TerraMaster vient d’annoncer son nouveau NAS 4 baies : le F4-425. Derrière ce nom se cache un boîtier compact, animé par un processeur Intel N5095, accompagné de 4 Go de RAM (extensibles jusqu’à 16 Go) et doté d’un port réseau 2,5 GbE. Déjà disponible à la vente, il est proposé au tarif de 339,99€.

TerraMaster F4-425

Le TerraMaster F4-425 se présente comme un NAS accessible, pensé pour les utilisateurs recherchant un bon compromis entre performance et prix.
Le boîtier, en plastique gris foncé, reprend le design sobre et habituel de la marque. Côté gabarit, il mesure 222 × 179 × 154 mm et affiche 2,1 kg sur la balance (à vide). Il dispose de 4 emplacements compatibles avec les disques durs et les SSD.

Caractéristique technique

Le F4-425 est construit autour d’un processeur Quad Core Intel N5095 cadencé à 2 GHz (jusqu’à 2,9 GHz en mode turbo). Grâce à son iGPU intégré, il prend en charge le transcodage matériel de vidéos Ultra HD/4K (encodée en H.265). Le NAS est livré avec 4 Go de DDR4, extensible jusqu’à 16 Go. Attention, un seul emplacement mémoire est disponible. A noter que le processeur obtient un score de 4027 points selon PassMark.

Interfaces de connexion

La connectique est assez complète pour un modèle de cette gamme :

• 1 USB 3.0 à l’arrière ;
• 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2 10 Gb/s (dont 1 à l’avant) ;
• 1 port réseau 2,5 Gb/s ;
• 1 sortie HDMI.

TOS 6

Comme les autres modèles de la marque, le F4-425 fonctionne sous TOS 6, le système maison de TerraMaster. Ce dernier est robuste, il dispose de nombreuses fonctionnalités et il n’a pas à rougir face aux concurrents. Il propose même un équivalent du SHR, nommé TRAID. Bien sûr, il est possible d’y loger des machines virtuelles ou encore faire de la conteneurisation avec Docker.

Prix et disponibilité

Voilà un NAS qui ne laissera personne indifférent. Le F4-425 est relativement complet et affiche un excellent rapport qualité-prix. Bien sûr, il présente quelques limites (un seul port réseau, pas de slot NVMe, un seul emplacement RAM…), mais à ce tarif, difficile de trouver mieux pour un NAS 4 baies équipé d’un processeur Intel récent. Le NAS est d’ores et déjà accessible à un prix public de 339,99€. Et il faut bien avouer qu’un NAS de cette capacité, avec ce processeur Intel N5095, c’est un excellent tarif.

Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur la page officielle du fabricant…

Pendant mes vacances, j’ai reçu un e-mail qui m’a donné quelques sueurs froides. L’expéditeur se présentait comme une société spécialisée dans la protection et la monétisation des droits d’image. Le message prenait la forme d’une mise en demeure pour « utilisation non autorisée d’une image protégée ». Sur le moment, difficile de savoir s’il s’agissait d’une tentative d’intimidation ou d’une véritable réclamation légitime. Mais une chose est certaine : ce type de message ne doit jamais être pris à la légère.

Copytrack, un service particulier

L’entreprise à l’origine de l’e-mail se nomme Copytrack. Si on jette un œil sur son site Web officiel, elle se décrit comme ceci :

Copytrack est un service qui vous aide à trouver et à réclamer vos images utilisées sans autorisation sur Internet. Téléchargez vos fichiers, signalez celles qui ont été volées, et laissez Copytrack se charger des poursuites judiciaires à votre place.

En clair, Copytrack propose aux photographes et agences de soumettre leurs visuels. L’outil se charge ensuite de scanner le Web à la recherche d’utilisations non autorisées, puis d’exiger une indemnisation. Le modèle économique est simple, l’entreprise se rémunère directement sur les sommes récupérées, à hauteur de 45 % (toujours selon le site officiel).

Ton menaçant

L’e-mail que j’ai reçu ne laisse pas de place au doute : le ton est direct, voire agressif. Je suis accusé d’« utilisation d’une image sans autorisation » et invité à régulariser ma situation sous peine de poursuites via leurs avocats partenaires. Le délai est extrêmement court, vous avez 10 jours pour vous défendre. Heureusement que je consulte mes e-mails pendant mes vacances…

Deux options sont proposées :

• Option 1 : achat d’une licence supplémentaire (valable un an, incluant l’utilisation passée et future) → 389,59 €
• Option 2 : indemnisation pour usage passé (suppression immédiate de l’image) → 350,00 €

Si vous décidez de payer, vous avez un petit délai supplémentaire (environ 20 jours)

Comment j’ai résolu la situation…

Heureusement, au milieu de ce message à la limite de l’intimidation, un paragraphe mentionne une alternative :

Si vous disposez d’une licence valide ou de toute autre justification légale pour utiliser ces images, veuillez nous en fournir la preuve.

C’était mon cas. L’image concernée avait bien été obtenue dans les règles et j’avais conservé la preuve. J’ai donc transmis plusieurs éléments (numéro de licence et capture d’écran) dès le lendemain.

Trois jours plus tard, je recevais une réponse beaucoup plus brève :

Nous avons examiné les informations fournies et avons décidé de clore la réclamation.

Fin de l’histoire.

En synthèse

Si vous recevez un e-mail de ce type, ne cédez ni à la panique ni à la tentation de payer immédiatement. Vérifiez vos droits, rassemblez vos preuves et répondez dans les délais. Dans mon cas, la situation s’est réglée rapidement grâce à une simple vérification de licence.

Ce genre d’e-mails peuvent sembler menaçants, mais ils reposent bien sur une base légale : la protection des droits d’auteur. De mon point de vue, si vous êtes dans votre bon droit, il ne faut pas ignorer ce genre de message et il vaut mieux répondre dans les délais. Vous pouvez ignorer ce genre de message, mais il y a de forte chance que vous receviez un recommandé par la suite. Si vous n’avez pas de licence valide, Copytrack peut exiger une indemnisation. À voir s’il n’est pas prudent de prendre un avocat…

Quelques conseils :

• Utilisez des banques d’images libres de droits fiables ;
• Vérifiez les conditions d’utilisation avant de publier une image ;
• Conservez toujours les factures le cas échéant ou certificats de licence ;
• Privilégiez vos propres créations visuelles…

Why are NAS Systems not 10GbE as Standard Right Now?

It is 2025, yet the majority of NAS systems on the market continue to ship with 1GbE or, at best, 2.5GbE networking, leaving many users questioning why 10GbE has not become a standard feature. Over the past decade, the cost of 10GbE networking equipment, including switches, NICs, and adapters, has steadily declined, and the technology has long since moved from being an enterprise-only option into mainstream availability. Home labs, creative professionals, and small businesses are increasingly working with 4K and 8K media, large VM environments, and multi-terabyte datasets, all of which can easily saturate a 1GbE or even 2.5GbE connection. Despite this shift, when browsing the portfolios of Synology, QNAP, Asustor, TerraMaster, or even newer DIY-friendly NAS brands, the entry-level and mid-tier systems remain locked at bandwidth speeds that are already dwarfed by modern SSD arrays and multi-bay RAID configurations.

asdasd

This gap between user expectations and manufacturer offerings has become more striking as affordable consumer motherboards and even some mini-PCs now integrate 5GbE or 10GbE as standard. By contrast, NAS vendors still tend to position 10GbE as a high-end add-on or restrict it to flagship models, often requiring costly proprietary NIC upgrades. For the average buyer, this creates the perception that NAS devices are lagging behind broader networking trends and are artificially constrained to maintain price tiers. The reality is more complex. The question of why 10GbE has not become universal in NAS hardware cannot be answered solely by pointing to falling market prices of controllers and switches. Instead, the explanation lies in a mix of economics, hardware design limitations, CPU lane allocations, and the fact that networking itself is evolving beyond 10GbE into alternatives like 25GbE and USB4. All of these factors together show why the integration of 10GbE into NAS devices remains more complicated than it may first appear.

Discussing the Issue / Barriers to Manufacturers

One of the most persistent barriers to universal 10GbE adoption in NAS systems is the economic reality of how these devices are positioned. Vendors like Synology, QNAP, and Asustor operate in a layered product ecosystem, where each tier is designed to push customers toward more expensive models. Entry-level devices often compete on affordability rather than raw performance, meaning that features like 10GbE are deliberately held back to differentiate mid-range and enterprise systems. The actual bill of materials (BOM) cost for including 10GbE hardware is lower than it was five years ago, but manufacturers still view it as a premium feature that justifies higher price points. By holding 10GbE in reserve for upper tiers, vendors protect their margins, avoid cannibalising sales of more profitable models, and keep upgrade paths clear for customers as their needs grow. This is not simply technical gatekeeping but a conscious market segmentation strategy.

A second, more technical challenge comes from CPU and chipset design. The processors used in affordable NAS devices are almost always low-power embedded models—Intel Celeron, Atom, or entry-level AMD Ryzen Embedded chips—which provide only a limited number of PCIe lanes. These lanes must be distributed across storage controllers, NVMe slots, expansion slots, and network interfaces. Introducing 10GbE requires not only dedicating at least two, and often four, PCIe lanes, but also ensuring that the CPU can handle the higher throughput without becoming the bottleneck. If a vendor reallocates lanes to add 10GbE, they may have to reduce the number of NVMe slots, cut down on SATA ports, or compromise expansion card bandwidth. For many manufacturers, it is simpler to leave 10GbE out of the base design than to risk producing a system that looks good on paper but struggles to deliver in practice.

Beyond lane allocation, there is also the issue of power, thermals, and board layout. 10GbE controllers typically draw more power and generate more heat than 1GbE or 2.5GbE chips. In compact NAS enclosures designed for low-noise operation, this can force more aggressive cooling solutions or tighter thermal management. For brands already working within strict acoustic and energy efficiency limits, especially in home or small office NAS devices, the integration of 10GbE becomes a balancing act between speed and stability. Higher thermal load can also reduce the overall lifespan of components or require larger enclosures, both of which erode the appeal of entry-level systems where buyers expect compact and efficient designs.

Another factor that discourages widespread 10GbE adoption is ecosystem alignment. NAS vendors are keenly aware that a large percentage of their target audience does not yet operate in 10GbE-ready environments. Even though 10GbE switches and NICs are more affordable in 2025, many households and small offices still rely on routers and switches with 1GbE or 2.5GbE uplinks. For these users, the inclusion of 10GbE would have little practical benefit, since the rest of the network infrastructure cannot support it. From the manufacturer’s perspective, bundling 10GbE into a device that will simply be throttled by the customer’s network backbone risks making the feature look pointless, or worse, “non-functional.” As such, 10GbE tends to be reserved for prosumer and enterprise segments, where it is more likely that users already have or are willing to invest in compatible infrastructure.

Finally, there is a subtle but important business factor at play: vendor ecosystems and upsell opportunities. Many NAS brands sell proprietary 10GbE upgrade cards or branded NICs, which can only be used with their systems. By omitting onboard 10GbE but providing expansion slots, vendors create an additional revenue stream while giving customers flexibility to upgrade later. This model also ensures that users who truly require 10GbE end up spending more within the brand’s ecosystem, while casual buyers stick to lower-cost systems that do not overdeliver. In this sense, the absence of 10GbE on affordable NAS units is not only about technical limitations, but also about preserving a staged upgrade model that aligns with each brand’s long-term revenue strategy.

The Solution – How Can 10GbE Be More Accessible?

The landscape for 10GbE networking hardware has improved significantly in the last few years, with controllers becoming cheaper, more efficient, and easier to integrate into consumer systems. Early 10GbE relied heavily on costly Intel or Mellanox chipsets designed primarily for enterprise servers, often priced in the hundreds of dollars per card. Today, vendors such as Realtek, Aquantia (now under Marvell), and Broadcom produce consumer-focused 10GbE controllers that are smaller, run cooler, and consume less power. These newer chipsets are also designed to integrate more smoothly with mainstream CPUs and motherboards, reducing the need for complex PCB layouts. The result has been a marked reduction in the cost of standalone NICs and USB-to-10GbE adapters, which now frequently sell for under $100, making them accessible even for home users experimenting with faster networking.

Even with this progress, manufacturers remain hesitant to make 10GbE a baseline feature across all NAS devices. Part of the reason lies in how modern NAS systems must juggle limited resources. As CPUs have shifted to PCIe Gen 4 and Gen 5, the available bandwidth has increased, but vendors are also using these lanes to expand NVMe storage pools, enable GPU acceleration, or add AI-focused co-processors for surveillance, indexing, or media analysis. In many cases, vendors see greater value in offering more M.2 slots, dual PCIe expansion options, or flexible NIC bays than in permanently dedicating space to 10GbE. This explains why hybrid designs are now common: devices shipping with 2.5GbE or 5GbE onboard, with a dedicated slot for an optional 10GbE card. Such configurations give users a faster-than-gigabit baseline, but also keep upgrade paths open for power users who truly need multi-gigabit networking.

The state of 10GbE is also being influenced by the rapid adoption of adjacent technologies. 2.5GbE has become the de facto standard in new consumer motherboards and mid-tier switches, offering a cheap and widely compatible upgrade path for everyday users who want more than 1GbE without changing their cabling. At the other end of the spectrum, higher-speed networking such as 25GbE or 40GbE is filtering down from data centres to advanced prosumer setups, while direct-connect solutions like Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 offer bandwidth well beyond 10GbE with less CPU overhead and simpler plug-and-play deployment. Software optimisation is also playing a role: modern NAS operating systems increasingly support IP over Thunderbolt or USB4, which provides a parallel path to multi-gigabit performance without the traditional reliance on Ethernet standards. As a result, 10GbE finds itself squeezed in the middle—too expensive to be a no-brainer at the entry level, but increasingly overshadowed by faster alternatives at the top end. It remains a critical sweet spot for small businesses and creative professionals, but its window of dominance is being challenged by the pace of networking innovation.

Verdict and Conclusion – Buy a 10GbE NAS Now or Wait?

The question of why 10GbE has not become a standard feature across NAS devices in 2025 does not have a single answer, but rather a convergence of factors. Manufacturers face technical challenges in CPU lane allocation, thermal management, and system design, while also making deliberate market choices to protect product segmentation and encourage upsell opportunities. At the same time, 10GbE sits in an awkward position within the networking landscape: cheaper and more efficient than ever, yet increasingly bypassed by the widespread adoption of 2.5GbE on the low end and the emergence of 25GbE, Thunderbolt, and USB4 on the high end. For now, this means that 10GbE remains reserved for higher-tier NAS systems where the hardware can genuinely sustain its throughput and where the user base is prepared to invest in compatible infrastructure. While prices will continue to fall and adoption will grow, it is unlikely that every NAS will adopt 10GbE as standard before other technologies begin to replace it as the next performance baseline.

5 affordable Turnkey 10GbE NAS Solutions (Between $499 and $699)

For years, 10GbE networking has been seen as a premium feature reserved for high-end or enterprise-grade NAS devices, often pushing total system costs well beyond the reach of home users and small businesses. However, as controller prices have dropped and demand for faster data transfers has grown, a new wave of affordable NAS solutions has started to appear with built-in 10GbE. These systems no longer require expensive proprietary upgrade cards or third-party NICs, and many sit comfortably below the $699 / £599 price point. They cover a range of use cases, from compact SSD-based NAS devices to rackmount storage appliances and versatile desktop units. Below is a selection of some of the most notable options currently available, each offering a balance of performance, connectivity, and affordability for users who want to move beyond 1GbE or 2.5GbE without breaking the bank.

UniFi UNAS Pro (7-Bay, Rackmount)

I keep coming back to two words for the UniFi UNAS Pro—fundamentals and consistency. UniFi has clearly focused on making this system a strong addition to their ecosystem, prioritizing the essential storage needs of a NAS. They’ve succeeded in this, but comparisons with long-established competitors are inevitable. While solid, reliable, and stable, the UniFi UNAS Pro will take time to be competitive on the software front. If you’re deeply invested in the UniFi ecosystem, you’ll appreciate its ease of use and integration. However, outside of a UniFi network, it may feel feature-light compared to alternatives. The pricing is competitive for a launch product at $499, and while it’s not the best NAS on the market, it’s the most user-friendly and UniFi-ready. It will likely satisfy many users’ needs. I can certainly see this being integrated into existing UniFi networks as a 2nd stage backup alongside their already existing 3rd party NAS solution, with the potential to graduating to their primary storage as Ubiquiti continue to evolve this platform above and beyond the fundamentals their have nailed down in the UNAS Pro system.

• Approx. Price: $499 / £400

• Specs: ARM Cortex-A57 quad-core CPU, 8 GB RAM, seven 2.5″/3.5″ SATA bays, 1×10GbE SFP+ and 1×1GbE.

• Why It Stands Out: Exceptional price-to-performance for pure storage needs. Lacks advanced multimedia or container apps but ideal for high-speed backups in a rackmount setup.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.2

PROS

Nails down the fundamentals of NAS Storage very well
Easy to use GUI and well suited in the UniFi Ecosystem/UX
Complete Offline Use is supported
Use of a UI account is NOT compulsory
Excellently deployed Snapshot Features
10GbE out-the-box
Open HDD Compatibility, but also 1st party options too
Backup and Restoration Options Nailed down perfectly
Very power efficient and CPU/, Memory utilization rarely high
Compact, Quite and well designed chassis
The LCD controls are completely \'different level\' compared to other brands in the market
Promised competitive pricing
FAST deployment (3-5mins tops)
Reactive Storage expandability and easy-to-understand storage failover options
Mobile app deployment is intuitive/fast
Feels stable, secure and reliable at all times
Performance is respectable (considering SATA Bay count and CPU) but also sustained performance is very good
Single screen dashboard is clear and intuitive
Ditto for the native file explorer

CONS

7 Bays is a bit unusual, plus feels like the existing UNVR with different firmware
Additional App installation (eg. \'Protect\') not currently supported. So no container support for 3rd party apps
Network Controls are limited
Works at it\'s best in an existing UniFi managed network, feels a little limited in \'standalone\'
Multiple storage pools not supported (nor is RAID 0)
Lack of Scheduled On/Off
Lack of redundant PSU
Only 1 10Gb port and 1x 1GbE, no USBs for expanded storage or an expansion

Asustor Flashstor 12 Gen 1 (Compact NVMe NAS)

The Asustor Flashstor Gen 2 12-Bay NAS is a robust and versatile solution for users with demanding storage needs. Its combination of high-performance hardware, extensive connectivity options, and compact design makes it a standout choice for content creators, small businesses, and enthusiasts. With dual 10GbE ports, USB 4.0 connectivity, and support for up to 12 M.2 NVMe drives, it offers exceptional speed and scalability. While the device has a few quirks, such as its mixed PCIe slot speeds and lack of M.2 heat sinks, these are manageable with proper planning and aftermarket solutions. The Flashstor Gen 2 excels in raw performance, handling intensive workflows with ease and maintaining low noise levels even under load. Its power efficiency and robust thermal management further enhance its appeal for 24/7 operation. For users prioritizing hardware capabilities and performance, the Flashstor Gen 2 delivers on its promises. While its complexity may deter less experienced users, those with the technical expertise to configure and optimize the system will find it a valuable addition to their workflow.

• Approx. Price: $750 / £600

• Specs: Intel Celeron N5105, 12×M.2 NVMe slots, single 10GbE port, compact form factor.

• Notable Traits: High-density SSD storage in a small desktop chassis. Excellent value for SSD-heavy builds.

SOFTWARE - 6/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 10/10

PRICE - 7/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.0

PROS

Exceptional Performance: Dual 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports and USB 4.0 connectivity deliver fast and reliable data transfer speeds, ideal for 4K editing and collaborative environments.
Extensive Storage Options: Supports up to 12 M.2 NVMe SSDs, allowing for large-scale, high-speed storage arrays.
ECC Memory Support: Includes 16GB of DDR5-4800 ECC memory (expandable to 64GB), ensuring data integrity for critical applications.
Compact Design: Small footprint makes it perfect for workspaces with limited room.
Quiet Operation: Dual-fan system keeps noise levels low, even under heavy loads.
Flexible Connectivity: Features two USB 4.0 Type-C ports and three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports for direct storage access and peripheral integration.
Power Efficiency: Low power consumption (32.2W idle, 56W under load) makes it economical to run, even for 24/7 operation.
Thermal Management Enhancements: Dual fans and copper heat pipes efficiently dissipate heat, ensuring stable performance.
Support for Third-Party Operating Systems: Compatible with platforms like TrueNAS and Unraid for advanced customization.

CONS

Mixed PCIe Slot Speeds: Inconsistent PCIe bandwidth across M.2 slots complicates unified RAID configurations.
Lack of M.2 Heat Sinks: NVMe slots do not include heat sinks, requiring aftermarket cooling solutions for intensive workloads.
No Integrated Graphics: The AMD Ryzen V3C14 processor lacks integrated graphics, limiting hardware transcoding and multimedia capabilities.
Steep Price: The 12-bay model’s cost ($1,300–$1,400) and the six-bay version’s lack of ECC memory make them expensive compared to alternatives.

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus

BOTTOM LINE – The UGREEN NASYnc DXP4800 Plus does not feel ‘finished’ yet and still needs more time in the over, but UGREEN have been very clear with me that this product is not intended for release and fulfilment till summer 2024 and improvements, optimization and product completion is still in progress. Judging the UGREEN NAS systems, when what we have is a pre-release and pre-crowdfunding sample, was always going to be tough. The DXP4800 PLUS is a very well put-together NAS solution, arriving with a fantastic launching price point (arguably even at its RRP for the hardware on offer). UGREEN has clearly made efforts here to carve out their own style, adding their own aesthetic to the traditional 4-bay server box design that plagues NAS boxes at this scale. Equally, although they are not the first brand to consider Kickstarter/Crowdfunding for launching a new product in the NAS/personal-cloud sector, this is easily one of the most confident entries I have seen yet. The fact that this system arrives on the market primarily as a crowdfunded solution (though almost certainly, if successful, will roll out at traditional retail) is definitely going to give users some pause for thought. Equally, the UGREEN NAS software, still in beta at the time of writing, although very responsive and nailing down the basics, still feels like it needs more work to compete with the bigger boys at Synology and QNAP. Hardware architecture, scalability, and performance are all pretty impressive, though the performance of the Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe slots didn’t seem to hit the numbers I was expecting. Perhaps a question of PCIe bottlenecking internally, or a need for further tweaking and optimization as the system continues development. Bottom line, with expected software updates to roll out closer to launch and fulfillment, such as an expanded App center and mobile client, the UGREEN DXP4800 Plus is definitely a device worth keeping an eye on in the growing Turnkey and semi-DIY NAS market. As an alternative to public cloud services, this is a no-brainer and worth the entry price point. As an alternative to established Turnkey NAS Solutions, we will hold off judgment till it is publicly released.

• Approx. Price: $595 / £475

• Specs: Intel Pentium Gold 8505 (6-thread), 8 GB DDR5, 4×SATA + 2×M.2 slots, 1×10GbE and 1×2.5GbE, plus HDMI, USB-C, USB-A, and SD reader.

• Why It’s Attractive: Well-rounded design with rich connectivity and media support, undercuts most rivals on price and features.

SOFTWARE - 6/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 6/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

7.6

PROS

Exceptional Hardware for the Price
4 HDDs + 2x Gen 4x4 M.2 in 1 box under $400
Good Balanced CPU choice in the Pentium Gold 8505
10GbE and 2.5GbE as standard
An SD Card Slot (wielrd rare!)
10/10 Build Quality
Great Scalability
Fantastic Mobile Application (even vs Synology and QNAP etc)
Desktop/Browser GUI shows promise
Established Brand entering the NAS Market
Not too noisy (comparatively)
Very Appealing retail package+accessories

CONS

10GbE Performance was underwhelming
Crowdfunding choice is confusing
Software (still in Beta) is still far from ready 22/3/24
non-UGREEN PSU is unexpected

TerraMaster F4-424 Max / F6-424 Max

The TerraMaster F4-424 Max is a robust 4-bay NAS system that offers a powerful mix of features and flexibility for a wide range of tasks. Powered by the Intel i5-1235U CPU with 10 cores and 12 threads, the F4-424 Max excels at resource-intensive applications such as Plex media streaming, 4K hardware transcoding, and virtual machine hosting. Its dual M.2 NVMe slots running at PCIe Gen 4 speeds significantly improve storage performance, especially when used for caching, while the two 10GbE ports offer high-speed networking environments, allowing for 20Gbps throughput via link aggregation.

In terms of software, TOS 6 brings notable improvements, although it still lags behind the more polished ecosystems of Synology DSM and QNAP QTS. That said, TerraMaster’s continuous software evolution with each new version of TOS ensures that users have access to more robust tools and security features. For its price point of $899.99, the F4-424 Max is a compelling option for those seeking high-performance NAS solutions with scalability in mind. While the Pro model offers competitive performance, the Max takes it a step further with advanced networking, making it ideal for environments where speed is a priority.

• Approx. Price: $675 / £550 (F4-424 Max, during sale) – $899 / £700 (F6-424 Max, regular)

• Specs: Intel Core i5-1235U (10-core), 8 GB RAM, dual 10GbE ports, dual M.2, with 4 or 6 SATA bays depending on model.

• Why It Helps: The F4-424 Max frequently drops below the $800 mark in promotions, offering unusually strong CPU performance and dual 10GbE at a mid-range price point.

SOFTWARE - 6/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 9/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.2

PROS

Powerful Hardware: Intel i5-1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads for resource-heavy tasks.
Dual 10GbE Ports: High-speed networking capabilities with link aggregation for up to 20Gbps, ideal for large file transfers.
PCIe Gen 4 NVMe Support: Two M.2 NVMe slots offering exceptional performance for caching or additional high-speed storage.
Efficient Cooling: The large 120mm fan ensures quiet and effective cooling, making it suitable for home and office environments.
Improved TOS 6 Software: Enhancements in GUI, backup tools, and overall security bring TOS closer to its competitors.

CONS

Higher Price Tag: At $899.99, it’s more expensive than TerraMaster’s other models, which may deter budget-conscious buyers.
No PCIe Expansion: Lack of a PCIe slot limits potential for future upgrades, such as adding 10GbE cards or more M.2 drives.
Presentation: The software has improved a lot, but still feels inconsistent in places compared with alternatives from brands such as Synology and QNAP.

Summary Table

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...N7 AMD 2x 10GbE NAS MotherboarN7 AMD 8845HS 2x 10GbE NAS MotCWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS BoCWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS BoN305 6-Bay 10GbE NAS MotherboaN305 6-Bay 10GbE NAS MotherboaTopton N100 10GbE NAS MotherboTopton N100 10GbE NAS MotherboThe Best 10GbE NAS Drives - 20QNAP TBS-h574TX Thunderbolt 4 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

The Synology Solution 2025/2026 Event – What Was There?

Before We Go Any Further – We STILL Have to Discuss Synology Hard Drive Compatibility!

Synology’s hard drive support policy was a recurring topic throughout the event and in direct conversations with staff. The subject was formally addressed in the opening session, where the company framed its approach as a strategic decision to validate and support selected drives for reliability and lifecycle assurance. In a later Q&A with a large Synology customer, the policy came up again, though the exchange felt somewhat staged. Away from the stage, I spoke with almost a dozen Synology team members on and off the record. The consistent message was that verification of Seagate and Western Digital drives is still in progress, but I also received conflicting off-the-record remarks about how validation and support could be expanded in the future. A follow-up article and video from me on this subject will be published soon to explore the matter further.

“As workloads scale and data becomes even more critical. We’ve made the strategic decision to fully validate and support scenario drives in our solution.
This means that we take an end to end responsibility for performance, reliability and long-term availability by managing both hardware and the software stack.
We intend to show you that we can deliver deeper integration, such as real-time health monitoring, predictive risk analysis and seamless firmware updates, all designed to reduce risk and maximise uptime.

This change is not about limiting choice, it’s about accountability. When you deploy a Synology solution, you can be confident that we stand behind every component and that you’ll receive a system optimised for performance and reliability over its entire lifestyle. And for our partners, this also means fewer unknowns of deployment and support, greater predictability and stronger value for your customers. Together, we can focus less on troubleshooting and more on helping businesses innovate, securely.”

The official position is that tighter control of hardware compatibility will improve integration features like predictive monitoring and firmware management, while reducing deployment risks. However, Synology repeatedly stressed that the policy is not yet final, with feedback from customers and partners still under review. From my discussions, the messaging suggests that although Synology’s stance is rooted in system accountability, the practical implications for users—particularly regarding Seagate and WD models such as IronWolf and Red or surveillance-focused drives like SkyHawk and Purple—remain unsettled. The lack of clarity points to an ongoing process where official announcements may evolve, but for now customers are being told the policy is about creating a more reliable platform rather than restricting options.

Introduction to Synology – 25 Years On

The opening session of Synology’s UK Solutions Exhibition marked the company’s 25th anniversary with a review of its history, current reach, and overall strategy. Synology reported that it has 14 million installations worldwide, is protecting around 25 million entities and servers, and manages more than 2 million accounts. Case examples were used to illustrate different applications, including the Imperial War Museum’s video archive workflows, Toyota’s use of scalable backup and disaster recovery, and surveillance and crowd management deployments using Synology cameras and DVA units. The presentation also provided background on the company’s origins in 2000 and the development of DSM as its Linux-based operating system. DSM was described as having grown from a small-business storage platform into a wider environment that spans file management, surveillance, backup, cloud services, and productivity, positioned between consumer-focused devices and enterprise systems.

The session also focused on the conditions in which these systems now operate. Trends highlighted included increasing architectural complexity from hybrid and cloud deployments, stricter compliance and regulatory requirements, persistent security threats, and ongoing budget constraints. Synology framed its approach around four design principles: integrating hardware and software into a single platform, embedding security features from the outset, simplifying management to reduce reliance on specialist expertise, and ensuring predictable long-term costs rather than shifting expenses over time. A notable point was the company’s drive compatibility and accountability policy. Synology stated that it will validate and support specific hard drives and SSDs to provide real-time monitoring, firmware updates, and lifecycle assurances. However, the company also acknowledged that it is still assessing customer and partner feedback on the subject of drive and SSD verification, indicating that its position may continue to evolve. The presentation ended with an invitation to engage with Synology staff during the event and a transition to the next session on data protection.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• Synology’s drive compatibility and accountability policy, with integrated monitoring, firmware management, and lifecycle support.

• Synology confirmed it is still assessing customer and partner feedback on hard drive and SSD verification, leaving open the possibility of adjustments.

Synology and Data Storage Now/Future

Active Protect and the DP series was once again a heavy presence at this event and was more formally presented as Synology’s hardware-plus-software backup appliance family, structured around three guarantees: isolation, visibility, and auditability. It combines technologies such as high-rate deduplication (up to 80%), btrfs checksums with self-healing, immutability at the primary backup layer tied to retention policies, VM-based backup verification and sandboxing, and software-driven offline air-gap replication. These measures are positioned as protection against common and combined attack chains, including phishing, stolen credentials, ransomware, insider threats, and zero-day exploits. Large-scale management is enabled through clustering (tested with over 2,500 nodes and 150,000 endpoints), protection plans, and failover between backup servers to avoid single points of failure. Audit logs can be forwarded to external SIEMs and long-term retention is supported via Synology’s Secure Scalable Storage with WORM. Case studies included a Japanese bank with six appliances across DR sites, a Taiwanese logistics company consolidating over ten devices, and Toyota, which migrated away from tape to Active Protect in 2025, citing reduced costs and improved resilience.

The presentation framed the wider context as one where 70% of organisations have experienced data loss or attacks and 88% of those were unable to recover. The strategy was outlined as layered: employee education, least-privilege delegated administration, and backup as the final line of defence. Technical implementation details highlighted cloning instead of full copying, policy-driven immutability, VM-based verification, and software-controlled air-gap mechanisms as ways to achieve isolation and restore confidence. Visibility was addressed through centralized portals, cluster management, and protection plan broadcasting across sites, while auditability was achieved through extensive telemetry, monitoring, and immutable log storage. The brand also noted that it is working to further improve connectivity between Active Protect appliances and Active Backup for Business-equipped devices, aiming to strengthen multi-site operations and incremental migration paths. Deployment was described as end-to-end through Synology appliances, with hot spares and replacement hardware options to maintain recovery point objectives. The solution was positioned as an integrated alternative to mixed third-party systems, with the trade-off being a reliance on Synology’s single-vendor model for both hardware and software.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• Active Protect appliance family: integrated hardware-plus-software backup solution with isolation, visibility, and auditability features.

• Protection plans and clustering: centralized policies for managing thousands of endpoints and enabling cross-site disaster recovery.

• Software-based air-gap replication: offline replication without tape media, controlled through software and network port management.

• VM-based backup verification and sandboxing: integrated hypervisor for validating and testing backups.

• Planned improvements to connectivity between Active Protect and Active Backup devices to strengthen multi-site operations and integration.

Robust, Scalable and Fast Storage Now and the Future

This session focused on Synology’s enterprise storage portfolio and its positioning across security, efficiency, scalability, and performance requirements. The company reported that it currently manages around 350 exabytes across roughly 260,000 businesses and highlighted product families for flash, hybrid, and high-capacity storage. Security was presented as a three-stage process (protect, detect, recover), incorporating measures such as multi-factor sign-in, encryption, immutable snapshots, Active Insight monitoring, and replication. This was also where we saw a reference (2nd time this year) to the multi-site storage tiering service ‘Synology Tiering’ – catchy name, right? Sadly, this does not appear to be a deployment model that can be done inside a single system (ala QNAP QTier).

Efficiency claims included up to 5:1 data reduction, thin provisioning, automated tiering, and hybrid cloud integration with C2 and Hybrid Share. Hybrid Share adoption was noted at over 1,400 enterprises and 3,500 sites, with features such as edge caching and global file locking to support multi-site collaboration. The GS series (notably GS3400) was introduced as a scale-out solution for unstructured data, supporting up to 48 nodes, 11.5 PB per cluster, SMB and S3 protocols, and managed centrally with the GridStation Manager software and its dedicated Cluster Manager GUI.

At the performance end, Synology presented the PAS series, including the PAS 7700 all-NVMe U.3 rackmount system and a 12-bay SATA SSD version. PAS systems run on new Parallel Active Manager software and feature active-active dual controllers, RAID TP (triple parity), rate bitmap rebuilds, and cache protection. Demonstrations covered VDI boot storms, large-scale SQL databases, and EDA simulations, with claims of sub-millisecond latency and throughput in the tens of gigabytes per second. Security measures include network isolation, VLANs, and self-encrypting drives. The GS and PAS series were described as extending Synology’s ecosystem from large-scale archival storage to ultra-low-latency mission-critical workloads, all linked through C2 cloud services, Active Insight monitoring, and policy-driven automation. The company also indicated that further improvements are underway to enhance connectivity between Active Protect appliances and Active Backup devices, enabling more integrated multi-site operations.

The demonstrations of the PAS 7700 system were used to illustrate performance under realistic enterprise workloads. In one scenario, a virtual desktop infrastructure with 1,000 desktops was booted simultaneously to highlight predictable behavior during “boot storm” events. A second demonstration focused on SQL database operations, where over 1,000 concurrent users generated mixed read/write activity, reportedly sustaining more than one million IOPS at approximately one millisecond latency. The third example involved an electronic design automation (EDA) simulation handling around 1,300 jobsets, used to demonstrate the system’s ability to maintain consistent throughput and ultra-low latency under computationally intensive conditions. These scenarios were intended to show how the all-NVMe architecture and active-active controller design could deliver stable, high-performance output across diverse mission-critical environments.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• GS series (GridStation): scale-out storage, GS3400 unit, up to 48-node clusters and 11.5 PB per cluster, managed by GridStation Manager with Cluster Manager GUI.

• PAS series: new enterprise rackmount systems, including the PAS 7700 all-NVMe U.3 48-bay system and a 12-bay SATA SSD version, with active-active controllers.

• Parallel Active Manager software: new management layer for PAS systems.

• Planned improvements to connectivity between Active Protect and Active Backup devices for enhanced multi-site integration.

Synology Surveillance Station, New DVA3000, DVA7400, Synology SD Card, Switches and More

This section outlined Synology’s surveillance strategy, built on two platforms: the on-premises Surveillance Station VMS and the new cloud-based Synology C2 Cloud VSaaS. Both are designed to scale across large environments, with CMS central management tested at around 3,000 hosts and 30,000 cameras, and real-world deployments exceeding these figures. Features include open APIs for third-party integration, drag-and-drop monitoring, E-maps, and bulk provisioning tools for rapid deployment.

AI capabilities are available on-camera and on-appliance, with functions such as people/vehicle detection, face recognition, license plate recognition, dynamic mosaic (privacy blurring), and smoke detection. An upcoming semantic video search will enable natural-language style queries across historical footage, and is cited as one reason for higher-capacity DVA models.

New hardware introduced includes the DVA3000 (4-bay, 40 cameras, 6 AI tasks) and the DVA7400 (12-bay rackmount, up to 100 cameras, 40 AI tasks, with a GPU included), both expected in early 2026. Additional components include three PoE switches and an industrial-grade microSD card designed for continuous edge recording and health monitoring, though final specifications such as SD card class remain unconfirmed.

C2 Cloud was described as a cloud-managed surveillance option requiring no local NAS or NVR, with built-in AI analytics, centralized access via browser or mobile, and failover to local peer-to-peer streaming when internet is down. The on-premises and cloud platforms are intended to remain separate at launch, though hybrid interoperability is planned in later updates to unify workflows. Security is built into both models, including encryption, MFA, granular access roles, privacy controls, and a product security incident response team supported by a bug bounty program.

Customer examples ranged from schools and stadiums to large government deployments, highlighting scalability, API-based third-party integration, and operational improvements such as automated crowd counting and smoke detection. Licensing continues to follow Synology’s low-overhead approach for on-prem setups, with cloud plans bundling AI features directly. The roadmap places new cameras in Q4 2025 and the DVA models in early 2026, with hybrid operation features to follow.

When asked directly about the status of hard drive compatibility in the new surveillance systems, including whether support would be limited to Synology-branded HDDs or extend to commonly used models such as WD Purple and Seagate SkyHawk, Synology was unable to provide a clear confirmation. The company indicated that final details on drive verification and supported models for these upcoming surveillance platforms remain under review.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• DVA3000: 4-bay surveillance appliance, 40 camera feeds, 6 AI operations, expected early 2026.

• DVA7400: 12-bay rackmount model with GPU, up to 100 cameras and 40 AI tasks, expected early 2026.

• Upcoming semantic video search: natural-language video query functionality.

• Three new PoE switches for simplified deployment and management.

• Industrial microSD card with edge recording and health reporting (specifications still unconfirmed).

• Synology C2 Cloud(cloud VSaaS): cloud-managed surveillance platform, launching with AI features included.

• Planned hybrid interoperability between Surveillance Station (on-prem) and C2 Cloud (cloud) in future updates.

Synology and AI – New GPU-Equipped Local AI NAS in Development and More Optional AI Integration in Synology NAS

This session focused on Synology’s Office Suite, which is positioned as a private-cloud productivity and communication platform designed to offer enterprises 100% data ownership, on-premises deployment, and long-term cost control. Core services include Drive and Office for file storage and real-time collaboration, Mail Plus for enterprise email, and the upcoming Chat & Meet for messaging and video conferencing. A new AI Console was also introduced, intended to manage and audit AI usage within the suite. The platform targets organizations concerned about rising cloud subscription costs—especially with Microsoft’s announced October 2025 price increases—data sovereignty, and security risks introduced by unsanctioned use of generative AI. Adoption figures cited include over 600,000 businesses and 80 million users.

Synology Drive and Office were presented as tools for structured file management and collaborative editing of documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. Features include file requests, configurable link sharing, audit logs, watermarking, and remote wiping. A case study from Yonsei University Medical Center highlighted the replacement of a Windows-based file system with Synology Drive, enabling centralized permission management, endpoint oversight, and synchronization across 15,000 employee devices. Mail Plus adds enterprise-grade email features, such as domain sharing for multi-site deployments, active-active clustering for high availability, delegated role management, auditing, and moderation workflows. Together, these services are designed to offer core collaboration and communication functions while preserving organizational control of data and infrastructure.

The roadmap extends the suite with Chat & Meet, an on-premises platform for real-time messaging and video conferencing. It is designed to support over 10,000 simultaneous chat users and 7,000 video participants, integrating channels, group messaging, and video sessions into a single interface. Administrative tools include permission management and migration utilities to ease transitions from existing platforms. Parallel to this, Synology is introducing the AI Console, which addresses risks such as content injection, jailbreaks, and data leakage by providing de-identification, provider management, permission settings, and auditing. The console will also support on-prem GPU-backed AI models for tasks such as semantic search, OCR, and speech-to-text, and is planned to integrate with OpenAI-compatible and self-hosted LLMs via MSCP.

The overarching message is that Synology is extending its productivity ecosystem to address enterprise concerns about cost, security, and compliance while enabling new collaboration and AI capabilities. The suite’s design emphasizes continuity through high-availability clustering, role-based administration, and unified consoles for policy enforcement and auditing. With the AI Console, Synology seeks to embed governance into AI usage, allowing enterprises to adopt advanced tools without exposing sensitive data to uncontrolled environments. Looking forward, further integration of GPU-enabled AI features and the addition of Chat & Meet mark key developments in Synology’s private-cloud strategy, aimed at providing alternatives to mainstream SaaS ecosystems while maintaining operational control.

New / in-progress / future items mentioned:

• Chat & Meet: on-premises messaging and video conferencing platform, supporting large-scale deployments.

• AI Console: centralized AI governance with de-identification, provider management, permissions, and auditing.

• Planned GPU-backed AI models: semantic search, OCR, image recognition, and speech-to-text.

• Integration with third-party and on-prem AI servers: OpenAI-compatible and self-hosted models via MSCP.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology in 2026 - What Have TWHY Synology Changed Support oWHY Synology Changed Support oWeek 33 Tech Roundup – TerraSynology AI Console ReviewSynology AI Console Review - GDS1825+ vs DXP8800 PLUS NAS - Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXPWeek 31 Tech Roundup – 245TBUsing Unverified HDD/SSD on a Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE   If you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver   Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

WE LOVE COFFEE

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

     

Plusieurs d’entre vous nous ont récemment alerté au sujet d’un commentaire publié sous une vidéo YouTube. Celui-ci, signé par Synology Europe (en réalité plutôt Synology Allemagne), a suscité beaucoup de réactions puisqu’il évoque l’avenir de la compatibilité des disques durs tiers avec les NAS de la marque. Cependant, certains ont cru (à tort) que Synology faisait machine arrière. Ce n’est pas le cas…

Changement de politique initié par Synology

Comme nous l’avions déjà expliqué, Synology a inversé sa logique de compatibilité. Désormais, ce n’est plus uniquement l’entreprise qui teste et valide les disques (HDD et SSD) pour ses NAS. En effet, cela représente un énorme travail, aussi bien en temps qu’en coûts financiers. D’autant plus que les fabricants de disques modifient régulièrement leurs firmwares, ou changent certains composants matériels, sans toujours communiquer sur les impacts potentiels pour les NAS.

Pour réduire cette charge, le constructeur taïwanais a mis en place un cahier des charges très strict à destination des fabricants de disques. Ces derniers doivent désormais certifier eux-mêmes leurs produits afin de garantir leur compatibilité avec les nouveaux modèles, comme la gamme DSx25+. On peut raisonnablement supposer que d’autres engagements sont exigés et que Synology procèdera ensuite à certains contrôles complémentaires. Depuis le début, Synology nous a toujours affirmé être en discussion avec plusieurs fabricants, mais sans donner plus de détails.

Le commentaire de Synology

Sous la vidéo YouTube en question, on peut lire ce commentaire (en allemand) :

« Wir wissen, dass sich viele User mehr Flexibilität bei den HDDs wünschen. Derzeit führen wir Gespräche mit Herstellern, damit in Zukunft auch wieder Drittanbieter-Festplatten offiziell unterstützt werden. Das ist aber ein Prozess, der nicht von heute auf morgen abgeschlossen ist. »

Et voici une traduction faite avec DeepL :

« Nous savons que de nombreux utilisateurs souhaitent davantage de flexibilité en matière de disques durs. Nous sommes actuellement en pourparlers avec les fabricants afin que les disques durs tiers soient à nouveau officiellement pris en charge à l’avenir. Mais il s’agit d’un processus qui ne se fera pas du jour au lendemain. »

Ce commentaire confirme donc que Synology est bien toujours en discussion avec les constructeurs de disques pour rouvrir la compatibilité. Toutefois, rien n’indique un quelconque rétropédalage de la part Synology comme nous avons pu le lire…

La réponse de Synology France

Afin d’éviter toute interprétation hasardeuse, nous avons contacté directement Synology France. Ivan Lebowski (Sales Team Leader) nous a confirmé :

« La situation n’a pas vraiment changé. Nous sommes en discussion avec les fabricants de disques afin qu’ils puissent certifier leurs disques sur nos NAS. »

En clair, Synology confirme les discussions, mais ne s’avance pas davantage. Pas de calendrier, pas d’annonce officielle, seulement une confirmation que le processus est en cours.

Bonjour à tous,

J’espère que vous allez bien. Les vacances sont déjà un lointain souvenir et le train-train quotidien a fait son retour. Je ne sais pas vous, mais j’ai l’impression que tout va bien trop vite en ce moment. Est-ce lié à l’âge ? Peut-être…

J’avoue que je n’ai pas réussi à reprendre le rythme d’avant les vacances. Comme indiqué précédemment, j’ai réduit la cadence des publications, car ce n’était plus soutenable. Je reste seul à la rédaction, même si parfois (et je les remercie chaleureusement) quelques rédacteurs occasionnels passent par là. Les sujets ne manquent pas et, encore une fois, inutile d’être une énième version de ce qui a déjà été écrit sur une dizaine d’autres sites.

Si je m’octroie quelques écarts, le stockage et plus particulièrement les NAS restent dans l’ADN du site. Les annonces sont, pour le moment, moins nombreuses… mais 2 fabricants m’ont dévoilé quelques nouveautés à venir. Je ne suis pas sûr que cela plaise à tout le monde. Nous aurons l’occasion d’en reparler prochainement.

Côté films, j’ai vu Le Routard : je déconseille ! Si lle début laissait espérer une comédie correcte, le film s’est rapidement transformé en quelque chose de confus et sans intérêt. Côté des Séries TV, Wednesday m’a semblé en retrait, surtout sur la première partie de la saison 2. En revanche, j’ai bien aimé Hostage sur Netflix, même si c’est un peu capillotracté.

Voilà, c’est tout pour cette fois. Je vous souhaite à tous une excellente journée et une bonne fin de semaine.
FX

QNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAS Coming Soon for Home and SMB Users

QNAP has officially launched the QuX05 series in the Eastern market, introducing three new desktop NAS systems: the Qu405 (4-bay), Qu605 (6-bay), and Qu805 (8-bay). Designed to refresh QNAP’s mid-range portfolio, these models target home users seeking centralised storage, creative professionals handling large-scale multimedia, and small to medium-sized businesses in need of reliable file servers with room to grow. Hardware configurations are offered in two processor options, with the Intel Core 3 N355 eight-core chip running up to 3.9 GHz for higher performance workloads, and the Intel N150 quad-core option at up to 3.6 GHz for cost-conscious deployments. All units adopt DDR5 memory, available in 8 GB or 16 GB SKUs, with support capped at 16 GB via a single slot, which while modest, still provides a step up in bandwidth over DDR4 used in older NAS systems. Storage capacity scales with the number of bays, from four in the Qu405 to eight in the Qu805, and each model also includes two M.2 PCIe Gen3 slots that can be assigned for cache acceleration or used as part of the storage pool. Connectivity has been modernised with dual 2.5GbE ports supporting SMB Multichannel and Port Trunking, USB 3.2 Gen2 across Type-A and Type-C, and a dedicated HDMI output capable of 4K60 playback or VM projection, ensuring these systems can function as both storage appliances and multimedia platforms.

The QuX05 series also benefits from QNAP’s dual operating system approach, allowing users to deploy either the established QTS software environment or the QuTS hero ZFS-based platform for improved data protection, inline deduplication, and snapshot functionality. Integrated AI-powered tools such as QuMagie for photo organisation, Qsirch for semantic search, and Qfiling for automated archiving further extend the usability of the series, making it suitable for both consumer and business applications. The timing of this release is notable, as QNAP’s TS-x64 and TS-x53E systems, including the TS-264, TS-464, and TS-664, are now over three years old, and while still supported, they increasingly feel dated in comparison to more recent offerings. At the same time, competition has intensified with new entrants such as UGREEN, Minisforum and Aoostar, which has gained traction in the NAS sector with aggressive pricing and updated hardware designs, underlining the demand for innovation. Against this backdrop, the Qu405, Qu605, and Qu805 arrive as QNAP’s latest response, bringing updated architecture, refined airflow and thermal design, modernised connectivity, and versatile system features to a market that is both more competitive and more demanding than before.

QNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAS Hardware Specifications

The Qu405, Qu605, and Qu805 are built around the latest Intel processors, with each model available in two distinct variants. The high-performance option uses the Intel Core 3 N355, an eight-core processor with a maximum turbo frequency of 3.9 GHz, paired with Intel UHD Graphics supporting 32 execution units. This CPU is part of Intel’s Twin Lake platform and offers a modest set of PCIe Gen3 lanes, sufficient for supporting dual 2.5GbE controllers, two M.2 NVMe slots, and other onboard I/O. The Lite models, intended for users with lighter requirements or stricter budgets, adopt the Intel N150 quad-core processor running at up to 3.6 GHz, paired with a reduced integrated graphics configuration and fewer available PCIe lanes overall. Both CPU options support AES-NI hardware-accelerated encryption, ensuring data security is handled with minimal performance impact, while the choice between N355 and N150 provides a balance between performance scaling and affordability across the QuX05 range.

Model	Qu405	Qu605	Qu805
Drive Bays	4 × 3.5″ SATA (hot-swappable, also supports 2.5″ SATA SSDs)	6 × 3.5″ SATA (hot-swappable, also supports 2.5″ SATA SSDs)	8 × 3.5″ SATA (hot-swappable, also supports 2.5″ SATA SSDs)
M.2 Slots	2 × M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen3 ×1	2 × M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen3 ×1	2 × M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Gen3 ×1
CPU Options	Intel® Core 3 N355 (8-core, up to 3.9 GHz) or Intel® N150 (4-core, 3.6 GHz)	Intel® Core 3 N355 (8-core, up to 3.9 GHz) or Intel® N150 (4-core, 3.6 GHz)	Intel® Core 3 N355 (8-core, up to 3.9 GHz) or Intel® N150 (4-core, 3.6 GHz)
Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics (32 EU for N355, reduced EU for N150)	Intel UHD Graphics (32 EU for N355, reduced EU for N150)	Intel UHD Graphics (32 EU for N355, reduced EU for N150)
Memory	DDR5 SODIMM: 8 GB or 16 GB (1 slot, max 16 GB)	DDR5 SODIMM: 8 GB or 16 GB (1 slot, max 16 GB)	DDR5 SODIMM: 8 GB or 16 GB (1 slot, max 16 GB)
Flash	8 GB eMMC NAND	8 GB eMMC NAND	8 GB eMMC NAND
Networking	2 × 2.5 GbE RJ45 (supports SMB Multichannel, Link Aggregation)	2 × 2.5 GbE RJ45 (supports SMB Multichannel, Link Aggregation)	2 × 2.5 GbE RJ45 (supports SMB Multichannel, Link Aggregation)
USB Ports	1 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C (front, one-touch copy) + 2 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (rear)	1 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C (front, one-touch copy) + 2 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (rear)	1 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C (front, one-touch copy) + 2 × USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (rear)
HDMI	1 × HDMI (2.0 or 2.1 depending on SKU, up to 4K 60 Hz)	1 × HDMI (2.0 or 2.1 depending on SKU, up to 4K 60 Hz)	1 × HDMI (2.0 or 2.1 depending on SKU, up to 4K 60 Hz)
Cooling	Redesigned airflow with improved heat dissipation	Redesigned airflow with improved heat dissipation	Redesigned airflow with improved heat dissipation
Power Supply	96 W external adapter, typical ~63 W under load	120 W external adapter, typical ~84 W under load	150 W external adapter, typical ~103 W under load
Dimensions	165 × 217 × 168 mm	165 × 217 × 226 mm	165 × 217 × 285 mm
Weight	Net 2.15 kg / Gross 4.1 kg	Net 2.52 kg / Gross 4.82 kg	Net 3.1 kg / Gross 5.7 kg
Operating System	QTS or QuTS hero (ZFS-based, supports inline deduplication, compression, snapshots)	QTS or QuTS hero (ZFS-based, supports inline deduplication, compression, snapshots)	QTS or QuTS hero (ZFS-based, supports inline deduplication, compression, snapshots)
Other Features	AES-NI encryption, hot-swap support, RAID protection, QuFirewall, 2FA, Malware Remover, Qsirch/Qfiling AI search, QuMagie photo AI, QVR Pro with 8 free camera channels	Same as Qu405	Same as Qu405
Ports Image

Memory is standardised across the series, with all three devices supporting DDR5 SODIMM modules operating at up to 4800 MHz. SKUs are available with either 8 GB or 16 GB preinstalled, and although only a single memory slot is provided, limiting maximum capacity to 16 GB, the use of DDR5 brings notable improvements in throughput and responsiveness compared to the DDR4 used in older generations. The memory arrangement also highlights the target audience of the QuX05 series: home and SMB users who need fast but manageable workloads rather than large-scale enterprise deployments that require extensive memory pools. The systems also include 8 GB of onboard eMMC NAND for essential system functions, ensuring that firmware and OS-level features remain responsive even during heavy storage activity. Unlike some higher-end SMB-focused NAS devices, there is no dedicated PCIe expansion slot for upgrades such as 10GbE, HBAs, or GPU cards. This omission is likely linked to the reduced lane count of the N150 and N355 processors, which restricts available bandwidth for add-in cards. Instead, QNAP has chosen to distribute available lanes across built-in features such as dual 2.5GbE ports and dual NVMe slots, a trade-off that prioritises out-of-the-box functionality over modular expansion.

Storage options are one of the main areas where the QuX05 series differentiates itself by bay count. The Qu405 provides four 3.5-inch SATA bays, the Qu605 six, and the Qu805 eight, with each also capable of accommodating 2.5-inch SATA SSDs for flexible configurations. All bays support hot-swapping, allowing drives to be replaced without shutting down the system. Alongside the main drive bays, every model includes two M.2 2280 NVMe slots running at PCIe Gen3 x1. While not offering the bandwidth of Gen3 x4 or Gen4, these slots are sufficient for cache acceleration or tiered storage, with QNAP’s Qtier software automatically balancing frequently accessed files between SSDs and hard drives. This approach provides both capacity and performance, especially for environments that mix multimedia storage with frequent small file access.

Connectivity is consistent across all three models. Networking is based on dual 2.5GbE RJ45 ports, supporting link aggregation for bandwidth scaling and redundancy as well as SMB Multichannel for improved multi-session performance. Local I/O includes two USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A ports at the rear, a front-facing USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C port with one-touch copy, and HDMI output capable of 4K at 60 Hz. Most SKUs list HDMI 2.1, while some Lite versions list HDMI 2.0, so capabilities vary depending on configuration. Power requirements scale with chassis size, from a 96 W adapter for the Qu405, to 120 W for the Qu605, and 150 W for the Qu805, with reported average consumption under full drive load measured at approximately 63 W, 84 W, and 103 W respectively. Additional features include system buzzers for hardware alerts, Kensington lock slots for physical security, and redesigned airflow systems that improve cooling efficiency compared to older QNAP mid-range hardware. Together, these specifications establish the QuX05 series as a modernised platform that balances capacity, performance, and power efficiency across three scalable sizes.

Comparison Between the QuX05 Series and TS-x64 & TS-x53E Series

The arrival of the QuX05 range marks a generational update in QNAP’s mid-tier NAS catalog, directly inviting comparison with the company’s established TS-x64 series (TS-264, TS-464, TS-664) and the TS-x53E line (TS-253E, TS-453E). While the older models remain capable and still receive firmware updates, they are now over three years old and show their age in several areas. The TS-x64 units rely on Intel Celeron N5095/N5105 processors, DDR4 memory, and single 1GbE networking as standard, with expansion slots required for faster networking or NVMe storage. The TS-x53E series, launched in 2022, provided an alternative path with dual 2.5GbE ports and built-in M.2 NVMe slots, though they were capped at DDR4 memory and lacked PCIe upgrade slots, restricting long-term flexibility. In contrast, the QuX05 systems use Intel’s newer N355 and N150 processors, move to DDR5 memory, and integrate features such as dual 2.5GbE, NVMe SSD caching, and HDMI 4K output directly into the base platform, reducing the reliance on add-in cards or optional upgrades.

Another major distinction lies in how QNAP has approached expandability. The TS-x64 devices maintain a traditional PCIe slot for upgrades such as 10GbE networking or storage accelerators, something absent from both the QuX05 and TS-x53E series. In the QuX05 range, the limited PCIe lanes of the chosen Intel processors have been redistributed to provide onboard dual NVMe slots and dual 2.5GbE networking, effectively prioritising out-of-the-box functionality over modular expansion. For many home users and SMBs, this built-in approach is practical, but for environments needing high-speed networking or specialised PCIe hardware, the TS-x64 remains more adaptable. Overall, the QuX05 line represents QNAP’s attempt to modernise its mainstream desktop NAS range by integrating features previously seen only in higher-end or expansion-reliant models, offering a balance of performance, efficiency, and simplified setup against the backdrop of older but more expandable TS systems.

Feature / Model	QuX05 Series (Qu405 / Qu605 / Qu805)	TS-x64 Series (TS-264 / TS-464 / TS-664)	TS-x53E Series (TS-253E / TS-453E)
CPU	Intel Core 3 N355 (8-core, up to 3.9 GHz) or N150 (4-core, up to 3.6 GHz)	Intel Celeron N5095/N5105 (4-core, up to 2.9 GHz)	Intel Celeron J6412 (4-core, up to 2.6 GHz)
Memory	DDR5 SODIMM, 8 GB or 16 GB, single slot (max 16 GB)	DDR4 SODIMM, up to 16 GB (dual-slot)	8 GB DDR4 onboard, not expandable
Network Interfaces	Dual 2.5 GbE built-in with SMB Multichannel and Port Trunking	Single 1 GbE standard, PCIe upgrade needed for 2.5/10 GbE	Dual 2.5 GbE built-in
Drive Bays (SATA 3.5″)	Qu405:4	Qu605:6	Qu805:8, hot-swappable
M.2 NVMe Slots	2 × M.2 PCIe Gen3 x1 slots built-in	Requires optional PCIe card	2 × M.2 PCIe Gen3 x2 built-in
Ports
PCIe Expansion Slot	None (lanes redirected to onboard features)	1 PCIe slot for network/storage cards	None
USB Connectivity	USB 3.2 Gen2: 1 front Type-C (one-touch), 2 rear Type-A	USB 3.2 Gen1 ports, front/rear, no one-touch copy	USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A ports
HDMI Output	HDMI 2.0/2.1, 4K60 depending on SKU	HDMI 2.0 or none (model dependent)	Dual HDMI 1.4b, 4K30
Cooling / Design	Redesigned airflow and thermal efficiency	Traditional chassis design	Traditional chassis design
Power Consumption (Typical)	Qu405 ~63 W; Qu605 ~84 W; Qu805 ~103 W (fully populated)	TS-464 ~44 W, TS-664 ~70 W (approximate)	TS-453E ~36 W typical

QNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAS

Early reports from Eastern markets suggest that QNAP intends to position the QuX05 series at a highly competitive level, targeting the same price bracket traditionally occupied by mid-range consumer and SMB NAS devices. Instead of focusing on premium pricing, QNAP appears to be bundling enterprise-class features such as DDR5 memory, dual 2.5GbE connectivity, and built-in NVMe caching into systems expected to fall within the reach of prosumers and small studios. This approach contrasts with past strategies where certain features were locked behind higher-end models or optional expansion cards. The Qu405 and Qu605 are anticipated to scale more affordably due to their lower bay counts, while the Qu805 represents the higher-capacity option. All systems ship with QNAP’s standard two-year warranty, with the option to extend coverage to five years, which remains an important consideration for business users seeking predictable long-term support. Early indications also point to launch bundles or promotional packages, including potential accessories or service benefits, underlining QNAP’s intention to add value in a market that has become crowded with alternatives from newer NAS vendors.

In terms of release timing, the Qu405, Qu605, and Qu805 have already been introduced to the Eastern region, with wider international distribution expected before the close of 2025. Based on QNAP’s established release cycle, this typically means North American and European availability will follow within one or two months of the initial rollout. The timing reflects both market demand and competitive pressure, as the TS-x64 and TS-x53E families are now over three years old, and users have been increasingly vocal about the need for refreshed hardware. With rival solutions from UGREEN, Asustor, and other consumer-oriented NAS makers gaining attention, QNAP’s scheduling suggests an urgency to reassert its role in the mainstream NAS segment. The QuX05 series therefore not only modernises QNAP’s desktop lineup but also aims to arrive quickly enough to counter competing releases, ensuring it remains a viable choice for prosumers, creative teams, and small business deployments into 2026 and beyond.

Feature / Model	QuX05 Series (Qu405 / Qu605 / Qu805)	TS-x64 Series (TS-264 / TS-464 / TS-664)	TS-x53E Series (TS-253E / TS-453E)
Check Amazon
Check AliExpress
Check B&H

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...QNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAWeek 32 Tech Digest – PCIe 6QNAP NAS Port Reference Guide Buy QNAP on B&HBuy QNAP on AmazonQNAP vs UGREENQNAP 2025 - EVERYTHING NEW forQNAP Launches TVR-AI200 Smart Week 19 Tech Roundup – QNAP Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464 Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Disponible depuis fin juillet, le Synology DS225+ fait beaucoup parler de lui. Ce nouveau NAS 2 baies marque un tournant stratégique pour le constructeur, notamment en matière de compatibilité matérielle et de positionnement produit. Nous l’avons testé en détail pour vous donner un avis complet…

Test Synology DS225+

La nouvelle gamme DSx25+ de Synology suscite de nombreux débats. Le fabricant a ajouté une restriction de taille sur l’utilisation exclusive de ses disques durs et SSD. Ce dernier met en avant la qualité et la stabilité de ses produits et promet la certification future d’autres disques… On en reparle un peu plus loin. Enfin, cette nouvelle série apporte (enfin) le réseau 2,5 Gb/s.

Contenu de la boîte

Commençons par découvrir le contenu de la boîte :

• Le DS225+ en lui-même ;
• 2 câble réseau RJ45 ;
• L’alimentation externe et son câble ;
• Des vis pour les SSD ;
• Un QR code renvoyant vers le manuel en ligne ;
• Un livret sur la garantie/conformité.

Construction du NAS et design

Le design du DS225+ reste fidèle à la tradition Synology. Nous sommes en présence d’un boîtier compact en plastique noir, robuste, pesant environ 1,3 kg et mesurant 165 x 108 x 232,2 mm. À l’arrière, on retrouve un ventilateur de 92 mm, assurant la circulation de l’air dans le boitier. Le fabricant annonce seulement 19,6 dB…

Installation du NAS

L’installation des disques durs se fait sans outil, mais un tournevis est requis pour les SSD SATA. Pas d’évolution de ce côté : c’est simple, rapide et efficace.

Compatibilité des disques et SSD

Synology impose désormais l’utilisation de ses disques durs et SSD (voir notre article). Le fabricant met en avant la stabilité, la qualité et la garantie d’un fonctionnement optimal, tout en promettant la certification future de modèles tiers. Pour l’instant, seuls les disques Synology figurent officiellement sur la liste de compatibilité.

Concrètement, qu’est-ce que cela veut dire (lire notre dossier) :

• En migration depuis un ancien NAS, vos volumes sont reconnus, mais Synology recommande de remplacer vos disques ;
• En nouvelle installation, impossible de créer un volume avec des disques non Synology ;
• Les SSD d’autres marques fonctionnent, mais des avertissements s’affichent pour inciter à les remplacer.

Il reste une solution pour passer outre ces messages d’alerte : utiliser le script 007revad. Ce dernier permet de faire reconnaître les disques tiers. Synology tolère encore cette méthode, mais l’assistance technique sera limitée en cas de problème.

Connectique

Le NAS dispose des interfaces de connexion suivantes :

• 2 ports USB 3.0 Type-A (dont 1 à l’avant) ;
• 1 port réseau 2,5 Gb/s ;
• 1 port réseau 1 Gb/s.

Bonne nouvelle : Synology passe enfin au 2,5 Gb/s de série, alors que la concurrence le propose depuis 2019.

Intérieur du DS225+

Le DS225+ embarque un processeur Quad Core Intel Celeron J4125 cadencé à 2 GHz (jusqu’à 2,7 GHz en mode Burst) et dispose de 2 Go de RAM DDR4 (non ECC), extensibles jusqu’à 6 Go. C’est la même architecture que celle du DS224+. L’absence d’évolution de ce côté est plutôt regrettable… Toutefois, la présence d’un iGPU reste un vrai atout pour le transcodage vidéo avec Plex ou Jellyfin.

Avec seulement 2 Go de RAM, le NAS est rapidement limité. Pour exploiter pleinement toutes ses fonctionnalités (conteneurs Docker, virtualisation, hébergement Web…), il faut ajouter 4 Go supplémentaires. Synology recommande sa propre barrette (D4NS01-4G), fiable mais chère. La Crucial CT4G4SFS8266, 3 fois moins coûteuse, est une alternative très appréciée.

DSM 7.2

Le DS225+ tourne sous DSM 7.2, la dernière version du système maison. Clair, complet et ergonomique, il reste aujourd’hui la référence du marché. Synology a clairement bâti son succès grâce à DSM : sécurité renforcée, interface intuitive, nombreuses applications pour particuliers comme professionnels. À ce jour, aucun concurrent ne propose une solution aussi aboutie.

Performances du DS225+

Dans la première partie des tests, nous allons évaluer les performances des transferts à travers un réseau 2,5 Gb/s (entre le NAS et des ordinateurs). Ensuite, nous regarderons les capacités du processeur, en analysant ses performances dans la virtualisation et le transcodage vidéo…

Vitesses dans les transferts

Depuis plusieurs années, nous avons mis en place un protocole de tests rigoureux fournissant des données fiables et comparables avec les performances des autres NAS. Pour cela, nous utilisons 4 applications de mesure différentes (2 sous macOS et 2 sous Windows) et réalisons en plus des transferts de fichiers de tailles variées dans les 2 sens (NAS -> Ordinateur puis Ordinateur -> NAS) :

• Petites tailles : 100 fichiers de 500 Ko à 12 Mo (MP3, photos, documents Office)
• Tailles moyennes : 30 fichiers de 12 à 350 Mo (DivX, images RAW, archives ZIP)
• Fichiers volumineux : 10 fichiers avec une taille comprise entre 4 et 10 Go (MKV, ISO)

À la suite de ces tests, une moyenne des transferts est calculée et nous la représentons sous forme de graphiques exprimée en mégaoctets par seconde (Mo/s). Plus le nombre est élevé, plus le NAS est rapide. Pour notre évaluation du DS225+, nous avons configuré un premier volume avec 2 SSD SATA en RAID 0, puis en avec le chiffrement des données. Enfin, nous terminons avec 2 SSD en RAID 1.

RAID 0

En RAID 0, le NAS peut bénéficier des meilleurs performances. On constate ici que le NAS n’a aucun mal à dépasser les 200 Mo/s en lecture et en écriture. Le fabricant annonce jusqu’ à 282 Mo/s en lecture et 217 Mo/s en écriture. Nous constatons qu’il est tout à fait possible de faire mieux en lecture…

RAID 0 + Crypt

Avec le chiffrement des données, on constate une légère baisse des performances en écriture. Cependant, cela reste tout de même de bon niveau… surtout avec ce choix d’architecture.

RAID 1

Synology montre encore une fois qu’il maitrise parfaitement sa plateforme offrant un très bon niveau en RAID 1. La perte en lecture/écriture dans cette configuration est minime comparé au RAID 0. Le fabricant est un des rares à offrir une telle stabilité…

Performances globales

Le DS225+ est l’un des derniers NAS à intégrer un processeur Intel avec iGPU, ce qui facilite le transcodage matériel des vidéos. Dans nos tests Plex/Jellyfin, il a lu sans problème 3 vidéos simultanées. Le NAS reste stable et ne souffre pas latence.

Le DS225+ n’a aucun souci avec Docker (et plusieurs conteneurs en simultanée). Toutefois, il faudra lui ajouter de la mémoire vive. Pour ce qui est de la virtualisation de machine, il faudra être moins exigeant. Si le NAS pourra faire tourner sans souci un machine sous Linux (ex : Debian, Ubuntu), il aura plus de difficulté avec Windows 11. Entendons nous bien, c’est tout à fait faisable… mais nous vous le déconseillons.

Consommation électrique et nuisance sonore

Le DS225+ est un NAS vraiment silencieux. Pour l’entendre, il faut tendre l’oreille et se trouver à moins de 2 mètres. Avec deux SSD installés, la consommation électrique n’est que de 6 W en utilisation normale. Non, ce n’est pas une erreur frappe : on est bien sur 6 watts. Même en cas de forte charge, elle ne dépasse pas 12 W, ce qui reste très faible pour un appareil de cette catégorie.

Debian 13 « Trixie » a débarqué le 9 août dernier, apportant une génération stable de la célèbre distribution GNU/Linux avec une longévité annoncée jusqu’à mi-2030 ! Aujourd’hui, Debian passe en version 13.1, une mise à jour visant à renforcer la robustesse du système via des corrections de sécurité et quelques ajustements. Cette version est donc corrective, sans changement fonctionnel majeur…

Quelles améliorations dans Debian 13.1 ?

On ne va pas vous lister toutes les améliorations et autres corrections de cette version 13.1… nous vous recommandons d’aller directement sur la page officielle. Cependant, voici ce que nous avons a retenu :

L’objectif de cette itération est bien sûr d’améliorer la stabilité, notamment des installations fraîches ou optimisations de déploiement automatisé.

Quel impact pour vous ?

Voici quelques informations/recommandations :

• Pas besoin de réinstaller : Debian 13.1 n’est pas une version majeure. Il suffit de mettre à jour les paquets via un miroir Debian pour obtenir la version 13.1.
• Nouvelle installation : De nouvelles images ISO intégrant les correctifs seront bientôt disponibles, permettant des installations sans étape supplémentaire de mise à jour post-installation.

Ceux utilisant les mises à jour via security.debian.org verront peu de différences, la plupart des correctifs étant déjà inclus.

Debian 13 “Trixie”

Comme mentionné dans notre article précédent sur Debian 13, cette version a apporté des avancées importantes :

• Support officiel du RISC-V en 64-bits (riscv64), une architecture de plus en plus adoptée dans le monde open source ;
• Durcissement avancé (hardening) : protection contre les attaques ROP et COP/JOP sur amd64 et arm64 ;
• Support de wcurl et HTTP/3 dans curl, pour de meilleures performances ;
• Environnements graphiques à jour : GNOME 48, KDE Plasma 6.3, LXDE 13, LXQt 2.1.0, Xfce 4.20 ;
• etc.

En syntèse

Avec Debian 13.1, la distribution confirme sa solidité et son sérieux. Cette mise à jour réaffirme l’approche pragmatique du projet Debian : corriger rapidement les failles et améliorer la fiabilité, tout en évitant les changements superficiels. Pour les utilisateurs, c’est une garantie de stabilité sur laquelle bâtir, que ce soit pour des serveurs de production, des stations de travail ou des installations embarquées.

source

Récemment, plusieurs alertes de sécurité ont été remontées par les principaux fabricants de NAS. Même si rien n’indique que ces failles aient été exploitées, il est fortement recommandé d’appliquer les mises à jour disponibles pour le système… et les applications ! Mais que faire lors le constructeur ne fait pas d’effort ? Il existe des solutions.

Pourquoi et comment mettre à jour son NAS ?

Vous le savez certainement (mais il est toujours bon de le rappeler), maintenir son NAS à jour est essentiel pour assurer sa sécurité. La sauvegarde régulière des données est primordiale, mais l’installation des mises à jour du système et des applications permet de corriger des failles de sécurité potentielles.

Les fabricants publient régulièrement des mises à jour, parfois pour ajouter de nouvelles fonctionnalités, mais aussi pour combler des vulnérabilités. Pour les applications (natives ou de sources tierces), c’est la même chose…

Note : si vous utilisez Docker, pensez également à mettre à jour vos images et conteneurs

Les risques liés aux failles de sécurité

Ces derniers mois, plusieurs vulnérabilités ont été découvertes et corrigées par les constructeurs. Leur exploitation pourrait avoir des conséquences sérieuses :

• Élévation de privilèges ;
• Exécution de code arbitraire ;
• Vol de données ;
• …

Certaines failles sont classées critiques. Il faut donc mettre à jour votre NAS ! Bonne nouvelle, ces correctifs sont gratuits. Il serait dommage de s’en priver.

Quand installer une mise à jour ?

Toutes les mises à jour ne se valent pas. Voici quelques recommandations :

• Mises à jour critiques : appliquez-les rapidement, idéalement dans les 48 heures. Attendre permet de s’assurer qu’aucun bug majeur n’a été signalé… mais n’attendez jamais plus d’une semaine si votre NAS est accessible depuis Internet.
• Mises à jour mineures (compatibilité avec de nouveaux SSD, améliorations visuelles…) : vous pouvez patienter plusieurs jours avant de les installer.

Note : on n’oublie pas de faire des sauvegardes régulièrement

Que faire si votre NAS n’est plus mis à jour ?

Lorsqu’une faille est détectée, les fabricants publient rapidement un correctif pour la dernière version du système (DSM, QTS, ADM…). Malheureusement pour les anciennes versions, cela peut-être très long… voire ils ne sont jamais mis à jour.

Si votre NAS contient des données sensibles (et c’est presque toujours le cas), voici quelques mesures à adopter si aucune mise à jour de sécurité n’est proposée :

• Ne l’exposez pas directement à Internet : désactivez la possibilité d’accéder au NAS depuis Internet ;
• Restez informé : consultez régulièrement les sites des constructeurs, les portails spécialisés comme Cachem ou Forum des NAS, ainsi que les réseaux sociaux ;
• Contactez le support du fabricant : signalez le problème afin d’encourager une correction.

Note : si vous devez absolument accéder à vos données à distance, mettez en place un serveur VPN (WireGuard, OpenVPN…) sur un périphérique tiers : routeur/box, Raspberry Pi, mini-PC… mais pas sur le NAS.

En synthèse

La mise à jour régulière de votre NAS et de ses applications est une nécessité pour prévenir les risques de sécurité. Cependant, toutes les failles ne sont pas liées à une exposition en ligne. Nous vous recommandons de limiter l’accès direct depuis Internet à votre NAS.

Enfin, une veille active est indispensable pour rester informer des correctifs et des recommandations en matière de sécurité. Un NAS non mis à jour peut devenir une cible facile. Faites les mises à jour régulièrement !

Is there a good reason for Synology to change the support of “Unverified Drives” in DSM?

Synology has long been regarded as one of the most user-friendly and reliable NAS brands in the market, balancing intuitive software with a wide hardware range that appeals to both home and business users. However, in recent years the company has taken an increasingly controversial path by enforcing strict compatibility requirements for hard drives and SSDs. Beginning with DSM 7 and escalating into the 2025 generation of devices, Synology now only certifies and supports its own branded storage media, effectively locking out many widely used alternatives from Seagate, Western Digital, and Toshiba. While Synology positions this move as a way to ensure system stability and consistency, the decision has sparked significant backlash among users who feel restricted in their options and burdened by higher costs. As competitors expand their ecosystems with more openness and flexibility, this proprietary approach risks damaging Synology’s reputation, raising questions about whether the company has prioritized profit margins over user choice.

What is the MAIN PROBLEM(s) with this decision by Synology?

The most immediate problem with Synology’s hard drive policy is the loss of flexibility that once made their systems so appealing. For years, customers could select from a wide range of industry-standard drives from Seagate, Western Digital, or Toshiba, tailoring storage to their budget, performance requirements, or regional availability. This freedom not only allowed users to balance cost and capacity, but also gave small businesses and home enthusiasts the ability to reuse existing drives, upgrade incrementally, or take advantage of promotions from different vendors. By restricting DSM compatibility to Synology-labelled drives, that flexibility is gone. For many users outside major markets, Synology’s drives are harder to source, priced higher than the competition, or limited in available capacities. What once felt like an open platform now increasingly resembles a closed ecosystem, where users must accept the vendor’s terms even if it means compromising on affordability or performance.

Another dimension of the problem lies in how Synology has communicated these changes, which many see as evasive or disingenuous. Officially, the company justifies the restriction as a move toward greater reliability and predictable system performance. The argument is that by narrowing the range of drives tested and supported, Synology can optimize DSM to work seamlessly with drives that have firmware tailored for its environment. In practice, though, the same underlying hardware often originates from Seagate or Toshiba, with only minor firmware adjustments and new branding. This creates a perception that Synology is overstating the technical benefits while quietly using the policy to secure higher margins. For long-time users, the contrast is stark: older models happily ran third-party drives with few issues, which makes the sudden insistence on “certification” seem less like an engineering requirement and more like a business maneuver. The result has been a significant erosion of trust between the company and its community.

The wider impact of this strategy has also been felt across the storage industry. Resellers have reported declining sales of Synology’s Plus series devices as customers explore alternatives such as QNAP, TrueNAS, or newer entrants like UGREEN and UniFi. For Synology, this shift is particularly damaging because its reputation has historically rested on attracting less technical buyers who value simplicity and reliability over DIY solutions. Now, even these entry-level and mid-range users are questioning whether they should commit to an ecosystem that limits their choice of drives and increases their costs. At the same time, hard drive manufacturers like Seagate and Western Digital are also affected, as Synology’s decision reduces the number of channels through which their products reach end customers. The ripple effect is therefore twofold: Synology risks alienating its base of loyal customers, while storage vendors lose a once-reliable partner, creating tension that could ultimately push more buyers toward competing NAS brands.

How Can Synology Solve This (if they want to)?

One path forward for Synology would be to adopt a hybrid compatibility model, where its own branded drives remain the recommended or default choice but third-party alternatives are still officially supported. This compromise has been proven by other vendors such as UniFi and QNAP, who sell their own labelled drives while maintaining compatibility lists for major manufacturers like Seagate, Western Digital, and Toshiba. By following this model, Synology could continue promoting the reliability benefits of its branded hardware without alienating customers who prefer flexibility. In practice, this would preserve a sense of choice for users while ensuring Synology can still highlight its “optimized” solutions as the safer, supported route.

Finally, Synology could address the availability and pricing concerns around its own branded drives. In many regions, these drives are either difficult to source or significantly more expensive than equivalent Seagate or Western Digital models. Improving distribution channels, ensuring consistent stock, and narrowing the price gap would make the transition more palatable to users who are willing to adopt Synology’s ecosystem but feel penalized by limited access. By focusing on accessibility and fairness rather than exclusivity, Synology could rebuild goodwill while still driving revenue from its hardware strategy. Taken together, these steps would not fully reverse the controversy but would demonstrate responsiveness and provide a clearer path to balancing stability, customer choice, and profitability.

Is there a way to FORCE a Synology NAS to accept unverified Hard Drives and SSDs in DSM?

For users unwilling to accept Synology’s restrictive stance on storage media, the community has developed reliable workarounds that re-enable full functionality for third-party hard drives and SSDs. The most widely adopted method involves injecting a script into the NAS system that bypasses DSM’s compatibility database, allowing otherwise unsupported drives to be used for installation, storage pools, caching, and expansion. Synology’s 2025 Plus-series models, such as the DS925+, block DSM installation if only unverified drives are present and issue constant warnings in Storage Manager. To overcome this, users first employ a Telnet-based flag during initial setup that tricks DSM into accepting the installation, followed by a more permanent fix applied through SSH. At the heart of this solution is Dave Russell’s (007revad) GitHub project Synology_HDD_db, which modifies DSM’s internal drive compatibility files. Once downloaded and executed via SSH, the script detects the NAS model, DSM version, and connected drives, then patches the system to treat them as officially supported.

The process is reversible, non-destructive, and works across multiple DSM versions, including DSM 7.2 and later. Additional features allow removal of persistent warning banners, full use of NVMe drives as storage volumes, and optional disabling of intrusive monitoring services like WDDA. To ensure ongoing stability, users can also configure a scheduled task in DSM’s Task Scheduler that re-applies the script at every boot, guaranteeing compatibility survives updates, reboots, or new drive insertions. While the script is robust and actively maintained, there are clear disclaimers: using it involves modifying system files, may void official Synology support, and should only be attempted by users confident with SSH and terminal commands who have reliable data backups. Nonetheless, for advanced users, system integrators, and enthusiasts, this community-driven solution has become the de facto method of restoring the freedom to use affordable and widely available third-party drives in modern Synology NAS systems.

Example of a 30TB Seagate HDD visible and functioning inside a Synology DS925+

Note – You can follow my guide on how to use this script modification (as well as outlining the pros and cons) HERE on the blog, or watch the video below:

The Future of Synology in the eyes of new and old buyers?

Synology’s decision to enforce exclusive support for its own branded hard drives and SSDs marks one of the most controversial shifts in the company’s history, transforming how both long-time customers and potential buyers view the brand. For over a decade, Synology’s appeal rested on a combination of intuitive software, solid hardware, and flexibility in allowing users to choose their own storage media from trusted vendors like Seagate, Toshiba, and Western Digital. By removing that choice in the 2025 generation, Synology has fundamentally altered the value proposition of its systems, making them appear less like open storage platforms and more like tightly controlled appliances. While the company justifies the policy by citing stability, predictability, and reduced support overhead, many users interpret it as a profit-driven attempt to push proprietary drives into the market, especially since these are often rebranded versions of third-party disks with modified firmware and higher price tags.

The backlash has been considerable, with resellers and community forums reporting falling interest in Synology’s Plus-series devices, particularly among home and small business users who previously embraced them for affordability and ease of expansion. Competing NAS providers such as QNAP, TrueNAS, UGREEN, and UniFi have been quick to capitalize on the discontent, positioning themselves as more open alternatives that maintain compatibility with industry-standard drives. At the same time, the growth of unofficial solutions like Dave Russell’s compatibility script demonstrates how determined users are to regain control over their hardware, even at the risk of voiding warranty or stepping outside official support. This dynamic reflects a widening gap between Synology’s official direction and the needs of its customer base, many of whom would prefer to accept a disclaimer about using unverified drives rather than being forced into a closed ecosystem.

Ultimately, Synology now stands at a crossroads that will define its reputation in the storage industry for years to come. If it continues to double down on a closed, proprietary model, the company may secure short-term revenue through drive sales but risks long-term damage to its image and market share. On the other hand, reintroducing a more flexible, transparent approach—such as allowing user consent for unsupported drives or improving global pricing and availability of its own disks—could restore trust and preserve its standing as the NAS brand of choice for both novices and professionals. The availability of community workarounds ensures that frustrated users are not entirely locked out of their systems, but the very existence of these tools highlights how far Synology has drifted from its once customer-first ethos. The next few years will be crucial, as the company either adjusts course and strikes a balance between profitability and user freedom, or risks ceding ground to rivals who are eager to embrace the openness Synology has chosen to leave behind.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology Solution Exhibition 2Synology in 2026 - What Have TWHY Synology Changed Support oWeek 33 Tech Roundup – TerraSynology AI Console ReviewSynology AI Console Review - GDS1825+ vs DXP8800 PLUS NAS - Synology DS1825+ vs UGREEN DXPWeek 31 Tech Roundup – 245TBUsing Unverified HDD/SSD on a Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Matomo a mis en ligne sa version 5.4.0. Sans être une révolution, cette dernière apporte des améliorations importantes. L’accent est mis sur la sécurité des comptes, la robustesse de l’archivage et une meilleure lisibilité des rapports. Pour nous, il s’agit là de 3 aspects essentiels pour ceux qui l’utilisent au quotidien. Explications…

Matomo 5.4.0

Cela fait maintenant 7 ans que j’utilise Matomo, et je ne regrette pas cette décision. Pourquoi ce choix ? D’abord pour mieux respecter la vie privée des visiteurs (oui, pour vous), ensuite pour reprendre un contrôle total des données. Mais ce sujet mérite un article à part entière : je vous renvoie donc vers mon billet Pourquoi j’ai remplacé Google Analytics par Matomo : vie privée, données, autonomie

Sécurité avant tout

Matomo 5.4.0 introduit plusieurs évolutions majeures en matière de sécurité :

• Les superadmins peuvent imposer des mots de passe complexes, empêcher la réutilisation d’anciens codes et identifier les comptes inactifs depuis plus de 180 jours ;
• Les jetons d’accès deviennent plus flexibles : il est désormais possible de définir une date d’expiration et de recevoir une notification avant leur fin de validité ;
• Du côté de l’infrastructure, Matomo bloque l’énumération d’utilisateurs lors de réinitialisations, masque les informations sensibles dans les logs et alerte en cas de requêtes non sécurisées ;
• Enfin, les connexions basculent par défaut sur tls, pour plus de robustesse.

Données & visualisation

La mise à jour apporte aussi des nouveautés côté reporting :

• La métrique “Hits” rejoint les graphiques d’évolution ;
• Les conversions par réseau social apparaissent désormais dans les rapports d’objectifs ;
• Les rapports multi-niveaux peuvent être “aplatis” en colonnes distinctes pour plus de lisibilité.

Les campagnes LinkedIn profitent d’un nettoyage automatique des paramètres d’URL. Un nouveau composant facilite la duplication de rapports ou d’entités (comme les Heatmaps). Côté interface, l’expérience utilisateur s’affine : création de sites plus claire, tableau de bord simplifié, filtrage des sites par type ou par droits, compatibilité élargie avec d’anciens fuseaux horaires.

Stabilité

Matomo 5.4.0 se déploie facilement. Une tâche de maintenance supprime automatiquement les archives corrompues, les métriques nulles sont mieux gérées et les processus d’archivage gagnent en fiabilité, même pour les périodes incluant la journée en cours. Autre point utile : la plateforme avertit désormais si votre base MySQL/MariaDB arrive en fin de vie

En synthèse

Matomo 5.4.0 consolide la plateforme sans rupture technique. Les utilisateurs bénéficient d’une sécurité renforcée, de rapports plus précis et d’une gestion de données plus fluide. Une mise à jour à appliquer rapidement pour plus de sérénité et d’efficacité. Nous, on a fait la mise à jour… et vous ?

source

Does this Budget $140 AliExpress 10GbE Switch Deserve Your Data?

The landscape of 10 Gigabit Ethernet networking has seen a significant shift over the past few years, with hardware that was once considered enterprise-only gradually trickling down to the consumer and prosumer market. Affordable multi-gig switches, particularly those with 2.5G or SFP-only configurations, are now commonplace. However, the search becomes much more complicated when you’re looking for a compact, budget-friendly 10GbE switch that combines both RJ45 copper and SFP+ fiber ports — and adds basic managed features to the mix. This is precisely where the Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE Managed Switch positions itself, offering four 10GBase-T ports, two SFP+ ports, and a claimed 120Gbps backplane bandwidth, all for around $140 on AliExpress.

At this price point, it’s important to approach products like this with realistic expectations. The Goodtop switch is not aiming to compete with the likes of Cisco, Aruba, or even MikroTik in terms of long-term support or security posture. Like many white-label or lesser-known brands shipping out of China, concerns around firmware transparency, update frequency, and potential vulnerabilities are valid. This is particularly relevant for users planning to expose management interfaces to external networks or integrate these switches into larger, more sensitive environments. Still, for isolated use in lab setups, home networks, or behind firewall-protected infrastructure, devices like this can offer compelling value — if they deliver on core functionality. This review takes a closer look at the Goodtop switch’s physical design, port configuration, internal hardware, software interface, and performance characteristics. Rather than focusing on theoretical specs alone, this analysis is based on hands-on testing to determine where the unit succeeds, where it cuts corners, and what kind of buyer it’s realistically suited for.

Goodtop Budget 6 Port 10GbE Switch Review – Quick Conclusion

The Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE Managed Switch delivers impressive value by combining four 10GBase-T and two 10G SFP+ ports in a compact, low-cost form factor, making it one of the most affordable mixed-media 10GbE switches on the market. It performs reliably under load, supports a full set of essential Layer 2 features like VLANs, link aggregation, and QoS, and provides a practical way for home lab users or small setups to adopt 10G networking without overspending. However, the switch’s low price is reflected in its build quality, fixed-speed noisy fan, and a barebones, unintuitive web interface that may challenge less experienced users. Security features are minimal, with no HTTPS, 2FA, or multi-user support, making it best suited for isolated, firewall-protected environments rather than critical infrastructure. For technically confident users seeking affordable, high-speed connectivity in a controlled setting, the Goodtop switch is a capable and cost-effective option—as long as its limitations are clearly understood.

Goodtop Budget 6 Port 10GbE Switch Review – Design

The Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE switch adopts a compact footprint and minimalist industrial design that aligns with many of the budget-friendly networking products emerging from OEMs in the Chinese market. Its chassis measures 200mm x 118mm x 44mm and is constructed from a thin, painted sheet metal. At just under 700 grams, the device is easy to handle and unobtrusive on a desk or shelf. It supports both desktop placement and wall mounting, the latter made possible by a pair of hook points integrated into the casing. While the construction is adequate for light to moderate use, it doesn’t offer the heft or rigidity seen in more enterprise-leaning gear.

There are no rubber feet to reduce surface vibration, nor any rack-mounting ears included by default. The paint finish is clean but basic, and minor flexing of the panels is possible under moderate pressure. These design choices reflect an emphasis on affordability rather than robustness, and users intending to deploy this switch in harsher physical environments may want to consider added enclosure or structural reinforcement. Still, for indoor use where vibration and temperature control are consistent, the physical form is entirely serviceable.

Thermal management is handled by a single small-diameter fan mounted laterally inside the chassis, supported by perforated ventilation cutouts on the opposing side. This active cooling setup is necessary given the heat output of the internal 10GbE components, particularly when all ports are under load.

During testing, the fan proved effective in maintaining safe thermal levels across typical workloads, with internal temperature readings ranging between 31°C and 36°C depending on ambient conditions and port usage. However, the fan’s acoustic characteristics are worth noting: it operates at a fixed RPM, regardless of system temperature or network activity.

This results in a constant hum that registers between 38 and 41 dBA — not excessive, but certainly noticeable in quiet environments. There are no accessible fan speed controls in the management interface, and the unit lacks thermal sensors or thresholds that would allow for adaptive fan curves.

For users operating this switch in a studio, home office, or any acoustically sensitive environment, the persistent fan noise could be a drawback. Modifications, such as third-party silent fan replacements, may be feasible but would require disassembly and some DIY effort. Overall, the cooling solution works, but its implementation is clearly a compromise between function and cost.

Goodtop Budget 6 Port 10GbE Switch Review – Hardware & Connections

The Goodtop switch is equipped with a total of six 10-Gigabit-capable ports, split between four RJ45 (10GBase-T) and two SFP+ slots. This particular configuration is uncommon at this price tier, especially among switches that offer web-based management. The inclusion of both copper and fiber interfaces in one device provides flexibility for mixed network environments — ideal for users bridging legacy copper infrastructure with newer fiber deployments or integrating NAS devices and uplinks with varying interface standards. All six ports are located on the front panel, clearly labeled and spaced far enough apart to accommodate bulkier cables and transceivers without interference.

The RJ45 ports support standard multi-gig Ethernet protocols, with backward compatibility for 100Mb, 1G, 2.5G, and 5GBase-T connections, depending on cabling. According to the manufacturer’s specs, Cat6 or better is recommended for full 10GBase-T performance up to 100 meters.

The SFP+ ports accept a wide range of 10G transceivers, including DACs (Direct Attach Copper), SR/LR fiber modules, and media converters, offering strong compatibility with third-party optics and hardware.

Despite its low cost, the switch claims a 120Gbps backplane switching capacity and a non-blocking architecture capable of 89.28 million packets per second. While exact benchmarking under full simultaneous port saturation wasn’t possible due to hardware limitations during testing, four concurrent 10GBase-T connections were tested successfully with sustained bidirectional transfers.

Under load, the unit handled transmission reliably without packet loss or obvious performance degradation. Power consumption scales with usage: idle draw sits at approximately 7.5 watts with no connected clients, while active use with four 10G copper links under sustained read/write activity peaked around 19.8 watts.

These values are in line with expectations for a full-10G switch operating with active cooling, and while not low, they are acceptable for most desktop or lab environments. It’s worth noting that due to heat generation and airflow limitations, users may experience rising internal temperatures if all six ports are driven continuously, especially in poorly ventilated setups. However, the flexibility to use either media type and the stable throughput on tested ports suggest that the internal switching logic and port handling are effectively implemented, given the device’s pricing and market position.

Internally, the Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE switch is built around a Realtek chipset configuration comprising the RTL9303 switch controller and RTL8264B PHYs, a pairing commonly found in recent budget and white-label 10G networking products. These components are designed to deliver basic Layer 2 managed functionality with support for VLAN tagging, link aggregation, and other expected switching features. Two medium-sized aluminum heatsinks cover the main chips, with thermal paste applied to ensure contact and heat dissipation, albeit passively reliant on the unit’s single fan for airflow. There is no internal battery backup, surge suppression beyond nominal protection, or modular power regulation — design choices consistent with its low cost.

The unit includes a modest 12Mbit of packet buffer memory and supports a MAC address table size of up to 16K entries, which should be sufficient for most small-to-medium environments. There are no removable components or visible debugging headers, and the board layout is straightforward with no major thermal bottlenecks observed during operation. Overall, the hardware design is minimal but appropriate for the target use case: non-critical environments requiring inexpensive multi-gig connectivity without expectations of advanced redundancy or hardware resilience. While it doesn’t compete with enterprise-class internals in terms of engineering quality or extensibility, it does reflect a competent implementation of entry-level switching silicon with functional thermal management.

Goodtop Budget 6 Port 10GbE Switch Review – Software

The Goodtop switch ships with a built-in web-based management interface that allows users to configure a range of Layer 2 features typical of entry-level managed switches. The interface is accessible via a browser once an IP address is assigned, and no additional software is required. However, the overall presentation and usability of the software are quite basic. The UI lacks visual polish, contextual help, or guided configuration tools. Navigation is functional but unintuitive, with much of the terminology and layout appearing generic and unbranded — a likely result of the firmware being repurposed from a reference design or OEM platform.

There are no wizards or safety prompts to prevent misconfiguration, which could make the switch challenging for less experienced users to manage safely. Additionally, there is no mobile optimization or official companion app, and the interface does not support HTTPS out of the box. Firmware updates are possible via the web console, though update channels or changelogs are not provided, and documentation is sparse.

Despite its limited interface design, the switch includes a solid range of features that are normally found in more expensive units. These include core Layer 2 controls and essential traffic management capabilities, offering flexibility for VLAN segmentation, link aggregation, and network troubleshooting. While these features are mostly geared toward technical users, they cover a surprisingly broad spectrum of functionality for a switch in this price bracket. However, it’s worth noting that the interface offers no access controls beyond a single user account, no two-factor authentication, and no role-based access — all of which may concern users deploying this switch in sensitive or multi-user environments. Fan speed control, system logs, or SNMP monitoring are also absent, limiting the unit’s viability for more advanced administrative needs. Key supported features include:

• VLAN support (802.1Q, VLAN IDs 1–4094)

• Port-based VLAN assignment

• Link Aggregation (LACP)

• Loop detection

• Jumbo frame support (up to 9K bytes)

• MAC address filtering

• Port mirroring

• Broadcast storm control

• QoS / Port-based priority settings

• Traffic statistics monitoring

• Basic firmware upgrade support

These tools are adequate for static network environments or those with fixed segmentation needs, but administrators seeking dynamic configuration, remote logging, or integration with monitoring platforms will find the software lacking in depth.

Goodtop Budget 6 Port 10GbE Switch Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The Goodtop 6-Port 10GbE Managed Switch offers an appealing combination of features that are rarely found together in a product at this price point. With four 10GBase-T copper ports and two 10G SFP+ fiber slots, it caters to users who need to bridge different media types without investing in multiple specialized devices. The unit delivers consistent throughput, a practical management interface, and baseline Layer 2 capabilities suitable for most small-scale, static deployments. For those building or expanding home labs, adding high-speed links between servers and NAS devices, or testing 10GbE equipment without committing to enterprise-level budgets, this switch is a very practical and accessible option. The price tag — typically hovering between $130 and $140 — is particularly compelling when compared with similar switches from established brands, which often cost two to three times as much while offering fewer ports or omitting management functionality.

However, it’s important to understand what trade-offs make that low cost possible. Physically, the unit is built with budget-grade materials, and although the compact design is functional, the thin metal chassis lacks the rigidity and passive cooling features seen in more expensive models. The inclusion of active cooling is necessary given the switch’s full 10GbE capability, but the fixed-speed fan results in a persistent acoustic presence that may not be acceptable in quiet workspaces. In terms of power usage and thermal output, the switch performs within expectations, though it naturally draws more power than multi-gig or 1G devices — something to consider if operating in environments sensitive to power efficiency or heat buildup.

On the software side, the web-based management interface includes a reasonably full feature set for configuring VLANs, link aggregation, QoS, and port monitoring, but the UI is visually dated, lacking intuitive navigation, helpful prompts, or contextual explanations. For seasoned users comfortable with networking terminology and manual configuration, this isn’t a major obstacle. However, newcomers may find the software overwhelming or difficult to use without external guidance. Security is another area where the switch shows its limitations. The absence of HTTPS access, multi-user management, or basic features like two-factor authentication limits its suitability for exposed or multi-tenant environments. Firmware updates are possible, but no public update path or official support channels are offered, making long-term update viability uncertain.

Ultimately, this is a product built around value — and that value is real, as long as buyers know what they’re getting into. The Goodtop switch does not pretend to be a polished enterprise-grade solution, nor does it offer the ecosystem integration or long-term support found in more expensive alternatives. Instead, it provides raw functionality: six full-speed 10GbE ports, a working management layer, and compatibility with a wide range of copper and optical transceivers. For environments that are self-contained, technically managed, and not security-critical, this device offers performance that aligns well with its low cost. For those willing to make small compromises on build quality and user experience, it’s an excellent option for extending 10G connectivity without overspending.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Why is 10GbE STILL NOT EverywhWhy is 10GbE STILL NOT EverywhN7 AMD 2x 10GbE NAS MotherboarN7 AMD 8845HS 2x 10GbE NAS MotCWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS BoCWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS BoSynology PS Series Managed 10GSynology Managed 10GbE PoE NetBest QNA-UC10G2T priceGoodtop Budget 6 Port 10GbE Ma Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review

The GL.iNet Comet Pro is the company’s latest remote KVM (Keyboard, Video, Mouse) solution, launched on Kickstarter with shipping scheduled for December 2025. Unlike standard remote desktop tools that require a functioning operating system, a KVM device operates at a much lower level, providing access from cold boot and BIOS onward. This allows users to troubleshoot, install operating systems, and manage systems without direct physical interaction. Positioned as both an upgrade to GL.iNet’s original Comet KVM and as a potential rival to the JetKVM, which attracted considerable attention in 2024, the Comet Pro integrates more modern hardware and a larger feature set. The device includes a quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor, 1GB of DDR3 memory, 32GB of onboard eMMC storage, and a 2.22-inch touchscreen for configuration. Alongside HDMI passthrough supporting up to 4K at 30 FPS, it also incorporates Wi-Fi 6 connectivity, Gigabit Ethernet, and a range of accessory integrations such as an ATX power board and Fingerbot for remote power cycling. Early backers can pledge from $99, with campaign tiers running up to $155 depending on bundles, and at the time of writing, the campaign has surpassed £200,000 in pledges with more than 1,900 supporters.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Quick Conclusion

The Comet Pro is a compact KVM device that builds on the foundations of earlier solutions with stronger hardware, built-in storage, dual HDMI with passthrough, and both wired and Wi-Fi 6 connectivity, making it practical for local and remote management tasks. Its touchscreen interface, bundled cables, and accessory support via the ATX board and Fingerbot give it utility beyond basic KVM duties, while low power draw and stable thermals make it suitable for 24/7 use. However, its design also brings limitations, most notably the fixed 32GB eMMC storage with no expansion, the absence of PoE for simplified cabling, and just 1GB of RAM, which may restrict headroom for heavier workloads. Compared with the JetKVM, the Comet Pro is more expensive but offers significantly higher specifications, a more polished and consumer-ready experience, and wireless deployment options, whereas JetKVM appeals to those who prioritise affordability, open-source flexibility, and community-driven extensions. Ultimately, the Comet Pro is best suited for users seeking a stable, ready-to-use appliance, while JetKVM remains the choice for enthusiasts who prefer a leaner, hackable platform.

Important! This is not ‘traditional retail’, this is Crowdfunding!

It is important to note that the Comet Pro is currently a crowdfunding product and not a retail release. Backing through Kickstarter carries inherent risks, as funding a campaign does not guarantee delivery, nor does it ensure the final product will exactly match the early prototypes or promises made during the campaign. GL.iNet has a history of successfully shipping crowdfunded devices, but manufacturing delays, component shortages, or design changes can still occur. Potential backers should approach pledging with awareness of these risks and only commit funds they are comfortable waiting on until the estimated December 2025 shipping window, bearing in mind that schedules may shift.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Design

The Comet Pro adopts a compact desktop form factor measuring 93 × 84 × 47 mm and weighing just 170 g, making it small enough to sit discreetly on a desk or beside a server rack without occupying unnecessary space. Despite this minimal footprint, it integrates a 2.22-inch colour touchscreen on the front panel, which plays an important role in the day-to-day use of the device. This screen is not only employed during initial setup for Wi-Fi and PIN entry but also allows the user to directly toggle remote services on or off, adjust brightness, and check status information such as uptime or network configuration.

Unlike entry-level KVMs that demand all management through a browser, the inclusion of a touchscreen brings a more immediate, appliance-like feel to the unit. Heat management has also been considered, with the case designed with discreet venting along the underside to maintain airflow during continuous operation. In extended sessions, surface temperatures were recorded at up to 49°C at the base, but without throttling or stability issues, showing the design can sustain 24/7 deployment.

Visually, the device takes a utilitarian approach, using a clean matte finish and prioritising ease of connection rather than elaborate styling. One of the more practical design decisions is the use of full-sized HDMI input and output ports. Many compact alternatives rely on mini HDMI or adapter cables, which can create points of failure or add cost, whereas the Comet Pro provides standard connections that integrate directly with PCs, NAS units, or workstations.

The rear panel arranges all I/O in a straightforward, linear layout, including Ethernet, USB power, USB-A for accessories, and the dual HDMI ports, reducing clutter and keeping cable routing manageable. This makes the device particularly well suited for semi-permanent setups where it may sit behind a desk or alongside other networking gear. GL.iNet has also bundled a complete set of cables in the package, including HDMI, USB-C to USB-C, USB-C to USB-A, and Ethernet, ensuring the unit can be deployed without requiring third-party accessories.

Build quality and practicality are at the centre of the Comet Pro’s design choices. At under 200 g, it is easy to reposition, mount, or carry between locations, yet solid enough that it will not slide around when multiple cables are connected. The lack of Power over Ethernet (PoE) is one area that has already drawn attention, as many users favour a simplified single-cable setup that combines power and network.

Instead, the Pro model must rely on USB-C power delivery or its bundled 10 W PSU, which while flexible, requires additional cabling. GL.iNet has confirmed that PoE support is reserved for its separate Comet PoE model, meaning the Pro prioritises wireless and accessory integration instead. Even so, its physical layout and cable-friendly design suggest it is intended for regular use in homelabs, testing environments, or small professional deployments where convenience and low-profile form factor matter more than absolute minimal wiring.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Internal Hardware & Storage

Inside the Comet Pro, GL.iNet has opted for a quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor paired with 1GB of DDR3 memory. This is a significant step up from entry-level KVM devices that rely on single-core or lower-clocked CPUs with a fraction of the RAM. In practice, this extra horsepower allows the Comet Pro to handle simultaneous HDMI input and passthrough, touchscreen responsiveness, and background tasks like network services without becoming sluggish. During testing, the system was able to manage multiple connections while remaining responsive, though the limited RAM may still cap future feature expansions. The use of DDR3 memory rather than newer DDR4 or LPDDR standards reflects a balance between cost and compatibility, keeping the device affordable while still delivering adequate performance for its class.

For storage, the Comet Pro is equipped with 32GB of onboard eMMC. This capacity is well above the minimal storage seen in many competing KVM devices, and it serves two primary functions. First, it can be used to host multiple ISO images, allowing the user to boot or reinstall different operating systems remotely without attaching physical media. Second, it can act as a mounted USB drive that provides read and write access to files directly from the host system. While these features add flexibility, the storage has limits. The lack of an SD card slot or USB-based expansion option means the 32GB is fixed, and transfer speeds during testing averaged between 23–25 MB/s. This is sufficient for smaller ISO files or driver discs but noticeably slower when handling larger media.

The choice of eMMC storage also reflects GL.iNet’s attempt to balance convenience with simplicity. eMMC is compact, inexpensive, and integrated directly onto the board, reducing complexity compared to SATA or NVMe alternatives. However, this comes at the cost of speed and upgradability. For most use cases—boot images, firmware updates, and light file transfers—the built-in storage will suffice. Yet users hoping to load multiple large OS images or transfer substantial file sets may find the limits more apparent. Overall, the hardware inside the Comet Pro prioritises straightforward functionality and self-contained operation, providing just enough headroom to support modern usage without straying into higher-cost hardware that would push the device beyond its current Kickstarter pricing tiers.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Ports and Connections

The Comet Pro provides a straightforward but practical set of external connections designed to balance usability with broad compatibility. On the rear panel, users will find a Gigabit Ethernet port, USB-C power input, a USB-A accessory port, and two full-sized HDMI ports for input and output. Unlike some compact KVMs that opt for mini HDMI or USB-based video, GL.iNet has chosen to include full HDMI, reducing the reliance on adapters and making the unit easier to integrate directly into PCs, NAS systems, or servers. This makes it more suitable for users who want a clean installation without juggling conversion cables. The layout also keeps ports well separated, which helps prevent cable congestion when all are in use.

One of the standout design choices is the dual HDMI configuration, offering both an input for capturing video from the host system and a passthrough for maintaining a local display connection. This allows the device to operate in the background without interrupting a user’s normal monitor setup, an advantage for environments where physical access is still required while also keeping remote access enabled. The USB-A port expands functionality further by supporting accessories such as the optional ATX power board and Fingerbot, which extend control over physical system states. These add-ons use standard USB 2.0 signalling, keeping integration simple, while enabling functions like remote power cycling or triggering a hardware reset at the press of a button.

Networking is handled through a single RJ45 Gigabit Ethernet port alongside built-in Wi-Fi 6 support, giving the user flexibility between wired and wireless setups. While the Ethernet interface provides the most stable connection, the inclusion of dual-band Wi-Fi means the Comet Pro does not require a physical LAN cable in every scenario, broadening its deployment options for homelab users or portable testing environments. However, the device lacks Power over Ethernet (PoE) capability, meaning power and network must be provided separately. GL.iNet has directed PoE-focused users to their Comet PoE variant, leaving the Pro model better suited for those prioritising wireless convenience and accessory integration.

• 1 × RJ45 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000)

• 1 × USB Type-C (Power Input, 5V 2A with PD support)

• 1 × USB 2.0 Type-A (Accessory connection, e.g., ATX board, Fingerbot)

• 1 × HDMI Input (Full size)

• 1 × HDMI Output (Full size, passthrough up to 4K@30fps)

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Performance and Tests

In practical testing, the Comet Pro demonstrated stable operation across both local and remote connections. When deployed on a local area network over Gigabit Ethernet, video output remained smooth, with latency kept to levels that were difficult to notice in everyday use. The passthrough HDMI supported up to 4K at 30 FPS or 1080p at 60 FPS, making it suitable for both configuration tasks and lighter remote interaction. While not designed for high-performance gaming, the device handled operating system installations, BIOS configuration, and desktop navigation without visible delay. Remote testing via GL.iNet’s relay service also showed responsive behaviour, though these tests were conducted early in the campaign with relatively few users active, making it unclear how well the service will scale under heavier demand.

The device’s quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor and 1GB of RAM proved sufficient to manage transcoding and stream adjustments when accessing via browser or desktop applications. The integrated H.264 encoding allows the unit to downscale or compress the video feed to accommodate lower-bandwidth scenarios, ensuring remote sessions remained usable even when connection quality fluctuates.

Audio support, both through HDMI and USB, added another layer of functionality for remote collaboration or troubleshooting, though microphone activation required restarts to take effect. During prolonged use, the touchscreen interface remained responsive, and system access features such as security PINs and two-factor authentication functioned as expected, providing a secure operating baseline.

Storage performance, while not fast, was consistent. Writing data to the 32GB eMMC averaged between 23–25 MB/s, which was sufficient for uploading ISO images and driver discs but noticeably slower for large files. Virtual media mounting worked reliably, allowing ISO files to be presented to the host system as if they were locally connected USB drives.

File sharing via the remote mount function extended this further, making the KVM’s internal storage act as a conventional drive from within the connected operating system. This feature proved useful for transferring smaller files such as utilities or configuration scripts but was limited by the inherent speed of the eMMC storage.

Power consumption during testing remained low, with idle draw measured between 1.5 and 2.5 W and heavier operation drawing up to 4.5 W. Temperatures were also within safe limits, peaking at around 49°C under continuous use with all ports occupied. Importantly, the system did not throttle or show instability during extended testing periods.

While the absence of PoE limited deployment flexibility, the ability to power the device either via the included 10 W PSU or from a client USB port added some versatility. Taken as a whole, the performance tests suggest that the Comet Pro is capable of delivering reliable day-to-day remote access for administrative tasks, though it is not intended for high-throughput or latency-sensitive workloads.

• Video Output: 4K@30 FPS, 1080p@60 FPS

• Encoding: H.264 hardware encoding confirmed

• Average Latency: ~30–60 ms (local and remote, tested)

• Storage Write Speed: 23–25 MB/s (32GB eMMC)

• Idle Power Draw: 1.5–2.5 W

• Active Power Draw: Up to 4.5 W

• Operating Temperatures (Tested): 40–49°C surface depending on panel location

Comet Pro vs JetKVM – Which Should You Buy?

When comparing the Comet Pro to the JetKVM, the most immediate difference is in hardware resources. The Comet Pro offers a quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor, 1GB of DDR3 memory, and 32GB of eMMC storage, while the JetKVM relies on a single-core Cortex-A7 CPU with 256MB of RAM and either 4GB or 16GB of eMMC depending on version. This gives the Comet Pro considerably more capacity to handle multiple connections, virtual media, and remote management tasks. The inclusion of a larger 2.22-inch touchscreen further expands its usability, particularly for setup and local controls, whereas JetKVM uses a smaller 1.69-inch panel with more limited functions. From a purely technical perspective, the Comet Pro is the more capable unit, but this comes with a higher entry price.

Networking and connectivity also reveal differing priorities. The Comet Pro includes both Gigabit Ethernet and Wi-Fi 6 dual-band support, allowing deployment without wired LAN, while the JetKVM only provides a 100 Mbps Ethernet port and no wireless option. JetKVM compensates for this with a lightweight, open-source software stack built around WebRTC, which emphasises speed and hackability for developers. It also features an RJ11 extension port for add-ons such as ATX control boards and DC power modules, encouraging community-built extensions. The Comet Pro instead integrates accessory support through USB, offering officially developed add-ons like the ATX board and Fingerbot, but with less emphasis on third-party modification. In short, JetKVM is more open and extensible, while Comet Pro is more self-contained and focused on out-of-the-box deployment.

Price and ecosystem support are another dividing factor. JetKVM launched on Kickstarter at $69 and built momentum on being affordable, transparent, and entirely open source. The Comet Pro starts at $99 for early backers and scales up to $155 for bundles, reflecting its higher hardware cost and added features. JetKVM’s community-driven development and open licensing have made it popular with enthusiasts who value hackability and long-term flexibility, whereas GL.iNet’s approach with the Comet Pro aligns more with a polished, consumer-ready appliance that still integrates optional remote cloud services. Choosing between them comes down to priorities: those seeking raw affordability and open-source collaboration may lean toward JetKVM, while those preferring a more powerful, integrated, and wireless-capable KVM will find the Comet Pro the stronger candidate.

GL.iNet Comet Pro Review – Conclusion & Verdict

The Comet Pro stands out as a more advanced and accessible interpretation of the compact KVM concept, incorporating stronger internal hardware, built-in storage for ISO management, and dual HDMI with passthrough that makes it practical for both remote and local use. The addition of Wi-Fi 6 support expands deployment flexibility, removing the need to always run physical network cables, while the integrated touchscreen interface allows for quick setup and control without relying solely on external software. During extended tests, it maintained stable operation with modest temperatures and low power consumption, making it suitable for continuous use in homelabs or small offices. The inclusion of accessory support, such as the ATX board for full remote boot control and the Fingerbot for physical power cycling, highlights GL.iNet’s attempt to broaden its appeal beyond simple KVM duties into more complete system management. At the same time, limitations such as fixed 32GB eMMC storage with no expansion options, reliance on external power rather than PoE, and the use of only 1GB of RAM show that the product remains firmly aimed at the consumer and prosumer segment rather than enterprise-grade installations.

When placed against the JetKVM, the decision largely depends on what the user values most in a remote management device. JetKVM has built its reputation on affordability, transparency, and openness, offering a $69 price point, an entirely open-source software stack, and an extension port that allows for custom add-ons developed by the community. For enthusiasts, developers, and those who prefer long-term flexibility, it remains an appealing choice.

In contrast, the Comet Pro arrives at a higher entry cost of $99–$155 depending on bundle but compensates with significantly stronger specifications, built-in wireless connectivity, and a more polished, consumer-ready experience that does not require modification or third-party involvement to be fully functional. Kickstarter progress, with more than £200,000 pledged and nearly 2,000 backers already, suggests demand for such a ready-made solution exists. For users who want a stable appliance with a straightforward setup process and modern hardware, the Comet Pro provides the stronger option. For those prioritising hackability and community-driven development above convenience, JetKVM remains the leaner and more customisable alternative.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...GL.iNet Comet Pro ReviewDo You NEED a WiFi 7 Travel RoGl.iNet Slate 7 WiFi 7 Travel GL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) PoGL.iNet Slate 7 (GL-BE3600) PoGL.iNet Puli AX Mobile Router GL.iNet Puli AX Mobile Router Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Le Terramaster D1 SSD Plus est un boîtier externe pour SSD NVMe pensé pour les utilisateurs exigeants : vidéastes, photographes… ou simplement passionnés de haute performance. Compatible USB4 et Thunderbolt 4/5, il promet des débits supérieurs à la majorité des solutions grand public, tout en offrant une excellente dissipation thermique. Nous l’avons testé avec un Samsung 990 Pro sur un iMac 2024 Thunderbolt 4. Voici notre verdict…

Terrasmaster D1 SSD Plus

Design et qualité de fabrication

Le Terramaster D1 SSD Plus inspire immédiatement confiance. Sa construction en aluminium inspire confiance… on est loin des boîtiers en plastique que l’on voit habituellement. Il mesure 112,5 × 60 × 33 mm pour environ 246 g. Oui, il est relativement lourd pour ses dimensions, mais il reste portable !

Le design n’est pas qu’esthétique, car l’aluminium joue un rôle de dissipation thermique passive. Le boîtier reste frais (ainsi que le SSD), même lors de transferts prolongés. Aucun ventilateur n’est nécessaire, ce qui le rend totalement silencieux.

À l’intérieur de la boîte, on retrouve un câble USB-C, un étui de transport, un petit tournevis et une pâte thermique supplémentaire. Terramaster propose un ensemble complet et cohérent, dont le design ne laisse pas indifférent.

Compatibilité et fonctionnalités

Le D1 SSD Plus est conçu pour une large gamme d’usages :

• Interfaces prises en charge : USB4, Thunderbolt 5/4/3 et USB 3.x
• SSD compatibles : NVMe M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0/4.0 jusqu’à 8 To

Cette compatibilité élargie en fait une solution pérenne, capable de suivre l’évolution de vos machines, qu’il s’agisse d’un PC, d’un Mac ou même d’une console.

Performances

Pour ce test, nous avons installé un Samsung 990 Pro, l’un des SSD NVMe les plus rapides du marché. Nous avons connecté le D1 SSD Plus à un iMac 2024 équipé de ports USB 4 / Thunderbolt 4 (jusqu’à 40 Gbit/s).

Voici les résultats que nous avons obtenus avec le logiciel AJA System Test :

• Lecture : ~3161 Mo/s
• Écriture : ~3082 Mo/s

Ensuite, nous avons utilisé Disk Speed Test :

• Lecture : ~3142 Mo/s
• Écriture : ~3170 Mo/s

Ces vitesses réelles sont légèrement inférieures aux valeurs maximales possibles avec le boitier en Thunderbolt 5, mais elles restent largement suffisantes pour du montage vidéo 4K/8K en direct ou la manipulation de fichiers très volumineux.

Terramaster D4 SSD USB4 Enclosure Review

The Terramaster D4 SSD is a four-bay all-flash storage enclosure designed for high-speed external data handling over USB4 connectivity, offering bandwidth of up to 40Gbps. It accommodates four PCIe NVMe M.2 2280 SSDs, allowing a maximum raw capacity of 32TB when fitted with 8TB drives, with larger capacities possible pending future verification. Aimed at professional workflows such as media creation, high-resolution video production, and post-production editing, it is also marketed for gaming environments where low-latency loading and direct game installation are desired. The enclosure does not feature built-in RAID capabilities, instead operating in single-drive mode and relying on the host computer or third-party software for RAID management when required. Measuring 138 x 60 x 140 mm and weighing 392grams, it offers a compact footprint suitable for desktop or mobile editing setups. With active cooling via dual smart fans, wide voltage power input for flexible deployment, and compatibility across USB4, Thunderbolt 3/4/5, and USB 3.x interfaces, the D4 SSD is designed to integrate seamlessly with both Mac and Windows systems, including use as a Mac OS boot drive or as direct expansion for NAS devices with supported ports.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Quick Conclusion

The Terramaster D4 SSD is a compact four-bay USB4 NVMe enclosure that delivers high transfer speeds through dedicated PCIe Gen4 x1 lane allocation per drive, managed by the ASMedia ASM2464PDX controller for consistent scaling across single or multiple SSD configurations. While it lacks built-in hardware RAID, this simplifies design, reduces power draw, and allows users to manage RAID through their host system or software tools, offering flexibility for performance or redundancy needs. In testing, it sustained multi-gigabyte throughput under prolonged load without thermal throttling, aided by its dual smart-fan cooling system and low-noise operation, making it suitable for studios and mobile production environments. Its wide voltage input range supports power from standard laptop and mini-PC adapters, and cross-platform compatibility extends to Thunderbolt 3/4/5 and USB 3.x systems, with support for multiple file systems across macOS, Windows, and Linux. Best suited for professionals in media production, post-processing, and high-resolution video editing, the D4 SSD offers a strong balance of speed, efficiency, and portability, though buyers should account for the cost of high-capacity NVMe drives and may wish to add heatsinks for heavy workloads.

BUILD - 10/10

HARDWARE - 7/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.4

PROS

High-speed USB4 interface with up to 40Gbps bandwidth, delivering strong multi-bay NVMe performance.
Dedicated PCIe Gen4 x1 lane allocation per slot ensures predictable scaling without lane-sharing bottlenecks.
Compact and lightweight chassis with active cooling and low noise output, suitable for quiet work environments.
Cross-platform compatibility with Thunderbolt 3/4/5 and USB 3.x, supporting multiple file systems for macOS, Windows, and Linux use.
Low power consumption, even under full load, making it efficient for continuous operation.

CONS

No built-in hardware RAID functionality, requiring RAID to be managed by the host system or third-party software.
No included NVMe heatsinks, which may be needed for sustained heavy workloads.
Performance dependent on host system capabilities and RAID configuration, limiting maximum speeds in some setups.

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Terramaster D4 SSD Review -Design and Storage

The Terramaster D4 SSD adopts a compact and minimalist design that prioritises space efficiency while accommodating high-performance M.2 NVMe storage. The chassis is constructed with a combination of metal and reinforced plastic to balance durability with weight reduction, making it practical for desktop setups or mobile editing stations. Measuring 138mm in height, 60mm in width, and 140mm in depth, it has a footprint smaller than many portable RAID enclosures yet houses four internal M.2 2280 slots. Ventilation is a key part of the design, with perforations along the chassis and an internal airflow path from the bottom intake to the top exhaust. This airflow design is paired with a smart dual-fan system to keep temperatures stable under sustained workloads. The minimalist exterior is free of unnecessary styling, focusing instead on functionality and discrete operation in professional environments.

Internally, the storage layout is based entirely on NVMe architecture, with each of the four bays supporting PCIe Gen4 x1 bandwidth allocation. This ensures each SSD has dedicated lane access to maintain predictable throughput, rather than sharing limited controller bandwidth as seen in some lower-cost enclosures. The D4 SSD supports up to 8TB per drive, giving a maximum raw capacity of 32TB, though higher capacities may be supported as larger consumer and enterprise NVMe drives are verified. This design choice prioritises performance consistency and reduces the risk of bottlenecks, particularly when drives are accessed simultaneously for large file transfers or multi-stream media editing.

The enclosure is not equipped with a hardware RAID controller, meaning all drives operate in independent single-disk mode by default. Users wishing to configure RAID 0, 1, or other levels must do so using their operating system’s built-in storage management tools or third-party RAID software. This approach reduces internal complexity, lowers power draw, and avoids thermal buildup from additional processing hardware, but shifts configuration responsibility to the user. For some workflows, particularly those involving high-performance NVMe SSDs, host-managed RAID can still deliver substantial speed gains without affecting compatibility.

For cooling, the D4 SSD uses an active design with two 50mm temperature-controlled fans. These are managed by four onboard temperature sensors, adjusting fan speeds based on workload and heat generation. The airflow design is optimised to pass directly over the NVMe modules and the mainboard’s heat-generating components. While the unit does not include NVMe heatsinks by default, there is space to install aftermarket options if desired. Terramaster’s decision not to bundle heatsinks reflects a balance between cost and compatibility, as different SSDs have varying thermal needs, and some users may prefer specific heatsink designs.

From a noise and usability standpoint, the D4 SSD is intended to operate unobtrusively in environments such as home offices, studios, and editing suites. In standby mode with SSDs installed, the noise level is measured at 19dB(A), making it quieter than many desktop PCs and suitable for near-silent workspaces. Combined with its small physical footprint, this makes it a storage device that can be positioned close to the user without being a distraction, even under full load during extended transfers or media rendering sessions.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Internal Hardware

Inside the Terramaster D4 SSD, the hardware is built around a dedicated USB4 bridge controller, the ASMedia ASM2464PDX, which is designed to maintain high throughput across multiple NVMe drives without the lane bottleneck issues found in some lower-cost enclosures. Each M.2 slot is wired for PCIe Gen4 x1 bandwidth, providing up to 2,000MB/s potential per drive, which is then aggregated and managed through the USB4 interface.

This design ensures predictable scaling in both single-drive and multi-drive use, with performance closely tied to the host system’s RAID or file management configuration. The PCB is perforated in multiple areas to enhance passive airflow in conjunction with the active cooling fans, helping to maintain SSD performance during sustained workloads such as large file transfers or continuous video editing.

The storage slots themselves support PCIe NVMe M.2 2280 SSDs, making the D4 SSD compatible with a wide range of consumer and professional-grade drives. While the official capacity limit is listed as 8TB per drive, the enclosure is not restricted by proprietary firmware, allowing for potential support of larger modules as they become available. The absence of hardware RAID keeps internal processing simple, reducing latency and power draw, while allowing the enclosure to work equally well in macOS, Windows, and certain NAS expansion scenarios where the RAID logic is handled externally. Additionally, the enclosure supports multiple file systems including NTFS, APFS, exFAT, FAT32, and EXT4, depending on the host environment.

Power delivery to the enclosure is handled through a 24W external adapter, with a wide input voltage range of 12V to 20V for compatibility with common laptop and mini-PC power supplies. This not only makes it more versatile for travel or integration into mobile production setups but also reduces the need for proprietary adapters.

The included USB4 Type-C cable is 0.8m in length and rated for up to 80Gbps, significantly higher than the device’s 40Gbps requirement, ensuring minimal signal degradation over time. Thermal and power management are monitored by four internal sensors, which regulate the fan speeds to balance cooling and noise.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Connectivity

The Terramaster D4 SSD keeps its external connectivity simple, focusing on delivering the highest possible throughput over a single interface. The primary connection is a USB4 Type-C port located on the rear of the unit, providing up to 40Gbps of bandwidth when used with a compatible host device. This interface also ensures backward compatibility with Thunderbolt 3, Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 5, and USB 3.x standards, although maximum speeds will vary depending on the protocol supported by the connected system. This approach makes the D4 SSD suitable for a wide range of setups, from modern Mac computers and high-end Windows workstations to certain NAS devices that offer USB4 or Thunderbolt connectivity for expansion.

The unit does not draw power from the USB4 connection, which is essential given the requirements of running four NVMe drives under load. This separation ensures stable power delivery regardless of the workload, preventing thermal throttling or performance drops caused by insufficient bus power.

The only other physical interface elements are the cooling ventilation openings, the power button, and status indicators. The ventilation is positioned to support the enclosure’s top-to-bottom airflow, with exhaust positioned to avoid heat recirculation. The power button is recessed to prevent accidental shutdowns, and the indicator lights provide a quick visual status of drive activity. While the D4 SSD avoids additional ports such as USB hubs or SD card readers, this streamlined design prioritises stability and speed for storage operations, aligning with its role as a dedicated high-bandwidth storage enclosure rather than a multifunction docking station.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Performance and Tests

In practical testing, the Terramaster D4 SSD demonstrated performance levels consistent with the capabilities of its USB4 interface and internal PCIe lane allocation. When fitted with a single PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and connected to a compatible Windows host system, sequential transfer rates reached around 1,480MB/s for reads and 1,140MB/s for writes in CrystalDiskMark, with mixed 70/30 read/write workloads averaging 1,286MB/s.

AJA System Test results with a repeated 1GB file showed roughly 1,400MB/s read and 1,300MB/s write, while ATTO Disk Benchmark recorded peaks of 1.57GB/s read and up to 1.5GB/s write.

These results represent roughly three-quarters of the theoretical maximum per-lane Gen4 x1 performance, with minor variations attributable to SSD model and host configuration.

With four SSDs installed and configured in RAID 0 via Windows Disk Management, throughput scaled significantly.

In AJA testing, read speeds reached 2,500MB/s and writes 2,300MB/s. CrystalDiskMark produced 2,047MB/s reads and 1,927MB/s writes in sequential tests, with mixed workloads at around 1,799MB/s.

ATTO testing peaked at approximately 2.93GB/s read and 2.66GB/s write. These figures are below the absolute maximum possible for USB4 but remain strong for a host-managed RAID array without dedicated hardware acceleration.

The results indicate that with a more capable RAID implementation, sustained speeds above 3GB/s would be achievable, making the D4 SSD suitable for high-bandwidth applications such as multi-stream 4K or 6K video editing. Thermal performance was another key testing area given the high-speed NVMe drives involved. Under sustained load with all four SSDs active, the enclosure’s dual-fan cooling system maintained stable operating temperatures without noticeable thermal throttling. Noise output, even at maximum fan speed, remained low enough for close-proximity use in an editing suite or home office. The absence of included NVMe heatsinks did not lead to significant overheating in tests, though installing aftermarket heatsinks could be beneficial for prolonged heavy workloads or in warmer environments.

Power consumption measurements showed efficient operation relative to its performance. With all drives in hibernation, draw was close to 1W; in standby, it was 3–4W; and at full load, the system used only 5–6W. This efficiency, combined with the wide voltage input support, makes the D4 SSD practical for mobile production setups and continuous desktop use without significant power overhead. Compatibility was confirmed across both macOS and Windows systems, with macOS tests achieving up to 3,257MB/s reads and 3,192MB/s writes using four Samsung 990 PRO 4TB SSDs in RAID 0 on a Mac mini with an Apple M4 chip.

Terramaster D4 SSD Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The Terramaster D4 SSD positions itself as a compact, high-speed, and flexible all-flash enclosure for users who require consistent bandwidth and expandable capacity over USB4. Its PCIe Gen4 x1 lane allocation per drive, paired with the ASMedia ASM2464PDX controller, ensures that performance scales predictably from single-drive use to fully populated configurations without the bottlenecks common in lower-end enclosures that multiplex lanes. While the absence of built-in hardware RAID will be seen as a limitation for users wanting an all-in-one solution, the decision to leave RAID management to the host system helps keep the enclosure’s design simpler, power consumption lower, and thermal output under better control. This host-managed approach also allows greater flexibility in choosing software RAID solutions optimised for specific workflows, whether for performance (RAID 0), redundancy (RAID 1), or other advanced configurations. Combined with its small footprint, professional-grade cooling, and wide voltage input range, the D4 SSD fits naturally into both fixed and mobile setups where reliable sustained throughput is essential.

From a value and application standpoint, the D4 SSD’s test results put it among the faster multi-bay USB4 NVMe enclosures currently available, especially given its ability to sustain multi-gigabyte transfers under prolonged load without thermal throttling. It is particularly well-suited to professionals in media production, post-processing, and high-resolution video editing who need large, portable, and quiet storage capable of handling multiple uncompressed video streams in real time. The unit’s quiet operation, even when all drives are active, makes it practical for use in audio-sensitive environments, and its compatibility with Thunderbolt 3, 4, and 5 as well as USB 3.x protocols expands its usability across a wide variety of systems. Potential buyers should, however, factor in the additional cost of populating all four slots with high-capacity NVMe SSDs and consider adding aftermarket heatsinks for continuous heavy workloads, as none are included. For those who already operate in environments where RAID is managed externally or within the operating system, the D4 SSD represents a balanced combination of speed, efficiency, and build quality that should appeal to both Windows and macOS professionals seeking long-term, high-performance storage expansion.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Week 34 Tech Roundup – UnraiWeek 33 Tech Roundup – TerraTerramaster D1 SSD ReviewTerramaster D4 SSD ReviewTerramaster D1 SSD ReviewTerramaster F4 SSD NAS ReviewTerramaster F4 SSD NAS ReviewTerramaster Prime Day 2025 - ATerramaster Prime Day 2025 - ASynology vs Terramaster NAS - Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Parfois, il m’arrive d’utiliser SwissTransfer à titre personnel, mais je n’en avais encore jamais parlé ici… à tort. En tant qu’adepte de l’auto-hébergement avec mon NAS, j’essaie habituellement de gérer mes besoins de partage de fichiers avec mes propres outils. Mais il faut reconnaître qu’il y a quelques limites dès qu’il s’agit d’envoyer ponctuellement de très gros volumes à des contacts externes : bande passante restreinte, accès au NAS limité ou disponibilité variable, etc. C’est précisément pour répondre à ces situations qu’Infomaniak propose ce service gratuit qui permet d’envoyer jusqu’à 50 Go en une seule fois, simplement et sans publicité…

Comment fonctionne SwissTransfer ?

SwissTransfer mise avant tout sur la simplicité d’utilisation de son service :

• jusqu’à 50 Go par envoi, sans inscription ni publicité ;
• partage par e-mail ou via un lien direct ;
• durée de validité modulable jusqu’à 30 jours, avec possibilité de personnaliser la date d’expiration ;
• nombre de téléchargements limité, jusqu’à 500 transferts par jour ;
• option de mot de passe pour sécuriser les fichiers.

L’expérience utilisateur est volontairement minimaliste : pas de compte à créer, pas de publicité, pas de fonctionnalités superflues. Franchement, c’est très appréciable

Confidentialité

Tous les fichiers sont stockés dans les centres de données d’Infomaniak, situés exclusivement en Suisse. À l’expiration définie par l’utilisateur, ils sont automatiquement supprimés. Contrairement à certains services extra-européens, les fichiers ne sont pas utilisés pour l’entraînement de modèles d’IA ni exploités à des fins publicitaires. L’exemple récent de WeTransfer, qui avait annoncé vouloir entraîner ses IA avec les fichiers déposés avant de faire machine arrière, illustre bien pourquoi la question de la confiance est centrale.

Points forts et limites

SwissTransfer présente plusieurs avantages : la possibilité d’envoyer gratuitement de très gros fichiers (jusqu’à 50 Go), l’absence de publicité, une interface simple et l’assurance que les données restent stockées en Suisse. En revanche, il faut garder en tête que le service se concentre uniquement sur le transfert. Il n’offre pas de stockage permanent ni d’outils collaboratifs. Pour l’archivage ou le travail en équipe, Infomaniak propose d’autres services payants

En synthèse

SwissTransfer s’est rapidement imposé comme une alternative à des services dominés par les géants américains. Simple, gratuit et transparent, le service permet de partager de gros fichiers en toute sécurité, sans conditions cachées.

Et vous, utilisez-vous un service pour envoyer de gros fichiers ? Si oui, lequel et pourquoi ?

 Synology DS425+ Review – Should You Buy This NAS?

The Synology DS425+ is a 4-bay NAS system launched in mid-2025 as part of the company’s continued refresh of its Plus Series product line, replacing the DS423+. It is designed to serve home power users, creative professionals, and small business environments that require a balance of reliable storage, streamlined software integration, and modest multimedia capabilities. The unit retains a familiar chassis and architecture, featuring the Intel Celeron J4125 quad-core processor (2.0 GHz base, 2.7 GHz burst) with integrated graphics support, 2GB of soldered DDR4 memory (expandable up to 6GB with an additional 4GB Synology module), and two M.2 NVMe slots intended primarily for SSD caching using Synology-verified drives.

Alongside this hardware, the DS425+ runs DSM 7.2 and includes the full suite of Synology services, such as Active Backup, Surveillance Station, Virtual Machine Manager, Synology Drive, and Hybrid RAID (SHR) support. Network connectivity is handled by a single 2.5GbE and a 1GbE port, while two USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports enable external storage or UPS integration. Despite minimal hardware changes over its predecessor, the DS425+ demonstrates Synology’s continued focus on efficiency, low noise output, and energy-conscious operation—important factors for users planning to run a 24/7 NAS. However, these choices also reflect broader changes in Synology’s platform strategy that may not suit every user, especially those seeking higher flexibility or modern internal specifications.

SOFTWARE - 10/10

HARDWARE - 4/10

PERFORMANCE - 6/10

PRICE - 6/10

VALUE - 7/10

6.6

PROS

DSM 7.2 Operating System: Offers a rich suite of first-party apps including Active Backup, Surveillance Station, Synology Drive, and Hyper Backup with strong cross-platform support.
Low Noise and Power Consumption: Quiet 92mm fan setup and efficient power usage (~28W under load) make it ideal for 24/7 operation in home or office environments.
Integrated Graphics (Intel UHD 600): Supports light Plex or Jellyfin hardware transcoding for 1080p media, a rare inclusion in Synology’s 2025 lineup.
Compact and Versatile Design: Small chassis with 4 SATA bays and 2 M.2 NVMe slots for cache acceleration, supporting RAID 5/6 and SHR.
Strong Security Posture: Includes 2FA, SSL, VPN tools, and a proactive PSIRT vulnerability disclosure program for ongoing protection.
Good Thermal Management: Maintains stable drive and system temperatures (~32–35°C) even under moderate load.
Broad Software Ecosystem: Additional apps like Synology Photos, Chat, Office, and Drive make it a multi-functional NAS beyond just storage.

CONS

Strict Drive Compatibility: Requires Synology-only HDDs and SSDs for full functionality; third-party drives trigger warnings or are blocked entirely.
Outdated CPU Platform: Uses a 2019-era Intel J4125 CPU, now underpowered compared to newer Intel N-series or AMD embedded chips.
Memory Upgrade Limitations: Comes with 2GB soldered RAM, upgradeable to only 6GB total, and officially supports Synology-branded memory only.
Limited Connectivity and I/O: No PCIe, eSATA, or SD card support; only one 2.5GbE and two 5Gbps USB ports—lagging behind competitors in 2025.

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

DSM Software Ecosystem and Integration

One of the most compelling reasons to consider the DS425+ is its support for Synology’s DiskStation Manager (DSM), a mature and highly integrated NAS operating system. DSM 7.2, which comes preinstalled, offers a unified and consistent user experience with a wide range of built-in applications tailored for home users, remote workers, and small office setups. Core tools like Active Backup for Business allow centralized backup of entire operating systems, folders, and virtual machines, making the DS425+ useful as a bare-metal recovery or disaster recovery node. Hyper Backup enables encrypted, versioned backups to local, remote, or cloud destinations, while tools like Snapshot Replication provide rapid rollbacks and protection against ransomware.

Synology also offers sector-specific solutions through packages like Surveillance Station and Virtual Machine Manager, the former allowing support for up to 40 cameras (with up to 800FPS at 1080p H.264), and the latter providing basic VM hosting for Linux and lightweight Windows workloads. These tools are tightly optimized for the hardware, with low overhead and accessible browser-based management. Furthermore, the DS425+ supports Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR), giving users more flexibility when mixing drive capacities and minimizing unused storage space compared to traditional RAID models.

DSM extends beyond simple storage management by including companion apps like Synology Photos, Drive, and Chat, all of which are compatible with Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS. The DS425+ integrates these tools with centralized user management, group permissions, and support for LDAP and Active Directory.

For users who value reliability, Synology’s proactive security strategy—including its public security advisories, pen-testing initiatives, and in-house incident response—adds extra confidence to the long-term stability and safety of the system. In many cases, users report that the simplicity and polish of DSM is what keeps them loyal to the Synology platform, even when hardware specifications appear modest.

Strict Drive Compatibility and Locked Storage Expansion

One of the most significant limitations of the DS425+ is its strict enforcement of Synology-only drive compatibility, particularly for both 3.5″ HDDs and M.2 NVMe SSDs. As of mid-2025, this model only allows full functionality when paired with Synology-branded drives, such as the HAT5300 series for hard disks or SNV3410/3510 for SSDs.

If users attempt to install non-Synology drives—even widely used options like Seagate IronWolf or WD Red—the system will either block the drives entirely or present warnings and restrict key functionality, such as RAID rebuild, hot spare assignment, or expansion. This policy represents a significant departure from Synology’s historically broader compatibility stance and has become a source of ongoing controversy among users and reviewers alike.

From a practical standpoint, this limitation can result in higher upfront costs, reduced flexibility in sourcing drives, and long-term concerns about availability and vendor lock-in. For example, Synology’s high-capacity enterprise HDDs are often difficult to find in retail channels and may be priced at a premium compared to similar offerings from Seagate or Toshiba.

Users migrating from older Synology systems who want to reuse perfectly functional drives may find themselves unable to do so, as the new system won’t allow proper array recovery or expansion unless all drives meet the strict compatibility criteria. While this approach enables Synology to tightly optimize performance and reliability, it effectively turns the DS425+ into a semi-proprietary ecosystem where even core storage components are vendor-restricted.

This is particularly frustrating for experienced NAS users who expect to mix and match drives or who run environments where hardware recycling and drive lifecycle management are critical. The decision also impacts future-proofing: users who want to grow their arrays over time must now ensure drive stock alignment with Synology’s approved list, which may change over time or vary by region. Despite DSM’s strengths, this hard stance on compatibility significantly undermines one of the key selling points of NAS platforms—modularity—and could be a dealbreaker for value-conscious users or those with existing disk investments.

Low Noise and Power Efficiency for 24/7 Use

Another advantage of the DS425+ lies in its energy-efficient and acoustically quiet design, which makes it highly suitable for constant operation in homes, studios, or office environments where noise and heat are critical considerations. Based on extended testing, the system consumes just 28.25W under access load and drops to as low as 6.10W in HDD hibernation, making it one of the more economical NAS units in its class when measured over long-term 24/7 usage.

Even when populated with four 4TB hard drives and placed under sustained load, real-world power draw rarely exceeded 44W during high CPU utilization. This is further aided by the relatively low thermal output, with ambient casing temperatures measured around 32°C and drive bays stabilizing at just 35°C under load.

In terms of acoustic performance, the DS425+ is equipped with two 92mm fans, and noise testing shows the system remains quiet enough for close-proximity deployment. In idle mode with the fans on their lowest profile, it registers a sound level between 36 to 38 dB(A), which increases only moderately under load or at medium fan speed. Even when the system was manually set to full fan speed with high drive activity, noise output peaked at 53 dB(A)—still manageable for most non-silent workspaces. This operational profile makes the DS425+ appealing to users seeking a low-maintenance NAS that can be discreetly placed in a shared room, office, or AV rack without introducing unwanted distraction or thermal buildup.

This power and noise behavior also helps prolong component lifespan, particularly in warmer climates or enclosed cabinets, and supports use cases like 24/7 media server operation, offsite backups, or even small-scale CCTV archiving. Importantly, despite these low operating figures, the DS425+ still maintains stability and consistent throughput thanks to the efficiency of the J4125 processor and DSM’s power-aware service management. These characteristics, often underappreciated in specs alone, make it especially suitable for those who want reliable long-term uptime without high energy costs or acoustic interference.

Memory Limitations and Unorthodox Upgrade Path

The DS425+ comes with 2GB of DDR4 memory soldered directly to the motherboard, which is low by 2025 standards even for entry-level NAS devices. While it includes an additional memory slot that allows for the installation of a single 4GB module, the system officially supports a maximum of just 6GB of total RAM. This is an unusual and restrictive configuration, especially when many modern NAS devices now ship with 4GB or 8GB by default, and support 16GB or more—sometimes with dual-channel configurations for better performance. Synology’s strict validation policy also means that only their branded RAM (e.g. D4NESO-2666-4G) is fully supported, and installing third-party modules can trigger warnings in DSM or potentially void support coverage.

This memory ceiling becomes problematic when running DSM features that scale with RAM usage, such as Synology Drive, Snapshot Replication, Virtual Machine Manager, or Surveillance Station. As observed during testing, the DS425+ routinely used 27–38% of its available memory at idle, even without third-party packages installed. This is largely due to DSM’s intelligent memory caching system, which improves performance but leaves little headroom for user-defined workloads. Once additional services or multimedia indexing tasks are introduced, memory utilization climbs quickly, increasing the risk of slowdowns, swap usage, or outright service failure under peak demand.

For users who intend to deploy containers, host multiple camera feeds, or run even a small number of VMs, this limitation may lead to bottlenecks sooner than expected. It also makes the DS425+ a less viable choice for future expansion or multi-user environments. Unlike other NAS brands that allow full third-party upgrade freedom—or systems with dual RAM slots and broader capacity support—Synology’s enforced limitations here represent another example of the platform’s increasingly locked-down approach. For a system marketed to prosumers, the inability to exceed 6GB RAM comfortably is a notable technical and strategic constraint.

Integrated Graphics for Light Media Transcoding

Unlike many NAS units in this price tier, the DS425+ includes an Intel Celeron J4125 processor with integrated Intel UHD Graphics 600, which unlocks hardware-accelerated video decoding and transcoding in supported applications like Plex or Jellyfin. This makes the DS425+ one of the few Synology models in 2025 that still offers integrated GPU support out of the box, especially as newer Synology models with more recent CPUs have increasingly omitted integrated graphics. While the DS425+ is not intended to replace a dedicated media server, its GPU can significantly improve performance and efficiency for on-the-fly transcoding of formats like H.264 and H.265 (HEVC), particularly when streaming to remote clients with bandwidth constraints.

In real-world usage scenarios, this means the DS425+ can handle direct streaming and limited transcoding of 1080p content without overwhelming the CPU, provided the source formats are within the GPU’s supported codec list. During Plex testing, the DS425+ performed adequately with one or two 1080p transcodes running simultaneously, and was also able to manage basic 4K downscaling if the codec was natively supported by the hardware. For home users who have mixed devices—such as smart TVs, mobile devices, and tablets that vary in codec support—the presence of hardware transcoding offers improved flexibility without requiring as much manual conversion or format standardization of their media library.

Additionally, Synology’s native multimedia applications such as Surveillance Station and Synology Photos also benefit from GPU acceleration, helping speed up thumbnail generation, indexing, and playback, especially for high-resolution image and video collections. While raw CPU power in the DS425+ is modest by 2025 standards, the inclusion of integrated graphics helps balance out performance for lightweight graphical workloads and makes the system more viable as a general-purpose media hub. For users considering a NAS for Plex, family media streaming, or small business content previews, this capability adds meaningful value—especially since few modern Synology NAS devices still include Intel-based chips with iGPU support.

Outdated CPU Platform and Limited Performance Headroom

The DS425+ ships with the Intel Celeron J4125, a 4-core, 4-thread processor that was originally launched in late 2019. While it offers modest performance and includes integrated graphics, the J4125 is now significantly behind modern alternatives in both efficiency and raw compute power. Intel itself has discontinued the Celeron branding entirely, moving toward newer architectures like Alder Lake-N and Jasper Lake, which offer improved IPC (instructions per cycle), higher core/thread counts, and better thermal efficiency—all while retaining low power consumption. In comparison, the J4125’s aging 14nm Gemini Lake architecture struggles with heavier multitasking, especially when running services like virtual machines, surveillance workloads, or multiple Docker containers in parallel.

Synology has retained this CPU across several generations of its 2- and 4-bay Plus series models, which makes the DS425+ feel less like a generational upgrade and more like a lateral move. During performance testing, the unit handled DSM core tasks and multimedia indexing smoothly, but CPU load increased sharply under heavier tasks such as simultaneous Surveillance Station streams, Hyper Backup routines, or basic VM instances.

This limited headroom constrains the DS425+ to light-to-moderate workloads, and it can bottleneck more quickly than newer systems from other brands using more recent Intel N-series or AMD Ryzen Embedded CPUs. This is especially important as DSM continues to add new features that may increase background resource consumption over time.

Additionally, the CPU’s lack of support for modern instruction sets or features like AVX can limit compatibility with certain Docker containers or third-party applications that expect more recent hardware. While the DS425+ can serve well as a general-purpose file server or light media NAS, it’s not suited for users who anticipate growth into heavier mixed-use deployments. In a 2025 market where many similarly priced NAS units offer 6- or 8-core CPUs and PCIe Gen 3 or 4 support, the DS425+ feels constrained and unlikely to age well for users with evolving or expanding workloads.

Compact Form Factor with Versatile Storage Options

The DS425+ offers a space-efficient chassis design that houses four 3.5″/2.5″ SATA drive bays, along with two M.2 2280 NVMe SSD slots for caching. This provides a versatile platform for users who want flexible storage layouts without moving to a physically larger or more expensive rackmount or tower system.

The vertical orientation of the chassis, measuring just 166 x 199 x 223 mm, makes it easy to deploy the device in tight workspaces, shelving units, or beneath desks—ideal for small offices, home studios, or AV setups where space is at a premium. Despite its small footprint, the device retains full support for key RAID configurations including SHR, RAID 5/6/10, and JBOD, and offers hot-swappable access to the main drive bays for ease of maintenance.

The inclusion of two M.2 NVMe slots on the base of the unit allows users to improve performance through read/write caching without sacrificing primary drive bays. Although these M.2 slots are limited to Synology-verified SSDs and are not usable for storage pools, they can still offer significant boosts to random I/O performance in multi-user environments or when used with demanding workloads like Synology Drive or VM hosting. Combined with support for SSD TRIM and smart cache algorithms within DSM, the system can be tuned to optimize response times during high-access periods without introducing large amounts of memory overhead.

From a practical standpoint, this layout is beneficial for users managing multiple storage tiers, such as a mix of large-capacity HDDs for archiving and faster SSDs for active projects or virtual machines. Furthermore, the DS425+ supports volume expansion using larger capacity drives, RAID migration options (e.g. from Basic to RAID 5 or RAID 5 to RAID 6), and up to 32 internal volumes, giving users enough headroom for future scaling. These features, while standard in DSM, are fully supported in this chassis and make it easier to adapt the NAS as storage needs evolve—without the need to start from scratch or invest in a new enclosure.

Limited I/O and Underwhelming Connectivity for the Price

While the DS425+ introduces a 2.5GbE network port alongside a legacy 1GbE port, the rest of its I/O configuration is relatively limited and arguably outdated compared to competitors in its price range. The system includes just two USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, both of which operate at 5Gbps rather than the more modern 10Gbps (Gen 2) speeds that are increasingly common in 2025. There is no SD card slot, no eSATA or PCIe expansion slot, and no HDMI output, all of which are features now appearing on rival NAS systems from QNAP, TerraMaster, and UGREEN—even at similar or lower price points. These omissions restrict how the device can be expanded or integrated into more complex workflows, such as direct-attached backup targets, external GPU support, or quick media ingestion.

The presence of only a single 2.5GbE port also imposes a bottleneck for users wanting to make full use of SSD caching or high-throughput RAID configurations. There is no support for link aggregation, as the 1GbE and 2.5GbE ports cannot be bonded in a meaningful way, and the system lacks support for 5GbE or 10GbE—either onboard or via expansion. In scenarios where large video files, virtual machine images, or multiple users are simultaneously accessing data, the NAS may become network-bound more quickly than other models with multi-GbE or SFP+ connectivity.

Furthermore, while DSM offers support for USB peripherals such as external drives and UPS devices, the limited port count and bandwidth mean there is little headroom for simultaneous external expansions, and the brand limits the support of USB peripherals for security reasons. For example, attaching both an external drive and a USB-connected UPS may require unplugging one to rotate in another device. This may not impact casual home users, but for power users managing workflows like video editing, offsite rotation backups, or multi-location file sync, this level of I/O flexibility feels dated. When factoring in the DS425+’s pricing, which places it near many NAS models with more expansive I/O, this minimalism can be a significant drawback.

Strong Security Framework and Proactive Vulnerability Management

The DS425+ benefits from Synology’s broader emphasis on security, offering a robust framework for data protection, secure remote access, and proactive threat mitigation. DSM includes built-in tools such as firewall rules, auto-blocking of suspicious IPs, HTTPS configuration, and native integration with Let’s Encrypt for SSL certificates. Two-factor authentication (2FA) can be enforced per user or globally, and built-in VPN server options (including OpenVPN and L2TP/IPSec) provide secure tunnels for remote workers or offsite access. For businesses or power users hosting sensitive data, the inclusion of AES-NI hardware encryption ensures efficient at-rest protection without drastically impacting system performance.

What sets Synology apart is its ongoing commitment to security research and response. The company operates a public-facing Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) and regularly updates a detailed security advisory page disclosing vulnerabilities and their mitigations. Synology also participates in Pwn2Own, a white-hat hacking competition, and runs internal bug bounty programs to uncover and patch exploits before they are discovered in the wild. This culture of transparency and preemptive action is especially valuable as NAS devices become more frequently targeted by malware and ransomware threats, particularly those exposed to the internet or used in hybrid cloud workflows.

Additionally, many DSM apps include granular permission management, audit logs, and user-based access rules, giving administrators tight control over file shares, backup targets, and service access. Synology’s Hybrid Share and Cloud Sync tools support end-to-end encryption and offer options to decouple cloud storage keys from the local system, further strengthening data sovereignty. For users concerned with long-term viability and platform trust, Synology’s structured and well-documented security practices help the DS425+ stand out against competitors that may offer more hardware but less attention to software and infrastructure hardening. This makes it a viable choice for users prioritizing data safety in either personal or professional contexts.

Questionable Long-Term Value Amid Shifting Synology Strategy

Another concern with the DS425+ is its position within Synology’s evolving product strategy, which raises questions about long-term support and ecosystem focus. Synology has recently been expanding its BeeStation and BeeStation Plus lines—pre-populated, user-friendly NAS solutions that share similar hardware (in some cases, the same J4125 CPU), but are bundled with drives and offer a simplified DSM variant tailored for general consumers. These systems, while more limited in scope, are marketed as turnkey alternatives with lower pricing and fewer user-configurable components. The DS425+, by contrast, sits awkwardly between Synology’s increasingly restrictive hardware requirements and the emerging shift toward closed, fully managed platforms.

This change in trajectory creates uncertainty for prospective buyers looking for a long-term investment. If Synology continues prioritizing its proprietary hardware and software pairings, users who prefer modularity, drive freedom, or advanced customization may find themselves increasingly constrained. As already noted, the DS425+ enforces tight compatibility rules, limits memory expansion, and restricts NVMe usage to caching only. At the same time, Synology is streamlining its portfolio around devices with even stricter limitations but more mass-market appeal. This raises the possibility that traditional “Plus” models like the DS425+ may be sidelined or see fewer feature updates in future DSM releases, as Synology shifts development toward more controlled environments.

From a cost perspective, the DS425+ is priced around $519, placing it uncomfortably close to more powerful third-party NAS systems that offer better CPUs, more RAM, and greater I/O flexibility. Competing brands frequently offer 4-bay systems with modern N-series Intel processors or embedded AMD chips, 8GB+ of memory, and faster networking, often for the same or lower price. As a result, the DS425+ risks being outclassed not only by its competition, but by Synology’s own growing lineup of prepackaged solutions. Users investing in the DS425+ today may find themselves limited not just by current specs, but by an ecosystem slowly drifting away from the prosumer and enthusiast segment this model was originally meant to serve.

Synology DS425+ NAS Review – Conclusion and Verdict

The Synology DS425+ presents a mixed proposition in 2025. On one hand, it remains a competent 4-bay NAS solution for users prioritizing software integration, low power operation, and quiet, reliable 24/7 usage. Its support for DSM 7.2 and the full suite of Synology applications—ranging from Active Backup to Surveillance Station and Synology Drive—makes it a strong turnkey platform for general-purpose storage, backup, and multimedia needs. Integrated graphics give it an edge in light media streaming scenarios, and its support for M.2 NVMe caching allows for performance optimization without occupying drive bays. It’s a well-built device that continues to “just work,” particularly in home and small office setups where reliability, simplicity, and refined software matter more than raw horsepower.

However, these strengths are increasingly offset by hardware limitations and Synology’s increasingly restrictive ecosystem. The soldered 2GB of RAM, locked 6GB memory ceiling, outdated CPU, limited I/O, and especially the enforced use of Synology-only drives all hinder flexibility and long-term value. When compared to similarly priced alternatives from competing NAS vendors—many of which offer newer processors, faster ports, and full hardware freedom—the DS425+ can feel constrained and overpriced. In addition, Synology’s expanding focus on pre-populated BeeStation devices suggests a possible shift away from traditional DIY-friendly models like this one. For users who are already invested in the Synology ecosystem or who value DSM above all else, the DS425+ may still be a worthwhile buy. But for those seeking hardware scalability, third-party compatibility, or better price-to-performance, it may be worth considering other options or waiting to see how Synology’s roadmap evolves.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Week 37 Tech Digest – ThundeSynology Solution Exhibition 2Synology in 2026 - What Have TWhy is 10GbE STILL NOT EverywhQNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAQNAP Qu405, Qu605 and Qu805 NAWHY Synology Changed Support oGL.iNet Comet Pro Review - TheGL.iNet Comet Pro ReviewWhy is 10GbE STILL NOT Everywh Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Syncthing est un logiciel open source qui permet de synchroniser des fichiers entre plusieurs appareils (ordinateurs, NAS, smartphones, etc.). Contrairement aux Clouds propriétaires, les données restent stockées sur vos propres appareils. La sortie de Syncthing 2.0 marque une étape importante et apporte de nombreuses améliorations… aussi bien pour les particuliers que pour les administrateurs de NAS.

Quoi de neuf dans Syncthing 2.0 ?

Pour rappel, Syncthing est particulièrement intéressant pour ceux qui possèdent un NAS. En effet, le logiciel offre une synchronisation chiffrée, sécurisée et automatique… avec un contrôle total des données. C’est une solution idéale pour les particuliers et professionnels qui veulent bénéficier du confort du Cloud sans dépendre d’un fournisseur externe.

La sortie de Syncthing 2.0 marque un tournant technique, tout en maintenant la compatibilité protocolaire avec la branche 1.x. Voici les principaux changements :

• Migration vers SQLite : la base de données interne passe de LevelDB à SQLite, gage de fiabilité et de maintenance simplifiée.
• Journalisation améliorée : logs structurés, nouveau niveau de sévérité WARNING et configuration plus fine par paquet.
• Performances réseau optimisées : ouverture de plusieurs connexions simultanées entre pairs, réduisant les blocages lors des transferts volumineux.
• Gestion des fichiers supprimés : rétention par défaut limitée à 15 mois, avec possibilité d’ajustement.
• Évolutions pratiques : suppression du dossier par défaut au premier démarrage, rationalisation des options en ligne de commande, fin de la prise en charge de certaines plateformes mineures.

Syncthing 2.0.3 : la version actuelle

Au moment d’écrire ces lignes, la version la plus récente est Syncthing 2.0.3. Elle corrige plusieurs points de jeunesse :

• retour de l’option –version,
• amélioration de la migration des bases volumineuses,
• nettoyage automatique d’anciens dossiers au démarrage.

Faut-il mettre à jour vers Syncthing 2.0 ?

La réponse est oui, mais avec précaution. Avant de migrer, il est recommandé de sauvegarder le répertoire de configuration et de prévoir un temps au système… surtout si votre base de données est importante. La compatibilité avec la version 1.x permet une transition progressive, appareil par appareil.

En synthèse

Avec Syncthing 2.0, l’outil gagne en fiabilité et en performances sans remettre en cause ses fondamentaux : une synchronisation sécurisée, décentralisée et respectueuse de la vie privée. Pour les utilisateurs de NAS comme pour les adeptes de l’auto-hébergement, cette mise à jour constitue une évolution solide et durable.