Synology DS925+ NAS Review – Good News, Bad News

If you have been looking at making the move away from your cloud service provider to gain better ownership of your data, or are looking to upgrade your existing network storage system to something a tad more modern, chances are that Synology and the new DS925+ system have already appeared on your radar. Synology, a 25-year veteran in the world of network-attached storage, is arguably one of the biggest names in the game and has long commanded the largest market share in home and business purchases of NAS. The new DS925+ is the refresh of the late 2022 Synology DS923+, upgrading a few things and arguably clipping the wings of others. Whenever Synology refreshes its range of solutions every few years, it is normally a moment of largely universal praise as long-term Synology users consider upgrading their kit.

However, the Synology 2025 series of devices has been arguably more contentious and criticized internet-wide due to the brand’s changing stance on its support of hard drives in this newer generation, revamping the way in which users can choose which drives they can use in their systems. This change is still very much in its early days and could easily end up working out for the best — or being reversed — but nevertheless, the Synology DS925+ has arrived on the scene to a great deal more criticism and apprehension than most other Synology NAS devices ever launched in the brand’s two-and-a-half-decade-long history. But all of that aside, is the DS925+ actually any good? What can it do, what can’t it do, and does it deserve your money and your data?

Synology DS925+ NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

On a sheer hardware level, the Synology DS925+ is one of the strongest 4-bay systems the brand has ever released in this class. Whether compared to the 2023 refresh or earlier models, it delivers a noticeably better hardware package for the price. The long-overdue move to 2.5GbE is welcome, even if extremely late, and the upgrade from a dual-core, four-thread processor to a quad-core, eight-thread chip is ideal for VMs and containers. The continued inclusion of ECC memory (4GB, expandable to 32GB) reinforces its focus on reliability. DSM remains a standout — arguably still the best turnkey NAS OS on the market for stability, usability, and features. However, the removal of 10GbE upgrade options feels like a significant regression, especially as external 2.5G/5G USB network adapters are now commonplace. The hardware, while generally solid, will still feel underwhelming to users who expect more flexibility — especially given the price.

But it’s Synology’s aggressive stance on storage compatibility that casts the longest shadow. The DS925+ refuses to initialise DSM unless you’re using approved drives — a dramatic shift from previous generations using identical hardware that supported many third-party drives. Synology’s vague communication and inconsistent rollout of this policy only amplify user frustration. It’s hard to escape the sense that Synology is either hesitating to fully commit to bundling its NAS units with storage, or clumsily trying to control the ecosystem. The DS925+ is still a very good NAS, maintaining a decade-long price point while offering improved internals and software. But unless Synology quickly clarifies this compatibility policy, this release may be remembered more for controversy than capability — their biggest “Apple moment” yet, for good or for bad.

SOFTWARE - 10/10

HARDWARE - 6/10

PERFORMANCE - 8/10

PRICE - 9/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.2

PROS

Dual 2.5GbE Ports: Finally upgrades from 1GbE, offering significantly better bandwidth and support for link aggregation and SMB multichannel.
ECC Memory Support: Comes with 4GB ECC RAM (expandable to 32GB), rare at this price point and excellent for data integrity in long-term storage.
Quad-Core Ryzen V1500B CPU: A proven server-grade processor with 4 cores and 8 threads, ideal for multitasking, VMs, containers, and business apps.
Excellent Thermal Performance: Dual 92mm fans and a well-ventilated chassis keep internal temperatures low even under extended load.
Low Noise Operation: Impressively quiet in idle and moderate use; system noise is more dependent on drive selection than fan noise.
USB-C Expansion Support: Adds future-proof connectivity via the DX525 expansion unit, replacing the aging eSATA interface.
Top-Tier DSM Software: Ships with DSM 7.2 — widely considered the best NAS OS — offering excellent backup, cloud, and media tools with a polished UI.
EXCEPTIONAL License-free software in Active Backup and inclusive-license Surveillance Station Software

CONS

No 10GbE Upgrade Option: Removes the PCIe slot from the DS923+, eliminating any path to scale beyond 2.5GbE.
Comparatively underwhelming hardware compared to similarly priced Turnkey NAS solutions available from QNAP, UGREEN, Asustor, etc
Strict Drive Compatibility: Will not initialise DSM without Synology-branded HDDs or drives on the compatibility list (which we are still awaiting confirmation on re: verification). Brand messaging on which drives work now, later, long term, etc is messy at the moment

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Synology DS925+ NAS Review – Design, Cooling and Power Consumption

The DS925+ maintains Synology’s long-standing chassis design, which has remained largely unchanged since around 2018–2019. It features a compact black plastic exterior with a solid metal internal frame that offers excellent durability and airflow.

The unit measures the same as its predecessors and blends easily into home or office environments. Ventilation is a central focus of the design, with large ventilated side panels, additional intake on the base, and a dual-fan array at the rear. These two 92mm fans replace the more typical single-fan setup found in many rival 4-bay systems, providing a more even and effective airflow throughout the unit.

The DS925+ also uses an external 100W power brick, though actual usage rarely approaches that limit.

In terms of noise, the DS925+ is impressively quiet during idle and moderate use — provided you’re using standard Synology-branded drives. With the system fully idle (RAID built, fans running at variable speed, no active users), the noise levels hovered around 36–37 dB(A).

When pushed with dual 2.5GbE connections and all drives under load, noise levels rose to about 48–50 dB(A), though much of this was attributed to the drives rather than the fans. Users planning to install high-capacity, enterprise-class drives like the HAT5300 series should expect higher operational noise. While the NAS fans remain relatively quiet, drive selection plays a significant role in the overall acoustic footprint of the system.

Power consumption during testing was also well within expectations. In a fully idle state, with base apps installed and the system not being accessed, the DS925+ drew approximately 28 watts. When fully loaded — with all four bays filled, SSDs installed, the CPU under strain, and both 2.5GbE connections active — consumption peaked around 62–64 watts.

These numbers align with what you’d expect for a Ryzen V1500B-based system with ECC memory and SSD support, though it’s worth noting that Synology’s own published power usage figures are lower. This discrepancy is likely due to Synology using SSDs in their testing rather than HDDs, which naturally draw more power and generate more heat.

Thermal performance on the DS925+ is particularly strong, especially considering the plastic enclosure. At the one-hour mark under moderate usage, system temperatures ranged from 35°C to 39°C.

After 24 hours of intermittent access, including background tasks like scrubbing and package installation, the system maintained a stable range of 34°C to 36°C. The dual rear fans, in conjunction with the well-ventilated chassis, clearly play a key role in keeping the internal environment controlled. These results are especially encouraging given that many competing 4-bay NAS systems still ship with only a single rear fan and less efficient airflow paths.

Bottom line, the DS925+ offers a refined, if familiar, physical design that prioritises quiet operation, effective heat management, and reasonable power efficiency – something this product series has always excelled at vs it’s competitors (such as the QNAP TS-464, Asustor Lockerstor series or still new UGREEN DXP4800. While Synology hasn’t reinvented the chassis, the dual fan design, ample ventilation, and strong thermal numbers show thoughtful incremental improvements. However, as with most NAS systems, the overall experience is still influenced heavily by drive selection — particularly in terms of noise and power draw. For users seeking a low-noise, power-efficient solution with excellent temperature control, the DS925+ remains a very well-balanced option in the 4-bay NAS category.

Synology DS925+ NAS Review – Ports and Connectivity

The Synology DS925+ supplies a fairly middling range of connections, depending on your point of view. Hot take: if you were to compare this device against previously released Synology devices, there is actually something of a mixed bag here to like as well as dislike. Likewise, if you compare the device to the available range of NAS solutions from this brand’s competitors, you could probably be especially critical of what you see here. However, there are some interesting features worthy of note, and given Synology’s heavy emphasis on internal operations and remote access priorities, it isn’t a huge surprise that the physical connections on this modest system are likewise pretty understated.

The front of the system features a single USB Type-A 5 Gb per second connection port that is predominantly used for connecting storage drives to make them remotely accessible. Synology has largely reduced the utility of these USB ports on their systems to simply storage and connection of a UPS system. So you can forget about utilising the majority of PC USB peripherals, directly connecting to the device over USB, or even simple network USB adaptors — a particularly unpopular choice by Synology in their DSM 7 update a few years ago. That said, the USB connectivity integrates extremely well with the backup software on this system, allowing for scheduled and automated backups to be conducted via this port, with particularly sophisticated filter customisation as needed.

Flipping the device around shows us the more important system connections available on the DS925+. The big headline here is Synology finally — finally — upgrading this system and the 2025 generation moving forward with 2.5 GbE ports, rather than the pedestrian and outdated 1 GbE network ports. The system features two ports, and the DSM platform allows for merging of these connections via protocols such as port trunking, link aggregation, load balancing, and SMB multi-channel, as well as failover as needed. These are certainly a welcome — if hugely overdue — upgrade on this system (when the bulk of this brand’s hardware competitors rolled out 2.5G as much as five years earlier at a similar price point). But at the very least, this does mean that users are going to be able to enjoy fuller saturation of the four SATA drive connections on this system more so than in previous generations of this product series.

That said, Synology giveth and Synology taketh away! Even though Synology has upgraded the default network connections on the device, they have removed the optional mini PCIe upgrade slot that was available on the DS923+ before this. This is going to be a huge kick in the ass for a lot of users who were considering purchasing this device over the DS923+ predecessor, as it means that the ability to scale up the network connectivity toward 10GbE is now not available on this system. So despite the fact that this system can now comfortably accommodate over two and a half times the external network bandwidth of its predecessor out of the box, it also means that the effective potential maximum network connectivity that a user could hope to achieve down the line has now been effectively halved! Again, this was always an optional upgrade in its predecessor, but it was an extremely welcome one for many — and given that even their value series of hard drives can hit between 180 and 200 MB per second per drive, that means that even the most inefficient RAID cluster with these drives will almost certainly still oversaturate the base twin 2.5G connections that the base model has. Therefore, you are being somewhat bottlenecked down the road because of this lack of network adapter upgradability. And don’t even get me started on the throttling that you will likely encounter if utilising M.2 NVMe RAID pools on the DS925+ via remote network connectivity.

Finally, we find another change in this product over its predecessors, and that is the shift in expandability on this system toward a USB-C output. This USB-C provides 5 Gb/s connectivity and only supports the new DX525 expansion chassis, which costs around $350 to $450 depending on where you are in the world and your local tax rate. Synology has always afforded the ability to expand this product series with a 5-bay expansion, either to spread the RAID configuration or mirror it appropriately, so this is a welcome — if expected — integration in the DS925+ class nonetheless, and it allows for greater storage scalability over the years.

All that said — and I’m sorry to be negative again — I can’t help but feel that this expandability is still being handled a tad clumsily. For a start, even at USB-C, that still means that the five SATA drives that the expansion supports are effectively capped in their maximum external bandwidth potential. And although you were never really going to enjoy greater speeds regardless — due to the 2.5 GbE network connectivity anyway — there are definitely going to be users who are sad about this further bottleneck on the performance of those drives in the expansion.

The fact that Synology did not implement an improved means of network connectivity — perhaps via 10 GbE or USB 3.2 Gen 2 (almost certainly due to a CPU choice limitation) — is really disheartening. Likewise, since this expansion now connects over standard USB, why are we still only limited to one expansion, and only via that specific USB port? The fact that we could have increased the number of expansion devices in line with the other available USB ports would have been tremendously appealing to users thinking about the long-term scalability of their system. And given that USB ports are common (if a little more restrained) on practically every single Synology NAS, this is a real missed opportunity to add storage expandability — and I can only assume it’s a conscious and deliberate choice by the brand to maintain their portfolio segmentation.

Bottom line: I love that this system is expandable, and I do like that a number of the features of the system have been improved over its predecessor. But as I mentioned earlier, the general standard of connectivity on the DS925+ is still awfully restrained when you take even a casual glance at the rest of the market right now. It only further underlines the fact that Synology is doubling down on this system more in terms of its software and capabilities rather than its hardware — which is no doubt going to please the bulk of users looking at this system who just want a stable NAS that does its job, but will nonetheless annoy enthusiasts and prosumers who want to make the most of their hardware.

Synology DS925+ NAS Review – Internal Hardware

If there is one area that Synology consistently gets criticised for, it is the hardware they choose to use. It can definitely be argued that, as a NAS is a 24/7 system, manufacturers need to focus heavily on the efficiency of hardware and keep things as high-performance as possible at the lowest cost of power consumption and hardware utilisation. Equally, it could be argued that because Synology prioritises software over hardware — and wants to maintain tightly locked price points in its portfolio — over the years they have had to be awfully tactical in the hardware they choose to use across their product lines. All these things no doubt play their part, but nonetheless, it all adds up to a system that is not exactly going to blow anyone away if they are looking at the hardware specs as the chief buying point for their first server or an upgrade.

The first thing I want to discuss is that CPU! Keeping things positive, this is a four-core, eight-thread AMD embedded server-class Ryzen processor. In human speak, that means this CPU is designed for server utilisation — chiefly for file processes and for spreading itself quite thinly across multiple processes and tasks with efficient ease. Additionally, this processor has already been utilised and heavily investigated by Synology since its first rollout at the higher end of the SMB section of its portfolio as early as 2019/2020 — so the brand has extensive experience in getting the very most it can out of this processor. Additionally, Synology has often taken the hardware configuration of a higher-tier solution in their portfolio and — between multi-year refreshes — then passed this hardware configuration down into lower and more affordable tiers over the years. So this processor’s appearance, and its refresh of the previous R1600 dual-core, four-thread processor in the DS923+ predecessor, is not unexpected — and for many, actually quite welcome.

Here is how the R1600 in the DS923+ 2022/2023 Release compares with the V1500B in the DS925+ Refresh:

Likewise, this processor provides the full spectrum of system software services and abilities that DiskStation Manager 7.2 has to offer. There is not a single DSM application or component that you are unable to take advantage of on this hardware spec. Alongside that, this CPU will comfortably allow for a decent number of VMs, containers, file processes, and simultaneous proprietary application services to all run at the exact same time — despite this system’s modest stature. Integrated graphics processors have been phased out from this particular product family — and this is the second refresh of the product line to remove integrated graphics-equipped processors — instead moving this kind of deployment to its smaller and more multimedia-focused DS425+ and DS225+ models. There are mixed results to this of course, especially given that the DS925+ has removed network upgradability — which I think may well leave quite a lot of CPU bandwidth by the roadside somewhat. But given the similarity in price point between this system and previous refreshes of this 4-bay series, I’m not, on the whole, unhappy with this processor. It’s just a continued departure by the brand away from classic 4-bays like the DS920+ and DS918+.

Alongside this processor, the system arrives with 4GB of DDR4 ECC SO-DIMM memory. ECC memory, in most network storage tech circles, is absolutely paramount for high-volume and high-frequency file transfers and long-term storage. Very, very few systems at the $550 price point ever include ECC memory in a turnkey NAS solution, and I know this is something that has always met with phenomenal praise by system integrators (SIs) who recommend Synology for simple and effective business storage requirements. Additionally, this memory can be scaled up all the way to 32GB, which — once you factor in the eight threads on this processor being spread out across multiple processes — is pretty darn good when you think about the scale of this system physically versus the potential of that software! Of course, in line with several other Synology policy changes over the years, the system is strictly compatible with only first-party memory upgrades from Synology — which you will not be surprised to hear are notably more expensive than third-party options in the market from Crucial, Kingston, and Samsung. This has always been something that has been met with notable disapproval by many, but Synology defends this by repeating the point that they want a single-party ecosystem, and the DS925+ is an appliance that centres around being smooth, efficient, and easy to deploy.

At the base of the system, we find the two M.2 NVMe slots that allow you to install one or two 2280-length SSD drives that can be utilised for read & write caching and/or use as storage pools. The benefits of utilising caching — when used in conjunction with the ECC memory and that file-transmission-focused processor — are pretty bloody significant, and it does allow for a degree of versatility and optimisation for users once again focused on high-volume and high-frequency data storage needs 24/7. But the use of these bays for storage pools is still pretty underwhelming at launch, and a big part of this is — much like other system upgrades — these M.2 bays are limited to only using Synology NVMe SSDs. This is a limitation compared with the predecessor, and while it’s a small tweak over the status quo, it becomes a significant one when you factor in that, currently, the only Synology M.2 NVMe offering is the heavily durability-focused but write-performance-weak SNV3400 series.

No doubt, as Synology rolls out more proprietary media-focused systems in their 2025 lineup and continues to expand the offering of branded storage media, the brand will eventually roll out a much more performance-rich NVMe SSD (perhaps the SNV5300 or SNV7400). But until that happens, these bays are a little restricted in terms of compatible media to really make the most of their capabilities right now.

Bottom line: for the money you’re laying down here — and if you factor in the value and quality of the software — many are going to be happy to overlook the comparatively underwhelming internal hardware on offer here when comparing it against the number of competitors on the market that focus on the hardware more than the software. If you’ve followed the brand for a long time, you’ll probably agree that what we’re seeing here is fairly standard for what this brand tends to include in their systems, and therefore you may be happy to give them a pass on this. But if this is a system that is chiefly being sold on its software and services — let’s discuss those a great deal more!

Synology DS925+ NAS Review – DSM Software and Services

The DS925+ arrives preloaded with Synology’s DiskStation Manager (DSM) 7.2, the latest version of their industry-leading NAS operating system. DSM has long been praised for its clean, intuitive interface that makes it easy for even novice users to get started while still offering deep functionality for IT professionals. Everything from user account creation, network configuration, file sharing, and app management is presented through a streamlined browser-based GUI. It’s an OS that feels more like a well-polished desktop environment than a traditional NAS UI, and the DS925+ handles it with ease thanks to its Ryzen CPU and ECC memory.

DSM offers comprehensive file management through File Station, and supports standard protocols such as SMB, FTP, WebDAV, and Rsync. Whether you’re accessing files locally or remotely, the experience is responsive and customisable. File previews, right-click menus, and in-browser streaming of media files all work out of the box, while features like folder-level encryption, WORM (write once, read many), and fine-grained user permissions ensure strong data governance. The included Synology Drive application further enhances file syncing and backup capabilities across multiple platforms — Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS.

Synology has also baked in powerful backup and disaster recovery tools into DSM, with Active Backup for Business standing out in particular. It supports full OS and file-level backups for Windows, Linux, virtual machines, SaaS apps like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, and even other NAS devices.

Best of all, it requires no additional licenses for most features. Hyper Backup provides flexible multi-destination backup options, while Snapshot Replication protects against ransomware or accidental deletions by allowing near-instant recovery of shared folders or entire volumes.

For users focused on multimedia, DSM supports apps like Synology Photos, Audio Station, and Plex Media Server. While Synology has scaled back some native media tools like Video Station, DSM remains highly compatible with third-party platforms. Container Manager and Virtual Machine Manager allow for lightweight app deployment and virtualisation without a license fee — with the DS925+ capable of running multiple Docker containers or virtual DSM instances simultaneously. Synology’s mobile apps also tie in seamlessly with DSM services, offering secure access to files, surveillance feeds, photo backups, and more.

Ultimately, DSM is the DS925+’s strongest asset. Synology’s software-first approach continues to pay off, delivering an experience that’s miles ahead of most competitors in terms of polish, security, and integration.

Whether you’re a home user setting up private cloud storage or a small business deploying multi-site backups, DSM remains the gold standard in NAS operating systems. For many users, the value of DSM alone justifies choosing Synology — even when hardware compromises or compatibility limitations exist.

Below is a breakdown of how the Synology DS925+ improves upon the software and service support of the DS923:

Synology DS925+ NAS Review – Storage and Compatibility

At the time of writing this review, Synology is seemingly waging a war on third-party drives being used inside their systems. Back in 2020/2021, Synology began rolling out their own range of storage media for use in their systems — starting with SSDs and eventually expanding to a range of 3.5-inch server-class and enterprise storage-class hard drives. Over the years, we have seen the brand begin to reduce the number of third-party drives listed as certified and verified for use in the DSM platform and in their NAS server devices. This duality — of promoting their own storage media while supporting third-party drives — has had its balance shifted considerably over the last two major Synology generations and across several updates in DSM.

In 2022, when the brand rolled out an update in DSM 7.1 that changed the system status for any NAS using non-Synology-approved drives to display a warning state, the wider Synology user base was in uproar — whether it was because they didn’t like the brand’s position on dictating which drives worked and which didn’t, or because, as a system integrator or admin, they suddenly had a bunch of clueless users complaining that the system had gone from green to amber. Synology would eventually roll this back and, although they never reversed the policy of warning users that their drives were not on the compatibility list, they did soften the system’s response. Fast forward to now, and the brand is again changing its third-party drive verification and compatibility methodologies internally. The 2025 series and onward will strictly require drives that are already listed on Synology’s compatibility list. So why is that a problem right now?

Well — twofold. First, right now only Synology HDDs and SSDs are listed on the official DS925+ compatibility pages, despite the hardware inside the DS925+ being identical to previous Synology hardware from both the 2020 and 2023 generations — both of which still list many Seagate, Western Digital, Toshiba, Samsung, Kingston, and more drives. That does look a little off.

But the second, more serious reason is Synology’s aggressive approach to this policy. Previously, if you used an unverified drive, the system would warn you in Storage Manager after setting up DSM, informing you that the drives were not verified by Synology and that using them might put your system in an unsupported state — potentially limiting any after-sales or technical support the brand could offer. The 2025 series, however, currently will not even allow you to initialise the system out of the box if you are using non-Synology hard drives.

This will no doubt be problematic with e-retailers and online dealers — unless they make this strict compatibility policy exceptionally clear. The rollout of these changes across the 2025 series has been inconsistent and unclear at best. It first emerged via a press release on Synology’s German website, despite now being mentioned in different areas of global Knowledge Centers. Even now, as I write this review, although the official Synology DS925+ page is live, the wording surrounding unverified drives and their support on this new system remains very diplomatic and vague.

It might well be that weeks or months from now, as this system rolls out, the list of drives supported on the Synology DS925+ and other NAS systems in the 2025 series will eventually include third-party drives from WD and Seagate. Nevertheless, the messaging has been profoundly unclear and inconclusive. Synology has always supported third-party drives in numerous systems before this one — systems that, as mentioned earlier, have exactly the same hardware as this system and run the latest version of DSM as well! If their verification and compatibility tests have changed, they need to make this a great deal clearer and more justifiable to users. If they have numerous reported cases of unverified drives wreaking havoc, they need to share these results.

On the flip side, many could argue that as long as Synology provides a range of hard drives and SSDs that are comparable in price and performance to those of third parties, then losing access to third-party drives is no big deal. Unfortunately, that is not globally true. While there are some examples of Synology media being at the same price and performance level as third-party options, the availability and pricing for these drives is nowhere near as consistent as those of third-party brands — and for many, that forms one of the greatest long-term issues for their storage.

If you have an existing Synology NAS that is using third-party hard drives, you are still able to migrate drives over to the new system physically. This will allow for an easy upgrade path for existing users — but it’s not really a tremendous benefit for those who were considering the DS925+ as their first shiny new NAS system.

Migrating your drives physically from an older Synology NAS to a new device allows you to proceed – but with warnings

In discussions with numerous people online, a lot of us agree that Synology is kind of half-assing something here. If they’re going to support third-party hard drives and SSDs on their systems, then they need to do it — and do it as well as they have before. Revamping a verification system in-house that many would argue didn’t need revamping in the first place seems silly at best and calculated at worst. Otherwise, if they want to commit to recommending their own media above all else, just go the whole hog: bundle the solutions as standard, pre-populated, and maybe even extend the savings too. Interestingly, the changes in system recognition of non-listed compatible drives seems to only impact HDDs at this time. If you first-time-setup your Synology DS925+ NAS with SATA SSD(s) – you are still able to initialise the NAS as before – albeit with red and amber warnings on the storage GUI:

We’ve already seen the brand’s stance on storage media play out this way with M.2 NVMe SSDs in the 2023 generation and later — only allowing storage pool deployments if you use Synology-branded drives and no others (yet still supporting third-party drives for caching, if you like). Synology knew this was going to be an unpopular policy, but obviously, this is part of their wider roadmap. The brand themselves state that this is a move toward redefining their platform — away from being just hardware and toward becoming a full and complete data appliance.

I do also want to comment on the way that the system presents the use of 3rd party drives, even when used in authorized ways (eg using SATA SSDs in initialization does NOT bar you from their use the way HDDs are when not on the compatibility pages – likewise when you use drives from an older Synology NAS via physical migration to the DS925+).

When you DO have non-synology confirmed drives in the system via these methods – the presentation of DSM is notably more negative and aggressively alarming. Red and Orange text, icons, warnings, alerts and triggering words like ‘At Risk’ are thrown around far, far too liberally.

As mentioned several times, this might all turn out to be a storm in a teacup, and Synology may expedite verification of hard drives on their compatibility lists — or even U-turn on this decision entirely and pretend it never happened. Either way, a lot of users — new and old — have based significant purchasing decisions on this change by the brand.

Synology DS925+ NAS Review – Conclusion & Verdict

On a sheer hardware level, the Synology DS925+ is largely a superior system out of the box compared with any previous 4-bay Synology NAS solution released by the brand in this class series. Whether you’re comparing how much has scaled up in this refresh of the previous 2023 series release, or just generally looking at the standard of what you get for your money here, for the most part — in terms of hardware — it is better than the majority of systems that came before it. The long, long overdue upgrade to 2.5 GbE network connections is welcome (even if the brand is especially late to the party here). The upgrade from a dual-core, four-thread processor to a quad-core, eight-thread processor is certainly going to please those VM and app sandbox/container users greatly. And the continued implementation of ECC memory at 4GB, with scalability up to 32GB, only further doubles down on this point.

DSM continues to impress and still holds itself comfortably as the premier turnkey NAS software solution on the market — both in terms of its feature set as well as its stability and usability. The lack of 10GbE scalability is a bitter pill to swallow when many of us were just getting used to the idea of Synology engaging with 10G NIC upgrades at this hardware level. And although this feature is promised on the DS1525+, it is still something of a pain point on the DS925+ — especially now, as $25 USB-to-2.5G and 5G network adaptors are very much a thing and widely supported everywhere. But for the most part, the hardware is consistent — if a little underwhelming. Synology solutions, though, have never been about the hardware. But beyond this is where the rather curious and unpopular choices by the brand regarding storage compatibility and verification in DSM and the 2025 series in general really end up marring what could have been a very confident release by Synology in the DS925+.

I hope that months from now, this matter is just a memory, and Synology has either expedited the verification of third-party drives or reversed the majority of these decisions due to public outcry. In truth, I think a lot of users would probably have preferred the DS925+ to roll out pre-populated with storage media — much like their new BeeStation series does. Going down the road of restricting which drives people can use was never going to be popular, so either don’t do it or fully commit to it. There is, of course, the argument that these drives — which were previously verified and confirmed working on the exact same hardware (CPU, motherboards, network deployment, and software utilisation) in previous generations — have mystically now been deemed unverified on the new 2025 series and its genuinely identical hardware to what came before. It’s an odd line in the sand to draw, a message that has been delivered messily, and I do not envy the Synology marketing team having to shape the narrative on this one. The bottom line is that the DS925+ is still a very, very good Synology NAS system, and although it loses a few bells and whistles compared to its predecessors, it still delivers very well on a platform that has maintained the same price point for its scale for more than a decade — despite changing world events. But until Synology clears up exactly how and why they’ve changed drive verification on this system in a clear and transparent fashion, I do think this is a NAS device that is going to pale in comparison to the deployment and overall sales of its predecessor — and the brand needs to sort this quickly.

The DS925+ is a good NAS for the money in terms of hardware and software, but we may well be witnessing Synology’s biggest “Apple moment” — for good and for bad.

Synology DS925+ NAS		Synology DS923+ NAS
Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS925+ NAS	Check B&H for the Synology DS925+ NAS	Check Amazon in Your Region for the Synology DS923+ NAS	Check B&H for the Synology DS923+ NAS

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464Synology DS925+ vs DS923+ NAS Synology vs UGREEN NAS (in 202Synology vs Terramaster in 202Synology vs UGREEN in 2025 - WSynology vs QNAP in 2025 - WhiWeek 17 Tech Roundup – LenovSynology DS925+ NAS ReleasedSynology DS925+ NAS Released ( Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Cette année, la journée mondiale du mot de passe est tombée le 1er mai. Pas de bol, je n’avais pas préparé d’article pour ce jour, donc il parait aujourd’hui. Mieux vaut tard que jamais, diront certains. J’ai décidé de partager mon expérience, donc n’hésitez pas à en faire de même en commentaire.

Bonnes pratiques pour ses mots de passe

Comme c’est la journée mondiale du mot de passe, il est important de rappeler quelques règles essentielles pour protéger vos comptes en ligne :

• Créez des mots de passe forts de 12 caractères minimum, en mélangeant lettres majuscules et minuscules, chiffres et symboles. Plus c’est complexe, mieux c’est !
• Ne jamais réutiliser les mots de passe sur plusieurs sites. Je sais, c’est plus facile à dire qu’à faire, surtout si l’on doit tout retenir de tête.
• Utilisez un gestionnaire de mots de passe (gratuit ou payant, il en existe beaucoup) pour stocker et générer des mots de passe uniques.
• Ajoutez l’authentification multifactorielle (MFA) lorsque c’est possible. Cela ajoute une couche de sécurité supplémentaire, même si votre mot de passe est compromis.

Mon expérience : gestionnaires de mots de passe

Au fil des années, j’ai utilisé plusieurs outils pour gérer mes mots de passe. Parmi les derniers, je peux citer KeePass, LastPass (que je déconseille pour diverses raisons de sécurité) et surtout Bitwarden. Ce dernier reste mon favori : il est sécurisé, multiplateforme, très complet, gratuit dans sa version de base, rapide et peut même être auto-hébergé sur un NAS. Pour ma part, j’ai environ 400 mots de passe enregistrés (impossible de tous les retenir). Du coup, j’ai un identifiant et un mot de passe fort uniquement pour accéder à mon coffre-fort Bitwarden.

Personnellement, j’utilise Bitwarden sur mon NAS depuis plusieurs années grâce à Docker (Vaultwarden). Cela signifie que mon coffre-fort de mots de passe est hébergé uniquement chez moi, ce qui me rassure côté confidentialité et sécurité.

Pour le quotidien, j’utilise l’extension Bitwarden dans mon navigateur préféré (Firefox) ainsi que l’application officielle sur mon téléphone. Cela me permet d’accéder à mes mots de passe où que je sois, sans sacrifier la sécurité.

Quelques mots de passe « hors ligne »

Cependant, je ne mets pas tous mes mots de passe dans Bitwarden. Oui, je l’avoue, je suis un peu parano sur les bords. Certains mots de passe ultra-sensibles, comme ceux de ma banque en ligne, l’accès à mes PC à la maison et au travail, ou encore celui de mon NAS, ne sont stockés nulle part (sauf dans ma tête, tant qu’elle fonctionne). C’est une précaution supplémentaire, même si cela demande un effort de mémoire.

Et vous, quelles sont vos habitudes pour gérer vos mots de passe ? Utilisez-vous un gestionnaire ? Si oui, lequel ? N’hésite pas à laisser un commentaire

Minisforum MS-A2 PC Review

The Minisforum MS-A2 is the latest entry in Minisforum’s growing lineup of workstation-focused mini PCs. First shown at CES 2025, the MS-A2 builds on ideas introduced in earlier models like the MS01 and MS-A1 but shifts toward an AMD platform, offering users a choice between two high-end Ryzen 9 CPUs. Rather than aiming for the ultra-compact form factor associated with traditional mini PCs, the MS-A2 leans into expandability, performance, and connectivity. It offers multiple M.2 storage slots, PCIe expansion, dual 10GbE SFP+ ports, and a layout designed to accommodate heavier workloads. Throughout this review, we’ll take a closer look at the internal hardware, external connections, design choices, performance in benchmarks, and how it compares to the MS-01, before wrapping up with a final verdict on where it fits in today’s mini PC market.

Minisforum MS-A2 Review – Quick Conclusion

The Minisforum MS-A2 is a powerful mini workstation that targets users needing high CPU performance, network scalability, and internal expandability rather than external device flexibility. Equipped with Ryzen 9 9955HX or 7945HX CPUs, up to 96GB DDR5 memory, triple M.2 slots, and dual 10GbE SFP+ ports, it offers strong capabilities for demanding workloads like virtualization, server hosting, and content creation. However, the absence of USB4/Thunderbolt 4 and observed inconsistencies in storage write speeds mean it may not fit every use case. Positioned alongside rather than as a replacement for the MS-01, the MS-A2 is best suited for buyers who prioritize multi-threaded performance and dense internal storage options in a compact form factor.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10

HARDWARE - 9/10

PERFORMANCE - 7/10

PRICE - 8/10

VALUE - 8/10

8.4

PROS

High CPU performance with 16 cores / 32 threads (Ryzen 9 9955HX or 7945HX options)
Support for up to 96GB DDR5 RAM for memory-heavy workloads
Triple PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots with U.2 drive compatibility for large internal storage capacity
Dual 10GbE SFP+ ports and dual 2.5GbE RJ45 ports for advanced networking
PCIe 4.0 x8 expansion slot for GPUs, NICs, or storage controllers
Efficient cooling design with separate fans for CPU and storage/network components
Tool-less chassis access for easy upgrades and maintenance
Strong multi-threaded performance for virtualization, server tasks, and rendering

CONS

No USB4 or Thunderbolt 4 support, limiting external expansion options
Inconsistent storage write speeds observed during testing
Large external 240W power brick, adding to desk clutter

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

Minisforum MS-A2 Review – Internal Hardware

Inside the Minisforum MS-A2, users have a choice between two processors: the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX or the Ryzen 9 7945HX. Both CPUs offer 16 cores and 32 threads, with a maximum boost clock of 5.4GHz. The 9955HX uses the newer Zen 5 architecture, while the 7945HX is built on Zen 4. The two processors are close in raw specifications, but the Zen 5 variant benefits from a more efficient 4nm process and updated IPC improvements. Integrated graphics are handled by the Radeon 610M on both options, offering basic graphical capabilities suitable for general-purpose workloads, but not designed for high-end gaming or intensive GPU compute tasks.

Memory support on the MS-A2 is generous for a mini PC. It features two DDR5 SO-DIMM slots, allowing up to 96GB of RAM. Systems based on the Ryzen 9000 series CPUs support memory speeds up to 5600MT/s, while Ryzen 7000 series CPUs are rated for up to 5200MT/s. This flexibility gives users room to configure the system for heavy multitasking, virtualization, or memory-hungry professional applications. However, the MS-A2 does not support ECC memory, which may be a consideration for users needing strict data integrity for server or professional workstation tasks.

Storage options are extensive, with three onboard M.2 slots available. One slot supports U.2 or standard M.2 NVMe drives up to 15TB (PCIe 4.0 x4), while two additional M.2 slots support either NVMe or SATA drives up to 4TB each.

All slots run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, ensuring strong storage performance for workflows like video editing, virtual machines, or database management. Minisforum also hints at future expandability through an optional accessory that would allow for the installation of up to six M.2 drives, although cooling for such configurations is still under development.

Cooling inside the MS-A2 is designed to accommodate the considerable thermal output of the CPUs and storage devices.

A dedicated CPU cooling system with copper piping and a 12V fan handles the processor, while a second 5V fan directly cools the SSD slots and the 10GbE controller. Despite the compact space, Minisforum has optimized airflow reasonably well, but heat sink space is limited, especially for M.2 drives, making active airflow critical.

Overall, the internal hardware layout focuses on balancing high performance with maintainability, though users planning extensive upgrades should be aware of space and thermal limits.

Minisforum MS-A2 Review – Ports and Connections

The Minisforum MS-A2 is equipped with a wide range of external connectivity options aimed at both workstation and server-style deployments. On the front panel, users will find two USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports, one USB 2.0 Type-A port, a 3.5mm four-in-one audio jack, and the system’s main power button with integrated LED indicator. This arrangement makes it easy to quickly connect peripherals like external drives, keyboards, or headsets without reaching around to the back of the device.

The rear panel is where the MS-A2’s workstation orientation becomes more evident. It features two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C ports with Alt Mode DisplayPort 2.0 support, a single HDMI 2.1 output capable of 8K60 video, and dual 2.5GbE RJ45 ports powered by Intel controllers. More notably, the system also includes two 10GbE SFP+ ports driven by an Intel X710 controller, opening up high-speed networking options typically reserved for larger systems.

This broad mix of ports covers a wide range of use cases, from high-resolution displays to enterprise-grade network environments.

The MS-A2 also provides PCIe expansion via a PCIe Gen 4 x8 physical slot, allowing users to install low-profile cards such as additional NICs, storage controllers, or even mobile GPUs through adapters. While the slot runs at x8 electrically, it can mechanically accommodate a x16-sized card, offering some flexibility in component choice.

However, users will need to consider power and thermal requirements carefully, given the limited space and airflow in the chassis. Overall, the MS-A2 offers a strong set of external connection options that match its intended role as a workstation-class device in a small form factor.

Minisforum MS-A2 Review – Design, Cooling and Power Consumption

The Minisforum MS-A2 maintains a compact footprint at 196 × 189 × 48 mm, but compared to typical mini PCs, it leans toward a small form factor workstation design rather than an ultra-portable device. Accessing the internals is straightforward thanks to a tool-less design: a single latch at the rear releases the chassis cover, making upgrades and maintenance simple. Ventilation is placed around all sides and across the base, maximizing airflow within the tight internal layout. Although densely packed, the internal component arrangement is relatively clean and accessible given the system’s size constraints.

Cooling inside the MS-A2 is split between two fans: a 12V fan for the CPU, which uses a heat pipe and fin arrangement, and a separate 5V fan cooling the storage area and 10GbE networking controller.

Minisforum has improved fan placement over the earlier MS-01 model, aiming to deliver better cooling to both the processor and critical components without introducing excessive noise.

During testing, the CPU temperatures at idle remained around 31–32°C, rising to approximately 50–52°C under sustained heavy load, including simultaneous 10GbE network activity and storage operations. SSD temperatures were also well-controlled, aided by direct airflow across the M.2 slots.

Power delivery for the MS-A2 comes through an external 240W power brick, rather than an internal PSU.

This design choice saves internal space but results in a relatively bulky external adapter. In idle conditions, the system drew between 23W and 26W, depending on network activity.

During maximum CPU load under PCMark and 3DMark testing, power consumption peaked at 129W.

Average system operation under moderate workloads saw consumption range between 60W and 80W. These figures suggest a reasonably efficient platform considering the CPU core count and networking capabilities, though users expecting true low-power behavior typical of smaller mini PCs should adjust their expectations accordingly.

Noise levels from the MS-A2 stayed moderate during most activities. Fan noise measured around 36–38 dB under light loads and rose to about 41–43 dB under heavy CPU and network utilization. This places the MS-A2 in a middle ground: quieter than larger workstations but more audible than simpler fanless mini PCs.

Overall, Minisforum’s cooling approach is effective for a compact workstation, balancing thermal performance and acoustic levels without the need for more aggressive—and louder—cooling solutions.

Minisforum MS-A2 Review – Performance Testing

In general usage and synthetic benchmarking, the Minisforum MS-A2 delivered performance levels in line with expectations for a device built around high-end mobile Ryzen processors. PCMark 10 returned an overall score of 6494, with strong showings in productivity (10,353 points) and essentials tasks (11,186 points). Applications like web browsing, document editing, and video conferencing performed without issue, backed by high single-thread and multi-thread responsiveness from the Ryzen 9 9955HX. The MS-A2 consistently handled multitasking loads involving office work, streaming, and background processes without noticeable slowdown.

For more demanding tasks, the MS-A2 remained competitive but showed the limitations of relying solely on integrated graphics. Digital content creation, including tasks like photo editing and light video editing, produced a PCMark 10 sub-score of 6418, which is respectable but not exceptional. 3DMark testing confirmed the Radeon 610M’s limited capabilities for 3D rendering and gaming workloads, achieving a Steel Nomad Light score of 605. These results reaffirm that while the MS-A2 is well-suited to workstation and productivity tasks, it is not designed for gaming or heavy graphical processing without an external GPU.

CPU-centric benchmarks demonstrated the strength of the Ryzen 9 9955HX. In the 3DMark CPU Profile test, the MS-A2 achieved 10,208 points at maximum threads and 9,879 at 16 threads, with a respectable 1,235 points in single-thread performance.

These scores reflect excellent multi-threaded processing capabilities, making the MS-A2 a solid choice for parallelized workloads such as software compilation, virtualization, and data analysis. Across extended testing sessions, thermal throttling was minimal, and the system maintained consistent performance without significant drops under sustained load.

Storage performance varied depending on the drive slot used, but generally provided strong results. Read speeds were consistently high, reaching 5.5 GB/s in AJA testing and peaking at 7.3 GB/s in CrystalDiskMark. However, write speeds showed more inconsistency across different test runs, sometimes peaking near 4 GB/s but with occasional dips depending on the benchmarking tool and conditions. While read performance makes the MS-A2 well suited for workloads involving frequent large file access, users planning heavy write-intensive tasks may want to further validate storage behavior based on their specific needs.

Minisforum MS-A2 or the Minisforum MS-01 PC?

While the Minisforum MS-A2 and MS-01 share a compact workstation focus, they are built around notably different platforms and priorities. The MS-01 uses Intel’s 12th and 13th Gen Core H-series processors, with options ranging from the Core i5-12600H to the Core i9-13900H, alongside Intel Iris Xe integrated graphics. It supports up to 64GB of DDR5 memory at 5200MHz and offers storage flexibility with up to three M.2 SSD slots. Crucially, the MS-01 features two USB4 ports capable of 40Gbps speeds and supports external GPU connectivity, along with dual 2.5GbE RJ45 ports and dual 10GbE SFP+ ports for network-heavy environments.

In contrast, the MS-A2 leverages AMD’s Ryzen 9 9955HX or 7945HX CPUs, offering more cores (16 cores and 32 threads) compared to the MS-01’s maximum of 14 cores and 20 threads. It also supports up to 96GB of DDR5 memory and includes three PCIe 4.0 NVMe slots, but lacks USB4 or Thunderbolt connectivity. Instead, the MS-A2 leans on internal expandability with a full PCIe 4.0 x8 slot and places a stronger emphasis on internal compute performance rather than external device bandwidth. Users needing the fastest possible external drive support or lighter CPU performance may prefer the MS-01, while those requiring maximum multi-threaded processing power and internal storage scalability will find the MS-A2 better suited to their needs.

Minisforum MS-A2 Review – Conclusion and Verdict

The Minisforum MS-A2 offers a significant amount of performance and expandability within a relatively compact design, but it is important to recognize exactly who this system is built for. Users needing strong CPU performance for workloads like virtualization, software development, database management, or network-attached storage will find a lot to like here. The Ryzen 9 9955HX and 7945HX options deliver high core and thread counts rarely seen in mini PCs, supported by fast DDR5 memory and ample M.2 storage options. Dual 10GbE SFP+ ports and PCIe 4.0 expandability add further flexibility for networked environments or specialized hardware configurations. However, the absence of USB4 or Thunderbolt support means the MS-A2 will not suit workflows heavily reliant on high-speed external devices. Storage write performance inconsistencies observed during testing may also warrant further validation depending on the intended workload.

Compared to the MS-01, the MS-A2 trades away some external connectivity and general-purpose flexibility in favor of raw compute power and internal upgrade potential. It does not replace the MS-01, nor is it a direct successor to the MS-A1—it instead sits alongside these models, offering an AMD-based alternative better suited for users prioritizing workstation performance over consumer-grade convenience. At a price range of $639 to $839 depending on the CPU, the MS-A2 is not inexpensive, and users must weigh its strengths against what they actually need. If maximum internal power, heavy multitasking, and network scalability are the priorities, the MS-A2 justifies its cost. If external GPU use, lighter workloads, or lower noise are the focus, other options—including the MS-01—might make more sense. Overall, the MS-A2 fills an important niche in Minisforum’s lineup, provided buyers approach it with the right expectations.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ NAS ReviewMinisforum MS-A2 ReviewWeek 17 Tech Roundup – LenovGoodtop Budget 6 Port 10GbE MaMinisForum N5 Pro vs AOOSTAR WZimaboard 2 ReviewZettlab D6 NAS ReviewZettlab D6 NAS Review - The FiUniFi USB4/TB4 to 10GbE Adapte Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Depuis quelques semaines, Synology prend un virage qui en déroute plus d’un. Tout d’abord, le fabricant limite désormais la compatibilité de ses NAS de la série “Plus” aux seuls disques durs et SSD Synology. Résultat : la DSx25+ est fermée à l’écosystème tiers. Seuls les disques Synology sont compatibles avec la gamme DSx25+. À ce jour, aucun fabricant de disques n’a obtenu de certification. Ce choix stratégique, associé à un DS925+ peu convaincant, pousse une partie de la communauté à envisager des alternatives sérieuses.

Dans ce contexte, nombreux sont ceux qui m’ont demandé quelle alternative pour remplacer un NAS Synology ?

Alternative à Synology

Avant toute chose, rappelons que la majorité des fabricants de NAS sont basés en Chine et à Taïwan. Un événement très important approche : le Computex. Les fabricants y dévoilent traditionnellement leurs nouveautés.

Comparatif meilleurs NAS en 2025

Si vous envisagez de quitter Synology, vous devez être prêt à faire une croix sur DSM, avec son interface et ses applications.

Quels fabricants sur le marché ?

Après Synology, on pense tout de suite à QNAP qui joue au coude à coude avec le fabricant historique. Ensuite, il y a bien sûr Asustor, mais aussi TerraMaster, Ugreen qui vient fraichement de débarquer. Après, le DIY (fait maison) a le vent en poupe en ce moment.

Mon choix : QNAP TS-464

Si je devais aujourd’hui remplacer mon NAS Synology, ce serait sans hésiter par le QNAP TS-464. Ce boitier dispose de 4 emplacements pour disques durs 3,5″ & SSD 2,5″, d’une architecture performante et d’une connectique riche.

Intérieur du NAS

Ce NAS est construit autour d’un processeur Quad Core Intel Celeron N5105 cadencé à 2 GHz (mode Burst jusqu’à 2,9 GHz). Il dispose de 8 Go de RAM extensibles jusqu’à 16 Go. Cette architecture fait de ce NAS un produit performant et économe en énergie. Il sera à l’aise avec les applications multimédias (Plex, Jellyfin…), Docker ou encore la virtualisation de machines Linux ou Windows.

Toujours à l’intérieur, le TS-464 possède 2 emplacements NVMe M.2 pour des SSD ultra-rapides.

Disque dur et SSD

Sur la question de la compatibilité, le TS-464 accepte de nombreux disques durs et SSD. Personnellement, je recommande les WD Red Plus, une valeur sûre.

Pour les SSD, j’apprécie également les WD Red SA500/SN700, mais aussi Samsung Plus/Pro ou encore les Crucial MX500. Ils fonctionnent tous très bien dans les NAS QNAP.

Interface de connexion

La connectique est également très riche :

• 2 ports USB 2.0 (arrière) ;
• 2 ports USB 3.2 Gen 2 (dont 1 en façade) ;
• 1 sortie HDMI 2.0 ;
• 2 ports réseau 2,5 Gb/s ;
• 1 slot PCIe Gen 3 x2 pour ajouter une carte 10 Gb/s ou des ports supplémentaires.

Oui, cela peut surprendre si vous ne connaissez que les NAS Synology.

Test du NAS QNAP TS-464

QTS

Le système embarqué dans les NAS QNAP se nomme QTS. C’est un système optimisé pour le stockage en réseau avec une interface moderne et complète. Comme avec DSM, il est possible d’installer de nombreuses applications : virtualisation, sauvegarde, multimédia, etc. Il existe également un catalogue d’application alternatif, MyQNAP.org qui proposent plusieurs centaines d’applications.

Même s’il est un peu plus technique que DSM, QTS est vraiment très puissant une fois qu’on le maîtrise, avec des possibilités supérieures.

QuTS Hero

QNAP propose un second système pour certains de ses NAS, dont le TS-464 : QuTS Hero. Il s’agit sensiblement de la même chose que QTS, mais axé sécurité et performances grâce notamment au système de fichiers ZFS nativement supporté ici.

Support

QNAP dispose d’une équipe en France, offrant un support en français pour les particuliers et les professionnels. De mon point de vue, c’est vraiment un atout. Même si l’IA commence à révolutionner le support technique, la présence humaine reste encore nécessaire. Aussi, vous pouvez compter sur le Forum des NAS avec sa communauté active et engagée.

Prix

À son lancement, le TS-464 coûtait environ 710 €, un tarif très élevé pour l’époque. Aujourd’hui, il est disponible autour de 630 €, ce qui reste un investissement, mais raisonnable au regard de ses prestations.

En synthèse

Si vous cherchez une alternative fiable, puissante et évolutive à un Synology 4 baies, le QNAP TS-464 est un excellent choix. Il demande peut-être un peu plus temps dans sa prise en main, mais les possibilités offertes par ce NAS sont nettement supérieures.

La nouvelle politique mise en place par Synology avec la série de NAS DSx25+ apporte beaucoup de confusion. Dans les commentaires, vous êtes nombreux à poser des questions — parfois en faisant quelques amalgames. Il faut reconnaître que la communication de Synology n’a pas été très claire sur ce sujet. Ayant un NAS DS925+ en test depuis plusieurs jours, je vais tenter de vous apporter quelques informations complémentaires basées sur mes propres tests.

Compatibilité disque dur et SSD

Avec la nouvelle série DSx25+, Synology a fait le choix de restreindre encore davantage la compatibilité des disques durs et SSD pour ses NAS. À l’heure où j’écris ces lignes, seuls les disques durs et SSD Synology sont officiellement compatibles.

Disposant d’un DS925+, j’ai effectué plusieurs essais avec différents disques et SSD. Voici ce qu’il en ressort…

Migration de disque dur

Fin 2023, j’ai remplacé mon NAS Synology DS920+ et, au passage, j’ai changé l’un des disques durs : un WD Red 4 To. Pour rappel, ce disque est spécialement conçu pour les NAS. Il est compatible avec l’ensemble des précédents NAS Synology, ainsi que chez les autres fabricants (Qnap, Asustor, TerraMaster, etc.).

Le disque, que je n’avais pas reformaté, a été inséré dans le DS925+. Dès le démarrage, le NAS le détecte correctement et propose une migration depuis l’ancien système. Une bonne nouvelle…

Après la migration et le redémarrage du NAS, les données sont parfaitement accessibles. Cependant, en consultant le Gestionnaire de stockage, des avertissements apparaissent :

Voici ce qu’indique DSM : « Ce groupe de stockage contient un ou plusieurs disques migrés. Ces disques peuvent affecter la fiabilité et la stabilité du système et doivent être remplacés immédiatement. Consulter les Infos sur le disque ci-dessous pour identifier les disques migrés. Veillez à sauvegarder vos données, puis supprimez ce groupe de stockage. Créez un nouveau stockage après avoir remplacé les disques par des disques compatibles ». Vous aurez noté également l’information en bas à droite en rouge « Migré depuis un autre système« .

La bonne nouvelle, c’est que tout fonctionne… sauf que l’on a un message d’avertissement. Synology explique qu’il faut le changer rapidement.

Nouvelle installation avec un disque dur

J’ai ensuite procédé à une réinitialisation complète du NAS, tout en conservant le même disque WD Red 4 To. Cette fois-ci, impossible de créer un volume de stockage. Oui, vous avez bien lu : blocage complet par le système.

DSM indique que « Aucun des disques inutilisés de votre Synology NAS ne répond aux exigences de disque ». Si je clique sur plus de détails, un message en rouge m’informe : « Ce disque ne figure pas sur la liste de compatibilité des produits Synology« . Impossible d’aller plus loin…

J’avoue avoir été surpris par cette interruption brutale de la part de Synology. Pour information, j’ai également tenté l’expérience avec un Seagate IronWolf Pro : le comportement est exactement le même.

Nouvelle installation avec un SDD

Étonnamment, le comportement est différent avec un SSD. Je possède un WD Red SA500, un modèle conçu pour des environnements RAID fonctionnant 24h/24 et 7j/7. Encore récemment, il était compatible avec tous les NAS Synology lui aussi.

Avec ce SSD, la création du groupe de stockage est possible. Synology semble estimer qu’un SSD répond mieux à certains critères de qualité (probablement en termes de vitesse de lecture/écriture) qu’un disque mécanique.

DSM autorise donc la création du volume de données, mais… de nombreux avertissements sont présents (notifications système, avertissement dans le Widget…) et notamment dans Gestionnaire de stockage :

Voici le message : « Ce groupe de stockage contient un ou plusieurs disques non vérifiés. L’utilisation de disques non vérifiés peut affecter la fiabilité et la stabilité du système. Vous pouvez vérifier les Infos sur le disque pour identifier les disques non vérifiés. Veillez à sauvegarder les données de ce groupe de stockage avant de le supprimer. Remplacez ensuite les disques non vérifiés et créez un nouveau groupe de stockage ».

Là aussi, Synology explique qu’il faut le changer rapidement.

En synthèse

Depuis quelques années, Synology renforce progressivement le contrôle sur l’écosystème matériel de ses NAS. Avec la série DSx25+, cette politique devient encore plus stricte : seuls les disques Synology sont officiellement supportés.

Avec un disque dur non Synology (WD Red, Seagate IronWolf…) :

Migration possible si le disque provient d’un ancien NAS Synology

Impossible de créer un nouveau volume/groupe de stockage

Avec un SSD non Synology (WD Red SA500 par exemple) :

Création d’un nouveau volume/groupe de stockage possible

Présence d’avertissements sur la compatibilité et les risques encourus

Si vous envisagez d’acheter un nouveau NAS Synology de cette gamme, il faudra impérativement intégrer dans votre budget l’achat de disques durs ou SSD Synology, sous peine de rencontrer des limitations.

À noter : pour ceux qui souhaitent savoir si le script 007revad fonctionne (afin de rendre éligibles les disques durs et SSD tiers) : la réponse est oui.

UniFi UNAS Pro: 6 Months On — A Measured Look at Ubiquiti’s First NAS

Six months since its public release in October 2024, the UniFi UNAS Pro has matured modestly but meaningfully. Initially positioned as an affordable $499, 7-bay NAS with integrated 10GbE and 1GbE networking, its appeal centered largely around seamless integration into UniFi environments and simple turnkey deployment. The first three months revealed a system that delivered on core promises without overselling itself, providing reliable basic storage with intuitive setup, minimal friction during deployment, and straightforward SMB file sharing. However, its limitations in areas such as feature breadth, expandability, and advanced administrative control left some early adopters questioning whether the device was ready to serve as a primary NAS solution.

UniFi UNAS Pro 6 Months Later – The TL;DR

Ubiquiti’s UniFi UNAS Pro has seen steady but conservative development since its launch in October 2024. At $499, it’s an affordable 7-bay NAS with 10GbE that integrates well within UniFi environments, but it launched with limited features and notable gaps. Over six months, some user-requested improvements have been delivered—such as RAID 6 support, expanded cloud backup options (Dropbox, OneDrive), admin control over user backups, and improved file sharing responsiveness. However, key omissions remain: no iSCSI support, no UniFi Protect integration, no containerization, no fan or power schedule controls, and occasional performance or file handling issues. It’s best suited as a supplementary NAS for existing UniFi networks rather than a full-featured standalone solution. Ubiquiti appears focused on stability and foundational updates, but major feature enhancements or new models have yet to appear. HERE are the most notable changes that have happened in the last 6 Months:

• Added support for RAID 6, hot spare migration, and Time Machine backups via Shared Drives.

• Enabled OneDrive and Dropbox as new cloud backup destinations.

• Introduced File Activity tracking and a Task Center for monitoring ongoing operations.

• Console owners can now manage and back up other users’ drives.

• Added SIEM server integration, SNMP configuration, and support for .exe execution via SMB.

• Users can now toggle Link Sharing and configure release channels per app.

• Support file generation now available for diagnostics.

• Improved setup, storage initialization, drive transfers, and local admin creation flows.

• Enhanced system performance, search speed, and responsiveness across the UI.

• File browsing, sharing, and backup/restore processes made smoother and more reliable.

• Boosted storage mounting and format resiliency, RAID resync handling, and external storage support.

• Improved reporting for storage health, system logs, and overall stability—especially with SSDs and encryption.

• Better SFP speed detection and more stable SMB file operations.

• Resolved issues with folder renaming, failed downloads, backup restore login errors, infinite loading on drive.ui.com, toast notification bugs, and destination switching during backups.

One of the more frequently cited early limitations was the lack of support for advanced RAID configurations and flexible storage management. At launch, users were restricted to basic options like RAID 1, 5, and a variant of RAID 10, with no ability to create multiple independent storage pools. This particularly limited users who wanted to separate SSDs for high-speed cache or hot data from HDDs used for cold or archival storage.

Three months after launch, UniFi began rolling out RAID 6 support—a heavily requested feature—and its integration was further refined by the six-month mark. Notably, users who had initially set up a RAID 5 with a hot spare could now migrate more smoothly to RAID 6 without complete data loss, provided certain steps were followed. While the system still lacks support for custom pool creation or tiered storage strategies, the RAID 6 addition is a clear example of Ubiquiti incorporating community feedback into its development roadmap.

Early adopters also flagged the limited backup options as a major downside, especially for offsite or cloud-based protection. Initially, users were confined to backups via SMB or to another UNAS unit, with Google Drive being the only available cloud service. This created friction for users looking to consolidate cloud storage or use existing platforms.

By the six-month update, support had been added for Dropbox and Microsoft OneDrive, expanding options and bringing the system more in line with mainstream NAS offerings. While other major providers like Amazon S3 or Backblaze B2 remain unsupported, the progress demonstrates ongoing development—even if somewhat slower than expected.

Administrative oversight and user management were similarly underdeveloped at launch. The inability for a super admin to manage, view, or initiate backups on user-specific drives was seen as a major gap in functionality. This was especially problematic in small businesses or households where centralized management is essential. At the six-month mark, UniFi addressed this by enabling admins to directly control user backup routines, offering a more appropriate level of oversight. Though expected in any multi-user NAS environment, this feature only arrived after considerable community pressure, reflecting a reactive—rather than proactive—development pattern.

Performance concerns also became more visible in real-world use. While general file transfers over SMB were stable for most users, large-volume or high-frequency data movements revealed issues. Users reported memory leaks, skipped files, permission errors, and signs of system instability during multi-terabyte migrations. One user described persistent problems during direct NAS-to-NAS SMB transfers, citing missing files and log entries showing out-of-memory warnings. While UniFi has issued multiple patches in response, these issues underline the system’s current limits as a high-performance data mover. Paired with its ARM-based CPU and fixed RAM, the UNAS Pro may not be ideal for workflows involving large file sets or deep nested directories with complex characters.

Quality-of-life improvements have also slowly emerged. File and folder sharing via the GUI is now more responsive, addressing early complaints that changes wouldn’t reflect until refreshing the browser or navigating away. A newly added file activity monitor provides more transparency by displaying changes and access logs on a folder-by-folder basis—a helpful addition for environments that require audit trails. Time Machine support has also been added for macOS users, allowing backups over SMB directly to the device. Additionally, executable files (.exe) now correctly run from network shares, resolving an earlier issue where files appeared to launch but did not actually execute on the system.

Despite hardware parity with UniFi’s UNVR line, the UNAS Pro still does not support UniFi Protect, Ubiquiti’s NVR platform. Although this was never advertised, its omission has disappointed users who hoped to consolidate storage and surveillance into a single device. Likewise, containerization remains absent. Users cannot deploy Docker or LXC-based services directly on the NAS. While the system is positioned more as a basic storage server than a full-featured app platform like Synology or QNAP, even lightweight container support would help bridge the gap in hybrid setups, reducing dependency on external devices for running supplemental services.

Several other features considered standard in competing NAS platforms are still missing. These include iSCSI target support, which allows for block-level storage mapping—a commonly requested enterprise feature that remains unaddressed despite repeated user requests. Scheduled power controls and Ethernet port management are also absent, limiting users’ ability to implement air-gapped operation cycles or optimize network behavior during off-hours.

Additionally, fan control settings are locked, leaving users with no way to adjust thermal behavior. System temperatures frequently hover in the 60–70°C range even during idle states, which some consider concerning. Whether due to poor fan curve logic or unreliable sensor reporting, the lack of manual override remains a drawback.

Another issue affecting a minority of users involves file download errors on mobile devices, particularly iPhones using Safari. Files would only partially download—such as halved images or incomplete audio/video files. The problem was isolated to Safari and resolved by switching to Chrome, but it exposed weaknesses in browser compatibility. Additionally, several systems erroneously report uptime durations exceeding 20,000 days—an obvious bug that, while harmless, illustrates rough edges still present in the software’s reporting logic.

As of April 2025, no additional NAS models have been added to the UniFi lineup. There is still only a single variant of the UNAS Pro, and no indications of rackmount, multi-unit, or lower-tier models have been announced. This suggests Ubiquiti is still treating this device as a pilot platform. The pace of development has been steady, with multiple small improvements and responses to community feedback, but foundational gaps remain. For users who need secure, reliable bulk storage within an existing UniFi network, the UNAS Pro is increasingly serviceable.

However, for broader use cases, it still lacks the depth, flexibility, and robustness of more established NAS vendors. Defintely a device with a long term plan, but it is not in a big hurry to stretch it’s muscles quite yet – but at $499, it has an exceptionally low bar for entry price wise for what you are getting!

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464Synology DS925+ vs DS923+ NAS Synology vs UGREEN NAS (in 202Synology DS925+ NAS ReleasedSynology DS925+ NAS Released (Aoostar WTR Max POWERHOUSE NASWeek 16 Tech Roundup – SynolSynology 2025 NAS Hard Drive a Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Synology vient de dévoiler officiellement son prochain NAS : le DS925+. Il fait déjà beaucoup parler de lui sur les réseaux. Même s’il n’est toujours pas commercialisé, ses spécifications sont d’ores et déjà connues. Vous avez été nombreux à nous solliciter pour savoir ce qu’apporte ce nouveau modèle face à son prédécesseur le DS923+. Nous vous proposons donc un comparatif clair et détaillé basé sur les données constructeurs pour vous aider à y voir plus clair.

DS925+ vs DS923+

Les NAS DS925+ et DS923+ sont des boîtiers plutôt haut de gamme chez Synology. Ils proposent chacun 4 emplacements en façade pour des disques durs ou SSD, ainsi que 2 emplacements SSD NVMe sous le NAS (pour le cache ou comme volume de stockage).

Il est également possible d’y connecter une unité d’expansion à 5 baies (DX525), permettant d’atteindre un total de 9 disques. Cette nouvelle unité externe utilise un port USB Type-C.

Processeur

Synology poursuit l’intégration de processeurs AMD Ryzen Embedded dans ses NAS. Le DS925+ embarque désormais un Ryzen V1500B Quad Core cadencé à 2,2 GHz, en remplacement du Ryzen R1600 Dual Core du DS923+.

Ce changement apporte une légère amélioration des performances, notamment en multitâche. Cependant, aucun des 2 modèles ne dispose d’un iGPU (processeur graphique intégré), ce qui limite leur capacité à faire du transcodage vidéo matériel… un point important pour les usages multimédia.

Mémoire ECC

La mémoire vive n’évolue pas entre les 2 modèle. On reste sur 4 Go en DDR4  ECC (Error-Correcting Code ou en français, code correcteur d’erreurs). La mémoire ECC est plus chère, mais elle apporte une certain stabilité. Elle est rarement conseillée dans les NAS, sauf lorsque le système utilise le système de fichiers ZFS.

Les 2 modèles intègrent 4 Go de mémoire DDR4 ECC, extensible jusqu’à 32 Go. C’est vraiment peu pour ce type de produit. La mémoire ECC (Error-Correcting Code) améliore la stabilité et la fiabilité, même si elle n’est pas indispensable dans un NAS non basé sur ZFS.

Connectique

Le DS925+ gagne 1 port USB 3.0 Type-C et 2 ports réseau 2,5 Gb/s. C’est la grande nouveauté de la gamme DSx25+, trop longtemps attendu.
En revanche, il perd l’emplacement pour la carte réseau 10 Gb/s (en option sur le DS923+). Ce dernier permettait d’atteindre selon le fabricant 1180 Mo/s en lecture et 772 Mo/s en écriture séquentielle, avec des SSD NVMe.

Limitation volontaire

Le principal point de friction reste la politique de compatibilité imposée par Synology. Le fabricant restreint l’usage aux disques durs et SSD certifiés. À ce jour, aucun disque n’est officiellement validé pour la série DSx25+, ce qui pourrait poser problème à court terme pour les acheteurs souhaitant utiliser leurs propres disques.

Tableau comparatif DS925+ vs DS923+

En synthèse

Le DS925+ s’inscrit dans la continuité du DS923+ avec quelques améliorations : un processeur plus costaud, des ports réseau 2,5 Gb/s et une connectique légèrement enrichie. Cependant, la suppression de l’emplacement pour carte 10 Gb/s et la politique de disques certifiés viennent tempérer cet enthousiasme.

Pour les utilisateurs ayant besoin de plus de baies, le DS1522+ reste une alternative intéressante avec ses 5 baies natives et la possibilité d’ajouter jusqu’à deux unités DX517. En revanche, son prix est plus élevé, aux alentours de 757 €.

Synology vs UGREEN NAS – Which One Deserves Your Money and Your Data?

In the evolving world of network-attached storage (NAS), users in 2025 are faced with a broader range of choices than ever before. Among the most discussed options in both professional and enthusiast communities are Synology and UGREEN. Synology has been a mainstay in the industry for over two decades, known for its reliable software, long-term support, and deeply integrated ecosystem. UGREEN, by contrast, is a relative newcomer to the NAS market in the West, but has quickly established itself as a serious contender by offering competitive hardware and pricing. Originally known for consumer tech peripherals, UGREEN has leveraged its manufacturing experience and market agility to carve out space in an area traditionally dominated by established NAS brands.

This comparison aims to provide a clear, unbiased overview of both brands, structured across several key categories: hardware capabilities, storage flexibility, software ecosystem, security infrastructure, pricing strategy, and overall value proposition. While some buyers may lean toward a brand due to legacy, others are driven by performance-per-dollar, or openness to customization. It’s important to understand that neither brand is objectively “better” in all respects. Instead, each appeals to different user priorities. What follows is a breakdown of how Synology and UGREEN compare across the board, giving potential buyers the tools they need to make a decision that aligns with their use case, technical comfort level, and long-term plans.

Synology vs UGREEN NAS Hardware Compared 

Synology’s hardware lineup spans everything from small 1-bay entry-level NAS units to rackmount enterprise-class systems with dual controllers. With approximately 15–25 models available at any given time, the variety on offer is extensive. This allows users to choose systems that align closely with their needs—whether that’s for simple backups, media streaming, virtualization, or business-critical data management. However, despite the breadth of its portfolio, Synology’s consumer and SMB offerings are frequently criticized for underpowered processors and limited upgrade paths. Many of their mid-tier models still rely on AMD Embedded or lower-end Intel chips, and memory configurations are often modest compared to similarly priced alternatives. PCIe expansion, 10GbE networking, and true Flash storage support are typically reserved for only the highest-tier devices.

UGREEN, on the other hand, has entered the NAS space with a clear emphasis on hardware strength. Their NASync series—although more limited in model variety—delivers high-performance components out of the box. Even in models priced around $1,100 to $1,200 USD, UGREEN includes features like Intel i5 processors, 16GB of DDR5 RAM, dual 10GbE ports, USB4, SD card slots, and Thunderbolt connectivity. Most of specifications are generally only found in Synology’s XS or SA series, which can cost double or triple the price. In terms of build quality, UGREEN’s enclosures also lean toward a more robust, enterprise-like design with better thermal management and port selection. While they may not yet offer the same portfolio depth or high-end rackmount solutions, the raw hardware value they deliver—especially for power users and media professionals—is difficult to overlook.

Synology DSM vs UGREEN UGOS NAS Software & Services

Storage features and flexibility represent one of the most contested areas between the two brands. Synology has developed a very feature-rich storage management system over the years, offering support for RAID configurations, Btrfs and EXT4 file systems, fast RAID rebuilds, advanced iSCSI LUN management, and deep integration with backup and synchronization tools.

File Services	SMB/NFS/AFP/WebDAV	Supported	Supported (AFP not confirmed)	Core protocols available
	iSCSI Support	Native iSCSI manager	Not currently supported	Important for VM/block-level storage
RAID & Storage	RAID 0/1/5/6/10, SHR	SHR and traditional RAID	Traditional RAID 0/1/5/6/10	No SHR support in UGREEN
	Snapshots	Btrfs-based with GUI versioning	Btrfs-based snapshots	Comparable snapshot system
	Deduplication	Btrfs-based	Planned, not available yet	UGREEN roadmap feature
	Encryption	Volume/folder/drive-level + WORM	No integrated encryption	Major security difference
	SSD Caching	GUI-managed	CLI-managed only (UI planned)	Limited interface currently

Their platform also supports drive pooling, storage tiering (in some models), and robust snapshot capabilities. Expansion options are a strong point too, with a range of proprietary expansion units that allow users to scale storage well beyond the original NAS chassis. These are bolstered by robust utilities in DSM that help manage redundancy, performance, and data recovery, all while maintaining consistency across the ecosystem.

However, Synology’s 2025 policy shift around hard drive compatibility introduces a significant caveat. Newer devices now strictly require Synology-branded drives for both HDD and SSD roles, including caching and storage pools. This effectively locks users into the Synology ecosystem and limits the ability to use commonly available alternatives from WD, Seagate, Samsung, and others. Availability issues in some regions further complicate this approach.

UGREEN, conversely, supports a far more open system—allowing users to populate their NAS devices with nearly any 2.5″, 3.5″, or NVMe drive on the market. With support for drives up to 24TB and Gen 4 NVMe speeds reaching 6,000–7,000 MB/s, UGREEN offers unmatched flexibility in storage media. However, their systems currently lack support for iSCSI and official expansion units, which could be a limitation for more advanced storage scenarios.

Software Comparison

Synology’s DiskStation Manager (DSM) is widely regarded as one of the most refined and mature NAS operating systems in the market. Backed by over two decades of development, DSM offers a wide range of first-party apps covering backup, multimedia, productivity, collaboration, and virtualization.

Tools like Synology Drive, Active Backup for Business, and Synology Photos provide enterprise-grade capabilities in a consumer-friendly package. The platform also integrates with cloud services like Office 365 and Google Workspace, and includes support for SANs, VMs, containers, and cloud sync. Importantly, most of these apps are license-free, representing significant value over time. The application center in DSM is extensive, and Synology’s desktop and mobile client tools are similarly well-developed.

Category	Feature	Synology	UGREEN NASync (DXP Series)	Notes
Core OS	OS	DSM (DiskStation Manager)	UGOS	Synology has a mature, polished UI
	Mobile Apps	Multiple DS apps across iOS/Android	One core management app + FireTV/Google Home apps	Broader app suite on Synology
Virtualization & Containers	Virtual Machines	Virtual Machine Manager	Dedicated VM app	Both platforms now offer VMs
	Docker Support	GUI + Docker CLI	Portainer + Docker CLI	Equal container support
	GPU Passthrough	Not available	Not supported	Neither platform offers this
AI & Surveillance	AI Services	Facial/people detection on DVA NAS	Advanced AI model recognition (Photo AI)	UGREEN offers more AI model types
	Surveillance Suite	Surveillance Station (native)	No native system (use Frigate, MotionEye via Docker)	Docker-based alternative
Media & Streaming	Plex Media Server	Native app support	Docker-only installation	Equal in function
	Jellyfin	Docker/homebrew only	Native app available	More flexible on UGREEN
	Video App	Video Station is EOL	Native video player app	UGREEN actively supports this
Backup & Sync	Backup Solutions	Hyper Backup, Active Backup Suite	Rsync, SMB, Cloud Backup, USB	GUI edge to Synology
	Cloud Sync	Native Cloud Sync app	Planned, rclone CLI workaround only	Still in development
Remote Access	DDNS + Tunnel	QuickConnect	UGREEN-hosted tunnel system	Functional equivalents
App Ecosystem	App Center	Extensive with many native packages	Real app center, but much smaller	Synology has a broader catalog
	Package Manager	synopkg	APT + Docker

UGREEN’s UGOS, by contrast, is still in its early stages—at least in the Western market—but has made notable progress. Built on a Linux-based open-source foundation, UGOS offers a modern UI and essential features like RAID management, Docker support, virtualization, remote access, and media streaming. The system is responsive and user-friendly, with most core NAS functions well-covered.

UGREEN’s App Center is less populated but growing, and the brand has made particular strides in AI-driven features—particularly in its photo application, which allows customizable object and face recognition with trainable AI modules. While still lacking some advanced enterprise features like Synology’s iSCSI or SAN support, UGOS is impressive for a brand with only a few years of development. Notably, UGREEN also supports the installation of third-party operating systems like TrueNAS or OpenMediaVault, appealing to users who want full control over their NAS.

Synology vs UGREEN NAS – Security 

When it comes to security, Synology’s long-standing reputation and infrastructure give it a distinct advantage. Over the years, the company has invested heavily in platform hardening, threat detection, and vulnerability response. The built-in Security Advisor not only scans for malware and viruses but also detects weak passwords, outdated software, open ports, and potentially exploitable system configurations. Synology participates in vulnerability disclosure programs, works with penetration testers, and maintains a public-facing security advisory database. They’ve even implemented a bounty system to reward ethical hackers for reporting vulnerabilities. These layers of proactive defense have earned Synology its reputation as one of the most secure NAS platforms in the world.

UGREEN has not experienced any public security incidents as of 2025, but its shorter time in the market means less historical data on its resilience. Their systems now include two-factor authentication and basic malware scanning, but currently lack the more comprehensive vulnerability detection tools that Synology provides. The security advisor in UGOS focuses primarily on active threats like viruses rather than system-level hardening.

That said, UGREEN has been responsive to user feedback and appears committed to improving its security infrastructure. For experienced users who follow best practices and secure their networks effectively, this may not be a deal-breaker. However, for enterprise users or those deploying systems in high-risk environments, Synology’s mature security ecosystem provides more peace of mind.

Remote Access	DDNS + Tunnel	QuickConnect	UGREEN-hosted tunnel system	Functional equivalents
Security & Access	Security Advisor	Ransomware, audit, malware, system hardening	Basic malware scanning only	Synology offers deeper protections
	VPN Server	Native UI for OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP	Docker-based VPNs (WireGuard, OpenVPN)	Manual setup on UGREEN
	SSL Certificates	Let’s Encrypt + GUI	Let’s Encrypt via Web UI	Parity here
	2FA Support	App-based 2FA	TOTP/Web 2FA	Both support 2FA login

Synology vs UGREEN NAS – Pricing and Value 

Pricing is one of the most decisive factors favoring UGREEN in 2025. The brand offers high-performance hardware at price points that undercut Synology by a substantial margin. An 8-bay UGREEN NAS with an Intel i5 CPU, 16GB DDR5 RAM, dual 10GbE, and Thunderbolt can be purchased for roughly $1,200-1300 (store depending). A Synology unit with similar specs would require jumping to the DS1823xs+ or even the SA series—devices that retail between $1,800 and $3,000 depending on configuration and region. This gap in price-performance makes UGREEN especially appealing to users who want modern hardware for tasks like 4K video editing, large-scale backups, or AI analytics but can’t justify enterprise-level spending.

Synology’s pricing strategy is rooted more in its software and long-term value. While the upfront cost may be higher, the investment is offset by an integrated ecosystem, professional-grade applications, and superior long-term support. For some buyers, particularly businesses and advanced home users who need software stability and vendor accountability, the price premium is justified. However, for price-sensitive consumers, hobbyists, or those comfortable managing their own systems, UGREEN’s value proposition is hard to beat. It’s also worth noting that UGREEN’s openness to third-party operating systems can further extend the device’s utility without adding cost, whereas Synology systems are heavily locked into their proprietary software environment. Here is a comparison of the Synology DS1823xs+ and the UGREEN DXP8800 PLUS NAS. Around $449 difference, but also the general level of the hardware inside and externally is technically higher on the UGREEN system. That said, the Synology system software does a huge amount with it’s software, keeping things super efficient. So, now let’s discuss storage and the respective software that both of these platforms offer to house and protect your data.

Synology vs UGREEN NAS – Verdict & Conclusion

Choosing between Synology and UGREEN in 2025 ultimately comes down to what matters most to the user. Synology is the more mature and refined platform, with a rock-solid software ecosystem, strong security credentials, and long-standing industry credibility. It is ideal for users who want a fully integrated solution with minimal tinkering, extensive app support, and professional-grade backup, synchronization, and collaboration tools. However, the brand’s increasing restrictions on drive compatibility, slower hardware updates, and higher prices may discourage users seeking flexibility or better raw performance.

UGREEN, while newer and still building out its software platform, delivers excellent hardware value and impressive flexibility for the price. It supports a wide range of third-party drives, offers strong virtualization and AI capabilities, and even allows OS replacement—making it highly appealing to power users and technologists. While it may not yet match Synology in software maturity or enterprise security, it is evolving rapidly and clearly resonates with a growing segment of the NAS market. For buyers focused on hardware, performance, and freedom of customization, UGREEN may be the better choice today. For those seeking long-term support, stable software, and enterprise-grade functionality, Synology still sets the benchmark across the rest of the NAS industry in terms of providing an all covering solution, though there is no denying that buyers are getting a little more cost aware. Synology clearly has it’s eyes on bigger prizes right now, and perhaps this is a growing gap in the market that UGREEN is eying up – knife and fork in hand!

NAS Solutions	NAS Solutions
+ Better Software (In almost every respect!) + Much Better Global Support Presence + More More business desirable + Larger Range of solutions – Compatibility restrictions on HDD and Upgrades More and more – Underwhelming hardware (comparatively)	+ Better Hardware for Price + Flexibility to Install 3rd Party OS’ + Excellent Mobile Application + Wide accessory compatibility – Software still has beta elements – The company has a much shorter NAS Market Experience
Check Amazon By Clicking Below:	Check Amazon By Clicking Below:

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464Synology DS925+ vs DS923+ NAS Synology vs Terramaster in 202Synology vs UGREEN in 2025 - WSynology vs QNAP in 2025 - WhiWeek 17 Tech Roundup – LenovSynology DS925+ NAS ReleasedSynology DS925+ NAS Released ( Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Synology vient d’annoncer l’arrivée prochaine d’un nouveau modèle de NAS : le DS925+. C’est le premier modèle de la nouvelle génération DSx25. Au programme : un processeur AMD Ryzen V1500B, 4 Go de RAM DDR4 ECC, et surtout deux ports réseau 2,5 Gb/s. Mais ce n’est pas tout…

Synology DS925+

Alors qu’il est attendu un peu plus tard en France, Synology vient de mettre en ligne la page produit du DS925+ en anglais. Il s’agit d’un NAS 4 baies, capable de recevoir une unité d’expansion de 5 baies supplémentaires, pour un total de 9 emplacements.

Ce nouveau boitier réseau repose sur un processeur Quad Core AMD Ryzen V1500B cadencé à 2,2 GHz, épaulé par 4 Go de RAM en DDR4 ECC (extensible jusqu’à 32 Go). C’est le même CPU que celui utilisé dans les modèles DS1621+ et DS1821+. Pour rappel, ce dernier ne dispose pas de GPU intégré (iGPU).

Disque dur & SSD

Le Synology DS925+ propose 4 emplacements pour disques 3,5 pouces (compatibles SSD 2,5 pouces) et 2 emplacements pour SSD NVMe, accessibles par le dessous de l’appareil. Il s’agit également du premier modèle  à restreindre officiellement la compatibilité aux disques durs et SSD Synology. Pour le moment, aucun autre disque n’est certifié comme compatible pour ce NAS.

Connectique

Côté connectique, le DS925+ est équipé de :

• 2 ports USB 3.0 Type-A (dont 1 à l’avant) ;
• 1 port USB 3.0 Type-C ;
• 2 ports réseau 2,5 Gb/s.

C’est tout… et c’est suffisant pour beaucoup.

On notera que Synology répond enfin à une demande récurrente des utilisateurs : la présence du Multi-Gig en standard. En revanche, contrairement au DS923+, le port PCIe a disparu. Ce dernier permettait de recevoir une carte 10 Gb/s.

DSM 8.0 ?

Le NAS sera livré avec DSM 7.2.2. Le fabricant ne fait aucune mention de la prochaine version de son système.

Prix et disponibilité

Le prix officiel du DS925+ n’a pas encore été communiqué par Synology. Toutefois, plusieurs fuites circulent déjà (avec 551£ au UK). La disponibilité semble imminente, une question de jours

[edit du 1/05] Le DS925+ vient d’apparaitre sur Amazon.

Pour plus d’informations sur ce nouveau NAS, rendez-vous sur la fiche produit officielle du DS925+…

source

Réputé pour ses Mini-PC fiables et performants, Beelink élargit son champ d’action avec une toute nouvelle gamme de solutions de stockage réseau : la série ME. L’entreprise chinoise fait son entrée sur le marché des NAS, avec une ambition claire : proposer une alternative compacte, silencieuse et performante aux solutions traditionnelles. Le premier modèle, baptisé Beelink ME mini, sera disponible très prochainement…

Beelink ME mini

Le Beelink ME mini est un boitier avec des dimensions réduites (99 × 99,2 × 98,3 mm) et un poids plume de 730 g. Malgré sa petite taille, il offre une capacité de stockage importante (jusqu’à 24 To) grâce à ses 6 emplacements M.2 SSD NVMe. Le NAS sera décliné en trois coloris sobres et élégants : blanc perle, bleu paon et gris nuit.

À noter qu’une version pré-configurée avec des SSD Crucial sera également proposée.

Architecture

Le Beelink ME mini  est construit autour d’un processeur Quad Core Intel N200 capable d’atteindre 3,70 GHz, épaulé par 12 Go de RAM en DDR5. Une configuration suffisamment musclée pour répondre aux usages typiques d’un NAS moderne, mais aussi pour d’autres fonctions plus complexes, comme le transcodage, exécuter des machines virtuelles, etc.

Connectique

Du côté de la connectique, nous avons :

• 2 ports USB 3.0 Type-A dont 1 à l’avant ;
• 1 port USB 3.0 Type-C à l’avant ;
• 2 ports Ethernet 2,5 Gbps ;
• 1 sortie HDMI ;
• Wi-Fi 6 et Bluetooth 5.2.

Mini PC ou NAS, pourquoi choisir ?

Cloud personnel

Faire du matériel c’est une chose, mais offrir un système complet, performant et ergonomique… c’est plus compliqué. Beelink fait le choix de proposer Windows par défaut sur ses machines. Le fabricant indique « Le système d’exploitation Windows comprend un service de stockage NAS intégré, qui prend en charge la connexion directe entre les téléphones mobiles et les PC au sein du réseau local, facilitant ainsi l’échange et la sauvegarde des données entre les téléphones mobiles et les PC. Polyvalent dans ses fonctionnalités, le ME mini peut être à la fois un mini PC et votre espace de stockage en nuage personnel ».

Enfin, Beelink prévoit également 2 modèles supplémentaires : ME Pro et ME MAX pour des besoins plus avancés.

En synthèse

L’arrivée de Beelink sur le marché du NAS est une bonne nouvelle. Le secteur, dominé par quelques acteurs historiques, avait bien besoin d’un vent de fraîcheur. Si la promesse matérielle est au rendez-vous, reste à voir si l’expérience logicielle sera à la hauteur. Affaire à suivre…

Le Beelink ME mini est déjà disponible en Chine en très faible quantité. Il devrait arriver prochainement sur le marché européen, on espère pour un prix autour des 400€ l’unité.

source

Synology DS925+ NAS Officially Launches in Eastern Markets – Full Specs and Features Confirmed

Following early retailer listings and semi-official leaks earlier this year, the Synology DS925+ NAS has now been formally launched in Eastern markets, including Taiwan, Japan, and China. With full documentation and product pages now publicly available, we finally have confirmation of the system’s complete hardware and software capabilities, as well as early indications of pricing and the compatibility of Hard Drives and SSDs (something of a hot button topic of late). As expected, this system builds on the DS923+’s foundation but introduces key changes that shift its performance profile and position within the Synology portfolio once again!

At the heart of the DS925+ is the AMD Ryzen V1500B, a quad-core, eight-thread processor previously used in larger business-class NAS models like the DS1621+, DS1821+, and DS2422+. Its integration into a 4-bay unit marks the first time this CPU has appeared in Synology’s enthusiast/prosumer tier, bringing greater virtualization, multi-user performance, and multitasking efficiency to this class. With a base frequency of 2.2 GHz and TDP of 16W, the V1500B is a lower-power but more scalable chip compared to the dual-core R1600 in the DS923+, which has a higher clock but fewer threads. This change benefits users focused on Docker, VMs, or simultaneous file operations.

Confirmed in the datasheet is the DS925+’s dual 2.5GbE network ports, supporting Link Aggregation (LAG) and SMB Multichannel, allowing up to 5GbE aggregate throughput—a significant improvement over the DS923+’s 2x 1GbE configuration. Expansion also sees a shift: the DS925+ uses the new DX525 expansion unit, connected via USB-C (6Gbps), replacing the legacy eSATA-based DX517. Internally, the system includes four hot-swappable drive bays (3.5″/2.5″ SATA HDD/SSD), and two M.2 2280 NVMe Gen 3 slots for SSD caching or storage pools (when using Synology’s SNV series drives).

Memory support includes 4GB of DDR4 ECC by default, expandable up to 32GB via two SODIMM slots, and the system supports 200TB volumes (with 32GB RAM) and up to 32 internal volumes. Storage management features are as expected from DSM 7.2+, including Snapshot Replication, Hyper Backup, Active Backup for Business, and Hybrid Share. While the system does not support 10GbE upgrades (removal of mini PCIe slot), Synology appears to be emphasizing strong native network performance and reduced complexity over modular upgrades.

Physically, the chassis weighs 2.26kg, has two 92mm fans, and offers 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, alongside one USB-C expansion port. It operates within a 0°C to 40°C range, supports high altitudes up to 5,000m, and includes all standard Synology DSM security tools: firewalls, encrypted folders, SFTP, HTTPS with custom ciphers, and Adaptive MFA. As a data platform, the DS925+ supports 500,000 hosted files in Synology Drive, up to 80 Office users, and 150 Synology Chat users. On the virtualization side, it supports VMware, Hyper-V, Citrix, OpenStack, and allows for up to 8 virtual DSMs or VM instances (license-dependent). Surveillance support includes two default camera licenses, and scalable support for up to 40 IP cameras at 1200FPS (H.265), with full integration into Surveillance Station and optional C2 cloud backup.

Synology DS925+ Pricing and Availability

Following the official launch of the Synology DS925+ NAS in Eastern markets—including Taiwan, China, and Japan—we now have more concrete pricing details. In China, the base unit without drives is priced at ¥4,999, which converts to approximately £500 before tax. Pre-configured options are also being sold, featuring combinations of Synology’s own-branded hard drives in 4TB, 8TB, 16TB, and even 64TB arrays. For example, a DS925+ with 2 x 8TB Synology drives (16TB total) is listed at ¥8,469 (~£845 pre-tax), while a fully populated 64TB configuration with 4 x 16TB drives is priced at ¥14,919 (~£1,490 pre-tax). In the UK and other Western markets, the DS925+ is expected to launch in early May, with Amazon UK listings already live very briefly last week before it was taken offline, showing the base unit at £550 including VAT. Here’s a rough estimate pricing table for the Synology DS925+ configurations, converted from Chinese Yuan (CNY) to both US Dollars (USD) and British Pounds (GBP) using the exchange rates as of April 22, 2025 (remember this does not precisely calculate tax across nations and their currencies, so these are for rough guidance only):

• 1 Yuan= 0.1371 USD

• 1 Yuan = 0.1025 GBP​

Note: Prices are approximate and based on exchange rates as of April 22, 2025. Actual prices may vary due to fluctuations in exchange rates and regional pricing policies with regard to inclusive tax at checkout.

The accompanying DX525 5-bay USB-C expansion chassis—which replaces the legacy DX517 and uses a similar metal casing—is priced at £439. These prices align with Synology’s long-standing strategy of maintaining consistent MSRP targets for its 2-, 4-, and 5-bay Prosumer-tier NAS units year-over-year, even when internal hardware evolves.

Synology DS925+ NAS HDD Compatibility in 2025

One of the biggest shifts accompanying the DS925+ release is Synology’s newly enforced drive compatibility policy on 2025 and newer NAS systems. Starting with this model, only drives listed on the official Product Compatibility List (PCL) will be supported during initial installation. At launch, this list consists exclusively of Synology-branded HDDs and SSDs, though Synology has confirmed that it plans to expand the third-party validation program moving forward. This move represents a broader shift by Synology toward an appliance-like ecosystem, citing increased reliability, faster support diagnostics, and significantly reduced system anomalies when validated media is used. According to the company, using listed drives can reduce storage-related issues by up to 40%, while severe disk anomalies on newer systems have reportedly decreased by as much as 88% under the new policy. Even though the DS925+ NAS has not been globally launched, in the regions it HAS been launched (China, Australia and Jopan, at the time of writing) it has opened up access to the DS925+ hard drive compatibility pages. Here is what you will find:

Practically speaking, this doesn’t mean you can’t install third-party drives (e.g. Seagate or WD), but using unlisted drives may limit your access to certain features—such as volume creation, deduplication, disk health analytics, automatic firmware updates, and even eligibility for Synology technical support. Fortunately, drive migrations from older Synology systems are supported, and older Plus series models (up to and including 2024) remain unaffected.

Still, new users and businesses investing in DS925+ hardware should factor these limitations into their decision, especially if they plan on using existing non-Synology drives. We are still awaiting FULL confirmation on the extent of the utility of 3rd party HDDs in realword use however. For example – can you even initialize a Synology DS925+ NAS with unverified Synology Hard Drives? There have been claims online that you cannot – but until this is fully verified, I/we will need to hold off full judgement!

Final Thoughts

The Synology DS925+ marks a meaningful update to the company’s 4-bay Plus series—bringing improvements in multi-core processing, networking, and system efficiency. The shift to a more capable 4-core, 8-thread AMD V1500B CPU, combined with 2.5GbE networking and modernized expansion via USB-C, ensures this model is better suited to the needs of virtualized, multi-user, and SMB environments. Yet, some users will see the removal of the PCIe slot for 10GbE upgrades as a notable loss, especially compared with the DS923+ which retains this feature.

That said, the DS925+ does benefit from many refinements learned across the Synology portfolio, and its arrival coincides with a broader strategy shift—one that tightens integration between hardware and software while prioritizing platform consistency. This NAS is clearly aimed at power users and businesses ready to invest in Synology’s controlled ecosystem, and for those who are fine with that trade-off, it offers a lot of value. However, prospective buyers who are still committed to third-party drives or planning future high-speed networking upgrades may want to carefully weigh their long-term priorities before making a decision.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464Synology DS925+ vs DS923+ NAS Synology vs UGREEN NAS (in 202Synology vs Terramaster in 202Synology vs UGREEN in 2025 - WSynology vs QNAP in 2025 - WhiWeek 17 Tech Roundup – LenovSynology DS925+ NAS Released ( Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Bonjour à tous,

J’espère que vous allez bien. J’avais prévu de prendre un peu de repos ces derniers jours, mais plusieurs imprévus m’en ont empêché. Ce repos pourtant bien mérité devra encore attendre, peut-être les prochains ponts. Quoi qu’il en soit, le moral est bon

Je suis en train de finaliser le test de 2 NAS (QNAP et Asustor), dont la publication est prévue dans les prochains jours. Il y a du bon… et du moins bon. Ces derniers temps, j’ai été agréablement surpris par les commentaires laissés sur les articles : moins de trolls, plus de réflexions constructives. Malgré quelques tempêtes passées, les commentaires sont restés ouverts. Pour moi, c’est essentiel de pouvoir lire vos retours et échanger ici. On ne partage pas toujours les mêmes points de vue, mais le débat et la réflexion ont toute leur place.

Vous l’avez sans doute remarqué, j’ai ralenti le rythme de publication des articles. J’ai suivi vos conseils… mais l’envie d’en faire un peu plus reste toujours là. Merci encore pour vos commentaires et vos encouragements, ils comptent beaucoup.

Du côté des films, j’ai été voir Zion, qui est assez plaisant. Du côté des séries, j’ai regardé avec plaisir The White Lotus – Saison 3, ainsi que Mr Bates vs The Post Office que vous m’avez conseillé. En revanche, j’ai moins accorché sur The Suspect.

Allez, je vous laisse…

Bonne journée à tous,
FX

Vous vous demandez si vous pouvez faire fonctionner ChatGPT, ou plus largement un LLM, sur votre NAS Synology ? La réponse est oui ! Mieux encore, cette installation ne prend que quelques minutes grâce à Docker. Dans cet article, je vous propose un guide simple et accessible, avec quelques conseils adaptés à votre NAS. Cependant, avant de commencer, il est important de garder à l’esprit que certaines limitations matérielles peuvent impacter les performances. Rentrons dans le vif du sujet…

ChatGPT et NAS Synology

Faire tourner un Large Language Model (LLM) comme ChatGPT localement sur un NAS Synology, c’est possible. Vous le savez, mais il est important de le rappeler, ces modèles sont gourmands en ressources, notamment pour un NAS Synology. Heureusement, il existe une multitude de LLM, chacun présentant des niveaux de performance et des besoins en ressources variables.

Ollama + Open WebUI = La solution simplifiée

Ollama est un outil open source et gratuit, qui permet de faire tourner des IA localement, que ce soit sur un ordinateur ou un NAS. Il sera alors possible de lui déléguer des tâches variées : rédaction, traduction, génération de code, réponse à des questions, etc.

Associé à Open WebUI, une interface web claire et ergonomique, vous pouvez interagir avec ces modèles directement depuis votre navigateur. L’interface permet de :

• Gérer les discussions et l’historique ;
• Changer de modèle facilement ;
• Organiser vos conversations ;
• Personnaliser l’expérience utilisateur.

C’est un peu comme avoir votre propre assistant IA privé, entièrement sous votre contrôle.

Installation pas à pas

Pour vous faciliter la tâche, j’ai préparé un fichier Docker Compose compatible avec la plupart des NAS Synology.

Prérequis

• Installez Container Manager depuis le Centre de paquets Synology ;
• Créez un dossier Ollama dans votre répertoire docker à la racine de votre NAS à l’aide de File Station ;
• À l’intérieur, créez un sous-dossier data.

Voici le contenu du fichier Docker Compose à placer dans le dossier Ollama :

version: "3.9"
services:
  ollama:
    image: ollama/ollama:latest
    container_name: ollama
    volumes:
      - ./data:/root/.ollama:rw
    ports:
      - "11434:11434"
    restart: unless-stopped

  webui:
    image: ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:latest
    container_name: ollama-webui
    environment:
      OLLAMA_BASE_URL: http://192.168.1.100:11434 # A remplacer par l'IP de votre NAS
      DISABLE_AUTH: "true"
    ports:
      - "8271:8080" # A changer si besoin
    depends_on:
      - ollama
    restart: unless-stopped

Comme vous pouvez le constater, le projet contient 2 conteneurs :

• Ollama : Moteur principal, chargé de faire tourner les IA localement ;
• WebUI : Interface graphique, accessible depuis un navigateur via le port 8271 .

Installation

1. Placer le fichier compose.yaml dans le dossier Ollama
2. Ouvrez Container Manager et naviguez vers le menu de gauche « Projets« 
3. Cliquez sur le bouton Créer, puis remplissez les champs requis et suivez les instructions (voir capture ci-dessous)
   
4. Appuyez sur Suivant, puis encore Suivant et enfin Effectué
5. Attendez quelques minutes que les conteneurs soient prêts.

C’est fini !

Utilisation

Une fois l’installation terminée, ouvrez un navigateur et accédez à l’interface via l’une des adresses suivantes :

• http://NomDuNAS:8271/
• http://AdresseIP:8271/

Ajout, suppression de LLM

Pour gérer les modèles (télécharger, supprimer), cliquez sur votre profil en haut à droite, puis sélectionnez Paramètres, vous arrivez sur cet écran.

Là, vous choisissez Paramètres d’administration, une nouvelle page s’ouvre :

Vous sélectionnerez Modèles dans le menu de gauche, et enfin vous cliquerez sur l’icône à gauche symbolisant le téléchargement. Cette nouvelle fenêtre permettra de télécharger et supprimer des LLM sur votre NAS.

Quel LLM avec son NAS ?

Si le NAS ne dispose que de 8 Go de RAM ou moins, je vous recommande :

• Phi-2 (2,7B) : Modèle léger, rapide, idéal pour les NAS peu puissants avec 6 Go de RAM minimum
• LlaMa3.1 (8B) : Plus complet, il nécessite plus de ressources et un NAS avec 16 Go de RAM ou plus
• Mistral (7B) : Également très performant, il nécessitera au moins 16 Go de RAM

Vous pouvez consulter la bibliothèque complète ici : ollama.com/library. Il est bien sûr possible d’installer d’autres modèles sur le NAS (Gemma3, DeepSeek, Qwen, StarCoder, etc.) et de basculer de l’un à l’autre selon vos besoins. Tous ces modèles fonctionnent tous localement, sans communication externe (désactivable/activable depuis l’interface Web).

À noter que BitNet de Microsoft, très prometteur pour les NAS sur le papier, n’est pas encore compatible avec Ollama au moment où sont écrites ces lignes.

Pour aller plus loin

Enfin, sachez qu’il est possible d’utiliser des clés API (voir ci-dessous) pour accéder à d’autres LLM hébergés à distance et compatibles avec OpenAI API (comme ChatGPT, DeepSeek, xAI Grok, OpenRouter, LiteLLM, etc.).

Certains fabricants de NAS (autre que Synology) prennent en charge nativement les TPU Coral (au format M.2 ou USB) ou les cartes graphiques Nvidia, spécialement conçus pour décharger le processeur du NAS et accélérer les réponses.

En synthèse

Faire tourner des modèles d’IA localement sur un NAS Synology, c’est possible. Docker permet de simplifier l’installation, et la combinaison Ollama + Open WebUI offre une interface fluide, intuitive, et surtout, tout se passe en local. Cependant, gardez en tête que les NAS, même performants, ne sont pas conçus pour des charges lourdes en calcul. Pour des modèles plus exigeants, un serveur dédié ou une machine avec GPU restera une meilleure option.

The Aoostar WTR Max is Coming Soon – And it’s kinda INSANE…

Aoostar had formally unveiled the WTR Max, its latest high-performance NAS mini-server platform, around about a month ago, and it has fast become one of the most requested NAS solutions from followers of this website and YouTube channel in a long time! Powered by AMD’s enterprise-grade Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS processor that is built on the Zen 4 architecture with 8 cores and 16 threads, this chip also features integrated Radeon 780M graphics on the RDNA 3 platform, making it suitable not just for data handling but also lightweight graphical tasks or GPU-assisted acceleration – i.e the whole package! The unit is designed for demanding home server enthusiasts, content creators, and small office environments that require a mix of compute power and dense local storage, all within a compact chassis. Arriving with a kind of bonkers $699 price tag – it really is making some incredibly bold promises in terms of hardware delivery. A review of the Aoostar WTR Max will be arriving on NASCompares very soon, but I reached out to Aoostar for more information on the further development of the WTR Max system, further information on it’s construction, and just generally, I want to establish just how real and close to everyone’s expectations this comparatively insane solution is.

While Aoostar remains a relatively niche manufacturer outside of East Asia, it has built a modest presence among hardware hobbyists and small-scale NAS users, largely due to its compact form factors and unconventional designs that prioritize modularity and high-performance components. The brand’s earlier products, including the WTR Pro, featured more modest hardware profiles, typically centered around lower-power Intel CPUs and 4-bay SATA setups. The WTR Max represents a departure from this strategy, introducing AMD’s Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS — a processor commonly found in business-class laptops and mini workstations — as well as a new thermal design and significantly expanded storage and connectivity. Its release follows an initial product demonstration during the 2025 AMD Greater China Channel Conference, where only limited technical details were disclosed at the time. This gradual unveiling process appears to be part of Aoostar’s typical product release cadence, which often begins with controlled regional availability before expanding to international buyers.

Aoostar WTR Max – Storage and Connectivity

The Aoostar WTR Max distinguishes itself within the compact NAS segment by offering support for up to eleven individual storage devices, a specification uncommon at this scale. The chassis accommodates six SATA drives in standard 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch formats, each housed in accessible tray bays. These are SATA 3.0 interfaces, allowing conventional hard drives or SSDs to be integrated into long-term storage arrays. The inclusion of six separate drive trays also allows for a variety of configurations, from simple JBOD to RAID levels supported by the operating system or third-party NAS software. These six bays are located along the front of the unit, accessible without disassembling the chassis, a practical choice for users who require regular drive replacement or expansion.

In addition to the SATA bays, the system includes five M.2 NVMe SSD slots, all using the 2280 form factor and PCIe 4.0 interface. Of these, two operate on a PCIe 4.0 x1 lane, while the remaining three operate at PCIe 4.0 x2, offering significantly higher transfer speeds. This hybrid layout allows users to designate drives for caching, high-speed scratch disk usage, or application hosting while reserving SATA drives for archival and bulk storage. The M.2 slots are mounted adjacent to the SATA bay area within the case, and their presence is likely facilitated by an onboard U.2/U.3 interface bridge or dedicated backplane. Notably, these M.2 bays support NVMe drives but do not occupy the OCuLink port, allowing for full utilization of external PCIe expansion if required. The overall layout provides flexibility in designing a multi-tiered storage structure, combining high-speed and high-capacity media without the need for external enclosures.

Beyond the physical drive support, the WTR Max is also notable for its inclusion of ECC (Error Correcting Code) memory compatibility, enabled by the use of AMD’s Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS processor. This addition aligns the device more closely with enterprise-grade NAS systems, where data integrity is critical during prolonged write operations or in scenarios involving large-volume transactions. The mainboard features two DDR5 SODIMM slots, supporting up to 128GB of dual-channel memory. ECC support is particularly relevant when using ZFS-based operating systems or software RAID configurations, as it reduces the risk of silent data corruption.

This combination of ECC memory, high-speed NVMe slots, and traditional SATA bays offers users multiple options for creating performance-optimized or redundancy-focused storage pools, depending on the operating system deployed. For example, a user might allocate two NVMe drives for read/write caching and use the remaining M.2 and SATA bays for separate data pools or mirror setups. The inclusion of an OCuLink interface—PCIe 4.0 x4—further extends potential storage configurations by enabling high-speed external expansion without occupying an internal NVMe slot. While hot-swapping is not supported via the OCuLink port, it still provides a route to attach external enclosures or additional PCIe-based storage arrays with minimal performance loss. Together, these features suggest that Aoostar is targeting users who require both flexibility and scale in local storage without moving into rackmount hardware territory.

The Aoostar WTR Max is equipped with a comprehensive selection of I/O interfaces aimed at users requiring diverse networking and peripheral options. On the networking front, the device features two Intel X710 10 Gigabit SFP+ ports, offering high-throughput connectivity suitable for local file servers, media editing environments, or clustered storage systems. These are complemented by two 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet ports, allowing simultaneous multi-network operation or network redundancy through bonding. This quad-port setup provides a level of network flexibility that is typically found in enterprise-grade hardware, but here it is integrated directly into the compact mini-server chassis.

Beyond networking, the WTR Max includes a range of USB ports designed to accommodate both legacy and high-speed devices. There are two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports and one USB 3.2 Gen 1 port, suitable for connecting peripherals like UPS systems, external drives, or KVM hardware. A USB4 port is also present, delivering support for data transfer, video output, and external GPU enclosures through a single cable. Additionally, a dedicated Type-C port and an SD card reader are mounted on the front panel, providing accessible options for external media ingestion. This combination of ports allows the unit to support a wide array of roles, from media archiving to virtualization or container workloads where device passthrough is required. In addition to conventional USB and Ethernet connectivity, the Aoostar WTR Max integrates several specialized ports intended for more advanced or niche use cases. Chief among these is the inclusion of an OCuLink port, which operates over PCIe 4.0 x4 lanes and enables external expansion without drawing from the system’s internal NVMe capacity. While it lacks hot-swap support, the OCuLink interface is capable of sustaining high-speed connections to external PCIe devices such as GPU enclosures or drive arrays, making it a useful option for users looking to extend the system’s capabilities without relying on standard USB protocols.

For video output, the WTR Max offers three simultaneous display options. These include one HDMI 2.1 port, capable of supporting 4K output at up to 240Hz, and video-capable USB-C and USB4 ports. This allows the unit to operate as a compact workstation in addition to its server functions, particularly useful in environments where headless operation is not desirable. A 3.5mm audio jack is also present, rounding out the set of standard desktop-level ports. Altogether, the variety and bandwidth of the available connections suggest a deliberate design approach aimed at accommodating multiple workloads—from headless server use to hybrid computing scenarios where local interaction and peripheral expansion are equally important.

Aoostar WTR Max – Design, Construction and Cooling

The chassis of the Aoostar WTR Max is constructed from anodized aluminum alloy, offering durability while maintaining a relatively compact and thermally efficient enclosure. The design reflects a utilitarian approach, with a front-loading layout for the six SATA bays and clear segmentation between airflow paths and drive compartments. Its compact footprint is intended to fit into home or small office environments without occupying significant space, while still allowing room for the eleven supported storage devices and multiple high-speed I/O interfaces. The system is designed with internal accessibility in mind, and most key components—including M.2 slots and memory—are positioned to be upgradeable without full disassembly.

A notable feature of the unit is its integrated diagnostic display. This small, embedded screen is controlled via Aoostar’s proprietary NAS screen management software and can be customized to show real-time information such as CPU temperature, RAM usage, storage activity, and fan status.

The display can be toggled off when not needed and includes several visual themes, including neutral system stats, graphic-based cyberpunk designs, and simplified icon views. While purely aesthetic in some modes, the screen provides functional monitoring capabilities that are uncommon in compact NAS units, offering basic telemetry without requiring an external monitor or remote access session.

Aoostar WTR Max – Summary, Price and Availability

The Aoostar WTR Max is an upgraded successor to the WTR Pro, designed to meet growing demand for high-throughput storage and processing in compact NAS units. It replaces Intel’s entry-level N-series chips with the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, supports ECC memory, and offers compatibility with PCIe 4.0 SSDs and six hot-swappable SATA drives—expanding total drive support to eleven. Priced at $699 for the barebone version, the WTR Max is currently in pre-order, with the first batch already sold out ahead of its expected May 10th shipping date. Aoostar has instituted a 5% fee for pre-order cancellations and has yet to announce broader availability or long-term pricing. The system uses the Glacier Pro 1.0 cooling solution, which includes a vapor chamber, four internal fans, and bottom-to-top airflow routing, aimed at ensuring consistent performance during sustained workloads.

With a modular layout, broad port selection, and support for external PCIe expansion via OCuLink, the WTR Max is targeted at advanced users comfortable configuring their own NAS environments. Its lack of proprietary software means users must deploy third-party operating systems, but this also opens the door for highly customized setups including containers, VMs, or ZFS-based storage arrays. Dual 10GbE SFP+ and dual 2.5GbE LAN ports offer robust networking options, while the system’s eleven-drive capacity and Ryzen APU make it suitable for media-heavy workloads and real-time data operations. Though not a plug-and-play solution, its hardware flexibility and enterprise-class features position it as a viable alternative to locked-down NAS appliances for technically proficient users. A full review will follow after retail availability begins, covering performance, thermals, and compatibility in depth.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...MinisForum N5 Pro vs AOOSTAR WWeek 10 Tech Roundup – AOOSTAoostar TB4S-OC Review - USB4 Aoostar TB4S-OC ReviewAoostar WTR Pro NAS ReviewAoostar WTR Pro NAS ReviewAOOSTAR GEM10 NAS ReviewAOOSTAR GEM10 SSD NAS ReviewAoostar R1 and R7 2-Bay NAS Re Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Is This The Beginning of the End of PLEX – Is It Jellyfin Time?

After more than a decade of keeping its Lifetime Plex Pass at $119.99, Plex has officially announced a significant price increase—raising the cost to $249.99 starting April 29, 2025. This announcement, delivered through a press release on March 19, also outlined several additional changes to Plex’s pricing structure and feature availability. While price increases are common in the subscription space, this is Plex’s first major change of its kind in over ten years. It affects not just future subscribers, but the entire conversation around personal media platforms and the value Plex provides in 2025. As someone who has tested and covered Plex across various NAS platforms over the years, I think it’s important to break this all down clearly—and fairly.

Note – at the time of writing, April 5th, the old prices from Plex Pass are still available and a Lifetime Plex Pass purchased now will be no different than one purchased after April 29th 2025)

The TL;DR – Plex Just Raised Prices and Paywalled Remote Streaming

Plex is doubling the price of its Lifetime Pass from $119.99 to $249.99 starting April 29, 2025—its first increase in over a decade. At the same time, remote streaming will no longer be free, now requiring either a Plex Pass or a new $1.99/month Remote Watch Pass. While Plex has removed mobile app unlock fees and teased new features like a Common Sense Media integration, users are frustrated that core features are being moved behind paywalls. Open-source alternatives like Jellyfin are gaining traction, though they lack Plex’s polish and easy remote access. Emby sits awkwardly between the two, offering both paid and free tiers but without a clear value advantage. If you’re a regular Plex user, now is likely the last chance to grab the Lifetime Pass at its original price—after that, the equation changes.

Why is PLEX Increasing Prices and Changing their Software Services?

Plex has positioned this move as a necessary step toward long-term sustainability and innovation, citing rising infrastructure and development costs. Alongside the new Lifetime price, the monthly subscription will increase to $6.99 (up from $4.99), and the annual plan will rise to $69.99 (from $39.99). That’s a considerable leap across the board. If you’re currently on the fence about investing in a Lifetime Pass, the window is closing quickly. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again—if Plex is part of your day-to-day setup, especially with multiple users or remote access needs, now is the most sensible time to act. Once the new pricing kicks in, the Lifetime tier may lose its appeal for newer users, especially when compared to other one-time license models in the tech space.

More controversial than the price hike, though, is the newly introduced limitation on remote streaming. As of late April, remote access will no longer be included in the free version of Plex. This means that if you want to stream media from your home server while away—say on a mobile device or at work—you’ll now need a Plex Pass or a new tier called Remote Watch Pass, which is priced at $1.99/month or $19.99/year. This shift marks a pretty significant change in Plex’s philosophy. Previously, you could set up a NAS, install Plex Media Server, and stream remotely with minimal friction. Now, that experience is essentially paywalled. While the company has clarified that users with an existing Plex Pass won’t be affected, new users and guests who rely on remote access will need to consider this new fee model.

In his own coverage of the news, Alex from the KTZ Systems YouTube channel offered a measured but critical response. He highlighted the underlying tension many feel: “You’re paying Plex to access your own files, on your own hardware, over your own network and internet connection.” It’s a fair point—and while I can understand Plex’s need for sustainable revenue, the optics of charging for what many considered a core, previously-free feature are less than ideal. In our recent joint podcast, Alex and I both agreed that if Lifetime Passes are no longer financially viable, Plex should have either phased them out or significantly increased the cost to signal their rarity. Instead, the $249.99 price tag sits in an odd middle ground—too high to feel like a deal, too low to feel truly premium.

(From official Plex Pages) IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CURRENT PLEX PASS HOLDERS:
For users who have an active Plex Pass subscription, remote playback will continue to be available to you without interruption from any Plex Media Server, after these changes go into effect. When running your own Plex Media Server as a subscriber, other users to whom you have granted access can also stream from the server (whether local or remote), without ANY additional charge—not even a mobile activation fee.

Could PLEX Have Approached Funding and Sustainability Better?

Rather than placing long-standing features behind a paywall, Plex had several other options for becoming more financially sustainable—many of which were discussed across the community in recent weeks:

• Introduce a “Plex 2.0” Premium Tier: Instead of retroactively limiting features, Plex could have rolled out a major version update with enhanced capabilities—such as native audiobook support, advanced download controls, or multi-user analytics—reserved for paying users, while leaving existing features intact for legacy users.

• Cap Lifetime Passes and Shift Focus to Recurring Tiers: Rather than awkwardly doubling the Lifetime price, Plex might have opted to discontinue Lifetime entirely and focus on expanding the value of annual/monthly subscriptions through regular feature rollouts or exclusive integrations, as seen in platforms like Roon or UnRAID.

• Use a “Freemium Scaling” Model: By allowing remote access for a limited number of external users or devices on the free tier (e.g., “first one’s free”), Plex could have maintained goodwill while encouraging heavier users to upgrade organically—similar to how many SaaS platforms incentivize scaling through added value, not restriction.

What Else is Changing in Plex?

To their credit, Plex has removed one of the more annoying barriers from its platform—the mobile app unlock fee. Previously, streaming via the Android or iOS app was limited to one minute unless you paid a small one-time fee or had a Plex Pass. With the rollout of their new mobile client experience, this limitation is going away. Local streaming—meaning within the same network—will now be completely free on mobile. This is undoubtedly a welcome change, especially for users who run everything locally and don’t rely on remote features. However, for those who previously enjoyed full functionality across networks without a subscription, this small improvement may not offset the new restrictions.

Plex also used the announcement to preview some upcoming features for Plex Pass subscribers, including an integration with Common Sense Media aimed at improving parental control tools, a new server management app (separate from Plex Dash), and a long-requested open API for metadata agents and custom integrations. While these additions have genuine value, their timing—bundled with a price increase and feature restrictions—makes it harder for users to assess whether Plex is giving more or simply charging more. Alex pointed out in our podcast that innovation, not restriction, should drive paid feature rollouts. It’s a sentiment I tend to agree with: adding new tools rather than paywalling old ones is the path that generates goodwill and long-term user engagement.

Is Now the time to Ditch PLEX, and Opt for Jellyfin or Emby Media Server?

Naturally, this news has reignited interest in Jellyfin, the most well-known open-source alternative to Plex. Jellyfin remains free, with no subscriptions or data collection, and offers solid core media server functionality. However, as Alex and I discussed in our joint video, Jellyfin comes with its own set of trade-offs. While it nails the fundamentals—smooth playback, broad codec support, and responsive local streaming—it lacks polish in its client apps, and remote access typically requires self-configuration through a VPN or mesh network like Tailscale. For tech-savvy users, that’s a worthwhile trade. But for those who rely on Plex’s seamless, cross-platform access, Jellyfin may still feel like a step backward in convenience.

Emby, once considered a middle ground between Plex and Jellyfin, is rarely mentioned in this conversation anymore—and there are reasons for that. Emby straddles an awkward line between open-source philosophy and commercial aspirations. It still charges for features like hardware transcoding and has moved away from its open development roots. In our podcast, Alex shared his own frustrations with Emby’s shift to closed source shortly after he purchased a Lifetime license. Combined with a smaller user base, inconsistent app support, and limited visibility in NAS ecosystems, Emby struggles to be either the budget-friendly choice or the polished premium one. In short, it’s not that Emby is bad—it’s that it’s not compelling enough to compete meaningfully right now.

Are We Seeing the End of PLEX on the Horizon?

One key issue here isn’t just the new pricing or paywalled features, but how Plex has communicated these changes. As we discussed in the podcast, the rollout feels rushed and reactive, missing an opportunity to reframe this as a strategic step forward—say, through a “Plex Plus” or “Plex Lite” tier with exclusive new tools, or by versioning changes the way other platforms (like UnRAID or even macOS) handle major updates. Instead, moving features behind a paywall post-launch risks alienating loyal users. Plex’s assertion that these changes won’t affect existing Plex Pass holders is reassuring, but it doesn’t help new users discovering Plex for the first time—and realizing that what used to be free is now a subscription service.

Ultimately, I don’t believe Plex is on the brink of collapse—as some dramatic headlines might suggest—but I do think this moment marks a turning point. If you’re a regular Plex user who streams remotely or shares content with others, the Lifetime Pass at $119.99 (until April 29) remains a solid investment. After that, the value calculus shifts dramatically. For new users, the free tier will still work well for local-only setups, and the Remote Watch Pass provides a budget-friendly option. But the days of a completely free, fully featured Plex experience are clearly behind us.

Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Is This The Beginning of the EWeek 12 Tech Roundup – SynolPLEX Playback Error: Please chHow to Install Plex Media ServHow to Install Plex Media ServPLEX TEST FILES - Video Files Buying a NAS for Plex Media SeCan you guys help me get SonSynology DS Video and Video StPlex Job Losses - Should You B Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Synology vient de durcir le ton. À partir de 2025, les modèles Plus de la série 25 nécessiteront impérativement l’utilisation de disques durs et de SSD Synology ou certifiés. L’objectif affiché du fabricant : introduire de nouvelles fonctionnalités avec la prochaine version de DSM. Explications…

Disques durs et SSD : vers un écosystème fermé ?

Synology France n’a pas encore communiqué officiellement, mais cela ne saurait tarder. Sur son site allemand, la marque a annoncé : « Après le succès de la série High-Performance (ndlr : XS/XS+), l’entreprise mise désormais davantage sur les supports de stockage maison de Synology pour les modèles de la série Plus qui seront lancés à partir de 2025 ». Jusqu’ici, cette approche était principalement réservée aux gammes professionnelles. Mais Synology semble décidé à l’étendre aux particuliers, malgré les nombreuses critiques exprimées sur les forums et les sites spécialisés.

Le fabricant précise : « cela signifie qu’à partir des modèles de la série Plus qui seront lancés en 2025, seuls les disques durs de Synology et les disques durs tiers certifiés selon les spécifications de Synology seront compatibles et offriront toutes les fonctionnalités et le support ». Contrairement aux modèles XS/XS+ (où seuls les supports Synology sont autorisés), la marque laisse ici une porte ouverte à des disques tiers, à condition qu’ils soient certifiés. Cette notion est nouvelle chez Synology (jusqu’à présent, il parlait simplement de compatibilité). Désormais, les disques devront répondre à un cahier des charges strict. Reste à savoir si Synology certifiera un nombre suffisant de références pour ne pas restreindre excessivement le choix des utilisateurs

À noter : aucune mention n’a été faite concernant les SSD certifiés… cela pose question.

Migration, pas impacté ou partiellement

Si vous décidez de changer de NAS, pour un plus récent, et que vous avez des disques non Synology ou non certifiés, il n’y aura pas d’incidence. Cependant, le(s) volumes seront vus comme migrés. Par contre, tout changement de disque, avec des produits non certifiés, génèrera un message d’avertissement.

Une gamme 2025 peu innovante

Les NAS Synology 2025, déjà en partie dévoilés, ne semblent pas marquer une rupture technologique. Les retours des utilisateurs sur Cachem ou d’autres sites spécialisés pointent dans le même sens : Synology semble s’éloigner des attentes du marché.

La généralisation du Multi-Gig (2,5 Gb/s) est évidemment appréciée… mais elle intervient avec plusieurs années de retard face à la concurrence.

Nouvelles fonctionnalités dans DSM

Dans le communiqué de presse, certaines informations importantes sont égrenées. En effet, Synology met en avant la qualité et la performance, mais il fait également mention de la « déduplication à l’échelle du volume ». C’est une première pour cette catégorie de produit. Pour rappel, la déduplication des données permet de repérer et supprimer les doublons, en ne gardant qu’une seule copie réellement d’un fichier, même s’il est présent plusieurs fois. Cela permet de gagner de l’espace de stockage et d’optimiser les sauvegardes. À noter, Synology nous confirme que la déduplication ne sera possible qu’avec ses SSD.

Synology fait également mention d’analyse du « lifespan » (durée de vie), ce qui sous-entend que le fabricant va rendre plus accessibles les informations sur la durée de vie des disques durs et SDD. Pour rappel, il avait volontairement supprimé la lecture des données SMART avec DSM 7.2.1.

Scrutiny sur NAS Synology, ou comment récupérer les informations SMART

Un pari risqué face à une concurrence en pleine forme

Le virage stratégique de Synology est ambitieux, mais il n’est pas sans risque. De plus en plus d’utilisateurs se tournent vers la concurrence : QNAP, Asustor, TerraMaster ou de nouveaux entrants comme Ugreen et Orico. Sans oublier le DIY (Do It Yourself), qui séduit également de nombreux utilisateurs.

Notre analyse

La nouvelle stratégie de Synology, imposer ses disques ou des modèles certifiés sur les NAS DSx25+, marque un tournant… risqué. L’idée d’optimiser les performances et d’ajouter des fonctions avancées (comme la déduplication) peut se comprendre. Cependant, cela ressemble à une logique de verrouillage de l’écosystème, au détriment de la liberté de choix des utilisateurs. Synology risque de se couper d’une partie de sa communauté fidèle et de renforcer l’attractivité de la concurrence avec des solutions plus ouvertes et souvent mieux positionnées (puissance, prix, évolutivité). Pour éviter que cette décision ne se retourne contre elle, le fabricant de NAS devra jouer la carte de la transparence et fournir rapidement une liste de disques certifiés. Synology devra surtout prouver que ce changement offre un réel bénéfice à l’utilisateur.

En verrouillant son matériel, Synology pourrait bien perdre une part importante de sa base historique.

Synology is closing the gap on third-party hard drive support further in 2025

UPDATE 3 – Synology has now made the DS925+ NAS NAS Product Page live in several of the Eastern regions (China, Australia, Japan – not the Taiwan page yet however). With it, we can now see the official compatibility pages. On the hard drive page there is now only Synology Drive media, and the option to select supported 3rd party HDD choices is removed. For all we know, this will return if/when 3rd party drives from WD and Seagate are verified. But at least for now, it seems the brand is serious about only recommending its own storage media in their 2025 systems at launch:

The full list of drives includes the Synology Plus series of HDDs, the Enterprise class drives and the enterprise class SATA SSDs. However, there are currently no Surveillance class drives listed (WD Purple/Seagate Skyhawk, etc):

In terms of M.2 NVMe SSD support, the brand has also removed any selection of 3rd party SSDs from Samsung, WD, Seagate, etc. I am particularly surprised about this, as their own M.2 drives are good for durability, but performance-wise are much lower than most in the market and whether it is as caching drives or as storage pools, there are definitely a lot of good options in the market. I hope Synology roll out some performance class SSDs to compensate for this very soon.

Original Article:

Over the last few years, Synology have not been exact about being forward in supporting. Back in 2021, we started to see the brand reduce the number of third-party hard drives and SSDs on their systems. This diminishing support has manifested itself in two main ways. The first is that drives that are listed on the official support and compatibility pages have significantly reduced, favouring the utilisation of their own growing range of hard drives and SSD media. The second way this has presented itself drew significant criticism in 2022/2023, when utilising third-party hardware resulted in the system presenting warning messages and even service limitations being suggested. It appears that this is something they are putting into force for their new 2025 series of devices. Numerous websites in Germany have today reported that Synology plans to go full first-party drive priority on all systems released from the 2025 generation and onwards. An official statement from Synology via an official source has not been released, but it appears that the brand is going to go hard on pushing their own drives when using their own systems – at least at launch. So, what are the intended limitations for those who want to use non-Synology branded drives from Seagate and Western Digital? And why would Synology do this with their systems that have been open for over 25 years? Let’s discuss.

UPDATE #2 – There is now an official press release by Synology on this, available from Synology.de:

Synology is increasingly relying on its own ecosystem for upcoming Plus models Germany, Düsseldorf – April 16, 2025 – Following the success of the High-Performance series, the company is now increasingly relying on Synology’s own storage media for the Plus series models, which will be released starting in 2025. Users will thus benefit from higher performance, increased reliability, and more efficient support.  “With our proprietary hard drive solution, we have already seen significant benefits for our customers in a variety of deployment scenarios,” said Chad Chiang, Managing Director of Synology GmbH and Synology UK. “By expanding our integrated ecosystem to the Plus series, we aim to provide all users—from home users to small businesses—with the highest levels of security and performance, while also offering significantly more efficient support.”  For users, this means that starting with the Plus series models released in 2025, only Synology’s own hard drives and third-party hard drives certified according to Synology’s specifications will be compatible and offer the full range of functions and support.

There will be no changes for Plus models released up to and including 2024 (excluding the XS Plus series and rack models). Furthermore, migrating hard drives from existing Synology NAS to a new Plus model will continue to be possible without restrictions.  The use of compatible and unlisted hard drives will be subject to certain restrictions in the future, such as pool creation and support for issues and failures caused by the use of incompatible storage media. Volume-wide deduplication, lifespan analysis, and automatic hard drive firmware updates will only be available for Synology hard drives in the future.  Tight integration of Synology NAS systems and hard drives reduces compatibility issues and increases system reliability and performance. At the same time, firmware updates and security patches can be deployed more efficiently, ensuring a high level of data security and more efficient support for Synology customers.

TL;DR: Synology to Restrict Third-Party Drive Functionality on 2025+ NAS Models

Starting with the 2025 generation of Synology Plus series NAS devices, the company appears to be tightening restrictions on third-party hard drives. While you’ll still be able to use non-Synology drives (like those from Seagate or WD), early reports suggest that certain features may be limited or disabled unless you’re using Synology-branded or Synology-certified drives. According to preliminary reporting (not yet officially confirmed by Synology), using third-party drives may restrict (i.e several news reports indicate this, but no official statement/confirmation yet):

• Creation of storage pools

• Access to health monitoring tools

• Volume-wide deduplication support

• Drive lifespan analysis

• Automatic firmware updates

• Access to official Synology support

Older NAS models (up to and including 2024, excluding XS+ and rackmount units) are not affected. Drive migration from existing systems to new ones should remain possible — but full functionality may require Synology drives.

Source – HERE (or click below)

What are the proposed limitations of using third-party hard drives in the Synology 2025 lineup?

Although the brand themselves, at the time of writing, has not officially stated that devices after the 2025 series will only support their drives, sources highlighted on numerous news outlets have detailed that a number of key storage features and functionality are going to be limited. These include health monitoring tools, deduplication features built into DSM, official support from the brand in some cases, and (most worrying of all if it’s true) storage pool support. I’m still waiting for further clarification if this storage pool support limitation to first-party drives is only referring to the use of M.2 NVMEs in storage pools (something we are already aware of from the 2023 series), or whether people are not going to be able to use third-party hard drives in storage pools moving forward in 2025 series releases. But it would seemingly very much indicate the latter. It’s also worth highlighting that this limitation seems to be a ‘launch’ choice and may also mean that drives are granularly added to the supported pages as the likes of WD and Seagate submit compatibility reports. But the message seems to be that Synology themselves will not be the ones who verify the drive compatibility.

It should also be worth highlighting that users who have purchased devices before the 2025 lineup will not be currently affected by this change and will continue to have broader support of third-party hard drives, although even that has diminished since 2021–2022 as it stands. This does bring into question for some whether this broader policy is something that would be applied in a large-scale DSM update down the road, i.e. DSM 7.3 or DSM 8. For now, until we have an official statement from the brand or access to compatibility lists for the intended new products, we need to reserve our full judgement.

Why would Synology reduce compatibility with the majority of third-party hard drives (Seagate and WD)?

There are plenty of reasons why Synology would consider a move like this, for good and for bad. So in the interest of balance, let’s start positive. What are the good reasons why Synology would endeavour to only support the use of their own storage media in their systems?

• To a much smaller group, it allows them to tailor performance and system deployment expectations a great deal more realistically and could result in improved overall performance for all users, as it allows the development of future solutions to be significantly more targeted.
• If Synology solutions only support Synology drives, it allows the brand to be a great deal more effective at reducing the TCO of the system to buyers, as it will be an all-in-one party solution and even opens the door to the brand rolling out bundled systems that will further reduce the total cost of ownership.

• Export costs in the US — Synology centralising the full component list of their products to the end user can also allow them to better absorb any potential costs efficiently and hopefully pass those cost savings onto the consumer, reducing reservations on purchasing the product in light of potential price hikes.
• Support will be a great deal more specialised if end user deployments have fewer variables to consider, resulting in reduced support resolution times and potentially improved support services as an end result for all users.

Beyond the other potential benefits, they will be considering this proposition to drastically reduce third-party hard drive compatibility and utilisation in the 2025 lineup:

• In a word, profit. Having their own storage hard drives as the main — and potentially only — storage option alongside their systems will allow the brand to make profit vertically across the product deployment. For a long time, the brand was only really monetizing the core system itself, which is really only going to be replaced every 7 to 10 years for most users. Storage media, given the escalating growth rate of people’s data, will require a great deal more regular replacement.

• If Synology storage media is largely the only option to buyers, the brand has a greater degree of control over which products are available. So, for example, currently Synology has fewer different capacity tiers and drive variation tiers compared with other brands (i.e. 24TB drives, surveillance-optimized drives, M.2 NVMEs built for performance, etc.), so in some cases a user may have to opt for a larger capacity or a more enterprise-class drive when they might not need to.

• Eliminates smaller-scale purchases. This is a particularly cynical point of view, I know, but a move like this will almost certainly push value series devices significantly more towards the likes of the BeeStation (which are already pre-populated and fixed with Synology storage media) and away from the Plus series, as a divide begins to appear in terms of the overall total purchase price for many users. Alongside upselling their value series to that buyer tier, it will also move only more serious buyers towards the Plus series and higher from 2025 onwards.

All of the above reasoning towards why Synology would prioritise their own drives over that of third parties are my own points of view, but I do think there’s a ring of truth in some of them.7

What are the potential problems surrounding Synology’s push toward its own storage media over third-party drives?

There are several small issues that are worth highlighting in this broader plan of Synology hard drive prioritisation that we should probably touch on — and hopefully ones that Synology themselves will resolve quickly if this is something they’re going to push hard on. Such as:

• The brand inadvertently revealed earlier this year that they are working on a 6 x 2.5-inch SATA SSD system called the DS-625 Slim. However, the only 2.5-inch SATA SSD media the brand has are way too enterprise — the SAT5200 series — and would be like putting a Ferrari engine into a Ford Focus in terms of the disparity in the hardware being used and the price point!

• Synology has still yet to introduce higher-performing M.2 NVMe storage media, and although several of the new 2025 series of devices arrive with M.2 NVMe support, Synology’s own M.2 SSDs prioritise durability over performance. That is a good thing, but users who are not going to be able to use third-party SSDs for caching or storage pools face being restricted to much lower-performing SSDs in these bays.

• How will the system identify the use of third-party drives, and to what extent are these drives going to be limited? Although lots of details have been revealed in the news reports today, we’re still yet to see a full detailing from Synology themselves on an official platform.
• Surveillance utilisation. Synology has an impressive range of surveillance solutions in the NVR and DVA series, as well as support for Surveillance Station on the majority of their systems, but to date, the brand still does not have surveillance-optimised hard drives in its lineup. Surveillance-optimised hard drive media like WD Purple are designed to have much higher write performance leveraging rather than read, and surveillance drives are generally only accessed for a very small percentage of the time when in use. Will third-party drive limitations extend to these systems as well?

I’m still waiting on an official Synology response on this matter, as there have been early indications (such as the Synology DS925+ Amazon.co.uk link 2 days ago) that indicate some of these systems may be arriving in May 2025 — not that far away! So, until we have full and officially backed confirmation on this, still treat it with a grain of salt. I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t a little disheartened by this move by the brand, as although their software is still absolutely the king of the hill in the world of NAS, further restrictions on their more modest hardware to only use their own range of hard drives — versus that of more widely available, globally distributed, and industry veteran–backed drives — seems a very odd move, and one that I think a lot of home/prosumer/enthusiast/SMB users might take issue with.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464Synology DS925+ vs DS923+ NAS Synology vs UGREEN NAS (in 202Synology vs Terramaster in 202Synology vs UGREEN in 2025 - WSynology vs QNAP in 2025 - WhiWeek 17 Tech Roundup – LenovSynology DS925+ NAS Released Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE

Pendant des années, j’ai utilisé des disques durs externes pour sauvegarder mes fichiers. C’était simple et pratique, mais il y avait de nombreuses limites : manque d’accès à distance, partage compliqué et sécurité fragile. C’est alors que j’ai découvert les NAS. Si vous vous demandez quelle solution est faite pour vous, laissez-moi vous expliquer pourquoi un NAS va révolutionner votre gestion des données et offrir bien plus qu’un simple espace de stockage.

Disque dur externe : simple, mais limité

Le disque dur externe est souvent le premier choix pour ceux qui cherchent une solution rapide et économique pour stocker des fichiers. C’est ce que j’ai fait pendant de nombreuses années. Il suffit de le brancher à son ordinateur pour transférer les données, ce qui le rend accessible même aux plus novices d’entre nous.

Cependant, cette simplicité a ses limites :

• Capacité fixe : Une fois le disque plein, il faut en acheter un autre ;
• Pas d’accès à distance : Vous devez connecter physiquement le disque pour accéder aux données ;
• Partage limité : Il est difficile de partager des fichiers avec d’autres utilisateurs simultanément ;
• Retrouver ses données : Sur quel disque sont les fichiers ? Suis-je sûr de travailler sur la dernière version ?
• Sécurité fragile : Les disques externes sont vulnérables aux pannes matérielles, aux pertes ou aux vols.

Pour un usage occasionnel ou pour transporter des fichiers d’un appareil à un autre, le disque dur externe reste une option valable. Mais dès que vos besoins deviennent plus complexes, ses limites se font rapidement sentir.

NAS : bien plus que du stockage

Le NAS est une solution de stockage connectée au réseau. Contrairement au disque dur externe, il ne se limite pas à une simple fonction de sauvegarde. Voici pourquoi il pourrait transformer votre gestion des données au quotidien :

1. Un stockage centralisé et accessible partout

Avec un NAS, tous vos fichiers sont stockés en un seul endroit et accessibles depuis n’importe quel appareil connecté au réseau (ordinateur, téléphone, tablette, TV). Mieux encore, grâce à l’accès à distance, vous pouvez consulter vos données où que vous soyez dans le monde.

2. Une capacité évolutive

Les NAS permettent d’ajouter ou de remplacer des disques durs pour augmenter leur capacité. Vous pouvez également configurer du RAID pour protéger vos données contre les pannes matérielles.

3. Automatisation des sauvegardes

Un NAS peut automatiser la sauvegarde de vos appareils grâce à des logiciels dédiés. Vous n’avez plus besoin de penser à copier manuellement vos fichiers.

4. Des fonctionnalités avancées

Un NAS ne se limite pas au stockage :

• Hébergez votre propre serveur multimédia (avec Plex ou Jellyfin) pour diffuser vos films et votre musique ;
• Installez des applications comme Nextcloud pour remplacer les services Cloud traditionnels ;
• Utilisez-le comme serveur de sauvegarde pour vos photos, vidéos ou documents sensibles.

5. Une sécurité renforcée

Contrairement aux disques externes qui peuvent être facilement perdus ou endommagés, les NAS offrent des options comme le chiffrement des données, la gestion des utilisateurs et des mots de passe robustes. De nombreux modèles incluent même des sauvegardes automatiques vers le Cloud pour une sécurité supplémentaire.

6. Auto-hébergement

Un autre avantage majeur, c’est leur capacité à supporter l’autohébergement d’applications ou de sites web. Avec Docker par exemple, vous pouvez déployer facilement des applications dans des conteneurs isolés. Par exemple, vous pouvez héberger un gestionnaire de mots de passe, un bloqueur de publicités pour tous vos appareils ou même un site Web directement sur votre NAS.

Comparatif des meilleurs NAS du marché

NAS vs disque dur externe : lequel choisir ?

Le choix entre un NAS et un disque dur externe dépend principalement de vos besoins :

Si vous avez simplement besoin d’un espace temporaire ou facile à transporter, un disque dur externe fera l’affaire. En revanche, si vous recherchez une solution durable, sécurisée et polyvalente pour gérer vos données (sauvegardes automatiques, partage familial ou professionnel), le NAS est clairement la meilleure option.

En synthèse

Un NAS représente un investissement initial plus important que celui d’un disque dur externe, mais ses avantages en font une solution incontournable pour ceux qui souhaitent gérer leurs données efficacement. Que vous soyez un particulier souhaitant centraliser ses fichiers multimédias ou une petite entreprise cherchant à sécuriser ses documents sensibles, un NAS répondra à vos besoins avec flexibilité et performance.

The Synology DS925+ NAS is (STILL) Coming..and Soon

It is fast becoming the worst-kept secret in the world of network-attached storage, but Synology’s continued plans to launch refreshes of a number of their popular desktop devices received another public outing this weekend, when keen users on Reddit spotted the official pages for the Synology DS925+ and DX525 on Amazon.co.uk, listing hardware specifications, pricing, release dates, and general background info. Although the appearance of the DS925+ isn’t exactly surprising—given the large info drop semi-officially revealed at an official event by a user on Chiphell—it is nonetheless surprising to see these two official Synology products seemingly added by Synology themselves for Amazon distribution, yet with absolutely zero mention on the traditional Synology platforms (Synology Products, Synology Downloads, Synology Download Registry, etc). Nonetheless, this appearance has confirmed numerous details about the DS925+ hardware specifications, for good and for bad, so I wanted to go through the further confirmed specifications and what they mean.

Synology DS925+ NAS Confirmed Hardware Specifications

As previously alluded to last month in the previous leak, the Synology DS925+ will arrive with the already integrated CPU from AMD that featured on previous SMB releases—the V1500B. This is a quad-core CPU that allows for more cores, more threads (i.e. more vCPUs) than the R1600 in the DS923+, as well as a lower TDP—though also a lower total clock speed available at first. It arrives with 4GB of ECC memory that can be scaled up to 32GB via two SODIMM DDR4 slots. DS925+ includes 2 × 2.5GbE, a very welcome if somewhat overdue upgrade on this product series from Synology. The SSD compatibility for storage pools and the speed allocated to each slot is still TBC. The expansion capabilities of the DS925+ have changed from the long-running eSATA support and DX517 of older Synology devices and now lean towards popular USB-C, and this is what triggered the new DX525 expansion box. We are still awaiting confirmation of the confirmed speed of this USB-C port, as well as its broader compatibility for other things (given the larger variety of USB-C options available in the market compared with eSATA), but slides shown at the Synology partner event last month seemingly indicated that this will NOT be USB 3.2 Gen 2 10Gbps.

Probably the biggest and most controversial change here in the newer generation box is the removal of the mini PCIe upgrade slot that featured on the DS923+. The new DS925+ completely lacks this ability to scale up to 10GbE later down the line, which is probably going to upset a lot of users. PCIe modules they have sold (which would greatly explain, perhaps, the motivation for removing this feature), it is still something of a blow that this new generation device has removed a particularly appealing network upgrade path option. The motivation for this could be theoretically for multiple reasons, such as:

• Synology might well have deemed the two-times 2.5GbE network connectivity on the DS925+ sufficient for the four drives of SATA storage that it features, as well as ensuring that the system does not overlap other devices higher in the product portfolio food chain too much.
• The PCIe line distribution of this CPU and the chipset used on this board might result in limitations to the distribution of those lanes and therefore made the upgrade difficult to implement.
• The USB-C port for expansions may support a 10GbE upgrade module down the line that Synology intend on rolling out—a bit of a long shot though, as currently USB-C to 10GbE is only afforded to TB3/TB4/USB4 connectivity and would commit a great deal of internal lane distribution to that port to accommodate this potential upgrade.
• As previously alluded to, perhaps user integration of this upgrade slot on previous DS923+ devices was too low to justify accommodating this feature in the newest iteration.

Any of those reasons, or others, might well be why Synology decided to rescind this feature on this device. Nevertheless, it is something of a bitter pill that this device will not be featuring the ability to scale up out of the potential 5GbE bonded network connection that it arrives with and likely serves as a slight bottleneck to more high-performance hard drives in the SATA bays, as well as a significant cap on using SATA SSDs or M.2 NVMes in storage pools via the provided slots.

The AMD Ryzen R1600 and V1500B are both embedded CPUs used across Synology’s NAS lineup, but they serve distinct roles depending on the target user and workload. The R1600 is a dual-core, four-thread processor with higher clock speeds (2.6GHz base / 3.1GHz boost), making it ideal for environments that prioritize single-threaded performance—such as general file sharing, light server tasks, and basic backup operations. It has a TDP of 25W and is commonly found in more entry-level to mid-range Synology NAS models like the DS723+ and DS923+. By contrast, the V1500B is a quad-core, eight-thread CPU running at a lower base clock of 2.2GHz, but it delivers greater efficiency and significantly better multi-threading performance—essential for virtual machines, Docker containers, multiple user sessions, and parallel workflows. Its lower TDP of 16W also makes it a more efficient option for always-on deployments in business settings.

CPU Comparison: AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B vs R1600

What makes the V1500B particularly notable in the DS925+ is that this CPU was previously reserved for Synology’s larger SMB and enterprise-tier systems, such as the DS1621+, DS1821+, and DS2422+. By introducing it into a prosumer-class 4-bay NAS, Synology is clearly continuing its long-standing trend of moving mature hardware platforms down into lower product tiers over time, as the cost of components becomes more accessible and manufacturing scales improve. This strategy enables Synology to offer higher-tier performance at mid-tier price points, effectively refreshing their product range while maintaining price consistency. For users who prioritize multi-tasking, virtualized workloads, or long-term scalability, the arrival of the V1500B in the DS925+ marks a significant shift in capability for this tier of NAS.

Want to Understand How Synology NAS Product Refreshes Work, as well as Why Synology Chooses Certain Hardware? Read my article below:

Synology DS925+ NAS HDD and SSD Compatibility?

Unfortunately, there is no mention of Synology’s position on third-party hard drive and SSD compatibility on the new DS925+ confirmed yet. Realistically, basing it on the predecessor and other Synology Plus Series devices, at the very least, we’re going to see a repeat of the priority towards Synology’s own series of hard drives and SSDs, with a handful of third-party drives from Seagate, Western Digital, and Toshiba added to the support list. This has now become the status quo with the majority of Synology Plus Series and above devices, and if this device rolls out with that, I’m not going to say that it’s perfect, but at the very least it does still leave a narrow window open for users to use third-party hard drives without the system spitting alerts or amber warnings at you during setup.

As the system is being listed on the Amazon pages without drives included, that at the very least removes the concern of many that Synology may have been proceeding down the pre-populated system route, or being more rigid on the lock-in of the drives you can use on the system. Nevertheless, there is still the matter of the M.2 NVMe slots and whether this system will continue with the policy of third-party drives only being supported for use as caching, whereas Synology’s own M.2 NVMe drives support both caching and storage pools. It will most certainly continue with this position.

Synology DS925+ NAS Price and Release Date?

As originally predicted last month, the pricing of the DS925+ will be largely the same as that of the DS923+, as Synology is always keen to maintain the pricing at each tier of its portfolio year on year—even if sometimes that can result in the hardware being a little more lean despite the cost of components going up. I kind of respect how long Synology has been able to maintain the same price for their prosumer 4-bay device, right? All the way back since 2015, it has always arrived at that similar £550 price. Keep in mind that the price listed on the early leaked Amazon.co.uk page includes VAT, whereas pricing listed in other countries like the U.S. will likely not include tax.

With regards to the intended release date and availability of the DS925+, the Amazon leak page appears to indicate the 7th of May. Now, whether this has always been the plan by the brand when refreshing all of its currently existing product line, or it is a launch date that has been changed rapidly in light of discussions surrounding tariffs and stock travelling around the world, is yet to be confirmed. Nevertheless, that seems like a fairly reasonable launch date in light of the information—originally appearing online with the product page added to Amazon on April 8th—and the slow but steady gear Synology goes through when making a product live across traditional online retailers. You can use the links below to monitor the availability and price of the Synology DS925+ on Amazon, as it will redirect to your own region via the link. Anything purchased via these links will result in a small commission to me (Robbie) and Eddie at NASCompares, which really helps us keep doing what we do.

Synology DS923+ vs DS925+ NAS – Buy Now or Wait?

When comparing the Synology DS923+ and DS925+, the differences are subtle but important depending on your priorities. Both NAS units share the same price point, run Synology’s DSM software with identical features, and include the same baseline 4GB DDR4 ECC memory (expandable up to 32GB). They also both lack integrated graphics, feature four SATA drive bays, and offer two M.2 NVMe Gen 3 slots for SSD caching. However, the DS925+ gains an edge in raw parallel processing power, featuring a quad-core, eight-thread AMD V1500B CPU, which translates to more virtual CPUs (vCPUs) for virtual machines and containerized applications. It also benefits from dual 2.5GbE ports, enabling up to 5GbE performance with Link Aggregation or SMB Multichannel, compared to the 2x 1GbE ports on the DS923+, which top out at 2GbE combined. Additionally, the DS925+ offers a faster expansion interface via USB-C (6Gbps) versus the older eSATA (5Gbps) on the DS923+.

That said, the DS923+ still holds certain advantages. Its AMD R1600 CPU features a higher clock speed, which may offer better single-threaded performance in lighter tasks or low-concurrency applications. Crucially, the DS923+ supports an optional 10GbE upgrade via its mini PCIe slot, a feature completely removed in the DS925+, which could be a deal-breaker for users planning to grow into a higher-speed networking environment. So, should users buy the DS923+ now or wait for the DS925+? If 10GbE upgradeability or faster per-core performance is important for your workload, the DS923+ is still a strong option. However, if you’re prioritizing multi-threaded performance, better default network speeds, and a more modern expansion standard, the DS925+ is the more forward-looking choice—particularly for virtualization and container-heavy environments. Ultimately, both devices serve the same class of user, but choosing the right one depends on whether your focus is scalability or efficiency out of the box.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

Want to follow specific category? Also Read...Synology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ NAS ReviewSynology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464Synology DS925+ vs DS923+ NAS Synology vs UGREEN NAS (in 202Synology vs Terramaster in 202Synology vs UGREEN in 2025 - WSynology vs QNAP in 2025 - WhiWeek 17 Tech Roundup – LenovSynology DS925+ NAS Released Subscribe You can also follow specific search terms:

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TRY CHAT

If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US

    

 

WE LOVE COFFEE