UniFi USB4/TB4 to 10GbE Adapter Review

Given the preponderance of 10 Gb Ethernet solutions available in the UniFi portfolio, it’s actually kind of weird that the brand has waited until almost halfway through 2025 to launch a convenient USB to 10G NIC adapter. To put it into perspective, the first generation of Thunderbolt to 10 GbE adapters arrived way back in 2018 from brands such as QNAP, StarTech, and Akitio. Despite this, however, there is still increasing demand for these convenient 10G upgrade alternatives to desktop PCIe card options, due to the growing support of USB4 client hardware, as well as its backwards compatibility with Thunderbolt 3 and Thunderbolt 4. This means that even particularly modest mini PCs and laptops now have the opportunity to scale up towards 10G easily. So, what exactly sets this new adapter from UniFi apart from the already quite oversaturated market of Thunderbolt/USB to 10 GbE adapters? Is it just the same thing with their own badge on top? Does it deserve your money and your data?

Feature	Specification / Details
Model	UACC-Adapter-RJ45-USBC-10GE
Price	$199 USD
Interface (Input)	USB-C (Compatible with USB4, Thunderbolt 3, Thunderbolt 4)
Interface (Output)	10GBASE-T Copper Ethernet (RJ45)
Controller	Marvell AQC113 (PCIe Gen 3/4 x1, x2, x4 support)
Compatibility	Windows, macOS, Linux (limited support on open-source NAS software)
Backward Compatibility	USB4, Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 3 (No support for USB 3.2 Gen 1/Gen 2)
Power Source	Bus-powered via USB-C
Cooling	Passive (thermal pad + internal heatsink, no active fan)
Build	All-metal chassis, compact and lightweight design
Performance	Full 10GbE saturation possible; tested with CrystalDisk/AJA for sustained transfer
Thermals	~44–45°C under full load, ~40°C idle
Auto-Negotiation	Supported (2.5G / 5G / 10G)
Distance (10GBASE-T)	Up to 20 meters (longer possible, but performance may degrade)
Notable Limitations	No USB 3.x support; slower heat dissipation due to compact, passive-only design
Best Use Case	Portable 10G upgrade for laptops, mini-PCs, and client devices without PCIe expansion slots

---

UniFi USB4 and TB4 to 10GbE Adapter Review – Quick Conclusion

UniFi have not really reinvented the wheel here. They were not the first to roll out Thunderbolt/USB 10G network adapters, and they certainly won’t be the last. It’s still a little confusing why it took the brand this long to roll out its own convenient accessory, but at least they’ve launched it with the latest controller on board—leading to a great deal more flexibility in its deployment on different client hardware, as well as reduced power consumption compared with the first generation of such adapters. The price of $199 lands pretty squarely between more cost-effective options in the market right now that use the previous generation controller, and the new generation of adapters arriving from brands like QNAP that feature the same hardware architecture as the UniFi option but are around $50 to $100 more. The design of this adapter is smaller and lighter than other options in the market by quite some margin, and as it is bus-powered and has no active cooling, the device is eminently portable and low-impact. All that said, it lacks the ridging and venting of other options in the market. Equally, we are on the cusp of just how big the evolution of USB4 network controllers is soon to become, and later this year we are likely to see the first generation of USB4 to 25G or 2x10GbE adapters arrive—clearly, these will scale in cost and won’t arrive for a great deal of time, but for those looking at this adapter as a means of future-proofing, you may well see the benefits in holding out a little bit longer. Nevertheless, UniFi have again released a great, solid network adapter here that does nothing wrong, and although they’ve arrived a little late to the party on this one, it’s still a very solid offering.

---

UniFi USB4 and TB4 to 10GbE Adapter Review – Design

As I’ve already mentioned, there are already a decent number of USB-C to 10 GbE network adapter options in the market, and given UniFi’s unique design choices, I’m always interested to see how Ubiquiti goes about designing their own version of something that the market already has—but more importantly, what exactly are they bringing to it that doesn’t already exist in the marketplace.

In the case of this adapter, the main three things that this adapter seemingly introduces over the status quo are:

• Their adapter is smaller in size and lighter in weight than pretty much every other adapter in the market for 10 GbE via USB-C.

• Their adapter has a lower power consumption than practically all other USB-C to 10 GbE Ethernet adapters.

• Their adapter uses a much more up-to-date and recent controller than any other Thunderbolt to 10G adapter released before 2025.

Those first two points are going to be very attractive to users who have been weighing up the need to buy an adapter over the last few years that connects via USB-C, but we are going to have to drill down a little bit later into why that third point is quite important to users with older generation equipment. But we’ll get back to that later.

The adapter is pretty damn small, as its completely metal external chassis is fanless. The adapter relies heavily on a controller-mounted heatsink internally that is connected to a thermal pad attached to the external metal casing. The USB Type-C input provides both data and power via a single interface, and this adapter supports Thunderbolt 3, Thunderbolt 4, and USB4. That also means that it will most certainly work with future generations of USB and the slowly rolling-out Thunderbolt 5 protocol. Crucially though, it’s worth noting that this adapter does not support USB 3.2 Gen 1 or Gen 2—domestic USB that a lot more value devices either exclusively have or the port that is more commonly found on everything else. So, despite the 5 to 7-year release difference between this adapter and the first generation of Thunderbolt to 10 Gb Ethernet USB bus-powered adapters, compatibility on especially legacy equipment is not guaranteed.

It is also worth touching on that adapters like this are chiefly designed for users that have client hardware that cannot support a traditional PCIe upgrade card for adding improved network interfaces. If you have the facility to add 10 Gb Ethernet via a PCIe slot, I would always recommend that instead of an adapter like this. It will end up being far more power efficient and considerably lower in price. But for those in a pinch that need a portable and easy-to-adopt network upgrade on their system, this is a great choice.

If you are in the market for improved network connectivity and 10 GbE is a bit too rich for your blood or your needs, you can still get hold of incredibly cost-effective USB to 5 Gb Ethernet adapters for as little as $30 right now. They also allow connectivity with legacy USB 3.2 connections as well. So, if you don’t actually need full 10 GbE, and your switch supports auto-negotiation with 5 GbE, you could save a bunch of money.

Check Amazon for a $30 USB to 5GbE Adapter HERE – Check AliExpress for $30 USB-to-5GbE Adapter HERE

Do keep in mind that there are affordable USB to 5 GbE adapters in the market. I’m actually kind of surprised that UniFi haven’t integrated a USB to 5 Gb Ethernet adapter into their lineup already, as there is definitely a growing demand for this middle choice in network connectivity at the home and prosumer level—especially as more routers and network switches roll out with both 2.5 GbE and 5 GbE support.

UniFi USB4 and TB4 to 10GbE Adapter Review – Hardware

The physical connection on the other side of this UniFi adapter is a 10GBASE-T copper connection. This is generally perfect up to about 20 meters, and although you can use it over longer distances, at that point you tend to experience some resistance and a drop in latency. A fiber SFP option would have been great, but if they were only going to launch one version—now or ever—almost certainly the one users would want for convenience is going to be the copper option. The adapter also supports auto-negotiation as you’d expect, and although some client hardware will require you to install the AQC113 driver, it is broadly available for the majority of platforms ranging from Windows to Mac and custom Linux builds. That said, support in most open-source NAS software is still a little patchy.

In terms of performance, I’m pleased to say that when connecting with a 10 GbE NAS system via a 10G copper switch, this adapter comfortably hit 10 GbE saturation very easily. Consistent testing by CrystalDisk and AJA using a NAS equipped with a 10 GbE port and SSDs allowed this adapter to run consistently with repeated 1 GB tests over 10 GbE for 15 minutes with sustained performance. Clearly, the performance you’re going to achieve with an adapter like this will be heavily based on both the network activity and the target IP device, but even this limited testing showed that this adapter is more than capable of hitting those performance numbers.

When the adapter was running full-flow, and after 10 minutes of sustained use, it was hitting around 44 to 45°C. When idle, the adapter rested at around 40°C when not in use. One slight complaint I had was that the adapter did not especially quickly dissipate the gathered heat during testing—and that didn’t come as a huge surprise. As this adapter lacks any active cooling system internally, lacks the ridged heatsink design of a lot of other USB-to-10G adapters on the market, and is notably more compact than other options, it was inevitable that temperatures might get a little spicy. Nevertheless, I am a little disappointed at how slowly heat was dissipated between uses, and that is sadly a price many users who want a compact adapter like this are going to have to pay.

Now I want to discuss the network controller inside this UniFi USB4-to-10G adapter, as I think it’s going to be an important area of distinction for buyers considering this new $200 10G adapter versus cheaper or more expensive alternatives that have been in the market for more than 5 years. The first generation of Thunderbolt-to-10G adapters that arrived way back in 2018/2019 featured the AQN-107 controller. This was designed exclusively for Thunderbolt connections and was a controller running on a PCIe Gen 3 x4 mounted connection in those adapters. This more modern controller is the AQC113, and alongside arriving in a smaller physical size with lower power consumption, it crucially runs on a flexible PCIe Gen 3/4 x1, x2, or x4 architecture as needed.

The reason this is important is that when Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 arrived on client hardware as more flexible and affordable alternatives to Thunderbolt 3, it also allowed client hardware creators to be a little bit more flexible on the allocated PCIe lanes that they would dedicate to USB4/Thunderbolt 3. As good as all this sounds, that meant that more modern hardware with USB4/TB4 (which is backwards compatible with TB3) often had much poorer or inconsistent performance when using the older generation TB3 10G adapters—because the adapter wasn’t flexible enough to adapt to the more dynamic deployment of USB4/TB4 on modern hardware. That is why the new controller and its flexibility may well run consistently better and more efficiently on modern hardware, as both the client and the adapter are more flexibly positioned to adapt to the unique deployments they may encounter.

Several of the existing USB-C to 10G network adapters in the market released over the last 5 years are soon to be updated with newer controllers (with QNAP recently upgrading their existing adapter with the new controller and increasing the price from $199 to $249 already). This is why I touched on earlier the importance of UniFi choosing the newer-gen controller for their adapter. It ensures far greater compatibility with modern USB4/TB3 architecture, as well as better flexibility for users on older-generation devices.

---

UniFi USB4 and TB4 to 10GbE Adapter Review – Verdict & Conclusion

Unless you properly dig down into just why both the internal hardware and the necessity for a device like this exist, chances are there are a lot of traditional 10G users who are going to question why you’d spend $200 on a USB adapter when there are cheaper and more power-efficient PCIe options on the market. Equally, there are going to be those who’ll point at UniFi releasing this adapter in 2025 and—without looking into how the hardware in these adapters has changed—will question why it took UniFi so long to jump on this bandwagon. To both of those kinds of users, I think they are either missing the point or need to spend a little bit more time looking at how this kind of technology has both changed and evolved for the better in the last few years. The original hurdles for users to scale up their network connectivity have evolved rapidly, and now even the most basic low-powered and low-priced Chromebook is not incapable of scaling up towards 2.5G and 5G network connections. Equally, as Thunderbolt and USB continue their tit-for-tat upgrades periodically, the network peripherals available to most users are evolving just as quickly. This new adapter takes advantage of the continued miniaturization of a lot of those components—and their growing comparative affordability.

I genuinely and wholeheartedly recommend the UniFi USB4 to 10 Gb Ethernet adapter. I also want to add that there are cheap alternatives in the market—if you’re a Thunderbolt 3 user, there are much cheaper alternatives for 2.5G and 5G. If you only have USB 3.2, those are also options to consider. And finally, keep your eyes on the end of 2025, as the controllers that made this adapter possible are going to start rolling out towards dual 10G and 2.5G solutions in due course. They will, of course, scale up in price too, but if you’re looking at this adapter for the sake of future-proofing rather than immediate deployment, you might want to hold off a little while longer. For everyone else, this is a fantastic and convenient network upgrade for content creators and prosumers alike.

Pros of the UniFi 10GbE / USB-C Adapter

Cons of the UniFi 10GbE / USB-C Adapters

Compact & Lightweight: Smaller and lighter than most 10GbE USB adapters on the market. Modern Controller (AQC113): Improved compatibility, power efficiency, and flexible PCIe lane support. Full USB4/TB3/TB4 Compatibility: Supports the latest connection standards with future-proof design. Passive Cooling: Silent, fanless design with metal chassis and internal heatsink. Bus Powered: No external power supply required, making it ultra-portable. Achieves Full 10GbE Saturation: Delivers consistent high-speed performance in testing. Auto-Negotiation Support: Easily scales down to 2.5G or 5G when supported by the switch. Cross-Platform Support: Compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux (with some limitations).

No USB 3.2 Support: Incompatible with many legacy USB ports found on budget or older devices. Limited Thermal Dissipation: Gets warm under load and dissipates heat slowly due to compact, fanless design. Price Point: At $199, it sits higher than 2.5G/5G alternatives and may be overkill for non-10G users.

---

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Alors que beaucoup de robots laveurs misent sur des doubles serpillières rotatives, le MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete prend un autre chemin avec un système à rouleau unique. Ce modèle, attendu pour le mois d’août (2025), pourrait bien faire évoluer la perception de ce type de technologie. À travers ses choix techniques, MOVA semble chercher à corriger certaines limites des robots actuels, tout en annonçant un prix qui se veut contenu… une promesse qu’il faudra vérifier à sa sortie.

MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete

Le Z60 repose sur un rouleau microfibre constamment alimenté en eau propre, avec récupération simultanée de l’eau sale. L’idée est simple : éviter de laver le sol avec une serpillière déjà souillée, un défaut courant sur d’autres modèles. Ce système vise donc une hygiène plus rigoureuse, notamment sur les grandes surfaces.

Ce modèle propose une détection automatique des tapis, avec un soulèvement du rouleau et le déploiement d’une barrière pour éviter l’humidité sur les surfaces sensibles. C’est, à ce jour, l’un des rares robots à rouleau à offrir une telle gestion active (une fonction souvent réservée aux modèles à serpillières).

Le Z60 est doté d’un double réservoir qui permet l’utilisation de détergents adaptés selon les besoins : enzymatique pour les salissures organiques (liées aux animaux ou à la nourriture), ou dégraissant plus classique pour l’entretien quotidien. Le dosage est géré automatiquement via l’application mobile.

Aspiration puissante

Avec une puissance annoncée de 28 000 Pa, le robot surpasse les valeurs habituelles du marché (généralement autour de 22 000 Pa). Sa brosse DuoBrush, mélange de caoutchouc et de poils, est conçue pour limiter les enchevêtrements, notamment avec les poils d’animaux. Côté déplacement, le châssis ajustable et le système de « jambes robotiques » (voir image ci-dessous) permettent de franchir des obstacles allant jusqu’à 8 cm, ce qui reste rare dans cette catégorie.

Navigation et nettoyage en bordure

Le capteur LiDAR LDS est rétractable : le robot peut ainsi passer sous les meubles bas (jusqu’à 96 mm de hauteur), avant de se redresser pour cartographier l’espace. Le positionnement avancé de la brosse latérale et du rouleau permet également un nettoyage efficace jusqu’au bord des murs, un point souvent négligé par d’autres modèles.

En synthèse

Avec le Z60 Ultra Roller Complete, MOVA ne cherche pas à réinventer la roue, mais plutôt à pousser une technologie existante à son plein potentiel. L’approche semble méthodique : lavage plus propre, navigation soignée et franchissement pensé pour les environnements complexes. Il reste à voir ce que cela donnera à l’usage et à quel prix. Mais sur le papier, le Z60 a de quoi séduire ceux qui cherchent une alternative plus aboutie aux serpillières rotatives classiques.

Arrêtez tout, voici un outil une image Docker que vous devez absolument avoir sur votre NAS : OmniTools. Il s’agit d’un véritable couteau suisse. En effet, OmniTools propose une panoplie d’outils en ligne pour faciliter les tâches du quotidien. Qu’il s’agisse de coder, d’éditer des images ou vidéos, de manipuler des PDF ou de traiter des données, tout se fait localement… sur votre NAS, aucune donnée ne quitte votre appareil.

OmniTools

C’est Korben qui en parlait récemment sur son blog et j’avoue que c’est une belle découverte. Comme il indique : « j’adore les petits outils pratiques, mais j’en ai marre de devoir uploader mes fichiers sur des services tiers ». En effet, OmniTools peut s’installer sur n’importe quelle machine compatible Docker : NAS, Raspberry Pi, mini PC, etc.

NAS Synology

Pour vous simplifier la vie, je vous ai préparé un fichier Docker Compose compatible avec la plupart des NAS Synology. Il est basé sur le fichier officiel (lien ici) et vous permet d’installer OmniTools en quelques minutes.

Prérequis :

• Avoir installé Container Manager depuis le Centre de paquets de Synology
• Créer un dossier OmniTools dans le répertoire docker à la racine de votre NAS.

Je vous propose de télécharger le fichier Docker Compose qui se nomme compose.yaml généré grâce à Container Manager de Synology. Voici ce qu’il contient :

services:
  omni-tools:
    image: iib0011/omni-tools:latest
    container_name: omni-tools
    restart: unless-stopped
    ports:
      - "8086:80"

Étapes d’installation

1. Placez le fichier compose.yaml dans le dossier OmniTools
2. Ouvrez Container Manager et naviguez vers le menu « Projets » dans la barre latérale
3. Cliquez sur le bouton Créer, renseignez les champs demandés (voir capture ci-dessous), puis cliquez sur Suivant
4. Continuez avec Suivant et enfin Effectué
5. Patientez 1 à 2 minutes…

C’est fini !

Utilisation

Une fois l’installation terminée, ouvrez votre navigateur et accédez à OmniTools via l’une des adresses suivantes :

• http://NomDuNAS:8086/
• http://AdresseIP:8086/

L’interface est en anglais par défaut, mais peut être basculée en français dans les paramètres (en haut). Vous pouvez ensuite parcourir les différents outils ou utiliser la recherche intégrée pour trouver ce dont vous avez besoin.

En synthèse

Leur slogan : « Boostez votre productivité avec OmniTools, la boîte à outils ultime pour accélérer vos tâches ! Accédez à des milliers d’utilitaires conviviaux pour modifier des images, du texte, des listes et des données, directement depuis votre navigateur ».

Un outil discret, rapide, complet… et 100 % local. Je recommande !

Are Chinese DIY NAS Devices Worth Your Time, Money, and Data?

Over the last 2 years, I have discussed at length multiple different Chinese-built NAS solutions in one form or another. From DIY NAS motherboards from brands like Topton and CWWK to pre-built solutions arriving both with and without NAS software from brands like Ugreen, Terramaster, Aoostar, and more. Thanks to the miniaturisation and power efficiency improvements in a multitude of different kinds of PC hardware, a lot of brands originally developing mini PCs, tablets, and laptops have started including developments towards NAS systems in their portfolios. Some brands, like Ugreen and Terramaster, have gone into this with significantly more energy than others, including and further developing their very own NAS software that is included with the hardware. But regardless of whether you are looking at a Chinese DIY NAS that does or does not include its software, it still raises the question of whether these solutions are worth your time and money. Are they as reliable as some of the long-established players providing solutions from Taiwan or the US? Can you trust it with your data? Let’s discuss.

Chinese NAS Brands That I Recommend

These are the brands I would personally recommend if you are considering a China-based NAS brand. These are 6 brands that I have used many of their products (NAS and others) that I have found the best experiences with, as well as, on balance,e the best online support and communication. No brand is perfect, and look hard enough and you will find good and bad on any brand, really, but these are six examples of brands that stand out from the others.

Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their Own Store	Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store
Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store	Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store
Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store	Buy Here on Amazon

---

The TL;DR – Are Chinese DIY NAS Devices Worth It?

• Chinese NAS popularity is rising due to affordability, broader hardware variety, and greater accessibility in Asia.

• Brands like Ugreen and Terramaster have built their own NAS software, adding credibility to their name in the eyes of consumers and long-term support potential that a lot of other options seem to tangebly lack.

• Mini PC brands (e.g., Minisforum, GMKTec) are repurposing their platforms into NAS devices, leveraging existing consumer trust.

• Many Chinese NAS systems are hardware-only, allowing users to install platforms like TrueNAS or UnRAID.

• DIY-friendly: Chinese NAS devices often support third-party OS installs without voiding warranty—unlike many Western brands.

• Hardware value: You can expect up to 25–30% lower prices compared to similar US/Taiwan/Japan-made systems.

• Tech culture: China has a more tech-literate consumer market, visible in high street and airport advertising.

• Security concerns exist, largely due to past incidents of spyware or malware embedded in hardware from some Chinese vendors.

• Using trusted open-source OS platforms can reduce risks—but can’t fully eliminate them if vulnerabilities are in firmware/hardware.

• Not all Chinese brands are equal—research brand background, online presence, and operational transparency.

• Some no-name brands just rebrand OEM hardware (e.g., from CWWK), but offer poor support and minimal warranty backing.

Support issues include:

• No regional presence

• Language/cultural barriers

• Long RMA turnaround

• Tax/import delays for returns

Brands with better reputations for support include: CWWK, Jonsbo, and Terramaster.
Be wary of AliExpress-only brands with no official website or global support—these often lack accountability.

Ultimately: Yes, you can buy a NAS from China—just stick to reputable brands, do your research, and stay security-conscious.

$169 n150 4x M.2 NVMe SSD NAS – The GMKTek G9

---

Why Have Chinese NAS Systems Rapidly Grown in Popularity?

The easy answer to this would be to say that they tend to be a lot cheaper than NAS products that are built in the US, Europe, or surrounding Eastern countries like Taiwan or Japan. Indeed, that is true, and you tend to find that NAS systems made in China are typically offered at great value price points and hardware value compared to anywhere else in the world. However, the popularity of Chinese NAS systems is actually a little bit more nuanced and about a lot more than simply money.

The UGREEN DXP NASync Series Now Globally Available

For a start, some of the brands that are currently moving into providing their own network-attached storage solutions are brands that already had a well-established presence in homes and offices around the globe for other peripherals. A great example of this would be Ugreen. Ugreen has provided accessories for PCs, power adaptors, and portable docking stations for quite a few years and is probably one of the most recognisable names for this kind of technology from China around the world.

The Aoostar WTR N305 4 Bay NAS Drive

Therefore, in early 2024, when the brand announced it was entering the world of NAS in the Western world, the brand already had a fairly solid and well-documented audience in place. That is likely why the brand, although still pretty good value, is actually slightly more expensive than the majority of other Chinese NAS brands.

The Terramaster F6-424 Max NAS – 2x 10GbE, 2x Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe & Intel i5 CPU

Alternatively, you have brands like Terramaster, who have been in the network-attached storage industry for over half as long as the likes of QNAP and Synology, and during that time have built up a fairly solid audience base long before the arguably heavy influx of smaller, lesser-known brands entering the world of NAS from China.

The Terramaster F6-424 Max NAS – 2x 10GbE, 2x Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe & Intel i5 CPU

Chiefly purchased for its hardware until now, Terramaster is a brand that has a fairly comprehensive and well-detailed software platform in TOS. Of course, both of these brands provide much better value for money than alternatives in the market from other countries, but in a lot of cases, people are purchasing these solutions for more than just the bottom-line price.

The Lincplus Lincstation N1 & N2 4x M.2 and 10GbE NAS

Alternatively, there is the now heavily saturated market of mini PC vendors who have modified a lot of their existing production and systems to now leverage towards storage. In many cases, some of these brands—such as Minisforum and GMKTec—already have a healthy relationship with consumers thanks to their mini PCs, and that brand awareness has clearly transferred over to NAS products.

The Minisforum N5 Pro NAS – AMD i9 HX370 / ECC Memory / 10+5GbE / 5 SATA and 3 M.2 NVMe

The other thing that makes these Chinese NAS products very appealing to new and even old NAS buyers is that a lot of them arrive without software included. This allows users to get just the hardware at a lower price and then go ahead and install software such as TrueNAS or UnRAID, because they want to take advantage of those more flexible (if slightly more intimidating) platforms. The majority of NAS products that arrive from other countries tend to arrive with their own NAS software included and, more often than not, do not allow the warranty to continue being supported if you install a third-party operating system. Whereas practically all NAS products that are developed in China tend to allow you to use third-party operating systems—even when they include their own OS (again, see Terramaster and Ugreen).

---

What Are the Benefits of Chinese NAS Systems?

Ultimately—and it’s kind of a shame that this is the headline here—but it is, of course, that NAS systems from China will generally give you much better hardware at a lower price tag. That isn’t to say that these systems are always going to be universally the lowest price, but it is simply that the average price tag of the system configuration and hardware, compared across multiple regions, will generally always end in the product being cheaper when it is manufactured in China.

UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS – 10GbEx2, Intel i5 CPU, Gen 4×4 NVMe

More often than not, whether you’re looking at a fairly modest entry-level Intel Celeron / Intel Alder Lake / Intel Twin Lake-based NAS system or scaling it up all the way towards Intel Core and AMD Ryzen systems, you will tend to find that NAS solutions built in China are as much as 25 to 30% lower in price than those made in the rest of the world.

The UnifyDrive UP6 6x NM.2 NVMe SSD Portable NAS

I guess you could also add that if you are based in the Eastern part of the world, there are also tremendous benefits to these solutions being so readily available and accessible. Indeed, on a recent trip to Shenzhen, I noticed how there were significantly more DIY NAS solutions available on the high street and in the tech malls than anywhere else in the world. A big part of this is that the general average standard understanding of tech hardware is higher out there than in a lot of Western regions. That isn’t to say that we don’t have a tremendously high volume of users who understand this kind of technology in the US and Europe, but the way it is framed to the consumer is notably different.

So, for example, if you walk around an airport in China, Hong Kong, or Taiwan, you will often see advertisements of a pretty technical nature with regard to CPUs and graphics cards on the back of trolleys, billboards, and on the sides of public vehicles. Whereas in America and Europe—although this is still not completely absent—adverts are much more focused on the end product, such as phones, tablets, laptops, and domestic client hardware.

---

Why Are People So Concerned About Chinese NAS System Security?

It is a pretty bloody valid concern! In recent years, tensions between large countries with regards to trade have been on the rise—one of the biggest being the US–China trade war, which, although it has ebbed and flowed over the last seven or eight years, is actually something that has existed for a few decades now. It largely boils down to the import and export of this kind of technology. However, the breaking point came when several Chinese products were found to contain spyware and malware that was hard-baked into the hardware and allowed for remote collection of user data. Numerous brands were implicated, and the fact that there is a degree of ambiguity between numerous Chinese brands in the eyes of the world—regarding how many of them cross over at the point of manufacture and how many of them are on the same production line filtering toward various brands—all added up to increased tensions and, eventually, several companies and organisations being barred from sale in the US.

Source – https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366622023/NCSC-issues-warning-over-Chinese-Moonshine-and-BadBazaar-spyware/

How much this has been respected by certain Chinese players in the past—I am not going to blanket-tarnish all Chinese brands with this, as that would be both unfair and hugely incorrect. Nevertheless, a small group of bad apples has certainly soured the mood for many when it comes to purchasing Chinese NAS products in terms of security, especially when it is noted that these systems will be on 24/7, contain all of your data, and, in many cases, are directly or indirectly connected to the internet depending on your own personal setup.

Source: https://www.security.com/threat-intelligence/us-china-espionage/

This is one of the main reasons why a lot of users will purchase a Chinese NAS product specifically if it does not arrive with any kind of included operating system. A lot of users would rather trust established and Western-orientated NAS brands such as TrueNAS and UnRAID, as these have a proven track record of firmware updates and security tools, but also have recognised vulnerability and security disclosure programs that they work with to be held accountable in the event of any security incident being recognised. Nevertheless, on numerous occasions, it has been noted that security vulnerabilities—and the aforementioned spyware, when it has been recognised—have been hard-baked into the hardware components and physical controllers, which means that regardless of the NAS software you use, some of these devices still have the potential to contain security vulnerabilities.

Now, playing devil’s advocate, it could actually be possible for any hardware manufacturer in any country in the world to implement these kinds of security breach methodologies into their hardware. When you really break it down, the architecture of a NAS device—regardless of where it is built in the world—is going to be largely similar to that of a standard PC, and therefore the opportunities for exploitation and manipulation are still going to be on the table. Nevertheless, although it has been recognised that different regions of the world have had their own bad actors who have introduced vulnerable devices into the market unbeknownst to end users, there is still no avoiding that the lion’s share of the manufacturers found culpable for this have been based in China.

However, we also have to be slightly reasonable in that, given the larger share of hardware that is manufactured and distributed from China, then statistically, they are always going to have the larger number of incidents. The propaganda machine of numerous nations will always be at play to present a particular picture of the safety of imported devices, but all that aside, it does still seem that—despite instances of systems with inbuilt vulnerabilities decreasing all the time—they do crop up more frequently in products made in China than anywhere else in the world.

Here – https://www.tomshardware.com/desktops/mini-pcs/mini-pc-maker-ships-systems-with-factory-installed-spyware-acemagic-says-issue-was-contained-to-the-first-shipment/

Should this be a reason to completely disregard purchasing a NAS solution from China? No, I don’t think so. I think it is a good reason to investigate the brand or organisation that you’re choosing to purchase from. I think it is a good reason to investigate how long a company has been in operation and to find out more about their offices and operations before making a purchase. And I do think it is all the more reason why organisations should not automatically assume that any piece of hardware from anywhere in the world is automatically the most secure out of the box, and should be implementing their own firewalls, VPNs, authentication methods, and security protocols regardless.

---

Remote Accessing My Chinese NAS – Alternatives to the Host OS

If you’re hesitant to use the default remote access features provided by your Chinese-made NAS due to privacy, transparency, or security concerns, you’re not alone—and thankfully, there are much safer and more trusted options available.

One of the most popular and user-friendly tools in this space is Tailscale, a modern mesh VPN built on WireGuard. Tailscale allows you to securely access your NAS (or any other device on your network) from anywhere in the world—without the need for risky port forwarding, dynamic DNS, or vendor cloud logins. With just a few clicks, you can create a private, end-to-end encrypted network between your NAS, phone, tablet, and computers, all managed via a clean web dashboard. It works across firewalls, NAT, and even CGNAT (carrier-grade NAT), which makes it ideal for less technical users looking for peace of mind when accessing their files remotely.

For those who want more customization or are working in slightly more advanced environments, there are other powerful self-hosted or cloud-assisted VPN solutions worth considering. Tools like ZeroTier allow for flexible, programmable virtual networks with global peer-to-peer routing. Meanwhile, OpenVPN and WireGuard (standalone) offer rock-solid, time-tested security for users comfortable with deploying and managing their own VPN servers. These services can be installed directly on your NAS or hosted on another home server or Raspberry Pi on the same network, offering complete control over who gets access and how. If you’re running TrueNAS, UnRAID, or even Debian/Ubuntu-based DIY NAS software, many of these can be installed natively or through Docker containers. This means you can completely bypass the vendor-supplied cloud services, eliminating a major attack surface while retaining secure access from anywhere.

Here are some of the most reliable and widely recommended remote access alternatives:

• Tailscale – Simple, secure mesh VPN using WireGuard; ideal for non-technical users

• ZeroTier – Virtual network overlay with programmable access control and P2P routing

• WireGuard (standalone) – Lightweight, fast, and secure VPN for advanced users

• OpenVPN – A well-established, highly configurable VPN solution

• Dockerized Access Tools – Solutions like Headscale (Tailscale self-hosted), PiVPN, or Cloudflare Tunnel

• Cloudflare Tunnel (Argo Tunnel) – Secure reverse proxy with public access protection

• FRP (Fast Reverse Proxy) – Lightweight self-hosted tunnel service often used in Chinese networks

• Syncthing – Peer-to-peer file sync tool for remote file access without VPN (for specific folders)

Using any of these tools, you can confidently disable or ignore the default remote access features provided by your NAS vendor and instead implement a hardened, trusted, and fully auditable solution. In doing so, you’re minimizing potential exposure, maintaining privacy, and ensuring that your remote access setup is under your control—not in the hands of a third-party vendor.

---

Should Users Be Concerned About Support?

Alongside the ever-present concerns around security, the other big issue that users tend to mention about purchasing Chinese NAS products is to do with support. It’s not unusual for a product or solution that you purchase in the market to not have a local or regional office that you can talk to in the event of hardware faults or software difficulties. Just because a product is manufactured in China doesn’t mean it’s the only one that suffers from the geographical hurdles of purchasing a system built in a completely different country than your own.

For example, there are plenty of American manufacturers that do not have any regional offices in Europe, and most support is provided remotely. In those cases, what puts support for products made in China into a different category for many is:

1. Language and cultural differences in communication between end users and the brand, and

2. The logistical difficulties of replacing a malfunctioning device with a replacement or repair.

Most of us are quite familiar with—and are happy to accept—that issues occur in the day-to-day operations of most large-scale mass manufacturing production lines. Even high production lines with a 0.01% failure rate, once you break into the million units, are still going to result in a handful of users who might receive a unit that is less than fully operational. But alongside the delays of swapping a bad device for a good one, other hurdles such as time zone differences and potential tax issues upon devices travelling internationally need to be considered. Many of these issues are not any one country’s fault and are just part and parcel of global trade that’s ever-present in any technology. However, it is how certain Chinese brands negotiate these many hurdles when selling goods to the US and Europe that very quickly sets apart the good organisations from the bad ones.

In my years reviewing and installing different Chinese NAS solutions, some brands have definitely stood out more than others in terms of their support. For example, in the past 2 years, I have heard significantly more positive warranty/repair threads for CWWK, Jonsbo, and Terramaster than I have for brands like GMKtec, B-Link, or pretty much any brand that only seems to exist on AliExpress and Alibaba but has practically no in-house website or Western presence. That isn’t to say that those first few companies I mentioned have a 100% success rate—definitely not. Some simple Googling will always find you both good and bad instances. However, broadly, I’ve had better feedback from people I have provided support for and from numerous NAS subreddits for those brands than I have for some of the lesser-known and far more isolated organisations.

Another point to highlight is that some of the lesser-known brands are simply reusing existing designs and hardware architecture provided by an original manufacturer and relabelling it as their own. For example, CWWK manufactures a large amount of the hardware solutions you may see in the market, but it just so happens that they are sold to contractors and lesser-known providers who then apply their own manufacturer’s badge.

Where this becomes a problem with support is that if you encounter an issue with your hardware, the relabelled and rebadged name that’s been applied to that CWWK product can only provide limited support and even weaker hardware repair, as they are heavily reliant on the original manufacturer and their own production lines.

In these cases, I once again heavily recommend that if you are going to purchase any Chinese NAS product, that you go to the source. And circling back to the issue of security I mentioned earlier on, you tend to find that when spyware has been found on some hardware systems, it has been due to software that was applied to the hardware after it left the original manufacturer—more often than not, applied within an .exe found autoloading in the included copy of Windows.

So once again, double-check that the brand you’re talking to is the original manufacturer before you purchase a Chinese NAS solution, and double-check that they have some kind of Western presence first. It may seem almost obvious and naïve to say this, but ultimately, a lot of these organisations operate on tremendously thin profit margins. This means that the cost of manpower and hiring sufficiently skilled people to create these Western websites and English-understood points of sale is often left by the wayside by the less scrupulous organisations, as they simply do not have a clear enough print-to-profit or long-term strategy to provide solutions they can trust in order to engage with this.

Should I Buy a NAS from China?

The short answer? Yes, I think you can. You should be as security-aware as (frankly) you should be with any NAS product—as any 24/7 data storage solution is only one vulnerability away from being compromised. But as long as you know the risks and understand that support is not going to be as “next day” as it would be if you purchased a local product, I do genuinely think that you are okay to buy a Chinese NAS solution from the more well-known and reputable brands in the market. If the brand doesn’t have much of an online presence outside of China—even doesn’t really have much of its own website outside of AliExpress, Amazon, or Alibaba—avoid them like the plague! Because those brands that aren’t prepared to make even the token effort to have much of an online presence outside of a retail website have certainly not got the profit margin to provide any kind of meaningful support and are more likely to cut corners. Worse still, it is those organisations that have such slim profit margins that are almost certainly going to be the ones that may be more susceptible to influence in installing exploitative or malware software components on their systems for an additional backhand payment.

Chinese NAS Brands That I Recommend

These are the brands I would personally recommend if you are considering a China-based NAS brand. These are 6 brands that I have used many of their products (NAS and others) that I have found the best experiences with, as well as, on balance,e the best online support and communication. No brand is perfect, and look hard enough and you will find good and bad on any brand, really, but these are six examples of brands that stand out from the others.

Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their Own Store	Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store
Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store	Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store
Buy Here on Amazon – Visit Their AliExpress Store	Buy Here on Amazon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Synology Hard Drives and SSD Comparison with Seagate/WD/Toshiba and More – Deal Breaker?

In recent years, Synology has steadily moved toward a more vertically integrated hardware ecosystem, and the arrival of the 2025 generation of NAS systems marks a significant escalation in that approach. With a much stricter verification process for compatible storage media—covering both hard drives and SSDs—Synology now appears to heavily prioritize its own branded storage. This shift has sparked widespread debate across the NAS community, particularly as many long-time users of Seagate IronWolf, WD Red, and Toshiba NAS drives find themselves increasingly locked out of certain key features like RAID expansion, hot spare assignment, and recovery operations unless using “verified” drives. What’s more, while some of Synology’s media are rebranded and firmware-modified versions of familiar drives from Seagate and Toshiba, the pricing and compatibility limitations often leave users puzzled—and frustrated.

Want to Support What We Do? Use the Links Below to Buy your NAS and/or HDD and SSD Media. Clicking these links will result in a small commission for anything you purchase, heading to me and Eddie @NASCompares and allows us to keep doing this! It’s just us two here and between this and ads, it’s the most passive way to keep us sailing! Thanks

Synology NAS and Media on Amazon – HERE Synology Products on B&H – HERE Seagate Ironwolf Media on Amazon – HERE WD Red Media on Amazon – HERE Seagate Products on B&H – HERE WD Products on B&H – HERE

In response to growing user concern, we conducted a comparison of Synology’s drive lineup against the current offerings from Seagate, WD, and Kingston—analyzing each in terms of price per terabyte, real-world performance, durability specifications, and availability. Drawing from direct benchmarking, manufacturer datasheets, and controlled NAS testing environments, this article aims to answer a key question: is Synology’s branded media actually worth the premium? While some users may welcome the simplicity of a one-brand ecosystem, others are understandably wary of higher costs, limited SKU availability, and the potential long-term implications of vendor lock-in. Let’s break down what Synology drives really offer—and where they fall short—compared to the tried and tested alternatives on the market.

Synology Hard Drives and SSDs – What Drives Are There to Buy?

Synology’s storage media catalog is divided across value, prosumer, enterprise SATA, and SAS hard drives, alongside both SATA and NVMe SSDs. While these drives carry the Synology name and firmware, they are not designed or manufactured in-house. Instead, Synology rebrands OEM hardware from established vendors: Toshiba for the enterprise SATA and SAS drives, Seagate for the value-tier NAS HDDs, and Phison-based platforms for SSDs. The internal firmware is customized by Synology to integrate tightly with DSM, and in some cases, to restrict compatibility to only their branded drives within the latest 2025 NAS systems.

The naming scheme makes it easier to distinguish between drive classes:

• HAT for SATA NAS hard drives

• HAS for SAS enterprise drives

• SAT for SATA SSDs

• SNV for NVMe SSDs

This segmentation aims to help users align their hardware with expected durability (e.g. workload in TB/year), power loss protection, and RAID integration. However, it’s worth noting that several of these drives are virtually identical to third-party counterparts—particularly in the HAT3300 and HAT3310 lines, which closely mirror Seagate IronWolf models down to mechanical structure and spec. Despite this, third-party versions of those drives remain incompatible with key RAID features on the latest Synology systems unless they are officially “verified.”

---

Synology NAS HDDs – HAT Series (SATA)

---

Synology SAS HDDs – HAS Series

---

Synology SATA SSDs – SAT Series

---

Synology NVMe SSDs – SNV Series

---

While Synology’s branding suggests ecosystem cohesion, it’s essential to recognize that their drive firmware is not engineered for general-purpose systems. These drives are optimized—and in some cases restricted—for Synology NAS environments. However, performance benchmarks show that Synology drives often perform equivalently or slightly below their third-party counterparts in synthetic and real-world tests. Moreover, price comparisons reveal a 5–15% markup on average in the value tier, and significantly higher deltas—often exceeding 30–40%—in the enterprise-class and SSD segments. Combined with regional supply inconsistencies and limited SKU availability, the value proposition of Synology-branded drives remains hotly debated, especially when identical hardware from Seagate or Toshiba can be purchased for less—if only the 2025 NAS series would support them natively.

Synology Hard Drives and SSDs vs Seagate, WD, etc – Price per TB and Value

When it comes to entry-level NAS hard drives, the price differences between Synology’s HAT3300 and HAT3310 series and their third-party equivalents—such as Seagate IronWolf and WD Red Plus—are generally modest. In most cases, the cost per terabyte (TB) stays within a 0% to 15% margin, with Synology’s versions sitting slightly higher. For casual or home users who just want a drive that “just works” out of the box and benefits from firmware-level integration with DSM, that small premium might feel justifiable.

But the story changes dramatically as we move into prosumer and enterprise territory. Drives like the Synology HAT5300 and HAS5300 series can cost 40%–50% more than Seagate IronWolf Pro, WD Red Pro, or Seagate Exos alternatives—despite sharing the same mechanical internals in many cases. These aren’t just marginal differences; when you’re building a multi-drive RAID array with 12TB or 16TB drives, that pricing gap quickly snowballs into hundreds or even thousands of dollars extra. And this is particularly frustrating when, for example, Synology’s 12TB HAT5300 (built on Toshiba hardware) costs nearly double what a comparable IronWolf Pro sells for, despite similar endurance ratings and warranty terms.

---

Entry-Level NAS HDDs – Synology vs Seagate & WD

---

Prosumer NAS HDDs – Synology vs Seagate & WD

---

Enterprise SAS HDDs – Synology vs Seagate Exos

---

Enterprise SATA SSDs – Synology vs Kingston

---

NVMe SSDs – Synology vs WD Red SN700

In short, while Synology’s drives are built on reputable platforms and do offer advantages like verified DSM integration and predictable firmware behavior, the value proposition becomes questionable—especially in higher capacities and enterprise deployments. For many users, especially SMBs and home power users deploying multi-drive setups, that extra 40–50% markup can be hard to justify. When the mechanical hardware is near-identical and the only major differentiator is firmware control, it’s no wonder many are pushing back against this pricing structure.)

SYNOLOGY DSM Storage Manager Benchmarks (1st and 3rd Party Drive Media)

Zoom in to see the results. IMPORTANT that you keep in mind that these SSDs and HDDs are different capacities and therefore direct comparison and correlation between their performance is not fair – I include these because I think it is important to compare the general gist of using Synology HDD media in a system and then alternatives, but measured with Synology’s in-system tools. Larger capacities mostly tend to yeald better results in any brand of drive (not a ‘do-or-die’ rule, but generally true).

SYNOLOGY HAT3300 HDD	Seagate Ironwolf HDD
SYNOLOGY HAT5300 HDD	Seagate EXOS HDD
SYNOLOGY SAT5200 SSD	Kingston DC600 SATA SSD
SYNOLOGY M.2 NVMe SSD	TeamGroup T-Create Gen3 M.2 SSD

Synology Hard Drives and SSDs vs Seagate, WD, etc – Performance

IMPORTANT – In the process of upscaling the test result images (as there is a lot crammed in, so I have included the slightly blurred ones here) but I and will replace these with upscaled versions as soon as possible.

When it comes to performance, Synology’s hard drives and SSDs generally stay within expected ranges for their class—but with some caveats. Most of their HDDs mirror the performance of the OEM drives they’re based on, particularly in the HAT3300 and HAT3310 lines, which perform nearly identically to WD Red Plus and Seagate IronWolf models. You’re looking at familiar specs here: 5400–7200 RPM spin speeds, ~200–280MB/s sequential transfer rates, and ~180TB/yr workload ratings. That’s no surprise, considering these are essentially Seagate or Toshiba drives with Synology firmware and branding. Where things start to scale up, like in the HAT5300 and HAS5300 series, the specs remain on par with their higher-end third-party equivalents. These drives offer 550TB/year workloads, 7200 RPM motors, and MTBF figures around 2.5 million hours—just like IronWolf Pro, WD Red Pro, or Seagate Exos. But Synology currently tops out at 20TB in both SATA and SAS drives, while the competition is already pushing 22TB, 24TB, and even 26TB models. So, if you’re planning a high-capacity build, Synology might already be limiting your options on sheer scale alone.

---

NAS HDDs – Capacity, Performance, Endurance & Class Comparison

---

Performance parity continues with Synology’s SATA SSDs. The SAT5221 and SAT5210 series are very close in spec to Kingston’s DC600M drives, offering similar read/write speeds, IOPS performance, and endurance levels. The SAT5210 even pushes into ultra-DWPD territory, boasting up to 10,000 TBW and higher daily write thresholds, which is competitive in the enterprise space. If you need high write endurance and steady power loss protection, these drives tick the right boxes.

The gap, however, opens up in the NVMe tier. Synology’s SNV3400 and SNV3500 drives fall short compared to third-party NVMe SSDs like the WD Red SN700. While Synology focuses on endurance, PLP (power loss protection), and integration with DSM caching features, the performance ceiling on these drives is noticeably lower—both in terms of sequential throughput and IOPS. Capacities also top out at 800GB, while others offer 1TB and beyond with faster read/write performance. So if you’re after speed or larger NVMe caching pools, Synology’s current options may feel behind the curve.

---

SATA & NVMe SSDs – Synology vs Kingston

---

In short, Synology’s drives generally deliver solid, reliable performance that matches their third-party foundations—but the benefits of full DSM compatibility come with a trade-off. While the SATA range holds its ground, the NVMe lineup is due for an update if Synology wants to stay competitive against higher-capacity, higher-speed SSDs now widely available elsewhere. If performance is your main concern, particularly for NVMe caching or flash-heavy tasks, third-party options may be a better fit unless full integration is a must-have.

Synology Hard Drives and SSDs Guide – The Good and the Bad

In reviewing Synology’s lineup of hard drives and SSDs, it’s clear that the hardware itself is solid—built on trusted OEM foundations and tuned to work seamlessly within DSM environments. From a compatibility and reliability standpoint, these drives do offer advantages, particularly for users who want an integrated, no-hassle deployment. That said, these benefits come with notable trade-offs. In many cases, Synology’s drives are mechanically identical to models from Seagate, Toshiba, or Phison, yet priced significantly higher—especially in the enterprise and NVMe tiers. While some of that premium may be justified by firmware-level integration, PLP, or simplified support paths, the cost disparity is hard to ignore for experienced users already comfortable with third-party hardware.

Ultimately, the decision to adopt Synology-branded drives will depend on your priorities. If you’re building a system where out-of-the-box compatibility, long-term support, and unified ecosystem control are paramount, Synology’s media may be a safe bet—albeit at a higher packaged price. But if your focus is on maximizing performance per dollar, scaling capacity, or customizing your setup beyond Synology’s verified list, third-party alternatives remain the more flexible and cost-effective choice. Until Synology expands their verified media list and adjusts regional pricing or availability, many users will continue to see these drives not as a value-add, but as an imposed requirement.

Want to Support What We Do? Use the Links Below to Buy your NAS and/or HDD and SSD Media. Clicking these links will result in a small commission for anything you purchase, heading to me and Eddie @NASCompares and allows us to keep doing this! It’s just us two here and between this and ads, it’s the most passive way to keep us sailing! Thanks

Synology NAS and Media on Amazon – HERE Synology Products on B&H – HERE Seagate Ironwolf Media on Amazon – HERE WD Red Media on Amazon – HERE Seagate Products on B&H – HERE WD Products on B&H – HERE

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

En juillet 2009, j’achetai un nom de domaine sans trop savoir ce que j’allais en faire. Au départ, c’était juste un petit coin du web pour partager des photos avec la famille et les amis. Et puis les choses ont changé… J’ai commencé à publier des tutos, d’abord très simples, parfois juste des pense-bêtes techniques. Très vite, c’est devenu un vrai site, avec des guides, des tests, des actus… j’ai toujours été animé par la passion.

Pour ceux qui se posent encore la question, CACHEM, c’est un clin d’œil très personnel : CAroline, CHloé et EMma. Trois prénoms qui comptent énormément. Ce projet, je l’ai porté seul, mais je ne l’ai jamais vécu seul. Il y a toujours eu autour de moi du soutien, des gens qui m’ont laissé le temps (et parfois l’espace) de m’y consacrer. Ce site, je le dois aussi à eux.

Et puis il y a ce logo, les trois croissants… Il  s’agit d’un clin d’œil à Diane de Poitiers et à la ville dont je suis originaire. Une référence discrète, mais assumée, comme un fil qui me rattache à mes racines.

Ce que ça m’a appris (et pourquoi je continue)

Je ne vais pas réécrire l’histoire… les premiers contenus étaient loin d’être parfaits. Je n’en suis pas toujours très fier, mais c’était un début… et c’était sincère. J’ai appris en faisant, comme beaucoup. J’ai testé, corrigé, recommencé. Le blog a grandi avec moi, sans plan marketing, sans stratégie de contenu, juste avec l’envie de partager ce que j’apprenais.

Le cœur de Cachem, ça a toujours été le stockage et surtout les NAS. Ce sujet m’a accroché très tôt et je m’y suis accroché aussi. L’explosion des données personnelles, la sécurité, la sauvegarde. C’est devenu un vrai besoin pour beaucoup et je crois que Cachem a trouvé sa place en aidant les gens à s’y retrouver, simplement, sans jargon inutile. Tester un NAS, expliquer une configuration réseau, recommander une bonne solution de sauvegarde, etc.

J’ai aussi tenté d’autres formats (vidéos, webinaires)… J’y reviens parfois, j’y renonce aussi. Par manque de temps, souvent, mais jamais par désintérêt. Ce site n’a jamais eu d’autre ambition que d’être utile. Et quand j’ai le sentiment que c’est le cas, ça me suffit.

Ce que je retiens après 16 ans ? Que le contenu a grandi avec moi. Que la communauté qui lit, commente, pose des questions, corrige aussi parfois, est précieuse. Le Forum des NAS vit maintenant sa vie, j’y passe de moins en moins de temps… la communauté ne cesse de grandir. Que le monde du stockage évolue sans cesse, mais que certains fondamentaux (comme la confiance et l’indépendance) ne changent pas.

Et après ?

Je ne sais pas à quoi ressemblera Cachem dans un an. Peut-être que j’aurai le temps de refaire des vidéos, je ne sais pas quel rythme (et surtout le temps) que je pourrai y consacrer. Peut-être que j’écrirai moins…. ou plus. Ce que je sais, c’est que tant que j’en aurai l’envie, je continuerai… sans pression.

Alors merci à vous. À ceux qui me lisent depuis le début, à ceux qui viennent de découvrir le site, à ceux qui posent des questions, qui partagent un article, qui m’envoient un message. Ce site existe grâce à vous. Et franchement, 16 ans plus tard… c’est quand même fou.

Un vaste coup de filet mené par la police italienne, avec le soutien de la France, de la Roumanie et d’Europol, a permis de démanteler le groupe criminel derrière un rançongiciel touchant les NAS Synology…

Menace sur les NAS Synology

Depuis 2021, le gang opérait sous différents noms « DiskStation Security », « Quick Security », « LegendaryDisk Security », ou encore « Umbrella Security  ». Leur objectif : infiltrer des NAS mal sécurisés exposés sur Internet. Les méthodes utilisées incluaient :

• Attaques par force brute ;
• Exploitation de failles connues ou 0-day.

Conséquences très lourdes

Les cibles étaient principalement des PME, des ONG ou des sociétés du secteur événementiel. Une fois les NAS chiffrés, les criminels exigeaient des rançons en cryptomonnaie pouvant atteindre plusieurs centaines de milliers de dollars. Sans paiement, les données restaient inaccessibles, paralysant totalement l’activité.

Enquête et arrestations en Roumanie

L’enquête, dirigée par le parquet de Milan, s’est appuyée sur des spécialistes en criminologie numérique et d’analyste de blockchain. En juin 2024, une opération conjointe a permis d’arrêter plusieurs suspects lors de perquisitions à Bucarest.

Une réseau bien structuré

Le groupe était organisé en cellules distinctes :

• Intrusion et compromission ;
• Chiffrement et déploiement des rançons ;
• Blanchiment des paiements en cryptomonnaies.

Le principal suspect, un Roumain de 44 ans, est aujourd’hui en détention provisoire à Milan. Il est poursuivi pour accès illégal à un système informatique et extorsion.

Une coopération européenne décisive

Baptisée opération Elicius, cette intervention est un exemple concret de la coopération transfrontalière. L’Italie, la France, la Roumanie et Europol ont mutualisé leurs compétence. Ce type de collaboration devient indispensable face à des cybermenaces de plus en plus sophistiquées.

L’opération a été tenue secrète (jusqu’à présent) pour des raisons stratégiques. Les autorités ont attendu la consolidation des preuves et la mise en détention des principaux suspects avant toute communication. La révélation intervient aujourd’hui, car le procès serait en préparation.

Conseils pour sécuriser un NAS Synology

On a cesse de vous le rappeler, les NAS sont devenus des cibles fréquentes en raison de leur accessibilité depuis Internet et de leur mauvaise configuration. Pour rappel, quelques bonnes pratiques :

• Mettre à jour régulièrement le système de votre NAS et les applications ;
• Désactiver les services inutiles (Telnet, SSH, UPnP) ;
• Ne pas exposer le NAS directement à Internet (utiliser un VPN) ;
• Utiliser des mots de passe forts et activer l’authentification multifacteur (MFA) ;
• Sauvegarder régulièrement les données importantes et conserver une copie hors ligne.

En synthèse

Le démantèlement de ce gang est un succès dans la lutte contre les rançongiciels visant les NAS Synology. Cette opération montre que les cybercriminels, même organisés à l’échelle internationale, peuvent être identifiés et arrêtés. Mais la menace reste bien réelle…

Une configuration sécurisée des NAS et une bonne hygiène numérique sont essentielles pour s’en prémunir. La vigilance reste la meilleure défense face à une cybercriminalité toujours plus sophistiquée.

source

Merci EVO

30TB Seagate Ironwolf Pro and EXOS HDD Review – When is Enough, Enough?

The arrival of 30TB capacity hard drives from Seagate — in the form of the IronWolf Pro ST30000NT011 and the Exos M ST30000NM004K — marks another incremental step in high-capacity storage for NAS and enterprise environments. Both models utilize helium-sealed conventional magnetic recording (CMR) technology and pack ten platters at 3TB each into the familiar 3.5-inch form factor. This represents the highest available capacity in a single drive to date, offering an alternative to more complex arrays of smaller disks while preserving compatibility with standard SATA 6Gb/s interfaces. These drives maintain a 7200 RPM spindle speed, 512MB cache, and sustained transfer rates approaching 275MB/s, making them suitable for environments that demand both scale and consistent throughput. The IronWolf Pro is targeted at commercial NAS and multi-user SMB deployments, where ease of integration, features like IronWolf Health Management (IHM), and bundled data recovery services are priorities. The Exos M, by contrast, is designed for data centers and hyperscale cloud storage, where maximum density, superior energy efficiency per terabyte, and sustainability play a more critical role. This review examines not only how these two 30TB drives are constructed and perform in practice, but also explores their compatibility with existing NAS hardware and server infrastructures, as well as the trade-offs involved when moving to such large single-drive capacities.

Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro and EXOS Hard Drive – Quick Conclusion

The Seagate IronWolf Pro 30TB and Exos M 30TB represent the cutting edge of mechanical storage, delivering unprecedented density in a standard 3.5-inch, SATA-compatible form factor. Both drives achieve their capacity through a helium-sealed, ten-platter CMR design, offering sustained transfer rates of up to 275 MB/s, 24/7 operability, and an MTBF of 2.5 million hours, making them viable for demanding NAS and enterprise environments. The IronWolf Pro is positioned for SMBs and creative professionals, bundling IronWolf Health Management for drive monitoring and three years of Rescue Data Recovery Services for additional peace of mind, while the Exos M caters to hyperscale and data center deployments by emphasizing power efficiency, sustainability, and seamless integration at scale. These drives are not for casual or budget-conscious users, as their high power consumption, increased heat output, and louder acoustics require properly specified NAS or server hardware to operate reliably. Additionally, their massive single-drive capacity raises practical considerations around redundancy, RAID rebuild times, and backup planning, which can offset some of the benefits of ultra-high density. Nonetheless, for users and organizations that can justify the investment and design their infrastructure to accommodate the specific demands of these drives, both models offer compelling solutions to growing storage needs. The IronWolf Pro excels in environments that value monitoring, support, and ease of deployment, while the Exos M is a better fit where operational efficiency and cost-per-terabyte are paramount, ensuring each serves its intended audience effectively.

 

You can purchase the Seagate Ironwolf 30TB Hard Drive Series via the links below: Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro HDD HERE on Amazon Seagate 30TB EXOS HDD HERE on Amazon Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro HDD HERE on B&H Seagate 30TB EXOS HDD HERE on B&H * Using these links will result in a small % commission coming to NASCompares and this helps me and Ed here (it really is just us!) to keep making our videos, writing our reviews and providing support in our free support sections for others!

Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro and EXOS Hard Drive – Design and Build

So, first up, below is a side-by-side comparison of the key specifications of the Seagate IronWolf Pro 30TB and Seagate Exos M 30TB drives. Both drives use CMR recording, a helium-sealed 10-platter design, and are built around similar mechanical and electrical platforms, but each is targeted at different use cases: SMB/creative NAS environments versus hyperscale cloud and enterprise data centers. This table highlights their similarities and subtle differences.

The IronWolf Pro places significant emphasis on durability and reliability within multi-bay NAS systems, making it well-suited to SMB and creative workflows. It achieves a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 2.5 million hours and carries a 5-year limited warranty, consistent with Seagate’s premium NAS offerings. The workload rate limit (WRL) of 550TB per year matches that of previous IronWolf Pro models but at higher capacity, allowing for heavier data activity in RAID configurations without voiding warranty terms.

To mitigate vibration issues common in dense multi-drive arrays, the IronWolf Pro integrates rotational vibration (RV) sensors that detect and compensate for external vibrations, stabilizing head positioning to maintain consistent throughput. Acoustically, the drive has been measured at approximately 28 dBA at idle and 32 dBA under seek activity, levels low enough to remain acceptable in small server rooms or under-desk NAS units, though still noticeable in very quiet environments.

By contrast, the Exos M 30TB, though physically and mechanically similar, is tuned for the needs of enterprise-scale and hyperscale cloud deployments. Its construction prioritizes energy efficiency per terabyte and long-term durability at scale, with features like PowerChoice for adaptive idle modes and PowerBalance for optimized performance-to-watt ratios. These firmware-driven features help reduce total operational costs when thousands of drives are deployed. The Exos M also includes RSA 3072 firmware verification for enhanced data security and is assembled with higher use of recycled materials and renewable energy inputs than earlier generations. These factors align it with the sustainability initiatives many data center operators are now targeting, while maintaining interoperability by preserving the same form factor, interface, and airflow characteristics as previous generations.

Both drives feature hardware-level secure data management, supporting Seagate’s Instant Secure Erase (ISE) to allow administrators to cryptographically erase all user data before redeploying or decommissioning a drive. This functionality is especially relevant for enterprise customers concerned with compliance and data security in multi-tenant environments. For SMB customers, the IronWolf Pro adds another layer of protection with Seagate’s Rescue Data Recovery Services bundled for three years, providing access to Seagate’s in-house data recovery team. This service has an advertised 95% success rate and is included at no additional cost, addressing accidental deletions, corruption, and even some mechanical failures — something that the Exos M does not include by default, as enterprises generally rely on their own backup and recovery procedures.

Finally, it is important to note the environmental operating specifications and resilience engineered into these drives. Both models operate safely in ambient temperatures between 10°C and 60°C and can tolerate non-operating storage temperatures down to –40°C and up to 70°C. They are rated to withstand 30Gs of shock during operation and up to 200Gs when non-operational, which is critical during shipping and installation in dense arrays. Vibration tolerances are also robust, with rotational vibration resistance specified up to 12.5 rad/s² between 10Hz and 1500Hz. Both require both +12V and +5V power rails and draw a typical 6.8–6.9W at idle, which increases during read/write activity as noted in Seagate’s specifications. Taken together, these figures indicate that while the drives are robust enough for demanding environments, users should still ensure their NAS or server chassis provides sufficient cooling, airflow, and power delivery to stay within these tolerances.

Comparing the 30TB IronWolf Pro to the 24TB IronWolf Pro and 4TB IronWolf (Non‑Pro) for Perspective

The 30TB IronWolf Pro represents Seagate’s largest capacity in the NAS‑optimized lineup, continuing the incremental increase in platter count, areal density, and helium‑sealed design. The 4TB non‑Pro IronWolf uses a more modest five‑platter, air‑filled design spinning at 5400 RPM, while the 24TB IronWolf Pro was the previous capacity peak, utilizing nine helium‑sealed platters and a 7200 RPM spindle. Despite sharing the same CMR recording and SATA interface, there is a clear progression in performance, power requirements, noise, and workload tolerances across these models. This comparison highlights how structural changes and internal technologies evolve with capacity—and where trade‑offs emerge at the top end of the spectrum.

Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro and EXOS Hard Drive – Performance, Noise and NAS Compatibility (WiP)

Performance testing of the Seagate IronWolf Pro 30TB and Exos M 30TB confirms that both drives deliver sustained sequential transfer rates close to their advertised 275 MB/s. In NAS systems tested—including QNAP, Synology, and Asustor platforms—both drives initialized without compatibility errors and achieved typical sequential read speeds of 268–270 MB/s and write speeds of 252–262 MB/s, depending on the platform and RAID configuration. These results align with expectations for a modern 7200 RPM CMR drive with a 512 MB cache and demonstrate that even at 30TB, throughput remains consistent with prior Pro‑series drives. Random IOPS, while limited compared to SSDs, remain within acceptable ranges for NAS workloads, with the Exos M specified at up to 170 IOPS read and 350 IOPS write at 4K QD16. Latency is nominal at approximately 4.16 ms, which is typical for this class of mechanical drive. Importantly, no firmware or block‑size compatibility issues were noted, and both drives default to 512e sector formatting, ensuring out‑of‑the‑box operability with most modern operating systems and file systems.

Acoustic performance, however, is noticeably impacted by the increase in platter count and capacity. During idle, the IronWolf Pro registers approximately 28 dBA in a quiet environment, with seek noise rising to around 32 dBA. These figures are slightly higher than those of the 24TB Pro and significantly more pronounced than the older 4TB IronWolf non‑Pro, which produces closer to 20–24 dBA. Subjectively, this noise was clearly audible in a quiet office when installed in a plastic‑chassis NAS and became more noticeable under heavy write operations. In larger arrays, particularly in 8‑bay or 12‑bay enclosures fully populated with these drives, cumulative vibration and resonance may amplify the perceived noise level. By comparison, the Exos M does not publish specific acoustic figures, reflecting its assumption of deployment in already noisy data center environments where ambient noise levels mask individual drive activity.

On the topic of environmental and electrical specifications, both drives are built to operate reliably in demanding conditions. The IronWolf Pro and Exos M are rated for continuous operation at ambient temperatures from 10 °C to 60 °C and can withstand storage temperatures from −40 °C to 70 °C when powered off. Shock ratings remain robust at 30 G operating and 200 G non‑operating, ensuring safe transport and handling before installation. Rotational vibration tolerance of up to 12.5 rad/s² helps maintain head‑positioning accuracy even in vibration‑prone multi‑drive arrays. Power draw, as specified by Seagate, averages around 6.8–6.9 W when idle and rises to between 8.3–9.5 W during typical operating workloads, depending on the model. Although these figures are in line with expectations for drives of this capacity, they are higher than those of lower‑capacity models, and users should ensure their NAS or server power delivery and airflow are sufficient.

In terms of platform compatibility, early testing shows that both drives are recognized and functional in all major NAS operating systems tested, including Synology DSM, QNAP QTS, TrueNAS SCALE, and Unraid. Both drives initialized cleanly, allowed full‑capacity volume creation, and performed as expected in single‑disk, RAID‑1, and RAID‑5 configurations. Some NAS brands, such as Synology’s newer units, do issue warnings when non‑Synology‑branded drives are installed, but no functional limitations were encountered. The Exos M, while designed primarily for enterprise and cloud storage arrays, showed no incompatibilities when deployed in smaller NAS appliances. As always, users are advised to consult their NAS vendor’s compatibility list to ensure formal support for these models.

Important point here – As this drive is something of a ‘bigger boy’ – the INITIAL power draw of the drive is quite high, so we are starting to see some examples of particularly high initial power draw drives having issues with NAS backboard/SATA PCB boards that do not have the consistent power delivery needed for larger drive arrays to be stable for a large number of big drives like this one. It’s a small % chance of being an issue, but it does mean that although support and compatibility of the Seagate Ironwolf Pro and EXOS 30TB Hard Drive might be fine on a lot of devices, more power efficient systems or lose built to a lower production cost that reduce a lot of the power deliver (PD) might have long term running and stability issues with drives of this scale down the road.

Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro and EXOS Hard Drive – Conclusion and Verdict

The Seagate IronWolf Pro 30TB and Exos M 30TB drives both exemplify the steady evolution of high‑capacity mechanical storage, bringing unprecedented density to the familiar 3.5‑inch form factor without sacrificing the reliability and compatibility that enterprise and NAS users expect. At 30TB each, they are currently the largest CMR SATA hard drives available, delivering predictable sustained transfer rates close to 275 MB/s and designed to operate 24/7 with an MTBF of 2.5 million hours. Both feature helium‑sealed, 10‑platter designs and include hardware‑level protections such as Instant Secure Erase and rotational vibration mitigation, which are critical in multi‑bay arrays. Where they differ is in market focus: the IronWolf Pro is clearly tailored for SMBs, creative professionals, and enterprise NAS environments that benefit from health monitoring via IronWolf Health Management and the inclusion of three years of Rescue Data Recovery Service, making it easier for smaller teams to recover from accidental loss. The Exos M, by contrast, is optimized for hyperscale data centers, where sustainability, operational cost per terabyte, and compatibility with existing rack infrastructure take precedence, and where administrators already have recovery processes in place.

That said, deploying drives of this capacity is not without its operational and economic considerations. At 30TB per drive, both models demand careful attention to power and cooling: idle and active power consumption are notably higher than lower‑capacity drives, and the additional heat and acoustic output can challenge under‑spec’d NAS enclosures. In smaller or plastic‑chassis NAS units, the noise profile of several of these drives spinning simultaneously can become disruptive in quiet offices or residential settings. Additionally, the sheer size of each drive raises planning concerns around data redundancy and recovery times—should a 30TB drive fail, rebuilding a RAID array or restoring from backup can take significantly longer than with smaller disks. For some users, a lower‑capacity, higher‑spindle‑count configuration may still provide better performance in parallelized workloads and potentially faster rebuild times, while keeping per‑drive costs more manageable.

Ultimately, both the IronWolf Pro 30TB and Exos M 30TB succeed at what they set out to do: deliver maximum capacity in a familiar, standards‑compliant format for users and organizations that can benefit from ultra‑dense storage. For NAS and SMB environments prioritizing ease of use, monitoring, and support, the IronWolf Pro remains the obvious choice. For data centers and hyperscale operations where scale, efficiency, and sustainability dominate requirements, the Exos M makes more sense. Either way, these drives are best viewed as specialist tools, suited to those prepared to manage the trade‑offs inherent in such high‑capacity storage. Provided that the environment, workload, and backup strategy are properly aligned, they offer a compelling, if premium, solution for meeting the growing demands of modern data storage.

You can purchase the Seagate Ironwolf 30TB Hard Drive Series via the links below: Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro HDD HERE on Amazon Seagate 30TB EXOS HDD HERE on Amazon Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro HDD HERE on B&H Seagate 30TB EXOS HDD HERE on B&H * Using these links will result in a small % commission coming to NASCompares and this helps me and Ed here (it really is just us!) to keep making our videos, writing our reviews and providing support in our free support sections for others!

PROs of the Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro and EXOs

PROs of the Seagate 30TB Ironwolf Pro and EXOs

Unprecedented Capacity — Both drives offer 30TB in a single 3.5-inch drive, reducing the number of disks needed for large arrays and saving space – but doing so in a CMR design (and not SMR) is just incredible Helium-Sealed Design — Uses a proven 10-platter, helium-filled architecture for improved reliability, reduced turbulence, and better areal density. Consistent Performance — Sustained transfer rates up to 275 MB/s and predictable latency ensure stable throughput for NAS and enterprise workloads. Enterprise-Grade Reliability — MTBF of 2.5 million hours, 550 TB/year workload rating, and 24/7 operation make them suited for demanding environments. Feature Sets Tailored to Audience — IronWolf Pro includes IronWolf Health Management and 3-year Rescue Recovery; Exos M adds power optimization and sustainability focus. Broad Compatibility — Fully SATA 6Gb/s compliant and functional across major NAS brands, RAID configurations, and operating systems without special drivers. Secure Data Management — Both support Instant Secure Erase (ISE) with Exos M adding RSA firmware verification for data security compliance.

Higher Power and Heat — Increased power consumption and thermal output require well-cooled, properly provisioned enclosures and PSUs. Audible Noise Levels — Louder idle and seek noise, especially when used in multi-drive NAS arrays, can be disruptive in quiet environments. Expensive Per Unit — High initial cost compared to smaller capacity drives, with diminishing returns in some scenarios if not fully utilized or backed up properly.

Find regulary updated NAS offers here
Of course I would prefer you choose AMAZON UK AMAZON USA to buy your perfect solution, however, if you would rather buy locally, please use the links used above to take you to your local Amazon store and help support this free advice service with ad revenue. More ways of supporting the blog are described HERE  
Home: https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-backup.html#af9rgr Business: https://www.backblaze.com/business-backup.html#af9rgr Comparison with other service providers: https://www.backblaze.com/best-online-backup-service.html#af9rgr   SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Bonjour à tous,

J’espère que vous allez bien. La saison estivale vient de démarrer et le soleil est au rendez-vous (ainsi que les chaleurs). Les vacances sont peut-être déjà une réalité pour certains et pour d’autres, c’est pour bientôt. Me concernant, je vais devoir attendre encore un peu…

En toute transparence, depuis ce week-end, il y a un peu moins de visiteurs au quotidien… cela me convient, car j’en profite également pour réduire la voilure de publication d’articles. Je vous rassure, cela ne veut pas dire qu’il n’y aura aucun article pendant les vacances… mais ils seront plus rares. J’ai quelques articles déjà programmés. Une petite pause s’impose » comme diraient certains. Côté test matériel, je vais également lever le pied jusqu’à la rentrée.

Je garde tout de même un œil sur l’actu Tech : plusieurs fabricants semblent préparer quelques surprises pour la rentrée… à suivre.

Du côté des séries TV, j’ai terminé Vrais voisins, faux amis (sur Apple TV+) qui est une vraie bonne surprise. Ce ne sera pas la série de l’année, mais l’idée est bonne… comme les acteurs. Je vais peut-être enchaîner avec Murderbot, qui m’intrigue pas mal. Si vous avez des conseils à partager, je suis preneur en commentaires J’ai aussi regardé le film Heads of State, qui ne restera pas dans les annales.

Enfin, je vais aussi essayer de décrocher un peu : balades, un bon livre et peut-être même un peu de tri numérique.

Je vous laisse et vous souhaite une bonne semaine,
FX

Cela fait maintenant un an que le fabricant UGREEN a fait son entrée sur le marché des NAS. Aujourd’hui, nous recevons en test le DXP4800 Plus. Dans cet article, nous allons tout d’abord explorer le matériel, puis nous nous attarderons sur la partie logicielle, enfin place aux tests de performance sur notre banc de mesure. Annoncé à moins de 600€, que vaut ce nouveau NAS ?

Test UGREEN NAS DXP4800 Plus

UGREEN est un fabricant chinois bien connu pour ses accessoires destinés aux smartphones, tablettes et ordinateurs. Sa réputation repose sur des produits fiables et performants. En 2024, la marque s’est lancée sur le marché des NAS via une campagne de financement participatif (Kickstarter). C’était un pari maîtrisé, qui a rencontré un vif succès, avec une communauté active autour du projet.

Le lancement a été relativement rapide. Entre l’annonce du Kickstarter et l’envoi des premières unités, tout cela s’est fait en 6 mois. Grâce à ses usines et ressources internes, Ugreen a su maîtriser sa production. Initialement réservée à certains pays, la commercialisation s’est aujourd’hui étendue.

Une concurrence qui s’interroge

D’abord ignoré par les acteurs historiques, le projet Ugreen a rapidement attiré l’attention. Certains fabricants ont même sollicité notre avis. Derrière une façade de désintérêt apparent, les leaders du secteur ont perçu l’impact de ce nouvel entrant, désormais considéré avec une certaine prudence.

Le Forum des NAS propose une section UGREEN, ce qui en fait la première communauté francophone pour des NAS de la marque.

DXP4800 Plus

 

Après ce rappel, intéressons nous de plus près au DXP4800 Plus. Il y a quelques semaines, un membre de la communauté Cachem avait partagé ses premières impressions. Le fabricant nous a envoyé le même modèle afin d’approfondir cette première approche.

Contenu de la boîte

À l’ouverture, on retrouve :

• Le DXP4800 Plus en lui-même ;
• 2 câble réseau RJ45 Cat. 7 ;
• L’alimentation externe et son câble ;
• Des vis pour les SSD avec un tournevis ;
• 2 blocs de pâte thermique pour les SSD NVMe ;
• Un guide de démarrage rapide en anglais, allemand et chinois ;
• Une feuille sur la garantie de 2 ans.

L’emballage est très soigné, avec plusieurs niveaux de protection. On note un effort de présentation proche de celui d’Apple.

Design et connectivité

Nous sommes en présence d’un NAS bien lourd. En effet, le boitier est en une pièce en aluminium bleu-gris (unibody à la façon d’Apple). Son poids impressionne avec 4,1 kg sur la balance. À l’arrière, un ventilateur de 140 mm souffle de l’air vers l’intérieur du boîtier, contrairement à la plupart des fabricants qui extraient l’air chaud.

En façade, on a 4 emplacements pour disques durs (ou SSD SATA). On retrouve également le bouton marche/arrêt en bas à gauche, ainsi que des diodes (LAN et disques).

 

Côté connectique :​

• 1 port 10 Gb/s RJ45 ;
• 1 porte 2,5 Gb/s RJ45 ;
• 1 port USB 3.0 (à l’arrière)
• 2 ports USB 2.0 (à l’arrière) ;
• 1 sortie audio-vidéo HDMI compatible 4K ;
• 1 port USB 3.1 Gen.2 (type-A à l’avant)
• 1 port USB 3.1 Gen.2 (type-C à l’avant)
• 1 emplacement pour carte SD.

Une connectivité complète et bien pensée.

Intérieur du DXP4800 Plus

Le DXP4800 Plus repose sur un processeur Intel Pentium Gold 8505 cadencé à 3,3 GHz (5 cœurs, 6 threads, jusqu’à 4,4 GHz en Burst) avec iGPU intégré. Il est épaulé par 8 Go de RAM DDR5 (extensibles à 64 Go). Le score PassMark est de 9220 points, plutôt prometteur !!!

Installation du NAS

Les disques dur 3,5″ s’installent sans outils. Les chariots, bien que différents des standards Synology ouQNAP, sont fonctionnels.

Pour les SSD, il faut retirer une fixation via un outil fourni. Malheureusement, il faut forcer légèrement sur une pièce en plastique fragile. Sur 4 chariots, l’une s’est abîmée pour nous.

Le NAS propose 2 emplacements pour SSD NVMe, accessibles via une trappe sous l’appareil. L’ajout de pâte thermique (fournie) et le rôle de dissipateur thermique du capot en aluminium sont des points positifs.

Petit défaut, le NAS n’est pas suffisamment surélevé.  Les patins dessous sont trop bas, ce qui limite la circulation de l’air et favorise les vibrations. De nombreux utilisateurs recommandent l’ajout de petits amortisseurs en élastomère pour corriger ce léger défaut.

UGOS

Vous êtes nombreux à vouloir en savoir plus sur le système embarqué UGOS. Nous allons être transparents de ce côté : le bon, voire très bon et le moins bon. Nous avons bien conscience que Ugreen est encore jeune sur le marché et il faut savoir être indulgent. Le fabricant met à jour très régulièrement son système afin de rivaliser avec les ténors du marché.

Installation d’UGOS

Après la découverte positive du matériel, la deuxième étape de l’installation est importante. L’utilisateur découvre pour la première fois ce qu’Ugreen va lui proposer. Le fabricant a bien compris l’importance d’accompagner l’utilisateur dès ses premiers pas avec UGOS. On vous laisse découvrir les étapes ci-dessous…

On regrettera que l’installation ne soit qu’en anglais. Cette première étape est pourtant cruciale… Après ces 4 premiers écrans, il faut ensuite patienter…

Comme vous pouvez le constater, les écrans d’attente jouent un rôle crucial pour anticiper les étapes suivantes du processus. Il est donc impératif qu’Ugreen les traduise rapidement afin d’améliorer l’expérience utilisateur.

Une fois l’installation terminée, le NAS a redémarré… en changeant d’adresse IP pour nous. Initialement configuré sur 192.168.1.151, il est passé sans avertissement à 192.168.1.191. Un comportement pour le moins surprenant, qui pourrait facilement passer inaperçu si vous accédez au NAS via son nom réseau ou si vous utilisez l’application officielle d’Ugreen que nous vous recommandons.

Pour retrouver son NAS sur le réseau, vous pouvez utiliser l’application ou taper dans votre navigateur find.ugnas.com

Découverte d’UGOS

L’écran de connexion permet de s’authentifier par identifiant et mot de passe classique… ou de cliquer en haut à droite pour obtenir un QR Code à utiliser avec l’application mobile.

Premier lancement

Au démarrage, un tutoriel se lance pour vous faire rapidement le tour du propriétaire. C’est simple, rapide et en français cette fois.

Volume de stockage

Ensuite, on est guidé vers la création du premier volume de stockage.

Là encore, on appréciera l’accompagnement d’UGOS… Beaucoup d’informations importantes et cruciales pour la suite, bravo à Ugreen.

Comme on peut le constater, le système ne prend pas le volume (unique) par défaut. C’est à l’utilisateur de le sélectionner.

 

Tout n’est pas parfait, mais l’utilisateur est bien accompagné.

Robot d’accompagnement

Sur l’écran principal, vous noterez la présence d’un robot virtuel en bas à droite. Ce dernier fournit des informations (plus ou moins importantes). En cliquant dessus, voici les informations affichées :

Il disparaitra une fois toutes les étapes finalisées. A noter qu’il faut aller jusqu’au bout pour le faire disparaitre (donc cliquer sur activer l’accès à distance).

Création d’un dossier partagé

On clique sur le bouton Créer pour la création du premier dossier…

Ici encore, un tutoriel se lance pour vous accompagner. UGOS utilise 3 terminologies différentes :

1. Dossier personnel : privé, accessible à un seul utilisateur ;
2. Dossier partagé : visible selon les autorisations définies ;
3. Dossier utilisateur (réservé à l’admin) : ensemble des dossiers personnels

Si vous avez déjà manipulé d’autres NAS, ces notions ne vous seront pas inconnues. La différence entre dossier personnel et dossier partagé, c’est que le dossier personnel n’est que pour un et un seul utilisateur. Alors que le dossier partagé sera partagé avec les autres utilisateurs.

Synthèse de l’installation et premiers pas

L’accompagnement est plutôt bien réalisé de la part d’Ugreen. L’utilisateur n’a qu’à se laisser guider. On regrettera l’absence d’un “mode expert” pour les utilisateurs avancés, et l’impossibilité de désactiver certains assistants. Ne soyons pas trop dur, on ne peut que les féliciter du travail réalisé.

Usage au quotidien

UGOS est un système Linux optimisé pour le stockage en réseau. Il propose un ensemble de fonctionnalités, qui sont complétées par des applications via le Centre d’applications : Antivirus, Download Center, Text Edit, etc. Nous sommes encore loin des capacités d’un NAS Synology ou QNAP. Ugreen a fait le choix de privilégier Docker pour compléter plusieurs de ses lacunes.

Au moment où nous écrivons ses lignes, les snapshots (instantanés avec Btrfs) viennent d’arriver, mais les capacités sont encore limitées. Il n’y a toujours pas la possibilité de chiffrer un dossier, pas de reverse proxy en natif, absence de planificateur de tâches, pas de sauvegarde vers un support externe… plutôt frustrant.

Cloud Drive permet des sauvegardes et synchronisations vers OneDrive ou Google Drive, mais l’outil reste perfectible (pas de chiffrement, filtrage limité, pas de planification).

Espérons que le fabricant corrige ces petits défauts agaçants dans les prochaines semaines.

Applications pour ordinateur, téléphone…

UGREEN propose une application de bureau (Windows et macOS) ce qui est une excellente idée. Il y a également une application mobile complète (Android et iOS), compatible également avec Apple TV et Android TV. Elles permettent d’accéder aux fichiers, au statut du NAS, aux notifications… mais aussi à la sauvegarde de photos, au visionnage de vidéo, etc. Tout y est, un véritable couteau suisse.

Mises à jour régulières

Ugreen déploie fréquemment des mises à jour pour corriger des bugs et soucis de traductions, mais aussi pour améliorer les performances et ajouter des fonctionnalités. La dernière en date vient d’introduire une protection contre les attaques DDoS.

Un NAS est coûteux, c’est un investissement sur le long terme. Aujourd’hui, les NAS sont régulièrement mis à jour… et surtout pendant de nombreuses années.

Nouvel entrant : doit-on faire preuve de tolérance ?

Ugreen est nouveau sur le marché des NAS, mais ce n’est pas un novice. L’entreprise possède une solide expérience industrielle et maîtrise déjà la conception matérielle et logicielle. Le fabricant savait dans quoi il s’engageait avec ce secteur exigeant, dominé par des acteurs comme Synology et QNAP.

Côté matériel, le produit tient la route. Mais c’est sur la partie logicielle que le bât blesse : UGOS reste limité pour un usage avancé. Si certains parient sur des mises à jour futures pour corriger le tir, d’autres estiment qu’un NAS doit être pleinement opérationnel dès l’achat, pas dans 6 mois. Ugreen en est conscient… Aussi, il propose l’installation de systèmes alternatifs comme OMV, TrueNAS, Unraid… Une approche ouverte, appréciée des utilisateurs.

L’essentiel est là : une base matérielle fiable et une volonté claire d’évoluer. À Ugreen maintenant de consolider son positionnement logiciel.

Performances du DXP4800 Plus

Dans la première partie des tests, nous allons évaluer les performances des transferts à travers un réseau 10 Gb/s (entre le NAS et des ordinateurs). Ensuite, nous regarderons les capacités du processeur, en analysant ses performances globales…

Vitesses dans les transferts

Depuis plusieurs années, nous avons mis en place un protocole de tests rigoureux fournissant des données fiables et comparables avec les performances des autres NAS. Pour cela, nous utilisons 4 applications de mesure différentes (2 sous macOS et 2 sous Windows) et réalisons en plus des transferts de fichiers de tailles variées dans les deux sens (NAS -> Ordinateur puis Ordinateur -> NAS) :

• Petites tailles : 100 fichiers de 500 Ko à 12 Mo (MP3, photos, documents Office)
• Tailles moyennes : 30 fichiers de 12 à 350 Mo (DivX, images RAW, archives ZIP)
• Fichiers volumineux : 10 fichiers avec une taille comprise entre 4 et 10 Go (MKV, ISO)

À la suite des tests, une moyenne des transferts est calculée et nous la représentons sous forme de graphiques exprimée en mégaoctets par seconde (Mo/s). Plus le nombre est élevé, plus le NAS est rapide. Pour notre évaluation du DXP4800 Plus, nous avons configuré un premier volume avec 2 SSD NVMe en RAID 0, puis un second volume avec 3 SSD SATA en RAID 5.

RAID 0

En RAID 0, nous devrions profiter pleinement des performances avec 2 SSD NVMe combinés. Comme vous pouvez le constater, les performances sont bonnes, mais pas exceptionnelles en lecture comme en écriture. On s’attendait à mieux au vu de la configuration.

RAID 5

En RAID 5, les performances en lecture restent stables, proches du RAID 0. En écriture c’est correct, mais on s’attendait à mieux également.

Performances générales

Ugreen a misé sur une architecture solide avec le processeur Intel Pentium Gold 8505 (sorti en 2022), qui a largement fait ses preuves. Son score PassMark de 9148 points témoigne de ses capacités. Ce choix lui permet d’assurer efficacement des tâches variées comme la conteneurisation, la virtualisation ou encore le transcodage vidéo. Seul regret, la présence de seulement 8 Go de RAM.. C’est un peu juste pour exploiter pleinement le potentiel de ce type de machine. 16 Go auraient été préférables pour offrir plus de marge, notamment en usage avancé.

Vous pourrez facilement trouver de la RAM compatible :

• Kingston 8 Go à 32€ 
• Kingston 16 Go à 50€
• Corsair 16 Go à 47€

Consommation électrique et nuisance sonore

LeDXP4800 Plus dispose d’un ventilateur de 140 mm à l’arrière, qui peut se faire entendre. Contrairement aux ventilateurs des principaux fabricants de NAS, ce dernier n’extrait pas l’air, mais souffle à l’intérieur du NAS. Certains l’ont remplacé par un Noctua NF-A14 afin de gagner quelqus décibels. Un ventilateur est présent au niveau du processeur, mais difficilement accessible. En fonctionnement normal avec 5 SSD, la consommation est de 27 W en fonctionnement normal. En cas de forte charge, elle monte à environ 64 W, ce qui peut surprendre pour ce type de produit.

The Synology DS925+ versus QNAP TS-464 – Buy NEW or Buy QNAP?

Every so often in the NAS market, a new model arrives that challenges not just its predecessors but also its closest competitors. With the 2025 release of the Synology DS925+, buyers now face an interesting dilemma: go with Synology’s latest compact powerhouse, or choose QNAP’s TS-464—a device that has already proven itself since its release in 2022/2023 and offers a wide array of features at a competitive price. The DS925+ brings notable upgrades to CPU architecture, system memory scalability, and integration within Synology’s tightly controlled ecosystem. Meanwhile, the TS-464 has spent years benefiting from firmware maturity, PCIe expandability, and a more open hardware approach that appeals to power users and tinkerers alike. But which device is ultimately the better buy in 2025? Should you embrace Synology’s ecosystem with its newer, high-performance release, or does QNAP’s more versatile and budget-friendly offering still hold strong in the face of newer competition? Let’s dive into the details to help you decide which NAS deserves your next investment.

Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464 – Hardware Specifications

When placing the 2025 Synology DS925+ alongside the 2022/2023 QNAP TS-464, one might expect the newer model to clearly dominate in every area. But hardware comparisons in the NAS market are rarely so simple. While both units are aimed at tech-savvy home users and small businesses looking for reliable, always-on storage solutions, their approaches to hardware—and the user needs they prioritize—are noticeably different. The DS925+ emphasizes streamlined performance, reduced noise, and integration within Synology’s tightly managed ecosystem. The QNAP TS-464, meanwhile, leans into raw hardware flexibility, DIY expandability, and a more open feature set for power users. Below is a detailed hardware breakdown of both NAS devices, showing where each shines and where compromises were made.

The DS925+ delivers a refined hardware experience out of the box, with its newer AMD Embedded Ryzen V1500B 4 Core/ 8 thread processor, dual 2.5GbE ports for faster LAN connectivity, and modern I/O including USB-C. It features two M.2 NVMe slots (for cache only, unless you use the Synology SNV3400 drives from Synology), dual memory slots supporting up to 32GB of ECC DDR4 RAM, and a compact metal chassis designed for quiet, efficient operation. It also runs cooler and quieter than many of its rivals, making it an ideal fit for environments where noise levels matter—such as living rooms, home studios, or small offices. This makes the DS925+ a “plug-and-play” NAS with premium internal components and minimal need for user intervention.

By contrast, the QNAP TS-464 takes a more modular, expandable approach. Powered by the Intel Celeron N5105/N5095 CPU (a quad-core processor with integrated graphics, but only 4 threads), it offers HDMI 2.0 output, two M.2 PCIe Gen3 x1 slots (which can be used for either caching or storage pools), and a PCIe Gen3 x2 slot for optional 10GbE or more M.2s, USB expansion, or even GPU cards. QNAP also includes dual 2.5GbE ports, putting it on par with the DS925+ in terms of network speed, but it edges ahead in overall hardware adaptability. Want multimedia output via HDMI? QNAP has it. Want to add NVMe storage pools or real-time transcoding? QNAP supports that too. That said, the TS-464 is based on a slightly older CPU architecture, lacks ECC memory support, and typically generates more fan noise under load. Additionally, its OS and ecosystem are broader in scope but often require more manual setup. Ultimately, the DS925+ is purpose-built for those who prioritize a quiet, polished, and simplified experience with modern performance. The TS-464, on the other hand, remains an excellent choice for users who prefer control, multimedia support, and greater hardware flexibility. Choosing between them largely depends on whether you value Synology’s stability and turnkey design, or QNAP’s freedom and potential.

AMD V1500B vs Intel N5105 – CPU Specifications (Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464)

In any NAS system, the processor plays a pivotal role in determining the scope of functionality—whether it’s managing multiple concurrent users, running virtual machines, powering AI-driven applications, or simply handling encrypted transfers and background tasks efficiently. The Synology DS925+ and the QNAP TS-464 take noticeably different approaches in this regard. The DS925+ features the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B, a server-grade SoC designed for sustained multi-threaded workloads. The TS-464, on the other hand, runs on the Intel Celeron N5105, a more consumer-oriented chip that prioritizes integrated multimedia support and power efficiency. While both CPUs are quad-core, their architecture, instruction set, and target use cases diverge sharply—affecting not only raw processing, but also the capabilities unlocked within DSM and QTS/QuTS, respectively.

In terms of raw specs, the V1500B offers 4 cores and 8 threads with a base clock of 2.2GHz and support for ECC memory—a key advantage for mission-critical environments. This CPU is built for multitasking and thrives in scenarios involving virtual machines, container services, and intensive file indexing or backup operations. As a result, the DS925+ supports up to 8 concurrent virtual machines, 8 virtual DSM instances, and higher thresholds for connected users across Synology apps. It is better suited to offices or power users who rely on services like Synology Office, Drive, or Surveillance Station running in tandem. The system handles up to 150 Synology Chat users, 80 Office users, and 80 Drive users, offering excellent multitasking performance with low overhead.

The QNAP TS-464’s Intel N5105 is a 10nm Jasper Lake processor, also quad-core but without hyper-threading and with a slightly lower base clock (2.0GHz). However, it includes integrated Intel UHD Graphics, giving it one key advantage the DS925+ lacks: hardware-accelerated video transcoding via QNAP’s own QuMagie, Video Station, and especially Plex Media Server with support for on-the-fly 1080p and 4K decoding when paired with proper client-side licensing. This makes the TS-464 ideal for multimedia-heavy environments. Beyond media, the N5105 powers QTS and QuTS hero with access to QNAP’s broader and often more modular ecosystem. This includes Hybrid Backup Sync (HBS 3) for unified backup and disaster recovery, QuDedup for deduplicated snapshot replication, QVR Elite and QVR Pro for professional-grade surveillance (supporting multiple IP camera licenses natively), and AI Core features like face recognition and event detection when paired with the QuMagie or QVR Human apps. The TS-464 also supports Virtualization Station, enabling users to run lightweight Linux or Windows VMs with direct passthrough access to USB or PCIe devices, and Container Station, which offers both Docker and LXC container compatibility with GPU passthrough for NPU-based AI inference workloads. Thanks to the included PCIe Gen 3 x2 slot, the system supports optional upgrades like 10GbE NICs, QM2 expansion cards (for M.2 SSD or additional 2.5GbE/10GbE ports), or even Wi-Fi 6 cards, something entirely absent in the DS925+. Additionally, QNAP allows direct output to an external display via HDMI 2.0, enabling standalone use of HD Station apps like Chrome, LibreOffice, Kodi, and even Linux desktop environments — a feature highly prized in HTPC and security NVR deployments. Users can leverage Linux Station to run full Ubuntu VMs locally, or install Ubuntu Core through the App Center for custom development or edge AI inference scenarios.

Taken together, the TS-464 may not support the same high virtual machine/user count as the DS925+, but it compensates with a broader set of integrated appliances catering to power users, home labs, edge AI, and media-heavy deployments. It’s a more “tinker-friendly” platform, favoring flexibility and breadth over centralized system control and vertical integration. If you need an appliance that works across entertainment, security, and hybrid cloud workflows, with room for add-on functionality via hardware or apps, the TS-464 is hard to beat for the price. That said, the Synology DS925+ ultimately offers greater headroom for enterprise workflows, heavier VM usage, and large-scale hybrid deployments. It sacrifices media transcoding and graphical acceleration, but gains a server-class CPU that ensures consistent performance under heavier load conditions. Meanwhile, the TS-464 excels in edge-case versatility, offering more multimedia flexibility and richer expansion potential via PCIe. If your priorities lie in business-class performance, ECC memory support, and robust multi-user capacity, the DS925+ is the clear winner. But for media streaming, home lab tinkering, and a wider hardware feature set, the TS-464 remains a very compelling alternative.

Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464 – Software Specifications

When it comes to NAS platforms, hardware is only half the story—what truly determines a system’s long-term value is the strength, maturity, and flexibility of its software. Synology’s DSM (DiskStation Manager) and QNAP’s QTS/QuTS Hero are two of the most advanced NAS operating systems available today, offering extensive suites of services for backup, virtualization, hybrid cloud, media streaming, and AI-assisted surveillance. But while both OS platforms cover similar ground, their design philosophies, application depth, and supported workloads differ substantially. The Synology DS925+ and QNAP TS-464, though comparable in price and both aimed at prosumers and SMBs, unlock very different software experiences depending on the deployment goals—be it centralized IT infrastructure, media-rich home labs, or container-based edge computing.

With the DS925+, Synology leans into its strength in unified management and vertical integration. DSM 7.2 is optimized for reliability, simplicity, and scalability within Synology’s ecosystem. The DS925+ supports up to 8 virtual machines and 8 Virtual DSM instances through Virtual Machine Manager, offers extensive group and user quotas, and enables full integration with Synology’s cloud services (such as Synology C2 Backup, C2 Identity, and Hybrid Share). Its higher hardware ceiling allows for more active users: 150 on Synology Chat, 80 on Synology Drive and Office, and up to 8 simultaneous VPN connections. Backup capabilities are similarly robust, with a higher threshold of shared folder sync tasks and superior support for incremental snapshot replication. Surveillance Station on the DS925+ supports up to 40 IP cameras and benefits from reduced CPU overhead during continuous recording, even while handling concurrent backup or media indexing operations. DSM’s elegant UI, consistent updates, and tightly integrated packages make it ideal for organizations that value centralized IT administration and long-term platform stability.

On the other hand, the QNAP TS-464 running QTS 5 or QuTS Hero offers a more open and modular software ecosystem. While the Intel N5105 CPU imposes lower multitasking ceilings than the V1500B, QNAP compensates with a broader set of feature-specific applications and customization paths. The TS-464 supports virtualization through Virtualization Station (for VMs) and Container Station (for Docker + LXC), and unlike the DS925+, can output video directly via HDMI 2.0—allowing the NAS to act as a standalone Linux desktop, NVR, or HTPC via HybridDesk Station. QNAP also differentiates itself with Hybrid Backup Sync (HBS3), which enables multi-destination sync, deduplicated backup via QuDedup, and real-time disaster recovery tools not found in DSM. QVR Pro and QVR Elite offer an expansive surveillance suite with optional AI-powered analytics (e.g., face recognition, people counting) when paired with compatible QNAP AI apps. The inclusion of ZFS with QuTS Hero (an optional OS for the TS-464) enables inline compression, self-healing file systems, and block-level snapshots, which can be critical for data integrity in business scenarios.

QNAP also encourages expansion through its App Center, which includes over 150+ native and third-party apps, from Node.js and GitLab to Home Assistant, Ubuntu Station, and even Mattermost for self-hosted chat. While the system supports fewer concurrent users and VMs than the DS925+, its strength lies in feature breadth and system-level flexibility. Add-ons like 10GbE NICs, QM2 SSD accelerators, or Wi-Fi 6 cards via PCIe further extend its versatility, especially for hybrid edge workloads or multi-role deployments that evolve over time. In short, the Synology DS925+ is designed for administrative simplicity and long-term scaling, excelling in consistent performance across multi-user deployments with deep DSM integration. The QNAP TS-464, meanwhile, is a powerful sandbox for customization, offering greater freedom, multimedia functionality, and third-party integration—at the cost of some operational polish and software limits. Choosing between them depends on whether your priorities lie in predictable enterprise-grade execution or a more adaptable, feature-dense platform.

Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464 – Hard Drive and SSD Compatibility

In 2025, Synology has taken its most aggressive step yet toward locking down hardware compatibility, and nowhere is this more evident than in the DS925+. Following years of gradual restrictions—starting with warnings for unverified drives and progressing to default white-listing only Synology-branded media—the DS925+ now represents a firm line in the sand. At the time of writing, this system will not allow DSM initialization if it detects hard drives or SSDs that are not officially listed on Synology’s compatibility list. This list includes exclusively Synology HAT5300/HAT3310 HDDs and SAT5200 SSDs, with no third-party Seagate, WD, Toshiba, Samsung, or Kingston media currently supported. Regardless of drive quality or performance, unsupported models will be outright blocked during system setup. While Synology claims this guarantees optimal reliability and performance within DSM 7.2, the move drastically reduces flexibility for users and integrators alike.

In stark contrast, the QNAP TS-464 embraces an open compatibility philosophy. It supports virtually all major consumer and enterprise drives—from Seagate IronWolf and Exos, to WD Red, Red Plus, and Ultrastar, as well as Toshiba N300/X300 and Samsung/Kingston SSDs—up to 24TB per drive (or higher as of late 2025). QNAP also maintains a regularly updated compatibility list, but crucially, this list is advisory rather than mandatory. Users can install any 3.5″ or 2.5″ SATA HDD/SSD, and as long as it meets the physical and electrical standards, the TS-464 will initialize without issue. This means integrators, home users, or small businesses can reuse existing drives or select from the most cost-effective options in their region—something that’s increasingly difficult to do on newer Synology units. Moreover, QNAP allows mixing and matching of drive brands and capacities within the same storage pool (especially under QuTS hero’s ZFS environment), giving users granular control over redundancy, performance tuning, and cache layering with non-proprietary M.2 NVMe SSDs. This openness also applies to QNAP expansion units, many of which continue to work even with completely mixed-brand storage configurations—something Synology’s newer expansion policies have started to restrict.

For users in regions where Synology-branded media is expensive, hard to find, or simply not justified for non-critical applications, this policy shift on the DS925+ can be a deal-breaker. It positions the system closer to an appliance model, where Synology controls not only the hardware and software, but the storage medium itself. While that vertical integration may improve long-term reliability for some enterprise users, it’s difficult to reconcile with the broader DIY NAS community that values choice and modularity. Ultimately, this creates a philosophical divide: QNAP remains open, modular, and adaptable, trusting users to make informed decisions about their storage media. Synology, in contrast, is consolidating control, with the DS925+ exemplifying a move toward a closed ecosystem—potentially alienating users who previously praised DSM for its balance of simplicity and flexibility. Prospective buyers need to weigh not just performance and features, but how tightly they want to be tied to a single vendor’s hardware roadmap.

Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464 NAS – Which Should You Buy?

The Synology DS925+ is a 2025 refresh designed with clear intent: push performance, tighten control, and streamline the out-of-box experience. In contrast, the QNAP TS-464—released in late 2022—is a Swiss Army knife of NAS flexibility, packed with customization options, open compatibility, and enough horsepower to meet the needs of both power users and small business deployments. Choosing between them ultimately comes down to what kind of NAS experience you’re after: a controlled, polished, and tightly integrated environment, or an open, adaptable, and hardware-friendly platform. On raw performance, the DS925+ has the edge. Its quad-core, 8-thread AMD V1500B CPU delivers higher throughput for multitasking, virtual machines, and heavier concurrent services, and DSM’s user/service thresholds are notably higher as a result. Add in dual 2.5GbE ports by default, and it’s clearly a step ahead of the DS923+ predecessor 1GbE-only base configuration, and you are looking at a healthy upgrade in several ways in this refresh. However, QNAP claws back ground with its PCIe Gen3 x2 slot, allowing 10GbE upgrades, Wi-Fi cards, and even GPU acceleration in select use cases—something Synology removed entirely from the DS925+. In QNAP’s favor is also its support for real-time hardware transcoding, HDMI 2.0 video output, and direct-attached monitor access—making it a better fit for media-centric environments where local playback, Plex, or Kodi usage matters.

Synology DS925+ NAS		QNAP TS-464 NAS
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS925+ NAS	Check B&H for the Synology DS925+ NAS	Check Amazon in Your Region for the QNAP TS-464 NAS	Check B&H for the QNAP TS-464 NAS

But perhaps the most significant dividing line is drive compatibility. The DS925+ will only initialize DSM with Synology-validated drives—locking out nearly all third-party HDDs and SSDs unless explicitly approved. This hardline stance means limited flexibility for users wanting to build using existing drives or regional market alternatives. Meanwhile, the TS-464 supports virtually all consumer and enterprise drives, from Seagate to Toshiba to Kingston, giving users total control over their storage budget and deployment roadmap. This open-ecosystem approach extends to M.2 NVMe usage too, where QNAP allows storage pool creation, caching, and tiering with off-the-shelf modules, while Synology restricts pool creation to only their branded NVMes. If you’re an IT administrator, content creator, or SMB looking for a polished, performance-forward NAS and you’re fully on board with Synology’s ecosystem—including its branded drives—then the DS925+ offers a streamlined, high-ceiling experience with excellent multitasking potential and cleaner UI/UX polish under DSM 7.2. But if you’re someone who values flexibility, upgrade paths, media support, or simply wants to control your storage choices without vendor lock-in, the QNAP TS-464 is an incredibly compelling alternative—offering strong performance for its price, an open architecture, and a deeper toolbox under QTS/QuTS Hero.

NAS Solutions	NAS Solutions
+ Better Software (In almost every respect!) + Much Better Global Support Presence + More business desirable + Larger Range of solutions – Compatibility restrictions on HDD and Upgrades More and more – Underwhelming hardware (comparatively)	+ Better Hardware for Price + Wider Variety of Solutions and Hardware Profiles + Supports ZFS and/or EXT4 (with ZFS platform now available on latest Intel Celeron Systems) + Wide accessory range and compatibility – Software can often feel inconsistent – Hit by Security Issues if the past
Check Amazon By Clicking Below:	Check Amazon By Clicking Below:

The Synology DS925+ is the better plug-and-play NAS for prosumers and SMBs who want a high-performance, low-maintenance experience—provided they’re comfortable buying into Synology’s tightly controlled ecosystem of software and storage hardware. On the other hand, the QNAP TS-464 remains the better choice for users who value flexibility, hardware freedom, and scalability—especially if media features, drive compatibility, or future upgrades are part of the plan. Ultimately, the DS925+ is the sharper tool, but the TS-464 is the more versatile one.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Aoostar WTR Max NAS vs Minisforum N5 Pro NAS Comparison

The demand for high-performance, multi-functional NAS systems has never been higher, as users increasingly expect far more than basic file storage from their hardware. Today’s workloads often include virtualization, AI-assisted operations, multi-tiered storage strategies, and high-speed, low-latency networking—demands that blur the line between a traditional NAS and a fully-fledged home server. In response to these needs, two closely matched contenders have emerged in the prosumer and power-user space: the Aoostar WTR Max and the Minisforum N5 series, which consists of both the more affordable standard N5 and the higher-spec N5 Pro. These devices, released in mid-2025, share some common DNA—both are bare-metal NAS platforms that let you install your own operating system and tailor your setup to your specific use case—but they diverge significantly in how they balance compute power, storage density, connectivity options, noise and power efficiency, and overall value.

Check Amazon for the WTR Pro MAX	Check AliExpress for the WTR Pro MAX	Check Amazon for the Minisforum N5	Check AliExpress for the Minisforum N5

In this article we provide a detailed, category-by-category comparison of these systems based on hands-on testing and real-world workloads. Key factors like physical design, internal architecture, storage configuration, CPU and memory performance, external connectivity, and power and noise profiles are all assessed in depth. We also consider important use case distinctions, such as suitability for 24/7 enterprise-grade uptime, AI model hosting, or quiet home use. Whether you’re looking to build a dense storage appliance, a virtualized host for multiple VMs, a locally deployed AI engine, or simply a robust and scalable home NAS, this analysis aims to clarify which of these two (or three, when factoring in the standard N5) offers the best fit. As the boundaries between NAS and full server hardware continue to blur, understanding these subtle trade-offs will help you make a more informed investment for your own specific workload and budget.

Written Review of the Minisforum N5 Pro NAS – HERE

YouTube Review of the Minisforum N5 Pro NAS – HERE

Written Review of the Aoostar WTR Max NAS – HERE

YouTube Review of the Aoostar WTR Max NAS – HERE

Minisforum N5 Pro vs Aoostar WTR Max NAS – Price and Value

When examining the price points of the Aoostar WTR Max and the Minisforum N5 series, it becomes clear that each brand has intentionally targeted slightly different segments of the advanced NAS and home-server market. The Aoostar WTR Max launches at $699 in a barebone configuration, which includes the chassis, preinstalled AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS CPU, external PSU, dual 10GbE SFP+ networking, and a front LCD panel. Like its competitor, it does not include RAM or additional storage at this price.

By comparison, the Minisforum N5 standard model enters at a lower price point of $583 in a similarly barebone configuration—also lacking RAM and user storage—but it does not include ECC memory support or a PRO-class CPU, which are key differences. The premium-tier Minisforum N5 Pro sits at a much higher entry price of $1,039, still barebone but featuring a far more capable Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 CPU and ECC support. Users who prefer to have memory preinstalled can opt for a top-tier N5 Pro bundle, which includes 96GB ECC RAM and raises the total cost to $1,583.

Minisforum N5 Pro vs Aoostar WTR Max NAS – Design

Both the Aoostar WTR Max and the Minisforum N5 series feature compact, all-metal chassis designs that prioritize serviceability, efficient internal space utilization, and professional-grade durability. The Aoostar WTR Max adopts a slightly larger rectangular footprint, accommodating six SATA bays, a dedicated seventh tray slot for up to four M.2 NVMe SSDs, and an integrated LCD display on the front panel for customizable real-time monitoring of system metrics such as temperature and network activity.

Ventilation on the Aoostar is extensive, with intake vents at the bottom, perforated panels on both sides, and dual rear-mounted exhaust fans drawing heat from the drive bays and CPU area. A vapor chamber heat spreader and a dedicated bottom-mounted cooling fan help distribute and evacuate thermal load evenly across internal components. The Minisforum N5 and N5 Pro, meanwhile, share a more compact and minimalist chassis with a slightly smaller footprint and a slide-out drive cage mechanism, making internal access and servicing more straightforward. Both Minisforum models include five SATA bays, a versatile three-slot M.2/U.2 arrangement, and a clean brushed-metal exterior that avoids visual distractions by omitting a front-facing display.

Minisforum N5 Pro vs Aoostar WTR Max NAS – Storage

Storage capabilities represent one of the most significant differences between the Aoostar WTR Max and the Minisforum N5 series, reflecting divergent priorities in how each system balances density and simplicity. The Aoostar WTR Max delivers a standout total of eleven drive slots, composed of six 3.5”/2.5” SATA bays, a dedicated seventh tray supporting up to four M.2 NVMe SSDs. This architecture provides users with the ability to create sophisticated storage topologies, combining high-capacity mechanical drives for bulk cold storage and multiple high-speed NVMe SSDs for tiered caching, scratch disks, or performance-optimized pools.

The additional M.2 tray, which is unique to the Aoostar design, simplifies the installation of multiple NVMe drives without occupying space within the motherboard area, while still offering full Gen 4 speeds on select slots. In contrast, the Minisforum N5 and N5 Pro are more restrained, offering five SATA bays and three NVMe/U.2 slots, which can be configured either as three M.2 drives or as one M.2 with two U.2 drives using the supplied adapter card. The Minisforum setup also includes a dedicated M.2 slot for its 64GB OS SSD, but sadly, this slot consumes one of the three available NVMe positions. Both Minisforum models support hot-swapping on the SATA bays and flexible RAID modes, but the higher bay count and more independent storage interfaces of the Aoostar clearly cater to users with larger or more diverse storage needs.

Feature	Aoostar WTR Max	Minisforum N5 / N5 Pro	Notes / Best
SATA Bays	6 × 3.5″/2.5″ (SATA 3.0, up to 22TB each)	5 × 3.5″/2.5″ (SATA 3.0, up to 22TB each)	Aoostar wins on total count
SATA Hot-swap	No	Yes	Minisforum wins
NVMe/U.2 Slots Total	4 × M.2 in tray + 1 × OS M.2 slot	3 × NVMe/U.2 + 1 × OS M.2 slot	Aoostar wins on total NVMe count
NVMe Slot PCIe Lanes / Speed	2 × Gen4 x2, 2 × Gen4 x1	1 × Gen4 x2, 2 × Gen4 x1	Aoostar provides more total bandwidth
OS Drive Impact	Separate dedicated M.2 slot for OS SSD	OS SSD occupies 1 NVMe slot	Aoostar wins here
NVMe Hot-swap	No	No	Neither supports hot-swap NVMe
Optional U.2 Support	Not natively supported	Via included adapter (2 × U.2 + 1 × M.2)	Minisforum offers flexibility
Reported Internal SSD Speeds	Gen4 x1 slots: ~1.6 GB/s read/write; Gen4 x2 slots: ~2.9–3.1 GB/s read/write	Gen4 x1 slots: ~1.7 GB/s read/write; Gen4 x2 slot: ~3.3 GB/s read, ~3.1 GB/s write	Comparable, slight edge Minisforum
Total Drive Capacity	6 SATA + 4 NVMe + OS SSD = 11 drives	5 SATA + 3 NVMe/U.2 + OS SSD = 8 drives	Aoostar wins on total drive count

Minisforum N5 Pro vs Aoostar WTR Max NAS – Ports and Connectivity

Both the Aoostar WTR Max and the Minisforum N5 series deliver a wide array of external ports and connectivity options, though their designs reflect different priorities and deployment philosophies. The Aoostar WTR Max is clearly oriented toward high-density, network-heavy environments, offering two 10GbE SFP+ fiber ports alongside two additional 2.5GbE RJ45 copper ports. This configuration enables up to four simultaneous physical network connections, making it well-suited to scenarios that demand redundant paths, segmented VLANs, or hybrid fiber-copper topologies.

In addition, the Aoostar includes a front-mounted USB-C port, an SD card slot for quick local transfers, a rear USB4 port, an HDMI output for direct monitoring or console access, and an OCuLink port for external PCIe-based expansions. The SD card slot is an unusual but useful addition for media workflows, though the absence of any PCIe slot in the WTR Max’s internal layout limits upgrade options to what can be connected externally through OCuLink or USB4.

Minisforum N5 Pro vs Aoostar WTR Max NAS – CPU and Memory

The Aoostar WTR Max and the Minisforum N5 series diverge substantially in processing power and memory capabilities, with the N5 Pro clearly at the high-performance end of the spectrum. The Aoostar WTR Max is equipped with an AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 8845HS, an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on AMD’s efficient Zen 4 architecture, and supports up to 128 GB of DDR5 memory with ECC. This makes the WTR Max a strong contender for users who need solid multi-threaded throughput, data integrity via ECC, and headroom for running many virtual machines or containerized workloads.

It is especially attractive in enterprise-like environments where reliability and memory capacity are priorities. The Minisforum N5 standard, by contrast, uses the older Ryzen 7 255, also with 8 cores and 16 threads, but based on the earlier Zen 3+ architecture, with a cap of 96 GB DDR5 and no ECC support. It remains competent for general NAS duties, file serving, light VM usage, and moderate multimedia tasks. Stepping up to the N5 Pro, however, brings a dramatic increase in compute and AI capabilities: its Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 processor offers 12 cores, 24 threads, ECC support, and a built-in neural processing unit (NPU) delivering up to 50 TOPS for AI inferencing, while maintaining the same 96 GB DDR5 limit. This makes the N5 Pro ideal for highly concurrent workloads, virtualized environments, AI model hosting, and scenarios where raw CPU power and error resilience are critical.

(The CPU in the Minisforum N5 Pro is also featured on the X1 Pro from Minsforum, so below you can see the GFX benchmarks of this processor vs the same CPU + an MGA1 External Oculink eGPU)

Feature	Ryzen 7 255	Ryzen 7 Pro 8845HS	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
Architecture	Zen 3+	Zen 4	Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid
Cores / Threads	8C / 16T	8C / 16T	12C / 24T
Base / Boost Clock	3.3 GHz / 4.9 GHz	3.8 GHz / 5.1 GHz	2.0 GHz / 5.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	16 MB	24 MB
GPU	Radeon 780M (12 CUs)	Radeon 780M (12 CUs)	Radeon 890M (16 CUs)
GPU Clock	~2.5 GHz	Up to 2.7 GHz	Up to 2.9 GHz
NPU	UPTO 16 TOPS	upto 16 TOPS	Up to 50 TOPS
TDP Range	~45 W	~45 W	28–54 W
PCIe Lanes	20 PCIe Gen 4	20 PCIe Gen 4	16 PCIe Gen 4
Memory Support	DDR5 (non‑ECC)	DDR5‑5600 ECC	DDR5‑5600 ECC

Looking deeper at the individual CPUs, their architectures reflect different generational and market goals. The Ryzen 7 255 in the Minisforum N5 is a Zen 3+ part built on a 6 nm process, with a base clock of 3.3 GHz and turbo up to 4.9 GHz. It provides 16 MB of L3 cache and includes integrated Radeon 780M graphics with 12 RDNA 3 compute units. At ~45 W TDP, it is a capable midrange processor for general NAS use but lacks advanced enterprise features like ECC and AI. The Ryzen 7 Pro 8845HS in the WTR Max upgrades to Zen 4 at 4 nm, bumps the base clock to 3.8 GHz while maintaining the same 5.1 GHz boost, and delivers better power efficiency.

It retains the Radeon 780M GPU but with improved clocks and adds ECC memory support plus 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for broader connectivity options. At the top sits the Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 in the N5 Pro, which leverages AMD’s Zen 5/5c hybrid architecture. Despite a lower base clock of 2.0 GHz (favoring efficiency) with the same 5.1 GHz turbo, it increases core count to 12 and thread count to 24, doubles L3 cache to 24 MB, and upgrades the GPU to Radeon 890M with 16 RDNA 3 compute units clocked up to 2.9 GHz. The Pro has a higher rated integrated NPU, capable of 50 TOPS, positioning it as an ideal candidate for on-premises AI inferencing and acceleration workloads, several times higher than the potential 16 TOPS rating on the CPUs of the N5 Standard and WTR ,Max. Its TDP range of 28–54 W also reflects its hybrid design’s balance of power and efficiency, although it offers slightly fewer PCIe lanes (16) than the WTR Max’s 20.

Minisforum N5 Pro vs Aoostar WTR Max NAS – Power Consumption and Noise

Both the Aoostar WTR Max and the Minisforum N5 series aim to strike a balance between capable performance, manageable power consumption, and acceptable noise levels, though they adopt distinct philosophies around power delivery and cooling. Both the Minisforum N5 and the Aoostar WTR Max feature external power supply unit (PSUs), of a pretty hefty 280W – these will almost certainly not be for everyone, but do allow for both systems to maintain a decent small-scale (however, be aware that they DO get warm)!

In terms of measured power consumption, the WTR Max idles at approximately 32–34 W even when fully populated with drives, and it ramps up to around 73–89 W under heavy load, such as during multi-VM and high-throughput testing.

The chassis design favors airflow with strategically placed ventilation on the sides, rear, and bottom, a pair of large rear exhaust fans, and a dedicated internal fan that focuses specifically on the hard drive bays. This combination keeps temperatures steady under pressure, and even during sustained activity, noise output remains modest — around 35 dBA at idle and typically peaking near 44 dBA when heavily loaded, which is relatively quiet given its drive density and active cooling.

Aspect	Aoostar WTR Max	Minisforum N5 (Standard)	Minisforum N5 Pro	Best & Why/Note
PSU Type	External	External	External	No Difference
Peak Power Consumption	~73–89W	~80W	~80W	Tie — both in similar range
Idle Power Consumption	~32–34W	~32–34W	~32–34W	Tie — similar efficiency
Noise at Idle	~35 dBA	~32–34 dBA	~32–34 dBA	N5/N5 Pro — slightly quieter at idle
Noise at Load	~44 dBA	~48–51 dBA	~48–51 dBA	Aoostar WTR Max — quieter at load

Minisforum N5 Pro vs Aoostar WTR Max NAS – Verdict and Conclusion

In reviewing the Aoostar WTR Max and the Minisforum N5 series—including both the standard and Pro models—it becomes clear that each system was designed with a distinct user profile and set of priorities in mind, making direct comparisons nuanced rather than absolute. The Aoostar WTR Max distinguishes itself with a compelling balance of high storage density, strong CPU performance featuring ECC memory support, excellent chassis ventilation and a competitive mid-range price point.

Its combination of six SATA bays, five M.2 slots, quiet operation under sustained loads, and a tidy all-in-one form factor appeals to users who value storage flexibility, operational efficiency, and simplicity in deployment. The Minisforum N5 standard model carves out its niche as an affordable entry point for those with lighter needs—delivering solid, modern NAS performance in a compact chassis at the lowest price of the three. At the other end of the spectrum, the Minisforum N5 Pro targets advanced power users, offering the AI‑accelerated Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 processor, ECC memory capability, and unmatched multi-threaded and inference performance, all of which position it squarely in the high-end category for workloads like intensive virtualization, heavy concurrent tasks, and AI-assisted applications. For those specific use cases, the N5 Pro’s premium price is justified by its unmatched compute capabilities and feature set.

Ultimately, choosing between these systems requires a careful assessment of workload demands, expansion expectations, and budget constraints. The Aoostar WTR Max delivers a well-rounded combination of storage capacity, compute power, noise and thermal efficiency, and ease of deployment at a price that is reasonable for most advanced home and small business NAS environments. Its blend of practical features and robust hardware makes it especially attractive for users who prioritize storage-heavy applications and quieter, more efficient operation. The Minisforum N5 standard model is best suited for users with modest requirements and tight budgets, offering a clean, capable NAS platform for general use without the advanced features or costs associated with its Pro sibling. The N5 Pro, however, remains the clear choice for users who need the highest possible performance, AI‑specific capabilities, and maximum concurrency—provided they are willing to pay a premium for these cutting-edge benefits. In short, while all three systems deliver strong value in their respective niches, the Aoostar WTR Max arguably offers the most versatile and cost-effective package for typical NAS workloads, striking a smart balance between affordability, capacity, and performance.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

New Value Series UGREEN DH4300 and DH2300 NAS Drives

UGREEN has unveiled two new value-focused NAS devices, the DH3400 and DH3200, designed to meet the needs of home and small office users who want practical, low-power network storage without unnecessary complexity. The DH3400 is a 4-bay model, while the DH3200 offers a 2-bay configuration, both intended for those looking to implement efficient backups, multimedia streaming, and personal cloud storage at a more affordable price point. First revealed through the 2025 iF Design Awards and then quietly launched with a limited discount during Amazon Prime Day, these models occupy a lower tier in UGREEN’s NAS range, complementing rather than replacing their existing higher-end DXP series.

These two devices clearly target users who prioritize straightforward functionality over high-end processing power or advanced virtualization. Both systems are engineered with energy-efficient components and a compact design that makes them suitable for desktop environments where noise, heat, and power consumption need to be minimized. By offering a clear set of features—including RAID support, snapshot capabilities, and 4K multimedia output—at a modest price, the DH3400 and DH3200 aim to appeal to customers who need reliable, low-maintenance storage hardware that can integrate easily into a home network or small office setup.

UGREEN DH2300 and DH4300 NAS Hardware Specifications

The UGREEN DH3400 and DH3200 are built on a shared hardware platform, with the key difference being drive bay count—four bays on the DH3400 and two on the DH3200. Both systems use the Rockchip RK3588C processor, an 8-core ARM-based SoC running at 2.4 GHz, designed to prioritize energy efficiency and low thermal output rather than raw performance. The RK3588C includes integrated Mali-G610 graphics and an AI engine capable of delivering up to six tera operations per second (TOPS), which enables features like facial recognition and semantic photo search without taxing the CPU as much as it would likewise ARM processors without it.

Both units come equipped with 8 GB of soldered LPDDR4X memory, which cannot be upgraded. This is a typical limitation of ARM-based NAS systems, where memory is tightly coupled with the SoC for efficiency. The onboard memory is adequate for the included software stack, which supports multi-user environments, Docker containers, and AI-driven media management. For system storage, UGREEN integrates a 32 GB eMMC module to host the UGOS Pro operating system. This keeps the SATA bays fully available for user storage, though it does mean the system disk cannot be swapped or expanded.

The DH3400 supports up to four 3.5” or 2.5” SATA drives, while the DH3200 supports two, and both models can accommodate up to 30 TB per bay, for a maximum of 120 TB on the DH3400 when fully populated. Supported RAID configurations include JBOD, Basic, RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10, providing a range of data protection and performance options suited to home and SOHO environments.

Networking and external connectivity are kept simple yet functional. Each system includes a single 2.5 GbE Ethernet port, which supports transfer speeds up to roughly 300 MB/s under optimal conditions. Although dual LAN ports for link aggregation or failover would have been welcome at this price point, the single-port setup is likely sufficient for the target audience.

Three USB ports are provided: one USB-C @ 5Gb/s and two USB-A @ 10 Gb/s. These are useful for connecting additional external drives, creating tiered backups, or quickly offloading data from portable devices. The inclusion of a full-size HDMI port capable of 4K/60Hz output is another notable feature, enabling direct connection to a monitor or TV for multimedia playback or system administration from a local display—something not all competing devices offer.

From a physical and design perspective, the DH series is clearly built to fit seamlessly into a home or small office. The DH3400’s chassis measures just 155 × 155 × 215.7 mm, and its vertical, injection-molded plastic design keeps its footprint compact and thermals manageable. Power consumption is modest at a rated 12V/6A, helping keep operational costs low and making the units suitable for 24/7 use.

The overall aesthetic is understated, drawing comparisons to earlier Western Digital consumer NAS devices, with a focus on quiet operation and minimal disruption to the workspace. While there is no support for PCIe expansion or M.2 NVMe storage—features found in higher-end UGREEN DXP models—the streamlined hardware specification aligns with the device’s role as an affordable, efficient, and easy-to-deploy file server for users who don’t require more advanced features.

UGREEN DH2300 and DH4300 NAS Software Specifications

Both the DH3400 and DH3200 ship with UGREEN’s UGOS Pro operating system, a Linux-based NAS software platform designed to be user-friendly while offering a solid range of core functionality. UGOS Pro provides a clean, browser-based interface accessible from Windows, macOS, Android, iOS, web browsers, and even smart TVs, making it easy for users to manage their storage from almost any device. The OS supports secure multi-user access with advanced encryption, a built-in firewall, and two-factor authentication, ensuring that data remains protected from unauthorized access. Local data storage is emphasized over cloud reliance, though cloud backup targets are supported for redundancy.

In terms of features, UGOS Pro includes most of the essential applications expected of a modern NAS. File and folder management is straightforward, with support for SMB/CIFS, NFS, and WebDAV protocols. Users can set up scheduled or on-demand backups, including multi-tiered strategies spanning local drives, external USB storage, and supported cloud services. Snapshot functionality is included to help protect against accidental deletion or data corruption. Multimedia applications are also integrated, with tools for organizing and streaming photos, videos, and music, plus support for the HDMI output for direct 4K media playback on connected displays.

Despite being a value-oriented device, the DH3400 and DH3200 still offer some advanced capabilities thanks to the efficiency of the RK3588C CPU. These include AI-powered features such as photo recognition by faces, scenes, and locations, automatic duplicate removal, and the creation of personalized albums. Semantic search functionality helps users locate files more intuitively, and Docker is supported for lightweight containerized applications. However, resource-intensive functions like virtualization and more complex enterprise-grade apps are not included, in keeping with the intended role of these systems as affordable, entry-level NAS solutions. Plus, no doubt, the ease of integrating this more cost-effective solution with other, more powerful DXP NAS systems using the nativa backup sync application is going to be a breeze on the LAN!

UGREEN DH2300 and DH4300 NAS – Price and Launch Date?

UGREEN’s new DH2300 and DH4300 NAS models have already quietly launched, with availability beginning during Amazon Prime Day 2025 in what can best be described as a stealth release. The DH4300, the 4-bay model, is currently listed at $429.99 diskless, although a temporary promotional discount during Prime Day dropped the price as low as $349.99. At the time of writing, UGREEN has not provided an official end date for the promotional pricing, so buyers should assume the standard price is $429.99 going forward. The DH2300, the 2-bay variant, has not yet been widely listed, and official pricing for that model has yet to be confirmed. Both models are expected to continue rolling out to major online retailers over the coming weeks, with broader global availability likely to follow given UGREEN’s previous product launch patterns. For now, early adopters in supported regions can purchase the DH4300 directly from platforms like Amazon, and keep an eye on listings for the DH2300 to appear soon. Buyers should note that, as with most diskless NAS products, storage drives are sold separately. These models are positioned as affordable, efficient storage solutions in UGREEN’s lineup, complementing rather than replacing their existing DXP series. By offering a lower barrier to entry, UGREEN appears to be catering to users looking for basic yet capable NAS hardware at an accessible price. Those interested in purchasing should monitor retailer listings closely for availability and any further discounts as stock becomes more widely distributed.

You can order from the Official UGREEN site via the banner below:

Alternatively, the UGREEN DH4300 has appeared on Amazon on Multiple locations. So you can check the Amazon store in your region by clicking the banner below.

Remember. We get a small commission from any sales that occur from using the links above, and these go directly into allowing us to keep doing what we do.

UGREEN Store – https://ugreen.pxf.io/jejy6Z/

Amazon Store – https://amzn.to/409Sckl/

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

QNAP annonce la disponibilité de sa solution de haute disponibilité (HA), conçue pour assurer la continuité des services critiques, quel que soit le secteur d’activité. Destinée aussi bien aux PME qu’aux grandes entreprises, cette architecture vise à maintenir l’accès aux données en cas de panne ou d’incident système, tout en réduisant les pertes opérationnelles et en renforçant les plans de reprise d’activité.

Architecture actif/passif simple et robuste

La solution repose sur un cluster à deux nœuds formés de 2 NAS QNAP identiques (avec 8 Go de RAM minimum), l’un actif… et l’autre passif. En cas de défaillance du NAS principal, le système bascule automatiquement vers le NAS secondaire en moins d’une minute (RTO < 60 s), sans nécessiter d’intervention manuelle. Ce mécanisme de basculement s’appuie sur un système de heartbeat, qui surveille en permanence l’état de chaque nœud via des échanges réseau (en UDP).

 

Gestion simplifiée avec High Availability Manager

La configuration, le suivi et la maintenance du cluster sont centralisés via l’application High Availability Manager, désormais disponible en Bêta (officialisé le 18/07). Cette interface permet de créer ou de modifier un cluster HA, de suivre les performances du réseau, ainsi que les statistiques des 2 NAS (latence, bande passante, état matériel). QNAP intègre également la technologie SnapSync, qui synchronise en temps réel les données entre les deux serveurs, réduisant considérablement le risque de perte de données (RPO proche de zéro).

Solution accessible et économique

Contrairement aux architectures HA traditionnelles, souvent lourdes et coûteuses, QNAP propose une alternative abordable, adaptée aux petites structures sans sacrifier la fiabilité. Cependant, la compatibilité est restreinte à certains modèles de NAS : les séries TVS-hx74, TS-hx88X, TS-hx87XU-RP ou encore le TDS-h2489FU. La version minimale requise du système d’exploitation est QuTS hero h5.3. Nul doute que QNAP va étendre cette liste de compatibilité dans les mois à venir.

Pour quels usages ?

La solution de haute disponibilité (HA) de QNAP est idéale pour tous les environnements où la continuité de service est non négociable. Parmi les cas d’usage les plus courants, on citera :

• Serveur de fichiers collaboratif : Garantit un accès constant aux fichiers partagés pour maintenir la productivité des équipes, même en cas de panne matérielle ;
• Stockage virtualisé (iSCSI/IP-SAN) : Maintient la disponibilité des volumes de stockage, évitant ainsi l’arrêt brutal de machines virtuelles ou la corruption de données ;
• Applications critiques (ERP, CRM, bases de données) : Permet un fonctionnement continu grâce à une latence minimale et une synchronisation constante entre les nœuds ;
• Environnements de calcul intensif et IA : Fournit un accès ininterrompu aux jeux de données volumineux, indispensable aux traitements IA ;
• Secteurs réglementés ou sensibles (santé, finance, industrie) : Réduit les risques liés aux interruptions de service, avec une infrastructure fiable et automatisée ;
• Réseaux d’entreprise résilients : En combinaison avec des switchs redondants QNAP (MC-LAG, voir ci-dessous), cette solution assure une continuité complète, du stockage à la connectivité.

En résumé, la haute disponibilité par QNAP s’adresse à toutes les entreprises qui exigent une tolérance à la panne quasi nulle, sans complexité d’intégration ni budget démesuré. Une réponse pragmatique aux enjeux de résilience numérique actuels.

Pour aller plus loin…

NAS à double contrôleur actif : performance et redondance

QNAP propose également une solution NAS à double contrôleur actif (architecture actif/actif), conçue pour allier performance, haute disponibilité et évolutivité. Intégrés dans un même châssis, deux contrôleurs système indépendants assurent un fonctionnement simultané et une répartition efficace des charges. En cas de défaillance d’un des contrôleurs, le second prend instantanément le relais, assurant un RPO quasi nul. Grâce à une interface SAS double canal, la fiabilité des connexions est renforcée. Compatible avec les protocoles SMB, NFS et iSCSI, ce type de NAS s’intègre facilement dans des environnements IT complexes. Il fonctionne grâce à QES, basé sur ZFS, et intègre des fonctionnalités avancées telles que la réparation automatique et la déduplication en ligne.

Réseau redondant avec MC-LAG

Pour assurer une connectivité réseau permanente, QNAP propose également une solution de redondance basée sur le MC-LAG (Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation). En associant 2 switches QNAP L3 Lite, il est possible de créer une infrastructure résiliente : si l’un des switchs tombe en panne, l’autre prend automatiquement le relais. Ce basculement rapide garantit un accès ininterrompu aux ressources réseau, tout en limitant la latence et les interruptions de service. Résultat : un débit stable, une meilleure tolérance aux pannes et une connectivité fiable, indispensable aux environnements professionnels exigeants.

article sponsorisé

Avec plus de 80 millions de rendez-vous médicaux pris chaque mois, Doctolib est devenu le leader de la prise de rendez-vous médicaux en ligne. Mais il est la cible régulière de tentatives de phishing. Ces attaques visent à voler vos données personnelles en imitant des messages officiels. Identifier ces arnaques est essentiel pour protéger vos informations de santé. Voici les signes à repérer et les bons réflexes à adopter.

Qu’est-ce que le phishing et pourquoi Doctolib est-il ciblé ?

Le phishing (hameçonnage en français) est une méthode frauduleuse utilisée par des cybercriminels pour récupérer des données personnelles sensibles, comme des identifiants de connexion ou des informations bancaires. Ces escrocs se font passer pour des entités de confiance (ici, Doctolib) en imitant leurs communications officielles (via des e-mails, SMS), afin d’inciter les utilisateurs à cliquer sur des liens malveillants ou à transmettre leurs informations confidentielles.

Comment reconnaître une tentative de phishing Doctolib ?

Les fraudeurs n’ont pas accès à vos données, mais exploitent l’image de la plateforme pour tromper votre vigilance. Voici les éléments à surveiller :

• E-mails :
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
• SMS : l’expéditeur doit être « Doctolib », non pas un numéro mobile.

Doctolib ne vous enverra jamais un message avec un contenu alarmant : messages évoquant une urgence, une suppression de compte ou un remboursement à réclamer rapidement. Ne cliquez jamais sur un lien suspect : les liens redirigent vers des pages imitant Doctolib, mais destinées à voler vos données.

Accédez à Doctolib en tapant directement dans votre navigateur (www.doctolib.fr) ou via l’application officielle.

Que faire en cas de suspicion de phishing ?

• Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et ne téléchargez aucune pièce jointe ;
• Ne communiquez jamais vos identifiants ou données sensibles par e-mail ou SMS ;
• Vérifiez l’authenticité du message via l’application officielle ou en saisissant l’adresse manuellement dans votre navigateur ;
• Signalez le message à [email protected] et sur la plateforme PHAROS.

Cela n’arrive pas qu’aux autres ! Si vous pensez avoir divulgué des informations confidentielles, allez sur  www.doctolib.fr ou l’application mobile :

• Changez votre mot de passe si vous avez communiqué des informations sensibles ;
• Activez la double authentification pour renforcer la sécurité de votre compte.

Chaque minute compte.

Conseils pour protéger vos données sur Doctolib

Voici quelques conseils valables pour tous les services en ligne (y compris Doctolib) :

• Utilisez un mot de passe unique et robuste (longueur de 8 caractères minimum, majuscules, chiffres, symboles) ;
• Activez la double authentification pour ajouter une couche de sécurité ;
• Mettez régulièrement à jour l’application (ici Doctolib) ;
• N’utilisez que les canaux officiels pour accéder à la plateforme ;
• Ne partagez jamais vos identifiants ou données personnelles.

En synthèse

Doctolib déploie des outils de sécurité avancés, mais la vigilance des utilisateurs est indispensable face à des attaques d’hameçonnage de plus en plus élaborées. En cas de doute, ne cliquez sur aucun lien suspect et contactez Doctolib directement. Le phishing ne cible pas que Doctolib : transporteurs, CAF, Sécurité Sociale, offres d’emploi douteuses… Les escrocs ne manquent pas d’imagination.

À nous de rester informés et de développer les bons réflexes pour protéger nos données personnelles.

Prime Day 2025 Deals Megathread – Terramaster NAS

Prime Day 2025 is not just a normal sales thing, it’s when the best deals becomes a quest for many, especially tech enthusiasts and savvy shoppers. This November, as we approach the holiday season, our focus sharpens on a segment that’s increasingly popular in the tech community: Network Attached Storage (NAS) solutions, particularly Terramaster products known for their quality and dependability in data storage. If you’re planning to enhance your home network, set up an efficient media server, or secure your files with reliable backup, Terramaster’s range might have the perfect solution for you. With Amazon Prime Day’s impressive discounts, it could be the ideal time to invest in your tech infrastructure. We’ve sorted the deals by region,.so we’ve got you covered.

US Terramaster Prime Day 2025 Deals

Stay tuned for tables showcasing the hottest deals on Terramaster products for our US-based readers.

USA

WHAT	MIX	DEAL
TerraMaster F8 SSD NAS 8-Bay	NAS	$479.99 (20% off off)
TerraMaster F4-424 Max NAS 4-Bay	NAS	$719.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F2-424 NAS 2-Bay	NAS	303.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F4-424 Pro NAS 4-Bay	NAS	$559.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F4-423 NAS 4-Bay	NAS	$344.99 (25% off)
TerraMaster F4-212 NAS 4-Bay	NAS	$224.99 (25% off)
TerraMaster D4-320 USB Enclosure 4-Bay	DAS	$151.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster D8 Hybrid NVMe HDD USB RAID Storage 8-Bay	DAS	$239.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster D5-300 RAID 5 Storage 5-Bay	DAS	194.99 (25% off)
TerraMaster TD2 Thunderbolt 3 RAID Storage 2-Bay	DAS	$207.99 (20% off)

---

UK Terramaster Prime Day 2025 Deals

To our dear readers in the United Kingdom, we haven’t forgotten you. Here’s a curated list of the top Terramaster NAS and DAS deals available on your shores this Prime Day 2025.

UK

WHAT	MIX	DEAL
TerraMaster T9-500 Pro NAS 9-Bay	NAS	£1399,99(£100 amount off)
TerraMaster F4-424 Max NAS 4-Bay	NAS	£655.99(20% off)
TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS 6-Bay	NAS	£735.99(20% off)
TerraMaster F6-424 NAS 6-Bay	NAS	£439,99(20% off)
TerraMaster F8-SSD Plus NAS 8-Bay	NAS	£583,99(20% off)
TerraMaster F8-SSD NAS 8-Bay	NAS	£439,99(20% off)
TerraMaster F2-212 NAS 2-Bay	NAS	£126.64 (25% off)
TerraMaster F4-423 NAS 4-Bay	NAS	£319.99 (28% off)
TerraMaster F2-423 NAS 2-Bay	NAS	£229.99 (26% off)
TERRAMASTER F2-424 NAS – 2Bay	NAS	£273.79 (26% off)
TERRAMASTER F4-424 NAS – 4Bay	NAS	£359.99 (25% off)
TERRAMASTER F4-424 Pro NAS – 4Bay	NAS	£472.49(25% off)
TerraMaster D2-320 USB Enclosure 2-Bay	DAS	£95.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster D4-320 USB Enclosure 4-Bay	DAS	£143.99 (20% off)
TERRAMASTER D6-320 USB Enclosure 6 Bay	DAS	£239.99 (20% off)
TERRAMASTER D8 Hybrid HDD NVMe Enclosure	DAS	£239.99 (20% off)
TERRAMASTER D5 Hybrid HDD NVMe Enclosure	DAS	£167.99 (20% off)

 

---

Canada Terramaster Prime Day 2025 Deals

For our Canadian friends, we’ve compiled a list of unbeatable offers just for you.

Canada

WHAT	MIX	DEAL
TerraMaster F8 SSD NAS 8-Bay	NAS	663.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F4-424 Max NAS 4-Bay	NAS	1039.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F4-424 Pro NAS 4-Bay	NAS	$713.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F2-423 NAS 2-Bay	NAS	$374.99 (25% off)
TerraMaster D4-320 USB Enclosure 4-Bay	DAS	$199.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster D8 Hybrid NVMe HDD USB RAID Storage 8-Bay	DAS	319.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster TD2 Thunderbolt 3 RAID Storage 2-Bay	DAS	$263.99 (20% off)

---

Germany Terramaster Prime Day 2025 Deals

Liebe tech enthusiasts, hier sind die besten Angebote für euch!

Germany

WHAT	MIX	DEAL
TerraMaster F2-424 NAS 2-Bay	NAS	€319.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F4-423 NAS 4-Bay	NAS	€367.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F4-424 Pro NAS 4-Bay	NAS	€583.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F4-424 MAX NAS 4-Bay	NAS	€759.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster F8 SSD NAS 8-Bay	NAS	€503.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster T12-500 Pro NAS 12-Bay	NAS	€1,799.99 (100 EURO off)
TerraMaster D5-300C USB RAID Storage 5-Bay	DAS	€183.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster D6-320 USB Enclosure 6-Bay	DAS	€263.99 (20% off)
TerraMaster D4-320 USB Enclosure 4-Bay	DAS	€167.99 (20% off)
TERRAMASTER D8 Hybrid HDD NVMe Enclosure	DAS	€263.99 (20% off)

 

---

France Terramaster Prime Day 2025 Deals

Chers amis français, voici les offres à ne pas manquer!

WHAT	MIX	DEAL
TerraMaster F8-SSD Plus NAS 8-Bay	NAS	€671,99(20% off)
TerraMaster F8-SSD NAS 8-Bay	NAS	€503,99(20% off)
TerraMaster F6-424 NAS 6-Bay	NAS	€503,99(20% off)
TerraMaster F4-424 Max NAS 4-Bay	NAS	€739,49(15% off)
TerraMaster F4-424 Pro NAS 4-Bay	NAS	583,99€ (20% off)
TERRAMASTER F4-424 NAS – 4Bay	NAS	423,99€ (20% off)
TerraMaster F4-423 NAS 2-Bay	NAS	322,49€ (25% off)
TerraMaster F4-212 NAS 4-Bay	NAS	€187.99 (25% off)
TERRAMASTER F2-424 NAS – 2Bay	NAS	296,99€ (25% off)
TerraMaster D8 Hybrid NVMe HDD USB RAID Storage 8-Bay	DAS	263,99€(20% off)
TerraMaster D5 Hybrid NVMe HDD USB RAID Storage 5-Bay	DAS	191,99€(20% off)
TerraMaster D5-300 USB RAID Storage 5-Bay	DAS	202,49€ (25% off)
TERRAMASTER D4-320 USB Enclosure 4 Bay	DAS	172,49€(25% off)
TERRAMASTER D2-320 USB Enclosure 2 Bay	DAS	111,99€(20% off)
TerraMaster TD2 Thunderbolt 3 RAID Storage 2-Bay	DAS	202,49€(25% off)

---

Spain Terramaster Prime Day 2025 Deals

¡Hola a nuestros amigos españoles! Aquí están las ofertas que no te puedes perder.

WHAT	MIX	DEAL
TerraMaster F4-424 Max NAS 4-Bay	NAS	759,99€ (20% off)
TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS 6-Bay	NAS	839,99€ (20% off)
TerraMaster F8-SSD Plus NAS 8-Bay	NAS	671,99€ (20% off)
TERRAMASTER F4-424 Pro 32GB NAS – 4Bay	NAS	583,99€ (20% off)
TERRAMASTER F4-424 NAS – 4Bay	NAS	412,49€ (25% off)
TerraMaster F6-424 NAS 6-Bay	NAS	503,99€ (20% off)
TerraMaster F8-SSD NAS 8-Bay	NAS	503,99€ (20% off)
TerraMaster F4-423 NAS 4-Bay	NAS	359,99€ (25% off)
TerraMaster D5-300C USB Enclosure 5-Bay	DAS	172,49€(25% off)
TerraMaster D2-320 USB Enclosure 2-Bay	DAS	143,99€ (20% off)
TerraMaster D4-320 USB Enclosure 4-Bay	DAS	167,99€ (20% off)
TERRAMASTER D6-320 USB Enclosure 6 Bay	DAS	263,99€(20% off)
TERRAMASTER D5 Hybrid HDD NVMe Enclosure	DAS	191,99€(20% off)
TERRAMASTER D8 Hybrid HDD NVMe Enclosure	DAS	263,99€(20% off)

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

En cherchant quelques bons plans à l’occasion du Prime Day, je suis tombé sur un produit qui n’a fait l’objet d’aucune annonce officielle : le UGREEN DH4300 Plus. Il s’agit d’un NAS 4 baies proposé à 343,99 €. Ce modèle intrigue autant par sa discrétion que par sa fiche technique…

UGREEN DH4300 Plus

Le UGREEN DH4300 Plus adopte un design peu commun qui rappelle étrangement celui du QNAP TS-453mini sorti en 2015. L’accès aux emplacements disques se fait en soulevant le couvercle supérieur, un choix de conception original pour ce segment.

Architecture

Ce NAS est propulsé par un SoC Rockchip RK3588C, un octo-cœur ARM composé de :

• 4 cœurs Cortex-A76 cadencés à 2,4/2,6 GHz
• 4 cœurs Cortex-A55 à 1,8 GHz

Le tout est accompagné d’un GPU Mali-G610 MP4 et d’un NPU 2.0 (Neural Processing Unit), dédié aux traitements d’intelligence artificielle. Ce dernier pourrait notamment permettre la reconnaissance faciale ou la recherche sémantique dans les photos, en local.

La mémoire vive serait de 8 Go de RAM DDR5, non extensible selon les premières informations.

Connectique

Pour ce qui est des interfaces de connexion, le NAS dispose :

• 1* port USB 3.0 (Type-C) en façade
• 2* port USB 3.0 (Type-A) à l’arrière
• 1* sortie HDMI Ultra HD/4K 60Hz
• 1* port réseau 2,5 Gb/s

On notera également la présence d’une puce NFC en façade, censée simplifier l’accès ou le partage de documents.

Système

Le NAS fonctionne avec UGOS, le système propriétaire de la marque, déjà utilisé sur les autres modèles UGREEN. Il devrait offrir les mêmes applications maison. Pour l’instant, aucune information ne confirme la possibilité d’installer un système alternatif

Prix et disponibilité

L’UGREEN DH4300 Plus est une curiosité qui pourrait séduire les amateurs à la recherche d’un bon rapport performance/prix. Si aucune communication officielle n’a été faite autour de ce modèle, il est pourtant disponible à 343,99 € (Prime Day), un tarif intéressant pour un NAS 4 baies. Il se positionne en concurrence directe avec des modèles comme le QNAP TS-433 ou le Synology DS423…

Prime Day Bargains on Synology, QNAP, UGREEN, Terramaster, Seagate and More to Watch

That’s right, it’s that time once again—Amazon Prime Day 2025 has arrived. The biggest e-retail giant in the world is rolling out its annual mega sale, and for those of us with a Prime subscription quietly siphoning cash every month, now’s the time to get something back. Whether you’re a home user looking to back up your devices or a business admin in need of robust storage solutions, Prime Day has consistently proven to be a great opportunity to upgrade your setup without breaking the bank. Unlike Black Friday—which tends to sprawl out across weeks and multiple platforms—Prime Day is a more concentrated event. That means the window to make a decision is often brief, and the best deals can vanish in hours, sometimes even minutes. So if you’re eyeing that NAS you’ve been meaning to buy or hoping to expand your RAID array with some fresh HDDs or SSDs, now’s the time to act fast.

Today, we’re rounding up as many of the best Amazon Prime Day deals on NAS and storage tech as we can find. That includes offers on popular brands like Synology, QNAP, WD, Seagate, Terramaster, and others. Alongside the real-time deals that we (me and Eddie—yes, still working double shifts!) track throughout the event, we’ve also put together a list of recommended hardware to watch for. Many of these devices pop up on lightning deals with limited stock, so having a shortlist in mind can really help.

Important Note – Every year, we run these Prime Day and Black Friday deal pages the same way: by personally curating the offers we believe are genuinely worth it. If it’s not something we’d buy ourselves, we won’t include it. You can also contribute and share any bargains you come across using the community deal-sharing tool below. We do this for a couple of reasons. First, to help people make smarter decisions with their tech purchases. Second, because every time someone clicks a deal link and makes a purchase, we receive a small commission from Amazon—no extra cost to you. That affiliate income directly supports the site and allows us to keep producing NAS guides, reviews, and how-to content every single day.

So, whether you’re looking to finally set up your first Plex server, expand your surveillance system, or just secure a better backup routine—there’s a good chance something will be on offer during Prime Day 2025. And if you’re unsure what’s right for your setup, don’t forget you can always use our Free Advice service for tailored recommendations.

Let’s dive into the deals!

NOTE – Just Adding European Deals Right Now. The U.S Amazon Prime Day deals and offers are just appearing as we speak, so I will add them as they pop up and are worth going for !

---

GMKTec G9 Nucbox 4x NVMe NAS + 64GB eMMC -15% $169.99 – HERE

---

26TB WD Red Pro NAS Hard Drive, –15% $484.49 List Price: $569.99 – HERE

---

UGREEN DXP4800 PLUS NAS (US) -25% $519.99 (Regular price $699.99) – HERE

---

Terramaster F6-424 6-Bay NAS -20% £479.99 (Was: $599) – HERE

---

Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro FS6712X – 12Bay SSD 10GbE NAS, -15% $679.00 List Price: $799.00 – HERE

---

CWWK Mini PC N100 Firewall Hardware 2 x 10GbE SFP+, 2 x i226V 2.5GbE, –20% $179.20 HERE

---

QNAP TS-233-2G-US 2 Bay NAS, 20% $159.00 (List Price: $159.00) – HERE

---

QNAP TS-433-4G-US 4 Bay NAS, 18% $309.00 (List Price: $379.00) – HERE

---

Seagate IronWolf Pro 24TB NAS Hard Drive – Now $419 –  HERE

---

Seagate Expansion 28TB External Hard Drive, -13% $329.99 Now – HERE

---

CWWK X86-P6 N150 4X m.2 NAS – -15% €184.44 Was: €216.99 – HERE

---

GMKTec G9 Nucbox 4x NVMe NAS + 64GB eMMC – HERE

---

CyberPower CP1500PFCRM2U PFC Sinewave UPS, -25% $299.95 List Price: $399.95 – HERE

---

Terramaster F8 SSD NAS (8x M.2 SSD and 10GbE -25% OFF, Now £412.49 – HERE

---

Crucial P310 4TB SSD (CT4000P310SSD801), 7GB/s -21% OFF, Now £205.99 – HERE

---

Seagate 20TB Ironwolf Pro NAS HDD – 8% £372.99 (RRP: £405.55RRP) – HERE

---

Discounts on UGREEN NAS- 20% OFF 6th July – 10th July 2025 – HERE

---

LincStation N1 6 Bay SSD NAS Storage – -15% £271.15 (Was: £319.00) – HERE

---

Terramaster F6-424 6-Bay NAS -20% £439.99 (Was: £549.99) – HERE

---

SODOLA 5 Port 2.5Gb Network Switch + 1 x 10G SFP V- HERE

---

Crucial BX500 SATA SSD 4TB, -15% £185.99 (RRP: £219.99) – HERE

---

UGREEN DXP4800 PLUS NAS (UK) -20% £479.98 RRP (£599.99RRP) – HERE

---

TERRAMASTER F2-212 2Bay NAS – Quad Core CPU DDR4 RAM -25% £127.49 Was: £169.99Was: £169.99 – HERE

---

Seagate IronWolf 4TB, NAS Hard Drive -9% £85.99 (RRP: £94.91) – HERE

---

Discounts on UGREEN NAS- 20% OFF 6th July – 10th July 2025 – HERE

---

TERRAMASTER F4-424 Max NAS, WAS $899, NOW $674 –HERE

---

---

————–  Useful Links  —————

US Amazon – Amazon USA Prime Day Official Page – Amazon UK Prime Day Official Page

Amazon Warehouse (20% Off Everything on Prime Day)

USA – UK – Germany

Still unsure of what you need – use the Free Advice Section here on NASCompares.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Les Amazon Prime Day se déroulent les 8 et 11 juillet 2025. Réservées exclusivement aux membres du programme Amazon Prime, ces journées promotionnelles offrent l’opportunité de réaliser d’importantes économies sur des milliers de produits, notamment dans les catégories high tech, maison, mode, et bien d’autres.

C’est une période particulièrement propice pour ceux qui souhaitent anticiper certains achats ou renouveler leur équipement à moindre coût. Les réductions proposées peuvent atteindre des niveaux rarement vus en dehors du Black Friday.

Profitez d’Amazon Prime gratuit pendant 30 jours

[edit] Mis à jour le 10 juillet 12h34

NAS

Le NAS UGREEN DXP2800 est à 279,99€. Il s’agit d’un boitier 2 baies complet, animé par processeur Quad Core Intel N100 cadencé à 2 GHz (mode Burst jusqu’à 3,4 GHz) et épaulé par 8 Go de RAM DDR5.

UGREEN DXP2800

On retrouve également l’excellent DXP4800 Plus au prix de 559,99€. Il s’agit d’un NAS 4 baies survitaminées, proposant une configuration robuste et du 10 Gb/s !

UGREEN DXP4800 Plus

 

Stockage externe

 

Le SSD externe SanDisk Extreme de 2 To est au prix de 151,98€ (un prix jamais vu). Le boitier propose de l’USB Type C et il peut atteindre jusqu’à 1000 Mo/s en lecture et écriture. Il est lui aussi résistant à la poussière et aux projections d’eau (IP65) !

Sandisk Extreme 2To

 

Le disque dur externe WD Elements de 20 To est à 381,89€, ce qui fait un prix de 19,09€/To… c’est un excellent tarif !!!

WD Elements

Ordinateur

Le MacBook Air M4 chute à 974€ (au lieu de 1199€ chez Apple). Il s’agit d’un ordinateur portable avec un écran de 13,6 pouces. Il est surpuissant avec une autonomie de 18 heures !

MacBook Air M4

Objet connecté

Les AirPods Pro de 2e génération sont à 199€ (au lieu de 279€ chez Apple). Il s’agit certainement des meilleurs écouteurs antibruits pour les fans de la marque.

Apple AirPods Pro

 

La prise connectée EVE Energy (compatible Matter) est à 29,99€. C’est une excellente prise connectée, respectueuse de la vie privée. Elle ne nécessite ni de cloud, ni d’inscription et tout fonctionne 100 % en local. Vous pouvez y aller les yeux fermés.

EVE Energy

 

 

Le détecteur de mouvement EVE Motion (compatible Matter) passe à 34,99€. Ce dernier peut fonctionner à l’intérieur, comme à l’extérieur. Nous, on recommande !!! Lire notre test…

EVE Motion

 

 

La station météo Netatmo Intérieur/Extérieur est à 109,99€ (remise de 19%) ! C’est sans aucun doute l’un des meilleurs produits  de sa catégorie. L’application mobile évolue régulièrement.

Station météo Netatmo

 

Pour faire un suivi de son poids, on peut prendre une pèse personne classique ou une balance connectée WITHINGS ! Cette dernière dispose d’un indicateur de masse grasse, de masse musculaire et peut même indiquer le pourcentage d’eau. Elle est à un prix de 79,95 € !

Balance Withings

 

L’excellent robot-aspirateur Dreame L10s Plus est à 269€… il s’agit certainement du des meilleurs qualité-prix sur son segment. Lire notre test…

Dreame L10s Plus

 

On présente plus ce classique, l’Amazon Kindle ! Toutes les versions (y compris les dernières) sont en promotion aujourd’hui et le premier prix démarre à partir de 69,99€.

Amazon Kindle

L’excellent casque Sennheiser MOMENTUM 4 est à 199,99€ (remise de 100€). Il s’agit certainement du meilleur casque avec suppression adaptative du bruit.

Casque Sennheiser

Logiciel

On ne le présente plus, Microsoft 365 famille est à 53,99€ (prix conseillé 189€) pendant 12 mois.. On retrouve toute la suite Office avec Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, OneNote… et surtout 6 comptes distincts avec chacun 1 To en ligne (soit 6 To en tout). Pour information, ce stockage en ligne est compatible avec les NAS Synology et QNAP. Si vous n’avez besoin d’un seul compte, le prix chute à 43,99€. Le choix est vite fait

Microsoft 365 Famille

 

Comment profiter de ces offres ?

Pour profiter de ces promotions, il vous faut absolument un abonnement à Prime. L’adhésion est à 6,99€ par mois (ou 69,99€ par an). Aussi, vous pouvez profiter gratuitement avec 30 jours d’essai gratuit !

Profitez d’Amazon Prime gratuit pendant 30 jours

De plus, vous aurez des conditions avantageuses pour les livraisons et accès aux services suivants : Prime Video, Prime Music, Prime Gaming, Prime Reading…

Cette page contient des liens affiliés