AppFlowy est une solution alternative et open source à Notion. Elle permet de créer un véritable espace de travail numérique modulable : prise de notes, gestion de projets, bases de données, tableaux Kanban, wikis et calendriers. Conçue pour offrir la même puissance que Notion, AppFlowy mise avant tout sur la transparence, la confidentialité et la flexibilité. L’utilisateur peut ainsi gérer ses informations en local, personnaliser son environnement de travail et même auto-héberger sa propre instance serveur.

AppFlowy, alternative à Notion

Notion s’est imposé comme un outil incontournable pour structurer ses connaissances et collaborer en équipe. Sa force réside dans sa polyvalence : un seul espace pour connecter idées, tâches et documents. Mais sa gratuité trouve vite ses limites : le travail en équipe devient payant et les données restent stockées sur un cloud propriétaire, souvent éloigné des exigences européennes en matière de protection de la vie privée.

AppFlowy : un espace de travail open source et local

AppFlowy répond à ces limites en proposant une approche décentralisée et open source. L’application fonctionne en local, sans dépendance à un service tiers, et offre une compatibilité multiplateforme : Windows, macOS, Linux, mais aussi Android et iOS. Les utilisateurs peuvent également accéder à leurs espaces depuis le navigateur web.

Mieux encore, AppFlowy peut être déployé sur un serveur personnel via Docker, sur un NAS ou toute autre machine. Cette architecture ouverte garantit confidentialité, indépendance et pérennité des données, des critères essentiels pour les entreprises comme pour les utilisateurs soucieux de leur souveraineté numérique.

L’éditeur décrit sa solution comme « l’espace de travail IA qui vous permet d’en faire plus sans perdre le contrôle de vos données ».

Communauté engagée et évolutions rapides

En tant que projet open source, AppFlowy repose sur une communauté de développeurs et d’utilisateurs actifs. Les contributions sont nombreuses : amélioration des performances, ajout de modules, intégration de fonctionnalités d’intelligence artificielle. Cette approche collaborative permet à la solution de progresser rapidement, sans dépendre d’un éditeur unique.

Reprendre la main sur ses outils

Comme Penpot, alternative libre à Figma, AppFlowy illustre un mouvement de fond vers des solutions ouvertes et auto-hébergées. Dans un contexte où la protection des données devient stratégique, ces projets offrent une réponse concrète aux organisations cherchant à allier productivité et souveraineté. Attention, certaines fonctionnalités AppFlowy sont payantes…

Synology vient de déployer une nouvelle version de son système interne : DSM 7.3.1-86003. Cette mise à jour ne propose aucune nouveauté, mais elle corrige plusieurs bugs apparus avec la version précédente. Un correctif attendu, notamment par les utilisateurs confrontés à ces dysfonctionnements…

Synology DSM 7.3.1

Il y a tout juste 20 jours, Synology mettait en ligne DSM 7.3, une version marquante car elle revenait sur la restriction concernant les disques durs tiers (en particulier Western Digital et Seagate) pour la gamme DSx25. Une décision perçue comme une prise de conscience bienvenue par certains, mais comme un aveu d’échec (voire une perte de confiance) pour d’autres.

Problème : cette version 7.3 a introduit plusieurs bugs gênants, ce qui reste assez rare chez Synology. DSM 7.3.1 vient justement les corriger.

Ce que corrige DSM 7.3.1

Si on regarde le journal des modifications, voici ce que l’on peut lire :

• Correction d’un bug empêchant l’ajustement de la luminosité des voyants LED sur certains modèles ;
• Correction d’un problème pouvant empêcher l’affichage des périphériques externes lors de la sélection de fichiers ou de dossiers ;
• Correction d’une erreur générant de fausses alertes liées aux périphériques de stockage externes ;
• Correction d’un problème pouvant empêcher le fonctionnement d’un onduleur connecté en USB après une mise à jour.

À noter : DSM 7.3.1 remplace entièrement la version précédente, d’où un fichier .pat d’environ 350 Mo.

Comment télécharger et installer DSM 7.3.1

Si votre NAS ne vous propose pas automatiquement cette mise à jour, voici comment l’installer manuellement en suivant ces étapes :

1. Téléchargement du fichier
   Allez sur la page officielle du Centre de téléchargement de Synology ou sur le site d’archive officiel.
2. Installation manuelle
   • Connectez-vous à l’interface d’administration de votre NAS.
   • Accédez à Panneau de configuration > Mise à jour et restauration.
   • Cliquez sur Mise à jour manuelle de DSM.
   • Sélectionnez le fichier téléchargé via le bouton Parcourir.
   • Cliquez sur OK et attendez environ 3 minutes.
3. Redémarrage obligatoire
   Une fois la mise à jour terminée, votre NAS redémarrera automatiquement.

Attention, cette mise à jour est assez longue… comptez entre 5 et 25 minutes suivant la configuration. Plusieurs paquets sont également mis à jour avec DSM 7.3.1.

source

Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vs CWWK P6 SSD NAS Showdown

The compact and SSD-focused NAS landscape has grown increasingly competitive, with new models targeting users who require silent operation, efficient performance, and small-scale virtualization or media serving capabilities. Devices like the GMKTec G9, Beelink ME Mini, and CWWK P6 represent a distinct shift from traditional 3.5” HDD-based systems, instead favoring M.2 NVMe SSD storage in compact chassis designs. These systems are marketed toward home users, prosumers, and developers looking for a balance between cost, flexibility, and low-noise operation, often for roles such as Plex servers, UnRAID deployments, or containerized environments.

Each unit in this comparison leverages low-power Intel Twin Lake processors (notably the N150), offers at least dual 2.5GbE connectivity, and supports multiple M.2 drives, but their implementations vary widely in thermal handling, expandability, and internal architecture. As the line between DIY NAS builds and pre-built options continues to blur, the GMKTec G9, Beelink ME Mini, and CWWK P6 provide a snapshot of how different brands interpret the needs of modern users who prioritize energy efficiency, small footprints, and SSD-based storage workflows. This article evaluates these three devices across pricing, storage architecture, design, and real-world usability to provide a clear overview of their relative strengths and compromises.

CWWK P6 SSD NAS	Beelink ME Mini SSD NAS – HERE	GMKTec G9 SSD NAS

Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vs CWWK P6 SSD NAS – Price and Value

The GMKTec G9 enters the market at around $199 for its 12GB RAM base configuration, positioning it as one of the more accessible SSD-based NAS units available. It includes a Windows 11 Pro license and Ubuntu Linux pre-installed, which can be attractive to users interested in general computing as well as NAS tasks. However, these operating systems are not tailored for storage-focused functionality, and the burden falls on the user to install and configure something like TrueNAS or UnRAID for proper NAS use. Additionally, the system uses non-upgradable LPDDR5 memory and features a plastic chassis, suggesting a design focus on affordability over long-term flexibility. While value is present in terms of included software and passive SSD-ready operation, its entry-level design limits appeal to users planning to scale or repurpose the device beyond its initial setup.

The Beelink ME Mini NAS, typically available at $209 on Beelink’s own storefront, offers a slightly higher upfront cost but balances that with integrated features aimed at simplifying deployment. Unlike the GMKTec G9, the ME Mini comes with an internal power supply and Crucial-branded SSDs in pre-built configurations, offering a greater level of assurance for storage reliability and plug-and-play readiness. The system supports Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, and features a silent fan-assisted cooling design that makes it more suitable for living rooms or office environments. Though it also utilizes soldered 12GB LPDDR5 memory, its form factor, passive aesthetics, and better thermals make it more appealing to users who want a quiet and tidy NAS solution that requires minimal tinkering post-installation. When compared to generic prebuilds, the ME Mini offers greater refinement and turnkey usability in exchange for a modest premium.

The CWWK P6 NAS sets itself apart with a lower base price of $195 for the N150 version, but this does not include memory or storage. Instead, the system is designed for users who prefer sourcing their own SO-DIMM DDR5 RAM and M.2 SSDs, potentially reducing costs if spare components are available. Its use of a single SO-DIMM slot enables expansion up to 48GB, which is considerably more than either the GMKTec or Beelink models. However, this flexibility comes at the cost of initial convenience. Users will need to handle their own OS installation, BIOS configuration, and possibly even resolve SATA recognition issues via firmware tweaks. The CWWK P6 also lacks wireless connectivity by default, and its use of a barrel connector rather than USB-C for power delivery may feel dated. Still, for users with a higher comfort level in DIY environments, the P6 offers a customizable platform with greater headroom for VMs, Plex, and containers.

When considering long-term value, each NAS appeals to a different kind of buyer. The GMKTec G9 is best suited for users who want a simple, functional NAS with minimal setup, though they may run into its limits quickly if performance expectations rise. The Beelink ME Mini justifies its price by offering a more thought-out design, silent thermals, and premium SSD options out of the box—better suited to users who want a clean and quiet system that can be set up rapidly. Meanwhile, the CWWK P6 represents a builder’s NAS: inexpensive upfront, highly scalable, and intended for users who value control over convenience. Ultimately, while price differences between these units are small, the total value depends heavily on user intent and whether ease of deployment, expansion, or component choice takes priority.

Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vs CWWK P6 SSD NAS – Storage & Memory

All three NAS systems in this comparison rely exclusively on M.2 NVMe SSDs for internal storage, reflecting a growing emphasis on silent, high-speed flash-based configurations in compact enclosures. The GMKTec G9 features four M.2 NVMe slots, each limited to PCIe Gen 3 x2, offering a theoretical maximum of 2GB/s per drive. In contrast, the Beelink ME Mini supports six M.2 NVMe slots, with five operating at PCIe Gen 3 x1 and one—typically reserved for the OS—at Gen 3 x2. The CWWK P6 matches the G9 in having four slots, though each operates at PCIe Gen 3 x1 speeds, reducing peak bandwidth per drive. This difference in PCIe lane allocation directly impacts aggregate read/write performance, especially in RAID configurations or during high-traffic file operations.

The GMKTec G9’s storage slots are laid out beneath a plastic panel with no included heatsinks, a decision that raises concerns about sustained thermal performance. While it technically supports up to 32TB of total storage across its four bays, the lack of passive or active SSD cooling can lead to throttling unless third-party heatsinks are installed. The Beelink ME Mini, in contrast, integrates a large aluminum heatsink with pre-applied thermal pads on all six slots, ensuring consistent heat transfer and reduced risk of SSD overheating. Though five of its six slots are bandwidth-limited to Gen 3 x1, the thermal design makes it better suited for prolonged uptime and high-usage environments. The CWWK P6 also features a metal enclosure that acts as a passive heat sink, but ships with notably thin thermal pads and relies on an optional USB-powered fan for improved airflow.

Memory configuration is another key area of differentiation. The GMKTec G9 and Beelink ME Mini both ship with 12GB of soldered LPDDR5 memory running at 4800MHz. This fixed memory cannot be upgraded, limiting their long-term viability in RAM-intensive use cases such as virtualization or large-scale container deployment. The CWWK P6, by contrast, includes a single SO-DIMM slot that supports up to 32GB of DDR5 4800MHz memory, making it the most flexible of the three for VM hosting, ZFS-based NAS operating systems, or other memory-sensitive applications. The tradeoff is that buyers must provide their own RAM, adding to the setup cost but allowing for performance tuning based on workload.

Boot and operating system storage configurations differ subtly across the three units. The GMKTec G9 includes a 64GB eMMC drive with pre-installed Windows 11 Pro and Ubuntu, though the eMMC capacity is insufficient for most NAS deployments beyond initial setup. The Beelink ME Mini also offers a 64GB eMMC module but encourages users to install the OS on the Gen 3 x2 slot, especially in bundled configurations that include Crucial P3 SSDs. The CWWK P6 does not include any pre-installed OS or eMMC storage but does allow booting from any of its four NVMe slots, giving advanced users greater freedom to optimize OS installation, especially when using UnRAID or TrueNAS SCALE.

Ultimately, the memory and storage architecture of each system reflects different user priorities. The GMKTec G9 aims for simplicity but is hindered by non-upgradable memory and inadequate SSD cooling. The Beelink ME Mini offers better thermal management and storage capacity, albeit with limited PCIe bandwidth on most slots. The CWWK P6 provides the greatest upgrade potential with socketed RAM and M.2 flexibility, but demands user familiarity with thermal solutions, BIOS configuration, and peripheral sourcing.

The physical construction of these three NAS units reflects differing priorities in material choice, ventilation, and power integration. The GMKTec G9 uses a lightweight plastic chassis, which helps reduce cost but limits heat dissipation across its four M.2 SSDs. The unit relies on internal airflow generated by laptop-style fans, but its design lacks direct ventilation over the SSD bays, and the use of a plastic cover above the M.2 slots reduces thermal transfer. In contrast, the Beelink ME Mini is housed in a symmetrical 99mm³ cube with an internal aluminum heatsink and integrated fan. Its minimalist cube layout includes top and bottom ventilation for vertical airflow and maintains a more enclosed, consistent cooling environment that better suits SSD longevity in passive setups.

The CWWK P6 offers the most robust build quality of the three, using a solid aluminum alloy chassis that doubles as a passive heat sink. It includes a base-level fan mounted beneath the CPU and an optional USB-powered fan for SSD cooling. However, the included thermal pads are extremely thin, reducing their effectiveness under prolonged load unless replaced. Despite this, the chassis is designed to tolerate higher ambient temperatures and shows consistent performance in enclosed spaces. One drawback is the lack of airflow across the top panel unless the optional fan is mounted—without it, SSDs tend to accumulate heat more rapidly, especially during concurrent write operations or large file transfers.

Power delivery also differentiates these devices. The GMKTec G9 uses a USB-C power connector with an external 65W power brick, aligning with modern standards and reducing desktop clutter. The Beelink ME Mini further improves on this with a built-in PSU, removing the need for external adapters altogether and simplifying cable management in home setups. The CWWK P6 reverts to a more traditional 12V barrel connector, which, while functional, feels outdated compared to the USB-C or internal PSU solutions. This design choice may require users to carry a dedicated power supply, limiting flexibility in mobile deployments or environments with shared power infrastructure.

In testing, all three systems showed efficient power usage, though their idle and peak wattages differ slightly due to cooling, CPU behavior, and drive count. The GMKTec G9 drew 19–20W at idle and peaked at 28–30W under sustained load. The Beelink ME Mini demonstrated the lowest idle consumption at 6.9W with no drives, increasing to around 30W when fully populated with six SSDs under heavy activity. The CWWK P6 consumed approximately 18W at idle and peaked at 34–35W with three active VMs and four SSDs. These figures indicate that, despite modest differences in architecture, each system remains power-efficient and suitable for 24/7 use, especially in home environments with low thermal tolerance and energy cost sensitivity.

Beelink Me Mini vs GMKTec G9 vs CWWK P6 SSD NAS – Conclusion and Verdict

When assessed across all key metrics, the GMKTec G9, Beelink ME Mini, and CWWK P6 occupy distinct positions within the low-cost, all-flash NAS landscape, each catering to different user expectations and levels of technical comfort. The GMKTec G9 is the most turnkey in terms of initial usability, with pre-installed Windows and Ubuntu providing a base for users new to NAS setups or simply looking to use the device as a low-power desktop or file server. Its plastic chassis and lack of thermal optimization limit its suitability for intensive tasks, and the fixed 12GB LPDDR5 memory restricts performance scaling for containers or virtualization. That said, the G9 offers predictable behavior and basic capabilities that will satisfy those seeking an easy, entry-level NAS with minimal setup time, especially for local media streaming or light SMB file services. That said, the G9 is getting rather notorious for it’s poor cooling abilities – so much so that the brand has rolled out an improved cooling verion (see images below). There DO help, but the G9 is still the poorest of the three NAS in this comparison in terms of active cooling and long term temps!

The Beelink ME Mini, though only marginally more expensive, adopts a more premium approach to internal design and build quality. The integrated fan and large aluminum heatsink ensure more consistent SSD temperatures under sustained workloads, and the system is noticeably quieter at idle compared to the G9. Its six M.2 NVMe slots provide greater storage density potential, even though five are limited to PCIe Gen 3 x1 speeds. The soldered memory mirrors the G9’s limitations in upgradeability, but its inclusion of Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth, and an internal PSU adds notable convenience for deployment in mixed-use environments like offices, bedrooms, or AV cabinets. It will appeal to users who value quiet, thermally reliable operation in a system that arrives largely preconfigured and ready for use with minimal additional hardware.

In contrast, the CWWK P6 forgoes polish and plug-and-play readiness in favor of maximum flexibility and user control. It is the only device in this group to feature upgradable RAM, allowing users to install up to 48GB of DDR5 memory, which opens the door to heavier workloads like virtual machines, ZFS-based NAS operating systems, or multiple Docker containers. The lack of included wireless, OS storage, or bundled RAM/SSD keeps the entry cost low but shifts responsibility onto the buyer to source compatible components. This extends to thermal management—while the chassis is solid aluminum, effective SSD cooling often requires replacing the thin stock pads and adding the optional USB-powered fan. These additional steps will deter less technical users but make the P6 a strong contender for builders, hobbyists, or professionals seeking a flexible platform they can adapt over time.

Ultimately, choosing between these three NAS units comes down to balancing ease of setup, long-term scalability, and thermal reliability. The GMKTec G9 suits users who want to get started quickly with a general-purpose device and accept limitations in memory and thermal design. The Beelink ME Mini delivers a more refined package, ideal for those who prioritize noise, storage density, and out-of-box functionality. The CWWK P6, meanwhile, is the most modular and scalable option, but requires technical confidence and additional investment in compatible components. Each has clear strengths and trade-offs, and the best choice depends on whether the user prioritizes convenience, passive reliability, or long-term upgradability in their NAS setup.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

TerraMaster enrichit son catalogue avec 2 nouveaux NAS : les F2-425 Plus et F4-425 Plus. Ces modèles reprennent une architecture commune articulée autour d’un processeur Intel N150 et de mémoire DDR5, tout en introduisant un nouveau design et quelques surprises. Le prix public de départ est fixé à 429,99 € (hors promotion).

TerraMaster F2-425 Plus et F4-425 Plus

TerraMaster s’est fait connaitre avec des NAS simple d’utilisation et accessible par rapport aux ténors du marché. Depuis quelques mois, il prend de plus en plus de place et fait de l’ombre aux Synology, QNAP et Asustor.

Design et capacité de stockage

Les deux NAS adoptent un nouveau coloris blanc, une évolution par rapport aux précédentes générations noires. Le F2-425 Plus dispose de 2 baies pour disques durs ou SSD, tandis que le F4-425 Plus propose 4 baies. Mais la vraie nouveauté c’est que ces modèles intègre 3 emplacements NVMe. Cela permettra de combiner SSD NVMe (pour les performances, par exemple en virtualisation) et disques durs classiques (pour la capacité de stockage, comme les photos ou vidéos). Une approche hybride particulièrement intéressante…

Architecture interne

Les 2 NAS reposent sur un processeur Intel N150 Quad Core cadencé jusqu’à 3,6 GHz. Le F2-425 Plus est livré avec 8 Go de RAM DDR5, alors que le F4-425 Plus dispose de 16 Go de RAM DDR5. La mémoire peut être étendue jusqu’à 32 Go, mais un seul emplacement est disponible. L’architecture n’est pas la plus récente du marché, mais elle a largement fait ses preuves. L’iGPU intégré facilitera le transcodage vidéo. Selon PassMark, le processeur atteint un score de 5 440 points…

Connectique

Du côté des interfaces de connexion, les 2 NAS possèdent :

• 3× USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (dont 1 en façade)
• 1× USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C
• 1× sortie HDMI
• 2× ports réseau 5 Gb/s

C’est assez rare pour le noter, on a bien ici 2 ports réseau capable d’atteindre 5 Gb/s

Système TOS 6

Les nouveaux NAS tournent sous TOS 6, le système maison de TerraMaster. Une mise à jour vers TOS 7 est prévue dans les prochains mois. TOS 6 offre déjà un large éventail de fonctionnalités (tout ce que doit faire un NAS en 2025), un magasin d’applications intégré et la prise en charge de Docker. TerraMaster utilise ses propres technologies de gestion de volumes TRAID et TRAID+, équivalents aux SHR et SHR+ de Synology.

Prix et disponibilité

Les nouveaux NAS TerraMaster F2-425 Plus et F4-425 Plus sont d’ores et disponible à la vente. On les trouve respectivement à :

• F2-425 Plus : 429,99€ (actuellement en promotion à 365,49€)
• F4-425 Plus : 599,99€

Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur le site officiel…

Chaque année, Pwn2Own rassemble la communauté d’expert en cybersécurité autour de la découverte de vulnérabilités critiques dans des appareils et logiciels du quotidien. Du 21 au 23 octobre dernier, l’édition irlandaise de Pwn2Own à Dublin a réuni des experts et hackers éthiques pour tester la sécurité de nombreux équipements : NAS, routeurs, caméras IP, imprimantes, smartphones… utilisés par les entreprises et les particuliers. Les principaux sponsors de cette édition étaient Meta, Synology et QNAP. Nous ne reviendrons pas sur l’ensemble des failles découvertes (elles sont nombreuses), mais nous allons nous concentrer sur celles touchant Synology et QNAP.

Qu’est-ce que le Pwn2Own ?

Pwn2Own est une compétition internationale de cybersécurité créée par la Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), un programme de recherche en sécurité géré par Trend Micro. Son objectif, c’est d’encourager les chercheurs en sécurité à identifier et exploiter des vulnérabilités dans des logiciels, systèmes d’exploitation ou matériels populaires. Les fabricants fournissent eux-mêmes les appareils à tester, afin de les soumettre à des attaques contrôlées et sécurisées. Les participants tentent de découvrir des failles “zero-day”, c’est-à-dire non documentées et non corrigées. À la clé, des récompenses financières plutôt conséquentes, proportionnelles à la gravité et à l’impact des failles découvertes. Pour cette édition, la cagnotte globale s’élevait à 2 millions de dollars.

Synology

Dès les premières heures, plusieurs produits Synology ont été compromis :

• BeeStation Plus : débordement de pile permettant un accès root — gain de 40 000 $
• DS925+ : exploitation de deux bugs combinés pour obtenir une exécution de code arbitraire — gain de 40 000 $
• DP320 : là encore, deux bugs exploités conjointement — gain de 50 000 $
• Caméra IP CC400W : faille déjà connue du fabricant (non corrigée et non documentée à ce jour) — gain de 30 000 $
• DS925+ (nouvelle attaque) : exploitation de deux bugs pour contourner l’authentification et exécuter du code en tant que root — gain de 40 000 $
• BeeStation Plus (hors scope) : vulnérabilité découverte mais non récompensée, car en dehors du périmètre de la compétition.

QNAP

Les appareils QNAP ont eux aussi été la cible de plusieurs exploits notables au cours de la compétition.

• Une équipe est parvenue à compromettre les QHora-322 et TS-453E grâce à la combinaison de huit vulnérabilités, incluant plusieurs injections — gain de 100 000 $.
• Une autre équipe a exploité sur le TS-453E un enchaînement d’injections multiples et un bug de chaîne de format, permettant une exécution de code — gain de 40 000 $.
• Une faille d’injection de code unique a ensuite permis à des chercheurs de prendre le contrôle du TS-453E — gain de 40 000 $.
• Enfin, une autre vulnérabilité, liée à un identifiant codé en dur combiné à une injection, a conduit à une nouvelle compromission du TS-453E — gain de 40 000 $.

Autres fabricants concernés

D’autres marques ont également vu leurs produits compromis :

• Canon et Lexmark (imprimantes)
• Philips Hue (lampes connectées)
• Sonos (enceintes connectées)
• Samsung (smartphones Galaxy)
• Ubiquiti (systèmes de surveillance AI Pro)

En synthèse

L’édition 2025 de Pwn2Own Dublin a une nouvelle fois démontré la richesse et la pertinence de ce type d’événement pour l’industrie. Il faut saluer les constructeurs qui acceptent d’exposer leurs produits à ce niveau de test (et donc de risque financier). Le fait que QNAP et Synology soient co-sponsors, aux côtés de Meta, illustre clairement leur engagement en faveur de la cybersécurité et leur volonté d’adopter une démarche proactive dans la protection de leurs utilisateurs.

The Minisforum MS-02 Workstation – FINALLY A MS-01 KILLER?

Note – Massive thanks to PCWatch for their coverage of the Japan IT Week 2025 Event. They made an excellent article on the Minisforum MS-02 HERE and was the source for today’s article. Check them out!

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is a compact 4.8-liter workstation revealed at Japan IT Week Autumn 2025, marking a major upgrade over the earlier MS-01 model. Built around Intel’s 24-core Core Ultra 9 285HX processor, it merges high-end mobile CPU performance with features traditionally reserved for full-size desktops. The system includes support for up to 256 GB of ECC DDR5 memory, four PCIe 4.0 NVMe slots, and three PCIe expansion slots, one of which supports PCIe 5.0 ×16. Network connectivity options extend up to dual 25 GbE SFP28 ports, alongside 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE (vPro) Ethernet. Designed to serve as a workstation or mini-server, the MS-02 Ultra incorporates an internal 350 W Flex PSU, a slide-out chassis for maintenance, and advanced front-to-rear cooling architecture.

Minisforum MS-02 – Internal Hardware

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is built around Intel’s Arrow Lake-HX platform, with the Core Ultra 9 285HX serving as its central processor. This 24-core CPU combines eight performance cores and sixteen efficiency cores, reaching up to 5.5 GHz while maintaining a 140 W thermal design power. It incorporates an integrated Intel Arc GPU with four Xe cores and an NPU capable of up to 13 TOPS for AI acceleration. The CPU provides 24 PCIe lanes in total, which are distributed among the system’s multiple expansion and storage options.

Memory capacity is one of the most notable upgrades over its predecessor. The MS-02 Ultra offers four DDR5 SO-DIMM slots, supporting up to 256 GB of 4800 MHz memory, with full ECC functionality for stability in continuous workloads. Two modules are located on the CPU side of the board, and two on the reverse, optimizing thermal spacing and service access. This capacity places it closer to entry-level server configurations than typical mini PCs, reinforcing its suitability for virtualization or compute-heavy tasks.

Storage expansion is handled through four M.2 2280 NVMe slots, each supporting PCIe 4.0 ×4 bandwidth. Combined, these slots can accommodate up to 16 TB of SSD storage. The system’s slide-out chassis design allows quick installation or replacement of drives, simplifying maintenance. Minisforum has also introduced a small debug LED and clear CMOS button on the board, indicating that the model is targeted toward users familiar with system-level configuration and troubleshooting.

Expansion flexibility extends far beyond most small form factor workstations. The system includes three PCIe slots: one PCIe 5.0 ×16, one PCIe 4.0 ×16 (often occupied by a 25 GbE NIC in standard configurations), and one PCIe 4.0 ×4. The top slot can host dual-slot desktop graphics cards, drawing up to 140 W through an included 8-pin auxiliary connector. This allows for the addition of mid-range GPUs such as the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada or workstation accelerators, while still retaining physical compactness.

Power delivery is managed through a built-in 350 W Flex PSU that eliminates the need for an external brick. This internal supply was a deliberate shift from the MS-01’s external adapter and helps sustain higher CPU and GPU draw without additional clutter. The unit supports 100–240 V AC input, giving it universal deployment flexibility for both workstation and light server scenarios.

 

Minisforum MS-02 – Ports and Connections

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra includes a broad range of connectivity options intended to support both workstation and server workloads. Front access is optimized for frequent use, featuring two USB4 Version 2.0 Type-C ports offering 80 Gbps bandwidth each, a 10 Gbps USB Type-A port, a 3.5 mm audio combo jack, and the system power button. These front USB4 v2 ports also support DisplayPort Alternate Mode and Power Delivery up to 15 W per port, making them suitable for high-speed data transfer or direct monitor output without additional adapters.

The rear I/O layout is designed for permanent peripheral and network connections. It includes a third USB4 Type-C port rated at 40 Gbps, three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports at 10 Gbps each, and a single HDMI 2.1 output supporting up to 8K at 60 Hz or 4K at 120 Hz. For network communication, the MS-02 Ultra integrates four ports in total: two 25 GbE SFP28, one 10 GbE RJ-45, and one 2.5 GbE RJ-45. The 2.5 GbE interface uses Intel’s i226-LM controller and supports vPro remote management for BIOS-level administration, which is beneficial for enterprise or headless operation.

Wireless connectivity is provided by an M.2 2230 E-Key slot supporting Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 modules, enabling flexible configuration for wireless networks or peripheral pairing. The combination of USB4 v2, multiple Ethernet options, and RDMA capability positions the MS-02 Ultra as a system ready for both high-performance workstation setups and compact server deployments. Its port layout, with both front and rear accessibility, ensures straightforward use in horizontal or vertical orientations.

Minisforum MS-02 – Cooling and Temperature Management

The cooling system of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is designed to manage sustained high thermal loads while maintaining compact dimensions. The chassis follows a front-intake and rear-exhaust airflow pattern, similar to rackmount servers. A six-heatpipe radiator combined with phase-change material (PCM) ensures efficient heat dissipation from both the CPU and expansion slots. This design enables the system to maintain stable operation at a 140 W CPU TDP, even when fully populated with PCIe cards and NVMe storage. Airflow direction also varies depending on the unit’s orientation, with side-mounted intakes feeding the expansion slots and rear vents handling exhaust when the unit is placed horizontally or vertically.

The internal layout is structured to prevent thermal overlap between major components. The CPU and memory modules are cooled through a direct-contact heat spreader, while GPU and add-in cards draw intake air from the left side and expel it from the right or top, depending on placement. The inclusion of an internal 350 W Flex PSU was balanced with this design, ensuring sufficient clearance and airflow. This approach allows the MS-02 Ultra to sustain continuous high-load performance without external cooling solutions or the noise levels typical of larger tower workstations.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra Workstation – Worth waiting for?

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra represents a substantial progression from the original MS-01 workstation, addressing nearly every limitation of its predecessor. The earlier model, released in 2023, gained attention for integrating desktop-class performance into a small form factor but was constrained by its single-slot PCIe design, limited memory capacity, and reliance on an external power brick. The MS-02 Ultra resolves these issues with four DDR5 SO-DIMM slots supporting up to 256 GB ECC memory, a dual-slot PCIe 5.0 ×16 slot for graphics or accelerator cards, and a fully internal 350 W Flex PSU. These refinements, along with the addition of 25 GbE networking and USB4 v2 connectivity, elevate the system into a new category that bridges high-end workstation and compact enterprise server design.

Performance and versatility are at the center of this system’s concept. The inclusion of a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX CPU and up to four PCIe 4.0 NVMe drives positions it for continuous workloads such as virtualization, software development, or AI inference without the thermal or structural compromises typical of small PCs. Minisforum’s decision to adopt ECC memory and RDMA-capable networking also underlines a shift toward reliability and professional usage scenarios rather than enthusiast or gaming audiences.

In terms of market placement, pricing has yet to be confirmed, but early indications suggest the MS-02 Ultra will likely start around $1,500, with higher configurations approaching or exceeding $2,000 depending on memory, storage, and NIC options. This aligns it with compact workstations like the ASRock DeskMeet X600 and high-end mini servers from OEM integrators, though the Minisforum model’s density and component flexibility set it apart. Overall, the MS-02 Ultra shows how far the brand’s SFF engineering has advanced since the MS-01, turning a well-liked prototype concept into a fully realized professional-grade workstation built for sustained heavy use.

Note – Massive thanks to PCWatch for their coverage of the Japan IT Week 2025 Event. They made an excellent article on the Minisforum MS-02 HERE and was the source for today’s article. Check them out!

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Après une année de développement et de tests intensifs, Jellyfin 10.11.0 marque l’une des évolutions les plus importantes du projet open source. Cette nouvelle version met l’accent sur la performance, la fiabilité et la préparation du futur, avec une refonte du système de gestion des métadonnées, de nouveaux outils d’administration et plusieurs améliorations côté utilisateur. Regardons de plus près cette nouvelle version…

Jellyfin 10.11.0 : le changement, c’est maintenant

Visuellement, Jellyfin 10.11.0 n’apporte que peu de modifications. Les véritables avancées se situent à l’intérieur du moteur : la base de données de la bibliothèque a été entièrement migrée vers EF Core.

Concrètement, Jellyfin abandonne les requêtes SQLite dispersées au profit d’une gestion centralisée des données. Résultat :

• des requêtes plus rapides,
• des migrations plus sûres,
• et une base bien plus facile à faire évoluer.

Cette refonte ouvre également la voie à la prise en charge future d’autres moteurs de base de données, comme PostgreSQL, pour plus de flexibilité et de robustesse.

Maintenance simplifiée

La migration des bibliothèques s’accompagne d’un processus de déduplication et de nettoyage des données (suppression d’entrées orphelines ou doublons). Selon la taille et l’ancienneté de la base, cette étape peut durer de quelques minutes à plusieurs heures.
Avant toute mise à jour, il est impératif de :

• sauvegarder manuellement les dossiers de données et de configuration,
• être déjà sur la version 10.10.7,
• et ne jamais interrompre la migration en cours.

Autre nouveauté appréciable : la fonction de sauvegarde et restauration intégrée. Elle permet de créer des instantanés (snapshots) de la base de métadonnées et de les restaurer facilement, un vrai plus pour la maintenance et la sécurité des données.

Performances et consommation mémoire

Le moteur de base de données tire désormais parti d’un cache en mémoire plus agressif, ce qui réduit les accès disque et améliore nettement la réactivité, notamment sur les grandes bibliothèques. En contrepartie, Jellyfin utilise davantage de RAM, mais cette mémoire est libérée automatiquement si d’autres processus en ont besoin. De nouveaux modes de verrouillage (locking) viennent aussi améliorer la stabilité dans les environnements sollicités.

Compatibilité et évolutions techniques

Jellyfin abandonne définitivement le support des systèmes ARM 32 bits (armhf). Pour continuer à bénéficier des mises à jour, il faut désormais utiliser un système d’exploitation ARM64.

Autre changement annoncé : la suppression prochaine du support TLS/SSL interne (prévue pour la version 10.12.0). Les développeurs recommandent désormais d’utiliser un reverse proxy (comme Nginx ou Caddy) pour la gestion des certificats, plus fiable et plus simple à maintenir.

Nouvelles fonctionnalités et améliorations clés

Parmi les nouveautés les plus notables de Jellyfin 10.11.0 :

• Recherche plus rapide et gestion enrichie des favoris (Live TV, clips, albums photo, saisons, etc.) ;
• Support HEVC dans Firefox 134+ et option pour désactiver le style natif des sous-titres ;
• Affichage en collections des séries et ajout d’un splash screen personnalisable sur la page de connexion ;
• Tableau de bord enrichi, avec statistiques médias et suivi de l’espace disque ;
• Support AV1 via VideoToolbox et passage à FFmpeg 7.1, pour de meilleures performances en décodage et transcodage ;
• Amélioration du rendu HDR et Dolby Vision sur certains matériels compatibles ;
• Nouvelle API de sauvegarde (BackupApi) et migration complète des plugins vers EF Core.

Cette version corrige également plusieurs failles de sécurité, y compris des correctifs issus de projets externes.

En synthèse

Jellyfin 10.11.0 pose des fondations solides pour l’avenir du projet. Plus rapide, plus stable et mieux structurée, cette version facilite la maintenance tout en préparant de futures innovations. Une mise à jour vivement conseillée, à condition de la planifier avec soin…. pensez aux sauvegardes.

source

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – The New $500+ NAS Standard?

The TerraMaster F4-425 Plus represents a significant step forward in the brand’s 4-bay NAS lineup, targeting users who demand capable hardware and broad feature support at a mid-range price point. Retailing at $569.99, or $484.99 during its introductory discount, it is positioned to compete directly with systems like the Synology DS925+ and QNAP TS-464, both of which occupy similar price and hardware tiers. TerraMaster’s intention with this model is to deliver a “jack of all trades” device that suits both home multimedia environments and small business offices. Internally, it uses Intel’s quad-core N150 processor, part of the newer Twin Lake architecture, with a base clock of 1 GHz and a turbo frequency up to 3.6 GHz. This CPU is paired with 16GB of DDR5 memory, offering a notable upgrade in bandwidth and responsiveness compared to previous DDR4-based TerraMaster models.

Complementing that performance core are three PCIe 3.0 x1 M.2 NVMe slots and four SATA drive bays, supporting a combined raw capacity of up to 144TB when fully populated. This configuration allows the device to accommodate both large-scale HDD storage for bulk data and high-speed SSD arrays for caching or dedicated performance pools. Dual 5GbE network ports on the rear enable theoretical aggregate transfer speeds exceeding 1,000 MB/s, aligning with the system’s positioning as a performance-focused yet affordable NAS. TerraMaster’s TOS 6 operating system comes preinstalled, providing modernized storage management, AI-based photo organization, and security tools like HyperLock WORM protection and isolation mode. Altogether, the F4-425 Plus arrives as one of the most fully featured mid-tier NAS options available in 2025, combining strong hardware, software maturity, and quiet, power-efficient design suited to both personal and professional use cases.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

The TerraMaster F4-425 Plus delivers one of the most complete mid-tier NAS packages currently available, balancing strong hardware, efficient design, and flexible software at a highly competitive price. Its Intel N150 processor, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and dual 5GbE ports provide ample speed for data-heavy workloads, while three M.2 NVMe slots add rare versatility for caching or SSD-based pools. The all-metal enclosure maintains low temperatures and quiet operation, and the TOS 6 operating system has matured into a capable platform with snapshot protection, Docker, virtualization, and AI photo management. Although it lacks premium details such as drive locks and redundant fans, and the interface remains less refined than Synology DSM or QNAP QTS, the F4-425 Plus stands out as a practical and forward-looking NAS. It bridges affordability and professional capability, making it suitable for home users, content creators, and small offices that need reliable, fast, and adaptable network storage.

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS
Amazon in Your Region for the Terramaster F4 SSD NAS @ $569 ($489.99 till 19th Nov)	Terramaster F4-425 PLUS – $569	B&H for the Terramaster F4-425 plus NAS @ $569.99

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Design & Storage

The exterior design of the TerraMaster F4-425 Plus maintains the brand’s familiar compact metal chassis but introduces small refinements that improve both usability and thermals. Measuring 150 by 181 by 219 millimeters and weighing just under 3 kilograms, it fits comfortably into a home office or studio setup without generating significant heat or noise. The enclosure is almost entirely metal, with a brushed silver finish that enhances rigidity and passive cooling compared with earlier plastic-faced designs. Four individual drive trays occupy the front panel, each featuring a simple click-and-load mechanism for 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch drives. Although there are no locking latches or LCD displays, the trays are tool-free and straightforward to handle. A single 120mm fan at the rear provides adjustable cooling across smart, low, and high-speed profiles, maintaining an operational noise level as low as 20.9 dB(A) when idle with drives installed, according to TerraMaster’s own test figures.

From a structural perspective, the F4-425 Plus has clearly benefited from improved thermal management. The metal shell acts as a heat spreader, with typical external temperatures ranging from 25 to 27°C across the enclosure after extended operation, even under multi-day workload testing. Internal drive bays were observed to maintain around 27 to 29°C, while the rear ports and fan area registered between 36 and 38°C during prolonged use. These figures indicate an efficient heat dissipation design, aided by the more conductive chassis material and smart fan calibration. For users concerned with energy efficiency, the power draw remains modest thanks to the Intel N150 processor’s low TDP, allowing the system to idle at roughly 13 watts with SSDs installed and scale to around 60 watts under sustained load with four enterprise-class HDDs spinning.

In terms of drive configuration, the NAS supports up to four SATA 6Gb/s drives and three M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs. This combination provides a theoretical maximum raw capacity of 144TB, assuming four 30TB HDDs and three 8TB SSDs. The inclusion of three NVMe slots rather than the more typical one or two is a notable strength. Each operates on a PCIe 3.0 x1 lane, delivering real-world throughput of approximately 800 to 900 MB/s per SSD, suitable for caching or storage pools. This setup makes it possible to allocate two drives for cache acceleration while dedicating the third to an independent SSD-based pool for high-speed operations like video editing or database hosting. Such flexibility is rare at this price point and broadens the system’s appeal to users with both large data sets and high-performance requirements.

Storage management is handled through TOS 6, TerraMaster’s web-based operating system, which supports a wide range of RAID configurations including TRAID, TRAID+, JBOD, and traditional RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10. TOS 6 also enables SSD caching, snapshots, and HyperLock write-once-read-many functionality for data integrity. Users can assign storage pools to specific workloads, such as separating SSD-based scratch space from HDD archival volumes. Combined with the new graphical interface and more detailed health monitoring tools, it provides a much more transparent overview of drive temperatures, utilization, and S.M.A.R.T. status. For additional flexibility, the system supports online RAID migration and expansion, meaning users can start small and scale capacity over time without data loss.

Beyond local storage, the device integrates directly with TerraMaster’s CloudSync service, which connects to providers like Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, and Baidu Cloud. Hybrid storage configurations allow partial replication or tiered backup between the NAS and the cloud, offering an extra level of redundancy for professional workflows. External connectivity through USB 3.2 ports also supports direct backups to DAS enclosures or portable drives. Altogether, the F4-425 Plus’s design emphasizes efficient cooling, solid construction, and versatile storage architecture, making it a flexible foundation for both data-heavy projects and long-term digital archiving.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Internal Hardware

Internally, the TerraMaster F4-425 Plus is structured around Intel’s N150 processor, a 4-core, 4-thread CPU from the Twin Lake generation. Built on a 6W TDP architecture, this chip delivers a significant efficiency advantage over the previous N5095-based systems while offering a higher burst clock of up to 3.6 GHz. The CPU integrates Intel UHD Graphics, allowing 4K hardware decoding for H.264, H.265, VC-1, and MPEG-4, which is particularly beneficial for Plex, Emby, or Jellyfin users who want native transcoding without GPU add-ons.

This combination makes the system viable not only as a file server but also as a local multimedia hub, capable of decoding and streaming 4K video at up to 60 frames per second. Despite being a low-power chip, its instruction set includes AES-NI hardware encryption, ensuring efficient data security without notable throughput loss when encryption is enabled.

The system’s memory architecture uses a single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot, populated with a 16GB non-ECC module by default and expandable up to 32GB. The adoption of DDR5 over DDR4 marks a generational improvement in bandwidth and latency, leading to faster multitasking, smoother virtualization performance, and reduced overhead when handling multiple users or services. The memory module is non-ECC but benefits from on-die error correction at the hardware level, offering stability improvements over standard DDR4 implementations. This approach aligns with the unit’s target demographic of small offices, creators, and advanced home users who want server-grade responsiveness without enterprise complexity.

Storage connectivity within the system is distributed between four SATA III 6Gb/s interfaces managed by an ASMedia controller and three PCIe 3.0 x1 lanes dedicated to M.2 NVMe SSDs. This configuration ensures balanced throughput for simultaneous HDD and SSD activity. Internally, the layout is straightforward, providing easy access to both the memory slot and M.2 bays via the removable top panel. The power supply is a single 90W external brick, keeping internal temperatures lower and simplifying maintenance.

Together, the hardware configuration represents a thoughtful balance between efficiency, expandability, and performance, aimed at users who need consistent data access, multimedia capabilities, and reliable long-term operation without excess noise or heat.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Ports and Connections

The TerraMaster F4-425 Plus offers a broad range of connectivity designed to meet both high-speed networking and general expansion needs. On the rear panel, two 5GbE RJ-45 network ports serve as the central performance feature. These are among the first dual 5GbE implementations in a mid-tier NAS, and each port operates through its own dedicated PCIe 3.0 x1 lane, avoiding bandwidth contention. In testing, each port achieved full theoretical throughput, confirming proper lane allocation. Users can enable link aggregation or SMB multichannel for multi-user workloads, although saturating both ports simultaneously requires fast SSD or hybrid storage configurations. These ports support IPv4/IPv6, VLAN tagging, link aggregation, and Wake-on-LAN, making the system suitable for both small office environments and direct workstation connections.

Complementing the network interfaces, the F4-425 Plus includes four USB 3.2 ports: three Type-A and one Type-C, all operating at 10Gbps. These ports can handle external DAS enclosures, UPS devices, or high-capacity backup drives. The inclusion of a front-mounted USB port improves convenience for ad hoc backups or quick file transfers, addressing a long-standing omission in earlier TerraMaster models. Additionally, an HDMI 2.1 output is positioned on the rear, though its practical use remains limited within TOS, which lacks a native display interface. It may, however, prove useful for third-party operating systems such as Unraid or TrueNAS, where direct console access or local media playback is desired.

Overall, the port layout is clean and efficient, optimized for straightforward cable management. The system’s single large fan sits adjacent to the networking array, allowing for effective airflow without excessive cable obstruction. Power is supplied through a standard barrel connector linked to an external 90W adapter, which helps reduce internal heat buildup. Though it lacks built-in 10GbE or PCIe expansion, the dual 5GbE setup provides more than enough bandwidth for its class, especially when paired with NVMe caching. Users can also connect the NAS to TerraMaster’s USB-based DAS units for storage expansion or off-site replication, offering flexibility without compromising portability or noise levels.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Tests, Noise, Heat and Power Consumption

Performance testing on the TerraMaster F4-425 Plus showed that the system comfortably meets its advertised speed class, particularly when networked over a single 5GbE connection. Using four Toshiba MG-series 7200 RPM enterprise hard drives configured in RAID 5, the system achieved full saturation of one 5GbE port during both AJA and ATTO benchmark tests, reaching consistent read and write speeds around 500 to 520 MB/s. When tested with mixed media files totaling 50.5 GB, it completed the transfer in approximately 3 minutes and 45 seconds, equating to an average throughput of about 224 MB/s.

This is a strong result for a mechanical-drive setup, reflecting efficient caching and balanced SATA bandwidth. SMB Multichannel and link aggregation are supported, though the CPU’s available PCIe lanes limit simultaneous dual-port saturation. Even so, the system handles multiple concurrent transfers and backups without a noticeable decline in throughput.

Testing with NVMe SSDs improved overall responsiveness considerably. The three M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0 x1 slots each sustained sequential transfer rates between 800 and 900 MB/s, allowing the NAS to maintain a high level of random IOPS for metadata-heavy workloads. When used as cache devices, these drives accelerated small-file transfers and application access times, especially when paired with the system’s 16GB of DDR5 memory.

TerraMaster’s TOS 6 supports flexible use of these drives, enabling independent storage pools or hybrid cache layers, depending on the task. In sustained transfers over SMB and iSCSI, the system achieved write speeds close to 950 MB/s and reads near 1020 MB/s when using SSD-based arrays, validating the advantage of dual 5GbE interfaces for all-flash or mixed-tier environments.

Power consumption during operation remained modest, aligning with the platform’s efficient design. With no hard drives installed and three SSDs active, idle draw measured around 13.3 watts. Adding four 7200 RPM HDDs increased idle power to 55 watts and full-load consumption to roughly 61–63 watts under concurrent read/write activity. These figures indicate a well-balanced design that prioritizes power efficiency without restricting performance. Fan speed settings affect both thermals and acoustics predictably: in low-speed mode, the NAS operated near 33 dB(A), while mid and high-speed profiles raised that figure to 37 and 39 dB(A) respectively. During heavy disk operations, readings peaked briefly at around 43 dB(A), which is reasonable given the metal chassis and high-RPM drives used in testing.

Thermal results further underscored the system’s stability. Surface readings from the aluminum body remained between 25°C and 27°C on average, while drive bays hovered at 28–30°C after extended workload sessions. The rear fan exhaust area reached approximately 36–38°C under sustained load. The efficient heat dispersion of the chassis prevented thermal throttling during prolonged transfers or virtualization testing, even with all seven storage devices active. This consistent temperature range indicates that TerraMaster’s choice of single-fan cooling and full-metal housing achieves a practical balance between noise, airflow, and longevity.

The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The TerraMaster F4-425 Plus demonstrates how far the company’s mid-range NAS lineup has progressed in terms of hardware refinement and real-world usability. By combining Intel’s efficient N150 processor with 16GB of DDR5 memory, dual 5GbE connectivity, and triple M.2 NVMe slots, it provides a specification normally reserved for higher-priced units. The build quality, centered around a full-metal chassis and quiet cooling design, contributes to consistent thermals and low power usage even under multi-day workloads. While the design omits premium touches like drive locks or redundant fans, the emphasis on practicality and efficient cooling makes it a dependable solution for continuous operation. From a user experience perspective, the integration of TOS 6 represents TerraMaster’s most stable and capable operating system to date, offering improved security features, cloud synchronization tools, snapshot management, and flexible storage configurations that appeal to both home and small office users.

From a value standpoint, the F4-425 Plus stands out as one of the most competitively priced NAS units in its category. At $569.99, or $484.99 during the initial discount period, it delivers strong network and storage performance that aligns closely with rivals from Synology and QNAP while retaining open installation flexibility for third-party platforms such as Unraid or TrueNAS. Its combination of high-speed connectivity, compact design, and mature software environment makes it an appealing option for anyone seeking a 4-bay system capable of multitasking across media streaming, data backup, and light virtualization. Although it cannot fully match the polish of Synology DSM or the plugin ecosystem of QNAP QTS, TerraMaster has successfully positioned this device as a bridge between affordability and professional performance, solidifying its place as one of the more balanced NAS releases of 2025.

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS
Amazon in Your Region for the Terramaster F4 SSD NAS @ $569 ($489.99 till 19th Nov)	Terramaster F4-425 PLUS – $569	B&H for the Terramaster F4-425 plus NAS @ $569.99

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS PROs

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS CONs

• Dual 5GbE network ports with full independent bandwidth for high-speed transfers + lots of USB-to-5GbE $30 upgrades in the market now • Three PCIe 3.0 x1 M.2 NVMe slots supporting cache or storage pool configurations • Intel N150 processor with integrated graphics enabling 4K hardware decoding and AES-NI encryption • 16GB DDR5 memory (expandable to 32GB) offering improved bandwidth and multitasking performance • Full-metal chassis with efficient thermals, low noise levels, and minimal vibration • Comprehensive RAID and storage management through TOS 6 with snapshot and HyperLock-WORM protection • Supports Docker, virtual machines, Plex, Emby, and Jellyfin natively within TOS 6 • Competitive pricing with strong value relative to Synology and QNAP alternatives

• Cheaper N150 NAS Systems have arrived earlier in 2025 • 5GbE adoption is low, so only larger 10GbE ready groups (via auto-negotiation) will enjoy the benefits of 5GbE • TOS 6 interface and app ecosystem remain less polished than top-tier NAS platforms

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Bonjour à tous,

J’espère que vous allez bien ! Pour ma part, les jours défilent à une vitesse folle… Il va clairement falloir que je lève un peu le pied (sur mon vrai boulot), sinon je risque de finir en mode surchauffe

Comme vous avez pu le constater, les NAS sont au cœur de toutes les conversations ces dernières semaines… et ce n’est pas fini ! Septembre et octobre ont été particulièrement chargés en annonces, mais d’autres nouveautés sont encore à venir… et du lourd, paraît-il.

Il fut un temps où le trio Synology, QNAP et Asustor dominait sans partage. Mais cette époque semble révolue. Le marché évolue vite et les challengers bousculent sérieusement la hiérarchie. Pour ne pas se faire dépasser (voire avaler) par la nouvelle garde, les leaders historiques vont devoir redoubler d’innovation. Le simple stockage en réseau ne suffit plus. Aujourd’hui, tous les fabricants proposent des solutions polyvalentes, puissantes et ultra-connectées. Prenez Ugreen (au hasard), en un an, ils ont totalement rebattu les cartes avec des NAS complets, performants, dotés d’un OS solide, d’apps bien pensées… et surtout d’un rapport qualité/prix redoutable.

Je n’ai pas vu de films récemment. Côté Séries TV, on m’a conseillé Painkiller sur la crise des opioïdes aux États-Unis. C’est pas mal, mais personnellement (sur le même thème) ma préférence va à Dopesick plus percutante et bien plus prenante à mon goût. J’ai aussi tenté House of Guiness dont les décors sont somptueux, les acteurs assez convaincants… mais honnêtement, je me suis un ennuyé. Je pense m’arrêter à la saison 1. Enfin j’ai terminé Néro, une série française qui démarre sur les chapeaux de roue avant de vite retomber à plat. À voir, mais ce n’est pas la série de l’année.

Je me rends compte que les 3 dernières séries Netflix sont plutôt… moyennes. La qualité sur la plateforme baisse clairement. Il reste bien quelques pépites, mais à ce prix, on est en droit d’en attendre plus. Et vous, quelles sont vos séries du moment ? Vos coups de cœur récents ?

Je vous souhaite une excellente journée.
FX

With Synology ‘Hurt’, Where Is QNAP Right Now?

In the rapidly shifting world of network-attached storage (NAS), QNAP remains one of the most established and technically capable names in the field, yet its place in the market has never felt more uncertain. While Synology has spent much of 2025 dealing with backlash over its increasingly closed-ecosystem strategy—restricting support for third-party drives and limiting upgrade paths—QNAP’s relative quietness has been equally striking. Rather than taking advantage of Synology’s missteps to present itself as the more open and flexible alternative, QNAP has maintained a notably low public profile. This has led many in the community to wonder whether the company is missing a rare opportunity to redefine the market narrative in its favour. Meanwhile, the NAS landscape itself has become more fragmented than ever, with emerging brands such as UGREEN entering the space aggressively, and DIY-friendly systems like ZimaOS, CasaOS, and TrueNAS reshaping what users expect from network storage. In this increasingly complex environment, QNAP’s silence raises an important question: where does the company stand today, and what direction is it heading next?

What Stops QNAP from Achieving Market Dominance?

For much of the last decade, QNAP and Synology were the twin pillars of consumer and SMB NAS. Both set the standards for design, functionality, and software maturity. But while Synology’s restrictive policies have alienated parts of its user base, QNAP has struggled to control the narrative. The company’s openness to third-party hardware remains one of its strongest selling points, yet it has failed to capitalise on that advantage through clear messaging or aggressive marketing. Instead, the brand has allowed the spotlight to drift toward newcomers offering simpler, more modern experiences. Without stronger communication, QNAP risks being seen not as the flexible choice, but as the complicated one. At the same time, the entry-level NAS market is shifting under QNAP’s feet. UGREEN’s arrival has changed expectations by blending appealing industrial design, approachable software, and low price points that attract first-time buyers. Asustor and Terramaster have also expanded their share through steady, incremental improvements that emphasise usability and value over complexity. These competitors are building ecosystems designed for beginners, while QNAP’s traditional focus on advanced workflows can appear intimidating to casual users. For those who simply want a plug-and-play media server or backup appliance, QNAP’s power and depth can feel like overkill.

The DIY and Open-Source Challenge

Beyond traditional competitors, the DIY NAS scene has exploded. Open-source operating systems and flexible, modular hardware are giving enthusiasts and professionals more freedom than ever. Platforms like ZimaOS, CasaOS, and LincStation deliver near-commercial polish at minimal cost, while established heavyweights such as TrueNAS and Unraid continue to dominate the prosumer and homelab segments. Even projects like HexOS, which simplifies TrueNAS for newcomers, show how far the DIY ecosystem has evolved toward user-friendliness. These developments put pressure on QNAP from two directions: on one side, budget newcomers promising simplicity; on the other, flexible open-source solutions offering near-unlimited control. QNAP’s traditional middle-ground position—balancing enterprise-grade features with consumer usability—has never been more difficult to defend.

Where Is the QNAP TS-464 Refresh?

One of the clearest signs of uncertainty around QNAP’s current direction is the lack of a follow-up to the widely praised TS-464 series. Three years after its launch, this model remains one of QNAP’s most balanced and popular NAS systems, yet there has been no formal announcement of a successor. During a recent QNAP partner event in London, attended by distributors and sales partners, several new devices were discussed—such as the USB-to-Dual-10GbE adapter, a 60-bay enterprise expansion chassis, and the QUTS-based AI systems shown earlier at Computex—but no mention was made of a new desktop refresh. What has been confirmed is the upcoming TS-62A series, effectively a value-tier alternative built on the same Intel Celeron N5095 processor found in the TS-464. While this helps QNAP reach a lower price point, it also highlights the absence of real progress in its mainstream lineup. More advanced models, such as the QU504, QU506, and QU508, featuring Intel’s newer Twin Lake N150 and N355 CPUs, have been spotted—but these are confirmed to be China-only releases, likely replacing the “C” series that previously served that region. This means global customers remain without a direct 464 successor in 2025.

The Twin Lake CPUs represent a notable improvement over the Celeron family, offering higher efficiency, DDR5 memory support, and lower power draw, though they are limited to a single memory channel and a maximum of 16GB. Their PCIe layout offers nine Gen3 lanes, potentially allowing QNAP to scale network speeds to 5GbE or even dual-5GbE configurations. However, insiders suggest the company may delay such upgrades until its World Partner Tour later this year, possibly aligning a new desktop rollout with that event. If true, the earliest a genuine TS-464 refresh might appear is early-to-mid-2026, leaving the current model to carry the banner longer than expected. This gap has created visible frustration within the NAS community. While competitors like UGREEN and Minisforum push out new models with 2023–2024 generation CPUs, QNAP continues to rely on hardware first introduced in 2021. The TS-464 remains capable, but QNAP’s silence about its replacement feeds the perception that the brand has slowed its consumer-level innovation cycle.

---

QNAP Is Doing More Than People Think

Despite appearances, QNAP has not been idle. At the 2025 Tech Summit in Taipei, the company showcased several major initiatives reinforcing its enterprise and AI ambitions. Highlights included the TVR-AI200 intelligent NVR, high-availability rackmount systems, and updates to QuTS hero, its ZFS-based OS. These developments show that QNAP is not chasing the beginner market but doubling down on performance, scalability, and professional reliability. Its quietness in consumer circles may therefore reflect a strategic pivot toward enterprise and prosumer deployments where its technology already excels. QNAP’s continued support for both QTS (EXT4) and QuTS hero (ZFS) remains one of its key differentiators. Few other vendors offer users this level of choice between consumer simplicity and enterprise-grade data integrity. Meanwhile, hardware flexibility continues to set QNAP apart: PCIe expansion, GPU support for AI and virtualization, 10GbE networking, and hybrid storage pools that combine HDD, SSD, and NVMe tiers. These factors allow QNAP to appeal to serious creators, labs, and businesses seeking more control than a typical turnkey NAS provides.

QNAP’s challenge now is less about technology and more about perception. To regain consumer trust and market visibility, it must simplify its message without diluting its strengths. Its dual-OS ecosystem, PCIe expandability, and AI integration are powerful advantages, but they must be communicated as accessible, not intimidating. Streamlining setup and maintenance could help QNAP reclaim the middle ground between Synology’s walled garden and the raw complexity of TrueNAS or UnRAID. A clearer consumer strategy is also essential. The company has the resources and product depth to compete head-to-head with UGREEN and Asustor, but a quiet marketing approach has allowed newer names to dominate the conversation. Reinforcing its openness to third-party drives, highlighting its unique Thunderbolt and ZFS support, and launching refreshed hardware with current-generation processors would go a long way toward rebuilding enthusiasm among home and prosumer users.

---

In Conclusion: Where Is QNAP in 2025?

QNAP stands at a pivotal point. Synology’s restrictive direction has created an opportunity for alternatives to flourish, yet QNAP has not fully seized it. Instead, it has focused on strengthening its enterprise and AI product lines while leaving a gap in its mainstream portfolio—most notably the missing TS-464 refresh. Meanwhile, challenger brands like UGREEN, Minisforum, and Aoostar are gaining traction with faster hardware and more aggressive pricing.

Still, QNAP retains unique advantages. Its dual-OS ecosystem, long-term software support, and deep hardware ecosystem remain unmatched in many respects. The TS-x64, TS-x62, and TVS-hx74 series may be ageing, but their ongoing QuTS hero updates show QNAP’s commitment to support longevity. The key now lies in timing: if QNAP can re-enter the consumer market in 2026 with refreshed Intel Twin Lake or similar platforms—balancing performance, energy efficiency, and modern connectivity—it could reassert itself as the most capable and open NAS brand available.

 

Until then, the silence surrounding its next-generation desktop NAS line speaks volumes. QNAP’s technical foundation remains solid, but in a market that rewards visibility and momentum, even the most capable brand cannot afford to stay quiet for long.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Asustor déploie actuellement ADM 5.1. Parmi les nouveautés, une technologie attire particulièrement l’attention : le PQC (Post-Quantum Cryptography). Derrière ce terme se cache un renforcement important de la sécurité, conçu pour préparer dès aujourd’hui les systèmes aux attaques des futurs ordinateurs quantiques. Cette évolution s’inscrit dans la stratégie définie par le NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, États-Unis) pour contrer le risque dit du “harvest now, decrypt later”, c’est-à-dire la collecte de données chiffrées aujourd’hui, dans l’espoir de les déchiffrer plus tard avec des moyens de calcul plus puissants…

ADM 5.1 et PQC-Ready

Avec ADM 5.1, Asustor ajoute le chiffrement TLS 1.3 hybride post-quantique, combinant ML-KEM (Kyber) à un échange de clés classique. L’objectif est de rendre les sessions Web résistantes aux attaques différées, où un attaquant intercepterait le trafic aujourd’hui pour le déchiffrer demain. Cette intégration s’aligne sur la vague de normalisation du NIST (2024-2025) et cible un risque réel : la compromission des données stockées sur les NAS.

PQC-Ready : effet d’annonce ou vraie avancée ?

Ici, le bénéfice est immédiat et transparent. Si le navigateur utilisé prend en charge les suites hybrides, la connexion “quantum-resistant” est négociée automatiquement. L’interface ADM affiche alors le mode actif, permettant de vérifier que la session est bien sécurisée. Pour les transferts via HTTPS ou WebDAV, cette technologie réduit considérablement l’intérêt d’une interception réseau dans le but d’un déchiffrement ultérieur.

Cette mise à jour positionne les NAS Asustor parmi les plus proactifs en matière de sécurité. Elle renforce la protection des accès exposés à Internet, garantit la pérennité de la confidentialité des données et prépare les infrastructures à une transition en douceur vers le chiffrement post-quantique, à mesure que les navigateurs et bibliothèques TLS adoptent ces nouveaux standards. Le message est clair : sécuriser les flux dès aujourd’hui pour éviter les mauvaises surprises demain.

PQC activé par défaut

Il est important de noter que le chiffrement post-quantique est activé par défaut dans ADM 5.1. Aucune configuration particulière n’est requise : la protection s’applique automatiquement, sans intervention de l’utilisateur.

Compatibilité navigateur

Bonne nouvelle : si vous utilisez Chrome (et ses dérivés sous Chromium), Firefox ou Safari dans leurs versions récentes, vous bénéficiez déjà du support nécessaire. La négociation hybride se fera donc automatiquement lors de la connexion à votre NAS Asustor.

Et la concurrence ?

À ce jour, aucun concurrent majeur (Synology, QNAP, Ugreen, TerraMaster) n’a communiqué sur une compatibilité PQC. Cela ne signifie pas qu’ils ne le prennent pas en charge (cela dépend principalement de l’intégration de la bibliothèque TLS utilisée), mais en l’absence d’annonce officielle, il est probable qu’Asustor soit le premier à activer cette technologie par défaut.

En synthèse

Asustor ne se contente pas d’un simple effet d’annonce avec la cryptographie post-quantique (PQC). L’intégration de ML-KEM / Kyber dans un TLS hybride activé par défaut représente une véritable avancée vers des connexions plus sûres et résilientes face aux menaces futures.
Il s’agit d’une évolution cohérente avec le calendrier du NIST, que ce soit dans un contexte professionnel ou domestique.

ASUSTOR vient de mettre à disposition ADM 5.1. Il s’agit d’une mise à jour majeure de son système pour NAS, axée sur la sécurité, la robustesse réseau et la gestion avancée des données.Regardons de plus près cette nouvelle version qui devrait en intéresser plus d’un…

ASUSTOR ADM 5.1

Après ADM 5.0 un peu plus tôt cette année, Asustor nous revient avec ADM 5.1. Le fabricant annonce que cette nouvelle version est compatible avant tout sur les gammes de NAS récentes (AS63, 64, Nimbustor, Drivestor, Lockerstor, Flashstor et dérivés). Cette version consolide la stratégie du fabricant autour de la protection des données et de la pérennité logicielle.

Nouveautés

ADM 5.1 introduit la prise en charge du chiffrement PQC Hybrid TLS, une technologie validée par le NIST américain, combinant cryptographie classique et post-quantique. Une avancée majeure face aux futures menaces informatiques. On parle ici plus dans le détails : Asustor et la sécurité post-quantique (PQC).

Les administrateurs bénéficient désormais de règles de robustesse des mots de passe : longueur minimale, complexité et expiration configurable. Le mécanisme de réinitialisation de mot de passe a également été sécurisé via une authentification obligatoire.

Le pare-feu ADM Defender se voit amélioré : il peut désormais bloquer automatiquement les adresses IP suspectes tentant des connexions via EZ-Connect. Il intègre également un nouveau profil pour restreindre les accès aux conteneurs Docker.

Journal des modifications

Après ces nouveautés, regardons les améliorations qu’Asustor nous a réservé dans ADM 5.1 :

• Gestion avancée du proxy inversé : les applications peuvent définir leur propre port dans le fichier de configuration, utilisé ensuite par ADM pour le serveur proxy HTTP/HTTPS ;
• Amélioration de la gestion des onduleurs réseau (UPS) : il est désormais possible de modifier le nom, l’utilisateur et le mot de passe pour faciliter la connexion à d’autres équipements ;
• Correction des connexions PPPoE : les connexions fonctionnent désormais correctement même lorsque le protocole IPv6 est désactivé ;
• Souplesse accrue du dossier Web : après la désactivation du serveur Web (Apache ou Nginx), le dossier partagé Web peut désormais être déplacé vers un autre volume depuis le module Contrôle d’accès ;
• Compatibilité matérielle étendue : ajout du support de nouvelles cartes réseau PCIe haute performance (Lockerstor 12R Pro Gen2 et Lockerstor 16R Pro Gen2) :
  • Broadcom P2100G (2 × 100 GbE)
  • Intel E810CQDA2 (2 × 100 GbE)
  • Intel E810-XXVDA2 (2 × 25 GbE)
  • Broadcom BCM95719A1904AC (4 × 1 GbE)
• Correction de vulnérabilités XSS : les failles potentielles de type Cross-Site Scripting ont été comblées ;
• Stabilité générale améliorée : nombreuses corrections de bugs dans ADM Defender, Web Center et Contrôle d’accès ;
• Traductions et chaînes multilingues mises à jour pour une interface plus cohérente à l’international.

Divers correctifs supplémentaires renforçant la stabilité et les performances globales du système.

Fin de support pour certaines séries

ASUSTOR confirme également la fin du support fonctionnel pour les séries AS31, AS32, AS40, AS61 et AS62. Ces modèles resteront bel et bien limités à ADM 4.3, avec uniquement des mises à jour de sécurité critiques. Le fabricant n’arrête pas les mises à jour, mais les NAS ne bénéficieront plus des nouveautés. Enfin, les Drivestor et Drivestor Pro perdent définitivement le transcodage matériel… cela semble restreint au puce Realtek. C’est également la fin du support des imprimantes IP USB, suite à la fin du support des pilotes par leurs fournisseurs.

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS (and F2-425 PLUS) NAS Coming Soon

The Terramaster F2-425 PLUS (8 GB, priced around US$399) and F4-425 PLUS (16 GB, priced around US$569) represent Terramaster’s latest step forward in its midrange NAS portfolio, arriving near the end of 2025 as a response to the growing competition from brands such as QNAP, Synology, UGREEN, and Asustor. Both models share the same Intel N150 quad-core processor running up to 3.6 GHz, use DDR5 memory, and include multiple M.2 NVMe slots, positioning them well above Terramaster’s previous generation of Celeron-based systems. The F4-425 PLUS is a four-bay platform that expands on the two-bay F2-425 PLUS by offering higher throughput and significantly greater storage flexibility, making it suitable for heavier workloads and multi-user environments. Terramaster appears to have used this release to redefine what can be expected in the $400–$600 NAS tier, especially by including dual 5 GbE network ports, three NVMe SSD slots, and native hardware transcoding for 4K and even 8K content through integrated Intel UHD graphics. Together these systems aim to deliver competitive all-in-one solutions for home and small-office users who require reliable local backup, multimedia streaming, and virtualization support without moving into enterprise-grade pricing.

Note – The Terramaster F4-425 PLUS and F2-425 PLUS NAS have now been launched, and are available to buy HERE for $569 and HERE for $399 (with 15% off as an introductory price till November 21st)

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS & F2-425 PLUS NAS Hardware Specifications

Terramaster’s F2-425 PLUS and F4-425 PLUS NAS units share a unified hardware architecture centered on Intel’s N150 processor, part of the Twin Lake family. This 4-core, 4-thread CPU operates at a base clock of 1.0 GHz and boosts up to 3.6 GHz, with integrated Intel UHD graphics that support hardware acceleration for 4K and 8K video decoding. While the N150 is not a high-power processor by desktop standards, it provides excellent balance between performance and efficiency for NAS workloads such as Plex or Jellyfin media streaming, file indexing, and lightweight virtualization. The use of this chip also aligns Terramaster’s lineup with newer offerings from competitors who have adopted similar architectures in their 2025 models.

The memory configuration has moved to DDR5, marking a notable generational shift from the DDR4 modules used in previous Terramaster systems. The F2-425 PLUS includes 8 GB of DDR5, while the F4-425 PLUS doubles this to 16 GB, both expandable up to 32 GB. DDR5 provides higher bandwidth and reduced latency, which benefits multitasking environments, particularly when running Docker containers, multiple user sessions, or AI-driven indexing services such as local photo recognition. This upgrade positions the new PLUS series closer to the performance levels found in more expensive NAS systems while maintaining efficient power draw and thermal output. In terms of storage capacity, the F4-425 PLUS can house up to four 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch SATA drives, while the smaller F2-425 PLUS accommodates two. Both models also integrate three M.2 NVMe slots, allowing up to 8 TB per SSD and enabling users to reach a maximum combined capacity of approximately 144 TB in the four-bay model. Terramaster’s hybrid storage design allows these NVMe drives to serve either as a dedicated storage pool or as cache acceleration for HDD volumes, giving users flexibility to prioritize capacity or performance. The inclusion of three M.2 slots is unusual at this price tier and stands out against most two- and four-bay competitors, which typically provide only two.

For network connectivity, Terramaster has equipped both models with dual 5 GbE ports. This configuration effectively doubles the throughput available in the previous 2.5 GbE generation and can deliver an aggregated bandwidth of up to 10 Gbps through link aggregation. Although the lack of a dedicated 10 GbE port might limit direct single-link transfers, the two 5 GbE ports provide redundancy, failover, and multi-user performance advantages. Both models also include a front-mounted USB-C port and rear USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A connectors for high-speed external backups and peripheral connections, reflecting a refinement in Terramaster’s chassis design compared with earlier models that relied solely on rear ports.

Cooling and chassis design remain consistent with Terramaster’s recent metal-based enclosures, using active fan ventilation with independent drive bay access. The F4-425 PLUS features dual rear fans to maintain airflow across four bays, while the F2-425 PLUS employs a single high-efficiency unit. The new layout provides improved front-to-rear ventilation and easier access to drive trays. Internally, the systems do not include a PCIe expansion slot, which limits the potential for GPU or high-speed NIC upgrades but simplifies internal lane allocation for the CPU’s nine available PCIe lanes. Terramaster appears to have distributed these lanes between the three M.2 interfaces and dual network controllers to maintain balanced throughput across all functions.

 

How the F4-425 PLUS Compares with QNAP TS-464 and Synology DS425+

The QNAP TS-464 is built around the Intel Celeron N5095, a 4-core, 4-thread processor that can boost up to 2.9 GHz, and ships with 8 GB of DDR4 memory. It supports four SATA bays plus M.2 expansion and includes dual 2.5 GbE ports that can be aggregated for improved bandwidth. QNAP’s system benefits from a mature software ecosystem, offering HDMI output, virtualization support, and extensive backup tools. In performance testing, it delivers sequential speeds around 560 MB/s under RAID 5, limited mainly by network bandwidth. Compared with the F4-425 PLUS, the TS-464 offers stronger software flexibility and PCIe expandability, but its networking hardware is slower and it relies on older memory standards.

The Synology DS425+ takes a more conservative hardware route, using the Intel Celeron J4125 with four cores running at 2.0 GHz base and 2.7 GHz burst. It includes 2 GB of DDR4 memory, expandable to 6 GB, and offers one 2.5 GbE port alongside a 1 GbE port. Two M.2 NVMe slots are available but only for cache acceleration, not full storage pools. Sequential throughput typically reaches about 280 MB/s for reads and writes. Against the F4-425 PLUS, Synology’s system trails in memory, raw processing speed, and throughput potential, but maintains an advantage in software polish and long-term reliability through DSM integration.

In side-by-side terms, the F4-425 PLUS aims for a higher performance envelope. Its dual 5 GbE ports deliver aggregate throughput potential far beyond both the QNAP and Synology options, and its DDR5 memory with three M.2 NVMe slots allows flexible caching or tiered storage setups uncommon at this price tier. The trade-off lies in expandability and software maturity, where QNAP’s platform remains more modular and Synology’s DSM ecosystem offers more stability. For users focused on performance-per-dollar, the F4-425 PLUS introduces hardware that surpasses both competitors on paper, though long-term evaluation will depend on software development under TOS 6.

Terramaster TOS 6 Software

The F2-425 PLUS and F4-425 PLUS both ship with TOS 6, Terramaster’s latest operating system that replaces the earlier TOS 5 platform across its new generation of NAS hardware. TOS 6 introduces a redesigned interface with improved responsiveness and a more modular layout intended to reduce latency during multitasking.

It expands Terramaster’s range of built-in applications to include enhanced TRAID and TRAID+ hybrid array configurations, snapshot scheduling, and real-time data synchronization features. Backup utilities such as Duple Backup, Centralized Backup, TerraSync, and CloudSync provide integration across local drives, offsite NAS devices, and major cloud providers. The system also integrates hardware-assisted AES-NI encryption, supporting secure data transmission over 256-bit TLS and optional two-factor authentication. Although its design remains more lightweight than QNAP’s QTS or Synology’s DSM, it is notably faster to load and more accessible to new users.

Beyond core management tools, TOS 6 also incorporates AI-assisted photo management and multimedia indexing designed to run locally rather than relying on external cloud resources. Its facial, object, and scene recognition algorithms operate entirely on the NAS, avoiding external data transfers while maintaining privacy for personal collections. The OS additionally supports Docker and VirtualBox, enabling light virtualization tasks or deployment of third-party services without command-line setup.

Multimedia servers such as Plex, Emby, and Jellyfin can use Intel’s integrated graphics for hardware decoding, improving playback efficiency in 4K and 8K environments. While TOS 6 still trails mature ecosystems in app diversity, it delivers steady progress toward matching more established competitors, particularly for backup, synchronization, and AI-driven photo organization.

Verdict? The New4-Bay NAS Score to Beat?

The Terramaster F2-425 PLUS and F4-425 PLUS introduce a considerable upgrade to the company’s mid-tier NAS range, setting new expectations for what users can expect at the $400–$600 level. Both models adopt the Intel N150 processor, DDR5 memory, and dual 5 GbE networking, bringing performance that previously required higher-priced hardware. The F4-425 PLUS, in particular, combines four SATA bays with three M.2 NVMe slots, creating one of the most storage-flexible designs in its category. This configuration makes it a practical option for users who require hybrid pools or tiered caching but prefer to remain within consumer-level power and cost limits. Terramaster’s decision to include high-speed networking and DDR5 support at this price point demonstrates an emphasis on raw throughput and bandwidth efficiency, although it comes at the expense of PCIe expandability. From a broader market perspective, the F4-425 PLUS positions Terramaster competitively against alternatives from QNAP and Synology, trading ecosystem maturity for stronger base hardware. TOS 6 continues to evolve, offering usable AI-based media tools, secure backup systems, and local synchronization features. The platform still lacks some advanced management functions and third-party integrations seen in more established ecosystems, yet it now provides sufficient stability and depth for both professional and enthusiast users. Overall, the F4-425 PLUS presents an incremental but strategically significant advancement in Terramaster’s NAS design philosophy, marking a shift toward higher efficiency and versatility within its compact, consumer-oriented systems.

Terramaster F4-425 PLUS NAS – $569 (15% OFF at Launch till 19th Nov)	Terramaster F2-425 PLUS NAS – $399 (15% OFF at Launch till 19th Nov)

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Disponible depuis quelques mois, le ASUSTOR FS6806X (Flashstor 6 Gen2) est un NAS atypique à bien des égards. Son format compact et son design sobre en font un appareil élégant. Entièrement full-flash, il n’accepte que des SSD au format NVMe. Sous le capot, on retrouve un processeur AMD Ryzen cadencé à 2,3 GHz, accompagné de 8 Go de mémoire DDR5. Côté connectique, il propose deux ports USB4 Type-C, trois ports USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (dont un en façade) et un port 10 GbE (RJ45). Affiché à 1 129 €, voyons ensemble ce que ce nouveau NAS a réellement dans le ventre…

Test du NAS ASUSTOR FS6806X

Le FS6806X ne s’adresse pas à tous. Il vise clairement les créateurs de contenu, les professionnels et les utilisateurs avancés à la recherche de hautes performances. Sur le papier, le produit semble prometteur. Voyons ce qu’il en est dans la pratique…

Contenu de la boîte

Le packaging comprend :

• Le ASUSTOR FS6806X en lui-même ;
• 1 câble réseau RJ45 Cat.6 ;
• L’alimentation externe et son câble ;
• Un serre câble ;
• Un guide de démarrage rapide ;
• Un livret sur la garantie.

Construction du FS6806X et aspect extérieur

Dès la sortie de la boîte, le format compact du FS6806X surprend. L’appareil mesure 48,3 x 308,26 x 193 mm pour un poids de 1,4 kg à vide. Le boîtier est en plastique noir rigide, avec un effet brossé qui lui confère un aspect plus haut de gamme. C’est un NAS au design singulier et c’est plutôt réussi.

L’installation des SSD demande un peu de patience : l’accès aux six emplacements NVMe se fait par le dessous du boîtier. Il faut retirer quatre vis à l’aide d’un tournevis (non fourni). Heureusement, on ne change pas de SDD tous les jours.

Le NAS dispose de 2 ventilateurs : un pour le processeur (vraisemblablement un 40 mm) et un autre pour les SSD de 80 mm.

Côté connectique, on retrouve :

• 2 ports USB4 Type-C ;
• 3 ports USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (dont un en façade) ;
• 1 port réseau 10 Gb/s.

À noter : aucune sortie HDMI n’est présente.

Intérieur du FS6806X

L’ASUSTOR FS6806X est animé par un processeur Quad Core AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C14 cadencé à 2,3 GHz (jusqu’à 3,8 GHz en mode burst). Selon PassMark, il obtient un score de 11 882 points, soit plus du double de la moyenne des NAS grand public (environ 5 500 points). En pratique, cela se traduit par une excellente gestion des tâches lourdes : chiffrement, virtualisation et traitement multitâche. Le NAS embarque 8 Go de DDR5 extensibles jusqu’à 64 Go (un vrai plus pour les utilisateurs exigeants).

Emplacements PCI

Le FS6806X dispose de 6 emplacements NVMe, répartis comme suit :

• 1 × PCIe 4.0 x4
• 3 × PCIe 4.0 x2
• 2 × PCIe 4.0 x1

Un emplacement PCIe 4.0 x4 permet d’atteindre environ 8 Go/s de bande passante (idéal pour les SSD haut de gamme).
Les PCIe 4.0 x2 offrent jusqu’à 4 Go/s, ce qui reste suffisant pour la majorité des usages.
Les PCIe 4.0 x1 sont limités à 2 Go/s, adaptés à des SSD de milieu de gamme.

Ce choix d’architecture découle directement des capacités du processeur AMD intégré. Autrement dit, inutile d’investir dans 6* Samsung 990 PRO : ils ne seront pas tous exploités à pleine vitesse. Heureusement, Asustor indique clairement la configuration de chaque slot (voir image ci-dessous).

Heureusement, Asustor indique clairement chacun des emplacements.

ADM

Le NAS est livré avec ADM 5.0, le système d’exploitation maison d’Asustor, basé sur Linux et optimisé pour la gestion de stockage en réseau. L’interface est fluide, claire et offre un vaste écosystème d’applications.

On ne le présente plus, un des meilleurs système du marché.

Performances du FS6806X

Dans la première partie de nos tests, nous allons évaluer les performances des transferts réseau (entre le NAS et des ordinateurs). Ensuite, nous regarderons les capacités du processeur, en analysant ses performances dans la virtualisation et le transcodage vidéo.

Vitesses dans les transferts

Depuis plusieurs années, nous avons mis en place un protocole de tests rigoureux fournissant des données fiables et comparables avec les performances des autres NAS. Pour cela, nous utilisons 4 applications de mesure différentes – 2 sous macOS et 2 sous Windows – et réalisons en plus des transferts de fichiers de tailles variées dans les deux sens (NAS vers Ordinateur puis Ordinateur vers NAS) :

• Petites tailles : 100 fichiers de 500 Ko à 12 Mo (MP3, photos, documents Office)
• Tailles moyennes : 30 fichiers de 12 à 350 Mo (MKV, images RAW, archives ZIP)
• Fichiers volumineux : 10 fichiers avec une taille comprise entre 4 et 10 Go (MKV, ISO)

À partir de ces tests, nous calculons une moyenne des transferts que nous représentons sous forme de graphiques, exprimée en mégaoctets par seconde. Plus le nombre est élevé, plus le NAS est rapide. Pour notre évaluation du FS6806X, nous avons configuré un premier volume avec 1 SSD Samsung 990 Pro et un second avec 3 SSD WD Red SN700 en RAID 5. Nous avons utilisé la prise réseau 10 Gb/s pour nos tests.

Single

Les débits sont en deçà des attentes. Le SSD Samsung 990 Pro est clairement sous-exploité, tout comme la liaison 10 Gb/s. Nous avons parfois dépassé les 1 000 Mo/s ponctuellement (moins souvent qu’escompter), mais sans atteindre les 1 250 Mo/s espérés.

RAID 5

Les performances sont similaires à celles du volume simple (SSD WD Red), à l’exception des écritures de gros fichiers, où une légère baisse se fait sentir. En revanche, nous gagnons en sécurité, continuité de service.

RAID 5 + Crypt

Avec le chiffrement activé, les vitesses d’écriture chutent nettement, plafonnant à environ 300 Mo/s. La lecture, elle, reste relativement stable.

Performances générales

Le FS6806X laisse une impression mitigée. Malgré une architecture solide, ses performances brutes ne sont pas toujours au niveau attendu, surtout face à certains concurrents. Espérons qu’Asustor identifie et corrige rapidement ces limitations via une mise à jour du firmware.

En revanche, le processeur AMD Ryzen fait preuve d’une belle efficacité dans les tâches lourdes : virtualisation et transcodage logiciel. L’absence de GPU intégré impose toutefois de rester attentif aux formats vidéo utilisés. Dans l’ensemble, cela reste une machine performante et robuste.

Consommation électrique et nuisance sonore

Côté bruit, le FS6806X se montre très discret. Les ventilateurs restent quasiment inaudibles, même en charge. Chapeau… Côté consommation électrique, en utilisation normale avec 3 SSD, elle varie entre 12 et 13 W. Lors de transferts intensifs avec chiffrement ou transcodage, elle ne dépasse pas 43,5 W.

UGREEN poursuit sa stratégie de simplification du stockage en réseau avec l’arrivée d’un nouveau NAS : DH2300. Disponible depuis hier, ce nouveau produit est conçu pour rendre la gestion locale des données plus accessibles. Son prix de lancement : 209,99€…

UGREEN DH2300, un NAS pensé pour le grand public

Après un lancement en toute discrétion du DH4300 Plus, UGREEN nous revient avec ce nouveau modèle. Le DH2300 s’adresse aux utilisateurs de disques durs externes ou de services cloud souhaitant reprendre le contrôle de leurs données. Ce modèle à 2 baies supporte jusqu’à 60 To de stockage, permettant d’héberger sans effort des vidéos Ultra HD/4K, photos en haute résolution ou documents professionnels. Il est construit autour d’un processeur huit cœurs ARM Rockchip RK3576 cadencé à 2,2 GHz et épaulé par 4 Go de RAM DDR4 (non extensible).

Connectique

Côté interface de connexion, le DH2300 dispose de :

• 1* port USB 3.0 (Type-C) en façade ;
• 2* port USB 3.0 (Type-A) à l’arrière ;
• 1* sortie HDMI Ultra HD/4K 60Hz ;
• 1 port réseau 1 Gb/s.

Petite déception, nous aurions préféré qu’il embarque directement du 2,5 Gb/s comme le modèle 4 baies. On notera également la présence d’une puce NFC en façade, permettant de simplifier l’accès ou le partage de documents.

Système

Le NAS fonctionne avec UGOS Pro, le système propriétaire de la marque, déjà utilisé sur les autres modèles UGREEN. Ce dernier propose les mêmes applications maison. Le fabricant met en avant une installation guidée en moins de dix minutes et une application mobile tout-en-un (gestion de fichiers, sauvegarde automatique des photos, etc.). Voila qui devrait plaire à ceux qui doute des capacités d’UGREEN.

UGREEN met l’accent sur la sécurité locale : stockage entièrement privé, chiffrement TLS/SSL, RSA et AES, authentification à deux facteurs et certifications TÜV et TRUSTe. Un « Security Manager » serait intégré dont le rôle est d’assurer une surveillance en continu et des analyses programmées contre les menaces.

En synthèse

Avec le NASync DH2300, UGREEN adresse un besoin croissant de disposer d’un espace de stockage personnel, performant et indépendant des grandes plateformes. Avec un tarif de lancement de 209,99€, nul doute que ce produit va trouver son public.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Cloud Subscription Killer

The UGREEN DH2300 is a compact two-bay NAS system positioned within the company’s value-focused lineup, intended for users moving away from cloud-based storage platforms toward affordable private solutions. Priced around the $200 mark, it is aimed at those who prioritize simplicity and convenience over raw performance or enterprise-level control. Designed for users who typically rely on Google Drive, iCloud, or Dropbox subscriptions, the DH2300 seeks to provide a self-contained alternative with no recurring fees, offering scheduled backups, remote file synchronization, and integrated media access through UGREEN’s proprietary UGOS Pro operating system. Internally, the system is built around an ARM-based processor combining a quad-core Cortex-A72 and quad-core Cortex-A53 architecture, clocked at up to 2.2GHz, with 4GB of LPDDR4 memory and a built-in 32GB eMMC for the OS. This hardware places the DH2300 in direct competition with entry-level models such as the Synology DS223 and QNAP TS-233, though its Rockchip RK3576 processor, G52 MC3 GPU, and 6 TOPS NPU give it a modest edge in AI-assisted photo recognition, multimedia indexing, and energy efficiency. As a compact, preconfigured NAS designed for first-time adopters, the DH2300’s real focus is not to replace professional systems but to bridge the gap between mainstream cloud users and personal storage ownership, reflecting UGREEN’s broader strategy of simplifying NAS technology for general consumers.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

The UGREEN DH2300 is a compact, affordable two-bay NAS designed to bridge the gap between cloud storage and local data ownership for everyday users. Built around the Rockchip RK3576 processor—featuring two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A72 and A53 cores at up to 2.2GHz—and paired with 4GB of LPDDR4X memory, the system offers reliable ARM-level performance with efficient thermals and low noise output. Its design prioritizes simplicity, with vertical drive insertion, a single rear cooling fan, and a dedicated 32GB eMMC for UGOS Pro, which separates the OS from user data. Connectivity includes a 1GbE port, multiple USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, and HDMI 4K60 output, while the software delivers key NAS essentials such as RAID management, snapshot recovery, cloud and USB backups, Docker support, and AI-powered photo indexing via its 6 TOPS NPU. Power consumption remains low at 9–13W depending on workload, and noise levels stay within 31–45 dBA under varying fan speeds. Although the fixed memory, single LAN port, and ambiguous CPU marketing reduce its appeal for enthusiasts, the DH2300 stands out as an efficient, straightforward, and well-priced solution for users seeking a dependable private cloud alternative without technical complexity.

Buy the UGREEN DH300 on Amazon @209	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on B&H
	STORE

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Design and Storage

The UGREEN DH2300 adopts a clean, vertical form factor made entirely of plastic, emphasizing practicality and low cost over premium materials. The enclosure is lightweight yet well-ventilated, featuring a magnetic plastic top panel with slotted air channels that promote consistent airflow across both drive bays. The overall construction favors simplicity, with drive access positioned vertically rather than through traditional caddies. This layout helps minimize the unit’s footprint, making it suitable for desktop environments where noise and vibration are key considerations. While the plastic frame lacks the rigidity of aluminum enclosures seen in higher-end NAS models, it contributes to lower noise resonance and reduced amplification of mechanical drive vibration. The minimalist aesthetic, consistent with UGREEN’s other recent NAS releases, reflects its target audience: users seeking a consumer-friendly device that blends into a home office or living space rather than a server rack.

Internally, the DH2300 supports two 3.5-inch or 2.5-inch SATA drives, each connecting directly to fixed SATA connectors mounted on the board. The drive trays are basic but functional, requiring manual screw installation rather than tool-less mechanisms. Although UGREEN has not explicitly advertised hot-swapping as an official feature, testing showed that it is technically possible to replace drives without powering down, though such actions are not recommended without confirmation from official documentation. The NAS supports standard RAID configurations, including JBOD, RAID 0, and RAID 1, as well as individual drive modes, providing adequate flexibility for redundancy or performance-based setups. Storage initialization is straightforward within UGOS, with pool creation and volume setup guided by a wizard interface that fits the product’s “set-and-forget” philosophy.

Cooling is handled by a single rear-mounted fan positioned behind the drive bays, ensuring that heat generated by mechanical disks is efficiently extracted from the enclosure. The system’s vertical drive layout assists in natural convection, drawing air from the lower portion and expelling it from the top and rear. Despite being a plastic chassis, thermal management remains effective due to the extensive side and rear ventilation grilles, which circulate air across both drives and the mainboard components. In long-term use, the design demonstrated stable internal temperatures under typical file access and synchronization loads, maintaining drive and board thermals within an expected operational range even during extended testing periods.

From a functional standpoint, the DH2300 includes an internal 32GB eMMC module reserved for UGOS, preventing users from needing to dedicate part of their main storage array to system files. This separation simplifies setup and improves reliability by isolating the operating system from data drives. However, there are no M.2 or NVMe expansion slots available, meaning caching or SSD-tiered storage cannot be implemented. This is consistent with UGREEN’s entry-level positioning for the model, and the omission helps reduce production cost while keeping the power footprint low. The 32GB internal storage performs adequately for OS updates, indexing data, and temporary system operations.

The device’s storage capacity can reach up to two 30TB drives, allowing a maximum theoretical total of 60TB raw capacity, though most users will likely configure it in RAID 1 for redundancy. This makes the DH2300 a practical fit for home backup, photo archiving, and small-scale media libraries, especially when paired with the system’s built-in applications for photos, video, and document management. Overall, the DH2300’s design and storage layout reflect its goal of balancing ease of use with functional flexibility, providing just enough configurability to support typical home NAS workloads without introducing complexity that would deter less technical users.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Internal and External Hardware

Internally, the UGREEN DH2300 is powered by the Rockchip RK3576 processor, a hybrid 8-core ARM SoC that combines four high-performance Cortex-A72 cores with four efficiency-focused Cortex-A53 cores, running at up to 2.2GHz. While UGREEN markets this configuration as an “8-core processor,” it is technically composed of two separate quad-core clusters, something the company’s documentation does not clearly explain. This lack of clarity can mislead users into expecting a single unified 8-core design, whereas in practice the chip functions as two 4-core groups optimized for different workloads. The RK3576, built on an 8nm process, delivers a solid balance between efficiency and multitasking, keeping thermals low while maintaining adequate throughput for home NAS tasks. Its integrated ARM G52 MC3 GPU supports up to 8K H.265/H.264 decoding and HDR rendering through Rockchip’s dedicated Picture Quality Engine, which also supports ACM and DCI color profiles. These capabilities allow the DH2300 to output 4K60 video via HDMI, offering lightweight media playback directly from the system interface—an uncommon inclusion in this price class. Additionally, the CPU’s built-in 6 TOPS NPU enables AI-assisted indexing and face recognition within UGOS Pro, processing such tasks locally instead of relying on cloud services.

Memory allocation on the DH2300 is fixed at 4GB of LPDDR4X, soldered to the mainboard with no expansion slot available. This restriction aligns with the model’s consumer-grade purpose, though it naturally caps Docker container and multitasking potential. The onboard memory is sufficient for file serving, indexing, and moderate background services, while the 32GB eMMC 5.1 storage is dedicated to UGOS Pro and ensures stable OS operations without user intervention. There are no NVMe or UFS storage options, which simplifies the hardware layout but limits potential caching or high-speed data tiers. Nevertheless, the RK3576’s low power draw and balanced architecture ensure consistent operation under typical workloads, even during prolonged use, with minimal heat output and silent operation under idle conditions.

Externally, the NAS presents a modest selection of connectivity options suitable for its market position. The rear hosts a single 1GbE LAN port—adequate for most home users but a notable downgrade from the 2.5GbE interface found on UGREEN’s larger models like the DH4300 PLUS. File transfers, backups, and streaming functions remain well within the limits of 1GbE for single-user environments, though network saturation can occur during multi-user access. Peripheral connectivity is handled by two USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 ports and one USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 port, all operating at 5Gbps, supporting external drives, UPS communication, or backup targets. An HDMI 2.0 port on the rear supports 4K60 output for local playback or display configuration, while system LEDs provide visual feedback for drive activity, system status, and network connection. Power is supplied by a 50W external adapter that connects via a barrel plug, keeping internal temperatures and noise low by externalizing the PSU.

The inclusion of HDMI output in such a budget-focused system underscores UGREEN’s attempt to merge NAS and home entertainment functions. Although the RK3576 chipset supports a wider range of display interfaces—including DisplayPort, MIPI, and eDP—these are not implemented in the DH2300’s design, reflecting deliberate simplification for cost and usability. The absence of multi-gigabit networking, PCIe expansion, or additional LAN redundancy limits its potential for advanced setups, yet for its intended audience the configuration remains practical. In short, the DH2300’s internal layout, despite its simplified design and some ambiguous marketing around the CPU, delivers an efficient and capable platform for mainstream home users seeking affordable private storage.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – UGOS NAS Software and Services

UGREEN’s DH2300 runs the company’s proprietary UGOS Pro, a Linux-based operating system tailored for simplicity and everyday use. The interface mirrors the design language of mainstream consumer cloud platforms, featuring a desktop-style environment with drag-and-drop file management, live system monitoring, and user account controls. Although UGOS Pro shares much of its design and functionality with that found on UGREEN’s larger DH4300 PLUS model, a few service limitations appear due to the ARM-based architecture of the DH2300. These include the absence of virtual machine support and limited resource capacity for multiple Docker containers, stemming from the 4GB of fixed memory. Nonetheless, the software remains fully featured for file storage, synchronization, multimedia management, and light AI applications, and receives regular over-the-air updates that refine usability and security. The desktop and mobile clients also synchronize settings seamlessly, allowing users to manage their NAS both locally and remotely.

From a user management perspective, UGOS provides fine-grained control of accounts, permissions, and network access. Administrators can create user groups, apply password complexity policies, and define shared-folder privileges with ease. The system supports multiple file transfer protocols, including SMB, AFP, NFS, and Rsync, as well as optional WebDAV and FTP for broader compatibility. Remote access can be configured either through UGREEN’s own relay service or via LAN-only mode for tighter network security. The security dashboard consolidates features such as auto-block for repeated failed logins, two-factor authentication, firewall configuration, and selective port access rules. SSH and Telnet access are disabled by default, a responsible design choice for less experienced users, but can be enabled manually for advanced administration. These features bring the DH2300 close in functionality to entry-level NAS systems from Synology or QNAP, even though it remains less configurable overall.

Storage management is one of UGOS Pro’s more mature components. Users can create storage pools and volumes in JBOD, RAID 0, or RAID 1, with scheduled drive tests, SMART diagnostics, and Seagate IronWolf Health integration for supported drives. The storage manager also includes rebuild and repair settings that allow users to prioritise either RAID reconstruction speed or system performance during rebuilds. Snapshot protection is integrated at the folder level, with both versioned and scheduled snapshots available for data recovery. Although the system does not offer full OS-level backups, users can schedule NAS-to-NAS, NAS-to-USB, and NAS-to-Cloud synchronisation tasks using Rsync or proprietary tools. These backups can include filters for file type, size, and modification date, making them adaptable to both personal and small office usage. In practice, the storage controls are intuitive and well-implemented for a first-generation NAS platform, with sufficient safeguards for casual users who might otherwise rely on third-party cloud apps.

Application availability has steadily improved since UGREEN’s NAS debut in 2023 (at least, in the ‘west’, as they have been a NAS name in the east since 2020/2021). The App Center now includes a range of first-party utilities such as a file manager, photo station, video station, and music library, as well as third-party options like Plex, Jellyfin, and Docker containers. AI-based features such as face, text, and object recognition are supported thanks to the 6 TOPS NPU in the RK3576, though performance varies depending on workload size. The integrated Vault app provides encrypted storage areas secured by password or downloadable key, which can be auto-locked on reboot for privacy. Meanwhile, the mobile companion app mirrors almost every desktop function, from user and storage administration to Docker control and media playback. Having all management tasks accessible within a single unified mobile app, rather than separate applications for photos or video, demonstrates UGREEN’s streamlined approach to usability, positioning UGOS Pro as a consumer-friendly OS that hides most of the NAS complexity from first-time users. However, I cannot stress enough that this software is still a decent way behind long-established players such as Synology DSM and QNAP QTS in terms of features, maturity and client support. Additionally, as one of the newest names in the world of NAS, the brand has yet to be truly ‘tested’ when it comes to security strength and how they handle/respond to a larger scale security incident. So wheat we find here is good enough for hte price point, but is only a small step or two above what users have come to expect from privately owned NAS nonetheless in 2025/2026.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Heat, Noise and Power Consumption Tests

Thermal and acoustic performance on the UGREEN DH2300 is generally stable and consistent with expectations for a low-power ARM-based NAS. The system uses a single rear-mounted fan that automatically adjusts its RPM in response to internal temperature sensors, aided by the ventilated top and side panels. During extended operation, the fan demonstrated smooth, gradual speed transitions rather than abrupt cycling, which helped minimize background noise. With two 4TB Seagate IronWolf drives installed, the system recorded approximately 31–32 dBA in idle mode with the fan set to “Low” in UGOS. When switched to “Auto,” and under light file activity, readings rose to 33–35 dBA, while heavier read and write operations increased noise levels to 38–41 dBA. Under maximum fan speed, levels peaked at 44–45 dBA, making the fan audible but still within acceptable limits for a desktop environment. The use of plastic housing reduces the resonance that typically amplifies drive vibration in metal enclosures, although some low-frequency hum remains during heavy disk access.

Temperature readings taken over a 24-hour mixed-use test period show that the chassis maintains good internal thermal balance, aided by vertical airflow and efficient low-wattage components. The NAS was powered down overnight before the test, then reactivated for hourly upload and backup tasks, simulating intermittent real-world usage. During idle periods, the drives stabilized at 35–37°C, while moderate access cycles pushed them to 42°C. The motherboard and surrounding airflow remained at approximately 34–35°C, with rear exhaust temperatures registering slightly higher. Despite the passive nature of some cooling zones, heat accumulation around the CPU remained minimal, peaking around 50–60°C during sustained transfer activity. These figures suggest that UGREEN’s internal airflow design, while basic, is sufficient for continuous operation with standard HDDs. Users in warmer climates or those employing higher-RPM drives might consider increasing fan control sensitivity via UGOS to maintain consistent thermals.

Power consumption results were equally conservative. With two 4TB mechanical drives installed and the system idle at below 5% CPU utilization, the DH2300 drew roughly 9.5W, a competitive figure for a two-bay NAS. During typical data transfers and 50% CPU load, draw increased modestly to 12–13W, remaining far below that of comparable x86-based systems. The external 50W power adapter ensures the NAS operates efficiently while reducing internal heat buildup. Users employing SSDs instead of HDDs could expect overall consumption to drop by an additional 4–5W, further improving energy efficiency. These results confirm the DH2300’s suitability for continuous operation, including 24/7 use as a network backup target or low-impact media server.

Its minimal noise and low thermal footprint make it a non-intrusive addition to a home or small office environment, aligning with its purpose as a budget, always-on NAS solution.

UGREEN DH2300 NAS Review – Verdict and Conclusion

The UGREEN DH2300 represents a carefully positioned step in the company’s ongoing effort to make private storage approachable for non-technical users. Its hardware configuration, led by the Rockchip RK3576 processor and 4GB of fixed memory, provides solid baseline performance for a two-bay ARM-powered NAS at this price point. Although its single 1GbE network port may limit throughput for larger file transfers, the system compensates with a highly efficient power profile, quiet operation, and full support for common RAID configurations. The inclusion of a dedicated 32GB eMMC system drive, HDMI 4K60 output, and an NPU capable of AI-based photo indexing places it above most similarly priced entry-level alternatives from QNAP and Synology. However, certain aspects of UGREEN’s marketing—particularly the way the dual quad-core CPU clusters are presented as a single 8-core design—could be clearer. Likewise, the absence of upgradeable memory or faster networking options limits its long-term scalability for users seeking to expand their NAS environment beyond basic media and backup tasks.

From a broader standpoint, the DH2300’s strongest appeal lies in its simplicity and low operational overhead. UGOS Pro, though still developing in maturity, has evolved into a competent, user-friendly platform offering the key features needed for home data management, multimedia access, and scheduled backups. The OS’s stability, combined with efficient hardware and lightweight design, makes this NAS a practical alternative to annual cloud subscriptions for users who simply want local control over their data. It is not a system aimed at enthusiasts or professionals demanding virtual machines, multi-gig networking, or broad third-party OS support, but rather those seeking a self-contained, reliable, and low-maintenance device. Within that niche, the DH2300 delivers strong value and performs consistently well for the intended demographic—serving as an accessible first step into local storage ownership.

 

Buy the UGREEN DH300 on Amazon @209	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on UGREEN.COM	Buy the UGREEN DH2300 on B&H
	STORE

PROs of the UGREEN DH2300 NAS

CONs of the UGREEN DH2300 NAS

Efficient Rockchip RK3576 processor (dual quad-core ARM design) provides strong performance for a low-power NAS. Integrated 6 TOPS NPU enables local AI functions such as face, text, and object recognition without cloud reliance. UGOS Pro offers an intuitive, user-friendly interface with features like RAID management, snapshots, Docker, and backups. Low noise output (31–45 dBA) and excellent power efficiency (9–13W typical use) suit 24/7 home operation. Dedicated 32GB eMMC system drive keeps the OS separate from data volumes for better reliability. HDMI 2.0 4K60 output allows direct media playback and display management. Competitive pricing around $200 makes it a strong entry-level NAS alternative to subscription cloud storage.

Single 1GbE LAN port limits transfer speeds and network scalability. Fixed 4GB memory restricts heavy multitasking or Docker use. Spending just $100-150 more gets you much, much more capable x86 powered systems

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Un dicton dit : « Il faut du temps pour bâtir la confiance, un instant pour la détruire ». Synology en fait aujourd’hui l’expérience. Le célèbre fabricant de NAS traverse une période compliquée, marquée par des choix stratégiques qui divisent sa communauté. Parviendra-t-il à regagner la confiance des utilisateurs ? Rien n’est moins sûr…

Des décisions qui fragilisent la fidélité des utilisateurs

Ces derniers mois, Synology a pris plusieurs décisions qui ont surpris et parfois frustré ses utilisateurs :

• Arrêt d’applications populaires : Video Station a été supprimée et le transcodage a été retiré de toutes les autres applications du fabricant ;
• Retrait de fonctionnalités clés : le transcodage matériel sur les derniers modèles de NAS a été vérouillé, limitant les performances pour le streaming de contenus haute définition… ou encore les données SMART pourtant précieuses pour nos disques ;
• Compatibilité restreinte des disques : une certification obligatoire pour les modèles DSx25 rend le choix des utilisateurs plus complexe.

N’oublions pas un choix particulièrement entêté : Synology a décidé de maintenir (jusqu’en 2025) sa stratégie consistant à ne proposer que des connexions réseau 1 Gb/s sur ses la grand majorité des NAS, malgré les critiques et l’évolution des besoins du marché.

Le constructeur est revenu sur certaines de ces restrictions (disques durs et réseau Multi-Gig), mais la confiance des utilisateurs a été profondément ébranlée. Ces décisions cumulées illustrent combien il est fragile de maintenir une relation de confiance dans un secteur où les choix techniques et stratégiques sont scrutés de près.

Une perte de parts de marché sur le segment particulier

Autrefois leader incontesté sur le marché des particuliers, Synology voit désormais sa position remise en cause. Les données de ventes sur des plateformes comme Amazon ou LDLC montrent clairement que la marque n’est plus systématiquement en tête. Ce segment, longtemps considéré comme sa vache à lait*, a été le moteur de sa notoriété et de ses millions d’unités vendues.

Des concurrents comme TerraMaster, le jeune UGREEN, ou encore QNAP et Asustor captent désormais l’attention des utilisateurs particuliers et des entreprises, profitant des hésitations de Synology pour proposer des alternatives performantes et souvent plus accessibles.

Les conséquences pour Synology et ses utilisateurs

Cette situation illustre un paradoxe : la popularité de Synology, construite sur des années de fiabilité et d’innovation, peut s’éroder rapidement dès lors que la marque prend des décisions impopulaires. Les utilisateurs (autrefois fidèles) se tournent désormais vers des alternatives offrant un meilleur rapport fonctionnalités/prix et une compatibilité plus ouverte.

Pour Synology, la leçon est claire : la confiance des utilisateurs ne se reconstruit pas en un jour. La marque doit réévaluer sa stratégie produit et son approche commerciale pour retrouver son leadership, sous peine de perdre durablement des parts de marché dans un secteur où la concurrence s’intensifie.

* Le terme « vache à lait » est une expression employée en marketing

The UniFi UPS-Tower 600W UPS Review

UPDATE – The Desktop UPS TOWER is available HERE for $159 , and the 2U Rackmount UPS-2U is available later in Q4 2025 HERE for $279

UniFi’s entry into the uninterruptible power supply market brings two distinct solutions tailored for professional and prosumer environments: the UPS-Tower desktop model and the UPS-2U Rackmount unit. The tower configuration provides 1,000VA / 600W of backup capacity and uses a single 12V, 9Ah lead-acid battery, while the larger 2U rackmount version scales up to 1,440VA / 1,000W with dual battery modules. Both adopt a line-interactive architecture with simulated sine wave output, a 6–10 ms transfer time, and Ethernet-based network management. Integration is handled natively within UniFi Network, where users can adopt, monitor, and configure the UPS directly from the UniFi Controller interface. For non-UniFi deployments, both models retain NUT (Network UPS Tools) compatibility for safe shutdown and system monitoring. This marks a significant expansion of UniFi’s ecosystem into power management and continuity—areas traditionally dominated by brands like APC and CyberPower—positioning UniFi’s UPS line as a bridge between smart network infrastructure and automated power protection.

The UniFi UPS-Tower 1000VA / 600W Review – Quick Conclusion

The UniFi UPS-Tower and UPS-2U deliver practical and ecosystem-focused power protection for small network environments. Both models emphasize integration and manageability rather than raw performance, providing stable 120V line-interactive backup power with simulated sine wave output. The tower model offers 600W of protection in a compact desktop enclosure, while the rackmount unit increases capacity to 1,000W with dual batteries. Integration through the UniFi Network Controller is straightforward, enabling central monitoring and alerting without external software. While limitations such as the lack of USB ports, PoE passthrough, and pure sine wave output restrict versatility outside the UniFi ecosystem, both units are solid entries for users seeking consistent, centrally managed backup power within UniFi-managed infrastructures.

The UniFi UPS-Tower UPS Review – Design & Connectivity

The UniFi UPS-Tower adopts a vertically oriented, compact chassis that measures 288 x 99 x 280.5 mm and weighs just over 8 kg. Its enclosure is built from a polycarbonate and ABS blend, which offers a balance between durability and low weight, and the overall shape resembles a small desktop speaker or heater.

The unit’s IP20 rating indicates it is intended for indoor use only, with ventilation panels positioned at the top, sides, and bottom to maintain airflow. During testing, internal temperatures averaged around 45–47°C after 24 hours of continuous operation, demonstrating stable thermal management for a unit of this density. The design is understated, with no LCD screen or physical display, relying instead on LED indicators and the UniFi interface for monitoring battery level and status.

In terms of connectivity, UniFi has implemented a clear division between power protection and control interfaces. On the rear panel, the UPS-Tower provides five surge-only outlets and five battery-backed surge-protected outlets, all of which are NEMA 5-15R ports suitable for 120V environments. The input connection uses a NEMA 5-15P plug, rated for 12A maximum load, supporting both 50 and 60 Hz operation. While this configuration is typical of compact line-interactive UPS units, the number of protected outlets is unusually high for its size, making it suitable for powering multiple small network devices, NAS units, or edge appliances simultaneously. However, only the five battery-backed ports will remain operational during a power loss.

UniFi has also included Ethernet management for remote monitoring and control. The rear I/O layout features a 100/10 MbE network connection that links the UPS directly into the UniFi ecosystem, as well as two GbE ports for surge in/out, allowing for protection of wired data paths. This implementation enables the UPS to send automatic notifications and power-state updates to the UniFi controller, ensuring that connected devices can safely power down when mains supply is interrupted. While users will not find USB connectivity here—a feature absent from both models—Ethernet management ensures seamless network-level integration with UniFi OS devices and provides remote monitoring capabilities not typically available in basic desktop UPS designs.

On the visual and operational interface side, UniFi relies on a multi-stage LED system to communicate battery and status information. A ring of LEDs on the front panel indicates power state, network connectivity, and battery percentage, with specific color patterns representing states such as initialization, adoption, or firmware upgrades. For example, a steady blue LED denotes normal operation, while flashing red signals a low battery, and alternating white/blue indicates firmware updating. This LED-centric approach aligns with UniFi’s existing product language and keeps the design minimalistic while relying on software integration for detailed telemetry.

Physically, the UPS-Tower fits neatly into a small office or studio environment, blending alongside UniFi routers or switches without dominating desk space. It operates quietly, with only a faint hum from the internal fan during battery mode. The 2U rackmount model, by contrast, uses a galvanized steel enclosure with front ventilation and nearly double the weight at 14 kg, prioritizing durability for data racks and wiring cabinets.

Both maintain an IP20 protection rating, ensuring basic safety against accidental contact but not dust or moisture resistance. Overall, UniFi’s approach emphasizes modularity, network integration, and compactness over display-driven functionality, positioning these UPS units as discreet but essential components within managed network setups.

The UniFi UPS-Tower UPS Review – Internal Hardware

Internally, the UniFi UPS-Tower follows a line-interactive architecture, combining voltage regulation with battery backup to ensure smooth transitions during power interruptions. The system utilizes an automatic voltage regulation (AVR) circuit that adjusts minor fluctuations in mains voltage without switching to battery mode, minimizing wear on the internal power cells. In the event of an outage or severe voltage dip, the UPS switches to battery operation within 6 to 10 milliseconds, maintaining output stability at 120V AC with a ±10% regulation margin. The waveform produced in battery mode is a simulated sine wave, which is adequate for most networking gear and consumer electronics, though not ideal for high-sensitivity audio, medical, or laboratory equipment. Power delivery remains consistent throughout short outages, allowing network hardware, NAS units, and servers to complete safe shutdown procedures.

The UPS-Tower contains a single 12V, 9Ah sealed lead-acid battery, user-removable via a bottom access panel. This design makes future maintenance straightforward, allowing owners to replace the battery when its capacity diminishes after several years of use. At full load (600W), the runtime averages around 2 minutes, while at half load, it extends to approximately 7 minutes before automatic shutdown. Recharge time to 90% capacity is listed at 6 to 8 hours. Thermal performance under sustained use is stable, and the inclusion of passive and active ventilation ensures no overheating under normal operating conditions. The system is also protected against short circuits, overloads, and over-voltage faults, automatically tripping into fault mode if thresholds of 110% to 120% load are exceeded.

Comparatively, the UPS-2U Rackmount uses a dual-battery setup with two 12V, 9Ah lead-acid modules to achieve 1,440VA / 1,000W output capacity. It shares the same waveform and transfer time but provides slightly extended runtime—2.3 minutes at full load and 8 minutes at half load—thanks to the added battery reserve. It also benefits from a galvanized steel chassis that enhances durability and is better suited for professional rack environments. Both systems are NDAA-compliant and certified under FCC, IC, UL 1778, and CSA C22.2 No. 107.3, ensuring safety and performance standards for commercial and residential use. In both models, system management and network telemetry are handled by a dedicated network controller chip, enabling UniFi OS integration and data synchronization with other UniFi devices.

The UniFi UPS-Tower UPS Review – Functionality

The UniFi UPS series is built around simplicity and ecosystem-level integration rather than feature-heavy configuration. Both the UPS-Tower and UPS-2U connect directly to the UniFi Network controller via Ethernet, where they appear alongside other UniFi devices for adoption. Once added, users can view real-time battery percentage, load level, input/output voltage, and system temperature directly from the UniFi interface. The units are also capable of sending power event notifications when mains power fails or returns, ensuring administrators receive alerts through the existing UniFi management system without relying on third-party monitoring software. This network-level approach allows the UPS to act as both a power backup and an automated coordination point for controlled shutdowns across UniFi infrastructure, such as Dream Machines, switches, or NAS units.

Integration with non-UniFi devices is handled through Network UPS Tools (NUT) compatibility. This makes the UPS-Tower particularly flexible in mixed environments where NAS devices or servers from other vendors, such as Synology or QNAP, require graceful shutdown when the UPS switches to battery mode. Users can define credentials and associate the UPS with NUT clients on the same network to relay status and trigger automated shutdowns once the battery reaches a predefined threshold. Although the review highlighted the lack of USB connectivity, which restricts plug-and-play use with devices expecting a traditional USB UPS handshake, the Ethernet management layer compensates by offering wider network-based communication. However, features such as per-device runtime configuration or selective port control are not yet implemented, leaving shutdown scheduling dependent on firmware updates or future model revisions.

The control and monitoring interface remains minimalistic, relying heavily on UniFi’s centralized GUI rather than onboard interaction. LEDs on the chassis provide a clear visual indication of status—covering power mode, adoption state, and battery level—but all deeper telemetry must be accessed through UniFi Network. Once paired, users can also configure email or push notifications for voltage irregularities, battery health alerts, and firmware updates. It is important to note that the current firmware does not support pure sine wave operation or lithium-ion battery upgrades, though UniFi has stated that future models will expand the portfolio to include these higher-end options. In its present form, the UPS-Tower and UPS-2U focus on stability, ease of deployment, and unified management within a single software environment, making them efficient for UniFi users seeking automation without added complexity.

The UniFi UPS-Tower UPS Review – Conclusion and Verdict

The UniFi UPS-Tower and UPS-2U represent the brand’s first foray into managed backup power systems, designed primarily to extend the reliability and consistency of the broader UniFi ecosystem. Both units share the same line-interactive architecture, simulated sine wave output, and Ethernet-based monitoring, offering a predictable and easily managed experience for users already invested in UniFi infrastructure. Their minimalist design, compact footprint, and seamless adoption through the UniFi Network Controller make them suitable for environments where simplicity, remote monitoring, and integration outweigh the need for advanced runtime management or pure sine wave output. For most small network or NAS setups, either model will provide adequate protection during short outages and brownouts, while ensuring systems are safely powered down when battery capacity is depleted.

However, their appeal remains closely tied to the UniFi ecosystem. The absence of USB connectivity, PoE passthrough, and lithium-ion battery options limits their usefulness in heterogeneous or high-performance environments. Users seeking pure sine wave support, longer runtimes, or advanced per-device control will likely need to wait for the next generation of UniFi UPS models, which the company has already suggested will expand to include these options. As they stand, the UPS-Tower and UPS-2U are well-built, tightly integrated, and cost-effective for UniFi users, but less compelling for those operating outside that ecosystem. They function precisely as intended: reliable, network-aware power backups for UniFi-managed systems, providing foundational stability rather than feature innovation.

UniFi UPS-Tower PROS

UniFi UPS-Tower CONS

Seamless integration with UniFi Network Controller for centralized management Compact and minimalistic design with low noise and stable thermal performance Ethernet-based control and monitoring eliminate the need for USB connectivity NUT compatibility enables basic third-party system integration User-replaceable lead-acid battery for extended product lifespan Competitive pricing relative to similar managed UPS devices Reliable short-term backup and safe shutdown coordination for UniFi devices

No USB port for direct communication with standalone servers or NAS systems Simulated sine wave output limits use with sensitive equipment Lacks PoE passthrough and per-device power control options

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
[contact-form-7]
Join Inner Circle

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry. [contact-form-7] TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions   Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

WE LOVE COFFEE

 

Runtipi est une solution open source permettant de simplifier la gestion d’applications auto-hébergées. Idéale pour monter un homelab sur un Mini-PC, Raspberry Pi ou un NAS, la plate-forme permet de déployer des services sans passer des heures à configurer Docker manuellement. Découvrons ensemble RunTipi…

Runtipi : centralisation & automatisation

Runtipi centralise l’installation, les mises à jour et la sauvegarde de près de 300 applications via une interface Web intuitive. Que vous souhaitiez monter un environnement multimédia ou de productivité, tout se fait en quelques clics, sans écrire de fichiers Compose complexes. Chaque application tourne dans un conteneur isolé derrière un reverse proxy Traefik géré automatiquement, avec des sauvegardes et restaurations guidées pour limiter les risques de perte de données.

La compatibilité avec la plupart des distributions Linux en fait une solution flexible pour un Mini-PC, un Raspberry Pi ou encore une VM légère sur un NAS. Pour les usages multimédias (Jellyfin, Sonarr/Radar) avec quelques utilitaires (AdGuard Home, Authentik, Vaultwarden) il est recommandé d’avoir un processeur Quad Core et 8 à 16 Go de RAM pour un fonctionnement fluide au quotidien. Avec un Raspberry Pi, il faudra donc rester attentif aux performances…

Fonctionnalités clés

RunTipi va simplifier l’installation et l’utilisation au quotidien des outils avec :

• Catalogue d’applications : environ 300 applications disponibles, allant de l’archivage web aux serveurs multimédias, en passant par les outils IA, l’automatisation et la sécurité ;
• Tableau de bord moderne : surveillez le statut du système, installez et configurez vos applications, effectuez des sauvegardes et mises à jour, le tout depuis une interface Web unique ;
• Sécurité par conception : chaque service est isolé dans son conteneur et géré via Traefik…

Installation et première mise en route

Le guide officiel explique comment préparer un serveur Linux minimal sécurisé, lancer l’initialisation de Runtipi et accéder au tableau de bord, sans connaissances approfondies en ligne de commande. En pratique, l’installation se résume à exécuter un script officiel sur une distribution type Debian/Ubuntu pré-installée, puis à terminer la configuration via l’interface web.

Voici la commande à taper pour installer RunTipi : curl -L https://setup.runtipi.io | bash

Déployer et personnaliser des applications

Une fois Runtipi installé, l’App Store permet d’installer vos applications en un clic. Les champs de configuration guidés facilitent la mise en route et les mises à jour se font en un seul clic. Bien sûr, les utilisateurs avancés peuvent personnaliser le compose via un fichier tipi-compose.yml dans user-config pour exposer le tableau de bord Traefik ou ajuster des ports, sans modifier le compose de base régénérée à chaque redémarrage.

En synthèse

Runtipi constitue une base solide pour construire un homelab fiable et facile pour un Mini PC et/ou avec un NAS. Son catalogue riche, ses mises à jour en un clic, ses sauvegardes intégrées et ses fonctionnalités avancées en font une solution complète. Pour démarrer sereinement, on vous recommande de suivre le guide officiel afin d’installer vos premières applications, puis affiner la personnalisation via user-config et Traefik selon vos besoins.

Sachez qu’il est tout à fait possible de tester RunTipi : demo.runtipi.io avec l’identifiant [email protected] et le mode de passe password.