pro continues to mature into a stable operating environment, but the DXP4800 Plus clearly represents the more capable and future-ready choice. The DH4300 Plus fulfills its role as a compact, accessible entry into local network storage, while the DXP4800 Plus defines UGREEN’s current benchmark for serious, performance-oriented users.

UGREEN DXP4800 PLUS NAS		UGREEN DH4300 NAS
Buy the UGREEN DXP4800 on Amazon @599	Buy the UGREEN DXP4800 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on Amazon @409	Buy the UGREEN DH4300 on UGREEN.COM

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology DSM 7.3 NAS - HDD/SSDSynology DSM 7.3 NAS - Full DeAmazon Prime Day Deals - The BUGREEN DXP4800 PLUS vs DH4300 Weekly Tech Digest – Week 40How to Make the UGREEN US3000 Week 39 Tech Digest – Wi-Fi UGREEN US3000 NAS UPS ReviewUGREEN US3000 NAS UPS ReviewHow to Get Hardware Transcodin Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Minisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 – Which Should You Buy?

Minisforum has steadily earned recognition in the compact workstation space, and the MS-01 stands as one of its most prominent entries. Released with a focus on balancing high-performance hardware in a small chassis, the MS-01 quickly found popularity among professionals needing powerful networking and scalable internals without the bulk of a full-sized desktop. It supports CPUs up to the Intel Core i9-13900H, includes dual 10GbE SFP+ ports, and provides expansion via a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot (operating at x8 speed), giving users access to discrete graphics or high-performance cards if needed. With three internal M.2 slots and support for up to 64GB of DDR5 memory, the MS-01 became a go-to mini workstation for users who value connectivity and component flexibility at a relatively modest price point.

In early 2025, Minisforum introduced the MS-A2 — a system clearly designed as a next-generation counterpart to the MS-01, but one that leans into AMD’s latest advancements. Featuring the Ryzen 9 9955HX processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, the MS-A2 offers more cores, more threads, faster base and boost clocks, and higher supported memory capacity, reaching up to 96GB DDR5 at 5600MHz. It also brings upgrades in memory bandwidth, M.2 storage speed (with all three slots supporting PCIe 4.0 x4), and internal thermal design. From a feature standpoint, the MS-A2 is positioned to meet or exceed the MS-01 in most categories — but it does so with a noticeable bump in price. Still, for users prioritizing top-end performance and storage throughput, the MS-A2 might justify the premium. The sections below break down how these systems stack up in real-world terms — not just on paper, but in actual deployment.

Minisforum MS-A2 vs MS-01 – Hardware Specifications Compared

At a glance, both the MS-01 and MS-A2 share a near-identical chassis, measuring 196×189×48mm and following Minisforum’s signature small form factor aesthetic. Internally, however, there are several notable differences that affect both systems’ expandability and long-term utility. Both devices feature three M.2 slots for high-speed NVMe SSDs, but only the MS-A2 supports full PCIe 4.0 x4 lanes on all three slots. By contrast, the MS-01 includes a single PCIe 4.0 x4 slot, one PCIe 3.0 x4 slot, and one limited PCIe 3.0 x2 slot. This directly impacts storage performance, especially for users aiming to run multiple high-throughput drives in parallel. In real terms, the MS-A2 allows up to three SSDs each capable of saturating 7,000MB/s read speeds, whereas the MS-01 will bottleneck in its second and third storage bays.

Specification	MS-01 (Intel Core i9-13900H)	MS-A2 (AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX)
CPU	Intel Core i9-13900H (14C/20T, up to 5.4GHz)	AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (16C/32T, Zen 5, up to 5.4GHz)
GPU	Intel Iris Xe (96 EUs @ 1.5GHz)	AMD Radeon 610M (2 CUs @ 2.2GHz)
RAM Support	DDR5-5200MHz, up to 64GB (2x SO-DIMM)	DDR5-5600MHz, up to 96GB (2x SO-DIMM)
M.2 Storage	1x PCIe 4.0 x4 (2280), 1x PCIe 3.0 x4 (22110), 1x PCIe 3.0 x2	1x PCIe 4.0 x4 (U.2/2280), 2x PCIe 4.0 x4 (2280/22110)
Max Storage Capacity	Up to 15TB (U.2), 4TB (each 2280/22110 slot)	Up to 15TB (U.2), 4TB (each 2280/22110 slot)
PCIe Expansion	1x PCIe 4.0 x16 slot (x8 speed, half-height)	1x PCIe 4.0 x16 slot (x8 speed, split support)
Ethernet Ports	2x 10Gbps SFP+, 2x 2.5GbE RJ45	2x 10Gbps SFP+, 2x 2.5GbE RJ45
Wi-Fi & Bluetooth	Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2	Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3
Display Output	1x HDMI 2.0, 2x USB4 (Alt DisplayPort 1.4a)	1x HDMI 2.1, 2x USB-C (Alt DisplayPort 2.0, up to 8K@60Hz)
USB Ports (Front)	2x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen1, 2x USB 2.0	2x USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A, 1x Audio Jack
USB Ports (Rear)	2x USB4 (40Gbps), 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen1	2x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen1
Audio I/O	HDMI audio + 3.5mm combo jack	HDMI audio + 3.5mm 4-in-1 combo jack (input/output)
Cooling	1x CPU fan (12V), 1x SSD fans (5V)	1x CPU fan (12V), 1x SSD fans (5V)
Power Supply	19V DC input (external adapter)	19V / 12.63A (external adapter)
OS Support	Windows 11 Pro	Windows 11 / Linux
Chassis Dimensions	196 × 189 × 48 mm	196 × 189 × 48 mm
Additional Accessories	U.2 adapter, SSD heatsink, mounting hardware	Not specified

Both systems include a PCIe 4.0 expansion slot, which is a rare and welcome inclusion in mini PCs. On the MS-01, this slot is x16 physically but electrically operates at x8 speed and is suitable for half-height, single-slot PCIe cards. The MS-A2 retains this format but introduces PCIe bifurcation support, enabling more advanced setups with compatible cards — a notable advantage for developers or users building niche use cases like NVMe RAID or multi-GPU compute tasks in an edge environment. Additionally, memory support is slightly more capable on the AMD model, with the MS-A2 supporting up to 96GB of DDR5-5600 via two SO-DIMM slots, compared to the MS-01’s 64GB ceiling at DDR5-5200. This can make a tangible difference in virtualization or memory-intensive creative workflows.

In terms of connectivity, both units are very well equipped: dual 10GbE SFP+ ports, dual 2.5GbE RJ45, HDMI output, USB 3.2 Gen1/Gen2 Type-A ports, and USB4 (or USB-C with DisplayPort alt mode). The MS-A2 takes a slight lead in display output capabilities, supporting HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0 over USB-C, compared to HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4a on the MS-01. This means the AMD system supports 8K60 and 4K144 video streams natively. Wireless capability is also a step ahead on the MS-A2 with Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3, compared to the MS-01’s Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2. Altogether, while the MS-01 still holds up well a year after release, the MS-A2 offers clearly improved throughput, higher bandwidth components, and better display and wireless standards.

Minisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 – CPUs Compared

The defining difference between the Minisforum MS-01 and MS-A2 lies in their processor choices: the Intel Core i9-13900H and the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, respectively. While both CPUs are built for high-end mobile performance and boast identical peak boost clocks of up to 5.4GHz, the underlying architecture and core configurations are markedly different. The i9-13900H uses a hybrid architecture with 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, totaling 14 cores and 20 threads. In contrast, the Ryzen 9 9955HX employs 16 full-fledged performance cores and 32 threads based on AMD’s latest Zen 5 architecture. For users engaged in parallel processing tasks—such as 3D rendering, large-scale compilation, or virtualization—the extra cores and threads in the AMD chip deliver a tangible performance uplift.

Specification	AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX	Intel Core i9-13900H	Better Performer
Architecture	Zen 5 (TSMC 4nm)	Raptor Lake (Intel 7)	AMD (newer architecture, denser node)
Cores / Threads	16C / 32T	14C (6P+8E) / 20T	AMD (more cores and threads)
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	~3.1 GHz (P-cores, estimated)	Intel (higher base for performance cores)
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz	5.4 GHz	Tie
L2 Cache	16 MB	Part of total cache (not separated)	AMD (clearly larger L2 cache)
L3 Cache	64 MB	24 MB	AMD (much larger L3 cache)
TDP (Base / Max)	55W / 75W	45W / 115W	Depends (Intel boosts higher, AMD more efficient)
Integrated GPU	Radeon 610M (2 CUs @ 2.2GHz)	Iris Xe (96 EUs @ 1.5GHz)	Intel (much better GPU performance)
Memory Support	DDR5-5600, up to 96 GB	DDR5-5200, LPDDR5x-6400, DDR4/LPDDR4x	Intel (more flexible memory support)
PCIe Support	PCIe 5.0 (28 lanes)	PCIe 5.0 (CPU) + PCIe 3.0 (Chipset)	AMD (uniform PCIe 5.0 support)
Overclocking	Yes (Unlocked, PBO, Curve Optimizer)	No	AMD
Memory Overclocking	AMD EXPO	Intel XMP	Tie
Instruction Set	x86-64, AVX512, SSE4A	64-bit, AVX2, SSE4.2	AMD (supports AVX512)
Multithreading	Yes (SMT)	Yes (Hyper-Threading)	Tie
AI Acceleration	None	DL Boost, GNA 3.0	Intel (dedicated AI features)
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, VT-rp	Intel (more granular features)
Security Features	SHA, AES, SEV	TME, Boot Guard, Control-Flow Enforcement	Intel (broader security set)
Display Output	DP 2.0, HDMI 2.1	DP 1.4a, HDMI 2.1	AMD (newer DisplayPort version)
Graphics API Support	DirectX 12, HDMI 2.1, DP 2.0	DirectX 12.1, HDMI 2.1, DP 1.4a	Tie
USB Support	USB 3.2 Gen 2 (4), USB 2.0 (1)	Thunderbolt 4 (USB4), USB 3.2	Intel (Thunderbolt included)
RAID/NVMe Support	Boot, RAID0/1/10	Likely supported via chipset	AMD (more explicitly documented)
Thermal Headroom (TjMax)	100°C	100°C	Tie
Software Ecosystem	Windows/Linux, no vPro	Windows/Linux, vPro supported	Intel (enterprise-ready)
Smart Platform Features	SmartShift MAX, SmartAccess Memory	Thread Director, Adaptix, Speed Shift	Intel (broader platform-wide optimization)
Max Memory Speed (Type)	DDR5-5600	LPDDR5x-6400	Intel (higher speed supported)
ECC Support	Not specified	No	Tie (consumer chips)
Max Displays Supported	4	4	Tie
Target Segment	Gaming, Content Creation	AI Tasks, Office/Enterprise	Depends on use case

Zen 5 is a notable advancement over its predecessors, built on TSMC’s 4nm process and optimized for both performance and power efficiency. This gives the Ryzen 9 9955HX a structural advantage in multithreaded scenarios, with improved instruction throughput, cache handling, and memory bandwidth. The Intel Core i9-13900H, based on Raptor Lake and fabricated using Intel’s “7” process (a refinement of their 10nm SuperFin node), holds its own with mature thread management and strong single-thread performance. Its support for Intel’s Thread Director technology ensures efficient scheduling across its mixed-core layout, which can be beneficial in workloads like content creation and lightly-threaded business apps. However, the Ryzen chip’s unified core design tends to yield more predictable and consistent scaling when all threads are pushed simultaneously, reducing thermal spikes and improving overall sustained performance.

Thermal and power characteristics further highlight the gap between the two systems. Intel’s i9-13900H has a base power of 45W but can boost up to 115W under load, while AMD’s Ryzen 9 9955HX has a configurable TDP ranging from 55W to 75W. Although the Intel chip has a higher upper limit, in practice it tends to spike power draw during short workloads and then throttle back. In comparison, the Ryzen CPU maintains a steadier thermal and power profile over longer tasks. This behavior was reflected in sustained tests over one-hour and 24-hour windows under mixed network and compute usage: the MS-A2’s CPU performed more consistently, with lower long-term thermal build-up, aided by its upgraded internal fan design. Combined with support for up to 96GB of DDR5 memory versus 64GB on the MS-01, the MS-A2’s CPU configuration offers better overall headroom for demanding, sustained workstation use.

Minisforum MS-A2 vs MS-01 – Graphics and Processing Power Compared

Although the Minisforum MS-01 and MS-A2 are positioned as compact workstations rather than gaming rigs, integrated graphics performance still plays a role in determining their suitability for visual workloads, media playback, and GPU-accelerated tasks. The MS-01 leverages Intel’s Iris Xe graphics, which includes 96 execution units running at up to 1.5GHz. The MS-A2, on the other hand, features AMD’s Radeon 610M — a lightweight RDNA2-based iGPU with 2 compute units operating at 2.2GHz. While the AMD GPU has a higher clock speed on paper, the significantly larger number of execution units in the Iris Xe gives the Intel system a considerable edge in real-world performance. In benchmarks such as the Steel Nomad Light test, the MS-01 consistently delivered higher frame rates and better render completion times, particularly during prolonged sequences that tax the GPU.

This performance advantage was also evident in media encoding and general GPU-accelerated workloads. Intel’s integrated graphics tend to benefit from better driver maturity, wider codec support (particularly for Quick Sync Video), and improved handling in professional apps with Intel-optimized pipelines. Users working in environments involving light 3D rendering, accelerated video encoding, or virtual display compositing are more likely to see stable and consistent results from the MS-01’s iGPU. However, it’s important to note that neither device is intended to replace a discrete GPU for high-end graphical workflows. Their iGPUs are best suited for media playback, multi-monitor output, light rendering tasks, and as fallback units for headless server use.

That said, the MS-A2 reclaims ground when it comes to video output capabilities. While the MS-01 supports HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4a via USB4, the MS-A2 steps forward with HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0 over Type-C. This enables support for up to 8K at 60Hz and 4K at 144Hz, offering tangible benefits for users who rely on ultra-high-resolution displays or high refresh rate monitors in productivity setups. Professionals in video editing, CAD work, or photography may find that this broader standard support gives the AMD model a longer shelf life as display technologies advance. In broader processing terms, the MS-A2’s superior CPU — the Ryzen 9 9955HX — delivers more overall compute performance, particularly in multi-threaded applications. But for users with GPU-reliant workloads or who value stability across legacy software environments, the MS-01’s Iris Xe graphics make a compelling case. Ultimately, choosing between the two comes down to workload distribution: CPU-heavy environments favor the MS-A2, while mixed or GPU-skewed tasks lean toward the MS-01.

Minisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 – Conclusion and Verdict

After evaluating both systems across CPU architecture, internal connectivity, storage bandwidth, and thermal performance, it becomes clear that the Minisforum MS-01 and MS-A2 cater to slightly different segments of the same professional user base. The MS-01, despite being over a year old, still offers a well-balanced configuration with mature Intel performance, reliable thermal behavior, and excellent compatibility with existing Intel-optimized software. Its Intel Core i9-13900H processor delivers solid single-core performance and responsive handling in mixed-load scenarios, particularly when combined with Iris Xe graphics that outperform AMD’s 610M in general GPU-accelerated tasks. When paired with dual 10GbE SFP+ ports, 2.5GbE RJ45, and PCIe expansion, the MS-01 provides considerable functionality in a highly compact chassis — all at a more affordable starting price than its AMD counterpart.

However, the MS-A2’s specification gains are more than just incremental. It introduces a newer CPU platform with significantly higher multi-threaded performance, better storage throughput via triple PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slots, and wider memory support scaling up to 96GB at 5600MHz. These improvements position the A2 as a clear upgrade in raw compute potential. Enhanced display output support, including HDMI 2.1 and DP 2.0 over USB-C, adds flexibility for users deploying ultra-high-resolution or high-refresh-rate monitors in content creation, design, or data visualization environments. Furthermore, the updated internal cooling system — subtle in layout but effective in long-term thermal consistency — ensures the AMD-based system maintains sustained performance under extended workloads. While the MS-A2 demands a higher upfront investment, it delivers longer-term value for users running multi-threaded software stacks, high-speed storage arrays, or heavy virtual machine workloads. In essence, the MS-01 is still a dependable and well-priced workstation that meets the needs of a wide user base. But the MS-A2 redefines Minisforum’s performance ceiling with broader bandwidth, more compute power, and enhanced scalability. For users focused on future-proofing, heavier workloads, or maximizing hardware capability within a small form factor, the MS-A2 is the more capable — if more expensive — option. Your choice ultimately comes down to whether cost or capability is the higher priority in your deployment.

Minisforum MS-01 Pros and Cons	Minisforum MS-A2 Pros and Cons
Lower Price Point The MS-01 is considerably more affordable than the MS-A2, making it a better value for users with lighter or mixed workloads. → The MS-A2 demands a premium due to its higher-end specs, which may not be fully utilized in typical home or office deployments. Superior Integrated Graphics (Intel Iris Xe) With 96 execution units, the Iris Xe GPU in the MS-01 outperforms the Radeon 610M in the MS-A2 for media encoding, driver stability, and general GPU-accelerated workloads. → The MS-A2’s Radeon 610M has only 2 compute units and is weaker in rendering, encoding, and professional visual tasks. Thunderbolt 4 and Mature USB4 Support The MS-01 offers USB4 with DisplayPort 1.4a and Thunderbolt compatibility, which ensures greater peripheral compatibility and broader bandwidth for external devices. → The MS-A2 lacks Thunderbolt and uses USB-C ports with DisplayPort 2.0, which are better for displays but more limited in external expansion options. More Established Intel Software Ecosystem Features like Intel vPro, Thread Director, and DL Boost make the MS-01 better suited to enterprise, AI inference, and compatibility with legacy Intel-tuned workloads. → The MS-A2 is newer but lacks mature support for certain enterprise features like vPro or AI-specific instructions. Limited Storage Bandwidth Only one of the three M.2 slots runs at PCIe 4.0 x4; the others run at PCIe 3.0 x4 and x2. This bottlenecks multi-drive setups or RAID configurations. → The MS-A2 supports PCIe 4.0 x4 on all three M.2 slots, enabling full-speed NVMe performance on every drive. Lower Memory Capacity and Speed Supports up to 64GB DDR5 at 5200MHz. This limits RAM-heavy workloads like virtualization or large dataset handling. → The MS-A2 supports up to 96GB DDR5 at 5600MHz, giving it better headroom for demanding memory scenarios. Solid GPU Performance Stability The MS-01 performs better under GPU-accelerated tasks due to more mature graphics drivers and better software integration (Quick Sync, Adobe, etc.). → MS-A2 may suffer compatibility or driver limitations in older applications or video pipelines.	Much Higher CPU Performance The Ryzen 9 9955HX delivers 16 cores and 32 threads, far exceeding the MS-01’s i9-13900H with 14 cores (6P+8E) and 20 threads. This gives the MS-A2 a major edge in rendering, VMs, and parallel workloads. → The MS-01 holds its own in lightly threaded or bursty workloads but falls behind in sustained multi-core tasks. Full-Speed NVMe Across All Storage Bays All three M.2 slots run at PCIe 4.0 x4 speeds, which is ideal for users building high-speed RAID arrays or multi-disk configurations. → The MS-01’s mixed PCIe generation slots limit throughput and performance scaling with multiple drives. Higher RAM Capacity and Bandwidth The MS-A2 supports up to 96GB DDR5-5600, making it more suitable for VM clusters, code compilation, or large creative project workflows. → The MS-01 tops out at 64GB DDR5-5200, which may become a limiting factor in future-proofing. Advanced Display Output Support The MS-A2 features HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0, allowing up to 8K60 or 4K144Hz. Ideal for users with high-res displays or multi-monitor setups. → The MS-01 is limited to HDMI 2.0 and DP 1.4a, which caps out at 4K60 in most scenarios. Weaker Integrated GPU (Radeon 610M) The 2CU RDNA2 iGPU in the MS-A2 underperforms compared to the Iris Xe in the MS-01 in encoding tasks, graphical acceleration, and some professional media pipelines. → The MS-01 offers better iGPU performance and is more compatible with widely used software stacks. Higher Price for the Same Chassis While offering better specs, the MS-A2 comes at a significantly higher price for a similar form factor and port layout, making it less cost-efficient for users not needing its full capabilities. → The MS-01 delivers solid value for money and remains a competitive mini workstation despite being a generation older. Improved Thermal Efficiency and Sustained Load Performance A redesigned internal cooling layout in the MS-A2 provides better performance consistency under long-term stress compared to the MS-01, which can throttle during extended workloads. → The MS-01’s cooling is competent but may experience more thermal spikes under 24/7 heavy use.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Aoostar WTR Max NAS vs MinisfoMinisforum N5 vs Aoostar WTR MMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewMinisforum N5 Pro NAS ReviewMinisforum MS-R1 POWERHOUSE ARMinisforum MS-R1 POWERHOUSE ARMinisforum MS-01 vs MS-A2 PC -Minisforum MS-A2 Review - The Minisforum MS-A2 ReviewWeek 17 Tech Roundup – Lenov Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Découvrez la gamme RAPID Pro de chez EcoFlow, avec une batterie externe dotée d'un câble USB-C intégré et un chargeur de bureau 6-en-1 pour tous vos appareils.

The post Test EcoFlow RAPID Pro : un chargeur de bureau et une batterie externe haut de gamme first appeared on IT-Connect.

Jonsbo N10 NAS Case Review – A REAL M-ITX NAS Enclosure?

The Jonsbo N10 is a purpose-built NAS enclosure tailored for Mini-ITX builds that prioritizes a compact footprint, flash-based storage, and low-power operation. Announced at Computex 2025, the N10 represents a significant design departure from Jonsbo’s earlier N5 chassis by reducing overall dimensions to just 205mm in width and depth, and 108mm in height. This change reflects a broader trend in DIY NAS building—especially among users deploying SSD-only arrays or compact motherboards with embedded CPUs—who value minimal space usage without sacrificing component access or build quality. The enclosure supports up to four 2.5-inch SATA SSDs or HDDs mounted along its internal base, along with a FLEX 1U power supply (up to 150mm) and a low-profile CPU cooler not exceeding 38mm in height. Constructed from thick 3.3mm aluminum alloy panels and a 1.0mm steel interior frame, it offers durability alongside a neutral, industrial aesthetic that blends well in home and office environments. Given the increasing popularity of MITX NAS boards from brands like Topton and CWWK, which often include soldered CPUs and compact layouts, the Jonsbo N10 enters the market as a focused option for builders who need efficient thermal performance, portability, and enough internal expansion to support a hybrid SSD/M.2 architecture in a space-conscious package.

Jonsbo N10 NAS Enclosure Review – Quick Conclusion

The Jonsbo N10 is a compact, purpose-built Mini-ITX NAS enclosure designed for users prioritizing SSD-based storage in a low-power, space-efficient build. With a footprint of just 205mm square and 108mm tall, it offers four 2.5-inch drive bays, FLEX PSU support, and a solid aluminum-steel construction that balances durability with minimalism. Its layout is well-suited for embedded CPU boards and hybrid storage configurations, but tight internal spacing, a 38mm CPU cooler height limit, and the lack of PCIe card support require careful component selection. While cooling is handled by two built-in 40mm fans and ventilation across multiple panels, airflow in the upper cavity remains passive and somewhat restricted—posing thermal challenges for high-performance CPUs or 10GbE NICs. Setup is straightforward, though users must manually route all SATA data and power cables, as no backplane is included. The inclusion of helpful accessories such as a Molex-to-SATA adapter and magnetic top panel adds value, and the minimalist I/O—with a single USB Type-C—reinforces its role as a headless NAS unit. Ultimately, the N10 is not a catch-all solution, but for users building SSD-centric NAS systems with efficient MITX boards, it offers a tightly focused and well-executed platform with a strong balance of features and size.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

SCALABILITY - 7/10

PRICE - /10

VALUE - 10/10

7.2

PROS

Compact and space-efficient footprint (205 × 205 × 108 mm)
High-quality construction with 3.3mm aluminum and steel frame
Supports up to 4 x 2.5\" SSDs or HDDs
Includes 2 x 40mm built-in exhaust fans
Magnetic removable top panel for easier internal access
Front I/O includes USB Type-C
Includes Molex-to-SATA adapter and spare accessories in box
Ideal for embedded ITX boards with passive/low-profile cooling designs

CONS

No support for PCIe add-in cards due to internal clearance
Lacks SATA backplane; requires individual data/power cabling
Limited cooling upgrade options (no top/supplementary fan mounts)
FLEX PSU format may be expensive and noisy depending on model

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Note – You can see the comparison of the Jonsbo N2, N3, N4 and N5 in this article HERE

Jonsbo N10 NAS Enclosure Review – Case Design, Ventilation and Cooling

The exterior design of the Jonsbo N10 emphasizes minimalism and space efficiency. Measuring just 205mm wide, 205mm deep, and 108mm high, the case is almost a perfect cube in footprint, but with a shallow vertical profile that makes it easy to deploy on desks, shelves, or tight AV cabinets. The use of 1mm thick aluminum alloy on the outer panels not only provides a premium feel but also contributes to structural integrity without excessive weight.

Combined with the internal steel chassis, the enclosure remains sturdy under load while keeping its overall weight to just 1.6kg. From a visual standpoint, the clean lines and brushed finish—available in black or silver—are devoid of branding or unnecessary ornamentation, which suits its role as a discrete server or quiet storage box in professional or home setups.

Ventilation is a core part of the external layout, with venting present on nearly every surface of the chassis. Perforations on the side panels, rear, and base allow for passive air movement across internal components, helping to reduce thermal buildup. While the compact size limits the scope of airflow paths, Jonsbo has attempted to compensate by ensuring that each major face includes some form of ventilation.

The top panel, held in place magnetically, can be removed easily for additional airflow during installation or servicing. However, this panel itself includes no fan mounts or perforations, which may limit vertical heat dissipation unless the lid is removed or modded.

Cooling is primarily handled by two built-in 40mm x 20mm exhaust fans mounted on the rear panel, each rated at 5000 RPM. These fans are positioned to draw hot air away from the internal drive bay and motherboard area, effectively pulling air in through the side and base perforations and pushing it out the back.

While the fans are small, their high RPM ensures a reasonable volume of air is cycled through the chassis. During testing, this design produced moderate acoustic output—peaking at around 43-45 dBA at load when measured from the rear—and noise levels were generally acceptable for typical NAS operation, particularly with low-TDP motherboards and embedded CPUs.

That said, airflow through the top cavity of the enclosure is limited. While the base panel and lower chamber benefit from fan-assisted cooling directed over the SSDs and PSU, the upper portion—where the CPU cooler and any on-board NICs are located—relies entirely on passive convection.

This can lead to hot air stagnation around components like 10GbE controllers or active M.2 heatsinks, particularly in long uptime scenarios. In your testing, surface temperatures on the top panel reached 31–33°C after 24 hours of deployment, with internals climbing higher toward 55–56°C, especially around passive heatsinks with limited surrounding airflow.

The absence of additional fan mounting options or top-mounted exhaust fans means users have little room to expand the cooling setup. While some users may consider modding the top panel to add extra fans or mesh inserts, the stock configuration offers no support for such upgrades.

This makes thermal planning crucial, especially for users deploying more powerful CPUs like Intel’s i5-1240P or using motherboards with multiple onboard NVMe drives and high-speed networking. For more passive deployments, like those with low-power N305 or N355 CPUs and minimal drive activity, the default setup should be sufficient—though tight airflow margins should always be considered during build planning.

Jonsbo N10 NAS Enclosure Review – Internal Design

Internally, the Jonsbo N10 is laid out to support only the essentials, reflecting its role as a NAS-first chassis with limited internal expansion. The Mini-ITX motherboard tray sits centrally within the lower half of the enclosure, flanked on one side by the FLEX PSU bracket and on the other by the horizontal drive cage. Despite the symmetrical exterior, internal space is tightly constrained, and components must be carefully selected and installed in a deliberate sequence to avoid obstructing airflow or cabling paths.

The steel frame keeps the motherboard tray stable, but there’s little clearance between installed components, which becomes immediately apparent when routing power and SATA data cables across the system. Most of the case’s internal volume is claimed by either the drive cage or power supply, leaving minimal open airspace.

The four 2.5-inch drive bays are arranged in a single, fixed cage at the base of the unit. This cage does not feature any kind of backplane or hot-swap system—instead, users must manually screw each SSD into place using traditional mounting trays. Drives are accessed from the underside of the top panel after removing the magnetic lid, and their power/data cabling must be routed individually.

In small builds, this can quickly become a challenge. The case includes a Molex-to-SATA power adapter, which is a thoughtful addition for budget FLEX PSUs that lack four dedicated SATA power leads. However, data cable management remains the user’s responsibility. In builds using motherboards without breakout SATA connectors (such as SFF-8643 or SlimSAS), this results in a dense bundle of SATA leads running through an already cramped enclosure.

Clearance around the CPU socket is equally limited. The N10 supports CPU coolers up to 38mm in height, restricting users to ultra-low-profile models. This makes it well-suited for embedded CPU motherboards like the CWWK N150 or N355, which come with passive or ball-bearing heatsinks under 30mm.

However, builders looking to use socketed CPUs like the i5-1240P will need to carefully select compatible coolers and be mindful of airflow choke points. There is no room for PCIe devices internally, and although some MITX boards have slots, they are effectively unusable due to chassis constraints. Any notion of using riser cards or external PCIe breakouts (such as M.2 to OCuLink) is largely impractical within this case’s physical limits.

Connectivity on the Jonsbo N10 is intentionally minimal. The front I/O panel includes a single USB Type-C port positioned on the top-right edge of the chassis, routed internally via a standard front-panel header. There are no additional USB-A ports, audio jacks, or buttons present, in keeping with the case’s clean exterior aesthetic.

While this simplicity reinforces the N10’s focus as a headless or remote-managed NAS system, it does reduce options for users who might want to connect external drives, peripherals, or configure the system locally without reaching behind the unit. Builders relying on initial direct access may need to route peripheral cabling through the rear motherboard I/O or temporarily remove the top lid for setup.

The power supply format supported is strictly FLEX 1U, with units up to 150mm in length permitted. This rear-mounted PSU bracket is placed above the motherboard tray and next to the SSD cage, and the power supply’s fan helps assist with rear airflow in conjunction with the two pre-installed 40mm exhaust fans.

While FLEX PSUs are well-suited to compact enclosures, they can be noisy under load and tend to cost more than SFX or ATX equivalents—especially if aiming for 80+ Gold or higher efficiency ratings. The internal wiring must be routed carefully due to spatial limitations, and although the case does include a Molex-to-SATA power adapter, it does not include any SATA data cables, which users must supply themselves. PSU airflow is indirectly beneficial to nearby components, but cooling requirements should be factored into PSU selection to avoid thermal bottlenecks.

The N10’s primary storage capability comes from its four internal 2.5-inch drive bays. Positioned in a fixed steel cage, the bays are arranged horizontally and mounted via screws without any vibration dampening or tool-less features. As noted earlier, there is no backplane, so each drive requires a dedicated SATA data and power cable, which must be routed manually through tight internal spaces.

While the design clearly targets SSD usage due to thermal and vibration limitations, there is potential for 2.5-inch HDDs as well—though builders should be cautious of heat and noise. Some modders may consider fitting up to two 3.5-inch drives with minor modifications, but this would require bypassing manufacturer recommendations and limits compatibility to 8TB drives or smaller due to physical height constraints.

When paired with modern MITX boards featuring multiple onboard M.2 slots, the N10 can accommodate hybrid storage setups—though again, thermal planning remains crucial.

The Jonsbo N10 delivers on its objective: to offer a compact, purpose-built NAS enclosure for Mini-ITX systems focused on SSD-based storage. It embraces the growing trend of low-power, embedded CPU platforms and caters directly to users building quiet, energy-efficient NAS devices for tasks like media serving, remote backups, or personal cloud storage. Its clean exterior design, robust aluminum-steel construction, and compact footprint make it appealing for constrained environments or unobtrusive desktop deployment. The inclusion of pre-installed fans, a Type-C front I/O, and even minor accessories like a Molex-to-SATA adapter add value to the out-of-box experience. However, its internal layout requires deliberate component choice and build planning due to significant space limitations and tight thermal margins.

While not designed for broad flexibility, the N10 excels in its niche. There is no support for PCIe add-ons or active top-panel cooling, and the absence of hot-swap bays or bundled SATA data cables may frustrate some users expecting turnkey solutions. That said, for those familiar with small form factor NAS building, these limitations are expected trade-offs for a case that prioritizes minimalism and focused utility. As pre-built NAS units continue to integrate soldered CPUs and non-upgradable memory, enclosures like the N10 offer a rare chance for builders to retain full control over their hardware stack—provided they’re willing to work within the tight confines of the design. In short, the N10 is not for everyone, but for those building compact SSD-focused NAS systems, it strikes a well-executed balance between form, function, and footprint.

Read the Jonsbo NAS Series Comparison Article on NASCompares Below (click below):

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Jonsbo N10 NAS Case Review - AJonsbo N10 and NV10 ITX NAS CaJonsbo N10 and NV10 ITX NAS CaJonsbo N5 ReviewJonsbo N5 vs N4 vs N3 vs N2 NAJonsbo N5 vs N4 vs N3 vs N2 NAJonsbo N5 NAS Case RevealedWitness the Power: Blackbird'sJonsbo N4 NAS Case ReviewThe Jonsbo N4 NAS Case Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Le Geekom A9 MAX est une bête de course : il est ultra-réactif et parvient à faire tourner des jeux gourmands. Un mini PC redoutable dans de nombreux scénarios.

The post Test Geekom A9 Max : l’infatigable mini PC avec un AMD Ryzen AI 9 first appeared on IT-Connect.

Review of the UGREEN NAS UPS – Is the US3000 120W UPS Any Good?

The UGREEN US3000 is a 120 W DC uninterruptible power supply developed specifically for UGREEN NAS devices that rely on an external DC power brick. Unlike conventional UPS systems that convert AC to DC, this model outputs direct 12 V DC power with a zero-second transfer time, ensuring there is no interruption during a power loss. It is equipped with a 12,000 mAh lithium-ion battery pack made up of four 3000 mAh cells, providing a rated energy of 43.2 Wh and up to around ten minutes of backup time depending on workload. Measuring 120.6 × 80.5 × 29.6 mm and weighing approximately 439 g, the US3000 is compact enough for desktop environments where space is limited. Beyond supplying short-term emergency power, it integrates with UGOS Pro software via a USB communication cable, allowing automated shutdown, timed standby, and restart once power is restored. This focus on seamless hardware and software compatibility makes the US3000 notable for users running UGREEN NAS systems that need to mitigate risks of data corruption caused by sudden outages.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Quick Conclusion

The UGREEN US3000 is a purpose-built DC UPS that prioritizes seamless integration with UGREEN NAS systems over broad flexibility. Its compact aluminum chassis houses a 12,000 mAh lithium-ion battery pack capable of delivering 120 W output with zero-second transfer time, ensuring that a connected NAS continues running long enough to perform a safe shutdown. Unlike traditional AC-based UPS units, it avoids conversion inefficiency by supplying direct DC power, while its USB link with UGOS Pro enables automatic shutdown, timed standby, and restart functions. Testing confirmed reliable operation across scenarios from immediate power loss to scheduled shutdowns, with system logs capturing events in under two seconds. However, its design is deliberately narrow in scope: it supports only one NAS at a time, does not extend to routers or switches, and offers limited runtime of around ten minutes under load. For users operating within the UGREEN ecosystem, it provides an efficient and well-integrated safeguard against data corruption during outages. For those needing multi-device protection or long-duration backup, its constrained design and compatibility limit its broader applicability.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

EASE OF USE - 10/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 9/10

9.2

PROS

Zero-second transfer time ensures uninterrupted NAS operation during outages.
Compact and lightweight aluminum chassis with integrated heat dissipation.
Direct DC pass-through eliminates inefficient AC/DC conversion.
Full integration with UGOS Pro, including shutdown automation and restart control.
Lithium-ion battery pack provides higher energy density than lead-acid designs.
Purpose-built for UGREEN NAS systems with native USB communication support

CONS

Limited compatibility, works only with UGREEN NAS models that use external DC input.
Short runtime and single-device capacity make it unsuitable for extended or multi-system protection.

Why the UGREEN US3000 UPS is Important/Interesting

Uninterruptible power supplies are not new, but most consumer models are designed for general computing and rely on bulky lead-acid batteries with AC pass-through. The UGREEN US3000 differs by offering a DC-to-DC solution that matches the external power design of UGREEN NAS units. This means it eliminates the inefficiency of double conversion and avoids the audible transfer delays that can occur with traditional UPS hardware. With a 120 W output ceiling, it is tailored for single-device use rather than multiple systems, but that specificity ensures closer integration with the NAS’s power and shutdown controls. From a technical perspective, its lithium-ion battery pack offers greater energy density than lead-acid, allowing the device to remain compact while still covering several minutes of safe system operation during an outage.

The importance of this UPS becomes clearer when examining how it interacts with UGOS Pro. Unlike generic solutions, the US3000 communicates directly with the NAS operating system via a USB connection, exposing monitoring and automation options in the control panel. Users can configure automatic shutdown after a set period, trigger standby to conserve remaining charge, or enable auto-restart once mains power returns. These features are not just convenient but directly address the risks of corrupted writes, incomplete backups, or damaged RAID arrays during sudden power loss. Given that UGREEN NAS systems are designed for small offices and home use, where environments may not include larger enterprise-grade UPS equipment, the US3000 effectively bridges that gap by offering a purpose-built, compact, and integrated safeguard.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Design

The UGREEN US3000 follows a compact, rectangular form factor with dimensions of 120.6 mm in length, 80.5 mm in width, and 29.6 mm in thickness. Its weight of just under 440 g makes it relatively lightweight for a UPS, reflecting its focus on portability and single-device deployment rather than large-scale power protection. The outer chassis is made from anodized and sandblasted aluminum alloy, which gives it improved durability compared with plastic housings and also aids in passive heat dissipation. The choice of materials ensures a consistent finish that aligns visually with UGREEN’s NAS enclosures, providing an integrated appearance when the two devices are used together on a desktop.

Connectivity is handled entirely through DC and USB ports positioned on a single side of the device. The panel includes a DC input, a DC output, a USB-C port for data communication, and a power button. The fixed DC cable has a length of approximately 28 cm, while the included USB-A to USB-C cable measures around 53 cm, allowing flexible placement next to a NAS system without excess cabling. Each port and control is clearly labeled with printed icons, reducing the likelihood of incorrect setup. Unlike conventional UPS systems that feature multiple AC sockets, the US3000 focuses on a single dedicated output, reflecting its intended role as a companion unit for UGREEN NAS models rather than a general-purpose UPS.

The packaging of the device mirrors UGREEN’s approach with its NAS line, offering clear product imagery and specification highlights on the box exterior. Inside, the unit is provided with a base stand for stable positioning, the aforementioned data cable, and basic documentation. This is a minimalist package compared to conventional UPS units, which often include multiple adaptors or accessories, but the streamlined approach ensures that setup remains straightforward for the intended NAS integration. The inclusion of a stand is particularly useful given the slim design, as it helps keep the UPS stable in vertical placement while maintaining airflow around the chassis.

From a design perspective, the emphasis is on simplicity and integration rather than flexibility. The device does not feature multiple voltage outputs, nor does it support powering unrelated devices such as routers or switches. Instead, its DC pass-through design, small footprint, and single-device orientation mark it as a specialized tool. This aligns with UGREEN’s approach of building a controlled ecosystem around its NAS systems, where accessories are engineered for direct compatibility. The US3000 therefore sits between consumer-grade battery packs and enterprise UPS units, offering a focused solution that fits into a narrow but clearly defined usage scenario.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Internal Power Design

Inside the UGREEN US3000 is a straightforward but carefully constructed layout built around a 12,000 mAh lithium-ion battery pack. The pack consists of four SunPower INR18650-3000 cells, each rated at 3000 mAh and 11.1 Wh, connected in series to deliver a combined rated energy of 43.2 Wh at 14.4 V. The cells are wrapped in foam insulation and secured with adhesive to minimize movement, with spot-welded nickel strips linking them. Additional barley paper insulation is applied around the terminals for added protection. This design choice allows the UPS to maintain compact dimensions while ensuring sufficient runtime for controlled NAS shutdowns.

Battery management is handled by a Chipsea CBM8580KV6NT protection IC. This chip monitors voltage, current, and temperature across the pack, ensuring safe charging and discharge cycles. It communicates with the system host via SMBus 3.1, which enables the UPS to relay real-time status to the NAS when connected through USB. Supporting components include current sense resistors, thermistors, and MOSFETs for switching and power regulation. Together, these ensure not only that the battery operates safely but also that the UPS can reliably deliver 120 W maximum output without voltage instability.

Voltage conversion is performed by a dual-stage arrangement. A Texas Instruments TPS55289 synchronous buck-boost converter handles a wide input range up to 30 V and can output between 0.8 V and 22 V. Alongside this, a SouthChip SC8002 synchronous buck controller manages current limiting and efficiency across dual channels. Power MOSFETs from CR MICRO and NCEPower are used for pass-through control and output switching, while a GigaDevice GD32F303RCT6 Cortex-M4 microcontroller coordinates the overall system, including communication with the NAS. Passive cooling, adhesive reinforcement on inductors and capacitors, and fuses at both input and battery ends further underline the design focus on stability and safety.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Testing with UGREEN NASync Systems

To evaluate the UGREEN US3000, three operational scenarios were simulated: immediate power loss with continued operation, automatic shutdown under UPS control, and timed shutdown with automatic restart when power returned. In each case, the NAS was connected to the UPS using both the DC input and USB communication cable to ensure full integration with UGOS Pro. The first test involved disconnecting mains power to replicate an outage. The NAS continued running without interruption, with the transfer to battery occurring instantly. System logs registered the event in under two seconds, and normal file access, media playback, and downloads remained available until the battery level dropped to the configured threshold.

In the second test, the system was configured to shut down automatically as soon as the UPS switched to battery mode. Once power was removed, the NAS immediately began its shutdown process. This test showed that the UPS integration with UGOS Pro allowed a fast and orderly shutdown sequence, preventing data corruption or incomplete writes. The reaction time was near instantaneous, and the system was powered down safely without user intervention. This mode may be best suited for environments where uptime during an outage is less critical than ensuring rapid data protection.

A third test focused on timed shutdown, with the UPS set to keep the NAS running for five minutes before initiating a safe power-off. Once mains power was disconnected, the NAS continued operating for the specified period, then shut down as configured. After power was restored, the UPS automatically triggered a restart of the NAS, returning it to full operation within a few minutes. This confirmed the UPS’s ability not only to handle outages but also to manage recovery without manual restart, which is beneficial for users who may not be present during a power failure.

During all tests, the device’s limitations became apparent. With a 120 W maximum output and battery capacity limited to 43.2 Wh, it cannot sustain extended operation. Its role is restricted to ensuring controlled shutdowns and short bridging periods rather than providing long-term backup. Furthermore, it supports only one NAS system via DC pass-through, so it cannot protect additional hardware such as routers or switches. Nevertheless, within its defined parameters, the UPS consistently delivered seamless transitions and executed software-triggered events reliably, confirming that its functionality matches its intended scope.

UGREEN US3000 UPS Review – Conclusion & Verdict

The UGREEN US3000 fills a specific role: protecting UGREEN NAS devices from sudden power loss. Its design avoids the bulk and inefficiency of conventional AC-based UPS units by delivering DC pass-through power with zero transfer time. In practice, it provides just enough runtime for the NAS to perform a controlled shutdown, while its software integration ensures automation of both power-off and restart processes. With lithium-ion cells, a compact aluminum chassis, and close alignment with UGOS Pro features, it is engineered as a dedicated accessory rather than a universal power backup solution.

As a result, its usefulness is limited to scenarios where a single UGREEN NAS is the priority. It does not offer multiple outputs or extended backup duration, making it unsuitable for wider network coverage or enterprise requirements. Instead, the US3000 should be viewed as a narrowly focused safeguard that addresses one problem reliably: preventing data corruption and incomplete writes during outages. For users within the UGREEN ecosystem, it is an effective solution, but for broader applications, its scope remains intentionally constrained.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Amazon Prime Big Deal Day StorUGREEN DXP4800 PLUS vs DH4300 UGREEN DH4300 vs DXP4800 PLUS How to Make the UGREEN US3000 UGREEN US3000 NAS UPS ReviewDS1825+ vs DXP8800 PLUS NAS - Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXPUGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewUGREEN DH4300 PLUS NAS ReviewUGREEN DH4300 and DH2300 NAS R Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

GinjFo poursuit sa découverte de la gamme de boîtiers Frame de Corsair. Après les Frame 4000D et 5000D nous testons le Frame 4500X

Cet article Test Frame 4500X RS-R ARGB de Corsair a été publié en premier par GinjFo.

The UniFi UNAS Pro 8 NAS Review – The Difficult 2nd Album…

Note, the UNAS Pro 2 is NOW LIVE on the UniFi Store . The UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 are now in the site, but are not available till October.

The UniFi UNAS Pro 8 is the latest rackmount NAS in Ubiquiti’s gradually expanding storage lineup and serves as a direct successor to the UNAS Pro released in late 2024. That earlier seven-bay system introduced UniFi’s first attempt at a prosumer-class NAS with 10GbE connectivity and integration into the UniFi ecosystem, but it was limited in scope by its unusual drive count, absence of fan control, and lack of redundant power options. The Pro 8 addresses many of those concerns by standardising the layout to a full eight 3.5-inch bays, adding dedicated M.2 NVMe slots, and adopting a 2U rackmount form factor with hot-swappable dual power supplies. It also includes a set of rails in the box, something not always seen in turnkey solutions of this scale.

From a technical perspective, the UNAS Pro 8 remains anchored to an ARM-based architecture, employing a quad-core Cortex-A57 processor at 1.7 GHz paired with 16 GB of non-upgradeable memory. This positions it differently from x86 alternatives from Synology or QNAP, limiting its scope for high-end virtualisation or transcoding tasks but keeping overall efficiency high. Network expansion is one of its more striking features, with three 10GbE connections — two SFP+ and one copper port — included by default, offering redundancy and multi-channel potential well beyond the capacity of eight SATA drives. Taken together with the dedicated M.2 NVMe caching support and optional redundant PSUs, the Pro 8 represents an incremental but deliberate step forward in UniFi’s second phase of NAS development.

UniFi UNAS Pro 8 Review – Quick Conclusion

The UniFi UNAS Pro 8 is a clear refinement over the first-generation UNAS Pro, standardising the design to eight bays, introducing hot-swappable dual PSU support, and improving cooling and fan control, while also including rack rails for easier deployment. It delivers solid storage functionality with RAID up to level 6, clustered pools, snapshots, encryption, and read/write caching via NVMe modules, though the caching remains limited to automated policies and the required trays are sold separately. Networking is unusually strong for an eight-bay ARM system, with three 10GbE interfaces providing flexibility for aggregation or failover, even if the storage media is unlikely to saturate that bandwidth. Performance testing showed read speeds close to 850 MB/s in RAID 5 with HDDs, with lower write speeds reflecting the ARM Cortex-A57 processor’s constraints, and SSD arrays would likely achieve closer to 10GbE saturation. The operating system has matured but remains more streamlined than established platforms, with no iSCSI, limited protocol support, and basic backup tools, making it more suitable for straightforward file storage than advanced workloads. Ultimately, the Pro 8 fits best for users already invested in UniFi infrastructure or those seeking a rackmount NAS with strong connectivity and efficiency, but it is not yet a direct alternative to feature-rich solutions from long-standing NAS vendors. That said, if you want an incredible value and solid ‘storage-focused’ rackmount NAS solution – this might well be one of the best examples in 2025!

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 8/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 10/10

8.6

PROS

Multiple RAID Configurations supported, but also clustered RAID\'s and support of M.2 NVMes for Caching
M.2 Injection is unique, well thought out and easy to utilise for caching
THREE 10Gb/s PORTS (technically)! Kind of insane actually, for a 8x SATA drive machine
Dual PSU and Failover hugely welcome, after it\'s omission on the UNAS Pro 2024
16GB RAM out the box is a significant upgrade over the UNAS Pro from 2024
Benefits from almost a year of development of the UNAS Pro by UniFi, resulting in a much more complete solution in both hardware and software
Rackmount rails are included in the UNAS Pro 8 retail box, and are of a high quality
Exceptionally appealing price point
Supports complete network/local access if preferred, as well as full remote connectivity with the UI.com account and site manager services
Wide Hard Drives and SATA SSD Support (UniFi branded drives and those from 3rd parties such as Seagate Ironwolf, WD Red and Toshiba N300)
Ditto for the m.2 NVMe support, though you will need to m.2 adapter trays
Comprehensive network storage software in UniFi NAS OS and Drive.
Latest OS updates have included fan control, flexible RAID configurations, encrypted drive creation, customizable snapshots, more backup client choices/targets
\'Single Pane of Glass\' management and monitoring screen is very well presented!
One of the fastest to deploy turnkey NAS solutions I have ever personally used!

CONS

Lack of USB connectivity for convenient plug and share storage drives, network upgrades, 3rd party UPS support and more
Very modest base hardware, but understandable relative to the price
HDD injection is very unique, but prevents hot swapping
Still a lack of client applications native to the NAS services for Windows, Mac, Andoid and Linux
Shame about the LCD/LCM control panel being absent
M.2 NVMes are not usable for storage pools, just read/write caching - which is a shame, given the large network connectivity available here

You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 8 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

UniFi UNAS Pro 8 Review – Design & Storage

The UNAS Pro 8 adopts a 2U rackmount form factor, measuring 442.4 x 480 x 87.4 mm and weighing 11.5 kg. The enclosure is constructed from SGCC steel, giving it a sturdy industrial build aimed at rack deployments rather than desktop placement. The system ships with rack rails included, which is uncommon among turnkey NAS appliances in this class, reducing the need for additional accessories when integrating it into an existing rack setup. The front panel presents a uniform layout of eight drive bays, standardising the design over the previous model’s unconventional seven-bay configuration and providing a more predictable arrangement for enterprise or prosumer storage planning.

Each of the eight bays supports both 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch HDDs or SSDs, with tool-less trays supplied for ease of installation. Drives slot in securely with a lockable motion, though there is no key-based locking mechanism on the trays themselves, limiting physical access protection. Installation is simple, with trays accommodating both large-capacity HDDs and smaller SSDs through included screws for 2.5-inch drives. While the bays can be partially populated for smaller-scale deployments, the absence of an expansion chassis option means users must fully plan around the eight-bay limit from the outset.

Cooling has been reworked compared with the earlier UNAS Pro. The system now features multiple fans with improved airflow across the drive bays and system board, supplemented by passive ventilation at the front and central areas of the chassis. Fan control has been integrated into the management software, allowing administrators to adjust fan speeds dynamically, a feature missing from the 2024 model. This provides more direct management of system acoustics and thermal balance, which is important given that high-density SATA arrays can run warm under sustained load.

In addition to the primary SATA storage, the rear of the chassis houses two M.2 NVMe slots. These are integrated into removable tray modules with thermal pads and heatsinks designed to dissipate heat from 2280 or 22110 length SSDs. However, the trays are not included by default, requiring a separate purchase if users wish to install their own NVMe drives.

The implementation is mechanically well thought out, but functionally limited: the NVMe drives can currently only be used for read and write caching.

They cannot be assigned to storage pools or volumes, restricting their utility for users seeking to leverage them as a high-speed tier alongside the eight SATA bays.

From a capacity perspective, the eight 3.5-inch bays allow the use of large modern drives, with confirmed compatibility during testing with 30 TB Seagate IronWolf units as well as UniFi-branded re-labelled Western Digital drives. The total maximum capacity therefore depends on the drives chosen, but the system power budget allocates up to 175W for drives, sufficient to support a full complement of high-capacity HDDs.

In practice, UniFi recommends their own labelled drives but does not enforce vendor lock-in, leaving flexibility for users to select from available NAS-grade HDDs and SSDs on the market. This more open stance is in contrast to the drive validation policies adopted by some established NAS vendors, and it provides an important degree of freedom in deployment.

UniFi UNAS Pro 8 Review – Internal Hardware

At the core of the UNAS Pro 8 is an ARM-based processor, specifically a quad-core Cortex-A57 running at 1.7 GHz. This architecture is consistent with UniFi’s approach in the earlier UNAS Pro, prioritising efficiency and lower power draw over raw computational performance. The choice of an ARM SoC means the device is well-suited for file storage, backups, and network-attached services, but it does not provide the same level of support for virtualisation, multimedia transcoding, or container workloads that x86-based systems can deliver. For users considering this system, the hardware direction underlines its positioning as a straightforward storage platform rather than an all-purpose server.

Memory is supplied in the form of 16 GB of LPDDR4, which is soldered to the board and cannot be upgraded. This is a relatively high baseline for an ARM-powered NAS, offering enough headroom for multi-user file access, caching operations, and handling larger RAID arrays without memory saturation. The allocation proved sufficient during array synchronisation tests, though high memory utilisation was observed when building an eight-drive RAID. This suggests the hardware has been provisioned carefully to meet expected workloads, albeit without scope for user expansion if requirements increase later.

The operating system is stored internally on dedicated flash storage, reported within the software as 25.2 GB, likely provisioned as a 32 GB module with some over-provisioning. This design ensures that installed drives remain fully dedicated to storage and that the system can boot independently of the data array. Storage management supports multiple RAID levels up to RAID 6, as well as clustered RAID groupings, providing some flexibility for mixed drive sizes. Combined with hot-swap support and optional failover protection through dual PSUs, the hardware configuration strikes a balance between basic efficiency and the inclusion of some enterprise features.

UniFi UNAS Pro 8 Review – Connectivity & Throughput

The UNAS Pro 8 is equipped with three 10-gigabit network interfaces, consisting of two SFP+ 10G ports and one RJ45 10GbE port with multi-gigabit fallback to 5G, 2.5G, 1G, and 100 MbE. This level of connectivity is notable for a system limited to eight SATA bays, as even high-performance HDDs or SSDs in aggregate are unlikely to saturate more than a single 10GbE link under typical workloads.

While the inclusion of three ports may appear excessive, the arrangement allows for link aggregation, redundancy, and separation of traffic across multiple networks. In practice, this provides administrators flexibility in how the NAS integrates with existing switching hardware, though the real-world performance ceiling remains constrained by the storage media.

Power connectivity is handled through two hot-swappable AC/DC 550W power modules, though only one is included in the base configuration. Installing a second unit enables redundancy, ensuring uninterrupted operation in the event of PSU failure. Testing confirmed seamless failover when one module was removed during sustained read/write operations, with no observable disruption in data availability. However, the absence of USB or UPS integration ports limits external redundancy options, leaving users reliant solely on the dual-PSU configuration for power protection.

In terms of general I/O, the device is closed in design, with no USB ports, HDMI output, or PCIe expansion available. This reflects UniFi’s approach of positioning the system as a dedicated, self-contained appliance managed exclusively via network interfaces and the UniFi OS console. While this reduces versatility for use cases such as direct-attached backups or third-party hardware upgrades, it aligns with the brand’s ecosystem-driven philosophy.

Performance testing with eight 8TB drives in a RAID 5 configuration produced throughput in the region of 800–850 MB/s during sequential read operations. Write speeds were lower, reflecting both the RAID type and the limitations of the ARM Cortex-A57 processor, but still sufficient for multi-user file access and standard NAS workloads. Tests with larger 30TB Seagate IronWolf drives confirmed compatibility, though extended stress testing was not undertaken. With SATA SSDs or a RAID 0 array, the system would likely be capable of saturating a single 10GbE connection, though fully exploiting the three available ports remains unrealistic under the current hardware constraints.

The inclusion of two M.2 NVMe slots, limited to use as read/write cache, provides some performance enhancement. Caching can accelerate frequently accessed data reads or speed up ingest of new data before it is written to the HDD array. However, the caching mechanism is automated, with no user control over cache policies, and the NVMe drives cannot currently be used for storage pools. During operation, thermal imaging recorded SSD module temperatures in excess of 50°C, indicating adequate but stressed cooling under load. This reinforces the importance of active fan management, now included in UniFi’s updated software.

• Networking: 2 x 10G SFP+, 1 x 10GbE RJ45 (5G/2.5G/1G/100M supported)

• Power Supply: 2 x 550W hot-swappable AC/DC modules (1 included)

• Management: Ethernet and Bluetooth 4.1 setup/admin

• Other I/O: None (no USB, HDMI, or PCIe expansion)

• Drive Support: 8 x 2.5″/3.5″ SATA HDD/SSD, 2 x M.2 NVMe (cache only)

• Tested Performance: ~800–850 MB/s sequential reads (RAID 5, HDDs)

• Write Performance: Lower than reads, limited by ARM CPU overhead

• Cache Functionality: NVMe SSDs limited to automated read/write caching

UniFi UNAS Pro 8 Review – Software and Services

The UNAS Pro 8 runs on UniFi’s NAS management platform, designed to integrate with the broader UniFi ecosystem while remaining usable as a standalone system. Administration can be carried out through the UniFi OS console in a web browser or via the ui.com cloud portal, with optional remote access that can be enabled or disabled depending on security requirements.

The platform aims to provide a single interface for storage management, user access, and system monitoring. It is less feature-rich than mature alternatives such as Synology DSM or QNAP QTS, but it retains a streamlined design that prioritises ease of setup and centralised administration.

Storage management supports common RAID levels up to RAID 6, with the additional ability to cluster groups of drives into combined pools. Snapshots are available at the folder level, allowing users to roll back to earlier revisions of files. Encryption is supported, requiring a password to mount encrypted volumes after reboot, which ensures data protection in the event of device theft or unauthorised access.

NVMe SSDs can be assigned to caching, though as noted earlier, they cannot be added to storage pools. File access is available through SMB and NFS, but the range of supported protocols is narrower than on established NAS operating systems.

Backup functionality is split into two categories: system configuration backups and file-level backups. System configuration backups can be stored locally or uploaded to a ui.com account, allowing settings and structures to be restored to the same or another UniFi NAS device.

File-level backups extend to cloud services and other NAS units, with support for scheduled routines and basic rules such as overwrite or versioned backups. Cloud integration is functional but limited compared to established platforms, and external synchronisation features such as continuous sync or third-party plug-ins are not yet available.

User management is relatively straightforward, with the option to bind accounts to the wider UniFi ecosystem or create standalone local users. Access can be restricted to LAN-only connections, while two-factor authentication is available through UniFi’s identity and verification tools. At present, some advanced functions common to other platforms, such as iSCSI target creation or scheduled power management, remain absent.

The software continues to evolve, with updates adding features incrementally, but its current focus is on providing reliable core storage, backup, and access management rather than competing directly with the broad feature sets of long-established NAS vendors.

UniFi UNAS Pro 8 Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The UniFi UNAS Pro 8 represents a measured but important step forward compared with the earlier UNAS Pro model released in 2024. By moving to a uniform eight-bay arrangement, it avoids the odd seven-bay design that limited the practicality of the previous system and brings it in line with industry expectations for rackmount storage. The addition of dual hot-swappable power supply modules, though only one is supplied by default, introduces a level of redundancy that was absent in the earlier generation and proved reliable during testing with seamless failover. Improvements to cooling and fan control further distinguish it, with administrators now able to actively manage system noise and temperature rather than relying on fixed presets. UniFi has also bundled rack rails and a robust accessory kit, which simplifies installation and deployment. At the same time, the reliance on an ARM Cortex-A57 processor keeps the platform efficient but restricts its performance ceiling, limiting its suitability for high-throughput tasks such as large-scale virtualisation, multimedia transcoding, or environments where sustained multi-gigabyte per second throughput is essential.

On the software side, UniFi’s NAS operating system has matured since the first-generation release but still prioritises simplicity over feature breadth. The UNAS Pro 8 includes key storage capabilities such as RAID up to level 6, clustered pools, snapshots, encryption, and read/write caching via the rear-mounted NVMe modules. However, those same M.2 slots remain limited to caching only, and the trays required for installation must be purchased separately, which may be seen as an unnecessary barrier. Network protocol support is limited to common services such as SMB and NFS, with no iSCSI implementation, reducing its appeal for professional editing environments or enterprise applications that depend on block-level storage. Cloud and LAN backups are supported with basic scheduling and rules, but the absence of broader synchronisation features or third-party integration keeps it behind more mature platforms. The Pro 8 therefore delivers dependable core NAS functions but does not yet challenge the established ecosystems of Synology or QNAP. For organisations already invested in UniFi’s infrastructure or those requiring a straightforward rackmount storage system with multiple 10GbE connections, it offers a compelling option, but it remains best suited to use cases focused on file storage and backup rather than advanced workloads.

You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 8 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UPS Tower ReviewSharge Disk Pro ReviewHow to Make the UGREEN US3000 Week 39 Tech Digest – Wi-Fi UniFi Launch the New UNAS 2, UUniFi UNAS 2 ReviewUniFi Launch the New UNAS 2, UUniFi UNAS Pro 8 ReviewUniFi UNAS 2 ReviewGL.iNet Comet Pro Review - The Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

The UniFi UNAS 2 NAS Review – Value vs Scale

Note, the UNAS Pro 2 is NOW LIVE on the UniFi Store . The UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 are now in the site, but are not available till October / Q4 2025

The UniFi UNAS 2 is a compact, entry-level two-bay desktop NAS introduced as part of Ubiquiti’s second phase of NAS development, following the debut of the UNAS Pro in 2024. That earlier seven-bay rackmount system was notable for its low $499 price and integrated 10GbE connectivity, but it had an unconventional design, limited fan control, and no support for USB expansion. By contrast, the UNAS 2 shifts away from rackmount hardware and into the desktop market, adopting a much smaller form factor and prioritising simplicity over raw performance. Measuring 13.5 x 12.9 x 22.37 cm and weighing only 1.3 kg, it is one of the smallest systems in the UniFi NAS range and is constructed from polycarbonate rather than steel, reinforcing its role as an affordable, lightweight device.

The hardware is designed primarily for modest storage requirements, supporting two 3.5-inch hard drives with a maximum combined power budget of 52W and an overall consumption ceiling of 60W. The device operates on a single 2.5 GbE RJ45 interface, which also functions as a PoE++ input, removing the need for a conventional power supply unit but requiring either a compatible PoE++ switch or the included 60W injector. This approach marks a clear departure from the UNAS Pro, which included a standard power connector and optional redundancy through additional PSU modules. In practice, the reliance on a single port for both power and data streamlines installation within UniFi networks, but it also introduces a single point of failure and reduces flexibility compared with larger systems.

UniFi UNAS 2 Review – Quick Conclusion

The UniFi UNAS 2 is a compact, entry-level NAS that prioritises simplicity and integration within the UniFi ecosystem over flexibility or raw performance. Its use of PoE++ for both power and connectivity makes installation straightforward in environments with compatible UniFi switches, but it introduces reliance on a single port and limits deployment outside that infrastructure, even with the included injector in the retail kit. The system supports two 3.5-inch drives in a shared non–hot-swappable tray, with RAID 1, or single-disk setups available, but there is no option for expansion or NVMe caching. Hardware consists of a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 processor with fixed 4 GB of LPDDR4 memory, which is efficient but imposes clear limits on throughput and application scope. Performance testing produced read speeds up to 260 MB/s and writes in the 160–180 MB/s range, sufficient for the 2.5 GbE interface but reflective of the modest hardware and thermal constraints, with CPU temperatures often approaching 80°C under load. Software provides a clean interface with snapshots, RAID tools, backups to other UniFi NAS or cloud services, and user management tied to UniFi identity, but features such as iSCSI, encryption, and granular backup rules are absent. As a result, the UNAS 2 is best suited as a secondary or edge storage device, particularly for UniFi users seeking easy integration, but it lacks the scalability and depth of established NAS platforms needed for primary or enterprise deployments.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 10/10

VALUE - 9/10

8.4

PROS

Benefits from almost a year of development of the UNAS Pro by UniFi, resulting in a much more complete solution in both hardware and software
Exceptionally appealing price point
Extremely low impact (power use, noise level, physical scale all great)
Introduction of USB C 5Gb/s Connectivity is very welcome
Supports complete network/local access if preferred, as well as full remote connectivity with the UI.com account and site manager services
Wide Hard Drives and SATA SSD Support (UniFi branded drives and those from 3rd parties such as Seagate Ironwolf, WD Red and Toshiba N300)
Comprehensive network storage software in UniFi NAS OS and Drive.
Latest OS updates have included fan control, flexible RAID configurations, encrypted drive creation, customizable snapshots, more backup client choices/targets
\'Single Pane of Glass\' management and monitoring screen is very well presented!
One of the fastest to deploy turnkey NAS solutions I have ever personally used!

CONS

Single network port, though not a dealbreaker (as this is still just 2x SATA throughput), is not great in terms of a network failover or in deployment of SATA SSDs
Choice of PoE deployment unusual and limits some deployments
USB C connectivity does not support network adapters, NAS expansions or 3rd party UPS devices
Very modest base hardware, but understandable relative to the price
HDD injection is very unique, but it prevents hot swapping
Still a lack of client applications native to the NAS services for Windows, Mac, Android and Linux

You can buy the UniFi UNAS 2 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

UniFi UNAS 2 Review – Design

The UNAS 2 adopts a small desktop form factor, measuring 135 x 129 x 223.7 mm and weighing 1.3 kg. Its enclosure is constructed from polycarbonate, which makes it lighter and less industrial than the steel-based rackmount models in UniFi’s NAS range. The compact build is suited for environments where space is limited, and it operates within an ambient temperature range of -5 to 40°C and a humidity tolerance of 10–90% non-condensing. With only two drive bays, the UNAS 2 positions itself as an edge device for simple storage and backup, rather than a primary data management system.

Drive installation is handled through a single removable cage that holds both 3.5-inch drives. Each drive clips into place using a shared tray design, with both units inserted in opposite orientations to align with the SATA connectors. While this arrangement is functional, it has some limitations.

There is no support for hot swapping, meaning the system must be powered down before drives can be replaced. Additionally, the shared cage design requires both drives to be handled together, which increases the risk of disturbing a healthy drive when removing or replacing a failed one.

Cooling is managed by a small fan located at the rear, supported by passive ventilation channels at the base of the unit. Air is drawn in from underneath and expelled from the top section, ensuring airflow across the drives and the system board. Thermal tests recorded CPU temperatures in the range of 75–80°C during higher utilisation, with the chassis surface reaching around 39–50°C depending on workload.

The fan is adjustable via UniFi’s management interface, offering a choice between balanced operation and higher cooling at the expense of noise.

Noise levels ranged from 31–32 dBA in idle to 35–38 dBA under load, influenced heavily by the vibration of installed drives.

At the front of the unit, UniFi has integrated a 1.47-inch colour LCM display for system information. This provides basic details such as network status, storage health, and system alerts, but it is not touchscreen and cannot be used for configuration.

The lack of interactive control means that most management tasks still need to be handled through the UniFi OS console. LED indicators are also present for system status, and a physical locking mechanism is built into the drive cage, preventing accidental removal.

From a storage perspective, the UNAS 2 supports a simple RAID configuration for two drives, namely RAID 1, in addition to single-disk setup. Given the limitations of two-bay devices, RAID 1 is the most practical option, prioritising data protection over capacity.

The system officially supports large-capacity HDDs, with tests confirming compatibility up to 30 TB drives. However, there is no expansion capability through additional enclosures, and the single USB-C port on the front is limited to attaching external drives for storage or backups. This means users are confined to the internal two-bay maximum, making long-term planning important for deployment.

UniFi UNAS 2 Review – Internal Hardware

The UNAS 2 is built around a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 processor clocked at 1.7 GHz. This CPU architecture is designed for efficiency rather than high computational output, which makes it suitable for low-power storage operations, but less capable for advanced workloads such as virtualisation, heavy encryption, or on-the-fly media transcoding.

During testing, CPU temperatures generally remained in the 75–80°C range under sustained use, dropping closer to 50–60°C when idle or under light activity. While these figures fall within operating limits, they reflect the modest cooling design of the enclosure and the limited thermal headroom of the ARM-based hardware.

The device includes 4 GB of LPDDR4 memory, which is soldered to the board and cannot be expanded. This fixed allocation is sufficient for handling RAID 1 synchronisation, snapshots, and standard multi-user file operations, but it sets a ceiling on the system’s multitasking capability.

Unlike larger UniFi NAS models that feature 16 GB of memory, the UNAS 2’s hardware is intended only for light to moderate workloads. Memory use during testing reached high utilisation during RAID synchronisation but did not exceed available capacity, suggesting that UniFi has provisioned enough for the intended use case, while keeping the system constrained to its role as an entry-level solution.

The operating system is stored internally and runs independently of the installed drives, leaving both bays available for data. This separation ensures that the system can still boot even if both drives are removed or replaced. Storage management is limited to the basic RAID levels supported by two-bay systems, and no M.2 NVMe slots are included for caching or tiered storage, a feature reserved for larger UniFi NAS models. As such, the internal hardware of the UNAS 2 reflects its role as a secondary or edge device, designed primarily for straightforward storage and backup within a UniFi-managed network.

UniFi UNAS 2 Review – Connectivity & Performance

The UNAS 2 relies on a single 2.5 GbE RJ45 port for both data and power, with PoE++ providing up to 60W of combined budget. This integration reduces cabling and eliminates the need for an external power brick, but it introduces a single point of failure. That said, the UNAS 2 retail kit DOES include a PoE mains adapter, so ultimately the end user does have the option of deploying in a traditional manner (though power and network connectivity are still funnelled into the same connector).

If the cable or port fails, both power and connectivity are lost. A 60W PoE++ injector is included in the package for users without a compatible PoE++ switch, but this approach remains less flexible than traditional dual-port NAS designs. There is no secondary network interface, Wi-Fi connectivity (rare in a system of this scale, but would allow for failover if it was), support of a USB network adapter or option for link aggregation, which makes the system dependent on one connection for all network and power needs.

In addition to the Ethernet port, the front of the device includes a USB-C interface rated at 5 Gbps. This provides the ability to attach external storage devices, enabling data import, backups, or temporary storage expansion. However, the USB port is limited to storage and does not support network adapters, UPS integration, or official expansion enclosures. While the addition of USB-C addresses one omission from the UNAS Pro, its functionality is constrained and focused solely on external drive access.

Network throughput reflects the limitations of a dual-drive ARM-based NAS. In testing with two 8TB HDDs in RAID 1, sequential read speeds reached around 260 MB/s, while write speeds varied between 160–180 MB/s depending on workload. Benchmarks such as AJA and CrystalDiskMark confirmed this pattern, with read performance consistently higher than write due to the processor’s handling of RAID and data caching. These figures make effective use of the 2.5 GbE interface but leave no capacity to challenge higher multi-gigabit standards.

Power consumption aligns with UniFi’s published specifications, averaging 16–17W in idle, 18–20W during light activity, and 23–24W under heavier use. Peak usage during sustained transfers with RAID synchronisation reached approximately 25W, well below the 60W ceiling. Thermal monitoring showed the CPU rising toward 79–80°C under stress, though the chassis fan helped bring temperatures back into the 50–60°C range once load reduced. These results indicate that while the system operates within its defined limits, sustained workloads push the ARM processor and cooling system close to their maximum operating range.

Noise levels were modest, with idle operation producing around 31–32 dBA and workloads raising this to 35–38 dBA. The shared dual-drive cage design contributed to additional vibration, particularly when placed on a hard surface. Rubberised feet help dampen this effect, but vibration noise was noticeably reduced when the device was placed on softer material such as foam. Overall, while the system remains relatively quiet, its acoustic profile is closely tied to the drives selected and the surface it rests on.

• Network Interface: 1 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 (PoE++)

• USB Ports: 1 x USB-C (5 Gbps, storage only)

• PoE Power Budget: 60W (52W available for drives)

• Power Supply: 60W PoE++ injector included

• Max Consumption: 60W (typical 16–25W during use)

• Tested Performance: ~260 MB/s reads, 160–180 MB/s writes (RAID 1, HDDs)

• Noise Levels: 31–32 dBA idle, up to 38 dBA under load

• Temperature Range (Observed): 75–80°C CPU under stress, 50–60°C idle/light use

UniFi UNAS 2 Review – Software and Services

The UNAS 2 runs on UniFi’s NAS management platform, which follows the same single-pane-of-glass interface design seen in the UNAS Pro and UNAS Pro 8. Administration is carried out via a web browser or through a ui.com account, with the option to disable cloud access and operate the system entirely on a local network.

The interface consolidates system status, storage health, user accounts, and backup management into one dashboard. While straightforward to use, it does not provide the same level of customisation or feature depth offered by longer-established NAS operating systems such as Synology DSM or QNAP QTS.

Storage management is limited by the two-bay architecture. Users can create RAID 1 volumes, or operate drives independently. Drive health monitoring, temperature reporting, and snapshot scheduling are all included, allowing basic resilience and file recovery options.

Snapshots can be created and managed at the folder level, with the ability to lock snapshots to prevent deletion. Encryption, however, does not appear to be available on the UNAS 2, in contrast to larger UniFi NAS models where encrypted volumes are supported.

Backup functionality includes both system configuration and file-level options. Configuration backups can be stored locally or uploaded to a ui.com account, allowing the system to be restored quickly if reset or replaced. File-level backups extend to other UniFi NAS systems and selected cloud services, including Google Drive, with scheduling available for automation.

Local LAN backups to other storage devices via SMB are also supported, though filtering and exclusion rules are limited. The system is therefore capable of basic backup routines but lacks the more granular tools available on competing platforms.

User and access management is integrated into the UniFi ecosystem. Administrators can create local accounts or bind accounts to UniFi’s identity services, with two-factor authentication supported via the UniFi Verify app.

Permissions can be set at the folder level, and users can be restricted to LAN-only access if required. Supported protocols include SMB and NFS, but there is no iSCSI target functionality, limiting its application in virtualisation or editing workflows.

The software also includes fan control and system monitoring tools, but resource reporting is basic, with only CPU and memory utilisation graphs available.

Overall, the software reflects UniFi’s effort to balance simplicity with integration, but it remains less comprehensive than that of established NAS vendors.

UniFi UNAS 2 Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The UniFi UNAS 2 is presented as a compact and affordable two-bay NAS designed for straightforward storage and backup tasks, particularly within environments already using UniFi networking hardware. Its PoE++ design is distinctive, allowing both power and connectivity to be delivered over a single cable, simplifying installation where compatible PoE switches are available. This approach aligns with UniFi’s strategy of reducing external hardware requirements, though it also means that a failed port or damaged cable will disable both power and network access simultaneously. For non-UniFi users, the reliance on PoE++ creates an additional barrier, as adoption requires either compatible infrastructure or the included 60W injector. The shared dual-drive tray, lack of hot-swap support, and absence of expansion options further reinforce the system’s role as a fixed-capacity solution, best suited to smaller or secondary deployments. With a maximum drive budget of 52W and overall consumption limited to 60W, the device is power-efficient, but its architecture prioritises simplicity over flexibility.

On the software side, the UNAS 2 provides a user-friendly interface with access to snapshots, RAID configuration, system backups, and integration into the UniFi identity ecosystem. However, the limited hardware constrains the range of features available, and certain tools seen in UniFi’s larger NAS models are absent, such as encrypted volumes or extended network protocol support. Performance testing showed sequential read speeds up to 260 MB/s and write speeds around 160–180 MB/s, which make full use of the 2.5 GbE interface but leave little headroom for more demanding tasks. Thermals during extended use regularly pushed the CPU into the high 70s Celsius, and although fan management can be adjusted, sustained workloads highlight the limits of the system’s cooling design. The software’s omission of iSCSI and advanced backup filters also narrows its role, making it less competitive against established vendors in professional or virtualisation scenarios.

Ultimately, the UNAS 2 is most appropriately positioned as an edge or secondary NAS, providing basic networked storage for existing UniFi users who value plug-and-play deployment and ecosystem consistency, but it is not equipped to serve as a primary system in larger or more demanding environments (VMs, Containers, etc). A great and unique NAS that will nbe at it’s most appealing if you are already invested in the UniFi ecosystem, or have a NAS already that needs a network backup.

You can buy the UniFi UNAS 2 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...UniFi UPS Tower ReviewWeek 39 Tech Digest – Wi-Fi UniFi Launch the New UNAS 2, UUniFi UNAS Pro 8 ReviewUniFi Launch the New UNAS 2, UUniFi UNAS Pro 8 ReviewUniFi UNAS 2 ReviewNEW UniFi NAS - What Comes NexNEW UniFi NAS - What Comes NexWhere to Buy UniFI Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

La GeForce RTX 5060 8 Low Profil est annoncée au prix de 290 €. Quelles sont ses performances en Rasterisation, en Ray Tracing. Le 1440p est-il envisageable ?

Cet article Test GeForce RTX 5060 8 Go LP de Zotac a été publié en premier par GinjFo.

Source

Découvrez notre test du Geekom XT13 Pro : un mini PC puissant, économe en énergie, silencieux et compact, idéal pour la bureautique et le multimédia.

The post Test du Geekom XT13 Pro : un mini PC à 549 euros avec un Intel Core i9 first appeared on IT-Connect.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review

The GL.iNet Comet Pro is the company’s latest remote KVM (Keyboard, Video, Mouse) solution, launched on Kickstarter with shipping scheduled for December 2025. Unlike standard remote desktop tools that require a functioning operating system, a KVM device operates at a much lower level, providing access from cold boot and BIOS onward. This allows users to troubleshoot, install operating systems, and manage systems without direct physical interaction. Positioned as both an upgrade to GL.iNet’s original Comet KVM and as a potential rival to the JetKVM, which attracted considerable attention in 2024, the Comet Pro integrates more modern hardware and a larger feature set. The device includes a quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor, 1GB of DDR3 memory, 32GB of onboard eMMC storage, and a 2.22-inch touchscreen for configuration. Alongside HDMI passthrough supporting up to 4K at 30 FPS, it also incorporates Wi-Fi 6 connectivity, Gigabit Ethernet, and a range of accessory integrations such as an ATX power board and Fingerbot for remote power cycling. Early backers can pledge from $99, with campaign tiers running up to $155 depending on bundles, and at the time of writing, the campaign has surpassed £200,000 in pledges with more than 1,900 supporters.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Quick Conclusion

The Comet Pro is a compact KVM device that builds on the foundations of earlier solutions with stronger hardware, built-in storage, dual HDMI with passthrough, and both wired and Wi-Fi 6 connectivity, making it practical for local and remote management tasks. Its touchscreen interface, bundled cables, and accessory support via the ATX board and Fingerbot give it utility beyond basic KVM duties, while low power draw and stable thermals make it suitable for 24/7 use. However, its design also brings limitations, most notably the fixed 32GB eMMC storage with no expansion, the absence of PoE for simplified cabling, and just 1GB of RAM, which may restrict headroom for heavier workloads. Compared with the JetKVM, the Comet Pro is more expensive but offers significantly higher specifications, a more polished and consumer-ready experience, and wireless deployment options, whereas JetKVM appeals to those who prioritise affordability, open-source flexibility, and community-driven extensions. Ultimately, the Comet Pro is best suited for users seeking a stable, ready-to-use appliance, while JetKVM remains the choice for enthusiasts who prefer a leaner, hackable platform.

Important! This is not ‘traditional retail’, this is Crowdfunding!

It is important to note that the Comet Pro is currently a crowdfunding product and not a retail release. Backing through Kickstarter carries inherent risks, as funding a campaign does not guarantee delivery, nor does it ensure the final product will exactly match the early prototypes or promises made during the campaign. GL.iNet has a history of successfully shipping crowdfunded devices, but manufacturing delays, component shortages, or design changes can still occur. Potential backers should approach pledging with awareness of these risks and only commit funds they are comfortable waiting on until the estimated December 2025 shipping window, bearing in mind that schedules may shift.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Design

The Comet Pro adopts a compact desktop form factor measuring 93 × 84 × 47 mm and weighing just 170 g, making it small enough to sit discreetly on a desk or beside a server rack without occupying unnecessary space. Despite this minimal footprint, it integrates a 2.22-inch colour touchscreen on the front panel, which plays an important role in the day-to-day use of the device. This screen is not only employed during initial setup for Wi-Fi and PIN entry but also allows the user to directly toggle remote services on or off, adjust brightness, and check status information such as uptime or network configuration.

Unlike entry-level KVMs that demand all management through a browser, the inclusion of a touchscreen brings a more immediate, appliance-like feel to the unit. Heat management has also been considered, with the case designed with discreet venting along the underside to maintain airflow during continuous operation. In extended sessions, surface temperatures were recorded at up to 49°C at the base, but without throttling or stability issues, showing the design can sustain 24/7 deployment.

Visually, the device takes a utilitarian approach, using a clean matte finish and prioritising ease of connection rather than elaborate styling. One of the more practical design decisions is the use of full-sized HDMI input and output ports. Many compact alternatives rely on mini HDMI or adapter cables, which can create points of failure or add cost, whereas the Comet Pro provides standard connections that integrate directly with PCs, NAS units, or workstations.

The rear panel arranges all I/O in a straightforward, linear layout, including Ethernet, USB power, USB-A for accessories, and the dual HDMI ports, reducing clutter and keeping cable routing manageable. This makes the device particularly well suited for semi-permanent setups where it may sit behind a desk or alongside other networking gear. GL.iNet has also bundled a complete set of cables in the package, including HDMI, USB-C to USB-C, USB-C to USB-A, and Ethernet, ensuring the unit can be deployed without requiring third-party accessories.

Build quality and practicality are at the centre of the Comet Pro’s design choices. At under 200 g, it is easy to reposition, mount, or carry between locations, yet solid enough that it will not slide around when multiple cables are connected. The lack of Power over Ethernet (PoE) is one area that has already drawn attention, as many users favour a simplified single-cable setup that combines power and network.

Instead, the Pro model must rely on USB-C power delivery or its bundled 10 W PSU, which while flexible, requires additional cabling. GL.iNet has confirmed that PoE support is reserved for its separate Comet PoE model, meaning the Pro prioritises wireless and accessory integration instead. Even so, its physical layout and cable-friendly design suggest it is intended for regular use in homelabs, testing environments, or small professional deployments where convenience and low-profile form factor matter more than absolute minimal wiring.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Internal Hardware & Storage

Inside the Comet Pro, GL.iNet has opted for a quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor paired with 1GB of DDR3 memory. This is a significant step up from entry-level KVM devices that rely on single-core or lower-clocked CPUs with a fraction of the RAM. In practice, this extra horsepower allows the Comet Pro to handle simultaneous HDMI input and passthrough, touchscreen responsiveness, and background tasks like network services without becoming sluggish. During testing, the system was able to manage multiple connections while remaining responsive, though the limited RAM may still cap future feature expansions. The use of DDR3 memory rather than newer DDR4 or LPDDR standards reflects a balance between cost and compatibility, keeping the device affordable while still delivering adequate performance for its class.

For storage, the Comet Pro is equipped with 32GB of onboard eMMC. This capacity is well above the minimal storage seen in many competing KVM devices, and it serves two primary functions. First, it can be used to host multiple ISO images, allowing the user to boot or reinstall different operating systems remotely without attaching physical media. Second, it can act as a mounted USB drive that provides read and write access to files directly from the host system. While these features add flexibility, the storage has limits. The lack of an SD card slot or USB-based expansion option means the 32GB is fixed, and transfer speeds during testing averaged between 23–25 MB/s. This is sufficient for smaller ISO files or driver discs but noticeably slower when handling larger media.

The choice of eMMC storage also reflects GL.iNet’s attempt to balance convenience with simplicity. eMMC is compact, inexpensive, and integrated directly onto the board, reducing complexity compared to SATA or NVMe alternatives. However, this comes at the cost of speed and upgradability. For most use cases—boot images, firmware updates, and light file transfers—the built-in storage will suffice. Yet users hoping to load multiple large OS images or transfer substantial file sets may find the limits more apparent. Overall, the hardware inside the Comet Pro prioritises straightforward functionality and self-contained operation, providing just enough headroom to support modern usage without straying into higher-cost hardware that would push the device beyond its current Kickstarter pricing tiers.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Ports and Connections

The Comet Pro provides a straightforward but practical set of external connections designed to balance usability with broad compatibility. On the rear panel, users will find a Gigabit Ethernet port, USB-C power input, a USB-A accessory port, and two full-sized HDMI ports for input and output. Unlike some compact KVMs that opt for mini HDMI or USB-based video, GL.iNet has chosen to include full HDMI, reducing the reliance on adapters and making the unit easier to integrate directly into PCs, NAS systems, or servers. This makes it more suitable for users who want a clean installation without juggling conversion cables. The layout also keeps ports well separated, which helps prevent cable congestion when all are in use.

One of the standout design choices is the dual HDMI configuration, offering both an input for capturing video from the host system and a passthrough for maintaining a local display connection. This allows the device to operate in the background without interrupting a user’s normal monitor setup, an advantage for environments where physical access is still required while also keeping remote access enabled. The USB-A port expands functionality further by supporting accessories such as the optional ATX power board and Fingerbot, which extend control over physical system states. These add-ons use standard USB 2.0 signalling, keeping integration simple, while enabling functions like remote power cycling or triggering a hardware reset at the press of a button.

Networking is handled through a single RJ45 Gigabit Ethernet port alongside built-in Wi-Fi 6 support, giving the user flexibility between wired and wireless setups. While the Ethernet interface provides the most stable connection, the inclusion of dual-band Wi-Fi means the Comet Pro does not require a physical LAN cable in every scenario, broadening its deployment options for homelab users or portable testing environments. However, the device lacks Power over Ethernet (PoE) capability, meaning power and network must be provided separately. GL.iNet has directed PoE-focused users to their Comet PoE variant, leaving the Pro model better suited for those prioritising wireless convenience and accessory integration.

• 1 × RJ45 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000)

• 1 × USB Type-C (Power Input, 5V 2A with PD support)

• 1 × USB 2.0 Type-A (Accessory connection, e.g., ATX board, Fingerbot)

• 1 × HDMI Input (Full size)

• 1 × HDMI Output (Full size, passthrough up to 4K@30fps)

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Performance and Tests

In practical testing, the Comet Pro demonstrated stable operation across both local and remote connections. When deployed on a local area network over Gigabit Ethernet, video output remained smooth, with latency kept to levels that were difficult to notice in everyday use. The passthrough HDMI supported up to 4K at 30 FPS or 1080p at 60 FPS, making it suitable for both configuration tasks and lighter remote interaction. While not designed for high-performance gaming, the device handled operating system installations, BIOS configuration, and desktop navigation without visible delay. Remote testing via GL.iNet’s relay service also showed responsive behaviour, though these tests were conducted early in the campaign with relatively few users active, making it unclear how well the service will scale under heavier demand.

The device’s quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor and 1GB of RAM proved sufficient to manage transcoding and stream adjustments when accessing via browser or desktop applications. The integrated H.264 encoding allows the unit to downscale or compress the video feed to accommodate lower-bandwidth scenarios, ensuring remote sessions remained usable even when connection quality fluctuates.

Audio support, both through HDMI and USB, added another layer of functionality for remote collaboration or troubleshooting, though microphone activation required restarts to take effect. During prolonged use, the touchscreen interface remained responsive, and system access features such as security PINs and two-factor authentication functioned as expected, providing a secure operating baseline.

Storage performance, while not fast, was consistent. Writing data to the 32GB eMMC averaged between 23–25 MB/s, which was sufficient for uploading ISO images and driver discs but noticeably slower for large files. Virtual media mounting worked reliably, allowing ISO files to be presented to the host system as if they were locally connected USB drives.

File sharing via the remote mount function extended this further, making the KVM’s internal storage act as a conventional drive from within the connected operating system. This feature proved useful for transferring smaller files such as utilities or configuration scripts but was limited by the inherent speed of the eMMC storage.

Power consumption during testing remained low, with idle draw measured between 1.5 and 2.5 W and heavier operation drawing up to 4.5 W. Temperatures were also within safe limits, peaking at around 49°C under continuous use with all ports occupied. Importantly, the system did not throttle or show instability during extended testing periods.

While the absence of PoE limited deployment flexibility, the ability to power the device either via the included 10 W PSU or from a client USB port added some versatility. Taken as a whole, the performance tests suggest that the Comet Pro is capable of delivering reliable day-to-day remote access for administrative tasks, though it is not intended for high-throughput or latency-sensitive workloads.

• Video Output: 4K@30 FPS, 1080p@60 FPS

• Encoding: H.264 hardware encoding confirmed

• Average Latency: ~30–60 ms (local and remote, tested)

• Storage Write Speed: 23–25 MB/s (32GB eMMC)

• Idle Power Draw: 1.5–2.5 W

• Active Power Draw: Up to 4.5 W

• Operating Temperatures (Tested): 40–49°C surface depending on panel location

Comet Pro vs JetKVM – Which Should You Buy?

When comparing the Comet Pro to the JetKVM, the most immediate difference is in hardware resources. The Comet Pro offers a quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor, 1GB of DDR3 memory, and 32GB of eMMC storage, while the JetKVM relies on a single-core Cortex-A7 CPU with 256MB of RAM and either 4GB or 16GB of eMMC depending on version. This gives the Comet Pro considerably more capacity to handle multiple connections, virtual media, and remote management tasks. The inclusion of a larger 2.22-inch touchscreen further expands its usability, particularly for setup and local controls, whereas JetKVM uses a smaller 1.69-inch panel with more limited functions. From a purely technical perspective, the Comet Pro is the more capable unit, but this comes with a higher entry price.

Networking and connectivity also reveal differing priorities. The Comet Pro includes both Gigabit Ethernet and Wi-Fi 6 dual-band support, allowing deployment without wired LAN, while the JetKVM only provides a 100 Mbps Ethernet port and no wireless option. JetKVM compensates for this with a lightweight, open-source software stack built around WebRTC, which emphasises speed and hackability for developers. It also features an RJ11 extension port for add-ons such as ATX control boards and DC power modules, encouraging community-built extensions. The Comet Pro instead integrates accessory support through USB, offering officially developed add-ons like the ATX board and Fingerbot, but with less emphasis on third-party modification. In short, JetKVM is more open and extensible, while Comet Pro is more self-contained and focused on out-of-the-box deployment.

Price and ecosystem support are another dividing factor. JetKVM launched on Kickstarter at $69 and built momentum on being affordable, transparent, and entirely open source. The Comet Pro starts at $99 for early backers and scales up to $155 for bundles, reflecting its higher hardware cost and added features. JetKVM’s community-driven development and open licensing have made it popular with enthusiasts who value hackability and long-term flexibility, whereas GL.iNet’s approach with the Comet Pro aligns more with a polished, consumer-ready appliance that still integrates optional remote cloud services. Choosing between them comes down to priorities: those seeking raw affordability and open-source collaboration may lean toward JetKVM, while those preferring a more powerful, integrated, and wireless-capable KVM will find the Comet Pro the stronger candidate.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Conclusion & Verdict

The Comet Pro stands out as a more advanced and accessible interpretation of the compact KVM concept, incorporating stronger internal hardware, built-in storage for ISO management, and dual HDMI with passthrough that makes it practical for both remote and local use. The addition of Wi-Fi 6 support expands deployment flexibility, removing the need to always run physical network cables, while the integrated touchscreen interface allows for quick setup and control without relying solely on external software. During extended tests, it maintained stable operation with modest temperatures and low power consumption, making it suitable for continuous use in homelabs or small offices. The inclusion of accessory support, such as the ATX board for full remote boot control and the Fingerbot for physical power cycling, highlights GL.iNet’s attempt to broaden its appeal beyond simple KVM duties into more complete system management. At the same time, limitations such as fixed 32GB eMMC storage with no expansion options, reliance on external power rather than PoE, and the use of only 1GB of RAM show that the product remains firmly aimed at the consumer and prosumer segment rather than enterprise-grade installations.

When placed against the JetKVM, the decision largely depends on what the user values most in a remote management device. JetKVM has built its reputation on affordability, transparency, and openness, offering a $69 price point, an entirely open-source software stack, and an extension port that allows for custom add-ons developed by the community. For enthusiasts, developers, and those who prefer long-term flexibility, it remains an appealing choice.

In contrast, the Comet Pro arrives at a higher entry cost of $99–$155 depending on bundle but compensates with significantly stronger specifications, built-in wireless connectivity, and a more polished, consumer-ready experience that does not require modification or third-party involvement to be fully functional. Kickstarter progress, with more than £200,000 pledged and nearly 2,000 backers already, suggests demand for such a ready-made solution exists. For users who want a stable appliance with a straightforward setup process and modern hardware, the Comet Pro provides the stronger option. For those prioritising hackability and community-driven development above convenience, JetKVM remains the leaner and more customisable alternative.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...GL.iNet Comet Pro ReviewDo You NEED a WiFi 7 Travel RoGl.iNet Slate 7 WiFi 7 Travel GL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) PoGL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) PoGL.iNet Puli AX Mobile Router GL.iNet Puli AX Mobile Router Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Terramaster D4 SSD USB4 Enclosure Review

The Terramaster D4 SSD is a four-bay all-flash storage enclosure designed for high-speed external data handling over USB4 connectivity, offering bandwidth of up to 40Gbps. It accommodates four PCIe NVMe M.2 2280 SSDs, allowing a maximum raw capacity of 32TB when fitted with 8TB drives, with larger capacities possible pending future verification. Aimed at professional workflows such as media creation, high-resolution video production, and post-production editing, it is also marketed for gaming environments where low-latency loading and direct game installation are desired. The enclosure does not feature built-in RAID capabilities, instead operating in single-drive mode and relying on the host computer or third-party software for RAID management when required. Measuring 138 x 60 x 140 mm and weighing 392grams, it offers a compact footprint suitable for desktop or mobile editing setups. With active cooling via dual smart fans, wide voltage power input for flexible deployment, and compatibility across USB4, Thunderbolt 3/4/5, and USB 3.x interfaces, the D4 SSD is designed to integrate seamlessly with both Mac and Windows systems, including use as a Mac OS boot drive or as direct expansion for NAS devices with supported ports.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Quick Conclusion

The Terramaster D4 SSD is a compact four-bay USB4 NVMe enclosure that delivers high transfer speeds through dedicated PCIe Gen4 x1 lane allocation per drive, managed by the ASMedia ASM2464PDX controller for consistent scaling across single or multiple SSD configurations. While it lacks built-in hardware RAID, this simplifies design, reduces power draw, and allows users to manage RAID through their host system or software tools, offering flexibility for performance or redundancy needs. In testing, it sustained multi-gigabyte throughput under prolonged load without thermal throttling, aided by its dual smart-fan cooling system and low-noise operation, making it suitable for studios and mobile production environments. Its wide voltage input range supports power from standard laptop and mini-PC adapters, and cross-platform compatibility extends to Thunderbolt 3/4/5 and USB 3.x systems, with support for multiple file systems across macOS, Windows, and Linux. Best suited for professionals in media production, post-processing, and high-resolution video editing, the D4 SSD offers a strong balance of speed, efficiency, and portability, though buyers should account for the cost of high-capacity NVMe drives and may wish to add heatsinks for heavy workloads.

BUILD - 10/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.4

PROS

High-speed USB4 interface with up to 40Gbps bandwidth, delivering strong multi-bay NVMe performance.
Dedicated PCIe Gen4 x1 lane allocation per slot ensures predictable scaling without lane-sharing bottlenecks.
Compact and lightweight chassis with active cooling and low noise output, suitable for quiet work environments.
Cross-platform compatibility with Thunderbolt 3/4/5 and USB 3.x, supporting multiple file systems for macOS, Windows, and Linux use.
Low power consumption, even under full load, making it efficient for continuous operation.

CONS

No built-in hardware RAID functionality, requiring RAID to be managed by the host system or third-party software.
No included NVMe heatsinks, which may be needed for sustained heavy workloads.
Performance dependent on host system capabilities and RAID configuration, limiting maximum speeds in some setups.

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Terramaster D4 SSD Review -Design and Storage

The Terramaster D4 SSD adopts a compact and minimalist design that prioritises space efficiency while accommodating high-performance M.2 NVMe storage. The chassis is constructed with a combination of metal and reinforced plastic to balance durability with weight reduction, making it practical for desktop setups or mobile editing stations. Measuring 138mm in height, 60mm in width, and 140mm in depth, it has a footprint smaller than many portable RAID enclosures yet houses four internal M.2 2280 slots. Ventilation is a key part of the design, with perforations along the chassis and an internal airflow path from the bottom intake to the top exhaust. This airflow design is paired with a smart dual-fan system to keep temperatures stable under sustained workloads. The minimalist exterior is free of unnecessary styling, focusing instead on functionality and discrete operation in professional environments.

Internally, the storage layout is based entirely on NVMe architecture, with each of the four bays supporting PCIe Gen4 x1 bandwidth allocation. This ensures each SSD has dedicated lane access to maintain predictable throughput, rather than sharing limited controller bandwidth as seen in some lower-cost enclosures. The D4 SSD supports up to 8TB per drive, giving a maximum raw capacity of 32TB, though higher capacities may be supported as larger consumer and enterprise NVMe drives are verified. This design choice prioritises performance consistency and reduces the risk of bottlenecks, particularly when drives are accessed simultaneously for large file transfers or multi-stream media editing.

The enclosure is not equipped with a hardware RAID controller, meaning all drives operate in independent single-disk mode by default. Users wishing to configure RAID 0, 1, or other levels must do so using their operating system’s built-in storage management tools or third-party RAID software. This approach reduces internal complexity, lowers power draw, and avoids thermal buildup from additional processing hardware, but shifts configuration responsibility to the user. For some workflows, particularly those involving high-performance NVMe SSDs, host-managed RAID can still deliver substantial speed gains without affecting compatibility.

For cooling, the D4 SSD uses an active design with two 50mm temperature-controlled fans. These are managed by four onboard temperature sensors, adjusting fan speeds based on workload and heat generation. The airflow design is optimised to pass directly over the NVMe modules and the mainboard’s heat-generating components. While the unit does not include NVMe heatsinks by default, there is space to install aftermarket options if desired. Terramaster’s decision not to bundle heatsinks reflects a balance between cost and compatibility, as different SSDs have varying thermal needs, and some users may prefer specific heatsink designs.

From a noise and usability standpoint, the D4 SSD is intended to operate unobtrusively in environments such as home offices, studios, and editing suites. In standby mode with SSDs installed, the noise level is measured at 19dB(A), making it quieter than many desktop PCs and suitable for near-silent workspaces. Combined with its small physical footprint, this makes it a storage device that can be positioned close to the user without being a distraction, even under full load during extended transfers or media rendering sessions.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Internal Hardware

Inside the Terramaster D4 SSD, the hardware is built around a dedicated USB4 bridge controller, the ASMedia ASM2464PDX, which is designed to maintain high throughput across multiple NVMe drives without the lane bottleneck issues found in some lower-cost enclosures. Each M.2 slot is wired for PCIe Gen4 x1 bandwidth, providing up to 2,000MB/s potential per drive, which is then aggregated and managed through the USB4 interface.

This design ensures predictable scaling in both single-drive and multi-drive use, with performance closely tied to the host system’s RAID or file management configuration. The PCB is perforated in multiple areas to enhance passive airflow in conjunction with the active cooling fans, helping to maintain SSD performance during sustained workloads such as large file transfers or continuous video editing.

The storage slots themselves support PCIe NVMe M.2 2280 SSDs, making the D4 SSD compatible with a wide range of consumer and professional-grade drives. While the official capacity limit is listed as 8TB per drive, the enclosure is not restricted by proprietary firmware, allowing for potential support of larger modules as they become available. The absence of hardware RAID keeps internal processing simple, reducing latency and power draw, while allowing the enclosure to work equally well in macOS, Windows, and certain NAS expansion scenarios where the RAID logic is handled externally. Additionally, the enclosure supports multiple file systems including NTFS, APFS, exFAT, FAT32, and EXT4, depending on the host environment.

Power delivery to the enclosure is handled through a 24W external adapter, with a wide input voltage range of 12V to 20V for compatibility with common laptop and mini-PC power supplies. This not only makes it more versatile for travel or integration into mobile production setups but also reduces the need for proprietary adapters.

The included USB4 Type-C cable is 0.8m in length and rated for up to 80Gbps, significantly higher than the device’s 40Gbps requirement, ensuring minimal signal degradation over time. Thermal and power management are monitored by four internal sensors, which regulate the fan speeds to balance cooling and noise.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Connectivity

The Terramaster D4 SSD keeps its external connectivity simple, focusing on delivering the highest possible throughput over a single interface. The primary connection is a USB4 Type-C port located on the rear of the unit, providing up to 40Gbps of bandwidth when used with a compatible host device. This interface also ensures backward compatibility with Thunderbolt 3, Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 5, and USB 3.x standards, although maximum speeds will vary depending on the protocol supported by the connected system. This approach makes the D4 SSD suitable for a wide range of setups, from modern Mac computers and high-end Windows workstations to certain NAS devices that offer USB4 or Thunderbolt connectivity for expansion.

The unit does not draw power from the USB4 connection, which is essential given the requirements of running four NVMe drives under load. This separation ensures stable power delivery regardless of the workload, preventing thermal throttling or performance drops caused by insufficient bus power.

The only other physical interface elements are the cooling ventilation openings, the power button, and status indicators. The ventilation is positioned to support the enclosure’s top-to-bottom airflow, with exhaust positioned to avoid heat recirculation. The power button is recessed to prevent accidental shutdowns, and the indicator lights provide a quick visual status of drive activity. While the D4 SSD avoids additional ports such as USB hubs or SD card readers, this streamlined design prioritises stability and speed for storage operations, aligning with its role as a dedicated high-bandwidth storage enclosure rather than a multifunction docking station.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Performance and Tests

In practical testing, the Terramaster D4 SSD demonstrated performance levels consistent with the capabilities of its USB4 interface and internal PCIe lane allocation. When fitted with a single PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and connected to a compatible Windows host system, sequential transfer rates reached around 1,480MB/s for reads and 1,140MB/s for writes in CrystalDiskMark, with mixed 70/30 read/write workloads averaging 1,286MB/s.

AJA System Test results with a repeated 1GB file showed roughly 1,400MB/s read and 1,300MB/s write, while ATTO Disk Benchmark recorded peaks of 1.57GB/s read and up to 1.5GB/s write.

These results represent roughly three-quarters of the theoretical maximum per-lane Gen4 x1 performance, with minor variations attributable to SSD model and host configuration.

With four SSDs installed and configured in RAID 0 via Windows Disk Management, throughput scaled significantly.

In AJA testing, read speeds reached 2,500MB/s and writes 2,300MB/s. CrystalDiskMark produced 2,047MB/s reads and 1,927MB/s writes in sequential tests, with mixed workloads at around 1,799MB/s.

ATTO testing peaked at approximately 2.93GB/s read and 2.66GB/s write. These figures are below the absolute maximum possible for USB4 but remain strong for a host-managed RAID array without dedicated hardware acceleration.

The results indicate that with a more capable RAID implementation, sustained speeds above 3GB/s would be achievable, making the D4 SSD suitable for high-bandwidth applications such as multi-stream 4K or 6K video editing. Thermal performance was another key testing area given the high-speed NVMe drives involved. Under sustained load with all four SSDs active, the enclosure’s dual-fan cooling system maintained stable operating temperatures without noticeable thermal throttling. Noise output, even at maximum fan speed, remained low enough for close-proximity use in an editing suite or home office. The absence of included NVMe heatsinks did not lead to significant overheating in tests, though installing aftermarket heatsinks could be beneficial for prolonged heavy workloads or in warmer environments.

Power consumption measurements showed efficient operation relative to its performance. With all drives in hibernation, draw was close to 1W; in standby, it was 3–4W; and at full load, the system used only 5–6W. This efficiency, combined with the wide voltage input support, makes the D4 SSD practical for mobile production setups and continuous desktop use without significant power overhead. Compatibility was confirmed across both macOS and Windows systems, with macOS tests achieving up to 3,257MB/s reads and 3,192MB/s writes using four Samsung 990 PRO 4TB SSDs in RAID 0 on a Mac mini with an Apple M4 chip.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The Terramaster D4 SSD positions itself as a compact, high-speed, and flexible all-flash enclosure for users who require consistent bandwidth and expandable capacity over USB4. Its PCIe Gen4 x1 lane allocation per drive, paired with the ASMedia ASM2464PDX controller, ensures that performance scales predictably from single-drive use to fully populated configurations without the bottlenecks common in lower-end enclosures that multiplex lanes. While the absence of built-in hardware RAID will be seen as a limitation for users wanting an all-in-one solution, the decision to leave RAID management to the host system helps keep the enclosure’s design simpler, power consumption lower, and thermal output under better control. This host-managed approach also allows greater flexibility in choosing software RAID solutions optimised for specific workflows, whether for performance (RAID 0), redundancy (RAID 1), or other advanced configurations. Combined with its small footprint, professional-grade cooling, and wide voltage input range, the D4 SSD fits naturally into both fixed and mobile setups where reliable sustained throughput is essential.

From a value and application standpoint, the D4 SSD’s test results put it among the faster multi-bay USB4 NVMe enclosures currently available, especially given its ability to sustain multi-gigabyte transfers under prolonged load without thermal throttling. It is particularly well-suited to professionals in media production, post-processing, and high-resolution video editing who need large, portable, and quiet storage capable of handling multiple uncompressed video streams in real time. The unit’s quiet operation, even when all drives are active, makes it practical for use in audio-sensitive environments, and its compatibility with Thunderbolt 3, 4, and 5 as well as USB 3.x protocols expands its usability across a wide variety of systems. Potential buyers should, however, factor in the additional cost of populating all four slots with high-capacity NVMe SSDs and consider adding aftermarket heatsinks for continuous heavy workloads, as none are included. For those who already operate in environments where RAID is managed externally or within the operating system, the D4 SSD represents a balanced combination of speed, efficiency, and build quality that should appeal to both Windows and macOS professionals seeking long-term, high-performance storage expansion.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Amazon Prime Big Deal Day StorTerramaster Prime Day Deals OcHow to Make the UGREEN US3000 Week 34 Tech Roundup – UnraiWeek 33 Tech Roundup – TerraTerramaster D1 SSD ReviewTerramaster D4 SSD ReviewTerramaster D1 SSD ReviewTerramaster F4 SSD NAS ReviewTerramaster F4 SSD NAS Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

 Synology DS425+ Review – Should You Buy This NAS?

The Synology DS425+ is a 4-bay NAS system launched in mid-2025 as part of the company’s continued refresh of its Plus Series product line, replacing the DS423+. It is designed to serve home power users, creative professionals, and small business environments that require a balance of reliable storage, streamlined software integration, and modest multimedia capabilities. The unit retains a familiar chassis and architecture, featuring the Intel Celeron J4125 quad-core processor (2.0 GHz base, 2.7 GHz burst) with integrated graphics support, 2GB of soldered DDR4 memory (expandable up to 6GB with an additional 4GB Synology module), and two M.2 NVMe slots intended primarily for SSD caching using Synology-verified drives.

Alongside this hardware, the DS425+ runs DSM 7.2 and includes the full suite of Synology services, such as Active Backup, Surveillance Station, Virtual Machine Manager, Synology Drive, and Hybrid RAID (SHR) support. Network connectivity is handled by a single 2.5GbE and a 1GbE port, while two USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports enable external storage or UPS integration. Despite minimal hardware changes over its predecessor, the DS425+ demonstrates Synology’s continued focus on efficiency, low noise output, and energy-conscious operation—important factors for users planning to run a 24/7 NAS. However, these choices also reflect broader changes in Synology’s platform strategy that may not suit every user, especially those seeking higher flexibility or modern internal specifications.

SOFTWARE - 10/10

HARDWARE - 4/10

PERFORMANCE - 6/10

PRICE - 6/10

VALUE - 7/10

6.6

PROS

DSM 7.2 Operating System: Offers a rich suite of first-party apps including Active Backup, Surveillance Station, Synology Drive, and Hyper Backup with strong cross-platform support.
Low Noise and Power Consumption: Quiet 92mm fan setup and efficient power usage (~28W under load) make it ideal for 24/7 operation in home or office environments.
Integrated Graphics (Intel UHD 600): Supports light Plex or Jellyfin hardware transcoding for 1080p media, a rare inclusion in Synology’s 2025 lineup.
Compact and Versatile Design: Small chassis with 4 SATA bays and 2 M.2 NVMe slots for cache acceleration, supporting RAID 5/6 and SHR.
Strong Security Posture: Includes 2FA, SSL, VPN tools, and a proactive PSIRT vulnerability disclosure program for ongoing protection.
Good Thermal Management: Maintains stable drive and system temperatures (~32–35°C) even under moderate load.
Broad Software Ecosystem: Additional apps like Synology Photos, Chat, Office, and Drive make it a multi-functional NAS beyond just storage.

CONS

Strict Drive Compatibility: Requires Synology-only HDDs and SSDs for full functionality; third-party drives trigger warnings or are blocked entirely.
Outdated CPU Platform: Uses a 2019-era Intel J4125 CPU, now underpowered compared to newer Intel N-series or AMD embedded chips.
Memory Upgrade Limitations: Comes with 2GB soldered RAM, upgradeable to only 6GB total, and officially supports Synology-branded memory only.
Limited Connectivity and I/O: No PCIe, eSATA, or SD card support; only one 2.5GbE and two 5Gbps USB ports—lagging behind competitors in 2025.

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

DSM Software Ecosystem and Integration

One of the most compelling reasons to consider the DS425+ is its support for Synology’s DiskStation Manager (DSM), a mature and highly integrated NAS operating system. DSM 7.2, which comes preinstalled, offers a unified and consistent user experience with a wide range of built-in applications tailored for home users, remote workers, and small office setups. Core tools like Active Backup for Business allow centralized backup of entire operating systems, folders, and virtual machines, making the DS425+ useful as a bare-metal recovery or disaster recovery node. Hyper Backup enables encrypted, versioned backups to local, remote, or cloud destinations, while tools like Snapshot Replication provide rapid rollbacks and protection against ransomware.

Synology also offers sector-specific solutions through packages like Surveillance Station and Virtual Machine Manager, the former allowing support for up to 40 cameras (with up to 800FPS at 1080p H.264), and the latter providing basic VM hosting for Linux and lightweight Windows workloads. These tools are tightly optimized for the hardware, with low overhead and accessible browser-based management. Furthermore, the DS425+ supports Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR), giving users more flexibility when mixing drive capacities and minimizing unused storage space compared to traditional RAID models.

DSM extends beyond simple storage management by including companion apps like Synology Photos, Drive, and Chat, all of which are compatible with Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS. The DS425+ integrates these tools with centralized user management, group permissions, and support for LDAP and Active Directory.

For users who value reliability, Synology’s proactive security strategy—including its public security advisories, pen-testing initiatives, and in-house incident response—adds extra confidence to the long-term stability and safety of the system. In many cases, users report that the simplicity and polish of DSM is what keeps them loyal to the Synology platform, even when hardware specifications appear modest.

Strict Drive Compatibility and Locked Storage Expansion

One of the most significant limitations of the DS425+ is its strict enforcement of Synology-only drive compatibility, particularly for both 3.5″ HDDs and M.2 NVMe SSDs. As of mid-2025, this model only allows full functionality when paired with Synology-branded drives, such as the HAT5300 series for hard disks or SNV3410/3510 for SSDs.

If users attempt to install non-Synology drives—even widely used options like Seagate IronWolf or WD Red—the system will either block the drives entirely or present warnings and restrict key functionality, such as RAID rebuild, hot spare assignment, or expansion. This policy represents a significant departure from Synology’s historically broader compatibility stance and has become a source of ongoing controversy among users and reviewers alike.

From a practical standpoint, this limitation can result in higher upfront costs, reduced flexibility in sourcing drives, and long-term concerns about availability and vendor lock-in. For example, Synology’s high-capacity enterprise HDDs are often difficult to find in retail channels and may be priced at a premium compared to similar offerings from Seagate or Toshiba.

Users migrating from older Synology systems who want to reuse perfectly functional drives may find themselves unable to do so, as the new system won’t allow proper array recovery or expansion unless all drives meet the strict compatibility criteria. While this approach enables Synology to tightly optimize performance and reliability, it effectively turns the DS425+ into a semi-proprietary ecosystem where even core storage components are vendor-restricted.

This is particularly frustrating for experienced NAS users who expect to mix and match drives or who run environments where hardware recycling and drive lifecycle management are critical. The decision also impacts future-proofing: users who want to grow their arrays over time must now ensure drive stock alignment with Synology’s approved list, which may change over time or vary by region. Despite DSM’s strengths, this hard stance on compatibility significantly undermines one of the key selling points of NAS platforms—modularity—and could be a dealbreaker for value-conscious users or those with existing disk investments.

Low Noise and Power Efficiency for 24/7 Use

Another advantage of the DS425+ lies in its energy-efficient and acoustically quiet design, which makes it highly suitable for constant operation in homes, studios, or office environments where noise and heat are critical considerations. Based on extended testing, the system consumes just 28.25W under access load and drops to as low as 6.10W in HDD hibernation, making it one of the more economical NAS units in its class when measured over long-term 24/7 usage.

Even when populated with four 4TB hard drives and placed under sustained load, real-world power draw rarely exceeded 44W during high CPU utilization. This is further aided by the relatively low thermal output, with ambient casing temperatures measured around 32°C and drive bays stabilizing at just 35°C under load.

In terms of acoustic performance, the DS425+ is equipped with two 92mm fans, and noise testing shows the system remains quiet enough for close-proximity deployment. In idle mode with the fans on their lowest profile, it registers a sound level between 36 to 38 dB(A), which increases only moderately under load or at medium fan speed. Even when the system was manually set to full fan speed with high drive activity, noise output peaked at 53 dB(A)—still manageable for most non-silent workspaces. This operational profile makes the DS425+ appealing to users seeking a low-maintenance NAS that can be discreetly placed in a shared room, office, or AV rack without introducing unwanted distraction or thermal buildup.

This power and noise behavior also helps prolong component lifespan, particularly in warmer climates or enclosed cabinets, and supports use cases like 24/7 media server operation, offsite backups, or even small-scale CCTV archiving. Importantly, despite these low operating figures, the DS425+ still maintains stability and consistent throughput thanks to the efficiency of the J4125 processor and DSM’s power-aware service management. These characteristics, often underappreciated in specs alone, make it especially suitable for those who want reliable long-term uptime without high energy costs or acoustic interference.

Memory Limitations and Unorthodox Upgrade Path

The DS425+ comes with 2GB of DDR4 memory soldered directly to the motherboard, which is low by 2025 standards even for entry-level NAS devices. While it includes an additional memory slot that allows for the installation of a single 4GB module, the system officially supports a maximum of just 6GB of total RAM. This is an unusual and restrictive configuration, especially when many modern NAS devices now ship with 4GB or 8GB by default, and support 16GB or more—sometimes with dual-channel configurations for better performance. Synology’s strict validation policy also means that only their branded RAM (e.g. D4NESO-2666-4G) is fully supported, and installing third-party modules can trigger warnings in DSM or potentially void support coverage.

This memory ceiling becomes problematic when running DSM features that scale with RAM usage, such as Synology Drive, Snapshot Replication, Virtual Machine Manager, or Surveillance Station. As observed during testing, the DS425+ routinely used 27–38% of its available memory at idle, even without third-party packages installed. This is largely due to DSM’s intelligent memory caching system, which improves performance but leaves little headroom for user-defined workloads. Once additional services or multimedia indexing tasks are introduced, memory utilization climbs quickly, increasing the risk of slowdowns, swap usage, or outright service failure under peak demand.

For users who intend to deploy containers, host multiple camera feeds, or run even a small number of VMs, this limitation may lead to bottlenecks sooner than expected. It also makes the DS425+ a less viable choice for future expansion or multi-user environments. Unlike other NAS brands that allow full third-party upgrade freedom—or systems with dual RAM slots and broader capacity support—Synology’s enforced limitations here represent another example of the platform’s increasingly locked-down approach. For a system marketed to prosumers, the inability to exceed 6GB RAM comfortably is a notable technical and strategic constraint.

Integrated Graphics for Light Media Transcoding

Unlike many NAS units in this price tier, the DS425+ includes an Intel Celeron J4125 processor with integrated Intel UHD Graphics 600, which unlocks hardware-accelerated video decoding and transcoding in supported applications like Plex or Jellyfin. This makes the DS425+ one of the few Synology models in 2025 that still offers integrated GPU support out of the box, especially as newer Synology models with more recent CPUs have increasingly omitted integrated graphics. While the DS425+ is not intended to replace a dedicated media server, its GPU can significantly improve performance and efficiency for on-the-fly transcoding of formats like H.264 and H.265 (HEVC), particularly when streaming to remote clients with bandwidth constraints.

In real-world usage scenarios, this means the DS425+ can handle direct streaming and limited transcoding of 1080p content without overwhelming the CPU, provided the source formats are within the GPU’s supported codec list. During Plex testing, the DS425+ performed adequately with one or two 1080p transcodes running simultaneously, and was also able to manage basic 4K downscaling if the codec was natively supported by the hardware. For home users who have mixed devices—such as smart TVs, mobile devices, and tablets that vary in codec support—the presence of hardware transcoding offers improved flexibility without requiring as much manual conversion or format standardization of their media library.

Additionally, Synology’s native multimedia applications such as Surveillance Station and Synology Photos also benefit from GPU acceleration, helping speed up thumbnail generation, indexing, and playback, especially for high-resolution image and video collections. While raw CPU power in the DS425+ is modest by 2025 standards, the inclusion of integrated graphics helps balance out performance for lightweight graphical workloads and makes the system more viable as a general-purpose media hub. For users considering a NAS for Plex, family media streaming, or small business content previews, this capability adds meaningful value—especially since few modern Synology NAS devices still include Intel-based chips with iGPU support.

Outdated CPU Platform and Limited Performance Headroom

The DS425+ ships with the Intel Celeron J4125, a 4-core, 4-thread processor that was originally launched in late 2019. While it offers modest performance and includes integrated graphics, the J4125 is now significantly behind modern alternatives in both efficiency and raw compute power. Intel itself has discontinued the Celeron branding entirely, moving toward newer architectures like Alder Lake-N and Jasper Lake, which offer improved IPC (instructions per cycle), higher core/thread counts, and better thermal efficiency—all while retaining low power consumption. In comparison, the J4125’s aging 14nm Gemini Lake architecture struggles with heavier multitasking, especially when running services like virtual machines, surveillance workloads, or multiple Docker containers in parallel.

Synology has retained this CPU across several generations of its 2- and 4-bay Plus series models, which makes the DS425+ feel less like a generational upgrade and more like a lateral move. During performance testing, the unit handled DSM core tasks and multimedia indexing smoothly, but CPU load increased sharply under heavier tasks such as simultaneous Surveillance Station streams, Hyper Backup routines, or basic VM instances.

This limited headroom constrains the DS425+ to light-to-moderate workloads, and it can bottleneck more quickly than newer systems from other brands using more recent Intel N-series or AMD Ryzen Embedded CPUs. This is especially important as DSM continues to add new features that may increase background resource consumption over time.

Additionally, the CPU’s lack of support for modern instruction sets or features like AVX can limit compatibility with certain Docker containers or third-party applications that expect more recent hardware. While the DS425+ can serve well as a general-purpose file server or light media NAS, it’s not suited for users who anticipate growth into heavier mixed-use deployments. In a 2025 market where many similarly priced NAS units offer 6- or 8-core CPUs and PCIe Gen 3 or 4 support, the DS425+ feels constrained and unlikely to age well for users with evolving or expanding workloads.

Compact Form Factor with Versatile Storage Options

The DS425+ offers a space-efficient chassis design that houses four 3.5″/2.5″ SATA drive bays, along with two M.2 2280 NVMe SSD slots for caching. This provides a versatile platform for users who want flexible storage layouts without moving to a physically larger or more expensive rackmount or tower system.

The vertical orientation of the chassis, measuring just 166 x 199 x 223 mm, makes it easy to deploy the device in tight workspaces, shelving units, or beneath desks—ideal for small offices, home studios, or AV setups where space is at a premium. Despite its small footprint, the device retains full support for key RAID configurations including SHR, RAID 5/6/10, and JBOD, and offers hot-swappable access to the main drive bays for ease of maintenance.

The inclusion of two M.2 NVMe slots on the base of the unit allows users to improve performance through read/write caching without sacrificing primary drive bays. Although these M.2 slots are limited to Synology-verified SSDs and are not usable for storage pools, they can still offer significant boosts to random I/O performance in multi-user environments or when used with demanding workloads like Synology Drive or VM hosting. Combined with support for SSD TRIM and smart cache algorithms within DSM, the system can be tuned to optimize response times during high-access periods without introducing large amounts of memory overhead.

From a practical standpoint, this layout is beneficial for users managing multiple storage tiers, such as a mix of large-capacity HDDs for archiving and faster SSDs for active projects or virtual machines. Furthermore, the DS425+ supports volume expansion using larger capacity drives, RAID migration options (e.g. from Basic to RAID 5 or RAID 5 to RAID 6), and up to 32 internal volumes, giving users enough headroom for future scaling. These features, while standard in DSM, are fully supported in this chassis and make it easier to adapt the NAS as storage needs evolve—without the need to start from scratch or invest in a new enclosure.

Limited I/O and Underwhelming Connectivity for the Price

While the DS425+ introduces a 2.5GbE network port alongside a legacy 1GbE port, the rest of its I/O configuration is relatively limited and arguably outdated compared to competitors in its price range. The system includes just two USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, both of which operate at 5Gbps rather than the more modern 10Gbps (Gen 2) speeds that are increasingly common in 2025. There is no SD card slot, no eSATA or PCIe expansion slot, and no HDMI output, all of which are features now appearing on rival NAS systems from QNAP, TerraMaster, and UGREEN—even at similar or lower price points. These omissions restrict how the device can be expanded or integrated into more complex workflows, such as direct-attached backup targets, external GPU support, or quick media ingestion.

The presence of only a single 2.5GbE port also imposes a bottleneck for users wanting to make full use of SSD caching or high-throughput RAID configurations. There is no support for link aggregation, as the 1GbE and 2.5GbE ports cannot be bonded in a meaningful way, and the system lacks support for 5GbE or 10GbE—either onboard or via expansion. In scenarios where large video files, virtual machine images, or multiple users are simultaneously accessing data, the NAS may become network-bound more quickly than other models with multi-GbE or SFP+ connectivity.

Furthermore, while DSM offers support for USB peripherals such as external drives and UPS devices, the limited port count and bandwidth mean there is little headroom for simultaneous external expansions, and the brand limits the support of USB peripherals for security reasons. For example, attaching both an external drive and a USB-connected UPS may require unplugging one to rotate in another device. This may not impact casual home users, but for power users managing workflows like video editing, offsite rotation backups, or multi-location file sync, this level of I/O flexibility feels dated. When factoring in the DS425+’s pricing, which places it near many NAS models with more expansive I/O, this minimalism can be a significant drawback.

Strong Security Framework and Proactive Vulnerability Management

The DS425+ benefits from Synology’s broader emphasis on security, offering a robust framework for data protection, secure remote access, and proactive threat mitigation. DSM includes built-in tools such as firewall rules, auto-blocking of suspicious IPs, HTTPS configuration, and native integration with Let’s Encrypt for SSL certificates. Two-factor authentication (2FA) can be enforced per user or globally, and built-in VPN server options (including OpenVPN and L2TP/IPSec) provide secure tunnels for remote workers or offsite access. For businesses or power users hosting sensitive data, the inclusion of AES-NI hardware encryption ensures efficient at-rest protection without drastically impacting system performance.

What sets Synology apart is its ongoing commitment to security research and response. The company operates a public-facing Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) and regularly updates a detailed security advisory page disclosing vulnerabilities and their mitigations. Synology also participates in Pwn2Own, a white-hat hacking competition, and runs internal bug bounty programs to uncover and patch exploits before they are discovered in the wild. This culture of transparency and preemptive action is especially valuable as NAS devices become more frequently targeted by malware and ransomware threats, particularly those exposed to the internet or used in hybrid cloud workflows.

Additionally, many DSM apps include granular permission management, audit logs, and user-based access rules, giving administrators tight control over file shares, backup targets, and service access. Synology’s Hybrid Share and Cloud Sync tools support end-to-end encryption and offer options to decouple cloud storage keys from the local system, further strengthening data sovereignty. For users concerned with long-term viability and platform trust, Synology’s structured and well-documented security practices help the DS425+ stand out against competitors that may offer more hardware but less attention to software and infrastructure hardening. This makes it a viable choice for users prioritizing data safety in either personal or professional contexts.

Questionable Long-Term Value Amid Shifting Synology Strategy

Another concern with the DS425+ is its position within Synology’s evolving product strategy, which raises questions about long-term support and ecosystem focus. Synology has recently been expanding its BeeStation and BeeStation Plus lines—pre-populated, user-friendly NAS solutions that share similar hardware (in some cases, the same J4125 CPU), but are bundled with drives and offer a simplified DSM variant tailored for general consumers. These systems, while more limited in scope, are marketed as turnkey alternatives with lower pricing and fewer user-configurable components. The DS425+, by contrast, sits awkwardly between Synology’s increasingly restrictive hardware requirements and the emerging shift toward closed, fully managed platforms.

This change in trajectory creates uncertainty for prospective buyers looking for a long-term investment. If Synology continues prioritizing its proprietary hardware and software pairings, users who prefer modularity, drive freedom, or advanced customization may find themselves increasingly constrained. As already noted, the DS425+ enforces tight compatibility rules, limits memory expansion, and restricts NVMe usage to caching only. At the same time, Synology is streamlining its portfolio around devices with even stricter limitations but more mass-market appeal. This raises the possibility that traditional “Plus” models like the DS425+ may be sidelined or see fewer feature updates in future DSM releases, as Synology shifts development toward more controlled environments.

From a cost perspective, the DS425+ is priced around $519, placing it uncomfortably close to more powerful third-party NAS systems that offer better CPUs, more RAM, and greater I/O flexibility. Competing brands frequently offer 4-bay systems with modern N-series Intel processors or embedded AMD chips, 8GB+ of memory, and faster networking, often for the same or lower price. As a result, the DS425+ risks being outclassed not only by its competition, but by Synology’s own growing lineup of prepackaged solutions. Users investing in the DS425+ today may find themselves limited not just by current specs, but by an ecosystem slowly drifting away from the prosumer and enthusiast segment this model was originally meant to serve.

Synology DS425+ NAS Review – Conclusion and Verdict

The Synology DS425+ presents a mixed proposition in 2025. On one hand, it remains a competent 4-bay NAS solution for users prioritizing software integration, low power operation, and quiet, reliable 24/7 usage. Its support for DSM 7.2 and the full suite of Synology applications—ranging from Active Backup to Surveillance Station and Synology Drive—makes it a strong turnkey platform for general-purpose storage, backup, and multimedia needs. Integrated graphics give it an edge in light media streaming scenarios, and its support for M.2 NVMe caching allows for performance optimization without occupying drive bays. It’s a well-built device that continues to “just work,” particularly in home and small office setups where reliability, simplicity, and refined software matter more than raw horsepower.

However, these strengths are increasingly offset by hardware limitations and Synology’s increasingly restrictive ecosystem. The soldered 2GB of RAM, locked 6GB memory ceiling, outdated CPU, limited I/O, and especially the enforced use of Synology-only drives all hinder flexibility and long-term value. When compared to similarly priced alternatives from competing NAS vendors—many of which offer newer processors, faster ports, and full hardware freedom—the DS425+ can feel constrained and overpriced. In addition, Synology’s expanding focus on pre-populated BeeStation devices suggests a possible shift away from traditional DIY-friendly models like this one. For users who are already invested in the Synology ecosystem or who value DSM above all else, the DS425+ may still be a worthwhile buy. But for those seeking hardware scalability, third-party compatibility, or better price-to-performance, it may be worth considering other options or waiting to see how Synology’s roadmap evolves.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Week 41 Tech Digest – SynoloSynology DSM 7.3 - Should You Synology DSM 7.3 NAS - HDD/SSDSynology DSM 7.3 NAS - Full DeSYNOLOGY SUPPORT SEAGATE & WD Amazon Prime Day Deals - The BUniFi UPS Tower ReviewAmazon Prime Big Deal Day StorSharge Disk Pro ReviewUGREEN DXP4800 PLUS vs DH4300 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

GMKTec G9 NAS (New Improved Cooling Version) Review

Important – My original review of the GMKTec G9 NAS in it’s original design can be found HERE on YouTube and HERE on the NASCompares blog.

The GMKTec G9 NucBox NAS has re-emerged in mid-2025 with a revised cooling design, following a wave of thermal criticism directed at the original release earlier in the year. Still marketed as an SSD-only NAS aimed at home and small office environments, the G9 maintains its core identity—a compact enclosure powered by Intel’s N150 quad-core processor, soldered LPDDR5 memory, and four M.2 NVMe SSD bays. The G9’s primary appeal continues to be its affordability, silent operation, and dual-use flexibility as both a NAS and lightweight desktop system, thanks to the inclusion of Windows 11 Pro and Ubuntu out of the box. However, early buyers and reviewers, including this channel, highlighted persistent thermal issues affecting SSD performance and overall system reliability under load, leading to thermal throttling even during idle states in warmer environments.

In response, GMKTec has issued an updated version of the G9 that retains the same form factor, internal hardware, and I/O but incorporates enhanced passive ventilation on the side and top panels. Though subtle at first glance, these structural changes are designed to improve airflow over the CPU and SSD compartments without increasing noise levels or power draw. In this updated review, we will revisit all aspects of the G9’s design, connectivity, and system behaviour under continuous load, while highlighting what exactly has changed and what remains untouched. The new G9 model introduces targeted thermal improvements, but beyond ventilation, it leaves the original architecture and feature set entirely intact.

GMKTec G9 Ver.2 NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

The improved GMKTec G9 NAS represents a targeted refinement rather than a full redesign, addressing the primary weakness of the original model: inadequate thermal performance. The updated version introduces enlarged ventilation cutouts on the top panel above the CPU fan and replaces the pinhole rear exhaust with a wider mesh, leading to measurable but modest reductions in system temperatures. In 48-hour test scenarios using UnRAID with hourly backup tasks, SSDs without heatsinks in the original unit reached idle temperatures of 66–67°C, while the revised model brought this down to 56–57°C. CPU vent temperatures similarly dropped from 54–56°C to 50–52°C, and rear I/O areas cooled by 5–7°C. These improvements enhance stability during sustained I/O activity but do not eliminate the need for additional SSD cooling—particularly in environments where ambient heat or multi-user access is expected. Internally, the hardware remains unchanged: Intel N150 CPU, 12GB of non-upgradable LPDDR5 memory, four PCIe Gen 3 x2 M.2 NVMe bays, and dual 2.5GbE ports, with storage and network throughput consistent with entry-level expectations. Power consumption remains efficient (19–30W), and noise levels stay low at under 40dB, making it suitable for always-on deployment. However, the continued use of a plastic chassis and base panel still limits effective heat dissipation, and the absence of thermal sensors or fan curve controls further limits its thermal adaptability. Compared to the Xyber Hydra—featuring a metal base, better SSD thermal contact, and 16GB RAM—the G9 now performs better than before but still falls short of what its hardware could achieve with more thoughtful engineering. For users willing to invest in SSD heatsinks and mindful of its limitations, the G9 is now a reasonably balanced entry NAS, though not the strongest performer in its tier.

BUILD QUALITY - 6/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 6/10

PRICE - 10/10

VALUE - 9/10

7.6

PROS

Affordable price point for a 4-bay NVMe NAS with dual 2.5GbE (typically under $200).
Support for up to 32TB of SSD storage across four M.2 NVMe slots.
Low power consumption (19W idle, ~30W under load) suitable for 24/7 operation.
Improved passive airflow design compared to the original model (lower overall temps).
Dual USB-C power input options for flexible cable management.
Silent operation, even during sustained activity (under 40dB).
Pre-installed OS (Windows 11 Pro and Ubuntu) allows for flexible initial use.
Compact, space-saving enclosure ideal for desktop setups or constrained environments.

CONS

Cooling Improvements are relatively small and No bundled SSD heatsinks, making thermal throttling likely without aftermarket cooling.
Non-upgradable 12GB LPDDR5 RAM limits scalability for heavier workloads.
Plastic chassis and base panel still hinder full thermal dissipation from SSDs.
The Introduction of other NAS such as the Beelink ME Mini and Xyber Hydra has provided appealing alternatives to this device right now

GMKTec G9 Ver.2 NAS Review – Design and Storage

The GMKTec G9 continues to use a compact, matte-black plastic chassis that is closer in design to a mini PC enclosure than a traditional NAS. The vertical design conserves desk space, and the front-facing panel remains clean and understated, with no visible drive trays or status indicators beyond the power button and basic branding. As with the original model, the chassis sacrifices the durability and thermal advantages of metal in favour of a lightweight, cost-efficient build. This makes the device appealing for users with space constraints, but it also signals the system’s budget positioning. The plastic enclosure, while solid enough for day-to-day use, is not especially resistant to heat buildup during sustained I/O operations, which remains one of its most persistent limitations.

Internally, the system supports four M.2 NVMe SSDs, each connected via PCIe Gen 3 x2 lanes. This setup allows up to 32TB of total SSD storage, assuming the use of high-capacity 8TB NVMe drives. The use of SSDs rather than traditional 2.5″ or 3.5″ hard drives enables near-silent operation, faster access times, and lower power consumption. However, SSD-only NAS designs like this one typically require better airflow and heatsinking to mitigate thermal throttling—especially during RAID operations or when used as a media server with multiple concurrent reads and writes. The G9 supports basic RAID via third-party NAS OSs, but due to PCIe lane limitations and lack of onboard RAID management, advanced configurations will rely entirely on software.

One of the primary complaints in the original model was the absence of SSD heatsinks and the system’s poor natural heat dissipation. While pre-built units from GMKTec occasionally shipped with low-profile aluminum heatsinks, user-added drives often ran hot, especially under sustained write loads. The M.2 slots sit stacked vertically inside a cramped compartment behind the lower rear panel, and when combined with a sealed plastic baseplate, heat quickly accumulates. This design still persists in the new version, and although airflow has been improved through the external vents, the interior thermal behaviour remains heavily dependent on user-supplied heatsinks and ambient cooling conditions. Users deploying high-endurance SSDs or running frequent write-intensive tasks will need to factor this into their thermal strategy.

The internal layout is efficient but fixed. There are no modular trays or hot-swap capabilities for the SSDs, and all upgrades must be performed by opening the device. Memory is soldered and therefore non-upgradable, and while there’s internal eMMC storage used for the pre-installed OS, most users will opt to install TrueNAS, UnRAID, or OpenMediaVault onto one of the NVMe drives for full NAS functionality. The passive cooling approach is unchanged in its core design: two internal fans (one for CPU, one system) move air through the case, but without direct thermal contact to the SSDs or a conductive enclosure material, this airflow has limited reach. Placement of the unit in a well-ventilated space remains essential.

The only real physical design changes in the new version are to the external ventilation panels. GMKTec has replaced the original pinhole-style vent on the rear side with a wider mesh grille, which now spans a greater portion of the side panel. Additionally, the top panel has been revised to include a broader cutout directly above the CPU fan, allowing a clearer exhaust path for rising hot air. However, the plastic base and internal heat chamber structure remain unchanged, meaning SSD temperatures are still a potential concern—especially without aftermarket cooling. The updated G9 retains the same core storage architecture as the original, but introduces modest improvements to airflow via enhanced external ventilation.

GMKTec G9 Ver.2 NAS Review – Internal Hardware

At the center of the GMKTec G9 is the Intel N150 processor, a quad-core, four-thread CPU built on the 10nm Twice Lake architecture. Designed for ultra-efficient computing, it operates at a modest 6W TDP, making it ideal for passive or semi-passive cooling environments like compact NAS systems. The N150 runs at a 1.0GHz base frequency and boosts up to 3.6GHz under load, delivering just enough headroom for tasks like SMB/NFS sharing, low-volume web hosting, and basic media playback. Its integrated Intel UHD Graphics support up to 4K at 60Hz output via HDMI or USB-C DisplayPort alt mode, though without hardware acceleration for modern codecs like AV1, its suitability for on-the-fly transcoding is limited. The CPU also lacks advanced server-grade features like ECC memory support, SR-IOV, or high-bandwidth PCIe 4.0 lanes, which reflects its role in cost-conscious, entry-level applications.

The onboard 12GB of LPDDR5-4800 memory is soldered and cannot be replaced or upgraded, a design choice that simplifies manufacturing and keeps costs down but limits versatility in heavier multitasking scenarios. In practice, the memory is sufficient for running one or two lightweight NAS services alongside file sharing, or even a basic Docker container or two, but its soldered configuration leaves no room for future expansion. Notably, the memory is dual-channel, which does help offset some performance constraints—especially in scenarios where the integrated graphics or CPU requires memory bandwidth access. While most users won’t hit the ceiling of 12GB under standard NAS tasks, advanced setups involving active sync with cloud platforms, large-scale Plex libraries, or multiple concurrent rsync/FTP sessions could find the limitation restrictive. Also, unlike some similarly priced competitors, there’s no accessible BIOS option to reserve RAM for cache acceleration, which could have improved responsiveness under heavier I/O loads.

In terms of storage hardware, the G9 offers four M.2 NVMe slots with PCIe Gen 3 x2 interfaces, a configuration that supports up to 32TB of total storage using current consumer-grade drives. Each slot is keyed for M-Key NVMe SSDs and arranged vertically inside the enclosure, though installation requires unscrewing the rear panel and working within the confined internal cavity. The system’s internal PCIe lane distribution is handled through multiple ASMedia ASM1182e switch chips, which divide the CPU’s limited PCIe bandwidth across all four NVMe slots and the dual 2.5GbE interfaces. While the Gen 3 x2 interface is technically capable of 2GB/s per slot, real-world speeds are often lower during concurrent access due to the shared architecture.

This design also limits SSD passthrough capabilities in virtualized environments, and users aiming for high-speed SSD RAID configurations (RAID 5 or 10, for example) may encounter inconsistent write speeds. Additionally, there is no hardware-level thermal throttling safeguard tied to fan curves or SSD temperature sensors, so thermal build-up under load could directly affect sustained throughput unless active cooling measures are installed. The internal hardware of the improved GMKTec G9 remains completely unchanged from the original release—no CPU, RAM, SSD slot layout, or controller chip has been altered in the updated version.

GMKTec G9 Ver.2 NAS Review – Ports and Connections

The GMKTec G9 offers a well-rounded I/O configuration that reflects its hybrid role as both a compact NAS and lightweight desktop appliance. It features two 2.5GbE LAN ports, both of which are directly linked to the CPU via PCIe lanes and can be configured for link aggregation, failover, or isolated network segments. In real-world testing, these ports easily saturate their 312MB/s bandwidth under SMB and iSCSI workloads, making the G9 more capable than traditional Gigabit NAS units. The absence of 10GbE is notable, especially for users planning to deploy NVMe RAID arrays or work in content-heavy environments, but at this price point and power envelope, dual 2.5GbE is still a competitive offering. Notably, both NICs support Wake-on-LAN (WoL), making the system convenient for remote access or low-power automation setups.

For peripheral and expansion support, the G9 includes three USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports and a single USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port, each capable of 10Gbps data transfer. The USB-C port also supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, allowing it to function as an additional video output alongside the two HDMI 2.0 ports on the rear panel. These HDMI ports support 4K resolution at 60Hz and are positioned for users who may wish to operate the G9 as a silent desktop system or a local media playback device via Kodi, Jellyfin, or Plex. However, the G9 does not include USB 4.0, Thunderbolt, or PCIe expandability, limiting options for future upgrades such as external GPUs, additional NICs, or DAS enclosures. In testing, connected peripherals such as USB drives and webcams were recognized instantly under Ubuntu and Windows, confirming basic plug-and-play compatibility.

Power delivery is handled via USB-C PD input, using a 65W external power brick that ships with the unit. Uniquely, the updated G9 introduces a small but notable change: dual USB-C power input points, allowing users to select which side of the device receives the power cable. This change doesn’t increase power capacity or enable redundancy, but it can improve cable management depending on the G9’s orientation on a desk or shelf. However, using one of the USB-C ports for power inherently sacrifices a high-speed data port—an unfortunate trade-off given the unit’s lack of PCIe or expansion bays. No dedicated power switch is present; the unit powers on via the front button or Wake-on-LAN and remains always-on unless shut down via software or OS-level scripts. Compared with the original G9, the only change to I/O is the addition of the second USB-C power input for layout flexibility—otherwise, all ports, speeds, and layout remain the same.

Port Type	Quantity	Specification
2.5GbE LAN	2	Realtek RTL8125, Link Aggregation Supported
USB-A 3.2 Gen 2	3	10Gbps, Backward Compatible
USB-C 3.2 Gen 2	1 (+1 PD)	10Gbps, DisplayPort Alt Mode
HDMI 2.0	2	4K @ 60Hz
Power Input (USB-C)	2	65W USB-C PD (Only 1 used at a time)
Wake-on-LAN	Supported	Both NICs
Audio	None	No 3.5mm jack or digital out

GMKTec G9 Ver.2 NAS Review – Tests and Performance

In synthetic and real-world benchmarks, the GMKTec G9 delivers the level of performance expected from an Intel N150 system with PCIe Gen 3 x2 storage. Read speeds per drive peaked around 1.4–1.5GB/s, aligning well with the theoretical limit of the x2 interface. Write speeds were notably more volatile, ranging between 400–600MB/s depending on SSD type, ambient temperature, and active processes. These numbers, while adequate for file serving, backups, and Docker apps, showed clear limitations when the system was pushed into simultaneous multi-disk writes or parity-based RAID configurations. The presence of ASMedia ASM1182e PCIe switches likely contributes to this variance, as downstream PCIe allocation under pressure introduces contention among the SSD lanes. In typical NAS tasks like SMB and NFS file transfers, however, performance remained consistent and stable, particularly when network activity was confined to single-user access or sequential transfers.

Thermal behaviour is where the most scrutiny falls, given the G9’s original design flaws. Under a controlled 48-hour test using UnRAID with scheduled hourly backups and mixed-use read/write activity, the older G9 unit routinely idled at 54–56°C, with peaks of 66–67°C on SSDs lacking heatsinks.

The improved model saw modest thermal gains, with idle temps reduced to 50–52°C at the CPU vent and around 56–57°C on the SSD layer. Some of this improvement came from the revised ventilation—namely the expanded top-panel fan cutout and rear-side mesh panel—yet the base remained the same thermally isolated plastic panel, and internal fan hardware remained unchanged.

Notably, temperatures around the rear I/O ports dropped by 5–7°C between versions, suggesting that airflow efficiency around the motherboard has improved even if core thermal load remains a challenge.

In terms of noise and power, the G9 performs admirably. Even under load, fan noise remained below 40dB, with idle operation being nearly silent. Power consumption remained within the expected range—19–21W idle and up to 30W under continuous activity—even during the 48-hour write test.

BIOS-level tuning is possible and can slightly reduce power draw or adjust fan thresholds, but no advanced power scaling or fan curve customization is exposed via software in stock OS images. More demanding operating systems like TrueNAS Scale ran stably on the G9 but did little to mitigate thermal behaviour, reinforcing the importance of user-added SSD heatsinks regardless of OS.

The lack of thermal sensors per SSD slot or fan feedback control means sustained operations should be closely monitored in hotter climates or enclosed environments.

Nowhere is the conversation about thermal and hardware design more relevant than in comparison to the Xyber Hydra, a near-identical system that appears to share much of its component sourcing with the G9—right down to the GMK-branded fans. The Hydra ships with 16GB of DDR5 memory, a metal base panel, and most notably, a thermal pad that bridges SSDs to the metal shell, allowing for actual heat transfer rather than passive convection. In direct tests, the Hydra consistently posted 5–10°C lower SSD temps under identical workload, with idle SSDs (no heatsinks) registering around 47–49°C versus 56–57°C in the improved G9.

Though the Hydra lacks branding clarity around its manufacturer, the design appears to be what the G9 should have evolved into: same layout and CPU, but better thermals, more memory, and more thought put into SSD dissipation. In conclusion, while the improved GMKTec G9 offers better thermals than its predecessor, the Xyber Hydra outperforms both G9 variants in every thermal category, making it the superior choice if cooling and memory capacity are priorities.

GMKTec G9 Ver.2 NAS Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The GMKTec G9, in its improved form, shows that the brand has listened—albeit cautiously—to thermal concerns raised by users and reviewers of the original model. The changes introduced in this updated version are minimal but measurable: better ventilation on the top panel and side mesh grille allow modest airflow gains, which result in lower surface and SSD temperatures across the board. Yet, GMKTec has stopped short of making any internal or structural upgrades that would more directly resolve thermal issues, such as introducing a metal baseplate, bundling SSD heatsinks, or adjusting the system’s internal fan architecture. All other hardware elements—CPU, memory, SSD configuration, I/O, BIOS, and software readiness—remain identical. As a result, while the device performs better in heat dissipation than before, it does so by a margin that may not justify an upgrade for existing G9 users. First-time buyers, however, may find it to be a safer choice now—particularly when paired with aftermarket heatsinks and used in moderate workloads.

However, the presence of the Xyber Hydra in the same price bracket poses a critical challenge to the G9’s value proposition. Offering the same N150 CPU, more memory, and a far superior thermal design with an integrated metal heat-spreading base, the Hydra addresses nearly every lingering complaint about the G9 without altering the system’s core layout. For prospective buyers deciding between the two, the G9’s only advantages now lie in its wider availability, slightly more recognizable branding, and marginally more mature firmware support. If those factors matter less than thermal reliability, long-term SSD health, and RAM headroom, then the Hydra is the more complete solution. Ultimately, the improved GMKTec G9 is a more stable and better-performing version of its former self, but its restrained upgrades feel like a missed opportunity in a market where near-clones have already moved ahead in meaningful ways.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Amazon Prime Day Deals - The BUniFi UPS Tower ReviewSharge Disk Pro ReviewUGREEN DXP4800 PLUS vs DH4300 UGREEN DH4300 vs DXP4800 PLUS Weekly Tech Digest – Week 40How to Make the UGREEN US3000 Week 39 Tech Digest – Wi-Fi UGREEN US3000 NAS UPS ReviewUGREEN US3000 NAS UPS Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Le mini PC Geekom IT12 2025 Edition se décline en 4 versions, avec un rapport qualité/prix attractif et de bonnes performances. Voici notre avis complet.

The post Test Geekom IT12 2025 Edition – Mini PC first appeared on IT-Connect.

Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS – Which Should You Buy?

In 2025, the market for high-capacity 8-bay NAS systems has become more competitive than ever, with traditional leaders like Synology now facing serious contenders from newer brands such as UGREEN. The Synology DS1825+ represents the company’s latest flagship in the Plus series, incorporating a more restrictive hardware ecosystem and a focus on long-term software support, surveillance integration, and backup solutions. In contrast, the UGREEN DXP8800 Plus leans heavily into raw hardware capability and customization, offering an unlocked platform for power users and DIY enthusiasts.

This head-to-head comparison explores both systems in terms of design, internal specifications, external connectivity, operating systems, and service ecosystems. Beyond surface specs, we’ll also assess real-world usability, third-party compatibility, and the broader implications of each system’s approach to expansion and user control. Whether you’re choosing a NAS for Plex, virtual machines, business continuity, or scalable 10GbE storage, this article aims to clarify which of these two NAS units better fits different user scenarios in 2025 and beyond.

Check Amazon for the Synology DS1825+ $1149.99	Check AliExpress for the Synology DS1825+ $1149	Check Amazon for the UGREEN DXP8800 Plus $1349.99	Check AliExpress for the UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS  $1149

Quick Summary of the Synology DS1825+ NAS

Synology DS1825+ NAS Review HERE

The Synology DS1825+ is an 8-bay desktop NAS that marks a significant shift in the company’s approach to hardware and compatibility. Equipped with the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B processor—a 4-core, 8-thread chip running at 2.2GHz —this system balances power efficiency with performance across general file operations, virtualization, and media hosting. It includes support for up to 32GB of ECC DDR5 memory (2x SODIMM, arriving with 8GB by default), two M.2 NVMe slots for Synology-only SSD caching, and an onboard 10GbE port alongside three USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports. However, Synology’s controversial locked ecosystem continues here, restricting users to only Synology-branded drives for full support and access to storage pools, along with limited use of the NVMe bays strictly for cache, not storage.

While its internal hardware is more capable than previous Plus series models, the DS1825+ removes several features seen in past units. By default, it arrives with 2x 2.5GbE network ports, with the option to scale upto 10GbE with the use of a 1st party upgrade PCIe card, but at this pricepoint many users wuld expect 10GbE as standard. The shift to DSM 7.2 brings a refined software experience, including native Active Backup for Business, Hyper Backup, Surveillance Station, and full Docker support. However, DSM’s increasing reliance on Synology’s own hardware and subscription services, such as C2 Surveillance Proxy and Synology Drive Server, makes it harder for users to customize or expand without sticking to Synology’s ecosystem. Overall, the DS1825+ is best suited for users who want an integrated, secure, and reliable NAS experience with minimal manual setup, provided they are comfortable with the tighter hardware constraints.

Quick Summary of the UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS

UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS Review HERE

The UGREEN DXP8800 Plus is an 8-bay NAS solution that positions itself as a powerful, open-platform alternative for users seeking greater control over hardware and software customization. At the heart of the system is the 8-core, 16-thread Intel Core i5-1235U processor, paired with 8GB of DDR5 memory (expandable up to 64GB), but lacks support for ECC memory. Unlike its Synology counterpart, the DXP8800 Plus supports a much wider range of third-party hard drives and SSDs, and offers 2x Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe slots that can be used not only for cache but also for primary or tiered storage, depending on the user’s operating system. This flexibility is backed by a user-serviceable layout and BIOS access, which allows full compatibility with alternative NAS OS options such as TrueNAS SCALE, UnRAID, or OpenMediaVault.

Connectivity is another area where the DXP8800 Plus stands out. It features two native 10GbE (RJ45) ports, two 2.5GbE ports, and dual USB4/Thunderbolt 4 ports, dramatically expanding external storage, docking, and display capabilities. This, combined with onboard HDMI output and front-accessible USB 3.2 ports, makes it far more versatile for media creation, backup workflows, and even lightweight workstation use. However, the DXP8800 Plus does not come with a polished first-party NAS operating system—UGREEN’s UGOS Pro remains in early stages, and lacks many of the mature backup, surveillance, and cloud services found in DSM. As such, the DXP8800 Plus is ideal for tech-savvy users who value open architecture, higher hardware flexibility, and self-managed software ecosystems over out-of-the-box turnkey simplicity.

Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS – Design and Storage

The Synology DS1825+ maintains the familiar chassis style used in the Plus series, combining functionality with conservative aesthetics. It features a full-sized 8-bay front panel with lockable trays, designed for tool-less insertion of 3.5” SATA drives and optional 2.5” adapters. The main body is a mix of steel and plastic, with a focus on rigidity and reduced vibration. The system lacks any onboard display or LCD, offering only basic LED indicators for system status, drive activity, and alerts, which may frustrate users seeking at-a-glance diagnostics. Access to internal components like the DDR5 ECC RAM and dual M.2 NVMe slots requires removing the top cover and internal caddy brackets, which isn’t as straightforward as it could be—especially given that the NVMe slots are only usable for cache and require Synology-branded drives. Thermal management relies on dual 120mm rear-mounted fans, which operate quietly but are non-replaceable without voiding warranty due to the proprietary fan harness. Physically, the NAS is slightly larger than competing 8-bay units and lacks rubberized feet or vibration isolation, which may be relevant for users placing it on shared work surfaces or desks.

The UGREEN DXP8800 Plus delivers a contrasting design focused on space efficiency, cooling, and user-accessibility. The NAS is housed in a durable metal shell with perforated side panels and a high-density internal structure. Despite its smaller footprint, it manages to accommodate eight SATA bays, two 4X4 M.2 NVMe slots, two SODIMM slots, and active cooling—all while remaining user-serviceable with just a standard screwdriver. The hot-swap trays are spring-loaded and support tool-less 3.5” drives or 2.5” drives via included screws. Access to RAM and SSD slots is streamlined through a simple internal partition design that doesn’t require full disassembly, making upgrades significantly faster than on the DS1825+. The rear exhaust fan is larger than expected for a device this compact, and although thermals are generally within acceptable limits, our testing showed that M.2 SSDs running at PCIe Gen 3 speeds did reach over 65°C during sustained I/O, especially when mounted without aftermarket heatsinks. Unlike Synology, UGREEN includes front-mounted USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports (Type-A and Type-C), ideal for creators and users who frequently move large projects or footage onto the system using direct-attached storage.

When it comes to storage flexibility, the differences are stark. Synology’s DS1825+ enforces a strict hardware compatibility policy, where only Synology-certified HDDs (such as the HAT5300) and SSDs (SAT5200 or SNV3410/3510) are officially supported. Drives outside this list may trigger warnings, be ineligible for pools, or lose access to SMART health readings. NVMe drives cannot be used for storage volumes at all and are locked to caching roles only. These restrictions are enforced by DSM 7.2+ and persist even with the system fully updated.

By contrast, the UGREEN DXP8800 Plus places no such limits. Any SATA or NVMe drive can be used, and users can create pools across mixed-capacity and mixed-brand disks, including enterprise-grade drives. Storage volumes can be configured freely in supported OS environments, and the two M.2 slots can act as primary storage, tiered ZFS vdevs, or cache depending on the OS—TrueNAS SCALE, for instance, recognized all M.2 drives and allowed custom pool creation without issue. This makes UGREEN’s system more attractive to users with existing drives or specific ZFS/Btrfs layouts in mind.

Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS – Internal Hardware

he Synology DS1825+ is built around the AMD Ryzen V1500B processor, a 4-core, 8-thread embedded SoC designed specifically for NAS and server workloads. With a fixed base clock of 2.2GHz and no boost functionality, this Zen-based CPU focuses on stability, multi-threaded efficiency, and low power consumption, making it well-suited for consistent background operations like file serving, multi-client backups, and large-scale storage array management. The chip includes AES-NI support for hardware encryption acceleration and offers full compatibility with DSM’s virtualization stack, including Docker and Synology’s Virtual Machine Manager. However, the V1500B lacks an integrated GPU, and the DS1825+ does not support hardware transcoding, making it unsuitable for Plex or media applications that rely on real-time video encoding unless offloaded to cloud services like Synology C2. It’s a reliable and mature processor choice, albeit one that prioritizes stability over flexibility or raw speed.

The DS1825+ ships with 8GB of ECC DDR4 memory (1x SODIMM) installed, with support for up to 32GB across two slots, and ECC is supported on both official and some compatible third-party modules. The internal layout, however, is relatively restrictive. The memory and M.2 slots require tray removal and partial disassembly to access. Synology includes two M.2 NVMe slots that operate at PCIe Gen 3×4, but DSM only allows them to be used for read/write caching and only with Synology SNV3410 or SNV3510 SSDs. These slots are not available for storage pool creation or system boot, regardless of the SSD used. There is no PCIe slot or BIOS access, making this a closed system that enforces Synology’s validation model tightly. While this approach ensures stability, it limits performance tuning and locks users into higher-priced branded components.

The UGREEN DXP8800 Plus uses an Intel Core i5-1235U, a hybrid 10-core (2 performance, 8 efficiency), 12-thread mobile CPU built on the Alder Lake-U architecture. With a boost clock up to 4.4GHz and integrated Intel Xe graphics, it offers both multi-threaded efficiency and hardware video transcoding support via Quick Sync. This is ideal for users running Plex, Jellyfin, or AI-based video analysis locally. The system ships with 8GB of non-ECC DDR4 memory, expandable to 64GB, using standard SODIMM slots. UGREEN’s internal board features 2x M.2 NVMe slots operating at PCIe Gen 4×4 speeds, offering significantly more bandwidth than Synology’s Gen 3 slots. These SSDs can be used for boot, storage pools, or cache, and the system supports a wide range of third-party drives without warnings or restrictions. BIOS access is fully available, allowing installation of operating systems like TrueNAS, UnRAID, or Proxmox. UGREEN’s internal hardware favors openness and customizability, providing users with direct control over performance, expansion, and component choice—at the cost of requiring more technical expertise.

Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS – Ports and Connections

The Synology DS1825+ delivers a modest and business-focused range of connectivity options, designed primarily for reliability and integration within an IT-managed environment. It includes 2x 2.5GbE RJ-45 LAN ports, offering basic link aggregation or dual-network failover functionality. While this offers faster-than-Gigabit throughput, the lack of 10GbE out of the box may be limiting for users working with large media files or virtualization workloads, particularly in comparison to other 2025 systems.

The system provides 3x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps) Type-A ports, all located on the rear, suitable for UPS integration, external storage, or compatible backup devices. In terms of expansion, Synology includes 2x USB Type-C ports, but these are reserved exclusively for connecting official DX525 expansion units. They do not support data transfer, peripherals, or USB-C accessories and serve only as proprietary expansion interfaces. No HDMI, DisplayPort, or audio outputs are included, and there is no SD card reader. This reinforces Synology’s design philosophy: operate headlessly, manage remotely, and keep the system within the bounds of their validated ecosystem.

In contrast, the UGREEN DXP8800 Plus positions itself as a fully-featured, hybrid-use NAS platform with wide-ranging I/O options for prosumers and professionals. It features 2x 10GbE RJ-45 LAN ports—a clear advantage over Synology’s 2.5GbE setup—offering significantly more bandwidth for media editing, VM hosts, or multi-user environments. On the front, UGREEN includes 2x Thunderbolt 4 (40Gbps) ports, which double as high-speed USB-C for peripherals, external drives, or even eGPU enclosures in supported OS setups. The rear provides 2x USB-A ports at 10Gbps, plus 2x USB 2.0 ports, allowing backward-compatible peripheral support. For display, the system includes 1x HDMI port with 8K output support, connected via Intel’s Xe iGPU, as well as a high-speed SD 4.0 card reader—a particularly valuable addition for content creators offloading camera media directly to the NAS. There is also a PCIe x4 slot for optional hardware expansion. This broad I/O layout enables the DXP8800 Plus to function as a headless NAS, a media server, or even a workstation replacement, depending on the OS you choose to run.

The gap in connectivity between these two NAS systems reflects their broader design philosophies. Synology has deliberately kept the DS1825+ minimal, standardized, and tightly integrated with its ecosystem, which enhances long-term support and serviceability but limits flexibility. UGREEN, on the other hand, offers extensive general-purpose ports that cater to a wider range of workflows—especially for users running Windows, Proxmox, TrueNAS, or virtualized environments. Whether it’s direct media ingestion via SD card, high-speed expansion through Thunderbolt, or dual 10GbE networking, the DXP8800 Plus outpaces the DS1825+ in almost every I/O category. However, this flexibility comes with the expectation that the user is comfortable with open-platform system management and a DIY-style deployment model.

Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS – Software and Services

The Synology DS1825+ runs on DSM 7.2, Synology’s mature and widely respected NAS operating system. DSM offers a broad ecosystem of native applications and services, including advanced storage management, multi-tiered backup solutions, virtual machine hosting, and comprehensive multimedia support. Key built-in tools such as Synology Drive, Hyper Backup, Active Backup for Business, Surveillance Station, and Synology Photos provide enterprise-grade data handling in a highly polished interface.

DSM also includes Snapshot Replication with Btrfs, granular folder/file-level restore, and Active Directory integration. Importantly, DSM supports features like Windows ACL permissions, Samba v4, WORM file locking, and two-factor authentication by default, with Synology’s C2 platform offering cloud sync, identity management, and secure backup options. However, DSM has increasingly tied deeper functionality (e.g., certain security tools and snapshots) to Synology-branded storage and expansion hardware, with third-party drive warnings now appearing by default.

UGREEN’s DXP8800 Plus runs UGOS Pro, a Linux-based operating system developed in-house. Now one year into active deployment, UGOS Pro has matured substantially with ongoing updates and wider feature support. The interface is clean and web-accessible, and recent updates have added core NAS functions previously missing. As of the latest firmware, Docker, virtual machine creation, and Jellyfin media server are all natively supported via one-click installs.

Importantly, iSCSI support was also added, addressing a key omission for enterprise or VMware users. 2-factor authentication (2FA) is now present, and security protocols include IP/MAC-level blocking, custom firewall rules, and access control policies. While UGREEN still lacks the depth of anti-ransomware protection found in DSM or QNAP’s QuFirewall, the fundamentals have improved dramatically. Local-only AI services for photo indexing and object recognition have also been refined, with user-selectable models running without internet access.

Where DSM excels in deep integration and business-class reliability, UGOS Pro stands out for its openness and responsiveness to user feedback. Users can enable SSH, customize OS-level settings, and even install TrueNAS, UnRAID, or Proxmox without voiding the warranty, as UGREEN has opted for an open-platform approach.

UGOS also supports Windows file services (SMB), NFS, and web-based file managers, though its permissions system and UI are still somewhat basic compared to DSM. Synology’s first-party software tends to offer higher polish, more documentation, and broader cross-platform support, particularly in cloud-integrated services, whereas UGOS is catching up in functional breadth but remains relatively limited in automation and long-term software ecosystem depth.

Both platforms include mobile apps and browser-based remote access, but Synology’s remote access via QuickConnect is significantly more user-friendly and secure out-of-the-box, while UGREEN’s remote services are best replaced or supplemented by Tailscale, Cloudflare Tunnel, or similar tools. Synology’s Surveillance Station also has years of development behind it with support for hundreds of IP cameras, whereas UGREEN does not yet include native surveillance software in UGOS Pro.

For users seeking a media-focused setup, UGOS offers a good local multimedia experience via Jellyfin, while DSM supports Plex and Video Station (with transcoding limitations depending on CPU). Ultimately, Synology’s DSM remains the more robust, enterprise-ready option, while UGOS Pro presents a highly promising and increasingly competitive open alternative that still favors self-managed users.

Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS – Verdict and Conclusion

The Synology DS1825+ remains a compelling choice for users prioritizing reliability, software integration, and long-term support. With the proven DSM 7.2 platform, it offers enterprise-grade tools for file management, backup, virtual machines, and surveillance. Features like Snapshot Replication, C2 cloud integration, and Active Backup for Business provide peace of mind for professionals who want a turnkey experience with minimal maintenance. Although hardware specs such as the Ryzen V1500B CPU and dual 2.5GbE ports might seem modest compared to rivals, they are more than adequate for office environments, multi-user file sharing, and even light virtualization. That said, its increasing reliance on Synology-branded drives and accessories, as well as its lack of GPU support and M.2 NVMe flexibility, could be frustrating for DIY enthusiasts or media-focused users.

By contrast, the UGREEN DXP8800 Plus is a hardware-forward NAS that emphasizes performance, bandwidth, and customization. With a 12-core Intel Core i5-1235U CPU, dual 10GbE, PCIe expandability, and full-speed Gen 4 NVMe slots, it is built for workloads that demand raw power—media servers, high-speed backups, AI indexing, and even containerized apps via Docker. UGOS Pro has matured considerably over the last year, with new features like iSCSI, 2FA, VM hosting, and Jellyfin support making it much more viable than at launch. Still, while UGREEN’s open architecture and wider SSD/drive compatibility are a strength, its software ecosystem isn’t yet as refined or battle-tested as Synology’s DSM, especially for more security-sensitive or compliance-bound environments. Surveillance features and enterprise-level monitoring tools are also still missing or immature in comparison.

In short, the Synology DS1825+ is best suited for SMBs, IT administrators, or content creators who want a dependable, low-maintenance NAS with rich native features and strong vendor support, especially where third-party remote access is limited or not desired. On the other hand, the UGREEN DXP8800 Plus is ideal for prosumers, media professionals, and tech-savvy users who want maximum hardware flexibility, faster internal/external transfer speeds, and the freedom to customize their NAS at the OS level, even if that means dealing with a slightly rougher software experience. If ease of use, documentation, and long-term stability are your priorities, the DS1825+ remains a safe bet. But if you’re looking for value in performance per dollar, more openness, and higher bandwidth potential, the DXP8800 Plus offers a lot for the price.

PROS	CONS	PROS	CONS
DSM 7.2 OS offers mature, stable, and feature-rich ecosystem with professional backup, replication, and VM tools. ECC DDR4 Memory (8GB expandable to 32GB) ensures greater data integrity and system stability. Broad software support including Surveillance Station, Active Backup, C2 Hybrid Cloud, and Hyper Backup. PCIe Gen3 slot allows for 10GbE or 25GbE network expansion or M.2 cache via supported adapters.   Low noise and power efficiency (~23.8 dB, ~60W during access), making it suitable for office environments.	Limited M.2 NVMe support (Gen3x4, only Synology-branded SSDs officially supported). No built-in GPU or transcoding support, limiting suitability for Plex or media conversion workflows.   Locks users into Synology drives/accessories, reducing flexibility and increasing costs over time.	High-performance Intel Core i5-1235U CPU (12-core, 10-thread) enables heavy multitasking, VMs, and AI workloads. Dual 10GbE LAN ports allow for ultra-fast network throughput and multi-client simultaneous access. Two M.2 NVMe Gen4x4 slots support broad range of SSDs for caching or fast storage pools. 64GB DDR5 upgrade support offers excellent memory headroom for Docker, virtualization, and AI indexing.   UGOS Pro now includes Jellyfin, Docker, VMs, iSCSI, and 2FA, closing many early software gaps.	UGOS Pro still lacks polished UI/UX compared to DSM; some features buried or poorly documented. No official Plex support and limited surveillance tools, weakening multimedia and NVR potential.   Brand trust and software maturity still lag behind market leaders like Synology or QNAP.
Check Amazon for the Synology DS1825+ $1149.99	Check AliExpress for the Synology DS1825+ $1149	Check Amazon for the UGREEN DXP8800 Plus $1349.99	Check AliExpress for the UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS  $1149

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Amazon Prime Day Deals - The BAmazon Prime Big Deal Day StorUGREEN DXP4800 PLUS vs DH4300 UGREEN DH4300 vs DXP4800 PLUS Weekly Tech Digest – Week 40How to Make the UGREEN US3000 Synology DSM Firewall Bug BlocWeek 39 Tech Digest – Wi-Fi UGREEN US3000 NAS UPS ReviewUGREEN US3000 NAS UPS Review Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE