Vous avez une imprimante 3D qui prend la poussière et un Steam Deck qui traîne sur le canapé ? Tom Patty vient de publier sur MakerWorld un projet qui va vous réconcilier avec les deux. L'idée c'est de transformer la console portable de Valve en mini borne d'arcade avec un vrai joystick et de vrais boutons, comme dans les salles de notre jeunesse (oui je suis vieux, je sais).
Le projet s'appelle Mini Arcade Steam Deck et c'est une version compacte d'un précédent design du même créateur. L'avantage de cette nouvelle mouture, c'est qu'elle ne nécessite ni moniteur externe ni haut-parleurs, du coup n'importe qui possédant déjà un Steam Deck peut se lancer. Bref, c'est du DIY accessible.
Le Mini Arcade Steam Deck dans toute sa splendeur (
Source
)
Côté matos à prévoir en plus des pièces imprimées, il vous faudra une carte contrôleur Picade Max de chez Pimoroni, leur joystick arcade, 12 boutons d'arcade de la même marque, le faisceau de câblage V2 qui va avec, un câble USB-C et 4 petites vis M5 avec leurs écrous. Un hub USB-C optionnel permet de charger la console pendant les sessions de jeu, ce qui n'est pas du luxe vu l'autonomie de la bête.
L'impression prend environ 31 heures et demie sur 8 plaques différentes en 0.16mm de couche avec 15% de remplissage. Ça fait un sacré projet, mais le résultat a de la gueule ! L'assemblage se fait ensuite à la superglue en suivant les instructions fournies, avec des chevilles hexagonales pour bien aligner les pièces. Le design a été pensé pour le plateau d'impression d'une Bambu Lab P1S, mais d'après les retours de la communauté, ça passe aussi sur une A1 sans modification.
Le Steam Deck est facile d'accès
Et si
l'idée de fabriquer votre propre borne d'arcade
vous titille depuis un moment, c'est peut-être le projet idéal pour vous lancer. Pas besoin de savoir souder ou de se taper l'électronique complexe d'une borne complète, la carte Picade Max fait tout le boulot de conversion des entrées.
Le modèle est gratuit à télécharger sur MakerWorld et la communauté autour du projet est plutôt active. Y'a déjà des discussions sur l'ajout de trous d'aération dans une future V2 pour éviter que le Steam Deck ne chauffe trop pendant les longues sessions.
Dans un article de blog publié le 5 janvier 2026, les chercheurs de l’entreprise de cybersécurité Securonix mettent en lumière une nouvelle campagne cybercriminelle visant en particulier les établissements hôteliers européens. Baptisée PHALT#BLYX, cette opération dissimule son piège derrière un faux écran bleu de la mort de Windows.
Dans un article de blog publié le 5 janvier 2026, les chercheurs de l’entreprise de cybersécurité Securonix mettent en lumière une nouvelle campagne cybercriminelle visant en particulier les établissements hôteliers européens. Baptisée PHALT#BLYX, cette opération dissimule son piège derrière un faux écran bleu de la mort de Windows.
Source: Securonix
Cybersecurity researchers have disclosed details of a new campaign dubbed PHALT#BLYX that has leveraged ClickFix-style lures to display fixes for fake blue screen of death (BSoD) errors in attacks targeting the European hospitality sector.
The end goal of the multi-stage campaign is to deliver a remote access trojan known as DCRat, according to cybersecurity company Securonix.
After the surprising hit that was the Beelink ME Mini NAS in 2025, a lot of users were looking forward to seeing what the brand would do next in the NAS space. In January 2026, the brand responded with the launch of the Beelink ME Pro: an Intel N95/N150 powered system with DDR5 memory, 5GbE plus 2.5GbE connectivity, 2 SATA HDD bays, 3 M.2 NVMe bays, and one of the smallest physical footprints in this device class that I have seen. I have a full detailed review in progress on the ME Pro, but even after several days of use, several pros and cons have already emerged that may influence whether this is the right purchase for a homelab. While the review comes together, this article will outline the good, the bad, and the weird aspects of the Beelink ME Pro NAS.
This is a minor point, but it is worth noting how the ME Pro arrives. The chassis box is unusually small for a 2-bay NAS, and at first glance it can look like the packaging contains little more than the unit itself. In practice, the accessory items are stored inside the drive bracket area in small internal boxes, which helps avoid loose parts moving around in transit and reduces wasted packaging volume.
The device also arrives with the M.2 thermal pads already positioned in place, so the initial storage installation process is more direct. It is not a major buying factor, but it is a practical packaging decision that avoids the excessive empty space and material waste that is common in this product category.
Reasons you Should Buy the Beelink ME Pro NAS
The ME Pro is positioned as a compact, high-connectivity 2-bay NAS that also provides NVMe expansion and local display capability, with hardware aimed at users who want more than basic file serving in a small footprint. It combines dual-port networking, integrated wireless connectivity, and multiple internal storage options in a chassis designed for straightforward access and cleaning, while also introducing a motherboard drawer concept that Beelink claims will support future platform upgrades. If those priorities match your setup goals, the ME Pro has several practical advantages that can justify its price and design choices.
#1 Man alive – this 2 Bay NAS is TINY!
The ME Pro’s most immediate differentiator is its physical footprint. The chassis measures 166 x 121 x 112mm and uses an all metal unibody design, which is notably smaller than most 2-bay NAS boxes that also include NVMe storage and dual network ports. In person it reads closer to a compact mini PC enclosure than a traditional NAS, and that difference matters if you are placing it on a crowded desk, a media shelf, or anywhere you are trying to keep cabling and hardware out of the way.
That compactness is not just cosmetic, it directly shapes how the hardware is arranged and how it feels to work with. Storage bays, the NVMe area, networking, and the cooling hardware are densely packed, so clearances are tight and the device is designed around precision fit rather than roomy access. The upside is that it is easy to place in small spaces without needing the usual NAS sized footprint. The tradeoff is that installations and maintenance are likely to feel more constrained than they would on a larger, more conventional 2-bay enclosure.
#2 Arrives with 5GbE and WiFi6, when everyone else is still on 2.5GbE
On networking, the ME Pro ships with 2 wired Ethernet ports and integrated wireless. The wired setup is a 5GbE Realtek RTL8126 port alongside a 2.5GbE Intel i226-V port, and the unit also includes WiFi 6 plus Bluetooth 5.4. For a compact 2-bay NAS, that is a broader mix of connectivity than the many systems that still top out at dual 2.5GbE, and it gives you more options for how the device fits into an existing home or small office network.
In practical terms, this provides flexibility rather than guaranteeing a specific performance outcome. A 5GbE port can be useful for faster transfers if you already have compatible switching or direct attach options, while the 2.5GbE port can serve as a secondary link for a different subnet, failover, or a separate device path depending on the OS and network configuration you choose. WiFi 6 is not a replacement for wired networking in a NAS role, but it can be relevant for temporary placement, initial setup, or use cases where running a cable is not straightforward, and the manual indicates the antenna is integrated into the front panel design rather than using an external antenna.
#3 Maintenance and Internal Access is a work of art!
The ME Pro is built around user access rather than treating the internals as a sealed appliance. The manual’s process is simple: remove the magnetic cooling mesh cover, unscrew and pull out the hard drive bracket, and use the bottom access panel to reach the M.2 slots. A screwdriver is stored in the base under a silicone pad, so the tool required for basic access is physically included with the device. The ports and recovery related features also acknowledge user servicing, with items like a reset hole and a CLR CMOS function shown in the manual.
In day to day handling, the layout is designed to slide out and reassemble in a specific order, and it generally supports the idea of quick cleaning and drive installation without full disassembly. At the same time, access relies on small screws and tight tolerances, so it is not a tool-less experience. In your first impressions, the mechanism for sliding the internal assembly out felt solid and precisely aligned, but you also noted that the included tool is very small and can be fiddly to use. The result is a design that prioritizes compact service access, but still expects careful handling during installation and maintenance.
#4 Great Base Memory Quantity at a time when RAM costs are BONKERS
From the start, the ME Pro is configured with either 12GB LPDDR5 4800MHz on the N95 models or 16GB LPDDR5 4800MHz on the N150 models, rather than shipping with a minimal memory pool that immediately pushes users toward an upgrade. In practical NAS use, that baseline capacity is relevant because it can influence how comfortably the system handles common add-ons such as containers, light virtualization, background indexing, and multiple concurrent services, depending on the operating system and workload. It also reduces the likelihood that memory becomes the first immediate bottleneck for typical home and small office setups.
The tradeoff is that this approach is linked to the way the memory is implemented. In your inspection of the unit, you noted there is no SO-DIMM slot and the RAM appears soldered to the board, which means users are effectively choosing their memory tier at purchase rather than treating it as a later upgrade (more on that in a bit). This makes the initial configuration choice more important, especially for buyers who already know they will run heavier applications or multiple VMs over time.
#5 Genuinely unique modularisation and upgradability in a pre-built solution, which I have ever seen
The ME Pro’s most unusual design claim is the swappable modular motherboard. Beelink markets the system as supporting interchangeable boards across Intel, AMD, and ARM options, using a drawer style layout intended to let the main compute board slide out rather than being permanently fixed inside the chassis. The product page frames this as a way to avoid replacing the entire enclosure when you want a different CPU platform, and instead treat the chassis, drive housing, and general structure as the long-term part of the purchase.
In practical terms, this concept will only matter if Beelink actually sells the alternative boards at sensible pricing and maintains availability over time, but the physical architecture appears to be built around the idea. Your first look showed a clear internal separation between the board assembly and the rest of the enclosure, and you also observed hints of planned scale-up hardware, such as layout markings that suggest different future storage or platform variants. For buyers who like the idea of extending a system’s usable life without a full rebuild, the ME Pro is one of the few pre-built NAS style devices currently trying to formalize that upgrade path rather than leaving it to a full case swap.
Reasons You Might Want to Skip the Beelink ME Pro NAS
The ME Pro’s compact design and connectivity focused feature set come with tradeoffs that will matter to some buyers more than others. Several of the core choices are linked together, meaning you get the small chassis, the storage density, and the modular drawer approach, but you also accept limits around upgrades, physical handling, and how the platform is configured from the factory. This is not a device where every part is meant to be user replaceable or easily swapped in the way a DIY small form factor build would be.
It is also worth treating the launch configuration and roadmap as part of the buying decision. The product is being introduced with very similar Intel CPU options and fixed memory tiers, while the company is already pointing toward future AMD and ARM variants and possible expanded layouts. For some buyers, that is a reason to wait until the wider range exists and the upgrade parts are actually available. For others, the current design constraints are enough to prefer a more conventional 2-bay NAS that is larger, simpler to work on, and has clearer long-term upgrade paths.
The RAM is FIXED (i.e cannot be upgraded or changed)!!!
The ME Pro uses LPDDR5 memory (12GB on the N95 models, 16GB on the N150 models), and based on the internal layout you inspected, there is no SO-DIMM slot for user upgrades. In other words, the memory appears to be soldered to the motherboard rather than installed as a replaceable module. That makes the initial purchase configuration more important than on many small NAS builds where memory can be upgraded later as needs change.
The practical impact shows up when your usage grows beyond basic file storage. If you plan to run multiple containers, heavier indexing tasks, or virtual machines, memory headroom can become a limiting factor long before CPU or network does, depending on the OS and services you deploy. With this platform, there is no simple path to increase RAM after purchase, so anyone unsure about future requirements may prefer a system with upgradeable memory, or may want to treat the 16GB model as the safer long-term option by default.
The design is so, so very tight!
The ME Pro’s small enclosure is achieved through very tight internal tolerances. That is visible in how the drive bracket, motherboard drawer area, and storage zones are packed together, and it influences the overall experience during installation and servicing. The system relies on screw mounting for drives rather than a click-in tray approach, and while the manual provides clear steps, the process assumes careful alignment rather than quick, tool-less handling. This level of precision fit is likely part of how Beelink is trying to control airflow and improve thermal transfer in a compact space, and it also aligns with their noise and vibration messaging around tightened mounting and silicone dampening.
In the first impressions, that tightness showed up most clearly when inserting and removing components. Slotting the hard drive bracket and drives could feel rough at times, with very little clearance to work with, and the internal assembly can require a firmer push to seat correctly. Even if the compact fit is helping with heat dissipation and vibration control, it remains a very tight build, and it is less forgiving if you are frequently swapping drives, testing different storage combinations, or repeatedly opening the chassis. The end result is a device that looks clean and flush when assembled, but can feel constrained during hands-on work compared with a larger enclosure with more physical margin.
Launching the N95 version and N150 version was an odd choice (i.e very similar processors)
At launch, the ME Pro is offered in N95 and N150 variants, and on paper these CPUs sit very close to each other. Both are 4-core, 4-thread Intel N-series parts with 6MB cache, and the headline frequency difference is modest: up to 3.4GHz on the N95 and up to 3.6GHz on the N150. For many NAS workloads that are constrained by storage or network throughput rather than CPU, this kind of gap may not translate into a clearly different experience, especially once real world thermal and power limits are applied.
This tight spacing makes the product stack less clear than it could be, because the pricing difference between the entry and higher tier configurations is not simply paying for a meaningfully different platform. In practice, buyers are also paying for the memory and SSD tier attached to each CPU option, and in your case the non-upgradeable memory makes that choice more permanent. If the goal is to segment the lineup, the N95 and N150 pairing may feel like a small step that leaves some users waiting for a more distinct higher performance option rather than choosing between two closely related CPUs. Given the noise that Beelink has made about this expanding range, that only further encourages some users who think these CPUs a little timid, to remain on the fence a bit longer….
There are other CPU/Architecture versions coming
As mentioned, Beelink is already signalling that the ME Pro chassis is intended to outlive the initial Intel configurations. The official product messaging highlights a swappable modular motherboard concept and explicitly references future boards beyond the current Intel N-series options, including AMD and ARM. In your first look, you also noted visible hints inside the unit that suggest the internal layout has been planned with other variants in mind, rather than being a one-off design limited to the launch hardware.
For buyers, this creates a timing question. If those alternative boards and models arrive soon, they may offer clearer performance separation, different feature priorities, or a better match for specific workloads. At the same time, the current purchase decision depends on what is available today, not what is promised, and the value of the modular approach only becomes real once the upgrade boards can actually be bought at reasonable pricing. Until the roadmap becomes a shipping product line, some users may prefer to wait, while others will simply evaluate the current N95 and N150 models on their own merits.
Mixed M.2 Speeds at PCIe 3.0 x2 and PCIe 3.0 x1? Was 10GbE and uniform lanes discussed instead?
The ME Pro’s 3 M.2 NVMe slots are not equal. Slot 1 is PCIe 3.0 x2, while slots 2 and 3 are PCIe 3.0 x1, and the manual specifically recommends using slot 1 for the system drive because it is the fastest slot. In practical terms, this creates a tiered NVMe layout where one drive has higher potential bandwidth than the other 2, which can influence how you plan cache, containers, VM storage, or scratch workloads. It also means peak NVMe performance depends heavily on which slot you choose, not just the SSD you buy.
That design choice raises an obvious tradeoff question: whether the platform would have been better served by a different allocation, such as keeping all 3 M.2 slots at PCIe 3.0 x1 in exchange for other connectivity, or prioritizing a different network tier such as 10GbE (though arguably, it might well have to sit at 3×1 and potentially be bottlenecked to 800-900MB/s, unless that lowered the m.2 to x2 bays). The ME Pro already includes 5GbE plus 2.5GbE, so the networking is not low end, but the mixed NVMe lane widths still make the storage side feel uneven by design. For a NAS focused build, the practical impact will depend on real testing: whether the internal topology causes contention under mixed loads, and whether the faster slot meaningfully benefits common tasks once network and SATA throughput are considered.
Conclusion & Verdict – Should You Buy the Beelink ME Pro NAS?
The Beelink ME Pro is a compact 2-bay NAS platform that combines SATA storage with 3 M.2 NVMe slots, dual wired networking, and integrated wireless in an enclosure that prioritizes density and internal access. It also introduces a modular motherboard drawer concept that, if supported with real upgrade boards over time, could change how long the chassis remains useful compared with typical pre-built NAS systems. As a hardware package, it is aimed at users who want high connectivity and mixed storage options without moving to a larger box.
At the same time, several of its main limitations are set at purchase and cannot be easily changed later. The memory appears fixed, the internal fit is very tight during drive and bracket handling, and the launch CPU options are closely spaced rather than clearly separated performance tiers. The NVMe layout is also mixed speed by design, which affects how you should plan drive placement and workloads. Whether these tradeoffs are acceptable depends largely on how much you value the enclosure size, the network ports, and the promised modular roadmap versus the more conventional upgrade flexibility of larger or more established NAS designs.
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service checkHEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check FiverHave you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.
Le Comet PoE GL-RM1PE est un petit boîtier de KVM PoE sur IP orienté homelab / sysadmin.
Il permet de piloter une machine à distance jusqu'au BIOS, une sorte d'alternative à plug'n'play à un montage Pi-KVM en local, à distance grâce à un port montant ou à travers un réseau VPN (Tailscale).
J'ai contacté le fabricant GL.iNET afin de pouvoir tester ce produit et vous le présenter ici, accompagné de son Fingerbot GL-FGB-01 permettant d'appuyer sur un bouton à distance en simulant un doigt humain.
Qui est cette marque ?
GL.iNET est une marque chinoise dont j'entends de plus en plus parler. Personnellement j'ai découvert la marque grâce à la dernière campagne participative avec +1M$ récoltés pour le Comet Pro.
Cette marque se positionne comme un outsider sur le créneau de ceux qui aiment bidouiller, en proposant des équipements originaux et de bonne conception. Exactement comme Synology il y a 15 années en arrière. D'ailleurs, ils proposent de nombreux routeurs de voyage basés sur des firmwares libre comme OpenWRT en ajoutant systématiquement une couche VPN pour sécuriser vos flux des réseaux publics douteux dans les (hôtels, aéroports, etc.) et toutes sortes de passerelles, cartes...
En bref : des produits originaux avec une grosse communauté derrière, plutôt sexy !
Caractéristiques du KVM Comet POE (GL-RM1PE)
Ce produit se destine aux Administrateurs système et aux bidouilleurs en tout genre (DIY, lab maison). Par exemple pour l'administration d'un ordinateur à distance, d'un NAS ou d'un serveur (proxmox ou autre). Mais aussi l'installation d'un OS grâce au système d'ISO virtuel monté via le KVM IP.
Sous le capot, on est sur une plateforme ARM plutôt musclée pour un simple KVM.
CPU : quad‑core ARM Cortex‑A53
RAM : DDR3L 1Go
Stockage : 32GB eMMC pour le stockage ISO et partage USB
1 entrée HDMI
Réseau : 1Gbps PoE (latence 30-60ms) 802.3af
Alimentation : Ethernet (PoE) ou par Type-C (5V/2A, compatible PD)
Support de l'audio
Poids : 140 grammes
Consommation <5 watts
Le Comet propose transcodage temps réel jusqu'à une résolution de 4K @30FPS.
Le gros changement par rapport aux premiers Comet, c’est cette eMMC de 32 Go, qui permet de stocker des ISO de taille confortable directement sur le boîtier, sans dépendre d’un PC local pour monter un média virtuel.
Une fois les formalités de création de compte passées : on branche et ça marche !
Important : je vous conseille de ne connecter que le KVM IP et de déconnecter tous vos autres écrans, Pour éviter que le KVM se retrouve comme écran secondaire, cela vous évitera un écran tout noir. Si vous connectez d'autres écrans, pensez à définir le KVM en écran principal et vous n'aurez plus de souci.
L'alimentation se fait via PoE en ethernet ou directement via USB-C. Le KVM se fait passer pour un ensemble clavier/souris au travers du câble USB-C et il récupère la sortie vidéo sur son entrée HDMI :
Pour configurer le produit vous pouvez utiliser GLKVM App, disponible pour Windows et Mac.
Pour la suite, vous pouvez tout faire via votre navigateur web tant qu'il supporte WebRTC (et qu'il n'est pas désactivé comme ce fut mon cas dans Firefox) grâce à l'URL suivante :
https://glkvm.local
Ou via l'IP locale attribuée (je vous conseille de définir du DHCP Static).
Pour accéder au KVM depuis Internet il faut l'associer au cloud GL.iNet, c'est natif et rapide.
Une URL liée à *.glkvm.com vous est assignée (gardez là pour vous car elle est fixe, bien qu'un mot de passe soit demandé à la connexion) :
Côté fonctionnalités :
Contrôle à distance (KVM IP)
Clavier virtuel
EDID personnalisé (code écran pour la résolution)
Presse-Papier (copier/coller)
Hotkeys (CTRL+ALT+SUPP etc)
Qualité d'image au choix et rotation de l'image
Transfert de fichier
Reboot du KVM
Mode clair ou sombre (web)
Un très bon côté consommation du boitier allumé en IDLE (écran connecté sans utilisation) car nous sommes en dessous d'un watt :
Ceci explique qu'il puisse être alimenté par un port USB de la machine cible (prévoir 1A donc USB3 ou PD). Pour ma part en USB3 ça fonctionnait parfaitement bien, dans le cas où vous n'avez pas de PoE, mais c'est un câble de plus.
Côté menu et interaction avec l'hôte je vous ai fait un condensé des menus et options disponibles :
La résolution de l'écran, le type (WebRTC ou direct) influenceront la qualité. Vous pouvez aussi choisir quelles informations sont envoyées comme EDID (identification de l'écran). Les options sont assez nombreuses sans être inutiles.
Côté "toolbox" il est possible d'injecter du contenu dans le presse papiers :
Le menu wake on lan permettra de réveiller votre machine si elle est en veille et que le KVM n'y parvient pas via les actions de clavier souris et sera pratique si vous n'avez pas de fingerbot.
On peut aussi se connecter en console comme je vous le montre dans le paragraphe suivant.
KVM : un accès root en SSH (et en web)
L'accès console est disponible directement en root depuis l'interface web et en SSH sur le port 22 (root:<mdp_web>) :
On voit bien l'eMMC de 32Go montée sur /userdata/media en exfat.
Côté OS on est sur un Buildroot custom.
KVM : montage d'un fichier / fichier ISO
Autre fonctionnalité utile, il est possible de monter à distance un fichier ISO ou des fichiers classiques :
et le KVM va faire apparaître le tout dans une lettre de lecteur (ici L:\) :
Comme ce montage virtuel est disponible en lecture+écriture, il est tout à fait possible de déposer un fichier depuis la machine cible pour le télécharger via l'interface web ensuite :
Malin et pratique si l'on a besoin de récupérer un fichier de log, etc.
On peut également uploader directement un fichier depuis une URL, pratique :
Et également installer un OS en montant une ISO via le menu "Virtual Media" après avoir envoyé l'ISO sur le KVM :
J'ai également expérimenté une mise à jour de BIOS UEFI à distance :
Upgrade de BIOS via retour KVM IP, c'est pour la science... enfin mon article^^ pic.twitter.com/BaI6XG8nwn
Pour éviter les problématiques de clavier qwerty/azerty un clavier virtuel est présent, ça dépanne bien et évite les prises de tête... Comme ici dans l'interface UEFI qui ne supporte rien d'autre que du qwerty :
En revanche, impossible de passer en AZERTY, même quand on est sous Windows, c'est un problème.
KVM : quelques inconvénients
Si le produit est tout à fait fonctionnel, j'ai tout de même noté quelques pistes d'amélioration et/ou dysfonctionnement :
pas de sortie HDMI (pour avoir un miroir sur un vrai écran)
Pas de langue française disponible
Faible rythme de publication de firmwares (4 mois)
Boutons précédents/suivant de la souris non supporté (même en plein écran)
pas de résolution des noms (netbios) dans la partie Wake on Lan
pas de support du clavier virtuel azerty
l'activation du media virtuel nécessite un reboot du KVM
Visibilité de fichiers cachés/système inutiles (System Volume Information)
Également, j'aurais apprécié une entrée VGA, je n'aime pas trop l'ajout d'adaptateurs Amazon dont la qualité varie beaucoup.
Si le stockage de l'eMMC peut semble un peu juste avec ses 32Go il est extensible avec une clé ou un disque USB.
Fingerbot (GL-FGB-01)
Si la machine sur laquelle vous connectez le KVM Comet est éteinte ou plante, alors un Fingerbot. peut vous rendre service. Il va, comme un doigt humain, presser un bouton "power" (ou tout autre action, mais à priori ce ne sera pas pour votre machine à café cette fois!).
Ici c'est le GL-FGB-01, un petit boitier plastique que l'on accroche sur une machine dans le but de presser le bouton d'allumage / arrêt :
Il est livré avec une pince qui permet de pincer un ordinateur portable dans le but d'atteindre la touche Power.
On colle le fingerbot sur la pince et on fixe la pince en serrant la vis (il y a un ressort à l'intérieur) :
Pour mettre en route le fingerbot il suffit de retirer le capot pour ôter la protection de la pile lithium (CR2) puis connecter le dongle USB sur le port USB du KVM :
Au-dessus de la pile se situe un petit bouton test, il permet de s'assurer que le produit fonctionne mécaniquement et de l'ajuster sur votre machine.
2 modes permettent d'appuyer plus ou moins loin (avec un angle différent), light ou hard :
Pensez à bien ajuster avec des petites cales si nécessaire, car le couple de ce fingerbot est assez important et vous pourriez appuyer trop fort sur un bouton
A noter qu'il existe un kit ATX si vous préférez ne pas utiliser de fingerbot, ainsi que d'autres versions de KVM si vous préférez avoir un écran.
Conclusion
C'est le genre de boîtier qu’on oublie une fois en place, jusqu’au jour où un serveur ne démarre plus un dimanche soir ! Et là on se félicite de l’avoir posé dans le rack
Les utilisations possibles sont nombreuses : connexion à distance à votre machine de télétravail pro depuis votre chalet à Megève le KVM étant vu comme un écran et un dispositif clavier/souris il n'interfèrera pas avec les restrictions de votre IT (je ne vous encourage pas à bypass le règlement IT de votre entreprise hein !). Grâce au support de l'audio et du micro vous pourrez même utiliser Teams
Mais aussi pour reprendre la main sur un serveur, une maquette, une machine de lab, pallier l'absence d'une console IPMI (iLO, idrac) grâce au fingerbot qui permet dans tous les cas de forcer un reboot grâce à l'appui sur le bouton d'alimentation.
J'ai écrit cet article à partir de mon laptop via le retour KVM video de mon ordinateur fixe qui est dans une autre pièce. Pour limiter la latence j'ai laissé le clavier sans fil logitech mappé en direct. Et c'est super confortable ! En ajustant la qualité vidéo on agit directement sur la latence (en activant plus ou moins de compression).
J'ai également testé le support via le forum et j'ai eu un retour rapide, malgré la modération de chaque message posté.
On trouve le KVM Comet PoE à environ 140€ et le Fingerbot 33€ :
En conclusion : je trouve le produit original, fonctionnel et bien fini avec son boitier en aluminium. Espérons que la démocratisation de ce type d'équipement permettra de réduire le coût de fabrication.
The Best RAID 5 Ready 4/5/6-Bay NAS Servers of 2025
Multi bay NAS units in the 4,5 and 6 bay bracket have become the default choice for users who want a single chassis that can handle RAID 5 or larger arrays, mix HDD and NVMe storage and still fit under a desk or on a shelf. This roundup looks at systems released in 2025 that sit in that space, from compact ARM based 4 bay boxes up to more expandable x86 platforms with additional M.2 slots and higher network bandwidth. The focus is on how each unit balances raw storage capacity across SATA and NVMe, the type of RAID and pool layouts it can realistically support, and the power, noise and feature overhead that comes with those choices, so readers can match a chassis to their plans for backup, media, virtualisation or general home lab use without stepping up to larger, more complex rack or 8 bay solutions.
SPECS: AMD Ryzen 7 255 8 core 16 thread up to 4.9 GHz – up to 96 GB DDR5 via 2 SODIMM slots – 5 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays – 1 x 10 GbE RJ45 / 1 x 5 GbE RJ45 – 3 x M.2 NVMe or U.2 SSD slots (PCIe 4.0, mixed x1 and x2 lanes) plus 128 GB OS storage.
With 5 SATA bays rated for up to 22 TB per disk and 3 PCIe 4.0 NVMe or U.2 positions, the N5 can be configured as a hybrid array where high capacity RAID 5 or RAID 6 sits on HDDs while SSDs are used for fast pools or tiered storage. MinisCloud OS exposes ZFS style RAID options including RAID 0, 1, 5 and 6, snapshots and compression, so the storage layout can be tuned for sequential workloads, mixed containers or heavier virtualisation without replacing the base system. The Ryzen 7 255 and Radeon 780M iGPU give it enough compute and PCIe bandwidth for multi gig throughput over the combined 10 GbE and 5 GbE interfaces, but they also raise power use and thermal output compared with simpler ARM or low end x86 models. In a 4 or 5 bay context it therefore suits users who expect to keep expanding with higher density drives and multiple NVMe pools over several years, rather than those who just need a small RAID 5 and basic apps.
The Minisforum N5 Pro is an impressive and highly versatile NAS platform that successfully combines the core strengths of a storage appliance with the capabilities of a compact, workstation-class server, making it suitable for demanding and varied use cases. Its defining features include a 12-core Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 CPU with 24 threads and onboard AI acceleration up to 50 TOPS, support for up to 96GB of ECC-capable DDR5 memory for data integrity, and a hybrid storage architecture offering up to 144TB total capacity through a mix of five SATA bays and three NVMe/U.2 slots. Additional highlights such as ZFS file system support with snapshots, inline compression, and self-healing, along with high-speed networking via dual 10GbE and 5GbE ports, and expansion through PCIe Gen 4 ×16 and OCuLink interfaces, position it well beyond the capabilities of typical consumer NAS systems. The compact, fully metal chassis is easy to service and efficiently cooled, enabling continuous operation even under sustained virtual machine, AI, or media workloads.
At the same time, the bundled MinisCloud OS, while feature-rich with AI photo indexing, Docker support, and mobile integration, remains a work in progress, lacking some enterprise-grade polish, robust localization, and more advanced tools expected in mature NAS ecosystems. Minor drawbacks such as the external PSU, the thermally challenged pre-installed OS SSD, and the higher cost of the Pro variant relative to the standard N5 are important to weigh, particularly for users who may not fully utilize the Pro’s ECC and AI-specific advantages. For advanced users, homelab builders, and technical teams who require high compute density, flexible storage, and full control over their software stack, the N5 Pro delivers workstation-level performance and configurability in NAS form—offering one of the most forward-thinking and adaptable solutions available today in this segment.
High-performance AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 CPU with 12 cores, 24 threads, and AI acceleration (50 TOPS NPU) is INCREDIBLE for a compact desktop purchase Support for up to 96GB DDR5 memory with ECC, ensuring data integrity and stability in critical environments ZFS-ready storage with numerous ZFS and TRADITIONAL RAID configurations, snapshots, and inline compression Hybrid storage support: five 3.5\\\"/2.5\\\" SATA bays plus three NVMe/U.2 SSD slots, with up to 144TB total capacity Versatile expansion options including PCIe Gen 4 ×16 slot (×4 electrical) and OCuLink port for GPUs or NVMe cages Dual high-speed networking: 10GbE and 5GbE RJ45 ports with link aggregation support + (using the inclusive MinisCloud OS) the use of the USB4 ports for direct PC/Mac connection! Fully metal, compact, and serviceable chassis with thoughtful cooling and accessible internal layout - makes maintenance, upgrades and troubleshooting a complete breeze! Compatibility with third-party OSes (TrueNAS, Unraid, Linux) without voiding warranty, offering flexibility for advanced users
CONS
MinisCloud OS is functional but immature, with unfinished localisation and limited advanced enterprise features - lacks MFA, iSCSI, Security Scanner and More. Nails several key fundamentals, but still feels unfinished at this time. Despite External PSU design (will already annoy some users), it generates a lot of additional heat and may not appeal to all users overall Preinstalled 64GB OS SSD runs hot under sustained use and lacks dedicated cooling. Plus, losing one of the 3 m.2 slots to it will not please everyone (most brands manage to find a way to apply an eMMC into the board more directly, or use a USB bootloader option as a gateway for their OS Premium $1000+ pricing may be hard to justify for users who don’t need ECC memory or AI capabilities compared to the standard N5 at $500+
SPECS: Rockchip RK3588 8 core ARM up to 2.0 GHz – 8 GB LPDDR4X – 4 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays – 1 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 – no internal M.2 SSD slots.
The DH4300 Plus concentrates all of its storage on 4 SATA bays with support for RAID 0, 1, 5, 6 and 10, up to a stated 120 TB raw using 30 TB disks, which makes it a straightforward choice for traditional RAID 5 capacity rather than mixed media architectures. The absence of M.2 slots means there is no internal SSD cache tier, although SSDs can still be used in the main bays if lower latency is required, at the cost of capacity per bay. In return, the RK3588 SoC and LPDDR4X memory keep power consumption relatively low, with quoted figures under 25 W under load, and the 2.5 GbE interface is enough to saturate what 4 mechanical drives in RAID 5 or RAID 6 can usually deliver. UGreen’s UGOS Pro platform adds a container system, snapshot capable file services and consumer facing features such as AI photo indexing, so for a 4 bay RAID 5 appliance the trade off is clear: a fixed, HDD focused storage layout with no internal NVMe, in exchange for low complexity, modest power draw and a simple upgrade path based mainly on higher capacity disks.
The UGREEN DH4300 Plus carves out a unique niche in the budget NAS landscape by delivering hardware typically reserved for higher-tier systems at a much lower price point. Its RK3588 processor, 8GB of RAM, and support for 2.5GbE networking place it well ahead of most similarly priced competitors in terms of raw specifications. Additionally, features such as HDMI output, 10Gbps USB ports, and local AI-powered photo indexing are rare to find in entry-level NAS systems. Despite its plastic-heavy internal design and lack of expansion options like PCIe or M.2, the device delivers stable performance for file sharing, media access, and low-intensity AI workloads. It is not suited for power users demanding virtual machines or advanced snapshot automation, but within its class, the DH4300 Plus presents an appealing balance between cost and capability.
That said, the software experience is still a work in progress. UGOS Pro covers the essentials and offers a visually accessible UI, but lacks the advanced features and ecosystem integration found in more mature platforms like Synology DSM or QNAP QTS. Docker and snapshot support add welcome flexibility, but the absence of native Jellyfin, iSCSI, and VM functionality limits its use in more complex environments. Still, for home users, media collectors, or small office setups looking for reliable backup, modest AI-enhanced photo sorting, and smooth 4K playback, the DH4300 Plus delivers value well beyond its price tag. While it won’t replace high-end NAS appliances, it serves as a capable, efficient, and quietly innovative option in a saturated entry-level NAS market.
Powerful ARM CPU: Equipped with the RK3588 SoC, offering 8 cores, integrated GPU, and NPU for AI workloads. Generous (but fixed!) Memory: 8GB LPDDR4X RAM, rare in budget NAS systems, supports multitasking and Docker use. 2.5GbE Network Port: Provides faster-than-Gigabit throughput for backups, media streaming, and multi-user access. HDMI 2.1 Output: Rare on ARM powered turnkey NAS, and enables direct media playback or NAS control at up to 4K 60Hz, uncommon in value-tier NAS units. USB 10Gbps Ports: Dual USB-A 10Gbps and one USB-C 5Gbps allow for high-speed backups or external storage expansion. AI Photo Management: Built-in NPU supports facial recognition and scene detection for local, private media organization. Low Power Consumption: Efficient under load (~30W) and idle (~5W without drives), suitable for 24/7 operation.
CONS
No PCIe or M.2 Expansion: Lacks future scalability for NVMe caching, 10GbE, or other upgrades. Single LAN Port: Only one 2.5GbE port, with no failover or link aggregation support. Limited Software Ecosystem: UGOS Pro lacks iSCSI, VM support, and native Jellyfin, trailing behind DSM/QTS in maturity.
SPECS: Intel N150 quad core up to 3.6 GHz – 12 GB LPDDR5 (16 GB variants available) – 6 x M.2 SSD slots (1 preinstalled 2 TB PCIe 3.0 x2, 5 user accessible PCIe 3.0 x1) plus 64 GB eMMC – dual 2.5 GbE RJ45.
The ME Mini replaces conventional 3.5″ or 2.5″ bays with 6 M.2 sockets, one wired as a PCIe 3.0 x2 system drive and 5 as PCIe 3.0 x1, giving up to 24 TB of all flash capacity in a 99 mm cube chassis when populated with current 4 TB modules. Because there is no SATA backplane, any RAID is provided by the chosen OS or software layer, whether that is a Linux distribution, ZFS based platform or a dedicated NAS operating system installed in place of the default Windows image. From a power and thermal standpoint, the combination of an 8 to 10 W class Intel N150 and low voltage NVMe SSDs keeps system draw relatively low compared with multi bay HDD units, while still allowing the dual 2.5 GbE ports to be used effectively for small sequential workloads and many concurrent small reads. In practical terms this makes the ME Mini a compact all flash alternative to 4 or 5 bay HDD chassis for users willing to handle their own OS choice, trading spinning disk capacity and native RAID controls for high IOPS, small physical footprint and lower acoustic impact.
The Beelink ME Mini NAS delivers an uncommon blend of size, functionality, and efficiency in a market segment often dominated by larger, louder, and less integrated alternatives. It is not designed to compete with traditional enterprise-grade NAS devices or modular, scalable solutions for prosumers. Instead, its strengths lie in targeting the needs of home users who want a quiet, energy-efficient storage solution that is easy to deploy, aesthetically unobtrusive, and capable of handling daily tasks such as media streaming, file backup, or soft routing. The inclusion of six M.2 NVMe SSD slots—paired with a Gen 3 x2 system slot—offers a rare level of expansion in such a small enclosure. The integration of an internal PSU, silent fan-assisted cooling, and a surprisingly effective thermal design are thoughtful touches that differentiate it from the majority of DIY NAS mini PCs.
That said, it is not without limitations. The memory is non-upgradable, thermal accumulation at the base suggests room for improvement, and bandwidth ceilings imposed by Gen 3 x1 lanes will constrain users who demand high parallel throughput. Still, for its price point—particularly when pre-order discounts are applied—the ME Mini offers significant value, especially when compared to ARM-based NAS solutions with similar or lower specifications. With bundled Crucial SSD options and support for a wide range of NAS operating systems, it positions itself as a ready-to-go platform for tech-savvy users wanting to avoid the assembly of a fully DIY system. Overall, while not a product for every use case, the Beelink ME Mini succeeds in its aim to be a compact, stylish, and capable home NAS.
BUILD QUALITY - 9/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 8/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 10/10
8.8
PROS
Compact cube design (99x99x99mm) ideal for discreet home deployment Supports up to 6x M.2 NVMe SSDs with total capacity up to 24TB Integrated PSU eliminates bulky external power adapters Dual 2.5GbE LAN ports with link aggregation support Wi-Fi 6 and UnRAID7 Support means not limited to 2x2.5G Low power consumption (as low as 6.9W idle, ~30W peak with full load) Silent fan and effective internal thermal management via large heatsink Includes Crucial-branded SSDs in pre-configured options for reliability
CONS
Five of the six SSD slots are limited to PCIe Gen 3 x1 bandwidth Memory is soldered and non-upgradable Not 10GbE Upgradable (maybe m.2 adapter - messy) Bottom panel retains heat due to lack of active ventilation
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Beelink ME Mini NAS ($329 4/6)
Check AliExpress for the Beelink ME Mini NAS ($344 4/6)
Check the Official Beelink Site for the ME Mini NAS ($209 4/6)
SPECS: Intel N150 quad core up to 3.6 GHz – 16 GB DDR5 (1 slot, up to 32 GB) – 4 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays – 2 x 5 GbE RJ45 – 3 x M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 3.0 x1 slots.
The F4-425 Plus is built as a hybrid 4 bay chassis with 3 additional M.2 NVMe slots, allowing a mixed layout where HDDs hold bulk data in conventional RAID while SSDs are used for cache or as separate RAID 5 or RAID 1 pools. TerraMaster quotes support for up to 120 TB on the 4 SATA bays plus up to 24 TB across the 3 M.2 sockets, and TOS 6 can treat the SSDs as either acceleration for HDD arrays or discrete volumes for latency sensitive workloads. The dual 5 GbE ports give a potential aggregated 10 Gb link that better aligns with SSD capable throughput than 1 GbE or single 2.5 GbE designs, while the N150 CPU and 16 GB DDR5 memory are sized for small office backup, virtualisation light use and multi user file serving rather than heavy compute tasks. From a RAID planning perspective the device suits scenarios where a 4 disk RAID 5 or RAID 6 on large SATA drives is combined with SSD based scratch or application volumes, without moving to a physically larger 6 or 8 bay enclosure.
The TerraMaster F4-425 Plus demonstrates how far the company’s mid-range NAS lineup has progressed in terms of hardware refinement and real-world usability. By combining Intel’s efficient N150 processor with 16GB of DDR5 memory, dual 5GbE connectivity, and triple M.2 NVMe slots, it provides a specification normally reserved for higher-priced units. The build quality, centered around a full-metal chassis and quiet cooling design, contributes to consistent thermals and low power usage even under multi-day workloads. While the design omits premium touches like drive locks or redundant fans, the emphasis on practicality and efficient cooling makes it a dependable solution for continuous operation. From a user experience perspective, the integration of TOS 6 represents TerraMaster’s most stable and capable operating system to date, offering improved security features, cloud synchronization tools, snapshot management, and flexible storage configurations that appeal to both home and small office users.
From a value standpoint, the F4-425 Plus stands out as one of the most competitively priced NAS units in its category. At $569.99, or $484.99 during the initial discount period, it delivers strong network and storage performance that aligns closely with rivals from Synology and QNAP while retaining open installation flexibility for third-party platforms such as Unraid or TrueNAS. Its combination of high-speed connectivity, compact design, and mature software environment makes it an appealing option for anyone seeking a 4-bay system capable of multitasking across media streaming, data backup, and light virtualization. Although it cannot fully match the polish of Synology DSM or the plugin ecosystem of QNAP QTS, TerraMaster has successfully positioned this device as a bridge between affordability and professional performance, solidifying its place as one of the more balanced NAS releases of 2025.
• Dual 5GbE network ports with full independent bandwidth for high-speed transfers + lots of USB-to-5GbE $30 upgrades in the market now • Three PCIe 3.0 x1 M.2 NVMe slots supporting cache or storage pool configurations • Intel N150 processor with integrated graphics enabling 4K hardware decoding and AES-NI encryption • 16GB DDR5 memory (expandable to 32GB) offering improved bandwidth and multitasking performance • Full-metal chassis with efficient thermals, low noise levels, and minimal vibration • Comprehensive RAID and storage management through TOS 6 with snapshot and HyperLock-WORM protection • Supports Docker, virtual machines, Plex, Emby, and Jellyfin natively within TOS 6 • Competitive pricing with strong value relative to Synology and QNAP alternatives
CONS
• Cheaper N150 NAS Systems have arrived earlier in 2025 • 5GbE adoption is low, so only larger 10GbE ready groups (via auto-negotiation) will enjoy the benefits of 5GbE • TOS 6 interface and app ecosystem remain less polished than top-tier NAS platforms
SPECS: AMD Ryzen V1500B quad core 2.2 GHz – 8 GB DDR4 ECC (2 slots, up to 32 GB) – 5 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays – 2 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 – 2 x M.2 2280 NVMe slots plus 1 x PCIe 3.0 x2 expansion slot.
The DS1525+ follows Synology’s typical pattern of putting all primary capacity on 5 hot swap SATA bays while reserving 2 internal M.2 slots for NVMe SSDs used as cache or, in some scenarios, as separate pools under DSM. Raw capacity on the main bays is specified around 100 TB, and with 2 supported DX525 expansion units the platform can scale to 15 drives and roughly 300 TB, giving it more growth headroom than most standalone 4 or 5 bay devices. DSM prefers Synology certified NVMe modules for cache, and the typical deployment is therefore a RAID 5 or RAID 6 array on the 5 SATA disks with SSD cache accelerating small random access workloads such as virtual machines, databases or heavy Synology Drive usage. The Ryzen V1500B and ECC memory are adequate for that role and integrate with DSM features like Btrfs snapshots, Active Backup Suite and Virtual Machine Manager, but they do not drive NVMe storage as a primary all flash tier in the way more other NAS brands do (i.e you can only use them for caching, or limited ‘synology only SSD’ use for pools to comparatively lower performance than most). The result is a system where the storage design is conservative but predictable, emphasising SATA RAID resilience and cache-assisted responsiveness rather than radical hybrid layouts, backed by a mature software stack.
The Synology DS1525+ is a capable and well built NAS that continues the company’s focus on dependable performance, solid build quality and very tight integration with DSM, which is the main justification for choosing this platform over more open hardware from other vendors. Its compact 5 bay design, quiet operation and scalable storage make it suitable for small offices, creative studios and prosumers who want a single system to handle file serving, backup and light virtualisation. The inclusion of a server grade Ryzen V1500B CPU and ECC memory support provides predictable performance for DSM services such as Synology Drive, Synology Office, Virtual Machine Manager and Surveillance Station, while the dual M.2 slots and PCIe expansion give enough headroom for cache and 10 GbE upgrades. DSM itself remains the central strength: Btrfs based volumes with snapshots, Active Backup Suite for Windows, Linux and SaaS workloads, integrated directory and access control, and relatively polished mobile and web clients mean that much of the day to day administration, recovery and user management can be handled inside a single, consistent interface rather than across multiple third party tools.
More importantly for many buyers, Synology’s 2025 Plus series, including the DS1525+, now fully supports third party hard drives without on screen warnings or functional restrictions, which removes a major concern from earlier policies and restores flexibility for users reusing existing disks or mixing capacities and brands under DSM’s storage manager. By contrast, M.2 SSD support remains locked to Synology’s own validated modules, so NVMe upgrades for DSM cache or SSD pools still carry a vendor premium and limit hardware choice. The switch from four 1 GbE ports to two 2.5 GbE ports trades some port level redundancy for higher per port bandwidth and may require compatible switches to realise the benefit, but DSM can aggregate links, shape traffic and expose detailed monitoring from within its own interface.
In practice the DS1525+ suits users who prioritise DSM’s software maturity, integrated backup and collaboration stack and the relative simplicity of a managed ecosystem over maximum hardware openness; for those who want unrestricted NVMe choices or the highest raw performance per dollar, more generic x86 systems with looser SSD validation may be a better fit.
Compact and quiet 5-bay design with support for 15 drives total Dual 2.5GbE ports with aggregation and optional 10GbE upgrade ECC memory support with upgradable capacity up to 32 GB Hot-swappable drive bays and tool-free tray design Integrated M.2 NVMe slots for caching or storage pools are easy to access, tooless and uncomplicated to deploy Excellent DSM software suite with extensive features Stable performance under multi-user and virtualized workloads Efficient cooling with low noise levels in office environments
CONS
Huge limitations on the choice of HDD and SSD Media you can use on this system USB ports limited to basic storage/UPS functionality M.2 NVMe performance has limited scope in current configuration and support
Taken together, the Minisforum N5, UGREEN DH4300 Plus, Beelink ME Mini, TerraMaster F4-425 Plus and Synology DS1525+ outline the main paths available in the 4,5 and 6 bay segment in 2025: high core count x86 with mixed SATA and NVMe for heavier workloads, low power ARM with straightforward 4 bay RAID for cost sensitive deployments, compact all flash designs where capacity scales through M.2 rather than 3.5 inch bays, hybrid chassis that combine 4 bay RAID with several SSD slots, and software led platforms where DSM’s feature set is the primary reason to buy. None of them is universally better than the others; the practical choice depends on whether the priority is raw HDD capacity in RAID 5 or RAID 6, a larger number of NVMe slots, lower power use, or tighter integration of backup, collaboration and virtualisation tools. For buyers who understand how they intend to balance SATA and NVMe storage over the next few years, these units set a useful reference point for what can realistically be expected from a modern 4,5 or 6 bay NAS without moving to larger rackmount or 8 bay hardware.
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service checkHEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check FiverHave you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.
Comme chaque année au premier Janvier, je vous souhaite mes meilleurs vœux de bonheur à tous et à toutes !
J'espère qu'en ces temps mouvementés, vous trouverez pour 2026 ce qui vous manquait en 2025 !
Je profite de ce billet, comme pour les années précédentes, pour dresser un bilan.
Début 2025, j'avais comme objectif de passer le site linuxtricks sur la version 6 du moteur PHPBoost. Cette fois-ci je m'y suis mis, le thème est prêt, les développements perso sont terminés. Cependant, Linuxtricks est toujours sur la version 5.2 de PHPBoost. Le processus de mise à jour ne se passe pas correctement, le problème est reproductible et identifié. J'ai échangé sur le forum de PHPBoost et plus d'une heure et demi en vocal, ils vont regarder afin de m'apporter une solution.
Pour 2026, l'objectif sera de concrétiser le passage du site sur la version 6 du moteur PHPBoost une bonne fois pour toutes. Là je suis maintenant dépendant de la solution apportée. Je ne migrerai pas vers une autre solution à ce stade car j'ai pu avoir quelques nouvelles du projet PHPBoost dont je garderai les détails, car je laisserai les équipes communiquer officiellement, mais elles sont rassurantes !
Je vais commencer par le bilan de Twitch !
Début 2025, j'avais indiqué "j'ai vraiment aussi envie de monter en puissance la chaine twitch, qui a été créée cet été et qui a déjà 1000 followers"
Sur cette plateforme les objectifs ont été atteints :
- Série de lives sur la découverte de LFS : FAIT
- Obtention du partenariat sur la plateforme : ce n'était pas un objectif, je n'y avais même pas songé, mais on l'a fait et c'est grace à vous ! MERCI !
Le meilleur live a été celui de "Fin de WINDOWS 10, Si vous essayiez LINUX ? Renseignements, Conseils, Questions" qui a duré plus de 4 heures, avec une moyenne de 2247 spectateurs. Merci à Twitch de nous avoir mis en page d'accueil, il y a eu énormément d'échanges instructifs. : https://twitchtracker.com/adrienlinuxtricks/streams/314850003428
La chaine a quand même de très bonnes statistiques, c'est grâce à vous, vous aimez mon contenu, différent de ce que je fais sur Youtube, et je ne m'attendais pas à de si bonnes nouvelles.
Sur le mois de décembre, nous sommes à une moyenne de 97.4 spectateurs sur l'ensemble des lives.
Au 31/12/2025, vous êtes 2693 followers.
Franchement, je ne sais pas quoi dire; à part MERCI pour votre soutien.
Etant partenaire, j'ai pu créer une équipe "Geeks Francophones" pour rassembler les streamer (qui ont accepté l'invitation) parlant d'opensource et d'informatique en général : https://www.twitch.tv/team/geeksfr
J'aimerais en 2026 essayer d'organiser un événement avec tous ces streamers (j'ai déjà quelques idées).
Concernant sur Youtube, j'ai publié 118 vidéos en 2025, contre 115 l'année 2024. C'est un peu plus mais je ne suis pas à la recherche de publications à un rythme fou non plus.
J'ai réalisé aussi 2 shorts, mais je ne sais toujours pas comment utiliser ce format, d'où le peu de contenu sous cette forme.
Cependant, les vidéos attirent toujours, voici quelques stats :
- 2 265 211 vues sur l'année 2025 (1 571 544 en 2024 soit +45%)
- 211 620 heures cumulées visionnées 2025 (147 886 en 2024 soit +44%)
- 12 254 abonnés de plus en 2025 (8 071 en plus en 2024 soit +53%)
Nous sommes à 71 901 abonnés ! Merci à vous.
Il n'y a pas de vidéo qui a cartonné outre mesure (car sur l'année, les vidéos publiées ont toujours eu un "nombre de vues" inférieures au nombre total d'abonés).
Vous allez comprendre avec le TOP5 des vidéos de 2025 pourquoi la chaine à évoluée de façon importante :
- 1 : Mettre à jour vers Windows 11 sur un PC non compatible : 74 236 vues
- 2 : TINY 11 : Windows 11 Super Light, Créer son image d'installation : 53 096 vues
- 3 : Activer les mises à jour étendues de Windows 10 (avec et sans compte Microsoft) : 52 979 vues
- 4 : Installer Linux (Ubuntu) sur son ordinateur Débutant : 44 082 vues
- 5 : Zorin OS 18 est là ! Tour des nouveautés : 36 597 vues
Si la chaine a bien évolué sur cette année, c'est parce qu'il y a eu du contenu Windows, donc en dehors de la "niche" Linux. Cela a attiré des nouveaux spectateurs, de nouveaux abonés.
Je ne suis cependant pas satisfait de ces résultats car cela met en évidence que le contenu Linux de la chaîne n'intéresse que les "habitués" et que la progression ne se fait que sur un autre domaine que Linux et le logiciel libre.
On voit donc la difficulté d'attirer des nouveaux sur les sujets Linux. Pourtant, on profite de la visibilité de Youtube.
Les revenus globaux ont quant à eux significativement augmenté (71% par rapport à 2024)
Les vidéos "Windows" rapportent plus par tranche de 1000 vues (globalement 2 fois plus), et je pense que c'est lié à 2 choses :
- Les annonceurs savent que ce sera plus vu donc la publicité rapporte plus au créateur
- Les utilisateurs qui visionnent ces vidéos utilisent moins de bloqueurs de publicités, et par conséquent, les revenus sont plus élevés.
Le but est de pouvoir autofinancer la chaine, le site, les noms de domaine, les frais et un peu de surplus pour faire des dons à des associations ou des projets libres. C'est toujours le cas. J'ai pu réinvestir de l'argent pour acheter une nouvelle machine (le Minisforum avec ses 2To de SSD et 64Go de RAM) pour faire fonctionner toutes les machines virtuelles sous Proxmox ! Donc ça c'est cool !
Le site quant à lui, a bien été complété cette année.
J'ai fouillé dans la base de données :
- 51 pages de wiki créées
- 76 pages de wiki modifiées
C'est pas mal ! Il y a eu quelques articles Apline Linux, NixOS, IA, Debian (DHCP/DNS/DDNS), des logiciels (send, plakar, tldr, tar, adguard) et quelques articles sur podman, proxmox et Raspberry Pi.
En 2025, j'ai continué à mixer sur Twitch sur la chaine adrienLT_DJ. Vous le savez sans doute, la musique me passionne tout autant que l'informatique, et j'ai pu m'éclater dans ce domaine. Les revenus Twitch ne sont pas énormes, à cause notamment du programme TwitchDJ lancé en 2024 par la plateforme. Nous sommes prélevés entre 30 et 40% de nos revenus pour payer une sorte de SACEM. Pour info, sur un "sub" de 4.99€, on perçoit que 50%, soit 2.50€. Enlevez 35% de TAXE DJ, il reste 1.62€. C'est la somme "virée" sur le compte. Sur ce "gain", retirez 26% d'URSSAF : il reste 1.20€. Ceci reste imposé sur le revenu, bref, il reste 1€. Cependant, je m'éclate à mixer sur Twitch et dans la vie réelle, la chaine reste approximativement à l'équilibre, car je n'ai pas acheté de nouveau matériel (PC, écran, micro, carte son, contrôleur DJ) donc les revenus ont tout juste payé la musique (j'achète à l'unité, je suis un peu limite pour prendre l'abonnement Beatport DJ.
Si vous voulez me suivre, voici le lien : https://www.twitch.tv/adrienLT_DJ, nous avons passé en fin d'année les 3643 abonnés ! On était à 2800 fin 2024, c'est pas mal !
On a une mooyenne de 39 spectateurs, et on est TOP 1.17% Twitch selon Twitch Tracker https://twitchtracker.com/adrienlt_dj
Pour finir ce bilan 2025, je reviens sur le site Linuxtricks.
Vous êtes plus nombreux à consulter mon site cette année après un déclin en 2024, ça fait plaisir !
En quelques chiffres :
Plus de 4920 visiteurs uniques journaliers en 2025 contre 3795 en 2024
Sur l'année 2025, 1341402 pages ont été vues par mois, contre 1085812 en 2024
A noter que le plus gros site référent (c'est à dire le site qui est consulté juste avant) est DuckDuckGo. On a ensuite QWant, Youtube, puis Brave.
De nombreux articles sont très bien référencés, je regarde assez régulièrement dans la base de données ceux le plus consulté pour essayer de les mettre à jour ou les clarifier.
Il faut vraiment qu'en 2026, je m'occupe de restructurer l'article OpenSSH.
J'en profite pour rappeler que par respect, s'il vous plait, quand vous citez / Copiez-collez un article qui a été rédigé ici, mentionnez la source et redistribuez le avec la même licence comme l'indique la licence du site. ( CC BY SA )
Adrien nous propose une vidéo sur la commande "tldr" (en français : trop long, pas lu) en complément de "man" :
J'ai toujours préféré les exemples à de longues documentations, certes essentielles pour décrire les options, mais rarement digestes pour les humains. La commande "man" reste utile si "tldr" ne vous offre pas les options les plus avancées... "tldr" séduira particulièrement aux débutants un peu frileux de la ligne de commande.
Et pour tout le reste, il y a les IA... à utiliser avec modération vu le prix de la RAM en ce moment
Sous Windows 11/10, les fichiers et dossiers stockés sur un disque NTFS possèdent des autorisations (ACL) qui définissent précisément quels utilisateurs peuvent lire, modifier ou supprimer leur contenu. Si ces permissions peuvent être configurées via l’interface graphique, PowerShell permet d’aller beaucoup plus loin : afficher, modifier et automatiser la gestion des droits d’accès à grande échelle.
Grâce aux cmdlets Get-Acl et Set-Acl, vous pouvez :
afficher les permissions d’un dossier ou d’un fichier,
ajouter ou retirer des autorisations,
appliquer les mêmes règles à plusieurs répertoires,
et même changer le propriétaire d’un dossier bloqué.
Cette approche est particulièrement utile pour les administrateurs ou utilisateurs avancés souhaitant :
automatiser la gestion des droits sur un serveur ou un poste multi-utilisateurs,
corriger des problèmes d’accès (“Accès refusé”) sans interface graphique,
ou déployer des permissions identiques sur plusieurs répertoires partagés.
Get-ChildItem -Recurse → parcourt récursivement toute l’arborescence.
ContainerInherit,ObjectInherit → applique la règle aux sous-dossiers et fichiers.
Cette commande réécrit les ACL de tous les sous-dossiers. Utilisez-la avec prudence sur un volume contenant beaucoup de fichiers.
Supprimer toutes les autorisations personnalisées (réinitialiser les ACL)
Pour revenir à la configuration par défaut (héritée du dossier parent) :
icacls "C:\Partage" /reset /T
Cette commande supprime toutes les règles explicites et rétablit les permissions héritées. Elle est utile pour corriger des erreurs “Accès refusé” ou des droits corrompus.
Changer le propriétaire d’un dossier (SetOwner)
Pour appliquer le changement de propriétaire à tout un dossier et ses sous-dossiers :
Ce script attribue automatiquement les permissions “Modifier” à plusieurs utilisateurs pour un même dossier.
PowerShell permet d’automatiser facilement des opérations complexes, comme appliquer des autorisations à plusieurs répertoires ou générer un rapport d’audit des droits.
Tableau récapitulatif des cmdlets PowerShell pour gérer les permissions NTFS
Cmdlet / Commande
Fonction principale
Syntaxe de base
Exemple d’utilisation
Get-Acl
Affiche la liste des autorisations (ACL) appliquées à un fichier ou dossier.
Get-Acl "C:\Dossier"
Affiche les permissions et le propriétaire du dossier.
Set-Acl
Applique ou met à jour des autorisations sur un fichier ou dossier.
Set-Acl "C:\Dossier" $acl
Met à jour les ACL selon les règles définies dans $acl.
Change le propriétaire pour le groupe Administrateurs.
Get-ChildItem -Recurse + Set-Acl
Applique des permissions à tous les sous-dossiers et fichiers.
`Get-ChildItem « C:\Dossier » -Recurse
Set-Acl -AclObject $acl`
**Get-Acl
Format-List**
Affiche les ACL dans un format lisible.
`Get-Acl « C:\Dossier »
icacls (CMD)(complément)
Réinitialise ou sauvegarde les ACL en ligne de commande.
icacls "C:\Dossier" /reset /T
Réinitialise toutes les permissions NTFS du dossier.
takeown (CMD)(complément)
Reprend la propriété d’un dossier ou fichier.
takeown /f "C:\Dossier" /r /d y
Attribue la propriété au compte administrateur courant.
Notes importantes
Les cmdlets PowerShell (Get-Acl, Set-Acl, etc.) sont plus flexibles et scriptables que les commandes classiques (icacls, takeown).
Pour toute commande modifiant les ACL, il est recommandé d’exécuter PowerShell en tant qu’administrateur.
Avant de modifier massivement des droits, vous pouvez sauvegarder les ACL avec : icacls "C:\Dossier" /save C:\backup_acl.txt /T
PowerShell ne demande pas de confirmation avant d’appliquer une modification via Set-Acl. Une erreur dans la variable $acl ou dans les permissions héritées peut supprimer des droits critiques.
Bonnes pratiques et précautions
Ne jamais appliquer un script sans sauvegarder les ACL : icacls "C:\Dossier" /save C:\Backup_ACL.txt /T
Utiliser la commande Test-Path pour vérifier les chemins avant exécution.
Toujours tester sur un dossier isolé avant d’appliquer sur un volume complet.
Exécuter PowerShell en mode Administrateur.
Une mauvaise manipulation des ACL peut rendre un dossier ou un disque inaccessible. Pensez à sauvegarder vos permissions avant toute modification en masse.
Ça va ? Vous avez passé un bon Noël ? Bien mangé ? Les cadeaux étaient cool ? Tant mieux pour vous, car de son côté, Tim Cook, a passé le sien à se faire lyncher sur X parce qu'il a posté une illustration de lait et cookies pour promouvoir
Pluribus
, la nouvelle série Apple TV+.
Pourquoi me direz-vous ? Et bien parce que tout le monde est persuadé que c'est de la bonne vieille image générée par IA.
Faut dire qu'il y a pas mal d'indices qui sèment le doute... John Gruber de Daring Fireball a été le premier à tirer la sonnette d'alarme en pointant du doigt des détails bien chelous dans l'image. Le carton de lait affiche à la fois « Whole Milk » ET « Lowfat Milk » sur ses étiquettes. Comme si le designer avait voulu cocher toutes les cases en même temps ^^ Et le labyrinthe « Cow Fun Puzzle » sur le carton ? Ben il est impossible à résoudre. Enfin si, mais uniquement en passant autour du labyrinthe, pas dedans. C'est de l'IA tout craché.
D'ailleurs, Ben Kamens, un expert qui venait justement de publier un article sur les labyrinthes générés par IA, a confirmé que l'image présentait les « caractéristiques typiques » des IA qui galèrent avec ce genre de truc. Et Gruber a aussi fait remarquer qu'on ne voit jamais de puzzles sur des cartons de lait (qui sont cireux et difficiles à imprimer) mais plutôt sur des boîtes de céréales. Comme si l'IA avait mélangé deux concepts...
Apple TV+ a répondu en créditant un certain Keith Thomson comme artiste, précisant que l'œuvre avait été « créée sur MacBook Pro ». Sauf que personne n'a tagué ce Keith Thomson et quand Slashdot l'a contacté, le bonhomme a refusé de commenter spécifiquement le projet, se contentant de dire qu'il « dessine et peint toujours à la main et utilise parfois des outils numériques standard ».
Traduction : Un esquive de niveau olympique.
Le plus marrant dans tout ça c'est que Sundar Pichai de Google a posté une boule à neige générée par IA le lendemain avec le watermark Gemini bien visible, et tout le monde a trouvé ça « trop mignon ».
Deux poids deux mesures ^^
Maintenant y'a une théorie alternative qui circule. Certains pensent que les « erreurs » seraient en fait intentionnelles... Que ce serait des références à la série Pluribus elle-même qui parle d'une intelligence collective... Le message de Cook aurait en fait été adressé à « Carol », le personnage principal joué par Rhea Seehorn. Une sorte de méta-promotion qui aurait mal tourné ? J'y crois pas une seconde...
Je pense plutôt que Keith Thomson était en famille, qu'il avait autre chose à foutre, que de toute façon il déprime parce que Midjourney ou un autre sait reproduire son style à la perfection et qu'il s'est dit « Pourquoi je me ferais chier le cul à peindre des cookies de merde pour Apple alors que je suis en train de jouer aux Lego avec mes petits enfants ?« . Bah ouais, pourquoi ? Ce n'est qu'une théorie mais c'est la mienne...
Bref, que ce soit de l'IA, de l'art volontairement buggé pour la promo, ou juste un artiste qui a fait des choix bizarres, cette histoire illustre bien le climat actuel. Les gens sont tellement bombardés d'images IA et ont tellement rien à foutre de leurs journées qu'un vrai artiste avec 30 ans de carrière peut se retrouver accusé de « triche » à tort ou à raison, parce que son labyrinthe est mal foutu.
Sous Windows 11/10, les associations de fichiers déterminent quelle application est utilisée pour ouvrir chaque type de fichier (.pdf, .jpg, .mp4, etc.) et conditionnent également l’icône affichée et le comportement à l’ouverture. Lorsqu’elles sont corrompues ou mal configurées, les fichiers peuvent s’ouvrir avec la mauvaise application, afficher une icône générique, ou provoquer systématiquement une demande Choisir une application.
Ces problèmes apparaissent souvent après une mise à jour de Windows, l’installation ou la suppression d’un logiciel, l’utilisation d’un outil de nettoyage, ou à la suite d’une infection logicielle. Dans certains cas, une simple correction ciblée suffit ; dans d’autres, il est nécessaire de réinitialiser toutes les associations pour repartir sur une base saine.
Dans ce guide, vous allez apprendre à réinitialiser et réparer les associations de fichiers sur Windows 11/10, de manière progressive et sécurisée : réinitialisation globale via les paramètres Windows, correction d’une extension précise, recours éventuel à un logiciel tiers, puis identification des situations où une réparation plus profonde de Windows devient nécessaire. L’objectif est de restaurer un comportement cohérent et durable, sans modifier inutilement les programmes par défaut ni réinstaller le système.
Symptômes et causes d’associations de fichiers corrompues
Lorsque les associations de fichiers sont corrompues sous Windows 11/10, les problèmes se manifestent généralement de façon très concrète : un double-clic n’ouvre plus le bon programme, Windows affiche un message Choisir une application, l’icône d’un type de fichier est incorrecte ou générique, ou certaines extensions ne s’ouvrent plus du tout. Dans d’autres cas, des fichiers s’ouvrent avec une application inadaptée, ou refusent de s’ouvrir malgré un logiciel installé.
Il est pertinent de réinitialiser les associations de fichiers lorsque ces dysfonctionnements apparaissent, en particulier si le problème est récent ou global. Les causes les plus courantes sont :
Installation ou désinstallation d’un logiciel (lecteur multimédia, PDF, archiveur, etc.)
Mise à jour de Windows ayant modifié les associations par défaut
Modification manuelle du registre ou des paramètres avancés
Conflit entre plusieurs applications capables d’ouvrir le même type de fichier
Profil utilisateur corrompu
Identifier ces symptômes et leur contexte permet de déterminer si une réinitialisation complète est nécessaire, ou si une réparation ciblée sur un type de fichier précis suffit, ce qui est abordé dans les sections suivantes.
Différence entre associations de fichiers et programmes par défaut
Sous Windows 11/10, les notions d’associations de fichiers et de programmes par défaut sont proches mais ne désignent pas exactement la même chose, ce qui est une source fréquente de confusion. Une association de fichiers définit le lien entre une extension (par exemple .pdf, .jpg, .mp3) et l’application chargée de l’ouvrir, ainsi que l’icône et les actions associées. Les programmes par défaut, quant à eux, correspondent au choix d’une application pour un usage général (navigateur Web, lecteur vidéo, client mail, etc.), qui peut ensuite définir plusieurs associations de fichiers en cascade.
Autrement dit, réinitialiser les programmes par défaut revient à remettre les choix globaux d’applications, tandis que réinitialiser les associations de fichiers vise à corriger des liens précis entre extensions et logiciels, souvent lorsqu’un type de fichier s’ouvre avec le mauvais programme ou ne s’ouvre plus du tout. Dans ce guide, l’objectif est donc bien de réparer ou réinitialiser les associations de fichiers, et non de choisir ou modifier les programmes par défaut de Windows, déjà couverts par des guides dédiés.
Réinitialiser toutes les associations de fichiers via les paramètres de Windows 11/10
Lorsque les associations de fichiers sont largement corrompues (plusieurs extensions concernées, icônes incorrectes, fichiers qui ne s’ouvrent plus), la solution la plus simple consiste à réinitialiser toutes les associations de fichiers aux valeurs par défaut de Windows.
Cette méthode permet de repartir sur une base saine, sans modifier les fichiers personnels.
Réinitialiser les associations de fichiers sur Windows 11
Pour réinitialiser les associations sous Windows 11 :
Ouvrez Paramètres
Allez dans Applications
Cliquez sur Applications par défaut
Faites défiler la page jusqu’en bas dans la partie « Paramètres associés«
Cliquez sur Réinitialiser (Réinitialiser aux valeurs recommandées par Microsoft)
Confirmez l’opération
Windows rétablit alors les associations par défaut pour tous les types de fichiers pris en charge.
Réinitialiser les associations de fichiers sur Windows 10
Sous Windows 10, la procédure est très proche :
Ouvrez Paramètres
Allez dans Applications
Cliquez sur Applications par défaut
Descendez jusqu’à la section Réinitialiser
Cliquez sur Réinitialiser
Confirmez
Toutes les associations de fichiers sont remises à l’état d’origine de Windows.
Ce que fait réellement cette réinitialisation
La réinitialisation :
Supprime les associations personnalisées
Rétablit les applications par défaut de Windows
Corrige de nombreuses erreurs d’ouverture de fichiers
Restaure les icônes associées aux extensions
En revanche, elle ne désinstalle aucun programme.
Points importants à connaître
Les fichiers s’ouvriront à nouveau avec les applications Microsoft par défaut
Vous devrez peut-être réassigner certaines extensions à vos logiciels préférés
Cette méthode est recommandée lorsque le problème est global, pas pour un seul type de fichier
Si le problème ne concerne qu’une extension précise, il est préférable d’utiliser une réparation ciblée, abordée dans la section suivante.
Réparer l’association d’un type de fichier spécifique
Lorsque le problème concerne une seule extension (par exemple .pdf, .jpg, .mp4), il est inutile de réinitialiser toutes les associations. Une réparation ciblée est plus rapide et évite de reconfigurer inutilement d’autres types de fichiers.
Réparer l’association depuis les paramètres de Windows
Ouvrez Paramètres
Allez dans Applications
Cliquez sur Applications par défaut
Dans le champ Définir les valeurs par défaut par type de fichier, recherchez l’extension concernée
Cliquez sur l’application associée
Sélectionnez le programme approprié
Cette action reconstruit l’association pour l’extension choisie et corrige généralement l’icône et l’ouverture du fichier.
Si l’association ne se corrige pas immédiatement :
Changez l’application associée pour une autre application
Fermez les paramètres
Revenez sur l’extension
Réattribuez ensuite l’application souhaitée
Ce va-et-vient force Windows à réenregistrer l’association.
Réparer l’association depuis l’Explorateur de fichiers
Pour un fichier précis :
Faites un clic droit sur le fichier
Cliquez sur Ouvrir avec
Sélectionnez Choisir une autre application
Cochez Toujours utiliser cette application
Validez
Cette méthode est pratique pour corriger rapidement un cas isolé.
À retenir
Utilisez une réinitialisation globale uniquement si plusieurs extensions sont affectées
Pour un seul type de fichier, privilégiez toujours une réparation ciblée
Une association correctement rétablie corrige aussi l’icône associée
Si l’association reste incorrecte malgré ces méthodes, une réparation via un logiciel tiers peut être envisagée, abordée dans la section suivante.
Réparer les associations de fichiers de Windows 11/10 avec un logiciel tiers
Lorsque les méthodes intégrées de Windows 11/10 ne suffisent pas (associations qui se réinitialisent mal, erreurs persistantes après nettoyage, profil endommagé), l’utilisation d’un logiciel tiers spécialisé peut permettre de réparer automatiquement les associations corrompues.
Ces outils modifient des paramètres sensibles du système. Ils doivent être utilisés en dernier recours, après avoir tenté les méthodes natives de Windows.
Les solutions les plus connues sont :
RstAssociations : Permet de restaurer rapidement les associations de fichiers par type ou en totalité.
Windows Repair : Outil plus global, capable de réparer de nombreux composants Windows, dont les associations de fichiers. Utilisez la réparation 22.
File Associations Fixer Tool : Utile lorsque certaines extensions critiques (EXE, COM, BAT) ne fonctionnent plus.
Cas particuliers et erreurs fréquentes
Le tableau ci-dessous permet d’identifier rapidement les situations courantes liées aux problèmes d’associations de fichiers sous Windows 11/10, ainsi que la solution la plus adaptée dans chaque cas.
Symptôme observé
Cause probable
Solution recommandée
Un type de fichier s’ouvre avec la mauvaise application
Association modifiée par un logiciel
Réparer l’association du type de fichier concerné
Windows affiche “Choisir une application” à chaque ouverture
Association manquante ou corrompue
Réattribuer l’application par défaut pour l’extension
Les icônes d’un type de fichier sont génériques
Association incorrecte ou cache corrompu
Réparer l’association ou réinitialiser le cache des icônes
Plusieurs extensions ne s’ouvrent plus correctement
Associations globalement corrompues
Réinitialiser toutes les associations de fichiers
Le problème est apparu après une mise à jour Windows
Valeurs par défaut modifiées
Réinitialiser les associations aux valeurs Windows
Les associations reviennent sans cesse à un mauvais état
Logiciel tiers ou malware
Vérifier les programmes installés, utiliser un outil tiers
Les fichiers s’ouvrent correctement sur un autre compte
Profil utilisateur endommagé
Réparer ou recréer le profil utilisateur
Le problème persiste malgré toutes les méthodes
Corruption système plus profonde
Envisager une réparation de Windows
Les associations se réinitialisent après chaque redémarrage
Profil ou système corrompu
Envisager une réparation plus profonde de Windows
À retenir
Un problème localisé à une extension doit être traité de manière ciblée
Un problème global justifie une réinitialisation complète des associations
Les erreurs récurrentes indiquent souvent une interférence logicielle ou un profil corrompu
Si aucune des solutions ci-dessus ne permet de corriger durablement le problème, il est alors pertinent d’envisager une réparation plus profonde de Windows, abordée dans la section suivante.
Quand une réparation plus profonde de Windows est nécessaire
Si les associations de fichiers continuent à dysfonctionner malgré leur réinitialisation et les réparations ciblées, le problème ne se situe probablement plus au niveau des extensions ou des applications, mais dans le fonctionnement interne de Windows.
Indices indiquant un problème système sous-jacent
Une intervention plus lourde devient pertinente lorsque vous constatez notamment :
Des associations qui se dérèglent à chaque redémarrage
Des types de fichiers qui reviennent systématiquement à une application incorrecte
Des erreurs similaires touchant d’autres composants (icônes, menu Démarrer, Microsoft Store)
Un comportement anormal apparu après une mise à jour majeure ou une opération de nettoyage système
Des réglages qui semblent appliqués, mais non persistants
Ces symptômes indiquent souvent que les paramètres utilisateurs ou système ne sont plus correctement enregistrés.
Réparer Windows sans repartir de zéro
Avant toute action radicale, il est préférable d’opter pour une réparation de Windows sans perte de données. Cette opération permet de remettre en état les composants internes responsables de la gestion des associations, sans supprimer vos fichiers personnels ni vos applications.
Elle est particulièrement adaptée lorsque :
Plusieurs fonctionnalités Windows présentent des anomalies
Les paramètres reviennent à un état incorrect sans raison apparente
Les solutions ciblées ne tiennent pas dans le temps
Si le problème est apparu récemment, une restauration système peut être une solution rapide et efficace. Elle permet de revenir à un état où les associations de fichiers fonctionnaient correctement, sans modifier les documents personnels.
Cette option est pertinente après :
Une mise à jour problématique
L’installation ou la suppression d’un logiciel impactant le système
En dernier recours : réinitialisation ou réinstallation
Si aucune solution ne permet de stabiliser durablement les associations de fichiers, il peut être nécessaire d’envisager une réinitialisation de Windows ou une réinstallation propre.
Ces solutions doivent rester exceptionnelles :
Elles nécessitent une sauvegarde complète
Les applications et personnalisations sont supprimées
Elles sont justifiées uniquement si le système est globalement instable
The Best PLEX, Emby and/or Jellyfin NAS Devices Released in 2025
Network media servers in 2025 range from tiny single drive boxes to fairly serious multi bay systems that can sit at the center of a home network. This article looks specifically at NAS hardware released in 2025 that can sensibly replace or supplement streaming services by running Plex, Jellyfin or Emby. The focus is on devices that arrive as complete appliances, with both hardware and a NAS style operating system included, so you can put a box on the network, install a media server app and start watching without building a PC or learning a full server stack.
To be included here, a NAS has to have gone on general sale in 2025, ship with its own OS rather than as a bareboard, and be able to run Plex Media Server, with Jellyfin and Emby support noted where it exists. In practical terms, that means hardware that can handle 4K and 1080p playback for multiple users and is realistically capable of at least 2 simultaneous 4K transcodes and 5 simultaneous 1080p transcodes, with a single exception where the overall package still makes sense for more limited workloads. RAID options, expansion, power use and noise are all taken into account, but the main filter is whether the device can function reliably as a modern media server on a typical home or small office network.
SPECS: Intel Celeron J4125 quad core 2.0 to 2.7 GHz – 4 GB DDR4 – 1 x 3.5″ 8 TB SATA bay (pre installed) – 1 x 1 GbE RJ45 / 1 x USB A 3.2 Gen 1 / 1 x USB C 3.2 Gen 1 – no M.2 SSD support.
BeeStation Plus is aimed at users who want a simple, appliance like Plex box rather than a configurable NAS. It runs Synology’s cut down BeeStation OS, has Plex Media Server support built in, and is set up entirely through a guided app and browser flow, so there is minimal configuration overhead. The hardware is sufficient for basic 4K and 1080p Plex use for a small number of clients, but the single non replaceable drive bay and lack of expansion, RAID options or M.2 slots mean it is best treated as a starter Plex unit for light libraries rather than a long term, scalable media server, and there is no official Jellyfin or Emby integration at this time.
The Synology BeeStation marks a significant shift in Synology’s product line, targeting a new segment of users with its simplified yet functional design. This device stands out as an excellent middle ground between ease of use and a comprehensive private cloud system, providing secure and seamless access to stored data. While it is incredibly user-friendly and easy to set up, the lack of LAN access by default and its single-bay, 4TB-only configuration at launch might limit its appeal to more tech-savvy users or those seeking greater flexibility and expandability. The BeeStation’s unique selling point is its simplicity, making it a compelling choice for those new to NAS systems or for users who prioritize ease of use over extensive customization options. However, its simplicity also means that it lacks the extensive app support found in Synology’s DSM platform, potentially disappointing users accustomed to the richer application ecosystem offered by Synology’s more advanced models.
For users concerned about security, the BeeStation still upholds Synology’s reputation for secure data handling, with encrypted data transmission as a standard feature. However, experienced users who prefer a more hands-on approach to their NAS setup might find the BeeStation’s lack of advanced configuration options and its reliance on internet access for setup somewhat restrictive. In terms of market positioning, the BeeStation fills a gap left by other brands like WD and Seagate in offering ‘Easy NAS’ systems. Its competitive pricing, particularly considering the included 4TB of storage, makes it an attractive option for users seeking a private cloud solution without the recurring costs associated with third-party cloud services. Despite these potential drawbacks, the BeeStation is a solid entry-level NAS solution, especially for those seeking a personal cloud with minimal setup and maintenance. It may not be as feature-rich as Synology’s DSM-based NAS devices, but for its intended audience, the BeeStation provides a well-balanced combination of functionality, ease of use, and affordability. Synology’s move to cater to a broader, less technically inclined audience with the BeeStation demonstrates their understanding of market trends and user needs, offering a solution that balances simplicity with the reliability and quality Synology is known for.
In the end, the Synology BeeStation is an ideal choice for users seeking a straightforward, reliable, and cost-effective personal cloud solution. It represents Synology’s commitment to diversifying their product range, catering to the evolving needs of different user segments. While it may not suit everyone, especially those looking for advanced features and customization, it excels in its role as a user-friendly, secure, and affordable entry-level NAS device.
SOFTWARE - 7/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 7/10
PRICE - 10/10
VALUE - 10/10
8.4
PROS
User-friendly setup, ideal for beginners or those seeking a simple cloud solution. Secure data handling with encrypted data transmission. Comes with 4TB of storage included, offering good value. Compact and lightweight design, enhancing portability. Quiet operation, suitable for home or office environments. Integrates seamlessly with popular cloud services like Google Drive and OneDrive. Affordable pricing at $199, a cost-effective alternative to third-party cloud services. Supports remote access, allowing data management from anywhere and across client devices/OS Synologys reputation for quality and reliability is still clear on this smaller scale. Several client tools (BeeFiles, BeePhotos and Desktop sync tool) for Windows, Mac, iOS and Android available for tailored access System configuration backup option to USB/C2 (Often absent in budget cloud solutions) AI Photo Recognition in BeePhotos for faces, Objects and geo data scraping + Advanced filter/search
CONS
Lacks the extensive app support and customization found in Synology\'s DSM platform. Only available in a single-bay, 4TB configuration at launch, limiting expandability. Single 5400RPM HDD running everything leads to slowdown more than you think! LAN access is disabled by default, which may not suit all users. Designed for a specific user base, may not meet the needs of more advanced users.
SPECS: AMD Ryzen 7 255 8 core 16 thread up to 4.9 GHz – up to 96 GB DDR5 via 2 SODIMM slots – 5 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays – 1 x 10 GbE RJ45 / 1 x 5 GbE RJ45 / 2 x USB4 – 3 x M.2 2280 NVMe or U.2 SSD slots (PCIe 4.0).
The Minisforum N5 is a compact 5-bay NAS that targets users who want preconfigured hardware with some workstation derived design features. It uses an x86 CPU in the same general class as the Aoostar WTR Max, paired with an internal storage module of 64 GB for the system volume, and is typically sold in the 599 to 699 USD range, with the separate Pro variant occupying a higher bracket. The chassis integrates a removable drive base section for easier maintenance, and the platform includes multi-gig networking up to 10 GbE and 5 GbE, a PCIe expansion slot and USB4 connectivity for additional bandwidth or external devices. Minisforum ships the N5 with its own NAS operating system to provide an immediate out of box experience, but the software is still relatively young and many buyers elect to overwrite the included module with a more established NAS or server OS. Throughout 2025, availability has been intermittent, reflecting a level of demand from home lab users who want higher specification NAS hardware without building entirely from individual components.
The Minisforum N5 Pro is an impressive and highly versatile NAS platform that successfully combines the core strengths of a storage appliance with the capabilities of a compact, workstation-class server, making it suitable for demanding and varied use cases. Its defining features include a 12-core Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 CPU with 24 threads and onboard AI acceleration up to 50 TOPS, support for up to 96GB of ECC-capable DDR5 memory for data integrity, and a hybrid storage architecture offering up to 144TB total capacity through a mix of five SATA bays and three NVMe/U.2 slots. Additional highlights such as ZFS file system support with snapshots, inline compression, and self-healing, along with high-speed networking via dual 10GbE and 5GbE ports, and expansion through PCIe Gen 4 ×16 and OCuLink interfaces, position it well beyond the capabilities of typical consumer NAS systems. The compact, fully metal chassis is easy to service and efficiently cooled, enabling continuous operation even under sustained virtual machine, AI, or media workloads.
At the same time, the bundled MinisCloud OS, while feature-rich with AI photo indexing, Docker support, and mobile integration, remains a work in progress, lacking some enterprise-grade polish, robust localization, and more advanced tools expected in mature NAS ecosystems. Minor drawbacks such as the external PSU, the thermally challenged pre-installed OS SSD, and the higher cost of the Pro variant relative to the standard N5 are important to weigh, particularly for users who may not fully utilize the Pro’s ECC and AI-specific advantages. For advanced users, homelab builders, and technical teams who require high compute density, flexible storage, and full control over their software stack, the N5 Pro delivers workstation-level performance and configurability in NAS form—offering one of the most forward-thinking and adaptable solutions available today in this segment.
High-performance AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 CPU with 12 cores, 24 threads, and AI acceleration (50 TOPS NPU) is INCREDIBLE for a compact desktop purchase Support for up to 96GB DDR5 memory with ECC, ensuring data integrity and stability in critical environments ZFS-ready storage with numerous ZFS and TRADITIONAL RAID configurations, snapshots, and inline compression Hybrid storage support: five 3.5\\\"/2.5\\\" SATA bays plus three NVMe/U.2 SSD slots, with up to 144TB total capacity Versatile expansion options including PCIe Gen 4 ×16 slot (×4 electrical) and OCuLink port for GPUs or NVMe cages Dual high-speed networking: 10GbE and 5GbE RJ45 ports with link aggregation support + (using the inclusive MinisCloud OS) the use of the USB4 ports for direct PC/Mac connection! Fully metal, compact, and serviceable chassis with thoughtful cooling and accessible internal layout - makes maintenance, upgrades and troubleshooting a complete breeze! Compatibility with third-party OSes (TrueNAS, Unraid, Linux) without voiding warranty, offering flexibility for advanced users
CONS
MinisCloud OS is functional but immature, with unfinished localisation and limited advanced enterprise features - lacks MFA, iSCSI, Security Scanner and More. Nails several key fundamentals, but still feels unfinished at this time. Despite External PSU design (will already annoy some users), it generates a lot of additional heat and may not appeal to all users overall Preinstalled 64GB OS SSD runs hot under sustained use and lacks dedicated cooling. Plus, losing one of the 3 m.2 slots to it will not please everyone (most brands manage to find a way to apply an eMMC into the board more directly, or use a USB bootloader option as a gateway for their OS Premium $1000+ pricing may be hard to justify for users who don’t need ECC memory or AI capabilities compared to the standard N5 at $500+
SPECS: Intel N95 quad core up to 3.4 GHz – 8 GB DDR5 (expandable to 32 GB) – 4 x M.2 2280 NVMe SSD bays – 1 x 5 GbE RJ45 / 2 x USB A 3.2 Gen 2 / 1 x USB C 3.2 Gen 2 / HDMI 2.0b – 4 x M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 slots (2 x2 / 2 x1).
The F4 SSD is an all flash NAS designed for users who want a compact, relatively low power Plex or Jellyfin server without mechanical drives. Its Intel N95 CPU and integrated graphics are sufficient for multiple 1080p and a modest number of 4K transcodes, and the 5 GbE interface allows the box to make use of higher network throughput than 1 GbE units. TerraMaster’s TOS 6 system offers a one click Plex package and container support for Jellyfin and Emby, but the interface and ecosystem are less refined than those from the largest NAS brands, and performance is ultimately limited by the entry level CPU and PCIe layout when many concurrent streams or heavier background tasks are involved.
The TerraMaster F4 SSD presents itself as a well-considered entry into the compact, all-flash NAS segment, balancing low noise, energy efficiency, and competitive performance at a sub-$400 price point. With its fanless NVMe-based design, Intel N95 quad-core processor, and DDR5 memory, it meets the essential needs of home and small office users looking for a reliable and responsive storage solution. The inclusion of TerraMaster’s increasingly capable TOS 6 operating system, featuring AI-driven photo management, centralized backup, and Docker/VM support, makes it more than just a network storage device—it becomes a lightweight but versatile data center for the home. Its TRAID support allows for mixed SSD deployments with easy expansion, which is particularly attractive to users upgrading gradually or working within budget constraints. The thoughtful internal layout and cooling also ensure performance remains consistent even under sustained load, without sacrificing the near-silent operation.
However, the F4 SSD is not without caveats. The use of a single 5GbE port, without redundancy or aggregation, may deter users requiring network failover or higher throughput for simultaneous operations. Additionally, although the PCIe lane allocation strategy maximizes the N95’s limited bandwidth, the asymmetry between Gen3 x2 and x1 slots could bottleneck RAID performance depending on how volumes are configured. When compared to the larger F8 SSD or DIY options with dual 10GbE or ECC support, the F4 SSD may feel limiting to power users or business environments with stricter reliability requirements. That said, for the vast majority of home users, content creators, and prosumers looking for an all-in-one, high-speed NAS that blends well into living spaces, the F4 SSD delivers a solid and accessible solution. Its price-to-performance ratio, combined with the simplicity of deployment and maturing software ecosystem, makes it a compelling option in the growing market of SSD NAS devices.
Compact, toolless chassis with easy-access thumb screw and SSD installation All-flash NVMe architecture with support for four M.2 2280 SSDs 5GbE network port enables high-speed local and remote transfers TRAID and TRAID+ allow mixed-capacity SSDs and seamless storage expansion TOS 6 OS includes Plex, Jellyfin, Docker, VM support, and AI photo indexing Quiet operation (19 dB) and low power usage (32W under load) Priced competitively at $399 for a turnkey SSD NAS
CONS
Single 5GbE port with no failover or link aggregation Two of the four SSD slots are limited to PCIe Gen3 x1, creating potential RAID bottlenecks Non-ECC DDR5 memory may not meet strict data integrity requirements
SPECS: Intel N150 quad core up to 3.6 GHz – 8 or 16 GB LPDDR5x – 2 x SATA 3.0 6 Gb/s ports for 3.5″/2.5″ drives (external bays or enclosures required) – 2 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 / 2 x USB 3.1 Type A / 1 x Mini DisplayPort 1.4 – M.2 SSD support via PCIe 3.0 x4 add in card only.
ZimaBoard 2 functions as a small, fanless compute module that can be combined with any suitable SATA enclosure or loose drives to create a highly customised Plex or Jellyfin server. It ships with ZimaOS, which exposes a NAS style interface, app catalogue and container options, so the system is usable out of the box without manually installing a general purpose Linux distribution. Dual 2.5 GbE ports and Intel Quick Sync support give it enough capability for several 1080p and selected 4K transcodes, but the absence of internal bays or native M.2 slots means storage design is entirely external, and the device is better suited to users who do not mind assembling their own chassis or reusing existing cases and drive cages.
The ZimaBoard 2 is a competent and thoughtfully assembled single-board server that builds meaningfully on IceWhale’s earlier efforts, especially the original ZimaBoard and the ZimaBlade. Its design clearly targets users who want more flexibility and performance than traditional ARM-based boards can offer, but who also value power efficiency, silence, and a small footprint. The use of an Intel N150 CPU, 8GB of LPDDR5x memory, dual 2.5GbE ports, and a PCIe 3.0 x4 slot makes it viable for a variety of home server roles—from basic NAS and smart home coordination to lightweight container hosting and local media streaming. Features like onboard SATA, USB 3.1, and a DisplayPort connection further add to its utility. However, there are hardware limitations that may affect long-term suitability for advanced deployments. The soldered RAM cannot be upgraded, and the internal eMMC storage, while useful for initial setup, is too slow for OS-level responsiveness in more demanding use cases. Passive cooling, while appreciated for silence, also imposes some thermal limitations depending on the deployment environment.
On the software side, ZimaOS offers a decent out-of-the-box experience that caters to users with minimal technical background. It handles core tasks like application deployment, file sharing, and system monitoring without requiring advanced configuration, and its Docker-based App Store simplifies access to popular tools. For more experienced users, the system supports third-party OS installation, which is likely how many will ultimately use the ZimaBoard 2. Still, as a bundled solution, ZimaOS has matured significantly and now presents itself as a lightweight, capable, and non-intrusive platform for those who prefer to get started immediately. In the broader context of DIY server hardware, ZimaBoard 2 occupies a middle ground: more powerful and modular than Raspberry Pi-class systems, yet more constrained than full x86 mini PCs or enthusiast-grade NAS hardware. For those who understand and accept these trade-offs, and are willing to plan around its limitations, the ZimaBoard 2 offers a reliable and flexible foundation for compact, energy-efficient computing at the edge.
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Zimaboard 2
Check AliExpress for the Zimaboard 2
BUILD QUALITY - 10/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 8/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 10/10
9.0
PROS
x86 Architecture – Compatible with a wide range of operating systems including ZimaOS, Unraid, TrueNAS SCALE, and Proxmox. Dual 2.5GbE LAN Ports – Offers strong networking capabilities for multi-service workloads and gateway setups. PCIe 3.0 x4 Slot – Enables high-speed expansion for 10GbE NICs, NVMe storage, or combo cards. Fanless, Silent Operation – Completely passively cooled, ideal for home or quiet office environments. Compact and Durable Build – Small footprint with an all-metal chassis that doubles as a heatsink. ZimaOS Included – User-friendly OS with a Docker-based App Store and basic VM tools, ready out of the box. Flexible Storage Options – Dual SATA ports plus USB 3.1 support for connecting SSDs, HDDs, or external drives. Low Power Consumption – Efficient 6W CPU with ~10W idle and ~40W max under heavy load scenarios.
CONS
Non-Upgradable RAM – 8GB of soldered LPDDR5x limits long-term scalability for memory-intensive tasks. Slow/Small Default Internal Storage – 32GB eMMC is convenient but underperforms for OS-level responsiveness or high I/O workloads. Thermal Headroom is Limited – Passive cooling alone may not be sufficient in closed environments or under sustained load without added airflow. Not Launching on Traditional Retail, but instead on Crowdfunding.
SPECS: Rockchip RK3588 8 core ARM (4 x Cortex A76 + 4 x Cortex A55) up to around 2.4 GHz – 8 GB DDR5 – 4 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays – 1 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 / HDMI 2.0b / 1 x front USB C 3.2 Gen 1 / 2 x USB A 3.2 Gen 1 – no internal M.2 SSD slots.
The NASync DH4300 Plus is a 4 bay ARM based NAS that targets users who want RAID 5 capable storage for Plex or Jellyfin along with general backup duties at a moderate price. UGREEN’s UGOS Pro operating system includes its own media apps, an app store and containerisation features, and community testing has confirmed that Plex can achieve multiple 1080p and several 4K streams, benefiting from the RK3588’s hardware video engines. There is only a single 2.5 GbE port and no M.2 cache or expansion options, so scaling is limited to the 4 SATA bays and external USB storage, but for users who prioritise RAID 5 resilience, low to mid range transcoding capacity and comparatively low power use, it fits the role of a budget multi user media and file server.
The UGREEN DH4300 Plus carves out a unique niche in the budget NAS landscape by delivering hardware typically reserved for higher-tier systems at a much lower price point. Its RK3588 processor, 8GB of RAM, and support for 2.5GbE networking place it well ahead of most similarly priced competitors in terms of raw specifications. Additionally, features such as HDMI output, 10Gbps USB ports, and local AI-powered photo indexing are rare to find in entry-level NAS systems. Despite its plastic-heavy internal design and lack of expansion options like PCIe or M.2, the device delivers stable performance for file sharing, media access, and low-intensity AI workloads. It is not suited for power users demanding virtual machines or advanced snapshot automation, but within its class, the DH4300 Plus presents an appealing balance between cost and capability.
That said, the software experience is still a work in progress. UGOS Pro covers the essentials and offers a visually accessible UI, but lacks the advanced features and ecosystem integration found in more mature platforms like Synology DSM or QNAP QTS. Docker and snapshot support add welcome flexibility, but the absence of native Jellyfin, iSCSI, and VM functionality limits its use in more complex environments. Still, for home users, media collectors, or small office setups looking for reliable backup, modest AI-enhanced photo sorting, and smooth 4K playback, the DH4300 Plus delivers value well beyond its price tag. While it won’t replace high-end NAS appliances, it serves as a capable, efficient, and quietly innovative option in a saturated entry-level NAS market.
mazon in Your Region for $349 the UGREEN DH4300 PLUS
Powerful ARM CPU: Equipped with the RK3588 SoC, offering 8 cores, integrated GPU, and NPU for AI workloads. Generous (but fixed!) Memory: 8GB LPDDR4X RAM, rare in budget NAS systems, supports multitasking and Docker use. 2.5GbE Network Port: Provides faster-than-Gigabit throughput for backups, media streaming, and multi-user access. HDMI 2.1 Output: Rare on ARM powered turnkey NAS, and enables direct media playback or NAS control at up to 4K 60Hz, uncommon in value-tier NAS units. USB 10Gbps Ports: Dual USB-A 10Gbps and one USB-C 5Gbps allow for high-speed backups or external storage expansion. AI Photo Management: Built-in NPU supports facial recognition and scene detection for local, private media organization. Low Power Consumption: Efficient under load (~30W) and idle (~5W without drives), suitable for 24/7 operation.
CONS
No PCIe or M.2 Expansion: Lacks future scalability for NVMe caching, 10GbE, or other upgrades. Single LAN Port: Only one 2.5GbE port, with no failover or link aggregation support. Limited Software Ecosystem: UGOS Pro lacks iSCSI, VM support, and native Jellyfin, trailing behind DSM/QTS in maturity.
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service checkHEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check FiverHave you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.
Vous vous souvenez de ces
robots chiens et humanoïdes Unitree
qu'on voit partout sur les réseaux depuis quelques mois ? Hé bien des chercheurs en sécurité viennent de découvrir qu'on pouvait les pirater en moins d'une minute, sans même avoir besoin d'un accès internet. Et le pire, c'est que la faille est tellement débile qu'elle en devient presque comique.
Lors de la conférence GEEKCon à Shanghai, l'équipe de DARKNAVY a fait une démonstration qui fait froid dans le dos. L'expert Ku Shipei a pris le contrôle d'un robot humanoïde Unitree G1 (quand même 100 000 yuans, soit environ 14 000 balles) en utilisant uniquement des commandes vocales et une connexion Bluetooth. Après environ une minute de manipulation, l'indicateur lumineux sur la tête du robot est passé du bleu au rouge, il a alors cessé de répondre à son contrôleur officiel, puis sous les ordres de Ku, il s'est précipité vers un journaliste en balançant son poing.
Sympa l'ambiance.
En fait, le problème vient de la façon dont ces robots gèrent leur configuration Wi-Fi via Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). Quand vous configurez le réseau sur un robot Unitree, il utilise le BLE pour recevoir le nom du réseau et le mot de passe, sauf que ce canal ne filtre absolument pas ce que vous lui envoyez. Vous pouvez donc injecter des commandes directement dans les champs SSID ou mot de passe avec le pattern « ;$(cmd);# », et hop, exécution de code en tant que root.
Et le truc encore plus dingue, c'est que tous les robots Unitree partagent la même clé AES codée en dur pour chiffrer les paquets de contrôle BLE, donc si vous avez cracké un G1, vous avez cracké tous les G1, H1, Go2 et B2 de la planète. Et là vous allez me dire : Et la sécurité du handshake ? Hé bien elle vérifie juste si la chaîne contient « unitree » comme secret. Bravo les gars ^^.
Du coup, la vulnérabilité devient wormable, c'est à dire qu'un robot infecté peut scanner les autres robots Unitree à portée Bluetooth et les compromettre automatiquement à son tour, créant ainsi un botnet de robots qui se propage sans intervention humaine. Imaginez ça dans un entrepôt avec 50 robots !! Le bordel que ça serait...
Moi ce qui m'inquiète avec ces robots, c'est l'architecture d'exfiltration de données car le G1 est équipé de caméras Intel RealSense D435i, de 4 microphones et de systèmes de positionnement qui peuvent capturer des réunions confidentielles, photographier des documents sensibles ou cartographier des locaux sécurisés. Et tout ça peut être streamé vers des serveurs externes sans que vous le sachiez surtout que la télémétrie est transmise en continu vers des serveurs en Chine... Vous voyez le tableau.
En avril 2025 déjà, des chercheurs avaient trouvé une backdoor non documentée dans le
robot chien Go1
qui permettait un contrôle à distance via un tunnel réseau et l'accès aux caméras, donc c'est pas vraiment une surprise que les modèles plus récents aient des problèmes similaires, hein ?
J'imagine que certains d'entre vous bidouillent des robots avec Raspberry Pi ou Arduino, alors si vous voulez pas finir avec un robot qui part en freestyle, y'a quelques trucs à faire. Déjà, pour la config Wi-Fi via BLE, ne passez jamais le SSID et le mot de passe en clair mais utilisez un protocole de dérivation de clé comme ECDH pour établir un secret partagé. Et surtout validez et sanitisez toutes les entrées utilisateur avant de les balancer dans un shell.
Et puis changez les clés par défaut, car ça paraît con mais c'est le problème numéro un. Générez des clés uniques par appareil au premier boot ou lors de l'appairage. Vous pouvez stocker ça dans l'EEPROM de l'Arduino ou dans un fichier protégé sur le Pi.
Pensez aussi à isoler vos robots sur un réseau dédié... Si vous utilisez un Pi, créez un VLAN séparé et bloquez tout trafic sortant non autorisé avec iptables. Comme ça, même si un robot est compromis, il ne pourra pas exfiltrer de données ni attaquer d'autres machines.
Ah et désactivez aussi le Bluetooth quand vous n'en avez pas besoin ! Sur un Pi, ajoutez « dtoverlay=disable-bt » dans /boot/config.txt et sur Arduino, c'est encore plus simple, si vous utilisez pas le BLE, ne l'incluez pas dans votre projet.
Bref, ces robots sont de vrais chevaux de Troie ambulants. Ils ont des capteurs, des caméras, des micros, et maintenant ils peuvent être compromis par n'importe qui à portée de Bluetooth... Donc si vous bossez sur des projets robotiques, prenez le temps de sécuriser vos communications sans fil avant de vous retrouver avec un robot qui décide de vous tuer !! Et
bookmarkez ce lien
car c'est là où je mets toutes mes meilleures news robotiques !
Et si vous êtes encore en train de lire mes articles à cette heure-ci, je vous souhaite un excellent Noël !
Si vous utilisez GitHub Copilot ou ChatGPT pour coder plus vite, voici une nouvelle qui va peut-être vous refroidir un peu.
Une fintech a découvert
que des attaquants avaient extrait des données clients via un endpoint API qui n'était documenté nulle part. Personne dans l'équipe ne se souvenait l'avoir créé et après 3 semaines d'enquête, le verdict est tombé : c'est Copilot qui l'avait généré pendant une session de code nocturne.
Bienvenue dans l'ère des "phantom APIs" les amis !
J'avoue que le concept m'a fait marrer car on parle quand même d'endpoints qui existent en production mais dont personne n'a connaissance. Ahahaha... y'a pas de documentation, pas de tests, pas de validation de sécurité. C'est juste un peu de code généré par une IA qui a trouvé ça "logique" de créer un /api/v2/admin/debug-metrics qui balance du
PII
à quiconque tombe dessus par hasard.
J'ai vu le dernier rapport
Veracode GenAI Code Security
et les chiffres font un peu flipper c'est vrai ! Ils ont testé plus de 100 LLM sur 80 tâches de codage différentes, et le résultat fait mal puisque 45% du code généré par IA contient des vulnérabilités classées OWASP Top 10. En gros, presque une fois sur deux, votre assistant IA vous pond du code troué comme une passoire. Java est le grand gagnant avec 72% de taux d'échec, suivi par Python, JavaScript et C# qui tournent autour de 38-45%.
En effet, l'IA ne pense pas comme un dev qui s'est déjà fait hacker. Par exemple, quand un dev crée un endpoint, il réfléchit authentification, rate limiting, exposition de données, documentation. Alors que l'IA, elle, génère juste ce qui lui semble statistiquement logique vu son dataset d'entraînement, sans comprendre les implications sécurité ou les politiques de l'organisation.
D'ailleurs
une autre étude Apiiro
montre que les assistants IA ont multiplié par 10 les vulnérabilités introduites en seulement 6 mois dans les dépôts étudiés. Les chemins d'escalade de privilèges ont explosé tout comme les défauts architecturaux. Et le pire c'est que les développeurs qui utilisent l'IA exposent leurs credentials cloud (clés Azure, Storage Access Keys) deux fois plus souvent que les autres.
Y'a aussi le problème du "slopsquatting". Oui, encore un gros mot, je sais... En fait, l'IA peut vous recommander d'installer un package qui n'existe tout simplement pas. Genre elle hallucine un nom de librairie et un attaquant un peu moins con que les autres, peut enregistrer ce nom sur npm ou PyPI et y foutre du code malveillant.
Et là que ça devient vraiment problématique, c'est que les outils de sécurité traditionnels ne voient rien. L'analyse statique compare votre code à des specs documentées, sauf que les phantom APIs n'existent dans aucune spec. Les API gateways protègent les endpoints enregistrés mais laissent passer des routes non déclarées sans authentification.
Pour s'en sortir, certaines boîtes commencent donc à analyser le trafic en temps réel pour détecter les endpoints qui traînent. Y'a aussi l'audit de code spécifique IA pour repérer les patterns de génération algorithmique, et la comparaison continue entre les specs et ce qui tourne vraiment en production.
Bref, relisez votre code généré par IA comme si c'était un stagiaire collégien de 3e qui l'avait écrit, et si vous découvrez un endpoint bizarre dans votre base de code dont personne ne se souvient, y'a des chances que ce soit un "fantôme" laissé par votre copilote préféré...
Cheap NAS hardware in 2025 sits in an awkward middle ground between full DIY servers and polished, premium turnkey appliances, but it is also where many first time buyers start when they want to get away from cloud storage and subscriptions without spending a large amount of money. This article focuses on systems that have been available for under $249, arrive pre built with CPU and memory, and come either with their own NAS style operating system or with enough onboard storage to install one easily. The aim is to show what you realistically get at this price in terms of bays, network speed, scale and software, and where each device draws the line on features, expansion and flexibility so you can decide whether a low cost 2 bay box, an all M.2 cube or a bare board server is the better fit for your first step into local storage.
SPECS: Rockchip RK3576 8 core ARM up to 2.2 GHz – 4 GB LPDDR4X – 2 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays (up to 60 TB total) – 1 x 1 GbE RJ45 – no internal M.2 SSD slots, 32 GB eMMC OS storage.
The UGREEN NASync DH2300 is aimed at users who want the cheapest possible entry to a proper NAS without losing basic RAID and a guided setup experience. Two SATA bays and support for up to 60 TB in RAID 0, RAID 1, JBOD or Basic give enough room for a modest media library, photo archive and PC backups, while UGOS Pro adds mobile apps, 4K HDMI playback, simple remote access and basic snapshot and multi user features in a consumer friendly interface. Power draw is low, thanks to the 8 core ARM SoC and 1 GbE networking, which also keeps noise and heat down compared with larger multi bay units. The key limitation at this price is that you are locked to 2 drive bays, a single 1 GbE port and no internal SSD caching or containers on this model, so long term scale and heavy app use are constrained. Overall it suits buyers who want a cheap, mostly turnkey alternative to cloud storage and USB drives, rather than a platform for heavier virtualization or high speed workloads.
The UGREEN DH2300 represents a carefully positioned step in the company’s ongoing effort to make private storage approachable for non-technical users. Its hardware configuration, led by the Rockchip RK3576 processor and 4GB of fixed memory, provides solid baseline performance for a two-bay ARM-powered NAS at this price point. Although its single 1GbE network port may limit throughput for larger file transfers, the system compensates with a highly efficient power profile, quiet operation, and full support for common RAID configurations. The inclusion of a dedicated 32GB eMMC system drive, HDMI 4K60 output, and an NPU capable of AI-based photo indexing places it above most similarly priced entry-level alternatives from QNAP and Synology. However, certain aspects of UGREEN’s marketing—particularly the way the dual quad-core CPU clusters are presented as a single 8-core design—could be clearer. Likewise, the absence of upgradeable memory or faster networking options limits its long-term scalability for users seeking to expand their NAS environment beyond basic media and backup tasks.
From a broader standpoint, the DH2300’s strongest appeal lies in its simplicity and low operational overhead. UGOS Pro, though still developing in maturity, has evolved into a competent, user-friendly platform offering the key features needed for home data management, multimedia access, and scheduled backups. The OS’s stability, combined with efficient hardware and lightweight design, makes this NAS a practical alternative to annual cloud subscriptions for users who simply want local control over their data. It is not a system aimed at enthusiasts or professionals demanding virtual machines, multi-gig networking, or broad third-party OS support, but rather those seeking a self-contained, reliable, and low-maintenance device. Within that niche, the DH2300 delivers strong value and performs consistently well for the intended demographic—serving as an accessible first step into local storage ownership.
Efficient Rockchip RK3576 processor (dual quad-core ARM design) provides strong performance for a low-power NAS. Integrated 6 TOPS NPU enables local AI functions such as face, text, and object recognition without cloud reliance. UGOS Pro offers an intuitive, user-friendly interface with features like RAID management, snapshots, Docker, and backups. Low noise output (31–45 dBA) and excellent power efficiency (9–13W typical use) suit 24/7 home operation. Dedicated 32GB eMMC system drive keeps the OS separate from data volumes for better reliability. HDMI 2.0 4K60 output allows direct media playback and display management. Competitive pricing around $200 makes it a strong entry-level NAS alternative to subscription cloud storage.
CONS
Single 1GbE LAN port limits transfer speeds and network scalability. Fixed 4GB memory restricts heavy multitasking or Docker use. Spending just $100-150 more gets you much, much more capable x86 powered systems
SPECS: Quad core ARM Cortex A55 1.7 GHz – 4 GB RAM – 2 x 3.5″/2.5″ SATA bays – 1 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 with PoE++ – no internal M.2 SSD slots, 1 x USB C 5 Gb/s expansion.
UniFi UNAS 2 targets users already invested in the UniFi ecosystem who want basic network storage and UniFi Drive integration at a low buy in price. Two SATA bays are enough for a mirrored pair of HDDs or SSDs for small site backups, UniFi Protect recordings or general file storage, and the 2.5 GbE plus PoE++ design keeps cabling simple by combining power and data on a single link to an existing UniFi switch. UniFi OS and UniFi Drive provide a simplified management layer for object storage, simple file shares and cloud synced folders, with a small color LCM display giving at a glance system status without needing to log in. The main limitation at this price is that UniFi’s NAS software is still relatively immature, with no native support for third party media servers or advanced NAS apps and no SSD cache tier, so it is best treated as a small, integrated storage node rather than a full featured general purpose NAS. For users who want a cheap box that drops straight into a UniFi rack and handles basic storage quietly and efficiently, it fits that role.
The UniFi UNAS 2 is presented as a compact and affordable two-bay NAS designed for straightforward storage and backup tasks, particularly within environments already using UniFi networking hardware. Its PoE++ design is distinctive, allowing both power and connectivity to be delivered over a single cable, simplifying installation where compatible PoE switches are available. This approach aligns with UniFi’s strategy of reducing external hardware requirements, though it also means that a failed port or damaged cable will disable both power and network access simultaneously. For non-UniFi users, the reliance on PoE++ creates an additional barrier, as adoption requires either compatible infrastructure or the included 60W injector. The shared dual-drive tray, lack of hot-swap support, and absence of expansion options further reinforce the system’s role as a fixed-capacity solution, best suited to smaller or secondary deployments. With a maximum drive budget of 52W and overall consumption limited to 60W, the device is power-efficient, but its architecture prioritises simplicity over flexibility.
On the software side, the UNAS 2 provides a user-friendly interface with access to snapshots, RAID configuration, system backups, and integration into the UniFi identity ecosystem. However, the limited hardware constrains the range of features available, and certain tools seen in UniFi’s larger NAS models are absent, such as encrypted volumes or extended network protocol support. Performance testing showed sequential read speeds up to 260 MB/s and write speeds around 160–180 MB/s, which make full use of the 2.5 GbE interface but leave little headroom for more demanding tasks. Thermals during extended use regularly pushed the CPU into the high 70s Celsius, and although fan management can be adjusted, sustained workloads highlight the limits of the system’s cooling design. The software’s omission of iSCSI and advanced backup filters also narrows its role, making it less competitive against established vendors in professional or virtualisation scenarios.
Ultimately, the UNAS 2 is most appropriately positioned as an edge or secondary NAS, providing basic networked storage for existing UniFi users who value plug-and-play deployment and ecosystem consistency, but it is not equipped to serve as a primary system in larger or more demanding environments (VMs, Containers, etc). A great and unique NAS that will nbe at it’s most appealing if you are already invested in the UniFi ecosystem, or have a NAS already that needs a network backup.
Here are all the current UniFi NAS Solutions & Prices:
Benefits from almost a year of development of the UNAS Pro by UniFi, resulting in a much more complete solution in both hardware and software Exceptionally appealing price point Extremely low impact (power use, noise level, physical scale all great) Introduction of USB C 5Gb/s Connectivity is very welcome Supports complete network/local access if preferred, as well as full remote connectivity with the UI.com account and site manager services Wide Hard Drives and SATA SSD Support (UniFi branded drives and those from 3rd parties such as Seagate Ironwolf, WD Red and Toshiba N300) Comprehensive network storage software in UniFi NAS OS and Drive. Latest OS updates have included fan control, flexible RAID configurations, encrypted drive creation, customizable snapshots, more backup client choices/targets \'Single Pane of Glass\' management and monitoring screen is very well presented! One of the fastest to deploy turnkey NAS solutions I have ever personally used!
CONS
Single network port, though not a dealbreaker (as this is still just 2x SATA throughput), is not great in terms of a network failover or in deployment of SATA SSDs Choice of PoE deployment unusual and limits some deployments USB C connectivity does not support network adapters, NAS expansions or 3rd party UPS devices Very modest base hardware, but understandable relative to the price HDD injection is very unique, but it prevents hot swapping Still a lack of client applications native to the NAS services for Windows, Mac, Android and Linux
SPECS: Intel Processor N150 quad core up to 3.6 GHz – 12 GB or 16 GB LPDDR5 – 0 x SATA bays / 6 x M.2 2280 NVMe slots (5 x PCIe 3.0 x1, 1 x PCIe 3.0 x2, up to 24 TB) – 2 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 – 64 GB eMMC plus up to 2 TB NVMe preinstalled.
The Beelink ME Mini trades spinning disks for six M.2 slots in a 99 mm cube, making it one of the most storage dense budget options for users who already have or plan to buy multiple NVMe SSDs. At this price bracket it offers far more raw flash capacity potential than traditional 2 bay HDD NAS units, and the dual 2.5 GbE ports allow the box to push enough throughput for small media servers, backup targets and home lab services once an appropriate OS such as TrueNAS, Proxmox, Linux or a lightweight NAS distribution is installed. The integrated PSU, WiFi 6 and compact chimney style cooling keep the physical footprint small while still supporting continuous operation as a low to moderate power SSD based server. The main limitation is that PCIe lane allocation and the N150 CPU cap per drive performance and the unit can run hot under sustained load, so you do not get high end NVMe speeds from each slot and there is no turnkey NAS OS included. It is therefore best suited to buyers who value maximum flash capacity per dollar in a very small chassis and are comfortable treating it as a DIY NAS platform rather than a plug-and-play appliance.
The Beelink ME Mini NAS delivers an uncommon blend of size, functionality, and efficiency in a market segment often dominated by larger, louder, and less integrated alternatives. It is not designed to compete with traditional enterprise-grade NAS devices or modular, scalable solutions for prosumers. Instead, its strengths lie in targeting the needs of home users who want a quiet, energy-efficient storage solution that is easy to deploy, aesthetically unobtrusive, and capable of handling daily tasks such as media streaming, file backup, or soft routing. The inclusion of six M.2 NVMe SSD slots—paired with a Gen 3 x2 system slot—offers a rare level of expansion in such a small enclosure. The integration of an internal PSU, silent fan-assisted cooling, and a surprisingly effective thermal design are thoughtful touches that differentiate it from the majority of DIY NAS mini PCs.
That said, it is not without limitations. The memory is non-upgradable, thermal accumulation at the base suggests room for improvement, and bandwidth ceilings imposed by Gen 3 x1 lanes will constrain users who demand high parallel throughput. Still, for its price point—particularly when pre-order discounts are applied—the ME Mini offers significant value, especially when compared to ARM-based NAS solutions with similar or lower specifications. With bundled Crucial SSD options and support for a wide range of NAS operating systems, it positions itself as a ready-to-go platform for tech-savvy users wanting to avoid the assembly of a fully DIY system. Overall, while not a product for every use case, the Beelink ME Mini succeeds in its aim to be a compact, stylish, and capable home NAS.
BUILD QUALITY - 9/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 8/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 10/10
8.8
PROS
Compact cube design (99x99x99mm) ideal for discreet home deployment Supports up to 6x M.2 NVMe SSDs with total capacity up to 24TB Integrated PSU eliminates bulky external power adapters Dual 2.5GbE LAN ports with link aggregation support Wi-Fi 6 and UnRAID7 Support means not limited to 2x2.5G Low power consumption (as low as 6.9W idle, ~30W peak with full load) Silent fan and effective internal thermal management via large heatsink Includes Crucial-branded SSDs in pre-configured options for reliability
CONS
Five of the six SSD slots are limited to PCIe Gen 3 x1 bandwidth Memory is soldered and non-upgradable Not 10GbE Upgradable (maybe m.2 adapter - messy) Bottom panel retains heat due to lack of active ventilation
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Beelink ME Mini NAS ($329)
Check AliExpress for the Beelink ME Mini NAS ($344 4/6)
Check the Official Beelink Site for the ME Mini NAS ($209 4/6)
#4 Xyber Hydra N150 – around $208 to $249
SPECS: Intel Processor N150 quad core up to 3.6 GHz – 16 GB LPDDR5 – 0 x SATA bays / 4 x M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 3.0 x2 slots – 2 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 plus WiFi 6 – 64 GB eMMC with Ubuntu preinstalled and 512 GB NVMe SSD included on many models.
The Xyber Hydra N150 aims at budget buyers who want an NVMe based NAS that is closer to ready out of the box, combining 4 PCIe 3.0 x2 M.2 bays with 16 GB of memory, preloaded Ubuntu and often a preinstalled 512 GB NVMe system drive. That combination makes it straightforward to stand up containers, Docker stacks or lightweight NAS services immediately, then expand capacity by populating the remaining M.2 slots with SSDs as budget allows. Dual 2.5 GbE ports with link aggregation give enough network bandwidth to take advantage of parallel NVMe arrays for home lab or small office workloads, and the revised metal baseplate plus dual fan cooling run cooler than earlier G9 derived designs while still keeping power use modest. The main limitation at this price is that RAM is soldered and each M.2 slot is only x2, so neither memory capacity nor per drive bandwidth can be increased later, and some tuning of fan curves is needed to keep thermals in check under heavy use. For users who want an inexpensive, compact NVMe appliance with more polish than bare boards but are comfortable managing their own OS and RAID layout, it offers a pragmatic middle ground.
The Xyber Hydra N150 NAS represents a deliberate and measured evolution of the budget-friendly compact NAS formula, clearly designed to resolve key weaknesses of similar products like the GMKTec G9 without altering the fundamental architecture. Its use of a thicker, thermally conductive metal base plate provides demonstrable improvement in heat dissipation compared to the plastic underside of the G9, a difference borne out in extended load testing where temperatures stabilized more quickly and stayed lower when fan profiles were adjusted. The pre-installed 64GB eMMC module running Ubuntu out of the box eliminates the initial configuration barrier often faced by novice users, while still allowing more experienced users to easily replace it with their OS of choice, such as ZimaOS or TrueNAS. The inclusion of a 512GB NVMe SSD in the primary M.2 bay adds immediate storage capacity without requiring an upfront investment in additional drives, an uncommon but practical feature at this price point.
Internally, the decision to provide 16GB of fixed LPDDR5 memory — 4GB more than its nearest comparable competitor — gives the Hydra slightly more headroom for memory-intensive tasks, such as running lightweight container workloads or maintaining a larger metadata cache for media streaming applications. While the memory remains non-upgradable, the choice of capacity is a reasonable compromise given the constraints of the Intel N150 platform and the system’s focus on cost efficiency. The integrated Wi-Fi 6 module, with dual antennas and full UnRAID compatibility, is another meaningful addition, enabling wireless deployments where cabling is impractical and expanding the deployment scenarios for home and small office users. These subtle but important upgrades make the Hydra feel more complete out of the box, catering to a broader range of use cases with fewer compromises.
That said, the Hydra still shares many of the inherent trade-offs of its class. The N150 processor is adequate for modest workloads, but becomes saturated under sustained high parallel usage, especially when all four M.2 slots are simultaneously active and the CPU nears 100% utilization. The PCIe lane limitations of the platform, with each M.2 slot limited to Gen3 x2 speeds, restrict the aggregate performance potential of RAID arrays or concurrent high-bandwidth operations. Similarly, the continued reliance on dual 2.5GbE ports limits maximum external throughput despite the internal SSD bandwidth being capable of more, and although M.2-to-10GbE adapters remain an option, they come at the cost of sacrificing one storage slot. BIOS-level adjustments are also required to extract the best thermal and fan performance under heavy use, something that more advanced users will appreciate but could frustrate beginners.
Overall, at its introductory price of $218.99, the Xyber Hydra N150 achieves a strong balance of value, practicality, and refinement in the entry-level NAS segment. The thoughtful inclusion of extras — the 64GB bootable eMMC, 512GB SSD, improved cooling, and additional memory — make it feel more turnkey than competing models, while still leaving room for advanced customization. It’s a sensible option for users seeking a compact and efficient NAS for personal cloud storage, light virtualization, or as a dedicated media server, provided expectations around CPU and networking throughput are kept realistic. For its target audience, the Hydra is a compelling and notably improved choice that addresses many of the criticisms of earlier designs without abandoning the affordability that defines this class of devices.
Improved thermal design with a thicker metal base plate for better heat dissipation compared to similar models. Includes 64GB eMMC storage preloaded with Ubuntu OS for out-of-the-box usability. Ships with a 512GB M.2 NVMe SSD in Bay 1, providing immediate usable storage. Fixed 16GB LPDDR5 memory — higher than comparable devices — supports more concurrent tasks. Wi-Fi 6 module with dual antennas, compatible with UnRAID, enabling flexible wireless deployment. Four M.2 NVMe bays, each supporting PCIe Gen3 x2, allowing up to 4 SSDs for flash storage arrays. Dual 2.5GbE ports with link aggregation support for improved network throughput. Compact, quiet, and energy-efficient form factor suitable for home and small office environments.
CONS
Memory is soldered and non-upgradable, limiting future scalability. PCIe Gen3 x2 and CPU bandwidth constraints limit maximum aggregate performance under full load. Fans require BIOS adjustments for optimal thermal control during heavy sustained workloads.
SPECS: Intel Processor N150 quad core up to 3.6 GHz – 16 GB LPDDR5X – 2 x SATA 3.0 ports (via cables to external drives) – 2 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 – 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 slot, 64 GB eMMC OS storage.
ZimaBoard 2 1664 is a single board x86 server positioned for budget home lab builders who want more flexibility than a fixed enclosure can offer while staying under typical entry level NAS pricing. The board exposes 2 SATA ports with power for attaching HDDs or SSDs in whatever chassis or external mounting the user prefers, alongside dual 2.5 GbE, USB 3, Mini DisplayPort and a full PCIe 3.0 x4 slot that can host extra NICs, HBAs or NVMe adaptors to scale storage and connectivity over time. ZimaOS comes preinstalled and supports alternative systems such as CasaOS, Linux and Windows, so it can act as a low cost base for self hosted services, small virtualisation labs or custom NAS builds using external drive cages or repurposed cases. The main limitation is that there is no built in drive bay system or enclosure, so buyers must factor in the cost and effort of adding their own storage chassis, cabling and cooling if they want something as neat as a traditional NAS. For those willing to do that, it offers one of the most flexible and expandable x86 platforms in the budget bracket, with enough CPU and RAM headroom to grow beyond simple file serving as needs evolve.
The ZimaBoard 2 is a competent and thoughtfully assembled single-board server that builds meaningfully on IceWhale’s earlier efforts, especially the original ZimaBoard and the ZimaBlade. Its design clearly targets users who want more flexibility and performance than traditional ARM-based boards can offer, but who also value power efficiency, silence, and a small footprint. The use of an Intel N150 CPU, 8GB of LPDDR5x memory, dual 2.5GbE ports, and a PCIe 3.0 x4 slot makes it viable for a variety of home server roles—from basic NAS and smart home coordination to lightweight container hosting and local media streaming. Features like onboard SATA, USB 3.1, and a DisplayPort connection further add to its utility. However, there are hardware limitations that may affect long-term suitability for advanced deployments. The soldered RAM cannot be upgraded, and the internal eMMC storage, while useful for initial setup, is too slow for OS-level responsiveness in more demanding use cases. Passive cooling, while appreciated for silence, also imposes some thermal limitations depending on the deployment environment.
On the software side, ZimaOS offers a decent out-of-the-box experience that caters to users with minimal technical background. It handles core tasks like application deployment, file sharing, and system monitoring without requiring advanced configuration, and its Docker-based App Store simplifies access to popular tools. For more experienced users, the system supports third-party OS installation, which is likely how many will ultimately use the ZimaBoard 2. Still, as a bundled solution, ZimaOS has matured significantly and now presents itself as a lightweight, capable, and non-intrusive platform for those who prefer to get started immediately. In the broader context of DIY server hardware, ZimaBoard 2 occupies a middle ground: more powerful and modular than Raspberry Pi-class systems, yet more constrained than full x86 mini PCs or enthusiast-grade NAS hardware. For those who understand and accept these trade-offs, and are willing to plan around its limitations, the ZimaBoard 2 offers a reliable and flexible foundation for compact, energy-efficient computing at the edge.
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Zimaboard 2
Check AliExpress for the Zimaboard 2
BUILD QUALITY - 10/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 8/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 10/10
9.0
PROS
x86 Architecture – Compatible with a wide range of operating systems including ZimaOS, Unraid, TrueNAS SCALE, and Proxmox. Dual 2.5GbE LAN Ports – Offers strong networking capabilities for multi-service workloads and gateway setups. PCIe 3.0 x4 Slot – Enables high-speed expansion for 10GbE NICs, NVMe storage, or combo cards. Fanless, Silent Operation – Completely passively cooled, ideal for home or quiet office environments. Compact and Durable Build – Small footprint with an all-metal chassis that doubles as a heatsink. ZimaOS Included – User-friendly OS with a Docker-based App Store and basic VM tools, ready out of the box. Flexible Storage Options – Dual SATA ports plus USB 3.1 support for connecting SSDs, HDDs, or external drives. Low Power Consumption – Efficient 6W CPU with ~10W idle and ~40W max under heavy load scenarios.
CONS
Non-Upgradable RAM – 8GB of soldered LPDDR5x limits long-term scalability for memory-intensive tasks. Slow/Small Default Internal Storage – 32GB eMMC is convenient but underperforms for OS-level responsiveness or high I/O workloads. Thermal Headroom is Limited – Passive cooling alone may not be sufficient in closed environments or under sustained load without added airflow. Not Launching on Traditional Retail, but instead on Crowdfunding.
Taken together, the UGREEN DH2300, UniFi UNAS 2, Beelink ME Mini, Xyber Hydra N150 and ZimaBoard 2 show the different ways vendors are trying to hit the sub 250 dollar bracket without stripping out the core value of a NAS. Some focus on simplicity and bundled software with limited scale, others trade turnkey polish for dense NVMe storage or flexible bare board layouts that assume you are willing to do more of the setup yourself. None of these devices removes the usual compromises around bays, performance, noise or software maturity at this price level, but each offers a clear path away from pure cloud dependence and USB drives. The practical decision is less about which is objectively “best” and more about whether you want a small 2 bay appliance, a compact all flash cube or a configurable single board system that can grow with your skills and requirements over time.
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.Need Help?
Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
[contact-form-7]
TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service checkHEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check FiverHave you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.
Connexion
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 
TRY CHAT 
le KVM étant vu comme un écran et un dispositif clavier/souris il n'interfèrera pas avec les restrictions de votre IT (je ne vous encourage pas à bypass le règlement IT de votre entreprise hein !). Grâce au support de l'audio et du micro vous pourrez même utiliser Teams 
KVM Comet GL-RM1PE : 
High-performance AMD Ryzen
AI 9 HX PRO 370 CPU with 12 cores, 24 threads, and AI acceleration (50 TOPS NPU) is INCREDIBLE for a compact desktop purchase
MinisCloud OS is functional but immature, with unfinished localisation and limited advanced enterprise features - lacks MFA, iSCSI, Security Scanner and More. Nails several key fundamentals, but still feels unfinished at this time.
Pour comprendre en détail la différence entre les autorisations NTFS et les permissions de partage, consultez le guide complet : 
